HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 City Update
From City Manager David Timmons
The Administration has been briefing
Council for some time on the status of the City’s
finances. We have heard much discussion
centered upon an examination of the drivers
contributing to the City’s financial situation. As
the Mayor aptly states in her column, the real
issue facing the City is regaining local control
over the long-term financial decisions facing the
community.
In 1999, an effort began to evaluate the City’s
programs and finances. This effort helped us
identify the critical issues that the community
needed to address.
We began this process by evaluating services on a
program basis. You may have heard this referred
to as “Programmatic Budgeting.” This financial tool
helps to evaluate a city service by examining a pro-
gram’s level of service, cost of the program and the
revenue basis to support it.
Very early on in this process it became clear what
is happening. The Mayor has highlighted many of
the challenges and issues which are slowly eroding
the ability to adequately fund continued mainte-
nance of City assets.
What are the City’s assets? Build-
ings, parks, streets, water and sewer
systems, storm water system, and
equipment are the City’s basic assets.
During this lengthy evaluation process, the City
struck a compromise by maintaining some services
while deferring investment in maintenance and up-
keep of City assets. This is not unique and many
communities around the nation find themselves
facing similar situations brought on by the deferral
of maintenance. The communities that have suc-
cessfully addressed these challenges are those
that have made a local commitment to invest in
their community’s future.
City of Port Townsend
(360) 379-5047 (email: citycouncil@ci.port-townsend.wa.us) www.ci.port-townsend.wa.us August 2004
Council News
From Mayor Catharine Robinson
This is the time when the City begins to
plan the budget for next year. Each year brings
new and old challenges to the forefront. We have
heard much about the finances of local govern-
ments and in particular about the issues and
challenges we face locally. Also, we have been
following closely the state-wide initiatives that
affect us whether or not we, as a community,
endorse them.
I-695 repealed the Excise Tax on motor vehicles.
It passed on a state-wide basis, but did not pass
locally. I-747 restricted the Council’s ability to
adjust local property tax burden from a maximum
of 6% to a maximum of 1% annually. Again this
initiative passed state-wide, but did not pass
locally. This year we braced ourselves for yet
another initiative, I-864, which would have reduced
city-wide property taxes by 25%. It did not gain the
necessary support to place it on the ballot; how-
ever, the initiative author did say he would be back
next year.
Other challenges that we face are unfunded
mandates handed down to us by federal and state
legislation. Over time this has taken a toll on city
services that once again has been directed by
actions beyond our local control.
A third issue has been referred to as the “trickle
down” effect of these previous issues on our
governmental and not-for-profit partners. As they
face their own challenges, the City in turn is faced
with the rising costs of these partnerships and a
need for increased participation by the City.
If we are to maintain the quality of life that is so
special to Port Townsend, we are going to have to
begin to address these issues locally. I have
asked the City Administration to focus this entire
newsletter on a discussion of the issues we face
and the state of the City’s finances.
We as a City must face these issues as a commu-
nity in partnership with our friends and neighbors.
Truly this ability to work together is the most spe-
cial aspect of our community.
Defining the City’s Financial Status: There have been any number of opinions
expressed about the state of the City’s
finances. Bottom line, the City has been evalu-
ated by many outside agencies that have granted
accolades for our efforts. The City is doing well,
but cannot sustain the current level of services it
offers. In fact, in streets alone, the City is losing
ground. Municipal finance is a very complicated subject.
It is governed by law and operates on a program
basis referred to as “Fund” accounting. Fund
accounting is similar to a household maintaining
separate checking accounts. Funds are segre-
gated according to their designated use and yet
the combination of the segregated funds work
together to support the household. An example
would be the Water and Sewer Fund. It supports
the operations and maintenance of this essential
service. It also operates independent of the
property taxes paid by residents. It is a user
supported community service. Another example
would be the EMS tax levy for emergency ambu-
lance service. This is a restricted tax that can
only be used for the EMS program.
Twice in the past five years, the City has received
a financial rating by a national rating service.
This rating would compare to an individual’s
credit score. Each time the City was granted an
“A” rating which is an excellent score for a small
community. The State Auditor’s Office has also
recognized the City’s financial controls as an
excellent example of fiscal responsibility.
Basis of Comparison: When comparing the City’s finances, care must
be used to find a true comparable. In many
Washington communities, Library, Fire, and
Parks are provided by separate taxing districts.
In addition, lower property tax burdens may
reflect the existence of special districts or a high
retail sales tax. The same is true with utility
rates. The level of capital investment can easily
skew a comparison. In comparison to other
cities, Port Townsend’s utility rates are average
and property taxes which support City services
are very low. Another point to be considered is
that although the property tax paid to the City has
remained relatively unchanged for the past five
years ($1,500,000), the City has absorbed an
increase in mandated services of $500,000 over
the same period.
Issues, Challenges and Solutions: The increasing challenges identified by the
Mayor have taken a toll on the City and will
compromise the City’s quality of life if they are
not addressed. Over the past ten years the City
has had to address a loss of revenue, in-
creased demand for services, and unfunded
mandates. The General Fund alone has
needed to absorb over $1,000,000 in unfunded
services in the last ten years. As a result the
City has had to make many compromises and
difficult choices. Through careful scrutiny of the
City’s finances, the Council has been able to
identify long term deferred maintenance of
critical city assets as the key element the
community must address. This problem exists
despite many efforts that have been made to
address this issue in the past several years. Some elements of the maintenance program
are being successfully addressed through
grants and program financing. Money from the
Water and Sewer Fund has been actively in-
vested in much needed improvements. “F”
Street, City Hall and the Fire Station are all
projects funded through grants and special
financing. Grant monies received so far total
more than $5,500,000 and further funding is
anticipated. The City is currently planning to
address the needs of Parks, Library and Police.
The Street Fund has been consistently identi-
fied as the program that lacks a dedicated
source of revenue. This fund maintains the
street network as well as sidewalks and trails
that link our community . The City has had
some success with special projects funded by
one-time grants; however, the network is in
need of serious maintenance. This mainte-
nance will be essential over the long term.
The challenge to adequately fund a street
maintenance program cannot be met with
current revenue without seriously compromising
other services. Where will the funds come from
if not from current revenue to the City? If
current revenues are used, what services will
be impacted by this reallocation? In the next
few months, these questions will be addressed
by the City Council and Administration. It is
anticipated that a ballot measure may be
presented to the community in November which
will allow the City to fund our investment in vital
infrastructure as well as continue the other
services which are necessary to maintain the
quality of life in Port Townsend.