Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BLD10-032
BUILDING PERMIT City of Port Townsend Development Services Department 250 Madison Street, Suite 3, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-5095 Project Information Permit # BLD10-032 Permit Type Commercial Miscellaneous Project Name ADA Ramp Site Address 265 HUDSON STREET Parcel # 001013001 Project Description New ADA compliant ramp and door thresholds Names Associated with this Project License Type Name Contact Phone # Type License # Exp Date Applicant Port Of Port Townsend Owner Port Of Port Townsend Representative Terrapin Architecture, (360) 379-8090 P.C. Contractor Owner Builder Q- STATE exempt 12/31/2010 Fee Information Project Details Project Valuation $2,657.40 Commercial Deck 258 SQFT Total Bees Units: Heat Type: Bedrooms: Construction Type: V - B Bathrooms: Occupancy Type: B Call 385-2294 by 3:00pm for next day inspection. Permits expire 180 days from issuance if work is not commenced, or if work is suspended for a period of 180 days. Work is verified by obtaining a valid inspection. The granting of this permit shall not be construed as approval to violate any provisions of the PTMC or other laws or regulations. I certify that the information provided as a part of the application for this permit is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further certify that I am the ownexof the property or authorized agent nN owner. Print Name band, yA dD te JO Nw Signature (Oyu L ww A Date 5-Il-t0 05/10/2010 Issued By: MWAY Date Expires: 11/06/2010 Date Issued: CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS RECORD CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND Development Services Department 250 Madison Street, Suite 3, Port Townsend, WA 98368 POST THIS CARD IN A SAFE, CONSPICUOUS LOCATION. PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE UNTIL ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS ARE MADE AND SIGNED OFF BY THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY AND THE BUILDING IS APPROVED FOR OCCUPANCY. STAMPED APPROVED PLANS MUST BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOBSITE. PARCELNO. 001013001. PERMIT NO. BLD10-032 ISSUED DATE _05/10/2010 —«EXPIRATION DATE __11/06/2010 ADDRESS 265 HUDSON STREET CONSTRUCTION TYPE _V-B OCCUPANT LOAD OWNER PORT OF PORT TOWNSEND PROJECT DESCRIPTION New ADA compliant ramp and door thresholds CONTRACTOR OWNER BUILDER LENDER INSPECTION INSP DATE COMMENT INSPECTION INSP DATE COMMENT FOUNDATION PIERS j= Veal FRAMING FS Phalio Ramp Only eg sah re 2ee3 EE MISCELLANEOUS / FINAL BLDG./C OF O FINAL PUBLIC WORKS TO REQUEST AN INSPECTION CALL (360) 385-2294. INSPECTION REQUESTS MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO 3:00 PM FOR NEXT DAY INSPECTION. PERMIT # &D10~ 0524 CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND PERMIT ACTIVITY LOG DATE RECEIVED. 2-9G-1\©O SCOPE OF WORK: New ADA campliant VYamo ana ddor “Wnreshol\ds DATE ACTION INITIALS 2-4 ~to | ENTERED INTO CHET Mw 2. ~A-~1© | CHECKED FOR COMPLETENESS Mv Q. (7: /® Plesn vevilu) complete. pao G—U~LoO hu. to SE Mw) Fee's dot [SLC _ ~ lor+ to be museca ZJ¢7 | O Zoning: M-1t C3) Setbacks OK? Lot Size: Building Size: Lot Coverage: FAR OK? Height OK? Parking OK? Critical Area? Demo? Historic Rev? Notice to Title? Lots of Record? Development Services 250 Madison Street, Suite 3 Port Townsend WA 98368 Phone: 360-379-5095 Fax: 360-344-4619 CITY OF eo www.cityofpt.us Commerciat Building Permit Application Project Address & Zoning District: Legal pert ai (or Tax #): Office Use Only a ibs 1, iM -\I Addition: O Perrnit eo HUD On = (e) Block:_ 5 2 45 # &JD10-03 2. Parcel# 00 |5\2606) Lot(s): 42 l-4 Associated Permits: Project Description: NEW APA COMPLIANT RAMP AND POOR THRENOLES > Applications accepted by mail must include a check for initial plan review fee of $150 > See the “Commercial Building Permit Application Checklist” for details on plan submittal requirements. Property Owner: Name: TORT OF FORT TOXNSEND Address:__f-0: BOX [190 Citysuzip. fOZT TOWNSEND, WA 48369 3L0 - 38S -0bSb Phone: Email: Contact/Representative: Name: TERRAPIN ARCHTE TURE, C. Address: /[9_ TAULOR ST. City/SvZip: (OT TAANSEND, WA 42369 Phone: 2b 0 - AT4- OVO Email: ViChwh (w Termin “arch. COM Contractor: Name:_ foe oF POET THWNARND Address: City/SU/Zip: Phone: Email: State License #: Exp: City Business License #: Lender Information: Lender information must be provided for projects over $5,000 in valuation per RCW 19.27.095. Name. SWNER FENANCED Project Valuation: $ Construction Type: VB Occupancy Rating: ‘os | Builiding fvformation (square feet): 1° floor (2,5: Restrooms: 2™ floor Deck(s): 3” floor Storage: Basement: Is it finished? Yes No Other: NewO — Addition '¥__- Remodel/Repair 0 Change of Use 0 ehaue RSD th Total Lot Coverage (Building Footprint): Square feet: NO CHANLE % Impervious Surface: Square fect_* 29H ia | hereby certify that the information provided is correct, that | am either the owner or authorized to act on behalf of the owner and that all activities Print sismtee!’ +77 Goren he agsociated with this permit will be in accordance with State Laws and the Port Townsend Municipal Code. — Signature: a a vate of) O TERRAPIN ARCHITECTURE « Richard Berg, Architect © Eric Kuzma, Architect AIA August 19, 2010 City of Port Townsend Development Services Dept. 250 Madison Street, 3% Floor Port Townsend, WA 98368 Attn: Fred Slota, Building Official Richard Berg met with Dave Johnson of the Port of Port Townsend maintenance department at the new ADA access ramp at the Shanghai Restaurant building, 265 Hudson Street at Point Hudson in Port Townsend. Dave was responsible for the construction of the ramp. He confirmed that the framing was done as shown on the plans: 4x8 P.T. girders located as shown, and 2x8 P.T. joists at 16” o.c. Nailing patterns in the deck boards confirm the 16” joist spacing. | have worked with Dave on other projects for the Port of Port Townsend and have found him to be honest and straightforward and | have no reason to doubt his word. So this letter can serve as my certification that the framing of the ramp was built as specified on the plans. Please let me know if you have any questions. 5665 REGISTERED RICHARD CoN o2enes STATE OF WASHINGTON 719 Taylor Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-8090 www. terrapinarchitecture.com Receipt Number: 10-051 ; BLD10-032 BLD10-032 BLD10-032 BLD10-032 BLD10-032 001013001 001013001 001013001 001013001 001013001 Plan Review Fee $54.11 $54.11 State Building Code Council Fee $4.50 $4.50 Technology Fee for Building Permit $5.00 $5.00 Building Permit Fee $83.25 $83.25 Record Retention Fee for Building Per $4.25 $4.25 Total: $151.11 Total: $151.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 genpmtrreceipts Page 1 of 1 TERRAPIN ARCHITECTURE « Richard Berg, Architect Eric Kuzma, Architect AIA | DSD Port of Port Townsend 265 Hudson Street New ADA Access Ramp Structural Calculations February 9, 2010 REGISTERED Joist and Beam sizes: Joists less than 6’ long: #2 Hem-fir pressure treated 2x6 @ 16” oc Joists 6’ long or longer: #2 Hem-fir pressure treated 2x8 @ 16” oc Beams with less than 30 square feet of tributary area: #2 Hem-fir pressure treated 4x8 Beams with more than 30 square feet of tributary area: #2 Hem-fir pressure treated 4x10 ~ ILE COPY 719 Taylor Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-8090 www.terrapinarchitecture.com Project: Shanghai ramp Location: Ramp Joists 1 Floor Joist [2006 International Building Code(2005 NDS)] 1.51Nx 7.25 INx7.1 FT @ 16 0.C. #2 - Hem-Fir - Wet Use page Richard Berg te > Richard Berg Architects “~ 719 Taylor Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Section Adequate By: 6.4% StruCalc Version 8.0.99.0 2/9/2010 10:38:59 AM Controlling Factor: Moment LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.14 IN L/592 Dead Load 0.02 in Total Load 0.17 IN L/515 Live Load Deflection Criteria: L/480 Total Load Deflection Criteria: L/360 | REACTIONS A B Live Load 473 |b 473 Ib Dead Load 71 Ib = 71 Ib Total Load 544 Ib 544 Ib Bearing Length 1.34 in_ 1.34 in oe | BEAM DATA Center Span Length 7.1 ft A Unbraced Length-Top O ft Unbraced Length-Bottom O ft Floor sheathing applied to top of joists-top of joists fully braced. Floor Duration Factor 1.00 MATERIAL PROPERTIES #2 - Hem-Fir Base Values Adjusted Bending Stress: Fb = 850 psi Fb'= 938 psi Cd=1.00 CF=1.20 Cr=1.15 Ci=0.80 Shear Stress: Fv= 150 psi FVv= 116 psi Cd=1.00 Cm=0.97 Ci=0.80 Modulus of Elasticity: E= 1300 ksi E'= 1112 ksi Min. Mod. of Elasticity: E_min= 470 ksi E_min'= 402 ksi Cm=0.90 Ci=0.95 Comp. + to Grain: Fe-L= 405 psi Fe-l'= 271 psi Cm=0.67 Controlling Moment: 966 ft-Ib 3.55 Ft from left support of span 2 (Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s) 2 Controlling Shear: 457 Ib At a distance d from left support of span 2 (Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s) 2 Comparisons with required sections: Section Modulus: Area (Shear): Moment of Inertia (deflection): Moment: Shear: Req'd Provided 12.36 in3 13.14 ind 5.89 in2 10.88 in2 38.63 in4 47.63 in4 966 ftlb 1028 ftlb 457 Ib 844 Ib [ JOIST LOADING Uniform Floor Loading Center Live Load LL= 100 psf Dead Load DL= 15 psf Total Load TL= 115 psf TL Adj. For Joist Spacing wT = 153.3 _ pif NOTES Project: Shanghai ramp page Location: Ramp Joists 2 Richard Perg es | es ,%, Richard Berg Architects Floor Joist SrugaleQ 7197 . — itech. 3 aylor Street of [2006 International Building Code(2005 NDS)] aot Port Townsend, WA 98368 1.5INx7.25INx6.5FT @160.C. , #2 - Hem-Fir - Wet Use Section Adequate By: 32.7% StruCalc Version 8.0.99.0 2/9/2010 10:39:22 AM Controlling Factor: Moment LOADING DIAGRAM [DEFLECTIONS —_ Center Live Load 0.10 INL/771 Dead Load 0.01 in Total Load 0.11 IN L/701 Live Load Deflection Criteria: L/480 Total Load Deflection Criteria: L/360 REACTIONS A B Live Load 433 Ib 483 Ib Dead Load 4 Ib 483 lb Total Load 477 |b 477 Ib Bearing Length 1.17 in_ 1.17 in BEAM DATA Center Span Length 6.5 ft Unbraced Length-Top O ft Unbraced Length-Bottom O ft Floor sheathing applied to top of joists-top of joists fully braced. Floor Duration Factor 1.00 MATERIAL PROPERTIES #2 - Hem-Fir Base Values Adjusted Bending Stress: Fb = 850 psi Fb'= 938 psi Cd=1.00 CF=1.20 Cr=1.15 Ci=0.80 Shear Stress: Fv= 150 psi Fv= 116 psi Cad=1.00 Cm=0.97 Ci=0.80 Modulus of Elasticity: E= 1300 ksi E'= 1112 ksi Min. Mod. of Elasticity: E_min= 470 ksi E_min'= 402 ksi Cm=0.90 Ci=0.95 Comp. + to Grain: Fe-L= 405 psi Fe-'= 271 psi Cm=0.67 Controlling Moment: 775 ft-lb 3.25 Ft from left support of span 2 (Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s) 2 Controlling Shear: 391 Ib At a distance d from left support of span 2 (Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s) 2 Comparisons with required sections: Req'd Provided Section Modulus: 9.91 in3 13.14 in3 Area (Shear): 5.04 in2 = 10.88 in2 Moment of Inertia (deflection): 29.64 in4 = 47.63 in4 Moment: 775 ft-lb 1028 ft-lb Shear: 391 Ib 844 Ib JOIST LOADING Uniform Floor Loading Center Live Load LL= 100 psf Dead Load DL= 10 psf Total Load TL= 110 psf TL Adj. For Joist Spacing wT = 146.7 __ pif NOTES Project: Shanghai ramp Location: Ramp Joists 3 Floor Joist [2006 International Building Code(2005 NDS)] 15INX55INx55 FT @160.C. #2 - Hem-Fir - Wet Use Section Adequate By: 15.5% Controlling Factor: Moment ) page Richard Berg Richard Berg Architects 719 Taylor Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 StruCalc Version 8.0.99.0 2/9/2010 10:39:45 AM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.12 IN L/556 Dead Load 0.01 in Total Load 0.13 IN L/505 Live Load Deflection Criteria: L/480 Total Load Deflection Criteria: L/360 REACTIONS A B LOADING DIAGRAM Floor Duration Factor 1.00 Floor sheathing applied to top of joists-top of joists fully braced. Live Load 367 Ib 367 Ib Dead Load 37 tb =. 337 Ib Total Load 403 Ib 403 Ib Bearing Length 0.99 in 0.99 in BEAM DATA Center Span Length 5.5 ft re Unbraced Length-Top O ft Unbraced Length-Bottom Q ft MATERIAL PROPERTIES #2 - Hem-Fir Base Values Adjusted Bending Stress: Fb = 850 psi Fb'= 1017 psi Cd=1.00 CF=1.30 Cr=1.15 Ci=0.80 Shear Stress: Fv= 150 psi Fv= 116 psi Cd=1.00 Cm=0.97 Ci=0.80 Modulus of Elasticity: E= 1300 ksi E'= 1112 ksi Min. Mod. of Elasticity: E_min= 470 ksi E_min'’= 402 ksi Cm=0.90 Ci=0.95 Comp. - to Grain: Fo-L= 405 psi Fe-t'= 271 psi Cm=0.67 Controlling Moment: 555 ft-lb 2.75 Ft from left support of span 2 (Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s) 2 Controlling Shear: -339 Ib At a distance d from right support of span 2 (Center Span) Created by combining all dead loads and live loads on span(s) 2 Comparisons with required sections: Section Modulus: Area (Shear): Moment of Inertia (deflection): Moment: Shear: Req'd Provided 6.55 in3 7.56 in3 4.37 in2 = 8.25 in2 17.96 in4 = 20.8 in4 555 ft-lb 641 ft-lb -339 Ib 640 Ib JO iG Uniform Floor Loading Center Live Load LL= 100 psf Dead Load DL= 10 psf Total Load TL= 110 psf TL Adj. For Joist Spacing wT = 146.7 pif NOTES Project: Shanghai ramp Location: Ramp beam 1 Uniformly Loaded Floor Beam [2006 International Building Code(2005 NDS)} 3.5 IN x 9.25 IN x 5.25 FT #2 - Hem-Fir - Wet Use Section Adequate By: 36.4% Controlling Factor: Moment Richard Berg — Richard Berg Architects triiCale..) 719 Taylor Street \ Port Townsend, WA 98368 page StruCalc Version 8.0.99.0 2/9/2010 10:38:03 AM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.04 IN L/1455 Dead Load 0.00 in Total Load 0.05 INL/1312 Live Load Deflection Criteria: L/360 Total Load Deflection Criteria: L/240 LOADING DIAGRAM Unbraced Length-Top 1 ft Floor Duration Factor 1.00 | REACTIONS A B Live Load 1706 Ib 1706 Ib Dead Load 186 Ib 186 Ib Total Load 1893 Ib 1893 Ib Bearing Length 1.99 in 1.99 in | BEAM DATA Center Span Length 5.25 ft ve Notch Depth 0.00 MATERIAL PROPERTIES #2 - Hem-Fir : Base Values Adjusted Bending Stress: Fb= 850 psi = 815 psi Cd=1.00 Cl=1.00 CF=1.20 Ci=0.80 Shear Stress: Fv= 150 psi FVv= 116 psi Cd=1.00 Cm=0.97 Ci=0.80 Modulus of Elasticity: E= 1300 ksi E'= 1112 ksi Min. Mod. of Elasticity: E_min= 470 ksi E_min'’= 402 ksi Cm=0.90 Ci=0.95 Comp. - to Grain: Fe-L= 405 psi Fe-l'= 271 psi Cm=0.67 Controlling Moment: 2484 ft-lb 2.625 ft from left support Created by combining all dead and live loads. Controlling Shear: -1363 Ib At a distance d from support. Created by combining all dead and live loads. Comparisons with required sections: Req'd Provided Section Modulus: 36.59 in3 49.91 in3 Area (Shear): 17.56 in2 32.38 in2 Moment of Inertia (deflection): 57.11 in4 230.84 in4 Moment: 2484 ft-lb 3388 ft-lb Shear: -1363 Ib 2512 Ib Total Maximum Load: [| FLOOR LOADING Side 4 Side 2 Floor Live Load FLL = 100 psf 100 psf Floor Dead Load FDL= 10 psf 10 psf Floor Tributary Width FTW= 3.3 ft 3.3 ft Wall Load WALL = O pif | BEAM LOADING Beam Total Live Load: wL = 650 pif Beam Total Dead Load: wD= 65 plf Beam Self Weight: BSW = 6 pif wI= 721. pif NOTES Project’ Shanghai ramp ae "ata r Richard Berg Location: Ramp beam 2 retanen ‘ F Uniformly Loaded Floor Beam PliGalgG) Revs Bere ake L [2006 International Building Code(2005 NDS)} oe Bist aie | WA 96368 of 3.5 IN x 7.25 IN x 5.25 FT ; #2 - Hem-Fir - Wet Use . Section Adequate By: 34.2% StruCalc Version 8.0.99.0 2/9/2010 11:29:08 AM Controlling Factor: Moment LOADING DIAGRAM DEFLECTIONS Center Live Load 0.07 IN L/872 Dead Load 0.01 in Total Load 0.08 IN L/786 Live Load Deflection Criteria: L360 Total Load Deflection Criteria: L/240 REACTIONS A B Live Load 1444 Ib 1444 Ib Dead Load 157 Ib 157 |b Total Load 1601 Ib 1601 Ib Bearing Length 1.69 in 1.69 in — BEAM DATA Center Span Length 5.25 ft A. Unbraced Length-Top 1 ft Floor Duration Factor 1.00 Se ee = FLOOR LOADING MATERIAL PROPERTIES Side 1 Side 2 #2 - Hem-Fir Floor Live Load FLL = 100 psf 100 psf Base Values Adjusted Floor Dead Load FDL = 10 psf 10 psf Bending Stress: Fb = 850 psi Fb'= 1103 psi Floor Tributary Width FTW= 28 ft 2.8 ft Cd=1.00 Cl=1.00 CF=1.30 Wall Load WALL = 0 oplf _ CLO ee? , Beam Total Live Load: wL= 550 pif Min. Mod. of Elasticity: E_min = 470 ksi E_min' = 423 ksi Beam Self Weight: BSW = 5 plf Gir0.90 Total Maximum Load: wT= 610 pif Comp. -L to Grain: Fe-L= 405 psi Fe-t'= 271 psi Cm=0.67 Controlling Moment: 2101 ft-lb 2.625 ft from left support Created by combining all dead and live loads. Controlling Shear: -1248 Ib At a distance d from support. Created by combining all dead and live loads. Comparisons with required sections: Rea'd Provided Section Modulus: 22.85 in3 30.66 in3 Area (Shear): 12.87 in2 25.38 in2 Moment of Inertia (deflection): 45.91 ind 111.15 in4 Moment: 2101 ft-lb 2819 ft-lb Shear: -1248 Ib 2461 Ib NOTES City of Port Townsend Development Services Department 250 Madison Street, Suite 3, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-5095 FAX (360) 344-4619 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION of the SHORELINES ADMINISTRATOR Minor Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Critical Area Review File No. LUP 09-082 Date: May 10, 2010 Applicant and Port of Port Townsend Property Owner: c/o Jim Pivarnik, Deputy Director PO Box 1180 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Staff Contact: John McDonagh, DSD Planner Appeal Deadline: May 24, 2010 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION Two buildings located within 200-feet of the waters in Point Hudson Marina and Admiralty Inlet are involved with this application. One building contains the Shanghai Restaurant and is located at 265 Hudson Street. The other structure is known as the Sail Loft building and is located at 315 Jackson Street. The request is for Minor Shoreline Substantial Development Permit approval for construction of a new accessible (ADA) entry ramp on the east facade of the Shanghai Restaurant. Also, the request proposes a new 2-story exit staircase along the south facade of the Sail Loft building. According to the City’s Critical Areas maps, the subject properties are mapped as being within a seismic/landslide erosion critical area. The City’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) incorporates the Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) by reference (Chapter 6 of the SMP). All appropriate findings and conclusions concerning Critical Area review will be included in the Minor Shoreline Substantial Development Permit decision. A separate Critical areas permit is not required. The properties are legally described as “Tax 21” along with Lots 1-4, Block 45 and Lots 1 & 3, Block 52 being a portion of the Pt. Townsend Original Townsite, The Jefferson County tax parcel numbers for the site is 001 013 001, 989-704-501 and 989-705-201, all lying within the SW /% of Section 1, Township 30 North, Range 1 West, W.M. Port of PT, Sail Loft/Shanghai, Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review LUP09-082 Page 2 of 10 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION OF THE SHORELINES ADMINISTRATOR After respectful consideration of the above-referenced Minor Shoreline Substantial Development application and supporting documents, the Shoreline Administrator makes the following findings of fact, conclusions and decision. FINDINGS OF FACT Project Description & Background iF The applicant proposes construction that meets the definition of Minor Substantial Development under the City’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP). Said construction would occur entirely on upland portions of property owned by the Port of Port Townsend at Point Hudson Marina. Point Hudson contains approximately 32 acres of uplands and tidelands dotted with numerous buildings, most of which date from the 1930’s and 1940’s. Due to the presence of seismic hazard soils that underlie the site, the project also requires review under the City’s Critical Areas Ordinance (PTMC 19.05). The SMP request is consolidated with the Critical Area review in this decision. (Exhibit A — Minor Shoreline Substantial Development application (JARPA) and site plans). The subject proposal involves exterior construction on two buildings at Point Hudson. One aspect of the project would construct a new accessible (ADA) entry ramp on the east fagade of the Shanghai Restaurant. The second aspect of the request would construct a new 2-story exit staircase along the south facade of the Sail Loft building. Each Minor Shoreline Substantial Development request is considered a Type II application under Port Townsend Municipal Code (PTMC, Chapter 20.01). DSD staff processes and reviews each Type II shoreline request and prepares a recommendation for consideration by the City’s Shoreline Administrator, who renders a final decision. Appeals of the Shoreline Administrator’s decision are heard first by the City’s Hearing Examiner Shoreline Master Program and Zoning 4. The buildings are located within the Point Hudson Marina District environmental designation (Point Hudson District) of the City’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP); however, each building lies within a different subdistrict of the Point Hudson District. The Shanghai Restaurant building is location within the subdistrict referred to as Point Hudson East. The Sail Loft is located in the Maritime Heritage Corridor Subdistrict. The overall purpose of the Point Hudson District is to provide a variety of water-oriented and other limited uses appropriate to a traditional small scale marina, together with marine trades, artisan and general public use. This SMP designation promotes adaptive reuse of the existing buildings at Point Hudson and a mix of water-dependant and water-related uses that are compatible with the district’s historic character. It also encourages historic preservation of the Point Hudson buildings, emphasizes increased public access to the shoreline and fostering ecological restoration of the eastern point. A mix of water-oriented uses with other Port of PT, Sail Loft/Shanghai, Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review LUP09-082 Page 3 of 1 limited activities that promote adaptive reuse are accommodated at Point Hudson so long as they are compatible with the historic, marine-related character of the area. 6. Inthe Point Hudson East Subdistrict, water-oriented uses and a limited number of nonconforming uses (the latter includes a number of visitor serving uses) that are compatible with the historic character of the buildings have successfully evolved in this subdistrict. Limited new development and adaptive reuse of existing buildings is allowed within the Point Hudson East Subdistrict to encourage public access and open space and to facilitate the revitalization and rehabilitation of existing buildings. 7. The Maritime Heritage Corridor Subdistrict is intended to continue support the majority of marine trades and other water-dependent and water-related uses located in Point Hudson. This subdistrict is well suited for this role due its proximity to the marina and haul-out facilities and because of the buildings’ suitability for small scale marine trades use. Limited water-enjoyment uses are also appropriate uses in this subdistrict. Non-water-oriented uses should be limited to minor portions of a development housing a mix of uses. 8. Pursuant to PTMC Title 17.22, the underlying zoning for all of Point Hudson is M-II(B) — Point Hudson Marina. The M-II(B) zone accommodates a variety of marine-related uses, but at smaller scale appropriate to Point Hudson. The district promotes mixed use projects which incorporate water-oriented uses, consistent with the historic, marine-related character of the area. Within certain eligible buildings, including the Shanghai Restaurant, a limited range of -water-oriented uses are allowed as a means to promote adaptive reuse of the original Point Hudson Station buildings. 9. The site also lies within the Port Townsend Historic Overlay District, which encompasses a National Historic Landmark recognized by the U.S. National Park Service. As such, all exterior changes to the buildings at Point Hudson are subject to Historic District Design Review approval pursuant to PTMC 17.30. The changes proposed to both buildings were reviewed by the City’s Historic Preservation Committee, who recommended approval of the changes to the Development Services Director (HPC09-044). The Director granted Design Review approval for the exterior improvements on December 18, 2009 (Exhibit B — Certificate of Approval, HPC09-044). ic Notice, SEPA and Critical Area review 10. Initial public notice of the project was provided pursuant to Chapter 20.01 PTMC, including a 30-day Notice of Application comment period. Said Notice was published in the local newspaper, mailed to neighbors within 300 feet of the site, and posted at the site on ecember 30, 2009 (Exhibit C — Notice of Application). The comment period ended January 29, 2010 and no written comments were received. 11. The project was found to be categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental olicy Act (SEPA) as minor new construction. 12. The project site is mapped as being within two mapped Critical Areas (seismic hazard and quifer recharge) and is therefore subject to the provisions of PTMC 19.05. Pursuant to Port of PT, Sail Loft/Shanghai, Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review LUP09-082 Page 4 of 10 PTMC 19.05.040.E.1.j, for projects located within either a seismic hazard or aquifer recharge area, the Director may waive compliance with the application and delineation requirements of the section and compliance with the performance standards for development contained in PTMC 19.05.060. The DSD Director finds that the performance standards for development within a seismic hazard critical area will be met by the project through application of the building code. No useful purpose would be furthered by requiring compliance with the Critical Area code application requirements or the performance standards for development. However, as the project is also subject to review under the SMP, a consistency analysis with the Critical Area provisions of the SMP are still provided. Shoreline Master Program Policies and Performance Standards 13. The following sections of the Port Townsend Shoreline Master Program (SMP) were reviewed as part of the requested use: 5.13 Point Hudson 6.5 Critical Areas — General 6.8 Critical Geologically Hazardous Areas 8.6 | Commercial Development 14. Project consistency with the above SMP sections, including all applicable management principals, policies and development regulations, are provided in the Findings below. The reviewed principals, policies and development regulations are listed in italics, with a Development Services Department staff (DSD) analysis following in regular text 15. Shoreline areas designated Point Hudson Marina District: “encompasses Port and private properties that are occupied by the Point Hudson marina and associated uses including marine trades, maritime educational use, visitor-serving commercial, recreational and moorage.” (SMP Chapter 5.13) 16. The overall Management Principals, Policies and Development Regulations for Point Hudson applicable to either project are as follows: Management Principles: Development and rehabilitation of existing buildings should be based on the following principles; 1. Allow incremental, evolutionary changes to existing buildings and shoreline uses, Starting with current use patterns. Policies Policy 5.13.4 Limit the size and total square footage of restaurants in order to protect Point Hudson’s small-scale character and emphasize marine-trades as the priority uses in this district. Policy 5.13.11 Public view corridors in Point Hudson identified in Appendix B should be protected and enhanced through appropriate design (e.g., modulation of building heights and massing). Port of PT, Sail Loft/Shanghai, Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review LUP09-082 Page 5 of 10 Policy 5.13.13 Retain the small-scale character of Point Hudson. Policy 5.13.15 Work in collaboration with the Port of Port Townsend to help keep Point Hudson financially self-supporting. Development Regulations DR-5.13.9 New development/redevelopment shall be compatible with the scale, bulk, materials and design of the Point Hudson Station Buildings. DR-5.13.13 New development shall strive to maintain/enhance key public views including the view eastward from the end of Water Street, views across and along the boat basin, and eastward from Jefferson Street. DR-5.13.15 Retain historic character of existing buildings. The Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures shall be used for modifications proposed to buildings that exceed 50 years in age or otherwise qualify for historic status. Additional design guidelines are contained in PTMC 17.30.140 Historic overlay district — Design Standards and 17.30.150 Waterfront subdistrict — Additional design standards. DR-5.13.16 No structure shall be erected, or altered, in any area defined in this section to a height in excess of the limits established in the Special Height Overlay District as codified in Chapter 17.28 PTMC (Appendix C). The height limit shall not apply to cupolas, water tanks, flagpoles, transmission lines, and radio and television towers and other similar structures. DR-5.13.20 Specific landscape plans shall seek to provide an attractive vegetative relief and screening while avoiding unnecessary blockage of views and solar access. DSD Analysis: Both proposals epitomize the stated SMP goal of rehabilitation of existing buildings at Point Hudson through “incremental, evolutionary changes.” Public view corridors as identified in Appendix B of the SMP are not impacted by either of the proposed exterior changes. The new ADA compliant ramp for the Shanghai restaurant improves public access to a Point Hudson facility. The second story access stairway provides a second means of egress from an area of the Sail Loft Building that has long been home to small scale marine trades. Height limits referenced in the SMP are also met by both proposals. The overall SMP cap on restaurant square footage (11,000 square feet) or the size limits for an individual restaurant (3,500 square feet, excluding decks) are not affected by the Shanghai ADA ramp proposal. However, it will assist the Port of Port Townsend in keeping Point Hudson financially self-supporting by providing enhanced access to persons with disabilities. The proposed exterior changes have undergone Historic District Design Review to ensure appropriate materials, colors, lighting and signage are used. Port of PT, Sail Loft/Shanghai, Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review LUP09-082 Page 6 of 10 17. 18. 19. Environmental Protection under the SMP sets forth: “ .. policies and regulations that protect the shoreline environment as well as the critical areas found within the shoreline jurisdiction. These policies and regulations apply to all uses, developments and activities that may occur within the shoreline jurisdiction regardless of the Shoreline Master Program environment designation. They are to be implemented in conjunction with the specific use and activity policies and regulations found in this Master Program.” (SMP Chapter 6.1) Chapter 6 first presents General Environmental Policies and Regulations including analysis of impacts, mitigation, bonding, and monitoring. Second, policies and regulations protecting the broad elements that comprise the shoreline environment (e.g., earth, air, and water) are provided. Finally, policies and regulations for the specific type of “critical area” are presented, which at this site are limited to geologically hazardous areas (seismic soils). Critical areas are also protected under the Critical Areas regulations of the Port Townsend Municipal Code, PTMC Chapter 19.05. As noted in Finding 10, above, the DSD Director has granted a waiver from the application and delineation requirements of PTMC 19.05 under the provisions of PTMC 19.06.040.E.1.j. The SMP overall Management Policies and Development Regulations of Chapter 6 applicable to the proposal include: Management Policies Policy 6.3.1 Protect the environment through implementation of this Master Program in concert with the City’s Critical Areas Ordinance and through the use of the AMRRC mitigation sequence (Avoid, Minimize, Rectify, Reduce, Compensate)(WAC 173-26-201(e)). Policy 6.3.2 Minimize the adverse impacts of shoreline developments and activities on the natural environment during all phases of development (e.g., design, construction, operation, and management). Policy 6.3.3 Assure, at a minimum, that development and use within the shoreline’s jurisdiction result in no net loss of ecological functions necessary to sustain shoreline natural resources. Development activities shall protect existing ecological functions and ecosystem wide processes. Development Regulations General DR-6.3.1 All shoreline development and activity shall be located, designed, constructed, and managed in a manner that avoids, minimizes and/or mitigates adverse impacts to the environment. The preferred mitigation sequence (avoid, minimize, rectify, reduce, or compensate for the environmental impact) shall follow that listed in WAC 173-26-0201((2)(e), see also definition of “Mitigation,” listed in this Master Program). Port of PT, Sail Loft/Shanghai, Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review LUP09-082 Page 7 of 10 DR-6.3.2 In approving shoreline developments, the City of Port Townsend shall ensure that shoreline development, use, and/or activities will result in no net loss of ecological functions necessary to sustain shoreline resources, including loss that may result from the cumulative impacts of similar developments over time to the extent consistent with constitutional and statutory limitations on the regulation of private property. To this end, the City may require modifications to the site plan and/or adjust or prescribe project dimensions, intensity of use, and screening as deemed appropriate. If impacts cannot be avoided through design modifications, the City shall require mitigation commensurate with the project’s adverse impacts. DSD Analysis: The overall shoreline environment will suffer no adverse impact as a result of either proposed construction project. The areas being developed involve previously altered upland areas adjacent to and in between buildings that contain existing SMP compliant uses. To require additional environmental mitigation or bonding is not necessary or required. Conditions that ensure Best Management Practices (BMP’s) are utilized during construction are necessary and can be imposed through both the shoreline permit and building permit. 20. Geologically hazardous areas are areas susceptible to severe erosion; slide activity, or other geologic events. In the Port Townsend shoreline, high marine bluffs are the most visible type of geologically hazardous area, although seismic, tsunami and erosion hazards have also been mapped. The subject site contains soils mapped as being seismically hazardous. The applicable SMP Policies and Development Regulations of Chapter 8 that relate specifically to geologically hazardous areas include: Management Policies Policy 6.8.1 Ensure that new development or the creation of new lots does not cause any foreseeable risk from geological conditions to people or improvements during the life of the development. DSD Analysis: As noted previously (Finding 10, above), assurance that the new development does not cause any foreseeable risk due to the seismic soils on site will be met through compliance with the building code. 21. Commercial Development is defined in the SMP as follows: “..those uses and facilities that are involved in wholesale or retail trade or business activities. Examples include but are not limited to hotels, motels, grocery stores, restaurants, shops, offices, and indoor recreation facilities. ... (SMP Chapter 8.6) Port of PT, Sail Loft/Shanghai, Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review LUP09-082 Page 8 of 10 22. Applicable policies and development regulations related to Commercial Development are as follows: Policies Policy 8.6.1 Give priority to those commercial developments that are dependent on shoreline locations or that allow a substantial number of people to actively or passively enjoy the shoreline. Policy 8.6.3 Design commercial uses in a manner that provides physical and visual access to the water. Development Regulations DR-8.6.2 Commercial development shall be subject to the design review provisions of the Port Townsend Zoning code (Title 17 PTMC). DR-8.6.3 All commercial development/redevelopment requiring a Substantial Development or Conditional Use Permit within shoreline jurisdiction shall provide for public visual and physical access to the shoreline in accordance with Chapter 7, Public Access, taking into consideration constitutional and statutory limitations. Such provisions could be the preservation of shoreline views, the establishment of public access easements across and to the shoreline, enhancement of an adjacent street-end or park or other consideration commensurate with the degree of impact caused by the development. DSD Analysis: The proposed ADA ramp improvements to the Shanghai Restaurant will provide enhanced restaurant access for persons with disabilities. And while not a building code requirement, the second story access stairway for the Sail Loft will enhance emergency egress from the building. Visual and physical access to the waters around Point Hudson will be unchanged by either of the projects. Design Review for both proposed improvements was performed and approved through a recommendation of the City’s Historic Preservation Committee (HPC). CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed construction meets the definition of a Minor Shoreline Substantial Development under the Port Townsend Shoreline Master Program (SMP). The projects are exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA); however, it is subject to review under the City’s Critical Areas regulations in PTMC 19.05. The DSD Director has correctly granted a waiver from compliance with the application, delineation requirements and performance standards for development contained in PTMC 19.05.060, as no useful purpose would be furthered by requiring said compliance. The performance standards for development within a seismic hazard critical area will be met by the project through application of the building code. . Subject to certain conditions, the development is consistent with the underlying shoreline designations of the Port Townsend SMP (Point Hudson Marina District and both the Point Port of PT, Sail Loft/Shanghai, Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review LUP09-082 Page 9 of 10 Hudson East and Maritime Heritage Corridor subdistricts therein). These same conditions also make the project consistent with all other applicable SMP policies and development regulations, including those that relate to protection of critical areas. 4. The proposed development is consistent with the provisions of this Master Program, the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the rules and regulations adopted by the Department of Ecology thereunder. Conditions have been applied to ensure consistency with policies and performance standards for Critical Areas contained in Chapter 19.05 PTMC (incorporated by reference in the City’s Shoreline Master Program). DECISION Based on the foregoing Findings of Facts and Conclusions, the Shoreline Administrator hereby GRANTS the requested Minor Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Critical Area review (LUP09-082), subject to the following conditions: GENERAL 1. Construction shall be completed in strict conformance to the plans contained within the submitted plans, except where modified by this decision. Conditions of any other city approvals obtained for the project (Historic District Design Review, building permit) must also be complied with during construction. 2. Noise generated from construction of each project shall be subject to the limitations set forth in the City’s noise regulations at PTMC 9.08. PRIOR TO COMMENCING DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 3 Erosion control measures shall be installed by the applicant in accordance with approved building permit plans and inspected by Development Services Department (DSD) prior to clearing and grading. DURING CONSTRUCTION 4. The applicant or his/her designee shall be responsible for maintenance of the site, including maintenance of any fencing and temporary erosion control devices as indicated on approved plans. Additional best management practices shall be implemented as necessary to control runoff/sedimentation from the site. All construction debris shall be properly disposed of on land in such a manner that it cannot enter into the waterway or cause water quality degradation to state waters. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT 5. Final building permit inspection shall only be granted upon a finding by the DSD Director that the improvements have been installed in conformance with this permit and all other City approved permits (including but not limited to Historic District Design Review). PERMIT REVSIONS 6. If substantive changes to the design, terms, or conditions of this approved permit are sought, the applicant must submit a request for permit revision for review consistent with SMP Chapter 10.18. Changes are “substantive” if they materially alter the project in a Port of PT, Sail Loft/Shanghai, Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review LUP09-082 Page 10 of 10 manner that relates to its conformance to the terms and conditions of this permit, this SMP, or the Shoreline Management Act. Changes, which the Administrator determines are not substantive, do not require approval of a revision. DURATION OF PERMITS 7. Pursuant to SMP chapter 10.17, the construction authorized under this permit is valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of issuance. Construction, or substantial progress toward completion, must begin with two (2) years after the date of issuance. 8. The City may, at its discretion, with prior notice to parties of record and the Department of Ecology, extend the two-year time period for the demonstration of substantial progress for a reasonable time, up to one year, based on factors including the inability to expeditiously obtain other governmental permits which are required prior to the commencement of construction. 9. If construction has not been completed within five (5) years of approval by the City of Port Townsend, the City will review the Permit and, upon showing of good cause, either extend the Permit for one additional year, or terminate the Permit. Prior to the City authorizing any Permit extensions, it shall notify any parties of record and the Department of Ecology. Note: Only one single extension is permitted. STiol[ic Judy pasa Shoreline Administrator Date ' Development Services Department APPEALS Local appeals of decisions by the Shoreline Administrator shall be filed pursuant to the procedures and timelines of PTMC 20.01.290 - .310. An applicant or other party of record who may be aggrieved by the administrative decision may appeal the decision to the hearing examiner; provided, that a written appeal in conformance with Chapter 1.14 PTMC is filed within 14 calendar days after the notice of the decision. The date on which a decision is deemed issued is 3 days after the City mails a written decision. The appeal period for this permit concludes at 5 p.m., May 24, 2010. DRAWN BY: AD. —— = == |DATE: OC | O AE | rs SCALE: REV DATE DESCRIPTION VAIRES PROJECT: © TERRAPIN ARCHITECTS, P.C. 2010 © NEW ADA COMPLIANT RAMP ON EAST SIDE OF BUILDING. NOTE TO OWNERS, CONTRACTORS AND INDEX TO DRAWINGS DRAINAGE REMODEL FOR ADA COMPLIANT THRESHOLD AT MEETING ROOM DOOR © REMODEL FOR ADA COMPLIANT ENTRANCE TO SHANGHAI RESTAURANT BUILDING OFFICIALS: eam 20 Al SITE PLAN # PROJECT INFORMATION SOME DOWNSPOUTS DRAIN ONTO ft tage 7 eee A2 MAIN FLOOR PLAN SPLASH BLOCKS AND SOME ARE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING AND ZONING AZ RAMP FOUNDATION @ FRAMING PLANS CONNECTED TO EXISTING Peer Toes Wa aecee CODES, IN CASE OF ANY INFORMATION THAT AND RAMP SECTIONS INFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEM. NEW r APPEARS TO BE LACKING, PLEASE CONTACT THE A4 ELEVATIONS RAMP WILL INCREASE IMPERVIOUS 7. AT OWNER: ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. AREA BY 240 5Q. FT. WATER FROM © PORT OF PORT TOWNSEND 2. THESE PLANS CONTAIN THE MAJORITY OF THE RAMP WILL DRAIN ONTO GROUND AT — = 2 PO BOX lI80 INFORMATION REGUIRED TO BUILD THE STRUCTURE aw <2 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 48368 SHOWN ON THE PLANS. HOWEVER, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE BASE OF RAMP. r $8 360-385-2355 TO ANTICIPATE EVERY PIECE OF INFORMATION v fh Oo a CONTACT: NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION. THE ARCHITECTS HAVE = & So JIM PAVARNIK MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO STRIKE A = ‘z Z e 360-385-0656 REASONABLE BALANCE BETWEEN PROVISION OF mitozs INFORMATION AND COST OF THE PLANS. THE PLANS TT] Ss) ze wi ARCHITECT: : WILL INEVITABLY CONTAIN MINOR DISCREPANCIES AND FILE COPY MrES TEAEAT IN ARCUMITKIVRE CC, AREAS LACKING IN SPECIFIC INFORMATION. DURING E44 <= KN as PORT TORNGEND, NA 48360 TE COUNEE OF COIR AS Te MENS = ‘ EMERGE, THEY WILL REQUIRE ATTENTION AND = See _ RESOLUTION. THE BEST RESOLUTION OF ISSUES OF APPROVED 314-8090 THIS IS MOST OFTEN ACHEVED THROUGH A NOTICE: Plans are approved excepting | Date: ALZLO Oo}. F3 JOINT DECISION MAKING PROCESS INVOLVING THE : ane _ wo ve any errors or omissions. All work must | permit No: Bu & us eo PROPERTY INFORMATION: OWNERS, ARCHITECT AND CONTRACTOR(S). pass inspection in conformance with : a Ey ez — all applicable codes and regulations. | By: = - 2 x z& ZONE: M-lI (B) Building Official ov < BUILDING TYPE: Y-B er ene OCCIPMIGY: A2 CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND 2s 01013001 i PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ; cylin S| T3ON RIW | TX 2I(POINT HIDSON)PTN OF PTOT \6'-0" ~ HUDSON STREET q CODE DATA THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CODES: . 2006 IEBC, 2006 IBC, 2006 IMC, 2006 IFC, 2006 IAMPO UPC, CONCRETE SIDEWALK \D—y O ANSI AIIT.|, 2006 WSEC, 2006 VIAQ, 2006 WATER CONS. STDS. —_——_ y Y, og UW ADA Y % 7, = | PARKING Y} Y ava | 8 y U _ Y VZAPARKING Upon RAMP | O Y y, Gow RAMP WW == J Gf oe amas 7 v2 / Z Li O NEW AIDA YY of COMPLIANT Q_ EXISTING RAMP BUILDING a 24'-p" x- 46'-0" = z — > EXISTING [| _ BUILDING i QL ABOVE GROUID WWI ssseonee2 : , eororz008 saa n4210.%, TANK La one ee -t _~” “geseoose2 “989714205 > 989703911. ABOVE GROUND cp) sg cates mons a ea on a2 Coorta ee PROPANE TANK Nee Ne ee \ a ——— xX, —— “|, 989714202 Fa EXISTING BUILDING jaoowog io 4, \ 9697941 a n JB] vesriacoa a FIRE HYDRANTS, TYP. ABOVE GROUND ie OR a NY o0l0l5Q0l Ly (3) PROPANE TANKS GPA hace \, 989714004 sear 0002 . \ saan OS g —_ — aoe f : 7 war © * a . 4 wr — B, -SRrtB8O1 A gear sor03 ” 9e9710006 he Ch» ill a %. se7ss904 —"<~ \ se97 10104 * 9@97 10006 p Zz. a \* 989710101 aa \ LL] +— MINI-PAD ie | LD a Ne \ss97 10108 - a Ne Ye feagponabe \ iting 0 a 2 be oS cwori020 "SN mere ; h/— UNDERGROUND 1 = areas, \\] at nee, he. ELEC. VAULT Ths if ’ i ge? 989709205 ADA i D 7 YN o S ; 7 “sora” \ areca esos ASPHALT _ » en = eg od . aig —— 4 DRIVEWAY RAMP RA ed + = = a) eg * e110 sesemos <— \ CONCRETE SIDEWALK a i S ia \ georges g8970g001 989705301 s\. . \ srt gaara oN o-— REERERAND > 99 22 ee eee LON 989705301 a PA \ Sy < i 2 ili, * te iam oi gesroain2 \\ i ye Xe) Le oy 989705504 : Ny 9708403 D N Y rd ‘geo rossns 3970580" \ | gx 989708302 & 969704401 a re) 989705604 969705503 oot weaiodsos ‘%. ; ; 7 Oo a a RE ne root / 7 O < BenTOSEOY cmoniiaas SN of 989700806 apora80% MEAN HIGH WATER LINE NORT 0. oe \ 989704202 7)" 989700601 989700506 os | - . NORTH NY SCALE: |" =|20'/ ON VICINITY Hl Fee 9 ao NTS NOTE: THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A PORTION) ai OF PARCEL #00I0ISO0I. SEE VICINTY ~Ciiy OF PORT TOWNSEND MAP FOR PARCEL OUTLINE. DSD = DRAWN BY: | AD. DATE: 2/8NO SCALE: REV | DATE DESCRIPTION | 4" = | 0" © TERRAPIN ARCHITECTS, P.C. 2010 EXISTING SLAB FOR ADA PARKING SPACE 2 sin on (Ig) Zz, ov 4 : mi 8 YZ < o _] | 5 . = 8 moe F cH a L qo oo Zo | wir o28 Cras LL) ~~ FEZ on * O P| Oz — a ro —— 8 q pas [ay 3 ‘i ee | o£ al = a 4| bs N25 z | Oe Wu 8 cave ze 3 ex ; SEEN SNEENERERER DEERE P ‘ n R308, Glazing,- 2003 IRC | All glass located in areas considered | = hazardous must be safety glazing and | EXISTING SIDEWALK | identified by manufacturer's or installers i label. (acid etched in glass) a - aca (1 | WI _ 2 ey) te = [2 = = =! 7 on REMOVE WALL, SHELVING, = ‘713 igh aie LINOLEUM FLOOR FINISH, He | om os : tn. ; AND MISC, STUFF. a ‘ | Lo 4/ o T.0-LANDING i | W Y TG.LANDING a ‘eka adie ioe — CURB FROM 2X6. TOP OF CURB eae OS ORE HEV: 1-0 1/4" Io" O EXISTING STAIRS TO BE 2" ABOVE SURFACE OF ! S | ana t_* RAMP AND LANDING, TYP. | 4 Py . ae a an Al Al ae, am Yj 1; (OF | \S; iS; | SU} as roan ae Zz N | as pz i! % T.O. era EFI FLR CURB FROM 2X6. TOP OF CURB EXISTING PORCH AND COLUMNS. 4. 1.0. LANDING et c tl | : TO BE 2" ABOVE ¥ | ‘rede ast aa id leat RAMP AND LANDING, TP. 1.0. PORCH FLOOR Om LEE Wo WBE | DIRECTION) "REF. ELEV.: 247 [2° uP DIRECTION) | a _ 1:12 SLOPE | ‘ / ] 25" REMOVE FALSE Vv ee CEILING IN THIS AREA. 7 ! I —_ Sa — a a REMOVE DOOR tls ! REMOVE 5/0 NEW 3/0 DOOR AND —e- o a. \ | NEN 3/0 DOOR DOUBLE DOORS SIDE LIGHT. m VViX EXISTING ADA SIMILAR TO EXISTING. io | lief 5 = | ra RES aed Sanaa el A 1 MEETING ROOM fT) USE nN SHANGHA!| ae Zz be rg ” | __ REMOVE WALL Q. ae = $ NEW WALL >a ey § & << Oa 0) 2o 2 < BS 8 wae I o (YY © Q_ NORTH ~< MAIN FLOOR PLAN > SS ) SCALE: |/4" = |' -O" AD. EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB FOR ‘agls ADA COMPLIANT PARKING SPACE 5-44 si ; 2/eNo 14 2X PT. HEMEIR #1 RIM Ist RE) DATE DESCRIPTION /4" = |'- Oo" ata —_ a + LH 4x4 "QUTDOORWOOD" Ke py - © TERRAPIN ARCHITECTS, P.C. 2010 POST (BELOW) W/ (2) LCE4 Vuat + rT] aimed -%| a Sa q 7 INTERMEDIATE POSTS Ss z i — BOLT TO DOUBLE JOIST a RS) " LL Br 2 5/4 STK CEDAR tL 7 | Last ed TRIM AT PERIMETER 7 LL iw X10 BT, HIMFR 2 > | —- [a4 (x2) |® ® . mi & Fi og A s = 8 4X4 "OUTDOORNOOD" <, ba ® eich lia Cea ; POST (BELOW) W/ (2) LOE4 : S tH a 2 & 7% a marse | mT a = 228 O ra) “|! O88 a] 8 ml at: L 4X4 "QUTDOORWODD" POST | a | @ | XIO PT. HEIR | * W HUC4I2 HANGER AT BEAM = gq oe 7s x |® 8 | r (TY AT SUPPORT POSTS) — I T| |_____ 4x4 ‘OUTDOORWOOD' POST els Brae z £ W CBSQ44 POST BASE 8" DIA SONOTUBE W os BOLT TO DOUBLE JOIST (TYP tw ck yz 7 (TYP AT ALL POSTS) \0"X18"SQ FOOTING 16] a AT INTERMEDIATE POSTS) t a: ay) 4 7 bo atic aoee (7 P| eb ewe a eine | ExSTING gay oe \Qso/) Gary 5 515" ‘ 5B" ‘ 1-4" Y SIDENALK so) 245 |, 2-4") 2, 2-4 3-05 \ se iF SOMA K £ ‘ — bell — Te Pua } Pe PS ~—7——7»—— i g es | Le ask el Lod L~_] 4X4 "QUTDOORNOOD" : . =) Py; POST (BELOW) W/ (2) LCE4 © os ~ wy = ow = 0 EACH SIDE OF BEAM je = §), | | | oF fle] SF al SF 6 ie a l Ts) 5 13" R wn ‘7R" : 1g" 7 1 4" is 1 ue He xin ae se Ss ia HG 5: EXISTING STAIRS AS) AS) Otel LO ES a 9 EXISTING STAIRS. pe ri rn PL | & 7a il ake ¥ " + He + = HK s. ty [H ia 4X4 "OUTDOORWOOD" 4X4 "OUTDOORWOOD" 4X4 "OUTDOORWOOD" WD) POST (BELOW) W (2) LCE4 POST (BELOW) W/ (2) LCE4 POST W/ HIC4I2 Zz = oH EXISTING PORCH AND COLUMNS. EACH SIDE OF BEAM EACH SIDE OF BEAM HANGER AT BEAM 9 “2 Sadly EXISTING PORCH AND COLUMNS peti vs 2 O ISTING Fi nA Cit . > M —@Q_ RAMP FOUNDATION PLAN —@ RAMP FRAMING FLAN | Sor >» SCALE, 1/4" =|'-O" ~ SCALE: /4"=1'-0" |S = ead o Q_ PUD. (HANURAIL 10 bt AVA 2X4 STK CEDAR TOP RAIL 0 > COMPLIANT.) (SHAPE TO MATCH EXISTING) = A = 5/4X STK CEDAR BLOCK 2 1/4" WOOD HANDRAIL (MATCH (Y = LET-IN TO EXISTING BEVEL EXISTING) W/ METAIL SUPPORT SIDING AT RAILING SUPPORTS BRACKETS AT 4'0.0. (ALL RAILING el | ENDS TO HAVE ROUNDED RETURNS. 9 EXISTING WALL AND FLOOR >. HANDRAIL TO BE ADA COMPLIANT) 5 =z . 22 R D i iN 4" i] ito? 4X4. "OUTDOORWOOD" POST 7 “5 © 5/4Xx5/4 STK CEDAR BALISTERS Lat ® ee eno vmcneame = ALDER RWE NO RALNG HATRNS . - OF (4" MAX. OPENING) WESTERN RED CEDAR (AS NOTED IN SECTION) METAL Z FLASHING OVER BASE __NEW ADA RAMP SURFACE 2. DECKING TO BE PAINTED WITH GACO-DEC SHOE AND UNDER HARDIEPANEL 2X8 HEMFIR JOISTS AT |6" OC. ah ee ‘au slp bap ba ioe DECK FINISH W GRANULAR ADDITIVE TO | 4XIO PI. GIRDERS x 3 SHAPE TO MATCH EXISTING PROVIDE A SMOOTH, FIRM, SLIP RESISTANT D 5/4X4 TONGUE AND GROOVE DF DECKING RAMP SURFACE. RAMP AND LANDINGS SHALL 2X8 HEMFIR JOISTS AT I6" OC. hy ay = BE PITCHED 2% MAX. IN EITHER DIRECTION TO WW LD 4XIO PT. GIRDERS EXISTING CONCRETE 2X4 P.T. SILL léd GALY NAILS @ 12" 0.0. TORR TIE | : 5/4X10 STK CEDAR FASCIA PROVIDE FOR DRAINAGE. iS) ss 5/4X4 TONGUE AND GROOVE DF DECKING SLAB FOR ADA COMPLIANT 2X4 P.T. STUDS @ 24" 0.0. o/ - PARKING SPACE 2X4 PIT. TOR PLATE led GALV NALS 5/AX6 STK CEDAR LATTICE TOP S S 4 o oC. RAIL (EXTEND PAST FASCIA 2") 2 ee 2" CDX PLYWOOD 1 FG 4 regs Sane gag HARDIEPANEL CEMENTITIOUS SIDING W/ ~ is a — aH 1/2" X | 1/2" CEDAR BATTENS AT 4' OC. | r Ma | Lea STR LADUE 2 7 6 D TT a (PATTERN TO MATCH EXISTING) 2 ie —— Ty | Th | SIMPSON (2)LCE4 POST CAP ————_| 6 S Q w) es <s a —— — 4 < sar, a 5/4X4 STK CEDAR LATTICE Lr T= Te SHRINE POST BNE eee BTTM RAIL AND SIDE STILES 5 uePe fees esas — —_— mle Tm coer ino fT || EAE ING 408 RALROPD TE: i SIMPSON ABU44 POST BASE OVP Ha Te es ' oe rt & Tea == TEE b SS SSS Seed : CONCRETE FER —__ % TT I Oe ee aL aa gel tebe NT wtf bem cen ee ee nee Ge ee | 8" DIA. PIER (2" 50 © || I=] | -Al | F= || =I Ft = || =| | =H | = Eq EW 1 |} WIN dui )_ @) RAMP SECTION SCALE: 3/4" = |'-o" =| I =F | Sl Poem (4) #4 VERT. REBAR W/ #3 REBAR TIES #4 REBARS AT 6" 0.0. EACH WAY IN FOOTING RAMP SECTION k =i O) SCALE: 3/4" = |'-O" @9 E S b YM ‘C N A S N M O L LA O d LA F a L S NO S C N H S9 T = 06 0 8 - 6 Z € (0 9 € ) ‘- A N O H d ° 89 € 8 6 VM ‘G N A I S N M O L LY O d NO Z O N I N S V A A dO BL W i S g ” LA F A L S YO T A V L 61 I | wa w WO O D - HD } 2 8 & * PA N L O A L I H O A | 7% ! CN A S N M O L LN O d 4O LN O d il . 3 c Ni d V a a H L ee 1 c9 9 5 1] NO l L W A S TA dO di v e WC l v ' Ma N | H © TERRAPIN ARCHITECTS, P.C. 2010 SCALE: |/2" = |'-O" SCALE: |/2" = |'-o" DESCRIPTION DATE A4 EXISTING SCALE: |/2" = |'-0" WEST RAMP ELEVATION . 4 = NORTH RAMP ELEVATION ql 2 Q) Hu MEETING ROOM DOOR ELEVATION oe, SS Z¥ <> xx en 2 COS, ee oS Neen SOO o S <x oS O25 SBS . <2 <> 52 @) SS oS Os <> LS ee oS SKS e, eS RS S Kx X S be S e s e > SI xd QJ 4 D SELF KOON S200 Mees SKOOL mS Me anes ne CK - XS e OM oS Z xX <> > QL? <> Ne oS xs XS oS o, o, <> 2X Oe, ‘aces SxS oe es SOD x xX ce 88 xe xe iM Mm 2X SS “ate o, o, o, 2 MM SSeS FSS4yeu [> ee ee TT Se WH WOT, FSS eg aiainie OOD SOR CRS SRLS SRLS SRE KS ORRKS —— NEW FIXED PANEL PROPOSED '— NEW 3/0 DOOR —_ <2earsoe: Bl Troon 6 eu UL Ht Ut | —— a | | Vale ail Ul NEW FIXED PANEL IN SAME PLANE AS DOOR — Co) fF 10 - E 10 - . E yj | ll i einer eneee.