HomeMy WebLinkAbout11142005
.
CITY OF ORT TOWNSEND
CI COUNCIL
MINUTES OF THE SPECIA SESSION OF NOVEMBER 14, 2005
CALL TO ORDER A D PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The City Council of the City of Port t ownsend met in regular session this
fourteenth day of November, 2005, ~t 6:30 p.m. in the Port Townsend temporary
Council Chambers in the Cedar Ro~m of the Waterman & Katz Building, Deputy
Mayor Michelle Sandoval presiding. .
ROLL CALL
Council members present at roll call were Frank Benskin, Freida Fenn, Kees
Kolff, Geoff Masci, Laurie Medlicott, and Michelle Sandoval. Catharine Robinson
was excused.
Staff members present were City At orney John Watts, and City Clerk Pam
Kolacy. City Manager David Timm ns arrived at 7:10 p.m.
.
PUB IC HEARING
RESO~UTION 05-045
A RESOLUTION OF THE City COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT
TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON, AU1!HORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN
A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I3LOCK (CDBG) APPLICATION, FUNDING
THE ACQUISITION OF A THREE-$UILDING OFFICE COMPLEX FOR LOCAL
COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
City Attorney John Watts reviewed the packet material. He stated the
Community Development Block Gra~t application process requires a public
hearing to discuss any potential proj~cts funded by the grant. The project
proposed is acquisition of a three-bUilding office complex for local community
action agencies including the Port TljJwnsend Food Bank, Working Image and
Olympic Community Action Programls (OL YCAP). In order to apply for the
CDBG funds, the Council must pass! a resolution giving the City Manager
authority to sign the grant applicatio~, and state that the City will comply with
provisions of Title I of the Housing ard Community Development Act and Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act. !
I
It was noted that no one from the pu~lic had signed in to speak regarding the
resolution. .
Motion: Mrs. Medlicott moved to w~ive the legislative public hearing script. Mr.
Kolff seconded. Motion carried, 5-1' Fenn opposed.
.
City Council Special Business Meeting
Page 1
November 14.2005
.
Ms. Sandoval asked if any Council embers had any financial or property
interests in the issue.
Mr. Benskin stated he does not hav such an interest but did wish to disclose
that he is the City Council represent~tive to Olycap.
Vanessa Brower of Olycap, introdu~d Tim Hockett, Deputy Director of Olympic
Community Action Programs, from ~ort Angeles. He noted his appreciation for
the support Port Townsend has provided, and for the work of Council members
who have served on the Board of Di~ectors. He stated that the organization is
well known for the programs they o~erate and that they cover a large territory.
He added that Olycap takes stewarqship of the public trust seriously and keeps
overhead costs in line. He noted o~e of the lowest overheads in the state at
9.8% for administration. .
.
He stated the organization's desire t retire the debt on the buildings early and
said this is a good mechanism for th t. Only seven million dollars is available for
the entire state but he said he belie es this will be a competitive application. It
is important to strengthen the community safety net.
Vanessa Brower stated she will con~uct the public hearing required for the
Community Development Block Grabt. She provided a fact sheet and project
summary to the Council members aM for the public record. The documents
showed a total project budget of $1 ,~99,940. This includes CDBG: $1,000,000;
Other Federal funding (USDA) $5841,800; and private funding of $415,140.00.
She reviewed the project summary fprm and noted that new construction of
housing is ineligible for funding. Sh~ added that a planning only grant has
recently been received by the City. I
I
Ms. Brower stated that the jurisdicti~n qualifies in size to receive funding through
local government agencies rather thjln directly. She noted the project has been
in the planning stage for a long timel(five years) without a site, since they were
displaced from their location at the Hospital. The interim facility in Glen Cove
was very small and not conducive tol good working conditions. Very favorable
terms were negotiated with the own~r of the property for the buildings in the
Business Park.
.
Ms. Brower noted that partners have been brought in, such as the Food Bank
and Working Assets. Olycap is working closely with the USDA and CDBG staff
to make sure activities were in line Vl'ith their specific requirements. Community
facilities must meet national objectiv~s in principally benefiting low or moderate
income persons. Olycap served in ~xcess of 11,000 clients this year and the
great majority are low income, with ~ few of moderate income.
She added that the investment of o'le million dollars in the Olycap campus will
compute to $91 per low income resi~ent served and this exceeds the granting
agency requirements. .
City Council Special Business Meeting
Page 2
November 14, 2005
.
.
.
Letters of support from community artners were entered into the record. These
partners included Jefferson Mental ealth Services, Jefferson County Food Bank
Association, Housing Authority of J fferson County, United Good Neighbors of
Jefferson County, Olympic Area Ag ncy on Aging Senior Information &
Assistance, Rotary Club of East Je erson County, The Salvation Army, and
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault ~rograms of Jefferson County (pending).
Ms. Brower noted that the non-Engli~h speaking outreach was appropriately
conducted and a multi-language tramslator is present. She added that Mr.
Hockett speaks seven languages. .
At the conclusion of the presentatiol11 , there were no questions from Council
members.
There was no public comment.
Motion: Mr. Masci moved for apprd,val of Resolution 05-045. Mr. Kolff
seconded. I
Mr. Kolff expressed appreciation to Olycap as a professional and productive
agency in the community.
Mr. Watts added that the grant mus~ be under City sponsorhip, however there is
no cost or expense to the City in corinection with the grant.
Ms. Sandoval asked what the $1 ,oo~,ooo CDGB funding would cover. Ms.
Brower stated this would be for acq isition of the land and three buildings. The
USDA portion would be for the remaining portion of land and buildings and tenant
improvements. .
Mr. Masci commended Olycap for fimding an excellent deal on the property which
will result in more funds being avail~ble for the programs and people served.
Ms. Fenn commended Olycap for th~ir years of service to the community.
Vote: motion carried unanimously, 16-0, by voice vote.
JOINT OPERATIONS AND NjANAGEMENT OF FIRE SERVICES-
CONTRACT ~EVIEW AND STATUS
Chief Mike Mingee was present to update the Council on the .draft Interlocal
Agreement. He noted that now only two entities are involved in discussion as
Districts 1 and 6 were merged by ani overwhelming vote of the residents of the
districts. He stated that the Interloc~1 provides for a joint fund rather than
City Council Special Business Meeting
Page 3
November 14,2005
.
.
.
attempting to assess equal contribu ions from each party and dealing with
different purchasing policies, budge s, etc.
He added that the joint board will co sist of three members from each agency
and for a measure to pass, at least ttwo affirmative votes from each entity must
be cast. The agreement has a thr~e year term, with one year dissolution
clause.
There was no public comment.
Ms. Sandoval asked about compara~le assets; she asked if there is a list and
some comparison so we know who i~ putting in what assets and whether it is
equitable.
Chief Mingee noted that the agreem!ant does mention personnel; regarding
rolling stock, the next step of the c01solidation retains the fleet, personnel and
facilities within the City. There havE! been difficulties in working out a contract
agreement among three different bargaining units and it is hoped that the
process will be worked out this year.
Ms. Sandoval asked if the City's General Fund supplement will grow as the EMS
tax decreases. .
Chief Mingee noted that the overall ~mount of the EMS levy will consistently
increase by 1 % from the previous year plus new construction; this results in
about a $6,000 increase this year. 4s it increases, whether the General Fund
subsidy will remain the same is som$thing we have to work on. He stated we
are trying to find equity between the City and District. At this point it is expected
that the General Fund supplement lMiII also increase by 1% per year.
Ms. Sandoval asked to confirm Gen$ral Fund contribution would not go higher
than $780,000 plus 1 % plus new coristruction and asked whether the Council
would have to vote that EMS appropriation each year.
Mr. Timmons stated that the EMS levy would have to be raised 1 % or it would
have to be supplemented by Genera!1 Fund - the City is obligated to provide the
funding whether the EMS levy is increased or not.
Mr. Timmons stated there are some !VIedicare billings outstanding that will not be
received until next year of about $85iOOO and Deputy Chief Aumock's fire and
plan review is being billed out at the City and County. The final numbers must
balance out by about a $60-80,000 ~djustment to the base budget which will
come not from the $780,000 or EMSllevy, but from these other revenue sources.
Ms. Sandoval asked about whether the City would assume any extra liability due
to the joint venture. Mr. Watts repli~d the liability provisions of the agreement
City Council Special Business Meeting
I
Page 4
November 14. 2005
.
.
.
I
have been reviewed with the City's itsurance authority and what is contained in
the agreement is their recommenda ion. For vehicles, the insurance will follow
the vehicle, not the driver. Regardi g City personnel who remain City
employees, their conduct is still the, ity's liability under our insurance.
Mr. Timmons noted that there are n<!> provisions of the agreement that will
increase the City's liability premium$.
Ms. Sandoval asked what "additional consolidation measures" on page 2 refers
to.
Chief Mingee stated that it should in~icate that we enter into this agreement but
still continue to look at other things we can do such as transfer employees into
one group. Any change would hav~ to be approved by the Council as an
amendment to the interlocal agreemlent.
Ms. Sandoval asked whether this pr~cludes the possibility of other districts
coming on board. Mr. Timmons st~ted that this isn't impossible but probably
wouldn't happen in the near term.
Mr. Benskin asked about how equip~ent replacement works. Mr. Timmons
stated that technically the City equipment rental fund owns it and it is rented to
the Fire Department, then to the dis~rict is the equivalent of a sub lease. This
may be an item of discussion as to Vrihether or not this is the best method.
When the equipment is retired, the qonsolidated district would be responsible for
replacement.
Mr. Timmons added that the City's cpntribution to the Equipment Rental Fund is
subtracted from our contribution to the district; if we transfer equipment, the
amount of contribution remains the ~ame, but is paid to the district rather than the
City.
The General Government Committe13 will review the interlocal agreement at their
next meeting and recommend action to the Council for the December 5 meeting.
~DJOURN
There being no further business, th~ meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Attest:
q~la~~
City Clerk
City Council Special Business Meeting
Page 5
November 14,2005