Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout080624 HPC Meeting PacketAgenda Historic Preservation Committee Regular Meeting 3:00 PM, Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2024 City Council Chambers, 540 Water Street • Join in person; via computer or tablet at http://Ooinwebinar.com enter the 9 digit Webinar ID 430-090-891; or by phone (listen only) United States: +1 (415)- 655-0052 access code: 491-363-921# • Local Dial In — (360) 390-5064 access code: 491-363-921# • Submit public comment to be included in the meeting record to: https://Publiccomment.fillout.com/citvofpt 1. Roll Call: Craig Britton (Chair), Walter Galitzki (Vice Chair), Kathleen Knoblock, Monica Mader and Michael D'Alessandro. Monica MickHager (Council Liaison) 2. Approval of Minutes (None) 3. Correspondence/Attachments: A. None 4. Public Comment (for Items not on the Agenda): 5. Old Business: A. None 6. New Business: A. A.1- HPC24-014, 1406 Garfield St. - Departure for Location of a New Accessory Structure on site with a Primary Historic Residence. Owner: Susan Bone O'Brian and John O'Brian Agent: Guy Hupy, Guy Hupy Design Applicable Guidelines: • Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitation, particularly Guideline No. 9: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. • Local Guidelines Departure for new accessory building location - PTMC 17.30.159C Exhibits: A.1 - Application and submitted Materials Applicant and Staff Presentation Public Comment (3-minute limit per person) B. HPC24-024, 1404 Lawrence St. — Departures for Principal Facade alteration and New Addition location onto a Secondary Historic Residence (i.e., a new covered front porch entry) Owner: James and Lani Brennon Agent: Guy Hupy Design Applicable Guidelines: • Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitation (PTMC 17.30.160A(1)), particularly Guideline No. 9: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. • Local Guidelines Departures for alteration to a Principal Facade and the location standards for New Additions - PTMC 17.30.158A(1) and A(2) Exhibits: A.1- Application and submitted Materials Applicant and Staff Presentation Public Comment (3-minute limit per person) C. HPC24-025, 955 Water St. New rooftop deck, revised railing, other facade alterations Rep: Trent McKnight, G. Little Construction Applicable Guidelines: Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitation (PTMC 17.30.160A(1)), particularly Guideline No. 9: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. • Local Guidelines for Exterior Colors - PTMC 17.30.160A(5) Exhibits: A.1 - Application and submitted Materials Applicant and Staff Presentation Public Comment (3-minute limit per person) HPC Questions and, if appropriate, Deliberation and Recommendation 7. Other Business: A. 2024 Workplan continued effort to: 1. Review of available draft Guidelines; 2. Phases II and III Introduction of historic residential inventory. 3. Consider Special Meeting date (late August?) to focus on 2024 Workplan items 8. Upcoming Meeting(s): A. Next Regular Meeting scheduled for Sept TBD due to Labor Day Holiday 9. Adjournment: City Po of rgy 250 Madison Street, Suite 3 Port Townsend, WA 98368 1 360.379.5095 1 www.cityofpt,us '� ,%� Townsend PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Historic Preservation Committee Administrative Design Review .... .-,. •e1-1_--- lI_ _ w1_i:_-_1 1 1 .....-1...,......-1, n;-.4 ;-4- All applicants and property owners must sign the application below to signify agreement with the proposed application. The Applicant(s) hereby certifies that all of the above statements and information contained in any exhibits, plot plans, or other transmittals made herewith are true and provide an accurate presentation of the proposed project. The applicant(,) acknowledges that any action taken by the City of Port Townsend based in whole or in part on this application may be reversed if it develops that any such statement or other information contained herein is false. The undersigned hereby saves and holds the City of Port Townsend harmless from any and all causes of action, judgments, claims, or demands, or from any liability of any nature arising fi-om any noncompliance with any restrictive covenants, plat restrictions, deed restrictions, or other restrictions which may have been established by parties other than the City of Port Townsend. ME Property Owner (if different from applicant) Date� ....__m......-...._._......� Date OVER RECEIvFC GITy OF FAO%D D Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) Administrative Design Review Basic Submittal Requirements * 1. One 1 copy of the followin • Completed and signed Design Review application form. • Site plan showing proposed project location. # Design plan on paper no larger than 1 Ix17: ➢ dimensioned floor plans showing addition or proposed change colors, with actual color chips exterior elevation(s) showing addition or proposed change • $57.50 (cash or check made out to the City of Port Townsend) 2. Alter submittal. • If needed, PCD staff will let you know what further information is needed to obtain approval for the project. • Please do not begin your project until other City permits that may be applicable to your project, such as building permits and sign permits, are issued. 1 5 CITY OF PORTTOWNSEND LSD * To see if your project can be administratively approved, please consult PCD staff. Rev. 1 /24 August 1, 2024 We are requesting a departure for B-2 under PTMC 17.30.159: "Location of proposed accessory structures". Departure Approval Criteria: C-1: The proposed ADU was designed to be in keeping with the historical home and the neighborhood. Because the existing lot is a double lot, the ADU has been placed with as much distance as possible from the historic home, maintaining required setbacks— in this case, the ADU has been placed 16 feet from existing home. Required setbacks from existing home are only 10 feet, but we have increased to 16ft to further minimize view blockage of historical facade. Because this property has two lots, we could redraw our lot lines and then build a larger, two- story home only 10 feet from the existing historic home. This would be allowed under the city codes, however, this type of building would block much of the historic home. We prefer to have a smaller footprint, with lower -angled hip roof, placed 16 feet from historic home in order to preserve the view of the historical facade. This planning and placement is very much in line with what the city codes desire. If we are required to place the ADU 10 feet back from the existing facade, the ADU can have no private back yard, only a very public front yard, which is significantly less desirable for any person living there. In addition, the proposed placement of ADU gives greatest privacy to all parties and minimizes blocking view from historic home. Because we are on a corner lot, our beautiful Victorian home has lots of exposure and can be appreciated from many angles. In addition, the most decorated sides of our home are on Van Buren St and Garfield St. The side of the house next to the proposed ADU has minimal detail and a non -original add -on (ugly!) concrete chimney. What is the intent of the code for corner primary historic buildings if they are have the same restrictions as a mid -block historic building? C-2: Proposed departure is consistent with existing land use patterns— eg: dwelling units were built with front facade even with each other. C-3: This departure has no negative impact on any existing and permitted uses in this zoning district C-4: There is no threat to public health, safety or general welfare in allowing this departure. C-5: This proposed departure is minor in nature and would not be granting any special privilege. Thank you for your careful consideration of this departure proposal and the uniqueness of this situation. Sincerely, Susan and John O'Brien 360-531-1795 and 360-531-2430 ME Vl RPCEIVED F PORTTOWNSEND DSD to > ar -T7 LJ� I c Ll L-1 LI J-11 ...... ✓ el kl. - — ------- - u 74 . .. . ........ LLJ r"e) LU rj) U-' > C) . ... .... ... ...... ..... . ........ . . .. ........ C—) 1A A - I 0r a, I L�ll 14 0 -41 .......... . . . . ...... -- — ----------- — -- . ....... . .......... ......... rU. HC-,27 HC-27 ... a k Fjuorl J•ER � "�a'r"trJ f,`�' f'�p.ti t»e� : , .. A . , , . w , .. m µ , CADKuN�'�« �PNct'c F7t_ b �..a"C'S u t •1.:� boa NORTH ARROW �` � z m z V �.C��1��`S`ri.. �0`\� �Q,.%C�� C►� • Qt�1 P'�C.C�J . QCG1�4�r� • rt ,�-w,�...,�».L"`�dk��'_��x. w w F7 m x a w Cu•Y.• .,.......� F . +•ter L-Y .«•,w.. ..•«++•• , .3--• m n.••r••-i a1•+..r , .-•.rF r ..rr.r .rlr.i iw.uY...i L.....�. C f'ti�a wey ,awn x� 4'tiM .m,,�mm „ �xwx�wxxzw,�zxxx.�,.�:, .,. +w•aa,�w � a �«.w�xw,� m w x X., :-4 .. VNI. z w « w m m �.••.la.a`i�..p.®,.:x,xx'v,w.. OD m �� A ��, ,, r x m w a �- a , w, x m a • m �EGEIVED m x, �APP a r1 : T> 's•.- 1"All" • w ..... ...•..�...a_.r . �,,. .�. a �..�x ¢GkC ...... w t,.«w. m ,LJ... .rs � ._._._ , ." «�, , � x x � w x FT 5T « : « SCALE; 1 SQUARE FT SITE DESCRIPTION ON -SITE STORMWATER LEGEND PLAN CHECK LEGAL 2.50 Madison Street, SWte 3 1 Port Townsend, WA 99369 360-479.5095 J wws.VAtVUfptus City.ffort T umsetl DEVELOPMENT ':j�ERVICES Historic Prga(zarwnfinn DnrnMittpp- Administrative Design Review Of Proposals Within the National Historic Landmark District APPLICATION#: BLD.-2Z- HPC: Applicant Name: J) PJ,"'I, C. i� -�-' 1"� "f,j IVN a r") Mailing Address: L /� "-v'J �5C:511111177 .................. Day Phone: 9O 41" Architect/Designer/Representative: e"e ( q Mailing Address: Day Phone: 1 15 Project Street Address: Legal Description. Parcel Number: 'Z 0 2- Property Owner Name if different from, Applicant): Day Phone: Project Description more Vace on back): [J 0 All applicants and property owners must sign the application below to signify agreement with the proposed application. The Applicant(s) hereby certyies that all of the above statements and information contained in any exhibits, plotplans, or other transmittals made herewith are true and provide an accurate presentation of the proposed project. The applicant(s) acknowledges that any action taken by the City of Port Townsend bayed in whole or in part on this application may be reversed ifit develops that any such statement or other information contained herein is false. The undersigned hereby saves and holds the City of Port Townsend harmless from any and all causes of action,, udgments, claims, or demands, orfi-om any liability ofany nature arising from any noncompliance with any restrictive covenants, plat restrictions, deed restrictions, or other restrictions which may have been established by parties other than the City of Port Townsend. A Applicant �p -Zb-24 Date Property Owner (if different from applicant) Date OVER 71 W.� 4-36W FOR ELEC. EASEMENT SEE AYX 6202M PP*!.-1!--:,',,,-,-, GARDEN Ln m 'o - ✓ CONC. DRrVE LAWN -18,6-- rl-) S7777r ...... 1440 LA WREN ST- WOOD FPME HOUSE, 2-STORY EXI-ST. JRe-s. LAWN SHRUBS ALOW PROPERTYLINE .-o fc 14 I OIL C/o Pt LAWN L ------------ I r-ol., I 10-0 DECID, ION DECO 5" CONC - 0 GRASS WATER MEM SWALE ASP, o V, 11 , �a 4" o ('- k« Y, K, u C. PA C? < 0 1 2 to < Vi X -2 tA X, tn 2 2 '106 X vi \j uj u I City5 Ma" "rn Street, Suite � Port Townsend, WA 9' - p 1360.379.5095 � www.c1tyofpt.us or Townsend PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPM5W Historic Preservation Committee Administrative Design -Review All applicants and property owners must sign the application below to signify agreement with the proposed application. The Applicant(s) hereby certifies that all of the above statements and information contained in any exhibits, plot plans, or other transmittals made herewith are true and provide an accurate presentation of the proposed project. The applicant(s) acknowledges that any action taken by the City of Port Townsend based in whole or in part on this application may be reversed if it develops that any such statement or other information contained herein is false. The undersigned hereby saves and holds the City of Port Townsend harmless from any and all causes of action, judgments, claims, or demands, or from any liability of any nature arising from any noncompliance with any restrictive covenants, plat restrictions, deed restrictions, or other restrictions which may have been established by parties other than the City of Port Townsend. I1 qss v.14_4e 66,ee�- u.L Property Owner (if different from applicant) Date Date RECELV,�J�y/Z� �(L j[.�I.. 2 9 2024 CITY OF PORTTOWNSEND DSD OVER G. LITTLE CONS ,,,,,I,,,. R U C Ti 10 III 955 Water Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 955 Water Street Roof-Deck-Railing-misc exterior repairs Construction start date: Pending permit August 2025 The historic Custom house building was built in 1878. See History Doc 1. The primary two-story structure to the water street side that currently houses Waterfront Pizza and Lighthouse cafe will remain the same. The emphasis of work will be off the Residential space located off the second floor and over the water portion of the structure that currently houses Better Living Through Coffee. The exterior work under permit consideration relates to the following work. Where possible, we will replace like -for- like and maintain the defining character of the building. All work is focused on stabilizing and accentuating the historical character and future life of the structure. The scope of work is as follows pending inspection of exposed elements and severity of deterioration. See Photo 1 for area of work Upper deck: 1. Remove existing roof membrane, repair framing damage, insulate ceiling space, apply new sheathing as per Structural documents. 2. Install new 60 mill TPO membrane fully adhered over tapered foam. Color: slate grey SEE Spec. 1 3. Install new Bison deck pedestals and FSC Cumaru 2x2 deck panels to cover entirety of roof top. See Spec 2/Spec 3. 4. New railing to replace existing. Material like for like: See existing Railing photo 1-5. Railing to be: 44 post (hardwood Ipe or Cumaru), galvanized hog wire, 1x4 upper/lower rail, 2x6 top cap. All details as per Structural plans submitted. 5. New deck railing fascia trim. See existing photos Railing Fascia 1 &2: The new design is not like for like. The post grows to ensure the post anchors into framing and an HDU2 as per Structural S3/3B-3C. See Deck Railing Fascia trim drawing. With the longer post the old fascia detail would not cover the post and create a new and undesirable aesthetic. The new fascia detail to cover the post is being submitted for consideration while wanting to communicate that if the HPC would like to see a different option we would work to meet any design criteria. 6. Move existing vents up on the same wall. 7. New box gutters at eave above new door and across the north wall to tie into scupper -collection box and downspouts down East wall as per Structural page 5 . Gutter color upper: White Downspout lower level: Harvest Brown. See Gutter profile Spec 4 and color as per paint schedule. 8. On East wall: See History Doc 2 Picture 2/ Existing 1/Elevation new: Raise door to accommodate slope insulation and roofing. Scope: Replace existing fiberglass door with: Therma-Tru Smooth Star Full light flushed glazed S2000 see Spec 6 : Painted as per paint schedule 1210 W. SIMS WAY, PORT TOWNSEND. WA 98368 T (360) 385-1020 F (360) 385-5078 WWW.G-LITTLE.COM GLITTLIB86KZ G w LITTLE IN IR I ,oT 10 N 9. On East wall: Replace existing Marvin wood window with new window: Marvin Essential Fiberglass Double hung. See Spec. 7 color: Stone white. The proposed Fiberglass change is taking into consideration the proximity to Salt water and life of the product installed. 10. Replace any existing rot at roof fascia, frieze, cornice like for like Paint color: As per Paint Schedule 11. Replace any damage siding on the east face of structure with existing ship lap channel profile: Paint color as per paint schedule. 12. Parapet cap to be replaced with like color: grey 13. Door and window trim to match existing: Cedar 1x6 Paint color as per Paint Schedule. Thank you for your time and consideration to review our project. 1210 W. SIMS WAY, PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 T (360) 385-1020 F (360) 385-5078 WWW.G-LITTLE.COM GLITTLI886KZ :is:fo=C1 EISENBEIS WOOD BUILDING Common Names: U.S. Customs House, Lighthouse Cafe Address: 955 Water Street Old Address: 339�-341 Water Street O.T. Block 9, Lots 7 & 8 Date of construction: 1878 Builder: Charles Eisenbeis By the last half of 1878 Charles Eisenbeis had completed the two-story wood structure. December 1878: The U.S. Customs House was moved to this location, their previous site being advertised for rent. 1885: With the Customs House still at this location, the east side of the building was leased to Noland and Zen, a dry goods store. 1878-1885: The upstairs portion of the building was°being used as a boarding house. 89o: The Commercial Hotel replaced the U.S. Customs House and boarding house accommodations. The Axtell Saloon was operating on Water Street frontage as well. 1907: John Mehling moved his tailor shop to the building and also sold tobacco. A restaurant was being operated in the east half of the building. 1912: Peter Erickson was operating a shoe and harness repair shop next to Meh- lings Tailor Shop, 1915: Mehlings had been replaced by a restaurant. 930s: The Coffee CupCafe was operating at this location. 1940s: The building housed the Italian Cafe and Hampden Brown's Electric Shop. 1968: The Lighthouse Cafe has been operating at this location since 1968. JEFFERSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY 540 WATER STREET PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 WWW.JCHSMUSEUM.ORG Durable. Efficient. Proven. Features: � Accessories: GAF knows thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO). Our EverGuard° TPO membrane construction has remained unchanged for decades. It's just one of the reasons we've sold more than 6 billion square feet. EverGual TPO offers flexibility, durability, UV reflectivity, and heat - sealable properties. It's inherently fungal resistant' and flexible without using plasticizers. Available in nominal and minimum thicknesses. Competitive pricing and a 20-plus-year track record for performance make TPO the most popular option in the commercial roofing industry and specialized training from GAF Roofing It Right videos and CARE classes add to GAF'= unmatched technical support. EverGuard" TPO is suitable for all types of single -ply systems: Mechanically Attached — for a quick and cost-effective system that can be installed practically year-round. Induction Welded — can be applied without using adhesives and installed practically year round. Qualifies for the same guarantee length as an adhered system? Adhered — can be installed with EverGuard" TPO Quick Spray, EverGuard' TO Quick Spray LV50, EverGuard' TPO Low VOC Bonding Adhesive, EverGuard' TPO 3 Square Low VOC Bonding Adhesive, EverGuard"' TPO SBA 1121 Bonding Adhesive, or EverGuard" WB 181 Bonding Adhesive for the smoothest appearance. EverGuard' TPO offers the following: * Endures 2 to 2.5 times the industry standard, depending on thickness (ASTM D6878 weather resistance test) * Offers guarantees for eligible systems up to 20 years for 45 mil, 25 years for 60 mil, and 30 years for 80 mil' * Available in 12' rolls to cover more area with fewer rolls and seams Pr Allows for heat -welded seams that provide greater seam strength to taped and other seams Creates a highly reflective and emissive white roof that can help reduce cooling costsf and urban heat island effect. (white, energy tan and energy gray only) TPO Field Study: As a relatively new roof technology, TPO performance was proven mostly in lab studies. So when real -world TPO systems started approaching 20-year marks, GAF acquired and analyzed EverGuard{' TPO samples across the United States. We found 8- to 16-year-old TPO roofs to be performing well and in most instances, meeting the current ASTM D 6878-14 requirements for new membranes C3o,wl-flood the study from GAF.com. MADE IN THE U.S.A. WITH DOMESTIC AND IMPORTED MATERIALS. AMERICAN JOBS IN AMERICAN FACTORIES. Meets ASTM G21 GAF warranties and guarantees do not provide coverage against fungi or other biological growth Refer to gaf.com for more information on waaronly and guarantee coverage and restrictions Additional requirements apply Contact GAF for more information Refer to sample guaranlees, available of gat com, for complete coverage and restrictions I Energy cost savings are not guaranteed and the amount of savings may very based on climate zone, utility roles, rodiollve properties of roofing products, insulolion levels, HVAC equipmenl, efficiency and alder faclots. EverGuard"° TPO prefabricated accessories deliver consistent quality and eliminate the worry and problems often associated with field fabrication. They can also boost productivity while reducing labor. w Coated Speedtite" and Hercules" Drain — TPO-coated flange for direct hot-air welding of TPO roof membranes w Corner Curb Wrap — Four standard sizes to flash 24", 36", 48", and 60" curbs. ■ Fluted Corner — For use in flashing outside corners of base and curb flashing. ■ Inside Corner — Manufactured to accommodate inside corners of base or curb flashing. w Preformed Split Pipe Boot — Three standard sizes accommodate most pipes and conduits v Preformed Vent Boot — Accommodates most common pipes and conduits from 1" (25A mm) to 6" (152 mm) - Scupper — Heat -welds to the scupper for a strong, secure installation. a Split Pourable Sealant Pocket — Cuts to size and offers a low profile to help seal varying penetrations with less sealant * Square Tube Wrap — Tube wraps are split with overlaps to wrap around square or rectangular tubing. o T-Joint Cover Patches Conforming seal for use over T-joints in 60- and 80=mil membrane applications. rr TPO Cover Tape — Self -adhered TPO ideal for stripping -in TPO and edge metal w Universal Corner — Accommodates both inside and outside corners of base and curb ffashings. a Vent — For use in venting low -slope mechanically attached roofs. ■ Walkway Roll — Heat -welds directly to TPO membrane or installs with seam tape. Available in gray and yellow. For additional information, contact GAF Design Services at 1-877-423-7663 or designservices@gaf,com We protect what matters most EverGuard' CJTPO Smooth Membrane 45, 60, 80 mil Physical Properties (ASIM D6878) Type ASTM Test ASTM D 6878 Minimum Method TPO Nominal Thickness ASTM D751 0 039" Thickness Over Scrim ASTM 7635 0.015" Breaking Strength ASTM D751 Grab Method MD 220lbf Elongation at Break ASTM D751 15% Tear Strength ASTM D751 (8" x 8' sample) 55 lbf Brittleness Point ASTM D2137 40 °F Ozone Resistance ASTM D1149 m cracks ti 7x magnification s1.5% weight change after Properties after Heat Aging ASTM D573 8 weeks @ 275" F, No cracks @ 7x magnification Properties after Heat Aging, Total radiation @ 8400 UAWS MJ/m2 UV, no cracking Linear Dimensional Change ASTM D1204 ±1 Water Absorption ASTM D471 13% Factory Seam Strength ASTM D751 66 Ibf 10,080 kJ(m2•nm) at 340 Weather Resistance ASTM G155 No cracks @ 7x magnification EverGuard® TPO Test Values (approx.)* 45 mil 60 mil' 80 mil 0.045" (1.14 mm) 0 060" (1.52 mm) 0.080" (2.03 mm) 15.8 mil (nominal) 24.1 mil (nominal) 31.4 mil (nominal) 375 Ibf x 330 Ibf 400 Ibf x 360 Ibf 440 Ibf x 390 Ibf (559 x 492 kg/m) ,. (596 x 536 kg/m) (656 x 581 kg/m) 30% 30% 30% 90 Ibf x 120 Ibf 70 Ibf x 130 Ibf 100 Ibf x 180 Ibf (134 x 179 kg/m) (104 x 194 kg/m) (149 x 268 kg/m) 40 "F 40 °F 40 of No visible deterioration No visible deterioration No visible deterioration @ 7x magnification @ 7x magnification @ 7x magnification Pass Pass „ D 2% 0.7 115lbf (membrane failure) (171 kg/m) >20,000 kJ(m2•nm) at 340 nm Pass Pass 0.4 07/„ 1451bf (membrane failure) (216 kg/m) >25,000 kJ(m2•nm) at 340 nm Au Permeance ASTM E2178 <0 02 L/(s ' r 12) <0 02 L/(s • m2),. Note 1: Certain data is provided in MD (machine direction) x CMD (cross machine direction) formal Note 2: Values stated are approximate and subjecl to normal manufacturing variation These values are not guaranteed and are provided solely as a guide Note 3: Also available in minimum 60 mil thickness Additional PI1Icwo6 Properties ..._. Puncture Resistance FTM 101 C Not established �... >350 lb. (159 kg) >380 lb. (172 kg) Method 2031 11 11 11 Permeance ASTM E96 Nof established <0.08 Perms ... 0,08 "" .,..."......".•,��,.., ..��,�� .a�. .....�. Guarantee Up to 20 years....._.. Up to 2Perms Pass Pass 0.4% 0.7 155 Ibf (membrane failure) (231 kg/m) >25,000 kJ(m2•nm) at 340 nm <0.02 L/(s • m2) >380lb. (172 kg) <0 08 Perms Up to 30 years Sustainability Ratings/Certifications .................. ....._,. ���� _ .... "a" _._m.................. � ...•................, ..w..,,., Cool Roof Rating Council (CRRC)........m�,_.,_n __.. Initial Aged Color Rated Product Solar Thermal Solar Reflectance Solar Thermal Solar Reflectance ID# Reflectance Emittance Index Reflectance Emittance Index (ASTM C 1549) (ASTM C 1371) (ASTM E 1980) (ASTM C 1549) (ASTM C 1371) (ASTM E 1980) White 0676-0001 0.76 0.90 94 _ 0,68 0,83 81 Energy Gray 0676-0045 072 0.87 _0.89 89 0 67 0 90 82 Energy Tan 0676 0039 0.72 89 0.66 0.89 . ........ ............ 80 �.�..a LEED Information Manufacturing Location Mount Vernon, IN, New Columbia PA, Cedar City, UT. Gainesville, TX For additional information, contact GAF Design Services at 1-877-423-7663 or designservices@gaf.com We protect what matters most" EverGuard' MITPO Smooth Membrane 45, 60, 80 mil Applicable Standards/Approvals Miami Dade County rrr c Product Control Approved UL Evaluation Report UL ER1306 Ol ICC-ES Evaluation Report ESR-4676 ( Cedar City, UT only) FM Approved (Refer to FM RoofNav com Meets or exceeds the requirements of ASTM D6878. State of Florida Approved for actual assemblies) APPROVED !" accordance Classified by UL in with ANSI/UL Meets or exceeds the requirements of CRRC Rated - Can be used to comply with 2022 Title 24, Part 6, Cool Roof Requirements 790, (Refer to UL Product iQ the Texas Department of Insurance of the California Code of Regulations for actual assemblies). (White, Energy Tan, and Energy Gray only) Product Data .a........o... w..... Roll Size EverGuard® TPO 46....P.......- EverGauard" TPO 60 EverGuardm TPO 80..w 12' x 100' (3.66 x 30.5 m) 12' x 100' (3.66 x 30.5 m) 12' x 100' (3 66 x 30.5 m) 12' Roll Size 1,200 sq, ft. (111.5 sq,m) 1,200 sq, ft. (111.5 sq m) 1,200 sq. ft. (111.5 sq m) 12' Roll Weight (Average) 307 lb (139 kg) 386 lb. (175 kg) 504 lb. (228 kg) 10' x 100' (3 05 x 30.5 m) 10' x 100' (3.05 x 30.5 m) 10' x 100' (3.05 x 30.5 m) 10 Roll Size 1,000 sq ft. (92.9 sq.m) 1,000 sq, ft. (92.9 sq.m) 1,000 sq. ft. (92.9 sq.m) 10' Roll Weight (Average) 256 lb. (116 kg) 322 lb. (146 kg) 420 1b (191 kg) 8' x 100' (2.43 x 30.5 m) 8' x 100' (2 43 x 30.5 m) 8' x 100' (2.43 x 30,5 m) 8' Roll Size 800 sq. ft. (74.3 sq.m) 800 sq. ft. (74.3 sq.m) (800 sq. ft. (74.3 sq, m) 8' Roll Weight (Average) 204 lb (93 kg) 257 Ib. (117 kg) 336 lb. (152 kg) 6' x 100' (1 83 x 30.5 m) 6' x 100' (1.83 x 30.5 m) 6' x 100' (1,83 x 30.5 m) 6' Roll Size 600 sq. ft (55.7 sq.m) 600 sq. ft. (55.7 sq.m) 600 sq. ft. (55.7 sq, m) 6' Roll Weight (Average) 153 1b (70 kg) 194 lb.(88 kg) 252 b. (114 kg) 5' x 100' (1 52 x 30.5 m) 5' x 100' (1,52 x 30.5 m) 5' x 100' (1.52 x 30.5 m) 5' Roll Size 500 sq. ft. (46.5 sq m) .. 500 sq. ft. (46.5 sq.m) 500 sq. ft. (46.5 sq.m) 5' Roll Weight (Average) 128 lb. (58 kg) 162 Ib. (74 kg) 210 lb (95 kg) ProductData Cont. ......... -..... _._........... .--...,.......... A-......_.. _...,......_....._�............._ , ..................w ..........._........_-........_... White, Gray, Energy Gray, 3pi',�W (ss"a ,', Tan, Energy Tan, Desert Tan, Dark Bronze, Dark Brown, Goldenrod, Sky Blue, Regal Blue, Colors Electric Blue, Hartford Green, Patina Green, Regal Red, Terra Cotta Storage Store on pallets in a clean, dry area at temperatures below 100°F (38°C) Safety Warning Membrane rolls are heavy. Employ at least two people to position and install. N 4 For additional information, contact GAF Design Services at 1-877-423-7663 or designservices@gaf.com We protect what matters mast'" Bison FSC° Cumaru Wood Tiles Model: WTFSC-100%-CUMARU24 Model: WTFSC-100%-CUMARU48 Species: Cumaru Surface: Smooth Color: Golden Brown* ASTM E108: Class A Spread of Flame Janka Hardness Rating: 3,540 lbs. Dimensions: 23.875" x 23.875" x 1.69" ! 47.9375" x 23.875" x 1.69" Weight: 24 lbs. / 48 lbs. Weight psf: 6 psf / 6 psf Bison Continuous Kerf cut design Ison t ; uarapa vv000 i iies Model: W7FSC-100%-GARAPA24 Species: Garapa Surface: Smooth Color: Golden Brown* ASTM E108: Class A Spread of Flame Janka Hardness Rating: 1,630 lbs. Dimensions: 23.875" x 23.875" x 1.69" Weight: 24 lbs. Weight psf: 6 psf Bison Continuous Kerf cut design "Wood tile colors may differ from photos and change without notice. Bison Innovative Products 1 701 Osage Street, Unit 120, Denver CO 80204 USA 1 800-333-4234 1 www.bisonip.com Isnfpesaan I S� ViSda9d I spn, ani}eAODUI uosig 5 c N u c m tll L f0 to td .A a d a� a c O W m 4 O N O O C..0 a o 1 r0 = 41 w O �- O O O N .0 H L. CO y � c .w !0 C- O. i m O Y � .E e o v Cc y 0- p c O 'p u L C d'- 0-yr +' :3 i ..3 O� m u ro U f0 _ T3 O O O c N 0 U f0 mar E m E ro E L bA y'^ c O c.Ub m uc 4' d c O �+- -;,- m .,, G1 .c C. C. U w w w by U N Q D O A 3 n c O (ID w c N S1 E O U N O m aas CL -o c a) f° a) ®- ma-0 N 0 u ._ 0--a CL 3 s •r U vi C o •it .� R -0 a) cur a) a) cr ® y = '� 'A0 a) o a) C G. R h u ro ou 0 - •W � i a) of �- 0 a> E q u f0 aJ w c :F, co M -a `+- u c c .� 0 — a -a _ u �; o a) j°y •W 0 .m RC L L W •i 0. i G L bA I vi U��ll,�JJiJJJf INS Ii iiJIJ1(�(J1(� f� Ali 0_ F2 0_ 0 A -j to 1I'10^al I STd1SEC79d I s}:)npoad ani}enouuI uosi8 9 }l°IOnOI f SI V1SIGId n slDnr„-t Oni}enoUUI Uosl9 L f 0 (3 u It F-9 q D � DANTE PERM BY ul I VY OF PORT TOWNSEND Product Type Exterior Doors Product Line Therma-Tru Steel and Fiberglass Doors Door Configuration Single Prehung Door Handing Right Hand Outswing OD) Door Height 6/8 Door Width 3/0 Style Number 52000 Door Category Clear Glass Doors Material Fiberglass Door Texture Smooth -Star Door Thickness 1 3/4" Glass Shape Full Lite Rectangle Glass Collection Flush -Glazed Clear Glass Door Style Full Lite Flush -Glazed Glass Name Clear Lite Flush -Glazed Low-E Glass Yes Style Option Number 52000-LE Door Protection Cover Door Protection Cover Lock System Type Lock Prep Only - No Hardware Door Bore Double Bore (Lockset w/ Deadbolt) Bore Backset 2 3/8" Edge Prep Mortise (Square Corner) Deadbolt Frame Prep 1" x 2-1/4" (Standard) Jamb Species Composite Smooth Jamb Width 4 9/16" Weatherstrip Bronze Weatherstrip Exterior Trim No Brickmould Sill Bronze Composite Fixed Sill Outswing Sill Cover Sill Cover Hinge Finish Stainless Steel Hinge Type NRP Outswing Hinge Shape 5/8" Radius Add-Ons No 52000 Rough Opening 38 1/4" 81 7/16" Net Unit Size 37 1/2" 80 15/16" **VERIFY** HANDING JAMB SIZE i- r- 3/0 x 6/8 - Right Hand Outswing (1 D) - 52000-LE - Exterior Therma-Tru Single Prehung - Lead Time: *(5-7 days) - 3/0 x 6/8 Smooth -Star Full Lite Flush -Glazed Clear Lite Flush -Glazed No Grilles Low-E - Double Bore (Lockset w/ Deadbolt) 2 3/8" - Mortise (Square Corner) Edge Prep - Deadbolt Frame Prep 1" x 2-1/4" (Standard) - 4 9/16" Composite Smooth Jamb - Bronze Weatherstrip - No Brickmould - Bronze Composite Fixed Sill Outswing - Sill Cover - Stainless Steel 5/8" Radius NRP Outswing Hinges - Door Protection Cover Item Price: $956.86 Quantity: 1 Item Total: $956.86 Quote: 2324180 06/24/2024 2:31 PM Page 2 of 3 OMS Ver. 0004.09.00 (Current) Product availability and pricing subject to change. Spec LINE ITEM QUOTES The following is a schedule of the windows and doors for this project. For additional unit details, please see Line Item Quotes. Additional charges, tax or Terms and Conditions may apply. Detail pricing is per unit. MARVIN Job. Exterior CN 3050 FS 35 1/2" X 59 1/2" RO 36" X 60" Egress Information Width: 32 9/16" Height: 25 13/64" Net Clear Opening: 5.70 SgFt Performance Information LI-Factor: 0.3 Solar Heat Gain Coefficient: 0.33 Visible Light Transmittance: 0.57 Condensation Resistance: 57 CPD Number: MAR- N-332-00368-00001 Performance Grade Licensee #870 AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/ 1.5.2/A440-08 LC-PG40 901X1973 mm (35.5X77.7 in) LC-PG40 DP +40/-40 FL9430 Ebony Exterior .. ..........................., . ,........ «, ., ..., ............. 24.32 Stone White Interior Essential Double Hung, , , . , , , „ , „ „ „ „...................................... 579.12 CN 3050 Rough Opening 36" X 60" Top Sash IG - 1 Lite Low E2 w/Argon Stainless Perimeter Bar Bottom Sash IG - 1 Lite Low E2 w/Argon Stainless Perimeter Bar 2 White Sash Lock White Sash Lift Exterior Aluminum Screen ...... . . . . . . ............ . . « ........ „ .. , „ n « ... « 32.68 Ebony Surround Bright View Mesh ***Screen/Combo Ship Loose 2" Jambs Nailing Fin ***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change OMS Ver. 0004.09.00 (Current) Processed on: 7/23/2024 4:30:48 PM For product warranty information please visit, www.marvin.com/support/warranty. Orl c Lri Rt 0 4- CL U 4.5 En 0 0 .S= U CU L- 4- L- en 4-J M =3 4- M 4-J wl E u 0 4-1 W cv 0 > 0 u 0 L- uj 4- Q) u sz co 4-J ::3 X M LL- z 0 0. E 0 > 0 0 L- 4- cr- z N 0 0 r%% 0 0 0 0 U 4- u 4-J 4- Zt 4-J aW w 0 U .-J cn u :Ll 0 x m CL Ln 0 m CL c aj aj cu m 0 0 0 0 0 0 c m ci am CO co ca Cf- 0 0 fn E m z 0 O 0 0 cc Ecc cC cC cc w 0 w w w wr- 0 x x x D ir. w w -. w . "We're Hanging Around Your Neighborhood!" Since 1984 � II Ivory Dark Gray Green Wicker Tuxedo Gray Blue Clay Weathered Bronze Pacific Northwest (Washington) Call today 866-GUTTERS or visit our website at www.CRGUTTERSINC.com DISCLAIMER: Due to the limitations of desktop scanners, and the relative inconsistencies of various displays (cellphones, tablets, monitors), the colors you see on your screen may not be a accurate reproduction of the actual product. We strive to make our colors as accurate as possible, but screen images are intended as a guide only and should not be regarded as absolutely correct. Lancaster Whitewash Blanco de Lancaster K-174 Ivoire I —'isUls SH321b NOIA'1\'O:) Q� SWOONISIN 'SS3:)DN IIX3 GINVHS = g w IU —T— -- Ln Q ❑;Q w< O Q Q� Ln QC�L I uy d II I�III Y1� V w N M N ks) d N fA w ❑ ❑ L.L !R" N � LQL Z w cG Q =O Z cc O O LL Q� �❑ CG m LL Z O� O O V J O LL w d w ./] Li M M Ln Lr)N Ln � C O v' w O OO Qo Qw x w w Z u= F-- F-- Q ❑ N n 0 �wmece, J OceLn Q LLI OQ ~ LLI LLJ 'o O �o w Ln CO M N M Oz N K meO OLL O❑ Q w L V Z v Q Z 0 ❑ O ❑ LL Ln Q w w O O i3lll�i5 ,�Iivm w C) �� \\ �\ «\ � — z \ \ / � \ § °/ {k'F!AAIM \/ <5 \_ �_ =z \\ \/ � f,\ \\ /y ƒ 7 /C)D 0 \z=3 = � / LLj <7 \ \//\�< _& / ui ui cra 0 CL CC) —7s zy co .. ........ .............. ------------------------------------- - - LIIIVM Ill t J co im U., iv - ----------- . . ..... . . ............... . ---------- ---------------------------- Le --------- ---- ----- -------------- --------------- ------------ .............. .......... .... . ...... . --------- -- ..... ........ ..... .. .......... . ........... . .......... ------------- - -------- - - Ir ... .. ........ . .............. ... - ------------------------ --- - - - - - - - - ---- - - ------------ - L-PJ-IS d-11W I VI GO :72 jl rr C, n I I il ME= ..... ........... tJ fl tro U, IL V) Y co Ilk V, I I I C) v� c fr U� l A j C, . ..... . ...... 0) I I J CL X 'k4 _� �-- �y, � `� V -11 m NOLVATH Hinos aHsododd C� wa m I I c� z a m c� z w w� w 1 U I m zo - o �, zwo _. � m � I - zou ti z m Ocn - UO o - - z-O - - - wa m� Q o III. � - w m-i wo Ic' _I -,Z l 9-,6Z „6- w = o o o � 0 m a 0 o w m U s � m s m Q m o z z z 0 c� o Q J o � m m ¢ o I o z 0 o a I ❑s Q m 0 0 w � m a z � O o f/ a 13391S 9IiVM 996b c � w a w o� w o CO c9 w co U� o � Q 0 0 W d U O JCO Z O � � Z CD w O O o n O O CID O � � O w o z CL Q w O O 0 N m �z � o o zo�oz _ o m zoc�� w owU � wd z m } o m w Q m w w � < z z r a mo m Q z o J o w a yQ o Q m o � mw Q m o w �zmU o yo 0 IyI zQ m m o o s Q o w N o m m o o �w w 'w c o oam 0 zsw wv> w m mo d m w iri Qm w omen m mwz O U�(n � � w w O m U l w J CJ � Q w Li W o Q � 0 w o m z r o N z w m o m o z Q o� z w o m o m zwc� ocoo z z w 0 0 o Isom m woo ow o�� mono m�az x rnm mm> mom z v� Ql�m calm r m 9 N W rl 0 �tyys ��GJ Of 3 ao I �/^ o� NOUVAII3 Hinos _ IJ m na O - ¢ O - o w (5 U� N 0 z o 0 z z z 0 Q � Y S S ¢ I LJ U) - o @G z x .�� 0 w z �S c� � w 0r cl w z ow � - o w v a f� z o x V O O � N wo Q @J J S S W O m w S w V O w M o O C�wOz O>w m o w � m� t U I`ri w Li 1 t p 91 9 owwin m Z � o m 3 x o m 3w zw �m x dU w ¢ w w w w S¢ o S�- wd�v�w w m m z wioz S �'m wo w Q 90 „0-,8 ©8-,S W „L „0-1 „b t2l z o\ z w w+ w N � m ¢ m � O w O g d w Cn X� 00 ID J W 9l 9l OID w W ¢ O S Z¢ �iQ-j O O � X S U U W r � O LiJ o �.0 © ww mF- w m N w a z = o CD L-1 @jLI w O O o oz o o O 5 � w= � o z � U II a U ' (n A m 3000 O w S w Q m O z w w w S w w O�'-' z S S W w Q 0 S Q w d O 2 iN U D i�0 D U U O S O Q z w N 3 w w U Q O m 0 � O Z O= O d ? w m m z - w O z s U z O m d � D m � o m z w Q w 0� �m< C, Q \ a � Z O W J o W S w J w co J s m w o w o 0 o x o f �c� J Q oN Da zo W O CD 0 EL w m�z m Swc�o z o o Q II ¢ az=mow uiQ X QW CD0 0 Q wo0 QQo 2J v�� Z Q- o r7 a =w0 D o 0 Q co wa,� J I�f 00w Dcwi] O d -1 F T T -1 C-C z O � U O QO to x z w O U C� Ow Q? \ w w w w O z Q d W � Q V «6 S Z Q V w S S W T T I I� Ir II y/ - � ,y— ------- / N N NOLVAII l Hinos o � - O - � m O� rn-GSCJ N —�— ZX3 F--F7 lx9—f-7 ZZlx9 X3 x z N x w Z l',r F B�9-M3N Z Zl 18lS M3N g o\ XI o� ZIx F $19 gM3N lx9 X3 hJ a ZIxI,, 9 B19 MIN '�' Z1 „i x,� F alg MIN JS, x e c tfi�nnaN z i 3 o a z III m z Q o w �Q x w aoo.� w Zlxe XN Z lx a F 8z9 M3N o w ` S x„t o\ `9 z "' Z l x T F 8l9 MIN F 8z9 M Z lx9 3 y Zlx9 X3 9� Zlx9 X3 Zlx e II 919 MIN S Zl ff19 MIN o Zlx' E 019 MIN iI �I flrl j it-- avaas Lolava9dn IanFn3 z 9NIV38 av3as � o Iava9dn IanFnl 9NR1H30 z Oozwoz �oQw — �'ocl >a i C] ��o�w a U W Nw 0 4 ti - �oo141 ��0 z �'' s w cD v� d S N « Q 3 pp ❑_ Ln Z Rz:- © SN - ZS ¢ O ¢ Q z W U U Z O O O w U z CD- z 0 o o 0 N ww CD o o co ao � z w C7 o ao o o —= z o a �' o a � a m m — w N w o O w U O iw o O w CDo O o Z Z W O Z Q Z pi Q E� N c� u z Q z C? U U .. a � o +• o �� .� o � a1 O w z z w w w Y z niv � w s JO Z z w iN� O � aw z O - S CD CL ��ow W ww U W w cn O o 0 o J W W W W a o o W W ~ W w o O o¢¢ ¢a O- _w w o Q w m w O a O ro a m QY �� 91 X w w � ¢ Z ~ W W Q O cityof port° Townsen Planning and Community Development Department 250 Madison, Suite 3 Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-5095 Fax 360-344-4619 Purpose These Design Guidelines are established for the following purposes: 1. To supplement land use regulations which encourage and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend. 2. To provide guidance to urban design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality throughout the City. 3. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications as part of the City's Historic Design Review process. 4. To provide for administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) of exterior lighting proposals that are subject to Historic Design Review and which comply with guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. Introduction Within Port Townsend's National Landmark Historic District (NHLD), the appropriate use of external lighting for non-residential buildings and private open areas (such as parking lots) is important to maintaining overall character. Historically, lighting was only provided at a building's main entry using lamp oil or kerosene. Today, the uses put to buildings often require more than one entrance (or exit) be lit using electricity. The use of subdued lighting in street level storefronts is preferable to having them dark during evening hours, especially during months where darkness arrives earlier. With modern lighting technology constantly evolving, the range of fixture types, color spectrum, and bulb intensity only continues to broaden. Good exterior lighting is good for business; however, excessive lighting can easily degrade pedestrian experience and the historical milieu of the town. Safely, well -lit buildings can benefit and enhance architecture; yet, nighttime views of the sky and stars are valued by residents and visitors as well. The goals of these guidelines are to describe exterior lighting use that is both appropriate and fosters an inviting, nighttime atmosphere without creating unnecessary glare and light pollution, and provides lighting that is compatible with the historic character of Port Townsend. Review Process 1. Consistent with PTMC 17.30.050, Historic Design Review requests for all non-residential exterior lighting that are consistent with these guidelines may be (reviewed administratively by DSD staff, and either determined to be exempt from design review, or reviewed as a Type I -A permit application, with a decision made by the DSD Director via a Certificate of Review. The determination of either exempt, or a Type 1 A permit, will depend upon individual circumstances of the application, including site conditions, compatibility of light fixtures with a specific building, and similar factors. Guidelines A. Objective. All exterior commercial lighting, including that used to illuminate signs and parking areas, shall be designed to reduce glare impacts to adjacent properties and public rights -of -way, to use energy efficiently, and to reduce nighttime "light pollution." 1. An exterior lighting plan, that includes specification sheets for each type of fixture proposed, shall be included with all Historic Design Review applications where new or revised lighting would be installed. 2. a. All exterior lighting, including that to illuminate signs, shall be pointed downward and shielded from direct observation from the air, adjacent properties, and public rights -of -way. Lighting "spillover" to adjacent properties shall be minimized. Lamps shall use recessed or flat lenses. Light fixtures shall be "full cutoff' fixtures as defined by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. b. Alternative. If use of fixtures which do not meet the "full cutoff' definition are proposed, other fixtures may be used if it is determined by the DSD director that no significant light pollution or trespass will result and if the maximum initial lumens generated by each fixture does not exceed 1,500 lumens in total (approximately equivalent to an 18-watt LED lamp, 18-watt compact fluorescent or 100-watt incandescent bulb). 3. Color Temperature: Historically, exterior lighting associated with buildings in Port Townsend was provided by oil or gas, or by incandescent light bulbs. The color temperature of these types of lighting did not typically exceed 2700K, so the light had a yellowish tint. To maintain this historic nighttime look, new exterior fixtures shall generally use lamps with a maximum color temperature of 2700K. If an LED fixture that otherwise meets these guidelines is only available with 3000K or higher color temp lamps, 3000K may be approved through the Type 1-A permit application process. Commented [JM11: Staff would suggest amended language which allows for issuance of a waiver from Design Review if new lighting is consistent with these guidelines. New street lights shall comply with this guideline, and replacement ofexisting street light lamps, whether maintained by the City or by the PUD, shall comply with this guideline. 4. Lighting in exterior canopies shall be recessed so that the lens does not drop below the k-ve4 bottom edge of the canopy. S. Except at Memorial Field, exterior light poles shall not exceed a height of 17 feet above grade, including the base. G. When lighting is used for security, it will be reviewed as a Type I -A permit application. Security lighting ionot allowed tostay oncontinuously. Depending oncircumstances, this can be accomplished through the use of light sensors, motion sensors, apd�� timers, � +ea64e4orother similar devices, subject tnapproval. 7. Exterior lighting shall belimited tonighttime business hours only. Lighting shall be located near the activity needing illumination. Walkways, entrances, and parking areas may be lit during nighttime business hours, but such lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety. Lighting inparking lots should beofuniform intensity, since the eye cannot easily adapt to areas of darkness and brightness in proximity to one another. D. Buildings shall not be outlined with neon or other lighting, except lighting that ispart of the Port Townsend Main Street seasonal building lighting program. The use ofstorefront window lighting that conforms with these guidelines (directed downward, does not spill outward, etc.)i,encouraged. o. If, once installed, lighting is found to be performing in violation of these standards, the City may require the business owner to take corrective action to bring the lighting into compliance. y.Lighting shall bemaintained tumeet these standards atall times. zU. Nighttime lighting of the American flag is exempt from the provisions of this chapter, except that such lighting shall not provide direct glare to neighboring properties or traffic. Examples Unshi Ided . ................................................. Sfiilded "Unshielded" does not meet these guidelines "Shielded" typically does meet these guidelines Examples of exterior fixtures that are shielded and compatible with the historic character of Port Townsend. Fixtures similar to these will most likely meet the guidelines: qq Iu ��pp �I'^V Ihl4 mo 111yof port�����1po� Townsen Planning and Community Development Department 250 Madison, Suite 3 Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-5095 Fax 360-344-4619 Purpose These Design Guidelines are established for the following purposes: To supplement land use regulations which encourage and promote public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend. 2. To provide guidance for design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality and historical character throughout the City. 3. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications. 4. To provide for administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) of routine windew solar device permit applications that satisfy guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. Introduction Across the nation, there is a rapidly growing trend toward retrofitting homes to be more energy efficient. These efforts have seen solar panels and other solar devices, such as radiant water heaters, becoming increasingly popular as the use of alternative energy sources become more readily available to the general public. When planning the installation of solar panels, the overall objective is to preserve character - defining features and historic fabric while accommodating the need for solar access to the greatest extent possible. All solar panel installations must be considered on a case by case basis recognizing that the best option will depend on the characteristics of the property under consideration. For purposes of these guidelines, the term "solar devices" shall include solar panels, solar water heaters, photovoltaic shingles, and any other installation that uses solar energy for mechanical or electrical purposes. Review Process 1. All solar device installations on historic residences designated as Secondary contributing structures shall be reviewed administratively by DSD staff with a decision made by the DSD Director. 2. Except where the guidelines below provide for administrative review, solar device installations on all other structures subject to PTMC 17.30 (i.e. Pivotal and Primary residences; all other commercial, public, religious and maritime trade buildings within the historic overlay district; other structures determined by DSD to be historic that lie outside the historic overlay district) shall be subject to Type I -A review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) with a final decision made by the DSD Director in a formal Certificate of Review. Guidelines Installation of a solar device on a historic building is permitted only after other locations on the subject property, such as an accessory outbuilding (whether historic or non - historic), have been investigated and determined infeasible. 2. Where possible, solar devices shall be installed in a compatible location on the site or on a non -historic building or addition where it will have minimal impact on the historic building and its site. 3. Solar device(s) shall be installed on a historic building so that it is not visible or only minimally visible from the public right of way. For example, on a flat roof set solar panels back to take advantage of a parapet or other roof feature to screen solar panels from view; or on a secondary slope of a roof, out of view from the adjoining public rights -of -way. 4. On pitched roofs, solar roof devices shall be installed 4ei--A flat or parallel to the roof to reduce visibility. 5. Solar device installations on the flat roofs of brick commercial buildings within the historic overlay district shall be reviewed administratively by the DSD Director. In these cases, solar devices may be installed at no more that 40' so long as the applicant demonstrates that doing so will not cause the installation to be visible from the adjoining rights -of -way. 6. Freestanding or detached on -site solar devices shall be installed in locations that minimize visibility from the public right of way.. and from neighboring properties. These systems shall be screened from the public right of way with materials elsewhere in the district such as fencing or vegetation of suitable scale for the district and setting. Placement and design shall not detract from the historic character of the site or destroy historic landscape materials. G„P4-d r^+i^9 t the , 6494i4' 4G f ee,9fGR64Rg S^l^r -d„,,;,-e 2 7. Solar device frame work and mounting systems shall be of a non -reflective color, such as an anodized finish, that is compatible in color to established roof materials. Mechanical equipment associated with the solar device system shall be treated as unobtrusive as possible. Trees in city right-of-way shall be preserved consistent with City code and not be topped or removed to improve solar access to a property. 3 City of Port Townsend Methodology, Scoring System, Design Guidelines and Departures for Historic Residences Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 1 of 15 ok VORr To►Y U` Purpose These Design Guidelines for Historic Residences are established for the following purposes: To provide reference to the Historic Residential Inventory Methodology and Scoring System used to differentiate between contributing and non-contributing historic residences. 2. To provide guidance to historic residential design decisions that will promote development of high environmental and visual quality throughout the City. To assist applicants in the preparation of development applications. 4. To provide for staff level only administrative review by the Development Services Department (DSD) for routine permit applications, including departure requests, that satisfy guidelines adopted by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and the City Council. Introduction The City of Port Townsend's National Historic Landmark District (NHLD) was established in 1976 and includes commercial, residential and institutional structures. Residential properties within the district, totaling approximately 700 structures, were not previously subject to local historic design review for proposed alternations, additions or demolition. In response to several partial or complete demolitions of residential properties in the NHLD in the summer of 2008, interim design review regulations were established while permanent controls could be adopted. As it was unclear the degree to which historic residential structures had been altered since the 1976 survey, a new inventory to distinguish between "Contributing" and "Non -Contributing" historic residences was conducted in the summer of 2009. While the focus of this effort was on residences within the NHLD, the Methodology and Scoring System developed for the survey was designed so it can be applied to residential properties both within and outside the NHLD. Structures found to be "Contributing" in the 2009 Inventory were differentiated into three (3) tiers of significance — Pivotal, Primary and Secondary. Definitions for each tier are as follows: • Pivotal - buildings which were the landmarks of the district, hallmarks of architectural or historical distinction their own merits, these buildings are eligible for National Register listing. These buildings strongly define the character of the district through strong examples of architectural styles, craftsmanship, exterior detailing and have retained their integrity. Other qualities such as the designeribuilding or historical significance because of the association with a prominent person or persons or a historic event may also be considered. July 12, 2010 Design Guidelines for Historic ,Residences Exhibit 8 to Ordinance 3037 Page 2 of 15 • Primary - buildings which have strong architectural or historical qualities and which maintain good integrity but which may not be individually eligible for National Register listing. Primary buildings have, to a lesser extent than pivotal buildings, strong character defining features but generally lack the level of architectural detailing, style and craftsmanship exhibited in pivotal building. • Secondary - buildings which have moderate historical or architectural qualities and which have maintained good (but not perfect) integrity. Secondary buildings first and foremast contribute the character of the district particularly in terms of scale and massing, but lack the architectural detailing and styling of pivotal and primary buildings and may have been constructed or altered after the period of significance for the district (1870-1920). The complete Methodology and Scoring System is attached as Exhibit A to these Historic Residential Design Guidelines. It sets forth the details on which elements of a residence were being scored, how scoring of these elements was assigned and the number of points needed by a residence to achieve a particular tier. The Methodology and Scoring System also resulted in a checklist, or scoring sheet, that was used to catalog each residence surveyed in the 2009 Historic Residential Inventory. The complete collection of these scoring sheets is on file electronically with the Development Services Department and was adopted by reference into municipal code via Ordinance 3037. Review Process A. Unless exempted by PTMC 17.30.020, no development or improvement regulated by PTMC 17.30 may be initiated without design review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and issuance of a certificate of approval by the DSD Director, except, as provided below, minor residential alterations can be administratively reviewed and approved by the DSD Director without HPC review and recommendation. L. Minor Alterations. Minor alterations that are administratively approved include: a. Repairs or restoration of historic features or elements. b. Changes in roofing material. c. Replacement in kind (or substantially in kind) of windows using the same or similar sash and pane configuration, including use of compatible substitute materials. d. New railings. e. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations. f Fences. g. Garages and outbuildings. h. New additions less than 300 square feet in size on non -primary facades Nothing prevents the DSD Director from obtaining HPC recommendation on a proposed minor alteration, and/or working with HPC to establish guidelines to implement applications for minor alterations. B. Review of any alteration proposed to Secondary residential structures, with the exception of demolition or partial demolition, may be performed administratively by the DSD Director without consultation and recommendation by the HPC. July 12, 2010 2 Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 3 of 15 Design Guidelines In its review of residential development designated or eligible to be designated on the Port Townsend list of historic places occurring within the historic overlay district, the HPC and the DSD Director shall apply the following design standards in addition to those set forth in PTMC 17.30.140. The standards shall only apply to the work or alteration for which a permit is sought, and shall not be applied to require an owner to change or restore other existing conditions or improvements to meet these standards. Sample illustrations of additions to historic residences are contained in Exhibit B to these Guidelines. A. General Standards. 1. Principal facades. The principal historic facade(s) of residential development shall be preserved. A principal facade shall be defined as a facade that fronts on any adjacent public right-of-way (not including alleys). Minor alterations that do not adversely affect the integrity of the principal facade may be permitted, provided that the proponent can demonstrate that the minor alteration is necessary to accommodate the continued viable use of the residence. Examples of allowable minor alterations include: accommodations to meet life/safety requirements, the use of new materials when historic materials are no longer available, are structurally impractical and/or are energy inefficient, provided that the new materials match the historic use closely. Functional adaptation of identified historic principal facades may be permitted provided that the adaptation is the minimum and least obtrusive necessary and still meets the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings" (1995), including any amendments, to accommodate continued use. 2. New Additions. a. To preserve the character and integrity of principal historic facades, any proposed additions to a historic residence shall be located to the rear or side of the subject property consistent with the following requirements: b. Proposed side additions shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the building line of the principal historic facade(s). c. In the case of historic residences that are located on corner lots that have two principal historic facades, additions shall only be permitted on the side containing a non - principal historic fagade(s). d. Additions that expand the residence by increasing the vertical height of the structure shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the building line of the principal historic faoade(s). e. Additions shall be harmonious with the design of the historic residence, shall clearly be of their own period and shall not be imitative of the original historic design. f Proposed additions shall be secondary design elements that are supportive of the integrity of the original historic residence. 3. Accessory structures. a. Accessory structures such as garages, ADU's or other similar structures shall be located to the rear or side of the subject property consistent with the following requirements: July 12, 2010 Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 4 of 15 b. Proposed accessory structures shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the building line of the principal historic fagade(s). c. In the case of historic residences that are located on corner lots that have two principal historic facades, accessory structures shall be permitted on the side containing a principal historic facade, provided that their proposed location minimizes view blockage of the historic facade from the adjacent public right-of-way. B. Specific Standards - Pivotal Residences. In its review of alterations to residences designated or eligible to be designated as Pivotal, the HPC and the DSD Director shall apply the following design standards in addition to those set forth in PTMC 17.30.140 and PTMC 17.30.158(A). 1. Exterior additions or modifications to Pivotal structures shall be designed in a manner that maintains and not destroy the pre-existing elements that characterize the building's historic integrity. 2. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 3. The present height of the existing structure shall remain intact. Any additions or modifications would not exceed the roof line of the original structure. 4. Compatible materials that respect the visual appearance of the existing structure shall be used. 5. Patterns and orientation of door and window openings represented in the existing structure shall be respected. 5. Additions and new construction shall be located to conceal them to the extent possible from the street level view from the adjacent right of way. For corner lots, the additions and new construction shall be located to make them as unobtrusive as possible from the view from the adjacent right of way, and preserve to the maximum extent possible the principal facade. 7. The present roof pitches of the existing structure shall be maintained where such element is visible from the adjacent right of way. 8. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 9. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. July 12, 2010 4 Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit 8 to Ordinance 3037 Page 5 of 15 C. Specific Standards - Primary Residences. In its review of alterations to residences designated or eligible to be designated as Primary, the HPC and the DSD Director shall apply the following design standards in addition to those set forth in PTMC 17.30.140, and in PTMC 17.30.158(A). 1. Exterior additions or modifications to Primary structures shall be designed in a manner that maintains the pre-existing characteristics that contribute to the buildings historic integrity. These characteristic include the massing, scale, height and architectural features of the structure. 2. Exterior additions or modifications may be permitted to the side or rear of the building, provided that the scale and architectural details of the principal facades are preserved. 3. Additions to Primary structures shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation and shall be subordinate and supportive elements to the pre-existing structure. 4. Additions and new construction shall be located to make them as unobtrusive as possible from the view from the adjacent right of way. D. specific Standards — Secondary Residences. In its review of alterations to residences designated or eligible to be designated as Secondary, the DSD Director shall apply the following design standards in addition to those set forth in PTMC 17.30.140 and PTMC 17.30.158(A). 1. Restoration activities that remove materials (siding, roofing, etc.) and/or features (doors, windows, etc.) that are inappropriate to the historic period in which the subject property was built are strongly encouraged. Replacement materials and/or features shall closely approximate appropriate historic design but are not required to be exact reproductions of those found on the residence at the time of initial construction. Departures A "historic residential departure" is a request by a historic home owner for relief from a particular design guideline or dimensional requirement through an alternative technique or standard not otherwise permitted by code. Departures can allow expansions/renovations of a historic home to better fit into their immediate site or neighborhood context without a significant loss of architectural integrity or neighborhood character. A. Allowable Departures Through the design review process in PTMC 17.30.159.D, departures may be allowed from the following design guidelines and/or bulk and dimensional standards: 1, Location of proposed additions; 3. Building setbacks; July 1 Z 2010 2. Location of proposed accessory structures; 4. Modulation requirements; Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit 8 to Ordinance 3037 Page 6 of 15 5. Lot coverage requirements; and, b. Daylight plane requirements. Sample illustrations of the above departures are contained in Exhibit C to these Guidelines. B. Departure Approval Criteria For a departure to be approved, an applicant must demonstrate the proposal is consistent with the following criteria: 1. The proposed departure does not significantly detract from the historic character and nature of the historic residential property for which it is proposed; 2. The proposed departure is consistent with the existing land use pattern with regard to the standard being varied; 3. The proposed departure does not interfere with or negatively impact existing and permitted uses within the zoning district it occupies; 4. The proposed departure does not constitute a threat to the public health, safety and general welfare within the city; and, 5. The proposed departure is minor in nature and would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zoning district in which the subject property is located; C. Departure Notice, Approval and Review Process For all departure requests involving Pivotal or Primary residences, review and recommendation by the HPC to the DSD Director shall be obtained consistent with PTMC 17.309.159.E(1). For all departure requests involving a Secondary residence, the DSD Director shall determine if the approval criteria have been met, and issue the certificate of review, including any modifications, conditions, or denial of approval consistent with PTMC 17.30.159.E(2). However, nothing prevents the DSD Director from requesting HPC recommendation on a Secondary residential departure request. The following departure requests are processed as Type I -A actions (administrative without notice; administrative appeal by applicant only) established in Chapter 20.01 PTMC a. Location of proposed additions; b. Location of proposed accessory structures; c, Modulation requirements; 2. The following departure requests shall be processed as Type II actions (administrative approval, with mailed and posted notice appeal by applicant or party of record to the hearing examiner), and notice shall conform to the requirements of PTMC 20.01.150. a. Building setbacks; b. Lot coverage requirements; c. Daylight plane requirements. July I Z 2010 6 Design Guidelines for Historic Residences Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 7 of 15 City of Port Townsend Historic Residential Property Inventory Methodology and Scoring System" ("2010 Inventory") Project Purpose and Need The City of Port Townsend's National Historic Landmark District (NHLD) was established in 1976 and includes commercial, residential and institutional structures. The survey of historic properties completed in 1976 established five tiers of classifications for properties within the district including: • Pivotal - buildings which were the landmarks of the district, hallmarks of architectural or historical distinction their own merits, these buildings are eligible for National Register listing. These buildings strongly define the character of the district through strong examples of architectural styles, craftsmanship, exterior detailing and have retained their integrity. Other qualities such as the designer/building or historical significance because of the association with a prominent person or persons or a historic event may also be considered. • Primary - buildings which have strong architectural or historical qualities and which maintain good integrity but which may not be individually eligible for National Register listing. Primary buildings have, to a lesser extent than pivotal buildings, strong character defining features but generally lack the level of architectural detailing, style and craftsmanship exhibited in pivotal building. Secondary - buildings which have moderate historical or architectural qualities and which have maintained good (but riot perfect) integrity. Secondary buildings first and foremast contribute the character of the district particularly in terms of scale and massing, but lack the architectural detailing and styling of pivotal and primary buildings and may have been constructed or altered after the period of significance for the district (1870-1920). • Altered Historic — buildings that are over 50 years old, but have been altered to the extent to which they have little historic or aesthetic value and do not have strong character defining features for the district. • Recent compatible — A building less than 50 years old, but that was designed and constructed such that the building is compatible with the style, scale and massing in the district. • Intrusion — new buildings built within the last 50 years that are not compatible with the style, scale and massing within the district and out therefore out of character with the district. Residential properties within the district, totaling approximately 700 structures, have not been subject to local design or historic review for proposed alternations, additions or demolition. However, interim design review regulations were established 18 months ago 1 of Exhibit 8 to Ordinance 3037 Page 8 of 15 for residential properties in the district. Therefore, it is unclear the degree to which the residential structures have been altered since the 1976 survey and the effect the alterations will effect the property classifications listed above. Despite the lack of local regulations for either design review or revision by the Historic Preservation Committee many properties appear to have been accurately restored to reflect the original historic features. In other cases structures have had unsympathetic alterations that have degraded the historic building features. A new inventory to distinguish between "Contributing" and "Non -Contributing" historic residences is the primary purpose of this effort. Structures found to be "Contributing" will be differentiated into three (3) tiers of significance — Pivotal, Primary and Secondary. When completed and adopted, the survey would assist the City in drafting new regulations to address proposed alterations and demolitions of historic residential properties. Methodology Based on the established purpose and need of the project, the methodology used to assess the historic and aesthetic value of residential properties within the district focused on the physical qualities of the buildings and the aesthetic value within the streetscape. Other factors such as the building designer/builder and historic events were deemphasized in order to provide for a timely completion of the project and to emphasize the visual contributions to the character of the neighborhood. Project Tasks • Reviewed the Jefferson County Historic Society's database of historic properties and the map generated by the 1976 National Park Service effort leading to creation of the Port Townsend NHLD. • Generated a checklist for use in evaluating and scoring the properties. The checklist and scoring system was based on the following criteria: o Building Exterior — The quality of the form, composition, detailing and ornament in part on originality, artistic merit, craftsmanship, and sensitivity to surroundings and overall visual quality. o Style — Significant as an example of a particular architectural style, type or convention o Age — Of particular age in relationship of the periods of development of buildings in the area o Continuity/Context — Contributes to the visual, historic or other environmental continuity or character of the street area. 2of5 Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 9 of 95 o Alterations — Degree of alteration done to important exterior materials and design features include the reestablishment of historic features through alteration o Reversibility — Extent to which integrity losses can be reversed, and ease or difficulty of making such corrections. • Took photos of each residential property in the district to identify key historic building features with emphasis on views from the street. Using the checklist, surveyed and scored the physical characteristics of each residential property in the district. • Produced a G1S Layer identifying the updated residential property classifications • Identified alternatives for addressing the preservation of these structures through new local regulations to include design/historic preservation review and potential restricti©ns on demolition. 3 of 5 Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 90 of 95 Survey Checklist Appendix A Methodology I. Ranking Definitions — The ratings listed below are considered on a relative basis and are not absolute ratings, but rather based on a comparison to other buildings within the landmark district. a. Excellent — An excellent rating identifies buildings in the district as exhibiting exemplary attributes within the category that are not commonly found on other buildings b. Good — A rating of good is above average for buildings within the district and the rating signifies the building shows strong attributes relative to the category c. Fair — A fair rating is average for the district and the building does not distinguish itself from other buildings in the district to any significant degree d . Poor — A poor rating is below average for the district and is reserved for buildings that are sub -standard rating relative to the underlying category 11. Alteration Definitions — The rankings that relate to alterations are more absolute than relative as they define the degree to which the alterations have negatively impacted the historic and visual integrity of the buildings and the degree to which they are reversible a. Significant Alteration - An alteration or alterations have occurred which have significant negative impact on the buildings historic and visual integrity. Examples include the removal of significant parts of the original building, major additions that significantly detract from original building integrity or unsympathetic siding b. Minor Alterations -- Alterations that have had a minor impact on the historic integrity and visual appeal of the building. Examples include unsympathetic windows, a minor addition or porch, or removal of outbuildings C. No Significant Alterations - No significant alterations have been done to the structure that affect the historic integrity or visual appeal of the structure III. Reversibility — The reversibility criteria, like those for alterations, are absolute and not based on the relative attributes amongst buildings in the district. a. Easily reversible — Alterations that can be easily reversed in terms of cost and labor. Examples include changing windows or siding or removing a minor addition b. Reversible — Alterations that are physically possible, but are more difficult in terms of cost and labor. Examples include the removal of significant additions or reconstructing exterior detailing that was previously removed damaged. 4 of 5 Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page I of 15 c. Not Reversible — Alterations that cannot be reversed in terins of cost and labor. Examples include the removal of historic sections of the home or the loss of most exterior detailing. IV. Ranking Point System a. Building Features i. Excellent — 3 Points (2 for Age) H. Good — 2 Points (1 for Age) iii. Fair — 1 Point iv. Poor — 0 Points b. Alterations i. Significant Alteration— -2 Points H. Minor Alteration — -1 Point iii. No Significant Alteration — I Points c. Reversibility i. Easily Reversible — 2 Points for Significant Alteration/1 Point for Minor ii. Reversible — 1 Point for Significant Alteration/0 Points for Minor Alteration iii. Not Reversible — 0 Points V. Property Classifications a. Pivotal — 15-18 Points b. Primary 10-14 Points c. Secondary 5-9 Points d. Non -Contributing 0-4 5 of 5 CD ca O Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 12 of 95 1 i _ I i � C I Zp I r r Q. CD ti i O 0 :. I ................................... .......................................... .... ' t 2................ ........... u....................................................................................................1...... _.-._.---•-•---•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•- - -I- I................ I uY- addition i I I Street ROW dD [0111 n ❑ Principal Facade and Addition viewed from Street ROW (Corner Propertv) m X s Cr e d V IL M 0 N 0 2 y rr 0 N Q CD 7 0 cD y Exhibit C - Sample Departures for Historic Residences 1. Location of proposed additions-, 1 ------------ -4-1 :: T ................ ................................. ......... . ................ Addition .......... Permitted by Ordinance 2. Location of proposed accessory structures; Permitted by Ordinance I F Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 13 of 15 Departure required Departure required July 12, 2010 3. Building setbacks; Permitted by Ordinance 4. Modulation requirements; Min 2' 20' Permitted by Ordinance July 12, 2010 Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 14 of 15 ........... ......................... Front porch matching neighborhood development pattern I. Departure required Departure required 6. Lot coverage requirements; Permitted by zoning 7. Daylight plane requirements. daylight plane 45 degrees property line 19 6° �I 5' side yard setback Permitted by Ordinance Exhibit B to Ordinance 3037 Page 15 of 15 Departure required daylight plane 45 degrees 30' height 1�1 E�E 19'6'Iilll!' property line 5' side yard setback Departure required July 12, 2010 wI Vsr, � l,x�,lr,)Jr � �Iri „l.t,,,, r r St �� �O�w m� 3/ f�; i ¢° m /I (it { Iti�(,II Olt�r 1 rl`9II�f t`( I 1 Center St. Cedar St. a' 2 Milo St. Tremont St QX I t rlr� 65 I m st _ P St..� I I �,> ,I t, t1 'Irr; ) Pp,: I o R i QS, - v { 65 II';li'i I' St I p Id 1 r lrJ�l%r' l� r i Ill � v v r v t N �ll�r� Ad5ti kt t l l St s c c y Ti -� KSr A, 1 r (J ste St I a ll��' �rlljilll��r� Q �r �s � S l (✓✓'l )1 F;hi I 7� 4 �\ Mdole pl + '� 1' it I Ga�edG\ °esi' Ss, 0\2 coM V� d o" es. �G i m °o s 1P CIO Historic Residential Property Survey Phase II Study Area 0 Buildings 1960 and Older (232) Buildings Year = 0 (61) N� 0 Building Year is NULL (21) N 7 �4 m� July 23, 2010 w a kv N Ln Clq - CY) ( (INVI(R)OM ac ONM,: :\ � \ C� LO Cd � ƒ c) Q) C'4 ;� C� C�Lo IT n 0