HomeMy WebLinkAbout071607
CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JULY 16, 2007
CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The City Council of the City of Port Townsend met in special session the sixteenth
day of July 16, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. in the Port Townsend City Council Chambers of
City Hall, Mayor Mark Welch presiding.
ROLL CALL
Council members present at roll call were Frank Benskin, Geoff Masci, Laurie
Medlicott, George Randels, Catharine Robinson, Michelle Sandoval, and Mark
Welch.
Staff members present were City Attorney John Watts, Public Works Director Ken
Clow, DSD Director Leonard Yarberry, Senior Planner Judy Surber, Police Chief
Conner Daily, Sergeant Ed Green, Fire Chief Mike Mingee, and City Clerk Pam
Kolacy.
CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
There were no changes proposed to the agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENT
David McCulloch reported on attending the League of American Bicyclists Bike
Education conference in Austin, Texas and thanked the Council and the Port
Townsend Bicycle Association for this opportunity. He also thanked the City for
having Sergeant Troy Surber of the PT Police attend.
CONSENT AGENDA
Motion: Ms. Robinson moved for approval of the following items on the Consent
Agenda. Mr. Randels seconded. The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice
vote.
Aooroval of Bills. Claims and Warrants
Vouchers 102060 through 102192 in the amount of $141,078.08
Aooroval of Minutes:
No minutes
Jefferson County Domestic Violence/Sexual Assault Services Transitional Living
Center - request for hearing to consider City sponsorship of Community
City Council Business Meeting
Page 1
July 16, 2007
Development Block Grant (CDBG). Action: Move to proceed with notice of
public hearing consistent with state requirements for submittal of a CDBG
grant application.
PUBLIC HEARING
RECOMMENDED DOCKET FOR 2007 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Mayor Welch reviewed the procedure for quasi-judicial public hearings. He asked if
any Council member had any financial or property interests in the matter or any
disclosures to make.
Ms. Sandoval stated that Matthew Shapiro has been a real estate client in the past,
she works with Carol Wise in the real estate community, and that Terri Nomura
works for her company.
Mr. Randels stated that he was chair of the Planning Commission during this
process and he did have occasion to form opinions on some of the issues. He added
he believes he can be fair and impartial.
City Attorney Watts noted that the involvement of Mr. Randels in Planning
Commission deliberations and subsequent Council deliberations is covered by state
rules. He asked Ms. Sandoval if she felt any of the disclosure affected her ability to
be fair and impartial. She replied they did not.
Mayor Welch asked if there were any objections from Councilor public to all Council
members participating in the deliberations. There were none.
Senior Planner Judy Surber reviewed the packet materials and reviewed each
proposed item along with the Planning Commission's recommendations.
Ms. Surber noted that Item #1 ShapirolWoods Rezone is a formal amendment and
will automatically be placed on the docket; therefore no recommendation from the
Council is needed.
Ms. Surber then noted that regarding item #2 (Q4 Development Rezone), Planning
Commission has recommended that an alternative amendment ("rezone vicinity of
30th and Gibbs") be docketed which would upzone other properties in the area of the
requested amendment. She provided a new Exhibit (B-1) showing the properties
affected. The reasoning of the Planning Commission was to expand the upzoning
rather than creating an island of R-II zoning in the midst of R-I and R-1I1.
Ms. Surber stated that because of this expanded scope, if Council wishes to
consider the recommendation, she suggests that the hearing on this single item be
continued to the business meeting of August 6 so staff can mail notice to additional
property owners and provide additional public notice.
City Council Business Meeting
Page 2
July /6, 2007
The following amendments were then presented for Council's consideration:
Item #3 Wise rezone. Planning Commission unanimously recommended
docketing.
Item #4 Nomura rezone. Planning Commission unanimously recommended
docketing.
Item #5 Rigby rezone: Planning Commission unanimously recommended not
docketing the item at this time, pending the Jefferson General Hospital Master Plan.
Item #6 Library rezone: Planning Commission unanimously recommended
docketing.
Item #7 Rezone and create overlay district for the Howard Street corridor: Planning
Commission unanimously recommended docketing.
Item #8 Minimum Density in R-III: Planning Commission unanimously
recommended docketing.
Item #9 Development standards for small wind energy systems. Planning
Commission recommended the item not be docketed but that proponents work with
the Citizen's Energy Advisory Committee to address the broader wind energy
issues.
Item #10 Residential setback adjustment process: Planning Commission
recommended that the item not be docketed but that staff and Planning Commission
incorporate it into the 2007 work plan as soon as feasible.
Ms. Surber suggested that Council members keep packet items together or allow
staff to hold them pending additions as the process moves forward.
Mayor Welch asked if any proponents for any of the proposals wished to speak.
There were none.
Mayor Welch asked if there was anyone neutral or in opposition to any of the
proposals who wished to speak.
Andrew Reding: stated he is concerned with setting a minimum density for R-III
zoning. He fears this will make it difficult to integrate different categories of housing
and promote a mix in income levels and therefore lead to segregation.
Ms. Surber replied that the housing group has also discussed integration of housing
and the conclusion was that zoning in Port Townsend doesn't create segregation
City Council Business Meeting
Page 3
July 16, 2007
due to the small size of parcels which exist that have infrastructure to support higher
densities and have access to transit and services.
Mr. Masci asked for a "cheat sheet" with information about R II and R III zoning as
the process moves along.
Mr. Watts reminded the Council that the items would come through as a single
proposed ordinance, not individual items.
Ms. Robinson asked whether there was more information on item 2 specifically
related to the stormwater constraints mentioned in the Planning Commission
minutes.
Ms. Surber stated that Basin 4 (a and b) was identified in 1996 to have soils that
would create issues at a high density and so zoning was set at R I in basin 4;
however, the zoning doesn't exactly follow the basin line. In addition, due to the
goals of affordable housing and walkable communities, staff's thought was to give
further consideration to whether stormwater issues could be overcome through
infrastructure and provide further support for C/MU designation. This will be
considered through the amendment process.
Ms. Robinson asked for clarification at some point as to whether housing use is
required or discretionary in C/MU zoning designation.
Ms. Robinson asked if the Nomura property is a single tax parcel. Ms. Surber
replied it is. Ms. Robinson asked if the whole parcel must be rezoned. Ms. Surber
stated that typically the entire parcel would be rezoned; Mr. Watts added that if
rezoning all was not desired, a process for dividing the property would have to be
initiated and this could be done whether desired by the owner or not. He added that
if that is the result and the owner did not wish to cooperate, the amendment would
probably be pulled.
Mrs. Medlicott asked how much commercial inventory would be lost by changing C-II
zoning to C/MU. Ms. Surber referred to Table 4 of the Comprehensive Plan.
Motion: Ms. Sandoval moved to accept the recommendations of the Planning
Commission on docketing of items 3-10, and holding action on item 2 until the
continued public hearing on that item August 6. Ms. Robinson seconded. The
motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote.
RECESS
Mayor Welch declared a recess at 7:24 p.m. for the purpose of a break.
RECONVENE
City Council Business Meeting
Page 4
July 16, 2007
The meeting was reconvened at 7:38 p.m.
OLD BUSINESS
PUBLIC PARKS DONATION POLICY
City Attorney John Watts reviewed the packet material regarding the policy, which
was proposed by the Park and Recreation Advisory Board and reviewed by the
Community Development and Land Use Committee.
Barb Pastore, Chair, stated that the Park and Recreation Advisory Board supports
the policy as presented and hopes that adoption will avoid any future
miscommunications in regard to donations for public parks.
Scott Walker stated that he is not in favor of the stipulation that a donation must be
accompanied by funding for long-term maintenance of the donated item.
Ms. Pastore replied to Mr. Walker that the Board thought long and hard about this
provision and recommend it due to the small funding level for parks; this is part of an
effort to keep the system afloat. She added that the City Council has wide latitude to
accept donations with specific conditions.
Motion: Mr. Masci moved to approve the "Open Space Memorial and Donation
Policy" as recommended by the Park and Recreation Advisory Board. Mr. Randels
seconded.
Mr. Masci noted that there are many ways to donate to the Parks system besides
buying a bench, drinking fountain, etc. and he would like an emphasis in the
presentation of the policy on the fact that anyone can donate any amount, including
five or ten dollars to the parks. He would not like people mislead into thinking they
cannot make smaller contributions.
Ms. Sandoval spoke in support of the wisdom of considering where funding will
come from for maintenance of donated additions to the parks.
Vote: motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote.
ORDINANCE 2948
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND AMENDING ORDINANCE
2906 AND THE PORT TOWNSEND MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 10.32,
BICYCLES, DELAYING THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR HELMET REQUIREMENTS
FOR BICYCLES AND "RECREATIONAL VEHICLES"
City Council Business Meeting
Page 5
July /6, 2007
City Attorney John Watts reviewed the packet materials, noting that the ordinance
presented provides a delay of 12 months until July 2008 for enforcement of the
helmet law. The ordinance is based on a recommendation from the Public Safety
Committee which includes a stipulation that all other rules of the road be enforced
immediately and Council encourage the community to participate in educat1on. He
provided a strikeouUunderline version of the ordinance.
Public comment
Sharon Durga requested that Council repeal the helmet law.
Scott Jaster (?): asked that police resources not be wasted on enforcing a helmet
law when education is working so well.
Scott Walker strongly encouraged the Council to revoke the law, noting the
recommendation of the Non-Motorized Transportation Advisory Board and the
amount of time the issue has already taken.
Bill Fisher: encouraged the Council to delay the effective date.
Jolly Wahlstrom: spoke against the helmet law and in favor of education.
Bly Windstorm: stated the initial delay has given time to get the safety program up
and running; said no interests will be served by delaying enforcement, encouraged
Council to resolve the matter instead.
Gil Whatley (?): favors education over helmet law.
David McCulloch: emphasized the need to institutionalize educational efforts, this
will be a more effective effort than helmet enforcement.
Andrew Reding: asked Council to validate Non-Motorized Transportation Advisory
Board's recommendation to repeal legislation; stated that traffic calming measures
will be more effective than helmet legislation.
Motion: Ms. Sandoval moved to repeal Section 10.32.130 (helmet requirement) of
Ordinance 2906 and for implementation of a comprehensive bicycle education
program including formation of a "Stakeholders" Education Committee; staff time to
coordinate the meetings; implementing the City's grant; scheduling teacher trainings;
and parlnering with other agencies such as the YMCA, PT School District, private
schools and others and to waive Council rules and adopt immediately. Ms.
Robinson seconded.
Motion: Mr. Masci moved to divide the question and take a separate vote on
waiving Council rules for two readings of the ordinance. Mr. Benskin seconded.
City Council Business Meeting
Page 6
July 16, 2007
Motion to waive rules failed, with Randels, Robinson, Sandoval and Welch in favor
(super-majority of five votes needed to carry.)
The motion remained on the floor as a first reading.
Mrs. Medlicott stated her reason for not supporting the motion is not to put
unnecessary restrictions on citizens, but for the safety of the public.
Mr. Welch stated he first supported the helmet requirement as a means of getting an
educational component started; in retrospect he feels it did more damage than good
and will support repeal.
Mr. Benskin spoke against the motion to repeal, stating that this is not an undue
burden on the public and that the result of the helmet requirement has so far been
positive, with many more people wearing helmets than before. He believes this is
an essential regulation.
Mr. Masci noted that as a physician he has had much experience with head injuries
and that the intention of the helmet law was that there would be secondary
enforcement, so that if someone were stopped for another infraction and was not
wearing a helmet they might be cited. He stated that much has been accomplished
since original passage in December of 2005 including the architecture for an
education program and commitment of City funds. He does not support repeal.
Ms. Sandoval stated that her motion does not mean she does not support people
wearing helmets, but at this point she believes the educational component will have
a greater impact.
Ms. Robinson stated she was not in favor of the helmet requirements the first or
second time it was introduced although she does encourage use of helmets; she
stated that education is key, for bicyclists and skateboarders. She also believes the
greatest danger to bicycles is automobile traffic and the speed limits in town which
she would like to see reduced overall.
Vote: motion for first reading of ordinance repealing PTMC 10.32.130 carried, 4-3,
by roll call vote, Benskin, Masci and Medlicott opposed.
Motion: Mr. Benskin moved to accept the recommendation of the Public Safety
Committee and stipulate that all rules of the road be enforced immediately. Mr.
Masci seconded. The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote.
NEW BUSINESS
JAIL-FRIENDSHIP DIVERSION SERVICES
City Council Business Meeting
Page 7
July 16, 2007
Police Chief Conner Daily reviewed the packet materials. He noted that the return
on housing long term prisoners at other facilities is not having as much positive
impact on the budget this year as last. Friendship Diversion Services offers an
alternative to housing prisoners in Jefferson or Chelan County while awaiting trial.
This is done by monitoring individuals to ensure they are in court when they are
scheduled rather than holding them at the jail facility. Participants pay for the
program per a daily fee although the City will take responsibility for paying the fee for
those deemed indigent. Chief Daily noted that had this program been in place the
first half of 2007, a potential savings of $46,150.
Executive Director Barbara Miller gave a presentation about the program and
introduced local staff members and answered questions from the Council.
There was no public comment.
Motion: Mrs. Medlicott moved to authorize the City Manager to execute interlocal
agreements with other agencies for housing/monitoring jail prisoners, including an
agreement with Friendship Diversion Services. Mr. Randels seconded. The motion
carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote.
ORDINANCE NO. 2947
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND AMENDING AND
UPDATING CHAPTER 16.04, BUILDING CODE, OF THE PORT TOWNSEND
MUNICIPAL CODE, TO INCORPORATE THE
. 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, WITH
APPENDICES J AND M
. 2006 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, WITH
APPENDICES B, F, G, H, AND K
. 2006 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE,
. 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, WITH APPENDICES
B, C, D107, E AND F
. 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE,
. 2006 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE
. INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL PERFORMANCE
CODE FOR BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES, INCLUDING
APPENDICES A, B, C, D, AND E
AND CURRENT CODES RELATING TO THE WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY
CODE; VENTILATION AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY CODE; AND RELATED
WASHINGTON ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHANGES, WITH CHANGES AND
EXCEPTIONS AS SET FORTH IN THIS ORDINANCE
Development Services Director Leonard Yarberry reviewed the packet materials,
noting that the proposed ordinance would adopt the statewide 2006 codes and
City Council Business Meeting
Page 8
July /6, 2007
appendices; adopt several new code and appendices; reformat PTMC 16.04, and
approve a number of local amendments.
Mr. Benskin asked why a local amendment was not proposed to keep the exemption
for 200 square foot single story structures which are not habitable space.
Mr. Yarberry stated that the City could adopt a local amendment increasing the 120
square foot exemption to 200 square feet. In answer to Mr. Randels' question, he
noted that all the proposals contained in the ordinance were discussed internally but
other jurisdictions were not contacted.
There was no public comment.
Mr. Randels noted that the sections in the ordinance are misnumbered; section 4
should be section 3. He asked about the desirability of a severability clause; Mr.
Watts stated that this is standard practice and it preserves the integrity of the
remainder of the ordinance if any section is declared invalid. A "savings" clause
would mean that if what you are enacting is held unconstitutional, you revert back
entirely to the prior regulations.
Motion: Mr. Benskin moved to waive Council rules and adopt Ordinance 2947 with
two changes: renumber the "Severability" Section as 3 rather than 4; add a local
amendment to exempt from from permit requirements one-story detached accessory
structures used as tool or storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided the
area does not exceed 200 square (instead of 120 square feet as provided in state
building code). Mr. Masci seconded.
In answer to Mr. Welch's questions, Mr. Yarberry stated that a 10 X 20 foot building
can be fairly large and in his judgment is would be more fitting to require a permit for
buildings over 120 square feet.
Mr. Benskin noted a building still must be built to code whether it is permitted by the
City or not. Mr. Randels stated that if a permit is required then the City is involved
that may save neighbors from having to take on "enforcement" by reporting
potentially illegal building projects.
Mr. Masci moved to divide the question.
Vote on motion to waive rules carried, 7-0, by voice vote.
Vote on main motion carried 5-2, by roll call vote, Robinson and Sandoval opposed.
PRESIDING OFFICER'S REPORT
Mayor Welch reported that he observed YMCA Expedition Club activities during his
trip to Thailand and that the program is an excellent example of worthy city funding.
City Council Business Meeting
Page 9
July 16,2007
STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS
Public Works Committee
Motion: Mr. Masci moved to approve the recommendation of the Public Works
Committee to adopt the Construction Traffic Policy dated June 21, 2007. Mr.
Randels seconded.
Ms. Sandoval asked how this policy would be implemented and enforced. Public
Works Director Ken Clow noted that this has been the practice of the staff and that
generally the issue is covered in the pre-conference meeting or even earlier in the
permitting process.
Vote: motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote.
COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL
Mrs. Medlicott apologized for any remarks she made at the Upper Sims Way
meeting at the High School Auditorium that may have given public offense.
ADJOURN
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
Attest:
9~~~
Pam Kolacy, CMC
City Clerk
City Council Business Meeting
Page 10
July 16,2007