HomeMy WebLinkAbout091390 Ag Packet
_f/I'
~",
Î TiP'
..,..
e
e
e
;,.
'-êity of Port Town.d
e
Planning Commission
540 Water St., Port Townsend. "VA 98368
206/385-3000
AGENDA
(Proposed)
Regular Meeting
September 13,. 1990
I. ROLLCALL-------------------------------------------7:3OP.M.
II. READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING
III. COMMUNICATIONS:
A. current mail
IV. OLD BUSINESS:
A.
Street Vacation Appl., 8911-04, Arne Willenhagf
1. Staff Review _~,~
2. Public Testimony
3. Committee Review-(Sherwood/Tavernakis)
4. Findings and Conclusions
B.
'I
Union :.
- hpro.;-.e.ol
Rezone Appl., 9007-02, Q\.:1i1Ìipe-rcredit
1. Staff Review
2. Public Testimony
3. Committee Review-(Grimrn/Sherwood)
4. Findings and Conclusions
C. Variance Appl., 9008-02, City·of.. Port TownseÏtci'
1. Staff Review' . "~
2 . Publ ic Testimony - APp,ove.r:4
3. Committee Review-(Erickson/McDole)
4. Findings and Conclusions
V. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Short Plat Appl., 9008-03, Barbara Williams
1. Scheduled: September 27, 1990
2. Committee: Grimm/Sherwood
B. Short Plat Appl., 9009-01, Campbell-Hogue and Associates
"Discovery View"
1. Scheduled: October 11, 1990
2. Committee: Carman/Erickson
VI. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
A. Next Scheduled Meetings:
"
e
e
e
/~
..,
e
e
1.
September 20. 1990
a. sign Code Workshop
2. September 27. 1990
a. Short Plat Appl., 9002-05, Jeff Porter
(TaVernakis/Erickson)
b.
variance
Hatfield
Appl., 9008-01, Garth
(Tavernakis/carman)
and
Patty
c. Short Plat Appl., 9008-03, Barbara Williams
(Grimm/Sherwood)
3. October 4. 1990
a. sign Code Hearing
4. October 10. 1990 ?
a. Public Open House and Hearing: Draft Urban
Waterfront Plan and EIS (Joint Waterfront
Planning Committee and City Council)
5.
October 11, 1990
a. Short Plat Appl., 9009-01, Campbell-Hogue and
Associates "Discovery View" (carman/Erickson)
6. November 1, 1990
a. Joint Public Hearing: Draft Ordinances
(City Council and Planning Commission)
7. November 15. 1990
a. Planning Commission Recommendation Issued on
Draft Ordinances Waterfront Plan
VII. ADJOURN
'"
TJI. -GWI~
Guest List
1-/
<J
...... ..
NAME (please print 1
;D~/d ~_-e_(
ADDRESS
~C>. l1:x /3s&-
9b-f" ~d,LA ~~
ItltJ,O ;("'1/&1< /'t #/'1 S¡-;
t, f( .ç1( (.kJ 'I z. ò L~ 7 2-
otf- T Du.H"~~J. W ^-
1 z..o '"L ~þ..~,<,,~ ~T
\l-l ~"-L-t) -No ~.
S-'309 h~
~ f
i(
5/;,0'-1 I- fA tJ-.
f
S- /V" S-v fJ., ~ 7'"
Do you wish to If yes, indicate
presenllesllmony? topic.
YES N.O
~
o
ŒI
o
o
JkJ
Α{
o
o
la
~.
o
o
o
o
o
lit
o
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
tJ 0
o 0
o 0
·0 0
tv i d te+L1...2u..J 7
Jzír~+-
/;;~cdr~
IfJžzêl<l£
~ (J,
l2e~ÞrJc:;:.
Q~, . Q..\( ~
R(é...:'!. ON ~
Qul~P~~'(iÛ,
V~
((
~~J--P
-
~e~4 Qh/9o ..!' V7 ..
~'~2<, ~~
~~-~··.ø
e./· . \,
. 1;:&1' ~ ;:;;¿~/7a¡'7.J, \¿~ ') \. ( _\ '
~/ .' ~~1'V
, ~,~, 7,Çg ///c= /~Ø' a&
#'l7&'~~//7 ¿/'l?~Pû'd. ,
#- ¿-&éé¿:ë?!' /25 /Þ'e ~/'l/¿;?Ç -Ø7;/Þ
~d ;Ø~ ð';~øøc:71 ?,//1 //?7éB?J7?¿Sr
t1-J1c?~-. ¿~/¥#i' 4::jC4d~ç/
/0 A-tf'"If/ ~ /0 d~t"",. ~~c
u&-';/ch/ //J ~/ré7/ài// ~ ~
ly{Çff d ko>~¿}'a?' ¡6t ~/7o/d'æ.I/4/tJ'
. // Jf~ f/ð?7ÞÞ&,/~//47//;ç4d
~7t~/'ff á'7f/~ce-c:;77d2--L /f~ 4?#¡.c:}/7~
) ../
t? /dd', // ~,çf>~;-/7 .kõ7b1
¿// ~/7Þ/ ///;¿) ¿::øzr.
. ~r ¡ßvC?/ // /1'/?~d þ::/
4~-? «It // #ßC /dçp/K ÆJ"jÍ ;&;ø1St'éc//
¿fbæ1 Mf /,7 J#é~p7?Æø:>C'?/T
ß!Pt7ó'7ViL. 7Z5 /;ë##?? ¿?//Ä~/kt
e .
/// ¿:~/7JßÆ ,,/
e
4-
¿
k·4~¿~ AÞvt//øØ;7t'~ ~h¿' e
/Þ:f/7/ /¿-Þ d';~. /
/~7;¡v~J7Aê/æ(?~
~.~~/
e
e
e
--- ....-...----......----.......--- ...-.~..- ---- -- --............ .....- - - - - -
~ .<\.\~<1 -t- Zot'\.lN.ì \V\~-\-. _ \~ 9/ S/9D
P (" fJAA M PAr Y-£I<.... c:n::
< -
~Nvlr¿oAJM.ÆNí?rL- IAlsí7TVn; M;¡t)oUIU~
CÅvv1PRie7-L -HoGtJ.t 11550(". (Olse. lIJ~w) IU4fJ of. ~.
/vf,'N~ of AV6.39 1910
LeiTd- ~~ ~ lftn..t.-owA-y 4: 7ðWn~~.s
Le1r~ ~ ~ w~ ~:. e;+SeMt:Nr £,A.J,OT71
I,
Copy Or C:-L 1£12-: G~ MIù67 ~/A)4¡e If
FÁ.JL- c;~ \J~\~c-<-
~\.V\I\...P ~
W;\~ s. V
ÚIJ-e,r ~ A41i -/d ~ kl ~d ¡e:
~n~~
e
--
, '
Fourth Annual
Planning and Zoning Institute
Tumwater · September 7-8, 1990
This popular institute is offered to provide an orientation of land-use principles and practices
for elected officials, commissions, and staff involved and interested in planning. This yearis
institute will include valuable sessions on implementation of our new growth management
a legislation (SHB 2929), as well as sessions on how to evaluate development proposals, update
,., cQmprehensive plans, and successfully utilize city planning boards and commissions.
(Planning directors and city clerks: please distribute to
your city council, planning commission, board of
adjustment and other interested parties.)
Who Should Attend
Planning commissioners, councilmembers, board
of adjustment members, shoreline hearings board
members, and planning staff.
Location and Schedule
The conference will be held at the Tyee Hotel, 500
Tyee Drivei Tumwater, WA 98502, (206) 352-9511.
A block of rooms has been set aside at the Tyee
for the night of September 7. The special room
rate is $46 single, $58 double (plus tax). To reserve
a room at the special rate, call by August 15 and
state you are with the Association of Washington
_Cities.
The Institute will begin Friday at 9:30 am and
close Saturday at 4:00 pm. Registration will begin
Friday at 8:30 am and Saturday at 8:00 am.
Registration and Fees
The conference registration fee for all city officials,
A WC associate and LCPI affiliate members is $85.
The non-member fee is $110. To register, fill out
the form provided and send it along with a check
or purchase order to AWe. Your form must be
received by September 4. Requests for refunds
and cancellations must also be made by this date.
No telephone reservations please.
Questions
Call Paula Fairchild or Dave Williams at (206)
753-4137, SCAN 234-4137, or toll-free message
line 1-800-562-8981 for additional information or
more registration forms.
-QVER-
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON CITIES
-
Agenda
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7
8:30 am Registration Begins
(Video Tapes and Information Booth
Available)
9:30 am
11:00 am
12:30 pm
2:00 pm
---- ._----~----_..-
3:30 pm
4:45 pm
5:30 to
7:30 pm
Opening Session
Planning in the 90' s-New Challenges
and Opportunities in Washington
Concurrent Sessions
Making Effective Use of Planning
Boards and Commissions
Capital Improvement Planning and
Land Use Decisions
Lunch (provided)
Growth Strategies Commission Update
Concurrent Sessions
Evaluating Development Impacts and
Mitigation Strategies
nt1pâating;'oür Comprehensive-Plan---
General Session
Hitting First Year Requirements in
SHB 2929-Ideas on how to identify
and protect resource lands and critical
areas.
(Videos and sample materials
available for review)
No-Host Reception and Growth
Management Jeopardy Game
e
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 8
8:00 am Breakfast (provided)
Local Planning Assistance from the
Department of Community
Development
9:00 am General Session
Legal Update and Issues
Concurrent Sessions
Identifying and Planning within
Urban Growth Areas
Review and Approval of Development
Applications
Lunch (provided)
Concurrent Sessions
10:45 am
Noon
1:15 pm
2:45 pm
4:00 pm
e
Annexations that Work
Making Development Work through
Design
General Session and Wrap-up
. _Cºordinatin.g1ocal Plannin~'Yjtt tl_
Other Cities and the County
Adjourn
e
·
e
_.tI_ -- ~--~~~------
-'~ "'---~--------'--- '- ~_. ,_._'~--.~.- --
~- -?~.,.-,~
e
-', --..~----,-'.- -:--.~O_'c-.'_-_-_
- .-_."~--'-" -_._~-".~-----c---;".;.~,~.__----::=-__
Association ofWasbington Cities
1076 Soutb Franklin Street
Olympia, WA 98501
e
!:~~7Ni:¡;}~¿? ,~::·~~;;:;;~~S-:~~§¡ ;
\( A,'UGI 0,'8,7,', ;-..",_1 BfiisJio~ ¡A[Ú~-¡:'
,J .~ j... 'i~-:r .;~i i: ;
;: - ': · I ~ 0 ... ,.. -'
It \ /~!{mJ::: t. *'\ _I.
'" ~/fJ'B_"åt.'lr'''' ¡ . v _!fIII:
",'.....' f,,~·<~ :~','~, 51' L___~.__J ~
/
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
¡
I
Mike Hildt
E~ec Asst/Planne~
Cl ty Hall
540 Wate~ St
Po~t Townsend, WA 98368-5724
"
---
" ..
Name/Title
Name/Title
Name/Title
Organization
Address/Zip
.' Phone
'-'~"....'."..'_.,."...""'..".o/.¡'",,,~".,,<-, '..,' -
Completed by
.
e
REGISTRATION FORM
Fourth Annual
PLANNING AND ZONING INSTITUTE
Tyee Hotel, Tumwater
September 7-8, 1990
Please þrÏnt your name and title as you would li1œ it to appear on your name badge!!
,~ "," ._'~" "..:.
,._.,.- -~._~ c....."'___.. .. . .~.
'"'".....,.....;...-'-""',-..~:<-..:'..-...._..
Method of Payment
o $85 AWCMembers
o $110Non-Members
o Check enclosed
o Purchase order' enclosed
Please make your check payable to AWe. Return your registratiön form by Tuesday, September 4, to:
AWC
Planning and Zoning Institute
1076 South Franklin Street
Olympia, WA 98501
.
M'. ._....
e
, ,
PROGRAM-October 2
9:00
Richard E. McCann
Perkins Coie
9:10
Greg Easton
Property Counselors
J. J. McCament
Marketing Manager
Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company
Land Management Division
· Demographic and market trends for the '90s and how
they affect development
· Affordable housing
· The resurgent condominium market
· The recreational buyer
· The retirement market
· Where development is occurring and why
· Bringing a development to market in the '90s:
product, process, price and partnership
· Establishing a competitive advantage in a changing
marketplace
10:00
Richard R. Wilson
Hillis, Clark, Martin & Peterson
· Complying with the New Growth Management Act
· Comprehensive plans
· Sensitive areas: steep slopes, wetlands, fragile habitat,
greenbelts, forested areas and agricultural areas
· Conservation preservation areas: limiting the power of
government to regulate land use
· Environmental interest groups-citizen's initiative
· The team you need for rural development
10:50 Coffee Break
11:00
John E. Keegan
Davis Wright Tremaine
· Basic rules of the game
· Concurrent zoning and site plan approvals/master plan
developments
· Zoning with annexations
· The role of agreements
· Preparing an effective rezoning proposal
· Processing the proposal in public hearings
· Downzoning and freezing
11:45
Markham A. Quehrn
Perkins Coie
· The environmental checklist
· Declaration of non-significance
· A mitigated declaration of non-significance
· Adoption of existing environmental documents
· Supplemental environmental impact statement
· Imposed mitigation measures
12:30 Reception and Luncheon
2:00
John C. McCullough, Jr.
Foster Pepper & Shefelman a
· Donation of land for parks or roads ..,
· Mitigation of traffic congestion
· Mitigation of school overcrowding and overcrowding
of recreational facilities
· Installation of surface drainage improvements that
include detention and retention ponds
2:45
Ellen Conedera Dial
Perkins Coie
· The legal framework
- CERCLA - Owner/operator liability and the
"innocent landowner" defense
- other regulatory programs-asbestos, UST's
- indoor air pollution
· Cost-effective environmental due diligence
- retaining and managing consultants
- using consultants efficiently
- meeting lenders' concerns
· Allocation of costs and risks
- opportunities to share costs
- allocation of risks-known and unknown
e
PROGRAM
3:.
Curtis Feeny Kerry L, Nicholson
Partner Vice-President and Manager
Trammell Crow Co. Seattle First National Bank
· Economic factors to consider at the time of
development
· Business parks
· Shopping centers vs strip plaza development
· Golden development: how to maximize opportunities
arising from the aging population
· Construction financing
4:30 Conference Adjourns
PROGRAM-October 3
9:00
10:00
Richard E. McCann
Perkins Coie
91
George E. Cook, P.E.
Project Engineer
Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company
Land Management Division
Kenneth Paauw
Vice-President
Puget Sound Bank
· Dealing effectively with the municipality-project
approval
· Dealing effectively with municipal utility services:
- latecomer agreements
- developer extension agreements
- oversizing of lines
- availability of services
- fire flow capacity
- storm drain systems and discharge
· Preventing construction problems before they arise
· Critical aspects of subdivision agreements
· Agreements for the purchase and sale of lots
· Construction financing
11:00 Coffee Break
11:10
Marc Boulé
Senior Vice-President
Shapiro & Associates
Stephen O. Kenyon
Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey
· Identifying a wetland
· Federal, state and local regulation of wetlands
- Clean Water Act
- Governor's executive order
- sensitive area ordinances
- citizen's initiatives
· Negotiating the development and acquisition of
wetlands
Andrea L. Eng
Associate Vice-President
Colliers MacAuley Nicolls, Inc.
Francis A. Wong
Faw International Holdings, Ltd.
· Who are the Asian buyers?
· Where do they purchase real estate?
· Asian buying patterns
· Hong Kong and 1997: the affect of the Tienanmen
Square incident
· Effects of the Japanese stock market decline
12:00 Conference Ends
WHO SHOULD ATTEND
· Builders · Developers and their key employees
· Real estate, corporate, commercial and municipal lawyers · Lenders and bankers
· Real estate brokers and agents · State and municipal government officials
.pevelopment and planning consultants · Engineering consultants
~eal estate consultants
SEE OVER TO REGISTER
- I
First Annual Environmental Institute
Wednesday, October 3, 1990 · Tacoma
Local governments will face many challenges in the nineties and one of the most difficult will
be properly protecting and managing the environment. The challenges will range from finding
meaningful, yet cost effective ways to reduce pollution, to forging true partnerships with other
governments and the private sector. The complexity and cost of regulation and litigation will
require use of collaborative means to resolve our environmental problems,
. .
. .
_ This Environmental Institute is the first of what will be an annual event in the Association's
- training program. It will provide local government officials with information about current and
proposed environment requirements, ideas and a vision for future efforts. .
:1
Featured Speakers
Tim Douglas, Mayor of Bellingham and Awe
Board Member, will provide opening remarks.
Mayor Douglas has dealt with several compelling
environmental issues for his own city as well as
serving as Chair of the Coalition for Clean Water,
serving on the board of the Puget Sound Water
Quality Authority, and on numerous other
environmental committees.
Susan Hall, a well known and innovative
consultant specializing in public process and
conflict resolution, will be our keynote speaker.
Ms. Hall works almostsolely on environmental
and energy projects. She is currently working
with another consultant on an environmental
exchange project with the Soviet Union.
e Pre Conference Tours
There will be three guided tours available for
conference participants on Tuesday afternoon,
October 2.
Hylebos Wetland, Federal Way
This wetland is a living museum of native
Western Washington regional shade and water
related plants and animals. The wetland is a one
mile long, interest-packed nature trail which
features many types of wetland plant life. You
will see prime examples of nearly every facet of
underwater structure such as a floating bog,
marsh, deep sinks, streams, springs, and floods.
When:, Tuesday, October 2, 2-4 p.m.
Limited to 25 people
Electric Generating System
Tacoma City Light, Steam Plant II
This one-of-a-kind plant in Washington, utilizes
RDF (refuse derived fuel) to supplement waste
wood and coal to make electricity. The plant,
which generates enough electricity for 30,000
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON CITIES
.
homes, reduces the volume of waste by 90
percent. This popular concept of handling waste
is a good environmental choice.
When: Tuesday, October 2, 2-4 p.m.
Limited to 30 people '
Redondo Secondary Treatment Plant,
Federal Way
This large state-of-the-art sewage treatment plant
incorporates odor control, noise control and
landscaping to make the plant nuisance free. The
plant was recently cited as the states's best
mid-sized facility. The success of this plant has
been the restoration of the neighboring Lakota
Creek which boasts a new stock of churn salmon.
When: Tuesday, October 3,2-4 p.m.
Limited to 30 people
Indicate which tour you wish to attend on the
attached registration form. We will send you a
confirmation notice and directions to the site. You
will need your own transportation to and from
the tours. There is no additional fee for these
tours. For further assistance, your A WC contact is
Paula Fairchild. Paula can be reached at (206)
753-4137.
Who Should Attend???
City and county officials who have responsibility
for or interest in environmental programs and
issues are encouraged to attend. These officials
include: elected officials, engineers, public works
and planning professionals, attorneys, and
managers. Consultants are also invited.
e
Location and Date
e
Tacoma, October 3
Tacoma Sheraton Hotel
1320 Broadway Plaza
(206) 572-3200
Paid parking is available at the south end of the
hotel.
A block of rooms has been reserved for Tuesday,
October 2, under the Association of Washington
Cities name. Room rates are $65 for a single and
double. An extra $10 is charged if two people
share a room.
1
Registration and Fees
The Institute registration fee for all city officialsi
A WC associate and LGPI affiliate members is $70.
The non-member fee is $85. To register, fill out the
attached form and send it along with a check or
purchase order to AWe. Please return your
registration form no later than Septebmer 28,
1990. Requests for refunds and cancellations must e
also be made by this date. .
CLE Credits
Application has been made to the Washington
State Bar Association for Continuing Legal
Education Credits.
Questions
For further information, call Paula Fairchild of
AWC at (206) 753-4137, SCAN 234-4137, or use
the toll-free message line 1-800-562-8981.
.
rl
~ ~
8:00 a.m.
8:30 a.m.
9:15a.m.
10:30 a.m.
10:45 a.m.
12:00 p.m.
1:00 p.m.
2:30 p.m.
4:15 p.m.
.,
Tentative Agenda
Registration and Coffee
Opening Remarks and Keynote Speech
Concurrent Sessions
· Legal Update on Environment Law
· 2010 and Water Resources-Agendas for the Future
· Hazardous Waste-Planning and Cleanups
Break
Concurrent Sessions
· Legal Update (repeat)
· Understanding and Using SEP A
· Water Quality-Problems and Promising Programs
Lunch (provided with conference registration)
Concurrent Sessions
· Designating and Protecting Sensitive Areas at the Local Level
· Recycling-Markets, Programs and Partnerships
· Air Quality-The Emerging Challenge
Concurrent Sessions
· Designating and Protecting Sensitive Areas (repeat)
· Stormwater andDischarge Permits-Tough New Mandates
· Roundtable with Ecology Officials
Adjourn
.
.
Associatiollof Washirigton Cities
1076 South>Pranklin Street
Olympia, WA98501
,
I
I
I
I
\
~ike ~~~~;Planner
E~~C Hall
~1. Y Wate'r st WA 9&36&-5724
p~~t ,. o\llnsend,
BULKRATE
U.S. POST AGE
PAID
OLYMPIA, WA
PERMIT NO. 201
.
. I-
i.
e
,.
~'
'.
e
.
e
--
REGISTRATION FORM
First Annual Environmental Institute
-"
Please print your name as you would li1æ it to appear on your name l:Tadge!!
i' '. Nameffitle,
I
D HylebosWetland
Nameffitle
(PI.. check applialble tour)
D Electric Generating System D Redondo Secondary Treatment Plant
D, Hylebos Wetland
NameITitle
(PI.. check applicable tour)
o Electric Generating System [] Redondo Secondary Treatment Plant
[] Hylebos Wetland
(Please chetk applicable tour)
o Electric Generating System 0 Redondo Secondary Treatment Plant
Organization
e Address/Zip
Phone
Completed by" .'
Me~hod of Payment
o $7tlAWC Members
o $85 Non-Members
o Check enclosed
D Purchase order enclosed
.
"
',; .:
Please make your êheckpayableto AWe. Return your registration form by Friday, September 28, to:
it
It
AWC
Environmental Institute
1076 South Franklin Street
91}'11\pia,WA 98501
.
e
.
,
e
,
e
ilpartment of Public wlks
PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON 98368
206/385-2294
August 20, 1990
TO: Michael Hildt
FROM: Robert L. Wheeler
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Utilities Easement Requirements for Street Vacations
Public Works staff has determined that utility easements
remaining after a street vacation should be a minimum of 25
feet. This is a reasonable easement to require, especially
when considering multiple use corridors.
cc: City Council
Jim Engle
Jim Orsborn
Keith Harper
--,~-\
"
e
· City of Port Townsend
Planning and Building Department
540 Water Street, Port Townsend, W A 98368 206/385-3000
september 7, 1990
Bob Alford
Superintendent
Port Townsend Public Schools
1610 Blaine Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Re: Proposed reuse of Lincoln School Building
Dear Bob,
This is to respond to the questions which you asked with respect
to the proposed reuse of the old Lincoln School Building.
Caveat
As the City has not received an application in
connection with the proposal, these responses are
offered preliminarily and without benefit of project
specifics or staff review. Consideration of any
applications which may be made for rezone, zoning text
amendment, etc., would be made by the Planning
Commission and City Council after appropriate public
notifications and hearings.
e
Q: "Is this a contractual rezone or a city rezone?"
Q;
A: Any possible rezone of the property would be a "city rezone"
because the City Council is the local zoning authority. A
contract rezone is an alternative means through which the
City Council could rezone the property under certain
specified contractual conditions. Typically, a 'contract
rezone is considered when the City Council finds that a
specific proposal is in the public interest, but that other
potential uses or projects which would otherwise be
permitted under the new zoning classification might not be
in conformance with the comprehensive plan or in the public
interest. Thus, a contract rezone provides a means to
restrict development on the rezoned property to the specific
project proposed. A contract agreement would be executed
between the City and the District.
"Will the variance to the P-I ordinance set a precedent that
will open the door to unwanted development in other parts of
the county? Can the P-I ordinance be guaranteed to remain
intact?"
e
\r1~"r"ì 1': ,Q.~ {\o 1">-. ,I.""L"\<; ,, """" _oR "11
H·V~.....~ '.~; "t.J\lji [h,J).,i",::,c:,.çLl
c:1l-::rlqO
~:;or~~ to PCO~j1N~
~.
~
~-
-
.
e
Bob Alford
september 7, 1990
Page 2
A:
I assume this question refers to the P-I zone provisions of
the Port Townsend Zoning Code (Title 17). section 17.16.010
of the Port Townsend Municipal Code describes the P-I zone
as "Primarily a public use district devoted to schools,
public buildings, parks and related uses. II There are
numerous uses which are either permitted outright or by
conditional use permit in this zoning district. These range
from relatively low-scale uses such as single-family
dwellings and churches to higher impact uses such as trailer
parks and sewer treatment plants. Attached is a list of the
permitted and conditional uses for the P-I district.
e
As the proposed mUlti-family use could not be permitted by a
variance, I assume that the question pertains not to a
variance but to a possible rezone or zoning text amendment.
Although offices may be permitted in the P-I zone by
conditional use permit, mUlti-family dwellings may not.
Consequently, a rezone or zoning text amendment would be
required. A conditional use permit would also be required,
if a zoning text amendment were approved to allow multi-
family dwellings as a conditional use (i.e., on a case-by-
case basis).
It has been my experience that the Planning Commission and
City Council are always concerned about the possibility that
a present decision might serve as an adverse precedent for
subsequent decisions. In the case of the Lincoln School
proposal, should the Planning Commission and City Council
find the project is in the public interest, a contract
rezone might be considered which could reduce or eliminate
the precedential effect of such an action. Alternatively, a
zoning text amendment could be restricted to reuse of older
buildings, etc., much as the City council enacted in the C-
III zone to facilitate reuse of historic buildings in the
downtown and uptown commercial districts.
Q: "How many off-street parking spaces are required for office
occupants in Port Townsend? For residential occupants?~
A: The zoning code requires off-street parking be provided for
these uses as follows:
e
Offices, business and
professional (other than
banks, medical, dental, or
veterinary offices) with on-
site customer service
1 per 300 square feet of
gross floor area
e
e
e
f
.
.~
--
.
Bob Alford
september 7, 1990
Page 3
Offices not providing on-site
customer service
1 per 4 empxoyees or 1 per
400 square feet of gross
floor area
2 per dwelling unit
Residential, duplex or multi-
family
Residential, government
assisted housing for elderly
residents
1 per each 3 bedrooms
The parking requirements of the zoning code provide for several
alternative means to provide off-street parking, including joint-
use agreements and reductions for providing bicycle racks or
recycling facilities or saving significant trees. The City
Council could increase these requirements through its
environmental determination and/or conditions imposed on a
conditional use permit. It could grant reduction of the
requirements through a variance.
Q:
"Since the conditional use permit ends with 'applicants
hereby certify that all of the above statements are true. .
. " does that mean that with the signatures of the school
board the permit becomes a de facto contract, obligating the
school to, for instance, provide 20-30 additional parking
spaces from the adjacent school lot, as called for on the
permit?"
A:
No. The certification referred to in the question is the
application form, not the permit. As the name implies, a
conditional use permit is a discretionary decision on the
part of the City Council to determine if a proposed use can
be established compatibly with surrounding uses under
certain conditions. Specific criteria are set forth in the
zoning code and the Council, if it approves such a permit,
invariably imposes certain conditions upon the project to
protect public safety and to assure compatibility with
neighboring uses.
The certification on the application form pertains to the
accuracy of the information provided to the Council. Any
conditions which the Council may impose on a conditional use
permit would be binding upon the District if it then decided
to proceed with the project under those conditions. Again,
a zoning text amendment would also be required to approve a
conditional use permit for a mUlti-family dwelling in the p-
I zone.
e
e
e
it
"
e
.
Bob Alford
September 7, 1990
Page 4
Q: "How have you resolved access to the Lincoln School
building? Have the streets on the high school property been
vacated or can roads be put in? What easements are
required? How will this effect students?"
A: Several internal streets within the high school property
have been vacated. A specific access plan should be
submitted with any applications pertaining to the project.
I expect that once a physical plan has been approved for
vehicular, pedestrian and emergency access, the legal
implementation would be by private easement granted by the
District wherever public rights-of-way are lacking.
Q: "Has the street been vacated and, if so, has the city ever
un-vacated a street?"
A:
As the question does not identify any particular street, it
is difficult to provide a specific answer. Fir Street
adjacent to the Lincoln School building is not shown as
vacated. If it became necessary to "unvacate a street," the
district could simply dedicate it or any other described
property as a public right-of-way easement or, as mentioned
above, grant a private access easement to the leaseholders.
I hope this information will assist the School Board with its
decision. Please let me know if anything further is needed.
cc: planning Commission
City council
file
Michael Hildt
Planning and Building Director
..
,
.
.
e
City of Port Townsend
Planning and Building Department
540 Water Street. Port Townsend, WA 98368 206/385-3000
PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES
P-I ZONING DISTRICT
Permitted
Conditional
Accessory uses incidental to permitted residential uses
Automobile parking in conjunction with permitted uses
Churches
Boat building and repair
Boat sales
Crop farming greenhouses with sale of products raised
on-prexmses
_ingle-family dwelling
~uel oil less than 750 gallons
Storage garages for public or quasi-public institutions
Offices, subject to höme occupation restrictions
Airports
Amusement parks, zoos
Assembly halls, coliseums
Cemeteries, mausoleums
Boat marina, piers
Co1leges, trade schools
Electric power stations
Excavations
Retirement homes
Hospitals
Jails, penal institutions
LandfiUs
Motels
Libraries, museums, galleries
Orphanages
Elementary schools
Co1leges/universities
Quasi-public buildings, non-profit in character
Swimming pools
Temporary buildings
Theaters, assembly ha1ls
Lodges
Office buildings
Trailer parks
Waste paper rags, collection and baling
Water and sewer treatment plants
~rived from Section 17.16.010, Port To~send Municipal Code. Not to be relied on for individual investment,
development or property decisions without consulting the Port Townsend Municipal Code.)
4-18-89
it,
.
.
PORT TOWNSEND PUBLIC SCHOOLS
e
1610 BLAINE STREET
PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON 9B368
DF"FïCE _OF" THE SUPERINTENDENT
~-t -90
~~~-
/ì- r ~~.:#yc.:.Ä¥
.~~~c¡~r:. -.
tv~ - ~~~ìL
" ~~~~
!~ . ß1~--~
Þr. t( ~ J4 d, /k; ú~
tt-~V~'
)
e
PTSDi>0
8/31/90
-
.
PAGE 1
_ V ARI ANCE REQUEST:
J WHY NOT APPLY FOR CONDITIONAL USE VARIANCE VS A TEXT
AMENDMENT TO CODE. OR IS THIS A CONDITIONAL USE VARIANCE?
WAS THIS AT M. HILT'S REQUEST.
3
3
MRS H IS THERE A WAY FOR THE PARTNERS TO REQUEST A REZOl"Œ
WITHOUT ASKING FOR A TEXT AME.t'lDMENT? ARE THERE NO
OTHER OPTIONS A V AILABLE? HAVE THEY INVESTIGATED THE
"PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT" CATEGORY? ANOTHER APPROACH
MAY BE BETTER POLITICALLY.
A TEXT AMENDMENT TO CITY AND COUNTY ZONING IS VERY
SIGNIFICANT. IT WILL AFFECT ALL P-I PROPERTY IN CITY AND
COUNTY. BOARD NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THE SIGNIFICANCE
OF TH IS REQUEST AND THE EFFECT ON FUTURE LEVY REQUESTS
AND THE BOARD'S CREDIBILITY WITH THE PUBLIC IN THE
FUTURE. APPROV AL OF THIS TEXT AMENDMENT IS CHANGING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ALL PROPERTY IN THAT CLASS-
IFICA TION. THE SCHOOL BOARD IS AN APPLICANT ON THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ALONG WITH THE
DEVELOPERS.
Opinion H
e
1
1
1
I
e
3
M/P WHAT ARE THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SCHOOL BOARD
ENDORSING A ZONING CHANGE FOR PRIV ATE PROFIT?
M/P HOW WILL SCHOOL BOARD ENDORSEM&~l OF BLANKET CHANGE T
WHICH WILL WEAKEN ZONE DEFINITION IN THE 6TH FASTEST
GROWING COUNTY: AFFECT THE BOARD'S CREDIBILITY TO SUCCESS-
FULLY PASS FUTURE LEVYS AND BONDS FOR OUR SCHOOL FACILITIES
NEEDS?
H IF THE APPLICATION FAILS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY
PLANNING COMMISSION OR THE COUNCIL DOES THE BOARD
HA VE PLANS FOR THE BUILDING? SHOULD THEY NOT BE LOOKING
INTO. OR INVITING PEOPLE TO SUBMIT PLANS NOW?
M/P PRIOR TO APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICA-
TION WILL THE BOARD MEET WITH THE COMMUNITY TO DISCUSS
AND DEFINE REASONABLE OPTIONS TO THE CURRENT LINCOLN
PARTNERS PLAN?
MAC ANY CHANGE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR PORT TOWNSE~'D
INCLUDING A TEXT AMENDMENT. REQUIRES A SEP A REVIEW AS WELL
AS COMPLETION OF AN ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT CHECK LIST. HAVE
THESE THINGS BEEN DONE?
FTSD ~ 0
8/31190
e
-
e
PAGE 2
MAC SINCE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION APPROVAL
3 DEPENDS ON THE TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE. WHICH
REQUIRES SEPA REVIEW (INCLUDING AN EIS), AND SINCE THE CITY
REQUIRES AN ENVIRONMENT AL CHECKLIST BE SUBMITTED WITH
THE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION WHEN APPLICABLE; WHERE IS
THE ENVIRONMENT AL CHECKLIST? WHY DIDN'T THE LINCOLN
PARTNERS HAVE IT AT THE AUGUST 23RD BOARD MEETING BEFORE
THE PLAN W AS ACCEPTED?
-------:vttiC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUIRES A SEPA REVIEW.
-------Mi\C SINCE TEXT AMENDMENT WILL CHANGE ZONING FOR WHOLE CITY IT
WOULD REQUIRE SEPA REVIEW.
4
4
e
3
1
1
I
I
e
Y IS THIS A CONTRACTUAL RFlONE OR A CITY REZONE? NEEDS
CLARIFICATION.
NeS WILL THE VARIANCE TO THE P-I ORDINANCE SET A PRECEDENCE
THAT WILL OPEN THE DOOR TO UNW ANTED DEVELOPMENT IN OTHER
PARTS OF THE COUNTY? CAN THE P-I ORDINANCE BE GUARANTEED
TO REMAIN INTACT?
M/P WHY ARE THE LINCOLN PARTNERS USING THE CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT PROCESS TO HAMMER OUT DET AILS OF THEIR PLAN WHEN
PROPER ZONING DOES NOT EXIST?
K
ONCE THE SUPERINTENDENT SIGNS THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICATION DOES THE GROUND LEASE GO INTO EFFECT? IF NOT,
WHEN DOES THE GROUND LEASE BECOME ACT I VE?
.
K
IS IT TRUE THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD RECEIVED THE GROUND LEASE
ON NOVEMBER 13TH AND THEN ON NOVEMBER 16TH PASSED A
MOTION TO APPROVE THE LEASE OPTION AND THE GROUND LEASE?
DID THE DISTRICT'S LA WYERS GO OVER THE GROUND LEASE, AND,
IF SO, WHEN?
K
[(
W AS THE ONLY DISCUSSION OF THE GROUND LEASE IN THE
EXECUTIVE SESSION ON NOVEMBER 16TH?
.PTSD 50
, 8Jt31/90
e
e
e
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
MAC PARCEL NUMBER DOES NOT APPEAR ON PERMIT APPLICATION OR
1 ON ATT ACHMENT(SITE PLAN). DOES PROJECT INCLUDE ALL OF
THE SCHOOL PROPERTY IN tHAT PARTICULAR PARCEL NUMBER?
IF SO, THEN THE DESIGNATION"ADjACENT PROPERTY" WOULD BE
INCORRECT SINCE IT WOULD BE PART OF THE SITE.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
3
j
NEED FURTHER DEFINITION OF TERM "ARTIST HOUSING"
IS "ARTIST HOUSING UNIT" A TERM FAMILIAR TO BUILDERS AÑ1)
CITY PLANNERS IN PORT TOWNSEND?
------*--- INCOMPLETE DESCRIPTION- NEEDS CLARIFICATION (ARTISTS'
HOUSING?).
_
3
K
PLAN APPROVED BY THE BOARD SHOWED SCHOOL OFFICE SPACES.
THIS IS NOT REFLECTED IN THE APPLICATION.
I D WILL THE BOARD MAKE IT CLEAR TO THE CITY PLANNING DEPART -
MENT AND CITY COUNCIL THAT, EVEN THOUGH THE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN CLEARLY DESIGNATES CERT AIN SPACES AS "SCHOOL DISTRICT'
OFFICES, THE DISTRICT HAS NOT SIGNED ANY CONTRACT FOR LEASE
OF THAT SPACE?
I MAC THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ST ATES ONLY THAT
THERE WILL BE OFFICE SPACE. THE LEASE/OPTION ST ATES THAT
THE LINCOLN PARTNERS "SHALL DETERMINE THE FEASIBILITY BOTH
ECONOMIC AND OTHERWISE..... SINCE THE LINCOLN PARTNERS INCOME
ANALYSIS SHOWS ANNUAL REVENUE OF $10,500 AS COMING FROM
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, DOES THAT MEAN THAT THE DISTRICT IS
OBLIGATED TO LEASE? ARE THE LINCOLN PARTNERS TELLING
BANKERS THIS? WHEN THE PLAN WAS ACCEPTED, DID THE DISTRICT
BIND THEMSEL YES TO A LEASE OF OFFICE SPACE? SHOULDN'T THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION SAY "SCHOOL OFFICE SPACE?
-3 Ie NEED CLARIFICA IION OF "COMMUNITY ARTS" TOO BROAD.
3 K ASK ATTORNEY ABOUT COMMUNITY ARTS ROOMS
PAGE 3
PTSD 50
tJ/31A90
. .
e
e
PAGE 4
e
3
r··
!\.
"COMMUNITY ARTS" IS NOT REFLECTED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION
BUT A SPACE IS DESIGNATED FOR THIS USE ON THE PLANS ADOPTED
BY THE BOARD..TH IS IS THE SAME SITUATION AS OCCURRED WITH
THE SCHOOL OFFICE SPACE.
3 D HA V ING ALREADY CONVERTED TWO "COMMUNITY/ARTS" SPACES TO
OTHER UNSPECIFIED USES, ARE THERE Ar-..ry WRITTEN ASSURANCES
THAT THE TWO REMAINING "COMMUNITY/ARTS" SPACES WILL BE
LEFT INTACT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CALLS FOR FIRST
FLOOR COMMUNITY USE?
3 MAC WHAT HAPPENED TO "COMMUNITY ARTS" ON THE CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT APPLICATION? THE ACCEPTED PLANS SHOW
COMMUNITY ARTS SPACES.
1 MAC WHY ARE THE HOUSING UNITS DESCRIBED AS "ARTISTS" HOUSING
UNITS? WILL THERE BE AN "ARTIST" TEST BEFORE RENTAL OR
SALE OF ONE OF THESE UNITS?
-3 MAC THE PROPOSAL FOR THE LINCOLN SCHOOL SITE (UNDER PROJECT
DESCRIPTION) LISTS "CREATIVE USERS WHO W ANT TO LIVE AND
WORK IN THE SAM SPACES". HOME OCCUPIED BUSINESSES ARE NOT
LISTED ON THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION.
3 NeS ARE THE DEVELOPERS WILLING TO TIGHTEN-UP THE OPTIONS ON THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO LEA VE IT LESS OPEN-ENDED?
CURRENT USE OF SIrE
K "UNOCCUPIED" IS NOT CORRECT. SITE IS PRESENTLY USED FOR
3 STORAGE. PLEASE CHANGE ON DOCUMEÑl.
FLOOR SPACE OF BUILDINGS
1
MAC THE DISTRICT'S "REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL" LISTS THE SQUARE
FOOT AGE AS 36,00 SQ. FT. THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICA-
TION LISTS THE SQ. FT. AS 29,000. THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
LISTS THE GROSS FT. AS 27,600 )22.046 NET). THE LEASE/OPTION
LISTS SQ. FT. AS "36,00 SQ. FT. OF NET RENT ABLE ." WHAT IS
CORRECT? WHO MEASURED? WH~~? WHERE IS THE
DOCUMENT A TION? WHICH PLAN DID THE DISTRICT APPROVE?
e
PTSD 50
å/31/tO
e
e
PAGE 5
e
HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL RESIDE OR WORK______
K WHAT DID THE DEVELOPERS BASE THEIR POPULATION FIGURES ON?
WHAT WENT INTO THEIR CALCULA TIONS?
3
HOURS OF OPERATION
, J HOURS OF OPERATION-8 HOURS A DAY FOR OFFICE....WHAT ABOUT 24
RESIDENTIAL HOURS? NEED CLARIFICATION OF HOURS FOR ALL
TYPES OF POTENTIAL OCCUPANTS.
3
K
WHAT IS THE FORMULA USED FOR DETERMINING "HOURS OF USE"
IS EVERYONE INCLUDED? WHAT WENT INTO THE CALCULATIONS?
3
ESTIMATED VEHICULAR TRIPS PER DAY
J TO M. HILT- WHAT IS PROJECTION FOR OFFICE SPACE?- FOR
RESIDENTIAL? WHAT IS FORMULA USED?
J WHAT ARE NUMBER OF VEHICULAR TRIPS PER DAY FOR OFFICE
3 OCCUPANTS?? FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANTS? GENERAL FORMULA.
3 K WHAT WILL THE TRAFFIC PATTER.t\I BE--IN AND OUT OF SITE?
fÌ K HAS A SURVEY BEEN DONE OF THE PRESENT /CURRENT TRAFFIC?
3 K HA VE THE PARTNERS COMPLETED A STUDY ON HOW THE PROJECTED
TRAFFIC WILL MESH WITH THE CURREL'iT SCHOOL TRAFFIC PATTERNS
INCLUDING BUS LOADING AND STUDEþjT SAFEnp?
3 K HOW DID THE PARTNERS COME UP WITH THE FIGURE OF 100 TRIPS
PER DAY?
3 K PLEASE FURNISH A TRIPS PER DAY BREAKDOWN BY EACH POTENTIAL
USER GROUP.
3 Ie WHA T IS THE FORMULA BEHIND THE NUMBERS SO THE BOARD CAN
JUDGE THE ACCURACY.
3 H NEED AN ACCURATE PROJECTION OF NUMBER OF TRIPS PER DAY
BASED ON MAXIMUM USE AND ANOTHER PROJECTION BASED ON
MINIMUM USE.
3 D HAS A STUDY BEEN DONE TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT OF 100+ TRIPS
(CON.. USE PERMIT FIGURES) DURING PEAK MORNING HOURS ON THE
It SCHOOL TRAFFIC, ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE RAIL-ROAD CROSS-
ING TYPE GATE INST ALLED TO CONTROL TRAFFIC?
3 M/P WHO HAS ANALYZED THE TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION? WHERE
ARE THESE FINDINGS?
PTSD 50
~ 8/'t31/90
-
e
e
PAGE 6
MAC WHAT FORMULA DID THE LINCOLN PARTNERS USE TO EV ALUATE
THE VEHICULAR TRIPS? IN WHAT WAY DID THE FIGURE "100"
VEHICULAR TRIPS TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE VARIETY OF PROPOSED
USES(OFFICE, ARTIST'S HOUSING, COMM[NITY ARTS).
3 ' M/P THE BOOSTERS HA VE RECOMMENDED TURNING THE LOWER FIELD INTO
A BASEBALL FIELD. HOW WILL THIS EFFECT STUDENT AND PUBLIC
TRAFFIC FROM UPPER LEVEL TO LOWER LEVEL? -
4
3
3
~
3
3
3
OFF-STREET PARICING PLACES:
J
TO M. HILT:
HOW MANY OFF -STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR OFFICE
OCCUPANTS IN PORT TOWNSEND? FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANTS?
K
PLAN APPROVED BY BOARD INDICATED 30 PARKING SPACES.
SITE PLAN ATTACHED TO PERMIT APPLICATION INDICATES MANY
MORE PARKING SPACES.
K
PLEASE CORRECT THE ATTACHMENT SITE PLAN TO REFLECT WHAT
THE BOARD APPROVED ON AUGUST 23RD.
K
PARKING SPACES AND HOURS OF USE SHOWN ON PERMIT APPLICA-
TION ARE DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IS IMPLIED ON SITE PLAN.
WOULD ANY EXISTING PARKING SPACES BE ELIMINATED?
K
HOW DID THE PARTNERS DETERMINE THAT NONE OF THE CURRENT
PARKING SPACES WOULD BE ELIMINATED.
K
WON'T THERE BE A DISPLACEMENT OF PRESENT USERS?
K
HOW DO PLANNERS FORESEE THIS.
3 MAC WHAT PARKING WILL BE ELIMINATED?
3
-
OTHER PARKING PROVISIONS
J
"USE OF ADJACENT SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKING"
00 THE PARTNERS ANTICIPATE NEEDING MORE PARKING SPACES?
DURING WHAT TIMES OF DAY? WHAT DAYS OF WEEK? WHICH USERS?
K
ADJACENT SCHOOL PARKING STATEMENT IS VERY QUESTIONABLE.
H WHAT WILL BE THE IMPACT/CONFLICT WITH STUDENT USE OF
CAMPUS AND PARKING?
.
PTSD 50
8A31/90
e
I
4
e
·e
. PAGE 7
H
SINCE NUMBER OF LIVING UNITS IS NOT DEFINED, DOES THIS PLAN
ALLOW FOR ULTIMATE USE OF PARKING? HOW WILL THIS BE
ADDRESSED?
IS THE SCHOOL DISTRICT RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE A PARKING
SPACE FOR EACH EMPLOYEE AND EACH STUDENT? THE ANSWER
COULD IMPACT "USE OF ADJACENT PARKING."
MAC WHAT PARKING WILL BE REQUIRED? BASED ON THE ACCEPTED PLAN.
OR BASED ON A REV ISED PLAN?
y
D
SINCE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ENDS WITH" APPLICANTS
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE ST ATEMENTS ARE TRUE. ."
DOES THAT MEAN THAT WITH THE SIGNATURE OF THE SCHOOL BOARD
THE PERMIT BECOMES A DE-FACTO CONTRACT, OBLIGATING THE
SCHOOL TO, FOR INSTANCE, PROVIDE 20-30 ADDITIONAL PARKING
SPACES FROM THE ADJACENT SCHOOL DISTRICT LOT, AS CALLED FOR
ON THE PERMIT.
e!!~E~~!:....\1LE. WHAT ARE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NOW APPROVED
PLAN?
nn nn
-------MfP. WHAT ARE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 7-12 CAMPUS?
nn nn
------~--- DOES THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HA VE TO SUPPLY A PARKING SPACE FOR
EVERY STUDENT AND TEACHER THAT DES IRES ONE ON CAMPUS ? HOW
WILL BOARD DO THIS?
1
1
e
BOARD'S LIABILITY:
J WHAT IS THE THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY AS CO-SIGNERS
IF THERE ARE ANY INDEFINITE TERMS IN THE VARIANCE DOCUMENT
AND IT IS APPROVED.
J WILL THE BOARD BE BOUND BY WHAT IS IN THE VARIANCE
DOCUMENT?
K
DO THE PARTNERS UNDERSTAND THAT THE DISTRICT IS NOT
COMMITTING ITSELF TO RENTING OFFICE SPACE?
K
WILL THE BOARD BE LIABLE TO RENT SINCE IT APPROVED THE PLANS
THAT INDICATED SCHOOL OFFICE SPACE?
K CLARIFICA IION NEEDS TO BE MADE SO THAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEMBERS AND THE CITY COUNCIL KNOW THA T THE
SCHOOL BOARD IS NOT COMMITTED TO RENTING SPACE.
el
e
e
¡. . PT~D 50
" 8/31/90
e
e
PAGE 8
K
IF CERTAIN THINGS ARE SPECIFIED ON THE SITE PLAN APPROVED
IS THE BOARD LEGALLY COMMITTED TO WHAT IS DESIGNATED ON
APPROVED SITE PLAN? HOW BINDING THE THE DESCRIPTION ON
THE PLANS FOR EACH ROOM'S USE. THIS NEEDS TO BE ANSWERED
LEGALL Y.
K IF THE DEVELOPERS DO NOT KNOW DEFINITELY WHAT EACH ROOM'S
USE WILL BE THEY SHOULD NOT LABEL EACH ROOM AS THEY HA VE
IN THE PLAN SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD AUGUST 23RD.
I
D
IN THE OPTION TO LEASE IT ST ATES THAT THE BOARD WILL JOIN THE
DEVELOPER IN OBT AINING PERMITS ETC.. WITH RESPECT TO
GRANTEE'S INTENDED USE OF THE PREMISES YET THE DEVELOPER
WILL NOT COMMIT TO USES OF THE BUILDING. IS THE BOARD
COMFORTABLE WITH THAT?
SITE PLAN ATTACHED:
J THE PLAN CURRENTLY ATTACHED TO THE VARIANCE DOCUMENT
IS NOT THE SAME PLAN APPROVED BY THE BOARD...SITE PLAN NEEDS
TO BE THE ONE BOARD APPROVED...REMOVE EXTRA PARKING SPACES
J SPACE BETWEEN RETAINING WALL AND FIR STREET- NEEDS TO BE
IDENTIFIED.
3
3
K WHY DOES ROAD GO INTO BANK ON SITE PLAN?
K WHA TWILL TRAFFIC PATTERN BE IN AND OUT OF THE PROPERIT?
3
K WILL THE PARTNERS NEED TO COME BACK LATER AND ASK FOR
EASEMENTS AT A FUTURE DATE?
3
MAC WILL THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HA VE AN EASEMENT TO GET FROM
ONE SIDE OF ITS PROPERTY TO THE OTHER. SINCE THE LINCOLN
SINCE THE LINCOLN PARTNERS HAVE LEASED THE ACCESS DRIVE?
Shouldn't THAT BOUNDARY BE CHANGED?
K IS SITE PLAN TO SCALE? DOES NOT SEEM TO BE. PLEASE SUBMIT
A SITE PLAN THAT IS TO SCALE THAT ALSO INCLUDES RELATION-
SHIP TO OTHER BUILDINGS IN THE AREA.
4
M/P HOW HA VE YOU RESOL VED ACCESS TO THE LINCOLN SCHOOL
BUILDING? HAVE THE STREETS ON THE HIGH SCHOOL PROPERTY
BEEN V ACA TED OR CAN ROADS BE PUT IN? WHAT EASEMENTS ARE
REQUIRED? HOW WILL THIS EFFECT STUDENT?
4 J HAS THE STREET BEEN V ACA TED AND IS SO HAS THE CITY EVER
UN- V ..\CA TED A STREET?
el
.
e
,fTSD 50
&/31/90
e
e
PAGE 9
MAC THE N.E. BOUNDARY, DESCRIBED IN THE TEXT OF THE CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT APPLICATION AND APPROVED IN THE PLAN IS STATED
AS 100'. HOWEVER, THE DRAWING ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLI-
CATION PLAN SHOWS ADDITIONAL BOUNDARIES AROUND WHAT IS
CALLED "EXISTING PARKING AND RIGHT OF WAY", IS THIS PORTION
INCLUDED IN THE LEASE OR NOT?
3
MAC THE SAME DRAWING, ATTACHED TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICATION, ALSO SHOWS 12 PARKING SPACE- 1/2 ON LEASED
PROPERTY AND 1/2 ON SCHOOL DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY. TO WHOM
DO THESE SPACES BELONG? ALL OF THESE SCHOOL SPACES ARE
CURRENTLY USED BY THE DISTRICT; HOW MANY SPACES WILL BE
DISPLACED? SEE "EXISTING-O UNDER "OFF-STREET PARKING".
3
MAC WILL THERE BE HANDICAPPED ACCESS TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT
OFFICES?
1
MAC IS THE GROUND LEASE AS GOOD AS SIGNED? LOOK AT "OPTION TO
LEASE", #2 ("NATURE OF OPTION")
1
MAC WHEN WILL THE SCHOOL'S ATTORNEY LOOK OVER THE COMPLETED
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION AND ACCOMPANYING
ENVIRONMENT AL CHECK LIST AND GROUND LEASE?
NOTE:
INITIALS BEFORE EACH QUESTION REPRESE..T\IT THE NAME OF THE PERSON
SUBMITTING THE QUESTION EITHER DURING THE MEETING OF AUGUST 29TH
OR IN WRITTING:
J
MRSH
H
M/P
MAC
y
NES
K
D
JANEL CARLSON
MRS. HAYDEN
STEVE HAYDEN
MONICA MICKHAGER AND PAULA MACKROW
MONICA MACGUIRE
PAT YEARIAN
BILL NESMITH
KRIS DEWEESE
RICK DENNISON
NUMBERS: I Bob ALford
2 School District's Attorney
3 Developer
4 M. Hildt
.~-Y"'41f'. e
City of Port Townsena
e
It
e
-
Planning Commission
540 Water St., Port Townsend, WA 98368 206/385·3000
To:
From:
Re:
Date:
Planning commission
Darlene Bloomfield, Secretary
City Council Update
September 7, 1990
At the City council meeting on September 4, 1990, the Council
took the following actions regarding land use cases:
Amendment to Ordinance 1990 (Zoning Appeal from 90 to 30
days) was approved by Council removing the "sunset" clause,
making the change permanent.
Ordinance 2204 - Extension of Ordinance 2192, Interim
Control Ordinance, to December 18 1990.
The City Council will meet again on September 18, 1990 the
following land-use cases will be heard.
Keith and Flora Lee Malone, Variance, 9007-01