Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout081326 Special Session PTAC Agenda Port Townsend Special Session Arts Commission Advisory Board City Hall- Council Chambers 540 Water Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 and Virtually Attend in person or virtually via computer or tablet at https://zoom.us/j/98925253431?pwd=Npd9zmvb2wR4qnSIbcKgpPKxIb1K9h.1 Webinar ID # 989 2525 3431 Join by phone, please use number 253-215-8782, and meeting id number 98925253431# Submit public comment emails to be included in the meeting record to: https://publiccomment.fillout.com/cityofpt If you are experiencing technical difficulties, please attempt all methods listed above before reporting any issues to: clerksupport@cityofpt.us AGENDA Date August 13, 2026 3:00pm Time ___________________________________________________________________ of this Commission is to advise City Government in order to facilitate public arts programs that enhance the cultural life of community residents, promote, and encourage programs that further the development and public awareness of, as well as the interest in all forms of the arts. The Arts Commission also works to strengthen artists' opportunities, visibility, and vitality within our community. "This meeting is open to the public at the City Council Chambers both in person and virtually via the Internet. The meeting is recorded for future reference. Public comments, limited to three minutes per person, are welcome during the period noted on the agenda. Please see the top of the agenda document for instructions to join the meeting virtually or to submit written I. Call to Order/ Roll Call II. Changes to the Agenda III. Approval of Minutes June 4, 2026, and July 2, 2026 IV. Public Comment (3 minutes per comment) V. Staff and Chair Updates a. Chair Update (Doug) b. Treasurer Update (Melanie) !¬¤±¨¢ ­² ¶¨³§ $¨² ¡¨«¨³¨¤² !¢³ In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodation for this meeting -5083. c. Staff Update (Katy) VI. Old Business a. Committee Reports i. Public Art 1. Update on Street Painting Code from Austin Watkins ii. Grants 1. Committee Recommendations for 2026/2027 iii. Art Awards 1. Award Design and Fabrication Artist recommendation iv. Poet Laureate 1. 2026 check in and 2027 planning VII. New Business (4:00-5:00) a. Response to budget request from City Manager b. PTAC development branding, recruitment, policies and procedures VIII. Set agenda for next meeting a. Grant Funding IX. Adjourn !¬¤±¨¢ ­² ¶¨³§ $¨² ¡¨«¨³¨¤² !¢³ In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodation for this meeting -5083. Minutes of the Port Townsend Special Session Arts Commission Meeting of June 4,2026 LOCATION: In-person at City Council Chambers and Remote : Dan Groussman,DougCaskey, Christine WalshRogers, Dana Nelson,Heidi Tullmann, Joshua Saunders, Melanie Muszynski, Sheena Uritzand Simon Lynge STAFF PRESENT:City Attorney Austin Watkins, Culture Coordinator Katy Goodman, and City Clerk Alyssa Rodrigues Board Liaison: Libby Wennstrom Community Members:Silva, Eden Blooms, Gillian Amas, Vicky Blakesley, Elizabeth Becker, Laura Newman, Leigh Hearon, Kelsey Caudebec, Daniel Micalone, Scott Braman, Joseph Gish, TopicMotions/Recommendation/Action Call to Order Chair Doug Caskeycalledthe meeting to order at 3:03pm. Approval of Agenda Commissioner WalshRogers moved to approve the agenda. Commissioner Lyngeseconded. Motion passed unanimously. Public Comment There was no public comment for this meeting. Staff and Chair Updates Doug Caskeymentioned the letter from the mayor about the workplan. Katy Goodmanmentioned the skate park mural process,and free movie screening. Austin Watkinsspoke about an updatedgrant sponsorship applicationand the threshold for 1099. Commissioners discussed insurance, and the mural applications. Grant Applications Staff and Commissioners listened and asked questions. Discussion ensued about the grant applicants. Commissioner Walsh Rogersmotioned to fully fund the Jefferson Teen Center anduse the remaining fundsfor the remaining applicants. Commissioner Muszynskiseconded. Commissioners discussed the motion. Commissioner Uritz motioned to table Commissioner Walsh Rogers earlier motion. Commissioner Walsh Rogersseconded. The group continued thediscussion.Commissioner Walsh Rogers withdrew her motion.CommissionerCaskeymotioned to recommend grants for Sequim City Bandof $ 500.00, PT Summer Bandof $700.00, PT Community Print Shopof TopicMotions/Recommendation/Action $800.00, Concerts in the Barnof $1000.00, Daniel Micalone of $250.00, PT Rock n' Roll Marching Bandof $250.00, Olympic Folk Foundationfor $1000.00, and Olympickin'of $500.00. Commissioner Walsh Rogersseconded. Motion passed unanimously. Set Agenda for Next Meeting: July 2, 2026 Workplan responds Adjourn This meeting adjourned at 5:05pm. Minutes of the Port Townsend Special Session Arts Commission Meeting of July 2,2026 LOCATION: In-person at City Council Chambers and Remote : Dan Groussman,DougCaskey, Christine WalshRogers, Dana Nelson,Heidi Tullmann, Joshua Saunders, Melanie Muszynski, Sheena Uritzand Simon Lyngewereabsent. STAFF PRESENT:Community Services Director, Melody Sky Weaver, Facilities and Parks Manager,Michael Todd, Arts& Culture Coordinator Katy Goodman, and Deputy City Clerk Lonnie Mickle Board Liaison: Libby Wennstrom Community Members: TopicMotions/Recommendation/Action Call to Order Chair Doug Caskeycalledthe meeting to order at 3:00pm. Approval of Agenda Commissioner Joshua Saundersmoved to approve the agenda. Commissioner Christine Walsh Rogersseconded. Motion passed unanimously. Approval of Minutes for May 7, 2026 Commissioner Dan Groussmanmoved to approve the amended minutes. Commissioner Joshua Saunders seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Public Comment There was no public comment for this meeting. Staff and Chair Updates Doug Caskeyreviewed the statement of purpose for the Commissioners. Commissioner Walsh Rogersmotioned to accept the statement for the Arts Commission. Commissioner Muszynskiseconded. Motion passed unanimously.Katy Goodman and Commissioner Muszynski Discussion ensued about the funds in the budget. Commissioners Caskeyand Walsh Rogerssaid they would be interested in attending a Creative District meeting. Discussionensued about the Creative district, different projects around the city, and grants. Old Business Staff and Commissioners discussed the selection of the grant for the Skate Park Mural and thecitycommunity that use the park. Commissioner Groussman made a motion that PTAC recommended artist Jesse Joshua Watson to the City Council for the skate park mural. Commissioner Walsh TopicMotions/Recommendation/Action Rogers seconded. Motion passed 5 to 1 with Commissioner Saunders abstaining. The Commissioners and Staff discussed grant meetings, the 2026Artsawards,and the Poet Laureate program. New Business Commissioners and staff letter, the City Council retreat,theworkplan,this goals, the creative district and LodgingTax Advisory Committeecollaboration,the Public Arts Plan, economic benefits, and art festivals. Commissioner Caskeymoved to forward to the City Council the fourbullet pointson the 2027 the Port Townsend Creative District and the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee so that together these City programs can collaborate....". Commissioner Groussmanseconded. Motion passed unanimously.The Commissioners and Staff then discussed the state arts education supportfor small school districts, how to get support for the program, and the . Member Update Commissioners discussed projects they have seen around the world and locally, library programs, the Oregon County fair, and the summer reading program. Set Agenda for Next Meeting: August 6, 2026 Internal processes, recruitment and OPMA Adjourn This meeting adjourned at 4:57pm. City of Port Townsend Arts Commission (PTAC) 2026 Meeting Schedule City of Port Townsend Arts Commission Mission Statement The Arts Commission's mission as an appointed City Commission is to facilitate public arts programs that enhance the cultural life of community residents.! Overview This document is a flexible summary of the annual approach to PTAC meetings in 2026 and the st development of the PTAC budget. PTAC meets on 1 Thursdays, from 3:00-5:00PM. The development of the PTAC budget is part of the development of the City of Port Townsend budget, and resides in the General Fund, with contributions as approved by City Council each year. This process begins nearly six months before the start of the subsequent year and includes state-mandated statutory milestones and deadlines. 1. January Program Planning Part 1: 2026 Grant Criteria & Art Awards Discussion of grant program specifics, including application, criteria, and any marketing or public education opportunities. 2. February Program Planning Part 2: Annual Arts Awards and Public Art Confirm Art Award winners and plans for ceremony. Discuss revisions/updates to Public Art Plan Policies and Procedures. 3. March Quarterly Grant Funding; Launch 2027 Art Award Nominations 4. April Poet Laureate Visit and Mural Policy Visit and update with Poet Laureate. Mural policy updates and review. 5. May Workplan Strategic Session PTAC receives request from Mayor/City Manager to PTAC (and all City advisory boards) for workplan items and preliminary budget request. PTAC reviews progress on the 2026 workplan, strategizes on multi-year initiatives and the 2027 workplan, and considers priorities for next fiscal year in order to suggest a preliminary PTAC workplan. 6. June Quarterly Grant Funding 7. July Mid Year Review and Budget Strategic Session PTAC discusses all 2026 programs and makes mid-year assessments. Discussion on budget to pair with workplan and submits a recommendation to staff and City Council in advance of a decision on the preliminary City budget. (City Council may choose to approve/incorporate or may send the recommendation back to PTAC for further discussion). 8. August PTAC Operations and Development Review internal processes, brand identity, recruitment, etc; Refresh on OPMA Rules 9. September Quarterly Grant Funding 10. October Poet Laureate Visit, Art Awards and 2027 Grant Planning Visit and update with Poet Laureate. Art Award nominations status and planning for 2027 Ceremony; 2027 grant deadlines and updates to grants program 11. November 1% for the Arts and Public Art Plan Review Invitation to Public Works Director to discuss possible 1% eligible projects in Capital Facilities Plan. Annual review of Public Art Plan. 12. December Annual Review. PTAC reviews the 2026 workplan, reviews 2026 granting data and budget expenditures, plans annual meeting schedule, and ties up loose ends in discussion. Board and Commission Priorities 2026 - Policy Recommendations to Council: 1. Artistic Mural code recommendation to Council 2. Update of Art in Public Places Policies and Procedures recommendation to Council 3. 1% for the Arts status update and possible projects ARTS COMMISSION (9 max.) Council Liaison: Libby Wennstrom Meets 3:00pm 1st Thursday at City Hall Pos. Name Exp. Simon Lynge 5/1/29 1 Dana Nelson 5/1/29 2 Melanie 5/1/29 3 Muszynski Heidi Tullman 5/1/27 4 Joshua Saunders 5/1/28 5 6 Sheena Uritz 5/1/28 Christine Walsh 5/1/27 7 Rogers Dan Groussman 5/1/28 8 Doug Caskey 5/1/27 9 Staff Memorandum From: Austin Watkins, City Attorney To: Arts Commission Date: August 6, 2026 Subject: Proposed Updates to Chapter 12.11 PTMC (Street Painting Code) Summary The City Attorney’s Office (CAO) recommends changes to Chapter 12.11 PTMC (Street Painting Code) to reinforce that permanent or semi-permanent street, sidewalk and intersection paintings, and decorative crosswalk installations are public art installations. Street paintings are a form of City (government) speech and City Council retains editorial control of street paintings thru final approval of proposals, after a recommendation by the Arts Commission and Historic Preservation Committee (if applicable). The CAO is bringing the proposed changes to Chapter 12.11 PTMC to the Arts Commission as an informational briefing prior to presentation to City Council. Background On February 1, 2021, the City enacted Ordinance 3260 which established the Street Painting Code. Prior to Ordinance 3260, the City did not have an enacted code establishing a process for the installation of permanent or semi-permanent street, sidewalk and intersection paintings, and decorative crosswalk installations. However, the City’s Art in Public Spaces Policy had an established framework for City sponsored installations. Ordinance 3260 established that street paintings must: Be permitted by the City, with approval by City Council after recommendation by the Arts Commission and Historic Preservation Committee (if applicable); Established approval criteria; Clarified that streets are not a “public forum”; Required that street paintings shall not interfere with traffic safety or the public’s use of streets; and, Authorized the removal of street paintings installed without a permit or when they present a traffic safety or public works issue. Ordinance 3260 was established in response to various street paintings proposals from 2020, including a Black Lives Matter mural (approved by City Council) and a Blue Lives Matter (not approved by City Council). Under the City’s Art in Public Places Policy and Procedure (2007), street paintings are “public artwork”. The Policy applies to all public artwork located on publicly owned property, which includes streets and rights-of-way. The Policy has a process for City initiated artwork or the acceptance of artwork as a gift – either of these procedures may be used for street paintings (either city sponsored or community sponsored). There may be amendments needed to the Policy to fully harmonize Chapter 12.11 and the Policy. Proposed Amendments The proposed amendments reinforce that permanent or semi-permanent street, sidewalk and intersection paintings, and decorative crosswalk installations are public art installations; that street paintings are a form of City (government) speech; that street paintings must comply with the City’s Art in Public Places Policy and Procedure; and that City Council retains editorial control of street paintings thru final approval of proposals, after a recommendation by the Arts Commission and Historic Preservation Committee (if applicable). The remainder of this memo focuses on PTMC 12.11.040 (approval criteria). Below is the adopted code compared to the proposed code amendments: 12.11.040 Approval Criteria. (Existing) The city does not intend a street, sidewalk, or intersection painting or a community-designed crosswalk to be a legal “public forum” and therefore reserves the right to control the art displayed on all city property, including painting or other art installations on city streets and sidewalks. The city reserves the right to deny a street painting permit application or to remove a street, sidewalk, or intersection painting or community-designed crosswalk if it depicts: A. Violent images. B. Sexually graphic images. C. Religious symbols or desecration of the same. D. Hatred of persons or groups of people. E. Support for or opposition to a candidate or initiative on the ballot. F. Advertisement for a good or service for sale. G. Imagery that may be inappropriate to maintain in or upon public property because it so objectionable under contemporary community standards that it is reasonably foreseeable to result in harm to, disruption of, or interference with the public’s use of city property. 12.11.040 Approval Guidelines for Street Paintings. (Proposed) The City does not intend a street, sidewalk, or intersection painting or a community-designed decorative crosswalk to be a legal “public forum” or “limited forum”. The City controls the permanent or semi- permanent art displayed City streets and sidewalks as the City is expressing its own speech or messages. A. When reviewing an application under this chapter, City staff, the Arts Commission, Historic Preservation Committee (if applicable), and the City Council shall consider whether the proposal: 1. Positively promotes and enhance public spaces; 2. Is consistent with the character and values of the community; and, 3. Adds to the unique vibrancy of the city. B. When reviewing an application under this chapter, City staff, the Arts Commission, Historic Preservation Committee (if applicable), and the City Council shall consider whether the proposal includes: 1. Violent images; 2. Sexually graphic images; 3. Religious symbols or desecration of the same; 4. Hatred of persons or groups of people; 5. Support for or opposition to a candidate or initiative on the ballot; and, 6. Advertisement for a good or service for sale. C. The City Council shall deny proposals that are not in the best interest of the City. The City Council should deny proposals that include any elements of subsection B or includes imagery that may be inappropriate to maintain in or upon public property because it so objectionable under contemporary community standards that it is reasonably foreseeable to result in harm to, disruption of, or interference with the public’s use of City property. Legal Background PTMC 12.11.040, as enacted, limits the City Council’s approval authority to the listed criteria. As explained below, permanent and semi-permanent street paintings on City streets and sidewalks are public artwork. Street paintings are City (government) speech and the City Council may authorize only its viewpoints when approving public artwork, including street painting. Put another way, the City Council may engage in viewpoint discrimination when approving or denying a street painting application, as it is a form of government speech. The proposed amendments clarify this and gives the City Council better direction on how to decide on street painting applications. First Amendment – Public Forums and Government Speech Under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment, as well as the Washington Constitution, government regulation of private speech on public property is broken down into three categories: (1) traditional public forums; (2) limited public forums; and (3) nonpublic forums. A public forum is government property that has been intentionally or historically opened for expressive activities by certain groups or for certain topics (e.g., public square that is historically used for various types of speech or protests). Under all three of these scenarios, the government may not engage in viewpoint discrimination of speech. For public forums, the regulation must be content neutral and only regulate time, place, and manner, while not promoting one viewpoint over another. However, when the government speaks for itself, there is a “government speech” exception allowing the government to select the views it wants to express, and it is not required to maintain viewpoint neutrality. This doctrine recognizes that the government must be able to speak for itself in order to function and carry out its policies. There is substantial case law on determining whether the government speech exception applies to certain scenarios and courts apply a holistic inquiry to determine whether the government intends to speak for itself or to regulate private expression – if it intends to regulate private expression on public property, the regulation generally must be viewpoint neutral. The three-part test in determining if the government speech exception applies is: (1) the history of expression at issue; (2) the public’s likely perception as to who (the government or a private person) is speaking; and (3) the extent to which the government has actively shaped or controlled the expression. Shurtleff v. City of Boston, Massachusetts, 596 U.S. 243, 252, 142 S. Ct. 1583, 1590, 212 L. Ed. 2d 621 (2022). For example, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia found the government speech exception applied when the District of Columbia government approved a Black Lives Matter street mural because the government maintained editorial control over the street mural. Small Bus. in Transp. Coal. v. Bowser, 610 F. Supp. 3d 149, 155 (D.D.C. 2022), aff'd, 22-7102, 2023 WL 2770986 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 4, 2023); See also Raymond v. City of New York, 715 F. Supp. 3d 402, 411 (E.D.N.Y. 2024) (holding that government-directed street murals were government speech because city streets were closely identified in the public mind with the government unit that owned them and that the city took ownership of the murals by displaying them on streets it owned and managed). Applying the three-part test above to the issue of street paintings in the City, it is the CAO’s position that street paintings under Chapter 12.11 PTMC are government speech as: (1) The history of expression at issue; CAO Analysis: The City has historically approved street paintings that are consistent with community held values, such as the 2020 Black Lives Matters street mural, 2026 Farmers Market street mural, and 2026 hán Trail Walk street markings while denying others that are inconsistent with community held values. This indicates that the City has maintained editorial control over street paintings. There is no history of individuals installing permanent or semi- permanent street paintings without City editorial control. (2) The public’s likely perception as to who (the government or a private person) is speaking; and, CAO Analysis: City streets have historically been controlled by the City, including expression physically on City streets. For example, the City regulates the types of messaging physically allowed on streets (e.g., street signs and markings). The public would likely perceive permanent or semi-permanent street markings, including murals, to be government, not private speech. (3) The extent to which the government has actively shaped or controlled the expression. CAO Analysis: The City has maintained editorial control over permanent or semi-permanent street paintings, markings, and murals. The City has had regulations in place since 2021, including approval criteria. The City has voiced its input on the content, design, and location of street paintings. Summary The proposed changes clarify that permanent or semi-permanent street paintings are public artwork, that street paintings are City (government) speech, and give the City Council more editorial control over proposals, by changing the approval criteria to approval guidelines and proposing other clean up edits ensuring that the proposals are consistent with community held values and are in the best interests of the City. Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance 3368 with line in / line out amendments to Chapter 12.11 PTMC. 2. Art in Public Places Policy (2007). Port Townsend Municipal Code Page1/3 Chapter 12.11 STREET USE PERMITS – STREET PAINTING ALL DISTRICTS Chapter 12.11 STREET USE PERMITS – STREET PAINTING ALL DISTRICTS Sections: 12.11.010 Intent. 12.11.020 Applicability – Permit required. 12.11.030 Street painting permit approval. 12.11.040 Approval criteria. 12.11.050 Removal and maintenance. 12.11.010 Intent. The purpose of this chapter is to establish a process for City review and approval of permanent or semi-permanent street, sidewalk and intersection paintings, and decorative crosswalk installations that Painting on city streets and sidewalks should positively promote and enhance public spaces including the character and values of the community while and adding to the unique vibrancy of Port Townsend. Paintings on the street and sidewalks should shall not negatively affect traffic safety or interfere with the traveling public’s use of cCity streets and sidewalks. (Ord. 3260 § 1 (Exh. A), 2021). 12.11.020 Applicability – Permit required. This chapter establishes the process for City review and approval of pertains to allowing street, sidewalk, and intersection paintings, and decorative and community-designed crosswalks in all districts in the Ccity. It applies to all City right-of-way and City owned or leased real property. It does not pertain to any painting or markings applied by the cCity or state for traffic safety or traffic control or to any street, sidewalk and intersection paintings and community-designed decorative crosswalks drawn in chalk or other medium that may be removed with the nonpressurized application of water. No permanent or semi-permanent installation regulated by this chapter person or group of people may be installed on any City right-of-way, street, sidewalk, or and intersection paintings or community-designed crosswalks in the city without first obtaining a permit from the cCity pursuant to the process and requirements in this chapter. This chapter provides the exclusive method for obtaining approval of uses that are regulated by this chapter. The city reserves the right to remove any street painting that is installed without a permit (Ord. 3260 § 1 (Exh. A), 2021). 12.11.030 Street painting permit approval. A. The pPublic wWorks director (or designee) will, in consultation with the aArts cCommission, develop an permit application and process for street, sidewalk, and intersection paintings, and community-designed decorative crosswalks. The application and approval process shall be consistent with City policy for Art in Public Places, as amended. The aArts cCommission will review proposed street, sidewalk and intersection paintings, and community- designeddecorativecrosswalks for consistency with this chapter and will make recommendations to the cCity cCouncil, which will have final approval of any street, sidewalk and intersection paintings, or community-designed decorative crosswalks that are consistent with this chapter and public safety. Street, sidewalk, and intersection paintings, or decorative crosswalks located on or within cCity right-of-way or City owned or leased real property is City (government) speech and the City expressing its own speech and messages. B. For street, sidewalk, and intersection paintings or community-designed decorative crosswalks proposed for installation in an area subject to design or historic preservation review, the cCity will process the installation through the cCity’s historic preservation review or design review process. The aArts cCommission and the hHistoric pPreservation cCommittee may meet together to discuss the permit application. C. Holders of street painting permits will coordinate with the cChief of pPolice (or designee) for any needed street closures in order to ensure the safe installation. D. The cCity may require that a street painting permit holder indemnify the cCity. E. The cCity cCouncil decision to approve or deny a street painting permit is final. (Ord. 3260 § 1 (Exh. A), 2021). Port Townsend Municipal Code Page2/3 Chapter 12.11 STREET USE PERMITS – STREET PAINTING ALL DISTRICTS 12.11.040 Approval Guidelines for Street Paintings criteria. The cCity does not intend a street, sidewalk, or intersection painting or a community-designeddecorative crosswalk to be a legal “public forum” or “limited forum”. and therefore The City reserves the right to controls the permanent or semi-permanent art displayed on all city property, including painting or other art installations on cCity streets and sidewalks as the City is expressing its own speech or messages. The city reserves the right to deny a street painting permit application or to remove a street, sidewalk, or intersection painting or community-designed crosswalk if it depicts: A. When reviewing an application under this chapter, City staff, the Arts Commission, Historic Preservation Committee (if applicable), and the City Council shall consider whether the proposal: 1. Positively promotes and enhance public spaces; 2. Is consistent with the character and values of the community; and, 3. Adds to the unique vibrancy of the city. B. When reviewing an application under this chapter, City staff, the Arts Commission, Historic Preservation Committee (if applicable), and the City Council shall consider whether the proposal includes: 1. Violent images; 2. Sexually graphic images; 3. Religious symbols or desecration of the same; 4. Hatred of persons or groups of people; 5. Support for or opposition to a candidate or initiative on the ballot; and, 6. Advertisement for a good or service for sale. C. The City Council shall deny proposals that are not in the best interest of the City. The City Council should deny proposals that include any elements of subsection B or includes imagery that may be inappropriate to maintain in or upon public property because it so objectionable under contemporary community standards that it is reasonably foreseeable to result in harm to, disruption of, or interference with the public’s use of cCity property. (Ord. 3260 § 1 (Exh. A), 2021). A. Violent images. B. Sexually graphic images. C. Religious symbols or desecration of the same. D. Hatred of persons or groups of people. E. Support for or opposition to a candidate or initiative on the ballot. F. Advertisement for a good or service for sale. 12.11.050 Removal and maintenance. Once installed, the street, sidewalk, or intersection painting or community-designed decorative crosswalk is the property of the cCity, which may remove it without notice if the painting is placed without approval or maintained contrary to the conditions of approval. The City may remove or modify any approved installation for safety, maintenance, transportation, accessibility, utility, or public works reasons. The City Council may also decide to remove an installation, through a City Council Resolution, if the speech or message is no longer consistent with the best interests of the community. interferes with public safety, street maintenance, or is vandalized or damaged. The Port Townsend Municipal Code Page3/3 Chapter 12.11 STREET USE PERMITS – STREET PAINTING ALL DISTRICTS cCity has no obligation to maintain, repair, or reinstall a street, sidewalk, or intersection painting, or community- designeddecorativecrosswalk. (Ord. 3260 § 1 (Exh. A), 2021). Ordinance 3368 Page1of 3 OrdinanceNo. 3368 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON, AMENDING PORT TOWNSENDMUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.11 – STREET USE PERMITS – STREET PAINTING ALL DISTRICTS WHEREAS, Chapter 12.11 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code (PTMC) establishes a process for the City Arts Commission and Historic Preservation Committee (if applicable) to review proposed permanent and semi-permanent street, sidewalk, and intersection paintings and community-designed crosswalks on City streets or right-of-way, making a recommendation to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 12.11 PTMC establishes the City Council as the approval authority for permanent and semi-permanent street, sidewalk, and intersection paintings and community-designed crosswalks; and WHEREAS, Chapter 12.11 PTMC establishes approval criteria for proposed permanent and semi-permanent street, sidewalk, and intersection paintings and community-designed crosswalks; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to further clarify that permanent and semi-permanent street, sidewalk, and intersection paintings and community-designed crosswalks on City streets and right-of-way are City (government) speech and wishes to give the City Council more editorial control over proposed permanent and semi-permanent street, sidewalk, and intersection paintings and community-designed crosswalks; and, WHEREAS, the City desires to make further improvements to Chapter 12.11 PTMC learned about street paintings since Chapter 12.11 PTMC’s adoption in February 2021. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Port Townsend, Washington ordains as follows: Section 1. Amendments. Amend Chapter 12.11 – Street Use Permits – Street Painting All Districts of the Port Townsend Municipal Code, which sections are set forth in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated by reference (underlines are additions and strikethrough are deletions). Section 2. Implementation. The Public Works Department and Arts Commission are authorized to implement this Ordinance. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Codification and Corrections. Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in Chapter 1.01.015 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code, staff and the Code Reviser are authorized to update and incorporate changes adopted in the Port Townsend Municipal Code. Staff and the Code Reviser are further authorized to make non-substantive edits related to numbering, grammar, spelling, and formatting consistent with this ordinance. Ordinance 3368 Page2of 3 Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days following its publication in the manner provided by law. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Port Townsend, Washington, at a regular meeting thereof, held this ________ day of ____________ 2026. Amy Howard Mayor Attest: Alyssa Rodrigues City Clerk Ordinance 3368 Page3of 3 Exhibit A Amendments to Chapter 12.11 – Street Use Permits – Street Painting All Districts Port Townsend Municipal Code Page3/3 Chapter 12.11 STREET USE PERMITS STREET PAINTING ALL DISTRICTS DƩğƓƷ /ƚƒƒźƷƷĻĻʹ {źƒƚƓ \[ǤƓŭĻͲ 5ƚǒŭ /ğƭƉĻǤ Actions to date for 2026: o Had new contract w/o insurance requirements adopted by City -- in use as of June 2026 grants o Developed new rubric based on April PTAC grants workshop meeting -- in use as of June 2026 Immediate recommendations for September Grant Meeting: o Cancel in-person presentations by applicants (still invite them to meeting) o Close portal until end-of-year to revamp application and materials Recommendations for updates to materials: o Include top award amount of $2500 o Add clarity around residency and event location requirements o Include option to upload short video of work samples or project explanation in lieu of in-person presentation o Simplify reporting possibly add mixer/presentations in lieu of written report o Review and edit guidelines and FAQs o Increase length between application deadline and grants meeting to give more time for review Budget recommendations for 2027: o Use video documentation budget to launch new artist-in-residence pilot program similar to poet laureate but in rotating artistic genres (visual arts, music, theatre, film, etc.) For discussion (now or later in year): o Review process: small or rotating committee to make recommendations or prepare presentations for PTAC? o Value of in-person presentations by applicants and can that be replaced by other means? Uif!Ijmm!Xf!Dmjnc! cz!Bnboeb!Hpsnbo Xifo!ebz!dpnft!xf!btl!pvstfmwft- Èxifsf!dbo!xf!gjoe!mjhiu!jo!uijt!ofwfs.foejoh!tibef-É! uif!mptt!xf!dbssz-! b!tfb!xf!nvtu!xbef@! XfÉwf!csbwfe!uif!cfmmz!pg!uif!cfbtu/! XfÉwf!mfbsofe!uibu!rvjfu!jtoÉu!bmxbzt!qfbdf- boe!uif!opsnt!boe!opujpot pg!xibu!kvtu!jt! jtoÉu!bmxbzt!kvtu.jdf/! Boe!zfu!uif!ebxo!jt!pvst!!!!21! cfgpsf!xf!lofx!ju-! tpnfipx!xf!ep!ju/! Tpnfipx!xfÉwf!xfbuifsfe!boe!xjuofttfe! b!obujpo!uibu!jtoÉu!csplfo! cvu!tjnqmz!vogjojtife/! Xf-!uif!tvddfttpst!pg!b!dpvousz!boe!b!ujnf! xifsf!b!tljooz!Cmbdl!hjsm! eftdfoefe!gspn!tmbwft!boe!sbjtfe!cz!b!tjohmf!npuifs! dbo!esfbn!pg!cfdpnjoh!qsftjefou! pomz!up!gjoe!ifstfmg!sfdjujoh!gps!pof/!!!31! Boe!zft-!xf!bsf!gbs!gspn!qpmjtife-! gbs!gspn!qsjtujof-! cvu!uibu!epftoÉu!nfbo!xf!bsf! tusjwjoh!up!gpsn!b!vojpo!uibu!jt!qfsgfdu/! Xf!bsf!tusjwjoh!up!gpshf!b!vojpo!xjui!qvsqptf-! up!dpnqptf!b!dpvousz!dpnnjuufe!up!bmm!dvmuvsft-!dpmpst-!dibsbdufst-!boe! dpoejujpot!pg!nbo/ Boe!tp!xf!mjgu!pvs!hb{ft!opu!up!xibu!tuboet!cfuxffo!vt! cvu!xibu!tuboet!cfgpsf!vt/! Xf!dmptf!uif!ejwjef!cfdbvtf!xf!lopx-!up!qvu!pvs!gvuvsf!gjstu-41 xf!nvtu!gjstu!qvu!pvs!ejggfsfodft!btjef/! Xf!mbz!epxo!pvs!bsnt! tp!xf!dbo!sfbdi!pvu!pvs!bsnt! up!pof!bopuifs/! Xf!tffl!ibsn!up!opof!boe!ibsnpoz!gps!bmm/! Mfu!uif!hmpcf-!jg!opuijoh!fmtf-!tbz!uijt!jt!usvf;! Uibu!fwfo!bt!xf!hsjfwfe-!xf!hsfx<! uibu!fwfo!bt!xf!ivsu-!xf!ipqfe<! uibu!fwfo!bt!xf!ujsfe-!xf!usjfe<! uibu!xfÉmm!gpsfwfs!cf!ujfe!uphfuifs-!wjdupsjpvt-!!!51! opu!cfdbvtf!xf!xjmm!ofwfs!bhbjo!lopx!efgfbu! cvu!cfdbvtf!xf!xjmm!ofwfs!bhbjo!tpx!ejwjtjpo/! Tdsjquvsf!ufmmt!vt!up!fowjtjpo! Hpsnbo-!ÆUif!Ijmm!Xf!Dmjnc-Ç!qbhf!2!pg!4! uibu!fwfszpof!tibmm!tju!voefs!uifjs!pxo!wjof!boe!gjh!usff! boe!op!pof!tibmm!nblf!uifn!bgsbje/! Jg!xfÉsf!up!mjwf!vq!up!pvs!pxo!ujnf! uifo!wjdupsz!xpoÉu!mjf!jo!uif!cmbef cvu!jo!bmm!uif!csjehft!xfÉwf!nbef/ Uibu!jt!uif!qspnjtf!up!hmbef-! uif!ijmm!xf!dmjnc!!!!61! jg!pomz!xf!ebsf!ju-! cfdbvtf!cfjoh!Bnfsjdbo!jt!npsf!uibo!b!qsjef!xf!joifsju!Å! juÉt!uif!qbtu!xf!tufq!joup boe!ipx!xf!sfqbjs!ju/ XfÉwf!tffo!b!gpsdf!uibu!xpvme!tibuufs!pvs!obujpo sbuifs!uibo!tibsf!ju! xpvme!eftuspz!pvs!dpvousz!jg!ju!nfbou!efmbzjoh!efnpdsbdz/! Boe!uijt!fggpsu!wfsz!ofbsmz!tvddffefe/! Cvu!xijmf!efnpdsbdz!dbo!cf!qfsjpejdbmmz!efmbzfe-! ju!dbo!ofwfs!cf!qfsnbofoumz!efgfbufe/!!!71! Jo!uijt!usvui-! jo!uijt!gbjui!xf!usvtu-! gps!xijmf!xf!ibwf!pvs!fzft!po!uif!gvuvsf-! ijtupsz!ibt!jut!fzft!po!vt/! Uijt!jt!uif!fsb!pg!kvtu!sfefnqujpo! xf!gfbsfe!bu!jut!jodfqujpo/! Xf!eje!opu!gffm!qsfqbsfe!up!cf!uif!ifjst! pg!tvdi!b!ufssjgzjoh!ipvs! cvu!xjuijo!ju!xf!gpvoe!uif!qpxfs! up!bvuips!b!ofx!dibqufs-!!!!81! up!pggfs!ipqf!boe!mbvhiufs!up!pvstfmwft/! Tp!xijmf!podf!xf!btlfe-! Èipx!dpvme!xf!qpttjcmz!qsfwbjm!pwfs!dbubtuspqif-É! opx!xf!bttfsu- Èipx!dpvme!dbubtuspqif!qpttjcmz!qsfwbjm!pwfs!vt@É Xf!xjmm!opu!nbsdi!cbdl!up!xibu!xbt! cvu!npwf!up!xibu!tibmm!cf; b!dpvousz!uibu!jt!csvjtfe!cvu!xipmf-! cfofwpmfou!cvu!cpme-! gjfsdf-!boe!gsff/!!!!91! Xf!xjmm!opu!cf!uvsofe!bspvoe! ps!joufssvqufe!cz!joujnjebujpo! cfdbvtf!xf!lopx!pvs!jobdujpo!boe!jofsujb! xjmm!cf!uif!joifsjubodf!pg!uif!ofyu!hfofsbujpo/! Pvs!cmvoefst!cfdpnf!uifjs!cvsefot/! Cvu!pof!uijoh!jt!dfsubjo;! Jg!xf!nfshf!nfsdz!xjui!njhiu-! boe!njhiu!xjui!sjhiu-! uifo!mpwf!cfdpnft!pvs!mfhbdz! boe!dibohf!pvs!dijmesfoÉt!cjsuisjhiu/!!!:1! Hpsnbo-!ÆUif!Ijmm!Xf!Dmjnc-Ç!qbhf!3!pg!4! Tp!mfu!vt!mfbwf!cfijoe!b!dpvousz! cfuufs!uibo!uif!pof!xf!xfsf!mfgu!xjui/! Fwfsz!csfbui!gspn!nz!cspo{f.qpvoefe!diftu-! xf!xjmm!sbjtf!uijt!xpvoefe!xpsme!joup!b!xpoespvt!pof/ Xf!xjmm!sjtf!gspn!uif!hpme.mjnofe!ijmmt!pg!uif!xftu- xf!xjmm!sjtf!gspn!uif!xjoetxfqu!opsuifbtu! xifsf!pvs!gpsfgbuifst!gjstu!sfbmj{fe!sfwpmvujpo-! xf!xjmm!sjtf!gspn!uif!mblf.sjnnfe!djujft!pg!uif!njexftufso!tubuft-! xf!xjmm!sjtf!gspn!uif!tvocblfe!tpvui/! Xf!xjmm!sfcvjme-!sfdpodjmf-!boe!sfdpwfs211 jo!fwfsz!lopxo!oppl!pg!pvs!obujpo!boe fwfsz!dpsofs!dbmmfe!pvs!dpvousz- pvs!qfpqmf!ejwfstf!boe!cfbvujgvm!xjmm!fnfshf-! cbuufsfe!boe!cfbvujgvm/! Xifo!ebz!dpnft!xf!tufq!pvu!pg!uif!tibef- bgmbnf!boe!vobgsbje/! Uif!ofx!ebxo!cmppnt!bt!xf!gsff!ju/! Gps!uifsf!jt!bmxbzt!mjhiu-! jg!pomz!xfÉsf!csbwf!fopvhi!up!tff!ju-! jg!pomz!xfÉsf!csbwf!fopvhi!up!cf!ju/! Å3132! Hpsnbo-!ÆUif!Ijmm!Xf!Dmjnc-Ç!qbhf!4!pg!4! Port TownsendArt Commission 2026 Art Awards Design and Fabrication Request for Qualifications Project Overview The Port Townsend Arts Commission announces an open call for artists interested in designing and fabricating small sculptural works that will be awarded as trophies to the winners of the 2026 Port Townsend Art Awards. Three-dimension work in any medium—metal, work, ceramic, glass, textile, paper, assemblage, or other materials—will be considered. This project is designed to highlight local artists through original artwork that represents the art community’s deep and enduring practice of producing meaningfulvisual culture. We request that AI not be used for work made in response to this CFA. Project Logistics The artist/artist team will create six (6) original three-dimensional pieces which will be presented to the winners of the Port Townsend Art Awards. Three to six artists will be chosen to receive awards. The City of Port Townsend will keep any sculptures created but not awarded The base of the work should be approximately 5 inches by 5 inches, and it should stand approximately 8 inches tall (these are loose guidelines to align with previous artist-created trophies) Regardless of the material used, the pieces should be durable and display-ready The pieces should include a gold or metallic element/feature Each sculpture should be roughly commensurate in size and intricacy and work as a stand- alonepiece of art (all six can be identical if desired) Pieces must be completed and delivered by December 1, 2026 Payment will be made after the work is delivered The artist/artist team commission is $1,500 The City of Port Townsend will announce the project and feature the chosen artist/artist teamin promotions related to the Art Awards, which will be held on March 5, 2027. Project goals Adds to acollection of unique, artist-createdtrophy-sculptures created for the Port Townsend Art Awards Honors the artist-winners for their achievements Demonstrates the skill and talent of our artistic community Who may apply? Artists living and working in Port Townsend or East Jefferson County What is the application process? Include 4-6 work samples or a link to an online portfolio/website Provide a short description of your design idea, inspiration, or point-of-view What happens after I apply? Qualifications will be reviewed by the Art Awards workgroup, which is made up of members of the Port Townsend Arts Commission. The submission that aligns best with the project goals will be chosen for the project and the artist will be contacted by August 10. Schedule RFQ Deadline: July 31 Decision and notification: August 10 Work-in-progress review date: September 30 (or earlier if desired by the artist/s) Final work due: December 1 Example Gallery 2025 Award Designs by Tori Power Ready to apply? SUBMIT YOUR APPLICATION HERE jotubhsbn/dpn0dmbjsf/sbhmboe0 Memo To: All Staff From: John Mauro, City Manager Date: July 20, 2026 RE: 2027Workplan and Budget Dear Team: Can you believe it? plan priorities and budget for 2027. extremely capable of working together to both deliver quality services day in day out, and plan strategically for the future. Last Monday, July 13, City Council and Department Directors spent all day discussing the high-level 2027 strategic workplan. year, an assessment of our current state, and some tough discussions on prioritizing our work for 2027. Directors were predictably awesome as they both facilitated and presented, and Councilmembers were highly This memo officially kicks off the 2027 budget process and as a way to help you stay informed and get involved in a process that takes so many of us to get to the finish line. Some of you put t ideas ƒƚƒĻƓƷǒƒ ƷŷƩƚǒŭŷ ĭŷğƓŭĻ. This year, the theme is adding lasting value. How do we add lasting value? We add value by using each opportunity in this budget to build off the to invest more than one year ahead, and to make historic gains on infrastructure repair. We add lasting value by working together and building our strength as a team, allowing every single one of our contributions to count for something. We add lasting value by developing a responsible, forward-focused budget that builds a better future for our community. What happens next? Below is what the general timeline looks like from today through that final Council decision. the most ambitious schedule of the past 6 years, with a comfortable amount of space to anticipate any changes or challenges along the way: the end of 2026. August 17 Revenue estimates to City Council submit budgets the budget timeline, our workplan, and how we engage with our teams and community on budget that I have nothing but the highest confidence in this team and the collaborative approach directors take to t reduce the quality and stability of the outcome one bit. at the upcoming departmental budget roadshows. Meanwhile, I invite you to ask me, your director, and your manager any questions to better understand how your work, your ideas, and your involvement can help shape our 2027 budget. Sincerely, John Mauro, City Manager 2027 Draft Workplan Goals Port Townsend Arts Commission Develop 1% for the Arts Fund policy framework so that public art projects are being proactively planned to best support Port Tow. Use the Public Art Plan to support the regular commissioning of new public art as well as investing in promotion and maintenance of the collection so that it reflects creative identity and enhances civic infrastructure. Build on momentum and accomplishments from 2026 to support Port cultural life through PTAC programs, including but not limited to: o Poet Laureate: conduct search for and choose 2028-2029 laureate; support current 2027 portfolio of projects o Arts Awards: continue to refine successful reimagined format from 2025; hold 2026 awards ceremony and launch 2027 nominations o Grants: continue to reduce barriers and streamline program so that funds have most possible impact on public and artist benefit. Clarify to the work of both the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) and Port Townsend Creative District so that together these City programs can collaborate and coordinate on progress towards goals set forth in the Arts & Culture Plan and Creative Economy subsection of the Comprehensive Plan (Economic Development). 2027 Draft PTAC Budget for Discussion Item2026 BudgetDraft 2027 Budget NOTES REVENUE Allocation$ 49,800.00 Grants 1% for Public Art EXPENSES Programs Grants to Artists $ 30,000.00 $ 33,000.00 Artist-in-Residence Pilot $ 5,000.00 Poet Laureate $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 Stipend for year 2 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,500.00 For poet laureate program projects Public Art 1% for Public Art 1% Determined includes maintenance includes award fabrication commission, event, Mayor's Arts Awards $ 7,500.00 $ 6,500.00 marketing Marketing/Outreach $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 Print / Web Publication Creative Assets Photo/Video $ 6,500.00 Grantee videos for artist and city use Application Software$ 100.00$ 100.00Fillout TOTAL$ 48,800.00$ 49,800.00 REMAINING Nbtufsjoh!nffujoht!vtjoh!Spcfsu“t!Svmft Fttfoujbm!Hvjefmjoft!gps!! Djuj{fo!Bewjtpsz!Dpnnjuufft Cjdzdmf!'!Qfeftusjbo!Bewjtpsz!Dpnnjuuff/!ª!Djuz!pg!Pmznqjb!XB!312:/ Uif!xpsl!pg!uif!Djuj{fo!Bewjtpsz!Dpnnjuuff!jt!up!dbssz!pvu!uif!dpvodjm(t!jotusvdujpot/!Gpmmpx! uiftf!fttfoujbm!hvjefmjoft!pg!qbsmjbnfoubsz!qspdfevsf!up!ublf!uif!qbjo!pvu!pg!zpvs!nffujoht-!ipme! qspevdujwf!ejtdvttjpot-!boe!tfswf!zpvs!dpnnvojuz!cfuufs/ !CBTJDT B!rvpsvn!nvtu!cf!qsftfou!gps!cvtjoftt!up!cf!epof/!Vtvbmmz!b!rvpsvn!nfbot!b!nbkpsjuz!)npsf!uibo! Uif!dibjs!svot!uif!nffujoh!jo!uif!tfswjdf!pg!uif!dpnnjuuff/!If!jt!opu!uif!”cptt•!cvu!tfswft!bt!b! gbdjmjubups-!ifmqjoh!uif!dpnnjuuff!up!ipme!gsff!boe!gbjs!ejtdvttjpo!boe!nblf!hppe!efdjtjpot/ Psejobsjmz!b!dpnnjuuff!nfncfs!nvtu!nblf!b!npujpo!cfgpsf!boz!ejtdvttjpo!cfhjot/!Jg!uifsf!jt!op! tfdpoe-!uif!npujpo!jt!opu!ublfo!vq/ Jg!b!nfncfs!nblft!b!npujpo!up!bnfoe!uif!nbjo!npujpo-!ju!jt!ejtdvttfe!boe!wpufe!po!cfgpsf!uif!nbjo! npujpo/!Bgufs!bnfoejoh!b!npujpo-!b!wpuf!nvtu!cf!ublfo!po!uif!nbjo!npujpo!bt!bnfoefe/ Bgufs!ejtdvttjpo-!uif!dibjs!dbmmt!gps!uif!wpuf!boe!boopvodft!uif!sftvmu/!Uif!npujpo!qbttft!xifo!b! nbkpsjuz!pg!uiptf!wpujoh!wpuf!jo!gbwps-!vomftt!dpnnjuuff!czmbxt!sfrvjsf!b!ijhifs!wpuf/!Uijt!jt!ejggfsfou! gspn!uif!sfrvjsfnfou!gps!b!rvpsvn/ Jg!tpnfpof!”dbmmt!uif!rvftujpo-•!uif!dibjs!nvtu!ublf!b!wpuf!po!xifuifs!up!wpuf!opx!! ps!dpoujovf!ejtdvttjpo/!Ju!ublft!b!304!wpuf!up!dvu!pgg!ejtdvttjpo/ xxx/kvsbttjdqbsmjbnfou/dpn !EJTDVTTJPO Bmm!dpnnjuuff!nfncfst!ibwf!frvbm!sjhiut-!qsjwjmfhft!boe!pcmjhbujpot/!Uijt!nfbot!uibu!ejtdvttjpo!jt! opu!b!dpowfstbujpo-!cvu!gpmmpxt!tpnf!jnqpsubou!svmft; €!Uif!dibjs!sfdphoj{ft!tqfblfst!jo!uvso/ €!Op!pof!nbz!tqfbl!b!tfdpoe!ujnf!voujm!fwfszpof!xip!xjtift!up!ep!tp!ibt!tqplfo!podf/ €!Joufssvqujoh!jt!opu!bmmpxfe/ Dpnnjuuff!nfncfst!nvtu!cf!dpvsufpvt!boe!sftqfdugvm/!Uifz!nbz!opu!nblf!jobqqspqsjbuf!sfnbslt! tvdi!bt!qfstpobm!sfnbslt-!jotvmujoh!mbohvbhf-!ps!dpnnfout!uibu!bsf!jssfmfwbou/ Jg!b!dpnnjuuff!nfncfs!csfblt!uif!svmft-!uif!dibjs!nbz!dpssfdu!ijn-!ps!bopuifs!dpnnjuuff!nfncfs! nbz!sbjtf!b!qpjou!pg!psefs/!Uif!dibjs!svmft!bt!up!xifuifs!uif!qpjou!jt!dpssfdu-!ps!opu/!B!dpnnjuuff! nfncfs!xip!ejtbhsfft!xjui!b!svmjoh!pg!uif!dibjs!nbz!bqqfbm!ju/!Jg!bopuifs!nfncfs!tfdpoet!uif!bqqfbm-! uif!dpnnjuuff!efdjeft/ Uif!njopsjuz!nvtu!cf!qspwjefe!frvbm!pqqpsuvojuz!up!efcbuf-!fwfo!jg!uifjs!wjfxt!bsf!voqpqvmbs/!Ipxfwfs-! uif!efdjtjpo!pg!uif!nbkpsjuz!wpujoh!bu!b!nffujoh!jt!uif!efdjtjpo!pg!uif!dpnnjuuff!bt!b!xipmf/ !QVCMJD!JOQVU Qvcmjd!ifbsjoht!boe!puifs!rvbtj.kvejdjbm!qspdffejoht!nvtu!cf!svo!bddpsejoh!up!uif!sfrvjsfnfout!pg! tubuf!mbx/ Qvcmjd!dpnnfou!tfttjpot!pggfs!bo!pqqpsuvojuz!gps!nfncfst!pg!uif!qvcmjd!up!jogpsn!uif!dpnnjuuff!pg! uifjs!wjfxt/!Xf!sfdpnnfoe!opu!foufsjoh!joup!cbdl.boe.gpsui!fydibohft/!Dpnnvojuz!gpsvnt-!pof.po. pof!ejtdvttjpo-!gffecbdl!gpsnt!po!uif!xfctjuf-!tvswfzt!fud/!bsf!cfuufs!diboofmt!gps!bo!fydibohf!pg!wjfxt/ Voefs!uif!Gjstu!Bnfoenfou!up!uif!V/T/!Dpotujuvujpo-!uif!qvcmjd!jt!opu!cpvoe!cz!uif!tbnf!svmft!pg! efdpsvn!boe!dpvsuftz!bt!uif!dpnnjuuff!nfncfst/ Uif!qvcmjd!tipvme!opu!fohbhf!jo!dmbqqjoh-!cppjoh-!ijttjoh!ps!puifs!ejtsvqujwf!bdujpot-!tjodf!uifz! joujnjebuf!tqfblfst-!nbz!tvqqsftt!gsff!tqffdi-!boe!jnqfef!uif!xpsl!pg!uif!dpnnjuuff/ Fttfoujbm!Hvjefmjoft!gps!Djuj{fo!Bewjtpsz!Dpnnjuufft! ª!Kvsbttjd!Qbsmjbnfou!/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/ UFSNT!PG!VTF Uijt!bsujdmf!jt!qspwjefe!gps!qfstpobm!vtf/!Uif!vtfs!nbz!opu!npejgz-!qvcmjti-!mjdfotf-!dsfbuf!efsjwbujwf!xpslt!gspn-!usbotgfs!ps!tfmm!boz! jogpsnbujpo!ps!tfswjdft!dpoubjofe!jo!uijt!qvcmjdbujpo!ps!pcubjofe!gspn!pvs!xfctjuf-!ps!vtf!uif!dpoufou!pg!pvs!xfctjuf!gps!qvcmjd!ps! dpnnfsdjbm!qvsqptft-!jodmvejoh!boz!ufyu-!jnbhft-!bvejp!ps!wjefp-!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!qfsnjttjpo!pg!Kvsbttjd!Qbsmjbnfou/!Kvsbttjd!Qbsmjbnfou! sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!vqebuf!pvs!xfctjuf!bu!boz!ujnf!xjuipvu!opujdf!up!zpv/!Jg!zpv!xpvme!mjlf!up!vtf!ps!rvpuf!uijt!nbufsjbm!gps!boz!qvsqptf! EJTDMBJNFS Uijt!nbufsjbm!jt!qspwjefe!gps!hfofsbm!fevdbujpobm!qvsqptft/!Kvsbttjd!Qbsmjbnfou!nblft!op!sfqsftfoubujpo!bcpvu!uif!tvjubcjmjuz!pg!uif! jogpsnbujpo!dpoubjofe!jo!uif!epdvnfout!boe!sfmbufe!hsbqijdt!qvcmjtife!bt!qbsu!pg!uiftf!tfswjdft!gps!boz!qvsqptf/!Bmm!tvdi!epdvnfout! boe!sfmbufe!hsbqijdt!bsf!qspwjefe!”bt!jt•!xjuipvu!xbssbouz!pg!boz!ljoe/!Kvsbttjd!Qbsmjbnfou!ifsfcz!ejtdmbjnt!bmm!xbssboujft!boe!dpoejujpot! rvftujpot!bsf!bewjtfe!up!tffl!bo!bqqspqsjbuf!dsfefoujbmfe!bvuipsjuz!up!beesftt!uifjs!jttvft/ Q/P/!Cpy!88664-!Tfbuumf-!XBQ/P/!Cpy!88664-!Tfbuumf-!XB!!::92889288 ufmufm!!3317/653/9533!17/653/9533!!!}!}!!!fnbjmfnbjm!!jjogpAkvsbttjdqbsmjbnfou/dpnogpAkvsbttjdqbsmjbnfou/dpn!! xxx/!kvsbttjdqbsmjbnfou/dpnxxx/!kvsbttjdqbsmjbnfou/dpn SPCFSU“T!SVMFT!PG!PSEFS!DIFBU!TIFFU Robert’s Rules of Order are a provision of each of the SMPS chapter’s bylaws normally stated as the following: “The rules contained in the most recent edition of Robert’s Rules of Order shall provide the rules of procedure for the Chapter where they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation or these bylaws.” Point of Inquiry: A member may use point of inquiry UZQFT!PG!NPUJPOT Main Motion: Introduce a new item decisions. Subsidiary Motion: Change or affect how to handle a Point of Personal Privilege: A member may use main motion (vote on this before main motion) point of personal privilege to address the physical Privileged Motion: Urgent or important matter unrelated comfort of the setting such as temperature or noise. to pending business Members may also use it to address the accuracy Incidental Motion: Questions procedure of other of published reports or the accuracy of a member’s motions (must consider before the other motion) conduct. Motion to Table: Kills a motion Motion to Postpone: Delays a vote (can reopen debate UJQT!BOE!SFNJOEFST!GPS! on the main motion) DIBJSQFSTPOT FWFSZ!NPUJPO!IBT!7!TUFQT Robert’s Rules of Order, which is also widely known as 1. Motion: A member rises or raises a hand to signal the parliamentary procedure, was developed to ensure that chairperson. 2. Second: Another member seconds the motion. skilled chairperson allows all members to voice their 3. Restate motion: The chairperson restates the motion. opinions in an orderly manner so that everyone in the 4. Debate: The members debate the motion. meeting can hear and be heard. The following tips and 5. Vote: reminders will help chairpersons to run a successful and productive meeting without being run over or running over others. 6. Announce the vote: The chairperson announces the result of the vote and any instructions. Follow the agenda to keep the group moving toward its goals. TIP! If the board is in obvious agreement, the chairperson may save time by stating, “If there is no objection, we will adopt the Let the group do its own work; don’t overcommand. motion to…” Then wait for any objections. Then say, “Hearing no objections, (state the motion) is adopted.” And then state who ask to speak. any instructions. Let all members speak once before allowing anyone to vote and then announce the vote. speak a second time. When discussions get off-track, gently guide the group SFRVFTUJOH!QPJOUT!PG!! back to the agenda. Model courtesy and respect, and insist that others do TPNFUIJOH the same. Certain situations need attention during the meeting, but Help to develop the board’s skills in parliamentary they don’t require a motion, second, debate or voting. It’s procedure by properly using motions and points of permissible to state a point during a meeting where the order. chairperson needs to handle a situation right away. Board Give each speaker your undivided attention. members can declare a Point of Order, Point of Information, Keep an emotional pulse on the discussions. Point of Inquiry, or Point of Personal Privilege. group. Point of Order: Draws attention to a breach of rules, improper procedure, breaching of established practices, etc. Point of Information: A member may need to bring up an additional point or additional information (in the form of a nondebatable statement) so that the other members can make fully informed votes. Source: www.boardeffect.com Dbo! Offe!b!Dbo!uijt!cf!Dbo!uijt!cf! BdujpoXibu!up!tbztqfblfs!cf!Wpuft!offefe tfdpoe@efcbufe@bnfoefe@ joufssvqufe@ Introduce main “I move to...”NoYesYesYesMajority motion “I move to amend Amend a motionNoYesYesYesMajority the motion by...” “I move that we Move item to refer the matter to NoYesYesNoMajority committee committee.” “I move to postpone Postpone itemNoYesYesNoMajority the matter until...” “I move the End debateNoYesYesNoMajority previous question.” Object to procedure“Point of order.”YesNoNoNoChair’s decision “I move that we Recess the meetingNoYesNoNoMajority recess until...” “I move to adjourn Adjourn the meetingNoYesNoNoMajority the meeting.” “Point of Request informationNoYesNoNoNo vote information.” Overrule the chair’s “I move to overrule YesYesYesNoMajority rulingthe chair’s ruling.” “I move to extend Extend the allotted the time by ____ NoYesNoYes2/3 time minutes.” Enforce the rules or point out incorrect “Point of order.”YesNoNoNoNo vote procedure Table a motion“I move to table...”NoYesNoNoMajority Verity voice vote with “I call for a NoNoNoNoNo vote countdivision.” Object to considering “I object to some undiplomatic consideration of YesNoNoNo2/3 matterthis matter...” Take up a previously “I move to take NoYesNoNoMajority tabled itemfrom the table...” * Reconsider “I move to something already reconsider our YesYesYesYesMajority disposed ofaction to...” Consider something “I move to suspend out of it scheduled the rules and NoYesNoNo2/3 orderconsider...” Close the meeting for “I move to go into NoYesNoNoMajority executive sessionexecutive session.” *A member may make a motion to reconsider something that was already disposed; however, the reconsidered motion may not be subsequently reconsidered. A motion to reconsider must be made during the same meeting and can extend to a meeting that lasts for more than one day. Link to “Amy’s Journey” on Concerts in the Barn’s YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL1zWcHKkX8 WEBVTT 1 00:00:03.600 --> 00:00:15.519 Council Chambers: All right, I will call the meeting of the Fort Townsend Arts Commission to order at 3.01 PM, and read our welcome and statement of purpose. 2 00:00:15.620 --> 00:00:34.109 Council Chambers: The role of this commission is to advise city government in order to facilitate public arts programs that enhance the cultural life of community residents, promote and encourage programs that further the development and public awareness of, as well as the interest in all forms of the arts. 3 00:00:34.110 --> 00:00:42.099 Council Chambers: The Arts Commission also works to strengthen artists' opportunities, visibility, and vitality within our community. 4 00:00:42.790 --> 00:00:47.350 Council Chambers: The rest of that is just out of join if you're not here. 5 00:00:48.030 --> 00:00:48.960 Council Chambers: All right. 6 00:00:49.090 --> 00:00:56.899 Council Chambers: Let's, go around the room, see who's here. Doug Caskey, Arts Commissioner, Chair. 7 00:00:58.380 --> 00:01:01.380 Council Chambers: Dan? Simon Lynch, Commissioner. 8 00:01:05.860 --> 00:01:14.019 Council Chambers: Will somebody go? Oh, sorry. I'm Lonnie, the Deputy City Clerk. 9 00:01:14.420 --> 00:01:20.679 Council Chambers: Melody Skyweaver, Community Services Director. Katy Goodman, Arts and Culture Coordinator, Staff Liaison to PFAC. 10 00:01:21.040 --> 00:01:30.110 Council Chambers: Katy Tolman, Commissioner. Christine Walsh Rogers, Commissioner. Daniel Rossman, I think I'm gonna start saying it like this. Vice Chair! 11 00:01:31.390 --> 00:01:34.450 Libby Wennstrom: Libby Wenstrom, Council Liaison, I'm online. 12 00:01:34.890 --> 00:01:41.449 Council Chambers: Libby is now online. Yes, she is. As is Austin. 13 00:01:41.940 --> 00:01:50.430 Council Chambers: All right. Are there any changes to the agenda? 14 00:01:50.570 --> 00:01:52.699 Council Chambers: Or is there a motion to approve? 15 00:01:54.740 --> 00:01:56.410 Council Chambers: There we go. 16 00:01:56.650 --> 00:02:00.499 Council Chambers: Can we just declare that approved if no one says anything? 17 00:02:01.350 --> 00:02:04.699 Council Chambers: Good, I think we will. The agenda is approved. 18 00:02:05.290 --> 00:02:11.959 Council Chambers: Alright, there are two different meeting minutes here. 19 00:02:13.020 --> 00:02:17.610 Council Chambers: Any changes or comments on the minutes for July 4th? 20 00:02:18.620 --> 00:02:20.250 Council Chambers: And data has arrived. 21 00:02:21.780 --> 00:02:28.479 Council Chambers: August? July 4th. I'm sorry, let me try to work on that. June 4th. 22 00:02:29.540 --> 00:02:32.140 Council Chambers: Gotcha. 23 00:02:35.530 --> 00:02:39.700 Council Chambers: If there are no… Changes? Do we have a motion to approve? 24 00:02:41.060 --> 00:02:43.710 Council Chambers: I make a motion to approve the general notes. 25 00:02:44.100 --> 00:02:47.790 Council Chambers: Okay… Yeah, second? 26 00:02:48.050 --> 00:02:49.079 Council Chambers: That's taken. 27 00:02:49.280 --> 00:02:50.919 Council Chambers: Thank you, Simon. 28 00:02:51.480 --> 00:02:53.889 Council Chambers: All in favor? 29 00:02:54.460 --> 00:02:57.950 Council Chambers: Is it unanimous? 30 00:02:58.110 --> 00:03:08.229 Council Chambers: And, any opposed? I guess not. Alright, the July… Second this. Any changes? 31 00:03:08.460 --> 00:03:10.490 Council Chambers: Corrections, comments. 32 00:03:10.700 --> 00:03:15.940 Council Chambers: It's very slight. In the second to… third to last box under member update. 33 00:03:16.460 --> 00:03:21.110 Council Chambers: we just went around and talked about our different stuff. It's the Oregon Country Fair. 34 00:03:21.600 --> 00:03:32.730 Council Chambers: Not a country fair that's got, like, blue ribbons and pigs and stuff. Country Fair. It's… I only brought it up because it's a big pet peeve by all the country fairs. You can add an R. 35 00:03:32.930 --> 00:03:37.149 Council Chambers: Take care. I like it. Okay. 36 00:03:40.750 --> 00:03:42.829 Council Chambers: County to country. 37 00:03:43.710 --> 00:03:49.900 Council Chambers: All right, is there a motion to approve the agenda and amend it? With that, I'll move to. 38 00:03:50.020 --> 00:03:51.830 Council Chambers: Take it in. We have a second. 39 00:03:52.470 --> 00:03:54.810 Council Chambers: Excuse me? 40 00:03:55.150 --> 00:03:59.779 Council Chambers: All in favor of approving the minutes for July 2nd as amended? 41 00:03:59.960 --> 00:04:03.800 Council Chambers: You just raise your hand, but it looks like it is unanimous as well. 42 00:04:04.540 --> 00:04:09.250 Council Chambers: Okay, any… Public comment. 43 00:04:09.600 --> 00:04:12.439 Council Chambers: No, no, no. No one's the longest. 44 00:04:12.950 --> 00:04:13.920 Council Chambers: Actually… 45 00:04:14.140 --> 00:04:27.520 Council Chambers: This would be kind of… Oh, yes, could I be… I'm not public, but… I just wanted to, mention the recent passing of Catherine Burrell, for the record. I worked with her on lots of art stuff. She was a, 46 00:04:27.940 --> 00:04:35.979 Council Chambers: a beacon of art's passion and effort in Oregon. So, that was just recent for passing, I think, last month. 47 00:04:36.240 --> 00:04:41.100 Council Chambers: So, just wanted that for the record. If it's more appropriate to move that to somewhere other than public. 48 00:04:42.080 --> 00:04:48.600 Council Chambers: Good, good. That was really lovely. Bye, Catherine. She's feisty arts advocate. 49 00:04:51.380 --> 00:04:52.870 Council Chambers: What are you on that? 50 00:04:53.570 --> 00:04:55.230 Council Chambers: Absolutely. 51 00:04:55.600 --> 00:05:01.720 Council Chambers: What part of… Okay, 52 00:05:02.390 --> 00:05:21.890 Council Chambers: I think the agenda speaks for itself. We have, hello! Sorry, is this a note about? It is! It is, so… Okay. I mean, we, we just, this moment, had the opportunity for public comment. 53 00:05:22.050 --> 00:05:33.889 Council Chambers: Not to put you on the spot, but did you have a comment you wanted to make, or you're just here to… Okay, that's great, thank you. 54 00:05:34.120 --> 00:05:39.679 Council Chambers: I'm not sure I have any, 55 00:05:39.910 --> 00:05:45.840 Council Chambers: specific comments other than what we're going to discuss in the agenda? So, 56 00:05:46.170 --> 00:05:53.359 Council Chambers: I will pass it over to, I guess, Katy. Yeah, Melanie's not here, and, Rich, sorry, guys, I'm gonna scroll. 57 00:05:53.750 --> 00:05:56.449 Council Chambers: perhaps, which is always annoying. 58 00:05:56.720 --> 00:06:08.140 Council Chambers: So, I guess I will give a little treasure update in her, oh, did you want to do some accessories? That's next. It's next. Oh, okay. 59 00:06:08.240 --> 00:06:14.860 Council Chambers: So, yeah, the budget actually, I think, has still remained unchanged since last meeting. 60 00:06:15.450 --> 00:06:32.799 Council Chambers: you know, this… I think the… we can expect some more changes in the next couple of months, because next meeting will be a grant meeting, where, assumably PTAC might distribute the $7,500 that's left for grants this year. 61 00:06:34.710 --> 00:06:43.979 Council Chambers: We are also gonna look at a, you know, a proposal for an artist to make the art awards for the 2027, or for the 2026 62 00:06:44.110 --> 00:06:48.460 Council Chambers: Art Awards, that the ceremony will happen in 2027, and so, 63 00:06:48.570 --> 00:06:57.090 Council Chambers: That will come out of the budget that we still have left for the art awards ceremony, for the art awards line item. 64 00:06:57.230 --> 00:07:13.399 Council Chambers: Yeah, and also, I guess Tyler is out… has been out collecting videos of many of the grantees who've already done their projects this year, you know, so that line item is already sort of spoken for, we just haven't been built for it yet, so we'll probably start seeing now that it's, you know, approaching the 65 00:07:14.210 --> 00:07:21.459 Council Chambers: fourth quarter, or whatever, someone says. Numbers starting to change, although they've been relatively steady for a while. 66 00:07:21.670 --> 00:07:31.510 Council Chambers: So, does anyone have any other thoughts on budget they want to talk about? Just a question that $4,400 onto art awards, is that all going to go for… 67 00:07:31.840 --> 00:07:51.040 Council Chambers: I don't remember what we said, for the art… for the awards themselves, or… No, that was a call for artists, that was a $1,500 call for artists, so the remainder of that, generally, is earmarked for promotions, to get people to nominate, artists, you know, before the end of 2026. 68 00:07:51.040 --> 00:08:03.180 Council Chambers: And for any, like, venue fees, and if, you know, if a venue is secured this year, and that kind of thing, so that'll come out of that same budget line item. Okay, thank you. 69 00:08:04.990 --> 00:08:07.129 Council Chambers: You know, the questions about the budget. 70 00:08:08.720 --> 00:08:28.379 Council Chambers: All right, thank you. Staff update. Oh, okay. Let's see, I don't have, like, a ton to report for, my staff update, except Melody shared with me and give her own updates. 71 00:08:28.420 --> 00:08:47.830 Council Chambers: Yeah, I guess I will, you know, on the skate park front, I think that's where most of this has been coming through, is staff updates. We had a really nice gathering on Tuesday at the skate park with Jesse, the mural artist, and we brought out some materials just for people to kind of, like, sketch and give ideas, and some sodas, which are very popular with me. 72 00:08:49.790 --> 00:09:14.640 Council Chambers: Coca-Cola, so that worked out really well. And yeah, it was really nice to be there, just kind of spending, like, unstructured time there, just for people to kind of stop by and see what's up, and just, like, had lots of different conversations with a lot of the skate park users, but also, like, a bunch of members of the arts community, including some members of the commission. Thank you guys for stopping by. Yeah, it was really, it was really nice, and that project is 73 00:09:14.640 --> 00:09:17.299 Council Chambers: Moving forward, it feels like we're really in a good… 74 00:09:17.640 --> 00:09:27.700 Council Chambers: place. Jesse really… Jesse wants a van, if anyone's got a line on a van for all of the materials. 75 00:09:27.700 --> 00:09:43.800 Council Chambers: I might. Like, that it would hold large quantities of paint, and move… and roll. I think those are the two requirements. No, he'd probably need it for, like… yeah, no, I think you'd want to keep it from, like, you know, from probably, like, the end of this month through the… 76 00:09:43.800 --> 00:09:51.440 Council Chambers: November. To keep up at night to secure the material. I got it. Yeah, so it'd be sort of like a… How abouta trailer? 77 00:09:52.170 --> 00:09:56.110 Council Chambers: Sure, I mean, anything, I think, yeah, any, any… 78 00:09:56.250 --> 00:10:01.180 Council Chambers: We're working it out, or just putting it out there, because, like, people do sometimes have… 79 00:10:01.600 --> 00:10:05.349 Council Chambers: Random vehicles they don't use, so it doesn't hurt to start spreading the word. 80 00:10:05.610 --> 00:10:10.399 Council Chambers: short-term loan. Supports the arts. Anyway, 81 00:10:10.530 --> 00:10:25.230 Council Chambers: And there's about probably 2 or 3 weeks' worth of prep for the skate park, which the Parks Department is working on, and they're, like, really on it, it's cool. And then they'll… the painting will probably start, you know. 82 00:10:25.540 --> 00:10:33.439 Council Chambers: maybe before the end of August would be excellent, but, like, most likely at the very beginning… beginning of September. 83 00:10:33.480 --> 00:10:47.019 Council Chambers: Which is interesting timing, because that's also the exact same time that the farmers market will be starting their street painting project. So it's kind of exciting to see a lot of… yeah, so there's going to be a lot of movement around getting, sort of, like. 84 00:10:47.020 --> 00:10:53.549 Council Chambers: art in the streetscape coming up in the next few weeks, so it's exciting. The, I know that the farmer's market 85 00:10:53.830 --> 00:11:01.680 Council Chambers: designer, Helena, they had, like, a stencil-making party at the community center last night. I didn't know I was able to make it, but that's also… 86 00:11:02.260 --> 00:11:18.019 Council Chambers: Yeah. In motion, cool. I'm assuming lots of people came out for that, too. Yeah, I went by, there was a couple… there were a few people, I think it went pretty… pretty well. They definitely need volunteer help, so, like, people want to, like, check that out, and… 87 00:11:18.150 --> 00:11:20.179 Council Chambers: You know, spread the word all that as well. 88 00:11:21.160 --> 00:11:42.150 Council Chambers: Was there a formal discussion, like, where you said, hey, I want to hear some ideas about what you think of what I've proposed so far, I'm open to changing my imagery, I want to brainstorm some new ideas or anything, or was it more like… No, it was much more casual than that, but he did bring sketches of, like, the current iteration of the concept, and people responded to it, and they were, like, a lot… it was a much more, like. 89 00:11:42.530 --> 00:11:46.670 Council Chambers: It wasn't, like, the presentations, you know what I mean? It was much more, kind of, like. 90 00:11:47.430 --> 00:11:57.289 Council Chambers: casual… Sure. Right, which felt like the right thing. I think that people felt more comfortable actually, like, sharing their ideas in that format than having it be, like, a 91 00:11:57.290 --> 00:12:15.339 Council Chambers: kind of, like, presentation-like discussion, so… Sorry, I couldn't attend. I was just curious if he's, like, sticking to, like, this is my plan? No, he's being really responsive to it. So he's flexible on change. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, within the boundaries of what the Council has approved, and what already went through the city, and that sort of thing, like, you know, the contract 92 00:12:15.440 --> 00:12:22.900 Council Chambers: states that, like, the concept is part of what was approved by Council, so it's not like, oh, we're gonna throw this whole thing out and start over, but, like, kind of with it. 93 00:12:23.160 --> 00:12:38.360 Council Chambers: the bound… within, sort of, the conceptual framework that has been approved, it's definitely… there's motion within that that's directly responsive to, like, the community. Well, and I have stuff to say about this later when we're talking about the new amendment. But, 94 00:12:39.000 --> 00:12:45.990 Council Chambers: Or, yeah, okay. There was one other thing I was gonna say about that. 95 00:12:46.780 --> 00:13:04.519 Council Chambers: Oh, I just wanted to say I love the interactive part that you had, where people could draw on tables, and they could add, like, elements for, you know, this marine vision that he has, or ocean theme, so that was great. Well, that was a great way to share ideas without 96 00:13:04.540 --> 00:13:11.319 Council Chambers: Like, sometimes it's hard to say, I want this, or I don't like that, but then to just be able to sort of 97 00:13:11.780 --> 00:13:16.480 Council Chambers: put it down without having to speak to somebody else was, I think, a great way to give me feedback. 98 00:13:16.810 --> 00:13:19.209 Council Chambers: Yeah, I think it was nice, like, especially 99 00:13:19.500 --> 00:13:26.179 Council Chambers: you know, I think I can say that most people in this room are, like, very comfortable with that being a way that you 100 00:13:26.600 --> 00:13:40.639 Council Chambers: share information and share ideas, and, like, that's not necessarily true of everyone, so the fact that, like, you know, after we were there for, like, a while, like, kids started coming over, like, the skaters started coming over, and they just grabbed pens and started drawing and that sort of thing, and that felt like the way they were comfortable. 101 00:13:40.790 --> 00:13:54.640 Council Chambers: like, having, like, making input, or, like, leaving their mark somehow, you know, as opposed to being like, oh, I've been thinking about this journal. You know, and stuff like that. Exactly, but people, everyone's at. So, yeah, it was really good. I like it. 102 00:13:55.860 --> 00:14:07.679 Council Chambers: So hopefully some jelly… jelly sent out. Yeah, there's a… people are keen on some sea… some jellyfish and some brightly colored sea creatures, so we'll see how it gets. Pink dolphins. I love the pink dolphins. Yeah, yeah. 103 00:14:07.680 --> 00:14:32.409 Council Chambers: But yeah, so, Melody is a special guest today at PTAC. Yeah, and I wanted to just talk a little bit about, like, her next chapter and what's going on. Thank you so much, amazing Katy Goodman. So, I'm Melody Skyweaver. I have been your Community Services Director for almost 2 years. Before that, I was Library Director for almost 10, and I wanted you all to know, if you have not seen it. 104 00:14:32.410 --> 00:14:56.819 Council Chambers: in the multiple papers, that I'm going to be the next Washington State Librarian for the Office of Secretary of State, so I've been appointed by Secretary Steve Hobb, and I will be going to Olympia to really champion libraries statewide, nationally, and a much bigger level. Thank you so much. Are you moving to Olympia? Yes. I mean, partly, we still are based in Kitsap, too, but… 105 00:14:56.860 --> 00:15:17.119 Council Chambers: be a woman of two worlds, like I've been a woman of two worlds here, so… but I really wanted to just have some time with the incredible PTAC commissioners, because I wanted to thank you all for the incredible work you've done in my tenure here at the City, but most especially for your courage and support when we created the Community Services Department to combine parks. 106 00:15:17.120 --> 00:15:29.819 Council Chambers: library facilities, and to add this new arts component, and I think one of my proudest things here has been working on developing the creative district, and navigating that, and bringing it to the city, and 107 00:15:29.940 --> 00:15:54.919 Council Chambers: If I get emotional, pardon me, but bringing Katy Goodman to the city, I think, has just been next level for how we think about arts and culture in Port Townsend, and I cannot thank you enough, Katy, for really amplifying the creative district and the work for artists, and that we can sit here and talk about street painting, and a mural, and paying local artists to do a variety of work in the community, and to give 108 00:15:54.920 --> 00:16:03.010 Council Chambers: people access to their creative heart space for the last two years is really amazing, and I think it's only going to continue to build. 109 00:16:03.010 --> 00:16:08.809 Council Chambers: So, I, wanted to just passionately, since I'm on my way out. 110 00:16:08.810 --> 00:16:29.639 Council Chambers: champion you all thinking more about what stable arts funding looks like, and I really hope that PTAC and our city council and our city look at what Washington's cultural access funding is. Katy knows a lot about it. It basically allows local cities and counties to enact a small local sales tax and use tax. 111 00:16:29.640 --> 00:16:37.040 Council Chambers: to make stable funding for nonprofit arts, sciences, and heritage organizations. And, 112 00:16:37.040 --> 00:16:56.809 Council Chambers: this, I think, is something that's really transforming communities in Washington that have gone for it, so it's something I would just hope you will have on the horizon, because under Katy's leadership, it's only going to continue to grow. With your amazing work at PTAC, it's only going to continue to grow, so I am hopeful, that you all can be a part of 113 00:16:56.970 --> 00:17:02.270 Council Chambers: of keeping this sustained, and not… what I don't want to see is, 114 00:17:02.290 --> 00:17:17.930 Council Chambers: the art going backwards or not being able to continue to sustain this movement. So it's a good time now, while we're in a good place, to think about how you build for the future, and your leadership and your dedication to the community and to the arts is just outstanding, and it's been such an honor to work with you all, and thank you. 115 00:17:18.300 --> 00:17:40.199 Council Chambers: Thank you for your contribution. What was the name of that program again? It's called the Cultural Access Funding, so there's a lot on ArtsWa if you go to that, and it's an RCW that was created, Inspire Washington has info, too. So I think it's something that, like, not a lot of people still know about. It's newer within the last couple of years. 116 00:17:41.140 --> 00:17:50.360 Council Chambers: 5, 7 years old, maybe, the program. Last few years. It's, what changed in the last two years was it's now… it's a 117 00:17:50.580 --> 00:18:07.139 Council Chambers: enacting it, it became councilmanic last, legislative session, which means now, like, the city council or the county commissioners could enact it without it going to a referendum, which means… which I think was the idea… the idea behind that was hopefully many more, 118 00:18:07.610 --> 00:18:10.030 Council Chambers: Many more communities would… 119 00:18:10.300 --> 00:18:27.939 Council Chambers: be able to take advantage of it is sort of a hard thing. I don't know, it's like a big thing to put something on a… on a ballot like that. So there's a lot more talk and work that needs to be done, but having our elected officials understand it, that it could be citywide or ideally county-wide to really serve Jefferson County, I think it's a good thing to explore. 120 00:18:28.430 --> 00:18:31.160 Council Chambers: All the opportunities that you may have. 121 00:18:31.780 --> 00:18:41.250 Council Chambers: Yeah, I have a lot of information on it if people are interested. I think we can talk about it at a different meeting and have something we wanted to get into the details on, or I could put something together. 122 00:18:41.250 --> 00:18:48.380 Libby Wennstrom: Katy, I'll reach out to you, but this seems like something that Culture and Society might want to take up as, you know, sort of talking through. 123 00:18:48.380 --> 00:18:51.779 Council Chambers: You're very quiet, Libby. Hold on one second. 124 00:18:52.870 --> 00:18:58.110 Council Chambers: It doesn't get louder? We've been messing around with the system. 125 00:18:58.510 --> 00:19:00.090 Council Chambers: Libby, can you hear us now? 126 00:19:00.440 --> 00:19:03.080 Libby Wennstrom: I can hear you just fine, can you not hear me? 127 00:19:03.460 --> 00:19:12.710 Council Chambers: Yeah, you're very quiet. But Libby, that sounds great. I wouldlove to talk to Culture and Society about this. I think that's a fantastic idea, so… 128 00:19:12.710 --> 00:19:13.440 Libby Wennstrom: Okay. 129 00:19:13.680 --> 00:19:14.119 Council Chambers: Let's do it. 130 00:19:14.120 --> 00:19:17.210 Libby Wennstrom: Sorry I'm quiet. It's unusual, but… 131 00:19:17.250 --> 00:19:29.330 Council Chambers: We are just finalizing our agenda for the meeting next week, too, so I don't know, we could take this, in email, Councilmember Winstrom and see if maybe it makes sense to have it next week, too. 132 00:19:29.700 --> 00:19:30.340 Libby Wennstrom: Okay. 133 00:19:31.100 --> 00:19:34.660 Council Chambers: Thank you. Totally, that'd be great. So, I look forward to seeing you all. 134 00:19:34.660 --> 00:19:38.010 Libby Wennstrom: And Melody, congratulations, this is a very big deal, so… 135 00:19:38.010 --> 00:19:51.270 Council Chambers: Thank you. Thank you very much. Don't forget us little people. I won't, and I've already, told the library that I'd love to come back as your state librarian and introduce the annual community reads. Oh, great. Oh, great. 136 00:19:51.390 --> 00:19:56.689 Council Chambers: We will look forward to that. All right, thank you guys so much. Thank you. 137 00:19:56.980 --> 00:20:08.989 Council Chambers: Take care, good luck. Oh, and I'm having a goodbye party on August 27th from 3 to 5. It's Thursday at the library, so everybody's invited, spread the word. I'll make sure you all get emails, too, so… 138 00:20:08.990 --> 00:20:18.480 Council Chambers: Love to see ya. Okay. Thank you, Melody. Better opportunity to get it out of my library, fine. 139 00:20:19.020 --> 00:20:20.450 Council Chambers: All right. All right. 140 00:20:21.100 --> 00:20:46.090 Council Chambers: That is… that is very good news. Yeah, isn't that great? I'm not sure it's good news for the city, but… She's got the glasses for it. Yeah. So does that mean her position's open, and how's that being… I don't know that they've chosen a specific path forward for that position, if there's room for that to change or stay the same, or… 141 00:20:46.090 --> 00:20:49.239 Council Chambers: see what happens to city manager. Yeah, I think there's, you know, there's one… 142 00:20:49.240 --> 00:20:54.920 Libby Wennstrom: This was just announced last, on Monday, so, I think, you know, we're… 143 00:20:55.910 --> 00:21:10.449 Council Chambers: It's brand new information. It's like, you know, like that. So right now, you and… is it Keith? Yeah. From the library, and I forget… Michael. Michael from Parks. From Parks and Facilities, yeah. You guys are kind of… 144 00:21:10.810 --> 00:21:25.360 Council Chambers: sharing responsibilities, or… Well, I mean, I think our responsibilities, like, largely stay… I meant, in the interim, I guess, will the… after Melody leaves… Yeah. …you guys will kind of be… 145 00:21:25.360 --> 00:21:34.800 Council Chambers: collaborating, or do you have any idea that one? Yeah, yeah, I mean, we collaborate already, so that's… we're sort of, like, the team under Melody in the Community Services Department, the three of us. 146 00:21:34.800 --> 00:21:50.559 Council Chambers: And I don't imagine that changing. You know, what will probably happen is we'll be more, like, reporting directly to Steve King until somebody else steps into that role. I mean, for the interim, that's what I imagine. Libby might be able to speak to this more, 147 00:21:50.870 --> 00:22:03.529 Council Chambers: Specifically, but, like, like she said, this is all brand new information, so there's not, like, a, you know… but all, you know, all of us have been doing what we do for, like, I think we're in good position to keep, you know, all our projects moving forward, and that kind of thing, so… 148 00:22:03.800 --> 00:22:06.390 Council Chambers: Well, yeah, that's good. That is good. 149 00:22:07.070 --> 00:22:10.759 Council Chambers: Any other… Comments, input questions? 150 00:22:11.180 --> 00:22:14.889 Council Chambers: All right. Let's move on to old business. 151 00:22:15.340 --> 00:22:24.489 Council Chambers: Committee reports, starting with the Public Art Committee. Austin, I believe you are online? 152 00:22:25.900 --> 00:22:27.300 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: I am. Can everyone hear me? 153 00:22:27.300 --> 00:22:33.060 Council Chambers: Oh, that's gonna be… that's gonna be a problem. We can barely hear you, anyone. 154 00:22:33.060 --> 00:22:35.420 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Okay, I'm talking as loud as I can. Hi, I'm Austin. 155 00:22:35.420 --> 00:22:38.250 Council Chambers: Yeah, I don't think it… Alright, wait. 156 00:22:38.250 --> 00:22:45.399 Libby Wennstrom: We've run into this before. We've run into this before, and it's some setting that has to happen that the clerk has to change. 157 00:22:46.100 --> 00:22:46.950 Libby Wennstrom: So… 158 00:22:50.010 --> 00:22:51.809 Council Chambers: Jack that's loose or something. 159 00:22:53.350 --> 00:22:54.790 Council Chambers: That was way up. 160 00:22:55.770 --> 00:22:58.169 Libby Wennstrom: It's, it's that it's not attaching into the right. 161 00:22:58.170 --> 00:22:59.090 Council Chambers: my speakers are… 162 00:22:59.090 --> 00:22:59.750 Libby Wennstrom: Something? 163 00:23:01.380 --> 00:23:04.050 Council Chambers: It's on all the way. We just. 164 00:23:04.050 --> 00:23:04.580 Libby Wennstrom: Interesting. 165 00:23:05.480 --> 00:23:06.130 Libby Wennstrom: Yeah. 166 00:23:11.390 --> 00:23:12.599 Council Chambers: Alright, topic again. 167 00:23:13.390 --> 00:23:14.680 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Is this any better? 168 00:23:15.130 --> 00:23:16.199 Council Chambers: That's another… 169 00:23:16.200 --> 00:23:16.570 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Bill? 170 00:23:16.570 --> 00:23:20.250 Council Chambers: It was while she's pulling that up, and we're waiting to talk about. 171 00:23:20.250 --> 00:23:24.270 Libby Wennstrom: Because on the phone, Austin sounds fine to me. He sounds normal, so it's something to. 172 00:23:24.270 --> 00:23:24.680 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Yeah. 173 00:23:24.680 --> 00:23:26.129 Libby Wennstrom: The speaker in the room. 174 00:23:26.480 --> 00:23:33.040 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: I can hear everybody great. I can also… I'm not sure if there's a speakerphone in there I could call in as well. Just let me know what works best. 175 00:23:46.190 --> 00:23:50.700 Council Chambers: Can you hear sometime? Inter… interact with the people. 176 00:23:50.700 --> 00:23:51.779 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Yeah, I can hear you. 177 00:23:52.490 --> 00:23:54.920 Council Chambers: Yeah, yay. Lovely. Hi, Austin. 178 00:23:54.920 --> 00:23:56.049 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Okay, any better? 179 00:23:56.050 --> 00:23:57.779 Council Chambers: Yeah, that's great. 180 00:23:57.780 --> 00:24:14.119 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Hi again, Austin Watkins, City Attorney. So, just to give a brief overview, we're here for an informational briefing on, potential updates to Chapter 1211 PTMC, which is the Street Painting Code, on, 181 00:24:14.140 --> 00:24:38.319 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: May 18th, City Council directed the City Attorney's Office to look at Chapter 1211 for consistency with First Amendment issues and updates in federal and state laws. We took a look at that code, and we essentially are recommending some light edits to it. The code edits that are proposed don't really change much, but primarily confirm what we're already doing. 182 00:24:38.510 --> 00:24:45.659 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: And it's really the three big takeaways from this is that, it first confirms that street paintings 183 00:24:45.660 --> 00:25:06.319 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: that they are public arts, and that they are on public right-of-way and public property, and that that is city or what's known as government speech. Therefore, we can have viewpoint discrimination, at the direction of City Council on what viewpoints they wish to express, through their arts program, within their own public property, public right-of-way. 184 00:25:06.320 --> 00:25:13.960 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: The second thing that this does is clarifies, really, the scope of applicability of Chapter 1211. It confirms that 185 00:25:14.040 --> 00:25:30.730 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: The city's art and public spaces policy applies, to future applications. There may be some harmonization between that policy and this code that may be required in the future, since that code's back from 2007, almost 20 years old, but still in, sorry, policies from 2007, but still a pretty good space. 186 00:25:31.280 --> 00:25:52.649 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: And the third thing it does is just, it provides further editorial control to the City Council, as well as, the PTAC and HPC, through recommendations of the City Council, for street painting applications, switching from an approval criteria, which is more limiting, to approval guidelines, which does give more discretion to. 187 00:25:52.650 --> 00:25:58.960 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: both the recommendation as well as the ultimate decision for City Council of what public art to accept on their public property. 188 00:25:59.050 --> 00:26:04.140 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Really, all of this comes down to the, kind of, the tests under the First Amendment. Whenever the 189 00:26:04.360 --> 00:26:28.890 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: government regulates private speech on public property. We typically have to have regulations that are what's known as content neutral or viewpoint neutral, meaning that you cannot favor one speaker over another, or one viewpoint over another. There is an exception to that, and that exception is known as the government speech doctrine, and basically what that means is the government is adopting a viewpoint 190 00:26:28.890 --> 00:26:34.499 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: it's speaking for itself and exercising, basically, its own, you know, First Amendment rights. 191 00:26:34.500 --> 00:26:43.910 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: And the three-part test to whether that exception applies or not, or whether it's regulation of private speech, is the history of expression issue. 192 00:26:43.910 --> 00:26:50.089 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: The public's likely perception as to who is speaking, whether that's a government or a private individual. 193 00:26:50.090 --> 00:27:11.689 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: and the extent to which the government has actively shaped or controlled the expression. That's the basic three-part test. There was a relatively recent Supreme Court case in 2022, that was Sureflett versus City of Boston. Just to give you a quick overview of kind of what happened in that case, there was a flagpole, three flags, I believe, at the City of Boston's public, 194 00:27:11.720 --> 00:27:17.209 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: public area that's outside City Hall, and they had a long-standing, 195 00:27:17.260 --> 00:27:36.660 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: unofficial policy of allowing any individual organization to put their flags up, for certain events, or to commemorate certain months. Eventually, someone came in, tried to put a flagpole up that the city disagreed with, and they denied that application, and they were sued, went to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court 196 00:27:36.660 --> 00:27:39.360 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Basically said, because the city was not 197 00:27:39.370 --> 00:27:51.840 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: exercising, adequate control over what viewpoints they wanted expressed at the OM's flagpoles, that it was a public forum. So whenever we have a public forum, or a limited form, or a non-public forum, 198 00:27:52.040 --> 00:27:58.490 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: We, again, cannot regulate from a viewpoint standpoint, again, unless it's government speech. 199 00:27:58.640 --> 00:28:05.239 Austin Watkins,City Attorney: And really, kind of the way of thinking about this, there's another case back in the 2009 Supreme Court, that held that 200 00:28:05.240 --> 00:28:23.150 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: the city's acceptance, it was a Utah case, the city's acceptance of a statue at a city public park was, government speech, because they were determining what type of statue they would allow to be, on display at their own public property, and that they had a history of, essentially 201 00:28:23.150 --> 00:28:33.779 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: discerning what type of statues they wanted to accept. So that really kind of is the three-part test we're looking at. That's what the city has historically done here with street paintings. 202 00:28:33.780 --> 00:28:52.019 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: And the role of this really is just to clarify, that the city can have viewpoint discrimination when it's appropriate and when it's consistent with, publicly held values. So we are proposing some edits to that code to, again, go from approval criteria, which is more limiting to giving more discretion to Council to. 203 00:28:52.100 --> 00:28:56.860 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Actively look at guidelines, and then make a decision of what's in the best interest of the city. 204 00:28:57.460 --> 00:29:06.729 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: So, kind of a lot there. I'm happy to take questions. Sorry, I kind of jammed a lot in a very short time frame, but, basically the question is, is, 205 00:29:06.880 --> 00:29:11.379 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Do we want a clearer code, or do we want one that's a little more ambiguous? 206 00:29:11.550 --> 00:29:13.010 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Which is what we have right now. 207 00:29:14.320 --> 00:29:17.169 Council Chambers: Going down to some of the actual edits here. 208 00:29:17.410 --> 00:29:20.879 Council Chambers: Guys, so… Could you say all that again? 209 00:29:20.880 --> 00:29:21.560 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Most of the time. 210 00:29:21.560 --> 00:29:24.489 Council Chambers: Can I ask you a question, Austin? 211 00:29:24.490 --> 00:29:24.930 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Of course! 212 00:29:25.580 --> 00:29:34.910 Council Chambers: From a legal perspective, is it better to be… More ambiguous, or less ambiguous? 213 00:29:34.910 --> 00:29:47.049 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: So, let me use the term ambiguous just now. I mean it in a way of whether or not we are creating some form of a public forum, or whether it's a government speech. I want this city to be very crystal clear that this is government speech. 214 00:29:47.050 --> 00:29:56.749 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: And not that that's a bad thing, actually, that's a very good thing, because it gives the authority to accept that art to the elected officials of the city. 215 00:29:56.840 --> 00:30:03.459 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: And in terms of ambiguous, I think you may be referring to probably the approval criteria versus guidelines. 216 00:30:03.460 --> 00:30:17.290 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: And in that case, I would argue that some ambiguity is actually preferential, because it'll give, again, discretion to Council and to this commission to make recommendations, and to ultimately say yes or no to things that are 217 00:30:17.290 --> 00:30:19.160 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Not so black and white. 218 00:30:20.670 --> 00:30:25.740 Council Chambers: That was kind of my perception, but I wanted to hear it from the legal side. Thank you. 219 00:30:28.230 --> 00:30:37.099 Council Chambers: Okay. Yeah, this is Dan. Thanks for the presentation. So this sort of speaks to the ambiguity question, but the way I read this, then. 220 00:30:37.480 --> 00:30:46.150 Council Chambers: is it does task the Arts Commission to carry forth some sort of a… Sentiment, or a, 221 00:30:46.990 --> 00:30:56.019 Council Chambers: a vibe of town into the deliberations as to what to recommend to Council. So it's almost like, in the past, we've looked at… we've weighed against artistic merit. 222 00:30:56.200 --> 00:31:08.500 Council Chambers: You know, leaning on our mission statement, something about, you know, high-caliber art to the masses, that's our role. But now this looks… and I'm not naysaying this, I'm just looking for clarity, it looks as though… 223 00:31:09.050 --> 00:31:14.780 Council Chambers: We need to sort of channel what Council's idea of what would be appropriate 224 00:31:15.410 --> 00:31:25.299 Council Chambers: to place in the public realm, as far as public art. We need to sort of channel that idea to the deliberation itself, so we're only handing over stuff that sort of 225 00:31:26.070 --> 00:31:41.689 Council Chambers: passes muster on those particular weighing components. In other words, they can only approve stuff that actually gets past our gateway, the way this is written. And they, so they can either say yay or nay, but they can't say yes to anything that we don't recommend. 226 00:31:42.480 --> 00:31:47.879 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: I… I don't read it that way. So this is… we didn't change the recommendation process 227 00:31:47.880 --> 00:32:06.659 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: through this code update, we basically kept that in the same process, and we might be able to clarify that as well, but it would just be a recommendation to the City Council. I don't believe the way the codes are written would require a recommendation of approval, so you could recommend denial, for example, and then the ultimate decision would be with Council. 228 00:32:07.620 --> 00:32:11.229 Council Chambers: PTAC could say, PTAC doesn't support this. 229 00:32:11.710 --> 00:32:28.219 Council Chambers: particular project, but the Council could still prove… still choose to approve it, if they wish. They could override that decision. So, when we do votes for something where we decide not to support it, we're still then forwarding that recommendation to not support it to Council? 230 00:32:28.620 --> 00:32:33.020 Council Chambers: My understanding is for something like this, which is a community, like. 231 00:32:33.850 --> 00:32:43.099 Council Chambers: proposed project, yes. I don't think that that's the case for something like a donation of art, or whatever that goes through the standard arts and public policy 232 00:32:43.520 --> 00:32:57.839 Council Chambers: AP4, you know, process, because that's… but this is, like, someone specifically saying, like, we want to do this, and then it has to go through, like, several steps to decide whether the city is like, yeah, we think that's a good idea or not, right? 233 00:32:57.840 --> 00:33:19.579 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Yeah, and if I can just jump on there, Katy, thank you so much. I agree entirely. So this could be a community- sponsored event, and we… we could… PTAC could say, for example, we recommend denial of that, and then Council could say yes or no to that. It could also be a, you know, city-initiated or PTAC-sponsored, you know, street painting as well. 234 00:33:19.580 --> 00:33:42.419 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: That require approval. And just to clarify, one point that I didn't make that I probably need to make is that the city would be accepting community-based art, so let's say that a community-based organization wants to do a painted crosswalk somewhere in the city. And this, and PTAC says, you know, recommends approval, City Council recommends, says yes to it, approves it. That would be… 235 00:33:42.420 --> 00:33:52.099 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: a gift of public art, essentially, to the city. So the city would be accepting that public art as a gift. And that may require some slight changes to the, 236 00:33:52.100 --> 00:33:58.360 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: art public spaces policy from 2007. Just to harmonize that that is, you know, the city accepting that art. 237 00:34:00.280 --> 00:34:05.460 Council Chambers: And follow-up question to Dan's comment. Austin, this… 238 00:34:05.980 --> 00:34:12.139 Council Chambers: The memorandum you presented only applies to street painting. 239 00:34:12.320 --> 00:34:24.260 Council Chambers: public visual arts, not to necessarily our grant process, or any… Any non-physical 240 00:34:24.440 --> 00:34:28.829 Council Chambers: Art project that is not on state… on city property. 241 00:34:29.580 --> 00:34:52.000 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: So, it applies to all street paintings. So, essentially, any permit or semi-permit, it does not apply to chalk, for example. That's a whole different conversation. So, it would apply to, for example, the farmer's market that would recently, you know, went through the process that was, I believe, in part sponsored by the city through funding, so that would apply in that case. 242 00:34:52.630 --> 00:34:54.140 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Does that answer your question? 243 00:34:55.110 --> 00:35:03.989 Council Chambers: Yeah, I think so. It's just for street painting. It's not gonna change the process for other kinds of public artwork. 244 00:35:04.100 --> 00:35:05.600 Council Chambers: Okay. Yeah. 245 00:35:05.710 --> 00:35:09.170 Council Chambers: I don't want to jump out of turn. No, go ahead. 246 00:35:09.860 --> 00:35:13.580 Council Chambers: It's Dan again. So, I had a couple other questions. 247 00:35:13.700 --> 00:35:32.989 Council Chambers: on the idea of the editorial control, so I read editorial control as, like, able to change, or can have influence over the visual outcome. The way I'm seeing that is, like, we had some editorial control with the, sidewalk mural uptown, the rainbow, because we… 248 00:35:33.050 --> 00:35:36.160 Council Chambers: It was proposed with the subject matter in the application. 249 00:35:36.590 --> 00:35:44.280 Council Chambers: before you joined us, you know, going back a few years, the Black Lives Matter mural, so that was approved by Council too, but that was subject matter that was 250 00:35:44.280 --> 00:35:57.119 Council Chambers: open to the public to apply at the time. That was a concern of mine at the time, because we couldn't really weigh the A through G criteria without knowing what the subject matter would be. That was something I brought up at the time. So, if this 251 00:35:57.350 --> 00:36:02.679 Council Chambers: amendment were enacted prior to the Black Lives Matter mural, we probably would have asked for more 252 00:36:02.680 --> 00:36:21.120 Council Chambers: subject matter to review, but then that brings us to our current mural, and I went back to the minutes to see the motion was passed. We didn't make the motion to approve his art proposal, we made a motion to approve the artist. Right. So even in our current mural, it wouldn't have stuck because we approved the artist, who's now open to 253 00:36:21.680 --> 00:36:39.570 Council Chambers: changing it after Council's approved, the mural, without knowing what the subject matter is? Yeah, that's why this is asking more about it. It's not street painting. Like, this is a totally different process. Like, the mural process went through the call for artists, it went through the AP4. This is, like, this stands next to it, but not… they're not the same. 254 00:36:39.570 --> 00:36:53.679 Libby Wennstrom: And it's also what we approved was an artist's concept. We didn't actually approve a final design. We approved a selection of an artist with a… based on their conceptual application. So there's a nuance there. But again, that's not a street painting. 255 00:36:54.070 --> 00:36:54.750 Council Chambers: And… 256 00:36:54.750 --> 00:36:55.710 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Yeah, both. 257 00:36:55.710 --> 00:36:57.530 Council Chambers: Oh, sorry, go ahead, Austin. 258 00:36:57.530 --> 00:37:22.499 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: I was gonna say, on both of those, the city kind of, again, retains control. The City Council does. As Libby was mentioned, it's a concept that's approved in the way the contract was written for the mural, for example. I believe it's any substantial or major deviations would have to go back to Council for approval. So there is wiggle room for the artist to, you know, change things, but the idea is the city agrees with the concept, agrees with the message that's being expressed, and, you know, accepts that message. 259 00:37:22.500 --> 00:37:43.590 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Right? So, an example of, you know, accepting a message A versus message Z, there might be some wiggle room between, you know, A1, 2, or 3 versus going all the way to Z. So, again, it's more of a concept level, but so they can make some changes to it. But that would generally apply to any ARC the city is accepting, as for the government speech exception to apply. 260 00:37:43.690 --> 00:37:52.109 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: we… the city does need to kind of maintain control over that message, if that makes sense. Again, not 100%, but 261 00:37:52.550 --> 00:37:54.540 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Generally speaking, per concept level. 262 00:37:56.850 --> 00:38:14.749 Council Chambers: I will say this proposal addresses a lot of the concerns that I've had over the last few years, and I think this is a cleaner way to write it, and make it First Amendment speech by the city, rather than the public forum concept. I think that's going to be safer for us. That's what we'd recommend, I think, if we really talk about it for a while. 263 00:38:14.750 --> 00:38:23.870 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: And there's a good amount of litigation, just to build on that really quickly. That's kind of post-BLM, that came out of the… a lot of the East Coast. 264 00:38:23.880 --> 00:38:43.870 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: federal district courts, about this topic, and most of the courts favored with the, government jurisdictions finding that it was, government speech, at least from BLM. There was, one, I believe, one or two holdings from… from Florida, it's where they found it was not government speech, but I think the fact patterns were a little different there, but 265 00:38:43.870 --> 00:38:50.689 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: I do think it's important we make these clarifications just to affirm to the public that this has been government speech and will continue to be government speech. 266 00:38:53.200 --> 00:39:07.540 Council Chambers: And Austin, like, I think generally this actually doesn't change things very dramatically, in my understanding, right? And doesn't change PTAC's role super dramatically, but I think that the next step for 267 00:39:07.830 --> 00:39:25.780 Council Chambers: like, the Public Art Committee, for example, would be to look at this alongside the Arts in public places as we work on that revision, and then continue to work with you on kind of harmonizing those documents and making sure that we're, like, retaining the right things. We're not doing, like, a huge revision of that, we're just kind of cleaning it up and modernizing it a little bit, but it feels like there's… 268 00:39:25.780 --> 00:39:29.120 Council Chambers: The opportunity to make sure that this all aligns well at this point. 269 00:39:29.170 --> 00:39:30.340 Council Chambers: Point. 270 00:39:31.220 --> 00:39:31.720 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Exactly. 271 00:39:31.720 --> 00:39:41.889 Council Chambers: Well, and I also feel like as a commissioner who is… I mean, this is not a paid or elected role, right? So this puts a lot of the onus 272 00:39:42.150 --> 00:39:55.210 Council Chambers: In the end, on paid and or elected personnel, where we're providing guidance, rather than, us maybe exposing ourselves to 273 00:39:55.400 --> 00:40:01.810 Council Chambers: Some concerns that… We're, you know, having a bias one way or another. Right. 274 00:40:02.290 --> 00:40:19.360 Council Chambers: Yeah, and I think as an advisory board to council, that's how it should work, right? Plus, thinking, you know, I think of this current configuration, and I've said to somebody, I really like the way we've had healthy dissension in this group, and been able to disagree, but still discuss things. 275 00:40:19.420 --> 00:40:28.100 Council Chambers: And that won't… that doesn't necessarily always hold true for every configuration of every group, so putting this all in the documentation. 276 00:40:28.430 --> 00:40:33.589 Council Chambers: Perpetuates the idea of good, good, you know? Yeah. 277 00:40:34.380 --> 00:40:36.290 Council Chambers: Sort of good discourse. 278 00:40:37.850 --> 00:40:44.139 Council Chambers: Austin, do you need action from PTAC on this memorandum? 279 00:40:44.720 --> 00:41:02.779 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: We don't. I was really here just for an informational briefing to get feedback from the commissioners, if you all have any, you know, major concerns before we take it to Council, hopefully on Monday nights. So really quick burn on this. So no, we don't, but if there are any questions or direction from, PTAC, happy to take that. 280 00:41:07.630 --> 00:41:11.799 Council Chambers: Any other comments or questions on this? 281 00:41:12.160 --> 00:41:14.750 Council Chambers: I'm sad. 282 00:41:16.790 --> 00:41:25.710 Council Chambers: So, what it does from the existing to the proposal is it takes item G, which is one that we spent a lot of time talking about back when this 283 00:41:25.730 --> 00:41:37.729 Council Chambers: code was first brought up a few years ago. What we wanted with item G was an area where the individual commissioners that were brought in to here based on their expertise, that's what the city uses. 284 00:41:37.860 --> 00:41:57.069 Council Chambers: could use their subjective… subjectivity component. This is… this is where it's not definable, it has to be everybody kind of defining it with… on their own. And I really like that, because the others are pretty obvious, like, what is a violent image, what's a sexually graphic image? Pretty easy, we could look at it. But then we had this subjective item G, so that's… 285 00:41:57.970 --> 00:42:02.349 Council Chambers: kind of removed in the next one, but given to Council to decide on. 286 00:42:02.620 --> 00:42:12.729 Council Chambers: So, that means that's not part of our weighing criteria, or would that just be something that we'd consider in our recommendation, that, hey, this would be offensive based on 287 00:42:13.190 --> 00:42:25.099 Council Chambers: general perceptions of the community and blah blah blah, like, it's sort of taking… it's sort of sharing the responsibility with Council versus us giving them a recommendation. Is that… am I reading it right? 288 00:42:25.100 --> 00:42:36.620 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: So, you would use the same approval guidelines as Council in making your recommendations. So, you'd look at the same factors Council would look at. And we did keep… I propose to keep most of those factors in, in 289 00:42:36.620 --> 00:42:55.779 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: kind of intact. So, the way that it would work under the proposed code within guidelines versus criteria, and it would be, you know, whether it positively promotes and enhances public space, that is consistent with the character and community values, and adds the unique vibrancy of the city. And then when reviewing this, 290 00:42:56.230 --> 00:43:01.660 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: You would also look at the approval criterias from, you know, from the existing code. 291 00:43:01.660 --> 00:43:25.290 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: I did, I did change that approval criteria G, so it's kept in there, and it does kind of shift that burden a little over to Council, that Council should deny any proposals, that essentially include that inappropriates, criteria. So, while I would encourage, PTAC to look at that in making a recommendation. 292 00:43:25.290 --> 00:43:29.169 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: That really is for Council's ultimate decision, 293 00:43:29.260 --> 00:43:42.179 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: in approving it. So it's not necessarily a per se approval guideline for PTAC to look at, but it's something I'd probably recommend that you look at holistically, whether or not you want to accept this arts under the factors. 294 00:43:42.760 --> 00:43:46.900 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: We also can strike that if you, if you think that it's, 295 00:43:47.530 --> 00:43:51.280 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: not needed. I… I'm not sure that we actually need that code language, but… 296 00:43:53.570 --> 00:44:08.089 Council Chambers: Might be helpful for Council. Too much, but it really raises some questions, like, if we… say we were to get another Black Lives Matter mural, request similar to this, under… before, under item G, if we had known what the subject matter was, we could have had a discussion about 297 00:44:08.300 --> 00:44:13.700 Council Chambers: I think it was in the bee itself was a clenched black fist, which has, historically, a meaning. 298 00:44:13.750 --> 00:44:27.550 Council Chambers: And some people might decide on the commission that that's definitely in the best interest of the city, because we should be in touch with our history, we live in a country that has this history, like, you know, in the best interest. Then again, that might be inappropriate to some people in our community. 299 00:44:27.550 --> 00:44:34.940 Council Chambers: It could be, you know, it might be interpreted that way. It's just really hard, and this is important because we do a lot… this… I think one of the most important things our commission does is 300 00:44:35.550 --> 00:45:00.490 Council Chambers: deliberate on these items and help advise the code that shapes the art policy, so it's worth a discussion on that. For sure, but do you… you don't think that's captured under, like, item A in the consistent with the character violence? No, I think a lot of people would say it's not a violent image, it's a stand up for yourself. No, but it says… no, above. Oh, A123. A123 are sort of three… They're, like, three relatively subjective criteria. Oh, right there. 301 00:45:00.490 --> 00:45:03.759 Council Chambers: discussion, where I… where it says specifically, like, PTAC, 302 00:45:03.760 --> 00:45:08.580 Council Chambers: You know, is considering it against these things, as opposed to the ones that are a little more clear-cut. 303 00:45:08.580 --> 00:45:19.609 Council Chambers: to me, that feels like it covers the… what you're saying, and I understand why that's important to you, but I don't… I don't think moving the specific language kind of out of that section, like, takes away that… 304 00:45:19.640 --> 00:45:21.989 Council Chambers: You know, takes away that. 305 00:45:22.150 --> 00:45:35.699 Council Chambers: I'd just like a little wiggle room where we can talk about what to put forward, but I guess that still pertains, because we have to weigh these three criteria. Right, exactly. And it seems to me that, you know, Austin, rewording what was… 306 00:45:35.700 --> 00:45:42.840 CouncilChambers: paragraph G into Section C now, really puts that onus onto the City Council. 307 00:45:42.840 --> 00:46:03.269 Council Chambers: And takes it off our plate. We can still address the topic. Yeah, yeah, we can, but, you know, that falls under one, two, or three paragraphs. I can't put something in public record at the same time, right? Yeah. I'm a little concerned about time. No, no, it's an important discussion, we just have quite a, like, packed agenda, so… 308 00:46:03.270 --> 00:46:04.420 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Okay, awesome. 309 00:46:04.420 --> 00:46:05.430 Council Chambers: Thank you. 310 00:46:05.430 --> 00:46:29.659 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Thank you all so much, and I, you know, after… I think I'm going to sit on this a little bit tonight, but I do think that I might propose that we strike, under, 1211040C, the existing language from, whether or not it's foreseeable to result in harm or disruption or anything, or it's used to see the property, just because I think it's unnecessary, given the other approval criteria, and it was kind of a holdover from the previous language, which is designed more of a 311 00:46:29.660 --> 00:46:33.410 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: public forum, limited public forum context. I don't think it's really needed right now. 312 00:46:34.460 --> 00:46:44.320 Council Chambers: Yeah, I would… I would agree with that, Austin. I think that that makes sense. It's kind of… it kind of, like, just muddies it a little bit more than feels necessary, honestly. Well, and it's… 313 00:46:44.920 --> 00:46:52.460 Council Chambers: It's city council's, issue, not ours. Right. And not to pass the box, but I think, yeah. 314 00:46:52.860 --> 00:47:04.029 Council Chambers: As I understand that. All right. The big, big, big money, right, Libby? Austin, thank you very much. Yeah, thank you. 315 00:47:04.340 --> 00:47:05.219 Council Chambers: That is… 316 00:47:05.220 --> 00:47:05.639 Austin Watkins, City Attorney: Thank you all. 317 00:47:05.670 --> 00:47:13.490 Council Chambers: Yeah, thank you, Austin. Always good to have you, by the way. All right, the Grants Committee. 318 00:47:13.980 --> 00:47:28.970 Council Chambers: We… we met last week? Week before? I… I don't know. Was it? Okay. Anyway, there are recommendations here. Sorry, guys, I'm going through the whole AP4, which is this package. 319 00:47:29.260 --> 00:47:32.590 Council Chambers: Do you want to run over these, or… 320 00:47:32.880 --> 00:47:47.979 Council Chambers: No. Okay, alright. I mean, I think, the immediate recommendations for next month's meeting were to cancel in-person, presentations. We're… 321 00:47:48.120 --> 00:47:53.790 Council Chambers: There's a real concern that, you know, the people who can make it have an advantage over the people who can't make it. 322 00:47:54.290 --> 00:47:58.629 Council Chambers: Everybody's welcome to come to the meeting, and encouraged to come to the meeting, but… 323 00:47:58.850 --> 00:48:12.129 Council Chambers: You know, let's not rely on in-person presentations, especially since that also makes us under a real time crunch for our evaluations and discussions. 324 00:48:12.240 --> 00:48:23.599 Council Chambers: And then once the September… I guess it closes at the end of this month, once the application deadline for the September 325 00:48:23.600 --> 00:48:42.910 Council Chambers: grants closes, we shut down the portal so that we can revamp it with some of the changes that theCommission elects to make. Those might include our recommendation, limiting an award to no more than $2,500. 326 00:48:43.100 --> 00:48:51.820 Council Chambers: So we don't have, especially in the last round, we had, you know, some great proposals that were, 15,000 or more, and 327 00:48:52.130 --> 00:48:56.679 Council Chambers: Add clarity around residency and event locations. 328 00:48:56.880 --> 00:49:04.409 Council Chambers: Give people a chance to upload a video of their work, oral presentation, 329 00:49:04.770 --> 00:49:22.970 Council Chambers: kind of what they would be doing in a public presentation, but do it online so that we can all look at it ahead of time. Simplify the reporting, add a mixer, which I think is Katy's suggestion, it's a great idea. Review and edit the guidelines and FAQs, as I said, we'll 330 00:49:23.270 --> 00:49:41.859 Council Chambers: Update the portal, and increase, if possible, the link between the application deadline and our review of it at a meeting, so we can pose questions, perhaps, if need be, just so we're not under as much time crunch. 331 00:49:42.340 --> 00:49:48.290 Council Chambers: Yeah, right now there's a two-week gap, like, it's usually the third, like, the… 332 00:49:48.290 --> 00:50:02.809 Council Chambers: Yeah, it's a Thursday, and then the Thursday two weeks later is when the review meeting is, and that can be certainly, like, made longer. And I have a question, not on the grants committee, but a thought I've had about simplification is, 333 00:50:03.310 --> 00:50:14.870 Council Chambers: You know, we have a certain block of money that we give in each round of grants, and before we even see what the applicants and the requests are, is to maybe think about how 334 00:50:15.210 --> 00:50:16.859 Council Chambers: You know, like, we… 335 00:50:16.980 --> 00:50:26.089 Council Chambers: We spread a lot very thin. And instead, do we want to look at a number like $7,500 and say we're going to do one $2,500 award? 336 00:50:26.220 --> 00:50:41.649 Council Chambers: two $1,000 awards, and two… five… I don't know if I just did the math right, but something, like, along those lines, so that coming in, instead of us having this discussion and trying to spend a lot of time assigning values. 337 00:50:41.850 --> 00:50:47.999 Council Chambers: We know we're going to give 8 awards, this is what they look like for this round, and we make our best decisions. 338 00:50:48.240 --> 00:50:54.730 Council Chambers: Yeah, I think we had a similar discussion in the Grants Committee, I feel like, what did… it felt like… 339 00:50:55.200 --> 00:51:01.200 Council Chambers: There was some… concern about that? That might, like, sort of… 340 00:51:01.470 --> 00:51:21.169 Council Chambers: you know, some people just ask for a very modest sum, and, like, it's nice to be able to award it, and, like, you know, it just felt like maybe the constriction of that didn't… didn't land super hard with you guys. Does that sound right? Or, like… Yeah, I think it would be difficult to know ahead of time what the applications are going to look like if we have 341 00:51:21.210 --> 00:51:33.259 Council Chambers: you know, 10 applications for $500, and we said, well, we're only going to give 6 applica… 6 grants for $500. Is there a point? Sure, okay. But, I mean, I… 342 00:51:33.260 --> 00:51:43.499 Council Chambers: I think that was our thinking about, you know, limiting… Yeah, maybe somewhere to play with that in there, not so much as having it so fixed ahead of time, but maybe us thinking of some formulas that help us make that… 343 00:51:43.720 --> 00:51:49.639 Council Chambers: final bit go faster, so we don't spend as much time, like, doing… 344 00:51:49.660 --> 00:52:12.019 Council Chambers: I think… I think having the top, like, just setting that top award limit was sort of, like, the first step. Yeah, yeah, I like that. Seeing how that felt. Yeah, and if that felt like it made it a little easier, then that was good, and maybe there's, like, room to continue. Sure. You know, I think that was sort of the… that's what I remember kind of coming out of the meeting, yeah. This is after a couple of them, that's the one thing I feel like, as a committee, we've spent 345 00:52:12.020 --> 00:52:16.290 Council Chambers: A lot of time on at the end, is how to best Spread the dollars out. 346 00:52:16.560 --> 00:52:25.050 Council Chambers: And ideally, each year, the budget will increase, right? So, whether it's, like, a number or a percentage… 347 00:52:25.060 --> 00:52:38.390 Council Chambers: Yeah, percentages might be easier if you do that. I mean, one thing that we could work on is, like, because we did develop this rubric this year that I think people appreciated, is that the rubric could do math. 348 00:52:38.990 --> 00:52:47.010 Council Chambers: You know what I mean? And that could maybe… maybe that wouldn't be the final decision, but it could take, you know, based on the score there, it could take the… 349 00:52:47.210 --> 00:52:56.070 Council Chambers: You know, and if people have more time to spend with it and fill out the rubric and stuff, we'd have better information from which to, like, derive those numbers, and so that could all kind of help towards that. 350 00:52:56.560 --> 00:53:08.970 Council Chambers: the root group doesn't do math yet, but we could teach it how, yeah. The timeline that you're wanting to increase between the closing of the applications and the grant meeting, does that include a 351 00:53:09.060 --> 00:53:24.749 Council Chambers: extra meeting in between where we would… No, no, it would just give people more time to spend with the application. My vision of that is that it would give us time to say, hey, we feel like this piece of information is missing. 352 00:53:24.870 --> 00:53:30.930 Council Chambers: So we can go back to the applicant. I don't know… Right, that was also an idea, is if there's more time, then… 353 00:53:30.930 --> 00:53:48.200 Council Chambers: then the commissioners could review things earlier, and then if there's missing information, since if we're not going to have people come and do in-person presentations anymore, there'd be time to kind of reach out and get some of those questions answered. So you could be like, oh, I really like this application, but I'm not sure about this part, and then we could reach out to the person and say, like, hey, what's up with this part? 354 00:53:48.370 --> 00:53:52.219 Council Chambers: get that information back to the Commission to integrate into their thinking. 355 00:53:52.310 --> 00:53:58.570 Council Chambers: I was just thinking about that. The nice part about having people here, even if they're not presenting, is we can ask them a quick question. 356 00:53:58.570 --> 00:54:19.650 Council Chambers: But then that means there's an edge over attendees versus not. So maybe either having an attendee for questions or a hotline number that someone just keeps near them. As far as uploading videos and stuff, I kind of had a quick conversation with Lonnie about that a couple meetings ago. I saw him roll his eyes, like, oh, great. Like, it's actually a little more complicated than it sounds to take that and make it all public. 357 00:54:19.820 --> 00:54:34.769 Council Chambers: publicly accessible before… I don't know. Predominantly, the only thing I can see is that… I mean, if you upload a YouTube video, we can set the link, yeah. …and you can go to it. But private videos? This is on my phone. 358 00:54:34.810 --> 00:54:49.450 Council Chambers: Right. There's no way for me to put it in a PDF form, Matt, so… Well, then the link could work, probably could see it. I like that idea. I guess I imagine that it'd be more like, you know how I've been sending out the folders ahead of time with information in them? 359 00:54:49.460 --> 00:54:59.130 Council Chambers: So you'd be able to review the video before the meeting. It wouldn't be something I'm playing in the meeting. Yeah. And for the sake of time, I mean, I think this is an important discussion. Yeah. 360 00:54:59.380 --> 00:55:12.169 Council Chambers: correct me if I'm wrong here, but the only immediate action items would be under immediate recommendations, and everything else are things that we can continue to discuss as the Commission before we get to the next… 361 00:55:12.290 --> 00:55:31.970 Council Chambers: before the end of the year. I mean, doesn't… well, if we close the portal after the deadline, we can decide, or the Commission can decide whatever schedule it wants for 2027, which I think is one of the… you know, and then we can just… I can put up something on the website that says, like. 362 00:55:32.130 --> 00:55:51.930 Council Chambers: More, yeah, yeah, yeah, like, grants will reopen in 2027 with deadlines, like, keep… check back or whatever. So, I think that, you know, that yeah, there's much… there's… there's time to dig deeper into, like, the rest of these conversations in the, you know, meetings that are still, happening in 2026, so… 363 00:55:52.250 --> 00:56:00.239 Council Chambers: And I think, you know, those are very important questions. Yeah. You know, I just… 364 00:56:01.510 --> 00:56:19.840 Council Chambers: now that I've said that, as a distraction, you know, one of the other things we talked about was perhaps, when we get to budget later in this meeting, maybe redirecting the money that's now going to the video program into an alternate artist in residence program. 365 00:56:20.210 --> 00:56:22.880 Council Chambers: gave the Poet Laureate at a… 366 00:56:23.010 --> 00:56:26.289 Council Chambers: Artists in residence that rotates every year between. 367 00:56:26.490 --> 00:56:30.830 Council Chambers: Visual art, music, performance, 368 00:56:31.110 --> 00:56:35.469 Council Chambers: Whatever. Theater film. Theater film, culinary. 369 00:56:35.470 --> 00:57:00.300 Council Chambers: Right. So it'd be, like, an artist… an artist laureate to kind of go with the laureate. A laureate. Yeah. Wait a minute. So because… because these, recommendations came out of, like, a subcommittee, which isn't actually allowed to make decisions, only the full commissions made decisions, I do think we probably would need, like, a motion for, like. 370 00:57:00.300 --> 00:57:15.110 Council Chambers: immediate recommendations, and the rest could be continued to discuss. So, could I just ask for clarity? Would we be canceling the in-person presentations by applicants and still inviting them to the meeting, but also letting them know that if they want to create the video where there's a link that could be put in their packet? 371 00:57:15.190 --> 00:57:32.180 Council Chambers: Is that something we can do? We have a link in… we have a link at the very last page of our original call that actually works. Because that'd be easy for him, versus people sending in their home video, like he said. Well, here's the thing, the question has to be, is how much is that… how much is that video going to sway you whenever it comes to, I didn't send in the video? 372 00:57:33.350 --> 00:57:37.650 Council Chambers: Yeah. I mean, I have a question… clarifying question. Does it… is it… 373 00:57:37.880 --> 00:57:42.089 Council Chambers: Is it our problem, or is it on us that, like. 374 00:57:42.450 --> 00:57:47.900 Council Chambers: whoever shows up gets a slight advantage. I mean, isn't that okay? 375 00:57:48.930 --> 00:57:53.159 Council Chambers: Only an advantage to where, like, if you were asking questions like. 376 00:57:53.270 --> 00:58:01.120 Council Chambers: say, oh, did you get funded for this last year? I mean, that's something we could look up. Like, that might be something you want to know, and it's always quick and easy to ask them. 377 00:58:01.270 --> 00:58:19.010 Council Chambers: Or, oh yeah, we're getting some, you know, I guess it's… a lot of it's in the application. Yeah, I mean, revamping the edge… the… revamping the application so that it does actually capture all of the information that is wanted by the Commission is, like, part of the idea, right, of moving forward, so that… 378 00:58:19.120 --> 00:58:27.619 Council Chambers: I just don't think we need to do extra work just to make up for people that don't… that aren't able to be present for whatever reason. 379 00:58:28.600 --> 00:58:42.210 Council Chambers: I just… my thought about that is, I mean, I agree, and, you know, if I've got a day job I can't get out of, that automatically disadvantages my proposal. 380 00:58:43.160 --> 00:58:49.499 Council Chambers: So, the presentations, we've mentioned this before, it does give us a sort of… 381 00:58:49.730 --> 00:59:13.310 Council Chambers: ability to touch base with our arts people in town. Right. You get to see a face with a name of an organization. That's one of the perks of this job. It is, yeah. That was one of the… that was the idea of… that… that came up of adding sort of, like, a mixer at the end of the year instead, so, like, all… inviting all the grantees to something together. I know, or whatever. Well, but we talked about it, maybe you do that in lieu of a written report, so it's, like, semi- mandatory. 382 00:59:13.310 --> 00:59:18.869 Council Chambers: Yeah, you know, or whatever, because I do agree, I mean, to me, that's, like, the best thing about… 383 00:59:19.040 --> 00:59:34.189 Council Chambers: those meetings is you get to see all these people doing different projects that you wouldn't see otherwise. But I don't think that's really necessarily a super fair reason to make them do something relatively inconvenient. Right. And also, like, you know, if people show up, if they're present, we're gonna… 384 00:59:34.310 --> 00:59:40.980 Council Chambers: interact with them. And what I would hate to see is, like, inviting them to come, but then, like, decreasing our interaction with them. 385 00:59:40.980 --> 00:59:59.569 Council Chambers: when they take the time to come to the meeting. How would it work? Would we even have them introduce themselves, or would we only just, if we had a question on an application, say, is someone from this group here? I don't… Because otherwise it gives an edge just to even knowing who showed up. That's… I mean, that's the… that's why I think it's actually better not to do it. And I think… I think because we had already said in the past. 386 00:59:59.620 --> 01:00:08.310 Council Chambers: like, that we've done this, and we hadn't sort of canceled it already, it felt right to still say, like, hey, you can come, we're not gonna do these 3-minute presentations, but come if you want to. 387 01:00:08.660 --> 01:00:24.760 Council Chambers: You know what I mean? Like, because it's already sort of been advertised out there, and people… but I think in general, moving forward, it's more equitable just not to do that. Like, it's very unusual for, like, a grant giving… making organization to do that. You don't usually do that. So then the idea is if we have a question, we have to… 388 01:00:24.760 --> 01:00:36.220 Council Chambers: propose it to them before the meeting, so we can answer it. Yeah, so it sort of makes it more… Yeah, it kind of makes it more on the commissioners to do the homework, honestly, is what it does, and I think that that's fair. 389 01:00:36.220 --> 01:00:54.830 Council Chambers: And I think, you know… It's almost like you guys thought this out. Sorry. I think for September, what I'm envisioning is… if I… I don't speak for you, but we would like more time for the Commission to, 390 01:00:55.190 --> 01:00:56.780 Council Chambers: deliberate. 391 01:00:57.030 --> 01:01:07.130 Council Chambers: Whereas I think we take up a lot of our time with the presentations, many of which are kind of reading verbatim what they put in their application. 392 01:01:07.270 --> 01:01:14.839 Council Chambers: And the people who have a good presentation probably do have an advantage. Or a nice smile. 393 01:01:14.900 --> 01:01:31.510 Council Chambers: That shouldn't be why you get a grant. Yeah, you're right, you're right. Yeah, it shouldn't. Mr. Temple's over here. So… so, is there any more discussion on… on this? You guys ever… 394 01:01:31.770 --> 01:01:34.130 Council Chambers: Change your mind because you talked to someone? 395 01:01:35.710 --> 01:01:46.089 Council Chambers: The example I would bring up was the first round we did this year, where the lady from the woodworking, you know, she raised her hand and said. 396 01:01:46.200 --> 01:02:03.360 Council Chambers: you know, I need to know now in order to order the wood to be able to complete the project by the end of the year. Right. And that's why usually, like, a very standard grant question is a timeline, and, like, when you need funding by, and, you know, there's a number of things, I think, that would 397 01:02:03.490 --> 01:02:07.209 Council Chambers: Change a little bit in this process, and one of which is that, like. 398 01:02:07.210 --> 01:02:31.220 Council Chambers: the applicants would have to be a little more careful, and the other is that the commissioners would have to be a little more careful, and I don't think that either of those things is, like, wrong to ask for, personally. Yeah, I think clarifying the timeline question, what are the factors that… Right, or like, would… if you didn't get funding this round, could you… we can even… I mean, we can put that in the application. Like, that's a good question to ask, because, like, you know… I'm just wondering how many times have you been swayed 399 01:02:31.220 --> 01:02:32.859 Council Chambers: I'm listening to the… 400 01:02:32.970 --> 01:02:41.970 Council Chambers: the videos and everything, how many times have you been swayed by two people sitting there? Good question. To say, okay, I was going to think about giving this person, but they made a really good 401 01:02:42.440 --> 01:03:06.399 Council Chambers: That happened with Yvonne last… Right. Last time. Yvonne would not have gotten funded if it hadn't been online. And so that's kind of what I'm saying, so we're going to get rid of that, and we're going to look at the paperwork, and that's what we're going to make decisions off of, just the paperwork. I mean, in the last round, I will say there was somebody who I thought I would want to give a grant to, and then in listening and comparing it to the others, realized that they need to do more. 402 01:03:06.400 --> 01:03:10.180 Council Chambers: work on their grant request. And someone else that I thought. 403 01:03:10.180 --> 01:03:12.330 Council Chambers: There's not really any way I'm gonna… 404 01:03:12.540 --> 01:03:33.290 Council Chambers: look for that, and in the end, I was like, yeah, we should give the guy a couple… Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking. What's this llama thing? Yeah. So what you're saying is, what you're saying is, so the meeting will come up, we'll do whatever, our normal business, and then we'll go into grants, and then it'll just be discussion. Yeah. 405 01:03:33.310 --> 01:03:37.489 Council Chambers: Correct. And then we'll make the decision at that point in time. Right. And we're… 406 01:03:39.310 --> 01:03:55.749 Council Chambers: That seems like… I mean, it's all… pretty much, it's always in your hands anyway, so I mean, pretty much as you just know what you're going to do. Is that a motion? No. But you're discussing it at that point in time. Yeah. Well, we do need a motion, which would be to, 407 01:03:55.790 --> 01:04:00.990 Council Chambers: Accept or amend the immediate recommendations from the grant committee. 408 01:04:01.480 --> 01:04:09.879 Council Chambers: So there's going to be a weird little overlap of not having the new application revamped in time for this new condition, so we probably want to put in the email, like. 409 01:04:09.920 --> 01:04:16.779 Council Chambers: really do a thorough application in this next round, or something like that. Do we have any applications currently? 410 01:04:16.780 --> 01:04:40.610 Council Chambers: Yeah, we do, but I can email… this is what we did last time. Yeah. Last round, because the rubric was developed, and that hadn't been developed the first time, like, when some grant applications came in. So I did reach out to those applicants and say, hey, here's the rubric that we're actually going to… that PTAC's actually going to be using to judge your grant. Do you want to make any changes to your grant? So I can definitely do that with the same thing, like, hey, this is, you know, we'renot going to have the 411 01:04:40.850 --> 01:04:54.150 Council Chambers: like, PTAC is not going to have the in-person presentations, still welcome to come and observe the meeting, but if there's anything… if you were expecting to do that, and you want to make changes because you're not going to be able to have that, you know, kind of chance to present orally, like. 412 01:04:54.190 --> 01:05:11.629 Council Chambers: I can, you know, I can… I can reach out and give them that option. Nobody reads anything, but I'm happy to do it. I'll make a motion to both cancel the in-person presentations of the applicants and close the portal until the end of year to revamp the application and materials. 413 01:05:11.800 --> 01:05:19.830 Council Chambers: You coming out of maternity. My brain's still working. Is there a second? 414 01:05:20.540 --> 01:05:21.480 Council Chambers: That's okay. 415 01:05:22.340 --> 01:05:26.390 Council Chambers: Nice. All… any more discussion? 416 01:05:27.600 --> 01:05:28.860 Council Chambers: All in favor? 417 01:05:30.620 --> 01:05:43.469 Council Chambers: That's exciting. All right. First time in decades. Some changes. Trying this out. Yeah. Great. What's next? Art Awards! Oh, oh, this is a fun one, guys. So, 418 01:05:44.530 --> 01:05:59.390 Council Chambers: Let me skip this part. Laureate part. This is another recommendation by the Art Awards Committee. Does someone want to talk about it? Who was there on that? That's so I don't have to do all the talking? 419 01:05:59.600 --> 01:06:09.829 Council Chambers: I don't remember, I don't have the… where I wrote down the person's… Oh, here. They're, they're, 420 01:06:10.670 --> 01:06:16.260 Council Chambers: Here, the… Claire. Claire Ragland. Claire Ragland, yeah. Right. 421 01:06:16.960 --> 01:06:25.359 Council Chambers: I don't know, I can do it, it's fine. So the Arts Award, committee met. 422 01:06:25.540 --> 01:06:36.560 Council Chambers: last week, and looked at four different applications that came in for artists who applied to make this year's awards. You all might remember last year, Victoria Power made the sort of golden 423 01:06:36.770 --> 01:06:56.320 Council Chambers: Seaweed awards. And yeah, I think… so, so four different applications… we looked at four different applications, and the, committee, which is Doug and Sheena and Dana, recommended this one to PTAC. So this is an artist named Claire Ragland. 424 01:06:57.430 --> 01:07:03.730 Council Chambers: And she has proposed doing a series of vessels. These are just sort of… these are the, 425 01:07:03.800 --> 01:07:18.829 Council Chambers: examples. The examples she gave, but I think there's sort of this… I think this is the most relevant one, doing a series of six… six ceramic vessels that will act as the awards for 20… for the 2026 artists who are, are, 426 01:07:18.990 --> 01:07:23.360 Council Chambers: recipients in 2026. And… 427 01:07:23.650 --> 01:07:31.059 Council Chambers: Yeah, her work samples are in here, as well as, you know, the application that she put together. 428 01:07:31.480 --> 01:07:36.430 Council Chambers: And… Yeah, everyone thought that these would be really… 429 01:07:37.340 --> 01:07:41.780 Council Chambers: That people would like them, that they're, like, you know, representative of kind of, like, a cool… 430 01:07:42.900 --> 01:07:58.110 Council Chambers: Port Townsend kind of spirit, handmade spirit. She's gonna use, like, a metallic glaze on them to kind of keep that, like, golden award feeling. And yeah, everyone, I don't know, people, I think just generally, like. 431 01:07:58.510 --> 01:08:03.080 Council Chambers: The committee felt like this was the strongest of the… Of the applicants, 432 01:08:03.240 --> 01:08:08.689 Council Chambers: And wanted to bring it to the full commission for approval, essentially, so… 433 01:08:09.110 --> 01:08:12.870 Council Chambers: Is there anything else y'all want to add, Doug or Dana? 434 01:08:13.370 --> 01:08:18.649 Council Chambers: You know, I think we'd like that the lady who did last year's awards also applied this year. 435 01:08:18.790 --> 01:08:25.109 Council Chambers: Yeah, I'd like to work, but I think it's nice to have something different when you distribute the, 436 01:08:25.390 --> 01:08:28.030 Council Chambers: Distribute the weld. 437 01:08:28.130 --> 01:08:37.279 Council Chambers: Yeah, there's four applicants, so… That's great. Did we all see this? No, we just brought the one that was recommended by the committee to the full… 438 01:08:37.390 --> 01:08:38.720 Council Chambers: Full commission. 439 01:08:39.300 --> 01:08:46.060 Council Chambers: That's how we did it last year as well, that the committee looked at the, you know, the committee chose the… chose the 440 01:08:47.100 --> 01:09:01.690 Council Chambers: chose the artist. See you next month! Thanks for coming! Thank you. Or that the committee recommended the artist, I guess, to the… to the… to the, so we don't get to see all four at all. 441 01:09:02.890 --> 01:09:09.569 Council Chambers: I didn't put them in the packet, I mean, we can… I can… I can share them out, just for curious, yeah, for sure, for sure, yeah. 442 01:09:10.020 --> 01:09:22.790 Council Chambers: Claire, Victoria, do we know the two other people? Yeah, so Swerve Wisely, who just opened the paint, sort of, artisan Paint Your Own Pottery place down here, and then, an artist named Sasa 443 01:09:23.319 --> 01:09:28.969 Council Chambers: salsa… Berlin? Belland? Salsa Belland? 444 01:09:29.830 --> 01:09:45.230 Council Chambers: who had sort of an interesting proposal of making kind of more, like, medallions, more like medals, you know, almost, like, kind of, it felt very, like, Olympic, you know, or whatever. I don't believe you wear those. No, like, they were, like, medallions, like, medallions. Wood. 445 01:09:45.229 --> 01:09:51.499 Council Chambers: I think they were wooden, and they were sort of intricately painted, like medallions, yeah. 446 01:09:51.569 --> 01:10:05.240 Council Chambers: Vandala, is that the word for it? Mandala? Yeah, sort of like mandalas, yeah, but they, you know, they read sort of, like, yeah, like, super hippie Olympic medals. It was kind of… they were kind of… I mean, they were nice. Yeah. I think our feeling was it wasn't as much of a… 447 01:10:05.920 --> 01:10:10.050 Council Chambers: trophy feeling, and sort of… 448 01:10:11.480 --> 01:10:31.480 Council Chambers: Was that the fungi one? Yeah. Yeah, he, he was… not that I dislike fungi and slugs, but that was… It was very slug-focused. It was… they were cool. Yeah. But I think, I think Claire… I think Claire's just felt… Yeah, yeah. I think Claire's felt the most, sort of, at peace with, like. 449 01:10:31.570 --> 01:10:44.080 Council Chambers: the la- you know, like, sort of continuing a… Art as an award for art. Yeah, like that. You know, I thought sort of, like, aligned with the ones Victoria had made, and like, you know, felt like maybe it was… 450 01:10:44.080 --> 01:10:50.009 Libby Wennstrom: It's a trophy that you could put on your shelf, but it's just a sort of an artsy trophy. 451 01:10:50.180 --> 01:11:06.750 Council Chambers: Right, yeah. But it doesn't have any, like, writing on it, because it's an article. No. 30 years from now, it will just be a vessel. Yeah. Oh, they'll know. Goodwill. Yeah, maybe. I mean, last year's did not either. But should it? That's what I'm… should it say? Something else. 452 01:11:07.040 --> 01:11:22.240 Council Chambers: It's an interesting question. I, like, in corporate world, I got so many various desk things, I'd call them, and the only ones I kept are the ones that don't have something engraved that says I got it for this or that. 453 01:11:22.330 --> 01:11:46.949 Council Chambers: Because those ended up being, like, oh, these are nice art pieces without any weird engraving on them. Right. So there is a plus and a minus, you know. They get their certificate. Yeah, they get a certificate with it, like a proclamation. I can see what you're saying, a little plinth, a little vase or something would be cool. Or underneath, on the back. On the back? Yeah. There were plinths. 454 01:11:46.950 --> 01:11:48.310 Council Chambers: added to 455 01:11:48.310 --> 01:11:54.959 Council Chambers: Victoria's, yeah, but they didn't say anything, they're just wood blocks. You know, that would be a place to put something. 456 01:11:55.070 --> 01:12:05.319 Council Chambers: I always like labeling art not on the art, but somewhere. Well, I personally am thrilled that our subcommittees are delivering such awesome ideas, and 457 01:12:05.460 --> 01:12:08.819 Council Chambers: Conclusions and proposals and ceramic awards. 458 01:12:08.900 --> 01:12:26.690 Council Chambers: Cool. Well done. Would you like to make a motion to… would you like to make a motion to move this project forward? I've been seconding, I'll make this. Okay, all right. I'll make a motion thatwe accept the changes as proposed. 459 01:12:27.030 --> 01:12:51.679 Council Chambers: Oh, I'm sorry, except the rewards as proposed. That's very hard to put in the notes. Just keep that motion handy for later. I propose to do the change. All right, it has been moved and seconded, except, Claire Reglin's proposal 460 01:12:51.680 --> 01:12:53.529 Council Chambers: For the art boards. 461 01:12:54.170 --> 01:13:10.189 Council Chambers: Cool. Trophies. Comments? Questions? Did somebody emails her after the meeting or something? Yeah. You get all the… I get to do all the great emails. That's good. Good question. What is your stipend for that? It's $1,500. 462 01:13:10.290 --> 01:13:12.519 Council Chambers: All in favor? 463 01:13:13.550 --> 01:13:17.639 Council Chambers: That's unanimous, okay, great, thank you. All right. 464 01:13:18.700 --> 01:13:43.690 Council Chambers: So, Rafina, was gonna join us today, but she has a concussion. It's actually a real bummer. Yeah, she had a concussion playing soccer, so she submitted some notes that I… and, and they were a little bit late, because she was planning to be here, but… so I, had Lonnie print them up for everybody, and then for the pack, I guess, for, like, post-pack it, right? Yep. But, I think the major 465 01:13:43.690 --> 01:13:55.799 Council Chambers: takeaway from this, just… I'll keep it really brief since Rafina's not here, is that Rafina continues to do lots of stuff, all the time. This is a Poet Laureate. Oh, okay. This is the Port Townsend Poet Laureate. 466 01:13:55.960 --> 01:14:04.409 Council Chambers: She's been, she has done, like, you know, several recent events in the community, has several more coming up, 467 01:14:04.840 --> 01:14:19.849 Council Chambers: And, I think it… I would highlight the fact that she's working on a capstone for this year, so each year, the Poet Lori is supposed to do a capstone project, and for this year, she's putting together a chapbook of, her poems from this first 468 01:14:19.970 --> 01:14:28.189 Council Chambers: year as Poet Laureate, which I think is really nice. I mean, there'll be sort of, like, an actual item, you know, like a piece of… 469 01:14:29.200 --> 01:14:30.020 Council Chambers: Work. 470 01:14:30.290 --> 01:14:44.550 Council Chambers: That will exist beyond the two years that she's Poet Laureate. And then she has also, you know, a bunch of ideas for next year, and at some point we'll talk about that in more detail. I would say… 471 01:14:44.550 --> 01:14:51.119 Council Chambers: I think, Heidi, you were that, or maybe currently the still the sole member of the Poet Laureate. 472 01:14:51.120 --> 01:14:54.880 Council Chambers: Like, subcommittee, which we made just basically to, you know. 473 01:14:54.880 --> 01:15:04.420 Council Chambers: put a new… to put Rufina in place to select a Polarin, and I've been working with, you know, with her as needed to 474 01:15:04.420 --> 01:15:23.300 Council Chambers: help with administration and help her with, like, budgeting and that kind of stuff, but if there's a PTAC, if PT… you know, if there's PTAC members who want to be, you know, involved more in that process, and we want to have kind of a poet laureate committee that's work that's happening, like, that's, you know, doable. I'm just… we're just gonna move it forward. So, that's just something to… 475 01:15:23.510 --> 01:15:24.480 Council Chambers: think about. 476 01:15:24.730 --> 01:15:44.450 Council Chambers: not a decision we have to make right now or anything, but, especially, like, looking ahead to 2027, it might be great to sit down, right, with some people and talk about what next year might look like, what works well this year, what maybe needs a little bit of refinement, and also, we do need to start talking about, the selection process for the Poet Laureate that will start at the end of 2027 through 2028, so… 477 01:15:45.510 --> 01:15:58.710 Council Chambers: I also know she has a budget request. Yes, so… That we'll need to deal with. Yes, so we'll look at that when we get to the budget part really quick, but just looking really at, administrative… 478 01:15:58.820 --> 01:16:16.460 Council Chambers: thoughts aside, she wants to, you know, one of her goals for next year is to sort of involve more youth in the Poet Laureate program, and she has this kind of really cool idea about doing kind of like a scavenger hunt poetry thing around town to get kids, like, moving through town and finding poems and writing poems. 479 01:16:16.460 --> 01:16:20.109 Council Chambers: And then I think she really enjoyed the art and poetry workshop that 480 01:16:20.190 --> 01:16:28.180 Council Chambers: she did at SoundCheck, I don't know if any of you guys checked stuff in there. Yeah, I did, yeah. And I think it was… it was just, like, it was kind of, like, relatively low… 481 01:16:29.110 --> 01:16:36.869 Council Chambers: it was low barrier for people, but it also wasn't, like, a ton of work to put together, but I think it felt really good, so I think she wants to do some more of that. 482 01:16:36.870 --> 01:16:49.959 Council Chambers: And then the big thing is that she really wants to partner with Centrum, which I think is a really awesome idea, and would, like, hopefully carry on beyond this Poet Laureate, right? So that the Poet Laureate would be more interwoven into their… 483 01:16:50.000 --> 01:17:00.869 Council Chambers: writing workshops and, like, all the writing stuff they do, and maybe also hada standing residency for part of the year or something like that with Centrum, because she did highlight 484 01:17:01.010 --> 01:17:10.679 Council Chambers: this fact… I guess for some reason, not all of the notes showed up on here. But she did highlight that, like, finding time to actually write 485 01:17:10.680 --> 01:17:35.580 Council Chambers: you know, has been, like, is, like, not, you know, right, it's sort of, like, a lot of public-facing work, and so I'm just trying to build in some space and time to support the poet to actually do writing, which I thought was really nice. For notes, there was, like, a few more things on here that for some reason I just didn't print out, but she just was saying that she had received a surprising number of invitations to participate in things just by virtue of being the poet laureate, which I thought was kind of cool. 486 01:17:35.580 --> 01:17:43.259 Council Chambers: exciting, and, like, offered a lot of opportunities. And then she mentioned… What you're wanting to involve. 487 01:17:43.540 --> 01:17:51.330 Council Chambers: more youth, and really highlighting that in year two, and then the thing about, sort of, space and time to actually do some writing as part of the program as well, so… 488 01:17:53.230 --> 01:18:11.380 Council Chambers: My comment is I had to look up the term ecclesi. It's descriptive poetry. A literary work, most often a poem, that vividly depicts, interprets, or responds to a visual work of art. 489 01:18:11.380 --> 01:18:35.669 Council Chambers: In this case, the button blanket. Right. Like, ode to a Grecian era, right? Classic example. Yeah, yeah. Good, good one for, for Wordle. Well, my only question would… would be… would be, do we… does the commission need 490 01:18:35.670 --> 01:18:39.219 Council Chambers: to participate in the discussion with Centrum. 491 01:18:39.470 --> 01:18:49.609 Council Chambers: I mean, and if we're increasing the budget for a Centrum program, maybe this is a discussion for the next 492 01:18:49.680 --> 01:18:51.589 Council Chambers: Agenda item, but… Yeah, yeah. 493 01:18:51.600 --> 01:19:09.850 Council Chambers: What's our role in those two big questions? I think it could be either way. I mean, I think, like, Rafina and I could go speak with them. I've already reached out to Eric, who's the writing person and stuff, and we have… we're supposed tohave a phone call at some point, that kind of thing. So I don't know that… that… 494 01:19:09.850 --> 01:19:17.019 Council Chambers: unless someone really wants to be, like, directly involved in those discussions, like, that'd be awesome, but I think Rafina and I could also go. 495 01:19:17.030 --> 01:19:31.240 Council Chambers: talk about it if PTAC was like, yeah, we like that idea, like, go ahead and see what you can find out, like, we can come back with… we can do a fact-finding mission, you know, and come back with more information. Or, like I said, if, like, someone's like, oh, no, I wanna, I wanna come with, like, them. 496 01:19:31.240 --> 01:19:40.799 Council Chambers: or, you know, I want to be involved in those discussions, I want to hear it from the horse's mouth, then that's great, too. So it's… but I don't think it's necessary. Which programs exactly would it be for? 497 01:19:40.940 --> 01:19:56.399 Council Chambers: Well, I think… I think there's a couple… there's the, ruffina already did, like, a residency at Centrum, the local artist residency, where you just get a studio space, you don't get a housing as well. Right. And I think that that's something that we could maybe make, sort of, semi… 498 01:19:56.410 --> 01:20:05.809 Council Chambers: just, like, permanent or whatever, like, try to integrate into the program, like, that's part of what… as the Poe Laureate, you get a couple week residency at… writing residency. Right at the end of this paperwork. 499 01:20:05.810 --> 01:20:29.599 Council Chambers: Yeah. So that would be a perfect way to launch the material. Yes, right, totally, yeah. So there's… and then there's the part, and then the other is the Writers Conference. So that's what I was asking, is it, like, is it going to be mostly servicing people that are coming in from out of town for a program, or for locals? Because if it's servicing people from out of town, it's almost like a $1,500 grant to Centrum for the services that they do. 500 01:20:29.860 --> 01:20:45.509 Council Chambers: Well, I think that the question is, and I was hoping to be able to connect with Eric before this meeting, because I think, ideally, we could arrange some sort of a partnership where the Poet Laureate was doing maybe, like, more like a work exchange, or like a workshop, or, you know, it was sort of just that… 501 01:20:45.800 --> 01:20:52.459 Council Chambers: part of that week included the Poet Laureate being involved as 502 01:20:53.230 --> 01:21:04.620 Council Chambers: a guest speaker, or something like that, and not necessarily… and that it would be… not necessarily become something that, yeah, that was paid for by the… 503 01:21:04.700 --> 01:21:13.519 Council Chambers: Well, that's what I'd like to personally hear more, because, like, to Dan's point, like, if it was $1,500, so she could participate, and… Right. 504 01:21:13.610 --> 01:21:21.810 Council Chambers: be, you know, fully engaged in that program, and use that as write, you know, dedicated writing time and inspiration time. Yeah. 505 01:21:21.810 --> 01:21:36.480 Council Chambers: then that is an investment in our laureate, and it's further value to the town. Yeah. But to Dan's point, if it's to, you know, run workshops for central participants, it might be servicing more. 506 01:21:36.560 --> 01:21:39.609 Council Chambers: Right. Non-residents, in which case. 507 01:21:40.150 --> 01:21:50.020 Council Chambers: Could we, you know, run a resident program, like, something for non-attendees, or something that happens concurrently that, you know, kind of crosses the idea. 508 01:21:50.020 --> 01:22:04.639 Libby Wennstrom: Now, I also realized that a fair percentage, particularly of the Writers' Workshop, a non-insignificant percentage of those people are local, too, so it's not… it isn't that there are non… that it's all non-locals participating in the Writers Central Writers' Workshop. 509 01:22:04.690 --> 01:22:15.350 Council Chambers: Good point, Libby. It also seems like there is an advantage, to a limited point, of promoting Port Townsend's artistic… Yeah. 510 01:22:15.500 --> 01:22:21.740 Council Chambers: Collaborations delivered of the year, yeah. That's why I like the collaboration rather than just… Yeah. 511 01:22:21.740 --> 01:22:36.340 Libby Wennstrom: Well, and I… I really like the idea of, having people who are arts leaders in their own communities bring back the idea of, hey, this little small town has a Poet Laureate program, could we do that too? You know, so… 512 01:22:36.340 --> 01:22:42.499 Council Chambers: Yeah, I think it has a lot of… I think it could have a lot of mutual benefit. I think the… 513 01:22:44.960 --> 01:23:04.519 Council Chambers: cost piece of it is more of a question. Like, I think it'd be great to figure out if there is a way that it could just be cost- neutral on both sides, right, or whatever, but I think the idea of, like, trying to budget a little bit for it, and at least have that as a possibility as it gets worked out, feels like it might be worthwhile to me. That's kind of, like, my thoughts on it, but… 514 01:23:04.740 --> 01:23:19.519 Council Chambers: That makes sense to me. I think we can discuss budget shortly, and the details of the program, perhaps, we can discuss in October, because the update with the Pullet Laureate is scheduled for that meeting. 515 01:23:19.880 --> 01:23:26.340 Council Chambers: Yep. Is there… is there any reason to consider a small portion of our grants funding? 516 01:23:26.750 --> 01:23:33.110 Council Chambers: pot to go towards the Poet Laureate, or something that would fulfill… Yeah. 517 01:23:33.480 --> 01:23:51.809 Council Chambers: Well, maybe we should just go ahead and move it. Is the budget the next item on here, basically? Like, maybe this is just a good segue. Yeah, I think it is. Because we also, we only, you know, we have about half an hour-ish left, so it might be, like, a good time just to start talking about that. Like, that, you know, there's a lot of decisions to be… 518 01:23:51.810 --> 01:23:55.860 Council Chambers: Yeah. Made on that front, I will… 519 01:23:56.000 --> 01:24:13.369 Council Chambers: I'm gonna pull out, like, a notes, because I… PDFs are, you know, hard to make notes on. You want to use this? No, but I need a pen. You need a pen? I think I have one. There's one on the table over there. 520 01:24:13.370 --> 01:24:26.729 Council Chambers: I got it. Oh, it's even… it's even a good pen. Okay. So, there's two things… I think there's a couple things to look at here. Let's… I'm gonna move… up. 521 01:24:26.930 --> 01:24:35.870 Council Chambers: I don't know if people had a chance to look at, like, the budget letter from John, it just basically lays out the, schedule. 522 01:24:36.120 --> 01:24:43.310 Council Chambers: for, for budgeting. Basically, the, they, the city needs… 523 01:24:43.890 --> 01:25:02.919 Council Chambers: requests by the end of this month, essentially, because there's a big budget retreat, in September, which, you know, Councilmember Wennstrom will be a part of. To build the PTAC budget, I thought it would be a good idea just a really quick look back at what we said. 524 01:25:03.050 --> 01:25:07.930 Council Chambers: Were the 2027 work plan goals? 525 01:25:09.050 --> 01:25:13.410 Council Chambers: It's, you know, nice to connect Budget decisions back to these. 526 01:25:13.880 --> 01:25:18.560 Council Chambers: Where possible, I mean, they're relatively… 527 01:25:19.570 --> 01:25:24.030 Council Chambers: I don't think any of them were super-duper out there, you know? But, 528 01:25:25.330 --> 01:25:28.080 Council Chambers: You know, if we think of these as the… 529 01:25:28.330 --> 01:25:34.130 Council Chambers: four important pieces of work for 2027, right? The budget should align as much as possible. 530 01:25:36.260 --> 01:25:46.609 Council Chambers: I don't know if it makes sense to talk through this really quick about which ones feel like they're more, like, budget-heavy. Like, the last one, I think, is relatively budget neutral, for example, like, planning and… 531 01:25:46.740 --> 01:25:52.930 Council Chambers: goal setting and aligning. Like, I don't think that's something that's gonna, you know, take a ton of specific funding. 532 01:25:57.460 --> 01:26:02.929 Council Chambers: was the idea on the Mayor's Arts Awards that we came in under by the last year, so… 533 01:26:03.610 --> 01:26:09.780 Council Chambers: Oh, for… yeah, okay, for the actual numbers. Alright, I'll scroll past this once you've had a chance to look at it. 534 01:26:11.040 --> 01:26:28.870 Council Chambers: Well, the idea was, initially, that $7,500 was at that level because there had been an idea that maybe, PTAC would give a financial award along with the actual, just, honor, right? And, 535 01:26:28.970 --> 01:26:33.499 Council Chambers: Then the commission decided that they didn't really want to do that. 536 01:26:33.520 --> 01:26:51.400 Council Chambers: So it was kind of a big budget line item to begin with, but then as the award ceremony kind of grew in scope, and we decided to commission these awards and all that kind of stuff, it made sense in some ways to keep it at a level that the ceremony could continue to be sort of a big deal, I thought, right? Or, like… 537 01:26:51.410 --> 01:26:56.370 Council Chambers: That's what felt like was happening, so it seemed like keeping it there was… Made sense? 538 01:26:57.950 --> 01:27:09.750 Council Chambers: But yeah, and I… the last year's award ceremony ended up being closer to $3,800 or something in total, so that is somewhat pegged to that $6,500 being… 539 01:27:09.990 --> 01:27:18.510 Council Chambers: it kind of covers two things… two… two years, in a way, right? It's always… it's like an overflow, since the thing happens in March, you know? 540 01:27:19.070 --> 01:27:20.590 Council Chambers: It's, like, funds that… 541 01:27:20.870 --> 01:27:30.060 Council Chambers: It funds the ceremony and the promotion of next year's ceremony, and, like, the commissioning of next year's awards, or whatever, so… 542 01:27:30.120 --> 01:27:46.300 Council Chambers: That's the technical term. So I guess my question is, is there enough in here for that selection of a new poet laureate, or anything that's involved with that? 543 01:27:46.590 --> 01:27:50.679 Council Chambers: search work. Yeah, that's a good question. 544 01:27:50.930 --> 01:27:55.470 Council Chambers: Last time, the Poet Laureate, there was a couple of costs. 545 01:27:55.790 --> 01:28:04.079 Council Chambers: There was, which maybe aren't captured in here. We… there's 3 jurors, and they were each paid $100. 546 01:28:04.570 --> 01:28:24.359 Council Chambers: And there was advertising in the leader, which was about… which I think was about $1,200, which is where that marketing and outreach, like, line could come in. But I… yeah, there's… the budget for paying jurors does… did not get captured in here, but could probably get, you know, could get… 547 01:28:24.830 --> 01:28:43.899 Council Chambers: I don't know that we'd have to make this budget bigger, we could take some funding out of marketing or something to… Sure. The reason I… oh, is, like, the allocation all we get? That's the question, maybe that's part of the question. So that's, sort of a TBD, right? Because, like, that's why, like, public art, for example, it's, like, why it says 1% determined. 548 01:28:43.900 --> 01:28:45.180 Council Chambers: Okay. Is that… 549 01:28:45.640 --> 01:29:01.819 Council Chambers: there should be some funding coming through the 1% for ARCs. Right, so what is that amount? We don't know what that amount is yet. The reason I was asking is, like, you know, if it's just a couple hundred dollars, do you want to just increase this to $50,000, even, to put that to… 550 01:29:02.120 --> 01:29:07.050 Council Chambers: Well, you know, it's probably 300, and it's 3 jurors, but to just… 551 01:29:07.220 --> 01:29:11.150 Council Chambers: Get us closer to an amount that we balance our budget. 552 01:29:11.660 --> 01:29:20.839 Council Chambers: Sorry, too many times I've been to treasurer, I get… Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. We make micro-changes that get us closer to flat. Right, totally, yeah. 553 01:29:20.840 --> 01:29:29.930 Libby Wennstrom: Now, one of the things to remember about the 1% per art is that that has some stipulations on it in terms of what it can and can't get spent on. 554 01:29:31.230 --> 01:29:31.760 Libby Wennstrom: So… 555 01:29:32.100 --> 01:29:38.789 Council Chambers: They're pretty limited. When we rewrote the code, it says, like, any… it says, promote art, do art programming. 556 01:29:39.150 --> 01:29:44.180 Libby Wennstrom: Yeah, I think it's not totally limited, it's just being aware of those limitations. 557 01:29:44.200 --> 01:29:45.580 Council Chambers: Yeah. 558 01:29:45.580 --> 01:29:49.059 Libby Wennstrom: And explaining this sort of chicken and an egg is that… 559 01:29:49.060 --> 01:29:49.480 Council Chambers: Yeah. 560 01:29:49.480 --> 01:30:13.049 Libby Wennstrom: the… each of the committees, in this case PTAC, are submitting a proposed budget, and those are all kind of going to finance and budget, and the department directors are doing their budgets, and then it all kind of goes through a great big sausage grinder, and then eventually comes to council as a proposal, and then you start kind of horse trading around, like, you know, oh, if we take this out of this, then we can increase that, etc. 561 01:30:13.060 --> 01:30:17.150 Libby Wennstrom: So, it doesn't mean it's gonna end up exactly this way, but it… 562 01:30:17.440 --> 01:30:20.899 Libby Wennstrom: The bottom line number probably needs to be relatively similar. 563 01:30:21.310 --> 01:30:21.960 Council Chambers: Right. 564 01:30:22.510 --> 01:30:27.370 Council Chambers: Right, right. I'm sorry, Libby, similar to the current year. 565 01:30:27.700 --> 01:30:29.290 Libby Wennstrom: No, to, to, you know. 566 01:30:31.180 --> 01:30:41.680 Libby Wennstrom: If you're making a proposal and says, we think our total budget is going to be, what does this say, $49,800, or $50,000, or something like that, and 567 01:30:42.260 --> 01:30:46.170 Libby Wennstrom: You're unlikely to end up with a final 568 01:30:46.300 --> 01:30:56.219 Libby Wennstrom: Number that's very different from that, but within that final number, there's some discretion for the committee to move things around within categories. 569 01:30:56.760 --> 01:30:57.290 Council Chambers: Okay. 570 01:30:57.290 --> 01:30:58.579 Libby Wennstrom: That's what I was trying to say. 571 01:30:58.580 --> 01:30:59.910 Council Chambers: Okay. 572 01:30:59.910 --> 01:31:24.469 Libby Wennstrom: But, Finance and Budget might come back and say, hey, you know, we're really squeaking to do things, and we'd like to see you guys, take your budget down to, you know, $46,000 or something like that. And, you know, what are you going to adjust in order to do that? I don't know, I'm just using that as an example. But… but that… that is sort of part of that process. If everybody comes in with their, like, maximum budget. 573 01:31:24.530 --> 01:31:27.080 Libby Wennstrom: Sometimes things are gonna have to squeak a little bit. 574 01:31:28.230 --> 01:31:34.480 Council Chambers: And I guess I'm still a little unclear, the 1% from, public art. 575 01:31:34.610 --> 01:31:39.199 Council Chambers: Does that… do we need to account for that in our budget request? 576 01:31:39.490 --> 01:31:43.670 Council Chambers: That comes… We can't really, because we don't know what it is. 577 01:31:43.670 --> 01:31:52.409 Libby Wennstrom: They don't know what it's gonna be. I mean, you can say, based on the funding that we get for 1% for art, we are intending to, you know. 578 01:31:52.800 --> 01:32:00.440 Libby Wennstrom: Prioritize the following types of programs, or something like that. But you probably can't put a dollar amount on it until you know what you get, what you're working with. 579 01:32:00.820 --> 01:32:10.150 Council Chambers: Okay, so we don't need to include a placeholder. No, well, and my thought here was that whatever… 580 01:32:10.840 --> 01:32:13.770 Council Chambers: Funding came from that. 581 01:32:14.170 --> 01:32:20.860 Council Chambers: fund, you know, which… It's gonna take a while to potentially accumulate into something. 582 01:32:21.500 --> 01:32:39.210 Council Chambers: usable, that it made sense to earmark it for public art, and then when there's enough of it, you can commission a piece of public art, or you can, you know, you can hire someone to maintain the public art at a higher level, and… but because that's kind of a static situation until it's not. 583 01:32:39.460 --> 01:32:56.889 Council Chambers: Do you know what I mean? Like, it's a little different than the ongoing idea of, like, the Poet Laureate, like, kind of like, I have to give her a stipend, like, that's not really a choice or whatever, but, like, commissioning a piece of art or not is sort of… is more of a choice, right? Does that make sense? Is there a reason, 584 01:32:57.360 --> 01:33:03.699 Council Chambers: We don't say, alright, we're gonna ask for $55,000, expecting that we won't get it. 585 01:33:04.870 --> 01:33:13.890 Council Chambers: Well, I will say what happened last year is that the Arts Commission budget has been about $30,000, $30,000 for a long, long time. 586 01:33:14.240 --> 01:33:25.349 Council Chambers: And bumping it up… $20,000 to $22,000. Yeah, bumping it up to $48,000 was a big deal, and there was, like, sort of an extra allocation made 587 01:33:25.350 --> 01:33:35.649 Council Chambers: out of the general fund, but it was noted that the idea was that that extra allocation would be backfilled in the future through the 1% for the Arts Fund. 588 01:33:35.890 --> 01:33:45.750 Council Chambers: So, it's already kind of, you know what I'm saying? It's already… and that I don't… the 1% of the Arts Fund might not be able to do that yet. 589 01:33:46.050 --> 01:33:58.289 Council Chambers: So it might be, like, the council might have to choose to give an extra general fund contribution again this year before it gets to the point where the Municipal Arts Fund can backfill that. 590 01:33:58.980 --> 01:34:10.169 Council Chambers: going higher, I think, is probably not the wisest. I've also been hearing from many corners that revenue is, like, flat to down for 2027. It's not, like. 591 01:34:10.940 --> 01:34:13.420 Council Chambers: You know, fountains of funding. 592 01:34:13.690 --> 01:34:15.220 Council Chambers: So… 593 01:34:15.220 --> 01:34:24.350 Libby Wennstrom: Well, I mean, 1% per art funding is coming out of capital projects, and there's actually a fair number of capital projects that are still happening, so… 594 01:34:24.630 --> 01:34:33.320 Council Chambers: Yeah, but, like, they… the funding doesn't move out of those projects into the Municipal Arts Fund until those projects close, and I don't. 595 01:34:33.320 --> 01:34:34.160 Libby Wennstrom: Correct. 596 01:34:34.160 --> 01:34:39.689 Council Chambers: projects have already actually are closing in 2026, and how many are actually closing in 2027, so… 597 01:34:40.820 --> 01:34:49.740 Council Chambers: It'll come. So, even this $1,000 increase, is that, more than we should expect? 598 01:34:51.480 --> 01:35:00.420 Libby Wennstrom: I think the $1,000 increase is within the realm of pain. I mean, you know, there's a recommendation, you know, there's a recognition that everything costs a little more, you know. 599 01:35:03.160 --> 01:35:15.810 Council Chambers: Don't ask for $75,000. Right. Well, that was my question, yeah. So at what point did we decide maintenance was going to be pulled into the 1% for the arts? Because I'm trying to think… 600 01:35:15.810 --> 01:35:24.000 Council Chambers: 1%, if we have any funds coming in this year, that's a question. We theoretically could have zero. Yet, we definitely know we're going to have maintenance costs, so… 601 01:35:24.580 --> 01:35:29.659 Council Chambers: It makes sense to me to have that be a hard number that we can allocate, like, we can all… 602 01:35:29.770 --> 01:35:36.719 Council Chambers: Just based on putting together the maintenance schedule. How many hours that is, what's the hourly rate for the city, plus 603 01:35:36.840 --> 01:35:49.890 Council Chambers: The equipment and stuff like… I don't think they're plan… I don't think we're getting billed. The PTAC's not getting billed for hours. So when it says includes maintenance, it's not… that's not a hard number, it's just the regular clock-in, clock-out maintenance crews that go. So, like, if they need to buy… 604 01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:54.700 Libby Wennstrom: I think that's… Dan, I think that's specifically about maintenance for public art. 605 01:35:54.700 --> 01:35:55.220 Council Chambers: Sort of. 606 01:35:55.480 --> 01:35:56.509 Libby Wennstrom: General City Game. 607 01:35:56.510 --> 01:36:11.480 Council Chambers: Right, that's what he's talking about. That's what he's talking about. The reason… well, one of the reasons is… is that, there's no… there wasn't a line item there last year, for reasons unknown, honestly. Like, I don't… I don't, you know, so part of me was like, well. 608 01:36:11.530 --> 01:36:16.600 Council Chambers: I guess PTAC chose not to put any funds towards that in 2020. 609 01:36:17.640 --> 01:36:34.489 Council Chambers: This year, so maybe, like, continuing that until there's, like, a particularly, like, dedicated fund for it is just, like… So we did put some money towards equipment and stuff for, like, cleaning supplies. It was very minimal, but that was a hard cost. So, and then… 610 01:36:34.490 --> 01:36:47.720 Council Chambers: So, say we need to buy some more turtle wax for our bronzes, does that come out of the 1% for the arts, or should that just be a separate… Yeah. $200 would be the line item permit? Or is that a maintenance cost for the city? 611 01:36:47.720 --> 01:36:56.769 Council Chambers: Yeah, out of a different… No, no, it gets… it gets allocated to PTAC, like, the Parks Department has charge… is charging those materials, too. But it's not in this year's budget. 612 01:36:56.770 --> 01:37:09.690 Council Chambers: I would just think once it's in our collection, the expenses to maintain it wouldn't be linked to the 1% fund, which is designed to… for acquisition of art, not so much the maintenance of it. No, it's designed to… 613 01:37:09.690 --> 01:37:14.819 Libby Wennstrom: It's… it's specifically, I think, part of the revision was that it included the cost of maintain… 614 01:37:14.820 --> 01:37:15.340 Council Chambers: Yeah. 615 01:37:15.340 --> 01:37:18.840 Libby Wennstrom: Wiring the pieces, but maintaining them in perpetuity. 616 01:37:18.990 --> 01:37:25.730 Council Chambers: Correct. Because otherwise, it's like, you could acquire these things and have no money to maintain them, and that wouldn't… Well, that's kind of what's happened. Right, right, exactly. 617 01:37:25.730 --> 01:37:27.320 Libby Wennstrom: Correct, and we're trying to fix that. 618 01:37:27.320 --> 01:37:43.959 Council Chambers: Well, we need some 1%, not to split hairs, but, like, would we ever not get anything for 1%? Like, would it ever be zero? I feel like it would never be zero. No, it probably won't be zero. 619 01:37:43.960 --> 01:37:57.899 Libby Wennstrom: I hope it's zero because it's covering… it's coming from any large capital project. So, you know, street paving and sewer projects, and, you know, there's always some of that. Right now, we're doing quite a lot of it. 620 01:37:58.750 --> 01:37:59.560 Council Chambers: Right. 621 01:37:59.560 --> 01:38:03.759 Libby Wennstrom: Like, all of these big grant-funded street projects include that 1%. 622 01:38:04.690 --> 01:38:22.799 Council Chambers: But to Dan's point, I mean, I think it… I think it's… we could certainly put a $500 line item in this budget, just to make sure there's, like, a placeholder there, and that, like, you know, if someone… like, yeah, if they are like, oh, hey, we need to go buy some, you know… It's not staff… staff funds, it's just the… Right, just the equipment and stuff like that, right, yeah. 623 01:38:22.800 --> 01:38:26.219 Council Chambers: And we do have two new pieces going in this summer. Yep. 624 01:38:26.230 --> 01:38:50.080 Council Chambers: It's true. Well, when I would do that, I would put, like, 500 bucks. Yep, great. Yeah.Two new pieces, you mean the… Two new art pieces, the mural and the street. Okay, yeah. Currently, the way the street painting works is it has to be maintained by the people who paint it, but I don't know if that'll stay as we move forward. I mean, with this whole new kind of rubric, or, like, with the city being more involved, that might change in the future. Okay, okay. I guess I would like to… 625 01:38:50.080 --> 01:38:52.299 Council Chambers: Not having been here last year. 626 01:38:52.320 --> 01:38:59.700 Council Chambers: Where did… where did maintenance land in this year's budget? Where does it come out of? 627 01:38:59.850 --> 01:39:14.189 Council Chambers: I did it. Parks ordered some materials for maintenance. I have to go back and look. I think I, just absorbed it into the arts and culture budget. 628 01:39:14.510 --> 01:39:39.200 Council Chambers: It was small. Yeah, it was small, and the supplies budget for the Arts and Culture Department had enough funding to cover it, so I just did that, because that makes sense. Yeah. Coca-Cola's, Coca-Cola, Turtle Wax, Coca-Cola… I was just trying to understand. I mean, that makes sense, to put a line item. Yeah. But because there wasn't a line item here, like, I… 629 01:39:39.200 --> 01:39:48.740 Council Chambers: like I said, I was like, the supplies budget is enough to take this $300 in, so that's where it came down. It just looks like, let's determine later… Totally. Totally, totally, no, that makes sense. Would, 630 01:39:48.740 --> 01:40:00.890 Council Chambers: So, there's two kind of proposals here to increase the… this budget by about $800, $500 for maintenance, $300 to pay the jurors for the, 631 01:40:01.370 --> 01:40:02.999 Council Chambers: Poet Laureate Search. 632 01:40:04.360 --> 01:40:21.519 Council Chambers: And there is, you know, a proposal from the… from Rafina specifically, you know, requested $1,500, so… basically to… so the Poet Lori could attend the, Writers' Conference, is essentially what that money's for. So I already gave her $500. 633 01:40:21.520 --> 01:40:29.660 Council Chambers: I had already suggested bumping up the program budget for the Poet Laureate by $500, because 634 01:40:30.410 --> 01:40:38.969 Council Chambers: that seemed like… it seemed… it seemed hard to do all the things that were desired with the $2,000 budget, so… 635 01:40:40.860 --> 01:40:48.619 Council Chambers: Anyway, so those are sort of the… so, you know, with those additions or whatever, if they were all to be added, right, that's what? $2,300. 636 01:40:48.930 --> 01:40:51.580 Council Chambers: The other thing in this proposed budget 637 01:40:51.730 --> 01:41:05.479 Council Chambers: that, like, I'm proposing these numbers just as a starting place, y'all, like, no one has seen these except for me. I'm, like, making it up just to try to have a place to start, because I know sometimes it's really hard to start from zero. So, like, for, like, grants, you know, I was like. 638 01:41:05.480 --> 01:41:19.009 Council Chambers: we should add a little more to grants, like, we should add a little more to grants every year, so I… like, $3,000, which would just be, like, $1,000 more each round, or however, to be split, right? And then this idea of the Artists in Residence Pilot Program came straight out of the grant subcommittee. 639 01:41:19.190 --> 01:41:35.930 Council Chambers: I mean, like, that… the idea was to, you know, re… reuse the funding that had been going to making these, like, grantee videos and taking some time off from that, perhaps, because maybe a million grantee videos are not necessary, and reallocating that towards that idea of this pilot program. 640 01:41:36.060 --> 01:41:45.040 Council Chambers: And then everything else is kind of pretty much just the same as it had been in the past, you know? And then to keep it close to the… 641 01:41:46.410 --> 01:41:50.099 Council Chambers: 2026 budget, yeah, take, like. 642 01:41:50.430 --> 01:41:54.979 Council Chambers: like, pulling down a little bit on the Arts Awards number. 643 01:41:55.410 --> 01:41:57.540 Council Chambers: And, 644 01:41:58.100 --> 01:42:06.000 Council Chambers: Yeah. That's the only one. That's the only one, yeah. So you're proposing adding the 2300 to the 49? Well, I don't know, that's an option. It might be… 645 01:42:06.490 --> 01:42:22.040 Council Chambers: it might… it might be harder to… to pass through this whole larger process. Artist-in-residence pilot down to four, and drop $1,000 off the marriage awards, that probably wouldn't hurt too bad, and that comes up to two grand right there. Yeah, yeah. We could ask for it. 646 01:42:22.090 --> 01:42:38.120 Council Chambers: And if we don't get it, we can make those subsequent budget changes. So, Libby might be able to answer this better. Yeah, but, like, what I've seen in the past is it just gets pushed back to PTAC, and they're like, there you go. 647 01:42:38.120 --> 01:42:45.050 Libby Wennstrom: I would try to make… do your… I mean, just as somebody… I'm not on finance and budget anymore, but I was for 4 years, and then it's… 648 01:42:45.580 --> 01:42:59.000 Libby Wennstrom: Asking for a budget that is, like, really pretty realistic, what you would like to work with, I think it's just helpful, rather than having to kind of play ping pong, where you're asking for a little more, hoping that you get what you need. It is just… just be straightforward. 649 01:43:00.020 --> 01:43:04.859 Council Chambers: Well, we've already increased the Poet Laureate's 650 01:43:05.550 --> 01:43:16.820 Council Chambers: program projects by 500. So rather than adding 1,500 there, could we just add another 1,000? Yeah. Make that $3,500. 651 01:43:17.080 --> 01:43:21.769 Council Chambers: You know, I think the 500 for maintenance is a great idea. 652 01:43:22.100 --> 01:43:25.569 Council Chambers: Well, if we do what Dan proposed. 653 01:43:25.890 --> 01:43:29.969 Council Chambers: You know, which I think taking… if you, if, 654 01:43:30.470 --> 01:43:49.720 Council Chambers: pushing that artist in residence pilot idea down to 4 makes it a little more commensurate with the kind of cool, which I think is… But we also talked about poetry being more niche than other artists, so maybe it's fine that it's at 5, and I would rather leave it at 5. Yeah, okay. 655 01:43:50.670 --> 01:43:58.649 Council Chambers: Well, if we leave that at 5, but take down the awards, which I think is true, that that… You said $3,800 was our last year's, so… 656 01:43:59.670 --> 01:44:09.610 Council Chambers: Sorry. Yeah, yeah. But, like, like I said, you have… it has to cover some of, like, the overlapping costs, but yeah. 657 01:44:11.180 --> 01:44:12.940 Council Chambers: What is the 5,000 for? 658 01:44:13.850 --> 01:44:23.090 Council Chambers: for the artist… for the artist in residence situation. I mean, I think you were there for the discussion, so I think it was just the idea was, like, sort of a grant, like, it was just basically… 659 01:44:23.600 --> 01:44:27.650 Council Chambers: Yeah, I think the idea that it was basically a grant, but maybe with some more… 660 01:44:28.300 --> 01:44:40.529 Council Chambers: some stipulations about doing specific kinds of programming that would be, you know, public-facing for the… for the… for the community. Like a hybrid between Poet Laureate and Grant. Yeah, yeah, kind of, right. Process? Yeah. 661 01:44:40.750 --> 01:44:43.499 Council Chambers: I think that was great. Yeah. 662 01:44:43.640 --> 01:44:51.659 Council Chambers: It is a nice round number. It is. Yeah. Are we thinking of raising Poet Laureate stipend? Are we thinking of doubling that, or… 663 01:44:51.920 --> 01:44:54.590 Council Chambers: Well, I think… I mean… 664 01:44:54.810 --> 01:44:59.809 Council Chambers: Yeah, I mean, that's the only thing about that whole… that idea of that pilot program, like. 665 01:44:59.950 --> 01:45:04.310 Council Chambers: Does that feel right to, sort of, how diff… like, those are pretty… 666 01:45:04.480 --> 01:45:08.230 Council Chambers: you know, 15… 5,000 is quite a bit more than $1,500, right? The… 667 01:45:08.270 --> 01:45:22.970 Council Chambers: poet laureate, not just Rafina, but Connor as well, like, did a lot, you know, for that. So, is… does it make sense to, you know… I don't know. That could probably be $2,500 and still be, like, a cool thing for somebody, especially if they're, like, asked to do relatively minimal 668 01:45:22.970 --> 01:45:28.700 Council Chambers: But I would say that it's not just a stipend. Right. 669 01:45:28.700 --> 01:45:33.769 Council Chambers: it is all the expenses. Right. So, whether it's, you know, materials or visual art. 670 01:45:34.070 --> 01:45:44.499 Council Chambers: royalties, whatever is involved. That's… yeah, that's for the whole project, just as the Poet Laureate's budget would be $4,000. 671 01:45:44.830 --> 01:46:01.679 Council Chambers: Currently. Right, and yeah. And maybe it would be $5 if we add that $1,000 to address her request. And I think that… and that's a great point, Doug, because the other thing is, like, that line item, we could, like, if, as that program is developed, could be… 672 01:46:01.680 --> 01:46:09.820 Council Chambers: could be spread out in a similar way, where it's this much for programs, and this much for your stipend, and stuff like that. Like, that number isn't necessarily… doesn't have to be, like, one. 673 01:46:10.220 --> 01:46:17.989 Council Chambers: $5,000, just, like, check to somebody, right, kind of thing, so… And you don't have to give $5,000. Right, right, right. 674 01:46:18.730 --> 01:46:21.650 Council Chambers: I was about to say that you've got to see that budget. 675 01:46:21.930 --> 01:46:26.170 Council Chambers: Also, for the 2028 Court Laureate. 676 01:46:26.710 --> 01:46:29.650 Council Chambers: For your next port, Laura, is that a decent amount also? 677 01:46:30.120 --> 01:46:32.399 Council Chambers: Are you gonna wanna go? That's another year. 678 01:46:33.210 --> 01:46:37.400 Council Chambers: That's why I said we needed some search, some money to search. 679 01:46:38.150 --> 01:46:51.280 Council Chambers: Right. But, I mean, I think the idea of if we… if $1,000 gets added to the laureate's budget, that makes them pretty even, and that feels kind of good. And then… and then, you know. 680 01:46:51.550 --> 01:46:55.390 Council Chambers: For 2028, we could look at that and decide, again, if there's a way to… 681 01:46:55.390 --> 01:47:12.469 Council Chambers: It's also good to note that the Poet Laureate does get a little bit of an extra stipend and some programming funding directly from the library for doing programs at the library. So there's… it's not… this is, like, most of that funding, but there's a little bit more on top of it as well. Yeah. That makes me feel better. 682 01:47:12.470 --> 01:47:14.339 Council Chambers: Rather than moving money out of… 683 01:47:14.490 --> 01:47:16.380 Council Chambers: programs. Let's ask for more money. 684 01:47:17.940 --> 01:47:27.039 Council Chambers: I mean, asking for 52 or something like this is fine. We need it. We do. The world needs it. Ask for what you need. 685 01:47:27.560 --> 01:47:44.330 Council Chambers: I mean, I'll… I'll… I'm happy to put forth whatever the Commission wants to, but I do think… I don't think it… I think if it was, like… and I think a few more… a little bit more money would probably… might be just fine, but I just… I… I'm hearing the feelings about… 686 01:47:44.360 --> 01:48:08.159 Council Chambers: budget in general this year, or not? Like… Does $5,000 feel like a lot or a little in the realm of things? I don't know. We're not even talking about $5,000. Well, I mean, in addition to the $49,800, like, 5 grand more on top of that. Well, here's a thought. If we said $52,000, again, it's kind of a random number, but okay, $52,000. There's $3,000 687 01:48:08.160 --> 01:48:13.999 Council Chambers: increase in the grants to artists, which… I think it's great. 688 01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:24.250 Council Chambers: if we have to cut, that would be a good place to start cutting. That shows the 3,000 increase right there. Yeah. Last year. And, you know, and then… 689 01:48:24.430 --> 01:48:32.630 Council Chambers: Gonna leave everything else… Adding in the 500 for maintenance and $300 for… Boom. 690 01:48:32.740 --> 01:48:35.270 Council Chambers: the Poet Laureate search process. 691 01:48:39.080 --> 01:48:44.570 Council Chambers: I was just saying the thing… the grants to artists increase could be on… 692 01:48:45.090 --> 01:49:03.510 Council Chambers: cushion, if we ask for 52 as we get. I do so love getting money to artists, though. I know. I do, too. If I have this right, though, the… the… what's on the table right now is just an $1,800 increase from what this says, right? 693 01:49:03.510 --> 01:49:10.379 Council Chambers: It's 18… it's $300 more for the Poet Laureate search, $500 for maintenance, and another $1,000 towards the Poet Laureate. 694 01:49:10.380 --> 01:49:13.780 Council Chambers: stipend. Or, or, I mean, programming budget? 695 01:49:14.330 --> 01:49:31.779 Council Chambers: So that's $1,800… I don't know, that's… and I think… Why don't we make the search process for the Poet Laureate, let's make that $500. And just… just ask for… so add… just add two… just add $2,000 to this, budget, and call that a… call that… 696 01:49:32.240 --> 01:49:36.099 Council Chambers: Like, 20 and 22 would make it even $52,000. 697 01:49:36.420 --> 01:49:57.509 Council Chambers: Right? Am I doing my math right? Yeah. Or, I mean, we could also 49, so 51… it would be 51.8 if we added that. I actually like a more odd number than a… Yeah. Because otherwise it kind of feels like you just randomly picked a number. Right, it's very… But they're killing the pennies, y'all. 698 01:49:57.510 --> 01:49:57.900 Council Chambers: 51. 699 01:49:57.960 --> 01:50:04.009 Libby Wennstrom: I mean, I can tell you that people don't… everybody thinks, oh, we're trying to overthink this, but, you know. 700 01:50:04.010 --> 01:50:05.080 Council Chambers: Yeah, just… 701 01:50:05.080 --> 01:50:09.100 Libby Wennstrom: Just put in what works for what your program state says. 702 01:50:11.290 --> 01:50:23.010 Council Chambers: Does that feel… I mean, that feels fine to me, if that feels good to folks, I think… Do you have a… A way to fix that? A spreadsheet that you can modify? Yeah, I probably do. 703 01:50:23.290 --> 01:50:45.279 Council Chambers: All right, I'm going to stop sharing while I do that. It's just gonna be so ugly while I look around. We've got 8 minutes. We have 8 minutes? We have 8 minutes. May I have to say one thing while Katy's pulling that up? Please, yeah. So, it's been a long time I've been on the Arts Commission, and we used to actually say, all right, who's going to go to the council meeting to stand up and say how important it is that we get this fund so we can get this 704 01:50:45.590 --> 01:51:02.040 Council Chambers: $21,000 that we really need, or whatever. We used to literally task each other to go and support, and never have we been in better support, better position with Katy on board, and Libby, a serious arts advocate, being at the meetings, going to bat for us. 705 01:51:02.390 --> 01:51:16.520 Council Chambers: Hint, hint, that, you know, every dollar is really important. We're an arts town. We used to literally have to be just our own little cheerleading team for that, and now we've got some staff and council people on board with us, so… awesome, good for us. 706 01:51:16.800 --> 01:51:17.340 Council Chambers: Brunswick. 707 01:51:17.340 --> 01:51:25.600 Libby Wennstrom: Yeah, I think this is the, you know, this is a kind of a time where there's a lot of solid support for arts work, and… 708 01:51:25.840 --> 01:51:29.640 Libby Wennstrom: If you're… if we were talking about having somebody come 709 01:51:29.640 --> 01:51:46.100 Libby Wennstrom: to do a presentation, my recommendation would be to have them go… have somebody go to Finance and Budget, because that's really where the sausage gets made, where they're sort of banging things around and asking questions and stuff, whereas by the time it comes to Council for approval, it's not really down to the line item kind of thing, so… 710 01:51:46.530 --> 01:51:52.939 Council Chambers: Well, what I'm getting at is I feel like we don't need to do that so much now as much as we used to, because we have staff and council. 711 01:51:52.940 --> 01:51:55.490 Libby Wennstrom: who are, who are already advocating, yeah, I think that's true. 712 01:51:55.490 --> 01:51:57.230 Council Chambers: Yep, that's what I meant. 713 01:51:58.140 --> 01:52:00.510 Council Chambers: Any of the budget meeting we'd go to. 714 01:52:01.130 --> 01:52:01.800 Libby Wennstrom: Right. 715 01:52:02.420 --> 01:52:11.639 Council Chambers: Show up with big signs. More money for the arts! Yeah. 716 01:52:12.440 --> 01:52:17.309 Council Chambers: We said $500 for the Poland search, right? Yeah. Search costs. 717 01:52:17.540 --> 01:52:29.809 Council Chambers: 51… okay, I'm forgetting something, I'm sure. And is that just to pay a person's charge for… That's for… It's to pay the jurors. Yeah, there were jurors. 718 01:52:29.810 --> 01:52:30.630 Libby Wennstrom: We're observed. 719 01:52:30.630 --> 01:52:37.320 Council Chambers: Easy for you to say. 31, right? Yeah. 720 01:52:39.300 --> 01:52:46.019 Council Chambers: Okay, I'm gonna share this now, but you tell me what I did wrong, because it's less than we said it should be. $1,800? 721 01:52:46.150 --> 01:52:47.719 Council Chambers: Is it capturing everything? 722 01:52:48.290 --> 01:52:54.439 Libby Wennstrom: That was $1,000 more for the Poet Laureate programming, and it's… 723 01:52:55.220 --> 01:53:01.859 Libby Wennstrom: 500 more for supplies for maintenance, and $300 more for… 724 01:53:02.540 --> 01:53:03.260 Council Chambers: Oh, so… 725 01:53:03.260 --> 01:53:03.719 Libby Wennstrom: Sure enough. 726 01:53:03.720 --> 01:53:11.069 Council Chambers: 500, that's why, right? Okay, yeah. Okay, so that's what it looks like. What do people think? Nice. 727 01:53:13.430 --> 01:53:18.210 Council Chambers: I, I do think this, that's… if, the one thing that might… 728 01:53:18.550 --> 01:53:23.009 Council Chambers: be somewhat missing from this, and maybe, 729 01:53:23.670 --> 01:53:28.320 Council Chambers: We, like, is that an explanation of what the, 730 01:53:29.730 --> 01:53:35.140 Council Chambers: an explanation of what a new artist in residence pilot program would be. 731 01:53:35.590 --> 01:53:39.770 Libby Wennstrom: I mean, you can certainly include, like, a blurb about each of these programs. 732 01:53:39.770 --> 01:53:41.459 Council Chambers: Yeah. So… 733 01:53:41.460 --> 01:53:59.570 Council Chambers: You know, because if I think if I was looking at this budget, and I was, like, unaware, that's where I… that's what I would cut. Choppable. Yeah, that's definitely the choppable-est line. So I could try to write up a little, just very loose blurb, or if someone else who, like… 734 01:53:59.570 --> 01:54:01.760 Council Chambers: There's a blurb in these. 735 01:54:06.360 --> 01:54:30.810 Council Chambers: Yeah, true. I actually would… I think that… I think that that would be actually very cool, because I think that… I think music is actually one of the more underrepresented. We have this… a lot of the… we have the mural, we have the visual arts, we have the poets, you know, so, like, I think that that would actually be great. Yeah, yeah. I thought you were on here to give money away. Great buskers on Water Street in summertime. 736 01:54:30.810 --> 01:54:32.409 Council Chambers: And I'm like, yeah. 737 01:54:32.410 --> 01:54:33.440 Council Chambers: Yeah. 738 01:54:34.090 --> 01:54:50.939 Council Chambers: Yeah, can be. Well, I mean, that would be an interesting thing. I think, again, with our… the last 4 minutes, like, maybe it's not, like, a total recommendation, but, like, does the… like, do you want to make a proposal that, like, the first artist in residence is… 739 01:54:50.940 --> 01:55:03.890 Council Chambers: has a music focus, and then that's something at least we could, like, have to talk about, do you know what I mean? Like, as opposed to being like, well, I don't know. I'd second that. Yeah. 740 01:55:03.890 --> 01:55:06.739 Libby Wennstrom: Leave it open, because you don't know who's gonna apply. 741 01:55:07.410 --> 01:55:07.840 Council Chambers: I would like to. 742 01:55:07.840 --> 01:55:15.140 Libby Wennstrom: I mean, you can say we'd like to see… we'd like to encourage musicians and other areas that are less represented to apply, but… 743 01:55:15.140 --> 01:55:26.819 Council Chambers: application process, or is it… I think it's… I don't… well, I don't know. Like, there's a lot of, there's a lot of… There's just, yeah, yeah. Well, and like, Libby, the discussion that the, 744 01:55:27.080 --> 01:55:34.159 Council Chambers: Grants Committee had had was that we would pick a specific, genre and rotate. 745 01:55:34.340 --> 01:55:55.189 Council Chambers: So you would say this year it's going to be a musician, and next year it's going to be a theater artist, and next year it's going to be a filmmaker. So that was just very specific. For the sake of time. Right, so that was just the idea. I think let's put that off to the meeting after next, if we can, because I think it's important, but let's put that process off, and… 746 01:55:55.190 --> 01:55:58.580 Libby Wennstrom: Do we need a motion about this proposed budget? 747 01:55:58.580 --> 01:56:06.660 Council Chambers: Just about to say that. Yeah. Could we get a motion to approve, this recommended budget? 748 01:56:07.480 --> 01:56:08.879 Council Chambers: That sounded like a motion. 749 01:56:09.580 --> 01:56:19.449 Council Chambers: I move that the Port Township Arts Commission, move… we send this budget request to City Council, if you want a… 750 01:56:19.630 --> 01:56:24.269 Council Chambers: Okay. I'm seconded. I do. 751 01:56:24.500 --> 01:56:27.840 Council Chambers: Any questions, comments? 752 01:56:27.990 --> 01:56:35.509 Council Chambers: 51's a lucky number. All in favor? Almost 52. Raise your hand. All right, that's unanimous. All right. Cool. 753 01:56:35.690 --> 01:56:39.270 Council Chambers: Great. Thanks, everybody. That's… that's awesome. I think I'll… 754 01:56:39.990 --> 01:56:41.499 Libby Wennstrom: $1,000 a week. 755 01:56:41.850 --> 01:57:02.490 Council Chambers: Yeah, that's kind of… that's kind of nice for the arts, right? Yeah, I mean, one of the… one of the main arguments that PTAC made for a long time about the budget, and Libby, maybe you may or may not have this, like, in your mind, or is that per capita, Port Townsend gives a very low per capita amount. 756 01:57:02.490 --> 01:57:08.680 Council Chambers: Compared to other… other places, or whatever, so… Best Ruper being an arts community, so it's like a… 757 01:57:08.820 --> 01:57:12.430 Council Chambers: So, but like that, and that… but that… that's an interesting… another… 758 01:57:12.690 --> 01:57:21.649 Council Chambers: $1,000 a week or whatever is also, like, a, like, modest way to think about supporting that, I would say. Yeah, yeah. 759 01:57:21.650 --> 01:57:42.620 Council Chambers: You seconded that motion? No, I didn't. Oh, oh, I'm… Sorry, my, okay, never mind. I forgot I moved, okay. All right, I will forward, I will forward this along, and, we'll see what happens. All right. Yeah. Great. Our next meeting, we're going back to the first 760 01:57:42.620 --> 01:57:46.930 Council Chambers: Thursday? Yes, yep. Is that the 1st next month? 761 01:57:47.030 --> 01:57:51.890 Council Chambers: Okay, so it's… sometimes, maybe it's, like… 762 01:57:52.080 --> 01:58:11.640 Council Chambers: It's the third, I think it's the 3rd. Yeah, the first is October. Anyway, we'll talk about that later. So, yes, the 3rd is a, grant… Meeting. Funding meeting. And the application closes on this, next… on the 20th, so a week from today, if you… 763 01:58:11.680 --> 01:58:21.159 Council Chambers: know people who might want to apply, remind them, and I'm gonna send out a newsletter on Monday, and I'll highlight the fact that the roads are closing Thursday, so… 764 01:58:21.230 --> 01:58:34.659 Council Chambers: All right, well, we have concluded the agenda. I think that is grounds for adjournment. Well done. We'll see you next month. Thank you all. At 5 o'clock!