Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout091420 Special Meeting Agenda Packet ARTS COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA September 14, 2020 | 3:00 p.m. | Remote Meeting ****The State of Emergency declared by Governor Inslee temporarily prohibits in-person contacts with the public required by the Open Public Meetings Act and the Public Records Act. The May 29, 2020 Public Health Order by Jefferson County Health Officer Thomas Locke also states no in-person meetings are allowed. Council will be participating by teleconference**** Submit public comment emails to be read aloud (up to three minutes per person) to: publiccomment@cityofpt.us or join in person via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter the 9 digit Webinar ID 539-393-595 or listen by phone only (listening mode only) United States: +1 (415) 655-0052 access code: 155-675-573# Local Dial In – (360) 390-5064 access code: 155-675-573# I. Call to Order II. Approval of Agenda III. Commission Business A. Review and provide recommendations on edits to Ordinance 3251 to City Council B. 2021 Budget IV. Next Scheduled Meeting – October 7, 2020 | 3:00 p.m. V. Adjourn Ordinance 3251 Exhibit A Page 1 of 3 Exhibit A Chapter 3.50 PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM – ONE PERCENT FOR ARTS Sections: 3.50.050 Arts commission responsibilities – Process. 3.50.060 Public arts projects – City council approval. 3.50.050 Arts commission responsibilities – Process. A. The commission shall make an annual review of all capital improvement projects as part of the annual budget process in order to make its recommendation to the city council as to which projects are subject to funding under the provisions of this chapter. In addition, the commission shall review and make recommendation on projects at the direction of the city manager other than during the annual review of capital improvement projects as deemed appropriate by the city council or city manager. Their review and recommendation shall be undertaken in accordance with the following procedure: 1. The commission shall meet with representatives of the city staff as designated by the city manager in order to review proposed capital improvement projects and to determine which projects are municipal construction projects subject to funding under the provisions of this chapter. Such review shall take place in advance of the preparation of the city manager’s budget report to the city council in order that the recommendations of the commission may be considered by the city manager in the preparation of his or her budget report, and at other times as deemed appropriate by the city council or city manager. The target shall be one percent of eligible capital costs of municipal construction projects. 2. The city council shall review as a part of its budget review, and at other times as it deems appropriate, the projects and the estimated expenditures proposed for funding. The city council retains its discretion to determine whether or not it is appropriate for such funding to be incorporated as a part of the budget and shall fix at the date the budget is approved the estimated expenditures for public art to be funded in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and also shall determine the level of general revenue funding to the municipal arts fund for the general purposes set forth in this chapter. 3. The city council determines to establish the level of funding at such time as substantial construction plans for municipal construction projects have been prepared and approved by the city council; provided, the city council, in its sole discretion, may choose to limit or eliminate funding in the event of a significant budget overrun for a particular project, if it believes such action to be in the public interest. B. The commission shall be responsible for working with the city manager (or designated staff) to recommend to the city council the method of selection for commissioning of artists, for reviewing the design of, execution and placement of, and acceptance of works of visual art funded by this chapter, subject to final approval by the city council. Ordinance 3251 Exhibit A Page 2 of 3 C. The city does not intend public art to be a “public forum” and therefore reserves the right to control the art displayed on all city property, including permanent painting or other art installations on city streets and sidewalks. The city reserves the right to deny display of art or to remove art displayed if, in the sole discretion of the city manager or designee, the art depicts: 1. Violent images 2. Sexually graphic images 3. Nudity 43. Religious symbols or desecration of the same 54. Hatred of persons or groups of people 6,5. Support for or opposition to a candidate or initiative on the ballot 7.6. Imagery that may be inappropriate to maintain in or upon public property 7. Advertises a good or service for purchase CD. The commission shall have such other duties and responsibilities as the city council may assign by resolution or other council action. 3.50.060 Public arts projects – City council approval. The city council specifically reserves to itself final decision-making authority regarding the funding, purchase, erection, siting and installation of works of public art; provided, nothing prevents the city manager authorizing street paintings, intersection murals, community-designed crosswalks, or temporary (not to exceed one year) placement of works of public art consistent with the intent of this chapter and public safety. The city council indicates its intention to use a selection process and public process which incorporates members of the city’s arts commission, and which provides opportunity to citizens to comment on any aspect of funding, purchase, erection, siting and installation of works of public art. The city council encourages the city manager to consult with the arts commission and the public prior to approving any street paintings, intersection murals, or community-designed crosswalks. The city manager will, in consultation with the arts commission, develop a permit application for street paintings, intersection murals, and community-designed crosswalks. The arts commission will review proposed street paintings, intersection murals, and community-designed crosswalks for consistency with this Chapter and will make recommendations for approval to either the City Council or the City Manager. The City Council ,will have final approval of any permanent street paintings, intersection murals, or community-designed crosswalks that are consistent with this Chapter and public safety. The City Manager will have final approval of any temporary (not to exceed one year) street paintings, intersection murals, or community-designed crosswalks. For public art, including any street paintings, intersection murals, or community-designed crosswalks, proposed for installation in an area subject to design review, the city council will process the installation through the city’s design review processes. Ordinance 3251 Exhibit A Page 3 of 3 Once installed, art work is solely owned and maintained by the city. City council has final authority to relocate, remove, or destroy artwork, following recommendation from the arts commission. Loaned art may be accepted by the city manager for a period not to exceed one year, and by the city council for a period not to exceed two years. From:joellen rossouw To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:BLM Date:Wednesday, August 19, 2020 10:01:23 AM > I support the BLM painting at water street & at whatever other streets it can be painted on!!! Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 1 of 91 From:Lynn Hisey To:CityCouncil; publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Graffiti in Port Townsendd. Date:Wednesday, August 19, 2020 10:31:10 AM CAUTION: External Email I sent this yesterday early morning but I’ve been directed by the City Clerk to resend it to these email addresses. Lynn Hisey From: Lynn Hisey <lhisey@earthlink.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:59 AM To: Joanna Sanders <jsanders@cityofpt.us> Subject: Graffiti in Port Townsend To Whom it Concerns at The Port Townsend City Council: I had a relative visiting recently that I took on a car tour through our Port Townsend downtown. When we got near the end of Water Street and saw the paint splattered on the street my first thought was, “who would deface our beautiful little town”. Then after looking more carefully we figured out it was BLM graffiti. We associate this group with riots, destruction and attacks on law enforcement in our cities like Seattle, Olympia and Portland, not to mention its Marxist/terrorist leadership. I don’t understand why this would be would be condoned by city government and you would be considering more graffiti defacing the quaintness of Port Townsend. If you are going to be permitting this then be prepared for a “MAGA -Make America Great Again” slogan at Water and Taylor. How can you possibly deny alternative views on public streets? How about keeping our city pristine and keep all graffiti out and clean paved streets in as your priority? Lynn Hisey Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 2 of 91 From:Madison Clevenger To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Date:Wednesday, August 19, 2020 4:55:14 PM Hello, It sounds like the city did not have a process in place when they allowed a slogan to be painteddowntown. It seems that they are now trying to navigate to get a system in place so that they will have the ability to deny future slogans that they deem less desirable. Seeing as the blacklives matter mural was already approved, even being added to the city council agenda on June 15th, I would expect the city to show equality by giving the exact same clearance toother groups without having to wait for the city to come up with their new system of approval. I will lose faith in the integrity of our public officials if I see that one mural was given preferential treatment, while another is subjected to more onerous and stringent requirements. Thank you,Madison Clevenger Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 3 of 91 From:Michael Clevenger To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Fwd: Law enforcement mural Date:Wednesday, August 19, 2020 10:05:56 PM ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Clevenger <michaelclevenger78@gmail.com>Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 Subject: Law enforcement muralTo: Jsanders@cityofpt.us I am writing to request that the city council add an agenda to discuss painting a back the bluemural in downtown Port Townsend. I want to see the council handle this matter the same as they did when they received requests for the black lives matter mural. Please consider requestsfrom all citizens of this county in a fair and objective manner. Thank you, Michael Clevenger Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 4 of 91 From:Philippa Mills To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Mural in front of City Hall Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 8:11:06 AM Dear Council Members, I feel the request to paint a Blue Lives Matter mural in front of City Hall is another attempt to provoke and intimidate our citizens - an authorized version of last Sunday’s “rally” which had members of the neo Nazi Proud Boys walking amongst us. Please do not grant this request. Philippa Mills 4053 Jackman Street Port Townsend 360-385-3881 Sent from my iPad Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 5 of 91 From:Philippa Mills To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Alternative to the Mural Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 11:41:10 AM Dear Council Members, Instead of a Blue Lives Matter mural in front of City Hall Might we, as a community, find a less potential divisive way to honor our Police and Fire Departments? I would like to propose we make September 11 a Port Townsend Police and Fire Department and First Responders Appreciation Day. The community can show its appreciation by buying local business gift cards and either deliver them to the departments in person, or have a designated drop box, perhaps at City Hall. For those who aren’t able to buy gift cards perhaps a “thank you” card mailed (thereby supporting our post office). All local businesses would benefit as the gift cards could be for the families as well (toys, clothing, school supplies, groceries). I value our Police and Fire Departments and First Responders and would like to find a concrete, positive and productive way to show it. Thank you. Philippa Mills 4053 Jackman Street Port Townsend 360-385-3881 Sent from my iPad Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 6 of 91 From:ohheyalisha@gmail.com To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Please consider reality:: Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 8:32:50 AM I am a resident of Port Townsend and I am requesting that the mayor, manager, council and all members involved please consider this article and that Blue Lives don’t exist. Being a LEO is a choice, a vocation, an employment status. It is NOT a race. Please protect the Black people and all people of color who live and give and serve this community. Thank you for your consideration, Alisha Cigalotti Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 7 of 91 From:pipercorbett@gmail.com To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Please keep “The proud boys” off our streets Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 9:29:27 AM Dear City of Port Townsend, I support our local police officers and BLM and freedom of speech, however this group of individuals with “the proud boys” are intentionally stirring up division in our community right now for the purpose of creating opposition and instilling fear in our citizens. Last weekend they unlawfully demonstrated that they were not interested in respecting our community streets or local laws with an un-permitted parade. They presented signs on their vehicles that sent the threatening message “their way or violence”. They drove in loops through our town, driving far too fast, endangering pedestrians, scaring visitors and honking, yelling, creating a huge and unnecessary noise disturbance that directly and negatively impacting the our local small businesses economy during an important August weekend. Our local business community does not need another weekend of disruption to our local economy and we do not need our streets shut down during Labor Day weekend or what is commonly know as “wooden boats weekend”. We need our street left open, calm and peaceful for visitors to enjoy our community business and not be afraid to eat outdoors on our streets. This proposal, presented by this group of individuals is not appropriate or safe for our local community or business. If Local Port Townsend citizens Of this particular group feels the need to demonstrate in our community, I suggest another time (perhaps in winter) and another location that does not impact our local Businesses or economy during this delicate economic time. Please keep our streets open, calm, clear and enjoyable for all our citizens and visitors, Piper Corbett Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 8 of 91 From:Amy Bartlett To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:City Streets Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:48:12 AM To whom it may concern, I hope you will consider this op-ed excerpt that I wrote in regards to the blue lives matter movement when decidingabout permitting to further adorn our streets. “At what point did the acknowledgment of hundreds of wrongfully incarcerated and killed black and brown peoplebecome a football game where there is another side? There is no question that blue lives matter - beyond the fact that it’s a career choice, they are given a car, protectivegear and a fairly good employment package. These two things are not comparable. BLM was never a cry for calland response. The only humane response is “shit, how can we fix this?” Any response other than that (oh yeah, wellblue lives matter!) is deflection, destruction, ignorance, and more than anything just really uncallled for. I don’t carehow you feel about police, that conversation is irrelevant. This conversation is about racism and brutality. If yourcops don’t do that - great, encourage them to help address systemic change. They are best poised to do so. If a kid reports years and years of child abuse, would all of you parents march down the street on behalf of yourparent awesomeness? No, you’d address the kid’s abuse. You’d get him out of the situation. You’d double checkthe parents he was placed with to be sure he was safe. Period. Roll up your blue flags and help us advocate”. Thank you for your time, Amy Bartlett, resident206-849-8157Sent from my iPhone Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 9 of 91 From:Doug Nellis To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 2:10:13 PM Hello Mayor and Councilmembers... I live in Seattle, but happened to be in Port Townsend this past Sunday. My wife and I visit your town often and were married at the Bishop Victorian Hotel in 2005. We love it there. Westayed at the Palace Hotel, ate at the Fountain Cafe, shopped at Green Eyeshade, contributing to the local economy. I must say I was disturbed by the Blue Lives Matter rally that took place in and arounddowntown on Sunday. This was not a peaceful parade. Peaceful parades do not circle an urban area, yelling at people, blaring their horns, and revving the engines of their motorcycles. These people are agitators and provocateurs, hellbent on "owning the libs." There is no suchthing as a "blue life." It's a job, not a life. These people disrespect the American flag by using a modified version as their logo. To allow this group to paint the slogan "Blue Lives Matter" on the streets of Port Townsend would be adisgrace to your town, and I would feel less safe visiting, and I probably wouldn't. Doug Nellis Seattle, WA Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 10 of 91 From:Angela Gyurko To:artscomm@cityofpt.us; CityCouncil; publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:personal thoughts on Public Art in Port Townsend Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 4:39:31 PM CAUTION: External Email Dear Arts Commission and City Council — As the City Council and Arts Commission discuss the idea of Public Art in Port Townsend, I would like to contribute the following thoughts to the conversation, and if time permits, I would like these comments to be read aloud at the next meeting. All of Port Townsend is an homage to white men: the name, the style of buildings, the street names. Port Townsend is in Jefferson County, a county named after a white man who owned between 175 and 200 slaves, a man who at age 44 began the systematic rape of a 14-year old girl named Sally Hemings. Jefferson County is in Washington State, named for a man who, while doing much to bring our fledgling nation together, also owned 100-120 slaves. I think there’s enough around us honoring white men. Public Art in Port Townsend should serve as a public means to correct the imbalance already present in our society. For those of you not familiar with the “Doll Test,” I’ve included the link to an article on a seminal study that showed how much representation matters. https://www.naacpldf.org/ldf-celebrates-60th-anniversary-brown-v-board-education/significance- doll-test/ On a more personal note regarding representation, as a child growing up, I loved math and science, but my whole life, I was told girls don’t do math and science. I cried at the movie Hidden Figures. These were the women I needed to see when I was a child, something to counter the message everything else around me – the speakers on PBS shows, the actors on TV – told me: girls aren’t mathematicians or scientists. Then I got angry. Why did I have Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 11 of 91 to wait until I was 48 years old to see smart women celebrated on the big screen? With that little rant out of the way, here are the criteria I recommend when considering Public Art in Port Townsend. Does this art installation celebrate a group traditionally marginalized in the history of the US? Is this art installation tied to a specific date in history? Please provide appropriate background. What image or words will this art installation include? Have you googled the image, the slogan, and its acronym to make sure that the image, words, or acronym of the words are not connected to groups, either present or past, that support hate, genocide, or denial of proven history? Are there other statutes, symbols, building or street name, or works of art already present in Port Townsend to celebrate this person, group, date, or event? If so, why is additional representation important in this particular case? Until we have a street in Port Townsend named LQBTQIA Boulevard, I think we need to have rainbow crosswalk on Water Street so all LGBTQIA persons know that they are welcome here. Until we have a street in Port Townsend named for Chief Chetzemoka or other indigenous leader (might I suggest renaming Jefferson Street), we need more art installations and plaques acknowledging the natives of this land, and a crosswalk painted in colors chosen by the native residents of town. I want a crosswalk painted in colors celebrating our African American residents and another one celebrating our Latinx residents, with colors and designs chosen by representatives from each community. When they walk through town, what do they see that tells them they are welcome, that they are part of this community? I want an art installation and plaque commemorating the Chinese settlers of this town for this same reason. If any Japanese residents of the town were moved into an internment camp during World War II, I want a statue and plaque apologizing for that horrific behavior. I want little red crosses painted in a crosswalk honoring our medical professionals who are serving us so well in this pandemic. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 12 of 91 I want little food symbols painted in a crosswalk honoring all the farmers, grocery workers, and restaurant workers who keep us fed. We all see and smell the papermill, but let’s put it on a crosswalk, celebrating the way it kept this town afloat during the Great Depression and thanking them for their early switch to recycled cardboard, preserving jobs in this town when so many other mills didn’t. Likewise, let’s put boats on a crosswalk, celebrating the economic and artistic contributions to the town made by our maritime workers, let’s have one dedicated to musicians, and let’s let the artists go nuts on their own crosswalk for their contributions. I want a crosswalk painted blue honoring our emergency responders, and if there’s any other group in town I forgot, I apologize. We can scatter the decorated crosswalks all over town, put out a map, and help draw tourists to the new business park up behind the Goodwill, to Uptown, and to other businesses off the main drag to help distribute the business. We’re Port Townsend. We do creative things like this all the time. There is enough art to celebrate everyone, we have enough crosswalks to paint, but at the same time, let’s make sure we are fully inclusive and welcoming. Thanks for your attention and consideration, Angela Gyurko Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 13 of 91 From:mraymond@olympus.net To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Public streets used to promote agendas Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 7:06:15 PM Please do not use our streets as statements to promote a particular ‘interest’ or cause. Seems like this has served to encourage others to demand the same privileges. Should the City be ‘Fair’, and allow any and all to make these public statements that do not represent All? I for one certainly do not think so. If the current artwork does not disappear quickly enough, I recommend it be removed before this gets even more unpleasant. Michelle Raymond A very concerned citizen of Port Townsend Sent from my iPad Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 14 of 91 From:Ramon Dailey To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:I oppose a Blue Lives Matter mural Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 7:13:48 PM Hello. I'm writing to let you know that I adamantly oppose the Blue Lives Matter mural that has been proposed by Jim Scarantino. While I support the PTPD, I believe that the Blue Lives Matter movement is a hateful reactionto Black Lives Matter. I believe that the primary message of Blue Lives Matter is one of hate and oppression toward people of color and, as such, has no place in our town. In addition, Mr. Scarantino is a known right-wing extremist with a history of rabble rousing. Ibelieve his intention is to stir controversy and not to show support for our police force. I am a Port Townsend native and local business owner who has been here most of my life. I love this town. I stand for compassion and equality and will stand up against racism,oppression, and hate. Please do not allow a Blue Lives Matter mural. Thank you. Ramon Dailey Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 15 of 91 From:Lois Jasmer To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Back the Blue Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 7:22:27 PM As a citizen of this fine town and in appreciation of our amazing public servants, I would like to see a Back the Blue Street banner painted in downtown Port Townsend. I would not suggest it be paint on the previous spot of a similar banner but near it and in equal size. If this was any other day in a different year and not election time, I really doubt it would be denied. As dignitaries of this city please use your best non-partisan judgement when making a final decision on this matter. Our men and women that serve and protect us everyday deserve a big “Thank you”. Lois Jasmer Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 16 of 91 From:di and Mike Clausen To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Murals Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 7:28:57 PM As a citizen of Port Townsend, I object to the painting of a Blue Lives Matter mural. Not because I don’t think that statement is true, but because I believe the motivation for the muralisn’t due to sincere wish to venerate fallen officers, but more of a way to push back against the Black Lives Matter movement. Police lives do matter, but comparing that movement to BlackLives Matter is wrong. Black Lives Matter is a cry for justice. It’s about righting the wrongs perpetuated against people because they are born Black. Being Blue is a choice. It’s aprofession, not a birth identity. When an officer dies on the job, they knew they were putting their lives on the line. They agreed to that risk. How can you compare that to being oppressedand killed for being born with darker skin? Shame on anyone that uses the memory of fallen officers to boost their own racist agenda. Diana Clausen Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 17 of 91 From:LANE LINDBERG To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue lives matter Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 7:30:53 PM CAUTION: External Email Hello, I’m appalled that a mural stating Blue Lives Matter is being painted outside city hall. Whenpolice reform has taken place, when police stop killing black and brown people indiscriminately, when they actually protect and serve all peoples in their communities(LGBTQ, mentally ill, too), when they have been retrained and policies rewritten, when they have been demilitarized, when QAnon and white supremacy members are removed from lawenforcement permanently, maybe then it would be appropriate. This is meant to create further racial divide, opening the door to more aggression against people of color. This will tear our town apart. This is purely a political move designed to beinflammatory and polarizing. Truly shameful. Disgusting. Unbelievable that this was allowed. NO ONE has said blue lives don’t matter. They chose their career, and for decades they’ve chosen to be flagrantlyracist, with their unions covering for them, and they aren’t being shot multiple times, often to death, at an alarming rate. How is this helpful to healing relations between police and thecommunities they are paid to serve? Don’t we have enough stress to deal with? Now we have this added white supremacy message splashed upon our street. Trumps emboldened minions will destroy this town. You’ll see, butthen it will be too late. So much for circling the drain. It now appears we’ve been flushed down. I grieve for all the senseless violence this will bring about. Lane Lindberg Port Townsend Get Outlook for iOS Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 18 of 91 From:Gabrielle Guthrie To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:City Council Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 7:46:13 PM CAUTION: External Email Hello! As long as you guys are pondering having art on public streets like you allowed in front of City Hall on Water Street, how about “Blue Lives Matter” or “Back the Blue” to support our local law enforcement who are really on the front lines fighting our addiction epidemic and trying to keep people in our community alive, working to reduce violence, and trying to protect and serve the community? Thanks, Gabrielle Guthrie Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 19 of 91 From:Brian Kay To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Cc:Dana Subject:RE: "Blue Lives Matter" mural Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 8:31:22 PM Dear Port Townsend City Council, I am adamantly opposed to a "Blue Lives Matter" mural in any way, shape or form. This proposed mural is meant to be directly antagonistic to the legitimateBlack Lives Matter movement. It's also worth pointing out the false equivalency of "Blue Lives" (police who may quit their careers) vs "Black Lives" (people who cannot 'quit'their skin color despite facing danger every day). I show that "Blue Lives Matter" with my tax dollars which go to pay police officers' salaries and benefits--money better spent than a bunch of painton the street. If we want to truly embody "Blue Lives Matter", we need to ensure police have the tools they need to do their jobs without resorting to brutalmethods. We should also make sure we offer competitive wages to attract and retain the best officers. Please do everything possible to prevent a "Blue Lives" mural. Besides, it just won't nearly as good as the Black Lives Matter street mural anyway. Thank You, Brian Kay Port Townsend Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 20 of 91 From:Lily Cael To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 9:18:21 PM Hello. I'm writing to let you know that I adamantly oppose the Blue Lives Matter mural that has beenproposed by Jim Scarantino. While I support the PTPD, I believe that the Blue Lives Matter movement is a hateful reaction to Black Lives Matter. I believe that the primary message of Blue Lives Matter is one of hateand oppression toward people of color and, as such, has no place in our town. I am a Port Townsend native. I grew up in this town, and now I am a healthcare worker serving the community I know to be inclusive and diverse. I believe this mural would createfurther division in an already tense and uncertain time. I stand for compassion and equality and will stand up against racism, oppression, and hate. Please do not allow a Blue Lives Matter mural. Thank you. Lily Cael Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 21 of 91 From:Kate Cecys To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Ordinance 3251 Related to the Public Arts Program – One Percent for the Arts, Amending Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 3.50 Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:05:54 PM Public comment related to Agenda Bill AB20-080 Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Agenda Item: VII. A. Ordinance 3251 Related to the Public Arts Program – One Percent for the Arts, Amending Port Townsend Municipal Code Chapter 3.50 As you consider processes for the selection and approval of street art installations, please consider whether an additional policy recognizing ‘special or unique circumstances’ is warranted. It’s not simply about the individual words or image, but also the context that matters. I refer to the distinct and specific request for the black lives matter mural, which was made, and granted, in the context of national civil uprising in response to hundreds of years of oppression our fellow Americans. The systemic bias against black, indigenous and people of color can no longer continue, and is elegantly summarized by the three words - black lives matter. This simple statement of human respect and the value of human beings is not in itself political. Moreover, the context for the mural was a small attempt to speak to the issue and move forward. Kate Chadwick Resident, Port Townsend Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 22 of 91 From:GoodToGoSailing To:PublicComment@cityofpt.us Subject:Mural permit Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:07:07 PM An interesting scenario. Should the people of a town have some say over what expressions use their public space?Whether a mural, sculpture, landscaping, lighting design, bike lanes etc... I would think a popular vote could solve the issue. I’d also be probably be fairly safe in assuming that many, if not most people here in town would be against this- if only because it is clearly a political rebuttal. It may even cross the line to be a kind of gaslighting or skewed logic- the two issues are somewhat “mutually exclusive”- BLM is about racism. Blue Lives Matter is about public spending policy. The Police are not suffering from illegal systemic mistreatment but rather are being subjected to a lot of scrutiny in regards to methodsand protocol. If the timing were different, and the local law enforcement were struggling with credibility orpolicy issues locally, (which as far as I can see they are not) it might have a different emphasis. I also think how cool it would be to ask the present police officials and officers and staff how they see it. Democracy! It would be a breathtaking statement of egalitarianism and tolerance to embrace the Blue LivesMatter folks. Could the average PT denizen see the value?Will that balance of concepts make up the decision process? Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 23 of 91 From:Hanna To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:regarding the blue lives matter proposal Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:22:04 PM CAUTION: External Email Hello, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Hanna Trailer. I grew up in Port Townsend, so while I don’t know precisely who will be reading this, it is likely that we have met. Or more likely you’ve met my far more sociable mother, Barb. I’m writing you today to urge you not to approve the blue lives matter mural currently under consideration. Rather than write you a long-winded essay about police brutality, I’ll keep this brief and just tell you that I’m here because I love our town. I’m away at grad school right now and I can’t tell you how much I miss home. I miss the ever-present clouds, I miss our artsy festivals, I miss waterfront pizza, and the days when the wind blows so hard the ocean crashes up against the street if you’re walking in just the right places. I even miss the seagulls. As a queer woman, I know that many people like me don’t get to love their hometowns. I get to love Port Townsend so much because I always felt safe and even when I wasn’t ready to tell the world who I was, I knew that my community would embrace me as it always had. I am writing you today because black, brown, and indigenous members of our community deserve to feel that way too. Black Lives Matter is movement about human rights—the right to walk down the street without slaughter, to sleep in your own bed and wake up the next morning, to exist freely in your own body. Blue lives matter rose up against that movement, against those ideals. Please, please, do not commit their deceitful words to our streets. Thank you for your time and consideration. Warm regards, Hanna Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 24 of 91 From:Sarah Peller To:PublicComment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue lives matter Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:26:46 PM I just read that there has been a request to paint blue lives matter on a city building in Port Townsend. As a resident and proud active community member of this town, I must pleadagainst this! If we want to be a community that welcomes newcomers and outsiders, then we must continue to make this place a town that shows people of color that they are welcomehere, and encourage more diversity. Already people of color feel as though they do not belong here and are uncomfortable moving here because of this lack of diversity. This would be aloud statement that they don't matter. Yes, police officers lives so very much matter, but it's not them that are being brutalised and oppressed at this stage in our country's history. Pleasedo not approve this painting!! - Sarah Peller Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 25 of 91 From:mountainspiritherbals To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue lives Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:33:43 PM I do not wish our town to paint a mural on our streets for our police and civil servants. I believe in the job they do But feel that this is just a diversion and not the point . I would be happy to honor them in other ways. Thank you cards, a big ad in our local paper. Something that can honor and respect the dignity of our community, bringing people together. Thank you for taking time to hear me out. Denise Joy Mountain Spirit Herbal co.Port townsend 3603854491 Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 26 of 91 From:Jen Lee To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:57:25 PM CAUTION: External Email To whom it may concern, It has been brought to my attention that a request for a “blue lives matter” mural be painted onthe streets of Port Townsend. From my understanding this is in retaliation to the “Black Lives Matter” mural painted on Water Street in June. To approve this mural would bring unwanted attention to Jefferson County, globally. Thisisn’t a mural intended to support the residence of Port Townsend, the businesses of Port Townsend, or a welcoming sign for the thousands of tourists that Port Townsend heavily relieson. The request is petty and should be denied. There is a reason no other “blue lives matter“ mural exists anywhere else in this country other than in Tampa, Florida where the mural was created prior to approval and has only been metwith much scrutiny and backlash. As a business owner with a storefront on Water Street I do not approve of this mural or this message. I am afraid of what this might bring to our community. This will only further thedivide between people of opposing views which could in turn create an environment that will not be safe for the residence of Port Townsend, the businesses of Port Townsend, and theinnocent people that come to visit our lovely town. Please deny the request. Thank you, Jen Lee ___Jen Lee Light | Photographer Jenleelight.com Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 27 of 91 From: Paulette Lack To: publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject: Blue Lives Matter Mural Date: Thursday, September 3, 2020 11:38:03 PM Attachments: Letter_PauletteLack.docx Please submit this as public comment in regards to the request to have "Blue LIves Matter" painted on our streets. Paulette Lack Members of the Port Townsend City Council: Why is the request for a “Blue Lives Matter” mural to be painted on the street in downtown Port Townsend, considered an emergency? The letter submitted to the city on behalf of James R. Scarantino and CORPSE (the Congress of Retired Police, Sheriffs, Etc) reads as if the request for a “Blue Lives Matter” mural is an urgent matter, of utmost importance. The letter equates their request to the request of the Black Lives Matter mural. If you recall, the “Black Lives Matter” mural was a direct response to the brutal death of George Floyd at the hands of law enforcement. That WAS AN URGENT MATTER! That was a direct reaction to police brutality. And now, nationwide, it has become blatantly obvious, that “Blue Lives Matter”, represented by the “thin blue line” flag (which is shown in the submitted letter) has become a hateful countermovement to “Black Lives Matter”. Some now consider it racist because their flag is being flown by white supremacist groups. While Black Lives Matter is a social movement advocating for non-violent civil disobedience in protest against incidents of police brutality and all racially motivated violence against black people. I am assuming, this mural will have to go through an approval process by the Arts Commission, just as the Black Lives Matter mural did. Well, as with all public art, not all projects get approved, this one should not. I argue that by approving a mural that reads “Blue Lives Matter” you will be creating a statement, a statement I believe the majority of the citizens of Port Townsend do not want to make. A statement of hate. We as a community should have the VOICE to say “NO” to this. I own a business in downtown Port Townsend, I pay taxes here, I have lived here for 22 years. I LIVE HERE AND I AM INVESTED IN LIVING HERE! I do not want a symbol of racism painted on our streets. ALL people should feel safe in our community, I want to feel safe in my community. Allowing this to happen does not create a “safe” feeling community. We CAN decide as a community NOT to have a symbol of hate painted on our streets. I would also like to know how members of the Port Townsend Police Department, and members of the Sheriff’s Department way in on this request? Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 28 of 91 From:Carol ODell To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Thursday, September 3, 2020 11:56:24 PM Please do not grant the permission to paint a Blue Lives Matter mural on the the road in front of City Hall. It will cause divisions and provoke confrontations. Carol O’Dell816 Taft Street Port Townsend -- Carol Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 29 of 91 From:sylvia bowman To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:no "lives matter" signs on our town streets, please Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 6:56:28 AM CAUTION: External Email As we learned last Sunday, there are people trying to turn our wonderful town into a chaos. Please keep us undivided and in support of our merchants, restaurants, tourists. Of course we support police—but not disruptive, economy-busting trouble-seekers. Sylvia Bowman 1924 Jefferson Street, PT Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 30 of 91 From:Mike Galmukoff To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:RE: Black Lives Matter, paint Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 7:55:47 AM Now that The City Of Port Townsend has allowed "Black Lives Matter" (which I agree with such a concept) painted on a city street, I would think that Federal Law nowtakes precedence over, and dictates any choices The City Council may have over any future painting of messages on city Streets? Jefferson County just settled out of court for $187,000.00 for not following the law. I wonder what it will cost the city (and its tax payers) if they do not Follow Federal Law, and not allow "Back The Blue" painted in front of City Hall? Mike Galmukoff Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 31 of 91 From:Stephanie Dickey To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Object to blue lives matter mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 9:10:05 AM Good morning. I am letting the city know that I object to a Blue lives matter painting in front of the city hall.Here is why. I believe we as a town provide a sanctuary for some in the cities residents to tour here and besafe in their surroundings. They come here to safely get away from things. The recent Blue lives matter events, not only broke the law with not permiting, but created a air of fear, whileshutting down our core downtown with out notice. Nobody coming here wants to deal with that. If I was traveling and looked at that on the road, I would just leave and go home, becauseI am tired of it. They should not be rewarded with a permit to create more division after Sundays events. Second, Black lives matter is a historical movement, to support black life that is being cut down by systemic racism. It is not a issue of us and them, black lives against blue badges assome would like to make it. This mural there would create more us and them. Third, If there is a mural approved, put it in front of the police department or on the backsideif the department on Lawrence at the bottom of the hill. Where the police will see it and appreciate it. I appreciate our officers. They deserve support. This is where they will see it. Last, this is another form of counter protest and our streets are being used as a winner takes all idea. This crap should have ended long ago. Does anyone remember Dr. Suess. Shut this downand do not let our town become another news article. Thanks so much. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 32 of 91 From:Megan Smith To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 9:33:56 AM I would like to express my opinion about the proposal to paint the phrase “Blue Lives Matter” in the street in downtown Port Townsend, following the previous action done by community members of the phrase “Black Lives Matter”. I encourage you, the city, to make your decision about this based on guiding principals that require public art to contribute to and further develop a peaceful, safe society, and to foster mutual respect between citizens. The Blue Lives Matter slogan has become divisive. Painting this in the street implies that the the black population and police officers have endured similar injustices and deserve similar responses. It pits one against the other. In reality the magnitude of these experiences are very different, and each deserve unique attention. Healing and growth comes from sharing, listening to one another, acknowledgment of injury and hurt, attempt to understand one another. Communication between community members should be a goal. Painting ‘Blue Lives Matter’ in the street would be a reactive, ‘tit-for-tat’ kind of response to issues that deserve attention within a different kind of context; something that encourages communication, growth and healing. We do not not further divisions - we need to use respect and communication to heal and reunify. Sincerely and thank-you - Megan Smith Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 33 of 91 From:Geoffrey R. To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:On the Subject of "Blue Lives Matter" Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 9:39:31 AM To whom it may concern, I am writing to you today to speak out against a Blue Lives Matter mural in your scenic town. I only was able to visit Port Townsend very recently and briefly but this wonderful place left quite the impression on me. I am fortunate enough to have fallen in love with a kind andcompassionate woman from Port Townsend and got to experience the pride and love she has for your town first hand. The community that I had the pleasure to meet came from all walks of life and backgroundsand spoke to me about the freedom and acceptance they found near the shores of the Pacific. You can imagine the shock that I experienced when I was informed that the representatives ofthis community saw fit to publicize and showcase something so antithetical to the essence of your city. I hope that you will reconsider and refocus on the community that already thrives in yourtown. The community that is found in the local businesses of Water Street, that celebrate your festivals, and promote acceptance among their neighbors, instead of sowing disruption andseparation. Thank you for your time and consideration. A concerned "tourist", Geoffrey Rath Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 34 of 91 From:Anthony Prud"homme To:PublicComment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Proposal is Racist Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 11:55:53 AM To the City of Port Townsend, A "Blue Lives Matter" mural would seek to make a statement similar to that made by a Confederate Flag, plain and simple. I cannot state how strongly I feel, and I speak for my family and friends in this community as well, that our community must stand up to this cynical, racist legal threat. There are legal precedents for how to navigate this in a way that supports the moral imperatives of our time. Jim Crow laws were abolished despite many people’s objections, and likewise many Confederate flags have been removed from the public square. Free speech does protect the right for the KKK to march, but there are limits to those freedoms when hate speech has the potential to endanger lives, and it is in this context that we should be looking at this matter. As a long time local resident and land-owner in Port Townsend, I am deeply invested in this community. What drew me and my family to this town and keeps us invested here is the sense that this is a community that is willing to fight for an inclusive and ecologically sustainable vision for our present and future. The Black Lives Matter movement has risen out of the oppression of black people by systemic racism in this country. The history and evidence of systemic racism is well documented. In particular, the Black Lives Matter movement has spotlit the abuse and criminalization of black bodies by the Police within this system. I was proud to see the Black Lives Matter mural in Port Townsend, because it is a statement of inclusion saying we see, hear, and will stand with our community members against oppression. The “Blue Lives Matter” group has risen in defense of the police, and in particular to the risk to Police funding and the public’s faith in that system. It is not a movement that attempts to give voice to the oppressed, but rather cynically steals the language of the Black Lives Movement and twists it, and in the process creates an intensely racist message. Despite the co-opted language of inclusivity, it is all too clear that this is a smokescreen for a loosely assembled group with direct historical ties to segregation, slavery and the many forms of intimidation and violence that has been employed to suppress people in American history who are not white. Whether they choose to acknowledge this or not, when “Blue Lives Matter” is used by a heavily militarized group as a rebuttal to an anti-racist social protest movement, the only possible way to read it is as a pro-racist statement, with an overt threat of violence. Similarly, when people say “All Lives Matter” as a rebuttal to “Black Lives Matter”, the only way to interpret the statement is as a refusal to acknowledge the persistence of racial inequities in our country, and the systems that perpetuate them. If All Lives mattered equally, the Black Lives movement would not exist. Please help preserve the inclusive values of our community and stand against racism. Sincerely, Anthony Prud'homme Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 35 of 91 From:Peter Guerrero To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Parades and Permits Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 12:17:45 PM Sunday’s parade occurred without a permit although it appears one may have been required. In the future, please enforce local ordinances to ensure public safety in these divisive times. I also understand a request has been made for a Blue Lives Matter slogan to be painted on thestreet in front of City Hall. As the council considers this request I’d like to acknowledge that we've asked our police to do an impossible job. The last time I looked, well over half of local police actions involved drugs, alcohol, individuals with mental problems, or just unacceptable social behavior. We've asked our police to be social workers, mental health workers, etc. while defunding health, social welfare, family and housing agencies that would, otherwise, address these issues. The police are asked to engage in some very difficult situations and deserve our thanks and appreciation. How we choose to do so is up to us as a community, not outsiders who seek to divide us into warring camps. We need to start looking at where our social welfare net has frayed and needs repair. This too honors our police. Let's show we are a community that both believes Black Lives Matter and that also values a functioning local government that serves the people with compassion and wisdom. Peter Guerrero Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 36 of 91 From:Reuben L. To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:"Blue Lives Matter" mural: NO. Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 12:21:43 PM The Black Lives Matter movement formed primarily to bring attention to- with the goal of eliminating- the unfair treatment and violence that people of color continue to endure at thehands of the racist elements of our police forces and of our society at large. I believe that any message that is created AS A RESPONSE to this movement is viewed as exactly that- a response- a diversion of some of the public's precious attention at a time whenwe least can afford to be distracted. Perhaps an analogy or two: if we start a movement to bring awareness to- with the goal of eliminating- all child abuse through sweeping systemic and societal changes- should we as a caring people also considerany OTHER view as valid? should we support the dilution of the significance of the original message with murals in our streets stating "Parents' Lives Matter?" In hindsight- If we could revisit the necessity of the Women's Suffrage movement- should wehave given the "other side" (and believe me, there was one) more exposure and allowed street murals proclaiming "Voters' Lives Matter", thereby giving validity to the idea that a women'sright to vote is even up for discussion? The thing is: all of these ideas are ultimately true. yes, Police, Parents', and Voters' lives DO matter. But that message- WHEN IT'S A DIRECT RESPONSE TO A MESSAGE OF GENUINE INJUSTICE can be seen as an idea that could take away from and even stand in opposition tothe original injustice. Is that the message our city wants to send? ...that a response that distracts our attention from the very real plight of the less fortunate somehow deserves as much exposure as the originalmessage? Black Lives Matter supports treating all people fairly, regardless of the skin color they are born with. "Blue" is not a skin color or a nationality- it's an occupational choice. It's a career option with some danger associated with it- and also a good salary, some authority, some autonomy, andsociety's respect. Let's not pretend that those CHOOSING to work in law enforcement need systemic change nearly as badly as those being redlined, marginalized, incarcerated, hurt or killed because ofour inherent prejudice. I firmly believe that contributing any of our citizen-funded city & county public resources to the support of a message that in ANY WAY dilutes the original message of equality andfairness lends validity to the idea that anything other than equality and fairness is worthy of our consideration... and it most certainly is not. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 37 of 91 Thank you. Reuben LalishPort Townsend, WA, USA Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 38 of 91 From:Josh and Keely Stranahan To:publicComment@cityofpt.us Subject:Equality amount us all Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 12:52:03 PM Good afternoon, I am writing in response to the “blue lives matter” letter submitted for approval. While I, whole heartedly, support the first responders and police in our town, they do a fantastic job. They have not had to endure racism throughout there lives, they chose theircareers, they are not oppressed, and they get paid accordingly. Difficult jobs, but rewarding. I feel as if it would be more divisive than if a “Equality for all” was painted in front of city hall. Especially just after a massive group of aggressive drivers literally threatened quietcitizens with the “blue live matter” messaging. The police were not even invited to the recent blue lives matter rally? Seems really odd. Sending a message that we are not supporting one political side over another is important- weas citizens support everyone and their equality to reach their full potential. Thank you for your service, Sincerely, Keely Stranahan Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 39 of 91 From:Janice Tucker To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Fwd: Blue lives mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 12:53:59 PM CAUTION: External Email I had the wrong address so I forwarded this message I wrote ---------- Forwarded message ---------From: Janice Tucker <mhhats.tucker@gmail.com>Date: Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 10:12 AMSubject: Blue lives muralTo: <publiccomment@gityofpt.us> I do not believe painting a blue lives mural is in the best interest of our city. Being a police officer is a choice but one can not escape being black. I have respect for our local law enforcement and feel they have handled all the recent protests well especially the one last Sunday. Please respect the BIPOC community and do notallow this mural to pass.Thank you, Janice Tucker Mad Hatter Hats 926 Water St.Port Townsend, Wa. 98368 360-379-1859https://www.etsy.com/shop/madhatterhatsofPT? Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 40 of 91 From:Bill Volmut To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Proposed Blue Lives Matter Banner on Madison Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 1:17:19 PM Hello, I am writing with concern about this request. Blue Lives Matter is a racist statement which disregards the plea for police to stop killing unarmed black people. Police already do matter. They are not being discriminated against,they are not being killed, and this message is a slap in the face to those who demand the end of systemic racism in our law enforcement and in our society. Police unions continue that cycleby refusing to address these problems and often cover for the crimes their own personnel commit. If "Blue Lives Matter," then they need to majorly step up to the plate and stop fighting against these demands. Please do not honor this request. This is not a "free speech" issue, this is an attempt to equate two very different sides out of spite and rage in REACTION to the pushback we've seen in thenationwide protests. Please be on the right side of history by standing up to racism and the continued militarism of our law enforcement. Bill VolmutPort Townsend, WA Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 41 of 91 From:Kilfiger To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 1:54:18 PM Hi, I’m Rosy Crecca a student at PTHS here in Port Townsend. I’m emailing to oppose the painting of a Blue Lives Matter mural in Downtown Port Townsend. Blue Lives Matter is a racist term and should not be painted anywhere. Thanks for your time, and I hope you can see why we don't want Blue Lives Matter to be painted. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 42 of 91 From:melanie bakin To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:I oppose the Blue Lives Matter mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 2:10:06 PM Hi! My name is Melanie Bakin and I am a student at PTHS. I’m emailing to oppose the painting of Blue Lives Matter downtown Port Townsend. Blue Lives matter is a racist term and shouldnot be painted anywhere, especially in a progressive town like PT. Thanks for your time, and I hole you can see what painting Blue Lives Matter should not be painted downtown PT. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 43 of 91 From:Chloe Lampert To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue lives matter mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 3:05:35 PM Hello, my name is Chloe and I’m a student at Port Townsend High School. I’m writing to oppose the action of painting a “Blue Lives Matter” mural in downtown Port Townsend. “Blue lives matter” is a racist term and should not be painted anywhere. It undermines the lives of minorities fighting for equality and draws equivalency between a career and human beings. Blue lives do not exist, we can support our local police without silencing those fighting for justice. I believe this term shouldn’t take a part in representing what the Port Townsend community stands for. It reflects a non inclusive narrative about our town. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sent from my iPhone Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 44 of 91 From:Ellise G To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue lives matter mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 3:06:06 PM Hi my name is Ellise Gardner a student at PTHS. I think that painting Blue lives matter on the streets would be a great way to show support for cops and that they do matter even some don’t think that. Thank you for your time! Ellise Gardner Sent from my iPhone Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 45 of 91 From:Isaac Urner To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Opposition to Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 3:08:36 PM I am writing to you to express my opposition to the proposed Blue Lives Matter mural on Madison Street. While there is much to object to about the “Blue Lives Matter” movement(which only exists to distract from the important work of Black Lives Matter), that is not the primary source of my opposition. I am opposed because the mural would create a danger to public safety. James R. Scarantino'sprevious unpermitted demonstration already resulted in people being nearly run over, and a number of reports of reckless driving, snarled traffic and harassment. It also brought the“Proud Boys” to town, violent right wing extremists designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. In my mind, intentionally inviting such violent groups andindividuals to Port Townsend is actively putting our law enforcement officers at risk, not supporting them. Painting such a mural would invite further conflict, and could encourage the Proud Boys toattempt to turn Port Townsend into a playground for violent street fights, as they have done in Portland with tragic results. Simply put, this event will put members of our community indanger. There are clear public safety reasons to reject this proposal, and to come down hard on any further unpermitted demonstrations intended only to disrupt downtown businesses, frightenaway tourists and intimidate residents. Given that the leading killer of police officers this year is Covid-19, perhaps “Blue Lives Matter activists” should focus more on mask wearing. Sincerely, Isaac Urner Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 46 of 91 From:Autumn Winsheimer To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 3:36:26 PM Hello, my name is Autumn! I’m a junior at Insight School of Washington, former student of PTHS. As a member of the Port Townsend community I would like to express my feelingstowards a Blue Lives Matter Mural. Blue Lives Matter is a racist term created to undermine and mock the use of the term Black Lives Matter. It was never used before Black Lives Matter became a popular term. It is tryingto compare race and career, two very different things. I believe that a mural depicting a racist term will upset many community members like myself, as well as create a bad reputation for Port Townsend. I understand that there are people out there that support our local police(myself being one ofthose people) but that doesn’t change the fact that a Blue Life is not a thing, and that Blue Lives Matter is a racist saying. Rather than painting a mural, might i suggest an article in thepaper..something a little more temporary. While I personally do not support Blue Lives Matter, I still want this town to be a place of free expression. So to go about this peacefully,please consider painting something a little less blatantly racist. Thank you. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 47 of 91 From:Juniper Cervenka To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 3:46:03 PM Hello, my name is Juniper Cervenka and I'm a student at PTHS. I'm emailing to oppose the painting of the Blue Lives Matter Mural in Downtown Port Townsend. Blue Lives Matter is aracist term and it should not be painted in this town or any other. With all due respect I hope you can understand why we think it is not appropriate to be painted and that we are not sayingthe lives of every one else dont matter, just that Blue Lives is not an appropriate term. Thank you for your time. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 48 of 91 From:Zula Mosher To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 4:13:50 PM Hello, My name is Zula Mosher from Chimacum High School. I am emailing to oppose the painting of a Blue Lives Matter mural downtown. Blue Lives Matter is a very racist term andshould not be painted anywhere. I hope you can understand why we don't want Blue Lives Matter painted. Thank you so much for your time. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 49 of 91 From:Ellie Davis To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Opposition to the Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 4:31:32 PM Hi, my name is Ellie Davis and I’m emailing to oppose the painting of a Blue Lives Matter mural in downtown Port Townsend. Blue Lives shouldn’t be equated to Black Lives, and it’sracist to use the term Blue Lives Matter. This delegitimizes a group of people who actually struggle because of something they cannot change; their skin color. I hope those who have thepower to make this decision will reconsider. Thank you for your time. -Ellie Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 50 of 91 From:Madison Arroyo To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 4:36:48 PM Hi I’m Madison and I’m emailing to oppose the painting of “blue lives matter” in Downtown Port Townsend. Thank you for your time and I hope that you choose not to approve James Scarantinos request. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 51 of 91 From:Dana Weir To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:DO NOT ALLOW the proposed Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 5:21:14 PM CAUTION: External Email To the Port Townsend City Council, I learned yesterday that James Scarantino and the CORPSE organization are submitting a request for a special event permit, so that he and his organization can paint the words, “Blue Lives Matter” in front of City Hall. I want to express that I am fervently opposed to this idea and to any mural, signage or other expression of the phrase, “Blue Lives Matter”. Through the text offered by his attorney, Scarantino argues that “Blue Lives Matter is intended to support law enforcement”. The attorney argues that because a “Black Lives Matter” mural was allowed to be painted on a downtown street, the same permitting process should be offered to Scarantino. It is clear that the city is reviewing the circumstances under which the Black Lives Matter mural was created (there wasn’t a clear process before that mural was created) and that the city is developing a new set of ordinances in respect to all downtown mural art. However, let’s consider the hypothetical possibility that Scarantino’s request fits within any future ordinance. I argue, firmly, that there are ethical reasons why Scarantino’s mural should not, cannot, be allowed to exist in the city. What does the phrase “Blue Lives Matter” represent? Scarantino’s only explanation is that it is meant to “support law enforcement”. What does that mean? If those words are painted in large, block letters on a street, what do they symbolize? The phrase “Blue Lives Matter” implies that police officers are a race of people, when, in fact, police officers have chosen their profession and they can choose to leave that profession. Their skin is not blue. By co-opting the phrasing of “Black Lives Matter”, the phrase “Blue Lives Matter” is used by its advocates to imply that police are victims who are being treated unfairly and unjustly. But the reality is clear: the police are privileged authority figures who carry lethal weapons. They have the power to intervene, to arrest, to use force and to kill. With few exceptions, they act with impunity and are not held responsible for their actions, even if they brutalize and destroy lives. They belong to an institution that was built out of the legacy of controlling enslaved African people, an institution that developed into a police force and police unions Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 52 of 91 that are systematically racist. To paint a mural with the words “Blue Lives Matter” is to further elevate the institution of the police force that has, for hundreds of years, oppressed, brutalized and killed people of color. By contrast, Black Lives Matter is a vast, social uprising that was triggered by beatings and killings of people of color by the police. The organizational leaders of Black Lives Matter movement call on participants to engage in peaceful protest. I’ve participated in our local rallies and marches in support of the Black Lives Matter movement, and I’ve witnessed the peaceful power of our community crying out for true justice. Our local Black Lives Matter mural was designed by and created by leaders in this community who are people of color. They collaborated with city officials and carried out the creation of a celebratory community event. I am a local art teacher. I have friends and colleagues who helped design that beautiful mural. I have students who helped paint that mural. By allowing the Black Lives Matter mural to exist in our city, the city council helped to elevate the voices of the people who have been the most oppressed in our nation: Black, Indiginous, People of Color. I’ve been educating myself on what the Black Lives Matter movement means. No one in that movement says that because Black Lives Matter, other lives don’t matter. Of course, all lives matter. But Black, Indigenous People of Color are not treated like they matter. They are not treated with justice and equality. Until they are, it is necessary to elevate their voices, to support this movement for civil rights, for the creative and compassionate reform of our cities, our institutions, and our culture. Sincerely, Dana Weir Sources: On systemic racism within policing: https://www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-protests-for-racial- justice/2020/06/15/877299937/u-n-human-rights-council-to-hold-urgent-debate-on-police- brutality-racism On police accountability and Black Lives Matter leaders: https://abcnews.go.com/US/black-lives-matter-founder-protesters-simple- accountability/story?id=71008710 Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 53 of 91 Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 54 of 91 From:Jeannette Patric To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 5:39:55 PM Hi, I’m Jeannette, a Port Townsend citizen, and I’m emailing to oppose the painting of a Blue Lives Matter mural in Downtown PT. This is a racist term which is beyond offensive to many. Thank you for taking this into consideration. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 55 of 91 From:Nan Evans To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Policy on art in public places Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 5:53:39 PM I understand that the City has received a request to paint a Blue Lives Matter on the street in front of City Hall, presumably on the premise that there a BlackLives Matter statement was allowed. I strongly urge the City Council not to approve this request. Such a request is clearly aimed to provoke confrontation and is neither art nor appropriate for our community. I am proud of the way our City Police handled last weekend’s incident. I hope we can move forward in ways that can respect differences without escalating tensions. In fact, All Lives Matter, whatever color of skin one has. Nan Evans Port Townsend Sent from my iPad Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 56 of 91 From:julia neville To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 6:05:54 PM Hi there, My name is Julia Neville and I’m a student at PTHS. I’m sending you this email to oppose theBlue Lives Matter mural planning to be painted in downtown PT. The moral significance behind this mural stands for the sort of stuff I never want to see in my hometown, comparing ajob title and occupational choice as something on par with a race that has faced centuries of oppression. I hope you and your team understand why this is fundamentally wrong andfurthermore, is downright disgusting. Thanks, Julia Neville Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 57 of 91 From:George Marie To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:In regards to Blue Lives Matter Rally and Mural in Port Townsend Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 7:08:49 PM Thank you for the opportunity to address this council and to submit this statement to the public record. I want to address events that I witnessed on August 30th. My home overlooksMountain View Community Center and the parking lot off 19th st. Around 2:10pm I witnessed a loud motorcade, honking, yelling and revving engines with various flags, andpolitical and pro-police signage attached to their vehicles. Two police cars were parked in the parking lot, and two officers were standing outside of their vehicles waving to the passingmotorcade. I witnessed at least one officer giving the passing parade the thumbs up. It has been reported by multiple witnesses that members of the motorcade displayed Nazi symbols and gave Nazi salutes, that when counter protesters chanted Black Lives Matters,members of the motorcade responded with the taunt: “no they don’t,” and that the Proud Boys (a SPLC designated hate group which regularly resorts to violence) also participated as part ofthe group. That racist hate groups took advantage of this rally and that members of the motorcade participated in hate speech should not surprise us, as the organizers and participants of therally and those involved with Blue Lives Matter have not been willing to publicly distance themselves from such groups or to condemn racist actions or racist symbology displayed bytheir members. Their silence is a tacit approval just as the thumbs up was also an act of tacit approval from a police officer to the Blue Lives Matter motorcade. In the end, this lack ofcondemnation and their silence also act as an invitation. The organizers of this motorcade rally and the participants signaled that such ideologies arewelcome. It has been stated by members of the motorcade that the family members of Law Enforcement officers themselves were the organizers. I ask them as I ask you, do we want ourforce aligned with hate speech? How can we move forward as a community in addressing racial justice if they are?The actions of the motorcade and the two Port Townsend police officers' appearance of endorsement inflames what is already a volatile situation and undermines the public’s faith inour local force. I have sent my rendering of these events to the Port Townsend Police Chief Troy Surber andto Sheriff Joe Nole, with the hopes that they will consider that the integrity of the individuals who try to serve our community with honor is undermined by any displays of solidarity withthose who participate in hate speech. It undermines the public trust in their stated commitment to work with communities of color, and to address and hold themselves accountable for anyaccusations of racism. I urge them and this council to take a public stance to dissuade any future rallies or any muralsconnected with Blue Lives Matter. I want to end by submitting a comment from my mother. My mother is a former law-enforcement officer and a whistleblower: “Being in law enforcement carries an enormous responsibility. The Blue line of defense keepsgood cops from coming forward to report corruption for fear of not only losing their jobs, but their lives and safety are at risk from those who see whistleblowers as traitors to the force. Thesystem as it is now ends up protecting bad cops and pushing good cops out. Good officers understand that it needs to change. It’s time they said so.Also, Black Lives matters because Black Lives Matter. Period.” Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 58 of 91 Black Lives Matter as a statement needs no qualification and there is no justification to sayotherwise that does not negate the worth, dignity and rights of Black people. Thank you for your time and consideration, George Marie Port Townsend ResidentPhyllis Owen Port Townsend Resident and former Sheriff Deputy. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 59 of 91 From:Kara Kellogg To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Painting political messages on city streets Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 8:13:18 PM I believe black lives matter. I also believe the lives of our police officers matter. The resurgence of Black Lives Matter in the wake of the death of George Floyd quickly morphedinto a call to kill police officers and defund police departments. I participated in the recent Blue Lives Matter rally to bring some balance back to the public rhetoric. I support painting amural in front of city hall to honor the sacrifices of men and women of every race who lost their lives because they wore the blue uniform. Kara KelloggPort Townsend Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 60 of 91 From:connor Brohman To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue lives matter Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 8:32:08 PM “ Hi I’m Connor and I’m emailing to oppose the painting of “blue lives matter” in Downtown Port Townsend. Thank you for your time and I hope that you choose not to approve JamesScarantinos request.” Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 61 of 91 From:zoe cook To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue lives Mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 9:36:56 PM Hi, my name is Zoe Cook and I am a citizen of Port Townsend Washington, emailing to oppose the blue lives matter mural. "Blue lives" don't exist, at least not in the same way blacklives, indigenous lives, or trans lives exist. Being a cop is a choice unlike the color of your skin or the way you are born and we can support our police in the regular way without turningthis into an insensitive display of our support. "Blue lives matter" is the common counter to the black lives matter movement, a very real, very impactful, and important movement, andwhether or not our local police force is taking part in force brutality and needless arrest, making a public display of our town's "support of blue lives matter" would be not onlyinsensitive but is completely unnessecary. Cops lives aren't at stake here. Cops are the ones who get to roam the streets of our town, a firearm and club in hand, with the trust of the cityon their shoulder. It is the citizens, primarily minorities, who across the country are having their lives stolen from them by law enforcement who's job was supposedly to protect them. Ifour cops ARENT killing and aren't performing racial micro aggressions, that is the bare minimum. The fact that that standard has been nationally construed to the point where wecelebrate the few "good cops" who aren't out here murdering innocent people of color, is sad. Blue lives do NOT need a movement and they sure as hell don't need a mural. I stand withhundreds of other community members when I say we do not want this in our town. Have a wonderful rest of your week and please take these words into consideration, Zoe Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 62 of 91 From:Jeffrey Vella To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 9:46:51 PM CAUTION: External Email Hello everyone. I will be brief. The public forum is exactly that. You agree or disagree. You try to convince or explain your beliefs or views. It is democracy. It is, as I expressed, thepublic forum. I agree with both views. Both views should be equally expressed. It is the nature of our system. It should not even be a question of whether a Blue Lives Matter mural shouldbe allowed. All views should be allowed. It is the only fair and correct way. If it isn't popular in PT, I'm sorry, but tough. It it still the only right way in OUR country.Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 63 of 91 From:Toby Fulton To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue lives matter mural Date:Friday, September 4, 2020 10:23:01 PM My name is Toby Fulton and I am a student at port Townsend highschool. I'd like to oppose the painting of a blue lives matter mural in downtown Port Townsend. Saying blue lives matter in response to the black lives matter movement is a direct sign of ignorance towards the victims of the police murders and their families, as well as being a racist dog whistle. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 64 of 91 From:jillster To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:lives matter mural(s) Date:Saturday, September 5, 2020 6:41:28 AM It has come to my attention that there has been a request to paint over the Black Lives Matter mural with a Blue Lives Matter. I believe both black lives and blue lives matter. I would support an additional mural for blue lives matter but find it divisive and disrespectful to paint OVER the black lives matter murals. Please consider having both of these murals in our town without defacing the black lives matter mural. Respectfully, Jill Allison (Port Townsend resident) -- One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time. -André Gide.. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 65 of 91 From:Kathryn Waters To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:BLM mural Date:Saturday, September 5, 2020 8:03:38 AM Greetings Dash Please keep the Black Lives Matter mural. If enough people want a blue lives matter mural we can certainly have that, too. I’m not sure why anyone feels the need here as most people are in support of the police and sheriff. Kathryn Waters Port Townsend, WA Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 66 of 91 From:Max Stewart To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:No Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Saturday, September 5, 2020 10:35:04 AM Hello, My name is Max Stewart, I am at PTHS student and a Port Townsend resident. I am emailing to say that I strongly oppose a Blue Lives Matter mural. That slogan has historically been a direct negative response to Black Lives Matter, and iscomparing an occupation to the systemic racism that Black folks have experienced in the USA since their ancestors were brought here as slaves. A mural containing that slogan will onlyfunction to make Black people and other people of color in town, including myself (an asian- american), as well as other marginaliized communities, feel unsafe and unwelcome. If there ispressure for the city to celebrate law enforcement, this is an unnecessarily reactionary and hateful manner of doing it. Thank you,Max Stewart Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 67 of 91 From:Caleb Staley To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:No blue lives matter mural Date:Saturday, September 5, 2020 10:43:13 AM My name is Caleb Staley and I oppose the the blue lives matter mural that is being considered. Blue lives matter is directly opposed to black lives matter, and is intended to take attentionaway from it. There is no need to publicly support the police in this way, as the state and country are already backing them. Blue lives matter is a campaign that makes minorities in theUS feel unsafe and directly harms them. Blue lives matter is a euphemism for racism and bigotry. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 68 of 91 From:Allison Barrett To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Regarding Blue Lives Matter Date:Monday, September 7, 2020 11:55:34 AMDear City Council, I am writing to urge you to not permit the painting of Blue Lives Matter in front of CityHall. We elect you to enact policy that is reflective of our community values. We claim to valueinclusivity and safety. We say we are committed to the reconciliation of the racial traumathat is embedded in our history and in our present systems. Blue Lives Matter is a movement that developed in direct opposition to Black LivesMatter and the movement for Black lives. It is racist, white supremicist, divisive andreactionary at its roots. Some people who support Blue Lives Matter simply think that they are expressingsupport for the men and women who work in law enforcement. They may notunderstand that by saying Blue Lives Matter, they are invigorating a directed andaggressive backlash against the movement for Black lives, Black healing and Blackresilience. If we are who we say we are, then a message and movement like Blue Lives Matter is ofno use to us. It is harmful and stands in stark contradiction to our values. The people who truly just want to show support for decent law officers can find anotherway, a way that isn’t a petty retort to the important efforts of the local BIPOC community,a way that doesn’t enshrine bitter anti-Black racism. Thank you,Allison Barrett Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 69 of 91 From:E Lessing Sokol To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Cc:E Lessing Sokol Subject:First Amendment Rights Date:Monday, September 7, 2020 12:19:14 PM CAUTION: External Email In light of your emotional and political decisions regarding painted streets/art this is an Interesting article. While you discuss and possibly decide it might be a good idea to run thisarticle by the city attorney. Edeltraut Sokol1005 Quincy St PT360 385-9002 https://www.judicialwatch.org/in-the-news/1st-amendment-rights-dc/ Wonder Land: "Systemic racism" is a systemic forgetting of 55 years of urban policy failure. “ ”We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 70 of 91 From:Ashley Stone To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Back the Blue/Blue Lives Matter mural Date:Monday, September 7, 2020 5:42:13 PM To whom even this may concern, I am writing to show my support of a law enforcement mural. My personal feelings about law enforcement, they play one of the most important roles in this community, they wear many different hats every single day. Law enforcement may be a choice they make while choosing a profession but it should not be a choice that we don’t show the utmost respect for Have any of you walked in their shoes? Do you have a loved one that puts that badge on? It’s not a job, it’s a lifestyle. When that uniform comes off, it doesn’t fully remove them from their duties, they are law enforcement 24/7. We expect, demand even, they portray themselves a certain way off and on duty. They all do that well, they sacrifice a lot of average privileges, when they earn that badge. Even after their time is served, it’s not over, it follows them for the rest of their lives. It’s a lifestyle they signed into for us, the people. Just as vets are celebrated for fighting for this county, long after they have fulfilled their duties, law enforcement should be as well. If you do not have any personal experience with these individuals, I urge you to reach out, have a conversation, sign up for a ride along, get an idea of what it’s like to walk a day in their shoes. It is a very selfless career choice and we should be happy to celebrate and recognize it. I fully support the mural being proposed. Thank you, Ashley Merrell Sent from my iPhone Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 71 of 91 From:Amanda Webby To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Mural Date:Monday, September 7, 2020 7:46:33 PM To those who will decide, The proposed “blue lives matter” mural in Port Townsend is an insult to a huge part of our society. It is an attempt to distract and divert attention from the very real problem of racism and abuse of POC in our town and all over the world. There are many ways for us to show appreciation to good police officers but this particular mode is an insult to black lives. BLM is obviously a response to police brutality. When the retort is “blue lives matter“ it can be nothing but incendiary and hurtful. Please do not allow a tiny small number of people in our town who don’t seem to understand how decisive and mean this is, to bring our WHOLE town onto the wrong side history. We will be judged by our big hearted youth who understand that this is wrong. We mustn’t allow any more dismissive aggressive responses to the majority of us who want to affirm that indeed, we care. We are not alright with the police abuse of Black people which our whole nation has seen for themselves on video. THAT is the conversation. That is what our town needs to say to this injustice. Please do the right thing and shut down this mural meant to taunt and distract. Respectfully, Amanda Webby Port townsend parent, business owner and 20 year resident. Sent from my iPhone Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 72 of 91 From:weaverop To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us; CityCouncil Subject:Blue Lives Matter Mural Date:Monday, September 7, 2020 11:38:43 PM CAUTION: External Email Dear Port Townsend City Council, The Council is considering a request by Blue Lives Matter for a mural by City Hall. I oppose that mural. Blue Lives Matter is in direct opposition to Black Lives Matter whose protests were about black lives murdered. Police officers breaking the law should be protested NOT encouraged. Allowing that mural is just that- encouraging unhealthy rhetoric about law enforcement. Rather than choosing a constructive promotion of police as peace officers and law enforcers they use confrontational in your face Blue Lives Matter. Exactly what we don't need, more adversarial them against us scenarios. Police and sheriff should be seen as law enforcers NOT agitators. They are notabove the law and need to be prosecuted for wrong doing just as citizens pay for their illegal actions.We need peace keepers that enforce and uphold the law. Please don't allow a Blue Lives Matter mural that enourages unhealthy, destructive views ofpolice and law enforcement. It encourages a police state. I strongly urge your active participation in molding a law enforcement environment thatprotects, and defends our community and county and does not hold any bureacracy above thelaw. Deny the mural. Thank you for your time.Cecilia Flickinger Sent from my Galaxy Tab® S2 Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 73 of 91 From:katherine baril To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:#2- please delete the first message I submitted and replace it with this one- the format broke up and looked awful- sorry Date:Monday, September 7, 2020 11:42:38 PM Please enter this testimony re request by blue lives matter for a permit. Submitted by L. Katherine Baril LKatherineBaril@gmail.com P.O. Box 268 Port Townend Washington I submit the following for your consideration: - Black Lives Matter street art was permitted on Water Street in June. This occurred as part of an historic engagement of over 45 million Americans who demonstrated peacefully in streets across the country calling for an end to racism and a “re-imaging of law enforcement and public safety”. National reports document that 80% of the demonstrations nationwide were non- violent. - The BLM street art was permitted by the City after an application process, consultation with the art community, review by the City Council, approval and conditions by the City Historical Review Committee, and oversight by the City Manager in consultation with the City Council. - Civil disobedience, demonstrations and street art have a long history in America of efforts by the disenfranchised to have a voice and draw attentionto inequality and discrimination. Seattle is recognized as an international leader of street art curated in galleries and museums, and is ranked as the#1 community in the world with publicly funded street art all along the route of METRO from downtown to the SeaTac airport. The Northwest is also aleader in conservancy and installations of street art in museums, public and private collections and public art funded by State and Local 1% for art programs. Art, statues, memorials pass on the stories of America. - Now comes an application for a blue lives matter permit to demonstrate the city’s support for law enforcement. - There is no doubt and should be no argument that this community supports and funds local law enforcement at a very high rate. About 34% of the City budget and 60% of the County budget goes to support local law enforcement. New positions are also being created. - It is routine that annually agencies are asked to “reimagine” their programs with a zero based budgets, upto date responses to the public's top priorities, to adjust programs with new research and effective strategies, and to demonstrate cost management/effectiveness on agreed upon outcomes. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 74 of 91 There has never been more public agreement and support for “re-imaging public safety” than now. Seize the opportunity.There is much to build upon and bring us together. The data is clear that there are growing difficult challenges of mental health, housing, poverty, and the current stresses of thevirus and a failing economy. We should be able to agree we are no longer in Mayberry but we are also not in a militarized zone.We want to recruit thebest professionals. We want people to feel safe and protected. We recognize that new research is estabishing the trauma that youth feel when guns, dog,and enforcment is brought into the schools. We recognize that the last six months have repeatedly shown film video, tears, and violence that it so undeniable that the system is failing and there is an opportunity to “reimage” our shared public safety. This is not about individuals- its about systems that either work for or against us. With good leadership we can hear each other, recognize the differences of our experiences and develop systems thatensure a better America for all of us. - Is it coincidental or intentional that the context of this permit application arises within days after an un-permitted 400 Truck/car parade on Water Street? The parade was described, by some, as motivated by a similar effort to support local law enforcement. Unfortunately, organizers of the event did not talk to, notify, or consult with the local Sheriff or Police Chief according to police and sheriff statements in the local press. Some organizers misrepresented the details of gathering to a city community officer saying it would be a small event, similar to antique car drive-bys within city speed limits. Instead the event was 400 large Trucks, many cars, loud speakers, roaring engines, and yelling for 2 hours while vehicles drove through town. Flags for state and national candidates were prominent, Proud Boys were in their garb, there were intimidating encounters visible and reported throughout town. Parents reported that youth working downtown came home crying and distraught. With no permits the community was denied any tadvance knowledge or opportunity to prepare or assist residents who may have been triggered or traumatized, there were no de-escalation plans nor opportunity to prepare and support local downtown businesses who held hope for a busy Sunday with tourism and high retail sales. Instead the consequences were complaints, frustration and angry conversations as participants confronted each other, getting more upset and faced something they never thought they would see in Port Townsend . - Local government’s role is to ensure safety, transparency and effective service to residents. Good governance is also a tool as we are called to work together to resolve conflicts. We can be reminded that we share more than divides us; that we are all experiencing stress and anxiety with the virus; that the economy, the election- any one of these puts us on edge. . Drama does not reflect our best selves and local governmentbecomes both the coach and the referee. Our kids look at us to see how adults deal with differences and challenges. Whether our perceptions of the current challenges pull us to Black Lives Matter or blue lives matter, we can decide not to fan the flames, not to reward retaliation and tit for tat thinking. A consultative or mediated process will require leadership and hopefully the result will be reconciliation and a stronger community. If not at least we will know where we agree to disagree, for now. How we respond and whether these permits and challenges makes us a stronger as a good community or more divided. Governments role is to bring us together. - Racial Reckoning is not an indictment of any one individual, of individual conduct or intent. It is an opportunity to recognize and reset the economic, health, education and social systems of our Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 75 of 91 nation. Since government created many of these systems- government can be expected to act to help us correct and work through them. We are increasingly recognizing that we live in different realities, with different experiences and different truths. Racial Reckoning is a growing understanding that our economic systems based on slavery for over 400 years have not provided a real truth and reconciliation process. Our shared task as Americans is to learn, understand, talk with each other, not become defensive and to move forward together, to a better tomorrow and an America as good as its promise. - Government is not required in any situation to approve action that is designed to result in violence, provocation, damage or emotional/physical risk. One may have a right to do something but the question is it the right thing to do? My suggestion and testimony is to suggest Government provide true civic leadership and good governance- get beyond taxes and roads- and focus on the role of governance by encouraging, yes requiring, a mediated process with all parties and professional facilitation. The goal would be to increase understanding, collaboration, and to reach an agreement on recommendations to be forwarded to Government for future action. We do not have to act like the only alternative is being pulled into an either- or— win-loose argument. We don’t have to personalize conflicts, mis- represent interests, or localize national polarization. This will require real courage and public engagement. It will be based on a belief that public processes and permits are not zero sum games but done in ways that bring out the best in us. This consultation process can apply to all permits- - This is an opportunity to model for our youth and community that we are a good community, that we are wise enough not to fall into the drama of a divided community but rather we will develop new paths and public processes that reflect shared values and collaboration. That will bring out the best in all of us. Together we can do this. Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 76 of 91 From:E. M. To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Back the blue Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 7:02:40 AM Good morning. I am writing in support of a "Back the Blue" mural for Jefferson County. Another mural was recently allowed and given City Council support in what seems like recordtime, I request the same support for law enforcement. I've heard the argument that "they can take off the uniform" and that's why the situation is different. I agree it is different, but not in the way you may think. These officers CHOOSE toput on that uniform to help thier community, knowing the dangers that face them. They give up holidays, weekends, nights, birthdays and anniversaries with friends and family to be therefor the people of Jefferson County. And yet, at the end of the day they are still law enforcement, uniform or no. They still think about their cases, they still worry about things outof their hands, they still see those they couldn't save in one way or another. They are harrassed, underpaid, underfunded and underappreciated. In spite of that they choose to put onthat uniform every shift, I and many others in the community are SO grateful they do. Please approve a "Back the Blue" mural to show those we rely on, those we call in our time of need, those that run to help regardless of who's calling, that we support them. That we Backthe Blue. Thank you for your consideration, Erin Murray Proud wife of a deputy Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 77 of 91 From:Jim Scarantino To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Political art on city streets Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 7:56:58 AM Giving the Arts Commission adequate time to fully consider the proposed regulations for art on public streets was the right thing to do. Comments by members of the Commission revealthe deep problems with the regulation as proposed. For instance, the Black Lives Matter mural, if subjected to those regulations, should not have been approved. As revealed in the June 15 comments, it is motivated by animosity toward oneracial group and demands for "revolution." As cities burn across America and mostly Black Americans have their livelihoods destroyed and lives taken by rioters, we see whatthis message of "revolution" really means. The Black Lives Matter movement is also partisan and heavily engaged in election politics, and the name of a for-profit corporation. "Blue Lives Matter" originated in 2014 in response to the murder of Hispanic and Asian lawenforcement officers. The most recently murdered law enforcement officer--just last week-- was a Black man. This message transcends race. Opposing a Blue Lives Matter mural, or othermessage of support for law enforcement, denigrates their sacrifice, while at the same time the banner of those who burn, loot and kill sprawls on a public street outside City Hall. Respectfully, Jim Scarantino Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 78 of 91 From:Kathy Stevenson To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:letter regarding blue lives matter Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 8:25:29 AM September 6, 2020 Dear Port Townsend City Council, We understand you have been requested to give permission for a Blue Lives Matter mural in Port Townsend public space. We have strong objections for the following reasons. The Blue Lives Matter slogan is a direct response to Black Lives Matter. Howeverthey are worlds apart in their intent. Black Lives Matters supports opposition to centuries of oppression of people with Black skin. Blue Lives Matter was developed to deny the importance of that oppression. Police officers are not an oppressed group. They have chosen a career that involves intensive training, protective gear, weapons and an above average salary. Yes, their lives matter, as do all lives. We have all heard the counter to Black Lives Matter, that of All Lives Matter. Those who spout that interpret the Black Lives Matter movement as ‘only Black Lives Matter’. But the actual intent is ‘Black Lives Matter, too!’ We all know the history of slavery, Jim Crow and continued discrimination even with laws that attempted to counter it. Yes, progress has been made in opportunities for Black people, but we see in so many ways how far short we are in creating equity for Black, Indigenous and People of Color. Oppression and bigotry are in the news every day. Police are not victims of oppressive policies and practices. The Blue Lives Mattermovement is clearly linked to anti-Black ideology and actions that endorse white supremacy. This is not an ideology that belongs in Port Townsend/Jefferson County public spaces. This is not a message that is unifying, justice seeking and worthy of our nation’s values. It is time to prove that our country can become an antiracist society where Black lives truly matter as much as other lives. Our city’s public spaces are for lifting up our country’s values; not a place for oppressive, anti-black slogans. Sincerely, Kathy Stevenson & Mike Morrissey 928 14th St Port Townsend WA kstevensonpt@gmail.com & mtmorrissey928@gmail.com 360-385-4565 & 360-379-8130 Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 79 of 91 From:Tina Flores-McCleese To:PublicComment@cityofpt.us Subject:city hall - mural blue lives matter Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 9:31:21 AM Attachments:image001.png FIRST AMENDMENT NEWS: Should ‘Blue Lives Matter’ be painted on Madison Streetoutside Port Townsend City Hall?This request does not have my support.We all hear the dog whistle and recognize it for what it is, a retaliatory response to a simpleconcept that Black lives do not have the same weight in our society and do in fact, matter. Sincerely, Tina Flores-McCleese Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 80 of 91 From:J JOHN To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Lives Matter Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 10:02:15 AM We hear that a painting on Madison Street saying Blue Lives Matter is being requested. We oppose the request. This is inviting confrontation during a very divisive time. Of course all lives matter and we could fill the streets with who’s and why’s. BLM is a broad statement with far reaching issues of inequality and suppression bringing into the forefront deep seated racism in America. The gravity and importance restated during this time of violence happening across our Nation. Let BML stand for a symbol of recognition that that is true and needs our attention and consideration. Thank you . Jay Johnson Sent from my iPhone Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 81 of 91 From:oconor@indra.com To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Blue Live Matter Mural - NO Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 10:09:43 AM To Whom it May Concern, Last weekend a group of people unlawfully paraded through our town, intimidating visitors and frightening locals by honking, yelling, waving signs and interrupting business and tourism. It was truly scary, and like nothing I’ve ever seen in Port Townsend. Among these people were members of the Proud Boys, admitted Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists. The flow of cars OUT of town after showed that most were not residents. They put our Police Department in a difficult situation in terms of managing this, and actually put them at risk. In what way did this support the Police? Now they want to come back and create a mural, and disrupt our lives again. They are not interested in supporting our police, they don’t even live here, they just want to disrupt and divide our town. There are many productive ways to support our police department if they sincerely want to help. Allowing this mural also opens a revolving door with no end in sight to groups who want to come and display their point of view. If you allow this, you open a Pandora’s Box for outside agitators coming in to make their point, disrupt business and residential life, and then leave. Imagine the negative impact on property values for residents, especially downtown, and for tourists who come here for a quiet weekend or vacation. I can’t think of one positive benefit this will have for our town. Finally, during these times of economic hardship, sickness and political strife, why would we willingly choose to add more chaos and disruption to our lives right now? Please say NO to this request. Thank You, A. O’Conor Port Townsend Resident Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 82 of 91 From:Jaimie Hoobler To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:No Blue Lives Matter mural in Port Townsend Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 11:17:06 AM Dear Members of the Port Townsend City Council, Please do not approve the painting of a "Blue Lives Matter" mural on Water Street or anywhere else in Port Townsend. "Blue Lives Matter" and "All Lives Matter" are meant to contrast and silence the Black LivesMatter movement, which is a movement of historically oppressed people. I find the Blue Lives Matter slogan to be a threat to efforts toward equity and justice for Black people. Their claims that it is a matter of free speech do not ring true to me, as I hope wewould not allow other messages of hate or suppression to be painted on our streets. Please take this into consideration and keep Port Townsend a safe space for those who are not in power and who are fighting for a more just society. Thank you, Jaimie Hoobler853 51st St Port Townsend Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 83 of 91 From:Shelly Brown Reiss To:Publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Honoring Port Townsend Police and First Responders Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 11:39:52 AM CAUTION: External Email To the Port Townsend City Council, I’m writing regarding requests to create a Blue Lives Matter mural in front of City Hall later this week. I object to these requests because I believe that such a mural would only increase the tensions that have arisen in our community around these issues. I agree with Pippa Mills’ suggestion that a better way to honor our wonderful team of police, firefighters, and other first responders, would be to buy gifts or gift cards from our local merchants that could be delivered directly to the departments or to City Hall on September 11. School supplies, toys, restaurant certificates, and the like would support local shops and also honor our public servants in memory of those who died on September 11. For those who prefer, a handwritten thank you card would be just as appreciated as a purchase. This could become an annual community event on September 11 that would help draw people together rather than drive them farther apart, as I fear another mural would do. Thank you for the work you do for all of us. I appreciate your taking the time to consider my request. Shelly Brown Reiss 610 Hudson Place (360) 379-4664 Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 84 of 91 From:Dan Meyerson To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Police Lives Matter mural Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:58:57 PM CAUTION: External Email I am writing to voice my opposition to the painting of the PLM mural on Madison St. I can spend a lot of time and effort to spell out all my objections to the idea but suffice to say that the Black Lives Matter movement is a response to systemic racism in our county while the Police Lives Matter assertion is a specious deflection which actually camouflages that underlying racism. I support and appreciate all the people who made career choices to enter the public sectors of police, fire and emergency services. They made a conscious choice to pursue those lines of work. There is no choice involved with what race one is born into. The inequalities that black people have suffered for centuries have to be corrected at every level of our society. Rebutting BLM with Police Lives Matter is a false argument and I am opposed the sanctioning of it by the City of Port Townsend. Dan Meyerson 4053 Jackman Street This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 85 of 91 From:Joan Cole To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Comments for blue lives mural permit Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 2:38:14 PM From: Joan Cole, 1411 Corona Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 I submit the following for your consideration re: blue lives mural permit: Even though I come from a family in law enforcement and have a deep respect for most who work in that field, I am not blind to the racial injustices I see in the criminal justice/policing system in this country. And very personally, I find myself angry by groups co-opting/using the police to push a racist and divisive agenda, as I see happening in the blue lives movement. Nothing good can come of giving this group the weight of BLM in this town through approval of the mural. Black Lives Matter street art was permitted on Water Street in June. This occurred as part of an historic engagement of over 45 million Americans who demonstrated peacefully in streets across the country calling for an end to racism and a “re-imaging of law enforcement and public safety”. National reports document that 80% of the demonstrations nationwide were non-violent. Civil disobedience, demonstrations and street art have a long history in America of efforts by the disenfranchised to have a voice and draw attention to inequality and discrimination. The BLM street art was permitted by the City after an application process, consultation with the art community, review by the City Council, approval and conditions by the City Historical Review Committee, and oversight by the City Manager in consultation with the City Council. The community in PT/Jeff Co came out for peaceful support of BLM and its goals of acknowledging the four hundred years of racial injustice and the need for facing/changing systemic racism in this country. Now an application is filed for a blue lives mural permit to demonstrate ‘support for law enforcement.’ It is not coincidental that the context of this permit application arises within days after a supposed blue lives truck/car parade appeared on Water Street without notification or consultation with the local Sheriff or Police Chief according to police and sheriff statements in the local press. Guised as a support for local law enforcement, the event consisted of 400 large trucks/cars, loud speakers, roaring engines, and yelling for 2 hours while vehicles drove through town. Flags for state and national candidates were prominent, Proud Boys were in their garb, and there were many intimidating encounters visible and reported throughout town. Parents reported that youth working downtown came home crying and distraught. It was a surprise invasion of a normally peaceful summer Sunday for those locals, businesses and tourists emotionally triggered/traumatized by the anger, noise and violence this group displayed. How many of these ‘supporters’ are actually local? The blue lives group is divisive and hostile, and has emerged as an ‘enemy’ of BLM not to actually support law enforcement. By permitting a blue lives mural the city is undermining the power of the original Black Lives Matter statement and mural in our community. There is no doubt and should be no argument that this community already supports and Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 86 of 91 funds local law enforcement at a very high rate. About 34% of the City budget and 60% of the County budget goes to support local law enforcement. New positions are also being created. It is routine that annually agencies are asked to “re-imagine” their programs. There has never been more public agreement and support for “re-imagining public safety” than now. Seize the opportunity. There is much to build upon and bring us together. The data is clear that there are growing difficult challenges of mental health, housing, poverty,and the current stresses of the virus and a failing economy. We want to recruit the best professionals. We want people to feel safe and protected. This is about systems that either work for or against us all. With good leadership we can hear each other, recognize the differences of our experiences and develop systems that ensure a better America for all of us. Do not approve this permit for a “blue lives matter” mural in Port Townsend. Thank you for all your service. Joan Cole We're all just walking each other home. Ram Dass Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 87 of 91 From:mstay@cablespeed.com To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:blue lives mural Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 3:48:47 PM Dear City Council Members, I'm writing to participate in the recent conversation in our community about a blue lives street mural downtown. This is problematic for me in a number of ways. At this moment in time, in the context of the Black Lives Mattermovement, this proposed mural does not celebrate the lives of police officers. It is being used to diminish black andbrown people in our community...as a direct affront to the idea that their lives matter. It's appalling. I know thatpolicing is hard work and an important ingredient in our community...there are lots of hard jobs, there are even moredangerous jobs, it remains a job. There is also a very real and purposeful perpetuation of the myth of the artificialdivisions between the people that live within Port Townsend and those that live in other parts of the county by thepeople promoting this mural. We depend on each other out here on the Peninsula, and I'm disappointed that themovement to eliminate police brutality and reform policing has been interpreted to the be anti-police. The BlackLives Matter movement is exposing some very real problems in policing all over the country, and presents anopportunity to rethink how policing supports the community moving forward by reallocation of funds to create asafer environment for both the police and community. Sincerely,Michelle Stay43 Vancouver Ln.Port Townsend, WA 360-379-6528 Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 88 of 91 From:Jesse Wild To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us; CityCouncil Subject:Comment on consideration of Blue Lives Matter mural Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 4:27:00 PM Attachments:BLM-PTCC.docx I have attached my letter to the council commenting on their possible consideration of a muralfor “Blue Lives Matter” If this letter is read out loud, please just state that there are statistics quoted in the letter (all of the indented paragraphs) and skip over those indented paragraphs to read the rest of the letter—it won’t be under three minutes if it is read in entirety. Thank you, Jesse jesse wild443-924-9453 Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 89 of 91 Dear Port Townsend City Council, I have heard that the council is considering a request to give permission for a Blue Lives Matter mural in Port Townsend public space. I strongly object. “Blue Lives Matter” and “All Lives Matter” are direct responses to “Black Lives Matter.” Those statements are very different in intent than Black Lives Matter (BLM). Statements that black lives matter, that black lives should matter, are in opposition to centuries of oppression of black people and people of color. BLM does not mean that only black lives matter. Just that they should matter as much as white lives. Because, presently, they don’t. The lives of black people, indigenous people, and other people of color have been and are still valued less in our society than the lives of white people. This is borne out in history, in the data, in many recent videos, in the news daily. Our health care system alone gives us a lot of evidence for the difference in the value of black and white lives. In the United States, black women are 2 to 6 times more likely to die from complications of pregnancy than white women, depending on where they live (American Medical Association, 1999). The infant mortality rate for black babies is more than twice that for whites. This gap persists as the mother’s’ education and income rises.— Lindy Washburn, “Medical Mystery Endures: Black Babies at Twice Risk of Whites for Death, Study Indicates,” Medical Press (March 2, 2011) (http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011- 03-medical-mystery-black-babies-whites.html). The chronic stress of experiencing discrimination can gradually erode people’s physical well- being over time, according to Mary Bassett, director of the François-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights at Harvard University. Babies born to well educated, middle-class black mothers are more likely to die before their first birthday than babies born to poor white mothers with less than a high school education.— Laudan Y. Aron, (August 26, 2013) “Despite Fifty Years of Improvements in Infant Mortality, Large Black-White Gap Remains Unchanged,” Urban Wire: Poverty, Vulnerability and the Safety Net. (http://www.urban.org/urban-wire/despite-fifty-years-improvements-infant-mortality-large-black-white-gap-remains-unchanged). In 2002, the groundbreaking report “Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care,” published by a division of the National Academy of Sciences, took an exhaustive plunge into 100 previous studies, careful to decouple class from race, by comparing subjects with similar income and insurance coverage. The researchers found that people of color were less likely to be given appropriate medications for heart disease, or to undergo coronary bypass surgery, and received kidney dialysis and transplants less frequently than white people, which resulted in higher death rates. Black people were 3.6 times as likely as white people to have their legs and feet amputated as a result of diabetes, even when all other factors were equal. One study analyzed in the report found that cesarean sections were 40 percent more likely among black women compared with white women. —New York Times, April 11, 2018: Why America’s black mothers and babies are in a life-or-death crisis At $171,000, the net worth of a typical [median] white family is nearly ten times greater than that of a Black family ($17,150) in 2016. White average wealth ($929,800), which is more influenced by very rich families and does not characterize the typical experience, is 6.7 times Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 90 of 91 greater than Black average wealth ($138,100).—Examining the Black-white wealth gap, Kriston McIntosh, Emily Moss, Ryan Nunn, and Jay Shambaugh, February 27, 2020; Brookings.edu In addition to these clear inequities captured in statistics, the intangible experience of being black in America is nothing like the experience of being white. “Racial injustice lies not only in hard facts, but also in ‘the thick of everyday life.’” — https://www.brookings.edu/research/time-for-justice-tackling-race-inequalities-in-health- and-housing/#footnote-1 Many of us are aware of the history of hundreds of years of slavery, of the subsequent discriminatory Jim Crow laws, of lynchings, and of overt discrimination and bigotry. But it is harder to see the systemic inequities, harder to notice the privileges afforded to white people in our society if we are the privileged ones. Although progress has been made such as voting rights laws, there are systemic injustices, and we are far short in creating equity for black people, indigenous people, and people of color. I am not a representative of any organized BLM movement. My understanding of BLM beyond just that statement is that BLM is an ideological and political intervention in a world where black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted for demise. It is an affirmation of black people’s contributions to this society, our humanity, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression. But some people seem threatened by this. So, back to the responses to “black lives matter” with other slogans stating “all lives matter” or “blue lives matter” or “white lives matter”: at this point, those responses are in effect, denying that history of—and that continuing—oppression. White lives do presently seem to matter more in our health care, education, economy, and system of justice. People in our nation or town are not presently oppressed because their skin color is white. Blue lives, or police lives, have always mattered. Police officers are not an oppressed group in our society or town. I’m all for applauding our law enforcement peeps, at appropriate times and places, and in ways that are not in opposition to efforts to create a more equitable society. I think our PTPD would agree. We live on the Salish Sea. When we call out to “Save the Whales,” we don’t mean, “And to Heck with All Other Marine Life”! We are highlighting the plight of the whales. All lives matter only when black lives matter. Layla F. Saad, author of Me and White Supremacy states that the phrase “All Lives Matter” feels like a weapon. She says (to OprahMag.com) “It may not be a consciously wielded weapon, but it is a weapon to silence. A weapon to undermine what Black people are trying to say.” The Blue Lives Matter movement apparently has links to anti-black ideology and actions that endorse white supremacy. I believe this ideology is very divisive and does not belong in Port Townsend or Jefferson County public spaces. This is the not a unifying message, nor is it worthy of our nation’s values. Our city, our county, and our country can be a place where black lives truly matter as much as all lives. Our city public spaces are for lifting up our citizens’ values of compassion and justice, for championing the oppressed, for calling for help for the needy (like those whales); not a place for oppressive, anti- black slogans. Sincerely, Jesse Wild, citizen of Port Townsend Public Comment from Sept. 8, 2020 Council Meeting (Related to Public Art) Page 91 of 91