Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout082724 HPC Meeting PacketAgenda Historic Preservation Committee Special Meeting 3:00 PM, August 27, 2024 City Hall Third Floor Conference Room, 250 Madison St, Port Townsend, WA 98368 • Join in person; via computer or tablet at http://ioinwebinar.com enter the 9 digit Webinar ID 430-090-891# • Local Dial In — (360) 390-5064 access code: 491-363-921# • Submit public comment to be included in the meeting record to: https://publiccomment.fillout.com/citvofpt 1. Roll Call: Craig Britton (Chair), Walter Galitzki (Vice Chair), Monica Mader, Kathleen Knoblock, and Michael D'Alessandro; Monica MickHager (Council Liaison) 2. Correspondence/Attachments: Link to Affordable Housing and Historic Preservation webinar, sent Aug. 19, 2024: https://www.bigmarker.com/national- alliance-of-preserv/Housing-and-Historic-Preservation-A-Joint-Webinar-with-the- Advisory-Council-on-Historic-and-the-National-Alliance-of-Preservation- Commissions?bmid=15bedf5714e1&bmid tvae=member&bmid=15bedf5714e1 4. Old Business: A. Draft Guidelines for Windows, Exterior Lighting, Solar Panels and Hardscape Installations a. Review ad hoc committee discussion(s) b. Public Comment B. HPC 2024 Workplan Discussion a. Continued review of Comp Plan areas involving historic preservation b. HPC Questions and Discussion. c.Public Comment C. Review of Historic Residence Inventory, Phases 2 and 3. a.Methodology used for Phase 1 b. Draft Phs. 2 & 3 maps. c.Public Comment D. Suggestions for Special Valuation code amendments a.ls it possible to expand allowances for and outreach efforts to historic SFRs most at risk for foundation deficiencies? b. Can a dedicated source of funding be identified? (loans, similar to the facade improvement loan program administered by Main Street) c.Public Comment New Business: None Announcements/Other Business: Adjournment: Next Regular scheduled meeting: September 3, 2024. City of Port Townsend oFe°AT Design Guidelines for i Residential Landscaping Walls and/or S rr i ^� of.. t.dgljs.....(�...�........:�'err a..�aes) Purpose These Design Guidelines are established for the following purposes: 1. To supplement land use regulations which encourage and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend. 2. To provide guidance to urban design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality throughout the City. 3. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications. 4. To provide for administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) of building permits for landscaping walls and/or terraces that satisfy guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. Introduction Landscaping walls and/or series ..ash'..Waadll.......(n.,.�,_._Lerrac_E _�t� Yf aees� -help define the edge of a property, create useable outdoor space and enhance privacy. Such elements, when appropriately designed, can contribute to the overall character of Port Townsend's historic properties. For purposes of these guidelines, the term "landscaping walls and/asir a ria..a;eirtes._arfwaafl .....(u...... le. ]. as as.)..4 rrrraees" includes those structures that require issuance of a City building permit (due to their height and/or the surcharge being retained). Review Process 1. All landscaping walls and/or v.da.lfll.s..... �........_ ..u..u.�n,a.a,s t uaarrees that require submittal and ....... ......... ....... ....... ......... issuance of a building permit crr residentially zoned sites that contain a designated historic [Commented [MM1]: Add code section reference. structure shall also require issuance of a Certificate of Review by the DSD Director as follows: a. For sites that contain a Secondary residence, review of the Historic Design Review application may be done administratively by DSD staff with a decision made by the DSD Director. b. For sites that contain a Pivotal or Primary residence, review of the Historic Design Review application shall undergo review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) with a final decision made by the DSD Director. Guidelines The installation of a landscaping wall or series of walls (i.e. terraces) that require submittal and issuance of the building pen -nit are subject to the following guidelines: )eafig-n:.. &c. z n Guidelines for l Landscaping Walls and ��r rxr% Terraces 1 1. Materials used in the construction of landscaping walls and/or terraces are prohibited from creating a monolithic, uniform wall surface. Fhe inelwtm of.S..stairs or other features that help interrupt (or modulate( the lineaai nature oil' landscaping walls and/or terraces is encouraged. 2. The use of native, angular -cut stone is-eiieet n=ages (basalt, granite, sandstone,..etc.,..) in landscaping wall and terraces are strongly encouraged. The use of pre -formed, ,swinnatitih sn]oot11.,faced concrete bltreks....i.s pianhibited for permanent landscaping walls andltae terraces, nspcitted )th� c h ara c st�s Match h the nr ll alp ✓n character t u clhe housi t is enc oun�d to _..._ 4at,,aeurTh' HuO'&41)nc Hcii�crsncnFtewhrratvganul.niln�a4o.hi,treated ia1mbef is- to tl nblt, Ee'a wna�ll on however, .i:t..:may .:u of be is is'tt4ilsle lsaf...ial lieationis wlneni a sn.nmeharstn, is- ..h inig...ret [in ........-------.. 3. Landscape walls and terraces.that result irony suinrAl[rca�n ^�¢u afl changes in grade are preferred ( i` 4o 4 ° in hetghl) over taller wall sectionsuu ....(1xLnat irgma &I over)8 ° in 1_acnght sce t .(I. .,smiIio t X.A. xX).. seek to mainittinto ➢aauaauauna sa°atle 4. Treesin eity right twr—'sN'ar sliiill....b eaiinsa atennt-with (`uty node .as...paart of any la ndseraped...:.waH annd/oi l i-naee....lsuriijce-t.........Landscaping plantings that :will ..tliape ...over the laee eel wall lla imn thm that ,soften tic ulrlre ndancc LA .................................aall, he�ineh aLvew.- are encouraged. )eafigo:.. &c. z n Guidelines for 2 Landscaping Walls and ��r car% Terraces 1 City of Port Townsend oFe°AT ro�ym Design Guidelines for i c Exterior Lighting of Non -Residential Properties Subject to Historic Design Review. Purpose These Design Guidelines are established for the following purposes: 1. To supplement land use regulations which encourage and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend. 2. To provide guidance to urban design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality throughout the City. 3. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications as part of the City's Historic Design Review process. 4. To provide for administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) of exterior lighting proposals that are subject to Historic Design Review and which comply with guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. Introduction Within Port Townsend's National Landmark Historic District (NHLD), the appropriate use of external lighting for non-residential buildings and private open areas (such as parking lots) is important to maintaining overall character. Historically, lighting was only provided at a building's main entry using lamp oil or kerosene. Today, the uses put to buildings often require more than one entrance (or exit) be lit using electricity. The use of subdued lighting in street level storefronts is preferable to having them dark during evening hours, especially during months where darkness arrives earlier. With modern lighting technology constantly evolving, the range of fixture types, color spectrum, and bulb intensity only continues to broaden. Good exterior lighting is good for business; however, excessive lighting can easily degrade pedestrian experience. Safely, well -lit buildings can benefit and enhance architecture; yet, nighttime views of the sky and stars are valued by residents and visitors as well. The goals of these guidelines are to describe exterior lighting use that is both appropriate and fosters an inviting, nighttime atmosphere without creating unnecessary glare and light pollution. Review Process 1. Consistent with PTMC 17.30.050, Historic Design Review requests for all non-residential exterior lighting that are consistent with these guidelines may be reviewed administratively by DSD staff as a Type I -A ermit application, with a decision made by the DSD Director via a Certificate of Review. 7 Design Guidelines for I Non -Residential Exterior Lighting Commented [J M t ]: Staff would suggest amended language which allows for issuance of a waiver from Design Review if new liehtine is consistent with these euidelines. Guidelines A. Objective. All exterior commercial lighting, including that used to illuminate signs and parking areas, shall be designed to reduce glare impacts to adjacent properties and public rights - of -way, to use energy efficiently, and to reduce nighttime "light pollution." An exterior lighting plan, that includes specification sheets for each type of fixture proposed, shall be included with all Historic Design Review applications where new or revised lighting would be installed. 2. a. All exterior lighting, including that to illuminate signs, shall be pointed downward and shielded from direct observation from the air, adjacent properties, and public rights -of -way. Lighting "spillover" to adjacent properties shall be minimized. Lamps shall use recessed or flat lenses. Light fixtures, shall be "full cutoff' fixtures as defined by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. b. Alternative. if use of fixtures which do not meet the "full cutoff' definition are proposed, other fixtures may be used if it is determined by the DSD director that no significant light pollution or trespass will result and if the maximum initial lumens generated by each fixture does not exceed 1,500 lumens in total (approximately equivalent to an 18-watt compact fluorescent or 100-watt incandescent bulb). 3. Lighting in exterior canopies shall be recessed so that the lens does not drop below the level of the canopy. 4. Except at Memorial Field, exterior light poles shall not exceed a height of 17 feet above grade, including the base. 5. When lighting is used for security, the use of motion sensors and/or timers is required. 6. Exterior lighting shall be limited to nighttime business hours only. Lighting shall be located near the activity needing illumination. Walkways, entrances, and parking areas may be lit during nighttime business hours, but such lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety. Lighting in parking lots should be of uniform intensity, since the eye cannot easily adapt to areas of darkness and brightness in proximity to one another. 7. Buildings shall not be outlined with neon or other lighting, except seasonal lighting. The use of storefront window lighting that conforms with these guideline (directed downward, does not spill outward, etc.) is encouraged. 8. If, once installed, lighting is found to be performing in violation of these standards, the City may require the business owner to take corrective action to bring the lighting into compliance. Design Guidelines for Non -Residential Exterior Lighting 9. Lighting shall be maintained to meet these standards at all times. 10. Nighttime lighting of the American flag is exempt from the provisions of this chapter, except that such lighting shall not provide direct glare to neighboring properties or traffic. Examples `M Unsh aided �! n PL Shielded ,.. r �"'^ .u, ea Fp f �rymd l+rna R 90 �Mwrextrermxd Design Guidelines for Non -Residential Exterior Lighting Design Guidelines for Non -Residential Exterior Lighting City of Port Townsend Design Guidelines for Solar installations On Historic Structures Purpose These Design Guidelines are established for the following purposes: 1. To supplement land use regulations which encourage and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend. 2. To provide guidance te ttfba for design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality and historical character throughout the City. 3. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications. 4. To provide for administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) of routine window solar device permit applications that satisfy guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. Introduction Across the nation, there is a rapidly growing trend toward retrofitting homes to be more energy efficient. These efforts have seen solar panels and other solar devices, such as radiant water heaters, becoming increasingly popular as the use of alternative energy sources become more readily available to the general public. When planning the installation of solar panels, the overall objective is to preserve character - defining features and historic fabric while accommodating the need for solar access to the greatest extent possible. All solar panel installations must be considered on a case by case basis recognizing that the best option will depend on the characteristics of the property under consideration. For purposes of these guidelines, the term "solar devices" shall include solar panels, solar water heaters, photovoltaic shingles, and any other installation that uses solar energy for mechanical or electrical purposes. Review Process I . All solar device installations on historic residences designated as Secondary contributing structures shall be reviewed administratively by DSD staff with a decision made by the DSD Director. 2. Except where the guidelines below provide for administrative review, solar device installations on all other structures subject to PTMC 17.30 (i.e. Pivotal and Primary residences; all other commercial, public, religious and maritime trade buildings within the historic overlay district; other structures determined by DSD to be historic that lie outside the historic overlay district) shall be subject to Type I -A review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) with a final decision made by the DSD Director in a formal Certificate of Review. Design Guidelines for Solar Installations Guidelines 1. Installation of a solar device on a historic building is permitted only after other locations on the subject property, such as an accessory outbuilding (whether historic or non - historic), have been investigated and determined infeasible. 2. Where possible, solar devices shall be installed in a compatible location on the site or on a non -historic building or addition where it will have minimal impact on the historic building and its site. 3. Solar device(s) shall be installed on a historic building so that it is not visible or only minimally visible from the public right of way. For example, on a flat roof set solar panels back to take advantage of a parapet or other roof feature to screen solar panels from view; or on a secondary slope of a roof, out of view from the adjoining public rights -of -way. 4. On pitched roofs, solar roof devices shall be installed €rem flat or parallel to the roof to reduce visibility. 5. Solar device installations on the flat roofs of brick commercial buildings within the historic overlay district shall be reviewed administratively by the DSD Director. In these cases, solar devices may be installed at no more that 40' so long as the applicant demonstrates that doing so will not cause the installation to be visible from the adjoining rights -of -way. 6. Freestanding or detached on -site solar devices shall be installed in locations that minimize visibility from the public right of way.- and from neighboring properties. These systems shall be screened from the public right of way with materials elsewhere in the district such as fencing or vegetation of suitable scale for the district and setting. Placement and design shall not detract from the historic character of the site or destroy historic landscape materials. ems. 7. Solar device frame work and mounting systems shall be of a non -reflective color, such as an anodized finish, that is compatible in color to established roof materials. Mechanical equipment associated with the solar device system shall be treated as unobtrusive as possible. Trees in city right-of-way shall be preserved consistent with City code and not be topped or removed to improve solar access to a property. Design Guidelines for Solar Installations City of Port Townsend Design Guidelines for Windows In Historic Structures Purpose These Design Guidelines are established for the following purposes: I . To supplement land use regulations which encourage and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend. 2. To provide guidance to urban design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality throughout the City. 3. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications. 4. To provide for administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) of routine window permit applications that satisfy guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. Introduction Windows have four basic functions: (1) admitting light to the interior spaces; (2) ordinarily providing fresh air, ventilation and potential emergency egress to the interior; (3) providing a visual link to the outside world; and, (4) enhancing the appearance of the building. Windows are one of the most a character defining features of a building. Their pattern, arrangement, materials, size and shape all contribute to the historic significance of the structure they serve. In Port Townsend, most original historic residential windows are rectangular wooden, double - hung sash, as are those on the upper floors of commercial buildings. Sashes are frequently further divided into individual panes, or "lights." Commercial buildings frequently have large fixed "picture" windows on the ground floor raised above the sidewalk via a "kickplate." These windows are often accented by separate fixed transom windows located immediately above. Fixed "fan" windows in arched openings also are found above the upper floor double -hung windows in several buildings in the commercial downtown. Less frequent, but still employed, are bay windows on the upper floors. Windows are a frequently tafget blamed for energy loss. Historic building owners commonly seek to replace their original wood windows eft with the expectation that replacement ones is are an environmentally correct improvement and that it will save them time and money. However, experts indicate that only between 10-25% of energy loss actually comes from windows. In reality, most heat loss comes from a poorly insulated attic and/or walls or an inefficient fireplace damper. Replacement windows frequently have a limited lifespan of 20 years, while a properly maintained historic wood window can last up to 200 years. In many cases, in the span of time it takes to "save" enough money due to energy savings efficiency, it is likely that "new" windows wi44 may have to be replaced again. Over the long term, greater savings can be achieved through Design Guidelines for Windows proper maintenance and weather stripping of historic windows, combined with a well fitting storm windows, which approaches the energy efficiency of double pane windows. Review Process 1. All building permit applications for window replacement on historic residences, which follow these guidelines, designated as Secondary contributing structures shall be reviewed administratively by DSD staff with a decision made by the DSD Director. Said review shall not require a separate design review application but findings regarding appropriateness of the proposed window replacement shall be made as part of the building permit application itself 2. Building permit applications for window replacement on all other structures subject to PTMC 17.30 (i.e. Pivotal and Primary residences, all other commercial, public, religious ffi+d maritime trade and industrial buildings within the historic overlay district, other historic structures lying outside the historic overlay district) shall be subject to Type I -A review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) with a final decision made by the DSD Director in a formal Certificate of Approval. (STAFF �Lrrs� rr r� rrrr� nr �zrt�r r� er err�� ea��nrnrcnrr�� mar Guidelines 1. Original wood windows shall be maintained and repaired whenever possible rather than replaced. DSD staff shall inspect existing windows sought for replacement to determine if they are original and to what degree deterioration would make their repair prohibitive, which must be validated by the HPC.. Where original wood windows are allowed to be replaced, the replacement windows shall match the historic window style eles€l (as described above in the Introduction). 2. If non -original windows are sought to be replaced, the replacement windows shall match the prior historic windows style. 3. Original window opening sizes shall be maintained. The closing down of an original opening to accommodate a smaller window is inappropriate. The return ofpreviously altered windows to their original configuration is encouraged. The addition of, or replacement of, non-conformimng must be approved by the HPC. STAFF DOTE; WHAT 4. Vinyl windows are stf etigly diseettfage prohibited on all historic structures, unless approved the HPC, which will only be approved under extreme circumstances and must be memorialized by a specific written finding. Theif ttse n Pivotal of n,-:,ti a fy Fesi enees is oh b to Design Guidelines for Windows 5. Wood windows are the preferred material in all historic structures. Wood windows given proper treatment with a penetrating epoxy and a quality primer (if painting is desired) will provide many years of use. 6. Windows should not have shutters unless there is physical or pictorial evidence they originally existed on the building. 7. Replacement windows which have flush or snap -in muntins are prohibited. True divided lite or simulated divided lite (SDL) windows are €neettfage required. SDL windows have permanent exterior and interior muntins and an integral spacer bar. S. The addition of new window openings on principal facades of historic residences is prohibited. The addition of new window openings on principal facades of non-residential historic structures may be permitted as part of an approved rehabilitation project so long as the new openings do not penetrate a historic mural and are approved by the HPC. 9. The use of weather stripping and proper fitting storm windows is strongly encouraged. Sources: provide a list of window repair sources; window economics, try to include a sketch of the "anatomy" of a wood double hung. window, etc. (Is this being done and by whom?) Design Guidelines for Windows City of Port Townsend oFe°AT Design Guidelines for i c Exterior Lighting of Non -Residential Properties Subject to Historic Design Review. Purpose These Design Guidelines are established for the following purposes: 1. To supplement land use regulations which encourage and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend. 2. To provide guidance to urban design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality throughout the City. 3. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications as part of the City's Historic Design Review process. 4. To provide for administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) of exterior lighting proposals that are subject to Historic Design Review and which comply with guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. Introduction Within Port Townsend's National Landmark Historic District (NHLD), the appropriate use of external lighting for non-residential buildings and private open areas (such as parking lots) is important to maintaining overall character. Historically, lighting was only provided at a building's main entry using lamp oil or kerosene. Today, the uses put to buildings often require more than one entrance (or exit) be lit using electricity. The use of subdued lighting in street level storefronts is preferable to having them dark during evening hours, especially during months where darkness arrives earlier. With modern lighting technology constantly evolving, the range of fixture types, color spectrum, and bulb intensity only continues to broaden. Good exterior lighting is good for business; however, excessive lighting can easily degrade pedestrian experience and the historical milieu of the town. Safely, well -lit buildings can benefit and enhance architecture; yet, nighttime views of the sky and stars are valued by residents and visitors as well. The goals of these guidelines are to describe exterior lighting use that is both appropriate and fosters an inviting, nighttime atmosphere without creating unnecessary glare and light pollution, and provides lighting that is compatible with the historic character of Port Townsend. Review Process 1. Consistent with PTMC 17.30.050, Historic Design Review requests for all non-residential exterior lighting that are consistent with these guidelines may be (reviewed administratively by DSD staff, and either determined to be exempt from design review, or reviewed as a Type I -A permit application, with a decision made by the DSD Director via a Certificate of Design Guidelines for I Non -Residential Exterior Lighting Review. jThe determination of either exempt, or a'Type 1-A permit, will depend upon individual circumstances of the application, including site conditions, compatibility of light fixtures with a specific building, and similar factors. Guidelines A. Objective. All exterior commercial lighting, including that used to illuminate signs and parking areas, shall be designed to reduce glare impacts to adjacent properties and public rights - of -way, to use energy efficiently, and to reduce nighttime "light pollution." 1. An exterior lighting plan, that includes specification sheets for each type of fixture proposed, shall be included with all Historic Design Review applications where new or revised lighting would be installed. 2. a. All exterior lighting, including that to illuminate signs, shall be pointed downward and shielded from direct observation from the air, adjacent properties, and public rights -of -way. Lighting "spillover" to adjacent properties shall be minimized. Lamps shall use recessed or flat lenses. Light fixtures shall be "full cutoff' fixtures as defined by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. b. Alternative. If use of fixtures which do not meet the "full cutoff' definition are proposed, other fixtures may be used if it is determined by the DSD director that no significant light pollution or trespass will result and if the maximum initial lumens generated by each fixture does not exceed 1,500 lumens in total (approximately equivalent to an 18-watt LED lamp, 18-watt compact fluorescent or 100-watt incandescent bulb). Color Temperature: Historically, exterior lighting associated with buildings in Port Townsend was provided by oil or gas, or by incandescent light bulbs. The color temperature of these types of lighting did not typically exceed 2700K, so the light had a yellowish tint. To maintain this historic nighttime look, new exterior fixtures shall generally use lamps with a maximum color temperature of 2700K. If an LED fixture that otherwise meets these guidelines is only available with 3000K or higher color temp lamps, 3000K may be approved through the Type 1-A permit application process. New street lights shall comply with this guideline, and replacement of existing street light lamps, whether maintained by the City or by the PUD, shall comply with this guideline. 4. Lighting in exterior canopies shall be recessed so that the lens does not drop below the it bottom edge of the canopy. Except at Memorial Field, exterior light poles shall not exceed a height of 17 feet above grade, including the base. Design Guidelines for 2 Non -Residential Exterior Lighting Commented [JMt]: Staff would suggest amended language which allows for issuance of a Waiver from Design Review if new lighting is consistent with these guidelines. 6. When lighting is used for security, it will be reviewed as a Type 1-A permit application. Security lighting is not allowed to stay on continuously. Depending on circumstances, this can be accomplished through the use of light sensors, motion sensors, tur44%- timers, is required or other similar devices, subject to approval. 7. Exterior lighting shall be limited to nighttime business hours only. Lighting shall be located near the activity needing illumination. Walkways, entrances, and parking areas may be lit during nighttime business hours, but such lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety. Lighting in parking lots should be of uniform intensity, since the eye cannot easily adapt to areas of darkness and brightness in proximity to one another. 8. Buildings shall not be outlined with neon or other lighting, except lighting that is part of the Port Townsend Main Sheet seasonal building lighting program. The use of storefront window lighting that confonns with these guidelines (directed downward, does not spill outward, etc.) is encouraged. 8. If, once installed, lighting is found to be performing in violation of these standards, the City may require the business owner to take corrective action to bring the lighting into compliance. 9. Lighting shall be maintained to meet these standards at all times. 10. Nighttime lighting of the American flag is exempt from the provisions of this chapter, except that such lighting shall not provide direct glare to neighboring properties or traffic. Examples M, Unshiaided „..,.,- '✓y' � t ^---_. Nyy"osrl'I�'zl"pwClr:" rvy�uvea ^gfi �tl me {tlweuw.wltrn�m++ti JR Shielded � imM M.d b'W ldgp, PivUa i1mP:umyz nneU`W1 /' � �""• .u, ma �Fpc�mf �rg�de lrrna Ras90 �Mw re0.6�ermnd "Unshielded" does not meet these guidelines "Shielded" typically dues meet these guidelines Design Guidelines for Non -Residential Exterior Lighting Examples of exterior fixtures that are shielded and compatible with the historic character of Port Townsend. Fixtures similar to these will most likely meet the guidelines: Design Guidelines for Non -Residential Exterior Lighting City of Port 'Townsend IpORT Design Guidelines for Solar installations On Historic Structures Purpose These Design Guidelines are established 1`6r the following purposes: I To supplement land use regulations which encourage and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend. 2. To provide guidance to urban ' lbr design decisions that will prornote development of high environmental and visual quality and historical character throughout the City. 3. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications. 4. To provide for administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) of routine win4ow solar device permit applications that satisfy guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (11PQ and the City Council. Introduction Across the nation, there is a rapidly growing trend toward retrofitting homes to be more energy efficient. These efforts have seen solar panels and other solar devices, such as radiant water heaters, becoming increasingly popular as the use of alternative energy sources become more readily available to the general public. When planning the installation of solar panels, the overall objective is to preserve character - defining features and historic fabric while accommodating the need for solar access to the greatest extent possible. All solar panel installations must be considered on a case by case basis recognizing that the best option will depend on the characteristics of the property under consideration. For purposes of these guidelines, the term "solar devices" shall include solar panels, solar water heaters, photovoltaic shingles, and any other installation that uses solar energy for mechanical or electrical purposes. Review Process I All solar device installations on historic residences designated as Secondary contributing structures shall be reviewed administratively by DSD staff with a decision made by the DSD Director. 2. Except where the guidelines below provide for administrative review, solar device installations on all other structures subject to PTMC 17.30 (i.e. Pivotal and Primary residences; all other commercial, public, religious and maritime trade buildings within the historic overlay district; other structures determined by DSD to, be historic that lie outside the historic overlay district) shall be sul?ject to Type I -A review and recommendation by the I listoric Preservation Committee (I ]PQ with a final decision made by the DSD Director in a Fon-nal Certificate of Review. Design Guidelines,torSolur Installations Guidelines 71 - .Installation ofa solar device sari a historic building is permitted only after other locations on the subject property, such as an accessory outbuilding (whether historic or non - historic), have been investigated and determined infeasible. 2. Where possible, solar devices shall be installed in a compatible location on the site or on a non -historic building or addition NArliere it will have minimal impact on the historic building and its site. 3. Solar device(s) shall be installed on a historic building so that it is not visible or only minimally visible from the public right of way. For example, on a flat roof set solar panels back to take advantage of a parapet or other roof feature to screen solar panels ftorn view, or on a secondary slope ofa roof, Out ot'view from the adjoining public all 'X, rights -of' -way. eat( 4. On pitched roofs, solar root'devices shall be installed froto flat or parallel to the roof O reduce visibility. 5. Solar device installations on the flat roots, oll'brick commercial buildings within the historic overlay district shall be reviewed administratively by the DSD Director, In these cases, solar devices may be installed at no more that 40' so long as the applicant demonstrates that doing so will not cause the installation to be visible from the adjoining rights -of -way, 6Freestanding or detached on -site solar devices shall be installed in locations that, minimize visibility from the public right, of way, amlftom iieglibot�iti�pi-ol,)ertie,.'I'l�iese Systems shall be screened from the public right of way with materials 4is4v�l. such as fencing or vegetation of" suitable scale liar the district and setting. Placement and design shall not detract from the historic character of the site or destroy historic landscape materials. 7. Solar device Erame work and mounting systems shall be of a non -reflective color, Such as an anodized Finish, that is compatible in color to established roof rnaterials, Mechanical equipment associated with the solar device system shall be treated as unobtrusive as possible. 8. Trees in city right-of-way shall be preserved consistent with City code and not be topped or removed to improve solar access to a property. Design C, uidelines.16t, Solar Installotions, N City of Part "Townsend Design Guidelines for Windows In Historic Structures Pur 2 -0 Se These Design Guidelines are established for the following purposes: I To supplement land use regulations which encourage and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend. To provide guidance to urban design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality throughout the City. 3. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications. 4. To provide for administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) of routine window permit applications that satisfy guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. introduction Windows have lour basic functions: (1) admitting light to the interior spaces; (2) ordinarily providing fresh air, ventilation and potential emergency egress to the interior; (3) providing a visual link to the outside world; and, (4) enhancing the appearance of the building. Windows are one of the most a character defining features of a building. Their pattern, arrangement, materials, size and shape all contribute to the historic significance of the structure they serve. In Port Townsend, most original historic residential windows are rectangular wooden, double - hung sash, as are those on the upper floors of commercial buildings. Sashes are frequently further divided into individual panes, or "lights." Commercial buildings frequently have large fixed "picture" windows on the ground floor raised above the sidewalk via a "kickplate." 'These windows are often accented by separate fixed transom windows located immediately above. Fixed "fan" windows in arched openings also, are found above the upper floor double -hung windows in several buildings in the commercial downtown. I..,ess frequent, but still employed, are bay windows on the upper floors. Windows are a frequently tar -got blamed for energy loss. Historic building owners commonly seek to replace their original wood windows on with the expectation that replacement ones are an environmentally correct improvement and that it will save them time and money. However, experts indicate that only between 10-25% of energy loss actually comes from windows. In reality, most heat loss comes from a poorly insulated attic andlor walls or an inefficient fireplace damper. Design Guidelinevfior Windows Replacement windows frequently have a limited lifespan of 20 years, while a properly maintained historic wood window can last up to 200 years. In many cases, in the span of time it takes to "save" enough money due to energy is&vings qfficiency,, it is likely that "new," windows wi44 may have to be replaced again. Over the long term, greater savings can be achieved through proper maintenance and weather stripping of historic windows, combined with a well fitting storm windows, which aj.�I)roaches the energy of cieney qI'double 1ane windows, Review Pr&Us� I All building permit applications for window replacement on historic residences, which ./bIlow these guidelines, designated as Secondary contributing structures shall be reviewed administratively by DSD staff with a decision made by the DSD Director, Said review shall not require a separate design review application but findings regarding appropriateness of the proposed window replacement shall be made as part of' the building permit application itself. 2, Building permit applications for window replacement on all other structures subject to PTMC 17.30 (i.e. Pivotal and Primary residences, all other commercial, public, religious an4 maritime trade and industrial buildings within the historic overlay district, other historic structures lying outside the historic overlay district) shall be subJect toType ]-A review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Cornmittee (I IPQ with a final decision made by the DSD Director in a formal Certificate ofApprovaL ---N441 1,,: kfl'A`A)- �4-04,Al.�XAA, t lfl k-'vlk �I Guidelines I a Original wood windows shall be maintained and repaired whenever possible rather than replaced. DSD staff shall inspect existing windows sought for replacement to determine if they are original and to what degree deterioration would make their repair prohibitive, which must be validated bjithe HN'.. Where original wood windows are allowed to be replaced, the replacement windows, shall match the historic window style e4)s4y (,as described above in the Introduction). 2, 11"non-original windows are sought to be replaced, the replacement windows shall match the prior historic windows style, ek)s-t4y44-&�-, I Original window opening sizes shall be maintained, The closing down ofan original opening to accommodate a smaller window is inappropriate. The return oaf previously altered windows to their original coqfiguration is encouraged. The addition oaf.or replacement q/,` non-conjbrinimng must be apl)roved bY the HN"'. "', I,\ I A 1, � f " i- 1)110-1—,�40,r( - 4k - "4, k,41 4111, 'I'll ll,k-, 4,114, AA i" \V,44k-% -7 A NII \k I P4 ) Vk- 4 N I � I �4 412.()N,Ik�4, 4411 C 2 Design Guieleflrm��Jbr [Vindows 4. Vinyl windows are str-engly diseoufaged I)rohibiled on all historic structures, unless approved the I-IPC,'which will only be approved under extreme circumstances and must be memorialized by a specific written finding. Their- use on Pivotal or- Pr-imar�,.fesidenees is pl:ehibited. 5. Wood windows are the preferred material in all historic structures. Wood windows given proper treatment with a penetrating epoxy and a quality primer (if painting is desired) will provide many years of use. 6. Windows should not have shutters unless there is physical or pictorial evidence they originally existed on the building. 7. Replacement windows which have flush or snap -in muntins are prohibited. True divided lite or simulated divided lite (SDL) windows are eneoufage4 required. SDI, windows have permanent exterior and interior muntins and an integral spacer bar. 8. The addition of new window openings on principal facades of historic residences is prohibited. The addition of new window openings on principal facades of non-residential historic structures may be permitted as part of an approved rehabilitation project so loll as the new openings do not penetrate a historic mural and are appromd by the J1PC. 9. The use of weather stripping and proper fitting storm windows is strongly encouraged. Sources: orovide a list of window re air sources; window economics, try to include a sketch of the "anatomv" of a wood double hung. window , etc. (1v this being done and b j, whom?) vv A4o vj15 w ("(k C fdlvvl� (ij c-y, be 6 W le ItJ I tAj 0 :.uE 3 Dewign Guidelines for Windows Historic & Cultural Resources Goal 17: Preserve historic and cultural resources to retain our connection to the past, enhance community values, and leave a historical legacy for future generations. Policy 17.1: Use the expertise of the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) in matters that relate to the preservation of Port Townsend's heritage and strategies to retain a sense of the past as the City grows and changes. Continue to use the HPC for all mandatory design reviews of developments within the City, as specified in Chapter 17.30 Historic Preservation Code PTMC. Policy 17.2: Encourage the retention of significant historic and cultural resources that foster community identity and pride. 17.2.1: Promote the revitalization of older housing stock, preservation of neighborhood patterns, and the marking of important sites. 17.2.2: Develop incentives that promote the adaptive reuse and preservation of historic buildings (e.g., use of the upper floors of downtown historic buildings). Ensure that incentives provide reductions in regulatory requirements such as parking, in exchange for desired public benefits. 17.2.3: Work with downtown property owners to seek grant funding to rehabilitate and seismically retrofit historically significant structures. 17.2.4: Promote commercial historic district revitalization strategies that recognize and capitalize on the historic traditions of Port Townsend. 17.2.5: Apply both the International Existing Building Code and the Special Valuation for Historic Properties program to ,qualified.historic structures d4 ` Na ritRror zJY ., �6 t�Y,N,o..JtFNu,ut � [h:n"11.�.Commented[JM1]:Considertheseeditstoexisting CP 11 Policy Li.7.2.•.Ga EnM.21 .. tN e maintenance re use and irr� roverv�ent of exisfln ............................................................................................ g............................................................................................................................................................ d ........... p.....................................................................................................................m historic structures both within the National N listorNc N andmark District and Commented [JM2]: Consider "all" instead of "the other" ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Commented [JM3]: Consider new CP Policy 17.2.6 from 2,27.24 mtg. Policy 17.3: Coordinate with the Port Townsend Historic Preservation Committee and the Jefferson County Historical Society to seek funding to revise and update the City's historic survey and enhance interpretive opportunities. 17.3.1: Continue to research, identify, and inventory Port Townsend's historic structures and sites. 17.3.2: Integrate an inventory of Port Townsend's historic sites and structures into the City's permit database for ease of recognition in permitting. Policy 17A Continue to refine and implement the historic preservation guidelines in the zoning ordinance to govern the demolition of historic structures and walls more than 50 years old. Ensure that the guidelines include a map and inventory that identifies all significant historic structures in Port Townsend. Policy 17.5: Continue to refine and implement historic preservation guidelines in the zoning ordinance to govern the conservation and preservation of historic murals. 17.5.1: Ensure that the guidelines include a photographic inventory that identifies all significant historic murals in Port Townsend. 17.5.2: Consider establishing guidelines that prohibit the repainting, removal, or alteration of historic murals, except for instances where the structural integrity of the building is at stake or where new development would obscure an historic mural. Policy 17.6: Develop and implement an historic preservation element in a future amendment to this Comprehensive Plan. 2024 Comprehensive Plan Historic Preservation Committee — Member comments (Monica Mader) Chapter4: Land Use Element Goal 17 (17.1) Consideration: Codify, bolster, enrich, and develop (as necessary) the existing Historic Preservation Code to reduce individual, case -by -case review by HPC where possible. [Moved to second -tier List] (17.2.2) Workwith property owners within the commercial historic districts to promote and encourage equity through universal access alterations to historic structures while following preservation best practices. [Moved to second -tier list] (17.5) Comment: Education about the history of Historic Murals will enhance the preservation of them too. Consider an interactive page on the City website, signage, or physical maps for the community and tourists to engage and learn about them. Likely in collab with Historical Society who current host tours? [Moved to second -tier list] Chapter 5: Housing Element (3.2): Provide educational opportunities for property/homeowners of historic buildings of ways to repair/rehabilitate structures. Provide incentives for low-income homeowners of historic properties for pathways to restoring/preserving features and contributing elements. Or housing affordability section (4.2.1) Comment: Change language to be more inclusive of other cluster developments; for example, encourage unit lot subdivisions — not tied to THOW or Cottage developments — to promote the construction of affordably priced single- family houses that are not tied to condominium ownership structures. Allowing lower income groups to build equity. Question: Does the City have an obligation in intervene (or provide targeted assistance) for at -risk historic homes that have become in disrepair? [Moved to second -tier list and combined with Richard Berg's comment] Chapter 9: Economic Development Element (Commercial Historic District Revitalization, Goal7.2) Consideration: Encourage rehabilitation, renovation, and adaptive reuse of street -level tenant spaces - alley -side only (non -street frontages) - to meet housing density goals. (Policy addition) Promote or incentivize structural rehabilitation for resiliency (and preservation) of waterside, historic, downtown commercial -district buildings to protect against sea -level rise, large weather events, and climate change. Historic Preservation Committee — Member comments (ALL) Second Tier Comments List - (Land Use Elements, 17.1) Consideration: Codify, bolster, enrich, and develop (as necessary) the existing Historic Preservation Code to reduce individual, case -by -case review by HPC where possible. [Just a suggestion] - (Land Use Element, 17.2.2) Workwith property owners within the commercial historic districts to promote and encourage equity to enable universal access alterations to historic structures while following preservation best practices. [Group decided YES to add language to comp plan, but need to reword for policies] - Education about district, murals, historical items o (17.5) Comment: Education about the history of Historic Murals will enhance the preservation of them too. Consider an interactive page on the City website, signage, or physical maps for the community and tourists to engage and learn about them. Likely in collab with Historical Society who current host tours? [Talk about later, could be considered for code and comprehensive plan] - "Demolition by Neglect" verbiage, housing element-17.30.400. Monica Mader to work with Richard Berg for correct verbiage. - Group Comment: Add language to Comp. Plan about "reviewing projects with HPC prior to demolition". Group Tasked To Review - Review"Transportation Element" and provide suggestions as they relate to NHL districts 2024 Comprehensive Plan Historic Preservation Committee Member comments from Special Meeting on 04-23-2024, amended on 05/28/24 Amended text in Red, dated 05/28/2024 1. Context statement. Codify, bolster, enrich, and develop (as necessary) the existing Historic Preservation Code/Guidelines to reduce individual, case -by -case review by HPC where possible. o Goal: Maximize administrative review through use of the guidelines to provide greater clarity for designers/applicants/etc. ■ Continue to develop guidelines for subtopics. ■ Periodically review existing guidelines to make sure content and language remains current [This activity to be added to workplan]. 2. Goal: Work with property owners within the commercial historic districts to promote and encourage accessibility equity through alterations to historic structures while following preservation best practices. o Implementation: During the permit process, applicants prepare a document addressing universal access: what accessibility measures currently exist on their property, what steps are taken to address current non -conformity, why steps were or were not taken to improve access. o Definitions for greater context: ■ Definition of Universal Design: "The design and composition of an environment so that it can be accessed, understood, and used to the greatest extent possible by all people regardless of their age, size, ability or disability." ■ Definition of Equitable use: The design is useful and marketable to people with diverse abilities. ■ Difference between ADA and Universal Design: "ADA requirements are regulations that dictate how spaces must be designed to accommodate disabled users, while universal design is an approach where designers think about how a space can accommodate everyone, regardless of age or ability." 3. Context statement. Education about district, murals, historical items, etc. o Goal: Increase outreach efforts to educate the Public regarding CoPT's National Historic Landmark districts ■ Distribution of information in passive contexts: ex. In monthly city flyer, quarterly reports, or utility bill. Information may include maps paired with literature. ■ Could be combined with the universal access commentary (see comment #2). ■ The intent of this goal is to provide greater education for those living within the district and provide direction to available resources. o Add "Historic Preservation" link to the CoPT website under the Community Development on main directory page for direct access to HPC information. 4. "Demolition by Neglect" verbiage, housing element -17.30.400, Policy Revision: Either expansion of note (C.) or additional bullet to describe the path forward for the City to enforce Demolition by Neglect. Correction would become mandatory (not voluntary) and the correction corrected at the owner's expense, but carried out and directed by the City. Path Forward: City outlines options for the repair may cause prop. owner to sell Intent: City is incentivized to maintain historic district over time. 5. Goal: Establish low interest loan program that targets residential properties in the Historic Districts o Funding ideas: ■ Similar to the Commercial -only Community Block Grant ■ Could money come from extra LTAC funds? o Goal intent: Preventative measure (before demolition by neglect) for restoring historic residences within the district. This strategy could reduce the economic burden of older home maintenance and make housing stock in Uptown more accessible to lower income property owners. Provides an incentive for preserving a historic residence. 6. Policy: Encourage exterior lighting guidelines for Residential Districts. o Intent: as increasing density becomes a firm direction for the City, exterior lighting strategies are becoming ever more important for neighborhoods and friendly communities. 7. Context: HPC Committee was directed to provide feedback on the Comprehensive Plan's "Transportation Element" and provide suggestions as they relate to NHL districts o Encourage more Ferries/buses o HPC recommends furthering the development of the Parking Management Plan ■ Enforce parking time limits to encourage biking or park and ride transit options ■ Increase the operating hours for busses o Make interim parking standards permanent, i.e. no onsite parking in residential neighborhoods CP Goal— Staff Initial Suggestions Goal 17. PolicyXXX: Consider allowing ground floor residential use of historic commercial buildings. Goal 17. Policy XXY. Create a grant and/or loan program available to income qualifying property owners that targets historic home foundation work. City of Port Townsend Methodology, Scoring System, Design Guidelines and Departures for Historic Residences Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 1 of 15 ok VORr To►Y U` Purpose These Design Guidelines for Historic Residences are established for the following purposes: To provide reference to the Historic Residential Inventory Methodology and Scoring System used to differentiate between contributing and non-contributing historic residences. 2. To provide guidance to historic residential design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality throughout the City. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications. 4. To provide for staff level only administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) for routine permit applications, including departure requests, that satisfy guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. Introduction The City of Port Townsend's National Historic Landmark District (NHLD) was established in 1976 and includes commercial, residential and institutional structures. Residential properties within the district, totaling approximately 700 structures, were not previously subject to local historic design review for proposed alternations, additions or demolition. In response to several partial or complete demolitions of residential properties in the NHLD in the summer of 2008, interim design review regulations were established while permanent controls could be adopted. As it was unclear the degree to which historic residential structures had been altered since the 1976 survey, a new inventory to distinguish between "Contributing" and "Non -Contributing" historic residences was conducted in the summer of 2009. While the focus of this effort was on residences within the NHLD, the Methodology and Scoring System developed for the survey was designed so it can be applied to residential properties both within and outside the NHLD. Structures found to be "Contributing" in the 2009 Inventory were differentiated into three (3) tiers of significance — Pivotal, Primary and Secondary. Definitions for each tier are as follows: • Pivotal - buildings which were the landmarks of the district, hallmarks of architectural or historical distinction their own merits, these buildings are eligible for National Register listing. These buildings strongly define the character of the district through strong examples of architectural styles, craftsmanship, exterior detailing and have retained their integrity. Other qualities such as the designeribuilding or historical significance because of the association with a prominent person or persons or a historic event may also be considered. July 12, 2010 Design Guidelines for Historic ,Residences Exhibit 8 to Ordinance 3037 Page 2 of 15 • Primary - buildings which have strong architectural or historical qualities and which maintain good integrity but which may not be individually eligible for National Register listing. Primary buildings have, to a lesser extent than pivotal buildings, strong character defining features but generally lack the level of architectural detailing, style and craftsmanship exhibited in pivotal building. • Secondary - buildings which have moderate historical or architectural qualities and which have maintained good (but not perfect) integrity. Secondary buildings first and foremast contribute the character of the district particularly in terms of scale and massing, but lack the architectural detailing and styling of pivotal and primary buildings and may have been constructed or altered after the period of significance for the district (1870-1920). The complete Methodology and Scoring System is attached as Exhibit A to these Historic Residential Design Guidelines. It sets forth the details on which elements of a residence were being scored, how scoring of these elements was assigned and the number of points needed by a residence to achieve a particular tier. The Methodology and Scoring System also resulted in a checklist, or scoring sheet, that was used to catalog each residence surveyed in the 2009 Historic Residential Inventory. The complete collection of these scoring sheets is on file electronically with the Development Services Department and was adopted by reference into municipal code via Ordinance 3037. Review Process A. Unless exempted by PTMC 17.30.020, no development or improvement regulated by PTMC 17.30 may be initiated without design review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and issuance of a certificate of approval by the DSD Director, except, as provided below, minor residential alterations can be administratively reviewed and approved by the DSD Director without HPC review and recommendation. L. Minor Alterations. Minor alterations that are administratively approved include: a. Repairs or restoration of historic features or elements. b. Changes in roofing material. c. Replacement in kind (or substantially in kind) of windows using the same or similar sash and pane configuration, including use of compatible substitute materials. d. New railings. e. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations. f Fences. g. Garages and outbuildings. h. New additions less than 300 square feet in size on non -primary facades Nothing prevents the DSD Director from obtaining HPC recommendation on a proposed minor alteration, and/or working with HPC to establish guidelines to implement applications for minor alterations. B. Review of any alteration proposed to Secondary residential structures, with the exception of demolition or partial demolition, may be performed administratively by the DSD Director without consultation and recommendation by the HPC. July 12, 2010 2 Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 3 of 15 Design Guidelines In its review of residential development designated or eligible to be designated on the Port Townsend list of historic places occurring within the historic overlay district, the HPC and the DSD Director shall apply the following design standards in addition to those set forth in PTMC 17.30.140. The standards shall only apply to the work or alteration for which a permit is sought, and shall not be applied to require an owner to change or restore other existing conditions or improvements to meet these standards. Sample illustrations of additions to historic residences are contained in Exhibit B to these Guidelines. A. General Standards. 1. Principal facades. The principal historic facade(s) of residential development shall be preserved. A principal facade shall be defined as a facade that fronts on any adjacent public right-of-way (not including alleys). Minor alterations that do not adversely affect the integrity of the principal facade may be permitted, provided that the proponent can demonstrate that the minor alteration is necessary to accommodate the continued viable use of the residence. Examples of allowable minor alterations include: accommodations to meet life/safety requirements, the use of new materials when historic materials are no longer available, are structurally impractical and/or are energy inefficient, provided that the new materials match the historic use closely. Functional adaptation of identified historic principal facades may be permitted provided that the adaptation is the minimum and least obtrusive necessary and still meets the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings" (1995), including any amendments, to accommodate continued use. 2. New Additions. a. To preserve the character and integrity of principal historic facades, any proposed additions to a historic residence shall be located to the rear or side of the subject property consistent with the following requirements: b. Proposed side additions shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the building line of the principal historic facade(s). c. In the case of historic residences that are located on corner lots that have two principal historic facades, additions shall only be permitted on the side containing a non - principal historic fagade(s). d. Additions that expand the residence by increasing the vertical height of the structure shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the building line of the principal historic faoade(s). e. Additions shall be harmonious with the design of the historic residence, shall clearly be of their own period and shall not be imitative of the original historic design. f Proposed additions shall be secondary design elements that are supportive of the integrity of the original historic residence. 3. Accessory structures. a. Accessory structures such as garages, ADU's or other similar structures shall be located to the rear or side of the subject property consistent with the following requirements: July 12, 2010 Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 4 of 15 b. Proposed accessory structures shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the building line of the principal historic fagade(s). c. In the case of historic residences that are located on corner lots that have two principal historic facades, accessory structures shall be permitted on the side containing a principal historic facade, provided that their proposed location minimizes view blockage of the historic facade from the adjacent public right-of-way. B. Specific Standards - Pivotal Residences. In its review of alterations to residences designated or eligible to be designated as Pivotal, the HPC and the DSD Director shall apply the following design standards in addition to those set forth in PTMC 17.30.140 and PTMC 17.30.158(A). 1. Exterior additions or modifications to Pivotal structures shall be designed in a manner that maintains and not destroy the pre-existing elements that characterize the building's historic integrity. 2. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 3. The present height of the existing structure shall remain intact. Any additions or modifications would not exceed the roof line of the original structure. 4. Compatible materials that respect the visual appearance of the existing structure shall be used. 5. Patterns and orientation of door and window openings represented in the existing structure shall be respected. 5. Additions and new construction shall be located to conceal them to the extent possible from the street level view from the adjacent right of way. For corner lots, the additions and new construction shall be located to make them as unobtrusive as possible from the view from the adjacent right of way, and preserve to the maximum extent possible the principal facade. 7. The present roof pitches of the existing structure shall be maintained where such element is visible from the adjacent right of way. 8. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 9. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. July 12, 2010 4 Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit 8 to Ordinance 3037 Page 5 of 15 C. Specific Standards - Primary Residences. In its review of alterations to residences designated or eligible to be designated as Primary, the HPC and the DSD Director shall apply the following design standards in addition to those set forth in PTMC 17.30.140, and in PTMC 17.30.158(A). 1. Exterior additions or modifications to Primary structures shall be designed in a manner that maintains the pre-existing characteristics that contribute to the buildings historic integrity. These characteristic include the massing, scale, height and architectural features of the structure. 2. Exterior additions or modifications may be permitted to the side or rear of the building, provided that the scale and architectural details of the principal facades are preserved. 3. Additions to Primary structures shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation and shall be subordinate and supportive elements to the pre-existing structure. 4. Additions and new construction shall be located to make them as unobtrusive as possible from the view from the adjacent right of way. D. specific Standards — Secondary Residences. In its review of alterations to residences designated or eligible to be designated as Secondary, the DSD Director shall apply the following design standards in addition to those set forth in PTMC 17.30.140 and PTMC 17.30.158(A). 1. Restoration activities that remove materials (siding, roofing, etc.) and/or features (doors, windows, etc.) that are inappropriate to the historic period in which the subject property was built are strongly encouraged. Replacement materials and/or features shall closely approximate appropriate historic design but are not required to be exact reproductions of those found on the residence at the time of initial construction. Departures A "historic residential departure" is a request by a historic home owner for relief from a particular design guideline or dimensional requirement through an alternative technique or standard not otherwise permitted by code. Departures can allow expansions/renovations of a historic home to better fit into their immediate site or neighborhood context without a significant loss of architectural integrity or neighborhood character. A. Allowable Departures Through the design review process in PTMC 17.30.159.D, departures may be allowed from the following design guidelines and/or bulk and dimensional standards: 1, Location of proposed additions; 3. Building setbacks; July 1 Z 2010 2. Location of proposed accessory structures; 4. Modulation requirements; Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit 8 to Ordinance 3037 Page 6 of 15 5. Lot coverage requirements; and, b. Daylight plane requirements. Sample illustrations of the above departures are contained in Exhibit C to these Guidelines. B. Departure Approval Criteria For a departure to be approved, an applicant must demonstrate the proposal is consistent with the following criteria: 1. The proposed departure does not significantly detract from the historic character and nature of the historic residential property for which it is proposed; 2. The proposed departure is consistent with the existing land use pattern with regard to the standard being varied; 3. The proposed departure does not interfere with or negatively impact existing and permitted uses within the zoning district it occupies; 4. The proposed departure does not constitute a threat to the public health, safety and general welfare within the city; and, 5. The proposed departure is minor in nature and would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zoning district in which the subject property is located; C. Departure Notice, Approval and Review Process For all departure requests involving Pivotal or Primary residences, review and recommendation by the HPC to the DSD Director shall be obtained consistent with PTMC 17.309.159.E(1). For all departure requests involving a Secondary residence, the DSD Director shall determine if the approval criteria have been met, and issue the certificate of review, including any modifications, conditions, or denial of approval consistent with PTMC 17.30.159.E(2). However, nothing prevents the DSD Director from requesting HPC recommendation on a Secondary residential departure request. The following departure requests are processed as Type I -A actions (administrative without notice; administrative appeal by applicant only) established in Chapter 20.01 PTMC a. Location of proposed additions; b. Location of proposed accessory structures; c, Modulation requirements; 2. The following departure requests shall be processed as Type II actions (administrative approval, with mailed and posted notice appeal by applicant or party of record to the hearing examiner), and notice shall conform to the requirements of PTMC 20.01.150. a. Building setbacks; b. Lot coverage requirements; c. Daylight plane requirements. July I Z 2010 6 Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 7 of 15 City of Port Townsend Historic Residential Property Inventory Methodology and Scoring System" ("2010 Inventory") Project Purpose and Need The City of Port Townsend's National Historic Landmark District (NHLD) was established in 1976 and includes commercial, residential and institutional structures. The survey of historic properties completed in 1976 established five tiers of classifications for properties within the district including: • Pivotal - buildings which were the landmarks of the district, hallmarks of architectural or historical distinction their own merits, these buildings are eligible for National Register listing. These buildings strongly define the character of the district through strong examples of architectural styles, craftsmanship, exterior detailing and have retained their integrity. Other qualities such as the designer/building or historical significance because of the association with a prominent person or persons or a historic event may also be considered. • Primary - buildings which have strong architectural or historical qualities and which maintain good integrity but which may not be individually eligible for National Register listing. Primary buildings have, to a lesser extent than pivotal buildings, strong character defining features but generally lack the level of architectural detailing, style and craftsmanship exhibited in pivotal building. Secondary - buildings which have moderate historical or architectural qualities and which have maintained good (but riot perfect) integrity. Secondary buildings first and foremast contribute the character of the district particularly in terms of scale and massing, but lack the architectural detailing and styling of pivotal and primary buildings and may have been constructed or altered after the period of significance for the district (1870-1920). • Altered Historic — buildings that are over 50 years old, but have been altered to the extent to which they have little historic or aesthetic value and do not have strong character defining features for the district. • Recent compatible — A building less than 50 years old, but that was designed and constructed such that the building is compatible with the style, scale and massing in the district. • Intrusion — new buildings built within the last 50 years that are not compatible with the style, scale and massing within the district and out therefore out of character with the district. Residential properties within the district, totaling approximately 700 structures, have not been subject to local design or historic review for proposed alternations, additions or demolition. However, interim design review regulations were established 18 months ago 1 of Exhibit 8 to Ordinance 3037 Page 8 of 15 for residential properties in the district. Therefore, it is unclear the degree to which the residential structures have been altered since the 1976 survey and the effect the alterations will effect the property classifications listed above. Despite the lack of local regulations for either design review or revision by the Historic Preservation Committee many properties appear to have been accurately restored to reflect the original historic features. In other cases structures have had unsympathetic alterations that have degraded the historic building features. A new inventory to distinguish between "Contributing" and "Non -Contributing" historic residences is the primary purpose of this effort. Structures found to be "Contributing" will be differentiated into three (3) tiers of significance — Pivotal, Primary and Secondary. When completed and adopted, the survey would assist the City in drafting new regulations to address proposed alterations and demolitions of historic residential properties. Methodology Based on the established purpose and need of the project, the methodology used to assess the historic and aesthetic value of residential properties within the district focused on the physical qualities of the buildings and the aesthetic value within the streetscape. Other factors such as the building designer/builder and historic events were deemphasized in order to provide for a timely completion of the project and to emphasize the visual contributions to the character of the neighborhood. Project Tasks • Reviewed the Jefferson County Historic Society's database of historic properties and the map generated by the 1976 National Park Service effort leading to creation of the Port Townsend NHLD. • Generated a checklist for use in evaluating and scoring the properties. The checklist and scoring system was based on the following criteria: o Building Exterior — The quality of the form, composition, detailing and ornament in part on originality, artistic merit, craftsmanship, and sensitivity to surroundings and overall visual quality. o Style — Significant as an example of a particular architectural style, type or convention o Age — Of particular age in relationship of the periods of development of buildings in the area o Continuity/Context — Contributes to the visual, historic or other environmental continuity or character of the street area. 2of5 Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 9 of 95 o Alterations — Degree of alteration done to important exterior materials and design features include the reestablishment of historic features through alteration o Reversibility — Extent to which integrity losses can be reversed, and ease or difficulty of making such corrections. • Took photos of each residential property in the district to identify key historic building features with emphasis on views from the street. Using the checklist, surveyed and scored the physical characteristics of each residential property in the district. • Produced a G1S Layer identifying the updated residential property classifications • Identified alternatives for addressing the preservation of these structures through new local regulations to include design/historic preservation review and potential restricti©ns on demolition. 3 of 5 Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 90 of 95 Survey Checklist Appendix A Methodology I. Ranking Definitions — The ratings listed below are considered on a relative basis and are not absolute ratings, but rather based on a comparison to other buildings within the landmark district. a. Excellent — An excellent rating identifies buildings in the district as exhibiting exemplary attributes within the category that are not commonly found on other buildings b. Good — A rating of good is above average for buildings within the district and the rating signifies the building shows strong attributes relative to the category c. Fair — A fair rating is average for the district and the building does not distinguish itself from other buildings in the district to any significant degree d . Poor — A poor rating is below average for the district and is reserved for buildings that are sub -standard rating relative to the underlying category 11. Alteration Definitions — The rankings that relate to alterations are more absolute than relative as they define the degree to which the alterations have negatively impacted the historic and visual integrity of the buildings and the degree to which they are reversible a. Significant Alteration - An alteration or alterations have occurred which have significant negative impact on the buildings historic and visual integrity. Examples include the removal of significant parts of the original building, major additions that significantly detract from original building integrity or unsympathetic siding b. Minor Alterations -- Alterations that have had a minor impact on the historic integrity and visual appeal of the building. Examples include unsympathetic windows, a minor addition or porch, or removal of outbuildings C. No Significant Alterations - No significant alterations have been done to the structure that affect the historic integrity or visual appeal of the structure III. Reversibility — The reversibility criteria, like those for alterations, are absolute and not based on the relative attributes amongst buildings in the district. a. Easily reversible — Alterations that can be easily reversed in terms of cost and labor. Examples include changing windows or siding or removing a minor addition b. Reversible — Alterations that are physically possible, but are more difficult in terms of cost and labor. Examples include the removal of significant additions or reconstructing exterior detailing that was previously removed damaged. 4 of 5 Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page I of 15 c. Not Reversible — Alterations that cannot be reversed in terins of cost and labor. Examples include the removal of historic sections of the home or the loss of most exterior detailing. IV. Ranking Point System a. Building Features i. Excellent — 3 Points (2 for Age) H. Good — 2 Points (1 for Age) iii. Fair — 1 Point iv. Poor — 0 Points b. Alterations i. Significant Alteration— -2 Points H. Minor Alteration — -1 Point iii. No Significant Alteration — I Points c. Reversibility i. Easily Reversible — 2 Points for Significant Alteration/1 Point for Minor ii. Reversible — 1 Point for Significant Alteration/0 Points for Minor Alteration iii. Not Reversible — 0 Points V. Property Classifications a. Pivotal — 15-18 Points b. Primary 10-14 Points c. Secondary 5-9 Points d. Non -Contributing 0-4 5 of 5 CD ca O Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 12 of 95 1 i _ I i � C I Zp I r r Q. CD ti i O 0 :. I ................................... .......................................... .... ' t 2................ ........... u....................................................................................................1...... _.-._.---•-•---•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•- - -I- I................ I uY- addition i I I Street ROW dD [0111 n ❑ Principal Facade and Addition viewed from Street ROW (Corner Propertv) m X s Cr e d V IL M 0 N 0 2 y rr 0 N Q CD 7 0 cD y Exhibit C - Sample Departures for Historic Residences 1. Location of proposed additions-, 1 ------------ -4-1 :: T ................ ................................. ......... . ................ Addition .......... Permitted by Ordinance 2. Location of proposed accessory structures; Permitted by Ordinance I F Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 13 of 15 Departure required Departure required July 12, 2010 3. Building setbacks; Permitted by Ordinance 4. Modulation requirements; Min 2' 20' Permitted by Ordinance July 12, 2010 Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 14 of 15 ........... ......................... Front porch matching neighborhood development pattern I. Departure required Departure required 6. Lot coverage requirements; Permitted by zoning 7. Daylight plane requirements. daylight plane 45 degrees property line 19 6° �I 5' side yard setback Permitted by Ordinance Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 15 of 15 Departure required daylight plane 45 degrees 30' height 1�1 E�E 19'6'Iilll!' property line 5' side yard setback Departure required July 12, 2010 wI Vsr, � l,x�,lr,)Jr � �Iri „l.t,,,, r r St �� �O�w m� 3/ f�; i ¢° m /I (it { Iti�(,II Olt�r 1 rl`9II�f t`( I 1 Center St. Cedar St. a' 2 Milo St. Tremont St QX I t rlr� 65 I m st _ P St..� I I �,> ,I t, t1 'Irr; ) Pp,: I o R i QS, - v { 65 II';li'i I' St I p Id 1 r lrJ�l%r' l� r i Ill � v v r v t N �ll�r� Ad5ti kt t l l St s c c y Ti -� KSr A, 1 r (J ste St I a ll��' �rlljilll��r� Q �r �s � S l (✓✓'l )1 F;hi I 7� 4 �\ Mdole pl + '� 1' it I Ga�edG\ °esi' Ss, 0\2 coM V� d o" es. �G i m °o s 1P CIO Historic Residential Property Survey Phase II Study Area 0 Buildings 1960 and Older (232) Buildings Year = 0 (61) N� 0 Building Year is NULL (21) N 7 �4 m� July 23, 2010 w a kv N Ln Clq - CY) ( (INVI(R)OM ac ONM,: :\ � \ C� LO Cd � ƒ c) Q) C'4 ;� C� C�Lo IT n 0 Chapter 2.72 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Sections: 2.72.010 Created. 2.72.020 Composition, terms of office and rules. 2.72.030 Repealed. 2.72.040 Repealed. 2.72.045 Repealed. 2.72.050 Repealed. 2.72.060 Authority and functions. 2.72.065 Register of historic places. 2.72.070 Eligible property for special tax valuation. 2.72.010 Created. There is established a Port Townsend historic preservation committee, hereinafter referred to as "the committee" and "HPC." 2.72.020 Composition, terms of office and rules. Composition, terms of office, rules and other scope of work assigned by the city council shall be as provided by council resolution with the following additional provisions: A. The members of the HPC shall include but not be limited to members of history or preservation -related organizations such as historical societies, museums, heritage groups, neighborhood organizations, interested citizens, and members of civic groups involved in historical and architectural development of the city, as well as members of professional bodies such as architects, historians, attorneys, realtors, and financiers. B. All members of the committee must have demonstrated interest in and/or knowledge of the historical or architectural development of the city. C. The city council will strive to have a minimum of two members of the committee who are business or property owners in the uptown area of the National Historic Landmark District. 2.72.060 Authority and functions. A. Authority. The HPC is authorized to: 1. Serve as the local review board to exercise the functions and duties as defined and authorized pursuant to Chapter 84.26 RCW and Chapter 25-12 WAC, as now or hereafter amended; 2. Serve as the design review board to exercise the functions and duties defined and authorized pursuant to this chapter; 3. The HPC serves as a citizen advisory committee and not as a quasi-judicial decision - making body to review proposals to develop, demolish or change development within the historic district pursuant to Chapter 17.80 PTMC, and provide recommendations to the planning and community development department (PCD) to assist in city review of such projects. PCD staff and the planning commission shall consider all HPC comments and recommendations in reviewing permit applications. HPC's role in the development process is further specified in PTMC 20.01.110(C); 4. Prepare and propose revisions to design review guidelines for evaluating development proposals. Such proposed revisions shall be forwarded to PCD for review and recommendation to the planning commission and the city council. Design guidelines and any revisions forming the bases of HPC review and recommendations must be formally adopted by the city council; 5. Initiate recommendations for listing on the Port Townsend register of historic places. This official register shall be compiled of buildings, structures, sites, objects, and districts identified by the committee as having historic significance worthy of recognition by the city and encouragement of efforts by owners to maintain, rehabilitate, and preserve properties; 6. Review nominations to the Port Townsend register of historic places according to criteria in PTMC 2.72.065 and adopt standards in its rules to be used to guide this review; 7. Submit nominations to the State and National Register of Historic Places. B. Functions. In addition to the authority prescribed above, the HPC may to the extent possible and at its discretion perform the following functions: 1. Provide information to the public on incentives for preservation of historic resources; 2. Within the historic district, review and comment upon the conduct and regulation of land use, housing, development, municipal improvements and other types of planning efforts undertaken by any agency of the city, Jefferson County, the state, or federal government as they relate to historic resources of the city; 3. Make recommendations to the mayor and city council upon request on matters of city history and historic preservation; 4. Recommend design guidelines and recommend resources upon request of an owner of property within the historic district, and provide review and advice, upon the request of the director of PCD (or designee), of applications for permits, variances, environmental assessments or impact statements, and other similar approvals pertaining to identified historic resources or adjacent properties; 5. Participate in, promote and conduct public information, educational and interpretive programs pertaining to historic resources; 6. Provide information to the public and city council on methods of maintaining and rehabilitating historic properties, including the use of various federal, state, local, or private funding sources available to promote historic preservation in the city. This may take the form of pamphlets, newsletters, workshops or similar activities; 7. Establish liaison support, communication and cooperation with federal, state and other local government entities which will further historic preservation objectives, including public education, within the city area; 8. As they relate to historic resources within the historic district, review and comment to the planning commission and city council on land use, housing, redevelopment, municipal improvement and other types of planning and programs undertaken by any agency of the city, other neighboring communities, the county, the state or federal governments; 9. Officially recognize excellence in the rehabilitation of historic buildings, structures, sites and districts, and new construction in historic areas, and encourage appropriate measures for such recognition; 10. Such other functions as directed by the mayor or city council. 2.72.065 Register of historic places. A. Criteria for Determining Designation in the Register. Any building, structure, site, object may be designated for inclusion in the Port Townsend register if it is significantly associated with the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or cultural heritage of the community, has historical integrity, is at least 50 years old, or is of a lesser age and has exceptional importance, and if it falls in at least one of the following categories: 1. If associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state, or local history; 2. Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style, or method of design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; 3. Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder, or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art; 4. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; 5. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state or local history; 6. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, important archaeological information; 7. Is a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event; 8. Is a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site associated with that person; 9. Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events, or cultural patterns; 10. Is a reconstructed building that has been executed in an historically accurate manner on the original site; 11. Is a creative and unique example of folk architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical categories. B. Process for Designating Properties to the Register. 1. Any person may nominate a building, structure, site, or object for inclusion in the Port Townsend register. Members of the historic preservation committee or the committee as a whole may generate nominations. In its designation decision, the committee shall consider the Port Townsend historic inventory and the city comprehensive plan. All nominations must be accompanied by a written statement of consent, signed by the property owner, stating their willingness to have their property listed in the Port Townsend, State, and/or National Register; 2. In the case of individual properties, the designation shall include all features which contribute to its designation; 3. The historic preservation committee shall consider the merits of the nomination, according to the criteria of subsection A of this section. The public, property owner(s) and the authors of the nomination, if different, and lessees, if any, shall be notified of the potential listing by posting of the property 10 calendar days prior to HPC review of the nomination; 4. Properties listed on the Port Townsend register of historic places shall be depicted on the official zoning records with an "HR" (for historic register) designation. This designation shall not change or modify the underlying zone designation. C. Removal of Properties from the Register. In the event that any property is no longer deemed appropriate for designation to the Port Townsend register of historic places, the HPC or property owner may initiate removal of such designation by the same procedure as provided for in establishing the designation, subsection B of this section. D. Effects of Listing on the Register. 1. Listing on the Port Townsend register of historic places is an honorary designation denoting significant association with the historic, archaeological, engineering, or cultural heritage of the community; 2. Design review by HPC of local register properties shall be limited to the scope established in Chapters.l.0. and 1 7 8 0.. PTMC. E. Maintenance of the Local Register. The list of properties on the local register of historic places shall be maintained by PCD. (Ord. 3287 § 5, 2022; Ord. 2892 § 1, 2005; Ord. 2770 § 2, 2001). 2.72.070 Eligible property for special tax valuation. For the purposes of historic property tax valuation authorized as a duty of the committee under PTMC 2.72.060(A), the class of eligible property is: A. Property within the city's C-III zoning district; and B. Property listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. QUALIFIED REHABILITATION ITEMS FOR SPECIAL PROPERTY TAX VALUATION There are typical Allowable Qualified Restoration Expenses (QRE) for Special Tax Valuation. *Note: This list does not constitute guaranteed approval of QRE All items require approval by your local Historic Preservation Commission • Stabilization expenses, roof, gutters, window -door security • Debris removal • Basic electrical service • Basic plumbing service • Basic HVAC service • Historic Tax Credit evaluation/planning • Project management • Taxes • Insurance • Architectural Fees • Engineering Fees Taxes • Insurance • Construction interest • Project management • Roof, gutters • Debris removal • Security • Exterior painting and tuck pointing • Electrical upgrades • Plumbing upgrades • HVAC Services (including Geo-Thermal external components) • Lead -Hazardous materials abatement • Window and door repairs/replacement • Interior surface finishes • Built-in structural element repairs • ADA accessibility interior elements • Interior elevators (conditionally) • Fire suppression • Interior signage • Exterior attached lighting NON -ALLOWABLE Restoration Expenses • Acquisition costs • Financing Fees • Surveys, appraisals, Inspections • Landscaping • Non-attached signage • Non-attached lighting • Marketing -Advertising • New addition construction • Furniture • Non -integral cabinets (i.e., kitchen) • Kitchen appliances • Parking lot Sidewalks