HomeMy WebLinkAbout042591 Min a
do all. _
Planning Commission Minutes, Meeting of 'April 25, 1991
I . ROLL CALL
Chairperson Ron Kosec called the meeting to order at 7 : 30
p.m. Members present were Alan Carman, Karen Erickson, Sally
McDole, and Jim Tavernakis,
II . APPROVAL of MINUTES
Approval of minutes from meetings dated March 28th and April
11, 1991. It was moved by Chairperson Ron Kosec and seconded by
Karen Erickson to approve the minutes. All were in favor.
III . COMMUNICATIONS
Current Mail
The Commission received a letter dated April 18 from Josephine
Reynolds regarding her Conditional Use Permit. A hearing date
was discussed. Mr. Sepler said that because this was merely an
extension of a precious application, the Commission probably
didn't have to operate on a first-come, first-served, basis, Mr.
Carman moved to have the hearing on June 27th. Ms. Erickson
seconded. All were in favor.
A letter from the Olympic Environmental Council was received.
IV. OLD BUSINESS '
A-* Street vacation #9101--w08, Mike Marson,
Mr. Koen reminded the Commission that this hearing was continued
from the meeting of February 28 .
1. Staff Presentation and Review
Mr, Sepler directed the Commission ' s attention to the
revised documents in their packets . The applicants request a
vacation of that portion of the entire 60 foot Width of platted
and unopened Magnolia Street. Mr, Sepler reviewed the Draft
Findings and Conclusions for the Commission, and said in
conclusion that planning staffinembers recommend that this Street
Vacation be granted as conditioned, with the following
conditions;
1 . A certified copy of the ordinance vacating the street
shall be recorded with the City Clerk, and the office of the
Jefferson County Auditor. Upon receipt by the City of a l l
fees and compensation required, pursuant to Section
12 - 20 - 120 of the Pori Townsend Municipal Code, the street
vacation shall be cancelled and become automatically mull
and void within one year after City Council action if said
fees have not been paid.
k
t f i
-foot easement for utilities shall be maintained
along the center line of the vacated portion of Magnolia
Street.
. All improvements ents stipulated by Street Development Permit
#91010 shall have been completed prior - tovacation f the
street.
4 . This street vacation shall not become effective until
restrictive covenants executed and recorded by the City ,
Attorney setting forth all conditions of this permit to
(unclear) and be binding upon the land.
Mr. Sepler then reviewed the snap for the Commission. Some
confusion arose over the correct names for streets in this area.
Mr. Marson addressed the Commission, hoping to correct any
confusion about proper names for streets, saying that confusion
had probably arisen because he had received another street permit
in that area recently.
Nis. Erickson and Ms. Sherwood said that they have the wrong
Public Works List.
Ms . Erickson asked a question about traffic fl.low and street
development.
Mr. Carman asked Mr. Marson if the hammerhead would severely
impact development if it were extended to 24 feet.
Mr. Marson said that it would just be giving the City more of his
property, but if there was a reason for it, it might be
considered.
Mr. Ta ernakis asked a question about access.
Mr. osec opened the floor to public testimony.
The applicant spoke first, saying that they had been working on
the application for about six months to get everything together,
and that it had been approved by almost everyone.
No one else chose to spoke for or against the application. Mr.
Kosec closed the floor- to public testimony, and roved on to the
Committee report, presented by Ms. Erickson.
Nis. Erickson said that she had no problems with the application,
or with Public Works approval. She had no further questions, and
said that all the things the Commission had requested be done,
were done.
Nis. Erickson moved that the Commission recommend Application
#9101-08 to City Council, Findings and Conclusions as written by
staff . Sally McDol.e seconded.
h
'roll call vote was taken, and all were in favor.
A, conditional use Permit , 9102-m01, Iran Deering
11 Staff Presentation and Review
Mr. Carman mentioned that there was a confiit because he had
become an adjacent property owner. He said that he felt no
personal conflict. He told the Commission that he would excuse
himself if anyone saw a conflict. No one opposed his presence
during the hearing.
. Sepler proceeded with the Staff Report.
The applicant proposes to establish a bed and' breakfast in an
existing single-family home located at 1208 Franklin Street on
the corner of Franklin and Fillmore Streets, in an -III zoning
district. Three guestrooxs are provided in the residence, along
with an apartment over the garage. An additional basement room
is proposed. Mr. Sepler reviewed Draft Findings and Conclusions
for the Commission, and presented a discussion on parking for the
proposed use. Mr. Sepler, speaking for Planning Stafftembers,
recommended that the application be granted conditioned,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of a Certifidate of occupancy for
the additional guest room, the premises shall be inspected
by the Washington State Fire Marshal.
.I
Proposed use shall ' comply with the proposed Findings of
Fact and conclusions and conditions. Ih case of any
.conflict, the Conditions shall prevail over Findings, and
interpreting or applying the same.
This conditional use permit i shall not become effective
until a restrictive covenant is entered and recorded by the
City Attorney, setting forth all the conditions of this
permit to run with and be binding upon the land.
Mr. Sepler- said that one question was whether or not one
additional unit, as proposed in the application, was reason
enough to require the conditional use process. The case was sent
to the City Attorney, who did determine that it was enough of a
substantial change to merit the conditional use process.
Ii
Mr. Tarernakis asked a question about the parking requirement.
r
I'
Mr. Kosec opened the floor to public testimony.
The applicant, Joan Deering, spoke first. She said that she had
spoken with at least five of her neighbors, and no one showed any
disagreement with the proposal. She clarified that they wouldn't
be building any additions, but would be remodeling their
basement, and the xoom would be in that space.
i
i
W
Helen ll n, a neighboring property owner, spoke in f av r of the
application. She said that the Deerings have operated a guest
house in the neighborhood for several years, and that they do not
bother the neighbors, they come in quietly, they leave quietly,
and it is a pleasure to see them cone.
Ivo one spoke in opposition to the application' .
. Kosec closed the floor to public testimony, and moved on the
committee report.
Ms, McDoie said that in reading Keith Harper"s letter, the one
family who had objected previously didn't appear, which was a
good sign to her that there wasn't much objection at all. She
said that she was in f ar of the application. Ms. McDoie roved
to accept Conditional use Permit Application #9102-01 a
conditioned, and that she accepts the finding.s of fact and
conclusions and conditions.
Ms. Erickson seconded.
A roll-call vote was taker-, and e' pprl was unanimous.
V. NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Sepler talked about applications that will be coming before
the Commission in the next few meetings, such. as the Arterial
Streets Plan, the Dignan Street Vacation Application, and
Zoning Text Amendment.
Mr. Sepler discussed the Elks rezone, and interesting conditions
that the application presented. He said that the SEPA
application is currently reaching the review stage.
A brief discussion on traffic plans and impact fees ensued.
vll . ANNOUNCEMENTS
The Petersen Street vacation Application was moved to June 27 .
Ms, Erickson and Ms. Sherwood said that they would not accept the
Elks Environmental. Checklist on the grounds that the information
submitted is incomplete to base a decision on.
M . McDole and Ms . Sherwood pointed out errors in the Checklist,
and also said that Mr. Robison had signed the Environmental
Checklist under Review for Completeness. They feel that it is
not complete.
Mr. Kos c asked the Commission if they would like to schedule Ted
Simmons to spear on Earthquake Preparedness. {
Mr. Tavernakis suggested that it didn't seem necessary to take up
Commission time to learn about Earthquake Preparedness, but that
maybe Mr. Simmons could schedule a separate session, to which
City Council members could be invited, along ;,with the Historic
Preservation Commission or anyone else who would be interested in
coming,
Katherine Johnson was delegated to arrange the session.
Mr. Sepler announced that on May 8 , from 7 : 00 to 10: 00, there
would be a charrette in the Community Center to design the
Gateway Triangles,
Ms. Erickson volunteered to be the Planning Commission
representative to the olarrette,
Mr. Tavernakis moved to adjourn the meeting, 4nd Ms. McDole
seconded. The meeting was adjourned at : o p. .
F
t List ,
Y �
Do you wish 1a If yes, indicate
AME [please printf ADDRESS present lesl1mony7 topic.
YES NO '
` �
Cy.
❑ �C�ondLlfi-tonat�
V�Qr2. �2�rMn ��c�a l"��t71r1 k4
0 0
. D D
D D
0 0
D - D
❑ D
D O
D D
El El
D D
D El
D ❑
D D
.d 0