Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
110325 City Council Business Meeting Packet
PORT TOWNSEND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 540 WATER STREET Business Meeting 6:00 p.m. November 3, 2025 • Attend in person or virtually via computer or tablet at Hells:.//zoon ..us/i/98187633367 enter the Webinar ID 98187633367 • Phone only (muted - listen -only mode) United States: Local Dial In — 1(253)215- 8782„981876333674 • Submit public comment to be included in the meeting record to: 1jtt s:// ubliccomment.lillout.com/cit of t • If you are experiencing technical difficulties, please attempt all methods listed above before reporting any issues to: cler .su ort �� ohs L Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Changes to the Agenda IV. Proclamation(s) or Special Presentation(s) A. Oath of Office- Police Officer V. City Manager's Report VI. Comments from the Public (re consent agenda items and items not on the agenda) (Each person has 3 min. to comment- City Clerk will signal at 2 min. 30 sec.) A. Public comment B. Staff or Council response, as needed VII. Consent Agenda Action: Move to adopt the consent agenda and/or request to remove any individual item from the consent agenda. A. Approval of Bills, Claims and Warrants B. Approval of Minutes: October 6, 2025 C. Appointments/Reappointments: Library Advisory Board, Arts Commission D. Poet Laureate Appointment E. Resolution 25-031 Amending the City's Personnel Policies Manual to Clarify Administration of Flexible Spending Accounts; Providing for Ratification and Severability; and Establishing an Immediate Effective Date VIII. Old Business A. Ordinance 3357 Revising Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 3.36, System Development Charges for Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Connections Proposed Action: Move to approve Ordinance 3357 Revising Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 3.36, System Development Charges for Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Connections i. Staff presentation and Council questions ii. Public Comment iii. Council deliberation and action IX. New Business A. Cherry Street Property Surplus Update Proposed Action: Discussion only. No action requested. i. Staff presentation and Council questions ii. Public Comment iii. Council deliberation and action B. Active Transportation Plan Presentation and Review Proposed Action: Discussion only. No action requested. i. Staff presentation and Council questions ii. Public Comment iii. Council deliberation and action X. Presiding Officer's Report XI. Suggestions for Future Agendas XII. Comments from Council XIII. Adjourn 0 Z W U) Z 3: w ULJL LJL 0 LJL 1 0 0 ` r z O U Z //_ �/J � L LL 0 0 LU �+ c� O U _ ° o CU cu O U) (n L L O '' O 70 7 O -0 cu cu cu cu C cn7� L-0 (B U +- cn—� O 0 '� 70 cu O U) U o� E��, 0)—� ��-0o 4- O O A.V O E 0 4— 4— 70 N O O O �J"Q O to E -o O cu Qf C: C O cu = OCM cu � -0 E c cCf O cn O >+U O 0- E O .E cu O O 0- c°n _0=DEL cn O_ � �cu U) -0 O Z.0) O O O �- (n O 0) Ecu J o U >cu — > cu 2 O cu O cu Z O O I N O N O O U 0 O A cu co N m O O O O c cu O U 71§;§\ \*;B=z! / a E 2 E o \ - 0 §§{ \)) ) o o \ t E \/o : ) [§$ ){\ ;> >\o \o \ \ \ \ \ o . {)2 § o ;:! )\! \ -\o r\: �.o \ \\ E : (-° : - /E \ ] �§I /o {/E / \ _ )} -g ( \ }/l- f uEo o = »)§2&:o i§!{2;ooEom $ 2=r::;=:!2): | / ;\§$/E\7($)( o\)��\\}\ o %(`\{;}{)o \// {){{\ \) f \ \ \\\\\\\\\E ` ;=m=m5;2o 22»#z:E::: \ - 2o,sou] ):/::fuEL,oc }. ; !»{\moo o /\ 3333\r\ao :=\,=y:a}\�s {y ( =;=;=7lE,lr» :/E: 6LE < ) /� fa/:K[§};\+ ; ������ E ; 2 {)§{§}\ _ | - mu }{\i( o �� §��\\}\\\{)\ 2 `7§®®y`:\010 :!: 2 _ )u. EE yj/} § o \==(:f®§;§2§ o ;!i/®)/)/ ) \\ \\\\/\]\j\\{ §£!s; =at;! 3 /k/ \\\ \/\ )|{) )7{ )7E )\j/ \)\ 1D \�§]\ ae; o )o )j ]\/\(\(\\\ \\(\(\\\ /\k\\\ o lo o ( lo § § : o ol \\ \\� \ 2ou \ \\ \ \ oo o \\\\ \o \2 \\\ \ : o o o lo o o o \\\\\.- \ \\\\�\ | - - - \ - - -�_ _ »:{{\\){\}\\{� /-{) ( o o )\;;f/[!>\)37):/{s} ! )f\\§}()?/[/3)\f/o \Z }{kkt {§(o \\} : �o ]\ )/ \\ o \\)(D !\ fi!!§2J 71§;§\ \*;B=z! a o \ \ : o \ \ \ § o lu -lo B � � \ o E }_ o o o { §o 12 \ f ( o 1 ( § o \ 12 o ( - { \ ` { 2 \ { oo /lo / { E E - ou { \ ; t : \ ) { / { \lo- _ § -o.ok ) { { { )o - \ ; § ( \ \ o \ \lo E \ § tj /a { ) o § o \ \ ol \ \ \ \ >o \ ; :) o » ? {o uo _ { §o o J / ) o - ) ) \ /o 2 o\ _ ) �: o �E ) k \ E \ ( { \ § /{ : - \ o ( \_ \E [ \ \ \ 2 \ � 3 m© 7 ! \ { ! ( § 7 kr f_ -o > - / -o ) \ (mP . E{ t _ {o § £ 1 .2 =!I!!; \k§! \\(! o E !|;2;! \)\ .; /{u ]/i E§rm )\i \:\ ]\ )j\\)\\E CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING OF OCTOBER 6, 2025 CALL TO ORDER The City Council met in a Regular Session on the 6th day of October 2025 in Council Chambers at 540 Water Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368. Mayor Faber called the meeting to order at 6:01 pm ROLL CALL Councilmembers present at roll call were David Faber, Amy Howard, Neil Nelson, Monica MickHager, Libby Wennstrom, Owen Rowe, and Ben Thomas. Staff members present were City Manager John Mauro, Community Services Director Melody Sky Weaver, Chief of Police Tom Olson , Facilities and Parks Manager Michael Todd , Finance and Technology Services Director Jodi Adams , Arts and Culture Coordinator Katy Goodman, and Deputy City Clerk Lonnie Mickle . CHANGES TO THE AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. PROCLAMATION(S) OR SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S) Oath of Office- Police Officer Chief of Police Tom Olson provided the Oath of Office to Police Officer Eric Morris. Friends of the Library Week Proclamation Mayor Faber presented the Friends of the Library Week Proclamation to Port Townsend Library Friends and Foundation President Cindy Johnson. Indigenous Peoples' Day Proclamation Mayor Faber presented the Indigenous Peoples' Day Proclamation to Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe and Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Tribal Council members. Port Townsend Golf Park Presentation City Manager John Mauro, Community Services Director Melody Sky Weaver, Parks and Facilities Manager Michael Todd, provided the Port Townsend Golf Park presentation which included Community Services Department Vision, Purpose of tonight's presentations, Background, Partnership, City Maintenance, City Capital Investment & More, Lease Phasing and Milestones Phase 1: 2024-2025, State Recreation & Conservation Office Grant, and Coffee with the City Manager Coming to Coyote & Crow Restaurant in 2026. Friends of the Port Townsend Golf Park President Bob Wheeler and Board Members Ben Krabill and Mac Little provided the Camas Prairie Park presentation which included Agenda, Introduction & Leadership Team, Historic Legacy & Transformation, Lease Overview & Strategic Commitments, Strategic Focus Areas, Selected Community Program Accomplishments, Community Engagement & Volunteer Impact, Enhanced Community Access & Inclusive Programming, Recent Events, Ecological Stewardship & Environmental Excellence, Operational Capacity & Infrastructure Improvements, Strategic Partnership Network, 501(c)(3) Status & National Links Trust Partnership, Future Vision, Expansion, and Master Use Plan, Future Vision & Expansion Plans, Financial Sustainability Achievement, Revenue Model & Breaking Even Projection, Business & Capital Investment Plan, Metrics Achievement & Performance Tracking, and Camas Prairie Park Mission. In response to Council's clarifying questions staff explained consultant letters, future partnerships, board composition and recruitment, how to volunteer or express interest to join board, particular skills needed, and SWOT Analysis. Discussion ensued around the Business Plan, History of Golf section, partnerships, community growing in support, thoughtful job financially for next five years, KPTZ, walking on Golf Park, East/West trail, comfort in supporting plan, meeting space rentals, appreciation for work done, brunch menu, and being very impressed. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager John Mauro provided the City Manager's Report which included water supply, encampment, sunk vessel, September Open House, RCO Grant, and Coffee with the City Manager. In response to Council's clarifying questions staff explained other agencies thoughts around encampment timeline. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Public comment Nat Jacob spoke about RCO Grant, play facilities and fixing the roads. Elena Bary spoke about opposition for the encampment sweep. Sarafina Landis spoke about evacuating community members at DSHS and concerns around where they will go. Dylan Quarles spoke about concerns around intersection on 19th and Sheridan. Staff or Council response, as needed In response to public comment staff explained changes coming for 19th and Sheridan intersection, encampment conversations and timeline, dispersal of people, where public can comment, Housing Fund Board meeting, Behavioral Health Consortium, and partnership with service providers. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PURSUANT TO RCW 42.30.110(1)(1) DISCUSSION WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ABOUT CURRENT OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION (APPROXIMATELY 20 MINUTES) Mayor Faber stated the Council will go into Executive Session to discuss RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) Discussion with legal counsel about current or potential litigation for approximately 20 minutes. No action to follow. Council went into Executive Session at 7:53pm. Council came out of Executive Session at 8:13pm. No action was taken. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Bills, Claims and Warrants Approval of Minutes: February 18, 2025 (Updated), August 18, 2025, September 2, 2025 Motion: Owen Rowe moved to approve the consent agenda. Libby Wennstrom seconded. Vote: motion carried unanimously, 6-0 by voice vote. OLD BUSINESS Ordinance 3354 Adopting 2025 Supplemental Budget Appropriations Finance and Technology Services Director Jodi Adams presented Ordinance 3354 Adopting 2025 Supplemental Budget Appropriations which included second reading, no changes to supplement from first reading, updated agenda bill, increase to Main Street contribution, and Shoreline Master Program Grant. In response to Council's clarifying questions staff explained unemployment costs. Public comment: There was no public comment. Discussion ensued around what has not happened and budget to expenditure comparison. Motion: Monica MickHager moved to approve Ordinance 3354 Adopting 2025 Supplemental Budget Appropriations Ben Thomas seconded. Vote: motion carried unanimously, 7-0 by voice vote. Ordinance 3353 Relating to Bonds for City Officers and Employees; Adopting a New Chapter 2.09 and New Section 2.09.010, Official Bonds, in the Port Townsend Municipal Code (PTMC); and Adopting a New Section in 2.10.050 in the PTMC Jodi Adams presented Ordinance 3353 Relating to Bonds for City Officers and Employees; Adopting a New Chapter 2.09 and New Section 2.09.010, Official Bonds, in the Port Townsend Municipal Code (PTMC); and Adopting a New Section in 2.10.050 in the PTMC which included second reading, updating municipal code, recommendation during audit, common practice, WCIA, and no changes from first reading. Public comment: There was no public comment. Discussion ensued around topic coming before Finance and Budget and Council prior, required to put in code, and research on other cities. Motion: Libby Wennstrom moved to approve Ordinance 3353 Relating to bonds for city Officers and Employees; Adopting a New Chapter 2.09 and New Section 2.09.010, Official Bonds, in the Port Townsend Municipal Code (PTMC); and Adopting a New Section in 2.10.050 in the PTMC Monica MickHager seconded. Vote: motion carried unanimously, 7-0 by voice vote. NEW BUSINESS Ordinance 3355 Repealing and Replacing Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 3.50 Relating to the City's Public Arts Program; Providing for Severability; and Establishing an Effective Date Arts and Culture Coordinator Katy Goodman and Melody Sky Weaver presented Ordinance 3355 Repealing and Replacing Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 3.50 Relating to the City's Public Arts Program; Providing for Severability; and Establishing an Effective Date which included history, better address 1 % for the Arts, priority for Port Townsend Arts Commission, changes over 20 years, Repeal and Replace original code, code specifically talks about how 1 % is funded, utilities projects, more flexible program, capital projects, funding can build up, Municipal Arts Fund, Capital Budgets, PTAC review and support, and supporting Public Art Plan. In response to Council's clarifying questions, staff explained seeing 1 % in upcoming budget, public art maintenance, grant funding/city's funds, and ordinance wording. Public comment: There was no public comment. Discussion ensued around appreciation for more art, maintenance, fund, in support, waiving Council Rules option, second reading on October 20, previous Arts Commission discussions, and great for community. Motion: Owen Rowe moved to approve first reading of Ordinance 3355 Repealing and Replacing Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 3.50 Relating to the City's Public Art's Program; Providing for Severability; and Establishing an Effective Date Ben Thomas seconded. Discussion ensued around making true what was initially intended, funding in future, forward looking and expansive, maintaining current public art, and leverages abilities of Art Commission members. Vote: motion carried unanimously, 7-0 by voice vote. PRESIDING OFFICER'S REPORT Mayor Faber provided the Presiding Officer's Report which included Farmers Market, America Walks, Peoples First Board Meeting, and Dove House Open House. SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS John Mauro stated the next workshop meeting is canceled and will send an update. Discussion ensued around chance of fourth meeting and converting workshops to special business meetings. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL There were no comments from Council. ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:52pm. Attest: Alyssa Rodrigues City Clerk City0f Port ' m�10 Townsen Submitted By: Mayor Faber Department: Mayor Agenda Bill AB25-105 Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Agenda Item: Consent VILC ® Regular Business Meeting ❑ Workshop/Study Session ❑ Special Business Meeting Date Submitted: October 30, 2025 Contact Phone: 379-2980 SUBJECT: • Appointment of Pam Adams (Position 1, Term Expires May 1, 2028) to Library Advisory Board • Appointment of Melanie Muszynski (Position 3, Term Expires May 1, 2026) to Arts Commission CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: n/a ❑x Consent ❑ Resolution Expenditure Amount: $ ❑ Staff Report ❑ Ordinance Included in Budget? Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Contract Approval ❑ Other: ❑ Public Hearing (Legislative, unless otherwise noted) ❑ 3-Year Strategic Plan: N/A Cost Allocation Fund: 010-011 GF - Mayor & Council SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Mayor is recommending the following appointments: • Appointment of Pam Adams (Position 1, Term Expires May 1, 2028) to Library Advisory Board • Appointment of Melanie Muszynski (Position 3, Term Expires May 1, 2026) to Arts Commission ATTACHMENTS: Citizen Advisory Boards, Commissions, Task Forces, Committees & Subcommittees Current Rosters CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION: If adopted as part of the Consent Agenda, no further action is needed; this effectively represents unanimous approval of the appointments. ALTERNATIVES: ❑ Take No Action ❑ Refer to Committee ❑ Refer to Staff ❑ Postpone Action ❑x Remove from Consent Agenda ❑ Waive Council Rules and approve Ordinance ❑x Other: l'Fll.,�/��1#i� GaGr I l fifigarr Meets Bi-monthly 4:30pm 4th Tuesday at City Hall Pos. Name & Experience Exp. 1 Matt Miner 5/1/28 2 VACANT 5/1/26 3 Richard Hefley 5/1/27 4 Pamela Adams 5/1/28 5 Rebecca Kimball 5/1/28 6 Russell Hill 5/1/27 7 Deborah Jahnke, Chair 5/1/27 aGrfc CC �:ra[san;` one Meets 3:OOpm quarterly 2nd Tuesday at City Hall Pos. Name & Role Exp. 1 Owen Rowe, Chair (Elected Official) N/A 2 Sarah Copley (At Large Position) 5/1/26 3 Cindy Finnie (At Large Position) 5/1/28 4 VACANT (Recipient) 5/1125 5 Rebecca Beebe (Recipient) 5/1/27 6 Danielle McClelland (Recipient) 5/1/28 7 Denise Winter (Recipient) 5/1/28 8 VACANT (Collector) 5/1/22 9 Kate Philbrick (Collector) 5/1/28 10 VACANT (Collector) 5/1/26 11 VACANT (Collector) 511124' 12 Main Street Designee (Nonvoting) 5/1/27 13 Designee (Nonvoting) 5/1/26 14 VACANT(Nonvoting) 5/1/20 PlIN, CAL I 'I`Ad IL �aGrfc CC �:ra[sarr` one TBD Pos. Name Exp. 1 Catharine Robinson N/A 2 Earll Murman N/A 3 John Nowak N/A 4 Richard Jahnke N/A 5 VACANT N/A 6 VACANT N/A 7 VACANT N/A 8 VACANT N/A 1419T, ... Gadw ll.:iaisarr ilarr c ,Mfowiq+ Meets 3:OOpm 1st Tuesday at City Hall Pos. Name Exp. 1 Kathleen Knoblock 5/1/26 2 Michael D'Alessandro 5/1/26 3 Monica Mader 5/1/26 4 Walt Galitzki 5/1/27 5 Zhenya Lavy 5/1/28 6 Craig Britton, Chair 5/1/28 7 VACANT 5/1/25 ofirfc CC ra[srr,,,1W Meets 3:OOpm 1st Wednesday at City Hall Pos. Name Exp. 1 Simon Lynge 5/1/26 2 Alexis Arrabito 5/1/26 3 VACANT 5/1/26 4 Heidi Tullman 5/1/27 5 Joshua Saunders 5/1/28 6 Sheena Uritz 5/1/28 7 Joe Gillard 5/1/27 8 Dan Groussman 5/1/28 9 11 VACANT 5i1/2� L���l�1/ISQI� 13fl��a �7j Meets Bi-monthly 1:OOpm 2nd Tuesday at the LLC Fos. Name xp. 1 VACANT 5/1/28 2 Kathleen Hawn 5/1/27 3 Susan Ferentinos 5/1/27 4 Diane Walker 5/1/26 5 Alyssa Fuehrer 5/1/26 6 Diana Grunow 5/1/26 7 David Tolmie 5/1/28 ' a l TtN . Meets 3:30pm 2nd Tuesday at the Gael Stuart Building Name City Council (Chair) Joanna Sanders, City Clerk Melody Eisler, Library Director John Polm, School District Superintendent , School District Video Instructor Richard Durr, School District Representative VACANT, Video'Professional' Citizen Representative VACANT, Student Representative... VACANT Producers Group Representative(Optional) VACANT Education Group Representative (Optional} CIMkTE ATfp1VMf11T7f (1 Meets bi-monthly 3:00 p.m. on 2nd Tuesday Pos. Name Exp. 1 Jefferson County BoCC ( Kate Dean) N/A 2 City Council (Owen Rowe) N/A 3 JeffPUD (Jeff Randall) N/A 4 Jefferson County Public Health (Laura Tucker) N/A 5 Jefferson Healthcare (Kees Kolff) N/A 6 Jeff. Transit (Nicole Gauthier/Sara Peck) N/A 7 Port of PT ( Carol Hasse/Eric Toews) N/A 8 PT Paper Corp. (Michael Clea) N/A 9 Cindy Jayne - Chair 12/31/26 10 Crystie Kisler - At Large 12/31/25 11 David Wilkinson 12/31/25 12 Jaime Duyck 12/31/27 13 Krista Meyers -At Large 12/31/27 14 Kate Chadwick (Policy) 12/31/26 15 Dave Seabrook 12/31/27 WIN ,,,,, oGrfc CC �:�a[sarr; l�h��y 1�crward Meets 2nd Thursday at 12:30 at Council Chambers Pos. Name Exp. 1 VACANT 5/17 2 Gabrielle Vanwert 5/1/26 3 Julia Cochrane 5/1/27 4 Amber Kent 5/1/28 5 Aimee Krouskop 5/1/26 6 VACANT 5/1127' 7 VACANT 511125' 8 Devin Gonzalez 5/1/26 9 Francisca Ramirez Aquino 5/1/27 PLA;IVI�IN� C4MIfSSI�iN 47� Meets 6:30pm 2nd & 4th Thursday at City Hall Pos. Name Exp. 1 Samantha Bair Jones, Vice Chair 12/31/27 2 Stephen Mader 12/31/26 3 Rick Jahnke, Chair 12/31/27 4 Viki Sonntag 12/31/26 5 Lois Stanford 12/31/25 6 Robert Doyle 12/31/25 7 Andreas Andreadis 12/31/27 ,......; Meets as needed Pos. Name Exp. 1 Darryl Elmore 12/31/25 2 Troy Surber 12/31/27 3 Richard Sussman 12/31/29 FaF�T (I�IQitdE� Pa/�9,�(1 �„ Council Liaison: Libby Wennstrom Meets at Fort Worden Commons B Pos. Name Exp. 1 Brad Mace 10/24/25 2 Tracy Garrett 10/24/25 3 David King 10/24/26 4 VACANT 10/24/26 5 John Begley 10/24/24 6 Steve Dowdell 10/24/24 7 VACANT 10/24/24 8 VACANT 10/24/22 9 10/24/25 10 10/24/25 11 10/24/25 City0f Port ' m�10 Townsen Submitted By: Mayor Faber Department: Mayor Agenda Bill AB25-106 Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Agenda Item: Consent VILC ® Regular Business Meeting ❑ Workshop/Study Session ❑ Special Business Meeting Date Submitted: October 30, 2025 Contact Phone: 379-2980 SUBJECT: • Appointment of Rufina Garay as the City of Port Townsend Poet Laureate (Term January 1, 2026- December 31,2027) CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: n/a ❑x Consent ❑ Resolution Expenditure Amount: $ ❑ Staff Report ❑ Ordinance Included in Budget? Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Contract Approval ❑ Other: ❑ Public Hearing (Legislative, unless otherwise noted) ❑ 3-Year Strategic Plan: N/A Cost Allocation Fund: 010-011 GF - Mayor & Council SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Mayor is recommending the following appointments: • Appointment of Rufina Garay as the City of Port Townsend Poet Laureate (Term January 1, 2026- December 31,2027) ATTACHMENTS: Citizen Advisory Boards, Commissions, Task Forces, Committees & Subcommittees Current Rosters CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION: If adopted as part of the Consent Agenda, no further action is needed; this effectively represents unanimous approval of the Poet Laureate. ALTERNATIVES: ❑ Take No Action ❑ Refer to Committee ❑ Refer to Staff ❑ Postpone Action ❑x Remove from Consent Agenda ❑ Waive Council Rules and approve Ordinance ❑x Other: Agenda Bill AB25-107 Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 City0f Port Agenda Item: Consent VII. E ® Regular Business Meeting Towinsu^n ❑ Workshop/Study Session ❑ Special Business Meeting Submitted By: Jodi Adams, Cynthia Shaffer Date Submitted: 10/29/2025 Department: Finance and People & Performance Contact Phone: 379-4403 SUBJECT: Resolution 25-031 amending the City's Personnel Policies Manual to clarify administration of flexible spending accounts, providing for ratification and severability, and establishing an immediate effective date. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: No impact 0 Consent ❑ Resolution Expenditure Amount: $ ❑ Staff Report ❑ Ordinance Included in Budget? Yes ❑ No❑ ❑ Contract Approval ❑ Other: Discussion Item ❑ Public Hearing (Legislative, unless otherwise noted) ❑ 3-Year Strategic Plan: N/A Cost Allocation Fund: Choose an item, SUMMARY STATEMENT: This is a limited update to Chapter 7 of the City's Personnel Policy Manual. The City has established flexible spending account programs for fulltime non - represented employees related to dependent care and health care savings accounts (collectively "flexible spending accounts"), through Resolution 13-004, under Internal Revenue Code Sections 125 and 129. These programs allow employees to set aside pre-tax funds for eligible dependent care and health care expenses. This proposed amendment adds a new section to the Personnel Policies Manual that formally references these benefits and clarifies the City's administrative authority. The new language specifies that the Finance and Technology Services and People and Performance Directors will implement and administer the plans, while the City Manager (or designee) will serve as the principal supervising official authorized to adopt or amend such plans. Both the healthcare FSA and the dependent care FSA are employee -funded on an elective basis. This amendment does not modify City contributions or overall benefits costs. The Resolution will clarify the administrative responsibility and authority of the City Manager. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 25-031 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION: If adopted as part of the Consent Agenda, no further action is needed; this effectively represents unanimous approval of Resolution 25-031 Amending the City's Personnel Policies Manual to Clarify Administration of Flexible Spending Accounts; Providing for Ratification and Severability; and Establishing an Immediate Effective Date ALTERNATIVES: ❑ Take No Action ❑ Refer to Committee ❑ Refer to Staff ❑ Postpone Action ❑ Remove from Consent Agenda ❑ Waive Council Rules and approve Ordinance ❑ Other: Resolution 25-031 RESOLUTION NO. 25-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY'S PERSONNEL POLICIES MANUAL TO CLARIFY ADMINISTRATION OF FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNTS; PROVIDING FOR RATIFICATION AND SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, flexible spending account programs allow employees to set aside money, on a tax -advantaged basis, to pay for certain medical and dependent care expenses; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 13-004, the City Council authorized the City Manager to establish and provide for a flexible spending account program as described in Resolution No. 13-004 for the City's employees; and WHEREAS, contribution limits can change from year to year and will require adoption of amendments to plans by the City that must be executed and delivered to the plan administrator; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to clarify the authority for and administration of flexible spending accounts for not only health care spending but also dependent care assistance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Townsend as follows: Section 1. Amending Chapter 7 of City of Port Townsend Personnel Policies Manual. Chapter 7 (Benefits) of the City of Port Townsend Personnel Policies Manual is hereby amended to add a new section 7.8 (Flexible Spending Accounts) as reflected in the attached Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. Implementation. The City Manager, Director of People and Performance, or their designee, is hereby authorized and directed to update the City of Port Townsend Personnel Policies Manual. Section 3. Ratification. The City Council hereby ratifies the establishment of the City's programs related to dependent care and health care savings accounts (together "flexible spending accounts") pursuant to Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. Sections 125 and 129, and as they may be hereafter amended, including but not limited to salary reduction agreements with employees implemented, monitored and administered in accordance with policies and procedures developed, approved, and communicated by the City's Finance and Technology Services and People and Performance Directors. Section 4. Severability. In cases where the City's Personnel Policies Manual conflicts with federal or state law, Civil Service Rules, or collective bargaining agreements agreed upon between authorized employee organizations or Unions and the City of Port Townsend, the City's Personnel Policies Manual shall be deemed superseded. In all other cases, the amended Personnel Policies Manual shall apply. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution or section of the Resolution 25-031 City's Personnel Policies Manual adopted hereby is held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution or the adopted section. Section 5. Effective Date. Any changes to policy resulting from this resolution shall be effective immediately. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Port Townsend at a regular meeting thereof, held this 3rd day of November 2025. David J. Faber Mayor Attest: Alyssa Rodrigues City Clerk Exhibit A: Amendment to add Section 7.8 to City of Port Townsend Personnel Policies Manual Resolution 25-031 Exhibit A Amendment to add Section 7.8 to City of Port Townsend Personnel Policies Manual 7.8 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNTS The City has established programs related to dependent care and health care savings accounts (together "flexible spending accounts") pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. Sections 125 and 129, and as they may be hereafter amended. Salary reduction agreements shall be implemented, monitored and administered in accordance with policies and procedures developed, approved and communicated by the Finance and Technology Services Director and/or Director of People and Performance. The City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall be the principal supervising official authorized by the City Council to adopt plans, or amendments to plans, for such flexible spending accounts. The City Manager or the City Manager's designee is further authorized to execute and deliver to the administrator of an FSA plan adopted by the City one or more counterparts of such plan. PORT TOWNSEND CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA November 3, 2025 A. Approval of Bills, Claims and Warrants: • Vouchers 177896 through 177986 in the amount of $570,816.30 • Electronic Fund Transfers in the amount of $44,051.28 B. Approval of Minutes: October 6, 2025 C. Appointments/Reappointments: Library Advisory Board, Arts Commission D. Poet Laureate Appointment E. Resolution 25-031 Amending the City's Personnel Policies Manual to Clarify Administration of Flexible Spending Accounts, Providing for Ratification and Severability; and Establishing an Immediate Effective Date Action: Move to adopt the consent agenda or request to remove any individual item from the consent agenda. (Short statements or easily resolved questions are appropriate without removing item from the consent agenda). Agenda Bill: AB25-108 "Yof port hMeeting Date: November 3 2025 Agenda Item: VIII.A uhm3u ® Regular Business Meeting lOwnsen ❑ Workshop/Study Session ❑ Special Business Meeting Submitted By: Renata Munfrada/Emma Bolin Date Submitted: 10/30/2025 Department: Planning & Community Development Contact Phone: (360)-379-4423 SUBJECT. Ordinance 3357 Revising Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 3.36, System Development Charges for Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Connections CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ❑ Consent ❑ Resolution Expenditure Amount: $0 ❑ Staff Report ❑x Ordinance Included in Budget? Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Contract Approval ❑ Other: Discussion Item ❑ Public Hearing (Legislative, unless otherwise noted) ❑ 3-Year Strategic Plan: 1 - Build small town quality of life. Cost Allocation Fund: N/A SUMMARY STATEMENT: Port Townsend's System Development Charge (SDC) ordinance was adopted by the i,Ly .C.2lk,n..ci,V, in 2019 (Ordinance 3235) to include SDC fee deferrals for low-income housing. This program, which is outlined in Chapter 3.36 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code, allows for the delay of payment for SDCs, building fees, and utility connection charges rather than providing an outright waiver. However, a key feature of the program is that after a 20-year period, the deferred fees are considered waived, if the property has been used for its intended low-income housing purpose. The city's SDC deferral program is primarily designed to assist qualified private and public nonprofit organizations that are constructing or developing low-income housing units restricted at 80%AMI. The proposed amended ordinance recommended by staff features two key changes to the SDC ordinance: 1) Add stormwater SDC, permit, and connection fees to eligible deferrals (current ordinance only applies to sewer, water, and building permit fees), and 2) Expand eligibility to include Community Land Trusts and private developers, and 3) Expand eligible units to include accessory dwelling units. In support of the original 2019 ordinance, the City's Finance and Budget Committee agreed to defer SDC fees, utility connections, and permit fees up to certain limits for single family and multifamily homes. There are opportunities to recoup the fee deferral/waivers such as through the Connecting Housing to Infrastructure Program (CHIP). CHIP provides competitive grants to Port Townsend Municipal Code Page 2/3 reimburse local governments for waived development fees and to fund the necessary infrastructure, further reducing costs for affordable housing projects. The structure for waivers is also influenced by other legislation. For instance, the Growth Management Act (GMA) in RCW 36.70A.540 permits local governments to establish affordable housing incentive programs that can include fee waivers. Separately, the recently implemented SB 5258 requires local impact fees to be calculated based on a housing unit's proportionate impact, leading to lower fees for smaller homes and contributing to the overall cost reduction for affordable housing. Port Townsend's water and sewer fee structure is based on pipe/meter connection size proportionate to impact. The city recently made updates to its SDC structure in 2024, altering how fees are calculated for new sewer and stormwater connections, with an eye toward encouraging smaller, more compact development that contributes to affordable housing options. Staff propose that the SDC deferral program also assist Community Land Trusts (CLTs) and private developers of low-income housing development. Including CLTs and private developers in the SDC deferral program can incentivize low-income housing development by addressing the critical challenge of high upfront development costs. For CLTs, it frees up capital for permanent affordability and growth. Since CLTs already operate on slim margins and rely on public and private funding, SDC deferrals are an especially potent tool for their unique model. For private developers, it improves project viability. High upfront fees can hurt a project's financial model, especially because building lower -income units generate less revenue. Deferring these fees lowers the initial capital requirements, making the project more attractive to investors and easier to finance. To qualify for the deferral, the qualifying developer must demonstrate that the prospective homeowners or renters meet the eligibility criteria for low-income status at the time of the building permit application. The amount of the fee deferral for mixed -use or mixed -income projects is proportionate to the percentage of the total project designated for low-income housing. All deferrals are recorded as a real property lien, which remains until the deferred amount is repaid or the 20-year term for waiver is met. If the property is sold to a person who does not meet the eligibility requirements before the 20 years have passed, the full deferred amount must be repaid to the city, potentially with interest. The new stormwater deferral would complement Port Townsend's current program and enhance the City's existing suite of affordable housing tools. The addition of a stormwater component would create a more comprehensive fee relief package, reducing the financial burden on developers and further streamlining the development process. From a market perspective, expanding eligible developers could encourage a wider range of developers, including smaller local builders and community land trusts, to take on affordable housing projects. Given that Port Townsend already structures fees based on impervious surface to encourage smaller building footprints, a waiver on these fees would amplify this incentive, supporting the creation of compact, low -impact housing options. The lower cost to developers would enable projects that might not have been financially feasible previously to move forward, directly contributing to the city's goal of increasing the supply of affordable housing. Moreover, in theory, this may translate to lower rent or purchase prices for residents, directly addressing the housing affordability crisis in the region. The Port Townsend Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 3328, passed January 2, 2024. Port Townsend Municipal Code Page 3/3 While this policy can help stimulate development of affordable housing, waiving or deferring SDCs directly reduces the City's revenue by removing a funding source for public infrastructure. This requires careful balancing to ensure that the benefits of increased construction do not outweigh the negative impacts on the City's ability to fund infrastructure projects and maintain service levels. The City may need to find alternative funds, like state and federal grant funding, to offset lost revenues and cover infrastructure improvements that were to be paid for by those fees. The net effect would be a more robust and accessible development environment for affordable housing. ATTACHMENTS: a. Ordinance 3357 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Move to approve Ordinance 3357 Revising Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 3.36, System Development Charges for Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Connections ALTERNATIVES: ❑x Take No Action ❑ Refer to Committee ❑x Refer to Staff ❑ Postpone Action ❑ Remove from Consent Agenda ❑ Waive Council Rules and approve Ordinance ❑ Other: The Port Townsend Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 3328, passed January 2, 2024. Ordinance 3357 Page I Ordinance 3357 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND, REVISING PORT TOWNSEND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.36, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES FOR WATER, SEWER, AND STORMWATER CONNECTIONS WHEREAS, Chapter 13.36 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code governs permit, application, and utility connection fees and allows the City to defer system development charges for qualifying low-income housing projects, enabling developers to delay payment until later in the construction process, which reduces upfront costs and support affordable housing feasibility. WHEREAS, RCW 35.92.385 allows municipalities to waive utility connection charges for low- income housing projects if the property is legally restricted for such use, with cities permitted to offset the lost revenue using other funds. WHEREAS, Senate Bill 5258 requires local system development charges to be calculated based on a housing unit's proportionate impact, leading to lower fees for smaller homes and contributing to the overall cost reduction for affordable housing. WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.540 encourages cities, towns, and counties in Washington to adopt or expand affordable housing incentive programs, such as density bonuses, fee waivers, parking reductions, or expedited permitting, to promotes development of low-income housing units. WHEREAS, the Connection Housing to Infrastructure Program (CHIP) in Washington helps affordable housing projects by funding utility connections (water, sewer, and stormwater), paying for onsite of offsite infrastructure improvements, and reimbursing waived system development charges. WHEREAS, the 2025 Housing Needs Assessment found that roughly forty five percent of households in Port Townsend are considered low income, earning eighty percent of the area median income. In addition, thirty three percent of households are cost burdened, paying more than a third of household income, and eighteen percent are severely cost burdened, paying more than fifty percent of household income. WHEREAS, the 2025 Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan found that housing production barriers increase costs by creating a market where demand outpaces supply and that high construction costs often make affordable housing projects financially unfeasible for developers. WHEREAS, the 2025 Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan found that there is a strong demand for a diverse supply of housing types, including middle housing options, and that limited housing diversity harms affordable housing by creating market imbalances that drive up prices for residents, and removes housing options specifically designed for people of varying income levels and life circumstances. Ordinance 3357 Page 2 WHEREAS, waiving system development charges reduces upfront infrastructure costs, lowering total development expenses and allowing limited subsidy or equity dollars to stretch further. By cutting these significant fees, projects face smaller financing gaps, making affordable housing more financially feasible to build and sustain. Now, Therefore, the City Council of the City of Port Townsend do ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 13.03 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code is amended as set forth in Exhibit A. Language to be stricken is indicated by strikeout, and language to be added is indicated by underlining. Section 2. Severabilily. If any sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase or work of this ordinance. Section3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days after the date of its publication in the manner provided by law. Publication of this ordinance shall be by summary thereof consisting of this title. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Port Townsend at a regular meeting thereof, held this 3rd day of November 2025. David J. Faber Mayor Attest: Alyssa Rodrigues City Clerk Exhibit A Sections: Ordinance 3357 Page 3 3.36.010 Fees — General. 3.36.011 System development charge, building fees, and utility connection charges — Deferrals for low-income housing. 3.36.015 Repealed. 3.36.018 Repealed. 3.36.020 Public works and utility billing service fee schedule. 3.36.030 Fees — Sewer connections. 3.36.040 Utility and garbage deposits. 3.36.050 Repealed. 3.36.060 Fees — Police department fee for fingerprinting. 3.36.070 Fees — Street vendor application and license. 3.36.010 Fees — General. Application fees for the various applications, permits and utility connections set forth below shall be as provided in this chapter. Unless the city has approved a fee deferral or waiver pursuant to this chapter or PTMC 0,09,0 70, no application shall be considered, nor shall any permit or utility connection be allowed, unless and until the fee has been paid to the finance director, which fee shall not be refundable unless the application is withdrawn in writing prior to the date of the first hearing scheduled on the application. Any such refund must be approved by the director of the planning and community development department or the director of public works and the finance director and all costs incurred by the city deducted from fees paid. (Ord. 3287 § 5, 2022; Ord. 3235 § 2 (Exh. B), 2019; Ord. 2892 § 1, 2005; Ord. 2507 § 1, 1996; Ord. 2492 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2173 § 1, 1989; Ord. 2050 § 1, 1986). 3.36.011 System development charge, building fees, and utility connection charges — Deferrals for low-income housing. A. Program Established. The city shall allow deferral of payment of system development charges (SDCs), building fees, and utility connection charges for a private or public nonprofit organization, Community Land Trusts, and private developers that are developing or constructing housing units for low-income households, as defined in this section. The city manager or designee is authorized and directed to administer the program and in such connection may promulgate forms and administrative regulations from time to time to carry out the intent and purpose of this chapter. B. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to the administration of this section: 1. "Low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is at or below 80 percent of the median family income adjusted for Ordinance 3357 Page 4 family size, for the county where the project is located, as reported by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2. "Private or public nonprofit organizations" means nonprofit corporations, municipal corporations, and other organizations formally established for the charitable purpose of providing low-income or affordable housing, recognized under the United States Internal Revenue Code as qualified recipients of tax deductible charitable contributions, including but not limited to organizations having received approval from the Internal Revenue Service of such status upon the filing of all forms as required for recognition as a 501(c)(3) corporation. For an entity to qualify as a private or public nonprofit organization under the provisions of this section, upon making a written request for deferral, the entity shall provide sufficient proof of such status, including such documentation as the city manager may deem necessary. For purposes of this section, municipal public housing authorities established pursuant to Washington law shall be considered public nonprofit organizations. 3. "Community Land Trust" means a nonprofit organization that owns land and leases it long- term to individuals or families for housing, separating land ownership from home ownership. The CLT model helps keep housing_ permanently affordable, stabilizes communities, and prevents displacement by controlling land costs while allowing residents to build equity in their homes. 4. "Private developer" means an individual or company that invests in, plans, finances, and constructs real estate projects, such as residential, commercial, and mixed -use properties, with the goal of earning a profit from sales, rentals, or long-term investment. Private developers operate independently of government ownership, thou _gh they maythey may work with public incentives or regulations. 5. `Building fee" means the building permit base fee, including related inspections, plan review, demolition, mechanical, plumbing, energy, addressing and street development permits. "Building fee" does not mean or include state building permit fee, fire code fees (including fire alarm/fire sprinkler fees), land use fees (including, but not limited to, related to permits or approvals for platting, environmental, shoreline, critical area, conditional use or variance, design review, or requests for waiver), technology or record retention fees. 6. "Utility connection charges" means charges to connect to the water, sewer, or stormwater utility. C. SDC, Building Fees, and Utility Connection Charge Deferral Requests — Qualified Applicants. Upon the approval of the city manager or designee, collection of system development charges, building fees, and utility connection charges to serve single-family, multifamily, or Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) residences shall be deferred at the request of a private or public nonprofit organization which is developing or constructing housing units for low-income households. To qualify for such deferral, deferral requests shall be made on forms provided by the city. For mixed-income/mixed-use development, the amount of the fees deferred shall be a percentage proportionate to the low-income housing provided; e.g., if 20 percent of the square -footage of the Ordinance 3357 Page 5 project is dedicated to low-income housing, 20 percent of the total fees would be eligible for deferral up to the limit specified in subsection F of this section. For Accessory Dwelling g Unit (ADU) development, Clearly define affordabilily period Administrative and monitoring requirements Mechanism for verifying income, enforcing covenants, ensuring compliance Infrastructure capacity; hooking up to main line or primary unit utilities? D. Recording. All deferrals granted shall be recorded as a real property lien until the deferral has been repaid to the city, or waived as provided in this chapter. The lien shall run with the land and apply to subsequent owners. E. Repayment of Deferrals. All amounts deferred for low-income single-family, multifamily, or Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) housing applicants pursuant to this section shall be reimbursed to the city in the applicable utility, as follows: 1. The applicant ("private or public nonprofit organizations, Community Land Trusts, or private developers") shall record a real property lien, in a form approved by the city, agreeing and covenanting that the property will be sold or rented to a person or persons who meet, at the time of certificate of occupancy, the eligibility requirements of this section. The agreement shall specify the waiver/repayment period, criteria for waiver, reporting requirements and shall acknowledge the city's right to audit (pursuant to subsection G of this section). a. For projects subject to an equivalent housing program: If the applicant conclusively demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the city manager, that the units will be monitored by a federal, state, or city program that requires units be reserved for low-income households for a minimum of 20 years, the city manager may waive the lien, city reporting requirement and eligible fees. b. For all other projects: If, after 20 years from the date of certificate of occupancy, the applicant demonstrates the property has been consistently sold/rented to households meeting the eligibility requirements in this code, then no repayment is required, subject to subsection (E)(1)(c) of this section. c. If within 20 years of the date of the certificate of occupancy the property is sold or rented, and the new buyer or tenant does not meet the eligibility requirements of this section, then repayment of the deferred fee is required in full with interest thereon at a rate commensurate with the annual one-year U.S. Treasury notes and bonds, adjusted for constant maturities, as published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin or otherwise available from the Federal Reserve Bank, computed annually on unpaid balances. Interest calculated pursuant to this section shall not be compounded. Repayment of deferred fees shall be secured with a real estate security instrument as approved by the city attorney. Such instrument shall be senior to all other security instruments securing loans on the property to the extent allowed by law. Ordinance 3357 Page 6 F. Limitation. 1. The program is limited as follows: a. For eligible single-family units: For building fees and utility connection charges, four dwelling units per applicant per year; for SDCs, no limit. b. For eligible multifamily units: For building fees and utility connection charges, up to $10,000 per project; for SDCs, no limit. c. For eligible Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): For building fees and utility connection charges, ..... 2. Requests for deferrals above the limit are subject to approval by the city council on a case -by - case basis. The council would evaluate, among other things, number of entities expected to request deferrals within the current budget cycle, the impact to city department budgets from processing an increased number of deferral requests. G. Reporting. 1. Fee Deferral Report Content. Within the time periods specified in subsection (G)(2) of this section, the owners of property with an active fee deferral shall submit to the city finance director: a. A signed affidavit that units are occupied in accordance with the terms of the lien. b. Any additional information deemed necessary by the finance director to determine compliance with the terms of the lien. c. Acknowledgment that the city retains the right to audit as per the terms of the lien. 2. Fee Deferral Report Timing. a. For units under private ownership, reports are due to the finance director prior to close of escrow and at the end of the period specified by the lien. b. For rental units, reports are due to the finance director in the first quarter of each calendar year and at the end of the period specified by the lien. 3. Budget Impact. At least annually, the finance director or designee shall report to the city council on the amount of deferral requests and deferred fees. (Ord. 3235 § 2 (Exh. B), 2019; Ord. 3052 § 1 (Exh. A § 1), 2011). 3.36.015 Fees — Building and land use. Repealed by Ord. 2580. Refer to Chapter 20,09 PTMC. (Ord. 2526 § 1, 1996; Ord. 2492 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2431 § 2, 1994; Ord. 2416 § 1, 1994; Ord. 2384 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2376 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2329 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2311 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2296 § 16, 1992; Ord. 2269 § 10, 1991; Ord. 2173 § 3, 1989). 3.36.018 Appeal fees. Ordinance 3357 Page 7 Repealed by Ord. 3311. (Ord. 3235 § 2 (Exh. B), 2019; Ord. 2580 § 2, 1997; Ord. 2507 § 2, 1996; Ord. 2492 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2431 § 3, 1994). 3.36.020 Public works and utility billing service fee schedule. The fees and charges listed in this section for services of the public works department and the finance department for utility billing are established. Fees for development engineering permits and inspections shall be as established by council resolution. The fees and charges shall be paid in advance unless an alternate method of payment is specifically approved by the director of public works. The continuance or establishment of water and/or sewer service by the city shall be contingent upon payment of all fees and charges contained in this section. (Ord. 3235 § 2 (Exh. B), 2019; Ord. 3051 § 1 (Exh. A), 2010; Ord. 2936 § 2 (Exh. A), 2007; Ord. 2763 § 1, 2001; Ord. 2731 § 1, 1999; Ord. 2678 § 1, 1999; Ord. 2619 § 1, 1997; Ord. 2580 § 3, 1997; Ord. 2526 § 2, 1996; Ord. 2516 § 1, 1996; Ord. 2492 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2449 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2423 § 1, 1994; Ord. 2396 § 1, 1994; Ord. 2391 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2383 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2290 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2050 § 2, 1986). 3.36.030 Fees - Sewer connections. The fee for connection to the sewage system of the city and the connection charge therefor shall be established under the schedule of fees and charges contained in PTMC 3,36,020. (Ord. 3235 § 2 (Exh. B), 2019; Ord. 2492 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2290 § 2, 1992; Ord. 2050 § 3, 1986). 3.36.040 Utility and garbage deposits. The city may require reasonable advance deposits for utility fees and charges where it is reasonable and prudent to do so to assure collection of such fees and charges. Where a utility or garbage customer fails to pay all charges due, the city may collect interest at the maximum legal rate, costs of collection and attorneys fees incurred in collection from the delinquent customer. (Ord. 3235 § 2 (Exh. B), 2019; Ord. 2492 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2310 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2290 § 2, 1992). 3.36.050 Fees - Fire department permits and inspections. Repealed by Ord. 3235. (Ord. 2492 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2340 § 1, 1993). 3.36.060 Fees - Police department fee for fingerprinting. A. Public fingerprint rolling fee, $5.00 per fingerprint card. (Ord. 3235 § 2 (Exh. B), 2019; Ord. 2526 § 3, 1996). 3.36.070 Fees - Street vendor application and license. The application fee for street vendor licenses issued in accordance with Chapter 5,32 PTMC, Sales and Performances on Streets and Sidewalks, shall be $50.00. The annual street vendor license fee required pursuant to Chapter 5,32 PTMC shall be $350.00. The street performer license pursuant to Chapter 5,32 PTMC, which is valid for 12 months, shall be $100.00. (Ord. 3235 § 2 (Exh. B), 2019; Ord. 3114 § 3, 2014; Ord. 2702 § 1, 1999). City0f Port ' m�10 Townsen Submitted By: Emma Bolin/ Steve King Department: PCD/ Public Works Agenda Bill AB25-109 Meeting Date: October 31, 2025 Agenda Item: IX.A ® Regular Business Meeting ❑ Workshop/Study Session ❑ Special Business Meeting Date Submitted: 10/31/2025 Contact Phone: 360-390-4048 SUBJECT: Cherry Street Property Surplus Update CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ❑ Consent ❑ Resolution Expenditure Amount: $ ❑x Staff Report ❑ Ordinance Included in Budget? Yes ❑x No ❑ ❑ Contract Approval ❑ Other: Discussion Item ❑ Public Hearing (Legislative, unless otherwise noted) ❑ 3-Year Strategic Plan: N/A Cost Allocation Fund: Choose an item, SUMMARY STATEMENT: It has been some time since a Cherry Street property update; therefore, staff has prepared a briefing on activities since the last Council Briefing on August 19, 2024. Property line adjustments: The City is currently preparing a survey to effectuate lot line adjustment applications to clean up property lines consistent with past City Council briefings. This is so that the property is ready for transfer of ownership for housing. Staff have been coordinating with neighbors to rectify encroachments and organize the property configuration in an efficient manner for future development. Zoning: The 2025 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update and associated development code regulation amendments proposed for adoption would upzone R-II, where the property is located, from allowance of a maximum of 8 dwelling unit sper 40,000 sq ft to 32 units. This increase, along with outright allowance for a range of multiplexes, simplified unit lot subdivisions instead of Planned Unit Developments, and other changes may be added benefit to the achieving the Council's goals of housing density and affordability on the property. Deed restriction: Upon research associated with the golf park deed, this property is subject to the same deed restriction —it must be used for municipal purposes. Legal review has provided that affordable housing is a municipal purpose. Property surplus: Staff will evaluate the previous surplus Resolution 17-021 which declared the City -owned property is surplus to the City's needs based on findings and conclusions. Given that there is debt on this property, the City does not expect there will be any net proceeds. The accounting history is as follows: $150,000 bond $69,000 estimated spent to support the project $81,000 approximate balance remaining Conclusion: Delays have worked in the favor of the City to achieve Council goals for housing. Change in staff recommendation is to move from listing the property from no restrictions to surplus property for the municipal purpose of affordable housing. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 17-021 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillilillillillillillilI RECOMMENDED ACTION: None requested at this time. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillilI ALTERNATIVES: ❑x Take No Action ❑ Refer to Committee ❑ Refer to Staff ❑ Postpone Action ❑ Remove from Consent Agenda ❑ Waive Council Rules and approve Ordinance ❑ Other: Resolution 17-021 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 17-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON, RELATED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING AT THE CITY'S CHERRY STREET PROPERTIES; DECLARING PROPERTY TO BE SURPLUS TO THE CITY'S NEEDS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISPOSE OF THE PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Port Townsend ("City") owns vacant property located in the 100 block of Cherry Street (Portions of Tax Parcels 001024075 and 001023005); and, WHEREAS, the City Council, in Resolution 09-035, designated this property as being suitable for affordable housing purposes under Chapter 3.44 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code ("PTMC"). This Resolution was modified by Resolution 10-024, which added two properties to the inventory and imposed a requirement that units constructed on all properties so designated remain affordable for at least 40 years; and, WHEREAS, Resolution 11-018 directed the City Manager to "work with owners and possibly providers to reconfigure Cherry Street to establish buildable lots for affordable housing, subject to final Council approval on agreements and configuration"; and, WHEREAS, Homeward Bound dba Olympic Housing Trust ("the Trust") is in negotiations with a property owner in Canada to acquire a four-plex building that could be placed on the Cherry Street property. They have a contract with Nickel Brothers, Housing Moving USA, Inc. and Nickel Brothers House Moving, Ltd., for the purchase, move, and delivery of this building to Port Townsend in mid -May 2017; and, WHEREAS, the Trust is currently seeking institutional and private funding for this project, but has not secured all its financing; and, WHEREAS, PTMC 3.44.030, 3.44.040, and 3.44.050 set forth the process for declaring property designated as suitable for affordable housing purposes as surplus and, if declared surplus, for disposition of that property; and, WHEREAS, at a Special Meeting held on April 24, 2017, the Council adopted Resolution 17-019, which authorized the City Manager to allow preliminary site work on the property and to execute loan agreements with the Trust; and, WHEREAS, as required by PTMC 3.44.040, the City issued a notice of a public hearing on the proposal to surplus the property, which hearing was conducted on May 8, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Townsend as follows: Section 1. Having conducted a public hearing as required by PTMC 3.44.040, the Council adopts the following findings and conclusions based on the non-exclusive criteria in PTMC 3.44.030. Resolution 17-021 Page 2 of 3 Findings: 1. The property is identified in the City's Non -Motorized Transportation Plan as having a pedestrian shortcut along the west boundary. Because that part of the property is covered in vegetation, no existing path exists there. Utilities on the property are noted as part of the inventory in the Water Systems Plan and the Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, but the property has not otherwise been identified in any other comprehensive or functional plan. (Criteria 3.44.030A(3)(a)). 2. The City Manager and City department heads have reviewed the property and state that, subject to retaining easements for access and utilities, the property is not needed for transportation, utility, stormwater, habitat, open space and recreation, or other city purpose. (Criteria 3.44.030A(3)(b)). 3. The only restraint on the property is that Resolution 05-039 states that net proceeds from the sale of the property are designated for the golf course capital improvement program,. (Criteria 3.44.030A(3)(c)). 4. Because the recommended action is to convey this property to a non-profit housing trust, staff has not done an analysis regarding whether future value of the property is greater than would be reasonably expected through fund returns (Criteria 3.44.030A(3)(d)) or whether return on investment would be greater through management of the property as opposed to disposing of it as proposed (Criteria 3.44.030A(3)(e)). Because the property will be transferred to a non-profit housing agency, there is no anticipated tax impact (3.44.030A(3)(f)). 5. Council has previously designated this property as being suitable for affordable housing purposes (Resolution 09-035) and has previously directed the City Manager to work with owners and providers to configure the property for affordable housing. (Criteria 3.44.030A(4)). 6. The City published notice of the public hearing on April 26, 2017, which complies with the notice requirements of PTMC 3.44.040B and C. 7. Based on information from the Jefferson County Assessor, the estimated fair market value of the property is between $500,000 and $600,000. 8. The City Manager recommends that Council declare this property as surplus. Additionally, the City Manager requests authorization to sell this property to Homeward Bound dba Olympic Housing Trust for $1 in order to support the City's Comprehensive Plan and meet the purpose and intent of the affordable housing provisions of Chapter 3.44 PTMC. Conclusions: 1. PTMC 3.44.030A(3) states that the criteria are non-exclusive. Therefore, Council concludes that it can weigh certain criteria more favorably than others, and that the proposal does not have to meet all the criteria for Council to approve it. 2. Based on Finding 1, Council concludes that the absence of a current path through the property means that the "shortcut" identified in the Non -Motorized Plan is not critical to the Resolution 17-021 Page 3 of 3 City's trail system. 3. Based on Finding 2, Council concludes that, provided deed restrictions remain in place for existing and reasonably -anticipated access and utilities, the property is not needed for any City purpose. 4. Based on Findings 3, 4, and 5, Council concludes that the financial implication of surplus of the property and disposing of it to a non-profit housing trust would have little or no impact on the City's anticipated budget. The property does not produce income now, and the possible benefit of a market -rate sale to the golf course is overridden by the overall benefit to the City of providing a location for affordable housing. 5. Based on all the adopted Findings, Council concludes that there is no potential future use or other compelling reason to retain this property. 6. PTMC 3.44.040E allows the Council to approve a sale without an appraisal if it determines that the value received will be of equal or greater value. That value may include "intangible values," including goals and policies of the City's functional and subarea plans, and provisions for other public health, safety, and welfare benefits to the City. Council concludes that the intangible value of supporting the City's affordable housing goals justifies accepting the Assessor's estimate without requiring a full appraisal and further justifies disposing of this property for less than the full market value. Section 2. Based on the Findings and Conclusions set out in this Resolution, the City Council declares that the City -owned property located in the 100 block of Cherry Street (Portions of Tax Parcels 001024075 and 001023005) is surplus to the City's needs. Section 3. As provided for in PTMC 3.44.050B, the City Manager is authorized and directed to dispose of the property by sale for a nominal amount. The disposal shall retain easements for public utilities over the property. Additionally, any conveyances will require that the property be rented to persons that meet the criteria as very low-income or low-income households. The City Manager is further authorized to sign all documents or take any other administrative actions consistent with this Resolution. Council ratifies and confirms the Purchase and Sale Agreement signed by the City Manager and Homeward Bound on May 4, 2017. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Port Townsend at a special meeting thereof, held this 8th day of May 2017. Deborah S. r meson.:. +✓ Mayor Attest: Joanna Sanders, CMC City Clerk Approved as to form: Steven L. Gross City Attorney Agenda Bill AB25-110 Cityof Porto Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 °�"� ��'°'°�� Agenda Item: IX.B M Regular Business Meeting Townsend ❑ Workshop/Study Session ❑ Special Business Meeting Submitted By: Jeff Kostechka, Assist. City Eng.; Steve King, PW Director Date Submitted: October 31, 2025 Department: Public Works Contact Phone: 360-379-5090 SUBJECT: Active Transportation Plan Presentation and Review CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ❑ Consent ❑ Resolution Expenditure Amount: $ ❑ Staff Report ❑ Ordinance Included in Budget? Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Contract Approval ❑ Other: ❑ Public Hearing (Legislative, unless otherwise noted) ❑ 3-Year Strategic Plan: 4 -Ensure sustainable future for public services and facilities Cost Allocation Fund: ("',''ho� )s an flem. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Over the course of the last 2 years, City staff has been working with a stakeholder committee to develop an Active Transportation Plan building on the fundamental success of the original 1998 Non -motorized Plan. Based on public feedback, this plan focuses on connectivity as a way to encourage mode shift to active transportation options away from single occupancy vehicles. The plan recognizes that effective active transportation systems connect people with places. After extensive public outreach, staff is pleased to present the final draft reflecting input and strategic goals in honoring key initiatives under as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff will provide a presentation to highlight the following key edits to the draft plan developed over the last few weeks. • Updated maps o Development of Recreational Trails map o Addition of Signature Trails Map • Project Implementation tables and cost estimates • New sections from stakeholder input o Trail development and Historic volunteer efforts o Use of Speed Safety Cameras in Washington State ATTACHMENTS: Final Draft Active Transportation Plan, Presentation CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A :7xd97JiIJ�14►1Q4DIFI[O]1110101F No Action. Staff is presenting the final draftof the plan ahead of adoption in November. ALTERNATIVES: ❑x Take No Action ❑ Refer to Committee ❑x Refer to Staff ❑ Postpone Action ❑ Remove from Consent Agenda ❑ Waive Council Rules and approve Ordinance ❑ Other: Ap a I Moro : '11' ON, JIM I e lm" v sw rr/ Pill LJF" 3"'N"A" �-Om� -.400... -.0- .40* 446mh 100114 1� SCJ ALLIANCE IIIP Ills ��9,0` 01 Introduction............................................................................................................6 StakeholderCommittee................................................................................................................6 Thank you to Past Volunteers......................................................................................................7 What is Active Transportation? And Why is It Important to Plan for It?....................................8 Purpose and Content of the Plan.....................................................................................................9 Goals..............................................................................................................................................9 TheE's..........................................................................................................................................10 Coordinated Plans Under Development.......................................................................................11 KeyMilestones............................................................................................................................12 PlanningProcess............................................................................................................................16 WhyUpdate the Plan?.....................................................................................................................16 Driversof the Update..................................................................................................................16 People, Planet, and Prosperity...................................................................................................17 02 Public Engagement...............................................................................................18 OutreachTimeline.......................................................................................................................19 Survey Highlights (June -September 2024)..............................................................................19 In -Person Highlights (July 2024-March 2025).........................................................................22 03 Brief History, Inventory, and Current Challenges...................................................27 Active Transportation Planning History........................................................................................27 Existing Conditions and Challenges..............................................................................................27 ExistingConditions.....................................................................................................................27 Why Port Townsend's Streets and Sidewalks Look the Way They Do?..................................28 Pre -Platted vs. Post 1937 Platted Development......................................................................30 Inventory......................................................................................................................................32 ExistingChallenges.........................................................................................................................34 ExistingOpportunities....................................................................................................................34 Key Challenges Moving Forward...............................................................................................34 04 Feasible and Practical Approach...........................................................................36 Four Important Strategies..............................................................................................................36 Strategy 1 - ADA Priority Routes...............................................................................................37 , oq �u 0 DIY ,a9 I 141 1% a u , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page ii ro�"roro ��Mo"`ro ,g001 Strategy 2 - Connected Routes...................................................................................................38 Strategy 3 - Recreational Trail System.....................................................................................41 Strategy4 - Culture....................................................................................................................42 Technologyand Trends..................................................................................................................44 Enforcement using Speed Safety Cameras and Equity............................................................44 E-Mobility and Micromobility......................................................................................................48 Low -Cost, High -Benefit Solutions..............................................................................................48 GolfCarts.....................................................................................................................................54 05 Design Guidelines.................................................................................................56 Referenced Guides and Standards................................................................................................56 WSDOT & Statewide Guidance.......................................................................................................58 Washington State Active Transportation Plan: 2020 and Beyond (2021)..............................58 WSDOT Active Transportation Programs Design Guide (February 2024)..............................59 WSDOT Design Manual (Selected Chapters)............................................................................59 Criteria for the Four Strategies.......................................................................................................60 Strategy 1 - ADA Priority Routes................................................................................................60 Strategy 2 - Connected Routes...................................................................................................60 Shared Streets and Neighborhood Greenways.........................................................................60 Strategy 3 - Recreational Trails..................................................................................................61 Strategy4 - Culture......................................................................................................................61 Levelof Traffic Stress....................................................................................................................62 SafeRoutes to Schools..................................................................................................................64 TrafficCalming...............................................................................................................................69 Placemaking....................................................................................................................................71 High Performance Public Spaces..............................................................................................71 PlacemakingPrinciples..............................................................................................................73 What Makes A Successful Place?..............................................................................................73 Concurrency....................................................................................................................................75 Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 12.04........................................................................75 Examples of Multimodal Concurrency......................................................................................76 06 Coordinated Plans................................................................................................80 Washington's Growth Management Act.......................................................................................81 , oq �u 0 ,a9 141 1% a u , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page iii ro�"roro ��Mo"`ro ,g001 Regionaland County Policy............................................................................................................82 Peninsula RTPO Transportation Plan (Ongoing - Expected October 2025) ..........................82 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan.....................................................................................83 Jefferson County Non -Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan (2010)........84 Jefferson County Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space Plan (2022-2028) ...................84 City and Local Planning Efforts......................................................................................................85 Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan........................................................................................85 Port Townsend Complete Streets Policy...................................................................................86 Comprehensive Streets Program...............................................................................................86 Port Townsend Municipal Code.................................................................................................86 ADATransition Plan....................................................................................................................86 LocalRoad Safety Plan...............................................................................................................88 SafeRoutes to Schools..............................................................................................................88 Port Townsend's Engineering Design Standards.....................................................................88 Port Townsend Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (2020)............................................88 07 Plan Framework: Goals & Policies.........................................................................89 Goals................................................................................................................................................90 Goal1 - Connectivity..................................................................................................................90 Goal2 - Opportunity...................................................................................................................90 Goal3 - Partnership...................................................................................................................90 Goal4 - Participation.................................................................................................................90 Goal5 - Safety............................................................................................................................90 Policies............................................................................................................................................91 Actions.............................................................................................................................................97 1. Build and Connect the Network.............................................................................................97 2. Prioritize Key Investments......................................................................................................97 3. Design and Maintenance Standards......................................................................................97 4. Development Standards and Land Use Integration..............................................................98 5. Equity and Access...................................................................................................................98 6. Partnerships and Coordination..............................................................................................98 7. Safety, Design, and User Experience.....................................................................................98 8. Sidewalks, Frontage, and Maintenance.................................................................................98 , oq �u 0 ,a9 141 1% a u , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page iv ro�"roro ��Mo"`ro ,g001 9. Education and Enforcement...................................................................................................99 ImplementationMatrix...................................................................................................................99 08 Implementation...................................................................................................101 Bringing the Previous Plan Forward....................................................................................... 101 FourStrategies......................................................................................................................... 103 General Transportation Standards Action Items....................................................................... 103 Strategy 1 - ADA Priority Routes................................................................................................ 104 Strategy 2 - Connected Routes.................................................................................................. 117 Strategy 3 - Recreational Trails................................................................................................. 125 Strategy4 - Culture..................................................................................................................... 128 Enforcement............................................................................................................................. 128 StreetParking: .......................................................................................................................... 129 Sidewalk and bike lane maintenance in the winter................................................................ 129 User Respect for One Another................................................................................................. 129 Mapping/Inventory/Monitoring............................................................................................... 130 09 Partnerships & Coordination...............................................................................135 DASH............................................................................................................................................. 135 Tribe Involvement in cicmahan Trail.......................................................................................... 137 CreativeDistrict............................................................................................................................ 137 Peninsula Trails Coalition............................................................................................................ 137 PTMain Street.............................................................................................................................. 137 Loca1 2020.................................................................................................................................... 137 JeffersonLand Trust................................................................................................................... 138 10 Funding Strategies..............................................................................................139 Feein Lieu Program..................................................................................................................... 139 Transportation Benefit District................................................................................................... 139 How is the TBD fund being used?........................................................................................... 140 Washington State Transportation Grants.................................................................................. 140 Federal Transportation Grants.................................................................................................... 142 11 Summary & Conclusions.....................................................................................146 Appendices..............................................................................................................147 Appendix A: Public Outreach Results.......................................................................148 City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page v SurveyResults.............................................................................................................................. 148 Current Active Transportation Routes vs. Future/Desired Active Transportation Routes. 151 Locations of Desired Amenities & Noted Problem Areas ..................................................... 152 DemographicSurvey.................................................................................................................... 156 January2025 Open House.......................................................................................................... 160 March2025 Open House............................................................................................................. 179 September2025 Open House..................................................................................................... 187 Appendix B: Traffic Calming Examples....................................................................188 SpeedHumps........................................................................................................................... 188 TrafficIslands.......................................................................................................................... 189 StreetPlanters.......................................................................................................................... 190 EdgeLane Roads..................................................................................................................... 191 CurbExtensions....................................................................................................................... 191 PedestrianRefuges.................................................................................................................. 192 Chicanes................................................................................................................................... 193 Appendix C: Speed Safety Camera Guide.................................................................194 City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page vi IIIP Vli °�0Y � IIII � °°° °°° u II u p , l° mm p ��'�������� 11117 lIIIII�����llllll ts Exhibit 1: 1998 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan........................................................................13 Exhibit 2 3: 1998/2011 Active Transportation Plan Map.................................................................14 Exhibit 4: People, Planet, and Prosperity...........................................................................................17 Exhibit 5:With limited funds, which type of transportation infrastructure do you prefer?.............20 Exhibit 6: Where do you feel comfortable biking or rolling? Check all that apply ..........................20 Exhibit 7: Future/Desired Active Transportation.......................................................................21 Exhibit 8: Desired Bike Parking..........................................................................................................21 Exhibit 9: January 2025 Open House Attendees.............................................................................23 Exhibit 10: March 2025 Open House Attendees.............................................................................24 Exhibit 11: September 2025 Open House Poster...........................................................................26 Exhibit 12: September 2025 Open House Attendees....................................................................26 Exhibit 13: An Example of Aging Streets within Port Townsend.....................................................28 Exhibit 14: An Example of a WPA Sidewalk in Uptown (1937 - 1938)...........................................29 Exhibit 15: A Sample Streetscape in the Madrona Ridge Neighborhood.......................................32 Exhibit 16: Existing Active Transportation Network.........................................................................33 Exhibit 17: Unmaintained Frontage and Parking.............................................................................43 Exhibit 18: Traffic Calming on Rose Street.......................................................................................49 Exhibit 19: Edge Lane Road in North Beach......................................................................................49 Exhibit 20: Seattle Bike Corral at Pikes Market................................................................................50 Exhibit 21: Seattle Separated Bike Lane with Flex Tubes................................................................50 Exhibit 22: Seattle Protected Bike Lane with Precast Curbs...........................................................51 Exhibit 23: Low Speed Electric Vehicles...........................................................................................54 Exhibit 24: Design Guides...................................................................................................................57 Exhibit 25: Acceptable Pedestrian Facilities (LTS 1 or 2)................................................................62 Exhibit 26: Acceptable Bike Facilities (LTS 1 or 2)...........................................................................63 Exhibit 27: The Port Townsend School District................................................................................65 Exhibit 28: Safe Routes To School....................................................................................................66 Exhibit 29: Safe Routes To School....................................................................................................67 Exhibit 30: Safe Routes To School....................................................................................................68 Exhibit 31: Benefits Provided by High Performance Public Spaces...............................................72 Exhibit 32: Policies Matrix..................................................................................................................91 Exhibit 33: Implementation Matrix.................................................................................................. 100 Exhibit 34: General Engineering Action Items................................................................................ 104 Exhibit 35: ADA Sidewalk Planning Costs...................................................................................... 111 Exhibit 36: Overall ADA Priority Routes Map................................................................................. 106 Exhibit 37: SE (Downtown /Uptown) ADA Priority Projects Map ................................................. 107 Exhibit 38: SW (Castle Hill) ADA Priority Projects Map ........................................................ 108 Exhibit 39: NW (N. of Hastings, W of San Juan) ADA Priority Projects Map ............................... 109 Exhibit 40: NE (Fort Worden / North Beach) ADA Priority Projects Map ..................................... 110 Exhibit 41: DRAFT Priority ADA Projects (0 to 5 Years)................................................................ 111 , oq �u 0 ,a9 141 1% a u , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan Page vii ro�"roro ��Mo"`ro ,g001 Exhibit 42: DRAFT Future ADA Projects (more than 5 Years) ...................................................... 114 Exhibit 43: Connected Routes Planning Costs.............................................................................. 123 Exhibit 44: Overall Connected Routes Map.................................................................................... 118 Exhibit 45: SE (Downtown /Uptown) Connected Routes Map ...................................................... 119 Exhibit 46: SW (Castle Hill) Connected Routes Map..................................................................... 120 Exhibit 47: NW (N. of Hastings, W of San Juan) Connected Routes Map ................................... 121 Exhibit 48: NE (Fort Worden / North Beach) Connected Routes Map ......................................... 122 Exhibit 49: Priority Connected Routes Projects (0 to 5 Years) ..................................................... 123 Exhibit 50: Future Connected Routes Projects (5 to 10 Years) .................................................... 124 Exhibit 51: Recreational Trails Map................................................................................................ 126 Exhibit 52: Recreational Trail Implementation............................................................................... 127 Exhibit 53: 2004 Port Townsend Walking Map.............................................................................. 130 Exhibit 54: 2004 Port Townsend Walking Map.............................................................................. 131 Exhibit 55: Cicemehan Trail Map.................................................................................................... 132 Exhibit 56: 2003 Quimper Peninsula Bicycle Map......................................................................... 133 Exhibit 57: Coordinated Trail Action Items.................................................................................... 133 Exhibit 58: Map of Accessible Port Townsend (July 2016).......................................................... 136 Exhibit 59: Grant Schedule Summary............................................................................................. 143 Exhibit60: Grant Summary............................................................................................................. 144 Exhibit 61: Transportation Improvement Boards Grant Summary ............................................... 145 Exhibit 62: An Example of a Speed Hump located on Blaine Street ............................................ 188 Exhibit 63: An Example of Traffic Island on F Street..................................................................... 189 Exhibit 64: An Example of Street Planting on Discovery Road ..................................................... 190 Exhibit 65: An Example of an Edge Lane Road on Kuhn Street .................................................... 191 Exhibit 66: An Example of a Curb Extension Located on Lawrence Street ................................. 192 Exhibit 67: An Example of a Pedestrian Refuge Located on Discovery Road ............................ 192 Exhibit 68: An Example of a One -Lane Chicane Located in in B.C., Canada ............................... 193 Exhibit 69: An Example of a Two -Lane Chicane Located in Berkeley, CA ................................... 193 City of Port Townsend WWWUIYOVYipp ih mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmww �11 �° �II�� Ilnmexm Wlm� INN 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page viii x("!I,, uti11 vp Slull„ Ill '111 Port Townsend's historic character and unique geography have shaped how people move through the community. However, with an aging infrastructure system and periods of limited economic investment, the city lacks the sidewalks, bike lanes, and overall connectivity needed to support safe and convenient walking, biking, and rolling. Steep terrain, such as Morgan Hill, adds further challenges to creating a fully connected network. As Port Townsend grows and traffic increases, active transportation is becoming increasingly vital for safety, access, and overall quality of life. With limited resources and one of the highest median ages in Washington at 59.4 years, the city must prioritize investments carefully and strategically. Building on the original 1998 Non -motorized plan, this Active Transportation Plan responds to community's desire to create connected routes. Drawing from best practices in the latest design and guidance manuals, the plan identifies long-term priorities for ADA improvements such as sidewalks along key routes, while also focusing on shared streets and connected routes that can benefit from short- term and incremental improvements that can be delivered within constrained budgets. In keeping with other successful communities, Port Townsend embraces the philosophy of "don't let perfection be the enemy of good." The plan is built on robust community input gathered through multiple in -person and virtual outreach events. Residents expressed the need for safer crossings, improved connections between neighborhoods, schools, and downtown, and better access to trails and the waterfront. Together, these strategies create a "right -sized", diverse approach to active transportation, one that acknowledges the city's constraints, builds on its strengths, and charts a realistic path toward a more connected, safe, and accessible Port Townsend for all ages and abilities. oVl 0IIIIOV, 09 ^ ^IIII, 011l�m u^ A111114a ^IIII� ^IIIOIII� I���Fm4M1l Illi�� � ��lllp TERM MEANING A measure of transportation mobility; as technically calculated, total ACCESSIBILITY travel time between areas weighted by the number of services and activities available at a given location. The term "accessibility" also sometimes refers to ADA accessibility. Facilities that meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, federal legislation passed in 1990 that protects ADA-ACCESSIBLE against discrimination based on disability. ADA priority routes should follow the latest version of the Public Right-of-way Accessibilities Guidelines (PROWAG). ADA PRIORITY Routes defined in this plan to provide ADA-accessible facilities as ROUTE determined in coordination with Disability Awareness Starts Here (DASH) and public input. Using a human -scale and often human -powered means of travel to ACTIVE get from one place to another; includes walking, bicycling, using a TRANSPORTATION mobility assistive or adaptive device such as a ,wheelchair or walker, using micromobility devices, and using electric -assist devices such as a -bikes and e-foot scooters. BICYCLING OR Includes use of various forms of bicycles and tricycles, both those CYCLING propelled solely by human power and electric -assisted bicycles/tricycles. A street that acts or is designed to operate at or below the posted CALMED STREET speed. Narrowing or other traffic calming devices may be required, as needed. A term to describe a continuous route as identified in this plan to provide transportation and recreational opportunities connecting CONNECTED ROUTE trails, paths, and shared neighborhood streets to serve most ages and abilities. Connected routes are not intended to serve as ADA compliant routes and may have conflicts or grades not meeting the Public Right-of-way Accessibilities Guidelines (PROWAG). City of Port Townsend 1 III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i�"�p ��Ile�pr V,�IlVk44MyuFV�dlhlall��� 811 i h V11�v,Tl� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page ii A measure of how well facilities are linked together to form a CONNECTIVITY convenient network that enables everyday trip purposes. In general, this means that the facilities follow the most direct path between origin and destination points. Also known as pedal -assist or electric -assisted bicycles, a -bikes are E-BIKE(S) defined in Washington state law as Class 1, 2, or 3, depending on how much assistance they provide. E-bikes are considered active transportation in this plan. Refers to transportation -related structures such as bike lanes, FACILITY sidewalks, trails, roads, and/or operational tools such as traffic signals, crosswalk markings, accessible pedestrian signals, bike boxes, street lighting, and the like. A trail that with improvements and maintenance schedule to accommodate most ages and abilities, although not ADA compliant. IMPROVED TRAIL These trails are improved by width, reduced trip hazards and vegetation management. These trails may serve as part of the transportation network. A quantitative evaluation of road segments and crossings based on posted speed, the number of vehicle travel lanes, traffic volume, and LEVEL OF TRAFFIC if there is a bike lane (for bicyclist LTS). LTS is calculated on a scale STRESS (LTS) of 1 (lowest level, generally suitable for people of all ages and abilities to use) to 4 (highest level, will be used only out of necessity). Small wheeled devices that may have an electric motor. Includes skateboards, foot scooters, hoverboards, and patented devices such as Solowheels and Segways. Micromobility use is not yet tracked MICROMOBILITY separately, and typical data counters do not distinguish between device types. Research on the use of these devices is so new that it is not included in the discussion of benefits and other issues in this plan; their use for transportation primarily emerged in 2018-2019. A system of links (roadway segments), nodes (intersections or NETWORK crossings), and modal connection points that describe a transportation system. , u 0 iY oq a ,a9 141 1% o u m , u ro , u � ro�"roro City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan Page iii ��Mo"`ro ,g001 As defined under Washington state law, "Any person afoot or using a PEDESTRIAN wheelchair (manual or motorized) or means of conveyance (other than a bicycle) propelled by human power, such as skates or a skateboard". One of three general forms of active transportation (walk, bike or ROLLING roll), and includes use of wheeled devices including, non -motorized and motorized versions of scooters, skateboards, one -wheels, and wheelchairs. Designated non -arterial streets where motorized vehicles share SHARED STREET space and yield to pedestrians and bikes. Shared streets are low - speed and low -volume, with an allowed speed limit of 10 mph. Shared Streets may have traffic calming measures as needed. A public way constructed primarily for and open to people walking, TRAILS AND bicycling, or rolling (and in some locations, riding horses); does not SHARED -USE include sidewalks. For certain purposes under Washington state law, PATHS a trail/path can also include a widened highway shoulder where that has been made part of a trails plan. Means a single event where a person goes from an origin to a TRIPS destination. A trip may or may not include intermediate stops. Trips can be taken using any transportation mode, including walking, cycling, public transportation, or private vehicle use, among others. A footpath resembling a hiking trail. Surfaces may be uneven, UNIMPROVED TRAIL narrowed by vegetation and seasonal. These are generally considered recreational or provide connections to transportation networks. WALKING Includes walking, running, and people with disabilities using assistive mobility devices. , oq �u 0 ,a9 141 1% a u , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page iv ro�"roro ��Mo"`ro ,g001 Stakeholder Committee Nicole Gauthier (Jefferson Transit Authority) Becci Kimball (Parks, Recreation, Trees and Trails Advisory Board, Transportation Lab, TAG (Transit Advisory Group)) Matt Klontz (Port of Port Townsend, Port Townsend School Board) Matt Miner (Parks, Recreation, Trees and Trails Advisory Board) Pat Teal (DASH (Disability Awareness Starts Here)) Nick Singer (ReCyclery, Salish Coast Bike Bus) Scott Walker (Transportation Lab) City Council Mayor David Faber Deputy Mayor Amy Howard Councilmember Neil Nelson Councilmember Ben Thomas Councilmember Libby Urner Wennstrom Councilmember Monica MickHager Councilmember Owen Rowe City Staff Steve King, Public Works Director Jeff Kostechka, Assistant City Engineer Winn McHenry, GIS Coordinator Emma Bolin, Planning Director Adrian Smith, Long Range Planner Consultant SCJ Alliance Thank you to those that worked on the original 1998 Non -Motorized plan, 2011 Update and the 2025 Active Transportation Plan. Many thanks to all the time the stakeholders, advisory boards, and the public put forth for helping shape this plan. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page v In Washington State, cities are required under the Growth Management Act (GMA) to plan for transportation systems that serve all users, including those who walk, bike, or roll. Port Townsend has adopted local policies through its Comprehensive Plan and Transportation Improvement Plan that call for safer, more accessible streets, while also coordinating with Jefferson County, WSDOT, and regional trail initiatives such as the Olympic Discovery Trail to enhance connectivity beyond city limits. Since the adoption of the original forward thinking 1998 Non -motorized plan, the City has undertaken several targeted efforts to improve active transportation in the form of policy and constructed projects. These initiatives form a foundation for a more coordinated approach to active transportation planning. An Active Transportation Plan provides the framework for connecting these state, regional, and local goals with the specific needs of Port Townsend. It establishes the foundation for identifying gaps, prioritizing projects, and guiding investments that improve safety and mobility for people of all ages and abilities. The Port Townsend Active Transportation Plan provides a framework for building a safer, more connected, and more equitable network for walking, biking, and rolling. It establishes the purpose and strategies of the plan, identifies clear goals for connectivity, safety, opportunity, partnership, and participation, and outlines a set of guiding principles rooted in the Seven E's framework. Because active transportation touches many aspects of city life, the plan is closely coordinated with other initiatives such as the Comprehensive Plan, Sustainable Streets Plan, and ADA Transition Plan to ensure consistency and efficiency. Equally important, the plan is shaped by robust public outreach, with input gathered through community events, surveys, and open houses that informed priorities and project recommendations. Together, these elements provide a roadmap for creating a transportation system that serves all residents, supports sustainability, and prepares Port Townsend for the future. Q%� In addition to public open houses, this plan formed a committee of stakeholders to bring diverse perspectives to the table. Many thanks to all the time the stakeholders, advisory boards, and the public put forth for helping shape this plan. See the list of stakeholders in the Acknowledgment Section. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 6 � o o � 4 uIP � °Vu ii �I u u poi °Vu 'I� ° c)1���411����I�U� I���,����'' )I ��I��,�� ��n,��� t Our community is fortunate to have the current trail system thanks to the many volunteers. who attended the meetings, open houses and planned the original Non - Motorized Plan. Since plan adoption, volunteers also rolled up their sleeves to physical build many of the trails we have today. They city partnered with volunteers to supply staff time, materials and equipment on some of these trails. Exhibit 1: Photos of Past Volunteer Trail Work Parties City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 7 01 Y � IIIP uuuVlV "' »`P. III I,�� �" I mull �mn a , IIII IIIII IIIII III � I ��. III mll � ��� »m ,� I� ,� ��III... IIII �� ��\\\ � II@ a III ��lopllll. ,� ��I� III ,�� " In I���I Mol IIIPq,"� � I ',, ��lipllll clllll#III ;yy� Mol IIII IIIP �� ,,,.IIIII IIII ;yy� nm n� �� ��\\) #\��1\V\\\ ��1ip 1\111V" 1111 ���)ii.,+��luaa��l 1I1�Yim dlllll �lllam,�� n ����ll ��uIIIIInIo #I1�Yim Ilil l 1\\ ill ao Illlll," +��I,aa � r., II,IIII�III �llla; ,111n1VI iIIIn11M lr., 1I1�Yito+��ll,aa l 1I1�Yito d IIIn11M Ild lr., II,IIII�III IIIIII Iln (�� d lr., II,IIII�III io 1\111V" 1111 ���)iir., 1\\� dlllll �lllam,��� ., ml 9 p oml A I `` A ICI II{�� 01II Y IIII � I II IIII{{���� III 4 Y I Sul II{{���� pl IIIIIIWm mpMll �� IIIII �IIIIIIilIIII IIIII IIIIWm41ma Ild III IIIIWm IIIIWm l�� �� 41ma dll II�III� l� II � IIm Put simply, Active Transportation is getting around by human -powered means by way of walking, biking, and rolling, including a -bikes and other electric mobility devices. Even those City of Port Townsend III °�u Iwal9,oakiuu I,�h WWpWlrol!n o �( � I�''Pp ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��p��Ile�pr V,�Il�k4,MyuRn1"dlmad��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan Page 8 that drive participate in Active Transportation once parked and walking/rolling to their destination. Planning a network of routes to accommodate active transportation is not simply a compliance measure. Port Townsend is planning intentionally, in order to continue establishing a community rich in connection, activity, and engagement. These attributes are integral for economic development and quality of life. To plan for these ideals, an active transportation system must include not only the minimum standard for biking, walking, and rolling, but must also effectively provide safety, accessibility, and convenience. If these components are not integrated into the long-term implementation, walking or biking will struggle to compete, and auto -dependence will continue. This Active Transportation Plan is meant to serve the entire Port Townsend community. It builds on the City's long history of non -motorized transportation planning and establishes a framework for the next generation of improvements. The plan provides a long-term implementation strategy that supports both the City's present needs and its future growth. To achieve this, the plan focuses on four primary strategies: Strategy 1 — ADA Priority Routes: Ensuring that key pedestrian routes meet ADA standards so all residents and visitors, regardless of ability, can travel safely and comfortably. Strategy 2 — Connected Routes: Building a network of continuous, safe, and inviting routes for walking, biking, and rolling that link neighborhoods, schools, parks, and major destinations. Strategy 3 — Recreational Trails: For non -designated connected or ADA priority routes, unimproved trails remain an important part of Port Townsend's identity. These trails are considered recreational as a result of a lower level of standard of care and maintenance. Strategy 4 — Culture: Building a culture that respects active transportation include behavior of motorists, adjoining property owners maintaining their sidewalks and frontage, parking management, courtesy between walkers, bikers, rollers, and drivers is critical for effective and safer streets. This Active Transportation Plan is meant to serve the entire Port Townsend community. It builds upon the City's rich history of non -motorized transportation planning, and aims to provide a long-term implementation process which accommodates the city's present and future growth. The goals of this plan align with the Washington State Department of Transportation's Active Transportation Plan (2020 and Beyond, 2021), adapted to reflect Port Townsend's local ort Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 9 priorities. Together, these goals guide the policies and investments recommended in this plan: Create a connected, comfortable, convenient, inviting, and effective walking and rolling network so people can reach their destinations. Eliminate disparities in access to safe, healthy, active transportation connections for people and communities most dependent on walking, bicycling, and transit. Collaborate and coordinate with public, tribal, nonprofit, and private partners to complete and improve the network across boundaries. Increase the frequency and percentage of everyday trips made by walking, bicycling, and transit. Using these two main strategies and five goals, policies have been developed to direct staff action and funding toward the fulfillment of these goals. � Wl"-"�l City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 10 This plan also builds on the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) framework, which emphasizes a holistic approach to active transportation. Traditionally known as the Six E's, Port Townsend has expanded the framework to include a seventh "E": Enforcement. 1. Evaluation - Assessing current conditions and identifying areas for improvement. 2. Education - Teaching children and the community about safe walking and biking practices. 3. Encouragement - Promoting walking and biking through events and activities. 4. Engineering - Implementing infrastructure improvements such as sidewalks, bike lanes, and crosswalks. 5. Engagement - Involving the community and stakeholders in planning and decision -making. 6. Equity - Ensuring that improvements serve all communities, especially those that are underserved. 7. Enforcement -Working with law enforcement, schools, and the community to improve safety around schools and neighborhoods through speed management, crossing guards, and driver awareness. Active transportation intersects with many other elements of the Comprehensive Plan and city policies. To be successful, this plan must be coordinated with other current and ongoing initiatives, including: Port Townsend Sustainable Streets Plan - Developing a balanced street system that reduces impervious surfaces, stormwater runoff, and long-term maintenance costs while supporting mobility for all users. Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plan - Expanding trail access and recreational connections. Traffic Calming Manual - Integrating tools for safer neighborhood streets. ADA Transition Plan - Ensuring compliance and accessibility in pedestrian facilities. Housing and Zoning Policies - Linking active transportation to land use decisions so that increased density supports walkability, reduces infrastructure costs, and expands mobility choices. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 11 11 ('�,y M������,�������� |n1988'local resident, and current stakeholder, Scott Walker spoke atCity Council toencourage the development of pathway system and forming a citizen committee to implement a plan — the early beginnings ofthe first Non -Motorized Transportation Plan. Exhibit2:1988 CouncilMinutem— Beginning of Non -Motorized Plan MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF DECEMBER 6, 1988 Scott Walker was recognized and spoke regarding the need for a p6thway system in Port Townsend to get pedestrians and slow bicyclists off the busy oteets. He pro- posed phase one to be developing dirt paths adjacent to the arterials in town-, imp- lement ways to restrict through traffic to the use of the urteriuls and collector streets in town, and to expand the basic pathway system using unopened right-of-ways and restricted local access residential streets, greenways and ooen spaces per the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan. He has many other ideas and details he would like to give to o council committee. Mayor Shirley noted that Resolution No 88-69 includes*this subject under item 3E and the lead responsibility is Councilmember McCulloch. A letter from Scott Walker and signed by 23 others, doted September 20, 1988" was copied for Council outlining the need for either simple pathways or paved sidewalks and ways to implement a pathway system. He suggested that the Council fbnma citizens committee to advise on a construction and implementation plan for a pathway system. This was referred to the.Stre8t/Storm Drainage/Light Committee, Port Townsend's commitment to active transportation began with the adoption of the city's first Non'MotorizedTnynaportation Plan. This groundbreaking plan laid out vision for a connected trail, sidewalk, and bikeway system. City ofPort Townsend 141 411 2O25Active Transportation Plan | Page 12 Exhibit 3:1998 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN Adopted by Ordi"aoce No. 2643 June 1,1998 Supplemeoted by Ordhiance No, 305� 6 0 June 6, 2011 City of Port'rownsend 250 Nhidkon SlieeI Poll Source: City of Port Townsend 141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r 1O o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 13 '001 Exhibit 4 5:1998/2011 Active Transportation Plan Map City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 14 In the years following adoption, the City made major strides in implementing the plan, including: Development of the city's core trail system, done by volunteers with city support Improvements to Lower Sims Way and Upper Sims Way Upgrades to F Street, San Juan, and a number of other small sidewalk projects and Sheridan Street Recognizing changes in community needs and best practices, the City updated the Non - Motorized Transportation Plan to refine priorities and expand the active transportation network. Over the last decade, Port Townsend has strengthened its active transportation framework through both local and state initiatives: Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan (2020) - Expanded the role of trails and active recreation in community life. WSDOT Statewide Active Transportation Plan (2021) - Integrated Port Townsend's efforts with state -level policies and goals. Port Townsend ADA Transition Plan (2023) - Advanced accessibility by identifying and prioritizing upgrades to pedestrian facilities. Street improvements - Improvements such as Water Street, Jefferson Street, Discovery Road, and many others made great improvements of adding sidewalks, bike facilities, and safety enhancements along a key corridors. Edge -Lane Roads - Piloted innovative street designs that provide flexible space for both vehicles and bicyclists. Building on nearly 30 years of progress, Port Townsend is now updating the 2011 Non - motorized plan into an Active Transportation Plan. This plan consolidates past efforts, sets new goals, and prioritizes future investments to create a safer, more connected, and focused investments on equitable transportation system for all ages and abilities. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 WWpWlrol!n o�( I''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 15 a/ i The development of the Port Townsend Active Transportation Plan has been guided by a collaborative, community -driven process. The City worked closely with residents, neighborhood groups, and regional partners to identify needs, priorities, and opportunities for improving walking, biking, and rolling throughout the community. Engagement efforts included public workshops, online surveys, and targeted outreach to historically underserved populations to ensure a wide range of voices shaped the plan. This feedback helped the City understand existing barriers to safe and comfortable travel, as well as the community's vision for a more connected and equitable transportation system. In addition to community engagement, the planning process built upon Port Townsend's strong foundation of past planning work, including the Non -Motorized Transportation Plan, the ADA Transition Plan, and the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan. Data analysis, field assessments, and coordination with state and regional initiatives such as the WSDOT Active Transportation Plan provided additional context. Together, these efforts informed the plan's goals, policies, and project recommendations, ensuring that they reflect both community priorities and best practices in active transportation planning. III The Active Transportation Plan is being updated alongside the 2025 Comprehensive Plan to ensure that Port Townsend's vision for walking, biking, and rolling is aligned with the community's broader growth and development goals. I � I"I�I°`lIIIII ���1�"����� 711�I����;;itiw�'�l�� (t'il�111:�lim "�� ���� °;'��h� �1� ������������ o , iiuu �stulu, Nina^ None i Iso^ ito Nmma ® Completed Projects - Many priority sidewalks, trails, and ADA ramps from the 2011 plan are already built. Feasibility Challenges - Earlier assumptions about density and sidewalk placement proved impractical and underfunded. Evolving Industry Trends - Cities are embracing lower -cost, flexible street designs and network approaches rather than single project types. Technology - E-bikes and other micro -mobility options have expanded the range of who can use active transportation. Community Needs - Greater emphasis on safety, comfort, accessibility, and recreational opportunities for all ages and abilities. Sustainability - Integration with the Comprehensive Plan's PT Sustainable Streets Plan to reduce street miles, stormwater runoff, and maintenance costs while increasing mobility, green space, and stormwater-friendly design. Comprehensive Plan Alignment - Ensuring that land use, housing density, and transportation infrastructure are coordinated to support affordability and livability. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 16 P u i m u u 4 p � u iVp �il iii 4 poi i II Vil m i °Ilia ,.I for ,I#\�yl � �, II The Active Transportation Plan is grounded in the principle of People, Planet, and Prosperity (PPP), recognizing that true sustainability must balance social, environmental, and economic outcomes. People reflects the importance of equity, health, and safety, ensuring that walking, biking, and rolling options are accessible for all ages and abilities. Planet emphasizes environmental stewardship by reducing vehicle trips, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, managing stormwater, and integrating trees and green infrastructure into street design. Prosperity acknowledges that active transportation supports the local economy by lowering household transportation costs, attracting visitors, and fostering vibrant, walkable neighborhoods. By aligning improvements with the PPP framework, Port Townsend can advance mobility solutions that strengthen the community today while building resilience for the future. City of Port Townsend Exhibit 6: People, Planet, and Prosperity III ��u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��p��Ile�pr V,�Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 17 Community engagement has been central to developing the Active Transportation Plan. The phased outreach process, starting with broad conversations and moving toward detailed input as the plan developed. Public engagement events were highly attended with much interest in this topic throughout the 2025 Periodic Update of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The timing of this plan update was coordinated with the Comprehensive Plan update as well as the PROS plan update to provide the opportunity for the public to provide input on balancing many city priorities such as housing and open space. Given transportation is the backbone of the City and active transportation is highly regarded as a priority, the public engagement meetings provided meaningful and very helpful feedback in the development of this plan. City staff and the stakeholder committee was able to review public comments to apply principles priorities such as connectivity as a focus of this transition from the Non -Motorized Plan to the more commonly used term, Active Transportation Plan. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 18 ��Im I'll Out 10Q i!' 1. April 2024 - Plan kickoff at the Transportation Lab's "Moving in the Right Direction" Conference 2. Spring/Summer 2024 - Farmers Market outreach events 3. June -September 2024 - Citywide online Active Transportation Survey (509 responses received) 4. July 2024 - Comprehensive Plan Studio event 5. January 2025 - Active Transportation Open House 6. March 2025 - Comprehensive Plan Open House 7. August 2025 - Farmers Market follow-up engagement 8. September 2025 - Planning for Our Future Open House At each stage, the focus of outreach narrowed: early events provided high-level information to spark broad conversations, while later events presented draft strategies and maps to gather more specific feedback. �u ul"911V I mor,�,� a ,� p��. � � Illglp (Ja���I �p �uu'I 911V �u �� cool oo �� wml �c� i duo ��u ,.I mon �Inum ��wail�Inmv ���^Is ^ a I t4, W1 4111u l "Illsoo�m u Iw �II� alllll I u �»>I alllll lU �»>I IIIR, II ,lll l llll � IIIR, �I IIIIII Ili ally C Iw IIIII 4 ���� �� 2 � The online survey was widely shared through posters, QR codes, social media, and in -person outreach at the Farmers Market. Below are some highlights of the survey results. A more detailed summary of outreach activities and results is provided in the Appendix A (Page). Strong desire for more connected routes across the city. People want city wide mobility, per future/desired map below. Preference for detached paths or calm neighborhood streets over facilities located directly on high -traffic, high stress roadways. Support for lower -cost, widespread improvements rather than fewer high -cost projects. Transit was not the focus of this plan update and yet, the community wide support for transit and recognition of its role in Active Transportation is understood. Bike Parking is desired in downtown, uptown, along Sims and near Fort Worden Golf carts represent alternative transportation methods that bridge the gap between active transportation and motorized transportation. This concept emerged as a potential accessibility option: 70% of respondents with disabilities and 48% of all respondents expressed interest. City of Port Townsend III °�u al9llak141 WWpWlrol!n o �( wau I�''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��p��Ilwr V,�Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 19 Exhibit TWith limited funds, which type of transportation infrastructure do you prefer? Limited amounts of high -cost infrastructure (large road 55 projects) Moderate amounts of middle cost items (sidewalks and bike lanes) Many low cost improvements (traffic calming, designating existing local streets as bike routes, and improved crossings at busy streets) Do nothing, we don't need active transportation 35 improvements 111111 X Submitted respondents: 435 Total respondents: 568 PM lim too 200 300 400 Number of Respondents Exhibit 8: Where do you feel comfortable biking or rolling? Check all that apply. Shared lane or shoulder on busy 129 EWA Edge lane roads - single lane with dashed stripes 230 0 CL 0 Calm neigbhorhood street 389 Path separated from a road 429 N/A - I'm not able to or comfortable walking, rolling, or running � 75 Submitted respondents: 384 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Total respondents: 540 Number of Respondents City of Port Townsend 141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r 1O o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 20 '001 City of Port Townsend Exhibit 9: Future/Desired Active Transportation Exhibit 10: Desired Bike Parking III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 21 �Ivmv � vmp �Ivmv � +n l pm �Ivmv � J O �Inw � ^I� ompll. q ������ Sul 1�4 ull you. Illlillll mll �I I^ IIIIII m .III � IIIIII mle �v ��u a"llll �1�� S� �������� IIIP v you II �����All�b^oi�1ivio�� ��II^ ,II,IIII �Il� JiIIU �»>7 aiiiiiIllU a �»>711���,���«<�II,���(J"bly�II� �III III � lllll ��1��^�� hil ��I llm� �»i �II� � �Il�x,,,,,,,ll��I,n ® Location: Cotton Building Downtown Presented Information: o Introduction to the plan o Flyers and tablets to take the online survey Received Feedback Highlights (see all feedback in Appendix XX): o This was a Comprehensive Plan event with limited Active Transportation information. Location: County Senior / Community Center in Uptown Presented Information: o Based on the previous feedback, the provided maps and content to solicit feedback on: ■ ADA sidewalk and ramp priority ■ medium and low-cost active transportation improvements ■ examples of Seattle Neighborhood Greenway installations Received Feedback Highlights (see all feedback in Appendix A): o Traffic Calming- Requests for speed control. o Speed Enforcement - Multiple requests for better speed control, including speed enforcement cameras. o Better Lighting - Especially along San Juan and other high -stress areas. o Uncontrolled Neighborhood Intersections - Concerns about intersections lacking clear traffic control. o Improved Connectivity for Walkers & Cyclists - Calls to close redundant streets and create safer connections (e.g., downtown to fort). o ELRs (Enhanced Local Roads) - Mixed support o Trail & Pathway Maintenance Issues - Complaints about overgrown vegetation. o San Juan and 491h Curve - Safety concerns and lack of shoulder and sidewalk. Many people cut through the fairgrounds o ADA & Stroller Access Challenges - Calls for better sidewalks and pathway accessibility. City of Port Townsend III °�u a,9llak141 fi ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 22 Exhibit 11: January 2025 Open House Attendees Location: Salish Coast Elementary School Presented Information: o Based on the previous feedback, the provided maps and content to solicit feedback on: ■ The challenge: we have lacking or failing infrastructure with limited budgets ■ City's Plan: • 1. Focus on ADA priority routes. Invest in sidewalk where the need is highest. • 2. Establish "Connected Routes." When not on and ADA Priority route, use low and medium cost improvements. Lower cost solutions may be installed in shorter timelines than large street projects. ■ Examples of medium and low-cost active transportation improvements ■ Examples of Seattle Neighborhood Greenway installations ■ ADA Priority Map - dot poll for sidewalk and ramp priority ■ Existing Conditions Map - dot poll on difficult connections or concerns City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 WWpWlrol!n o�( I''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 23 City of Port Townsend Exhibit 12: March 2025 Open House Attendees III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 24 Received Feedback Highlights (see all feedback in Appendix A): o Feedback was supportive of the city's general approach to making strategic investments for sidewalk and looking for lower cost solutions in other locations. o The dot poll showed making the greatest investments in the Castle Hill area, including Sheridan which has a large sidewalk gap from 101n to 151n o Challenging Locations: ■ Hastings - walking and biking is stressful ■ Curve at 491n and San Juan - tight corner, no city right-of-way to improve ■ Admiralty and curve with Spruce near cemetery ■ Discovery Road - city limits to Rainier ■ Connecting to Larry Scott Trail in the Port ■ Traffic Calming- city wide o Opportunities: ■ People use 471n through the fairgrounds to avoid 491n and San Juan ■ The vision board noted: Neighborhood greenways and Connected Routes Location: Farmers Market Presented Information: o Connected Routes map o Connected Route sections and examples ■ Priority trails ■ Paved Paths ■ Neighborhood Greenways on existing local streets o Sustainable Streets Plan Map and information - the long term plan to: ■ Minimize street miles for the city to maintain ■ Maximize trails and tree retention ■ Reduce stormwater runoff Location: County Senior / Community Center in Uptown Presented Information: o Refined ADA Priority Routes Map o Refined Connected Routes Map o A map to gather feedback on which trails should become "priority trails" for improvements and maintenance priority o Feedback forms o Other groups presented on: ■ Sustainable Streets Plan ■ Parks, Recreation, Open Space (PROS) Plan City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 WWpWlrol!n o�( I''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 25 City of Port Townsend Exhibit 13: September 2025 Open House Poster fir VisionOne Shared ' ir' le, ree` llls Exhibit 14: September 2025 Open House Attendees III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 26 Port Townsend's pre -platted condition coupled with its boom and bust history created a broken and aging infrastructure system. Port Townsend has been a regional leader in advancing active transportation for nearly three decades. The city's first Non -Motorized Transportation Plan was adopted in 1998, setting the foundation for a community -wide system of trails, sidewalks, and bikeways. Since then, the City has steadily built upon that work through updated plans, street improvements, and partnerships with state and regional initiatives. This Active Transportation Plan builds on that long history and carries it forward into the next generation of improvements. E ��� ' ���� iI I ��„°�i� l���������� iI I � Ih I����C U,� (...l , ���� � � h I����C 15�511� ���� ������� iI I ������) � Ih I����C �,Cl poi° i� mi ���n The following map shows existing sidewalk and bike lanes. Many arterials are missing sidewalk and or bike lanes. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 27 01 p °i IIIPuu umIIIV r,, �U pwmolll@ r ppu uoI1111V u� r a@mm ��� Sul m C �Ip m C ��u ". , �_ a@mm a mlllillll U n�� mp �,n ... �, ,,, ��1ioi Ili�l ��1ioi p lonulli�l onulli�l ��1ioi mo, � lonulli�l � mo, � ��1ioi , 1 �»>7 iiiii II���, �, aiiii� aiiic IIIII, aiiii� aiiic 1115�51 IIIII, IIII«,,,,,n�� II��R, iiiii II II���, IIIII, ��1,�4�� aii aiiic 15�511 IIII«,,,,,n�� milli I�5�511����I� ��, ��11,�4�� C ���� IIIII, I I Port Townsend's streets, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities reflect the city's long history, much of which predates modern street design standards. As a result, today's infrastructure is a patchwork of older systems, intermittent improvements, and gaps that create challenges for active transportation. Many of the city's oldest neighborhoods were built in the late 1800s and early 1900s, before paved streets, concrete sidewalks, or bicycle facilities were standard practice. Streets were often dirt, and sidewalks were made of wood. Over time, these wooden sidewalks deteriorated and disappeared, while limited city budgets upgraded dirt streets with very thin layers of pavement, called chip seal. Today, poor drainage, age, and heavier vehicles are causing many of these chip seal streets to fail. Exhibit 15: An Example of Aging Streets within Port Townsend Source: City of Port Townsend City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��p��Ile�pr V�, Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 28 In Uptown, most of the existing sidewalks were built during the Great Depression through the federal Works Progress Administration (WPA) in 1937-1938. Many of these sidewalks are still in use today, stamped with the WPA mark, but they are now aging and in need of repair. Exhibit 16: An Example of a WPA Sidewalk in Uptown (1937 -1938) Source: City of Port Townsend City of Port Townsend III °�u m9111a�141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 29 Some neighborhoods constructed after World War II also lack sidewalks, not because of age, but because they were built under standards in place at the time. These subdivisions were developed without requirements for pedestrian or bicycle facilities, leaving lasting gaps in connectivity. The most recent developments in the City have required the installation of sidewalk which have resulted in greater walkability in those neighborhoods. + umi , uuuui , uuuoi �u �nuq pq�IN� IIII lv uumoi , °hull u a ��� C , , , � Illlgm 4 ii Iqm ��� ���� � � 4 mp a ',�� ��� u u ��� C u , , , � u ii Wool � ,c �i ��u �nlli �1� +�nlli �1�� 1�� ml } �� � @ II �� ��I IIIII III III � 1110 no ��1Ai ����v 1VA I�tulu+��@ uuu a+ m I�tulu+��@ ��� +o ++ : nil@ m+ � 7 � u+ '+�wm� ���u (�� pl��io au ��1Ai �� , �� o uullaa 1VA i au lu m � ��������u ������� �d���� i as Another defining factor in Port Townsend's infrastructure is the distinction between pre -platted and un-platted development. Port Townsend is unusual because most of the city was "pre -platted" in the late 1800s, in anticipation of becoming a booming seaport city. The expectation was that streets and utilities would be built all at once as homes were built. However, when the city's growth stalled —first with the shift from sailing ships to steam, and later when the railroad never arrived — development slowed dramatically. Land was sold off lot by lot, often with multiple owners on a single block. Today, this "fractured ownership" means that infill development is difficult to coordinate. Unlike more recently platted development, where a single developer installs all the infrastructure across a large area, in pre - platted areas infrastructure was not installed to service the lots and thus each property owner is responsible for extending streets, sidewalks, and utilities at the time of construction. The vast majority of Port Townsend was pre -platted as shown below. Only very few larger open tracts of land were not included in the original late 1800 plats. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r V,�Il�k4+MyuF��dlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 30 Pre -platted Port Townsend circa 1900, with over 14,000 lots The result is a city with discontinuous and unorganized infrastructure: Sidewalks that start and stop mid -block Throughout much of Port Townsend history, sidewalks were not required to be installed leaving large areas without pedestrian infrastructure Streets that transition from paved to chip seal to gravel Gaps in safe routes to schools for walking and biking Generally lack of connectivity for most modes of transportation except the automobile The Washington State legislature adopted the Platting Act in 1937 which changed the platting process drastically. Over the years a number of changes and updates have been made which are now codified in Title 58 RCW. The modern subdivision requirements combine with Growth Management Act requirements ensure that infrastructure is provided for every newly created lot City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 31 including sidewalks and transportation facilities meeting the City's engineering design standards. Several recent development illustrate implementation of these requirements. A good example in Port Townsend is the Madrona Ridge neighborhood, where the private developer constructed complete streets, utilities, and walking/biking paths to modern standards. These developments provide accessible streets for all with continuous sidewalk fronting the majority of homes. Exhibit 17: A Sample Streetscape in the Madrona Ridge Neighborhood Source: , Based on the history of development of Port Townsend and having a clear understanding of current conditions is essential for shaping an active transportation system that meets community needs. By documenting the existing network, identifying challenges, and recognizing opportunities, Port Townsend can prioritize improvements that address gaps, enhance safety, and build on strengths. This approach ensures that investments are data -driven, responsive to community input, and aligned with long-term goals for connectivity and livability. Port Townsend's active transportation system includes sidewalks, trails, bike lanes, shared roadways, and connections to transit stops. Key assets include the Larry Scott Trail, which links the city to the Olympic Discovery Trail, sidewalks in the historic downtown, and pedestrian - friendly waterfront areas. However, the network varies in quality and consistency, some neighborhoods lack sidewalks, bike facilities are limited, and accessibility features are not always present. An accurate inventory of existing facilities provides the foundation for identifying gaps and prioritizing improvements. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 32 City of Port Townsend Exhibit 18: Existing Active Transportation Network Mp City of Part Townsend ro S Fn:rx-,try+ , Sclu"C A Sid: L vry , T^liospinl. I'<Am of ketierw t Ck, l,nr,rcs I°m liulteLane/ft hi Gb orch -rt PQx 1104lt 0 I, 2,mn) 3j tiJ 4,0001 5jito US TIm t III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 WWpWlrol!n Q rt. II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOyU�o" up / h kp,m�g�p,W 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 33"°�gN'��a1j 111�M �Hm"`�^^° Despite an extensive trail network with over 30 miles of trails and numerous bike lanes,, the public clearly indicated that connectivity is a major barrier and challenge. Building a complete and connected active transportation system requires extensive infrastructure investments. Gaps in sidewalk and bike lane coverage create barriers for people walking and biking, particularly near schools, commercial centers, and major roadways. Topography and constrained right-of-way in some areas limit options for facility expansion and many recreational trails are not accessible to all. Safety concerns, including high vehicle speeds and limited crossing treatments, further discourage walking and biking. Funding limitations and competition with other infrastructure needs also present barriers to implementing improvements at the pace desired by the community. These challenges combined with the historic platted city provide the opportunity for connectivity and provide the fundamental basis for this plan. Port Townsend's number one asset is the fact that active transportation became a priority with the adoption of the 1998 Non -motorized plan. Combining the community desire to improve active transportation with the gridded historic and undeveloped plat from the 1890s provides the perfect opportunity to address the lack of connectivity with focused attention and investments on priority routes. Public engagement continues to shows strong community interest in more walking and biking options, and adopted policies such as Complete Streets and the Climate Action Plan provide clear direction for increasing transportation through active means compared to the automobile. These combined factors increase the likelihood of continued success in active transportation supported grant programs as opposed to building larger and more expensive streets. �" V1fV � u �� � I u � ii � I I ii oi, ��� a of .�.I, �1�1�1��41� �!'�°�111111 aIIIC I�,�iip�nl� ��� ���������"� lIIIII lIIIII ally IU' �������� I�Ih \��` ��I��, I�Ih I� �II The legacy of Port Townsend's early platting and development history continues to shape the city's infrastructure challenges today: Aging Infrastructure - Much of the city's existing pavement and sidewalks are over 80 years old and showing signs of deterioration. Disconnected Routes - Active transportation networks are fragmented, with sidewalks and bike routes beginning and ending abruptly. Despite the large trail system, public comments illustrate a perception of a disconnected community. Limited Resources - Decades of deferred maintenance, paired with a modest tax base, have left the city struggling to keep up with repairs and improvements. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 34 High Cost of Infill -In pre -platted areas, extending streets, utilities, sidewalks, and bike lanes falls on individual property owners, making coordinated improvements difficult and expensive. Equity in Access - Neighborhoods with un-platted developments (like Madrona Ridge) enjoy higher -quality streets and walking/biking paths, while older areas often lack even basic pedestrian infrastructure. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 35 F% Given the extensive gaps in the existing walking and biking networks, Port Townsend must take a practical and iterative approach. Solutions must be feasible to build, fund and fit our small town and sometimes rural context. While grants often fund larger projects on major streets, or arterials, many gaps will remain. Grants often come with restrictions on eligible projects and scopes of work. To address these challenges, Port Townsend must adopt a diverse and practical approach, using a range of strategies and project types to close critical gaps and create a more connected active transportation system. The "right" solution will vary upon site context, available funds and whether a interim or long- term fix is needed. See the III 11111111l IIIIIIIIIIl Fill Moving forward, the City will take a four -pronged approach to improving active transportation. The first three represent the built environment, and the fourth is Culture which binds all the strategies together. Strategy 1 — ADA Priority Routes Strategy 2 — Connected Routes. Strategy 3 — Recreational Trail System Strategy 4 - Culture Together, these strategies balance the need for fully accessible infrastructure with practical, lower -cost improvements that expand the network quickly and equitably. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 36 joy r � ��°im sal� �II The first strategy focuses on providing fully accessible sidewalks along key streets. Working with Disability Awareness Starts Here (DASH), and feedback from open houses, the City identified where sidewalks are most needed to create connections to locations, such as grocery, parks, schools and other key community locations. Many of these connections are primarily along arterial with higher traffic volumes and speeds. These streets are the least safe for walking in the roadway and therefore warrant dedicated ADA-compliant sidewalks. In addition, a number of connecting non -arterial streets were identified to access parks and other important public facilities. Because full ADA sidewalks are complex and costly to design and construct, this plan prioritizes a limited number of strategic corridors rather than attempting to retrofit every street. Prioritization ensures that the most critical connections are built first, providing safe routes for the most vulnerable users. This strategy also supports the City's Complete Streets Policy, aligns with grant funding requirements, and supplements the draft ADA Transition Plan. The ADA transition identifies the goal of adopting this Active Transportation Plan to prioritize improvements. City of Port Townsend r III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 WWpWlrol!n o �( � I�''rp ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r V,�Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 811 i h �1r��1� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 37 Exhibit 22: ADA Compliant Improvements on Discovery Road Exhibit 22: ADA Compliant Improvements on Lawrence Street �uvm ito Iso^ ito N I III VIIII Ioli� lom i N i mt ito N I I uu� ito N .Ilium mom u The name "Connected Routes" came directly from public outreach, reflecting the community's desire for better, continuous pathways through town. These routes will create safer and more comfortable connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, business districts, and multi- use trails. The city determined the Connected Routes based on the following criteria: • Connection to points of interest (schools, jobs, parks, grocery, transit, commercial) • Ideally one block away from an arterial (a nearby and lower stress alternative) City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 811 i h �1II�l� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 38 • Grade (flattest routes where possible) • Connect to existing system (routes can connect to prior walking/biking investments) • Coordinate with other networks (cicmehan routes, Creative District, and more) Connected Routes are "Improved Routes." These are not ADA compliant, see the disclaimer below, and have a goal of connecting the community with low and medium cost solutions allowing faster timelines. This can be done by utilizing existing infrastructure and building low- cost connections where needed. Unlike ADA routes, these corridors can be implemented at lower cost, in stages, and with more flexibility. Improvements may include: 1. "Improved Trails" (roots removed, graded and surfaced with compacted gravel) 2. Paved multi -use paths 3. Shared Streets (Neighborhood Greenways or Bicycle Boulevards) with traffic calming Exhibit 22: ADA Priority Routes VS Connected Routes ADA (Americans with Disability Act) Routes are long-lasting engineered projects (sidewalks, curb ramps and repaving the street crossing) to meet the Federal rules for slopes, surfacing and detection. These projects typically require longer timelines and larger budgets or grants to complete. Connected Routes are planned to provide improved walking and biking connections and are not intended to function as American's with Disability Act (ADA) accessible routes. Realistically, making these routes 100% ADA compliant ahead of "Connected Route" designation would make this program cost prohibitive. Therefore, Port Townsend is taking an iterative approach and working with the local advocacy group, Disability Awareness Starts Here (DASH), to identify and construct both ADA Priority Routes and Connected Routes in our community. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 39 Exhibit 22: Connected Routes - "Improved Trail' on Kah Tai Exhibit 22: Connected Routes - Multi -Use Path (Valley Trail) City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 40 Exhibit 22: Connected Routes — Shared Street / Neighborhood Greenway pu u111Viii ti� � 10j�V, III I VIV "1°I ° pullou111V �Iliival � poi uIP a ulli�l �,�U�. ml, ������ °Ili�l "41�" ion ulli�l IIIP a ii � �I IIIP u � mou. IIIP u 1 ��� �Iliival � ��.'��iii Vu II, , II........ �I This strategy maintains a primitive trail system in many of the Port Townsend rights -of -way. Recreational trails are considered "unimproved" and will remain narrower and more natural than "improved trails," see the Engineering Design Standards for details. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r V,�Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 41 Exhibit 22: Connected Routes — "Unimproved Trail" in North Beach o .. ��1� t iih ati , y 4 C 1 , »e This strategy maintains focuses on education to help community members and visitors take an active role in honoring active transportation. Out of the 7 E's much of this effort is education and engineering related in order to encourage equitable access for all users. This is a huge social pivot from years of focus on the ease of travel for the automobile. Key topics to consider for changing culture include: 1. Traffic calming 2. Addressing conflicts between active transportation user groups such as biking and walking, or rolling 3. Addressing technology changes such as which electric devices are allowed on the sidewalks 4. Speed limits for motorized devices City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r V,Il�k4�MyuFn�dlmall�� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 42 5. Property owners maintaining their frontage along streets, sidewalk or trails (clearing vegetation, shoveling snow, and fixing sidewalk trip hazards) to support user experience and mobility. 6. Creating artwork on the streets for place making 7. Treating people with courtesy 8. Clarifying the difference between transportation routes and recreational routes in the field. City of Port Townsend Exhibit 19: Unmaintained Frontage and Parking III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 43 ,.I IIImIoillVl., 9�or °°° Ummu , ammo , 9`0Y loouu , uuu °'' I i moi. 4�� I sm ,m i I � I IIu � I � �Ilpu m I I I �Ilpu uIP I pl alp sm ,m i I poi. uIP IIu uIP � Sul uululli�l uululli�� ��1ioi V1 � �t lonulli�l uululli�l V1 � moo, uululli�l moo, uululli�l moo, ��1ioi m�o� quiiiiii,,Ity Attendees at Open houses frequently commented on traffic calming and the desire for the police to enforce speed violations. When people don't feel safe to walk or bike, they choose to drive. Those that can't drive, are disproportionately affected. Advantages of these cameras include: 1. Improves safety: Proven to reduce speeding and crash severity, especially near schools, parks, and hospitals. 2. Behavior change: Most drivers who receive a ticket don't reoffend (e.g., 90% in Seattle, 89% in Kirkland). 3. Protects vulnerable users: Reduces risk for pedestrians, cyclists, and children in high - traffic areas. 4. Consistent enforcement: Provides objective, 24/7 speed monitoring not limited by police staffing. 5. Frees up police resources: Allows officers to focus on other priorities. 6. Equity: a. Lower income neighborhoods are disproportionately impacted by traffic safety and experience the most injury. b. Revenue from safety cameras must prioritize funding safety improvements in low-income and high -crash areas. Locations of cameras should be based history of speeds, crash data and other factors, see Appendix C. However, the allowed locations, specifically the "School Walk Zones" within one - mile of schools, would allow camera installations on most any arterial in Port Townsend. See the Safe Routes to School Section with a map showing Port Townsend schools with one -mile radii covering most of city limits. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 44 Exhibit 20: Speed Safety Cameras Allowed Locations in Washington State School speed ones: 20 rnph zones within 300 feet of a School r ;)layground border. School wMk zone: Roadways within a one -We raduus of: a <'r. . . .. . . School that students Use to travel to school by foot, bicycle, or other means of active transportation. Public park speed zones: The marked area within public park "XI pr operty and extending 300 feet from the border of the park "t"1117 nsistent with active park use. HospftM speed zones: The marked area within hospitall property and extending 300 feet from the border of hospital propierty consisterit with hosp�tal use, Roadway work zones: A roadway with construction, maintenance, or utdity work with a duration of 30 days or more, identified by the placement of temporary traffic control devices, MOWN 1 State highways that function as, city streetsa: These are legacy highways designed to carry larger volumes of vehicle traffic quickly that now run through population centers with walker, roller, and transit use. Othier focafions: pities may operate one autorrated speed camera, PlUS one additional camera for every 10,000 residents, This includes state highways that are also dassffied as city streets. ((.'arneras may not be used Many cities in Washington State implemented a Speed Safety Camera program including: • Bellevue • Seattle • Lake Forest Park Kirkland • Tacoma • Federal Way • Kenmore • Renton City of Port Townsend • Lynnwood • Des Moines • Longview • Everett • Auburn • Edgewood • Bothell 141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r 10 o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 45 '001 Expected Revenue to Fund Traffic Safety Projects City staff researched generated revenue per camera from locations in Washington State. Revenue ranged but increased with the traffic volumes and violation rates. Port Townsend would fall in the Low population and violation rate category. These are estimates and not projected revenue. A portion of the revenue generated by the cameras would pay for the equipment and management of the program. Remaining funds stay within the community to construct traffic safety projects. See the Implementation section for project lists. Exhibit 21: Expected Revenue per Camera, based on other Cities in Washington State EquitX In Washington State, traffic safety projects funded by camera revenues must prioritize projects in neighborhoods with the highest equity needs. Below is a map of Equity Needs from the WSDOT Sandy Williams Grant Program showing the highest need in the Castle Hill area along SR-20 / Sims Way. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 46 City of Port Townsend Exhibit 22: WSDOT Equity Needs Map �a3d �e��r�t� a^...�KK'u��ss�'Bm mmas����rt�re��,ro�'uaaro "�asaror��r ;: f wulll1111ar u� Ea uky Weds ,h, III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 47 lull cihiiiiii Ity, aaIIIII,ld Miiiiii It° Micromobility refers to the use of small, lightweight vehicles operating at speeds typically below 25 mph, such as e-bikes, e-scooters, electric skateboards, and other compact electric devices. These modes can play a significant role in Port Townsend's transportation future when paired with a robust active transportation network. They extend the practical range of walking and biking, reduce the physical burden of hilly terrain, provide easy connections to transit, and offer a lower environmental footprint compared to traditional motor vehicles. To encourage safe and equitable adoption, the City should establish clear rules for micromobility use across different facility types, roads, sidewalks, trails, and shared -use paths. Barriers to entry can be lowered by investing in supportive infrastructure, including designated parking zones, charging stations, and secure storage facilities. Lessons from other communities highlight potential challenges: improper parking and clutter, conflicts with pedestrians, damage and vandalism, and uneven service distribution. By proactively developing a policy framework and considering community input, Port Townsend can embrace the benefits of micromobility while minimizing conflicts. ' � \\ �, ," '' ;il;i �����, a ���� alllll ;,n 11111 y»>' 111111 'Ij mti° y»>'' I����N IIIIII e " �`;�i� ��'�� lllllll llllU �«� Illllf �� '�� alllll allll ,�;;;iik The "right" solution does not need to be expensive. As construction costs continue to rise, many cities are turning to lower cost alternatives for walking, biking and vehicle safety. This approach is also called "tactical urbanism" or even "road diet" where low-cost materials modify an existing roadway to provide or improve safety and mobility for many forms of transportation. These solutions have the following benefits: • Lower construction costs • Budgets can be spread to more locations (connected routes) • Often there is no, to little design needed • Can be an interim solution before budgets allow more costly options • Allows the community to provide feedback before greater investments are made Examples are shown below, some from Port Townsend while others are from other regional cities. Applications include: City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 48 City of Port Townsend Exhibit 23: Traffic Calming on Rose Street Exhibit 24: Edge Lane Road in North Beach III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 49 Exhibit 25: Seattle Bike Corral at Pikes Market (Photo credit - City of Port Townsend Staff) Exhibit 26: Seattle Separated Bike Lane with Flex Tubes (Photo credit - City ofSea ttle) City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 50 Exhibit 27: Seattle Protected "Better Bike Lane" and "Neighborhood Walkway" Programs (Photo credit - City ofSea ttle) (Photo credit - City ofSea ttle) City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 51 (Photo credit - Universal Precast Concrete, Inc.) (Photo credit - Bike Dela ware) City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan Page 52 Neighborhood Walkways These are quick -build walkways made from paint, asphalt, and barriers. They're usually on local streets with less traffic bUt can be ternporarilly built on busy streets. .1111q� 111111 1 111�1111 III 111111111 11 1 11111111pij�11111 ��11111 Illill 11�111 i I 1111 71 1 -t 1 • (Photo credit - City of Sea ttle) (Photo credit - City of Sea ttle) City of Port Townsend III °ru 41 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 53 Under RCW 46.08.175, cities and counties in Washington State may establish designated "golf cart zones." Golf carts represent another form of small-scale mobility that can serve residents, particularly older adults and people with limited mobility, by offering an affordable, low -speed option for short trips. From the 2024 Port Townsend Active Transportation Survey: • Those that would use a golf cart if permitted 0 50% of all respondents 0 70% of those with disabilities • Low Speed Electric Vehicles are sought in a rental program Exhibit 28: Low Speed Electric Vehicles Survey Question: Would you participate in a rental program for the following? 200 1 84 II 161 °n60 140 120 1103 Ira �r 0 86 40 20 Low•speed dectric I`rucks Cars Scooters Bkes r eNcic; Submitted respondents: 252 'total respondents: 331 City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 54 Several cities in Washington have adopted the use of golf carts on public streets with a local ordinance. Below is a list of some of those cities: Bainbridge Island Liberty Lake Vancouver Bainbridge Island Walla Walla Langley Designating golf cart zones in Port Townsend could expand mobility choices for residents, but successful implementation would require community engagement, careful route planning, and alignment with existing active transportation goals. Golf carts should be viewed as a complementary mobility option, particularly on low -speed streets, while ensuring they do not compromise the safety of people walking, biking, or using mobility devices. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 55 Active transportation brings a wide range of benefits to communities. For individuals, it provides affordable and reliable ways to get to school, work, shops, and services while also encouraging healthier, more active lifestyles. For the city as a whole, walking and biking reduce traffic congestion, parking demand, and vehicle emissions, helping improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas contributions. Active transportation also fosters stronger social connections by encouraging people to be out in their neighborhoods and interact with one another. When safe and comfortable routes are available, residents of all ages and abilities are more likely to choose walking or biking for daily trips. Best practices in active transportation planning emphasize safety, equity, and long-term sustainability. Leading cities integrate complete networks of sidewalks, bikeways, trails, and crossings so that active modes are not an afterthought but a central part of the transportation system. Successful programs combine infrastructure with supportive measures such as wayfinding, education, and community engagement. They also align active transportation planning with broader goals such as climate action, economic development, and public health. By following these best practices, Port Townsend can close gaps in its network, prioritize projects that deliver the highest impact, and build an active transportation system that is safe, practical, and enjoyable for everyone. As introduced earlier in this plan, there will be three categories of infrastructure. Each category will have fewer design standards as listed in the below order. ADA routes have the most strict guidelines, with the least being recreational trails. The fourth, Culture, is not physical. Strategy 1 — ADA Priority Routes Strategy 2 — Connected Routes Strategy 3 — Recreational Trail System Strategy 4 - Culture These manuals should be consulted to prepare engineered plans for implementation. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 56"°�gN'��a1j111�M1�m"`�^^° 1. Public Right -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) 2. WSDOT Active Transportation Programs Design Guide February 2024 3. WSDOT Design Manual M 22-01.23, Division 15 for Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) 4. AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (5th Edition) 5. FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks City of Port Townsend Exhibit 29: Design Guides III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 57 t Active transportation planning in Port Townsend is guided in part by state -level policies and standards established by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). These guidelines provide technical requirements for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, safety considerations, and multimodal corridor design, ensuring consistency with statewide transportation objectives. By aligning local projects with WSDOT and other statewide guidance, such as the Washington State Active Transportation Plan and relevant safety programs, Port Townsend can leverage funding opportunities, adopt best practices, and ensure that local improvements meet recognized standards for accessibility, safety, and connectivity. plull null uu II@" ° IIII hm Sul m mil Sul �II "' II@" u m uu uu gym» � n r n w uu Wmu II@mm �I VIIV uum noq mol., a °1 II@" u u mp � I ',, II14 II@mu Sul .uuu mn�1ill �... Nvq „n of Ili�l n ��I� lonulli�l mn�1iol m,„o �. Vum'n�� mn 1\111V" 111��1� +��I,aa�\111 Illy; ,��@ V������ dlllll dlllll ,Illl�m i o� #I1�Yito �� n11V' d., ,Illl�m Illllavo�m�l�. #I1�Yito +��u,aa�\111#I1�Yito ��i ao. ����m ��i inlo #I1�Yito �dm n\ �� m ur., IIIII, +��u,aa�\111dr.,,llll� Illy; ,��@ nowlllll "�Ilo u� uur., #I1�Yito+��l,aa�\111 #I1�Yito dlllll ��uun11V' dlllll, ,Illl�m �'ur, +��u,aa�\111dr., ,Illl�m uuu mum i m �mn vmp �,9 J O U � 9 vmll � 9 I n11IIlI n nlll n mp a i011I mu OIII uw ��° � ��° P �I I WSDOT's Active Transportation Plan (ATP) was published in 2021 and is Washington State's strategic vision for improving conditions for people who walk, bike, and roll. This plan lays out a framework for integrating active transportation into the state's transportation system. The statewide plan is built upon 5 key goals, and Port Townsend's Active Transportation plan mirrors these same goals. The plan's five goals are below, and the corresponding links redirect to Port Townsend's analogous goals lower in the document: Connectivity: Create and connect comfortable and efficient walking and rolling networks so people can reach their destinations and other forms of transportation and have everyday access to physical activity. Safety: Eliminate deaths and serious injuries of people walking and rolling. Opportunity: Eliminate disparities in access to safe, healthy, active transportation connections for people and communities most dependent on walking, bicycling, and transit. Participation: Increase the percentage of everyday trips made by walking or bicycling. Partnership: Collaborate and coordinate with public, tribal, nonprofit, and private partners to complete and improve the network across boundaries. The nearly-400-page document includes the first statewide inventory of pedestrian and bicyclist crash data on state routes. It points out over 3,000 miles of state highways with inadequate or no shoulder, many of which are critical links in rural communities. It also highlights safety trends. It states that over 20% of statewide traffic deaths involve people walking or biking, despite representing a smaller share of total trips. According to the data, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), as well as low-income and disabled people, face higher risks to safety. The plan advocates for the inclusion of active transportation into statewide planning, design, and maintenance. It also touches on funding, local coordination, and development of dedicated City of Port Townsend I III °�u IWU\�Illp�ipu �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��p��Ile�pr V,�Il�k4,MynF��dlma��� 811 i h �11��1� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 58 active transportation funding streams. These aspirations are incorporated into Port Townsend's goals and policies. ������ IIIIIIIIII � ,»»IIII ��� , �,, ,, III°liul liI m �����„ IIIII ���,II� „I 1,, IIIII IIIII II i� IIIII �����„ 11,, �����„ IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIU, IIIII 1,, IIIII IIIII ail IIII»i I ' °Iul ,I,li !IIIII IIU' !IIIII IIIIIV Glllllll„IIIIU !IIIII I ���1 �I°Iu, Iw ul C;'� IIIII °I lllllll„IIIIUI ll,; IIIII °I 20 24) This manual provides design guidance to prioritize comfort, safety, and accessibility. Part 1 of 2 outlines key considerations in the design process, including level of traffic stress (LTS), Equity and designing for children, climate resiliency, and safety regarding vehicle turn radius. Part 2 provides a toolbox of 49 strategies to accomplish the above considerations through appropriate infrastructure design. Port Townsend's plan will use these strategies and incorporate them into its implementation. II!IIllmIII!II O IIIII col. OQ(IIIII, ,;;iik Port Townsend's plan will also incorporate facility design guidance from WSDOT's Design Manual, last update September 2025. Specifically, Chapters 1510 (Pedestrian Facilities), 1515 (Shared -Use Paths), and 1520 (Roadway Bicycle Facilities) are useful sources of active transportation recommendations. City of Port Townsend III °�u al9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i�"�P ��II�r V�, Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan Page 59 As introduced earlier in this plan, there will be three categories of infrastructure. Each category will have fewer design standards as listed in the below order. ADA routes have the most strict guidelines, with the least being recreational trails. The fourth, Culture, is not physical. Strategy 1 — ADA Priority Routes Strategy 2 — Connected Routes Strategy 3 — Recreational Trail System Strategy 4 - Culture m,n I m Careful planning and design is needed to meet criteria. Designs should follow The PROWAG standards. �uvm ito Iso^ ito N I OIII Ioli� lom ii to ioNl ito N I I ii ��ll�w����� mein u Connected Routes have varying conditions. Follow guidelines listed in this section depending on the condition, trail, shared street/neighborhood greenway, or shared -use path. Trail segments on a Connected Route will be "Improved Trails" to accommodate multi -modal recreation and transportation users. See the Implementation section for more information. Trails standards will include: • Compacted gravel or suitable native soil surfacing • Sufficient width • Graded to drain • Free of trip hazards such as roots • Maintained vegetation A large portion of Connected Routes will use existing or future local access, neighborhood streets. Networks like these, commonly called neighborhood greenways, is a concept widely used across the country to transform residential streets into safe, low -traffic routes for people walking and biking. Neighborhood Greenways have the following minimum requirements and optional improvements: City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 60 Minimum Requirements o Wayfinding signage, may include "sharrow" symbols on the street o Spot street repair Optional improvements depending on vehicle volumes, route popularity and observations: o Placing stop signs to give greenway the right-of-way o Traffic calming to discourage cut through traffic o Arterial Intersection crossing treatments The most important feature of a successful greenway is how safe, comfortable, and accessible it is for people walking and biking. Key characteristics include: o Low vehicle speeds (generally 20 mph or less) o Low vehicle volumes (typically fewer than 1,000 cars per day) o A relatively flat and comfortable grade for walking and biking o Attractive, direct connections to key destinations +jiii V U m� mP hull you mP u ti�0 ° I u � of u i o IIIR uu"IVi � �Illm ( Y. �� ����iul � m� �i��iul �l��lll4 (� �L,�� v 16 �11111 �� �: IIIII �I��,1 I G m�,n Y. Many of these trails exist today. Since they are recreational, little design is needed. Alignment may meander to avoid trees, strive for flat grades and meet streets in a safe manner. Follow the latest Engineering Design Standards (EDS). U lavo�m ito Iw^ o i 5 iiio i� uu� I. n Imuuao. No engineering design guidelines or standards apply here. Instead, this element should follow policies and programs discussed elsewhere in this plan. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��p��Ile�pr ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 61 Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) is a measure of discomfort experienced by those walking, biking, or rolling. By ranking street segments on the LTS scale of 1 to 4, jurisdictions like Port Townsend can assess the conditions of their street network and address factors causing stress. In the City's public engagement processes, it opted to use the term "traffic -induced stress" to better illustrate that traffic is the cause of stress. Traffic is inherently stressful to pedestrians and bicyclists. Proximity, noise, road design, and unpredictability play a part in stress associated with traffic. This plan encourages an approach to ensure all street segments are classified at a score of 2 or less. LTS 1. Suitable for all ages and abilities LTS 2. Comfortable for most adults LTS 3. Comfortable for confident users LTS 4. Suitable for only the very brave Exhibit 30: Acceptable Pedestrian Facilities (LTS 1 or 2) 0 - 1,000 preferred1 0— 1,500 20 or less Not specified acceptable 0 — 2,000 maximum 0-1,500 20 25 1,500 - 3,000 20 25 > 3,000 20 20 0 — > 3,000 20-25 30 0 — > 3,000 20-30 50 + 1 Consistent with City of Portland, Seattle and Kirkland Greenways 2 Per 2024 WSDOT Design Manual Chapter 1510: Physical separation typically consists of either a planting strip or other constructed buffer strip, a separated bicycle lane, a parking lane, or traffic barrier. Note that a roadway shoulder or a conventional bicycle lane are not considered physical separation. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 WWpWlrol!n o�( I''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 62 i"° ��aII 14"`err° Exhibit 31: Acceptable Bike Facilities (LTS 1 or 2) 0 - 1,000 preferred1 0— 1,500 20 or less Not specified acceptable 0 — 2,000 maximum 0-1,500 20 25 1,500 - 3,000 20 25 > 3,000 20 20 0 — > 3,000 20-25 30 0 — > 3,000 20 — 30 50 + Consistent with City of Portland, Seattle and Kirkland Greenways 2 Per 2024 INSDOT Design Manual Chapter 1510: Physical separation typically consists of either a planting strip or other constructed buffer strip, a separated bicycle lane, a parking lane, or traffic barrier. Note that a roadway shoulder or a conventional bicycle lane are not considered physical separation. City of Port Townsend III °�u m9111a�141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 63 Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) programs are designed to make it safer and easier for students to walk or bike to school. SRTS maps currently do not exist for Port Townsend Schools but will be developed in 2026. • Port Townsend School locations: 1. Salish Coast Elementary School 2. Blue Heron Middle School 3. Port Townsend High School / OCEAN School 4. Swan School (private) • Public Schools only bus beyond one -mile of the school. • Students must walk, bike, or be driven within one -mile of a school • A one mile radius covers most of the city, per the following map. The SRTS Planning Grant for its "Connected Neighborhoods and Safe Routes to School' and beginning in 2025/2026, this program will include public outreach, pilot projects (potentially using Connected Routes), and design work for key sidewalks and other improvements. Since most of the city falls within a one -mile radius of a school, these efforts will benefit nearly all residents while ensuring safer, more equitable options for young travelers. By improving conditions near schools, SRTS reduces reliance on car trips, eases congestion around campuses, and promotes healthier, more independent travel for students. City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 64 Exhibit 32: The Port Townsend Schools with One Mile Radius Abe fis$aa wk`Rakub¢a Mims 6d; d1P 1100) 1,.7,z'e. Townsend Source: City of Port Townsend. Port Townsend is home to the ReCyclery, a non-profit community bike project providing access to bikes, parts, and education. The ReCyclery has launched a weekly "bike bus" program to enable students to ride their bikes to and from local schools, escorted by ReCyclery staff, volunteers, and other students. In practice, this program provides both safe opportunities to ride to school and supports the associated aspirations of SRTS. City of Port Townsend III °1u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 65 Exhibit 33: Safe Routes To School Salish Coast Elementary TO FOLLOW THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL OUTREACH AND PLANNING STUDY 2026 City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 66 Exhibit 34: Safe Routes To School Blue Heron Middle School TO FOLLOW THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL OUTREACH AND PLANNING STUDY 2026 City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 67 Exhibit 35: Safe Routes To School Port Townsend High School TO FOLLOW THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL OUTREACH AND PLANNING STUDY 2026 City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 68 Traffic Calming refers to a set of design strategies and physical measures implemented on roadways to reduce vehicle speeds, improve safety for all users, including pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. Traffic calming strategies are used to enhance the overall quality of the street environment. These measures help create safer, more comfortable, and more accessible streets, encouraging active transportation modes like walking and biking in Port Townsend. Traffic speed in urban environments is one the largest predictors of safety relating to vehicle to non -motorized user crashes as illustrated below. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 69 0 4f hil by a person d6vim,�; at, Person Survives the (, raMruion RORAMS 4a FataMy 1 %, e 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 A 0 o c 111 o _.aaa.........................................................................................wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww....w� 4I/�'I Illlll:11il��%Irll�� US Department of Transportation, Image Credit: San Francisco MTA Vision Zero Action Plan Furthermore, the City's Local Road Safety plan stresses reduction of traffic speeds on arterial streets to improve safety for all modes of transportation. This is particularly important on streets where either vertical or horizontal separation does not exist between vehicle traffic and active users where speeds are high. See the Level of Traffic Stress charts to see how active transportation users stress increases with traffic speed and volume. The Transportation Benefit District will allocate 10-20% of the annual total to fund sidewalks and traffic calming. This plan suggests prioritizing traffic calming elements on Connected Routes first. Utilizing Transportation Benefit District funding of approximately $25,000 per year, the City plans to implement an annual program to work with neighborhoods to install low cost traffic calming strategies throughout the City. This investment strategy needs to be deployed with equity in mind such that all neighborhoods have opportunity to improve safety on their streets. r r r highlyis one of the most r items for improving roadway safety for pedestrians, r The city has a draft Traffic Calming Manual that sets the design and installation standards for said devices. A list of traffic calming options are available in the Appendices. In addition, the please refer to the City's traffic calming guidebook currently underdevelopment. This traffic calming guidebook will be utilized to implement the traffic calming program. City of Port Townsend III °ru IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r V,�Il�k4�MyuF��dlma��, 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 70 Active transportation networks can enliven a city, increase usage of public spaces, and enable new patterns of use. By creating safe, connected, and inviting routes, communities open the door to more opportunities for people to walk, bike, and gather in shared spaces. Streets, intersections, and corridors can become destinations themselves when designed with placemaking in mind, offering spaces that encourage lingering, conversation, and community interaction. Features such as public art, landscaping, benches, lighting, and wayfinding can transform everyday travel into a more engaging and enjoyable experience. Placemaking supports both local culture and economic vitality by enhancing access to historic districts, waterfront areas, parks, and neighborhood centers. umi m � n��4 II col 9 ml col sm c I ulp IIu m I "�IIIY II un��4.I � p uuu a IIIW SSS��Vu�g111V c it ulp IIu �41Y II IIIy11V C� 1��� � � "im�nll� Io N Isa^ lumen" N uum �� m� o ullu Illavo�m Isa^ mt N Imo. Illlmul� mnm Public spaces provide communities with a multitude of benefits. Through his research, David Barth developed the concept of "High Performance Public Spaces (HPPS)©" and identified 25 key benefits described below (Barth, 2014). City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r I��p��Ile�pr ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 811 i h �1��v,Tl� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 71"° ��aII 14"`err° Exhibit 36: Benefits Provided by High Performance Public Spaces The space creates and facilitates revenue - generating opportunities for the public and/or the private sectors. The space creates meaningful and desirable employment. The space indirectly creates or sustains good, living wage jobs. The space sustains or increases property values. The space catalyzes infill development and/or the re -use of obsolete or under -used buildings or spaces. The space attracts new residents. The space attracts new businesses. The space generates increased business and tax revenues. The space optimizes operations and maintenance costs (compared to other similar spaces). City of Port Townsend ® The space uses energy, water, and material resources efficiently. The space improves water quality of both surface and ground water. The space serves as a net carbon sink. ® The space enhances, preserves, promotes, or contributes to biological diversity. Hardscape materials were selected based on longevity of service, social/ cultural/ historical sustainability, regional availability, low carbon footprint and/or other related criteria. The space provides opportunities to enhance environmental awareness and knowledge. ® The space serves as an interconnected node within larger scale ecological corridors and natural habitat. The space improves the neighborhood. The space improves social and physical mobility through multimodal connectivity — auto, transit, bike, pedestrian. The space encourages the health and fitness of residents and visitors. The space provides relief from urban congestion and stressors such as social confrontation, noise pollution, and air pollution. The space provides places for formal and informal social gathering, art, performances, and community or civic events. The space provides opportunities for individual, group, passive and active recreation. The space facilitates shared experiences among different groups of people. The space attracts diverse populations. The space promotes creative and constructive social interaction. III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 72 Various aspects within parks, trails, and open spaces work together to create vibrant spaces for communities. These include benches, art, large and small gathering spaces, pathways, lighting, and more. Project for Public Spaces, a national leader in making great places, says the following: -M-577-M-571ng inspires people to collectively relmagine r reinvent pumic spaces as tneh—ea-7737 every community. Strengthening the connection between people r the places they share, r sharedmaximize value. More than just promoting better urban design, placemaking facilitates r-124r"-"L-"WQW— that define a place and support its ongoing evolution." Several critical features contribute to the development of exceptional spaces, including accessibility and connectivity, social engagement, comfort, and functional versatility. Below is a brief summary of concepts, metrics, and considerations involved in placemaking. ,#ffl'A,��II a� �a'li, � , , , ® Core Concepts: Fun, active, vital, special, real, useful, indigenous, celebratory, sustainable Measurable Data: local business ownership, land use patterns, property values, rent levels, retail sales Considerations: o Are people using the space or is it empty? o Is it used by people of different ages? o Are people in groups? o How many different types of activities are occurring - people walking, eating, playing baseball, chess, relaxing, reading? o Which parts of the space are used and which are not? o Are there choices of things to do? o Is there a management presence, or can you identify anyone in charge of the space? City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r V,�Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 73 Core Concepts: Safe, clean, green, walkable, charming, attractive, historic Measurable Data: Crime statistics, sanitation rating, building conditions, environmental data Considerations: o Does the place make a good first impression? o Are there more women than men? o Are there enough places to sit? Are seats conveniently located? Do people have a choice of places to sit, either in the sun or shade? o Are spaces clean and free of litter? Who is responsible for maintenance? What do they do? When? o Does the area feel safe? Is there a security presence? If so, what do these people do? When are they on duty? o Are people taking pictures? Are there many photo opportunities available? o Do vehicles dominate pedestrian use of the space, or prevent them from easily getting to the space? Core Concepts: Continuity, Proximity, connected, readable, walkable, convenient, accessible Measurable Data: Traffic data, mode splits, transit usage, pedestrian activity Considerations: o Can you see the space from a distance? Is its interior visible from the outside? o Can people easily walk to the place? For example, do they have to dart between moving cars to get to the place? o Do sidewalks lead to and from the adjacent areas? o Does the space function for people with special needs? o Do the roads and paths through the space take people where they actually want to go? o Can people use a variety of transportation options - bus, train, car, bicycle, etc. - to reach the place? City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 74 Core Concepts: Diverse, stewardship, cooperative, neighborly, pride, friendly, interactive, welcoming Measurable Data: number of women children & elderly, social networks, volunteerism, evening use, street life Considerations: o Is this a place where you would choose to meet your friends? Are others meeting friends here or running into them? o Are people in groups? Are they talking with one another? o Do people seem to know each other by face or by name? o Do people bring their friends and relatives to see the place or do they point to one of its features with pride? o Are people smiling? Do people make eye contact with each other? o Do people use the place regularly and by choice? o Do people tend to pick up litter when they see it? ICE' Concurrency ensures that transportation facilities and services are adequate to support new development as it occurs. In practice, this means growth in Port Townsend should be matched with timely improvements to streets, sidewalks, bike facilities, and transit so that the system remains safe, efficient, and accessible for all users. + uuoi IIIP° 'IIIV +n � u � uuu uu¢ ��1�u111�ti nmv�uo�i lu�0 New development must comply with transportation concurrency requirements per PTMC Chapter 12.06. This means a project can only proceed if adequate transportation facilities are in place or will be provided within six years of the development's impact. A number of concurrency models for active transportation have been tried as outlined below. Most of these models are in highly urbanized areas and thus setting concurrency requirements for Active Transportation may take a simplified approach. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�4 V�, Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 75 i olll''' ,npll�°`I It' IIIPq,� en im I c p �t ulli�l ���mllll.. mil � 9ror I � m umi � r I p � r C VIPq,��� p�looul�1111 p � � I ro»41� col;+n col ulli�l � �' IIII�'Ir��� �����) �a� lull ��aa�llr�iiiu II��R,�� milli aiii aiii�� �aiii�� �� )1115�511 IIr4 I,rlllllrll aiiii� aiiic l m ��aa�llr�iiiu iiiiil aiiii aiiic l m ml The following examples were cited in Bellevue's 2017 report on the Multimodal Level -of -Service (MMLOS) metrics, standards, and guidelines.' Seattle is transitioning from an auto -based concurrency standard based on volume -to -capacity ratios to a multimodal concurrency standard based on mode share. Both the volume and mode share concurrency standards vary across the city, reflecting a higher tolerance for congestion and a higher goal for mode share in denser areas of the city. Mode share goals are identified in the Seattle Comprehensive Plan, but as of 2017, the City was still working on the specific methodology to assess transportation concurrency related to the mode share standard. King County has a concurrency evaluation method that considers auto LOS within various "travel sheds" using average travel speeds on state routes and arterials. LOS standards vary depending on whether the travel shed is a rural area, a rural neighborhood commercial center, an urban growth area or a rural mobility area. Rural area LOS standards are skewed to higher speeds than are urban areas. In each area, 85 percent of the state routes and arterials must meet the adopted LOS standard. King County does not test individual developments; rather they assume a development proposal meets concurrency if it is located in a travel shed that meets the LOS standards cited above. This type of concurrency assessment is known as Plan Based Concurrency. ' City of Bellevue, WA. MMLOS Metrics, Standards & Guidelines Final Report: A Recommendation of the Bellevue Transportation Commission. April 13, 2017. City of Port Townsend III °�u al9oak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r V,Il�k4rMyuFn�dlma�� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 76 Bellingham implemented a multimodal transportation concurrency program in 2008. It aims to quantify the number of person trips available (PTA) for each mode, both motorized and non - motorized modes. The Comprehensive Plan includes LOS standards based on the PTA platform, as follows: Arterial Streets: LOS E which corresponds to no more than a 1.0 volume -to -capacity ratio. Transit: LOS F which corresponds to 1.0- 1.25 riders per seat (e.g. up to 50 riders on a 40- seat bus). No separate LOS thresholds are identified for pedestrians, bicycles, or trails; however, they are considered in the overall PTA measure. Based on the existing and planned transportation facilities, the City estimates the total PTA in the planning horizon year. Land use forecasts can then be tested against this transportation system to determine if the land use plans and transportation system are in line with one another. Other than determining whether future roadway and transit infrastructure meet the LOS standards, there are no explicit quantitative metrics guiding the long-range planning for the other modes. Bellingham developed the bicycle and pedestrian plans using traditional planning approaches. Redmond implemented a multimodal transportation concurrency program that defines LOS based on citywide person miles traveled, which are called "mobility units". The City uses supply and demand concept to describe the program: completed infrastructure projects create a "supply" of mobility units and new developments create "demand" for mobility units. The Redmond Transportation Master Plan (TMP) lists multimodal capital projects intended to achieve the envisioned land use/transportation balance. The fundamental assumption underlying the concurrency system is that the list of projects to be constructed by the TMP's horizon year is expected to meet the demand of new development. The number of mobility units supplied by the TMP is equal to the number of mobility units that would be consumed by the planned development. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 WWpWlrol!n o�( I''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 77 The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) developed a detailed handbook for determining LOS. In addition to auto LOS, which is the typical volume to capacity ratio, the handbook addresses transit, pedestrian, and bicycle LOS. Pedestrian LOS is based on four variables: existence of a sidewalk, lateral separation of pedestrians from motorized vehicles, motorized vehicle volumes, and motorized vehicle speeds. Bicycle LOS is based on five variables: average effective width of the outside through lane, motorized vehicle volumes, motorized vehicle speeds, heavy vehicle volumes, and pavement condition. For transit, FDOT relies on the concept that frequency of service is the most relevant performance measure. FDOT uses the service frequency standards cited in the Transportation Research Board Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Jxiality The San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH) developed a Bicycle Environmental Quality Index (BEQI) and a Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index (PEQI). These indices consider a wide variety of facility characteristics and quantify how well the facility is serving pedestrians or bicycles. The PEQI has 30 variables such as the type of crosswalk and the traffic volume, and the BEQI has 22 variables that include also include traffic volume together with the presence of a marked bicycle facility. These scores help to prioritize capital investments. j San Francisco has also tried the concept of Auto Trips Generated ATG in development review. p p ( ) p This method assumes that each new auto trip creates an incremental impact to the network. The concept is aimed at balancing mobility objectives to consider the public right-of-way as a space for all modes. It is a challenge to demonstrate the nexus between ATG and the mitigation. The 2025 Periodic Comprehensive Plan update and this plan shift attention away from the automobile to active transportation for several reasons. 1. The community does not desire larger multilane streets carrying more traffic. 2. The community as requested through a vote of the public and the Comprehensive Streets Program on fixing the streets we have and emphasizing investment in active transportation. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 78 3. Funding is limited and connected routes require focused investment with the limited resources which primarily rely on grants. Given the Growth Management Act allows for local control on topics such as concurrency, the City of Port Townsend proposes in the Comprehensive Plan to make the following changes to concurrency. 1. Change the Level of Service Standard for Traffic from D to F for streets that meet current standards (excluding SR20). The City does not have many locations other than SR20 that is experiencing failing traffic flow conditions compared to large urban areas. Furthermore, creating wider streets and adding lanes and signals is the traditional way to add traffic capacity which is not a priority. Adopting Level of Service F will negate the need for traffic studies associated with development for the purpose of traffic volume as well as focus offsite improvements to installing active transportation facilities. . 2. Access to a connected route within'/4 mile. This standard will help build improved trails and paths as well as enhance the connected route systems. 3. Access to a priority ADA route such that at least 20% of all housing units in Port Townsend are directly connected to ADA accessible routes that connect to the City's most important facilities. This standard will primarily impact large subdivisions and supports the existing fee in lieu program to allow all new development to either build or contribute to creating connected ADA priority routes. How does this plan anticipate this type of Level of Service system to work? Several options exist. A. Continue to use the fee in lieu program with a focus on priority ADA routes. This is especially important for infill development where existing nearby sidewalk infrastructure may not exist. B. Replace the fee in lieu program with an impact fee system. This would require a study to estimate the cost of improvements needed to reach the ADA priority route and connected routes objectives. This study would establish the fee per unit that would go to the City to make improvements to the system. C. Review development for connectivity to ADA priority routes and connected routes. Reviews must make sure that any improvements have nexus and proportionality. Larger subdivisions will have larger impacts to the non -motorized system and necessitate investments including offsite investments to make sure new units are connected to the priority route system. Investments must be measured proportional to the impact. In all cases listed above, the intent of this system is for all of the community to contribute to the overall system to realize the goals in the Comprehensive Plan and this Active Transportation Plan. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 WWpWlrol!n o�( I''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 79 Active transportation planning in Port Townsend benefits from coordination with county, regional, and state efforts that share goals for safety, connectivity, and sustainable mobility. Jefferson County's transportation and land use policies influence regional trail connections, roadway design, and growth patterns that extend beyond city limits. At the regional level, the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO) provides guidance and prioritization for multimodal investments, ensuring that local projects align with broader mobility strategies and funding opportunities. Statewide initiatives, such as the Washington State Active Transportation Plan and WSDOT safety programs, further frame the context for local improvements by establishing standards and goals that promote consistent, equitable access across communities. By aligning the Port Townsend Active Transportation Plan with these coordinated efforts, the city can maximize resources, strengthen regional connections, and advance a shared vision for a safe and accessible transportation network. Furthermore, understanding how active transportation fits within Port Townsend's broader planning framework is essential for creating a cohesive and effective system. Reviewing existing guidance and standards along with plans and policies, such as the Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Element, Capital Improvement Program, and regional or state transportation strategies, helps identify where goals align, where gaps exist, and where opportunities for coordination can strengthen outcomes. This review also ensures that the Active Transportation Plan builds on adopted community priorities, leverages previous investments, and provides clear direction for future updates to land use, transportation, and capital planning documents The Washington State Growth Management Act provides the overarching framework for planning and expects coordination with State, Regional, County and City Planning. Goal 3 of the Growth Management Act emphasizes multimodal transportation: coordinated r city comprehensive plans. Other goals encourage reduction of reliance on cars and access to active modes of transportation via neighborhood -scale planning. Additionally, the GMA requires transportation concurrency, meaning that infrastructure for transportation must be in place to support future development. Recently, cities have begun to include Level of Service (LOS) for active transportation concurrency measures to improve other modes of transportation other than the automobile. Port Townsend's Comprehensive Plan includes new Level of Service Standards to support this Growth Management Goal. This chapter illustrates the hierarchy of planning and coordination required starting with State, Regional, County, and then City Planning. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 81 MITI,/ ,,, 11,11 + uuol uu° "' Imp IIII! VIV iuuuul 000pl IIIP°1° VIV uuu ,n I m ,,. (11( mlp � �il � I Illli I mu I 4 � ,.I pp �Ilu �I Ili c�iiil II ,.I pp��� �� �u � ���� pl � ��il 4 mlu � I '��n� IIII IIIPq,,,,, ��� � ��������n�� � � IIIPq,,,,, +��nl� IIII 1 � IIIPq,,,,, ', n�� IIIPq,;,, � I ' 1�� � ����C �� �� ����C IIII �i� ���� ,�����UI t �,�� � � ��� � � � itt ,I� ���L,, t �,�� � ����C IIII �i� „� �� � ���p ���IIII � t �,�� ���IIII � � �� � �� ����C� � t �,�� �� ����C�tt , IIII, �Ilt 41, ,III, 411, III, ��� �Rtt 41, �Rtt 411, ,I, I�m VI I N u I mm o I ou VI ua OIII uuu011I lilt, I PRTPO is the Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO) for the Peninsula region. The Peninsula region includes all of Clallam, Jefferson, Kitsap, and Mason Counties, encompassing the Kitsap and Olympic peninsulas. As of the drafting of this review, its priorities include: Preservation: Taking care of existing infrastructure and protecting investments that have already been made. Multimodal Mobility: Developing an integrated multimodal transportation system that makes walking, biking, transit, and driving safe and efficient so more people can easily meet daily needs. Environmental Stewardship: Addressing past damages to habitat and environment, and mitigating transportation's legacy impacts on our communities. Safety: Addressing location -specific problems and systemic programs that improve safety for all modes of travel, for all travelers. Economic Vitality: Investing in transportation systems that stimulate economies, enhance freight mobility, and connect people with opportunities needed to support communities. Fiscal Responsibility: Providing transportation agencies with sufficient, sustainable, reliable funding while also reducing financial burdens on small local agencies. Port Townsend's Active Transportation Plan takes these priorities into account. City of Port Townsend t III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 IlulluWl�l!n o �( � I�''pp ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r I��P��IIe�pr V,��lpk4,MyuF��dlmall�p� 811 i h �1t�vTlp 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 82 II uuIlllliV 0 0 onlllliV �01 '+11111111�� IIIII 111 1�1��111111�VI 111110W o o I110V. IIIII la��up��@ IIII ^IIIII.., 011l�u 0oQ%m. �Vy, pIIV . ou114p "IIlM ^ y, u0lll�m The 2018 Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Element emphasizes enhancing non -motorized travel through several goals and policies. That emphasis is continued in the 2025 periodic review of Jefferson County's Comprehensive Plan. A few active transportation goals and policies from the April draft of the plan are highlighted here: Goal TR-G-3 Provide safe, accessible, and convenient routes, trails, parking facilities, trailheads, and other amenities that promote the use of non -motorized travel in a manner that integrates other forms of transportation. o Policy TR-P-3.1 Using established standards, promote coordinated and safe bicycle, equestrian, and pedestrian way improvements in accordance with the Non -motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan. o Policy TR-P-3.2 In coordination with Federal, State, and regional agencies, utilities, and citizen groups, emphasize connectivity and access to schools, parks, employment, major activity service centers, transit facilities (ferry, bus, etc.), and links between existing trails and regional trail networks during land use and transportation system development planning. o Policy TR-P-3.3 Evaluate safety issues for bicycle and pedestrian travel near schools and identify potential improvements. o Policy TR-P-3.4 Support educational opportunities for children and adults that will encourage safe use of roadways, trails, and sidewalks for all transportation modes. o Policy TR-P-3.5 Promote safe, convenient, and protected bicycle parking at activity centers such as schools, parks, commercial centers, employment and service centers, and mass transit facilities (ferry, bus, etc.) in accordance with the Non - motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan. o Policy TR-P-3.6 In coordination with the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan and the Non -motorized Transportation and Recreation Trails Plan, provide signage for on -street segments of bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian routes in accordance with the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). o Policy TR-P-3.7 Encourage buffering between motorized travel and non -motorized transportation modes, where appropriate and economically feasible. o Policy TR-P-3.8 Coordinate with WSDOT and PRTPO to enhance existing bicycle connectivity and safety along state highway bicycle routes. o Policy TR-P-3.9 Provide adequate and appropriate signage to promote safe and effective multimodal transportation on local and state bicycle routes. The plan mentions Jefferson County's Non -Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan, summarized on the following page. City of Port Townsend 1 III °�u a�9llakluu ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i"�p�Ile�pr V,IlVk44MyuFV�dlhlall�� 811 i h V11�vT1� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 83 I��Illu �Illu t4Vlr V"" IIIP uu"IVV uuu � ,.I mi uuu IIIP ""'IVV uuu i (2G] 0) This foundational plan guides the county's development of non -motorized transportation facilities and multi -purpose trails. Key components include: Bicycle Commuting Routes: Establishing designated routes to facilitate safe and efficient bicycle travel. Trail Development: Enhancing and expanding trails such as the Larry Scott Trail, Rick Tollefson Trail, and the Olympic Discovery Trail. Transit Connectivity: Improving pedestrian and bicycle connections to transit routes. Regional Integration: Connecting to regional trail facilities like the Pacific Northwest Scenic National Trail. Safe Routes to School: Developing infrastructure to ensure safe travel for students. Infrastructure Enhancements: Adding sidewalks in commercial areas, improving roadway shoulders, and creating community trails. Jefferson County's Non -Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan was updated in 2010 and integrated into the County's 2022 PROS Plan. 9,or 9,or uum, IIIPum uu"IVV uuu m 10°""IIIIY '0 , ��u ��u mou. IIIIPm uui Sul Iw ,� ��� r � �� u� VL. �4 V@mlu for °IIWu ",o9Vr mi ��V4 luuro a"'V&0 ° uv a ulo u � ���� ��� mV ��� Sul nulli�l ulli�l ��Vp � 1 ', �u n� o �VI 1�1NIul I ° �n Ili�l �, y���Y� � ` �. " you.' VIP ° ��lilpllll Illlll�mo�»�II� ����I„��I�U,��llll all l ���III� � 1�14 �� ��,1��� �a � �mo 711�, ���llllll !IIIII allP I�Iti!IIIII I�rlll,�, �ollll� !IIIII �III� °�,�1 'IIII��, �I� r �� II 1 A,N �7�r� ��1 �v ,����� �v 1,.I ��r 10��� Ior�� �Il�u �����`�� ����� �� ��IIIC 1Ih ��r r 11111111I�rI� This plan builds upon previous parks and recreation efforts, focusing on community needs and future development. This 2022 PROS Plan includes several goals and policies which are relevant to the City's Active Transportation Plan, including trail/corridor connectivity to public facilities, system linkages, ADA accessibility, and sustaining cultural and environmental resources. The Jefferson County PROS Plan provides a strong policy foundation for Port Townsend's Active Transportation Plan by emphasizing connected, inclusive, and sustainable trail systems, designing for universal access, and integrating active transportation into natural, cultural, and civic landscapes through regional collaboration. Below are relevant key points from the 2022 PROS Plan: City of Port Townsend I III °�u IWU\�Illp�ipu �iM1 WWpWlrol!n o �( � I�''Vp ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��p��Ile�pr V,�Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 811 i h �1r6�1� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 84 r in /i e r / � � ,mac, ;,�ill PH Active transportation in Port Townsend does not exist in isolation, it is supported and influenced by a variety of local planning efforts. To help create balance, all City plans fall under the authority of the Comprehensive Plan. Reviewing these plans and policies helps ensure that the Active Transportation Plan is consistent with existing goals while also identifying opportunities to strengthen connections, fill gaps, and guide future investments to create a balanced and sustainable community oQ%l ii sm ,cmi c ii you. ��u ��u ��� Ilgm umi w u u uu ��4 ulp a ��� Sul The Comprehensive Plan serves as the city's long-range vision for growth, development, and quality of life. Its Transportation Element identifies goals and policies related to safe, efficient, and multimodal travel, while the Land Use Element emphasizes compact development and neighborhood connectivity that support active transportation. The Active Transportation Plan builds on these guiding policies by providing more detailed strategies for implementing the city's vision, particularly around walking, biking, and public space improvements. The Transportation Element includes policies and overarching maps that guide development this plan. For example, the PT Sustainable Streets Plan is also known as a circulation map is a policy too for implementation of development regulations and overall transportation planning identifying where streets are to be built and where they are not to be built. Since, the majority of the City's right-of-way network was originally platted as small square grids intended for high - density development, the plan calls for intentional location of streets in order to minimize maintenance by minimize miles of street, preserve open space and trail corridors, and promote urban forestry and stormwater management. This strategy ultimately reduces the financial burdens, and provide a holistic approach to development, rather than simply an auto -centric approach on a case by case basis as historically done. This community -centered strategy aligns with the aspirations of this Active Transportation Plan and the previous Non -motorized plan, it that it supports coordinated planning with predictability. The Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan includes Level of Service Standards and an assessment of the capital facilities needed to achieve the goals of the City from an infrastructure standpoint. The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is updated every 2 years per Growth Management Act requirements. The CFP is part of the Comprehensive Plan and is intended to outline investments funded and unfunded necessary to meet the infrastructure needs of the City based on available funding. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r V,�Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 85 IIIPII 'IIIV �' ouu1111 pumloull@ uii;yy IIII���� uo �_ � I Illllillll II � I m ii sm ,n i �� c it#I .ICIIIII Ill����lli�l �liiina�IIII you Ill����lli�l III���IIIII ��iili IIII 4 mph I m» #\��1\V\� ,� "��4m�o�. uI���140 �,� n1VI1i ullll u�#I1�Yi,�i nu. Illllavom�l�� #I1�Yi,� �II\\uuu Port Townsend has adopted a Complete Streets Policy to ensure that all transportation projects consider the needs of all users, pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, drivers, and people of all ages and abilities. This policy establishes a commitment to designing and maintaining streets that are safe, accessible, and welcoming. The Active Transportation Plan operationalizes this vision by identifying specific projects, treatments, and design approaches that bring Complete Streets principles into practice throughout the community. 11»} IIIVI II VI „III u, +`iu44 „I I,n � lIIIII allll 11111 '„ IIIIL Iln 11111 n llllll allll II ,� lIIIII OQ OQ �����„ ;,,; IIIIV � , I,�li VVVIII �� IIIIIV allll 111111 The Comprehensive Streets Program provides a citywide framework for designing, constructing, and maintaining streets that accommodate all users —pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and drivers —while supporting placemaking and public safety. The program was developed over 3 years in preparation for the Transportation Benefit District public vote. This proactive approach allows Port Townsend to coordinate infrastructure investments, prioritize improvements based on community needs, and create a consistent, safe, and inviting network for all modes of travel. �4 ' � IIIII�°"'�����'; IIII ;' a„\\I " llllll lallll ,;;iiki "lisp llllll allll I'���1 ����` lllllllnllllU llllld" Illll �llll 'm°° IIIIIV '�Illu� ° Cc�)d e, The Municipal Code provides the regulatory framework for land use, development standards, and street design within the city. Provisions related to subdivision design, street connectivity, parking, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities all have a direct influence on how easily people can walk and bike in Port Townsend. The Active Transportation Plan offers opportunities to align local code with best practices, ensuring that development and redevelopment projects contribute to a safe, connected active transportation network. The Port Townsend Municipal code includes revisions associated with the Periodic Comprehensive Plan update. The code is also expected to be updated in the following years to further implement the Comprehensive Plan and this Active Transportation Plan. A ��� �I��A IIIII 1) a°alll�I The 2023 ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities within the Public Right -of -Way outlines the City of Port Townsend's commitment to improving accessibility for individuals with disabilities. The plan strives for equal access in compliance with the ADA standards and is especially important today given the city's aging population and high disability rate, which is 21 % in Jefferson County, significantly higher than state and national averages. It was officially adopted in 2023. The adoption of this plan is a major driver for this Active Transportation Plan including the identification of ADA priority routes. Implementation efforts include: reviewing all new construction for ADA compliance, City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 uuuuWl�l!n o � I�''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u"k4,my"nmrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 86 maintaining a GIS-based map of accessible routes, closing gaps in the pedestrian network, and continually updating the plan as improvements are made. updating the plan with the results of this Active Transportation Plan with the priority ADA routes map. The plan aligns with federal guidelines such as: the Public Right -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) standards, and the city's own engineering design standards. It sets clear criteria for pedestrian facilities, including: minimum sidewalk widths, appropriate slopes, detectable warning surfaces, accessible street crossings accessible driveway crossings, and the elimination of tripping hazards. Accessible sidewalks are documented through a GIS layer available on the city's website, and any existing sidewalks not listed are assumed to be non -compliant due to common deficiencies like improper curb ramps or vertical discontinuities. The cost to upgrade all non -compliant infrastructure is estimated at $20.4 million —approximately $115 per lineal foot. To address these challenges, the city relies on: capital improvement projects, developer installed infrastructure, and targeted small-scale upgrades. Funding sources include grants, transportation benefit districts, developer impact fees, and potential property tax adjustments. The city works closely with local organizations such as Disability Awareness Starts Here (DASH) and the Accessible Communities Advisory Committee (Jefferson County ACAC), both of which review project designs and advise on prioritization. Engineering staff meet annually with these groups to assess progress and set new goals. The plan suggests expanding the work from the ADA Transition Plan between 2024 and 2026 to include public parks, trails, and other facilities. This future work will involve self -evaluations, updated maintenance procedures, staff training, and improved communication about accessibility features. To accomplish this goal, this Active Transportation Plan sets forth to prioritized ADA routes connecting public services, shopping areas, parks, and civic destinations. These efforts reflect the city's long-standing commitment to non -motorized transportation and City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 WWpWlrol!n o�( I''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 87 its vision of creating a community where all people —regardless of ability —can navigate and enjoy public spaces with safety and dignity. 9, �r cmal, u� � �I���u 41 ' lum I mt ��,04 � lum i,o^ Illluto„n i,o^ ui „o In i Port Townsend's Local Road Safety Plan is updated every 2 years. The plan analyzes accidents and proposes countermeasure strategies to reduce a certain accident type with a focus on arterial streets. The number one conclusion of the Local Road Safey Plan identifies a need to lower traffic speeds and install facilities to support Active Transportation. #I1� rouU�i� �� �1� �� �� °lii° �� ���"� ��'�� lull lllP ���� �� °lii� �un���i� �����, I�o�rouU�i� �� "�e �'1�11 �� �' ���I���u ,��>;,i�i� uv„n i,o^ Nma � iu, ,o N .Il�uu „o luu u�,�,n I m'�� � lum Port Townsend's Safe Routes program is also relevant to this plan. An update to these routes is scheduled through a safe routes planning grant in 2026. Schools are major nodes of activity in the city, and active transportation policies should coordinate with those of the Safe Routes program. The City's Engineering Design Standards reflect Port Townsend values for small streets, broken grids, and more recently on -street parking. They are informed by the guidelines in WSDOT, AASHTO, and other design practices. The proposed policies in this plan may have implications for the City's engineering standards, necessitating updates to these standards. +n uumi°I IIIPum uu"IpV ° � �� nouw 1° +n uumup uuu m �imuoup wm � ry � ,r,, col °�IIu �u ��� ,coo � lw �� i o � umr � lo,� nq�p I wio uow ,�� moo. oii mm �� ��� mil ��� �w mm �i m C pool oii w :,,u V l0000lll uu,,,,,1 Ili II vY�w L000 1 Vlllll titiw IIIV IIIP,,,,, V IIIIII �» ltiti �� IIIIII llll n�,�i lIIIII �IIII 1, ����� „, 0� lull Mill iilll s� �� 11,1l 111,,,IIIII ,, ����� lIIIII ����) llll allll ���,�,�� llll allll 5�51 ,,,„ �J llllll allll VI@ V ,4ro , wool w1i1ro v hum i mwmum Pl oou mu m V v„ Port Townsend is updating its Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan in 2026. Much of the open space analysis work has been completed concurrently with the Comprehensive Plan to help inform housing opportunities, transportation, and open space preservation and enhancement together. The PROS plan recognizes that parks and open space systems must be integrated into a broader network of walking and biking routes to serve the full community. Furthermore, the some of the trail systems identified in this Active Transportation Plan have recreational elements and are maintained by the parks maintenance department. As such, the PROS plan and Active Transportation Plan work together to fulfill many goals in the Comprehensive Plan. . Additionally, the PROS Plan highlights the importance of equitable access to recreation which is planned to be accomplished through this plans ADA priority routes and connected routes maps. , oq �u 0 ,a9 141 1% a u , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 88 ,g001 The framework of this Active Transportation Plan is built on a set of goals and policies that reflect community priorities, align with citywide and regional objectives, and provide a clear path for implementation. These goals articulate the long-term vision for a safe, connected, and equitable active transportation system, while supporting policies guide day-to-day decision - making and investment strategies. Together, they establish a consistent foundation for evaluating projects, shaping land use and transportation decisions, and coordinating with partners. By grounding the plan in goals and policies, Port Townsend can ensure that each step taken, whether a quick -build project, a major infrastructure investment, or a policy update, moves the city closer to its vision of accessible, people -centered mobility. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 89"°�gN'��a1j111�M1�m"`�^^° Iflfl�glhll0l Create a connected, comfortable, convenient, inviting, and effective walking and rolling network so people can reach their destinations. Gc)al 2 Eliminate disparities in access to safe, healthy, active transportation connections for people and communities most dependent on walking, bicycling, and transit. c � mm �� � �l ,.I poi �„I��IiI�u �11117�'lllll� u i �III� Coaborate and coordinate with public, tribal, nonprofit, and private partners to complete and improve the network across boundaries. ��� °711�1 ���!IIIII m!IIIII �J�, ���llllll !IIIII alll� Increase the frequency and percentage of everyday trips made by walking, bicycling, and transit. �IVVV I 9 iii)1S ooI 11 II o create a safe walking and rolling environment consistent with Goal 1: Connectivity. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup WWpWlrol!n o � I�''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 90 m� Exhibit 37: Policies Matrix Connect key locations such as schools, transit stops, commercial centers, public buildings and open spaces. x x x x x Prioritize investments identified in the action plan, such as the Safe Routes to School, Connected Routes, and ADA Priority x x x x x Routes. Update the ADA Transition Plan to be consistent with this x x x x x plan. Coordinate the Active Transportation Plan with the Streets Master Circulation Plan. x x x x Create and maintain context sensitive connected routes that x X x x vary in standard based on use and location. Create a maintenance schedule that meets the needs of each trail standard and site conditions. x x x Coordinate local route improvements with this plan, and support incremental investments to meet the ultimate goal of x x x x a citywide connected route system. Develop Engineering Design Standards (EDS) and street sections to locate 20% of all new and existing houses on x x x direct accessible streets (ADA). Prioritize investments based on equitable access x x Develop a Safe Routes To School Plan in partnership with local schools x x x Coordinate with Jefferson Transit Authority. x x x City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 91 Work with local private and public organizations to implement a coordinated mobility system. x x x x Continue city staff participation in community stakeholder boards and advisory boards. x x x Require property owners to maintain sidewalks, landscaping, and other frontage elements to ensure safe and unobstructed x x x pathways, with enforcement mechanisms for compliance. Support active transportation implementations in the City's transportation network plans. x x x x Ensure building and zoning regulations encourage active transportation and reduce sprawl. x x x x Review proposed zoning to meet active transportation goals and policies x x x Coordinate activity hubs with active transportation capital plan infrastructure x x x x Increase awareness of existing active transportation routes. x x x Construct for all ages and abilities with a focus near schools and other areas with frequent vulnerable users. x x x Construct for all ages and abilities with a focus near schools and other areas with frequent vulnerable users. x x x Implement LOS standards for Active Transportation x x x x x Adopt and implement a motor -vehicle Traffic Calming Manual. x x x Incorporate Active Transportation policies into the Engineering Design Standards (EDS) and require development x x x x x to construct frontage improvements. City of Port Townsend III ��u a�9oak141 WWpWlrol!n o�( I''�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r iP�ll�r �u0kpm�umrydlma� 811 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 92 Develop and implement education and enforcement programs to support active transportation such as traffic violations, x x x parking management and code enforcement. Address conflicts between active transportation users through monitoring, prioritizing, and implementing safety measures. x x x x Address conflicts between motor vehicles and active transportation through monitoring, prioritizing, and x x x x implementing safety measures. Review all new construction for compliance with ADA standards. x x x x x Continue to update GIS-based map of both accessible street segments and segments without accessibility. x x x Monitor improvements over time and keep a log of completed projects, ensuring adequate maintenance and long-term x x x x connection. Provide safe, accessible, and convenient routes, trails, parking facilities, trailheads, and other amenities that promote non - motorized travel in a manner that integrates other forms of x x x x x transportation. Using established standards, promote coordinated and safe bicycle and pedestrian way improvements in coordination with Federal, State, and regional agencies, utilities, and citizen x x x x groups. Emphasize connectivity and access to schools, parks, employment, major activity service centers, transit facilities (ferry, bus, etc.), and links between existing trails and regional x x x x trail networks during land use and transportation system development planning. City of Port Townsend III ��u a�9oak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 93 Evaluate safety issues for bicycle and pedestrian travel near schools and identify potential improvements. x x x x Support educational opportunities for children and adults that will encourage safe use of roadways, trails, and sidewalks for x x x all transportation modes. Promote safe, convenient, and protected bicycle parking at activity centers such as schools, parks, commercial centers, employment and service centers, and mass transit facilities x x x x (ferry, bus, etc.) in accordance with the Non -motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan. In coordination with the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan, provide signage for on -street segments of active transportation routes in accordance with the Federal Manual x x x x on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Encourage buffering between motorized travel and non - motorized transportation modes, where appropriate and x x x economically feasible. Coordinate with WSDOT and PRTPO to enhance existing bicycle connectivity and safety along state highway bicycle X x x x x routes. Where accessible ADA routes are not required, plan trails to link neighborhoods with key points of interest such as parks, significant open spaces, schools, cultural resources, shoreline access areas, mixed use centers, and employment centers. x x x Developments should provide trail improvements according to the Active Transportation Plan consistent with relative impact. Develop and adopt standards regarding trail uses that minimize conflicts between different types of trail users (e.g., x x x x x pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians). City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 94 Implement the Active Transportation Plan with the following goals: Endeavor to invest 20% of annual transportation investments towards ADA priority route improvements ® Prioritize investments around completing connected routes. ® Seek grants and prioritize projects benefitting disadvantaged communities Develop outreach to encourage a culture supportive of active transportation. ® Plan and implement annual improvements using Transportation Benefit District funds: 0 40-60% pavement repair 0 20-40% grant match for Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan 0 10-20% Sidewalk, ADA upgrades and neighborhood traffic calming Plan for and implement an interconnected system for pedestrians and bicyclists with a safe, convenient, services that fully support trip -making connections between residential areas, employment centers, shopping, recreational facilities, points of interest, schools, public transit, and other public services within the City. Develop this system using measures that include: a. Physically separating pedestrian and vehicle (including bicycles) traffic; b. Encouraging separated internal pedestrian circulation systems in new or redeveloping commercial -retail districts; c. Developing policies that address conditions warranting illumination of pedestrian crossings; d. Providing pedestrian facilities that meet ADA requirements; e. Giving special consideration to pedestrian and bicyclist opportunities in school, park, sports, and commercial areas; and f. Expanding and improving the City-wide sidewalk/pathway system including on- and off -road trails to establish safe integration of bicycle and pedestrian circulation. City of Port Townsend III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 95 Require safe, convenient walkways and bikeways in proximity to all arterials and collectors including streets near multi- x x x family and commercial development. Plan and implement safe, convenient walkways and crosswalks on streets leading to or near transit stops. x x x Ensure that the implementation and maintenance of non - motorized improvements are coordinated and consistent in x x design and construction. Maintain a safe route to school map to assure that safety and accident prevention for pedestrian and bicycle travel to school receives the highest consideration. Work with the School x x x x X District and private institutions to jointly prepare the maps and to implement the design and construction of pedestrian and bicycle facilities in and adjacent to school zones. Establish pedestrian and bicycle links between public facilities, commercial and employment centers, neighborhoods, and higher density residential areas. Consider establishing maintenance programs to remove barriers and promote connected routes such as: Design and construct a trail network in size and methods that can be feasibly maintained for safe and consistent travel. Identify key trails for prioritized maintenance Encourage abutting property owners to embrace their responsibility to maintain most gravel and dirt trails and adjacent vegetation. Support volunteer groups with resources to help maintain trails. Unless noted through covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs), developed (key gravel or paved) trails will be managed by the city.) Distinguish between areas where non -motorized transportation should be encouraged as a top priority (i.e., the National Register Historic District) and areas that are likely to be more auto -oriented (i.e., the Gateway Commercial District). Study and consider setting a level of service standard for pedestrian and bicycle facilities that supports the vision of linking the community via a comprehensive system of convenient pathways and bikeways. City of Port Townsend x x X III °�u a�9llak141 1ulupWlrol!n Q rt, II'�p ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r�W+uOkp�myU�o" 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 96 The following actions provide a roadmap for implementing the Active Transportation Plan. They outline practical steps that connect policy goals with on -the -ground improvements, ensuring Port Townsend creates a safe, connected, and equitable system for walking, biking, and rolling. I'�� lllllll,llllU'i11 �"��, ���,�;�� lIIIII1,11 l 111���1 1I,' ' � lIIIII lallll lIIIII allll °liul I'm` '�����' ����� 11117 iiliill ����I ,,� °lisp ���� \\I "' c) IIIII Il II � Connect key destinations such as schools, transit stops, commercial centers, public buildings, and open spaces. Eliminate gaps and barriers by incorporating projects into the Capital Improvement Plan. Actively pursue state and federal grants to fund local connectivity projects. Consider and require connectivity in new development areas. Clarify routes with a comprehensive wayfinding and signage program. KIII IIIy „IIIIII IIIINI�V1Nu y�����ll II I V1N�I 114;���� �II� Advance priority projects identified in the plan, including Safe Routes to School, Connected Routes, and ADA Priority Routes. Update the ADA Transition Plan to align with this plan. Coordinate the Active Transportation Plan with the City's Streets Master Circulation Plan. Create a publicly accessible overlay map showing both plans to visualize coordinated efforts. 9ri"m1 uuuNl uu umr 9!'llll l iml i lIIIISI ul allllm���!II'I�1�ImI1IIyIIIV �IIIISI ul allll II@�m��m; lIIIISLul allllI 'lmll� IIIIIu IIIII ��IIriuv,,�n°� 111V m ���°,1 uI�P ,a, lIIIISI ul allllmI���1C II@�m,m, ,.I I�Itif, or,' m11���1C 1,1r�1�inll�lI ® Develop and apply context -sensitive standards for Connected Routes that vary by location and use. Create a maintenance schedule that reflects trail types, standards, and site conditions. Coordinate incremental improvements to meet the long-term goal of a citywide connected route system. Pursue grants and local funding to support phased improvements. Develop prioritization criteria to direct funding toward projects with the highest connectivity benefits. City of Port Townsend III °�u IWU\�IIIV�Iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r V,�Il�k4,MyuF��dlma��� 811 i h �1r��1� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 97 m °1I IIII ,� � II II ��� �uul ��� � c I III ��� IIII �`ii"°°IIIV „ uIP lu ��� IIII C ulp�llu ,�� col ,� C ••"•IIIII mP � ��� IIII ,,, C + ulp�llu � I ,,, C � ^°°PIII .IIII ® Develop Engineering Design Standards (EDS) to ensure 20% of homes are on direct, accessible ADA-compliant streets. Amend development standards to require proportional active transportation improvements with new development, with thresholds based on land use, zoning, and project scope. Explore replacing fee -in -lieu systems with targeted impact fees for high -impact connections. Amend the municipal code to require land use applications to meet active transportation goals and policies. Ensure zoning and building regulations encourage active transportation and limit sprawl. 5IIIIII qI uIIIIII t+' °` �til,�,�� III1,11IIII I�5�511 "Allis ��I'm`�� I m` ��I°I�m 1 „I,�i�1��,�,"� �II Prioritize investments that expand equitable access to safe walking and biking routes. Partner with schools to develop a Safe Routes to School Plan. Coordinate with Jefferson Transit Authority to integrate transit and active transportation. Work with local organizations to create a coordinated mobility system. Engage the public in reviewing projects to ensure accessibility and equity are prioritized. Daum n��4 IIIP ++ col � I alllll Imou ��\opIIII IIIIII I Ii m ��, uWpO Wlll IIIIII IIIIII II IIIIII41,, IIIIII alllllI IIIII 1111;,i 11111 IIIIII GI��J�t1��"I;�i� �41,�4�� !IIII allll I5�511 ��, IlllrIII� IIIIPIIIIIw„�IIIPI Illlll allll41,, ����� !IIIII �»wlttitiv �IIIIII'lllllll Continue staff participation on stakeholder and advisory boards. Coordinate activity hubs (schools, parks, downtown, transit centers) with capital plan investments. Increase public awareness of existing and planned active transportation routes. Collaborate with regional, county, and state partners to align active transportation with broader transportation planning. uuu�I��pv ,¶pu III@ V uuuml uma I IIII'... uuu 1114.° l° 'lll�l111p\\ � IIIP"° � II i to II,1 +n l�l Illlll ,�1511j IIII"' I IW hI IIIVq,u, uuu I ,,, I���,�IS\'IIIII alllll �ou � '`I AI lull lull ��I 111� 11111,E lllllk��� IIIIII alllll aI,�1 Illllll Illllll,,u��� �����,,,,,,,,, 1111,�I Illllll °°'ro" ICJI IIIIII°`!IIIIII !IIIII l"allllI'mI OQ Allllll Construct facilities that serve all ages and abilities, especially near schools and vulnerable - user areas. Adopt a Level of Service standard for active transportation based on Level of Traffic Stress (LTS). Adopt and implement a Traffic Calming Manual to reduce motor vehicle conflicts. Incorporate Active Transportation policies into Engineering Design Standards (EDS), requiring development frontage improvements. Address conflicts between active transportation users and between active transportation and motor vehicles through design and education. mm ��I Sul m C '0 I 1" uuu I Sul Ilu � I ��I Sul ,m» IIII IIIPq+++++ IIIPq+++++ nllllll ��I IIIPq+� 111� umllllll IIII IIIIII ,,,,,n�� IIIIII III���11IIIIII \\II, CI III IIIIIII,P IIIIIIIII !IIIII allll �����II, IIu ��I��,�� !IIIII alllll I���1����` ��I��,�� !IIIII !Illlll allll �����I !Illlll alllll, !IIIIII alllll! IlmIIIIII. Require property owners to maintain sidewalks, landscaping, and frontage features to ensure safe, unobstructed pathways. , lu I oq I 0 ,Y I IIY a ,a9 1 \u I , 1% I u I o I I � I IIII I I u Ilm II I , I � u � III City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan Page 98 ro�"°II VIM"`ro Ig001 Develop enforcement mechanisms for compliance. Consider a point -of -sale or time -of -sale sidewalk improvement program. ,% 1„II C 9 ��'It u� IIII �n.Iiiit a�c)�I ® Implement education and enforcement programs to support safe active transportation. Strengthen parking management and code enforcement to reduce conflicts and improve safety. Promote traffic law awareness for drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians to encourage mutual respect on the streets. Explore implementing a speed enforcement camera program as outlined in the Speed Safety Camera Readiness Guide produced by Washington State Traffic Safety Commission, see Appendix C. The Implementation Matrix (Exhibit 38) translates the goals and policies of the Active Transportation Plan into concrete, actionable steps. It identifies key actions, responsible parties, timeframes, priorities, and potential funding sources, providing a clear roadmap for moving projects from planning to completion. By organizing these actions in a single, easy -to -reference format, the matrix helps city staff, partners, and the public track progress, coordinate efforts, and ensure that investments in active transportation are strategic, equitable, and effective. See the implementation matrices in this plan. City of Port Townsend III ��u IWU\�IIIV�iup �iM1 ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r i��P��ll�r ��u0kpm�umrydlma��� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 99 City of Port Townsend Exhibit 38: Implementation Matrix City of Port Townsend, Short -Term Jefferson County, Jefferson Transit City Public Works, School District Short -Term Public Works, Parks Department Ongoing Planning Department, Public Works Mid -Term City, School District, Jefferson Transit, Short -Term Community Groups City, RTPO, WSDOT, Local Organizations Ongoing Public Works, Police, Planning Short -to Long -Term Planning, Public Works, Mid -Term Code Enforcement Police Department, Schools, Ongoing Advocacy Groups 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 100 ii � ��iii Vu �m��4 uIP � � Dui i IIII uoi � you, ,,, ,� ��, uIP a you. � C ������ �����,�iiiu «<,,,� �,4�� aiiii� aiiic ������ iI ��, �,4�� �iiiii ����5, The previous plan had several long routes that served as the backbone of the trail system. This plan kept the same intent with slight modifications based on current existing trails /paths and planned Connected Routes. These long routes are considered "Signature Routes" and are a mix of the three categories - ADA, Connected Routes, and Recreational Trails. Signature Routes include: • Creative District Trails • Cicmehan Trails • Waterwalk • Beach Walk • Grand Loop City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 101 City of Port Townsend Exhibit 39: Signature Routes 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 102 ^��"°�a��M"`� The following Implementation of the four strategies outline in the Plan is critical to making a difference and meeting the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. This chapter outlines key implementation strategies accordingly: Strategy 1 — ADA Priority Routes: Ensuring that key pedestrian routes meet ADA standards so all residents and visitors, regardless of ability, can travel safely and comfortably. Strategy 2 — Connected Routes: Building a network of continuous, safe, and inviting routes for walking, biking, and rolling that link neighborhoods, schools, parks, and major destinations. Strategy 3 — Recreational Trails: For non -designated connected or ADA priority routes, unimproved trails remain an important part of Port Townsend's identity. These trails are considered recreational as a result of a lower level of standard of care and maintenance. Strategy 4 — Culture: Building a culture that respects active transportation include behavior of motorists, adjoining property owners maintaining their sidewalks and frontage, parking management, courtesy between walkers, bikers, rollers, and drivers is critical for effective and safer streets. General Transportation Action Items The following sections provide needed action items for each category. 1. Update the Engineering Design Standards to coordinate with this plan. 2. The City will incorporate Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) analysis into its engineering design standards. WSDOT has the goal of meeting LTS 1 or 2 for pedestrian and bicycle projects. This encourages flexible design to "right size" projects for the project specifics such as vehicle volume, speeds and street section. City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 103 Exhibit 40: General Engineering Action Items Engineering Design Standards Update X Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) Standard X Adoption Work with Council to explore programs X X including: • Speed Safety cameras • Golf Cart Zones Establish clear rules for micromobility use X X across different facility types, roads, sidewalks, trails, and shared -use paths. Location: Construct ADA priority routes per the ADA Priority Routes Map. These routes generally follow arterial streets with some additional connections on local streets to key points of interest. Project Prioritization: The city worked with the stakeholder committee, DASH and solicited public feedback, see Public Outreach. See the table in this section for priority projects. Funding: o Grants: See Funding Section for details. The city will continue to pursue grants that fund active transportation. These grants may construct bike lanes and or sidewalk as part of a large street rebuilding program, or smaller grants that fund only sidewalk. The City will look for alternative grants that allow alternative approaches, such as connected routes. o Sidewalk Fee in Lieu: The city will continue this program, see Funding Strategies section for details. This fund can help fill small sidewalk projects or help contribute to larger projects. Moving to a Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) could replace this program once developed. o Transportation Benefit District: The city will continue this program, see Funding Strategies section for details. Lists and Feasibility o The following maps and project lists are long and constructing all may take more than 10 years. City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 104 ^��"°�a��M"`� o The long list of diverse projects, in scope and budget, is helpful when applying for grants given the specific selection criteria. o Unconstructed projects will be considered to carry over to the next Active Transportation Plan City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 105 ^��"°�a��M"`� City of Port Townsend Exhibit 41: Overall ADA Priority Routes Map 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 106 ^��"°�a��M"`� Exhibit 42: SE (Downtown /Uptown) ADA Priority Projects Map City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 107 Exhibit 43: SW (Castle Hill) ADA Priority Projects Map City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 108 Exhibit 44: NW (N. of Hastings, W of San Juan) ADA Priority Projects Map City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 109 Exhibit 45: NE (Fort Worden / North Beach) ADA Priority Projects Map City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 110 Exhibit 46: ADA Sidewalk Planning Costs Sidewalk Lineal Foot $250 Sidewalk Ramp Each $8,000 Block of Sidewalk Per Block $70,000 with Two Ramps Paved Shoulder / Lineal Foot $100 Path Exhibit 47: High Priority ADA Projects - SE Quadrant (Uptown/Downtown) SE Quadrant (Downtown / Uptown) Memorial Bulbout at 1 $30,000.00 does not Field Washington include entrance ramps into the stadium Jefferson / Bulbout on w 110 1 1 $65,500.00 does not Skate Park to side of include tree Jackson Monroe at removal cost (Point Memorial Hudson field, Property line) Sidewalk and ramp at Jackson, S Side. Blaine sidewalk and 280 2 $86,000.00 does not (Van Buren ramps. include cross to Harrison) N Side Only. street ramps. Benton sidewalk and 210 7 $108,500.00 does not (Lawrence to ramps. include cross Benton/ High W Side. street ramps. School) Harrison St One block of 250 5 1 $132,500.00 does not (Post Office sidewalk include cross to Lawrence) plus ramps street ramps. W side only. Lawrence St sidewalk and 530 2 1 $178,500.00 Will be part (Kearney to ramps. of a larger Walker) N Side Only. street project City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 111 ^��"°�a��M"`� Washington Sidewalk and 670 / Walker ramps, N. (Sims to side of Courthouse) Washington and E. side of Walker Benton sidewalk and 700 (Lawrence to ramps. Benton/ High E. Side Only. School) Lawrence St sidewalk and 500 (Tyler to ramps. Both Monroe) sides Lawrence St sidewalk and 750 (Walker to ramps. Both Harrison) sides Lawrence St Completed - (Harrison to 2025 Tyler) 3 $191,500.00 Active Project. Construction Fall 2025 8 $239,000.00 does not include cross street ramps. 18 9 $539,000.00 Will be part of a larger street project 24 12 $739,500.00 Will be part of a larger street project - Complete SE Quadrant ADA Subtotal $2,310,000.00 Exhibit 48: High Priority ADA Projects - SW Quadrant (Castle Hill) 7th Sidewalk and (QFC to ramps Sheridan) S side 10th Sidewalk and (Sheridan to ramps Cleveland) S side Rosecrans Sidewalk cut (9th to 10th) through SW Quadrant (Castle Hill) 135 1 210 1 200 2 Sims Sidewalk and 260 1 (along ramps garden center) 121h and Sidewalk and 300 2 Landes ramps Intersection Sims Sidewalk and 750 2 (Logan to ramps Hancock) S side (Bishop Canyon) City of Port Townsend 4 $41,750 $60,500 $66,000 no cross street ramps. Does not include retaining walls $73,000 Active Project by Port. Construction 2026? $211,000 Coordinate with Olympic Discovery Trail. $203,500 Active Project. WSDOT Ped Bike Grant. Construction 2026? 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 112 ^��"°�a��M"`� Sims and sidewalk to 550 5 2 $237,500 Sandy Williams Sheridan west. Planning/30% Intersection Possible Design Grant enhanced Secured. Sims Construction crossing not year not included in identified cost 19th Sidewalk and 820 3 $229,000 Construction (Landes to ramps. 2026? McNeil) S. side. Sims Sidewalk and 1050 $262,500 Active Project (Haines to ramps by Port. Safeway Construction Gas station) 2026? Sheridan Sidewalk and 950 8 $301,500 (10th to ramps 15th) E side 9th Sidewalk and 1300 7 $381,000 cosider a (McPherson ramps, see shared -use to Hancock) notes. N side path for bikes, Sheridan to McPherson 19th Sidewalk and 1730 16 $560,500 critical gap in (Sheridan to ramps network. also Landes) S side consider a lower cost, interim project. Sheridan / Replace 6 $48,000 Discovery Ramps Intersection SW Quadrant ADA Subtotal $2,627,750 Exhibit 49: High Priority ADA Projects - NW Quadrant (N of Hastings, W of San Juan) NW Quadrant (N of Hastings, W of San Juan) 39thi38th Multi -modal path. 2,800 $280,000 (Wilson to Safe Routes to San Juan) School Admiralty / Sidewalk and ramp 1100 3 $299,000 47th to 47th. Coordinate (San Juan with 47th St to Spruce) connected route. City of Port Townsend NW Quadrant ADA Subtotal $579,000 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 113 t�"°ta��M"`t Exhibit 50: High Priority ADA Projects - NE Quadrant (Fort Worden and North Beach) NE Quadrant (Fort Worden and North Beach) San Juan and Stub ramp and 70 2 Admiralty sidewalk to east (47th) towards Fort Worden. NE Quadrant ADA Subtotal $33,500 The following projects were identified as lower priority and do not show up on the priority maps. Exhibit 51: Other ADA Projects - SE Quadrant (Uptown/Downtown) Pierce ADA Ramps, (Jefferson to E. side of Lawrence) street Monroe St ramps on (Lincoln to west side of Blaine) Monroe. Pierce ADA Ramps, (Lawrence to E. side of Van Ness) street Walker sidewalk and (Lawrence to ramps. Jefferson / W. Side Only Courthouse) plus ramp crossing at Franklin Harrison St sidewalk and (Lincoln to ramps. Blaine) E Side Only. F St sidewalk and (San Juan to ramps. Olympic Ave / S Side Only. Valley Trail) Blaine sidewalk and (Walker to ramps. Benton/ High E. Side Only. School) Cherry (A to E) City of Port Townsend SE Quadrant (Downtown / Uptown) 5 $40,000 no cross st re et ramps. 6 $48,000 7 $56,000 no cross st re et ramps. 250 5 $102,500 does not include cross street ramps. 360 3 $114,000 does not include cross street ramps. 680 1 $178,000 700 sidewalk and 1000 ramps. W Side Only. 5 1 $245,000 does not include cross street ramps or retaining walls 1 $258,000 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 114 t�"°ta��M"`t Cherry sidewalk and 1650 (F to 0) ramps. E Side Only. Lawrence St Completed (Harrison to 2025 Tyler) 13 $516,500 no cross st re et ramps. Ramp crossing Walker at Tremont Complete SE Quadrant ADA Subtotal $1,558,000 Exhibit 52: Other ADA Projects - SW Quadrant (Castle Hill) Sheridan Sidewalk and (Sims to ramps 7th) E side McPherson Sidewalk and (7th to 9th) ramps E side. Sidewalk towards Business Park SW Quadrant (Castle Hill) 700 2 620 2 $191,000 $171,000 SW Quadrant ADA Subtotal $362,000 Exhibit 53: Other ADA Projects - NW Quadrant (N of Hastings, W of San Juan) NW Quadrant (N of Hastings, W of San Juan) None NW Quadrant ADA Subtotal $0 Exhibit 54: Other ADA Projects - NE Quadrant (Fort Worden and North Beach) City of Port Townsend NE Quadrant (Fort Worden and North Beach) 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 115 ^��"°�a��M"`� Cherry/Redwood/W W. Side 2700 10 $755,000 (0 to Fort Worden) Only NE Quadrant ADA Subtotal $755,000 , oq �u 0 ,a9 141 1% a u , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 116 ,g001 [ [ i i r r, / rii As discussed in the Design Guidelines section, the minimum requirement for shared streets / neighborhood greenways is wayfinding signage. For Port Townsend's Connected Routes, the minimum standards should include: Wayfinding signage Repair any surfacing hazards (potholes or roots on priority trails) Establish a priority trail, if not existing Overtime, incremental improvements may be installed, as needed for the specific route as budget allows. By phasing improvements in this way, Port Townsend can establish its Connected Routes quickly, then refine them based on traffic volumes, comfort levels, and usage. This practical approach balances safety and usability with available resources while laying the foundation for a citywide system of safe, inviting neighborhood routes. City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 117 ^��"°�a��M"`� City of Port Townsend Exhibit 55: Overall Connected Routes Map 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 118 ^��"°�a��M"`� Exhibit 56: SE (Downtown /Uptown) Connected Routes Map City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 119 ^��"°�a��M"`� City of Port Townsend Exhibit 57: SW (Castle Hill) Connected Routes Map 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 120 Exhibit 58: NW (N. of Hastings, W of San Juan) Connected Routes Map City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 121 ^��"°�a��M"`� Exhibit 59: NE (Fort Worden / North Beach) Connected Routes Map City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 122 ^��"°�a��M"`� The current plan proposes the following Connected Route Lengths Exhibit 60: Connected Routes Summary 18.5 98,000 12.5 66,000 1 5,000 1.7 9,000 Exhibit 61: Connected Routes Planning Costs Fix Potholes, Spot Repair Lineal Foot of street $20 Improved Trail Lineal Foot of trail $50 (major work: tree removal, Minimum grading, gravel) Requirements Improved Trail Lineal Foot of trail $14 (minor work: grub and gravel) Wayfinding Signange Lineal Foot entire route $2 Street Connected Route Per Block $1,000 to $6,000 Priority Trail Connected Per Block $4,000 Route to $14,000 Stop Signs on Side Streets Per Block $1,000 (Connected Route has right-of-way) Optional Future Traffic Calming Per Block $1,000 Additions, As to needed $10,000 Improved Crossing as Per Block $2,000 Busy Streets to (central refuge or diverter) $20,000 , oq �u 0 ,a9 141 1% a u , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 123 ,g001 Exhibit 62: Connected Routes Projects Street Wayfinding signage only 98,000 $2 $196,000 Segments Street Spot paving repair. Work 98,000 $20 $1,960,000 estimate. need to Segments with Street Dept. to create verify with a list detailed project list. Minor Priority Trails - Maintain 52,800 $14 $739,200 assumed 80% Improved Trail trails to meet trail width, Segments vegetation and hazards per EDS Major Priority Trails - Maintain 13,200 $50 $660,000 assumed 20% Improved Trail trails to meet trail width, Segments vegetation and hazards per EDS Total $3,555,200 Exhibit 63: Interim Hastings Trail Hastings Based on need form community input. This 5000 14 $70,000 Trail is a proposed interim solution before the ultimate bike lanes and sidewalk may be funded. Exhibit 64: Future Connected Routes Projects (5 to 10 Years) Description Length M (feet) E TBD Observe use and consider additional TBD TBD treatments such: as stop signs on intersecting streets, traffic calming, improved crossings at major streets City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 124 ^��"°�a��M"`� As discussed in the Design Guidelines section, recreational trails may be more primitive in nature since they will not serve as long connections. They may resemble hiking trails. City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 125 City of Port Townsend Exhibit 65: Recreational Trails Map 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 126 ^��"°�a��M"`� Below describes that recreational trails will primarily be constructed by infill development or by volunteer groups. Maintenance of these trails will be the responsibility of the adjoining property owner, volunteers and limited work by the City Parks department. Exhibit 66: Recreational Trail Implementation SE Quadrant (Downtown / Uptown) Existing Notify adjoining property owners to NA maintain trails New Per the plan, continue to develop NA trails with infill development and or volunteer groups SW Quadrant (Castle Hill) New Per the plan, continue to develop NA trails with infill development and or volunteer groups New Per the plan, continue to develop NA trails with infill development and or volunteer groups NW Quadrant (N of Hastings, W of San Juan) New Per the plan, continue to develop NA trails with infill development and or volunteer groups New Per the plan, continue to develop NA trails with infill development and or volunteer groups NE Quadrant (Fort Worden and North Beach) New Per the plan, continue to develop NA trails with infill development and or volunteer groups New Per the plan, continue to develop NA trails with infill development and or volunteer groups 1 The city may contribute some staff time, materials and or equipment. the annual budget. City of Port Townsend $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Costs should be part of 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 127 ^��"°�a��M"`� i n; Building on Port Townsends culture of supporting active transportation necessitates the next level of community participation in making the city walking, biking, and rolling environment welcoming. This entails changes in behaviors to walk the talk. A number of strategies are outlined as follows: ° Enforcement are essential components of a safe, functional active transportation system, and enforcement is recognized as one of the "6 E's" of bicycle and pedestrian planning (Education, Encouragement, Enforcement, Engineering, Evaluation, Equity). Enforcement strategies complement maintenance by promoting compliance with traffic laws and encouraging safe behaviors for drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians. This includes monitoring speed limits, crosswalk usage, parking violations, and conflicts between motor vehicles and active transportation users. Coupled with education and community engagement, enforcement ensures that streets function safely, reinforces shared responsibility among users, and helps reduce accidents and injuries throughout the city. MalIIIII °lIIIII°allll �����, °"°° °lIIIII°allll ° IIIIII "Illll1� N' ii"' Maintenance strategies focus on keeping sidewalks, bike lanes, trails, and multi -use paths in good condition by regularly inspecting surfaces, repairing hazards, clearing snow and debris, and ensuring proper signage and markings. Well -maintained infrastructure reduces risks for all users and increases confidence and usage across the network. The vast majority of maintenance impacting active transportation users relies on property owners maintaining their street frontage. Whether a sidewalk exists or not, property owners can create space and keep areas clear for walkers, cyclists, and other active ways of traveling. The largest impact community members can have is to maintain vegetation that overhangs sidewalks and the street. Keeping this area clear to a height of 7 feet and making sure that sidewalks are full width clear of vegetation is especially important for those with mobility impairment as well as those pushing strollers. Most City residents currently maintain their street frontage. This transition creates equality in maintenance of vegetation. Until this year, 30% of the City's labor was dedicated to vegetation maintenance. This transition has allowed City staff to work on drainage control necessary to preserve the streets. Water is the number one enemy of streets and trails, especially in Port Townsend, where most of the ditches have filled in over time. This transition was also coupled with the Parks division of the city performing more maintenance on the trail system. City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 128 ^��"°�a��M"`� In general, property owners should maintain their frontage from the street edge or the trail edge to the right of way line as required in City code and state laws. Extensive education and outreach along with code enforcement is necessary to make this a reality for the city. Voluntarily performing this maintenance is the desired outcome out of respect for active transportation users. fl„11 � nII��,III �a ��� �����"0 Street parking is encouraged with the latest update to the Comprehensive Plan in order to promote greater density. Additionally, in some areas of the City, vehicles are parked on the sidewalk along narrow streets without vertical curb. This results in greater obstructions to active transportation users and therefore, outreach and education to include how residents can park their cars to maintain pedestrian safety especially in areas where sidewalks do not exist. 1 OQ. Although Port Townsend does not have a lot of snow, during inclement weather is when many people choose to walk instead of drive. Property owners are required to shovel snow from the frontage of their property to make a path for pedestrians and to clear the ice. This is especially important in public places and the commercial areas of the City. The City should also consider plowing snow for the bike lanes as well. I„, a ��yii� I �� � IIIII �� „ �t !IIIII IIIII �� °liu' ���li 111111 IIIII �}llw � �����, �ii� �n��i �i �1� u,� ���� a �1�1I ;lisp I�Ih -@s, Nmu0� oi�li Ir Ili u, Understanding how various users might be challenged and respecting others is another way to improve the culture around active transportation. Examples such as riding bicycles too fast on a sidewalk create conflicts between walkers and cyclists. Also, many people experience disabilities may not be able to see or hear people or cars, and thus having awareness of others and potential impacts is helpful to others. Finally, many shared streets in Port Townsend have the potential for conflict between vehicles and active transportation users. Some cities are now installing speed limits on shared use paths. Speed control for motor vehicle traffic also helps as discussed in the traffic calming section. Providing comprehensive education on how to show kindness and respect between user groups is beneficial for all modes of transportation. City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 129 1. The City will maintain and update an inventory of all formal and informal trails, and periodically update connected routes and the transportation portion of the Capital Improvement Plan. 2. The City should monitor overtime all modes of transportation along with the inventories to provide the greatest opportunity for meeting the goals of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element and the Growth Management Act. 3. The City should publicize maps of connected and ADA priority routes and plan accordingly to meet the level of service objectives. Partnerships with local advocacy groups such as DASH can leverage outreach and information sharing for the benefit of the public. This plan builds upon the walking trail routes provided in the 2004 Port Townsend Walking Map (City of Port Townsend), the 2003 Quimper Peninsula Bicycle Map (Port Townsend Bicycle Association), and Jefferson County's Transit system maps (Jefferson Transit). These maps are outdated and need updating. The new connected route maps joins walking, recreation, and connectivity based on existing infrastructure, grades, and common walking routes enjoyed by residents. These maps are provided for historical context to illustrate loops that may or may not connect places. An action item resulting from this plan will be to update these maps with new user friendly maps. Exhibit 67: 2004 Port Townsend Walking Map 'jua e estted waillkii,t l"okairs "1 H'us9oric DoSvtrytow- and Vptlown Gr s,�,rlesi trvprMNl ql tc r',. rvAa Oro, k A wpp, b'r k«f ley 4erpre ,wYnl mr M,1:r re t.V. ,.I a rAtvrvxx Oar yr<LlOrrry ,b Alf w(urrrpl Aly9ru lr. ffu, &rr eda Fwt o ;.urir;HN w u, u+.w. M: V"errvrt 0 a• wr0 flewµ Mu11 I '.ilre, nlda.�un M1 yrlsirve ePlatnc`v'. Tesuw! M tly'ntirrle ,X w.�lks,lae:V,� q b rs rri irl VVI a',rs,;cV'+Ori01V' dA +rt4rawii po 11FN,rvn'I. Morgan Hill and H➢sMoric Hormel P 1 -,&, 7 Oi,q fgh ilf II k,,— lle. nb�.i.rlrte d rtY4r.[ovla hnrmes.5av3rer vr�rk, n r N r r l nsrrmo. Tenvn eup FSII "}I�anrl 1 eatlawaM1k. S� Xcan.e cXlmM1 rrenelry rmlp rvf NMrtyd'n HI�I. Aam�� amam�mG 8aa.h Wallk amd Fort Wordem G n r,r6lrnl tJdtMi,I 4rv1. W Irak, 0—,tr,m, C.rsra'lv,.Fnl Wuats F4rta Pn, k, T".rrfir:r IPurlu Yiu«rriun Ino:rrruc"., wruevi N,IA Irnus rr�[U .r. Ii ,� Lr,ran lrr;, atruo h—,rtl, —1W 2ry k1-,fl',. fM I nYrdl,o ONNOMEND Horth3—handthinese Gardens (3.%rrill-s) tiJ7ryFrIeAM1r, Crr :xe C;,nud uvarlw+l exkrY ! ur¢N vJPal.ty 4xbn r vmar,�r x Y.in,uii 'IeaxrK{ C' mtllus Errnw clwnv,sd mnmel F rsWl 'rgnrwal Woo 4N :Nr�,zaxN.t, tmfrlM Imrv'•,1, Cap y',Traltls Is.z mflursj kideh g ft. 4:c+V1,(revw 1 9 IN eurru nrr N -9- �rvlrl'ie^ '.NI.',1. u,tlx) X clot Ycrrnrxt. 1'exrnd hl .4 rc,mmllo ly irs,rvtll lrrlm o„nnn [xai4rylwnl of q;eat'ha mvaxXly Nla'[. ARTeer06n and Western Fort TownisendlLO�op ia.:r,A,) 11" h W rrp Sc"mM I0'artl,+- k w ,nIh o1W Panrttluwri I.q 1 `user:[ Mu rk, R,,t 9ImvnarkavrN 1W f t.a, znn, K,.,h Tni l,a„J+'rcn l"srh. Ienr«e M I're-11,sY Yr tu,,, nn 1 —1, (1 be dr J Iwino x"+1 swlkMr mntl dONONNO ADM Arresvib[e Routes TYsv<v F J;nelal.; 1 6 Ar�FM'"va��� City of Port Townsend III (�U 0ppp�pl�ll141 1 liAld to �+N uu °tu u�lwewmnlmM1�p, ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwr ��� �� r �WOkpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 130 Exhibit 68: 2004 Port Townsend Walking Map S(Mft COMM de �Wa M, µ JI 1r�c ig Ir� �2��� City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 131 The Cicemehan trail map is a great resource for residents and visitors desiring a cultural walking and biking experience. This map will be updated to coordinate with the connected routes map. An example of the map is shown below. Exhibit 69: Cicemehan Trail Map This map includes bike trails such as Historic Downtown and Uptown (1.5 miles) Highlights: Pope Marine Park, viewpoint at end of Clay Street, Victorian homes, Uptown business district, Carnegie Library, Post Office (originally built to be the Federal Customs House), views of Port Townsend Bay, Haller Fountain, downtown shopping district. City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 132 ^��"°�a��M"`� Exhibit 70: 2003 Quimper Peninsula Bicycle Map The Qkdrnper Ppvdnsula MqKfe Map SAME ROADS,SAME MOWS ,SAMERk LE:S I ji �...,� s� City of Port Townsend W ,, S �; tl Exhibit 71: Coordinated Trail Action Items City to lead or partner in the update of creating TBD TBD user friendly walking and biking maps. Coordinate with the Cicemehan trail partners to discuss revising the routes to Cicemehan trail $0 align with proposed Connected Routes, where feasible. Coordiante and participate in the Olympic Discovery Trail TBD planning of the Olympic Discovery Trail. Revise 0ppp�pi��l141 �iE �Q� W °�u u�lw=xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 133 ^��"°�a��M"`� the Signature Map Alignment, as needed. City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 134 ^��"°�a��M"`� Partnership is a central goal of Port Townsend's Active Transportation Plan, recognizing that successful implementation requires collaboration across multiple agencies, organizations, and community groups. By fostering synergy between city departments, regional partners, schools, transit providers, advocacy groups, and private stakeholders, the city can maximize resources, streamline project delivery, and ensure that improvements serve the broadest possible range of users. Coordinated planning helps align local, county, and state initiatives, ensuring that active transportation projects are consistent with regional mobility goals, safety standards, and accessibility requirements. Maintaining strong partnerships and clear lines of communication supports ongoing maintenance, program implementation, and long-term monitoring, ultimately creating a connected, safe, and equitable transportation network for all residents and visitors. The DASH Project (Disability Awareness Starts Here) is a non-profit organization in Jefferson County advocating for accessible environments. DASH has been working to improve access to public places and programs in Jefferson County since 1999, resulting in access improvements to streets, sidewalks, trails, paths, public spaces, and commercial spaces. DASH has worked with local members and staff of the City of Port Townsend, and has developed resources and guidance for accessibility improvements. Among other resources, DASH has developed a Map of Accessible Port Townsend (for those who use mobility aids), accessible trail guides, accessible restaurant guides, accessible entertainment venue guides, and others. The map City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 135 ^��"°�a���My�"`� provided in the following exhibit will be updated following this plan to reflect ADA priority routes and recent construction project upgrades to the sidewalk system. Exhibit 72: Map of Accessible Port Townsend (July 2016) Source: Accessible Port Townsend Map - Downtown/Uptown: A Guide for Wheelchair Users and Those Who Use Mobility Aids."DASH (Disability Awareness Starts Here). Updated July2016. Retrieved from City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 136,001 �i"°�a��M"`� The cicmahan Trail was developed by the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, and its intent is to educate the public on the relationship between the S'Klallam people ("gatay") and the European settlers who arrived in Port Townsend in the mid-19th century, intent on making it a key port of trade in the Northwest. The continued Partnership with the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe is an important part of Port Townsend's active transportation network. The City has been working with the Native Connections group to coordinate location of the trail and connected routes. / The Creative District joins Downtown, Uptown, and Fort Worden to honor and support the arts. Routes between these areas of town were created and will need to be updated to correspond with the connected routes map. The PTC is a very active group focused on the promoting and implementing the development of the Olympic Discovery Trail (ODT) and the more recent P2P (Pacific to Puget Sound) trail. The recent success with procurement of a RAISE grant is helping agencies including Port Townsend plan for and build segments of the ODT. Within the City Limits, funding for planning for trail extensions from the current Larry Scott Trailhead located in the Port of Port Townsend Boat Haven boatyard to the Fort, the Park and Rida, and to the Ferry Terminal are part of the RAISE grant. / The City's Downtown and Uptown are key hubs of activity for residents and visitors. The City works with PT Main Street on topics such as infrastructure for active transportation, parking, landscaping and place making. Local 2020 is an advocacy organization supporting sustainable practices in the region. In particular, Local 2020 Transportation -Lab and Climate Action focus areas support Active Transportation to improve the environment. Local 2020 has held transportation focus events as well has been active in the promotion of electric vehicle conversion and reduction of vehicle miles traveled. City of Port Townsend IVg1UA�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 137 ^��"°�a��M"`� The Jefferson Land Trust continues to be and advocate for preservation of open space such as in Cappy's Trails and the Quimper Wildlife Corridor as well as in the surrounding unincorporated area of the Quimper Peninsula. The Land trust supports densification in the City where services are available including active transportation. Funding strategies are critical to implementing the Active Transportation Plan and sustaining improvements overtime. A combination of local, regional, state, and federal funding sources can support projects ranging from small tactical urbanism interventions to major capital investments. Leveraging grants, public -private partnerships, and dedicated city funds allows Port Townsend to implement both short-term and long-term improvements while maximizing community benefits and minimizing costs. In addition to traditional funding mechanisms, creative approaches such as impact fees, fee -in - lieu programs, and point -of -sale sidewalk improvement programs can provide ongoing revenue for active transportation infrastructure. Prioritizing investments based on equity, connectivity, and safety ensures that available funds achieve the greatest benefit for residents, including underserved populations. Long-term planning and consistent budgeting enable the city to maintain existing facilities, expand the network, and respond flexibly to emerging needs and opportunities. The city has limited funds generated by the sidewalk fee in lieu program. Where sidewalk is required, but would not provide significant value, the city allows the applicant to pay an equivalent fee. This will then fund infill sidewalk on priority routes, or similar active transportation projects. The Port Townsend Transportation Benefit District (TBD) was created for the sole purpose of funding repair, preservation, and improvement of streets in city limits. Port Townsend City Council formed the TBD on July 24, 2023, providing oversight to the fund. City Council chose to put a 0.3% sales tax increase on the ballot to ensure all people who visit and shop in the city contribute to paying for streets. It passed with 77% of the vote. This local sales tax went into effect April 1, 2024 and will expire in ten years unless terminated by Council. The revenue from the TBD sales tax is estimated to total $1.2 million each year. , oq u 0 iY ,a9 141 1% a u m , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 139 , °° , °°l ���� �iiiu aiiii� aiiic 5�51 C� � e�� II iiiiii aiiii� aiiic U u ����� �iiiu «<,,,u ° ���5 I �M����� ������c \� ` " JII �� ����"�� 1�1� ��lii° ���lim ��n�� u� �m n Funds generated are used primarily for street repair and preservation given the current poor condition of most streets. Additionally, street improvements for walking, bicycling, and ADA upgrades are included. 40 - 60% Pavement repair, rehabilitation, and preservation of the City's 80+ mile street system. Note that any privately maintained streets are not eligible for funding. 20 - 40% Grant match for projects in the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan. This investment will leverage $7 million in state and federal grants for streets over the next 2 - 3 years. 10 - 20% Sidewalks, ADA upgrades, and neighborhood traffic calming. At $1 million per year, 10%-20% equates to $100k-$200k that will go toward Sidewalks, ADA upgrades, and neighborhood traffic calming. Furthermore, the funds used to leverage grants almost always are focused on Active Transportation improvements. Therefore, the total transportation investments including grants are on the order of $1-2 million per year for Active Transportation depending on grant procurement success. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) - The purpose of the Safe Routes to Schools Program (SRTS) is to improve safety and mobility for children by enabling and encouraging them to walk and bicycle to school. Funding from this program is for projects within two -miles of primary, middle and high schools (K-12).2 Port Townsend recent awards: o 2025 - Port Townsend's Healthy Neighborhoods and Safe Routes to School Outreach, Study and Implementation Plan Sandy Williams Connecting Communities Program- Improves active transportation connectivity for people walking, biking and rolling along and across current and legacy highways. The program focuses on communities with high equity needs, which are those communities most affected by barriers to opportunity and environmental health disparities.' Port Townsend recent awards: o 2025 - HOPE-20 - SR-20 from Sheridan to Haines shoulder improvements 2 Source: „ 3 Source: City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 140 Transportation Alternatives - Transportation Alternatives (TA) projects and activities encompass smaller -scale transportation projects such as pedestrians and bicycle facilities, historic preservation, safe routes to school and other transportation -related activities.4 Port Townsend recent awards: o Multimodal Cohesive Streets Plan (2026) Pedestrian and Bicycle Program - The Pedestrian and Bicycle program objective is to improve the transportation system to enhance safety and mobility for people who choose to walk or bike. 5 Port Townsend recent awards: o Discovery Road (2024) o SR 20 (Bishop Canyon) (2027) Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) - This program focuses on safety improvements to support active transportation in urban environments. Port Townsend recent awards: o Discovery and Sheridan Intersection (2026) 0 191n Street - Landes to San Juan Sidewalk and street crossings (2027) Transportation Improvement Board - Urban Arterial Program - This program focuses on rebuilding failed pavement and brining urban streets up to standards with multimodal facilities while addressing safety. These grants are the largest grants and fund projects such as: 6 Port Townsend recent awards: o Discovery Road (2024) o Lawrence Street (2026) o F Street (2002) Transportation Improvement Board - Sidewalk Program - This program focuses filling in sidewalk to complete pedestrian routes: 7 Port Townsend recent awards: o Washington and Walker (2023) o Discovery Road between San Juan and 191n o Jefferson Street 4 Source: I WSDOT. 5 Source::- WSDOT. 6 Source::- WSDOT. Source::- WSDOT. City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 141 ^��"°�a��M"`� Transportation Improvement Board - Complete Streets Program - This program focuses providing facilities for all modes of transportation and in particular, creating an urban environment welcoming to active transportation users: 8 Port Townsend recent awards: o Lawrence Street (2024) o Washinton Street bulb outs (2020) Transportation Improvement Board - Arterial Preservation Program - This program focuses on preserving existing streets in relatively good condition. This program requires sidewalk upgrades for ADA accessibility: 9 Port Townsend recent awards: o Tyler Street (2025) o Walker Street / F RAISE - The purpose of the RAISE grant is to plan for and build trail infrastructure on the North Olympic Peninsula. This one time $16 million funding is split among many agencies across the peninsula. Safe Streets for All (SS4A) - This program is designed to create safety action plans and active transportation improvements for safety. The City and County have a joint award for a safety action plan development. Surface Transportation Block Grants (STBG) - This program provides funding routed through the State to local agencies to make improvements to Federally classified arterial streets. The County manages these funds and the City recently funded Discovery Road as well as Kearney Street paving and sidewalk fronting the Co-op and Penny Saver. 8 Source::- WSDOT. 9 Source: ; WSDOT. City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 �i� �Q� W °�u u�lw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 142 ^��"°�a��M"`� City of Port Townsend Exhibit 73: Grant Schedule Summary 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 143 ^��"°�a��M"`� City of Port Townsend Exhibit 74: Grant Summary 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 144 ^��"°�a��M"`� Exhibit 75: Transportation Improvement Boards Grant Summary City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 145 ^��"°�a��M"`� The Port Townsend Active Transportation Plan provides a comprehensive roadmap for creating a safe, connected, and equitable transportation network that serves people of all ages and abilities. By integrating goals, policies, and actionable strategies across walking, biking, and multi -use pathways, the plan establishes a framework for coordinated investments and long- term system development. It emphasizes the importance of connected routes with a focus on priority routes for ADA connections and shared streets and improved trails for areas lacking sidewalk infrastructure. Furthermore, the plan strongly encourages the development of culture that respects and supports active transportation to further goals of transportation mode shift from the automobile to walking, biking, and rolling. The substance of the plan is the implementation of four key strategies in the most affordable way utilizing existing infrastructure while creating system to focus on connectivity. Ultimately, the plan represents a commitment to active transportation as a core component of Port Townsend's livability, health, and sustainability. By following the strategies outlined in this document, the city can enhance mobility, strengthen community connections, and create streets and pathways that encourage walking, biking, and active engagement with public spaces. This plan lays the foundation for a resilient, people -centered transportation system that will benefit residents and visitors for years to come. City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 146 ^��"°�a���My�"`� Appendices Appendix A: Public Outreach - Online Survey..........................................................148 AppendixB: Title Here.............................................................................................188 Appendix C: Title Here ....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix D: Title Here .......................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. City of Port Townsend ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 147 The online Active Transportation Survey saw a total of 1,551 visitors, 509 submitted surveys, and 2,322 total answers. If there was a pedestrian ferry to Seattle, would you take it rather than driving? Submitted respondents: 436 Total respondents: 569 City of Port Townsend No ® Yes 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 148 Would you participate in rental program for the following? Check all that apply. 200 184 180 161 u) 160 140 n 120 103 a) 98 100 86 80 a� E 60 73 z 40 20 0 Low -speed electric Trucks Cars Scooters Bikes vehicles Options Submitted respondents: 252 Total respondents: 331 With limited funds, which type of transportation infrastructure do you prefer? Limited amounts of high -cost infrastructure (large road 55 projects) Moderate amounts of middle cost items (sidewalks and bike lanes) Many low cost improvements (traffic calming, designating existing local streets as bike routes, and improved crossings at busy streets) Do nothing, we don't need active transportation 35 improvements L' Submitted respondents: 435 Total respondents: 568 City of Port Townsend 290 188 100 200 300 400 Number of Respondents 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 149 How do your kids get to and from school most days? Check all that apply. Walk, bike, or roll 11.00% Take the school bus 0 5.60% U) Carpool h� 2.60% n O Individually drive my kids) 11.80% N/A -I don't have children in or commuting to school IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 78.50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Submitted respondents: 438 Percent of Respondents Total respondents: 610 Where do you feel comfortable walking, rolling, or running? Check all that apply. Shared lane or shoulder on busy 129 Cn C O O Edge lane roads - single lane with dashed stripes230 Calm neigbhorhood street 389 Path separated from a road IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlljll429 N/A — I'm not able to or comfortable walking, rolling, 75 or running Submitted respondents: 384 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Total respondents: 540 Number of Respondents City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 150 �ioomyllti n u II � o uuu r , v u IIIPum uu"IVV uuu +n uuuuul lio i +�11luua�llll IIIII u m dlllll ,Illl�u, #I111ito n 11111uummo #I111ito dm 1\\umao m'm. 11�i,a4 dlllll. ,Illl�m Illls ,�I�! m�iluluu�l�" IIIII #I111ito 11�u,a4#I111ito dlllll �I�"� du.,llll� m.��o �I�"� 4111Iiu,a�llllo. #I111itoi umo. Illlam,�l 1\\ Illlam,�l uuu ,n um""'9Vf „n uuumlIIIPuu' uu"IpV ^^^ ,n uuuuul �ucol' a@mm ��� � i nglV ��� cmil o mopm uu a@� u m ��� uo � i 4 uul n ,� uu CC Illu �' Illu t4, a �4, um^ �� uu o f uaa �.. m .... uo4 � ��������i,,l���� Imtu �I mmn � in m����u, ��� ,o �,04 ��� ,o ������ mn ������, �,I����m �� �u, �� uun �����u,m����i, ��� ,o i ma Imtum,�l@ Current Active Transportation Routes Future/Desired Active Transportation City of Port Townsend iVWUA�'iiV�lp4 ��iM1 'iAld rrm �+� 1p"�� °�u u�lw�xm�imM1p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� r �u0kpmu�l 41 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 151 9444v IIIIII 1 IIIIII IIIIII �4u " upl 14p"y �IIIIPV"��III�II.. mIIIIIpIpI I IIIII mII �u111 ��,¶I11II1I�I� IIIII " uupll � .IIIIIII ��1111111 mI +n �01 IIIIIII �gIII� 1 41 I '0�11 IA 11 `I IIIIIII I ^° 1 I IIIp I umullV�'+11111111II1I�I� II�IIIII�Y II���'lll " IIIII IIIp .IIIIII 4w11 o III��` ��IIII�� ��I ml +111�114aap\1111 AI11114a ^IIIII �� �� u^ ly, u01111 Ia��u4�IW ��II ) o� I oVl IIIIIIIO� ��I OaV. I���g 4M1I�" ^ lu ul ��I OaV 11111 �'I����II.., 1ll�lllu u^ ly, u011111 o^ I ��I OaV ^IIIII u011111 ^IIIII AI11114a ^ u ��IIIIIOV. I���g 4M1I�" � IIIIV II o I IIIII ��IIII�� AI11114a ��I IIOV. III�'I����II.... IIIIII°Ic) IOQI'liul lIIIIIalllll°11111 1i "IIIIII°IIIOQ I'I°°I;11',iik Desired Bike Parking Desired Bike Shares City of Port Townsend Pon *'end r e r 0„ Y 111IIr u, Desired Sidewalk Ramps III �'Pu 0pp0�plPllip4 ��iM1 �^� I I °�u II�Iwaxm�ImM1p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��W�� r �u0kpmu�l 41 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 152 Desired Car Share Locations Pon "mMnsend l City of Port Townsend Aggregate Problem Areas 0ppp�pi��l141 o u�lw�xm�imM1�p, ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 153 ^�y�"`� Respondents would be encouraged to bike more with 1.) more bike lanes, 2.) more paved paths, 3.) a more connected route, and 4.) more trails. Which would help you bike more? Check all that apply. More trails More bike lines More paved paths Improved crossings at busy streets 201 Less traffic speed and/or traffic volume IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlI 181 Small/pocket parks or benches - 36 Cn Street lighting <., "", 86 253 0 p More/closer destinations (parks, commercial, services) 84 A more connected route (transit, bike, or trail)265 Education/maps on where to go 103 Social fun rides or events that encourage active IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJIM 85 transportation Adequate bike racks 141 Feeling safe """" 149 337 N/A - I don't plan to bike MEN= 95 Submitted respondents: 404 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Total respondents: 539 Number of Respondents City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��lip4 ��iM1 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 154 Respondents would want to walk/roll more with 1.) more trails, 2.) a more connected route, 3.) improved crossings at busy streets, and 4.) new/better sidewalks and ADA ramps. Which would help you walk or roll more? Check all that apply. New/better sidewalk and ADA ramps More trails 228 Improved crossings at busy streets�������������������»������ 273 Less traffic speed and/or traffic volume Small/pocket parks or benches 100 355 Cn More trees 122 0 n O Street lighting „ 135 More/closer destinations (parks, commercial, ����������� ��� 129 services) A more connected route (transit, bike, or trail)\\1111111111111111������������������������ 348 Education/maps on where to go 127 Feeling safe 170 I don't plan on walking or rolling . 20 Submitted respondents: 433 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Total respondents: 578 Number of Respondents City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��lip4 ��iM1 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 155 What is your approximate average hoUsehold income? �.�, ,J ryEtl)............................ Less lh an S"I „„ ,,,,, 1(J yy�� ��Ir25 tttttt sly 000.$99,000 "MO 000 S1,14,999 airy, 000 St49,999 its rk $150 000 . ,174 9ry2 1t> "s P i' cr 0 t'1 f 1 $19 °7 4'r 9 [,,,, ,,, , , S200,000 and up -,Ira'^t`ei, nrit to d iscloso 361 37 0 10 20 40 40 50 Re,rarar d rtt SUbmitted respondents; 285 Total respondents: 285 What is the highest degree, or level of education you have core 0.11 Less than high school I sou a9 s de,, l ase I������ 1 G Completed srrnsa, post graduate 18 Ph U 17 I pefet rot to ctss�rlrrsw:, is Respondents * w Total respondents: w w+ City of Port Townsend M 120 0ppptpi�t141 W °�u urlh�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� t �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan l Page 156 Do you identify with any of the following religions? Buddhism C h@ M,,O I an I t"t` WIVIUIU�IUIU�IUIU�IUIU�IUIU�IUIU ���IUIU�W .:R �. rl l wa!iramn Clwtoal/lacac7-r1v^raaaPxailwxt�lahr,.al IIIIIIIIII� �'' I ,lam cr �''.. JudaNsir 8 Native Amerrcan I� Other pppppppppppp ��,,{{ ��Q����A��ANNflNNflIIIIIIIINIIII��IIIIU 11 I jxefe, not to (fiscGose 0 20 40 M Total respondents� i r What Is your age;'? Under 18, .. 1 1 V"a'f "�4 OOOOOOOOO� 25 .pp4 FM:f. 35 III ������������ 1:. 55-64 t-7 ��������������������������������������������IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIII 80 2 V ril efer not to chscIose '16 11,) ,b0 SUbn-ultted respondents:296 Total respondents:296 City of Port Townsend 149 54 60 80 100 120 140 1Ci11 >espoYidowInU; cle3 x 35 6 z 44 59 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �r.� 30 40 bCal 6a (0 80 ail spondet. is 0ppp�pi��l141 �t W °�u utlw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan l Page 157 What is YOM- marit ll staters? SIng10 aIsed r. 0 vvldov,,o- x 2 In Ma domesis IxavtneMsIiiI'a VIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV 15 1 IIj�ofor neat' to discluse m 21 0 0 r15 What ethnioitios to identify s? check all that apply 13Gcaais oa Afu°ia aan ArTierI rran I Ast an 1 I-fEslaaamc L;atim1 Caucasian CL Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllll»»»»»»»»»»»»»»J1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111LG/G/G/G/G/G/G/G// Cvtiaaa 0 raavaaicv/Frra, Ntit, Vsalaiaat rr �IIIIIII 2 niti: ncaan lira&iaa¢r/ Alaska INative � fr 1)I`kraar; IIIIII 2 I pr efau not GO (JIa,ulvwe f!;'f Respondents 4 r Total respondents: • City of Port Townsend ESD x 1 1 e 74 60 70 80 W °eau 0ppp�piari41 W °�u urlw�xm�imM1p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 158 of"°f%��aMy�of"`� West gender to identify s: "e�na� 001er Prefer not to disdose Total respondents: •1 City of Port Townsend r'1 � ResjDondeiMs 0ppp�pi�t141 �i� �Q� W °�u utlw�xmo"M1 p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 159 �y�ot"`� City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��lip4 ��iM1 W °�u u0bpmuu�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� r�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan Page 160 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 161 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 162 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 165 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 166 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 167 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 168 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 169 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 170 ty survey indicated a preference for many f�P �"k lei (dkh fo r�1G i� ���uStUA o� "�+ �t improvements instead of just a few high ° �aq + rod „mod rllt - rojects. What could this look like? ya is �d �jomf c^ t (,a l�h'�L l�v(l ✓ ad/GlI �t�rl5 4t>..Ia ,'c ICk7C % ff �$ r-Mt 41e.4-i4rNK Wa./:ar.rS °tl a ,p r✓i .Ir;(i rep 5k..ld+r ck.r d4'Jsbni f$Hr"1O� a�e..f+,.�.w„c..., ,S -/pis /tr, !r r: + j y�. nt«kr eHq C orJ2r t Ti4R/ %AJ( Yt h OIVF OA f/AO/oot riw.tYK-..wen jwiRridewelk °n ux tiki MAYMA"0"010' bdw<°Atn 1 0 3kuak 9etr I.4T a (w-*r$r arJ, tilr° is V➢Ry UWHFF ^I° uw➢➢ nlUr� 4oj- /r!r—k YO., J ¢ompiete streets have you What challenges n Port Townsend? What do with incomplete ;e or dislike about them? y� _PI,V"�' tA6 �.. �S ➢fl°7UI,d1y ^,: ilf "A, I\ W A., ,, _� " �' ;.r,o Qnve oo, e eta wa.gt Gil City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 171 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 172 else can you personally lend a /Vo.a tuccrl wrkl st %s �icbdr Gs, to maintain and improve our /� O+V'wn # et (uoN Mel 7ortation system? 64, M", deb' (red WA�k I'D r1G�cCrl �laork %r�+r� 20tn Y.i ��' �'`� t��Cr la. dive �e opl zn. wtt . { me b 4j ✓4y.,JC'%�/� How can you help with kids walking, mANy FAMtLIO LN our oc-rc biking, or rolling to school? TnwN OAIW 4 'r rxe of ,'``rmmtny crW na, 7nii�G> ��7faIrGr` filcb(ems -KO' ���F 5a�<4y tss�asarr'S�ra�h�.dwi-sb�a Iof pVtprc' ? Lama gn��,a..d....+k;ds Yncrtase '{iu3.r v�s..t.� I.}Y (I�v��r karnr� $-r,.cr, mow, 1. rrdx cl<f nstvcly .. fulkca"�c:on 6�ka 5 * i?ailsf sn{c rcN4as % ea6,.a.1. hauri�@� M�<Iu�NCr' ,I,�ytifs �,qa�' t nc, v� toy [, r� f3i&Z 3" tk erested in being a trail ice volunteer? Scan here iformation. City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 173 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 174 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 175 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 176 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 177 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 178 City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��lip4 ��iM1 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 179 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 180 Medium Gost Projects Lower -Cost Alternatives tQX of Low Cost,Alternativas +/- ,7^ ELR lo Neighborhood Greenway Car focus, accommodates peds and bikes Ped and Bike Focus, accommodates local traffic limited use: wider use: mid -volume collector streets 20' minimum street width low -volume neighborhood streets , no minimum street width ; Pros: Lowest Cost Pros: ,y Flexible design; Low to medium cost T Slows traffic Creates some space for walkers, bikers Connected Routes Safe, low -stress walking / biking routes Cons: Tend to be short segments given spec constraints Cons; 'i higher than ELR Often do not connect key areas of interest New, but growing concept Community support and maintenance needed u, M oq �u DIY0 , r u ,a9 1L a u , - o u ro , u i City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 181 0 City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�iuu ��ih W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 183 City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 184 People QW04y 01 Loa NpUbw m4my DENSITY cost of URBAN FORM ... . . .... — LLIKY Lim". City of Port Townsend Reduces Cut -Through Traffic Creates Non -Motorized Access IF reetshOServe short Side of Blocks Side" Streets Every 3 to 6 Blocks .............000000000o 1� 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 186 September 2025 Open House Images to Follow , oq �u 0 , u a u , o u ro , u � City of Port Townsend 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 187 t Illu Illu t t4,���� Speed humps are raised areas of pavement typically placed across the width of a road to reduce vehicle speeds. Unlike speed bumps, which are more abrupt and often found in parking lots, speed humps have a gentler slope and are designed for use on local streets or residential areas. They effectively calm traffic by forcing drivers to slow down to maintain control and comfort, thereby increasing safety for pedestrians and cyclists. Their spacing and height are engineered to reduce speed without significantly hindering emergency vehicle access. Speed humps are a cost-effective and widely used tool in traffic calming strategies. Exhibit 76: An Example of a Speed Hump located on Blaine Street Source: ( ) via City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 188 o4,,99 d m � �at4„, IW �4� ,�� dll1 �III� ����1�a����„�IW t„ Traffic islands are raised or painted areas within a roadway that separate lanes of traffic or provide a refuge for pedestrians crossing a street. They help organize traffic flow, reduce vehicle speeds, and improve safety by channelizing vehicles into proper lanes and providing physical separation between opposing directions of traffic. Traffic islands can also be landscaped to enhance the visual appeal of a roadway and increase driver awareness. In pedestrian -heavy areas, refuge islands offer a safe midway point, allowing pedestrians to cross wide roads in stages. Source: Google Maps City of Port Townsend Exhibit 77: An Example of Traffic Island on F Street 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 189 II�Qiuw�ii�° ���� ���p��� �1 lh��alll����°'����°liu' lavo�m ito m m umo i i mOQ Street planters are landscaped features placed along sidewalks or at curb extensions to provide greenery in urban environments. Besides their aesthetic benefits, street planters serve as traffic calming devices by narrowing the perceived width of the roadway, which encourages drivers to reduce speeds. They also offer protection for pedestrians by acting as a buffer between the sidewalk and moving vehicles. In addition, planters contribute to stormwater management by absorbing runoff, improving air quality, and enhancing the overall livability of streetscapes. Exhibit 78: An Example of Street Planting on Discovery Road Source: City of Port Townsend City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 190 ^��"°�a���My�"`� Edge lane roads refer to roadways designed with lanes adjacent to the curb or shoulder that accommodate different types of traffic, such as bicycles, parked cars, or turning vehicles. These lanes help organize traffic and increase safety by separating slower -moving or stationary vehicles from through traffic. Properly designed edge lanes provide space for cyclists, reduce conflicts with parked cars, and facilitate smoother turns and merges. They also enhance pedestrian safety by creating a buffer zone between sidewalks and travel lanes. Exhibit 79: An Example of an Edge Lane Road on Kuhn Street Source: City of Port Townsend °"0 �1,11IIII �,,°IW Curb extensions, also known as bulb -outs are roadway design features that extend the sidewalk or curb line into the parking lane or travel lane at intersections or mid -block crossings. By narrowing the roadway, curb extensions reduce crossing distances for pedestrians, increase their visibility to drivers, and help slow down turning vehicles. They also provide additional space for street furniture, landscaping, and signage, enhancing the pedestrian environment. Curb extensions are an effective tool in traffic calming and pedestrian safety improvement strategies. City of Port Townsend 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 191 110 ii"�', IIIII °`'111111 ; lIIIII allll �" IOQ IOQ lull IIIIP U' ° °liu ,;;iik Pedestrian refuges are designated safe zones or islands located in the middle of a roadway that allow pedestrians to pause while crossing wide or multi -lane streets. These refuges improve pedestrian safety by providing a protected space away from vehicular traffic, reducing the risk of collisions. They enable pedestrians to cross in stages, which is especially beneficial for slower walkers such as the elderly or people with disabilities. Pedestrian refuges also help manage vehicle speeds and improve the overall walkability of urban areas. Exhibit 80: An Example of a Curb Extension Located on Lawrence Street Source: City of Port Townsend Source: Google Maps City of Port Townsend Exhibit 81: An Example of a Pedestrian Refuge Located on Discovery Road 0p�Ap�piV�141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 192 A chicane is a traffic -calming design feature that involves a series of alternating curves or lane shifts in an otherwise straight roadway. The purpose of a chicane is to slow down vehicle speeds by forcing drivers to steer left and right, rather than continue in a straight line. There are two main types of chicanes: One -lane chicane: Narrows the road to a single lane with alternating curb extensions or barriers, requiring drivers to yield and take turns. Two-lane chicane: Uses staggered curb extensions or landscaping on both sides of a two- way street, causing vehicles in each direction to weave slightly around obstacles. Chicanes are often used in residential neighborhoods or areas where pedestrian safety and speed reduction are priorities. They can be made with curbs, landscaping, bollards, or even paint and planters in tactical urbanism contexts. Exhibit 82: An Example of a One -Lane Chicane Located in in B.C., Canada Source: I % :)via City of Port Townsend Exhibit 83: An Example of a Two -Lane Chicane Located in Berkeley, CA Source:, I I I (; ) via 0ppp�pi��l141 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 193 �i"°�a���My�"`� ��� „ , nix um- sn rt [t,IF////,tka.11 City of Port Townsend June 2024 0ppp�pi��lip4 ��iM1 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r ��� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan Page 194 In 2000, Washington state wrote its first Target Zero strategic plan with the goal of eliminating traffic deaths and serious injuries. The current version of the plan integrates a Safe System Approach to reach Target Zero. Essential elements of a safe system include safe roads, :safe drivers, and safe speeds. From 2019 to 2023, traffic fatalities in Washington increased by 51 percent. During the same period, deaths involving excessive speed increased 65 percent.' Meanwhile, law enforcement agencies have struggled to maintain adeciLiate staffing. As local leadership strives to change that trajectory and increase safety for road users, more local agencies are considering speed safety cameras as a potential tool to reduce crashes and gave lives. The Washington Legislature made substantial changes to automated speed enforcement laws in 2022, and again in 2024, which provide additional opportunities for cities and counties to expand their use of speed safety cameras. This guide is for local leadership, law enforcement, transportation engineers, and community members looking for an introduction to speed safety cameras (5SC) and what it takes to establish a successful program. It is a primer, intended to help local communities assesstheir readiness to implement a speed safety camera program. For those desiring a more in-depth understanding, additional resources and references are included at the end of this guide. (Note: This is not a legal guide regarding state laws or local ordinances governing automated enforcement of traffic faws.1 City of Port Townsend I() Why Speed Safety Cameras? Authorized Speed Enforcement Locations Building the Team Crafting an Ordinance Equity Analysis Partnering with the Community 4 pa 1) Choosing Camera Locations Deploying the Cameras Program Evaivation Additional Resources and References .. .. . . . . . . . 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 195 0 11 by Speed Safety Cameras? According to the 2023 Annual Statewide Traffic Safety Survey of nearly 11,000 adults in Washington, only one-third of drivers reported that they have not driven 10 miles over the posted speed limit within the last 30 days.' Observation surveys have shown that speed compliance is not evenly distributed. Non-compliance ranged from 14 percent to 100 percent, depending on the road surveyed.'A problem area may be addressed in the long term through redesigning the roadway to encourage slower speeds, but in the short-term, enforcement may be the most appropriate tool to reduce speeding and crashes. The goal of SSG programs is increased safety, Speed is a contributing factor in 31 percent of fatal crashes in Washington.`' Excessive speed increases the risk and severity of a crash; for every 1 percent increase in speed there is a 4 percent increase do traffic fatalities." Pedestrians and cyclists are disproportionately represented in serious traffic crashes. (From 2014 to 2023, 21 percent of traffic fatalities in Washington were pedestrians and cyclists.' Vehicle speed plays a major role in the severity of a crash involving a vulnerable road user. Washington's Target Zero plan encourages enforcement of speed Ilimits, and reduction of speed limits where appropriate, to reduce high -risk driving behaviors that contribute to traffic crashes involving vulnerable road users. State law allows the state transportation secretary or local authorities to reduce speed limits an non -arterial highways to 20 n-1 The National Transportation Safety Board recommends the use of SSC as an effective countermeasure for reducing the frequency and severity of speed -related crashes, reducing excessive speeding, and maximiizing safety improvements with the most efficient use of resources. Nationwide and around the world, speed safety cameras are being used effectively to change behaviors and reduce crashes. There are numerous examples already in Washington. The Cityof Kirkland deployeds eed cameras at three schools and B 11 1 reduced the number of vehicles exceeding the speed limit by nearly halt in just two years.8 In the first two years that Seattle used automated speed cameras, violations dropped from over 45,000 to under 20,000 at the eight locations where cameras were installed.' Speed -involved Fatal Crashes City of Port Townsend Pedestrian and Cyclist Fatalities 9 n/ 1070 SPEED iLIMIT 25 10 0 01, 0 pedestrian crash survival at 25 mph and below ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 196 0 21 Authorized Speed Safety Camerai Locations Washington flaw determines the types of locations where speed safety cameras can be used." Consistent with the goal of protecting vulnerable road, users, automated speed cameras are authorizedin the following locations: School speed zones: 20 mph zones within 300 feet of a school Wry or playground border.. N� School wal l< zone. Roadways within a one -mile radius of a r° school that students use to travel to school by foot, bicycle, or other means of active transportation. , ,IN Public park speed zones., The marked area within public park IX property and extending 300 feet from the harder of the park 7 consistent with active park use. lHocspiital speed zones: The marked area within hospital property and extending 300 feet from the border of hospital property consistent with hospital use. Roadway 'Work ,tones. A roadway with construction, maintenance, or utility work with a duration of 30 days or more, Identified by the placement of temporary traffic control devices. State highways that function as city streetslr These are legacy highways designed to carry (larger volumes of vehicle traffic quickly that now run through population centers with walker, roller, and transit use. Other locations: Cities may operate one automated speed camera„ plus one additional camera for every 10,000 residents. This includes state highways that are also classified as city streets. (Cameras may not be used on freeway on -ramps,) These cameras roust be placed in locations deemed by the local legislative authority to experience higher crash risks dace to excessive vehicle speeds. Cameras used under this provision roust complete an equity analysis (see section S. Equity and Enforcement) and meet the general requirements for automated enforcement: travel by vulnerable road users, evidence of vehicles speeding, rates of collision, reports showing near collusions, or anticipated or actual ineffectiveness or infeasibility of other mitigation measures, City of Port Townsend 0ppplpi�ilp4 �l� ..�.� W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p. ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 197 1 Building the "beam Although not required, creating a team of community representatives may increase the likelihood of a successful SSC program, This team can serve in an advisory role when developing the program and when expanding speed safety cameras to additional locations. When creating an advisory team, include representation from groups that will be involved with the planning, and operation of speed safety cameras, as well as groups that will be impacted by it Examples of advisory group members include: Elected officials Traffic engineers I-aw enforcement Diversity, Equity, and inclusion (DEI) professionals School officials Public health Community residents Courts The success of a SSC program, and the community's acceptance of the program, is greatly increased when both city leaders and citizens understand how the program works and have a voice in how it is deployed. The advisory team may be responsible for establishing guiding principles for the SSC program, such as safety, equity, and transparency. The team plays a critical role in building understanding and providing input. The advisory team may also provide input when choosing the safety projects that will be paid for with revenue from the SSC program, Input from a diverse group of stakehonders can help to align the priorities identified by local public works roads department with the perceived needs of the community. City of Port Townsend 0pppipi�iip4 ��iM1 ..�.� W °�u uilw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� �� r �u0kpmu�l 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 198 of"°wau�iMy�ot"`a 41 ing an Ordinance Before a city or county can implement a speed safety camera program, the local legislative authority Must enact an ordinance authorizing the use of speed cameras. Prior to developing, an ordinance, the law requires, an analysis of the proposed location of cameras. For what to include in a location analysis, see section 7: Choosing Camera Locations. At a minimum, a local ordinance must include the restrictions and requirements for SSC described in the law. A summary of the requirements in the law include: * Use of SSC' is limited to authorized locations (see section 2: Authorized Speed Safety Camera Locations). * Cameras may only take pictures of the vehicle and the license plate, and only while the infraction is occurring. * A notice of infraction must be mailed to the owner of the vehicle within 14 days of the violation. * All locations where speed safety cameras are used must be clearly marked at least 30 days prior to activation, * Must complete an equity analysis for new camera locations. * Compensation to the SSC equipment vendor must be based only on the value of the equipment and services and imay not be based on a portion of the fine imposed or revenue generated. Jurisdictions may consider including additional restrictions or requirements in their ordinance. Forexample, a city could choose to limit SSC operation in school zones to specific times and days or to complete an equity anialysis for all camera locations. Examples of ordinances from cities in Washington are included iin section 10: Additional Resources. City of Port Townsend Modal traffk fiiirehng: A l oad desn that restricts the parsatfe of cclk.ain type-s of Vehicies, 0 1� o" C4'% 1 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 199 �4 0 51 Equity Analysis At first glance, a speed safety camera program appears to be a more equitable system, as cameras initiate enforcernent action objectively based on vehicle speed. However, camera placement can have a disproportionate impact on low-income and other historically marginalized communities. Careful) consideration of camera placement is important to avoid unintended consequences. Context: In many cities, there is a history of under - investment in transportation infrastructure in low- income communities and communities of color, Higher - income and predominately white neighborhoods are more likely to have better road engineering that naturally moderates vehicle speed. Legacy systems that didn't fully consider environmental or community impact, on the other hand, have resulted in highways and other arterial roads with higher speeds running through historically mar&alizecl communities, in these communities, installing a speed safety camera may further penalize the residents for the city's lack of investment in road engineering in that neighborhood. -Pedestrian, Fatalities 'by Race/Ethnic Group Deaths pier Ion,000 people 111 111 11 4 mon anow INS AmW M"Ifi.,"(W Hmpww Pa,ffic War"Jer Where appropriate, 5elf-renfDrdng roadways* are a preferred strategy for reducing vehicle speeds. In those locations, speed cameras may provide an immediate solution until the roadway is redesigned. F-Pedestrian Fatalities by Income Deaths per 100,000 1p(�ople It Iff wx . $2.5 $43,0k $ 4 3�Oki: $553 k �553k $70,3k Va,A-S93 ik V43, 1 k $2 5ok CeOSW tract AUAlall hl,121101111h) I 5 2,5i ilml W who", Pip, k A--- hufl,v, o, MaRa Mime Locations As, part of an equity analysis, consider who is Impacted by fines and who benefits from the chosen location for a speed camera. The analysis must include equity considerations including the impact of the camera placement on livability, accessibility, economics, education, and environmental health. The assessment should extend beyond the location of the camera to consider who is using the roadway and for what purpose. In such instances, a speed camera may be an appropriate and effective measure until other speed calming measures can be implemented. City of Port Townsend Fines: Traffic enforcement should balance community safety and individual financial burden, A traffic fine should be designed to change behavior, but not to inflict financial hardship. The maximum fine for an infraction generated through an SSC is $145 but may be doubled for school zone infractions. Drivers who receive an infraction and who receive state public assistance can request a 50 percent reduction for their first 55C violation. A city or county may use an online ability -to -pay calculator to process requests, for reduced fines. Jurisdictions may also consider other options and alternatives for low-income violators not receiving state assistance, * Due date extensions * Payment plans * Community service * Traffic safety education Part of planning an SSC program should include evaluating ways to reduce burdens and advance equity. Ad&flonal resources can be found in section 10, .. .. . . . . . . . 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 200 61 Partnering with the Community Community members will have opinion-, about speed safety cameras. Some will see the value of a properly established and operated prograrn. Others will have experienced or heard of automated enforcement done poorly or used for the wrong reason. Local jurisdictions should reach out to stakeholders including residents near the proposed camera sites, others who frequently use the site (e.g,, school or park), and road users, who regularly travel on that route. There are likely to be different perspectives among these groups. These perspectives may also be influenced by misinformation or previous experiences of misapplied automated enforcement. However, when done properly SSC has consistently proven to be constitutional, effective, respectful of privacy, and an economically prudent strategy in reducing crashes. By clearly communicating the requirements of Washington law and demonstrating that the program w,i I I follow best practices, misperceptions can be addressed. Before launching an 5SC program, engage in outreach to, inform the community about the new program and give people an opportunity to have their questions answered. The following approaches can help build community confidence in the program: City of Port Townsend Pilot Project: To allay concerns, consider launching speed safety carneras as a pilot program. Let the community know that the team managiing the program will assess impacts, collect collision data, and determine if the cameras have been effective, Demonstrate that cameras will be removed if either they aren't effective at a particular location, or if they've achieved the goal of reducing speeds and have been replaced with more permanent measures. Justification: Be clear that speed safety carneras are one component in the solution to create safer streets, and that they will only be used in locations where it is appropriate and effective. SK also provide additional data and, potentially, revenue that will help develop longer -term solutions. (See Revenue, page 11) Community Input, Center community engagement on people most affected by the Implementation of 55C, For example, parents of students who regularly travel through a school speed zone, or residents who live near a park or hospital speed zone. Data aind Trainspareiri Before the program launches, have a plan for transparency. Let the community know what data you'll be tracking and how you'll share it. Include crash data, the number of infractions issued, revenue generated, how the revenue is being used, year-to-year trends, and any other relevant information appropriate to your community. Public Reporting: Jurisdictions using automated traffic safety cameras are required to post an aninual report an their website, The report includes. • Number of crashes at camera locations • Infractions issued for each camera • Percentage of revenue from fines used to pay costs of the program (starting 01/01/26) • Use of revenue that exceeds the cost of operating the program (starting 01/01/26) 0 4,%frl1 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 201 0 7 1 Choosing Camera Locations and Systems Law enforcement and community leaders may intuitively have a good idea of where to put their first speed safety cameras based on a history of crashes, observing speeding vehicles, and input from the community. While initial intuition might be correct, the final selection of a camera location is a more comprehensive process. Locationi An,,Oysis:, in addition to the location type-, and safety criteria outlined in state law, each potential camera location requires an analysis. The analysis must include equity considerations including the impact of the camera placement on: * Livability . Economics Environmental health * Accessibility . Education The analysis must also show a demonstrated need fortraffic cameras based an one or more of the following in the vicinity of the proposed location: • Travel by vulnerable road users (walkers and rollers) • Evidence of speeding vehicles • Rates of collisions • Reports showing near -collisions • Ineffectiveness or infeasibility of other mitigation measures • Equity considerations (see section 5. Equity and Enforcement) ('cnnrrain01:V I lrhPLA� Along with a location analysis, jurisdictions are encouraged to seek input from the community. Because community support is a key factor in the success of an SSC program, the best practice is to choose locations that have community backing when implementing a new program. Deploying cameras in locations most likely to, protect more vulnerable road users, such as school zones and school walk routes, is a good place to start. The goal is encouraging safe speeds rather than issuing citations, Gn,rnc.,,ra A city or county may purchase cameras or lease them from a vendor, The compensation paid to the manufacturer or vendor must be based only on the value of the equipment or services. Payment cannot be based on the revenue generated by the equipment. City of Port Townsend 0 4'% 1 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 202 0 8keploying the Cameras City of Port Townsend Signage; The purpose of S5C is to encourage safe speeds, and the law requires that signs notifying drivers of speed safety cameras be installed at least 30 days prior to activation of the camera. The signs must inform drivers that they are entering an area where speed violations are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera and must follow the specifications of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Warnings: When launching a new 55C program, consider induding a plan for issuing warnings to violators. Some programs establish a period of time after activation (typically 30 days) when all violators receive a warning. As, an alternative, some programs issue warnings to all first-time violators. Eniforcernent tolerance threshoid. Asa matter of fairness, it is important that the threshold for issuing an infraction from an automated system is consistent with in -person enforcement. The local law enforcement agency should provide iniput when setting the enforcement threshold. As a reference, NHTSA recommends a threshold of up to 11 mph on most roads, and no less than six mph in school zones and other locations with lower speed limits where pedestrians and children might be present, such as neighborhoods, playgrounds, and parks." Setting the threshold too high can reinforce speeding behaviors, while setting it too low can be perceived as unjust and prioritizing revenue over safety. Authorized review of infracttons; In addition to review by law enforcement officers, appropriately trained and certified civilian employees of a law enforcement agency or a public works or transportation department are permitted to review infractions detected through the use of an 55C, Due princess: Ensure that the agency managing the SSC program has adequate staffing to send out timely notice, The law requires that a notice of infraction be mailed to the registered owner within 14 days of the violation, Minimizing the number of days between the violation and the mailing of the notice contributes to a more effective speed safety camera program. .. .. . . . . . . . 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 203 0 9 1 Prograim Evaluation A speed safety camera program should be regularly evaluated to validate its effectiveness. Evaluation should include: • Analysis of vehicle speeds • Crash statistics in SSC locations and jurisdiction -wide • Changes in public awareness and acceptance • Data on citations issued, including disaggregation of demographic data on drivers receiving citations and patterns regarding times and days when citations are issued When properly implemented, SSC is an effective tool for changing driver behavior. Speed Safety Camera programs typically see a decrease in speeding drivers in the first year of impEementation, with additional decreases in following years. If driver speeds do, not decrease after implementation of the program, there may be factors contributing to speeding that SSC can't solve. When speed cameras aren't achieving the goalls of the program, it may not be the right tool in that situation. The right tool could be in -person enforcement, NVAMIN 1011, signage, striping, design changes, or some other solution. The Safe, System Approach includes the concept of self -enforcing roadways which limit the ability of drivers to operate outside of design parameters. Whatever the case, continuing to use SSC in a location where it's not effective erodes public trust in the program and doesn't contribute to the goal of reducing high -risk driving behaviors that contribute to traffic crashes, Vehicle Speed Analysis 2018-2020 Kirkland IN= Rose Hill John Mulir/Kamilakin 100 9 HM %Uxeeding I2O MPH % ExceedWj 20 MPH Uajg3 showing R ed kiced spoed s in shoal ool zones d tie t o ASS Kirkland,, WA City of Port Townsend 1,12 2,384 W24) includes requirennents for H)(1 US& Of revenue Lwyond the casof adrininistering Uie pircigram. .. .. . . . . . . . 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 204 Additional l Resources I References This Speed Safety Camera Readiness Guide is a starting point for understanding SSC, of you are part of the team in your community that plans to umplement SSC, the following resources will provide in-depth guidance, Example Ordinances: Des Moines htt:P1 /.wv r cyzrF &r,i la N7ria€�:gpl'gf !ffra,m,ri+a n ,(6,riiir?tl/D Yh/Craii,l �,�it'p�C���fvt r,d,ir , 1��kw htmrl, Fife; irtR aR vtiws v o aaiC lrsf�irrg ca�rmJA & i�leAv nnrl f=wfe1 rQ nELeIOSr7 itnn4 Kirklandr ftyax,;�, w v m9 prrr� lPta@jointr c sni ' f1 I iikac�/7rU rrrn�k,ill<q uir9t p r'rul Poulsbo� ord VVA n'rar.ul'Sbo tf! ,PouN bo.1?F1.0 Seattle: Irtltu.s:l:ukr�rR.cnlrs, dlirrttartbt7tl� Spokane httpj�l/ink rrkrnar�hy 'pK?rV1?frotwmi®,lt r Tacoma ��1 ' Lciis tiff:yafk r rn'uti�re a if Ja ¢�.yl< r�< f ilaerf V arruir �V4 a �� P`T tlell .:Pa affix P DF wenatChee II'tR_Y1 LYwv+rwt�ro9c0.L[rletiiDtuti9an IMq �6fArrtclraf ITarJV,l'ai9u21gttrtrRY1-"'tytalrwm i1!1 Seattle Racial EquityToollkut I-ar"'gy/gvlriiw s-ltaft fi, Vami rill a ggit_y_toollsi_I. Department of V#ea#th Environmental Healtlh Disparities Altai irttta,„s,,,;/trials n ..:gpv/d ut, -and tati toc,al;;; o ejgor9_/ w is tinuP�trmrs tr r;,6aaasg�� ory[.^'f� aau8+ rtro ur r;Itir ..V au� ri l Arlo tr fsi: wl iir �i1� --rfu #r ti Vllzr^b i�r,aa V4'15RC Automated Traffic Safety CamerasResource page. httL,s /rm},r ya.i.P,/?.x1 !Q9 iPPJctf# afetvhra f c-tare l,y � References., 1. Washington Traffic Safety Commiss on, (2024,.ApriI). Target Zero Performance, High -Risk Behavior. n,rttprer fortify ,incr f y hlca.a.r l,, 2, Washington Traffic. Safety Cormmission. (2024, May). 2023 Annual Statewide Traffic Safety Survey, U_ra 1✓v ,st tr_v r_ca suivwi,y_ai rsfrkscm rr_I:11 3. Washington Traffic Safety Commission. (2024,.April). Washington Speed Observation Survey. C:tP //fit.:.! v .fm >Ptd m Ittr aartts/ Pr r.,a obsPIFVati&I Survi 4. Washington Traffic Safety Commission. (2024, Apriit). Target Zero Performance: High -Risk Behavior. httyrrn ncc 29a trh n d/ 5, Nilsson, G, (2004). Traffic Safety Dimension and the Powver Modef to describe the Effect of Speed an Safety. Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden. 6, Washington Traffic Safety Commission. �2024, April). Target Zero Performance: Read Users Vrt:�as: tsm �va_r.°uv Ma <f arcl°o -r,t�����rV'oi°rtrtui�cc <iasCnlrca<rrci�° T RCW 46.61,405, RCW 46 61.41.5 8, Pascal, J. (2022, April). Automated Traffic Safety Enforcement -A Kirkland Case Study. Washington Transportation Professionals Forum and Peer Exchange 9, City of Seattle (2021„ January). Automated Enforcement— Overview of Seattle Programs. Re -Imagining Community Safety Monthly Meeting 10. RCW 46.63.170 11. RCW 47.2.4 City of Port Townsend w °emu 0ppptpi�tip4 ��iM1 mo a#iw�xm�imM1O, ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� iu0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 205 �t"°�ar��My�of"`� 12. Venkatrarnan, V., Richard, C. M,, Magee, K,, & Johnson, K. (2021july), Countermeasures; that work: A hiyliway safety countermeasures guide for State Highway Safety Offices, 10"' edition, 2020 (Report No. DOT H5813097). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 13. City of Seattle. (2021, January). Automated Enforcement — Overview of Seattle Programs. Re -Imagining Community Safety Monthly Meeting 14. City of Seattle. (2021, January). Automated Enforcement — Overview of Seattle Programs. Re -Imagining Community Safety Monthly Meeting 15. Pascal, J. (2022, April). Automated Traffic Safety Enforcement —A Kirkland Case Study, Washington Transportation Professionals Forum and Peer Exchange 16, Pascal, J. (2022, April). Automated Traffic Safety Enforcement —A Kirkland Case Study. Washington Transportation Professionals Forum and Peer Exchange 17. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (2008, March). Speed Enforcement Camera Systems Operational Guidelines. 18. Department of Health. (May, 2024) Washington Environmental Health 06,Vuritie5 Map. j/alcul- I qggy/ VV t! al,ri.GJ.orts was fi et" 0 -W jeTgq[2 A Speed -involved Fatal Crashes; Washington Traffic Safety Commission (2024, May). Target Zero Performance: High -Risk Behavior, 7-,Rv e-dasl �Iboa,r i _�'for in a rq "I-11,111,11-1-11,11Ill""I'll'-"'I "Y Pedestrian and Cyclist Fatalities, Washington Traffic Safety Commission (2024, May). Target Zero Performance: Road Users. I'TUP-f. arciz j Pedestrian Crash Survival. Tefft, Biria n C. (2011, September) Impact speed and a Pedestrian's Risk of Severe injury or Death. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety Pedestrian Fatalities by Race/Ethnic Group: Washington Traffic Safety Commission (2024, May). WTSC Coded Fatal Crash (CFC) flies. Pedestrian Fatalities by Income. Venson, E., Grimminger, A., Kenny, S, (2022), Dangerous By Design 2022. Smart Growth America Vehicle Speed Analysis 2018-2020 Kirkland; Pascal, L (2022, April). Automated Traffic5afety Enforcement — A Kirkland Case Study. Washington Transportation Professionals Forum and Peer Exchange Acknowledgments: Several people shared generously of their time and knowledge during the development of this project. Many thanks to: Jon Pascal, City of Kirkland Dongho Chang, Washington State Department of Transportation Allison Schwartz, lBradley Topol and Venu Nemani, City of Seattle Josh Diekmarn, Carrie Wilhelirre, and Rachel Barra, City of Tacoma Doug Dahl, TransitLab Consulting Jon Snyder, Office of Governor Jay inslee Brandy DeLange, Association of Washington Cities City of Port Townsend ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r 411 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 206 0 Publication . Shelly Baldwin Director June 2024 6,21 V' Avenue SE Suite 409 Olympia,, WA 98501 360-725-9860 EL—.v✓wa; uv :'. Traffic Safety Programs; wade Alonzo, Director, aVurtzGa e t tsr � t J:,�nv Research and Data: Staci Hoff, Director, 0off(ujwvCsc wi .8c�j External Relations: Mark, McKechnie, Director, inmc_I e e hntwtsw.W!"L,Lov Speed Pragram; Janine Koffel, Manafer,1 � lfw ,Ifx City of Port Townsend 0ppp�pi��llp4 ��iM1 W °�u u�lw�xm�imM1�p� ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�r �� ru0kpmul 2025 Active Transportation Plan I Page 207 ^��"°�a���My�oJ"`� aPp.rm- 1, LnO c- 0 4--) m 4--) L- 0 C) L40 c- Q) N 0 4--) 0 0 ;7 Q) C-- 4-j Ll-- 0 Q) 4--) C) D I cy. awk 400 40,0 40* 4101 00 I 7 9 So=f-4 6 or T T con OWN* 0 I • • A 0 0 f • • f • i • � N Z i s s s s s e e e s o o o J E iLl c Q) L1J a I 0 :0 C&I 0 Q- 0 Ln N C) N L: a C> .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .2 0 C> ----------- w u c 0 CL 6) E Ln E N 0 0 u N E 0 L) u .... .... .... .... .... .... E E 0 u ai Ln N 0 U .. .. .. .. .. <) I 0 :0 C&I 4� Q- LLI 4� Ov� ar u CL 4-J V) 4-J C: b.0 C: 0 V) _0 0 0 0 C: V) 4-J S 0 CL 4-5 % L- 4-J u V) 0 _0 V) C: u C: >- (3) > 0 u 4--J u ai C: 0 0 > :3 — -0 a) E u 0 3) CL E 0 4-j 0 'Gi C: OJ -J �: o 0 4- �: o 0 4- -�e 0 0 0 P- " TA' A I I _0 C: 4-j E V) 0 > 4-j V) C: 0 V) 4-j ar E w I— .Ei V) C: Cr 0 w w u _0 E cn C: U- 0) > x 0 u 0 4-j E 0 4-J 0 0 U o 0 0 \ � \ @ y \ 4-j »\ / @\ @ d } \� CT 76 . 6 .3 4-j � � @ 0 ^ > L- ' m @ — � .- 2 � g � @ 4 . r r ra `7 r r r T ❑ o ❑ ❑ A u •4 1 is •u i .' Ak it � s s KAK,E �}� \ � \ ) � / A ( � \ 3 / : \ / t r , & 2 3 3 / / j � � � � � � \ a \ _ \ ) / \ 2 « » » \ � � � \ \ \ � s \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ � |� � � � § e :4 \�\\\} ,- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _- E V V., 1 h If SO LAI\�\111\\11\ 1� OR I a) miuotu 0 N 0 cf� F�11 E IRII� bn MST up 'Al o ri N m Qa as' 4J u 0 •E w I Qp 4J = , = 0 En r- 100 O. -0 4 L. Ln 0 4- 41 M m 0 w VD 0 0 w 0 w Qj s- LA >1 4J 0 QUA M, 0) C: u 10 10 0 iG +1 ro 41 :Z: uj 4a en cn vy "0Cat cz c M L a)' 0 x (u, Tl 14 0) > Q c O'D QL 0) 0 0 S. 0) 41 rz u CL 0 vi m 0 'o .0 :3 0 (A +, > th .Ne 0 V1 >) a 1 M, 0 tA U '00 o o Qv o 41 W 4-1 0 t. 44 u u U 0 o 0 V) CL CL 0 CL a 0 v N4 E 17 0 15 t: 0 > �6 Z _0 C, orK5 Ana eo 4 c CL V, IA W X, w all ,A 2 B Odi ce E v CL I >1 cc cc (n cc 0 , , E Y a) -C -C CY CO E 0 (n E co (1) > o Cl E Co 4 0--- cc .E u) CY 2�1 cc C: C: :3 0 Ir w N 0 0 .0 U) Cl U) L C-0 E (n (n CO 0 0 E 0 0 cc; > CO (n E E o 0 L) > LU 0 I \\\ ^ ^ \ A A IN IN M 11 'a M m W - \\\\\\\ a + / A � \ =k j f +X + 4 1 ® j K A m . . ° . � . � 2 > > > / « 0 L \ bio ) / u \ \ \ \ $ \ \ \ \ CL » a Q - j L k \ o } bo \ \ u § \ M z j § � 2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ; ƒ ( \ ! ; } 0 ,e > > > > > > > > > > > > V) Q 7 O uu N N -6 L a -0 c u V) ra � U _ o � cn m ai CO 4J m v N O 'cp -o w ai � c N a- N ai O O ai Q u u c bA E o 0 M a v u v � a v a H U � M v a •u .0 k., C°i Q O v cr a• c ° `v o j a `v O n a o a ai aE o `v °�' c o o v =' o - E o N H c u 0 ° o. v a o -°° :Q v O v °u' c �- Q. v v v c L Vl G C E SZ 3 Qj E° o E E N N ?, i O0 v -0 i. 0 GO O E 4 ° O a0 O O x ,m p u c O u c u G c c c ur dp 4U o O- '� ° o c c O o c N i n.. •p O G 'O N O_ E O t. .N L - a a .o a •� v c c N a°, Vl N ••- \ '6 C O v U v u°_°° . ao ° u p a m O o Q c v •- 3 O a v Q U 'v ao -I-- om °- D -u M - ° - v v - p t o_0 L 3 c ao >- - ° 3 v+ n L c m u 1� v u O v s on c v= L c U m 3 p- O v ''c v ° Y v v a3i ° V V 7 v.., v Nam., -6 ° a 4J a_. v N 3 (6 i-� v C i ° O > OJ ? a 3 °' n +O+ `v — �° avi L � N ,� _0 a .� - 3 u .� — aci w u sy —_ - •n — ° h p O a c v N se axi Ea a - WOJ n> o Q O jj t3LOO QJ 4J O O L U i N F 7 °- v + 3 °o L ai a a E aci `--' `a i ° a°/o ° p aco ai v o o E N a v n u v ° N° °u' a>'i -zo L v ° E °� U a ° °c° v ° a°i v 3 w c > U. •c o -ww ++ Z v N aci m '� v O v .3 c ° .� n ti.o c � c u W c v v '° co cA a a c o ao c v E o u ao L ,a; N (6 a N uc of 3 C o 4= v "_' a) a �n i — ou �- c� .c �.. . a v O E E a�i Y n Y O_ E a+ io O a O = aj o ° °�' a .� u u au V a �; u m = m L c ° c c aui a; OC h c a 1D u a M W wi V) J p V 3: ' � a ti u 0 E a, ca G ba E E tin 0 O_ D �o tin E 12 bD O n s bD tin 0 0 U ai O u Q .o. i v `a a Y i O 3 C: c c o Va) Sao N u > c c a, bn a o E o w a v n N n D > � v > c N u a, O n E aa) (n W w E n O v bn ai c 0 c 2 H ao c O 0 0 tin a, u 0 0 c �o D E ai tin ao c a, 0 a, c � v E o n o o n > m v n 5 ago 3 O u o c b c � aa) E tin tia M C: ago a, n 0 0 Q u E o w E 12 tin O Q Ga tin `O E ao u 0 u Ln 0 .; v a a ti i c ai o a N ba c D W bo ax, _ 0 E v .3 a-' D Q u a° i L ° tb N 'O c c v ai v > -�2 n u O c ° a/ E 0 ba N O v E u i bai o a -6 c Q E Q M (b N ++ c f0 mE c °U ao o v v a, E m — E � > � o a/ o N ro U v C: n n ELc c v aEi o° c m N c +m fO c N =o u O c ro N o .v p z ai 'n o + E .- U c + g ° ° c v m _ o ba c ° a`) U > c o o °/ ° .� c c .c o E o c O c O N E v a E a) c h Y c m uui `o °c° E E + v m om ° o m c a/ Q — o `� O ++ m E c m E c O to d m w o U * O •� 3 > a°i m o E ba c 3 n E a3i � Y c N �o ° � * >° v 0 0 c 0 c aco c � t ao v v c- +� N N w I— w-Lz V v U � u N � N -° a1 � O '^ Q � L > � a1 L � c Q E aJ c by N (b > ba o g -0 c� N E U by t U Q � O E a u E n ba N a aci 3 ,U Y E W O 7 b o n to -a a, -0 o v ba U w O s u O -0 -0 u C VI ice+ 7 Q °- E U m 7 E c °L bo O Ou E 'o aN O O t � v o v O by � t n O bn o_ v 0 + U O v v ° O E: 4z O 2 (O N = .N U c Q -O .0 bbo a� -o O N _1 U In _1 0 J v a a N 0 O Cn w 21, 0 U w O C� CO U U) c' CD � Z s U F— O w w U � O H U) C) >; c a) N Q O Ep O 00 L L L L U L L L L L E L L L O p O O LO p O -0 O -0 N .0 O -0 O _0 L O p OO O -0 O -0 N a E U E E = E = E -g o E = E = E � E = E = O -o o E = E = E � o o ( U U N 0 U U C) U U N U U U L) a � a co °' (D z m a , _ Q Q N O c) LL _ O O U �0- � �'� a�� N LU -� co a a oi; o i = o Z a U Cl) (�5 Lu Q m p (B N m a o O0 � W = a LUz U)m a a a � o o J� Q a a,�o �o �W o� �� a '� U a .o a Y V z W LLLL p a N a) Q- co=a��0 ��U �0 CO co :z mo_ a Co Cm =•a'a'�•a'LL co M O O m> z Z I� � N t3 co� O aco c a> O a> U a> t O a 0) Q In J O iB U U O U N O > • • • • • • LU • • • S J U C � Q �-- +, J LU LU cv z • • • • I� CQj C� (D O tm c C LL E E 4) O U E U � C.i _ o a> � o � N � c`aCL m o _ > 0 ) 'c E LU._ J � c' CD a> o X U Lu Z m o E� U O t m }, m p U E > ca a� CQj V c E> Eo Q 2i }, m o c E o . O O 6�mO 0 co E0 •c CO N0) O C) O O p _'O E� — C Ln c(D O c > M E •a' m _ ++ N 'V O CO , in 2 •O CO to m 'V y to Q X .•_• � O U O E •� E c 3 aD CO L a 4- (D Cn E c LL- c = am ca O U c > L� U � V � O C�0 O tm CL co N -p > M F� C> Cn m= U Cn Q U C> U) CL J U W Ua- 0 c O O CD co O CD O CD O CD O CD O CD O CD O CD O CD O CDCV cn LP CD M CD O CDE O F— to W M M M M M CG CG M M ct CO w Ln ct' ct' LO C9 CO p CD e— CD e— e— e— CD CV Rf O O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O O 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z I Z Z Z Z O CO O O O L L O O O CQ N � a)O L L � L � 0 L 0 :-E aD 21 E2 L L � L L L L L L L L m E L� L L L L L N 0 0 0 0 N O L O N O E U E E E E E E E E E o E E E = E U E E C6 C6 C6 Rf t m == m m = m = M t M = a O M M M t a_ U M M m O N o O O O N a a cu LL .> o m 2 Q a o cl� =a O �a a, 0 o a coo O O ��� ?'2 m a `� o a O O J J 0 U pco O a '�m J J cq w cq w — O U cu m N a N a � Q cq w cq w L) L) iza o a c a,a c�a a o �, c) L) U a �� a O O �a .i a o coo 0a ~ O O >- H> a a ' a> U J. N U LL a co .g 2 C/) iB Q 0 Q 0 a °�' O O_ J m Q a Q Q 0 w Q 0 in 0 U J 0 Z J = J=� U I- a � = cn �L a N J� S C) S w Q V -2 tm -2 O O O 0o E a m m O cn O U rn -2 O 0 > 0 N aD 0 > � o E w W2 3 E o E V m - tm O c itm O > O U Z — p U •5 > (D O O c m _ Q a w 0 E O Q O V L) 0 o cCf) (D0)O N O m ._0 N n � O _ O = o 'O t C EO E, E � O = O_ _ cn is = E E m n 'co—n � ° C co U E E— pp E E a� U O U �j — c co 2 cn 'E c — c y N a � p 0 U c p U a� U O U U c O 0, a E LL- 3 N to �_ U Q 3 Q aD O 0) L c O L)p o— c p— U G O V •O i G � (D � c •E O L)m (D cn L c C a--� c� = U ¢ U 6 cn U w U a- a- O M O M O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O co Lo O M O O O O O M O M O M ct N CO to M M M M w w Co. CV ct' CO to Co. mot- N CO Lo N CO N r— N ti N tb N N M .:I- CO tb t70 O _ Ln co N co N .:I-� N N Lo N to N > O > O > O > O > O V N U O U O U O U O V O V N U O p O O U O V N U O U O U O V N U O V N Z Z Z Z Z D D 0 D 0 p 0 0 O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D L L C O L � c C C -0L L L C CQ (D � (DCOD -0 -0 N L � Cps O cO O O p O O U cu O -> O -0 Z � E -E - = U .- a) O O 0 OIL _0 Q C a) � p N Ocu O O a5 C �J a) a5 L11> a) cr- C a) -O a3 O m LO C 0 -0 O 3 Op =cr-2mCU �, Q as Q c cu ca o a w �00 .? p E a) 2cr,- 0 — Q d cuQ O 3 U `O in `p n co���C..) U .� ca 41) -o a)o a� s O E w Ecnm E 6 S Cj o- o' o in 2Q5)= o_ a) O O) =3 'O =3 O a) �QcnUa =40 PENINSULA Serving the communities of the Clallam-Jefferson-Kitsap-Mason County Region PT October 22, 2025 .ERIE�Q 1--lonorable Patty Murray 154 Russell Senate Office Building C10110m County Washington, DC 20510 Jefferson County 1--lonorable Maria Cantwell Kitsap County 511 II -cart Senate Office Building Mason County Washington, DC 20510 Bainbridge Island 1--lonorable Emily Randall 1531 Longworth 1--louse Office Building Bremerton Washington, DC 20515 Forks Port Angeles Dear Senator Murray, Senator Cantwell, and Representative Randall, Port Orchard l am writing to you on behalf of the 27 governments that make up the Peninsula Regional Port Townsend Transportation Planning Organization (PRTPO). Our communities are preparing to host fans and Poulsbo events for the 2026 World Cup matches in Seattle next summer. We're working to make transportation as efficient as possible to accommodate the historic surge in visitors while also Sequirn continuing to support our residents and businesses. We anticipate unprecedented levels of travel Shelton between the Olympic and IKitsap Peninsulas via the II -food Canal Bridge with correspondingly high Clallarn Transit demand for reliable transit and ferry access to and from Seattle. Jefferson Transit We are writing to ask for your help, please. We ask that you request the Coast Guard to modify its rules for when the II -food Canal Bridge spans will open to allow large recreational sailboats tojourney Kitsap Transit in or out of II -food Canal. This is necessary for our transit agencies, charter service providers, and Mason Transit others to make reliable travel plans during the World Cup. A Notice to Mariners establishing set Port of Allyn times for sailboat passage at 10:00 am and 2:00 pm, plus any time between 11:00 pm and 5:00 am, would greatly increase predictability and travel time reliability during this period of profound strain Port of Bremerton on our rural highways and services. Port of Port Angeles Under the current rule, with limited exceptions during peak evening periods in the summer, the Port of Shelton skipper of any large sailboat can request that WSDOT open the II -food Canal Bridge spans so it can IAISDOT Olympic Region pass through, stopping all vehicular traffic. This entire process takes an hour or more and creates back-ups felt from Bremerton to Port Angeles. The unpredictable nature of these drawbridge Jamestown S'Klallarn Tribe openings impacts transit, commerce, ferry riders, commuters, and tens of thousands of other Lower Elwha Klallarn Tribe travelers on SIR 104 and SIR 3. We expect recreational sailboat activity to be higher next summer as Makah Notion a result of the World Cup, too, with associated increases in requests for passage that exacerbate these congestion impacts and undermine our coordination efforts. We believe a workable Skokornish Tribe compromise between recreational sailors and all other travelers exists, but that depends on the Squaxin Island Tribe Coast Guard. Coast Guard policies dictate when WSDOT will open the II -food Canal Bridge spans for recreational sailboat passage. We respectfully ask for your assistance in getting a temporary modification to www ..................... ..................................... current policies to better account for the historic travel demands we anticipate next summer, increasing predictability for highway travel and recreational marine travel alike. This will in no way Pg 1 of 2 infringe upon existing policies governing passage of Navy or commercial vessels. We welcome the chance to talk with you and your aides about this request and are ready to offer whatever support you may need in presenting this to the Coast Guard for its consideration. Please contact me or our coordinator, Thera Black, for support. Our contact information is below. It is an honor to be a part of the region that will host matches for the 2026 World Cup and a tremendous opportunity for our communities to tap into the economic stimulus this offers our state. A proactive and coordinated approach to managing known conflicts between recreational marine travel and highway travel will help ensure Seattle's World Cup events are remembered for the sport and not Hood Canal Bridge frustrations. Thank you in advance for your consideration and assistance with this important matter. Sincerely, Lindsey Schromen-Wawrin, Chair Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization City Councilmember, Port Angeles Attachment: 33 CFR Part 117 — Docket No. USCG-2012-0074, "Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hood Canal, WA" cc: PRTPO Executive Board Julie Meredith, WSDOT Secretary of Transportation Steve Roark, WSDOT Olympic Region Administrator 23rd Legislative District Members Senator Drew Hansen Representative Tarra Simmons Representative Greg Nance 24' Legislative District Members Senator Mike Chapman Representative Adam Bernbaum Representative Steve Tharinger 26' Legislative District Members Senator Deborah Krishnadasan Representative Adison Richards Representative Michelle Caldier 35' Legislative District Members Senator Drew MacEwen Representative Dan Griffey Representative Travis Couture Pg2of2 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012/Rules and Regulations 28767 TABLE 1 OF § 100.801—EIGHTH COAST GUARD DISTRICT TABLE OF ANNUAL MARINE EVENTS Table No. Sector Ohio Date Event/sponsor Sector Ohio Valley Regulated area Valley location 5 ............... 5 The second Sunday in Au- Mountaineer Triathlon/ Monongahela River, Mor- Monongahela River, mile gust. Greater Morgantown gantown, WV. marker 101.0 to 102.0, Convention and Visitors Morgantown, WV. Bureau. * * * * * Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. ■ 4. Amend § 165.801 by revising in Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; Table 1, the entry for Table No. 151 to PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; read as follows: AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Star 2064; Department of homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. § 165.801 Annual Fireworks Displays and ■ 3. The authority citation for part 165 other events in the Eighth Coast Guard District requiring safety zones. continues to read as follows: * * * * * TABLE 1 OF § 165.801—EIGHTH COAST GUARD DISTRICT TABLE OF ANNUAL SAFETY ZONES Table No. Sector Mobile Date Sponsor/name Sector Mobile Safety zone location 151 ........... 10 Biannually occurring dur- Angels Over the Bay/ Back Bay Biloxi, Biloxi, Back Bay Biloxi, Bounded ing odd numbered Keesler Air Force Base. MS. by the following coordi- years; 2 Days; Mid- nates: March to end of April. Eastern boundary; Lati- tude 30°25'47.6" N, Longitude 088°54'13.6" W, to Latitude 30°24'43" N, Longitude 088°54'13.6" W. Western Boundary; Lati- tude 30o25'25.6" N, Longitude 088°56'9" W, to Latitude 30o24'55" N, Longitude 088°56'9" W. * * * * * Dated: April 23, 2012. Roy A. Nash, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 1;ighth Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2012-11809 Filed 5-15-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [Docket No. USCG-2012-0074] RIN 1625—AA09 Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hood Canal, WA AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is modifying the drawbridge operating regulation for the Hood Canal floating drawbridge near Port Gamble. This modification will relieve heavy rush hour road traffic on State Routes 3 and 104 by allowing the draw of the bridge to remain closed to maritime traffic during afternoon rush hours during summer months. This action will help alleviate heavy rush hour road traffic by reducing bridge openings, thereby reducing traffic queues and delays due to bridge openings. DATES: This rule is effective May 22, 2012. ADDRESSES: Comments and related materials received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket USCG-2012- 0074 and are available online by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2012-0074 in the "Keyword" box, and then clicking "Search." This material is also available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email the Bridge Administrator, Coast Guard Thirteenth District; telephone 206-220-7282 email rondall.d.overton@ uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory information On March 1, 2012 we published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hood Canal, WA in the Federal Register (77 FR 12514). We received 17 comments on the proposed 28768 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012/Rules and Regulations rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was held. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because due to the volume of traffic and congestion in the area around the bridge any further delay would not be in the best interest for public safety. The Coast Guard conducted a test deviation of the bridge operating schedule from May 27, 2011 through September 30, 2011 with comments received through November 30, 2011. The Coast Guard also published an NPRM, which referenced a May 22 start date. The comments received both from the test deviation and the NPRM were overwhelmingly in support of implementing this rule, with no comments opposing the modification. Basis and Purpose Senator Phil Rockefeller and Representative Christine Rolfes of the Washington State Legislature requested that the operating regulations of the Hood Canal Bridge be changed to provide some relief to road traffic on State Routes 3 and 104. Traffic queues south of the eastern end of the bridge can be in excess of 45 minutes during and after openings of the draw span. The stopped road traffic on this two- lane highway blocks access to intersecting streets along the queue. The current operating regulations for the bridge are found at 33 CFR 117.1045. Per existing operating regulations, the bridge shall open on signal if at least one hour notice is provided and the draw shall be opened horizontally for three hundred feet unless the maximum opening of 600 feet is requested. The current regulations remain in effect except for the establishment of the restricted period under this rule. Navigation on the waterway consists of commercial tugs with tows, recreational vessels of various sizes, commercial fishing vessels, and U.S. naval vessels with escort vessels including those of the U.S. Coast Guard. This new rule will not affect commercial tug and tow vessels nor will it affect U.S. Naval Vessels or vessels in service to the U.S. Navy or other pubic vessels of the United States because pursuant to this rule, the bridge is required to open for these types of vessels during the restricted period. The Coast Guard conducted a test deviation of the bridge operating schedule from May 27, 2011 through September 30, 2011 during which the bridge was not required to open from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. except for U.S. Navy Vessels and vessels attending the missions of the U.S. Navy. This test deviation was published in the Federal Register under docket number USCG- 2010-0314 and comments were received and evaluated during the comment period which ended November 30, 2011. Comments received, during the test deviation were evaluated and incorporated into a proposed rule which was published in the Federal Register on March 1, 2012 under docket number USCG-2012-0074. Discussion of Comments and Changes The Coast Guard issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) under docket number USCG-2012-0074 and received comments through April 16, 2012. 17 comments were received. The comments received in response to the NPRM were overwhelmingly in favor of instituting this rule. Sixteen of the 17 comments supported the modification. Eight of 16 comments supporting the modification also proposed adding similar restrictions on bridge openings for morning commute hours. The Coast Guard reviewed the bridge opening logs and the vehicle traffic counts for the morning hours and found no definitive benefit of imposing a morning restriction on the drawbridge operation. One comment was received in opposition to the applicability of the rule. The opposing commenter stated that the restriction should be expanded to include naval and commercial vessels. The Coast Guard reviewed the bridge opening logs and found no significant benefit gained by expanding the restrictions to tug and tow vessels which are exempt from this rule. The Coast Guard will not expand the restrictions to vessels of the U.S. Navy or vessels attending the missions of the U.S. Navy because restricting movement of U.S. Navy vessels could compromise national security. This final rule is being issued with no changes from the proposed rule issued under docket USCG-2012-0074. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders. Regulatory Planning and Review This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. We have reached this conclusion by the fact that commercial tow vessels and U.S. Naval Vessels are exempt from the restricted openings. Vessels that would be primarily affected are recreational vessels that are not able to pass through the fixed navigational channels of the bridge. Vessels affected by the restricted opening schedule will be able to plan their trips to avoid the restricted period. There are no changes to the regulatory text of this rule from the previously issued NPRM. Impact on Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term "small entities" comprises small businesses, not -for -profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule would primarily affect recreational sailboats which have mast heights that preclude them from passing under the fixed navigational openings in the bridge. Vessels which require an opening will be informed of the restricted closure period via the Coast Guard's Local Notice to Mariners which will allow them to plan trips to avoid this time frame. Collection of Information This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501- 3520). Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012/Rules and Regulations 28769 particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a "significant energy action" under that order because it is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.11), which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded that this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are not required for this rule. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 117 as follows: PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS ■ 1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of ficuneland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. ■ 2. Amend § 117.1045 by redesignating paragraphs (b) and (c) as paragraphs (c) and (d) respectively, and adding new paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 117.1045 Hood Canal. (b) The draw of the Hood Canal Bridge, mile 5.0, need not open for vessel traffic from 3 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. daily from 3 p.m. May 22 to 6:16 p.m. September 30, except for commercial tug and tow vessels and vessels of the U.S. Navy or vessels attending the missions of the U.S. Navy and other public vessels of the United States. At all other times the bridge will operate in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section. Dated: May 3, 2012. A.T. Ewalt, Captain, U.S. Coast Gaard Commander, Thirteenth Coast Gaard District Acting. [FR Doc. 2012-11810 Filed 5-15-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket No. USCG 2012-0229] Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks, City of Antioch, CA AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the City of Antioch Fourth of July Fireworks display in the Captain of the Port, San Francisco area of responsibility during the dates and times noted below. This action is necessary to protect life and property of the maritime public from the hazards associated with the fireworks display. During the enforcement period, unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring in the safety zone, unless authorized by the Patrol Commander (PATCOM). DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1191 will be enforced from 8 a.m. on through 10 p.m. on July 4, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice, call or email Ensign William Hawn, Sector San Francisco Waterways Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 415-399-7442, email D11-PF- MorineEvents -PF- MorineEvents@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone in navigable waters around and under the fireworks barge within a radius of 100 feet during the loading, transit, and arrival of the fireworks barge to the display location and until the start of the fireworks display. From 8 a.m. on until 8:45 p.m. on July 4, 2012 the