HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/20/1989
205
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 6, 1989, Cont.
Agreement with Jefferson County on Property Tax Distribution. Mr
Grove explained the agreement. Councilmember Camfield made a
motion to approve the agreement which was seconded by Councilmember
McCulloch and passed unanimously by voice vote. Mr Grove stated
that a resolution will be forthcoming.
I
COUNCILMEMBERS GENERAL DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit. Councilmember Kenna made a motion that the
Council renew the Conditional Use Permit for William J Medlicott
for the Holly Hill House Bed and Breakfast Inn at 611 Polk street
for one year which was seconded by Councilmember Camfield and
passed unanimously by voice vote.
49th and Cook. Councilmember Camfield asked the status of ,the
street problem at 49th and Cook. City Attorney Harpe!r responded
that the lawyer for the family has been out of town and they have
not been able to get together.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Shirley declared the meeting
adjourned at 9:00 PM.
~lJ
Mayor
I
Attest:
iLJ~
Clerk-Treasurer
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20, 1989
The city council of the City of Port Townsend met in regular
session this twentieth day of June, 1989, at 7: 30 PM, in the
council Chambers of city Hall, Mayor Pro-Tem Mike Kenna presiding.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present at roll call were Jean Camfield, Karen
Chang, John Clise, Vern Jones, Mike Kenna, Julie Mccu~loch and
Norma owsley. Also present were Clerk-Treasurer Davld Grove,
Public Works Director Ted Stricklin, City Attorney Keith Harper and
Executive Administrative Assistant/Planner Michael.
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Jones made a motion to approve the following items
on the Consent Agenda which was seconded by Councilmew)er Camfield
and passed unanimously by voice vote.
I
Approval of the minutes for the Special Session for May 25, 1989,
and the minutes for June 6,1989, as written without reading.
Approval of the following Bills and Claims:
Current Expense
Street
Library construction
Park
Hotel-Motel Transient Tax
Water-Sewer
~
$ 13,052.49
6,196.27
14.70
279.42
14,624.45
11,130.13
. f
206
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20, 1989, Cont.
Storm Drain
Equipment Rental
Firemen's' Pension and Relief
Total
348.32
2,536.02
43.40
$ 48,225.20
Adoption of Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO 89-45
I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PORT TOWNSEND, AUTHORIZING A LATECOMER
UTILITY CONTRACT PURSUANT TO RCW 35.91.
Andrew Thurston has agreed to construct a 6 inch water line in U
Street from Redwood Street to approximately 90 feet east of Beach
Street within the City of Port Townsend.
Communications:
A letter dated May 29,1989, from Margaret Lee enclosing a copy of
a letter she wrote to R Marie Zimmerman, LSCA Administrator,
Library Planning and Development Division, stating her opinion of
the proposed Memorandum of Agreement for the Library Expansion, and
giving an alternative to the first stipulation, was copied for
Council and referred to the Public Hearing later on the agenda.
A letter dated May 31, 1989, to Mayor shirley from Steve L Olsen,
Attorney at Law, on behalf of the Jefferson/Clallam Counties Big
Brother/Big Sister Program requesting a contribution of $1,500, was
copied for Council and referred to the Finance Committee.
A letter dated June 7, 1989, to the city Council and the Planning
Commission from Calmar A McCune, including a proposed ordinance
which he suggested for Parking in the Historic District was copied
for Council and referred to the Planning Commission.
I
A letter dated June 8, 1989, to Michael Hildt from Trudi Ann
ElofsQn requesting transfer of the Conditional Use Permit for
Townsend Place, A Bed and Breakfast Inn, from the previous owners,
Mark and Juanita Bunch to Trudi Ann Elofson and Herbert Toby
Elofson was copied for Council and referred to the Legislative/
Environmental Committee.
A letter dated June 12, 1989, from Richard R Gastfield to the
Council disagreeing with the Planning Commission on Variance
Application No 8904-03 -T F and CA. Belgard was copied for Council
and referred to the Public Hearing later on the agenda.
A notification dated June 12, 1989, from Karen Cartmel, Election
Coordinator, Jefferson County, was copied for Council stating the
expiration this year of the terms of Karen Chang, Jean Camfield,
Vern Jones and Norma Owsley.
A memorandum dated June 12, 1989, from Keith Harper to Ted
Stricklin and Michael Hildt regarding the request of Sue Yawman
pertaining to extension of water and sewer lines near Gise and 54th
Streets was copied for Council and referred to the Water/Sewer
Committee.
I
A memorandum dated June 13, 1989, from Donna Leckenby to The
Histpric Preservation Committee, urging preservation of the pink
House .at its present site was copied for Council and referred to
the Pub~~c Hearing later on the agenda.
"
A letter dated June 13, 1989, from Douglas V Franz, Building
Inspector, to Richard Romano regarding his sign and building permit
was copied for Council.
207
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
An Environmental Checklist dated June 14, 1989, for Brian and
Aileen Dimick to build a vacation building on Washington street was
copied for Council and referred to the Legislative/Environmental
Committee.
I
A letter dated June 15, 1989, to the Councilmembers from the
Historic Preservation Commission with their recommendations for the
Pink House was copied for Council and referred to the Public
Hearing later on the agenda.
A letter dated June 16, 1989, from Charles E Wallin suggesting
changes in the Bed and Breakfast Ordinance before passage was
copied for Council and referred to Ordinance No 2155 in Unfinished
Business.
This concludes the Consent Agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Street Vacation Application No 8903-04 -City of Port Townsend.
Conditional Use Permit Application No 8903-05 -city of Port
Townsend. Shoreline Development Application No SDP 88:-0020 -city
of Port Townsend. A motion was made by Councilmember Jones to
continue the hearing for these applications until the next meeting
which was seconded by Councilmember Clise and passed unanimously
by voice vote.
I
Rezone Application No 8905-04 -City of Port Townsend. Proposed
Removal of the "pink House". After discussion in which Marie
Zimmerman, LSCA Administrator of the Washington state ]~ibrary, was
asked if it would be a problem and she answered that it would not,
these two hearings were held together. Mr Grove outlined the
history of the Pink House and it's proposed removal. He stated
that because Federal funds were included as part of the financing
for the renovation and expansion of the Library, that a Section 106
Review under the National Historic Preservation Act is necessary
and that this is the first step of that process. The Council has
received the following written communications since the last
Council meeting on the proposal:
A letter dated May 29, 1989, from Margaret Lee, who lives in one
of the apartments created in this house, requesting that the City
hold at least two meetings showing site plans in final form to
allow everyone time to prepare comments they wish to present to the
City or Library Board.
A letter dated June 14, 1989, from John H Feikert, thE~ owner of a
lot just down Lawrence Street and a turn onto Polk Street,
conveying his sincere interest in the preservatiort of the "Pink
House" by moving it to his lot.
I
A recommendation from the Port Townsend Historic Preservation
Commission dated June 15, 1989, encouraging the City Co,uncil to
study the site to accommodate both the Pink House and ithe Library.
In the event that a choice must be made between expanding the
Library and leaving the house on the site, the majority of the
Commission recommends that the house be sold by bid and moved to
a lot, preferably wi thin the Port Townsend National Historic
District as conditioned by the Memorandum of Agreemeni:.
A letter dated June 19, 1989, from Jo Yount requesting that they
approve plans to move the house at the corner of Harrison and
Lawrence for the specific purpose of providing reasonable parking
and entrance for the Library addition. Her recommemdàtion was
qualified to this particular house at this particular íocation
under these particular circumstances.
208
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20, 1989, Cont.
A letter dated June 20,1989, from Robert Yourish encouraging them
to take care of the Library needs and move or demolish the house
that is in the way.
A Memorandum from Douglas Franz to David Grove was copied for
Council on June 20, 1989, reporting on code violations that were
observed on a tour of the structure at 1256 Lawrence Street.
I
A letter dated June 20, 1989, from Edward and Eileen Barcott
expressing support for relocation of the Pink House because the
apartments for the most part have been a source of disruption and
neighborhood aggravation.
The report of an inspection made June 9, 1989, by Surety Pest
Control out of Oak Harbor on the structure at 1256 Lawrence Street
indicating that there is visible evidence of one or more
infestations of wood destroying organisms, there is visible
evidence of damage to structure due to infestation of wood
destroying organisms, and there is visible evidence of conditions
conductive to infestation of wood destroying organisms.
The options which have been identified for the use of this property
are:
1. Manage it as a rental.
2. Move some city offices into it.
3. Remove part of the structure to provide parking access to
the Library.
4. Remove the entire structure from the site to provide
parking for the Library along with park facilities to
enhance outdoor library activities such as summer story
hours, etc.
5. Surplus the entire parcel.
I
The order of preference for removing the structure would be:
1. Call for bids to have the structure moved to another
site within the National Historic Distr~ct with
restrictive covenants.
2. Call for bids to have the structure moved to another
site within the National Historic District with some of
the restrictions removed.
3. Have the structure moved to another site within the
City outside of the Historic District with restrictive
covenants.
4. Have the structure moved to another site within the
City outside of the Historic District with some of the
restrictions removed.
5. Have the structure moved to another site anywhere
with restrictive covenants.
6. Have the structure moved to another site anywhere
without restrictive covenants.
7. Have the structure demolished.
Mr Hildt explained the rezone of the property to P-I is primarily
tor public use and is a necessary action according to the City
3.prÜng Code if it is to be used for parking accessory to the
Library and that is why this rezone is before the Council. He then
r~viewed the findings and conclusions of the Planning Commission.
I
M&yor Pro-Tem Kenna stated that all opinions are valued and that
the Council does not have to arrive at a conclusion this evening.
He then opened the hearing to th~ public.
Lars Watson, Chairman of the Library Board of Trustees, read a
letter from the trustees stating the background for the proposed
renovations to the Library. During the process, the use of the lot
on the corner was discussed and deemed desirable. The Board of
209
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20, 1989, Cont.
Trustees recommends the removal of the house and use of the lot as
access to the Library and for related library activities as the
best means of serving the needs of the community 'while still
preserving the unique historical character of Port To\lTnsend.
I
Tom Kimball was recognized and supported the Library Board. He
suggested that the people who want to preserve the house could go
out and raise the necessary money to move it just as thl:! people who
are working for the Library Renovation have done.
David Sharp spoke against the removal of the Pink House and recited
a poem he wrote, "The Pink House Blues".
Mildred Jones was recognized and spoke in favor of removing the
house for the safety of library users.
Helen Monell was recognized and spoke saying the people of Port
Townsend have spoken very strongly in their support of the Library
as evidenced by their generous contributions to the Library Fund.
She stated that the Library is situated on a small lot: and should
not be crowded by any structure that isn't related and should have
a spectacular site as will be allowed by the property surrounding
it, which can be done by removal of the Pink House.
Frank Kilham was recognized and spoke in favor of the! removal of
the Pink House and using the space for Library requirements. He
supports the Library Board in their efforts to provide library
service which is important to everyone in the community as well as
future generations.
I
Lillian Mueller was recognized and stated she has lived on Harrison
Street for over 81 years, saw the Library built and voted to keep
it going, keep it where it is, and have it expanded. The Pink
House is a duplicate of the Rothschild House and is not needed.
She is in favor of saving the trees around the Pink House as they
cannot be duplicated.
Helen Rosselet, President of the Friends of the Library, was
recognized and spoke saying she admires those who want to preserve
Port Townsend's historic places, including the Pink House. Only
when people care and are willing to pursue what they believe in
will Port Townsend have the best possible historic restoration.
Countless numbers of Port Townsend residents have worked to bring
the restoration of Port Townsend's carnegie Library to reality.
All of the plans have been completed for an attractive, pleasant
and efficient library building, the additional space occupied by
the Pink House will improve the access for all residents and
enhance the visual aspect from the street. The Pink House, moved
to another site and restored, can become an asset to 1::he Historic
District; at it's present site, it could really be a big
distraction to everyone in Port Townsend.
I
Madeline Bertelli Merrick was recognized and spoke against the
removal of the Pink House saying she doesn't feel that the house
being a distraction to anyone or everyone in Port Townsend is the
issue. Real people live there. She never sees childrl3n, dogs, or
bodies being accosted by the heavy duty traffic, in fact there is
nothing going on. Most people walk there or take the bus. Sh~
cannot fathom living without a Library. Living without a parking
lot next to a place that is going to remove a historic building,
let alone people that are worthy and marvelous citizens of this
community is not to be fathomed.
Darin Vercoe who has lived in the Pink House for a little over a
year was recognized and spoke against the removal of i:he house
for a parking lot when the house crowns the hill so bl:!autifully.
She questioned the need for nineteen parking spaces and suggested
the possibility of leasing the parking lot across the street behind
210
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
the dental office after 5:00 PM; leasing the parking lot of the
Catholic Church; installing diagonal parking in front of the
Library on Lawrence Street; putting a small parking area behind the
pink House with ingress and egress from Harrison Street, and
returning to the original plan with parking on the north and east
of the addition with ingress and egress from Fillmore Street. She
stated the most common complaint she has heard about the library
expansion is the old entryway no longer being used as the entryway
and the new one being on Harrison street.
I
Marci Stewart was recognized and spoke in favor of the library
renovation and against the parking lot and moving the house. It
would take away the safety of our kids.
Donna Leckenby was recognized and spoke against the moving of the
house stating the area is subject to vandalism because of the
present empty spaces that don't have houses in them, and a parking
lot could be a source of a problem. Most of the restorations of
the old houses in Port Townsend have been done well and contends
that the Pink House is part of a Historic Neighborhood that has
already been seriously eroded by parking lots and public buildings.
She also contends that the location of the house on the crest of
Lawrence Street is an important feature of the street which is
well-travelled by residents of the city. She believes that the
removal of the house would greatly change the character of both
Lawrence Street and the neighborhood. She encouraged the sale of
the Pink House property and the funds to go to the Library for
further design work if necessary.
Margaret Lee was recognized and read a letter from Allen T
Dennison, one of the authors of the book "victorian Architecture
of Port Townsend, Washington" stating that the best alternative is
to leave the Pink House on its original site. She stated that it
is not necessary to remove the Pink House for a park as the grounds
are already a park with old fruit trees, stone walls and an
abundance of flowering shrubs and gardens. She requested that the
Ci ty maintain the house where it stands and actively seek to
utilize it for the greater public good. She suggested using the
house for a day care center; an elderhostel; the Mainstreet Project
Office; the Historic Homes Tour or Port Townsend Preservation
commission offices; or lease the building for social service or
professional offices. She presented a petition requesting a
complete review of plans to remove or demolish the house at the
corner of Harrison and Lawrence known as the Charles Pink House,
and a more thorough examination of parking alternatives for the
Library Expansion with 400 signatures.
I
Rebbekka Riverstone was recognized and spoke saying that it is
important to have access to the library for everybody and if moving
the Pink House is necessary that's okay. She would like to see the
trees saved, moved if necessary, but not killed. She stated that
the pink House was never of any note until somebody said it should
be moved, and only now is it being landscaped and cared for; it was
nothing but an eyesore before.
Joseph Calabrese was recognized and spoke saying the other houses
in the neighborhood were built circa 1890 and as a neighborhood
resident, he is most concerned about the erosion of the historic
quality of the upper Harrison Street area that will result when or
if the Pink House is removed from its site. He stated access to
the Library can be accommodated without removing th~house and he
would like to see the house maintained for some public use along
with the trees, lilacs, and stone retaining wall.
I
Michael Lavine was recognized and spoke against the parking lot
saying it has not been proven that parking is a problem and it is
a waste of money.
211
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
I
Peg Lewis was recognized and spoke in favor of the removal of the
Pink House and the Library renovation saying it is a Library of
Dreams as this is a City of Dreams. The needs of the present as
well as the future use of the Library must be met. The idea of
having a library oriented mini-park is in keeping with the forward
looking dreams that should go with this library. She would like
to see the Pink House moved wi thin the Historic District and
believes the library serves the whole community and should continue
to do so.
Bill Romadka was recognized and spoke against the removal of the
Pink House saying that it is whimsical to state that the removal
of an historical home from an historical site in an historical
district in a reportedly historical town to accommodate parking
automobiles makes any kind of sense and is worrisome. Port
Townsend has got the largest viable collection of honest Victorian
buildings north of San Francisco and we are not a community
developing a theme but are a 100% viable and historical. community,
proud of our past and the remarkable preservation of thE~ structures
of our forbearers. The moving of the home will be viewed as a
precedent, weakening the historic dike.
Pete Bonyun was recognized and spoke against the removal of the
Pink House and presented an alternate plan for parking according
to the second draft of the proposed parking ordinance that is being
worked on. He proposed parking on both sides of LawrEmce Street,
a joint use agreement with the Catholic Church and ot:her day-use
only parking areas. providing more parking spaces for cars will
not solve the problem when cars are the problem.
I
Nora Porter was recognized and spoke in favor of the rHlocation of
the Pink House and the Library Renovation. She stated that the real
issue here is the renovation of both properties - most want to
expand the library and save the Pink House. The House can be saved
and the Library can be developed to its fullest and bE!st use, but
not both in the same place. Many old houses in Port Townsend have
been moved to their benefit: parking is really a secondary issue.
Madge Wallin was recognized and spoke thanking Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna
for stating that the Council is here to listen to everyone before
a decision is made and that it doesn't have to be made tonight.
She stated that the reason many people are in Port Townsend is
because decisions haven't been made in a hurry. She fUJ::-ther stated
that the rezone seems to be completely opposite to the ordinance
on bed and breakfast inns and questioned the differemce between
renting by the day, by the week, by the month or by t:he year. A
town interested in its past, tearing down part of its past, to make
way for a concrete parking lot doesn't seem to make much sense when
you take the time to analyze the situation because thore were and
are alternatives to this. We must protect the integ'rity of the
threatened private homes and historical buildings or our cultural
heritage will continue to diminish. She asked that the Council
temper their decisions with fairness and with reason.
I
Jodi Hatchett was recognized and spoke saying she doesn't see that
keeping an old historic building has anything to do with not loving
libraries. Both can exist, and the parking alternativl3s suggested
tonight should be looked into before a decision is made.
Jean Anderson was recognized and spoke saying that thl:! Pink House
is literally falling apart. If it is saved, it cannot be low-cost
housing because of the cost of restoration. To leave the house
where it is and have a gracious entrance to the Library the house
would no longer have the character that it has if the back sections
are removed. The best way to preserve the house and: all of its
parts is to move it. The house itself would be happier as a house
if it were moved to a different site where it could still be a
house and didn't have to have it~ rear-end cut off and its usage
212
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
changed. When the Library is enlarged, there will be programs that
require more parking. When Federal Funds are involved, the
regulations are more stringent than those that would be required
if they were not and the Library should have precedence is this
case and should be inviting to the entire town.
At this time, Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna asked Marie Zimmerman and Dave
Hansen if they have any comments. They did not.
Sue Sidle of the Library Board was recognized and read a letter
from Gary Swett, Uptown Businessman, stating his concern for
parking in the Uptown District and the need for the proposed
parking area for the Library and its increased usage. It seems
very reasonable to move the existing building to an alternate
location where it may continue to be used as a house. Proximity
to the Library is more advantageous to Library patrons for safe
access to the building, it makes the renovation plan truly work.
She stated that the Council will need the "Wisdom of Solomon" to
deal with this because it is a very hard position and those of us
who love libraries, love old houses, and love Port Townsend, know
that it is not and easy decision, and in order to meet the desires
of everyone, there has to be a lot of goodwill and a lot of
compromise. It was community input that made this project a
success, the use of the Library by the larger community,
unfortunately not all of us can walk to the library, some now and
in the future will have difficulty with steps and we need to
consider what library usage for the very old and the very young
will mean from now and into the future.
I
Bob McGuinnes was recognized and spoke saying a couple of his
friends live in the Pink House and he hates to see people evicted.
There is less and less low-income housing available. It may come
to people working in Port Townsend and living away because they
can't afford to live in Port Townsend. It seems that whenever he
wants to use the Library, it is closed. If given the choice
between funding a parking lot and keeping the library open when it
is now closed, he would rather have the library open.
Pete Raab was recognized and spoke saying that the library is a
very valuable and worthwhile community asset, but he has gotten an
appreciation for the past and the people living in his neighborhood
before him. Concrete proposals should be made before the removing
the Pink House is considered showing the entrance and view of the
Harrison Street side of the Library before any decisions are made.
The Council should weigh very carefully the impact of removing an
historic landmark within an historic district to make way for a big
question mark at this point.
I
Lars Watson was recognized and spoke saying that one very important
thing that people who do not want parking on the Pink property site
are forgetting is the main entryway that we have now is not
suitable for handicapped access nor is there anyway from the back
that is sui table for handicapped access. The ramp there now is not
that suitable. The only way to have suitable handicapped access
is if there is an entrance from Harrison Street from the pink
property which will not entail the use of steps. The Catholic
Church parking lot, the parking lot at the dentist's, the street
parking is not acceptable for a person who is handicapped: there
is no way that they can park there and find a way into the library.
An elevator will be installed so that both floors will be usable
and friendly to handicapped access people so it doesn't make much
sense to park on the street and have an elevator that people can
use to go up and down between floors but not have the people be
able to get into the library. Parking on the Pink property allows
an entryway that is somewhat level and is friendly to a person who
is handicapped. This is the reason parking plans at other sites
are not acceptable.
I
213
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
I
Howard Scott, Fire Chief, was recognized and spoke saying the Fire
Department could use the parking lot for access and meeitings at the
Fire Hall. "Firewise" and "safetywise" the Pink House! would take
a lot of renovation. He suggested leaving the Pink House where it
is and moving the Fire Hall someplace else.
Jim (Bonzo) DeLeo was recognized and spoke saying that Victorian
homes on either side of the Presbyterian Church have bE~en moved to
Blaine Street and have been there for years. He endorses the
efforts of the Library to remove the Pink House from the place and
not destroy it. There is plenty of room for it around town.
I
Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna thanked the public for their comments. It has
been very interesting and some new things have come up. Council-
member Jones made a motion that the Council extend the hearing
until next meeting on July 5, 1989, for additional testimony on
new information to help arrive at a decision at that time. Bev
Lamb, Librarian, was asked to comment on what impact this would
have on their plans. She stated that bids will be opened on June
30, 1989, and that they did separate anything that \rJ'Ould happen
with the corner lot from the general contract, so the construction
schedule will not be affected. Councilmember McCulloch requested
that the plans be posted during the next meeting and urged people
who made comments tonight give them in written form so that they
can be transferred along with the record of the hearing for the
section 106 Review Process. Councilmember Owsley ask.ed that all
information at the next meeting be new information and :~ot a repeat
of tonight. Councilmember Camfield asked if a transcript of the
hearing will be prepared. Mr Grove responded saying that it is not
necessary at this time especially in light of the fact that we had
the State Historical Preservation Officer present and Marie
Zimmerman from the State Library here to hear the testimony in
person. The motion was seconded by Councilmember McCulloch and
passed unanimously by voice vote.
Variance Application No 8904-03 -Belgard. Mr Hildt reviewed the
findings, conclusions and conditions of the Planning Commission.
Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna opened the hearing to the public. Ted Belgard
was recognized and spoke in favor of the variance stating that all
he wants to do is build a nice house and that.he has no intention
of blocking the easement for any other user's use and Ile does have
adequate on-site parking for guests off the easemEmt. David
Colbert was recognized and spoke saying that he is in favor of the
variance but was not in favor of no height restriction as it would
impact on his view. Mr Grove noted two letters received by Council
that were referred to this hearing. There being no further
testimony, Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna closed the hearing to the public and
turned to the Council for disposition. After a lengthy discussion,
Councilmember McCulloch made a motion that the Council adopt the
following findings, conclusions and conditions and apprlDve Variance
Application No 8904-03 which was seconded by Councillilember Jones
and passed unanimously by voice vote.
Findings:
I
1.
The applicant proposes to construct a single-family dwelling
on unplatted property described as section 15, Tm.mship 30 N,
Range 1 West, W M, Tax Lot 14. The subject property is
located in the R-IA zoning district. Included wi thifi t1'\~
subject property is a 20-foot-wide easement, extending 85 feð1:
southerly from the northwest corner of the subjec::t property.
The easement extends from platted 1st Street, and was
purchased in 1952 by the owners of what is now described as
Lots 1 and 2, Island vista subdivision. The eélsement also
serves the subject property. Section 17.08.032 of the Port
Townsend Municipal Code states that "'Front lot line' means
the lot line which is adjacent to a street or access easement
of at least twenty feet in width." A memorandum from City
214
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
Attorney Keith Harper, dated May 8, 1989, states that the
building setback must be measured from the easement line.
Section 17.20.010 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code requires
a front setback of 20 feet for property in the R-IA zoning
district. The applicant proposes that the building be
constructed with no setback from the easement; therefore, a
variance is required.
I
2.
The subject property is bounded by Lots 10 and 11, Galleon
View Estates, to the north; Lot 2, Krieger Short Subdivision,
and Lots 1 and 2, Island vista Subdivision, to the west; the
Government Meander line to the south; and unplatted property
to the east. Single-family residences are located on Lot 11,
Galleon View Estates, Lot 2, Island Vista, and Lot 1 of the
Krieger Short Subdivision, located approximately 200 feet to
the west of the subject property. The 20-foot access easement
extends from 1st street to the north through Lot 11, Galleon
View Estates to the subject property.
The subject property consists of approximately 1.12 acres, or
approximately 48,600 square feet. A large portion of the
property consists of a bluff which is approximately 130 feet
high and slopes down to the southeast. The bluff extends from
a point 46 feet south of the northeast corner of the subject
property southwesterly to a point 161 feet south of the
northwest corner of the subject property. The applicant
proposes to construct the building on the northern portion of
the site, which is the most level area of the property. The
portion of the site located north of the bluff consists of
0.32 acres, or approximately 13,920 square feet.
3.
4.
The applicants are proposing a 25-foot setback from the bluff.
In a letter dated April 1, 1987, David Goldsmith, the Director
of the Jefferson County Planning/Building Department, informed
the applicants that the subject property is outside the
jurisdictional boundaries of the Shoreline Management Act and
therefore not subject to the setback requirements in the
Jefferson County-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master
Program.
I
5.
The applicant has submitted a site plan which proposes that
the northwest corner of the building be located approximately
7 feet from the easement and the southwest corner of the
building be located on the easement line. The applicants
propose that the dwelling would have a ground coverage of
approximately 1,750 square feet. The site plan submitted by
the applicants shows that the southeast corner of the building
would be located adjacent to the proposed bluff setback line.
6.
The applicants' lot and surrounding lots have views of the
wàter to the southeast. The lots in Galleon View Estates
abutting the subject property are subject to covenants
restricting building height to 14 feet. The lots abutting the
subject property to the west are not subject to any height
restrictions other than those required in section 17.20.010
of the Port Townsend Municipal Code. The height restriction
in the R-IA zoning district is 30 feet. (Section 17.20.010,
Port Townsend Municipal Code). The setback variance is
requested by the applicants would not impact the view
corridors of adjacent dwelling.
I
7.
The bluff located on the subject property is designated as an
environmentally sensitive area in the Port Townsend
"e=omprehensi ve Plan. The applicant has submi tted an
eBVironmental checklist pursuant to the Washington State
EÏ\1;vironmental Policy Act. At their May 16, 1989, meeting, the
Ci18 Council issued a Mitigated Determination of
Nonšignificance after review of the checklist. The mit,igating
I
I
2.15
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
8.
conditions added by Council require the applicants to maintain
a 25 foot setback from the bluff and submit a storm drainage
plan to the City Public Works Director.
'The applicant states that the presence of the bluff and the
shape of the lot severely restrict the space available for
construction. The applicant also states that it would be
reasonable to build to the easement line since thE! purpose of
the easement is to serve the subject property only.
Conclusions:
1.
The proposed variance would not amount to a rezone nor
constitute change in the district boundaries shown on the
official zoning map.
2.
Because the topography of the site and the angle of the bluff
constrains the portion of the site on which construction is
possible, special conditions exist which do not result from
actions of the applicant which are peculiar to the subject
property and which are not applicable to other lands in the
district. Locating the building closer to the esLsement than
the required 20 feet has the effect of moving it further from
the edge of the bluff.
3.
The variance requested would not confer a special privilege
to the subject property that is denied other lands in the same
district.
4.
The granting of the variance would not be detrimemtal to the
public welfare and injurious to the property or improvements
in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
Locating the building closer to the easement than i:he required
20 feet would have the effect of providing a better view
corridor for the adjacent dwelling on Lot 11, Galleon View
Estates.
5.
The reasons set forth in the above-referenced application
justify the granting of the variance, and the variance is the
minimum variance that will make possible the reslsonable use
of the land.
6.
Because the granting of the variance would be in harmony with
the general purpose and intent of Title 17 of the Port
Townsend Municipal Code, the Port Townsend City Council adopts
the above referenced variance as conditioned.
Conditions:
I
4.
1.
The proposed residence shall be located no closer to the crest
of the bluff than 25 feet. The southe~st corner of the
building shall be the only portion of the builqing abutting
the bluff setback line, as shown in the site plan submitted
by the applicants on May 4, 1989.
The applicants and guests of t~~ a,pplicants shall not park
vehicles in the easement. "
2.
3.
The proposed residence shall b~ located no closE~r than five
feet from 1*,e ~rdnt proper~y 1 í~e:,,-
The prQpq~~<;\ :t,"~~:i.,~el'\Qe spalJ. be restricted to a maximum height
of 17 ~.~"
C ditio se Permit A lication No 8904-04 -LaVi nee Mr Hilt
~.yiewed . t e findings, conclusions and conditions of 'the' ,Planning
commission. Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna opened the hearing to tQ¿ public.
Denny LaVigne was recognized and spoke in favor of the appÏication.
216
6.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
There being no further testimony, Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna closed the
hearing to the public and turned the application over to the
Council for disposition. After a lengthy discussion, Councilmember
McCulloch made a motion that the Council adopt the following
findings, conclusions and conditions and approve Conditional Use
Permit No 8904-04 which was seconded by Councilmember Owsley and
passed unanimously by voice vote.
I
Findings:
1.
The applicants propose to establish an eighteen-hone miniature
golf course at 414 Kearney Street. The subject property
consists of Lots 1-8, Block 76, Mabel Addition, and is located
in the C-II zoning district. section 17.16.010 of the Port
Townsend Municipal Code does not list a use designation for
a miniature golf course; the closed use designation listed is
"amusement enterprises". This use is permitted as a
conditional use in the C-II zoning district.
2.
The subject property is bounded by Jefferson Street to the
south, Kearney Street to the west, Franklin Street to the
north and Gaines Street to the east. The site consists of
eight lots for a total site area of 48,400 square feet. A
bowling center and a retail store are currently located on the
subject property.
The subject property is surrounded by Great Northwest Bank to
the west across Kearney Street; Penny Saver convenience store
and deli to the south across Jefferson street; a used car lot
to the north; and vacant property to the east. The eastern
portion of the site slopes up towards unopened Gaines Street;
the property on the east side of Gaines Street is currently
undeveloped. The property to the north, west, and south of
the side is zoned C-II; the property to the east across Gaines
Street is zoned R-II.
I
3.
4.
The bowling center building located on the subject property
has a gross floor area of approximately 11,000 square feet.
The center consists of 12 bowling lanes and a 1,000 square
foot restaurant. The retail building (Tuttles) has a ground
coverage of approximately 1,500 square feet with an apartment
upstairs. Approximately 1,000 square feet of the building's
ground floor is used for retail space, the remainder being
used as storage. The applicants propose to locate the
miniature golf course along the southern edge of the property
between Jefferson street and the bowling center building. The
proposed miniature golf course would cover approximately 8,600
square feet of the site. The applicants also propose to
construct a 112 square-foot customer service booth for the
proposed use.
The applicants are proposing that the miniature golf course
would operate during the summer months from noon to 10:00 PM
on weekdays, and noon to 11:00 PM on week-ends. During the
winter months the proposed use would operate from 1:00 PM to
6:00 PM. In the summer, the existing bowling center operates
from 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM, on Monday, Tuesday, and Friday; 9:00
AM to 11:00 PM on Wednesday; noon to 11:00 PM on Saturday; and
noon to 9:00 PM on Sunday. The bowling center operates from
10: 00 Am to 10: 00 PM in the winter. The applicants state that
peak league activity at the bowling center occurs between
10: 00 AM and noon and between 6: 30 PM and 9: 30 PM. The retail
store operates from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday through
Saturday.
I
5.
61 off-street parking spaces are proposed for the subject
property as shown on the site plan submitted by the applicants
dated April 27, 1989. The applicants have submitted an
I
I
I
217
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
7.
amended site plan dated May 24, 1989, which shows 69 off-
street parking spaces. The applicants state that there are
presently 48 off-street parking spaces existing on the
property. There is currently a paved parking area. to the west
and south of the bowling center; the parking area to the south
of the center would be eliminated by the proposE~d miniature
golf course. A portion of the area to the north of the
bowling center is also available for parking, although this
area is currently not paved nor are parking spaces marked.
On-street parking spaces are available on the portion of
Jefferson Street located to the south of the subjeGt property.
The applicants propose to excavate land on the northeast
portion of the subject property and develop parking along the
northern portion of the site, as shown in thE~ site plan
submitted by the applicants on April 27,1989.
Section 17.28.080 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code lists
the required number of off-street parking spaces for various
uses. There is no off-street parking requiremen1: listed for
a miniature golf course. Section 17.28.050 of the zoning code
states that when a use is not specifically mentioned in
Chapter 17.28, the board of adjustment (City Council) shall
determine off-street parking requirements.
8.
Because the bowling center and the retail store were
established prior to the enactment of the zoningr code, off-
street parking requirements do not apply to the existing uses.
If, however, these uses were established today, the parking
requirement would be as follows;
Use
Bowling Alley/12 lanes
Restaurant/l,OOO SF
Retail/l,OOO SF
TOTAL SPACES
Requirement
8 spaces per alley
1 space per 200 SF
1 space per 300 SF
Spaces
96
5
~
104
parking
9.
Data from the 1987 parking Generation manual prepared by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers show that bowling
centers at peak capacity require, on average, 4.36 off-street
parking spaces per lane. No such data are available for
miniature golf courses. The manual states tha"t:, based on
limited samples, that peak period demand for bowling centers
was weekday evenings, and that peak demand for miniature golf
courses was late afternoon and early evening. A survey of
three other communi ties' parking requirements re:vealed that
Port Angeles requires six parking spaces per bowling lane;
Auburn requires five spaces; and Bellingham requires four
spaces. Bellingham's code was the only one surveyed which
specifically mentioned miniature golf facilities; the
requirement is one parking space provided per hole.
Accordingly, it appears that the Port Townsend zoning code
overstates the expected peak parking demand j:or bowling
alleys. Using the Parking Generation manual estimate, the
expected peak parking demand for the bowling alley center
would be 52 spaces (4.36 parking spaces per lane with 12
lanes). Assuming a peak parking demand for the miniature golf
course of one space per hole, the total parking dE!mand of the
site may be estimated as follows:
Use Requirement Parking
Bowling Alley/12 lanes 4.36 spaces per alley
Miniature Golf/1ß~øles 1 ~PAq~ p~~ hole
Restaurant/l,OOO SF 1 space per 200 SF
Retail/l,OOO SF 1 space per 300 SF
TOTAL SPACES
Spaces
48
18
5
J
78
218
10.
11.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
As 60 off-street parking spaces are proposed, the expected
peak parking deficit would be approximately 9 spaces with the
miniature golf course. Overflow parking currently occurs
during peak periods primarily across Kearney street at Great
Northwest Bank.
The subject property is approximately 150 feet north of Sims
Way, the major thoroughfare providing access in and out of the
ci ty . Kearney Street feeds into sims Way. Both Kearney
Street and Sims Way are designated as arterial streets in the
Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan. Ingress and egress to and
from the subject property is currently provided by driveways
from Kearney Street. The applicants propose an ingress/egress
point from Kearney Street at the northwest portion of the
site, and two separate ingress and egress points to the north
of the proposed miniature golf facility. Platted Franklin
Street, which abuts the subject property to the north, is
currently undeveloped. Jefferson Street, which abuts the site
to the south, is graded; however, the location of the proposed
use would inhibit access to the site from Jefferson Street.
I
The applicants state that the bowling center is primarily a
nighttime activity, while the proposed use would be primarily
a daytime activity. The applicants state that the two uses
would compliment each other with regard to parking
requirements, and that peak parking demand for the proposed
miniature golf facility would be during the off-season for
bowling, which is May 1 through August 25. The applicants
have submitted an activity schedule which shows that league
bowling activity would overlap with the proposed miniature
golf facility on Sunday evenings between 6:00 PM and 8:00 PM
during the summer, and between noon and 1:00 PM on Saturdays
and 6: 30 PM and 8: 30 PM on Sundays during the fall, winter and
spring.
I
Conclusions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The proposed use would be operating at some of the same times
as the other existing uses on the subject property.
Furthermore, late afternoons and evenings may be peak hours
for both the bowling center and the proposed use. It is
expected that a shortage of approximately 9 parking spaces
will occur during peak periods.
The proposed use, if developed under the conditions specified
herein, will not endanger the public health or safety, nor
will a nuisance be created.
The proposed use will be required to meet all of the
conditions and specifications set forth in the C-II zone in
which the property is located, excepting those legal, non-
conforming conditions which presently exist.
The proposed use, developed under the conditions specified
herein, will no be injurious or detrimental to adjoining or
abutting property.
The subject property is' located in an area zoned for
commercial land uses, and is surrounded by commercial
development. Therefore, the location and character of the
use, developed under the conditions specified herein, will be
in harmony with the area in which it is located and will be
in general conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.
I
In consideration of the aforementioned findings and conclusions,
the City Council adopts the above referenced application as
conditioned:
I
I
6.
219
. i
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20, 1989, Cont.
1.
Ingress and egress to and from the site shall be I::onfined to
two driveways from Kearney Street, instead of the three shown
in the applicants' site plan. The proposed separate ingress
and egress points proposed by the appl icants l>etween the
existing retail store and Jefferson Street shall be combined
to one common point of ingress/egress which shall be located
no closer than 75 feet from platted Jefferson Street.
Driveways from Kearney Street shall be clearly defined and be
no less than 24 feet wide.
2.
18 off-street parking spaces shall be established for the
proposed use in accordance with the specifications set forth
in Chapter 17.28 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code.
If no paving and striping is used in the parking areas,
definite markings of each parking space shall be done in
accordance with section 17.28.090 (1) of the Port Townsend
Municipal Code.
3.
4.
Landscaping shall be included as part of the final parking lot
design, particularly along Kearney and Franklin streets.
5.
Prior to July 6,1989, the applicant shall obtain approval of
the City council of a specific site plan which shall be
substantially the same as the site plan submitted on May 24,
1989, with modifications in conformance with the conditions
set forth herein, and with the addition of a landscaping and
lighting plan and all pertinent dimensions in conformance with
Chapter 17.28, Off-Street Parking, of the Port Townsend
Municipal Code.
If a building permit or occupancy permit is not obtained for
the subject property within one year from the date of the
board's decision, the conditional use permit shall be
cancelled and automatically become null and void.
Proclamation. Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna read a proclamation for the week
of June 19 to 25, 1989, as Amateur Radio Week.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Community services. Councilmember Chang reported that the
Homelessness Task Force will present their report on ,July 11, 1989,
at 3:00 PM at the Community Center.
city Attorney. Mr Harper explained the reason for Ordinance No
2157 is in response to a request for a shorter extension of lines
than currently required under certain circumstances.
I
ORDINANCE NO 2157
AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING IN CERTAIN Cl~SES
SHORTER EXTENSIONS TO THE CITY OF PORT
TOWNSEND'S SEWER SYSTEM AND WATER SYS~~EM;
ESTABLISHING A PROCESS FOR PERMITTING THE SAME
BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR WITH A RIGH~r OF
APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL; AMENDING SEC'rION
1 OF ORDINANCE 1508, AS AMENDED BY SECTION 1
ON ORDINANCE 1980; AMENDING SECTION 6 OF
ORDINANCE 1110, AS AMENDED BY SECTION 3. OF
ORDINANCE 1601 AND SECTION 2 OF ORDINANCE 2062;
AND' ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mr Grove read the ordinance by title. Councilmember McCulloch made
a motion that the first reading be considered the second and the
third be by title only which was seconded by Councilmember Owsley
and passed unanimously by voice vote. Mr Grove again read the
ordinance by title. Councilmember Jones made a motion that the
220
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
Council adopt Ordinance No 2157 which was seconded by Councilmember
McCulloch and passed unanimously by roll call vote after discussion
of the fifteen year time period.
Water/Sewer. Councilmember McCulloch announced that the tour of
the watershed with the National Forest Service will be June 27,
1989, and they will be leaving town at 12: 15 PM. The length of the
tour is 2 to 4 hours.
I
Parks/Property. Councilmember Camfield set a meeting of the
Committee and the Park Board for June 28, 1989, at 5: 00 PM to
discuss the proposal from Paco Mitchell for a bronze statue of
Chief chetzemoka for Chetzemoka Park.
Water/Sewer. Councilmember McCulloch
Committee for June 29, 1989, at 5:00 PM.
set
a
meeting
of
the
Legislative/Environmental. Councilmember Kenna set a meeting of
the Committee for July 5,1989, at 6:30 PM to discuss the transfer
of the Bed and Breakfast Conditional Use Permit from Bunch to
Elofson, the Demick Environmental Checklist, and a proposal for the
sign at the Boardin' House for Sandi Davis.
Police/Fire/Animal Control. Councilmember Clise reported on the
meeting held by the Committee and Bayshore. Updated costs for some
of the recommended items have been requested from Bayshore for the
Animal Shelter. Bayshore will be starting the search for funding
for a new shelter, which is about two to three years down the road
if all goes well.
Councilmember Clise reported on the Committee meeting held to
discuss issues raised in a letter from the Palace Hotel owners.
An ordinance from Montesano was discussed regarding the use of
alcohol by minors and the difficulty enforcing the present laws.
Noise and night problems in the downtown area were discussed at
length. It was suggested that business owners, residents and
property owners might contract with private security to patrol the
area between Sabo's and the Town Tavern on a trial basis between
the hours of 11: 00 PM to 3: 00 AM. Main Street representatives were
asked to check with their constituents to help determine
feasibility.
City Hall Elevator. Mr Grove reported that the elevator in city
Hall will be ready for public use on Monday, June 26,1989.
I
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
ORDINANCE NO 2155
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING, DEFINING "BED
AND BREAKFAST INN", ADDING NEW SECTIONS
17 . 0 8 . 04 3 , 1 7 . 16 . 0 4 0 , AND 17 . 28 . 085 , AND
AMENDING SECTIONS 17.08.240, 17.08.485,
17.16.010,17.28.020,17.28.060, AND 17.64.050
OF THE PORT TOWNSEND MUNICIPAL CODE.
Mr Grove read the ordinance by title and stated that this
consti tutes the third reading of the ordinance. Councilmember
Owsley made a motion that the council adopt Ordinance No 2155 which
was seconded by Councilmember McCulloch and pa~ed unanimously by
roll call vote after discussion of the procedure to call for a
hearing on when complaints have been received.
I
Resolution No 89-42 - Agreement with Jefferson County on the
Community Center. Mr Grove reported that the comments from the
City Attorney have not been shared by Jefferson County as yet and
requested that this be held until the next meeting.
221
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
Resol utions Author i zing Amendments to the Teamster's Contracts.
Mr Grove requested that this be carried over until the next meeting
as he and Mr Harper have not had a chance to meet.
I
NEW BUSINESS
ORDINANCE NO 2158
AN ORDINANCE REZONING LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, ,
INCLUSIVE, OF BLOCK 208, EISENBEIS ADDITION ']~O
THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND, FROM R-I TO R-III;
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CI,]~Y
OF PORT TOWNSEND; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Mr Grove read the ordinance by title. Councilmember McCulloch made
a motion that the council reconsider the motion to adopt Rezone
Application No 8904-01 which was seconded by CouncilIIllember Clise
and passed with six councilmembers voting in the affirmative and
Councilmember Jones voting against. Councilmember Owsley made a
motion that the Council adopt the following findings and
conclusions and deny Rezone Application No 8904-01 which was
seconded by Councilmember Camfield and passed unanimously by voice
vote.
I
I
5.
Findings:
1.
The applicant proposes a rezone of Lots 1-4, Block 208,
Eisenbeis Addition, from R-I to R-III. The area is bounded
by 9th Street to the north, Grant Street to th'9 east, 8th
street to the south, and Lots 5-8, Block 208, to the west.
The subject property is located two blocks west (If Jefferson
General Hospital and two blocks north of the Castle Hill
shopping center. The site is currently vacant. The applicant
proposes to construct two tri-plexes or two four-plexes should
the rezone application is approved.
2.
Block 209, Eisenbeis Addition, which is located to the east
of the subject property, is zoned R-III. The rezone
application, if approved, would have the effect of expanding
this R-III zone. Block 211, Eisenbeis Addition, which is
located to the southeast of the subject property, is zoned R-
II. The remaining property surrounding the subjE!ct property
is zoned R-I.
3.
Block 209 was rezoned from R-I to R-III in March, 1987. The
property is currently vacant and undeveloped. The subject
property is surrounded by single-family residential
development to the north, west, and south. Single-family
residences are located on Lots 7 and 8, Block 208; Lots 5 and
6, Block 208, are currently vacant.
4.
section 17.16.010 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code outlines
the purposes of each zoning district in the City of Port
Townsend. The purpose of the R-I zoning district, which is
the present zoning designation of the subject property, is
defined as "Exclusively a single-family residence district
with adequate plat areas required and including the customary
accessory and secondary uses." The purpose of the R-III
zoning district, which is the proposed zoning designation of
the site, is defined as "primarily a multiple family residence
district with adequate plot areas required and inc:luding some
single-family residences and the customary ac(:essory and
secondary uses.
There are currently 16.3 acres of land in Port Tmvnsend which
are zoned R-III. A land use survey undertaken of these areas
indicates that 4.5 acres of the R-I~II land is developed as
222
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
multi-family housing. Another 4.9 acres are currently
undeveloped; however, approximately 2 acres of the undeveloped
land would be difficult to develop due to severe slopes. The
remaining portion of the R-III land is developed as single
family residential.
6.
The Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan presents several
performance and locational standards for the siting of multi-
family housing. The Plan states that multi-family housing
should be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood; that
it should be located to minimize traffic generation; that it
should provide screened off-street parking; that it should be
restricted from being utilized as a buffer between other land
uses; that is should be located in such a manner to preserve
views; that it should be restricted from designated sensitive
areas; that it should be located in areas with sui table
drainage, slopes, soils and utilities; and that is should be
located so as to have a minimum negative impact on adjacent
and surrounding areas.
I
7.
Section 17.16.010 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code lists
the uses which are permitted in the various zoning districts.
The uses which are allowed in the R-III zoning district, as
either permitted or conditional uses, which are not allowed
in the R-I zoning district are listed as follows:
Permitted
Conditional
Apothecary shop operated
within a hospital, clinic
or physicians' office
Apartment house
Catering establishments
conducted as an incidental
home occupation
Clinics
Dwelling, two family
Incidental keeping of
non-transient boarders
by a resident family
Signs
Dwelling, multi-family
Hotels not catering to
transient guests
Libraries, museums, art
galleries
Lodges, social organizations
Tourist homes, seasonal
Trailer camps
Undertaking establishments,
mortuaries, funeral homes
I
The City Council is currently considering an ordinance
amending the zoning code to provide a definition and
guidelines for bed and breakfast inns. Should the ordinance
be passed in its present form, bed and breakfast inns and
tourist homes would also be permitted in the R-III zoning
district.
8.
Block 208, Eisenbeis Addition, is served by three opened
streets: 8th, 9th, and Grant. The platted right-of-way of
these streets is 66 feet. 9th Street has a paved width of
approximately 18 feet; 8th and Grant Streets are not paved,
and have a graded width of approximately 14 feet. City water
mains are currently located in Grant and 9th Streets abutting
the subject property. There are no sewer mains abutting the
subject property; sewer mains are presently located in Grant
Street to the north and south of the subject property.
Development of subject property would require extension of the
sewer line.
I
9.
The applicant states that rental units in Port Townsend are
in short supply, and that there is an increasing demand for
units with one-to-two bedrooms. The applicant also maintains
that the site would be appropriate for multi-family housing
due to its proximity to the Jefferson county Hospital and the
Castle Hill shopping center.
10.
I
11.
223
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
In an informal telephone survey, realtors who are familiar
with the rental housing market in Port Townsend expressed the
opinion that rental housing in Port Townsend is in short
supply.
The city Council has issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance, dated May 2, 1989, after review of the
Environmental Checklist submitted by the applicant pursuant
to the Washington state Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The
checklist was submitted for the rezone action, Jbut no site
plan for any proposed development has been submitted by the
applicant. Should the rezone be approved, any residential
development of greater than four dwelling units would require
SEPA review.
Conclusions:
1.
2.
3.
I
4.
5.
The applicant states that a demand exists for relittal housing
in Port Townsend. The applicant has not submitted data
supporting this conclusion, nor presented evidence or facts
to justify the proposed zoning change.
The property abutting three sides of the subject property is
zoned R-I. The development surrounding the subje!ct property
is predominantly single-family residential detached dwellings.
Therefore, the proposed rezone would single out at small area
for a use different and inconsistent with the surrounding
zoning and land uses of the abutting properties.
There is presently land zoned R-III directly adjalcent to the
subject property in which the proposed use could be located.
This land is currently vacant.
The proposed zoning change would result in one half of a Block
208 being zoned for multi-family housing and the other half
being zoned for single-family housing. Two single-family
dwellings are currently located on the western portion of
Block 208. Therefore, the proposed zoning change would not
be consistent with the present zoning and land uses of the
surrounding area.
The applicants have not demonstrated that housing and
demographic conditions have changed to the extent that zoning
of the subject property should be changed from single family
to multiple family.
In consideration of the afore-mentioned findings and conclusions,
the City Council denies the above-referenced application.
Ordinance No 2146 -Allev Vacation.
until the fees have all been paid.
This ordinance watS continued
w
I
Flood Damaae Ordinance. Mr stricklin expl~tp~9 1:h~'~ tþ.,~ S1:~te
requires a flood damage prevention ordinance in order to maintain
flood insurance and this ordinance is an update to our present
ordinance. This ordinance was held until the next meei:ing to give
Mr Harper time to review it.
COUNCILMEMBERS GENERAL DISCUSSION
Bed and Breakfast ComDlaint. Councilmember Clise suçrgested that
the complaint be given to staff for analysis. It was the consensus
of the Council that this should be done.
224
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 20,1989, Cont.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna recessed the meeting into Executive Session at
11:55 PM to discuss property acquisition. The meeting reconvened
at 12:15 AM.
ADJOURNMENT
I
There being no further business, Mayor Pro-Tem Kenna declared the
meeting adjourned at 12:15 AM.
M\'c~ \ ~
Mayor Pro-Tem
Attest:
ß~~
Clerk-Treasurer
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JULY 5,1989
The city Council of the City of Port Townsend met in regular
session this fifth day of July, 1989, at 7:30 PM, in the Council
Chambers of city Hall, Mayor Brent Shirley presiding.
ROLL CALL tPJl.oJv
Councilmembers present at roll call were Jean Camfield, Karen ~~~ I
Chang, John Clise, Vern Jones, Mike Kenna and Norma Owsley. Also
present were Clerk-Treasurer David Grove, Public Works Director
Ted stricklin, City Attorney Keith Harper and Executive
Administrative Assistant/Planner Michael Hildt.
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Jones made a motion to approve the following items
on the Consent Agenda which was seconded by Councilmember Owsley
and passed unanimously by voice vote.
Approval of the minutes for June 20,1989, as written without
reading.
Approval of the following Bills and Claims:
Current Expense
Street
Library
Library Construction
Park
Fire Equipment
Emergency Medical Services
capital Improvements (Elevator)
Community Development Block Grant
Water-Sewer
Storm Drainage
Equipment Rental
Firemen's Pension and Relief
Total
$ 46,846.40
309.36
3,429.75
930.56
987.97
4,081.05
298.92
4,106.28
12,934.48
60,712.52
11,887.14
13,023.06
809.89
$160,357.38
I
Communications:
A let~ dated June 13,1989, from Evan Jones, State
Repre~tative, to Mayor Shirley, thanking him for his message
regarddng the gas tax and including a comment that there is also
"