Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06172002CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF JUNE 17, 2002 The City Council of the City of Port Townsend met in regular session this seventeenth day of June, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. in the Port Townsend Council Chambers of City Hall, Mayor Kees Kolff presiding. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmembers present at roll call were Freida Fenn, Joe Finnie, Kees Kolff, Geoff Masci, Catharine Robinson, Michelle Sandoval and Alan Youse. Staff members present were City Manager David Timmons, City Attorney John Watts, Public Works Director Ken Clow, BCD Director Jeff Randall, BCD Planner Judy Surber, Fire Chief Ed Edwards, and City Clerk Pam Kolacy. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. PRESIDING OFFICER'S REPORT An official of the Department of Ecology was on hand to present an award of recognition to the Port Townsend Biosolids Compost Facility for its excellent performance last year. Jim Freitas, Jeff Wood and John Merchant were on hand to accept the award. Midyear assessment: council agreed to schedule a midyear assessment some time in July. County Negotiations re Glen Cove: The mayor stated that the negotiating team would like to submit to the County Planning Commission the letter which was submitted to the County on May 8 with notification that further recommendations of the full council will be submitted to the BOCC in July. The negotiating team's draft response will be brought forward to the July 1 city council meeting so that the public and full council will have the opportunity to review the draft recommendations on the LAMIRD boundary and UDC codes. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Seawater Intrusion: Mr. Timmons noted that materials were placed in the council packet which were received from the County regarding the proposed Unified Development Code (UDC) amendments relating to seawater intrusion. The amendments were developed in response to a Growth Management Board ruling that Jefferson County's 2000 UDC regulations had failed to provide adequate protection against seawater intrusion into City Council Business Meeting Page 1 June 17, 2002 groundwater sources. When there has been time to review the materials, council will be asked for direction concerning the proposed amendments. PUBLIC COMMENT Ted Shoulberg: commented on the excellent, refreshing and informative town meeting, and supported strategy sessions by the negotiating team on the GMA PUBLIC HEARINGS (OPEN RECORD) 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS - FORMATION OF THE FINAL DOCKET Mayor Kolff opened the public hearing. He asked if any council wished to disclose any interests, financial or property, in connection with the matter. Ms. Sandoval noted that Mr. Norcross, proponent of Amendment # 1, has been her client in the past. She stated she did not have any current interest in property that would affect a fair and impartial decision. Because of the quasi-judicial nature of the first amendment, Mr. Watts asked if any council member had any communication with the applicant or opponent. Ms. Fenn replied she had talked with Mr. Norcross during her office hours and the subject had been addressed briefly. Ms. Sandoval than noted that Mr. Shoulberg, proponent of Amendment #5, is a current real estate client with a multi-family property listed. She stated she would recuse herself from voting on that amendment. Staff presentation Senior Planner Judy Surber presented the staff report on the Planning Commission's recommendations. Consensus was that she would present each amendment individually, with a vote to follow immediately. The following proposed amendments were presented. Amendment # 1: Rezone Blocks 170 and 171 of the Eisenbeis Addition (quasi-judicial). Proponent: Glenn Norcross. Ms. Surber noted that a question had been raised at the joint Council/Planning Commission about prior downzoning in the area. She confirmed that had occurred with the stated reason that pending single family development permits were in process for those blocks. In response to a question from Ms. Robinson, Mr. Randall noted that there are about 18 acres of R-IV zoning, less platted rights of way, in the city at this time and some is in the area of the proposed rezone. City Council Business Meeting Page 2 June 17, 2002 Ms. Surber stated that the planning commission voted unanimously to recommend docketing the amendment. Motion: Mr. Masci moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and docket proposed amendment itl. Mr. Youse seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. Amendment it2: Revise Comprehensive Plan Text to be Consistent with Recent GMA Amendments. Proponent: Building & Community Development Department The amendment would amend the goals and policy text of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect recent amendments to the Growth Management Act since 1995. Consultant Eric Toews has identified appropriate amendments. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend docketing proposed Amendment it2. Public comment: None Motion: Mr. Masci moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and docket proposed Amendment it2. Ms. Sandoval seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. Amendment it3: Revise Lot coverage in P/OS Districts. Proponent: Building and Community Development Department. The changes proposed would resolve inconsistencies, and proposed projects in the P-I district indicate a need to increase the allowable lot coverage. Floor area ratios for the P- I zone would be made consistent with the C-III and C-II zoning district standards depending upon whether the P-I zone is in the historic district. Public comment: none Motion: Mr. Youse moved to docket proposed Amendment it3. Mr. Masci seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. Amendment it4: Remove FUGA Language from the Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Alice King Ms. Surber noted that the Planning Commission voted 5-4 to recommend docketing the amendment. Supporters reasoned that the amendment was needed to resolve inconsistencies between the City and County Comprehensive Plan and that the current text regarding the Glen Cove FUGA is outdated. Dissenting voters felt such major changes were premature considering the twenty-year planning horizon and that the issue was being discussed before too many venues. City Council Business Meeting Page 3 dune 17, 2002 Public comment Alice King (proponent): stated she sees the proposed amendment as a housekeeping measure and that city and county comprehensive plans are out of synch. She also said she does not believe passage removes any alternatives and will have no effect on political discussion. Amc Hanson: spoke in favor of docketing the amendment. Nora Regan: spoke in favor of docketing the amendment, stating it looks at realistic growth for the area. Jeff Kelety: spoke in favor of docketing the amendment, saying it would contribute to continuing the city's stewardship of our way of life. Stated that GMA growth management indicators don't presently support the envisioned FUGA; believes majority of townspeople do not favor large retail centers; believes there is no evidence that a majority of county residents wish to see the UGA expand into Glen Cove. Joe Pipia: spoke in favor of docketing the amendment, referenced his letter to the Planning Commission, stated that need, urgency and appropriateness are all present, i.e., citizens must be at the forefront of the process, the county is considering expanding the UGA and citizens clearly want no commercial buildings. He stated that if the language remains, it will encourage the county to move on it. Jim Todd: spoke in favor of adoption, calling the Comprehensive Plan our most important tool and that clarification of the plan is important. Ms. Sandoval noted that staff has not yet supplied the final version of last year's language for the notebooks. Ms. Surber said it would be distributed. Motion: Ms. Fenn moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and docket proposed Amendment #4. Ms. Sandoval seconded Ms. Sandoval asked if the language proposed could still be modified if the amendment were docketed. Mr. Randall answered that it could. Vote: the motion carried 4-3, by voice vote, with Councilors Youse, Masci and Finnie opposed Amendment #5: Revise Density of R-III and R-IV Zoning Districts. Proponent: Ted Shoulberg. Planning Commission recommended docketing by unanimous vote. Ms. Sandoval was recused. City Council Business Meeting Page 4 dune 17, 2002 The proposed amendment would revise the maximum density for the R-III and R-IV zoning districts to allow calculation of density to be based on either bedrooms or units. would provide increased flexibility for development in the multi-family zones. It Motion: Mr. Masci moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and docket proposed Amendment #5. Ms. Robinson seconded The motion carried unanimously, 6-0, by voice vote, with 3~Is. Sandoval recused Ms. Sandoval returned to the meeting. Amendment #6: Revised Setbacks/Lot Coverage for Comer Lots. Proponent: C.L. Flint The amendment would reduce side-hard setbacks and increase lot coverage in the residential zoning districts. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the item be docketed with the expanded scope of reconsidering the front-yard setback requirements as well. The amendments would support infill within the residential districts. Public comment Scott Walker: spoke in favor of docketing the amendment, noting that towns are more attractive to pedestrians if people can build closer to the front lot line and interaction with neighbors and the community is promoted. Motion: Ms. Fenn moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and docket Amendment #6. Mr. Masci seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. Amendment//7: Revise Zoning Use Tables to Allow Group Homes Outright in Certain Zones. Proponent: Building & Community Development Department. Ms. Surber stated the proposal is to amend definitions and use tables in the zoning code to differentiate group homes for the disabled and emergency shelters from residential treatment facilities whose clients may be considered a risk to the public. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend docketing the item. Public comment: none Motion: Mr. Masci moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and docket Amendment #7. Ms. Robinson seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. Amendment #8: Strike the 50% Rules for Accessory Dwelling Units. Proponent: Building & Commtmity Development department. City Council Business Meeting Page 5 June 17, 2002 Ms. Surber stated the amendment would strike the current code requirement that limits Accessory Dwelling Units to less than 50% of the total floor area of the main residence. The current code tends to penalize owners of smaller homes. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to docket the amendment. Public comment: none Motion: Mr. Masci moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and docket Amendment #8. Mr. Youse seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. Amendment #9: Delete Portion of Waterwalk from Non-Motorized Transportation Plan. Proponent: Sarah Westall Ms. Surber entered a letter from Ms. Westall into the record. She noted that staff has clarified that the proposed amendment was not to actually delete a portion of the water walk but to simply eliminate an "existing trail" designation on her property from the Non-Motorized Transportation Plan. The Planning Commission voted 3-6 against recommending the amendment be docketed. The majority felt that the revision could be handled outside the Comprehensive Plan process, noted that the map is being revised to show public trails only, and that it is unlikely that removing the trail from NMTP maps would solve problems with trespassers. Those voting in favor felt that Ms. Westall has tried various routes to have the designation removed and this may be the only way to be sure it happens. They were also generally opposed to mapping existing trails across private property. Public comment: Scott Walker: stated that the orange dots in question are simply existing trails which have been used in the past, not trails that are open to the public; he added that the map is primarily for in-house purposes so staff and the Transportation Advisory Board can develop policies. Ms. Surber noted that the plan specifically states that existing trails are mapped and some cross private property. Ms. Sandoval added that many people who cross the property are not doing so because of reliance on the Non-Motorized map but simply because of the configuration of the road and the property. Ms. Surber noted there would be no charge involved to the applicant if the item were not docketed as a comprehensive plan amendment. Motion: Mr. Masci moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and deny docketing proposed amendment #9. Mr. Finnie seconded Mr. Finnie noted he sympathized with the applicant but supported a reasonable alternative to accomplishing the objective. He stated the intent of the council is clear and City Council Business Meeting Page 6 June 17, 2002 administration understands the concern of the applicant and will seek an alternative remedy. Discussion also included consideration of docketing the item and then pulling it if a better solution is found; the fact that the Transportation Committee has already requested that a new trail map for use by the public be produced by Public Works. Vote: the motion carried, 5-2, with Ms. Fenn and Mr. Youse opposed. RECESS Mayor Kolff called a recess at 8:10 for thc purpose of a break. RECONVENE The meeting was reconvened at 8::20 p.m. RESOLUTION 02-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2003-2008 SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT THIS TO THE STATE Public Works Director Ken Clow stated that the council must adopt a six year Transportation Improvement Program each year in order to show plans for any street projects that might require state or federal funding. The list is integrated into the regional transportation plan and also goes independently to the state. He noted changes from last year's TIP, stating that San Juan from 19th to "F" and the Sims Way pathway (from the Park & Ride to Keamey) have been approved by the state and are proceeding with design. The city hopes to execute the projects this year. The next three projects listed were three segments of Discovery Road, from Hastings where "F" Street ended to Sheridan, from Sheridan to Howard, and from Howard to the city limits. Mr. Clow noted that as a result of discussions with the Transportation and General Government committees, the Sheridan to Howard and Howard to city limits sections were consolidated as the current #3. The prior project #6, Howard Street extension from the business park to Discovery was redesignated as #4 and the remaining piece of Discovery from Sheridan to Hastings is now currently #5 on the list. Mr. Clow stated that the reason for theses changes is primarily to take advantage of the fact that significant development has not yet taken place from the city limits to Sheridan, City Council Business Meeting Page 7 June 17, 2002 whereas the Sheridan to Hastings stretch does have considerable development which would complicate the project. A comment was also received on project #10, gateway improvements along Sims Way to the ferry dock, at the Transportation Committee meeting. The comment was that bicycle lane improvements on Keamey Street should be included in the project. Public comment Scott Walker: spoke in favor of approval of the TIP; also noted the need for safety improvements on portions of Discovery Road which are more heavily developed. Nancy Dorgan: stated she is unclear about the "multi-purpose trail" slated along Kah Tai Park; stated that there may be controversy if a wide trail were placed in the park which would remove habitat. Shirley Rudolph: stated that business o,amers in upper Sims Way must be contacted so they can comment on projects, asked for more public input before submitting the TIP to the state. Ms. Clow noted that the TIP is not designed to go into a great level of detail; during the design process, issues such as what is going where and how does it fit, will be raised and resolved. Mr. Timmons noted that the proposed fight of way exchange with the Port would add 20 feet to the Sims Way ROW and place the non-motorized pathway just inside the poplar trees. He also stated that projects #1 and #2 have been dropped back a bit in the design process; listing them does not preclude the city from doing them this year but indicates to the state we may be using some of the money next year. Motion: Mr. Masci moved for adoption of Resolution 02-028. Mr. Youse seconded. Staff again emphasized that the TIP is not a listing of projects in order of urgency or priority and that other factors come into play regarding the feasibility and timing of certain projects, like traffic lights. Vote: the motion carried, 7-0, by voice vote. CONSENT AGENDA Mr. Kolff suggested a change in the language of item 8(C) Council Rule Amendments so that under "Regular meeting schedule" for each committee, "and otherwise as determined by the Committee be changed to "or otherwise as determined by the Committee." There were no objections. City Council Business Meeting Page 8 June 17, 2002 Motion: Mr. Masci moved for approval of the following items on the consent agenda. Ms. Fenn seconded. The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. Approval of Bills, Claims and Warrants Vouchers 82030 through 82039 in the amount of $1,494.67 Approval of Minutes: Special Business Meeting of May 29, 2002 Workshop Session of May 29, 2002 Regular Business Meeting of June 3, 2002 Special Session of June 6, 2002 Adoption of Council Rule Amendments Modification of Exhibit E of the Council Rules to include regular meeting times and add the Transportation Committee. (with language change in each regular meeting schedule to read "or" rather than "and" otherwise as determined ..... Adoption of Resolution RESOLUTION 02-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON AUTHORIZING LATECOMER UTILITY CONTRACTS PURSUANT TO RCW CHAPTER 35.91 AND PTMC CHAPTER 13.28 (KEITH MARZAN) Adoption of Ordinance ORDINANCE 2811 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND AMENDING THE PORT TOWNSEND MUNICIPAL CODE, SPECIFICALLY CHAPTERS 3.3 7 - POPE MARINE BUILDNG USE REGULATIONS AND CHARGE; 3.38- CHETZEMOKA PARK FACILITY USE; .5.14- PORT TOWNSEND MASTER CABLE TELEVISION ORDINANCE; 5. 46- CITY DOCK AND UNION WHARF USE REGULATIONS AND CHARGES, 10.04 - PARKING; PROCEDURES, BY DELETING OUT-MODED REFERENCES TO CERTAIN COUNCIL COMMITTEES THAT ARE NO LONGER IN EXISTENCE, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO PERFORM CERTAIN FUNCTIONS PREVIOUSLY PERFORMED BY COUNCIL COMMITTEES City Council Business Meeting Page 9 June 17, 2002 UNFINISHED BUSINESS ORDINANCE 2810 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PORT TOWNSEND MUNICIPAL CODE TO CREATE CHAPTER 9. 06, FIREWORKS, PROHIBITING THE SALE AND DISCHARGE OF FIREWORKS, AND POSSESSION AND/OR USE OF EXPLOSIVES, PROVIDING EXEMPTION FOR PUBLIC DISPLAYS, PROVIDING PENALTIES, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mr. Watts noted that a motion was made and seconded to adopt Ordinance 2810 at the June 3, 2002 meeting, with action postponed to June 17 to allow additional opportunity for public comment. In response to a request for research on the subject, Mr. Watts noted that the city could adopt a partial ban on fireworks. He added that a new state law provides a new period of time (December 27-31) during which "consumer fireworks may be sold and used" in addition to the current June 28 to July 4 period and December 31. The law allows a city to adopt an ordinance prohibiting or limiting the sale and use of fireworks for the period Dec. 27-31, 2002, if an ordinance is adopted by August 12, 2002. Mr. Watts read an e-mail received from Veto Garrison into the record. Mr. Garrison supported adoption of the ordinance. Public comment: Karen Gower: representative of American Promotional Events, spoke against adoption, citing profits raised by community organizations through sale of fireworks and distinguishing between legal and illegal fireworks. Shirley Rudolph: president of Edgewater Condo Association supported banning fireworks in public areas. Scott Walker: urged the council to be sensible and start with enforcement of the existing ban; stated perhaps sales but not use could be banned. Mr. Youse noted the ordinance still allows public displays which can be monitored and controlled. Ms. Fenn stated that regulation should be done at the state, not local, level. Motion to amen& Mr. Masci moved to amend the ordinance to make the effective date December 27-31, 2002 and thereafter. Mr. Finnie seconded The motion carried, 4-3, with Councilors Robinson, Fenn and Finnie opposed Mr. Kolff cited the official position of the American Association of Pediatrics stating its position that fireworks for individual private use should be banned. City Council Business Meeting Page 10 June 17, 2002 Vote on motion to adopt Ordinance 2810 as amended motion carried 6-1, by roll call vote, with Councilor Fenn opposed DISTRESSED COUNTY INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING Mr. Timmons noted the staff has been unable to bring forward recommendations to the Finance Committee because very little information has been made available to the city with regard to the program, which is designed to implement use of the county sales tax established under the distressed county authorization. The council has named a representative (Ms. Sandoval) to serve on a yet to be formed county committee. The county staff has informed the city that EDC Executive Director Ann Avary has been tasked with developing a program for the administration of the funds. Ms. Avary was present to speak. She stated a draft ordinance has just been developed and she will provide this to the city manager tomorrow. Two tracks have been identified, a loan track and a grant track for construction of public infrastructure. Other components are criteria for both grant and loan tracks, a due diligence function and a community investment fund board to review applications and then submit to the Board of County Commissioners with recommendation for approval or denial. She estimated that the county receives about $200,000 per year through the program. Motion: Mr. Masci moved that the representatives at the intergovernmental elected officials meeting inquire as to the status and expected time line for this program. Ms. Sandoval seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: SIMS WAY BICYCLE LANES The Transportation Committee, on the advice of the Transportation Advisory Board, has recommended that the Sims Way bluff corridor bicycle lanes be signed with bicycle lane symbols. Mr. Clow noted that there are some areas on Sims Way that don't fully comply with state regulations for bicycle lanes. Public Comment: Shirley Rudolph: spoke in opposition to signing the bicycle lanes, stated all upper Sims Way businesses and property owners should be included in the decision process. Motion: Ms. Sandoval moved to sign the bicycle lanes from Water Street up to Sheridan where necessary and revisit the issue of upper Sims Way bicycle lane signing at a future date. Mr. Masci seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. City Council Business Meeting Page 11 June 17, 2002 GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION REGARDING FIRE DISTRICT NO. 6 JOINT OPERATIONS Fire Chief Ed Edwards stated that he would like to continue discussions with Fire District #6 to assess the feasibility of consolidating certain functions. He added that the Fire District #6 Commissioners have now expressed support for this cooperative assessment. He added that the districts are currently cooperating through a mutual aid agreement and an Emergency Medical Services agreement which have proven mutually beneficial to the departments. Because both departments have difficulty with the low number of volunteers available for response and both departments are understaffed, the most promising option for both departments is to work more closely together. He added that by consolidating certain functions and working together, both departments can initially increase the services provided while laying the groundwork for necessary future expansion. He outlined the boundaries of District #6 in answer to Ms. Fenn's inquiry. Public Comment: Julie Jaman: opposed joint operations as it would affect the rural character of the fire district. Nancy Dorgan: opposed joint operations because the city would give up its urban fire department; also does not want another government entity in her life. Ms. Fenn wanted far more information. Mr. Finnie noted that the discussions suggested would allow Chief Edwards to obtain that information. Mr. Youse noted that the city and district 6 departments are currently working in a joint relationship. Motion: Mr. Masci moved to adopt the recommendation of the General Government Committee that discussions continue with members and commissioners of Fire District 6 with the goal to be to determine if any type of joint operations are feasible at this time. Mr. Youse seconded Motion to postpone: Ms. Sandoval moved to postpone action on the item. Ms. Fenn seconded The motion carried, 5-2, with Councilors Masci and Youse opposed 35th STREET PARK PROPERTY Mr. Timmons stated that Jefferson County has accepted the City's offer to purchase the 35th Street Park property for $60,000. The County has stipulated that the transfer will include a reversionary clause should the city choose to surplus the property or use it for non-public purposes. If the settlement is approved, the property would be held in trust City Council Business Meeting Page 12 June 17, 2002 for development of a neighborhood park and conservation land, with no immediate plans to develop the property. Mr. Timmons stated that there is no consequential effect on operations and maintenance budget due to the purchase in answer to Mr. Finnie's question. He added that the purchase expenditure would come from the capital improvement fund. Motion: Mr. Masci mOved to authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents to resolve the 35th Street Park matter with the County y payment of $60, 000 to the County, consistent with the County administrator's May 28, 2002 letter, with the transfer including a reversionary clause should the city choose to surplus the property or use it for a non-public purpose; and further, directing the Manager to prepare a supplemental budget to authorize release of the funds. Mr. Youse seconded The motion carried unanimously, 7-0, by voice vote. CINGULAR WIRELESS LEASE Mr. Watts noted that Cingular Wireless has proposed co-location of antelmas on the existing VoiceStream monopole at the City's water reservoir site near Hastings Avenue. The co-location will avoid proliferation of poles. The proposed lease is for five years, with five five-year extensions for a total of 30 years at $600/month with a 20% increase every five years. Requested action is to authorize the City Manager to execute the communication site lease agreement. Mr. Youse recused himself because of his employment with Qwest. In response to Mr. Masci, Mr. Watts noted that the rate was proposed by Cingular and then analyzed by staff to insure its consistency with the market rate. Motion: Mr. Masci moved to authorize the City Manager to execute a lease with Cingular wireless for a ground lease and co-location of antennas at the City reservoir site near Hasting Avenue for a term not to exceed 30 years, at a rent of $6OO per month with 20% cost of living every five years, and other standard lease terms. Ms. Sandoval seconded Motion to postpone: Sandoval seconded recused). Ms. Fenn moved to postpone action until the July 1 meeting. The motiOn carried unanimously, 6-0, by voice vote (Mr. Youse Ms. Mr. Youse returned to the meeting. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/LAND USE FORMULA STORE ORDINANCE City Council Business Meeting Page 13 June 17, 2002 Motion: Ms. Fenn moved to endorse the committee recommendation: "The CD/LU committee, having reviewed information concerning formula store and community impact ordinances, determines that goals that might be achieved by such ordinances may be better attained by focusing on design standards that insure that building designs and developments are compatible with community standards and available infrastructure, and by promoting community vitality strategies to improve our local economy." Ms. Robinson seconded The motion carried, 6-1, with Mr. Masci opposed ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m. Attest: Pamela Kolacy, CMC City Clerk City Council Business Meeting Page 14 June 17, 2002