The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About062524 PRTTAB Meeting Packetlilyof TownseM. PARKS, RECREATION, TREES, & TRAILS ADVISORY BOARD Agenda June 25, 2024 1 4:30 p.m. I Virtual or In Person Meeting City Council Chambers, 540 Water Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 • Join via computer or tablet at https://zoom.us/I/95894147191?pwd=cUbxfxVisGsmfVzRTVQEI<i6YtL2egw.1 Meeting ID: 958 9414 7191 • Join by phone in listen -only mode: (253)215-8782 access code: 95894147191 • Submit public comment to be included in the meeting record to: https://Publiccomment.fillout.com/citvofpt • If you are experiencing technical difficulties, please attempt all methods listed above before reporting any issues to: clerksupport@cityofpt.us Welcome, Introduction & Call to Order - Chair Debbie Jahnke Good afternoon and welcome to this meeting of the Port Townsend Parks, Recreation, Trees & Trails Advisory Board. The role of this Board is to assist City staff and to advise the City Council on legislative matters concerning parks, recreation, trees and trails. This meeting is open to the public at the City Council Chambers, virtually via this web format, and is also being video recorded for those who could not attend the meeting today and for future reference. Given that this meeting is in virtual format, we ask that the board members raise their hands to be called on by the Chair. The public can do the same to comment during the public comment periods. We take public comment at the beginning and end of the meeting. I. Roll Call: II. Approval of Agenda/Changes to Agenda: III. Approval of Minutes: IV. Public Comment (3 minutes per person/agenda items only): V. Old Business (40 min) A. PROS Plan update — 6 year update or Comp Plan (Carrie Hite) B. Lawrence and Tyler Street (Steve) C. Tree subcommittee update — final draft tree list (Debbie, Robin, Russell, Richard) D. Landmark Tree Application Review — PW Director review criteria —Application review next meeting. VI. New Business (40 min) A. 2025 Work Plan — From Letter — See attached. i. What is the status of your work in 2024 to date (i.e., highlights, accomplishments, future milestones)? What work from this year is likely to continue into 2025? ii. What 2-3 priorities do you and your board believe are most important to consider as part of the overall City workplan and related to your purpose and role as an advisory body? iii. What has gone well this year that we should learn from or consider more broadly? iv. Are there things we should stop doing or do differently, both at strategic and operational levels? V. What else should we be considering? B. Set date and time for next meeting since there is a meeting conflict. VII. Staff update — (10 min) A. Gratitude for Bre Ganne's service B. Urban Forestry Plan Update (Robin, Michael) C. Operations - Michael D. Pool process update - Carrie Vill. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: July 23, 2024 (conflict will need to reschedule) IX. Public Comment: X. Adjourn: lilyof TownseM. PARKS, RECREATION, TREES, & TRAILS ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES May 28, 2024 1 4:30 p.m. I Virtual or In Person Meeting City Council Chambers • Join via computer or tablet at.http://*oinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 752-525-115 • Join by phone in listen -only mode: (360)390-5064 Ext. 3 access code: 699-128-175# • Submit public comment to be included in the meeting record to: https://Publiccomment.fillout.com/citvofpt • If you are experiencing technical difficulties, please attempt all methods listed above before reporting any issues to: clerksupport@cityofpt.us Welcome, Introduction & Call to Order at 4:30pm by Chair Debbie Jahnke Good afternoon and welcome to this meeting of the Port Townsend Parks, Recreation, Trees & Trails Advisory Board. The role of this Board is to assist City staff and to advise the City Council on legislative matters concerning parks, recreation, trees and trails. This meeting is open to the public at the City Council Chambers, virtually via this web format, and is also being video recorded for those who could not attend the meeting today and for future reference. Given that this meeting is in virtual format, we ask that the board members raise their hands to be called on by the Chair. The public can do the some to comment during the public comment periods. We take public comment at the beginning and end of the meeting. I. Roll Call: Pam Adams, Matt Miner, Jim Todd, Becci Kimball, Richard Hefley and Debbie Jahnke present, Russell Hill absent excused. Staff present included Steve King, Robin Hill, Carrie Hite and Michael Todd. Council liaison Monica MickHoger present. II. Approval of Agenda/Changes to Agenda: approved by consensus III. Approval of May 28, 2024 Minutes: approved by consensus IV. Public Comment (3 minutes per person/agenda items only): One comment in the packet expressed concern with development in Cappy's Trails; Steve responded - in our Comprehensive Plan process we evaluate buildable lands so we will work through that process; the 'puzzle' of Cappy's Trails deals with property rights for privately owned parcels. Our 'open space and buildable lands' subcommittee has not yet been engaged but will do so in the Comp Plan process. Becci asked if the potential Parks Foundation might be of help, Steve stated that the Jefferson Land Trust is a logical partner. A neighbor of the 12th and Hancock property, Eric Negle, spoke about concerns with the development plan for the park, advocating for quiet activities, no parking on the ROW, and other concerns including a request for a fence or hedge separating the private property from the park. Carrie confirmed that the agreement is subject to Council approval. V. Old Business (60 min) A. PROS Plan update (Carrie Hite and Michael Todd): Proposed update to PROS Plan to accomodate development of the two parks. Redline version is in packet with two concept plans; this will be going to Council on June 3. Board recommended the updated PROS Plan be forwarded to Council with Jim Todd moving, Pam Adams seconding. 1. Port Townsend Golf Park: six committee members from golf park community assembled for design discussion; Jump Playground style was chosen for inclusivity. 2. 12t" and Hancock: nature play area planned. B. Discovery Road update and possible plant substitution (Laura Parsons): Plant substitutions necessitated by lack of available stock, considerable discussion about the logistical concerns of trying to find stock at a single vendor. Richard Hefley inquired about the issues of availability and noted that nurseries must be certified, minimums on quantity for wholesale were discussed, we have a requirement for low bid, Prairie Fire or Prairie Snow cultivars were suggested if available as some issues with the proposed Red Barron were noted, Green Pillar a good choice to substitute for Zelkovas; substitution of a seeded sweet gum for the proposed seedless variety discussed, different Ceanothus variety than listed was discussed, with concern about effect of abrupt cold temperatures on drought -tolerant cultivars, Laura Parsons noted that the amount of maintenance must be considered. C. Tyler and Lawrence Street Project — planting plan update (Robin, Richard, Steve, Laura): Staff are in the process of laying out the design and a tree/shrub list for Tyler; planter size about 2x2x4 or 5ft with structural options for intact removal of plants for replanting; questions about PUD plans for future undergrounding, trees/shrubs will have to stay narrow or be pruned; six callery pears will be removed; location will gain 13 plus the ones in planters for Tyler. Lawrence planting needs to account for soil volume, rain gardens; removing three hornbeams and adding ten(?) new trees/shrubs. Monica MickHager spoke about the importance of selecting narrow trees and shrubs for the planters, like Ceanothus Victoria and rhodies. Some discussion occurred about Logerstroemia and adding wax myrtle, arborized. D. Tree subcommittee update (Robin, Debbie, Richard): Subcommittee nearly finished with the street tree list, in addition to a park and open space list and an understory list. We need to talk to the PUD to groundtruth our list. VI. New Business (20 min) A. Park Name Recommendation (Steve) - Port Townsend Golf Park - our code allows only City Council to name parks and other public facilities; the recommendation is that the Port Townsend Golf Park is the official name in the lease so Golf Park staff can use Camas Prairie Park as a dba. Board recommended with Jim Todd moving, Matt Miner seconding. B. Landmark tree nomination - Mature madrone in Sather, SW corner, 48 inches diameter; tree is on city -owned property, so Council will be asked to authorize or concur with submission, electrical wires impact the tree so staff will ask the PUD that any needed pruning will be done by City staff. Note that PW Director approves landmark submissions on private property but Council must address any submissions on public land. C. Dog Park update (Dena Odell) - Re-signing at the dog park of the most important rules to replace the current sign. Dena read them aloud for discussion. Use of non -emergency contact number to be used for most cases. Park is not for small children. No food allowed. Jim recommended contact number be at the top of the rules. Unaltered dogs are a concern and unaltered males are the cause of about 85% of attacks nationwide, so they must be closely supervised. Current veterinary guidance is to not neuter large dogs until mature, so this is a concern to address. Toys are shareable by all dogs. No digging. Rules are enforceable and codes will be cited. This must be approved by the City Manager as administrative. Becci recommended finding and posting a video on aggressive play. Two other rules about dog feces cleanup will be on small signs on the fences; the ordinance number should be quoted on the signs. Each pen will have a sign to remove any leash before entry. Staff is creating a pamphlet to hand out. Dog handlers need to be at least 16, children under 13 must be supervised. Dena also provided visuals of proposed new play equipment for dogs, including structures made of large tires or wooden cable spools. Debbie Jahnke moved, Pam Adams seconded, recommended by board. Jim suggested that we provide the work of prior board members on dog rules to staff. VII. Staff update — (10 min) A. Operations -(Michael): Staff is working on trails, both seasonals and permanent staff, volunteers are working individually on trail segments. Some discussion about reconstituting volunteer workparties for trails. B. Pool process update -(Carrie): Mountain View proposed location would require PFD funding countywide and County Commission did not support a PFD with the Mountain View location. Decision was to create another task force; two possibilities - a Sprung structure and/or a Hadlock location. It is the County Commission's decision for location. Vill. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: June 25, 2024 IX. Public Comment: none X. Adjourn: 5:49 pm 3 cityof ort TTowns en WW PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROWS PARKS 1'� I ",,J A J ll,,! 1 2 02 4 City Council David Faber Amy Howard Monica MickHager Owen Rowe Ben Thomas Aislinn Palmer Libby Wennstrom Parks, Recreation and Tree Advisory Board Deborah Jahnke Jim Todd Russel Hill Pamela Adams Matt Miner Richard Hefley Planning Commission Viki Sonntag Lois Stanford Robert Doyle Andreas Andreadis Samantha Bair Jones Neil Nelson Rick Jahnke Parks, Recreation & Community Services Department Carrie Hite, Parks Strategic Director Michael Todd, Parks and Facilities Manager Bre Ganne, Lead Operator — Parks Shawn Wiles, Operator I - Parks Lisa Titterness, Maintenance Worker - Parks Brenda Burke, Crew Chief— Facilities Terry Kurtzbein, Maintenance Facilities Chan Hettle, Maintenance Worker — Facilities Other Departments John Mauro, City Manager Jodi Adams, Finance and Administrative Services Director Rich Gould, Finance Manager Emma Bolin, Planning and Community Development Director Judy Surber, Planning Manager Consultants BERK Consulting, Inc. (prime) HBB Landscape Architecture Special Thanks A special thank you to the numerous Port Townsend community members and stakeholder agencies who provided their time and thoughtful ideas to help the City create this PROS Plan for 2024. Executive Summary i Purpose i Why Parks and Trails? i Community Engagement Themes ii Inventory and Needs iii System Plan v Pairk,s V I iraIIIs N Funding and Facilities X FiAmflng X CapO,al FadHky P. an Ah Management and Implementation Xv Plan Contents Xvi Vision & Foundation 1 Introduction and Purpose 1 Vision 2 Planning Process 3 f'ROS Plan Update 3 Relal,JoinsKp to (Xhei� Plains 3 Goals& Policies 13 Introduction 13 Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Element 13 Op(,n Spaces &. Tirafls '13 Pairks and Rec.reation — FAcflhtk"s and Pirogirairris 16 Pairks and Recreation — Adrniinistirafloin and OpeiralJoins 19 Pairks and Rf.!(,ireaton — BRI(AgEA and Funding 1,9 0�h(.�,ir Policies 20 Comprehensive Plan — Capital Facilities Element 20 Facilities & Programs Inventory 21 Introduction 21 History 21 Port I ownSE"ind liec'ir'E�,Itioin 21 Facilities 24 Pairlks 24 1'ra l I s 29 F�acHffies 31 Otheir Parks and I�eci�eatIoin 1a(J I ties :# 1 °)2 Recreation 34 Maintenance and Operations 35 Community Profile & Engagement 37 Community Profile 37 Ag(:,, 37 Households 38 DiveirsiLy -3 9 1ncorne 40 Health Survey 41 Community Engagement 43 V�sk)n Survey 44 { D 'airk FeIatures aind Pirk)irY hes 443 Vision i heiryies 48 Demand & Need Introduction 51 51 Recreation Trends 51 Wash�ingtoin State and 11eirdinsulas Reg�bin I)aiMJcJpadon Trends, 51. Nafloinal Recr'Ema[,Join INograirnirrdrig and FacflNyTireinds 52 Poft'lbwnseind IRecr(:Mfloin lNeeds 53 Participation 54 0 ty 55 Otheir Recireaboin Ilrovideirs 'iin IPorl I MAIinseind Arears 55 Future Growth and Change 58 PopukMJoin Girowbh 58 I ouirisirn I Irene s 59 Gaps and Opportunities 59 Parks 59 Tra � I s 61 Recreation 64 Benchmarks 65 Level of Service 69 Adqpled ILevel of Servk,,e 69 � a irget I OS 70 Park & Recreation System Plan 75 Parks 75 GuRfing Prin(,Jples 75 Herarchy of llarks 75 Wrflrnurn Standairds/Allowaale Features 79 Coincept [31ans 89 Special Use Facilities 100 Mlouin[laiin View Pool 1.00 [�Iorl� lownSEnnd Goff llairk lrolr Trails 102 Hkeirarchy 1,02 Walkway SyStENrn 1,03 Wirdirnurn Standairds/Allowable LJses 1,05 Programs 108 Funding and Facilities Plan 111 Operations and Capital Funding ill [fistorc and Proa ected Qperal:ions and Caph:al Revenue 1,1..I Qpeira6oins arid CapIital Revenue 1�:uindiiirig (.") ptil'o iris L3 Programs and Cost IRecnaarery 121 Capital Facility Plan 121 Implementation Strategies 127 Monitoring 127 Phasing 128 Partnership & Funding Opportunities 128 Volunteerism 128 Donations/Fund Raising 129 Asset Management 130 Roui6ine Marriteinaince 130 Deferred !\Uintleriairx;e 1]31 ACCEmSSiibiiliity 1]31 Sr,Mairdslflp and Mlauinb:ainaince Plans 1,32 Environmental Conservation 132 Community Education & Promotion 133 Plan Coordination 133 References 135 Appendix A Park System Inventory Cut Sheets Appendix B Community Engagement Results Appendix C Open Space and Other Regional Assets Appendix D Park Concept Cost Detail Exhibit 1. PROS Plan Community Outreach and Engagement Efforts Exhibit 2. Properties in a Half Mile of City, County, or State Parklands iv Exhibit 3. Park Classifications Map vi Exhibit 4. Park Classification Summary Definitions vii Exhibit 5. Bobby McGarraugh Park — Neighborhood Active Park viii Exhibit 6. Funding and Financing Options Evaluation A Exhibit 7. Summary Capital Facility Plan Expenditure Type and Schedule xiv Exhibit 8. Capital Budget and Target Level of Service — Per Capita Investment xiv Exhibit 9. PROS Plan Update Schedule 3 Exhibit 10. Park Classification Summary Definitions 26 Exhibit 11. City, County, and State Parks 27 Exhibit 12. Parks Inventory with Classification and Park Size in Acres 28 Exhibit 13. Trail Inventory Feet and Miles, 2019 29 Exhibit 14. Trails by Zone 30 Exhibit 15. Port Townsend Recreation Facilities 31 Exhibit 16. Jefferson County Parks Facilities in Port Townsend 32 Exhibit 17. Schools and Recreational Facilities 33 Exhibit 18. Combined Facility Inventory: City, State, County, Schools 33 Exhibit 19. Youth Recreation Programming Landscape in Port Townsend 34 Exhibit 20. Adult Recreation Programming Landscape in Port Townsend 35 Exhibit 21. Maintenance and Operations — Full Time and Seasonal Positions and Full -Time Equivalents 35 Exhibit 22. Age Distribution in 2010 and 2017 38 Exhibit 23. Persons Per Household 39 Exhibit 24. Household Income Shares 2010 and 2017 40 Exhibit 25. Vision & System Plan Participation Summary 43 Exhibit 26. Survey Participants: Frequency of Use 44 Exhibit 27. Top Recreation Activities 45 Exhibit 28. Survey Priorities — How would you spend $100 — All Respondents (n=589) 47 Exhibit 29. Vision Workshop: What do you want in your parks? 47 Exhibit 30. Vision Themes Exhibit 31. Top-10 Outdoor Recreation Activities for the Peninsulas Region by Rank, 2017 Exhibit 32. Top Planned Facilities and Programs by Rank, 2019 Exhibit 33. Future Port Townsend Recreation Programming Needs, All Respondents Exhibit 34. Future Port Townsend Recreation Programming Needs, Youth Respondents Exhibit 35. Participation in City of Port Townsend Recreation Programs Exhibit 36. Participation in YMCA of Jefferson County Recreation Programming Exhibit 37. Participation in Jefferson County Parks and Recreation Programming Exhibit 38. Population Growth and Growth Target Exhibit 39. Population Growth Rates Exhibit 40. Properties in a Half Mile of City, County, or State Parklands Exhibit 41. Potential Loop Trail Exhibit 42. Better Use of Parks and Trails Exhibit 43. Community Engagement Trail Improvement Requests Exhibit 44. Peer Communities Reviewed Exhibit 45. Total Acres per 1,000 Population Exhibit 46. Trail Miles per 1,000 Population Exhibit 47. Facility Benchmarking Exhibit 48. Maintenance and Operations Expenditures per Acre of Managed Sites Exhibit 49. Operating Expenses per Capita 2019 Exhibit 50. LOS Evaluation: Comprehensive Plan 7.6 Acres per 1,000 Population Exhibit 51. Investment Per Capita 2019 Exhibit 52. Future Investment 2019-2036 Exhibit 53. Example Agency Annual Capital Investments Exhibit 54. Maintenance Per Capita 2019 Exhibit 55. Park Classifications Map Exhibit 56. Park Areas of Focus/Key Features Exhibit 57. Community Parks Exhibit 58. Neighborhood Parks Exhibit 59. Downtown Parks Exhibit 60. Garden (Landscape) Parks Exhibit 61. Special Use Parks Exhibit 62. Key Features of Park Concept Plans 48 52 53 53 54 55 55 56 58 58 60 61 63 63 65 66 67 67 68 69 70 72 72 72 73 76 78 79 83 85 87 88 89 Exhibit 63. Chetzemoka Park Concept 91 Exhibit 64. Kah Tai Lagoon Park Concept 93 Exhibit 65. 35th Street Park Concept 95 Exhibit 66. Bobby McGarraugh Park Concept 97 Exhibit 67. Sather Park Concept 99 Exhibit 68. Port Townsend Loop Trail 104 Exhibit 69. Standard Detail — Multi Use Trail 106 Exhibit 70. Standard Detail — Neighborhood Connector and Undeveloped Shortcut 107 Exhibit 71. Recreation Program Cycle 109 Exhibit 72. Historic and Projected Parks and Recreation Revenues, 2009 to 2036 (Nominal$) 112 Exhibit 73. Historic and Projected Parks and Recreation Cost Recovery, 2009 to 2036 (Nominal$) 113 Exhibit 74. Maximum Levy Amount, 2021-2024 (Nominal $) 115 Exhibit 75. Funding and Financing Options Evaluation 119 Exhibit 76. Maintenance Objective: Deferred Maintenance and Capital Replacement 123 Exhibit 77. Investment per Capita Objective: New Investments at Existing Parks 124 Exhibit 78. Equitable Access and Distribution Objective: Fill Gaps in Parks and Trails Network 125 Exhibit 79. Summary Capital Facility Plan Expenditure Type and Schedule 125 Exhibit 80. Capital Budget and Target Level of Service — Per Capita Investment 126 Exhibit 81. Potential Monitoring Measures and Targets 127 Exhibit 82. Maintenance Appreciation —Vision Survey 130 PROS PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS PURPOSE The Port Townsend 2024 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Functional Plan (PROS Plan) guides the City's parks and recreation system. It updates and replaces the 2020 PROS Plan. Several updates have been introduced in 2024 and are within this document. The PROS Plan update is essential to maintain eligibility for Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) grants. It is also designed to meet the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA): Designate the general location and extent of land uses including recreation and open space lands; Estimate park and recreation demand for at least a ten-year period; and Identify lands useful for recreation, including wildlife habitat, trails, and connection of critical areas; Develop a capital facilities plan (CFP) identifying funds necessary to implement the plan for at least a six -year period. I Ids IlIft )S Ilan supports 11fi C,oi"Ir'uprdeir'nr!pilve Main VuaHkwi to cirea te: ap coir nlrTMi nity wilq h a seIruse of rniistoiry ap In d Ip 11 ax e C I rc� . � .pa . �p.�'.° that plrll/G,Ws IIha IrnapbB.pll' p ,ueil';a:nrll a g;Irea t plla ap to Iliive The goals and objectives in this PROS Plan reflect those in the Comprehensive Plan. WHY PARKS AND TRAILS? Parks and trails are essential to Port Townsend's quality of life, and provide opportunities for: Living a healthy active lifestyle, Connecting with families and the community at park spaces and events, Supporting the local economy and tourism, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Connecting with nature, Conserving fish and wildlife habitat including water quality and wildlife corridors, and Providing tree canopy contributing positively to air quality and mitigating climate change. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT THEMES The PROS Plan Update is based on public outreach and engagement to help define a new vision, needs, and actions. The City provided extensive public input opportunities identified in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1. PROS Plan Community Outreach and Engagement Efforts `.outc(, ICI H�l<Consu 9.ii� Bi lY1 Engagement results revealed several Vision Themes for Port Townsend's Parks and Recreation System carried forward in the PROS Plan: Balancing aging in place and coming of age in Port Townsend Indoor and outdoor recreation for healthy lifestyles Access, navigability, and safety Green spaces Specialization, flexibility, versatility and creative partnerships March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY These PROS Plan Vision Themes are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Vision to ensure Port Townsend is great place to live, with a sense of place, that prizes its natural setting. P'Ks AND ice» INVENTORY AND NEEDS Port Townsend manages about 189.2 acres of parkland A 20111. >t:udy fbLflrid that Sea ttil I"'s paalrks and 26 properties ranging from street end retreats to extensive open spaces to active recreation areas that serve much larger areas. Port Townsend also manages over 31 miles of trails largely on unimproved rights of way. The City's parks contain a variety of facilities including playgrounds, picnic shelters and benches, paths, and special facilities such as dog parks. Carrying forward the City's Level of Service policy to provide 7.6 acres of parkland per 1,000 population about 7 acres of developed parks would be needed by 2036. Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, this measure excludes the golf park and wetland/water areas of Kah Tai Lagoon. If the golf park were broadly available for public use the deficit of acres could be reversed. While the City's overall park system largely meets the needs of the community today, and there is ample parkland provided at Fort Worden and recreation offerings syaalaarrn was worth crveir 650 rnfllllo n wwlHlii vaallll.m a:oi ntir llbu tinarns Iirncllu.uflirg :'alirract use vaa llu.ar° Arid ll'd:'6rarnaa� Iprql:panrty saallres aaaalh.ae re 1park fnrraprlirn~nuty �..kaaallth araalhie lIru: fit frraulraru 1paalrll, Irs.allaatr d tou irisrrn Iaaxlrr,ncr.upt.n lirnciveaa.an:nd llplro peirlyvalluara Crpurnllrxnralr°u ty r:;ohaarsuralru aaaallupra I anx Irea;(.ull,)1:s. lilncir a.gaad tou,ulruwarlc'u vMu e Stkalr'Irlrnawaaatr°Ir" Im allnaagerlrna`Int aaaallu e "I rust: for Pu.ulalua: II aurnd, 2011. Vaalluue lilrnciveaase to Ihurplrrnes located araria;lhulilro 1.®II500 ft:eL of Chnra faallllrrwa rig types of parks: \➢atu14r Areas„"a3.0,648 Goff IPaalrlksm : $8, 49 Sp eciaa lky Parks: $IIV 611 "7 u.a7lrlbaarn Parks: $1.,21 Active Il..liarulrug I11r�nrar�naalrchu, IlMay 2011.0 through County facilities, there are gaps in neighborhood parkland access in the west or southwest of the community. See Exhibit 2. Ensuring there is parkland in proximity to a majority of residents was highly supported in survey results. To address system gaps and needs, the Plan establishes a target level of service or objectives to provide for: Equitable Access and Distribution Function through: a Per Capita Investment in Capital Facilities, and a Per Capita or per Acre Investment in Maintenance. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS VV `S�f.. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exhibit 2. Properties in a Half Mile of City, County, or State Parklands � f f Oil l/IIIiLlli / , /i V s v r 6?r�( It now" s f ; l d d'mman", IT „_ TNT, lnpr, ✓,�j.�fY-�rl rn�,�P�'wrL'�i' `aai'+e101_n UP}w�✓. (,In'�g�1 IY fl 44 u o ` oiar'rnc': ic�ffr,,tson t`,oiuwyi ssessor, Port I rativrvsund (',15, R1,1 RK 20)(), March 2020 PORTTOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS VV, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SYSTEM PLAN Guiding principles have been established to steer the focus and the growth of the Port Townsend parks and recreation system. These principles are to work in concert with the Vision Themes and are incorporated throughout the PROS plan update to best meet the needs of the community. Address deferred maintenance and critical maintenance needs. Develop park stewardship and master plans to guide investments. Invest in existing parks to meet community desires (or demands, needs, etc.) and address expected growth. Achieve equitable access and distribution by filling in gaps in central and western Port Townsend through improved trails, partnerships, and targeted acquisitions. ��IIIII',f IIII��^ Parks are classified based on their function and service area: Community Park Neighborhood Park Downtown Park Garden Park Special Use Park Park sub -classifications include "Active" or "Nature" and are combined with Community and Neighborhood Parks. Classified parks are mapped on Exhibit 3. Summary definitions follow in Exhibit 4. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS °, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exhibit 3. Park Classifications Map S C) u t ce: I ", I 111 1< ) 019, 40 mww" -J 01w. Am a! - jq 41 4� rk 'k 12*1ftwoo, Oty B cmvnda� y w, 7, y in icalremb6ly Nut S in am, IV rtrt r?"(1, 511pqv; tjv@ Vvq It", bip Or 4qflbv� pork Clas's S,ub+yjpfe 00 0',�CTJNV IN ij P''%I [BERK Jvf,1, March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exhibit 4. Park Classification Summary Definitions Primary Classes Community Park Community Parks are larger parks providing a variety of major recreation facilities, open space, and/or recreation programming, serve multiple neighborhoods and are a generally treated as a destination for visitors. Community Parks often reflect a shared community identity and offer flexibility across recreation and programming types throughout the year. Their size and range of offerings attract visitors and neighbors who may travel from further distances and stay longer periods of time, requiring more allowance and provisions for parking, seating, restrooms and family support amenities. Sub -classes identify if the park is more Active or Nature focused. Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Parks are smaller than Community Parks and intended for frequent and convenient access to basic recreation activities and opportunities. These parks best serve nearby residents and visitors in less formal or organized recreation and leisure. Neighborhood Parks provide open space values. They are less suited for longer stays, heavily programmed activities, or larger rental or permit -required spaces. These parks prioritize open space over parking and encourage visitation through pedestrian and bike networks. Sub -classes identify if the park is more Active or Nature focused. Downtown Park Downtown Parks are located in the downtown/uptown urban core and provide plazas and urban community gathering and special event spaces, waterfront or shoreline access, art and cultural facilities, or picnic or other passive enjoyment facilities. In some instances, Downtown Parks serve the needs met by neighborhood parks for residents living in the urban core. These parks may be referenced in other Comprehensive and Subarea Plans as Urban Pocket Parks, the 2014 Classification. Garden Park Garden parks include medians, gateways, rights of way, and small greenspaces, with ornamental plantings, trees and sometimes limited amenities such as a bench or interpretive signage. They are small in size and may only provide a visual buffer or beautification enhancement to the urban or other environment that surrounds them. Special Use Park Special Use Parks are designed for specialized or single -purpose recreation activities. These purposes may include golf parks, marinas, sport complexes, community and aquatic centers, historical areas, nature centers, conservatories, amphitheaters, or other purposes. These parks typically offer a narrower range of recreation uses or amenities. This classification can be combined with others. Sub -Classes Nature This sub -classification identifies parks where the primary purposes include nature and wildlife habitat conservation, passive recreation such as trails and viewpoints, and educational and cultural appreciation elements. Intensive areas of development are limited based on the environmental characteristics of the park. Active This sub -classification identifies parks that are designed for frequent and convenient access to recreation activities and opportunities such as family activities (picnic, gathering), active recreation (play, sports, other), and passive recreation (trails, open lawn/turf, informal activity). These parks would also contribute open space and environmental values. Soui,ce: Oily cyl Izorl Iownr,end, i4f i41;, 2019 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS +>, ``, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Each park should be improved over time to achieve minimum standards or offer allowed uses to meet the needs of the community and to provide for consistent and sustainable management and maintenance. The PROS Plan includes example concept plans identifying how different parks could be improved over time; these are meant to provide broad illustrations of amenities. Master plans and stewardship plans would be prepared for parks and may differ. An example concept plan for Bobby McGarraugh Park follows. Exhibit 5. Bobby McGarraugh Park — Neighborhood Active Park r r " `,ollrce:I I141B jnd r alai ht(Jtilcc1llrc. 2011). DRAH" lanuary 2020 - - • Trail Entrance: Neighboiihood connection to hillside trails --• Native Forest: Improve plantings on slope to prevent sofil evosion -- • Fitness Area: All age fitness elernents & obstacle course --• Adventure Trail: ball, throughout the hillside with playful eleinenat inteirwoven _ `• Hillside Slide: Slide cminecting the adventure halls to She play wea With %i rnulfilAe access routes - Spray Pad: Accessible water play featLites -- Restroom: Moved to central location on site - • Rock Climbing Wall: Low climbable rock wall along hillside with connection to adventure trails - - • Adventure Play Area - - - Improved Entrance Sidewalk & wayfinddng signs to increase safe bike & pedestrain access to park ----` Picnic Area: ADA picnic shelters &tables ra+rdport.,*t Townsenr March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Typically existing parks are zoned Existing Park and Open Space (P/OS(A)). The "district has been applied to existing city, county, and state-owned parks, recreation areas, and city -owned or controlled lands which provide valuable natural and open space functions." In addition to the PROS Plan classifications and minimum standards, the City's zoning standards would apply including allowable uses, bulk, and dimensional standards. i1c)irt 1rb ln.aaalr cn Ihaas as very aadlrcnrngl Iilrichi haa�d:ua.brn d:rnnnraard wefli Ihuar 1ngg and ggananaJl Ihunaaaithn. The Insaguulraai aauulrlrauu.ulruafurhggs that e irNbra ce the d:aanabrh all )ng with the parks systrbrnn auraa as Irnuaajoir focus for everyday aar donr1d.'hr.na and r;rblrrrulrrruENrrs., C d ozrarns haeinefit flrabrnrn gdlrnrne rallse nd. a:buuldaaHe lilru umuatu.ulraalll suulrra:bubrhaglnngfs as found in the Iluda,lraag:uulu a. Ireg;aaraf1ing„ g:hnaa hba:,rhefodna of suula':Ilmu gnlrana_dllce s as nsMind n°°ya:bku, or frneand bathing, Sturfles, have Qga"IThh:arr"Ar'ra:aa:R that tIk ne salr7w".Irnd paaaa`r`Ilv6y Ilan rnrnd4ne decirea aes b bod piressnabs'«, heart rate, coin Ikon and rbg':ha;,"Ir" "sdlre s`,a hoi l II"Ilaalrnes nFnJhda';,". b7S7S,"ad':Illr"Ilgl Ilirnllr"IrIUJllrle sy"sd':a"ICVII factors, fffldl:e et A (2019) daulrnnaaruagdlrante aarudhu an subject Id poi of Inaaady 20,000 Ipaaftic;lpaints IIhnall: the increase in the nuauulhbpu_a:d:ive feet llir°uggas of good hrnanh:hn and na efliI being a s salgflnliflia:aang:iy corr6anadanag with dime aallraaunt in uua-ud:aar'aana widno aahln2aarein : aaaldffiloinaai nuce_aruruf t frrbrru active ra,r.raaaaflloin. Peak. d,braa:a� )fllons of good huaaaah:hu and n raii..hbeingg occurred at 111.2.0 Irnnlilnu,uga s por week, whuandh er as an sr nggllh� nruwrild: or raawnaaralraull shhualyda.Irrau.aligs, "" (A sh:bh.4,RJiabin of Nature and 6 ore.ug II hnuwraaday Guides and IPrrbg,raurrn.u, 2019) (frhd'Ihirt , 2.03.9( ra fl s With a history of platting beginning in 1852, a number of blocks and rights of way were planned in Port Townsend but were not developed. On the undeveloped rights -of -way the City planned and coordinated trail improvements, and volunteers established and maintained public trails that are now maintained by the City. In addition the multimodal regional Larry Scott Trail meanders at the edge of Port Townsend Bay and extends into unincorporated Jefferson County. The Community Engagement results show the public uses their trails a lot and desire better connected trails. Most want to see a loop trail and would be satisfied with either a signed route utilizing different trail types or a multi -purpose trail along with improving trail connections and amenities that would also help encourage more use of parks in Port Townsend as desired in PROS Plan survey and meeting results and community health surveys. Community input received during the 2020 PROS Plan process affirms the Community Direction Statement in the Comprehensive Plan which envisions "....a larger network of trails that lead to surrounding districts and residential neighborhoods. This loop also unites an extensive system March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS `,`,, . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY of parks and open spaces, including many environmentally sensitive areas that provide significant wildlife habitat." This vision for a potential loop trail is reflected on the Land Use Map adopted in concert with the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the P/OS(A) - Potential Park and Open Space (overlay) shown on the Land Use Map "includes areas that may have the potential to be included within a comprehensive and interconnected system of open spaces and trails. The P/OS(A) overlay appears in areas that could be valuable if maintained as open spaces, such as wooded areas, drainage corridors, and scenic vistas. These areas could accommodate multiple functions, including lower density residential development, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, and passive recreation. Three primary approaches are being considered in the development of this network: outright purchase of key properties; incentives for landowners to cluster new development in areas outside, or on the margins, of open space areas; and reductions in allowable density." Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goal 2 Policy 3.2.2 recommends zoning and subdivision code amendments to provide open space incentives including clustered developments and planned unit developments (PUDs). See Appendix C, Open Space Assets. This PROS Plan supports the implementation of Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Goal 3 to "develop a comprehensive open space and trails plan and implementation program" and the implementation of the Non -Motorized Transportation Plan that accomplishes a loop trail and many other priority connections. FUNDING AND FACILITIES F iiii iiiii iiii As public goods, City parks and recreation services are largely supported by public monies, similar to the vast majority of municipalities across Washington State. This PROS Plan includes a financial situation assessment that: Analyzes the City's historic and projected revenues and expenditures to estimate expected available resources; and Identifies the City's potential funding and partnership options, based on current policies and potential new policies, to address any anticipated future funding gaps. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS _. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Currently, the City has primarily funded its parks and recreation services through the Community Services Fund, which includes revenues from property taxes, sales taxes, utility taxes, and transfers from the General Fund. As the Community Services Fund also funds other City services, demand for resources is competitive and may be constrained in the future. To mitigate the risk of constrained resources on delivering parks and recreation services, the City should identify and pursue alternative parks and recreation funding sources. Each of the potential funding or financing sources is screened according to these criteria: Magnitude. Estimates the order of magnitude of these options. Feasibility. Estimates how realistic each option is to be used for parks and recreation revenues. Flexibility. Estimates the extent to which each option is restricted for certain purposes, or vice versa. See Exhibit 6 for a funding and financing option evaluation summary. Exhibit 6. Funding and Financing Options Evaluation Current Available Options capital only; Real Estate Excise Tax $100,000s currentlyearmarked for debt payment paths and trails; Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax $1,000S currently used for transportation projects Utility Taxes $1 00,000S politically unfeasible PropertyTaxfrom Fire capital onlyV District Annexation �� $100,000s (2012-2023; then unrestricted) Possible Future Options Grants $100,000s P„ ll:�i"��"��i11 often require matching funds March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY capital only,• Parks Impact Fees ° $10,000s Council action required Metropolitan Parks District*$1,000,00 vote required Os Parks Levy $1,000,00 vote required Os Financing Options Parks and Open Space GO $1,000,00 vote required,• Debt I" Os capital only Noler ,, "An I'lHID r.aaaald he foi, i,.ru lkilrle pulaose and (_fJp2iate a lu;+ral; g�ii ?n'Al p ai I<s rrirrf rvilahin el� l ei, r.f'o;y rai sa of (Ji y'and Ccujiit,/ I linaricirig, rahrktons sfr„, nc)t 1HVV i WE'Ili e hria aai e rruarvhi anisir s to rrafavr,r money 4:hrnuq:,h P:irne Sc'�wi'cr , 13,Ellh1, 2019, Most large funding sources require voter action. All funding opportunities involve tradeoffs between priorities (for example, transportation versus parks), political will (voter and/or Council action), and changes in flexibility as implementation of most funding mechanisms involve a reduction in funding capacity. Grants and repurposing property tax from the fire district annexation represent the two most likely funding increases for parks and recreation purposes. Either option has the possibility of significantly increasing the revenues available for parks and recreation (10% or more of parks and recreation expenditures), are existing revenue streams that could be increased, and offer some flexibility in spending. Both options have competitive processes; City capital priorities will be competing for the first three years of repurposed property tax and grant -making organizations generally solicit requests to consider multiple possible projects to be funded. The PROS Plan revenue analysis and exploration of funding opportunities helps the City implement Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Goal 6 to "Strive to adequately fund ongoing parks and recreation programming and maintenance through proactive well -planned budgeting practices, the pursuit of partnerships and the securing of grants." In addition to the exploration of funding sources, this PROS plan addresses the importance of volunteerism and donations. See the Implementation chapter. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS _; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY C I'll 'IIIII III��acflltyIIIIIIIIIIiiii In 2024, Port Townsend will implement a park capital facility plan. Agencies of similar size or system have capital facility plans ranging from $250,000 to $1.1 million dollars per year with over $800,000 the median value. To implement the Comprehensive Plan including Land Use Element Policy 6.2, a capital program is included: "Policy 6.2: Establish an ongoing six -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for parks and recreation facilities." Three types of capital facility project categories are addressed in the PROS Capital Facility Plan: maintenance, investments at existing parks, and investments for equitable access and distribution. Maintenance includes projects to address unmet capital replacement needs at existing parks. Projects that provide capacity at existing parks, allowing more persons to enjoy Port Townsend Parks include: Improvements at Kah Tai Lagoon to increase passive recreation opportunities, improve existing facilities, and conduct habitat restoration. Improvements to picnic shelters, restrooms, and repairs to slope erosion at Chetzemoka Park. Longer -term improvements across the system to improve parks consistent with concept plans or minimum classification standards. To address equitable access and distribution objectives, a series of capital improvements would address acquisition or partnerships to fill gaps in the parks and trail system. In the immediate 6- year period, the investments would be to: Fill in missing trail links to improve access to existing parks Beginning minimum improvements for 35t" Street Park serving the western portion of the city where gaps are identified, or similar lot. Post 2027 additional park acquisitions are noted for central and southwest city limits to fill other gaps. Excluding an aquatic center, which is under discussion regionally by the City, County, and YMCA, the total capital program is approximately $38.2 million. The 6-year investment is approximately $6.6 million. See Exhibit 7. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exhibit 7. Summary Capital Facility Plan Expenditure Type and Schedule 1. Maintenance $71,000 $1,294,000 2. Invest in Existing $1,069,875 $2,618,795 Parks 3.Equitable Access $600,000 $902,113 and Distribution Total $1,740,875 $5,165,070 1�,urr,e f'o[t lGrvIIsa,^iiid 20191!;4GasIg„et. V.II"'8 201.9:"' E Its' 2 11'1.9. $1,365,000 $227,500 $0 $1,365,000 $3,688,670 $614,778 $25,248,572 $28,937,242 $1,502,113 $250,352 $6,456,338 $7,958,450 $6,555,783 $1,092,630 $31,704,910 $38,260,692 On an annualized basis, if the City invests in only maintenance and existing parks in the 2020- 2026 period, the annual investment will equal about $842,278 per year. See Exhibit 8. This is similar to the median investment per capita identified in the Level of Service analysis in Chapter 5. If the City invests in equitable access and distribution as well as maintenance and existing parks over the next six years the annual investment will equal about $1,092,630 per year, at the upper end of peer communities. This would be feasible if additional funding sources are identified. Exhibit 8. Capital Budget and Target Level of Service — Per Capita Investment Port Townsend Target LOS - Per Capita $5,058,900 $843,150 See Target LOS, page 71 Investment Priority Focus 6-Year with Feasible Funds Maintenance and Existing Parks $5,053,670 $842,278 Seek feasible funds, e.g. Grants, I'D Annexation, Private, Other Add as Funds Allow Equitable Access and Distribution $1,502,113 $250,352 Where funding is more successful (e.g. Grants), or if additional funds become available, e.g. MPD, Levy, Other March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The overall capital budget at $38.2 million is greater than investment per capita enjoyed today. It serves as a 40-year level of investment if population grows at a rate assumed in the Comprehensive Plan. However, the more complete capital facilities list can be a source of proposals for grant or partnership opportunities, and the list can serve as a guide to capital proposals for future Comprehensive Plan Updates and PROS Plan Updates. MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION In addition to addressing funding and resources, this plan suggests: Setting a rate of maintenance resources as the system expands and developing an asset management program, Reviewing cost -recovery policies and evaluating programs to address community engagement results, Monitoring a set of performance measures, and over the long-term adaptively managing the system, Advancing environmental conservation, Increasing partnership and funding opportunities, Increasing the volunteer program and donations/fundraising, and Integrating the PROS plan with the Comprehensive Plan. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS _°, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLAN CONTENTS This PROS Plan is organized as follows: Vision & Foundation Goals & Policies Facilities & Programs Inventory Community Profile & Engagement Demand & Need Park & Recreation System Plan Funding and Facilities Plan Implementation Strategies References March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Port Townsend's Comprehensive Plan recommends that the City "continue to address the community's needs for active and passive recreation opportunities through the implementation of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Functional Plan."(Land Use Policy 4.1). The City's Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Functional Plan (PROS Plan) was last updated and adopted by the City Council in 2020. It is time in 2024 to reassess and adjust the plan for the future, adopting it into th Comprehensive Plan in 2025.. Parks and recreation needs and demands will continue to increase and evolve as the City grows. The provision of parks, open spaces, and recreational programs must be within the means of the residents. As in most communities in America, the ongoing challenge of funding park and recreation services forces hard choices. The overall objective of the PROS Plan is to guide the development of park and recreation facilities and programs that are responsive to the needs and interests of Port Townsend residents for the next decades. It presents a logical, consistent, and purposeful approach to managing parks and recreation services. Implementation of this PROS Plan will help preserve and enhance the quality of life and the natural beauty that make the area home to its citizens and a destination for visitors. This PROS Plan examines Port Townsend's existing park and open space system, assesses needs, identifies short- and long-term recommendations, details funding sources, and prioritizes our next steps. It reflects the goals and policies for parks, recreation, and open space set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Through implementation of the PROS Plan, Port Townsend's parks and recreation programs will be better able to provide a full range of recreational activities, park assets, facilities and strategies to implement the open space component of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, it will maintain the City's eligibility for state and federal grant funds. CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION VISION The community direction statement from the Comprehensive Plan forms the foundation of this PROS Plan. Parks and open space are a constant theme throughout the community direction statement, as illustrated in the Textbox below, reflecting an integral role in the community's identity. Residents and visitors alike enjoy parks and trails as part of their daily schedules and take advantage of the city's waterfront and beach access. Whether enjoyed in solitude or as gathering spaces, the park system of the City of Port Townsend enriches the life of the community. community with as sense of history and IIAacaan i-Ilistorlkd coin nlrnneird;liaall Ihaalilldiings, Ilaang a~ staalhallli.,lhd.d resideindz ll areas, aalnd iaa:alrlkns„ towvin squ wires, and stireets limed with tIrwadb4t groivwn Line City aarn aatlnndasp anlre of Irdbllaanudndi peirlmnaalrna°Irncen. Parks, gateways, and vwaallkwvawys as re itch wa th hnuQa'i:dalrilc4i rrnornua rnaarn'ts and puaialic aalrt. The Gi . iay °a'�rrraaa- Illrnar':a' vraa �, Frraai �„a, �alrna' aall lra�a;.a'�a�a provide shade a!alrna, habitat and Iraunlllrn�°ora;na Port '1f�ovwlrn;adiana, °a netwolrlk of gireein spaces, Open spaces offering an aapp oirtUlnity for rest, views, coin teirmnkallatioirn, and a: i njaaylrunaalrn�t of the Irnaa'tualra i ei nvlilranl nlrna int aare found throughout the City. as Ipi®ace that Ipirize s its i settling The Inaa�a.ualraall setting of tlhnin °"Key City" of t� hrn 11PenainSLalla is a accuan�a.uaa�Led with Ikaaaill&n"ngs and green spaces that combine wiaan the Ilower Uylnnplics, the Cascades, and marine vistas to create as dranrnaa�dc backdrop for an a aa.aaraanwa.ilvaa and mernorable Ifil ace. The downtown waterfront is «alrn a a�ttraad;tioirn that a:a�i`fers a u.ullaualracell, eduar.a�a:6or4, and sociaall opportunities that ranilrnkraard e the City"sw Inaatuaraall uaadwtuiing,, The Wateirwalk provides Iradadnplle as Ilpedaawtnanrn liaaatlh aalloirlg the shore of Porn 'll-ow in send Bay, tying tife ity's awlhorawllilne together fllrrarrn the Gyrnrniaic Divacovery'll-raailll to Fort Worde n State F"aarlk and INorth iihdaaad;lh. The wwraalllk coininectsr the wwwatdarflydarnt vaWh as Ilaarger Inetwvdalrlk of traaii s that Ildeaad to salrlrwualnd4i drr¢Irdits and rdHe lal nnei htnoi innnds, n � dn�also Ar'u?s an r�drwvdwyw'aarrof pagr6ns and open spaces, lincluadiing Irnaalny aalnviiraalnlrnnaann�talllly seinsA:Gve areas that IfalroOdnw algnnirficann�t willldlllife Ihabitat, a great piace to ilve 01falfanrlr'tualrnli lle s foir sradallaallrJirig, Irecir aaa'tionn, quiet, and ""nawlllranadda c"arch all dose at haannd, as aalrss faadflIIrties and events that darniNdwlh the lbody, Innlind, and nalfalilrlit. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION PLANNING PROCESS Rllf°ZOSIlllf lull iiii QIIp a° The 2014 Plan updated a 15-year-old 1999 Plan and was, therefore, an extensive revision. The 2014 Plan endeavored to integrate information about the City's extensive trails system with parks and other aspects of recreation. The 2014 Plan is superseded by the 2020 PROS Plan. The 2024 update only has a few updates but will be ready for the 2025 Comprehensive update for the City. Members of the Parks, Recreation, and Trees Advisory Board (PRTAB) reviewed the 2020 Plan during their regular monthly meetings and recommended edits and updates to the Plan. To further support the City's 2020 PROS Plan Update, the City engaged a consultant team. With added consultant resources, the City Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Department and PRTAB conducted an extensive public engagement process, evaluated demand and needs, identified facility and program improvements, and developed the PROS Plan Update. The overall phases included the following. Exhibit 9. PROS Plan Update Schedule Till! i ilia ilia �Illlh°� I IIII� o (1)1�lt°IIIII � it IIIIf Ians This PROS Plan builds on a number of past programs, plans, ordinances, and studies, and integrates interrelated concepts. The following provides a brief summary of each relevant initiative or plan. The overall context of this PROS Plan is directed by the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan recognizes the community vision and provides goals and March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION policies for parks, recreation, open space, and trails. The Land Use Map is intended to guide both public and private actions with regard to future land use. Planning specific to parks and open space should: Maintain or improve the character and livability of established neighborhoods; Protect natural resource lands and environmentally sensitive areas; Create desirable and distinctive neighborhoods based on their cultural and natural characteristics; and, Provide for a comprehensive and interconnected system of parks, open spaces and trails. The Comprehensive Plan sets a Level of Service (LOS) standard for parks as discussed further in Chapter 5. This subarea plan addresses the gateway to Port Townsend. Public and private parks and open space assets in or abutting the subarea include: Port Townsend Parkland Assets: City Entrance Park, Bishop Park, Bishop Play Park The Business Park includes a private park with public access. The park is wooded with a small pond. The Forest Corridor is a natural area along Sims Way. It has large evergreen tree stands and a thick understory. Howard's End is a wetland preserve located at the south end of Rainier Street. It has trail connections and natural areas for passive recreation. Some recommendations relevant to the parks and open space system in Port Townsend include: Forest Buffer: Continue to preserve the Forest Buffer along a portion of Upper Sims Way to preserve the "carved out of the wilderness" character and a conifer backdrop. This forested buffer is an appropriate aesthetic and urban design element for the subarea and as a sense - of -arrival into the City. Sidewalks And Trails: Continue to expand existing sidewalk and trail connectivity as the Upper Sims Way area develops. Continue to develop a safe and well-defined bike route throughout the gateway corridor. The subarea includes several trails that traverse and terminate in the subarea. There are opportunities to provide additional connections and March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS -_> CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION linkages to ensure a connected trail network that will facilitate recreational and commuter travel. Recreation and Open Space: The subarea includes multiple public parks and designated open spaces. Many of these areas can be enhanced for additional community access and enjoyment. There is opportunity to make Howard's End a recreational focus for the district by enhancing park access, signage, and trail connections. The plan calls for trail extensions through the district to complete city-wide linkages. Future district development should embrace and tie into the Forest Blocks. A particular catalyst project involves Bishop Park and a concept to extend the park south of SR 20 with a means for crossing Sims Way: "Bishop Park abuts the subarea and serves as a significant community park. This park should grow in size and extend into the city -owned property south of Sims Way. The 0.94-acre property is heavily wooded and it rests within a ravine. The City should designate this property for park use and create an improvement plan. Park development should include a means for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross Sims Way. Overall, the property should retain much of its natural vegetation and topographic features." The concept of pedestrian and bicycle crossing under Sims Way is also part of the Nonmotorized Transportation Plan, described in further detail in Chapter 6. The Shoreline Master Program (SMP) was started in Port Townsend in 1974. An extensive update, initiated in 2001 and completed in 2007, was prepared to carry out the responsibilities imposed on Port Townsend by the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58); to promote uses and development of the Port Townsend shoreline consistent with the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan while protecting and restoring environmental resources; and to promote public health, safety and general welfare by providing a guide and regulation for the future development of the shoreline resources of Port Townsend. Policies contained in the 1990 Urban Waterfront Plan (a sub -area land use and urban design plan focusing on the downtown waterfront) were incorporated into the SMP. The SMP Plan was last updated in 2018 (Ordinance 3198) and is currently undergoing a periodic review which is scheduled for adoption in June 2021. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION The 1998 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan was updated in 2011 and 2014 and an update is in progress at this writing. The Non -Motorized Transportation Plan addresses transportation for pedestrians and bicyclists through development of trails and other facilities. The main goal of the planning process is to integrate bicycle and pedestrian transportation into the City's circulation patterns. The Active Transportation Advisory Board has overseen the development of over 30 miles of trails in Port Townsend; many of those are through parks, adjacent to parks, or connecting parks and neighborhoods. The City's 1987 Comprehensive Storm Water Drainage Plan for Port Townsend established the City's municipal stormwater utility. Plan deficiencies were noted when preparing the Growth Management Plan in the early 1990s, which resulted in initiating a new 1996 Comprehensive Plan and a 1999 Stormwater Management Plan draft. Notable in the draft plan was the idea of a "natural drainage systems" approach, which included the mapping of "Critical Drainage Corridors". The draft 1999 plan was never adopted; however, the natural drainage systems approach was adopted through the 1996 Comprehensive Plan with policies and goals in both the Land Use and Utility Elements. The Critical Drainage Corridors were protected through regulatory language in the City's Critical Area Ordinance (CAO) (Port Townsend Stormwater Management Plan, 2019). The mission and vision of the 2019 update to the City's 1987 SMP are: "A fully functional, achievable, and sustainable stormwater system that is integrated into the landscape, supports envisioned growth, protects residents, and nurtures the environment." (Ordinance 3219) The Stormwater Plan notes that increased urban development can alter existing stormwater drainage patterns which can lead to new drainage problems in areas that previously were unaffected and to increased water quality issues. The retention of open spaces including City park lands has a moderating effect on the quantity and quality of stormwater run-off. Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park and Bishop Park are essential elements of the City's stormwater system while the Golf Park and 351" Street Park also play a considerable role in stormwater management. However, all designated open space tends to reduce drainage impacts. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION The Port Townsend Gateway Development Plan, adopted by Council in August 1993, provides a comprehensive blueprint for actions to improve traffic safety along the Sims Way/State Route Corridor, make the City's entrance more visually inviting, and promote the economic vitality of district businesses. The 1999 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Functional Plan identified the importance of additional open space designation and park development in commercial zones, especially along this corridor. The Quimper Wildlife Corridor Management (QWC) Plan identifies a series of wetlands and forested open space along a 3.5 mile corridor in the northwest area of the city. Spearheaded by the Jefferson Land Trust, the intent of the Plan is to preserve an undeveloped wildlife corridor of native vegetation connecting important wildlife habitat areas between Fort Worden and the Middlepoint Land Conservancy. The QWC Plan includes stewardship recommendations and information on public trails, signage and interpretive/education opportunities. City Council adopted the QWC Management Plan by Ordinance 2976 in May 2008 and sponsored the successful applications for two Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) grants (now Washington Recreation & Conservation Office [RCO]) for the Corridor. A number of plans and studies have been completed relating to Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park. The 1986, 1991 and 1999 PROS Plans contain references to a "master plan" for the park. However, this reference appears to be to a collection of documents rather than to a singular, stand-alone plan. Many of these past documents were developed with the assistance of grant funding. A 1980-81 Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) acquisition grant allowed purchase of private parcels at Kah Tai to create a nature park, and a 1983 IAC grant partially funded park development. The 1983 grant was to be funded in two phases focused on the southern uplands resulting from dredge spoils emplacement. Seattle architectural firm Bassetti/Norton/Metter/Rekevics, Seattle landscape architectural firm MacLeod Reckord, and landscape architect Jestena Boughton developed plans for site development, landscape furniture, and park construction March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ' CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION specifications. In 1985, City Council approved the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application request to dig the small lagoon as a part of park development. At the request of the Jefferson/Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission, Ornithologist Dr. Dennis Paulson reviewed the proposed development plan. He found the plan to be favorable and it was approved by the Washington Department of Ecology. Permitted plans finalized by the Army Corps of Engineers stated the designated purpose as: "Restore Wildlife Habitat." Funding for the second phase did not materialize and completion of the recommended landscape design was inhibited by ownership disputes resolved in 2013. A future phase of the park includes a wetland in the southeast corner of the park. Community volunteers continue to help care for the park and implement landscaping as envisioned by these early efforts. The Port Townsend Arts Commission prepared a Public Art Plan adopted by the City Council in 2019. The plan serves as a guide to sites for their readiness and appropriateness to site art. Each site evaluated was rated based on: Readiness of location based on current zoning and development. Viability and appropriateness for public art. Each site was then rated either as a site ready within the short-term or long-term or as not recommended. Sites can be re -visited regularly. Of 70 survey sites, the Public Art Plan identifies 26 that are suitable in the short term. Beyond the site suitability each piece of art will come with its own set of requirements around infrastructure, safety, maintenance and security. The sites in the categories were not rank ordered in the plan. Below is a list of the sites that immediately overlap with the City's park inventory: City Entrance Triangle Park III at Kearney/Sims Way itOT IIIII IIIIIII: �� Chetzemoka Park Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park Larry Scott Memorial Trail and Port Wetlands March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION 11 Mountain View Commons Port Townsend Golf Park Tyler Street Plaza ell rson County Non -Motor hred 7 rarmpor� eoation Plan Larry Scot,,t Though the majority of the County Non -Motorized Transportation Plan addresses facilities beyond the city limits, one key facility, the Larry Scott Memorial Trail, will ultimately connect Port Townsend with the Olympic Discovery Trail providing non -motorized access from Port Townsend to the Pacific Ocean through Sequim and Port Angeles. Located on the former Seattle & North Coast Railroad grade, the Trail realizes a plan envisioned by community member Larry Scott, who first sought funding for a community trail. Port Townsend owns and manages 7.07 acres at the trailhead in the Boat Haven. Jefferson County owns and manages the 7.3-mile non -motorized, multi -use Larry Scott Memorial Trail from Port Townsend Boat Haven to Milo Curry Road in the Four Corners Area of Discovery Bay. The City's Non -Motorized Transportation Plan and this Plan recognize the linear park as an important transportation and recreation link to Jefferson County. Ji,,,, CoUnl"y 17 dr?k;,,, Recreation, arW Open,,Space,?, Plan Last updated in 2015, the Jefferson County Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plan provides goals and objectives, inventory and demand and need, recommendations, and capital programming for the Jefferson County parks and recreation system. It applies to facilities inside the city limits such as North Beach County Park, Port Townsend Community Center, Memorial Field, County Courthouse Park, Fairgrounds, and the Larry Scott Trail. The Jefferson County PROS Plan actions and capital program identify improvements at these parks that help serve Port Townsend residents and visitors. In turn, this Port Townsend PROS Plan integrates the County facilities as well as State and School District facilities, in the consideration of park distribution and access and available recreation facilities. The Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) is a collaboration of Jefferson Healthcare, Jefferson County Public Health, Discovery Behavioral Healthcare, the City of Port Townsend and March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION Jefferson County. Chronic disease accounts for the top four causes of death and the top three causes of hospitalization in Jefferson County. Active living contributes to decreasing the risks of chronic diseases and the related health outcomes. Many social and environmental factors influence the exercise choices individuals make, including the built environment, knowledge, skills, social support, policies, cost, access, and safety. One of the four CHIP goals - that Jefferson County residents get the appropriate levels of physical activity - is especially relevant to this PROS Plan. Barriers to access of recreational and exercise opportunities and assets prevent citizens from benefiting from time spent outside in natural surroundings or in organized recreational activities. The CHIP collaboration seeks to identify and mitigate those barriers. The Climate Change Preparedness Plan for the North Olympic Peninsula (S. Petersen et al., September 2015) provides a Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Plan to adjust to actual or expected climate and its effects. Climate changes are anticipated to affect temperature averages and extremes, precipitation averages and extremes, sea level rise, and coastal flood elevations. This could affect all of Port Townsend's parklands with more impact to properties that lie along the waterfront. Adaptation strategies relevant to parkland includes: Enhance efforts to encourage breeding and planting of drought tolerant, resilient plant species Enhance efforts to incentivize use of native plants landscaping Promote and incentivize smart irrigation technologies Enhance water storage and groundwater recharge Encourage soft defenses for shoreline infrastructure Improve on -site stormwater management practices The Chetzemoka (cicmahan) Interpretative Trail is Port Townsend's most recent trail addition. The Trail is the result of a plan envisioned by the Port Townsend Native Connections Action Group of the Quimper Unitarian Universalist Fellowship. The plan was endorsed and assisted by the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, the Jefferson County Historical Society and the City of Port Townsend. The Trail was named for the last S'Klallam chief and dedicated on June 29, 2019. As March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 1 I VISION & FOUNDATION a part of the dedication, a totem pole was installed at the Northwest Maritime Center as a gift from the S'Klallam people to the City. See more information under Public Art in Appendix C. The Trail utilizes existing facilities including City sidewalks and trails to connect many points of tribal, geographic and historic interest in Port Townsend. The Trail comprises 18 sites that include City parks (Chetzemoka, Kah Tai or gatay), Sentinel Rock and the Kah Tai Prairie (the last remaining native prairie here) at the Golf Park; County parks at North Beach and at Memorial Field (the site of the last native village in the City, burned by European settlers in 1871); and Point Wilson in Fort Worden State Park. The intent of the Trail is to educate the public about the S'Klallam people who were well - established here since the 1400s, and their relationship with the European settlers who arrived in Port Townsend in the mid-19th century. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS INTRODUCTION This chapter includes Parks and Recreation goals and policies. Goals are aims or objectives, the desired outcome of an effort or design. Policies are the courser principles of action proposed to achieve goals. The following Goals and Policies integrate Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan goals and policies that are most relevant to this Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Functional Plan (PROS Plan). Overall, the goals and policies from the Comprehensive Plan are well developed and provide adequate guidance for parks and recreation planning. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - LAND USE ELEMENT Goal 3: Develop a comprehensive open space and trails plan and implementation program that protects the natural environment and significant cultural resources, provides passive recreation opportunities, is integrated with the nonmotorized component of the Transportation Element, and is designed to link neighborhoods with parks, significant open spaces, schools, shoreline access areas, mixed use centers and employment centers. Policy 3.1: Acquire and develop public open space and trails within the financial capabilities and level of service standards of the Capital Facilities Element. Policy 3.2: Develop and implement nonregulatory and regulatory means for acquiring and developing the open space and trails network. CH. 2 1 GOALS & POLICIES 3.2.1 During development review, encourage applicants to dedicate land for future open space and trails. 3.2.2 Amend the zoning and subdivision codes to provide incentives for open space including, but not limited to, clustered developments and planned unit developments (PUDs). 3.2.3 Acquire land for open spaces and trails through municipal or state programs, such as stormwater management and wildlife/wetland protection. 3.2.4 Apply for grants from public agencies and private foundations to acquire land for open spaces and trails. 3.2.5 Work with nonprofit groups, such as the Jefferson Land Trust, to obtain conservation easements and create incentives for open space and trails system development. 3.2.6 Use property tax deferral programs to promote the retention of valuable open space land in an undeveloped state (i.e., the Open Space Taxation Act, Chapter 84.34 RCW). 3.2.7 Explore other techniques for acquisition and development of the open space and trails network (e.g., RCO funding: utility bill donations, a community or regional bond issue, etc.). Policy 3.3: Locate trails in areas that are important to preserve as open spaces, such as wooded areas, drainage corridors, shorelines, scenic vistas, and others. Locate trails along drainage corridors when possible to do so without degrading the environmental functions and values of the area. Policy 3.4: Designate and retain wetlands, drainage corridors and other areas that provide essential habitat for priority plant or wildlife species as passive open space. Sites which the City should consider acquiring include, but are not limited to: a. Winona Wetlands; b. Howard Street Wetlands and Drainage Corridor; c. 50th Street Wetlands and Drainage Corridor; and d. Hastings/25th Street Wetlands and Drainage Corridor. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 2 1 GOALS & POLICIES Policy 3.5: Where possible, accommodate multiple functions within the open space and trails system, including stormwater management, viewpoints, protection of cultural resources, wildlife habitat, and passive recreation. Policy 3.6: Coordinate with Jefferson County to identify and designate open space corridors and trails within and between urban growth areas, as required under the GMA. 3.6.1 Integrate the open space and trails network with the Olympic Discovery Trail. 3.6.2 Support the expansion of a Quimper Peninsula wildlife and open space corridor consistent with the Quimper Wildlife Corridor Management Plan. Policy 3.7: Identify existing unopened rights of way, utility corridors and drainage corridors for use in developing the trails system. Design trails in a manner which allows the corridors to function as urban wildlife corridors. Policy 3.8: Preserve and enhance shoreline access areas consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program. Policy 3.9: Design the trails system to link neighborhoods with parks, significant open spaces, schools, cultural resources, shoreline access areas, mixed use centers, and employment centers. Abutting or nearby larger scale developments should be encouraged to provide trail connectors to the larger trails and open space network. Policy 3.10: Design trails to be accessible to people with disabilities as much as the natural characteristics (e.g., topography) of the region will allow. Policy 3.11: Develop a coordinated sign program that provides a user friendly guide to the location of trails. Policy 3.12: Consider trail linkages in the development of new government facilities, including new parks and open spaces. Policy 3.13: Prohibit the use of off -road vehicles on public trails designated in the Non - Motorized Transportation Plan. Policy 3.14: Develop and adopt standards regarding trail uses that minimize conflicts between different types of trail users (e.g., pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians). March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 2 1 GOALS & POLICIES Policy 3.15: Provide adequate funding for open space and trails network operation and maintenance. Parks arid Recreation 1 aiiiii III hill° iiiiienc F )ogr rn Goal 4: Develop park and recreation facilities, programs and opportunities that are responsive to the needs and interests of Port Townsend residents. Policy 4.1: Continue to address the community's needs for active and passive recreation opportunities through implementation of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Functional Plan. 4.1.1 Provide recreation programs that are comprehensive, enriching, and affordable for all citizens. 4.1.2 Provide a wide range of athletic facilities such as tennis courts, baseball and softball fields, gymnasiums, swimming pools, multi -purpose fields for soccer and general outdoor play, volleyball courts, and a golf park. 4.1.3 Provide a wide range of passive recreation opportunities within the parks system (e.g., nature walks, picnic areas, bird -watching, observation areas). Policy 4.2: Acquire and develop public park and recreational lands to serve the future population of the City. Policy 4.3: Pursue a variety of options for park and recreation facility acquisition and development. 4.3.1 During development review, encourage developers to dedicate land for future park and recreation facilities. 4.3.2 Apply for grants from public agencies and private foundations to acquire land and develop the City's park and recreation facilities. 4.3.3 Provide incentives that encourage developers to provide neighborhood parks which serve the residents of new developments (e.g., density bonuses, mitigation land banking, creative right-of-way use). March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 2 1 GOALS & POLICIES 4.3.4 Provide incentives that encourage developers in commercial districts to provide pocket parks, plazas, courtyards, arcades, atriums, pedestrian corridors, and through block corridors. Policy 4.4: Locate, design, construct and manage park and recreation facilities to be compatible with natural features (e.g., soils, geology, topography, and shoreline resources) and cultural resources. 4.4.1 Preserve natural features which are conducive to park and recreation functions. 4.4.2 Incorporate habitat considerations in the design and development of new park and recreation facilities. 4.4.3 Encourage the use of native plants which attract wildlife. 4.4.4 Incorporate significant cultural resources in the design and development of new park and recreation facilities and provide interpretive opportunities where appropriate. Policy 4.5: Design and manage park and recreation facilities to maximize environmental protection and provide interpretive opportunities for ecological systems and features, and cultural resources. 4.5.1: Extend maximum environmental protection in perpetuity for the exclusive open space, wildlife habitat, and passive outdoor recreation functions within Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park. Within those areas depicted on the 6(f) Boundary Map (RCO Project # 81- 043, Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) 53-00486, executed by the City on July 3, 2013 and the State Recreation and Conservation Office on June 19, 2013), Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park shall be designed and managed in accordance with the legal obligations assumed under the 1981 Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Acquisition Grant, and any grant amendments. As stated on the 6(f) Boundary Map: "All land within the boundary of the park is dedicated in perpetuity to public outdoor recreation." The contract obligations include the following (Project # 81-043A, Amendment Number 2): "The purpose of the grant was to expand the City's ownership and control around the lagoon and develop a municipal passive use park. The lagoon is a natural area associated with marsh, wetlands, and grasslands and provides nesting, feeding, and breeding habitat for birds, ducks and other wildlife. The March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ; CH. 2 1 GOALS & POLICIES area should be set aside for preservation of natural resources and open space to serve wildlife habitat and compatible passive recreation uses." The 6(f) Boundary Map, depicting the property subject to the LWCF protections, the project contract, and other key documents, are recorded at Jefferson County Auditor File No. 585012 (July 18, 2014). Policy 4.6: Design park and recreation facilities to accommodate a citizenry diverse in age, interests, income levels, and abilities. Policy 4.7: Where adverse impacts could occur, screen and buffer park and recreation facilities to protect adjacent or nearby private properties. Policy 4.8: Consider acquiring inholdings and adjacent parcels that would increase the long- term integrity and viability of the City's park and recreational lands. Policy 4.9: Broaden the use of school buildings and grounds as places for public use after school and on evenings. 4.9.1 Increase cooperative management with the Port Townsend School District through joint use agreements. 4.9.2 Joint use agreements should seek to renovate, schedule, and manage facilities for greater public use and enjoyment. Policy 4.10: Support, encourage, and provide technical assistance to neighborhood associations seeking to acquire or develop property for neighborhood parks, recreation, and open space. Policy 4.11: Work with Jefferson County to identify future park and recreational facility needs within Port Townsend and facilities within Jefferson County that will serve Port Townsend residents. Policy 4.12: Assure that maintenance and operation costs are considered in the development of City park and recreation facilities. Ensure that City park and recreation facilities incorporate design and construction features that minimize long-term operation and maintenance costs (e.g., design park restrooms to include energy efficient light fixtures and skylights). Policy 4.13: Set City-wide standards for park and recreational facility maintenance, and the unit costs to achieve those standards. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 2 1 GOALS & POLICIES Parks and m"finIIIII's IIImIIIIIon aIIII If" Opemtloulis Goal 5: Provide the support and leadership to respond effectively to the community's evolving priorities and needs. Respond and be accessible to the community by creating new policies, procedures and technologies to meet the diverse current and future needs. Policy 5.1: Deliver measurable economic benefit to the community by providing or supporting programs, special events, and facilities. Policy 5.2: Incorporate sustainable standards and best management practices into planning and design of new parks and rehabilitation of existing facilities. Policy 5.3: Keep clean and well -maintained parks and facilities, retaining a high level of appearance of landscaped sites. Policy 5A Identify, preserve and interpret Port Townsend's heritage, traditions, historic, environmental, and cultural features. Policy 5.5: Master Plan major parks and facilities through a public input process to modernize and update sites. Policy 5.6: Develop staff growth through educational classes, certification and training. P IIII+s &IidIIIIRecfc'f'f III on Bt,idget &Iid N finding Goal 6: Strive to adequately fund ongoing parks and recreation programming and maintenance through proactive well -planned budgeting practices, the pursuit of partnerships and the securing of grants. Policy 6.1: Prepare and anticipate for future staffing needs that may arise due to budget and other financial circumstances. Policy 6.2: Establish an ongoing six -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for parks and recreation facilities. Policy 6.3: Pursue local, regional, state and federal grant sources for park maintenance and development. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ", CH. 2 1 GOALS & POLICIES Policy 6.4: Develop new and additional partnership/volunteer stewardship programs utilizing local service clubs and organizations. Policy 6.5: Investigate establishing a set of impact and/or mitigation fees that fairly contribute to the construction and upgrading of parks. °GfIher IIIII' IIIII iiiiic� iiiii e s Land Use Element: Air Quality Management, Climate Mitigation & Adaptation Policy 8.8.1: Consider projected climate change impacts and adaptation strategies when investing in public projects and updating disaster preparedness plans, land use plans, and regulations. Land Use Element: Residential Lands Policy 9.8: As funding becomes available, develop neighborhood parks in higher density locations where the need is greatest. Land Use Element: Public Facilities & Utilities Policy 14.6: Locate public facilities that are intended to serve the entire community in areas conveniently accessible to City residents (e.g., community parks, schools, government offices). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT The Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element provides a level of service for Parks in two parts: 7.6 acres/1,000 population Local service standards for equitable access, distribution, and function as outlined in the City of Port Townsend Parks, Recreation and Open Space Functional Plan Chapter 5 Demand & Need evaluates the level of service retaining the Comprehensive Plan level of service while identifying an alternative standard that can be phased in as a target or goa I. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS % ? PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS INTRODUCTION This Chapter includes a history and overview of Port Townsend's recreation opportunities. It provides an inventory of City parks and trails, a summary of other agencies' facilities, and a review of recreation programs offered by the City, County, and other jurisdictions and organizations. HISTORY This section provides an overview of the City's recreation programs, including relevant history, and the City's park and open space inventory. Also included is a brief overview of public facilities owned and operated by other jurisdictions. F)art I o n s n There have been many attempts in Port Townsend's recent history to create and maintain active recreation opportunities for youth, adults, and seniors. In 1973 a recreation department was established by the Port Townsend School District in cooperation with the City of Port Townsend and Jefferson County. In 1978, Jefferson County assumed leadership of the recreation program and created a recreation division. An intergovernmental agreement existed between the City and the County to operate the recreation program including the Mountain View Swimming Pool until 1994, when the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners decided to discontinue operation of the swimming pool and other recreation programs. CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY The City of Port Townsend opted to provide its own recreation program in 1995 to address diverse community needs. In response to the number one priority in the 1991 City Park Plan community survey, a dedicated effort provided opportunities for youth and included after - school and summer enrichment camp programs. Recreation and pool operations were combined into a single division of the Public Works Department under the direction of the Public Works Director. Because of the previous involvement of other jurisdictions, recreational facilities in the City are in large part owned by either Jefferson County or the Port Townsend School District. Recreational programs were therefore offered in partnerships negotiated between the City and the facility owners. The recreation and pool programs were supported through a collaborative effort by the Port Townsend School District, community organizations, area businesses, grants, and fundraisers as well as the City budget. Many businesses contributed to the effort. The recreation program received the 1997 Association of Washington Cities Municipal Achievement Award. Recreatiori History,,,, 21st Century Much has changed since the late 1990s due to fiscal realities associated with public funding and shifting priorities. The City funded a professional evaluation of the Mountain View Pool in 2001 to consider possible pool expansion In 2003, the City encumbered general obligation bonds (Ordinance 2844) intended in part to upgrade and repair the pool but the inability to secure a long-term lease from the School District made amortization of 20-year bonds untenable. The School District considered briefly the idea of surplusing the property in 2008 and decided to consolidate elementary students onto one campus at Grant Street (now Salish Coast Elementary) in 2009, at which time the City began to manage the whole Mountain View campus, but without a long-term lease that would be necessary for grant or loan acquisition for major repairs or renovations. In 2009, the City considered what life cycle repairs were necessary and what upgrades were recommended for continued use. The City and County collaborated to fund nearly $200,000 in critically needed pool repairs and improvements in early 2013. In 2015, City voters overwhelmingly supported a $3.6M bond measure to upgrade Mountain View Commons after the School District and the City signed a long-term lease agreement. At this writing, efforts to improve access for aquatic March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS JJ CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY recreation, exercise and rehabilitation continue, with proposed partnerships under consideration between the City, County, School District, the YMCA and Jefferson Healthcare. file r eatwion: Cuu r eri Ope tryh,� ,)n The City continues to serve as a provider of indoor aquatic recreation services (e.g., Mountain View Pool). The City coordinates its parks and recreation efforts with Jefferson County and other entities. Through these combined efforts, a range of programs are offered encouraging life-long development of skills and interests for all age groups. The future of recreation programs is, however, threatened by diminishing resources as discussed further in Chapter 7. Mountain View Pool: The City continues to staff, support and maintain the only public pool in Jefferson County. The pool continues to be used extensively by schools for swimming lessons for all age groups; middle and high school competitive swim teams; Redfins youth swim club (USA Swimming); aquatic fitness/wellness classes and aqua therapy. It also provides water babies classes, lap swimming and open recreational swimming. Pool use has more than doubled in the last six years. Port Townsend Golf Course: After a robust community conversation in 2023, the City contracted operations of the Golf Course to a local nonprofit with the requirement to operate the 9 hole park and also expand use for the general community. From mini golf, disc golf, foot golf, first Sundays in the Park, this 58.9 acre piece of land will be an asset for the whole community, this will now be called the Port Townsend Golf Park. Previously, the City's 9-hole, 58.9-acre golf course had been leased by the City to a private operator since 1987. The previous lease was transferred to a new vendor in 2013 by Council Resolution 13-033. The City commissioned a study in 2019 which indicated that there is a need for considerable investment in improvements and modernization of the golf park (described in further detail under Chapter 6 Park & Recreation System Plan). The future of the facility is under review as declining revenues render upkeep and improvements problematic to fund. The current lease expired in 2023, and the City Council determined to lease it to the newly formed nonprofit to operate. The Parks, Recreation and Tree and Trails Advisory Board (PRTTAB) advises the City Council on issues related to the City's parks, open spaces, trees, trails and recreational opportunities. The Advisory Board provides review, advice, and recommendations on the implementation of the PROS Plan and other topics that are important to maintaining and expanding the City's commitment to conservation and legislation regarding the City's parks and trees. The PRTAB has oversight to City trees and helping to maintain Port Townsend's Tree City USA status as well as evaluating nominations for the City's most outstanding specimen trees to the March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS :%;.`_ CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY protective Landmark Tree status. Management of City trees is split between the Parks Department (trees in parks and along trails) and Public Works Department (street trees). FACILITIES IPA k's Port Townsend's first Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan was written in 1975 and updates occurred in 1980, 1986, 1991, 1996 (in concert with the Comprehensive Plan), 1999 2014, 2020 and 2024. Although National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) information and studies are a basis to define parks and recreational assets, no community's resources fit neatly into a single framework. Port Townsend fits perhaps even less well than most communities into a common classification scheme, as it is in the unique situation of having the 433.6 acres of Fort Worden State Park within the City limits. The City also hosts Jefferson County's physical footprint of North Beach County Park, the County Courthouse Park, the Port Townsend Community/Recreation Center and the only lighted stadium in the County, Memorial Field. As well, Port of Port Townsend facilities along the waterfront and the current Little League fields at the Jefferson County Fairgrounds are within the City footprint. As mentioned above, none of these facilities are owned by the City. Although the City contains a wealth of open space and recreational facilities, it does not maintain or control these assets. It is not cost effective or good management of limited resources to provide redundancy for these existing assets but it is prudent to consider their future and plan for the possibility of loss and prioritize the necessity of replacement for those assets deemed critical. City parks can range from street end retreats to extensive open spaces that serve much larger areas. Recent updates of NRPA and other established standards are less likely to base park designation on size and more logically on park function. The Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) includes a level of service (LOS) exercise in its most recent iteration of park grant planning documents (Manual 2, Planning Policies and Guidelines, April 2019) that recommends using a community's own guidelines for LOS. Additionally, RCO evaluates recreational assets by relative support for active recreation, by population distance from parks and trails within neighborhoods, communities and regions, and by accessibility with various modes of transport, most particularly nonmotorized transport and public modes of transport. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS :%' CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY This PROS Plan establishes an inventory of parks based on a range of types of park facilities currently existing in the City of Port Townsend: Community, Neighborhood, Downtown, Garden, and Special Use. The definitions are based broadly on the type of amenity, size and function in the landscape that is provided and have been tailored to meet the needs of this community. Exhibit 10 provides summary definitions. Exhibit 11 maps inventoried parks. A list of the parks, classifications, and acres are included in Exhibit 12. The LOS analysis in Chapter 5 factors in these park types and identifies three key level of service indicators: function, accessibility, and service area. The key features for each park type are further elaborated in Chapter 6. All City parks and other City assets are described in greater detail in Appendix A. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS : ' CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY Exhibit 10. Park Classification Summary Definitions Primary Classes Community Park Community Parks are larger parks providing a variety of major recreation facilities, open space, and/or recreation programming, serve multiple neighborhoods and are a generally treated as a destination for visitors. Community Parks often reflect a shared community identity and offer flexibility across recreation and programming types throughout the year. Their size and range of offerings attract visitors and neighbors who may travel from further distances and stay longer periods of time, requiring more allowance and provisions for parking, seating, restrooms and family support amenities. Sub -classes identify if the park is more Active or Nature focused. Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Parks are smaller than Community Parks and intended for frequent and convenient access to basic recreation activities and opportunities. These parks best serve nearby residents and visitors in less formal or organized recreation and leisure. Neighborhood Parks provide open space values. They are less suited for longer stays, heavily programmed activities, or larger rental or permit -required spaces. These parks prioritize open space over parking and encourage visitation through pedestrian and bike networks. Sub -classes identify if the park is more Active or Nature focused. Downtown Park Downtown Parks are located in the downtown/uptown urban core and provide plazas and urban community gathering and special event spaces, waterfront or shoreline access, art and cultural facilities, or picnic or other passive enjoyment facilities. In some instances, Downtown Parks serve the needs met by neighborhood parks for residents living in the urban core. These parks may be referenced in other Comprehensive and Subarea Plans as Urban Pocket Parks, the 2014 Classification. Garden Park Garden parks include medians, gateways, rights of way, and small greenspaces, with ornamental plantings, trees and sometimes limited amenities such as a bench or interpretive signage. They are small in size and may only provide a visual buffer or beautification enhancement to the urban or other environment that surrounds them. Special Use Park Special Use Parks are designed for specialized or single -purpose recreation activities. These purposes may include golf parks, marinas, sport complexes, community and aquatic centers, historical areas, nature centers, conservatories, amphitheaters, or other purposes. These parks typically offer a narrower range of recreation uses or amenities. This classification can be combined with others. Sub -Classes Nature This sub -classification identifies parks where the primary purposes include nature and wildlife habitat conservation, passive recreation such as trails and viewpoints, and educational and cultural appreciation elements. Intensive areas of development are limited based on the environmental characteristics of the park. Active This sub -classification identifies parks that are designed for frequent and convenient access to recreation activities and opportunities such as family activities (picnic, gathering), active recreation (play, sports, other), and passive recreation (trails, open lawn/turf, informal activity). These parks would also contribute open space and environmental values. Soui,ce: Oily of Izorl I ow7,,end, i#f i I , 20119 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS " CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY Exhibit 11. City, County, and State Parks vAlzat 01-00"A ',4 "A '4 4' 21 ry # w� al A "0 mm/ j �' ItAwma aj -1W 01 Il ON M J, 7"" f mo, Rav, Am nal C� y Rfjune.ki ry clly 5 (,p ray P iik5 En,51, � 0 a Sw-l'e Porks �Pnul cle: of o�I:�vfr'/"'Td,, BE ' SOLMCC: Cil,y O, I'Utt, I C)Wnsencl) Rl RK� 0 11), FL11-tiek Sprees Cerwrflne� BERK March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS '/"',,' CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY Exhibit 12. Parks Inventory with Classification and Park Size in Acres Chetzemoka Park (Park, Dog Park, Golden Age Community Park Community Park -Active 7.3 Club) Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park Community Park Community Park -Nature 75.9 35th Street Park Neighborhood Park Community Park-Active/Nature 14.0 12th & Hancock Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park -Active 1.0 Baker View Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park -Active 0.2 Bishop Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park -Nature 3.6 Bishop Play Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park -Active 0.6 Bobby McGarraugh Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park -Active 2.0 Sather Park Field (East) Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park -Active 1.4 Sather Park Forest (West) Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park -Nature 5.3 Adams Street Park Urban Pocket Park Downtown Park 0.1 Bell Tower Urban Pocket Park Downtown Park 0.1 Haller Fountain /Terrace Steps Urban Pocket Park Downtown Park 0.4 Pope Marine Park / Jackson Tidal Park Urban Pocket Park Downtown Park 1.3 Rotary Park Urban Pocket Park Downtown Park 0.3 Tyler Street Stairs Urban Pocket Park Downtown Park 0.1 City Entrance Urban Pocket Park Garden Park 0.6 Dahlia Park (Triangle 1) Urban Pocket Park Garden Park 0.1 Speakers Corner at Kearney/Sims Way Urban Pocket Park Garden Park 0.2 Gateway Park (Triangle 11) Urban Pocket Park Garden Park 0.2 Elmira Street Viewpoint Park Neighborhood Park Special Use 0.5 Golf Park Community Park Special Use 58.9 Larry Scott Memorial Trail Community Park Special Use 7.1 Mountain View Neighborhood Park Special Use/ Neighborhood 7.6 Seamus Sims Skateboard Park Community Park Special Use 0.3 Grand Total 189.2 `,rail CC: City O„ I'r,i t I r,:axAtnsend, I4I Itl , 2011J. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS '1 CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY Tils With a history of platting beginning in 1852, a number of blocks and rights of way were planned in Port Townsend and not developed. On the undeveloped rights -of -way the City planned and coordinated trail improvements, and volunteers established and maintained public trails that are now maintained by the City. In addition to pedestrian trails, the multimodal regional Larry Scott Trail begins in the City and extends into unincorporated Jefferson County. The Chetzemoka Trail was dedicated in 2019, and is an interpretative trail traversing Port Townsend that honors the life of Chief Chetzemoka, the important places in his life and the S'Klallam people. The Trail is comprised of 18 sites throughout the city that divide into 3-mile, 6-mile, or 12-mile loops. Some of the interpretive site are in City parks. The trail has signage and stops of historical significance at Chetzemoka Park, Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park, the Kah Tai prairie at the golf park, Froggy Bottoms, as well as county facilities at North Beach and Memorial Field, and at Fort Worden. The City manages the trails by zones. Trail extent is summarized by zone in Exhibit 13. Exhibit 13. Trail Inventory Feet and Miles, 2019 1 12,321 2.3 2 5,627 1.1 3 10,657 2.0 A. Larry Scott Trail Multimodal Paths 7,351 1.4 B. Other Paths 3,306 0.6 4 14,491 2.7 5 19,929 3.8 6 18,153 3.4 7 41,288 7.8 8 27,393 5.2 9 (including Fort Worden) 23,637 4.5 Tota 1 173,496 32.9 `outc(,��CityofIIc)t1Io"irrz,end,RII",K; `011a), March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS J'= CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY Trails by zone are included in Exhibit 14. Exhibit 14. Trails by Zone SC2i.arce� (Jly of I)orl I OWiIrrOTiid, B4ERI , 21119 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY Facilities The City's parks contain a variety of facilities including playgrounds, picnic shelters and benches, paths, and special facilities such as dog parks. See Exhibit 15. Port Townsend Recreation Facilities. Exhibit 15. Port Townsend Recreation Facilities Community Park 35th Street Park 14.0 X Chetzemoka Park 7.3 X X X X X X X X X X X X Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park 75.9 x x X x X x X Neighborhood Park 12th & Hancock 1.0 Baker View Park 0.2 X X Bishop Park 3.6 X X Bishop Play Park 0.6 X X X X X X Bobby McGarraugh Park 2.0 X X X X X X X X Sather Park Field (East) 1.4 X X Sather Park Forest (West) 5.3 X Downtown Park Adams Street Park 0.1 X X X Bell Tower 0.1 X X X X Haller Fountain / Terrace Steps 0.4 X X X X Pope Marine Park / Jackson Tidal Park 1.3 X X X X X X X X Rotary Park 0.3 X X X Tyler Street Stairs 0.1 X Garden Park City Entrance 0.6 X Dahlia Park (Triangle l) 0.1 X Gateway Park (Triangle II) 0.2 X X X Speakers Corner at Kearney/Sims Way 0.2 Special Use Elmira Street Viewpoint Park 0.5 Golf Park 58.9 X X X X X X Larry Scott Memorial Trail 7.1 x X X X X Mountain View 7.6 X X X X X X X Seamus Sims Skateboard Park 0.3 X X Grand Total 189.2 5 9 13 4 8 13 6 5 2 10 6 1 2 1 Sourccr C ilyM f'a�r9'I"MnriI,,��,r'd, I41EIth., 20L9 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY ° m l l 1uIi a rks n IIIII iiii l Illll liiii llllRt iiii Fort Worden State Park and Conference Center is a 434-acre park with a wide variety of services and facilities for tourists and residents: Conference Center and Lodge: Meeting rooms, food services, and 456 bedrooms/accommodations that include officers' housing, a castle, special one -room houses and large dormitories Camping: Two campgrounds with 80 campsites, and RV rally site for 10-22 RVs Picnicking: Day -use and picnic areas Trails: 5 miles ADA hiking trails, 12 miles hiking trails, 12 miles bike trails Sports: 1 Baseball/Softball Field, 2 Tennis Courts Water/Boating Access: 2 boat ramps, 235 feet of dock and moorage, kayak and bike rentals Other: Alternative fitness classes, birding, 2 fire circles, interpretive activities mountain biking, museums (Washington State Parks, 2019) Jo,, pr s(,,�hn I°°11airks Jefferson County provides recreation facilities in the city limits including a Community Center with teen and senior activities, sports complex at Memorial Field, sports courts and picnicking at the Courthouse Park, a County Fairgrounds, and a community -oriented North Beach Park. See Exhibit 16. Exhibit 16. Jefferson County Parks Facilities in Port Townsend Community Center 1.9 Special Use Play Areas Court House Park 2.0 Neighborhood Sports Courts, Picnicking, Tennis Fairgrounds 34.0 Regional Special Use Picnic Shelter, Picnicking, Play Areas, Restrooms, Walking/Jogging, Stadium, Camping, Off -Leash Area Memorial Field 5.2 Regional Special Use Ballfields, Restrooms, Stadium North Beach Park 1.9 Community BBQ, Picnic Shelter, Picnicking, Restrooms Grand Total 45.0 .;rj arcs. Icffcrsori (:aa[ rdy, fiERI< 201.9�), March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY 5,the wh; There are three public school sites with indoor and outdoor recreation facilities. They are meant for use by students. People have access to the sites after school hours. For example, the play areas at Salish were placed in front deliberately for public use after hours intentionally to provide a community asset. See Exhibit 17. Exhibit 17. Schools and Recreational Facilities Salish Coast Elementary 1 1 1 Blue Heron School 1 4 1 1 Port Townsend High School 2 1 4 1 1 �xr�ul°r::ra; I'�flP:��f�ffrrut�a�al':fl',r.h:��t?I Ifl��thlr;t,f,r�r�f;lr> Il:�,ili�t, I?I!:I�I°, �"Ci`L`7, Across all agencies reviewed in this PROS Plan, the City focus of facilities is family activities and special use activities whereas the State, County, and Schools focus on outdoor sports facilities. See Exhibit 18. Exhibit 18. Combined Facility Inventory: City, State, County, Schools Diamond Fields 2 2 3 Rectangular Fields 1 6 Basketball Courts (outdoor) 4* 1* Tennis Courts (outdoor) 2 1 4 Pickleball Courts (outdoor) 2* 1 1 Picnic Shelters 4 2 Playgrounds S__ 2 1 Special Use: Passive Dog Parks 2 1 Special Use: Active 3 Multiple: Conference 3 3 Golf, Skate Park, Center, Museums, Fairgrounds, Comm Gym Pool, Gym Historic Sites Ctr, Mem Field `Jolo? `III f ciffitiofl H"Iere ill('.' II`1flool faf:'llltJos I Ilt' C liy has 1. Irlf"'fool hask4':p'tball court and 1 IIIIf,00r plcl d€ half court at Mountain "✓i(nu.,lf ffr.l",`af„'?n Couf`1'l:"y offf' s, Indoor LY<]skcll2fall al the i:oll I f'b l"Y,xond llch4P4 is have rlffiool, coin'!„ r1l g`+; f"°ns soljtce„ City of Port I o w`ns nd, leff!'I" vfJn (4 471Jf7'ty,'r/f/o`4hijnf, lto Y StaLe Parks, R1 RI<, 207.9. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY RECREATION As mentioned under History, the recreation programming offered by the City of Port Townsend consists of aquatic -based programming at the City's Mountain View Pool such as swimming lessons, fitness classes, and drop -in swimming or aquatic recreation. In addition to the aquatic -based programming provided by the City, other major providers of recreation programming in the Port Townsend area include Jefferson County Parks and Recreation and Jefferson County YMCA. Below in Exhibit 19 and Exhibit 20, the recreation programming landscape for the Port Townsend area is shown for youth -focused programming and adult -focused programming. Exhibit 19. Youth Recreation Programming Landscape in Port Townsend Club Swimming n Swim Lessons Drop -In Recreation Arts & Craftsoi�oi�" Child Careoi�oi�" Drop -In Recreation `40, Family Activities �N Mentorship Preschool' Special Needs Programs' Sports Camps `40, Sports Leagues Youth `40, Summer Day Camps �N Summer Overnight Camps Youth Nutrition Programs Aquatic Programming ' Ancillary programs provided either through partnership or contract Srri.ai°ce: (,!iy of )cn i Ir,;,rnErisend, 2019;.1efferson ts>ui)ly, 201 Bl!:�Rl<, 2019 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY Exhibit 20. Adult Recreation Programming Landscape in Port Townsend Aquatic Programming 1 Ancillary programs provided either through partnership or contract z Senior recreation options `ouic , ( it:yai Poll Iawiirxr,nd, )0'19; ioffoi'son (ounty, )019; I;I'Iltb', ; 0'19. Looking at the roles each provider plays in recreation programming in the area, beyond the aquatic programming provided by the City, the County mostly provides community center recreation and sports leagues while the YMCA provides cultural programming, childcare, summer camps, and family activities. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS The City maintains and operates 25 of its 26 sites excluding the golf park, which is managed separately in an agreement with the operator. Maintenance and operations staff include 12.8 full time equivalents (FTEs), most of which serve the pool. See Exhibit 21. Exhibit 21. Maintenance and Operations — Full Time and Seasonal Positions and Full -Time Equivalents Facilities and Parks Manager 1 FTE Parks(FTE 3.0) Maintenance Worker Parks Maintenance Worker Parks `>r,La CC. I'Mt; IC)Wnsend I4,u tf,ct)014 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 3 1 FACILITIES & PROGRAMS INVENTORY Port Townsend's maintenance and operations expenditure per capita is about $109 with the pool and $50 without the pool. The City's 2019 budget identified unmet and unfunded needs for maintenance and operations staff including: 1 FTE for parks maintenance An annual amount for a trail maintenance crew The City's 2019 budget also identified unmet needs for deferred and unfunded items including one-time costs for site maintenance. This is further discussed in Chapter 5 Demand & Need and Chapter 7 Funding and Facilities Plan. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS This chapter describes the demographics of the Port Townsend community and results of Community Engagement efforts to update this plan. COMMUNITY PROFILE Understanding resident demographics helps the City identify how to best serve current and future resident population with parks and recreation facilities and programs. Since 2010, Port Townsend has become increasingly older while also becoming increasingly less impoverished. The following section reviews the share of older and younger persons, household characteristics, persons of color, and household income citywide. Age As of 2017, about one-third of City residents were 65 years and older, increasing from about a quarter of City residents in 2010. The portion of City residents who are 24 years and younger has held relatively constant from 2010 to 2017, from 21% to 22%, respectively. The median age for Port Townsend as of 2017 was 55 years -- similar to Jefferson County as a whole, which had the highest median age of any county in Washington State in the same time period. See Exhibit 22 for a summary of how the citywide age distribution has changed from 2010 to 2017. CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT Exhibit 22. Age Distribution in 2010 and 2017 WAM 201.2 Far>and over 5% Srnandover % 3% Z' %On111`` �111` 6% "% °?, m1111\`lk 15% 15Lo 84 FS Lo!4\11 . „ , �Alc 1111111 75 to 94 G ; tag14 , , , b , , ;., , , ,,�IA1111111 21% 1�j S L. E 4 i $%a;, , , , , , , l� 14 % 21% 5 5 to 64 �p 10% , , `8% 4S Lo 54 €; 4°l 7% 4, 4.5 to 54 p �,�;:.�I�1111��\�\�\�� 12% 3S Lo 44 j..,,��1�1��`��1�`` 10% '5.� to 44 4�iu,, 9% 4% 25to:34 2.5to34. p� 3% 611117% 1.5 to 24 7..5 to 2.4 4% 5% 9% 5 Lo 14 5 to 1..4 5% 3% 8% Under 5years Under 5years 2% 61111��J� 5% 0% 5% :1.0% 1...5% 20% 25% 0% 5% 1.0% 15% 20% 25% ,,; Male II��I Female "Male IN Fernale `.,o urr„a . SourcoAnnorican °i40,101 !.> Yi �,1irr��5tr,, rf11.f11., )01 /; BI Kl< C:r:rriskialtir'i ;, 01�), Both youth and older residents should have facilities or programming that are suited for their needs and accessible, as barriers such as limited resources or transportation options may be higher among this population than the rest of the community. Nearly 40% of Port Townsend households are one -person households compared to about 30% of households in Jefferson County overall. Exhibit 23 for a comparison on how persons per households has changed in Port Townsend from 2010 to 2017. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT Exhibit 23. Persons Per Household 100 % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2017 2010 2017 Port Townsend Jefferson County IN 1-person household 111111 2-person household 3-person household 1100 4-or-mare-person household `oui,a.r ,r Ain' rl Icmn Corrnrrlwlrit:y Sul wy S x01 `�x Yr �,I:irr'�ta9a r,, t(,ra.() & 20 1 /[ I,I 1"'K r-r nsullanl" 20,19 laaaa°cireaat: din needs fGalrrilingplle aadualks, p:aaartlia:uallaarlly the rallrgam a duallts Inaua cr palrruw lleint in the coin nrruualrnlity, rain support as lrng lilnl Ipalla ce and IlilgrJapoing Ihuuaaalltlhn, \Alh .lrna',. Ir m pairk rllrs ca n a -a o a� , pS4sdir'lig �IIII� erSii;lnce is in �pira�k�✓Iirfilrng &JiY�CIIdle nP�4J°��D&!''4rsed chroir'Vll I a:alnGg Ira rrdJ!!'a-npll&alrll aa, "'gga rAluseaa wEa Irmlrewalrrfl'orn and/or maalnaagernei'A Ipulrogiraalrrnas that keep 61der a. dualh:s Ih eaWhy a rnd a:ia::dve foryears to c orlrue (Mean! n Iltrut:lhn, 2.01.7). R rreaadon Ina.aaaa:p.aa grabyouth iiruduQde atr uctuulred a aa°Il,oarut,ies that rrneet druaaaulluuuplrrn rnt. ll Inuueds o Clh lldrein and q,a.a:^Irnr, rgualle cei nu:aa wair0 t:u:a u:IlauwraMllaata Lh"neir cap'aaau ilde Ihauuq 0h ey ruaued opapua:aru:ualr0tieua and a atalpulropriate aadu.ulhq: ilruvaalhiernrarnt: and g u'Haalance w do so. (\Moue:® 2010) ('flulidaanco pralr devr Ilralhaiing Iraarlla and a ,�circaafllrarn delhaaalrq:lrineint: youtahl Ihalrra lraarrur lindluudes t;lhun fo llra ung gr^aa�tuulresr: lyllrysk:all and lyaaya:;lhnrrolluag;liuMaall saufifty, struuct:ulra:^ that Is aguaaarallu.ap irinernt,alllly aalpalpalraalhulrilaae, suaplp oirllovr^ Irr.11autilu:ar115lhnulyaa, a: aragaOlrt:uurnliuilaan'tQ kuelluang' Ip osr i.oaau nuaur4 ll rna;,arrru^a, sualralhuralrG:'fu:alr efficacy and Irrnaut.tering, ualpalpaoirtuulrnlitlies fualraulkdlll Ilarulillre�:flrug;, and iinteguaa�tli0rn of Nnirndy, sualrraok, and a:rarrrnrinuurnity a;ffoirLs. ( AL, 20'.10) Diversity Port Townsend has grown slightly more diverse since 2010; however, the population remains largely white at 94% of the population in 2017. People of color identify as Black, Asian, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, two or more races or other. Port Townsend is also slightly less diverse than Jefferson County overall, which is 91% white as of 2017 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT There are Spanish-speaking children in public schools. Other languages spoken by students include Thai, Tagalog, Chinese and Japanese; there are fewer of these language speakers than for Spanish. (Palmer, 2019) fiIII""i f'� IIIrne Around 13% of Port Townsend residents were living below the federal poverty line in 2017, a decrease from about 17% in 2010. Jefferson County also had around 13% of residents living below the federal poverty line in 2017. Port Townsend's median income in 2017 was slightly below the countywide median income at $50,330 versus $51,842 and significantly below the statewide median income of $66,174. The share of Port Townsend's households at different income levels is illustrated in Exhibit 24. Exhibit 24. Household Income Shares 2010 and 2017 '100'1yF, O''flb 80111ri 70 tr11D 501X0 40 t,.;"y� 30% 20` b 110,f b 011Y r l S"r'rs MGM i P91rla Ifflig 16'a/b VMN Jefferson County 22r14 Ili ■ Less ffic"i w$35,000 0 ' : 5,000 to $49,999 50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 tow 9 999 t,/" Ore ffia n $1010,000 ` oijtccc s: Arrir:ur rm (otrirru,miF:y `xw vcyF S1901 �y Yt s larr ala r, )011.0 fir 201./; Ivl R11, f: r+ri;,kt11:1ni,, 10119, The share of households earning different income levels shows an increase in higher income households and a decrease in households at lower income levels at the city and county level in 2017. This may reflect the community attracting higher income households while still having a significant share of households in need as living costs rise. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT Households receiving food stamps have slightly risen from 2010 to 2017 from 11.2% to 11.7% according to the ACS. The number of cost burdened households, renters and owners, earning 80% or less of the area median income and spending more than 30% of their income on housing costs is 48% as of the 2012-2016 ACS. As described under the Health Survey below, a lack of economic resources and ability to access recreation are concerns. HEALTH SURVEY Based on the Jefferson County Community Health Assessment Report: Qualitative Findings from Community Input, May 2019, top health and social concerns reflected the needs of both elderly and young residents: Access to health care Barriers to accessing care Affordable housing Affordable childcare, and support for families with young children Rural infrastructure challenges Aging in place Coordination across behavioral health, medical, justice and emergency response systems One of several solutions for health and social challenges includes physical activity: Community members and key informants felt that having access to outdoor recreation, including hiking trails, hunting and fishing are key elements to promoting physical activity in the community. However, respondents reported challenges in the winter when indoor facilities are unavailable. The study of health in Jefferson County included an online survey as well as qualitative interview results summarized above. About two thirds of the 1,107 respondents had a Port Townsend Zip Code. Responding to a health survey, respondents living in Port Townsend indicated they go for physical activity primarily: on paths (23%), outside at home (19%), and at public parks/playgrounds (16%). Other opportunities included inside at home (12%), roads (9%), schools (7%), paid gym/class (7%), and other. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT What would help Port Townsend individuals or families be more physically active included the following top reasons: Indoor options when weather is bad (17%) More affordable classes/activities (17%) More time (16%) Information about activities or ways to be active that are free (13%) More places where I can be active near my home (10%) The survey asked about top challenges for senior citizens aged 65 years or greater. Port Townsend respondents identified the following top five concerns: Living on a fixed income Social isolation/being lonely Cost of needed assistance/care Housing Managing health problems Providing affordable recreation programs may assist with the two top concerns. The survey respondents also identified the biggest challenges for teens, with the top five being: Substance use Unhealthy or unstable home life Maintaining emotional health Abuse or misuse of technology (texting, internet, games, etc.) Lack of afterschool or extracurricular activities Having teen -oriented recreation programs could address the lack of afterschool or extracurricular activities; the programs may also offer a sense of belonging and mastery of skills that can help with a number of the other top concerns. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT The PROS Plan Update is based on public outreach and engagement to help define a new vision, needs, and actions. The City has provided extensive public input opportunities identified in Exhibit 25. Results of these events are summarized below the table and details included in Appendix B. Exhibit 25. Vision & System Plan Participation Summary Survey 927 Postcards 277 Stakeholders Meeting 22 Middle School Vision Event 90 Public Open House 93 MVP Poster Comments Undetermined Staff & Parks Board Workshop 19 Public Workshop 70 sr,lsirc s110 ifl<consuh'lrgi 01.9. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT Survey respondents from across the city and across age groups use and enjoy parks and trails, and have ideas about how to improve upon what is important to them. Most participants use parks in Port Townsend weekly or daily. The most visited parks in Port Townsend are Fort Worden (a state park) and Chetzemoka (a city park), followed by other facilities like North Beach Park (county park), Larry Scott Memorial Trail, and Mountain View Pool. Exhibit 26. Survey Participants: Frequency of Use 4. How o7 ten do yvn.0 A0 cap use parks in Port� Towinsen d2 (rr- 8.529. Now ohen do you vLsit or use Poaih, in Po¢t fownuend? (ro.=8 26) Newer lira w,n Swwey Ma+iilFey, I3f,fRK, 2019 Trail use is daily or weekly, similar to park use. People primarily use trails for active or passive recreation purposes rather than commuting. Fort Worden trails are most used. There is also high use of trails in the east and south parts of the city. Most want to see a loop trail, and would be satisfied with either a signed route or a multi -purpose trail. The top five recreation activities include hiking or walking, wildlife/nature viewing, and biking/mountain biking, swimming, and picnicking. High School and Middle School kids identified many of the same activities as well as basketball and skateboarding. See Exhibit 27. The PROS Plan Update survey in 2019 and a prior survey in 2010 listed the top two leisure activities as 1) hiking/walking 2) wildlife/nature viewing. These activities have been listed among the top five since 1975. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT Exhibit 27. Top Recreation Activities Most survey respondents depend on parks and open space to provide opportunities for passive recreation purposes like hiking, walking, or enjoying nature, and to provide environmental benefits for green space and wildlife. (See sidebar.) Most participants believe it is important to have parks or open space within a 10-minute walk of their home. Most feel welcome and safe whether using the parks in groups or alone. Most would use parks and trails more if they were a) better/improved, b) if they could more safely access them by foot or bike, or 3) if they had more time to visit them. About 30% of the survey respondents use the City's Mountain View pool daily or weekly, about 35% use the pool monthly or occasionally, and another 35% never use the pool. Most respondents agreed very strongly or strongly about making capital investments in the pool and exploring partnerships. If the pool were to be improved, most are interested in a 25- meter lap lane and features for kids. Most disagree with the idea that the City should stop operating the pool and explore other alternative options for the facility. A place to hike and enjoy Erotw'e A quiet prace to relax, l.aEcnl;c or walk Preservation of green spaces for future g5enri.im atioins H aba tgsa for w dkfe A place, fc" chddren to 1plara). ............................ 565 A physical Lmeak laowween urban deve lop-raearN 341 A Iplace 90 nde ny biia cie rinouvat;air 339 buses A place to pay wu+ or walk my c�oq '325 A place Bo gather for fc,inily events ///% � 324 A place to play orgaarauzed sports 553 `,dotlrmg -- I don't use ilae Ipark syrsterav _ P P 695 602 55'S =t55 March 2020 PORTTOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT Most respondents (76%) do not golf at the Port Townsend municipal golf park, or at other golf courses in the region (78%). Most do not have an opinion on the operation (72%) of the golf park. Opinions were mixed on investment or use of the golf park with most selecting "Don't Know" (about 33%). The most important facility needs identified by participants include trails, indoor facilities (pool and centers), and open space. (See sidebar.) The types of programs desired by survey and postcard participants include outdoor activities, indoor activities, and community events. High School survey participants and Middle School postcard participants identified a need for sports and classes for youth or teens. Park cres and Fli�riarifies 0 100 200 300 00 321 C. ndoo4 facll l'.,Yles IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiI�Ilua�l, .. .t d G. Open Space IIIIIENfl��l�i,,, „ „ , 37S H, \,Vatec fi onl Fadlith-u �r%,,, ,,,,,,i. 215 �ulllhll B. Family spacesIIIIii�(�Yflil��l�ll p(+ .. � r�� D. C")obtdoor Active Recreation �alll�,,, 129 A.C"cn,unanitySpe'aces Bill�@ I. t:;WhVrr.:r Iirll�i �� 96 E. p cichl4yF.clMi., s� 94 When asked to distribute dollars towards projects, respondents put a higher average amount on the aquatic center, followed by trails and open space/habitat. High school students provided higher average dollars to the aquatic center, community center, and active recreation. See Exhibit 28. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT Exhibit 28. Survey Priorities — How would you spend $100 — All Respondents (n=589) Faciilliity Responses Average $1.0 Normalized Trails $22.6 $12.2 Aquatic Center Open Space, Habitats $22.0 $11.9 Water Access 325 L $12.1 $6.5 Family Activities 321 $13.0 $7.0 Community Centers 296 L $16.8 $9.0 Active Recreation 264 $18.7 $10.1 Golf Park 225 L $7.3 $3.9 Other 121 30.9 16.6 Reviewing photos of different facility types, Vision Workshop participants tended to choose passive outdoor features, though, Middle School students chose more active outdoor facilities. See Exhibit 29. Exhibit 29. Vision Workshop: What do you want in your parks? I Most participants at the System Plan workshop would prioritize a "first" action as investing in existing parks before adding new parks or programs. (See sidebar.) At the System Plan workshop, participants also showed enthusiasm in poll responses and small groups for: Pickleball, swimming, and trails ¢npmve existing parks Expand trMs Offer rrruevt rrmgrzrerT[Ming arid eve iQs, Add new parks Source!! IfoIlll I very"vvll on"< 2001:f. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS - CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT Mixed opinions on the potential placement of active sports facilities with a preference in more central locations, e.g. Mountain View instead of 35th Street Park Support for active play areas in Bobby McGarraugh and less support for play areas in the eastern part of Sather Park Support for improved water access at Chetzemoka and improved picnic areas at Chetzemoka and Kah Tai parks Across Vision activities, some themes stood out as illustrated in Exhibit 30. Themes included: Balancing aging in place and coming of age in Port Townsend Indoor and outdoor recreation for healthy lifestyles Access, navigability, and safety Green spaces Specialization, flexibility, versatility and creative partnerships These PROS Plan Vision Themes are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Vision to ensure Port Townsend is great place to live, with a sense of place, that prizes its natural setting. Exhibit 30. Vision Themes At the System Plan Workshop attended by about 70 persons, the theme that resonated the most included "indoor and outdoor recreation for healthy lifestyles" selected by 59% of participants. Secondarily, "green spaces" was selected by 29% of those attending the workshop. "Balancing aging -in -place and coming of age in Port Townsend" received 11% of votes at the March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS = `. CH. 4 1 COMMUNITY PROFILE & ENGAGEMENT workshop. "Access, navigability, and safety" was selected by 7% of participants. Last, "specialization, flexibility, versatility, and creative partnerships" was selected by 2% of respondents. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS INTRODUCTION Building on the prior Chapter's review of community demographics, health, and engagement, this Chapter focuses on demand and need for parks and recreation facilities and programs considering: Recreation trends, Participation and use of the current park system, Future growth and change, Gaps and opportunities, Comparisons to benchmark communities, and Levels of service RECREATION TRENDS Recreation trends both locally and nationally were studied to better understand how existing recreation programming in the Port Townsend area aligns with what other park providers offer and what is desired by the public. They can also help the City anticipate new trends where demands may not be filled by existing programming. IIMn on ��i � ",irlbl(' an F)enfiIristo Flegi oli Ftf' IIIII IIIIIcII potion Trends Washington State surveys residents statewide every five years about outdoor recreation demand and identifies participation trends statewide and by region as part of its Washington State Recreation and Conservation Plan (Hedden, 2017) (Jostad, 2017). Port Townsend falls in the Peninsulas Region. Findings for 2017 are shown in Exhibit 31 and include: CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED The activity with the highest participation rate, is walking in a park or trail setting (84% statewide, 85% Peninsulas region). This is true of respondents of all ages, genders, races, and incomes. Walking as an activity has seen an increase in participation since the last survey in 2012. Visiting a water body of some kind directly appears in three of the 10 top activities. Exhibit 31. Top-10 Outdoor Recreation Activities for the Peninsulas Region by Rank, 2017 1 Walking in a park or trail setting Walking 85% 2 Visiting a beach or tide pools Nature Activities 75% 3 Visiting rivers and streams Nature Activities 64% 4 Gather or collect things in a nature setting (e.g., rocks, shells, plants) Nature Activities 59% Attending an outdoor concert or event (e.g. farmer's market, fairs, 57% 5 sporting events) Leisure Activities 6 Scenic or wilderness area Sightseeing 57% 7 Day -hiking Hiking 54% 8 Wildlife or nature viewing Nature Activities 54% 9 Swimming/wading at a beach — saltwater Swimming 49% 10 Driving or motorcycling for pleasure Sightseeing 48% ourco: (R+s k; cl, �('H./). A national survey of more than 1,400 public, non-profit, and private recreation providers illustrates top planned facilities or programs in 2019 nationwide; see Exhibit 32. Results show the top five facilities planned include splash play areas, playgrounds, fitness trails, synthetic sports fields, and dog parks. The balance of facilities involve picnic shelters, trails, restrooms, bleachers and seating, and fitness centers. The top five programs involve exercise, fitness, education, programs for older adults, and mind -body balance. Remaining programs include teen programs, day camps, special events, environmental education, and special needs programs. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS '% CH. 5 1 DEMAND& NEED Exhibit 32. Top Planned Facilities and Programs by Rank, 2019 1 Group exercise programs (27.5%) 1 Splash play areas (21.1%) 2 Fitness programs (27%) 2 Playgrounds (17.6%) 3 Educational programs (26.6%) 3 Fitness trails and outdoor fitness equipment (17.1%) 4 Programs for active older adults (25.9%) 4 Synthetic turf sports fields (16.8%) 5 Mind -body balance programs (24.5%) 5 Dog parks (15.7%) 6 Teen programs (23.4%) 6 Park shelters (14.5%) 7 Day camps and summer camps (23%) 7 Walking and hiking trails (13.8%) 8 Holidays and other special events (21.8%) 8 Park restrooms (13.8%) 9 Environmental education (21.8%) 9 Bleachers and seating (12.9%) 10 Special needs programs (21.6%) 10 Fitness centers (12.5%) Part I ow"�sehill d IIINdeeds Based on the results from the Vision Survey summarized in Chapter 4, the top three most important needs for future recreation programming identified by respondents were outdoor activities, indoor activities, and community events. See Exhibit 33 for a summary of recreation programming needs identified by respondents. Exhibit 33. Future Port Townsend Recreation Programming Needs, All Respondents Outdoor activities Indoor activities - gVm, swirnming, other Community events Classes or progra ms for youth & teens Enrichment and education Classes or programs, senior/adult Daycare -- Licensed childcare for working families Classes oir programs for preschool age. Sports — leagues or lessons Camps --suminer and school-brealk volunteer opportunities 0 M 5 - Very important 11111114 3 2 Soijrcc: 131: [:d I<, 201,9, 200 300 400 500 600 700 11111 1 - Very unimportant 0 Don't Know March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ',' CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Unsurprisingly, given the differing needs of youth versus adults for recreation programming, youth respondents to the Vision Survey identified contrasting priorities relative to the results of all respondents. The most important needs for future recreation programming identified by youth respondents were sports leagues, youth -focused classes or programming, daycare, outdoor activities, and educational programming. See Exhibit 34. Exhibit 34. Future Port Townsend Recreation Programming Needs, Youth Respondents Sports ..... leagues or lessons Classes or programs for youth & teens ICkdAyCelPe— If ce nse'.d chlidcare iorworking ffamliles Outdoor activities Enrichment and education Indoor' adivitlea ... gyrra, sw I mrming, either' Community events Camps.....surnmerand school -break Volunteer opporiunitles Classes or programs ffor preschool age Ciasses or programs, senior/adult 1015 a - Very irnportant. 11014 i ;'2 IN 1 - Very uniimportarrt N Don't, Know `,o,urcei . ItI:IRK, 201.9, PARTICIPATION Participation data for the City as well as for the Jefferson County YMCA and Jefferson County Parks and Recreation were compiled to gain further context for recreation programming demand in the Port Townsend area. Please note that this information was compiled from multiple recreation providers using varying tracking methods; as such, not all data are directly comparable. For example, drop -in recreation programming such as that offered at the Mountain View Pool through the City or at the Port Townsend Community Center through Jefferson County is best measured in visitors received whereas other programs such as arts and crafts programming through the YMCA is best tracked through unique registrations. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED The City currently offers recreation through aquatic programming. Participation in the City's programming is fairly robust, especially for a city of 9,600 people, though participants are drawn from a larger area. See Exhibit 35 for a summary of participation in the City's recreation programming. Exhibit 35. Participation in City of Port Townsend Recreation Programs Club Swimming Registrations 2018 Youth 270 Swim Lessons Registrations 2018 Youth 1,080 Health and Fitness Classes Attendance 2019 Adult 10,197 Total Annual Visits Visitors 2018 Youth & Adult 34,812 f cjlee, Hr>altlii and ItriessClasses zlr,es nr+t incliucJe Ac,{I,m Boxing € 1, IIower I uncJ1 psaQiG il,mtIcm i��G�arr`il�a i,,, IOtl l Annuzil VISItS (JM S not lnc.liaeje v1sit alion frorn swim IeSS, 111 Iai��;rG,airyas. `.,OUiTC C1I,yO> I'01H I�OW11,01"Id, 201% BI Itlt, )tJiJ�:��. °111 ° III Ig�!III,II ' (!!%.111�(-re ti III �Illl f�� ideIIr in IIIII")oII f II I�,�WeIIi Area General Recreation -- WWCA The Olympic Peninsula YMCA operates the YMCA of Jefferson County branch, which provides a wide variety of programs. While these programs tend to have smaller registration numbers relative to the City or the County, these programs are generally more specialized and fill another niche. See Exhibit 36 for participation in YMCA of Jefferson County programming. Exhibit 36. Participation in YMCA of Jefferson County Recreation Programming Arts & Crafts Registrations 2019 Youth 14 Child Care Registrations 2019 Youth 48 Family Activities Registrations 2019 Youth & Adult 50 Mentorship Registrations 2019 Youth & Adult 70 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Sports Leagues Adult Registrations Summer Day Camps Registrations Summer Overnight Camps Registrations Youth Nutrition Programs Registrations `,wjrc s, Olynnjpp c fIenr i,vml;7 Yi1 t y, 20111); B1:1 R, I<, 2019. 2019 Adult 106 2019 Youth 37 2019 Youth 28 2019 Youth 150 "4 W " t 9' 4 1 ",:I� w l Parks �� and pc " A ry >�`�J1�.d'��f.,�`�� i�,fro�",o�a�„n��„��`� �f,..p��nL."��"�Gai��'i Vlo�.+fd"nt��'�n�"�� n��W"rn,"�v 1�.hW�'f,��` �ilr�.�f.��,�n>A�'��"f,��"'�` Jefferson County Parks and Recreation's recreation programming is mostly concentrated in sports leagues and sports camps along with drop -in recreation, but with a healthy amount of registrations per program type. This usage aligns with the needs of Port Townsend residents expressed in the Vision Survey of indoor activities and sports leagues (especially for youth). See Exhibit 37 for annual participation and seasonality of programs offered by Jefferson County. Exhibit 37. Participation in Jefferson County Parks and Recreation Programming Health and Fitness Classes N/A Preschool N/A Special Needs Programs N/A 16+ Coed Rec Soccer League Registrations 16+ Coed Rec Soccer Pick - Up (indoor and outdoor Registrations depending) Youth Volleyball Camp Registrations Winter Wrestling Camp Registrations Summer Basketball Camp Registrations Basketball - 16+ Coed Rec Registrations Evening at PT Rec Basketball -16+ Coed Rec Morning Basketball M-W-F Registrations Softball, 18+ Co -Ed Rec Softball League (12 teams) Registrations Youth Basketball — Jr Hoops Registrations PreK - 6 Soccer, Coed PreK - 8th Grade Fall Rec Soccer Registrations League 2019 Adult N/A* Year Round 2019 Youth N/A* Year Round 2019 Youth & Adult N/A* Year Round 2019 Adult 70 16 2019 68 36 Adult 2019 Youth 35 1 2019 Youth 30 3 2019 Youth 38 1 2019 Adult 24 40 2019 Adult 29 42 2019 Adult 220 12 2019 Youth 178 9 2019 169 9 Youth March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Soccer, Coed PreK - 6th Grade Spring Rec Soccer Registrations 2019 254 League Youth Drop -In Recreation Visitors Avg. Estimate Youth & Adult 45,700 Irira1es, Particilrsiftbrn ru nnl:l,Crs,',irr• not rr c ordl"r 1. ,ourc s,Jefferson f.r,;rui3Oy, 201,1), i;i"C�211�, 011). Year Round ,5;,entor f ocusedProgrciu'ri,P ��`m�� .i��u��ti b (�mO,LU'l?`,'y erso9' q l. he� b Jefferson County contracts with the Port Townsend Senior Association (PTSA) to operate the upstairs portion of the Port Townsend Community Center. The PTSA provides: senior meals, senior exercise programs, learning opportunities, social activities, games, and meeting spaces for local clubs, service organizations, and support groups. (Port Townsend Senior Association (PTSA) , 2019) Usage information was not available at the time of this writing. Jefferson Healthcare provides a Wellness Center offering senior exercise options including fitness classes, cardio, balance, yoga, and pilates. Usage information was not known at the time of this writing. (Jefferson Healthcare, 2019) Other recreation providers are specialized with regard to maritime recreation, including: Northwest Maritime Center: This center hosts the long-standing Wooden Boat Festival started in 1978. In 1980 the center added youth and adult programs to offer on -the -water opportunities in sailing, rowing, boatbuilding, and wooden boat regattas. Programs are housed at the Northwest Maritime Center within a waterfront campus that opened in 2009 after much fund raising. Marine Science Center: The Port Townsend Marine Science Center (PTMSC) is an educational and scientific organization with its mission devoted to understanding and conserving the marine and shoreline environment. The center has an aquarium and museum. It offers wildlife cruises and beach low -tide walks. The center offers school -age classes and tours and summer camps. The center provides a lecture series, and encourages Citizen Science projects. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Key City Public Theater offers Shakespeare in the Park at Chetzemoka Park every summer in August. Shakespeare in the Park is "Pay -What -You -Wish" at the gate with cash or check. Centrum is a non-profit focused on fostering creative arts experiences for adults and children. The center is located at Fort Worden. Offerings include: Artists residencies Music workshops and festivals Writers conferences for high school age and adults Youth programs in theater, music, dance, and science (the latter in coordination with the Marine Science Center) FUTURE GROWTH AND CHANGE Popt,fllatiari GrowfIh Port Townsend's Comprehensive Plan is directed towards a 2036 population growth target of 12,165 persons, an increase of 2,555 persons beyond 2019, a 27% increase. See Exhibit 38. Exhibit 38. Population Growth and Growth Target Population 8,334 9,113 9,610 12,165 Soi.arce `zNAe of V,/ ashingl'oii Office of I [rirar vial IVlPaim gn rnent, 2019. To achieve the 2036 target, the City would experience a 1.3% growth rate from 2019-2036. This is higher than experienced from 2000-2010 at 0.9% or from 2011-2019 at 0.6%. See Exhibit 39. Exhibit 39. Population Growth Rates Growth Rate 0.9% 0.6% 1.3% soutcesa BI R K, )0'19, March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED The City has capacity for added residential growth and an increase in population would mean an increase in use and demand for parks and recreation facilities and programs. See the level of service analysis later in this chapter. To i uIIrIIIII IIIrv"t I rends Port Townsend is a destination for visitors and some parks, particularly those in Downtown and the Waterfront are visited. Tourism spending and employment have increased in Jefferson County: Tourism spending for accommodations, food, retail, arts and entertainment, and recreation in Jefferson County has increased from 2010-2018 by 5.5%. Employment in tourism businesses has increased from 2010 to 2018 by 1.7%. (Dean Runyan Associates, 2019) Assuming tourism remains a strong aspect of the local economy it is likely that tourism will increase over the City's planning horizon of 2036. Usage of parks by visitors is likewise likely to increase with implications for special event planning and maintenance. GAPS AND OPPORTUNITIES IP A IIIIdIIk Port Townsend has ample parks acres between its own inventory as well as Fort Worden and County lands. However, it is not distributed to all neighborhoods. Exhibit 40 illustrates parcels within a half mile of City, County, or State Parklands. Generally a quarter to a half mile is considered walkable. Ensuring there is parkland in proximity to a majority of residents was V-ny h porfan t Neutral/'Not Scum Unimportant 20 vevy 9Jnhnipollan t 12 highly supported as described in Chapter 4 Community Profile & Engagement. (See sidebar.) Based on access, there are gaps in central and western neighborhoods of Port Townsend. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Exhibit 40. Properties in a Half Mile of City, County, or State Parklands Exhibit 401. Properties in a Half Mile of City, County, or State Parldands % F0, f'N 41 , wo NMI a me r �PY y�yNIIN��Y� �r gggvy i � Golf J i i ly t G gigs oIMS i ;'"nmmNrNl l 0,11 ur4hr m�& f i n o ;.: �rrv_�r rt� vr�.r ��"ma�mtl�.rllFuavouall� ,ll1� ryY W '', I,p�mr 3 n �s e , „ o Ja..�,a n owe„ � , , .,, a Vr„ i5c v,,,ar r x.,�✓,, ;d � ,� �. (,��;, Ynv�o fP , ✓- pt,i �ti ,f r v. u ^r , w � ti r m r R u r r p a �� ro✓ �� r:,. 0„, el w Ik✓�-�, uV, kbNul, lik' "YRelr .✓,b✓ ✓nF%n„%ll L�SIec 000 i 4 — ,a _ , e p u 0 .: r..ri 'wP wn�:,mu.u� mwll V�o�u�smw,�u¢r�.e ,� , '11l 411 BERK "syi. i,n. 1rtPierscan C o wnly Assessor) ['o H I (mivir„ nind t IS, 4[fl:.Rl< 2019 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED It should be noted that the map in Exhibit 40 accounts for proximity as well as quality (or breadth) of facility offerings by location. As noted on the map some facilities have narrow or broad offerings for recreation. For example, Garden Parks (City Entrance, Dahlia Park) provide visual open space benefits but limited or no recreation opportunities, whereas, Chetzemoka Park offers playgrounds, open lawns, picnic areas, restrooms, etc. Thus, the access gaps for residents to facilities offering broader recreation opportunities are greater in the western and southwestern areas, given more comprehensive facilities are located in central and eastern parts of town. There are opportunities to close these service gaps in the central areas of the city by partnering with the School District at Blue Heron Middle School. There are also opportunities to improve access and features at existing parks such as 35t" Street Park or 12t" and Hancock to help serve the western side of the city. Filling gaps in the trail network such as along Discovery Road (described below) can help connect residents in the southwest to existing facilities. Through Community Engagement results, the public conveyed high use of existing trails and a desire for better connected trails. Most want to see a loop trail and would be satisfied with either a signed route utilizing different trail types or a multi -purpose trail. See Exhibit 41. Exhibit 41. Potential Loop Trail The Port Townsend Loop Trail is a conceptualized "circle" through the City connecting neighborhoods, schools, and parks. What kind of Loop Trail would you want? (n=807) Entire Va, q,-> Iaa[Vt to mulltii-purposealcsu gn standards (u aiurafdlcar c.xaYrvjo�a is Larry 267 Scott Trdl)? _oop dos'tlgnaalod as a "route" rhaar cor)Taut,cWst1ru4:",gdna.afkarttraxVsof 399 diffaarentt widths and cha°arcaca or? � 'rho: Ti oil sysioni is, fine as -'is, 0 don't want ca 141 LamcrptaToaII SC2LLrc.a.. Smrvoy IVlorflkoy, f1f,Rl?'20][9, March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS , CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Community input received during the 2020 PROS Plan process affirms the Community Direction Statement in the Comprehensive Plan which envisions "....a larger network of trails that lead to surrounding districts and residential neighborhoods. This loop also unites an extensive system of parks and open spaces, including many environmentally sensitive areas that provide significant wildlife habitat." This vision for a potential loop trail is reflected on the Land Use Map adopted in concert with the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the P/OS(A) - Potential Park and Open Space (overlay) shown on the Land Use Map "includes areas that may have the potential to be included within a comprehensive and interconnected system of open spaces and trails. The P/OS(A) overlay appears in areas that could be valuable if maintained as open spaces, such as wooded areas, drainage corridors, and scenic vistas. These areas could accommodate multiple functions, including lower density residential development, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, and passive recreation. Three primary approaches are being considered in the development of this network: outright purchase of key properties; incentives for landowners to cluster new development in areas outside, or on the margins, of open space areas; and reductions in allowable density." Improving trail connections and amenities would also help encourage more use of parks in Port Townsend, important to Vision Survey and Health Survey respondents described in Chapter 4. See Exhibit 42. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Exhibit 42. Better Use of Parks and Trails What would encourage you to use parks and trails in Port Townsend more often? (n=775) Better/rnpurovecd Vpark faaafl%ea ([uglhfing„ ue,trroornn, etc,)2 t H [ ¢:arfld safely wcsVVa..',r it rude unn°y IU lke to therm 165 More time to vVmut or u�sa parks and Poramuls �iiii� �� 1 50 Be1der/4aap roved park grounds and tr aiVs 135 ni a'IrlenaIIni:"'" Bette„ ir/�reampp°ove playground <stru.uctuirea, � 1 122 More urafforirm�caficrrvn on park bceafions and carmau:inifiese 117 If I hva. d r oser to ca I,raaWark or trcaiV 106 IEaatyeOnagrove d safety un the parks W1 MopeIi„acairI*urng cavrfl abh.r inea r thi- park 53 Vff I had trcacn<..podaafion access to get to as p ad< or 17 h"do coramn�em�yu, I'm uat¢nffde ud 161 `,oiaree: S, Ai wsy Monl,a y, Itf.l11< 2019 Through Community Engagement results, specific requested trail location improvements included several along major routes to connect to destinations. See Exhibit 43. Exhibit 43. Community Engagement Trail Improvement Requests oi,arr;a 111.R,I , 201.1,1. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED IIII�Icrea iiiii aiii The landscape of current recreation programming in the Port Townsend area was compared with resident recreation programming needs as expressed through the Vision Survey to identify recreation programming gaps. Through this analysis, the following program gaps were identified: There are currently no childcare, daycare, or afterschool programs provided directly by either the City or Jefferson County. The Jefferson County YMCA offers a childcare program while Jefferson County has a partnership with a day care center in the Port Townsend Recreation Center. Nevertheless, among youth respondents to the Vision Survey, daycare was among the most important future programming need identified. Providing more of these programs could help ease the burden on the area's working families. The 2019 Health Survey also found that affordable childcare and support for families with young children was important. Given that Port Townsend is becoming increasingly older with over 30% of the population 65 and older as of 2017, there is a relative lack of programming specifically targeting seniors. In the Port Townsend area, senior specific programming primarily consists of the senior exercise programs offered through the Port Townsend Senior Center and health and fitness activities through Jefferson Healthcare. While not senior specific, the aquatic fitness classes offered through Mountain View Pool also offer a good senior exercise option. Still, based on community feedback, residents recognize there is a need for additional senior programming. In the Vision Survey, respondents were given the opportunity to rank their three most important recreation needs -- classes for seniors were among respondents' top -five most important recreation needs after aggregation. Additionally, according to the 2019 Jefferson County Community Health Survey, one of the top challenges for Port Townsend seniors was the lack of recreational or social activities. In both the City's and in Jefferson County's recreation programming offerings there is a strong focus on sports or fitness recreation without much of a focus on cultural or educational classes. The YMCA does offer some arts and crafts courses; however, these are offered only for youth and have minimal participation. However, there does appear to be a strong desire for these types of offerings in the community. Both adults and youth respondents for the Vision Survey identified enrichment or education course or classes as among the most important recreation needs for the future. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Similar to cultural or educational offerings above, there is a lack of environmental or wilderness classes or courses among recreation programming offerings in the Port Townsend area. There is a strong interest and desire among the community for outdoor recreation and activities. Outdoor activities were listed as the most important recreation programming need in the future among all respondents of the Vision Survey. BENCHMARKS Benchmarking compares Port Townsend's park system to peer communities or to communities that offer aspirational park systems. While Port Townsend forms its own plans to meet its residents' needs, comparisons to other communities can offer valuable perspectives and insights. Peer communities include other peninsula or tourist -oriented communities of Port Angeles, Sequim, and Poulsbo. See Exhibit 44. Exhibit 44. Peer Communities Reviewed Port Angeles 23 270.0 19,370 Poulsbo 19 134.9 11,180 Port Townsend 26 189.2 9,610 Sequim 8 117.0 7,695 ,tai.2i,c r £zNAe? of ' ✓,a..�1� 11i.1#"101.i Office c� I in ancial Mai irag,e men , 201. 1, Cities' s' ,)udge s 1201.17 Bl::ItI' 2019 Annually, the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) provides benchmark information for communities across the country similar in size as Port Townsend. Additionally, NRPA accredits highly functioning systems through the Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA). This analysis reviews CAPRA accredited communities of Bellevue and MetroParks Tacoma. While larger, this analysis considers their systems on a per population or per acre basis for comparison. The inclusion of the CAPRA accredited systems is to provide a comparison to agencies that meet NRPA's highest criterion, considered to be industry best practices and standards. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED cn k Diu A c; res Port Townsend's own inventory provides 20 acres per 1,000 population counting its full inventory with the golf park. Compared to the full inventories of other communities, including NRPA's inventory of communities less than 20,000 in population, Port Townsend's inventory is relatively higher. If adding the Fort Worden and County properties the acres per 1,000 would be even higher at 70.9 acres per 1,000 though that would be true of other peer communities if adding state and county facilities in their city limits. Despite the high acreage and as described under Gaps and Opportunities, Port Townsend's park acres are not distributed to all neighborhoods. Park improvements at undeveloped sites, targeted partnerships with other public agencies, trail extensions, or acquisitions could help fill the gaps. Exhibit 45. Total Acres per 1,000 Population r-M'ort Townsend 19.7 NRPA 1Rc: p -20K Upper Qurcrt0e %//////%0//////%//////////%%//////1111/%//%/////%/////////%0//////%//////////%%////////%//// 18.9 Bau ev ue (APRA 1 S.6 SecjuG rn 1115.2 Meta°oPaarks Tacoma CAPRA, jj � 1 4X) Poulsdoo 12,1 51,0 I 1„ro ,?Baca 25.0 >ourc,,�, 11JI1,11A ?0 19, (Iiy and Sjp col lyi i ris i Bw fz,,,O ,, BI I kfr ("ll l.9 ail Miles Similar to parks, Port Townsend has an abundance of trail miles per 1,000 population compared to peer and aspirational communities. See Exhibit 46. Though abundant, the trail system is not continuous. As described in Chapter 4, public input has identified some trail system desires and gaps in key locations. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS .... CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Exhibit 46. Trail Miles per 1,000 Population Po rn 7, ms,,-wa 0.0 P,,ukr r, 0. 5 1'ue.,xwo C'APPA 0. So arc , loRI'A 019, City ,and `fj"icr, aI 1:lisrina t I,di.arlgnt ",, I;I'1141' 20,1191 Recreation Fad1h1,'h.,may. Based on NRPA benchmarks for communities with a population density similar to Port Townsend, the combined sports inventories of the State, County, Schools, and City illustrate a population ratio that is favorable. See Exhibit 47. Facility Benchmarking. Exhibit 47. Facility Benchmarking Playgrounds 3,163 5 2 1 1,201 Basketball Courts (outdoor) 5,971 4 1 1,922 Tennis Courts (outdoor) 4,296 1 2 4 1,373 Diamond Fields -Youth 6,597 2 2 2 1,373 Rectangular Fields -Multipurpose 7,469 2 6 1,201 Dog Park 47,000 2 1** 3,203 Seamus Sims Skate Park 44,000 1 9,610 Pdotes: '`B a c; d on r r,r"ntnunil ics with prrl"aukrtlon Iar r Sta1U Ur mile raf I'';01 to `? 'a00, l hu City h,,S �3 d nsify of "I,''94 in y 019, �" I I i a f,aii{','tciijnaJr<,airyr,t o11" e1,aled I:ay1 hu, r,oI.inty, ina1: by t h e, fait bciatd and r Ia: ,,isft,, `krrurce: je fr;"tsvn (:r,,,runlo I"Id0 !, I'Is",in 201b" f111V/11, �019 N I � I I A l(; 11)j Idl I� K' 2019, The NRPA benchmarks address typical facilities. A facility type not benchmarked is pickleball which has seen local interest in community clubs, and Vision Survey responses. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED The City's share of expenditures per acre of managed sites, excluding the golf park, is in the range of examined jurisdictions including the pool. See Exhibit 48. However, the neighboring communities (Poulsbo, Sequim, Port Angeles) do not operate pools, so once excluded, the City's expenditures per acre are less than nearly all agencies. The golf park is excluded in these estimates since the City does not maintain it. Most peer communities referenced do not operate pools, except MetroParks Tacoma. The level of outdoor pool operation is about 52% in NRPA benchmark information; the percentage with indoor pools is not known. Exhibit 48. Maintenance and Operations Expenditures per Acre of Managed Sites otroPaurrhrs I'aconna ew PRA Bellevue n°:;A PRA P4RIPA Upper Qu orlik ,, 1 Sf:d'U -2500 pprrrn IIU IIIII�1111�1111UUIIII�1111! y1111�1111�!!l1�11111 y1111 yJJJ1 yIJJJ�1al lu � ,»�� Port Angeles f 2,820 Port'Towsrersa;~nd wlitht Poolll" 0,000 h4IRIPA Mcdl in 1501 to 2500 p psirri $6, ,50 Ur ,rooaiUslkrcti 6,526 Port 'Townsend w0h oul Poolle $3,722 N" excludes PT Uolf 1 1u uunn 2,1 IU2 CC)ul'Se (kCCeS Note: IVIr Holt ''ai ks 1 racorlI a operates irirdoor pcxa Is 0lheI'cit in s ir!.,'fr.rrsrIc d do rix+l: 11MItagE; rrr oIs I he IdIU"'A iInLes 11"rak 52%, of� <,d,rslncl s have outrla ol, hrrarals as of 12011) Ili t i411r iiwlr°aa:ai Pools Is; n at I010VVI'l. Acra'2 rlylw,, ("AI)RA (.:ofl"nnl1 ,sla Y or Accrt fdlt ",rl,Jori fdl Flair ono Recreation Ag,, .P1cl , thl" lirl p.,fJ YI,'y/ has liccI(' fated the Islf'1d ar' r dlcl rai•,i lor i ,rarl" pol ,r{a.aare l the NldfF' -) as ialent if ie d 1:hrii o xll-wndlt ur od lypk al a1„cn( esk f awo d on flonsily of� I rr,rl:5aalra1:ir,ra�7. `7rrlmc 11,IRI''Fr, 2019, 01Y and AV �crat.y Bu dl,ut, )0191 BI'RK, 2011), Results are similar when considering operating expenses per capita. See Exhibit 49. Port Townsend is in the range of peers and lower when excluding the pool, a feature most communities do not have under their management as a public facility. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Exhibit 49.Operating Expenses per Capita 2019 sokvuc "APRI�U111111111�1111111111U�U1111111111�1111111111�1111111111�1111111111�1U111111111�1111111111� � M lroParks l'ac,csnsa CAPP 504 �NRPA Upper Qu�arlde 1500.2500 IIIIIIIIII III 1 4 Pears Townsend wvfth Poo109 INRFIA me&ani 1501 to 2500 p psn,ro Pould->o 6 Port'lro,wnsa'nd aadsl"Ioul Pool 0 Sc slu hin S 2 `.,ourrc; I,IluIIA, r011); City and p,,onc )019, ItI RK, XY19, LEVEL OF SERVICE IIIq° ' IIIII of S ii iiiii °4 The City's adopted level of service (LOS) is an acres -based formula established in the 1990s with the City's first Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act. The Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element continues to identify 7.6 acres per 1,000 population as the standard. However, the Comprehensive Plan defers to this PROS Plan for direction on local service standards for "equitable access, distribution, and function." The 2014 PROS Plan indicated that the acres -based LOS is measured to exclude the golf park acres and to exclude the water area of Kah Tai Lagoon. With that measurement standard, the City has adequate acres to serve its population today but there would be a deficit of about 7 acres with the 2036 population projection established in County Resolution 38-15. See Exhibit 50. If the golf park with 58.9 acres and the lagoon with 44.7 acres is included, the reserves would increase. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Exhibit 50. LOS Evaluation: Comprehensive Plan 7.6 Acres per 1,000 Population 1993 7,755 58.9 59.0 7.6 Yes 0 130.6 71.7 2010 9,113 69.3 74.6 8.2 Exceeds 5 146.2 76.9 2019 9,610 73.0 85.6 8.9 Exceeds 13 189.2 116.1 2036 12,165 92.5 85.6 7.0 Exceeds [7] 189.2 96.7 rt: ui,c.eCity (�,)f O)w n serid 2014; I13, RII, "(ill). This PROS Plan carries forward the Comprehensive Plan LOS policy as a base standard. Target LOS measures are presented below to address "equitable access, distribution, and function" referenced in the Capital Facilities Element. The base and target LOS help the City to acquire and develop parks consistent with Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policy 4.3 in Chapter 2. Alternative means of measuring the acres available to the public are also provided for consideration in future Comprehensive Plan Updates. LOS This PROS Plan establishes an equitable access and distribution objective: Provide parks and recreation facilities within a 10-minute walk (approximately a half mile, 0.5) to reach over 90% of Port Townsend's population by 2036. Currently, based on the Trust For Public Land's park score, about 68% of current Port Townsend residents are within a 10-minute walk of a park. This objective would increase the percentage of residents with equitable access over the Comprehensive Plan period. Ensure parkland within a 10-minute walk meets minimum standards for the park classification. Prioritize neighborhoods with higher concentrations of families with children or seniors living alone. Target filling of gaps in central and western city limits by 2036. See Exhibit 40. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ' CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Consider phasing improved access by filling in missing links in trails, improving existing parkland that does not meet minimum standards, partnering with other public agencies such as schools or Jefferson County to make available properties to the public for recreation, and targeted acquisitions. To maintain functionality, the PROS Plan establishes an objective that the value of the system the City has invested in does not decrease as the community grows. As of 2019, on a per capita basis the City has invested in the system at about $910 in facilities and $3,250 to $6,670 in land. See Exhibit 51. This is estimated from insurance values in structures and an average value per acre considering several park sites in the inventory. If investing at a similar rate as the current population, the total investment need in the future by 2036 with the planned 2036 population up to 12,165 would equal nearly $11 to $20 million. For a typical capital facility plan 6-year period, the level of investment would be $3.8 to $6.9 million. Annually, this is approximately $625,000 to 1,150,000 per year. See Exhibit 49 for the current per capita investment value and Exhibit 52 for the application of the per capita investment value to future population growth. The median investment per year considering all NRPA agencies of all sizes is just over $800,000 per year. Agencies with a similar population density as Port Townsend manage capital programs of about $1.1 million per year. Agencies managing 250 acres or less of parkland tend to have capital budgets of about $280,000 per year. See Exhibit 53. Locally, the 2019 budgeted investments for nearby communities ranged from $145,000 (Sequim) to $300,000 (Port Angeles) to $687,000 (Poulsbo). Future investments should add capacity to the system consistent with this plan and without decreasing the value of the system enjoyed today. This plan proposes an annual investment range of $300,000 to $900,000 per year, depending on available funding sources. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ' CH. s| osMxmo&msso Exhibit S1'Investment Per Capita 2019 popu|ationaoze e,610 9,610 Average Assessed Value per Park Acre* $201,087 $412,987 Inventory Acres Excluding Lagoon (Open vvater)~~ z*sz zss.z Land Value $31,200700 $64079,000 Land Value per Capita (mundcd) -------------------------------------------------------------------- g3,250 $6,670 mmranceva|ueFau|uies $8,768380 $8,768380 Improvement Value per Capita (mvnded) $910 $azo Total Land and Improvement Value per Capita $4,160 $7,580 No�s�°H�hincludesfor [ommunity(Che�zemok andKahTal) andParks(8bhopNay Park,8bhnp Par�SatherParkFiekJEast, 8aherView, andl2thand Hancuok)'Lowbthemedianvalueperacpeofall availal"fle1andvaIueofor Cummun�tKNmi0hborhood^5pecblUse (Goffl)'and Gardenparks,VaIuesforommntownparksnot avai1ab1eNotaU parkgtes haveAuuessorkandvaluasduo toexemp|gatu!' **0penVVateris34acnsperAssessor, 5inceandvaflumuforKahTaiin pau'did notdiscountvwgUands Soui'ce:]effersonCounty Assessor, AssmciationofVVashinglonCities, 8ERK[onsulting,2D18 Exhibit 52.Future Investment 2D18-2Q36 2036 Population 12,165 12,165 Net ponu|a�onmcna,ezn1y'znss _ �sss 2,555 Total Per Capita Investment Value $4,160 $7,580 Future Total Value tobeInvested znzs'znas $10,628800 $19,3e6,900 Annual Investment 2019-2036 $625,224 $1,139,229 6-Year Investment $3,751,341 $6,835,376 Exhibit 53'Example Agency Annual Capital Investments Acreage ofparks maintained: zsoo,fewer acres $z0000n _ Median Capital Budget Investment All Agencies $801,450 Agencies serving Population per Square Mile: 1,501 TO 2,500 $1,074,350 xxaohZ0Z0 PORT TOvvm3smo2O2OPROS PLAN |TOmxY'SVISION, nJrwOmmOxx'SPARKS zz CH. 5 1 DEMAND & NEED Another functional measure is to ensure that maintenance resources keep up with increased usage. This PROS Plan establishes an objective that the 2019 maintenance investment per capita of about $120 is carried forward as the population grows to ensure budgeted resources increase as usage grows. The estimate includes the 2019 budgeted expenditures plus the unmet maintenance needs divided by the 2019 population. Applying $120 per capita to the City's 2036 population target would equal about $307,000, or 3 FTEs. Exhibit 54. Maintenance Per Capita 2019 If measuring maintenance costs by acres the rate is $3,200 excluding the pool expenditures and $6,100 including the pool expenditures, and both excluding the golf park acres since those are not maintained by the City but rather the lessee. If the City added two parks of 10 acres each (total 20 acres) to fill gaps in the system, that would equal a need for $66,000 per year assuming the cost per acre excluding the pool. The amount of resources needed depends on the acquisitions and there may be one or two increases rather than a gradual increase based on population growth. FiAiir aT ° Quantity Measures In future Comprehensive Plan Updates, the City could consider focusing its acres -based LOS on acres of parkland open to the public. This could include the golf park acres and exclude park acres that are not providing a minimum level of service; the latter of which would require defining. The City could also set goals with regard to park sites that meet the minimum park standards in Chapter 6 Park & Recreation System Plan. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS '' PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS This Chapter provides minimum standards for parks, and concept plans for key parks. It identifies the trail system classes and improvement standards. It also describes the City's process for adding and modifying its suite of programs. PARKS t i iiiii iiiii iiin Guiding principles have been established to steer the focus and the growth of the Port Townsend parks and recreation system. These principles are to work in concert with the Vision Themes, identified in Exhibit 30, and are incorporated throughout the PROS plan update to best meet the needs of the community. Address deferred maintenance and critical maintenance needs. Develop park stewardship and master plans to guide investments. Invest in existing parks to meet community desires (or demands, needs, etc.) and address expected growth. Achieve equitable access and distribution by filling in gaps in central and western Port Townsend through improved trails, partnerships, and targeted acquisitions. II fi � iiir i lllll of IIIII' rlllks Parks are classified based on their function and service area. Classified parks are mapped on Exhibit 55. Summary classifications are included in the textbox following the map. The primary purpose and features of each classified park follow in Exhibit 56. CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 55. Park Classifications Ma s �I — �X��all�iLrkj�V�N' lmrl now" s f l „_ TN T, lnpr, ✓,�jtfY-,rl fp�,3 PP""f'1, 5,1 F/vo Y_ n of! v".(,I)'m"' ow* fl v "ml , 44 u o March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS i 11 CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Cornirnuinvity Parks aire lairgeir paidks serving rniulllliple ineighborhoods diraMing resideints fiorn acirossthe co irnimunilty as w6lHl as visftcrrs firuin iJhe county and beyond. Community ilairksoffeir ip�aces for cornimunilty gatheirings, fairnHy activities, and active oir passive ein�oyivqrieint of faci�lhlties and airneinities. Chietzemoka ilairk, anchors the east side of Poirli, lowinseind, Kah Taal) Lagoon liA"ve center, avid 35"" Stmet Park thie WEwSt s�de. Sub dlasses Heiniffy If dhe pairk is iririore Active or `401 :U,vre fOCUsed. i4eiglilmirtrood Parks pirmikle Ilocaall opportUirifties for firequenit and coinVEin6eint access to ba:ac recireation activivies aind oppoirtuinities. Sevein pairks aire coinslldeire(-] Neighborhood Flairks aind seirve resideinb!4l areas dhiirouglhiout thie comirrminifty. Neiglhboidhood Natuire flairks such as Sadheir IFbirest Flairk pir(:wide Ipaaa~va~vive ein()yinrieint oppoirturdbes aind Nl6ghboirhood Acbv(�n Parks Ilillke Ih (:)Uby McGairiraiugh Park r)irovrde inore Intense pilay, spoirts, and other active recreation opportunities, SUb- dlasses dentiffy If the Iraaanlh is iinvoire Achive or NlabAre frKlAsed, 1)owritowiri IlParks serve the historic, downtown and uptowin areas and offeir ssateir, access, urlbain (",orninunity gathering and sraediA eveinir space, and other recreation fealiillres at six ocations. They rrvay Ipiroarlid e neghboidwmd Ihaaalrlk funcdons rou a esklents Ming in thic, uirbain coil :a ffielse Iraaarlkssairinay Ibe refeirenced lirn otheir Coinnipircheinsive and Subziirea ilIlains as Urban il)(xket Parks, the 2014 CAassfficabion. Gairden Parks piicwide [aindscape featiures thiat offer vrsuA rehef and hinrifted rsubhc access or aiineinkies,, Fbur such pairks aire at einliries and afoing Iroaadwaays in the crty,, rhey aid." simailf 41 size and rnay (nsnly Irnudannid e as vrsua� buffer ()ir Ikadna«mauullufliraanllud in enhainceiimsirit� U) thie urban oir otheir enviii-oirililleirit dhat suirrounds llhicairn. Spev:4l Use Parks aire focused typicaHly airouin(l as sirvglle Ipu.ulrlposc or uinique set of facflffies; Five such parks aire hnd�luded in Floirt Tbwinseind ofiR�ihhng rndooir (`sr outdooir recireaboin oftrnin wWh ain acilkle rrr(�,,atkm focus, T'lltids dlassffication can br" uwnbiimml \Adth offic!irs I Ihe i4atuire sub classificatioin ideindfies paid<s whiere lii(:n pirihmairy Irauarradnnaes ilindlude inature aind wflldhfe habiltat ("lonservation, passive recrealJoin such as tiraflls and viewp6nts, and educalionaand (zuhm14l appii(xiation 61eirywinli.s. linteinskie areas of devebpiineint aire innited based on rhe onviii-onirrvent4l chairacteirisOcs of the pairk- I he Active sub classification ideiritifies parks that aire desllgned for freeluent aind coinveirfleint access t(°�) re,creation ad',' rvilrie�& avid oprsorrunivies such as farnfly activities (picnic, gatheiring), actiw,, recreation (pqay, sports, other'), and passive rc,,cireatbn (tra0s, open Uawn/turf. inforrna� aurvity), Fbescl! parks woUd ailso contibAlte open srmice and einvrroinirnenta�l vahAes, March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 56. Park Areas of Focus/Key Features Community Park 35th Street Park— Nature/Active X X Chetzemoka Park —Active X Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park — Nature X Neighborhood Park 12th & Hancock —Active X x Baker View Park —Active (future) X Bishop Park — Nature X Bishop Play Park —Active X Bobby McGarraugh Park —Active X Sather Park (east) —Active (future) X Sather Park Forest (west) — Nature X Downtown Park Adams Street Park Bell Tower Haller Fountain/Terrace Steps Pope Marine/Jackson Park X Rotary Park Tyler Street Stairs Garden Park City Entrance Dahlia Park (T1) Gateway Park (T2) Speaker Corner Special Use Elmira Street Park (future) Golf Park X Larry Scott Memorial Trail X Mountain View Park and Pool — X X Special Use/Neighborhood* Seamus Sims Skateboard Park X *Includes a dog park. Sources: City of Port Townsend, BERK 2019. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ? X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS .,,,. CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN inh°°r°''l fIIff SMrida rcls/AlIowa ble1a flVIlrf" Each park should be improved over time to achieve minimum standards to meet the needs of the community and to provide for consistent and sustainable management and maintenance. Typically existing parks are zoned Existing Park and Open Space (P/OS(A)). The "district has been applied to existing city, county, and state-owned parks, recreation areas, and city -owned or controlled lands which provide valuable natural and open space functions." In addition to the PROS Plan classifications and minimum standards, the City's zoning standards would apply including allowable uses, bulk, and dimensional standards. Community Parks are larger parks providing a variety of major recreation facilities, open space, and/or recreation programming, serve multiple neighborhoods, and are generally treated as a destination for visitors. These parks also tend to offer accommodations and infrastructure for community events. Community Parks often reflect a shared community identity, and offer flexibility across recreation and programming types throughout the year. Their size and range of offerings attract visitors and neighbors who may travel further distances and stay longer periods of time requiring more allowance and provisions for parking, seating, restrooms and family support amenities. Sub -classes identify if the park is more Active or Nature focused. Exhibit 57. Community Parks Parks in this category also often have unique or identifying characteristics further described as: Established in 1904 this park sits on a gently sloped hillside overlooking Admiralty Inlet. It provides a highly manicured site with unique gardens, multiple play areas, family picnic facilities, and community gathering spaces including a gazebo and a vast lawn/natural amphitheater where cultural events are held. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ., CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN The lagoon is a natural area associated with marsh, wetlands, and grasslands and provides nesting, feeding, and breeding habitat for birds, ducks and other wildlife. The area is set aside for preservation of natural resources and open space to serve wildlife habitat and compatible passive recreation uses. This park currently offers passive unimproved trails. Its future uses are meant to be further defined through a park master plan. Early concepts in this PROS Plan emphasize trails and passive elements. Small areas for family activities and sport courts are suggested. In the Port Townsend Collection: Community Active: Chetzemoka Park Community Nature: Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park Community Nature/Active To Be Determined: 35th Street Park Minimum Size: 10 acres+. Comm Phi Vie .Acry"WE PARm ..................................................................................................................................................... Key features might include: Family Activities (Picnic, Gathering), Passive Recreation (Trails, Open Lawn/Turf, Informal Activity), Water Access, Active Recreation (Play, Sports, Other). Often sought after for: Outdoor Recreation, Open Space/ Habitat Preservation. At a minimum the parks should aim to provide everything neighborhood -active parks do plus: Community gathering and event space Infrastructure for gathering and events (e.g. audio, lighting etc.) Interpretive signage Off-street parking, adequate but conservative Pathways between elements and to safely enter and exit the park as well as pathways to navigate around the property (e.g. loop path) Permanent restroom facilities (universal design, gender equity, and family accommodations) Play equipment, multi -age and ability levels Shelters that can accommodate numerous and/or larger groups March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Where possible, and appropriate in their contexts, parks falling into this typology should consider everything in neighborhood -active parks as well as: Conservancy and nature park protections Designated sports courts and fields (and subsequent lighting) and skate park/infrastructure in Community -Active parks Designated dog areas (on and off -leash) in Community -Active parks More substantive plantings including groundcovers, understory and canopy, with a focus on native species and no invasive species Gardens, arboretums, food forests Storage and maintenance buildings Use of green stormwater infrastructure approaches Because of the intent and goals for community parks they should limit where appropriate: Extensive off-street parking Threats to flexible multi -use activities and landscaped, natural or habitat areas Sports complexes or regional -scale facilities (see Special Use) Comilauirry NI ["LIRE PARK .......................................................................................................................................................... Often sought after for: natural and or cultural environment, passive recreation, nature and wildlife habitat. At a minimum the parks should aim to provide: Community gathering space appropriate to site conditions and to support environmental or cultural education Picnic shelters or picnic furnishings that can accommodate groups in appropriately focused site locations Interpretive signage with a preference for low -intrusion Interpretive or educational facilities Off-street parking, adequate but conservative to reduce impervious areas and development footprints Pathways between elements and to safely enter and exit the park as well as pathways to navigate around the property (e.g. loop path) Permanent restroom facilities (universal design, gender equity, and family accommodations) where feasible March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Limits on the amenities provided to the numbers and types of visitors the area can accommodate while retaining its resource value, natural character, and the intended level of solitude Natural character and restoration and maintenance as needed to ensure health and longevity Supportive of solitude and passive or quiet experiences and recreation Trails, soft -surface or permeable materials Where possible, and appropriate in their contexts, parks falling into this sub -typology should consider: Trash receptacles, and leash and scoop dispensers, where applicable Viewpoints or viewing blinds Restoration of the natural resource values of the site Use of green stormwater infrastructure approaches Because of the intent and goals for conservation in community nature parks they should limit: Turf areas Exotic plantings Sources of light and glare that may interfere with the natural, open space, and habitat character of the park. Neighborhood Parks are intended for frequent and convenient access to basic recreation activities and opportunities. They typically serve neighborhoods within walking distance of a to % mile. These parks best serve nearby residents and visitors in less formal or organized recreation and leisure. Neighborhood Parks provide open space values. They are less suited for longer stays, heavily programmed activities, or larger rental or permit -required spaces. These parks prioritize open space over parking and encourage visitation through pedestrian and bike networks. Sub -classes identify if the park is more Active or Nature focused. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS �' : CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 58. Neighborhood Parks Minimum Size: Typically 1-5 acres in size. In the Port Townsend Collection: Neighborhood Active: Bobby McGarraugh Park, Baker View Park, Bishop Play Park, Sather Park (east), 13th & Hancock Neighborhood Nature: Bishop Park, Sather Park Forest (west) Aarrive PAIRK Key Features might include: Family Activities (Picnic, Gathering), Passive Recreation (Trails, Open Lawn/Turf, Informal Activity), Active Recreation (Play, Sports, Other). Often sought after for: Outdoor Recreation, Open Space/ Habitat Preservation, Ornamental/ Greenspace Buffer. At a minimum the parks should aim to provide: Open and accessible landscape for unstructured activity, play, and respite Basic maintenance, care and landscape improvements Pathways between elements and to safely enter and exit the park Simple seating where appropriate and accommodating Universal play equipment Where possible, and appropriate in their contexts, parks falling into this typology should consider: Conservancy and nature park protections Natural or low -intervention areas and green space Community gardens or food forest Irrigation March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ; CH. 6 l PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Seating, shelters, tables and BBQs Sports and fitness accommodations, surfacing and equipment Open playfields Restrooms permanent or portable, only where/when needed (in peak times) Use of green stormwater infrastructure approaches Because of the intent and goals for neighborhood parks they should limit where appropriate: Off street parking Horticultural programs and plantings that do not have a committed maintenance program orsponsor Specialized maintenance heavy equipment and amenities, especially those requiring staff supervision Designated dog parks IN111MG11BOR1400D hilAllll IRE PARK Often sought after for: natural and or cultural environment, passive recreation, nature and wildlife habitat. At a minimum the parks should aim to provide: Limits on the amenities provided to the numbers and types of visitors the area can accommodate while retaining its resource value, natural character, and the intended level of solitude Natural character and restoration and maintenance as needed to ensure health and longevity Supportive of solitude and passive or quiet experiences and recreation Trails, soft -surface or permeable materials Low -intrusion Interpretive or educational facilities Where possible, and appropriate in their contexts, parks falling into this sub -typology should consider: Trash receptacles, and leash and scoop dispensers, where applicable Viewpoints or viewing blinds Restoration of the natural resource values of the site March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN l TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Use of green stormwater infrastructure approaches Because of the intent and goals for conservation in neighborhood nature parks they should limit: Turf areas Exotic plantings Sources of light and glare that may interfere with the natural, open space, and habitat character of the park. D o w n tomin Par'h Downtown Parks are located in the downtown/uptown urban core and provide plazas and urban community gathering and special event spaces, waterfront or shoreline access, art and cultural facilities, or picnic or other passive enjoyment facilities. In some instances, Downtown Parks serve the needs met by neighborhood parks for residents living in the urban core. These parks may be referenced in other Comprehensive and Subarea Plans as Urban Pocket Parks, the 2014 Classification. Exhibit 59. Downtown Parks In the Port Townsend Collection: Adams Street Park, Bell Tower, Haller Fountain/Terrace Steps, Pope Marine Park, Jackson Tidal Park, Rotary Park, Tyler Street Stairs. Key features might include: Water Access, Family Activities (Picnic, Gathering), Passive Recreation (Trails, Open Lawn, Informal Activity). Often sought after for: Outdoor Recreation, Ornamental/ Greenspace Buffer or Heritage Preservation. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN At a minimum the parks should aim to provide: Spaces for events and gathering activities Green spaces and plantings Seating Lighting and electricity (as appropriate and feasible) Where possible, and appropriate in their contexts, parks falling into this typology should consider everything in neighborhood parks as well as: Expanded utilities, shelters and seating for programming, gathering and permitted events A horticultural program to include healthy and maintained landscaping (understory and canopy) and hangings/boxes with a focus on native plants and no invasive plant species Interpretive signage Use of green stormwater infrastructure approaches Because of the intent and goals for landscape parks they should limit where appropriate: Off-street parking is not recommended Garden Parks include medians, gateways, rights of way, and small greenspaces, with ornamental plantings, trees and sometimes limited amenities such as a bench or interpretive signage. Garden Parks address limited, isolated, or unique recreation or open space needs. The parks usually do not serve contexts much beyond their immediate vicinity and may or may not include green space or plantings. Garden Parks may include park benches, or streetscape buffers. They are small in size and may only provide a visual buffer or beautification enhancement to the urban or other environment that surrounds them. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 60. Garden (Landscape) Parks In the Port Townsend Collection: City Entrance, Dahlia Park (Triangle 1), Speakers Corner at Kearney/Sims Way, Gateway Park (Triangle II). Key features might include: Horticultural Programming, Heritage Preservation, Passive Recreation Often sought after for: Ornamental/ Greenspace Buffer. Where possible, and appropriate in their contexts, parks falling into this typology should consider: Accessible pedestrian safety and respite amenities Buffers from vehicular activity Access to utilities and irrigation as appropriate, useful and safe Community gardens or food forests Encourage use of native plants that attract wildlife Use of green stormwater infrastructure approaches Because of the intent and goals for landscape parks they should limit where appropriate: Off-street parking is not recommended Special Use Parks are designed for specialized or single -purpose recreation activities. These purposes may include golf parks, marinas, sport complexes, community and aquatic centers, historical areas, nature centers, conservatories, amphitheaters, or other purposes. These parks typically offer a narrower range of recreation uses or amenities. Special Use Parks may carry a double classification. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 61. Special Use Parks In the Port Townsend Collection: Special Use: Golf Park, Larry Scott Memorial Trail, Seamus Sims Skateboard Park, Elmira Street Viewpoint Park Special Use/Neighborhood: Mountain View Park and Pool Key features might include: Passive Recreation (Trails, Open Lawn, Informal Activity), Active Recreation (Play, Sports, Other). Often sought after for: Outdoor Recreation, Indoor Recreation. Consider use of green stormwater infrastructure approaches. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Parks representing different landscapes, locations, and classifications were studied conceptually for a range of potential parks uses. Desired features and concepts were reviewed at Vision and System Workshops in fall 2019 to gain public input. Concepts for the following parks are described on the following pages: Chetzemoka Park Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park 35th Street Park Sather Park Bobby McGarraugh Park Elements of the park concepts vary by park as listed in Exhibit 62. It is important to note that these are concept ideas for potential future park improvement and that, at the time of development, master planning to a greater detail would occur when appropriate and be the subject of more focused public input and may be subject to review under the State Environmental Policy Act, the City of Port Townsend Critical Areas Ordinance and/or Shoreline Master Program. Future designs may depart from the concept plans in this document. Exhibit 62. Key Features of Park Concept Plans Chetzemoka Park X X X X X X X Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park X X X X X 351h Street Park X X X X X Bobby McGarraugh Park X X X X X X Sather Park X X x x X X x ;rrurf.o IIfxl;3,11,1.RK,2019 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Essential features of Chetzemoka Park are retained in the Concept Plan including open lawns offering passive enjoyment of views and space for cultural events, pathways to the water, gardens, picnic facilities, play areas, dog park, restrooms, and parking. Recognizing the age and condition of facilities and enhancement of site assets, improvements are proposed to stabilize the shoreline, rebuild picnic and restroom structures, expand play offerings, add ADA access, open views, and more. Major features of the concept include: Shoreline: Increased vegetative buffer. Improve shoreline access (ADA). Community Space: Explore future of existing Golden Age building including investment, demolition, or other potential park use. Develop adjacent open plaza space. On the south, formalize amphitheater space. Play: Nature play area. Play trail and rain garden. Accessible play area. Informal Space and Picnic Facilities: Open lawns. Picnic areas. Rehabilitated kitchen shelter. Paths and Gardens: Improved ADA access throughout. Native forest and plantings. Cascading showcase garden. Access and Parking: Open Views at Entrances. Green infrastructure for Parking. Restrooms: Rehabilitated restroom. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 63. Chetzemoka Park Concept t5 0 E 0 E N" Z 0 E 0 �5 0 Z E > E 0 a isro 0 1, -0 r'- 0C Z- z- Cc) C Cl m t ;D w t" —C q, %A Cl — m C E1.C: to ta CL T E 0 i 2 C7 S z eq M V) d V C Z -X 13 -2 E cu E •.5 as 0 E' OM cc) E E & >:E 0 — "v CL= E E 3 o d CyL E u -0 CL P_ March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park is and will remain a park where residents and visitors can connect with nature. Passive trails and viewing areas and picnic facilities allow for public access and use in focused areas. The park concept plan includes: Entries: Improved entrances and sight lines into park. Informal Space and Picnic: Open Lawns. Bathroom Converted into Picnic Shelter.' Additional Picnic Shelter and equipment storage and irrigation access. Trails and Views: ADA accessible Loop Trail With Interpretive Signs. Informal Trails. Other: Improved Hydraulic Connection Between Ponds. " I he du nc& H II'oar�k i nd aride a iow IPua s , DA u`esbru )oir7rns.. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS � CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 64. Kah Tai Lagoon Park Concept E Q, > 2 S ci E E 2— ml 0 cl, QN' ZD -o > c 0 U'o c uj .0 ca as Z' E -a, 0 I m P_ U-pl 105 4m lk March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN 35"" Street Park, 35th Street Park today has informal trails but is otherwise largely treed and in a natural state. The park concept plan retains the wooded character, wetlands, habitat, and natural drainage of the site and adds a network of formal and informal trails including fitness and play stations. A small focused area of play, picnic, and sports courts for multi -uses (e.g. tennis, pickleball, basketball) is provided on the north, served by on -street parking. Park concept features include: Informal Spaces and Landscaping: Native forest — retain particularly specimen trees. Some interspersed forest play areas. Mowable prairie. Trails: ADA loop trail and informal trail connections. Connection to surrounding trails. Play: Loop trail with play and fitness nodes. Forest play area. Sport Courts: Multi use sport courts. Picnic and Seating: Picnic Shelter and Tables. Observation Seating. Benches. Access and Parking: Improved Gateway Entrance retaining specimen trees. Parking along the Street. ADA Parking. Restroom: Restroom provided in the active recreation area. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 65. 35 th Street Park Concept 121-1 0 E No b CL 01, x u c a C" 2 z lu CL < < lCl 0 - >m' -C w E 0,. LL 0. GL Z CL 0 o P_ March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Bobby McGarrmigh Bobby McGarraugh Park is a neighborhood park with traditional swings and a playground. The park concept plan enhances its central use as an active play space adding a wider variety of play, adventure, and fitness features and increasing picnic facilities. Play and Fitness: Inclusive play area, splash pad, adventure play trail, hillside slide, rock climbing wall, and fitness area. Informal Space and Picnic: Open lawn, ADA picnic shelters, and tables. Trails and Fitness: Adventure Play Trail. Access and Parking: Improved entrance with signs. Improved access for pedestrians and bicyclists. Landscaping: Native forest improvements avoid erosion. Restroom: Moved and improved restroom. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 66. Bobby McGarraugh Park Concept r r 0 - 0 CL 2 a _Q J-ro m *C5 n- E awl tyi VI .c '0 2 2 TO 2 —CL -a uj E LL 0,2 0. C IUD 2 A0 m E K I z 2 L� E �Aii March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN ,Sather Park Sather Park consists of two parts — an eastern passive manicured open lawn area with a hedge and a western wooded area with trails. The park concept retains the passive, wooded character of the Sather Park Forest on the west, while making selected enhancements of its entrance, and habitat and forest ecology. Existing trails would be retained and a ADA loop trail added. An outdoor classroom and nature play area would also be added. Sather Park East would have a focus on family activities. A loop path, picnic area, and play area are envisioned to be added. It would retain a buffer but with native species and ornamental plantings. An open lawn allows for informal uses. ................................. Open and improved entrance Improve habitat & forest ecology ADA Loop Trail and connection to informal trails Nature play nodes Forest gathering space Wayfinding elements E-6.S Open and improved entrance Native buffer Loop Path Ornamental Plantings Picnic Areas Play Area Open Lawn Wayfinding elements March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 67. Sather Park Concept 5 E 15,2 C: awl D m C uj v, 4) ro v 2 w r- CL C v C C C 2 cl Z uj m E m C E E W cm c Q0 E 2 al r > 5� m M-0 E z7a 0 E-a E z q,z March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS "`", CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Hancock Street Park i ��Ir V�d f/ 6 fII k rfRt(µ 11 If ^ 1 oc rr ' �� ° $ ...'�P� , . �G t rt� �hffi a I z Yi1 it i i NJ 4W A �^ y r ^� r i a" r� r a i �� J fiy, ^ P i 7jw T F LL,R AJYU (�d '^0 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ';' CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN SPECIAL USE FACILITIES t uiii ° 'iiiii iiii View Fillool Port Townsend has successfully operated Mountain View Pool since 1995, increasing its use and serving residents of all ages as indicated in Exhibit 35. The pool was designed and constructed in 1963 for use by middle school students and now provides for swimming lessons, swimming practices, aquatic classes, and drop -in use. Its size and shape is not designed for competitive use. While a maintenance bond has been implemented to make necessary repairs to allow pool use to continue, the pool is beyond its useful life and capital improvements are needed. Community engagement results in Chapter 4 Community Profile & Engagement and Appendix B illustrated support for investing in the pool as an important form of indoor recreation: Most Vision survey respondents agreed strongly or very strongly that Port Townsend should: Make capital investments (e.g. larger multilane lap pool; children's water slides and play area; tot pool; sauna and hot tub) to improve Mountain View Pool and make it more attractive for public use Explore options to partner with other public agencies and/or private businesses to make March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN the needed capital investments and operate the pool Among a range of possible investments, an aquatic center received the second highest number of responses and the highest dollar share among Vision survey respondents Community Health surveys indicated access to indoor recreation was important for year round fitness The City is currently engaged in a multi -agency discussion about the development of a new, full - service YMCA that would include an updated and more modern aquatic center to replace Mountain View Pool. Proposed funding mechanisms for the project include a Metropolitan Park District. Given this process has been underway for a number of years, this PROS Plan was not purposed with exploring the viability of the proposed YMCA but, rather, to focus more exclusively on the other components of the City's parks and recreation system so decisions regarding funding options, partnerships, facilities, and recreation programming could be made more holistically. Additional public involvement and elected official discussions about Mountain March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN View Pool and future investments in city parks and recreation are forthcoming and should be informed in part by this PROS Plan. Ilf iiii Townsend GdII[ 1 ) aiiidlll The City currently manages the golf park by contracting operations to a private business. In advance of this contract expiring on December 31, 2023, the City hired Groundswell Architecture to conduct a robust community process to assist City Council to decide the future of the Golf Park. Similar to the situation with Mountain View Pool and the YMCA proposal, this PROS Plan was not purposed with determining the future of the golf park but, rather, providing information about the City's other parks and recreation assets and operations so that decisions could be made that are more fully informed. The City Council decided to sign an operating lease with the Friends of the Port Townsend Golf Park to operate the 9-hole course but also to expand use of the 58.9 acres. PROS Plan community engagement results showed limited use of the Port Townsend Golf Course and interest in golf in general, similar to declining national trends. Most Vision survey respondents do not have an opinion on the operation, investment or use of the golf course. For those who do have an opinion, most do not want to make capital investments, set a cost recovery policy, or explore partnership options. For those with an opinion, most do not want the City to stop operating the golf course, but others are supportive of exploring alternative options. While the future and alternative uses of the golf course were not directly sought, ideas and thoughts were nonetheless shared during the Vision and System Plan outreach events; comments included: Continuing to operate the golf course for golf Allowing multiple recreation uses on the property (e.g. frisbee golf, foot golf) or other active sports uses that could be accomplished while still having golf on certain days Repurposing to more active sports and managing as a complex with Mountain View, especially if active sports are not feasible on other properties like 35th Converting it to a nature park Surplusing for nonpark uses In December of 2023, the City Council opted to expand the use of the golf course, calling in the Port Townsend Golf Park, and adding an inclusive playground as shown below. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS ' CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN TRAILS Through the Healthy Community Design Initiative, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identified the ways in which park and especially trail access could impact overall health in youth and adults alike. Trails, as they suggest, should be within walking distance of homes with safe access and connections points to enter the system. Trails should also support a thorough non -motorized system of sidewalks, crosswalks, and bike paths accessible to the areas people live, work, and play. A trail network serves as a linear park system linking parks, civic spaces, neighborhoods, and ultimately communities together. Trails should be designed and maintained in a way that protects the resource, provides a degree of universal access and "device" friendliness, and encourages maximum usage. Devices would include strollers, ambulation aids like walkers or canes, or wheelchair navigability where feasible and safe. 1 I'iiiii iiir iirdlll Trails are designed and maintained based on the role they serve in the overall connected system and the usage they receive. Port Townsend's Non -Motorized Transportation Plan (1998, 2011, 2014) addresses pedestrian and bicycle facilities. For the purposes of this PROS Plan, a focus is on off -roadway elements given the Parks Recreation and Community Services Department's role in maintaining the City's network of all unpaved trails. The Non -Motorized Transportation Plan identifies the following facility types: Major Streets with Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: Arterial and collector streets are main thoroughfares that will ultimately include pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Neighborhood Connectors: Neighborhood connectors are intended to provide routes across town to the identified destinations and links between and within neighborhoods. Neighborhood connectors may be sidewalks or pathways adjacent to streets or pathways on alignments separate from streets, within unopened street rights -of -way. Pathways will generally be shared facilities serving walkers and bicyclists. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Shortcuts: Shortcuts are typically one -block pathways on unopened rights -of -way that connect between streets. They are often unimproved, but are envisioned to be signed and cleared. Multi -Use Trail: The multi -use trail is a wide, arterial trail generally separated from city streets. Its purpose is to provide non -motorists the greatest variety of experience and the least amount of conflict with motorized traffic. It is routed, wherever possible, through parks and potential open spaces, adjacent to drainage corridors, and along existing trails and unopened street rights -of -way. It is located adjacent to streets in as few places as possible, and only where it is necessary to provide continuity. The multi -use loop is routed on slopes with moderate grades to accommodate a wide range of users. It will serve all user groups and will accommodate bicyclists, pedestrians, and in some cases equestrians. IA4Idkway Systeali The Non -Motorized Transportation Plan proposes a Walkway System with the following key elements: A Multi -Use Trail, a unifying loop that circumnavigates the city, A Portage Trail between Port Townsend Bay and the Strait of Juan de Fuca connecting the County and Larry Scott Memorial Park with the Park -and -Ride, shopping areas, the Boat Haven, the golf park, schools, Chinese Gardens and Fort Worden State Park The Waterwalk, a coordinated set of connected pathways, sidewalks, passageways between buildings and shoreline access points along Port Townsend's Urban Waterfront Primary and secondary Neighborhood Connectors which function as major and minor collectors for pedestrians Off-street pathway system providing: more direct connections, greater separation from traffic, and a more pleasant walking experience Sidewalks and Pedestrian Pathways on Local Streets Short-cuts, such as formalizing existing short cuts and paths such as through block connections The concept of a loop trail is highly supported in the Community Engagement results. The City's Non -Motorized Transportation Plan conceptually identifies an interconnected "loop and spoke" March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN pattern with Larry Scott Trail on the south, and connecting trails looping to the east, north, and west. See Exhibit 68. Exhibit 68. Port Townsend Loop Trail `>rai,aIT(:. Pram; IOvAIMS(� siiid "N998", updated tI a uf"ht 201ZL Some priority projects have been identified in the current Non -Motorized Transportation Plan within the overall plan conceptual framework. These include: Multi -use Trail from Fort Worden to the southwest to Discovery Road Trail from W Street (Fort Worden) south and west along Cherry Street and from W Street south and east along Jackson Street Trail east -west along Lawrence Street on the east side of town and a trail east -west along Hastings Avenue on the west March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Trails along Discovery Road Non -motorized facilities, including trail and a passage under Sims Way Some of these connections were identified in the public input for the PROS Plan Update. Exhibit 43. The current Non -motorized Transportation Plan identifies multi -use trails with pedestrians and bikes, neighborhood connectors on local streets with sidewalks or on trails in unopened rights of way, major streets with bike lanes and sidewalks, and short cuts. Standard details are shown in Exhibit 69and Exhibit 70. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 69. Standard Detail - Multi Use Trail I 1"okvinsend - flubhci Wr,)rks offlol' Standard Detailit 2% Crcns sk)pe or vown reepAyed fov dr6nage 2' ksphalt Top Colume (959 M P D), 4" -6' Pit run (or any rIon-orgamc 611), +"-6" (may be reduced F odequote subgrade exusts) Gravel shmIder Subqrcde carnpacted lo 95% NEPJD r— Gvotetae 2% Cross Wope of cmwn reqrAmd for drorxNe 1/4 compocted quarry fines (95X M.P,D)., 2*--4' PlIt ur+ (or ony mom _organlc fill), 4' 6" byXIS., Subgrade cornpovtod to 95% MP,D, (1) CURS WS' ARE REQUIRED WHERE TRAILS MEET STRELEIS (2) NE9,IHOORR000 CONNEZrOk STANDARDS MAY BE USET) FOR A MULTI -USE MAR AS AN WERN MEASURE. (a) 16RXL SUBCRADI SHOULD BE GVWX.F.) AND CLEARED OF VEGETAT(ON (4) roxLAYOW AND DESIGN SHOULD WHWE, DAMAGE M TWES, AND R00P., (5) BARN NAZE DMURBANCES 10 SURROUNDING VECLTAIION AND soli, DURING c0N',rTRUC'T*N (6) ALL WETURBED MEAS ARE 10 BE REMOOED AND REJ:LM1E1G (7) MAWTAN NAWRA, DRAINAGE PIAMERNS WITH USE OF CULWRIS WHERE NECESSARY (8) AVOID STEEP WOOES AND CWW SLVES (9) "ML FIU. 40 BASE SHOULD C-ONIAN Ko mwc IoAERX (10) 20 .FL)Cff PAVED APRON REWIRED MIEN AN UNPAVED rRm CONNECIS TO A PAWIT 's'rREF (II) MNAGE T1,eT WDWkMS TRAFFIC CONMOL DWANCES AND DRECT04S SHOlAl) BE PLACED AT STREP INTERSECIN)NS ................. . ... ............. ........ -- . . .............. .......................... .................... . ..................... . — ----------------------- N1t'66TT'I4 t1M St�aTfdzrd Approv""6 By. .......... - ------------------- Filk; IF - X S,r>ijrceIIV oFlorl Tom/rsorld, L99,9 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS — : CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 70. Standard Detail — Neighborhood Connector and Undeveloped Shortcut ty c) 1"' Port I crv,"r)scrid ,, lltdflic VV�,,�rks Dcj,,yarttncn,)t 1`0arxiark] Dc,,,tafl PRIMARY NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTOR 219 cma slop. w, cm.n ,.q.4.d 9., &0,.q. d/4," cornpacled crushed rock (95% M.P.D)., 2" 4" Felt run (ce any non-onjanic fill), 4"-6' ("my be mlucod if adeqcwto aribgrmle exiAts) Subgrade cvnpocled to 95% M,PJ1 SECONDARY NEIGHBORHOOD CONW'ICTOR AND DI,�VELOIDED S1.1DR1CU1 G00 XV110 2% cra" 610P0 amw r , wdh requk.d f,.a9a 1/4" cornpactNt crushed rock (953 M,P.D�), 2" 4" (rvmy require subbase If subgrade �s inodequato) $jbgrade cornpucted to 959 MY D UNDEVE10PED S-IORI'CUF 6' clear 2' tread (1) CURB CU'll, ARE REQUIRED WHERE TITNUS MErSIREE-rS (2) THE UNDEVELOPED SHOKI'CLI7 STANDARD MAY BE USE) FOR NILIGHBORHOOD CONNECIORS AS AN lNrLRUM wASURC! (3) IRAA %HiGRADE SHOULD BE GRADED AND CUARED OF VEGEIAIION! (4i iRNI !AYOUT AND DEMGN SHOWD MINIMIZE DAMAGE 10 rRf:[% AND ROCHS (5 ) IAINIMiZE D6TURBANCE'S TO SURROUNDiNG VETOATION AND SOIL DUFONC 4dONSIRUC110N (6) M1, UXIURSED AREAS ARE 10 K REGRADED AND REPLANIFI) (7) MNNIAN NArUM )PANAGE RATrERNS WnUSE OF CULVERn Y01ERE 19ECESSARY (8) AV00 STEEP GRADES AJ40 (N'tOSS SLOPES 19) TRAIL FU AND BASE SHOULD CONTATN NO ORGANIC MAFEWN (10) 20- FO(J PAVED APRON REQUIRED WHEN AN UNPAV0 "kMl CONNECTS TO PAVED 5TREL11 ('II) StGNAGE IKMC0N0 A PUBUC PAITI SHOULD BE PIKED AT SPREEI` INTERSECTIONS f,ar Jwu,%168 " """ (" iq'rypmvcxi R", Standin] ............... ................................................. Soutcc�(Jtyof Port fivvncnd, 199,,3 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN PROGRAMS Goal 4, in 0 Goals & Policies provides guiding principles for Port Townsend's program areas of focus and evaluation. Key concepts include: Provide comprehensive, enriching, and affordable programs Consider community needs, interests, and trends Serve as many persons as possible Accommodate a citizenry diverse in age, interests, income levels, and abilities Gap areas where the City could provide services or partner with other entities include: Publicly provided childcare, daycare, or afterschool programs Senior -specific or focused programming Cultural or educational classes or courses Environmental/wilderness programming or other non -sporting outdoor activities Whether the City continues to focus on aquatic programs or whether it broadens its offerings to fill gaps, ensuring programs fit the community over time is important. Through program evaluation, the City can determine which programs to add, increase, or reduce. See Exhibit 71. The City can regularly review community needs, its best role, available resources or partners, and develop programs. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 6 1 PARK & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Exhibit 71. Recreation Program Cycle >ourco,, (f arit,J�.s, 2008), 1'1 RKt 20'153 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS This Chapter provides an evaluation of current and potential funding options for operations and capital revenue and a capital facilities plan. OPERATIONS AND CAPITAL FUNDING This PROS Plan includes a financial situation assessment that: Analyzes the City's historic and projected revenues and expenditures to estimate expected available resources; and Identifies the City's potential funding and partnership options, based on current policies and potential new policies, to address any anticipated future funding gaps. arid F1111rod Illy liiiinand Capital As public goods, both City parks and City recreation services are largely supported by public monies, similar to the vast majority of municipalities across Washington State. Specifically, the City has primarily funded its parks and recreation services through the Community Services Fund, which includes revenues from property taxes, sales taxes, utility taxes, and transfers from the General Fund. The City also generates revenues directly from providing parks and recreation services, such as user and rental fees, which can directly offset a portion of parks and recreation expenditures. The portion of parks and recreation expenditures that the City has been able to recover from direct revenues has grown from around 17% in 2009 to 27% in 2019. Nevertheless, going forward, parks and recreation cost recovery rates are projected to decline as expenditures are expected to grow at a faster rate than direct revenues. As a result, the share of parks and recreation direct revenue are expected to decrease from 27% in 2019 to 20% in 2036. The additional funding is expected to come from the Community Services Fund, which CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN is projected to increase proportionally as direct revenues decline —from 73% in 2019 to 80% in 2036. See Exhibit 72 for actual and projected parks and recreation revenues broken down by source and Exhibit 73 for actual and projected parks and recreation expenditures compared to parks and recreation direct revenues. Exhibit 72. Historic and Projected Parks and Recreation Revenues, 2009 to 2036 (Nominal$) $1..5 $ 1..0 $0.0 C'S'Y C.7 e--i f"�I CIO "•".k' Ln lD r, CO M CD a --'I N M � U1 4D r, CO C61 K::;b a --'I CN M -1, I..t1 K C:N e--'I e--i e--i 1 1 8 r-I e...p I f r-B e--'I CN N CV fV Cal C^J Y14 fel r'U C'A rn M M M M��t C'✓3 f 0 0 CY 0 K.m;D 43 CD O O O O C) J 0 C"::) C') o 0 K.::) C'::} 0 K.-:k J CD CD 0 C) C (14 " C•8 f11I C14 Va4 r14 Y (Ili " C"wl f'W " CV fV Cal C^J Y14 (el r'U CIA Cl C'14 f"ld fV rq fV C Ilgairll s IM&O Revenues Pooll I1:1ev inues IPirope ty I...ax Salley I ax 1:)u1bhc Utillity I ax Generall If und Transfer �nuro: City of f:�nrt Ir°xrnriiser�id, 2019 I!!1f.fd1* 2019 1J��taa; f'rrrlu�ri:y, sales, and pu lk ratili�P_y taxes realonf :r 'nai�Pern[ frai id trrari,Jc rs anre re e 9lrr�.ated G.arr11 �;g iarl allocatiolI based on total C rririnluliity `,uwr cl .r 1 1,11 id rovvrll.wss March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN Exhibit 73. Historic and Projected Parks and Recreation Cost Recovery, 2009 to 2036 (Nominal$) 2.5 ActualiProjections $2..0 vT �. w onioiinixvmnnrnro �onouruvnoannni�aon�nnni�a�m�a�m�amamm�mmm�mmm�nni�a�mnm�a�minu�mniam,�mm�m�mm�mmm�mmm�i�mannm�aminu�maonm�am�a�m�amamm%mnn....) mnmmnwwinwiaonn�nn�nn�nn�nnsnnnnnnnnnnnnn�nn�nn�nn��n mmm�nao�mm��mnumiwm��w�nmmmmmmmmmNNonmti�u � C'r1 0 r...s IN m "t Ln rn r, 00 C) c...I (v e» „d- "I « h lM C) �...p rW M ~'t Lr) �. 0 a --'I e--'I e--i v--'I e--'I r—I r--p a --'I e--i e--'I rw rq N l A Cad r,4 ry tV l rn ro CW7 m A m f 0 0G'mb C7 Cm'.k C9 Cm) r) 0 Cm} 0 C> 0 CD 0 Cm.1 0 C) 0 0 o C} O C'A O C? n G r,4 rq rya h8 rW rV CJ l ", rV l rw rq CV l rq Cad rq ry tV l IN rq ra l C'J (N C 11....... Parks &. Recre adon Direct Revenues , 1 1 Parks & Racveat'ican Expenditures `.,rnair,e:(..'rlyr:a1110r1,10 niseI,Id'2a'19 h''ill,f �> rxJol.a: R voraua., sand oxp nialituroa , have ',won oxlna., sod In nornin7,fl rJollrart (i rr. uraar!justoe,',I for 11-JI'-lion) As the Community Services Fund also funds other City services, demand for resources is competitive and may be constrained in the future. To mitigate the risk of constrained resources on delivering parks and recreation services, the City should identify and pursue alternative parks and recreation funding sources. This section lays out several options for the City to increase funding for parks and recreation, both with funding sources that are already being used by the City, albeit for other purposes, and with funding sources that could potentially be available to the City. A list of the options appears below. Following that, evaluation criteria and a matrix provide an assessment of magnitude, feasibility, and flexibility. The City of Port Townsend has a variety of options already available for increasing its parks and recreation revenues. Some notable options include: March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN Real Estate Excise Tax. A real estate excise tax (REET) is levied on all real estate sales measured by the full selling price, including the amount of any liens, mortgages, and other debts given to secure the purchase. All cities may levy 0.25% of the full sale price of real estate (described as "the first quarter percent of the real estate excise tax" or "REET 1"). Cities that are planning under Growth Management Act (GMA) have the authority to levy a second quarter percent tax (REET 2). Because this funding may be used for different types of capital and is not restricted to parks only, it is up to the discretion of each jurisdiction as to how they choose to spend these funds. However, it is important to note that REET is restricted to capital uses and cannot be used for operations. Since REET is based on the total value of real estate transactions in a given year, the amount of REET revenues a city or county receives can vary substantially from year to year based on the normal fluctuations in the real estate market. During years when the real estate market is active, revenues are higher, and during softer real estate markets, revenues are lower. The City already collects REET 1 and REET 2 revenues, however, neither of these revenue sources are currently used to fund parks and recreation capital projects. REET revenues in the City are currently primarily allocated for debt service. Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax. As of July 1, 2016, the State levies 49.4 cents per gallon on motor vehicle fuel under RCW 82.36.025; a portion of the collected tax is distributed to cities. In 2018, Port Townsend received $207,986 of statewide MVFT revenues. The City is required by RCW 47.30.050 to spend a minimum of 0.42% of MVFT receipts on paths and trails (unless that amount is $500 or less). In 2018, receipts were equal to a minimum of $874 of MVFT funds spent on paths and trails. Utility Business Tax. Any city may impose a business and occupation tax on the gross operating revenues of public or private utilities providing services within city boundaries and/or upon the City's own municipal utilities. Revenues collected from utility business taxes are unrestricted and may be used for any lawful governmental purpose. The City uses utility business taxes to fund parks and recreation operations through the Community Services Fund. As of 2019, Port Townsend currently levies a rate of 22% on the City's water, stormwater, and sewer utilities. Increasing the rate levied on these utilities would likely be politically difficult given that the rates are already relatively high. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN Accessing Property Tax Banked Capacity. With the annexation of the City into the Jefferson Fire Protection District No. 1, the amount of property tax levied that currently pays for fire services — around $908,000 annually — will remain as property tax capacity that can be used for streets, parks, contributions to the City's housing trust fund, or utility tax relief. City Council passed Resolution 18-062 which limits its authority to levy this banked capacity over a period of 5 years from 2019-2023. The City will not assess any of the banked capacity in 2020 and the City can restore banked capacity at a rate not to exceed 33% per each year starting in 2021. Given $908,000 in banked capacity, this would allow an increasing maximum levy amount as shown in Exhibit 74. Specific to parks and recreation, the use of the banked capacity is restricted to capital needs for parks and trails between 2021-2023 but will be unrestricted in use beginning in 2024. Exhibit 74. Maximum Levy Amount, 2021-2024 (Nominal $) 2021 $299,640 2022 $599,280 2023 $908,000 2024 $908,000 Sources: City of Port Townsend, 2019; BERK, 2019. While these funds are available, the City has multiple competing needs that will also be eligible for these monies. The City could also pursue several revenues sources that are not currently imposed or received. Options for additional revenues include: State and Federal Competitive Grants. State and federal grant programs can provide some funding from outside the region. These programs are extremely competitive; however, any grant funding that could be made available would significantly improve the funding feasibility of the 2020 PROS Plan Update, since these funds would reduce the amount needed from local public sources. Many of these grants often require matching funds and are restricted for March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN acquisition or capital development. However, the City has been successful at obtaining grants in the past and a variety of needs to align with funders. Parks Impact Fees. The City of Port Townsend currently does not collect parks impact fees, which are fees on development intended to support the infrastructure needs generated by that growth. Rates would be determined through a rate study and consideration of system improvements needed to support growth at desired levels of service. Park impact fees can only be used for capital improvements aligning with the City's level of service standards. Given the relatively small amount of growth anticipated in the City, the expected revenues are less than $100,000 annually assuming similar existing rates in Sequim, Gig Harbor, and Poulsbo. Additionally, impact fees require City Council action and can face resistance from the development community. Metropolitan Parks District. One of three types of parks/recreation districts in Washington, Metropolitan Parks Districts (MPD) are authorized by Chapter 35.61 RCW and are quasi - municipal corporations and independent taxing districts. MPDs "may be created for the management, control, improvement, maintenance, and acquisition of parks, pathways, boulevards, and recreational facilities" or also formed for a limited purpose that identifies specific public parks and/or recreational facilities. An MPD can include other jurisdictions through interlocal agreements and only portions of the establishing entity or included jurisdictions. An MPD can be initiated through resolution or initiative. As an independent taxing district, MPDs have two regular property tax levies available — 1) $0.50 per $1,000 assessed value and 2) $0.25 per $1,000 assessed value. These are considered as a single levy, up to $0.75, for the purposes of the 1% annual levy limit. An important note is that MPDs are junior taxing districts, meaning that if localities approach the local district taxing limit of $5.90 per $1,000 of assessed value, the MPD will be lower on the list of collections and could receive less or even no funding. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN The City has jointly considered an MPD with Jefferson County in the past. Resulting from the work of the Exploratory Regional Parks and Recreation Committee in 2011, the Metropolitan Park District Steering Committee worked in 2013 to evaluate the feasibility of forming an MPD including the City and eastern portion of Jefferson County. The City and Jefferson County passed resolutions in 2013 to accept the Steering Committee's recommendation that an MPD was not feasible. The YMCA of Jefferson County branch has been exploring the option of a purpose - specific limited MPD to construct and operate a replacement facility to Mountain View Pool. Examples of purpose -specific and general MPDs are included in the two inserts. Given the 2018 assessed values, a City - only MPD could have raised a maximum of $1.1 million and a combined City and Eastern Jefferson County MPD could have raised a maximum of $3.5 million. Note that these values are approximate and meant for illustration of magnitude only; there are two existing parks and recreation districts within the Eastern Jefferson County area. The assessed value for these existing districts were removed from the overall East Jefferson County area approximately weighted by population distribution. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN Property Tax Levy Lid Lift. A property tax levy lid lift occurs when a taxing jurisdiction with a tax rate less than its statutory maximum rate asks voters to increase the property tax rate to an amount equal to or less than the statutory maximum rate, effectively lifting the lid on the levy rate. The taxing jurisdiction then collects more revenues because of the higher levy rate. These revenues can be unrestricted or restricted depending on the stated purpose in authorizing the ballot measure. The City could increase property taxes in the City to fund parks and recreation services or capital projects through a voted levy lid lift. Dedicated Parks Property Tax Levy Lid Lift. While the City does not currently have any banked property tax capacity, the City could fund parks and recreation capital projects through a voted parks levy lid lift. However, the City does have an unusual situational banked capacity resulting from annexation of fire services, described beginning on page 115. The City manages long-term debt in a way that utilizes its credit to optimize City services while balancing overall debt levels and annual debt service obligations. Long-term debt may be used for capital acquisitions and construction but may not be used to fund operating expenses, and it should be structured in a way that debt payments do not exceed the expected useful life of the financed project. The City can levy additional debt through two main financing tools: Limited Tax General Obligation (LTGO) Bonds. Councilmanic bonds that must be repaid from existing resources, as there is no dedicated source of new revenue for debt service. These bonds can be issued by the City Council without going out to residents for a public vote. Cities are limited to an indebtedness amount of 1.5% of assessed value for LTGO bonds. Unlimited Tax General Obligation (UTGO) Bonds. Voted bonds that must be approved by a vote of the City's residents and are paid off by a new city property tax levy. This type of bond issue is usually reserved for municipal improvements that are of general benefit to the public, such as arterial streets, bridges, lighting, municipal buildings, firefighting equipment, and parks. There is no specific indebtedness amount limit for UTGO Bonds, however, the total amount of LTGO and UTGO indebtedness may not exceed 2.5% of assessed value. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN Parks and Open Space General Obligation Bonds. In addition to the debt outlined above, cities may also issue debt, with voter approval, for up to 2.5% of assessed value for acquiring or developing open space, park facilities, and capital facilities associated with economic development. Each of the funding or financing sources is screened according to these criteria: Magnitude. Estimates the order of magnitude of these options. Feasibility. Estimates how realistic each option is to be used for parks and recreation revenues. Flexibility. Estimates the extent to which each option is restricted for certain purposes, or vice versa. See Exhibit 75 for a funding and financing option evaluation summary. Exhibit 75. Funding and Financing Options Evaluation Current Available Options capital only,• Real Estate Excise Tax AL $100,000S currently earmarked for debt payment paths and trails; Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax NF $1,000S currently used for transportation projects Taxes Utility100,000S �' $ politically unfeasible Property Tax from Fire District capital only $100,000S (2012-2023; then Annexation �, unrestricted) Possible Future Options Grants $100,000S 111=211 often require matching funds capital only, Parks Impact Fees $10,000S Council action required March 2020 PORTTOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN Parks Levy Financing Options Parks and Open Space GO Debt $1,000,000S mi f „ vote required $1,000,000S vote required,• capital only 1`Cr tcs, * ri lVll'la rrwdd lre iG:,xirrricd forrmillilrlc '-mvi ar�rl01rx'�i'a�ie a licml� fxf iir'r;PPAI Ir;fi'lrS h1l"ir,lirWi^„b Wid'Wi�P,a ill elil"ie l the r 1�P:y a,i ra wrinbin alion of City al id C"rwlI ,/ I ir.ialIcii16', options, do nud1 repi,esE'[]l: I �W'l Friat <are in ech ariisirns tra nna We rrx.aney 1'a 'n'1giI t: rye. So , 131 1'(1 , 20a.9. Most large funding sources require voter action. All funding opportunities involve tradeoffs between priorities (for example, transportation versus parks), political will (voter and/or Council action), and changes in flexibility as implementation of most funding mechanisms involve a reduction in funding capacity. Funding sources should also be considered based on equity. Property taxes and sales taxes are regressive, taking a larger percentage of income from low-income earners than from high -income earners, but Washington governments rely on them to fund basic services and capital investments. Grants and repurposing property tax from the fire district annexation represent the two most likely funding increases for parks and recreation purposes. Either option has the possibility of significantly increasing the revenues available for parks and recreation (10% or more of parks and recreation expenditures), are existing revenue streams that could be increased, and offer some flexibility in spending. Both options have competitive processes; City capital priorities will be competing for the first three years of repurposed property tax and grant -making organizations generally solicit requests to consider multiple possible projects to be funded. „nii'opi"'rati111s"m'„a" Ojipot"ttii"iV'irties Because open spaces, trails and parks that are situated in natural low areas and shallow depressions may also temporarily store stormwaters, there are opportunities to incorporate park development into stormwater management facilities. Where feasible, parks should be incorporated into the design of regional stormwater facilities thereby increasing the community benefit from scarce public funds. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN As the City considers additional programming and changes to maintenance and operations, a key aspect is expected impact on finances. As discussed in the Demand & Need section, the City has opportunities to expand programming. Expansion of programming is a chance for the City to revisit cost recovery goals. In general, a leading practice considers the level of public or individual benefit for cost recovery goals. The more that the benefit is individual, the higher the cost recovery goal should be. Taking two examples, at one end are provision of public goods like large open spaces that can be used by many people at once without detracting from others use (non -rivalrous goods), and thus are not candidates for cost recovery. At the other end of the benefit spectrum, individual swimming lessons are for a single person at a time. These resources are limited (one slot for each person), require scheduling and registration, and have concentrated benefits. Parks and recreation provide services across the range of possibilities, which creates opportunities to tailor cost recovery goals. The level of benefit approach is attractive because it easily accommodates customization of fees for equity purposes. Programming with high individual benefit tends to be programs that require registration, allowing for conversation about needs. For example, low- or fixed -income individuals can have fees adjusted to match ability to pay, and these programs can be tied to other income -dependent programming to reduce the burden on individuals to prove their ability to pay. CAPITAL FACILITY PLAID The 2014 PROS Plan identified 17 capital projects for the period 2013 to 2020+. Projects completed during that period included: Bishop Play Park: Develop Parkside Drive (Bishop) Park Property Mountain View Dog Park: Develop a dedicated sufficient sized dog park on current City property or new purchase The PROS Plan called for renovations to the Mountain View Pool with a potential timeframe of 2015-2018. Pool renovations did not specifically occur. General Mountain View Commons improvements with some minor improvements for ADA access to the pool did occur as noted in the City's 2019 Budget: March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN Mountain View Commons Improvements 2015-2018: The City completed energy efficiency and emergency repairs, improved ADA access in the pool and gym, addressed fire and safety systems, and others. Bishop Play Park and Mountain View Dog Park were funded with private and volunteer resources and City resources. Mountain View campus improvements were funded with a $3.6 million voter -approved Bond and Community Development Block Grant Funds. The City of Port Townsend has not included a parks capital improvement program in its 2019 budget due to competing priorities and lack of resources. As described in Level of Service evaluations, based on past investment carried forward, the annual average investment in facilities and land would equal about $625,000 to 1,150,000 per year. This is in the range of investments by agencies with similar assets or population densities ($280,000 to $1.1 million per year with a median investment per year by agencies of all sizes at just over $800,000 per year). Given scarce resources and a need to secure enhanced funding, projects are prioritized based on their ability to advance the following objectives identified as target levels of service in Chapter 5 Demand & Need: Maintenance Objective Investment per Capita Objective Equitable Access and Distribution Objective Projected funding assumes sources with moderate to high magnitude, moderate to high feasibility, and moderate to high flexibility identified on Exhibit 75 above. These include capital funds potentially available over the short term due to annexation to the fire district, general fund, grants, and either impact or SEPA mitigation fees. Longer -term capital sources include a potential MPD or parks levy. Should the City not pursue additional funding sources the capital facility plan would require update. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN The table below identifies projects with a maintenance objective, based on unmet and deferred needs in the City's 2019 budget, the 2019 NGF Consulting Golf Park Study, and Departmental input. Exhibit 76. Maintenance Objective: Deferred Maintenance and Capital Replacement 1. Pope Marine Park Plaza - Add $6,000 X electricity pedestals for special events 2. Mountain View Pool Building: $10,000 X Foyer Heater Replacement 3. Improvements to Dog Park at Mtn $20,000 X View 4. Kubota Utility Vehicle $10,000 X 5. Dump Truck $65,000 6. Replace Skateboard Park Fence $25,000 X 7. Golf Park Repair and Replacement $1,229,000 8. Mountain View Pool: Lifecycle Analysis and Associated Repairs Total Soul, Inrt, Irv,fiind?O 19 I:��rJfz�`t, 1''fl I rl<)01.9 TBD $1,365,000 $71,000 X X $1,294,000 FD Annexation, General Fund FD Annexation, General Fund Private, Volunteer, FD Annexation, General Fund FD Annexation, General Fund FD Annexation, General Fund FD Annexation, General Fund TBD: Cost Recovery, Private, Grants, MPD, Levy See also Aquatic Center (#18) Projects that provide capacity at existing parks, allowing more persons to enjoy Port Townsend Parks, are listed in Exhibit 76. The 6-year plan would implement improvements at Kah Tai Lagoon to increase passive recreation opportunities, improve existing facilities, and conduct habitat restoration. Improvements would also be made to picnic shelters, restrooms, and repairs to slope erosion at Chetzemoka Park. Longer -term improvements across the system would be to improve parks consistent with concept plans or minimum classification standards. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN Exhibit 77. Investment per Capita Objective: New Investments at Existing Parks 9. Mountain View Pool: $6,000 X 4 Drinking Fountains with Bottle Filler 10. Mountain View Pool: $43,000 X Inflatable Playground, Slide, Climbing Wall 11. Chetzemoka Concept $10,652,800 X X Plan Implementation 12. Kah Tai Lagoon $4,083,500 X X X Concept Plan Implementation 13. Bobby McGarraugh $5,127,000 X Concept Plan Implementation 14. Sather Park Concept $2,524,942 X Plan Implementation 15. Neighborhood Parks $2,500,000 X Minimum Standards Progress 16. Downtown Park $1,500,000 X Minimum Standards Progress 17. Special Use Park $2,500,000 X Minimum Standards Progress 18. Aquatic Center: TBD X Replacement/ Expansion Total $28,937,242 $1,069,875 $2,618,795 $25,248,572 >ourtr.. IInrt, lfawl 2€ 19 li udr ,,,,.t, Gllif4 20191 BI Rl< 2[6719, Private, FD Annexation, General Fund, Grants Private, FD Annexation, General Fund, Grants Private, Grants, Impact/Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy Private, Grants, Impact/Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy Private, Grants, Impact/Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy Private, Grants, Impact/Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy Private, Grants, Impact/Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy Private, Grants, Impact/Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy Private, Grants, Impact/Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy Private, Grants, Impact/Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy To address equitable access and distribution objectives, a series of capital improvements would address acquisition or partnerships to fill gaps in the parks and trail system. In the immediate 6- year period, the investments would be to fill in missing trail links to improve access to existing parks and to more fully implement minimum improvements for 35t" Street Park serving the western portion of the city where gaps are identified. Post 2027 additional park acquisitions are noted for central and southwest city limits to fill other gaps. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN Exhibit 78. Equitable Access and Distribution Objective: Fill Gaps in Parks and Trails Network 19. 35th Street Park Concept $3,608,450 X X X Private, Grants, Plan Implementation Impact/Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy 20. Park Acquisitions or $2,000,000 X Private, Grants, Partnerships and Impact/Mitigation Development: Central and Fees, MPD, Levy Southwest 21. Missing Links: Trails, 2 miles $600,000 X X Public Works Capital Funds Coordination, Grants, Impact/ Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy 22. Loop Trail Connections $1,750,000 X Public Works Capital Funds Coordination, Grants, Impact/ Mitigation Fees, MPD, Levy $7,958,450 $600,000 $902,113 $6,456,338 Source: 2019111Gar1€er.9 1-188,2f111; ir1.11,I"201.9, Excluding an aquatic center, which is under discussion regionally by the City, County, and YMCA, the total capital program is approximately $38.2 million. The 6-year investment is approximately $6.6 million. Exhibit 79. Summary Capital Facility Plan Expenditure Type and Schedule 1. Maintenance $71,000 $1,294,000 $1,365,000 2. Invest in Existing $1,069,875 $2,618,795 $3,688,670 Parks 3. Equitable Access $600,000 $902,113 $1,502,113 and Distribution Total $1,740,875 $5,165,070 $6,555,783 `,rjui,fXr: i'orl. irrwiiscnd 0.'19 f:;aGadget, 411:58 01.1); 11t1.i,1<2019, $227,500 $0 $1,365,000 $614,778 $25,248,572 $28,937,242 $250,352 $6,456,338 $7,958,450 $1,092,630 $31,704,910 $38,260,692 March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 7 1 FUNDING AND FACILITIES PLAN On an annualized basis, if the City invests in only maintenance and existing parks in the 2020- 2026 period, the annual investment will equal about $842,278 per year. See Exhibit 80. This is similar to the investment per capita range identified in the Level of Service analysis in Chapter S. If the City invests in equitable access and distribution as well as maintenance and existing parks over the next six years the annual investment will equal about $1,092,630 per year, at the upper end of peer communities. This would be feasible if additional funding sources are identified. Exhibit 80. Capital Budget and Target Level of Service — Per Capita Investment Port Townsend Target LOS - Per Capita $5,058,900 $843,150 See Target LOS, page 71 Investment Priority Focus 6-Year with Feasible Funds `,ou1,°cr I ? I fR1<; 019, The overall capital budget at $38.2 million is greater than investment per capita enjoyed today. It serves as a 40-year level of investment if population grows at a rate assumed in the Comprehensive Plan. However, the more complete capital facilities list can be a source of proposals for grant or partnership opportunities, and the list can serve as a guide to capital proposals for future Comprehensive Plan Updates and PROS Plan Updates. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS This chapter identifies actions the City can take to optimally implement the goals, objectives, and projects of this plan. It also identifies topics meant for further exploration. MONITORING The City intends to track its performance periodically to determine progress on implementation of this plan. Monitoring is recommended in association with updates to the City budget and capital improvement program. Performance measurement is a useful strategy in requesting additional funding and resources. Exhibit 81. Potential Monitoring Measures and Targets Equitable Access and Distribution Parks and recreation facilities within a 10-minute walk to reach over 90% of PortTownsend's population. Parkland within a 10-minute walk increases its consistency with minimum standards for the park classification. Reduced park gaps in central and western city limits by 2036. Improved access to neighborhoods with higher concentrations of families with children or seniors living alone. Phase improved access by filling in missing links in trails. Function - Investment The value of the parks and recreation system is maintained as the community grows. Maintain an annual capital facility investment range of $300,000 to $1,100,000 per year, depending on available funding sources. Function - Maintenance Ensure that maintenance resources keep up with increased demand. Maintenance investment per capita is applied to increased population growth (approximately $120 in 2019 dollars). Maintenance costs per acre are considered as developed parks are added. Source: R1 Rll�, 2019, CH. 8 1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES PHASING Given local conditions of each park site and trail route, Port Townsend may phase improvements and consider alternative facility types and cross sections. At the master plan or project design level, each project will be reassessed to determine the appropriateness of the suggested improvements based on physical characteristics of the property and public engagement associated with master plan development. It may be necessary to implement a different design solution or combination of design solutions than are shown in this plan. In addition, there may be development of other capital projects or changes in funding strategies that dictate a different approach. PARTNERSHIP & FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES The PROS plan has been developed with information from Jefferson County, State Parks, YMCA, and other stakeholders in mind. Stakeholders can advance implementation of this system through joint design, funding, and coordination, and the City intends to continue to build relationships with these and other partners to implement the plan. Port Townsend also partners with community groups, non-profit, and government agencies to support stewardship and public access. Port Townsend intends to monitor contributions from its partners to ensure that investments and resources align with expected outcomes and benefits, advancing the goals, needs, policies, and recommendations of the PROS Plan. VOLUNTEERISM Volunteer programs are common to parks and recreation programs. Such programs can enhance and beautify park properties and allow agencies to offer programs and events that would not otherwise be available or be more costly. Port Townsend has had a long history of park and trail volunteerism. Examples of volunteers contributing to park and trail development include the building of 31 miles of trails and a dog park. Volunteers supporting maintenance include those participating in the City's Adopt A Park program in place since 2001. Port Townsend's current park and trail volunteer program consists of: Adopt -A -Park Trail parties March 2020 PORTTOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 8 1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Garden care Volunteer programs require administration and training, background checks, and oversight, and agencies often have volunteer coordinators to fill this role. In 2019, Port Townsend filled a position addressing an events / facility / volunteer coordinator. This will allow the City to create a more robust volunteer program addressing a range of park system aspects. DONATIONSIFUND RAISING The City of Port Townsend's Park Memorial and Donation program allows community members the opportunity to remember or honor a loved one, celebrate an event or provide a legacy for the future through a donation to the City's park system. These donations may include, but are not limited to, park benches, bicycle racks, picnic tables, drinking fountains, flags, and other types of park or trails accessories and (in certain limited circumstances) public art and monuments. This policy does not apply to buildings or land. Many park and recreation agencies across the country benefit from private donations that pay for purchase and construction of new facilities or program costs such as scholarships for camps or other recreation programs. The mechanism for donations is frequently through a non-profit foundation or conservatory organization. The City could develop criteria for determining which projects and programs to fund, based on public goals. Fund-raising often occurs with foundations but more recently newer forms of fundraising include crowd -sourcing. Crowd -sourcing uses donor sites where stakeholders can pledge donations online to a specific project and will only be charged in the event that the funding target is reached and the project moves forward. The City could determine its policies around whether it would: Champion projects on existing platforms Run its own campaigns or establish its own platform Facilitate a citizen -led and financed project without being directly responsible for a project A near -term example of grass -roots fundraising effort relates to the Mountain View Dog Park. The City has an active dog park/ dog owner community anticipating holding future fundraisers related to the dog park specifically. March 2020 PORTTOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS % , CH. 8 1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES ASSET MANAGEMENT The park system must be maintained on a regular and ongoing basis for the public to benefit from it and to ensure facilities achieve their longest lifespan. Additionally, assets must be tracked, scheduled, and funded for repair and replacement. Maintenance crews provide a wide range of services to ensure parks are clean, safe, and functional. Routine maintenance includes duties, such as garbage pick-up, lawn and landscape care, set up for events, cleaning and general maintenance of play areas, beaches, waterfronts, trails, pathways, parking lots, pool, dog parks, and skate park. Maintenance staff also support special events and volunteer projects. Public input at the Vision Survey showed the public found the overall quality and maintenance of the parks to be good or very good. See Exhibit 82. Exhibit 82. Maintenance Appreciation — Vision Survey How would you rate the overall quality and maintenance of parks in Port Townsend? (n=769) Very Good 153 Good N eLJ1t� C11 188 Poor 24 Very ➢'fit V" c➢cart Iknow,/i ,,) opiin or. Source: SwwcylMonlkcy,la RI<201.y� March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 8 1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Deferred Port Townsend strives to preserve the quality and capacity of existing facilities, extending useful life for as long as practicable. As described under Monitoring above, target level of service objectives seek to ensure maintenance resources are increased as system usage or system size increases. Maintenance staff review the physical condition of park assets regularly. Each asset receives a rating condition as good, fair, or poor. A condition rating is used to determine needed maintenance, repair, or replacement. Capital replacements are scheduled in the City capital improvement program in the budget. Smaller projects are handled by the on -site, routine maintenance staff. Port Townsend strives to schedule planned lifecycle improvements and known repairs within a six -year window. Capital replacement projects are prioritized and executed based on the following criteria: ■ Addresses a public safety or environmental health issue, ■ Promotes intended usage by the public and reduces loss of function, ■ Increases park capacity or benefit to the public, and ■ Promotes cost benefit and generates return to the park system. AccessEbflNty The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 is a civil rights law prohibiting discrimination based on disabilities and ensuring that people with disabilities have the same rights and opportunities as everyone else. Under Title II of the ADA, a public entity is required to perform a self -evaluation of its current services, policies, and practices for ADA compliance. The self - evaluation includes surveying the existing facilities and identifying barriers to access and/or communication. Following this self -evaluation, municipalities are required to create a plan to make "reasonable modifications" where necessary to avoid discrimination and to ensure their facilities and activities are accessible to all. New construction projects are being designed in compliance with the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design. ADA improvements have been considered in park concept plans and the capital budget allows for additional improvements at other parks. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 8 1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES sI I p and III' iiii hint na nc Plans Though natural areas have fewer built amenities and are maintained less frequently than active recreation parks, stewardship of these areas increases opportunities for people to connect to nature. This PROS Plan supports the development of Stewardship and Maintenance Plans for parks intended for conservation such as Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park and Neighborhood Nature Parks. Stewardship and Maintenance plans involve site assessments, tailored stewardship and maintenance programs, coordination with partners or volunteers to ensure sites are properly and safely managed and opened to the public for access and enjoyment consistent with the plan. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION The City has identified open space assets in Appendix C. It identifies assets and priority areas for open space conservation which can guide open space conservation efforts and create opportunities for partnerships. It can also be a platform for identifying stewardship management needs, and grants, funding, and education opportunities. Opportunities for environmental conservation recognition and education include: Certifying Community Nature Parks and Neighborhood Nature Parks as Certified Wildlife Habitats through the National Wildlife Federation. This would place certified parks on the Federation's national register of certified spaces, and the Federation would provide weather-proof signs to hang in the public space at each park that could support education and understanding about the need for such spaces. This would advance the Federation's goal to create large scale, nationwide wildlife corridors through certification, one property and park at a time. Consider opportunities (with a certified arborist's approval) for a dying or failing tree in an Community or Neighborhood Park to be turned specifically into Wildlife Trees (or Snags) and Certified as such by the State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (for which they have a specific program and signage for the tree). Like the Certified Wildlife Habitat Certification by the National Wildlife Federation, the Wildlife Tree Certification is inexpensive, the signs are weather proof and they are educational. City park trees could illustrate the benefit of allowing dying trees to serve a wildlife function where appropriate to the location and condition of a City park site. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS CH. 8 1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES COMMUNITY EDUCATION & PROMOTION Given the number of parks and recreation sites operated and programed by the City, County, State, and School District as well as non -profits within Port Townsend city limits, it can be challenging for the public and each agency to understand available activities, schedules, and resources. Each agency provides regular fliers and news ads and web/email communication about its recreation programming and events. The City and other agencies could jointly coordinate and cross -promote recreation program materials and parks and trails maps. The City and other agencies could explore establishing a central email and phone number staffed on a rotating basis by each agency staff. PLAN COORDINATION This PROS Plan retains the Comprehensive Plan level of service (LOS) for consistency but explores related target or aspirational LOS measures for distribution and function consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies. During future Comprehensive Plan Updates the City could consider alternative means of measuring LOS or integrating target LOS measures in the Comprehensive Plan. The City could consider updating the Non -Motorized Trail Plan drawing from the information in this plan. March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS PLAN TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS Association of Nature and Forest Therapy Guides and Programs. (2019). The Science. Retrieved from https://www.natureandforesttherapy.org/: https://www.natureandforesttherapy.org/ Dean Runyan Associates. (2019, May). Washington State Travel Impacts & Visitor Volume 2010 —2018p. Retrieved from www.deanrunyan.com: http://www.deanrunyan.com/doc_library/WAStlmp.pdf. Hedden, B. P. (2017, September). 2017 Washington State Recreation and Conservation Plan, Provider Survey Results. Retrieved from www.rco.wa.gov: https://www.rco.wa.gov/StateRecPlans/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Provider-Survey- Results.pdf Jefferson Healthcare. (2019, March). Senior Exercise Options in Port Townsends, Tri-Area, Quilcene, Brinnon. Retrieved from https:/Aeffersonhealthcare.org/: https://jeffersonhealthcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Senior-Exercise- Options.pdf Jostad, J. e. (2017, July). State of Washington 2017 Assessment of Outdoor Recreation Demand Report. Retrieved from www.rco.wa.gov: https://www.rco.wa.gov/StateRecPlans/wp- content/uploads/2017/08/Assessment-of-Demand.pdf Kevin Roth, N. (2017, July 2). Parks and Recreation: Serving a Growing, Older Population. Retrieved from https://www.nrpa.org/: https://www.nrpa.org/parks-recreation- magazine/2017/july/parks-and-recreation-serving-a-growing-older-population/ Landes, S. E. (2008). Municipal Recreation Programming. Retrieved from Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources: CH.9 1 REFERENCES http://www.docs.dcnr.pa.gov/cs/groups/public/documents/document/dcnr 002292.pd National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO). (2014, March). nacto.org. Retrieved from Urban Bikeway Design Guide: https:Hnacto.org/publication/urban- bikeway-design-guide/ National Recreation and Park Association. (2019). 2019 NRPA AGENCY PERFORMANCE REVIEW. PARK AND RECREATION AGENCY PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS. Ashburn, VA: N RPA. Palmer, L. (2019, September 12). Board Member, Jefferson County Immigrant Rights Advocates. (P. R. Alex Wisniewski, Interviewer) Port Townsend Senior Association (PTSA). (2019, 12 20). Learn About Us. Retrieved from http://ptseniors.com/: http://ptseniors.com/about/ Tipping, E. R. (2019, June). 2019 State of the Managed Recreation Industry. Retrieved from http://recmanagement.com: http://recmanagement.com/feature/201906FE01 US Forest Service. (2016, September). Trail Fundamentals and Trail Management Objectives. Retrieved from https://www.fs.usda.gov/: https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing- land/trails/trail-management-tools/trail-fundamentals Washington State Parks. (2019, December 20). FORT WORDEN STATE PARK. Retrieved from www.stateparks.com: https://www.stateparks.com/fort_worden_state_park_in_washington.htmI White, M. P. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Nature 9:7730. Witt, P. A. (2010). The Rationale for Recreation Services for Youth: An Evidenced Based Approach. Retrieved from https://www.nrpa.org/: https://www.nrpa.org/globalassets/research/witt-caldwell-full-research-paper.pdf WSDOT. (2009, March 16). Bicycle Facilities. Retrieved from www.wsdot.wa.gov: https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2009/03/16/BicycleFacilitiesPoster_VO4. pdf March 2020 PORT TOWNSEND 2020 PROS PLAN I TODAY'S VISION, TOMORROW'S PARKS PRTTAB Draft Workplan Recommendations for City Retreat 22 July 2024 2025 Priorities for Workplan - Parks, Recreation, Trees & Trails Advisory Board (PRTTAB - this is a draft list of suggested/possible responses to Council's five questions for the city retreat in July - questions are in the Mayor's letter and copied in our agenda. The capitalized words in brackets are from the Strategic Workplan's 7 Priority Areas in your packet. Please evaluate whether the item is responsive to the suggested priority and please contribute ideas and responses, especially to questions 4 and 5). 1. status of workplan items from PRTTAB's 2023 list for 2024 priorities - our list last year had three priorities tree lists - a subcommittee (Russell Hill, Richard Hefley and Debbie Jahnke) is working with staff toward completion on three lists: street tree list, parks/open space tree list and understory list - we expect to finish soon; we are also engaged in helping staff with tree selections for existing road projects [DELIVER] buildable lands - a subcommittee (Pam Adams, Becci Kimball and Jim Todd) has been identified but has not yet begun their work effort - they will proceed whenever the Comprehensive Plan update process is ready for their effort [SUSTAIN] parks foundation - effort to establish a foundation is underway (led by Becci Kimball with volunteer David Lubinski), steering committee members have been identified, mission statement is being constructed, goals are being discussed [ENGAGE, ENVISION] 2. PRTTAB priorities for 2024/2025 • stabilize funding for parks - every budget cycle is tenuous for parks funding without a dedicated funding source [INVEST; SUSTAIN] • increase permanent and seasonal park staff - Trust for Public Lands says that our city of 10K should have at least 5 full time parks staff and several seasonals [INVEST, SUSTAIN] • equitable distribution - equity is being addressed with grant proposals submitted for two new efforts, one in midtown (Golf Park accessible playground) and one on the west side (Hancock Park) [DELIVER, SERVE] • reclaim street ends - street ends tend to get subsumed for use by adjacent property owners and should be kept available for public use as they are often the best view locations in the city and are public rights of way [EMBRACE] • re-establish volunteer trails workparties - with 30-odd miles of trails, we could have much more involvement of volunteers to help staff if we could re-estabish our previous Inon motorized' work parties [ENGAGE, INVEST] 3. what has gone well? two new parks/park features were submitted for funding to RCO by Michael Todd and Carrie Hite (Golf Park playground and Hancock Park) [ENGAGE, EMBRACE] two grant proposals were submitted to USDA and funded (thanks to Robin Hill, Emma Bolin and others). One grant will fund consultants to develop an Urban Forestry Plan and update the Tree Conservation Code; we will work with WSU as a CBO for outreach. A second grant from the same source was funded to provide approx. 75 street trees for westside road improvement projects to provide some canopy equity, also working with WSU as a CBO for outreach [EMBRACE, DELIVER] one grant proposal was submitted to DNR (thanks to Michael Todd and David Lubinski) and funded to provide tree/understory equity to two neighborhood parks that have both active and passive features - Bishop and Sather; currently selecting contractor for the work [EMBRACE, ENGAGE] PRTTAB Draft Workplan Recommendations for City Retreat 22 July 2024 • subcommittee (Matt Miner and Becci Kimball) are engaged with the update to the Active Transportation Plan, working with Jeff Kostechka as staff lead [ENVISION, DELIVER] • Discovery Road project planting plan reviewed and recommended by PRTTAB members [EMBRACE] • Dog park Adopt A Park group (Mountain View Tail Waggers) is a great model for volunteer Adopt A Park efforts [ENGAGE, ENVISION] • Caretaker at Kah Tai is a phenomenal success - the park is clean and quiet and beautiful and many folks have commented about the changes [EMBRACE, SERVE] 4. what should we stop doing or do differently? 5. What else should we be considering? • let's not wait to update the PROS Plan until 2030 - selected updates were approved by Council to accomodate the RCO grant process, but there is much more that needs to be updated and corrected in the Plan [SUSTAIN, ENGAGE] FA City Q ' , . 25 Madison Street, Suite 2R � Port Townsend WA, SR`1 R �360379.5096r www.cityofpt,us �! 4 µ`Y ryA 4P �'mWilSei1� PUBLIC WORKS Memo To: Parks Recreation Trees and Trails Advisory Board From: Steve King CC.: Date: 6/25/24 Subject: Landmark Tree Evaluation Considerations I NTRODUCTION/PU RPOSE: The City's Landmark Tree designation process is governed by Chapter 12 PTMC. The codified process involves evaluation of the tree and then presenting the application to the PRTTAB for recommendation to the Public Works Director on whether or not a tree should receive landmark designation or not. As part of the process, the code does a good job of laying out considerations related to the tree distinctly, but is silent on other considerations that may impact the public. Staff is concerned about landmark tree process being a tool that divides neighborhoods or as a way to stop work that is proposed as part of the overarching city plans. Here are the code considerations regarding the merits about the tree proposed to be designated. 12.24.050 Landmark trees - Qualification. A. The landmark tree preservation designation recognizes the significance of certain special trees to the citizens of Port Townsend. A tree on private or public property may be protected throughout its useful life because of its contribution to the environment and city character. B. Property Owner Consent. To be nominated as a landmark tree, consent of the tree's property owner, or owners, is required. Forms for nominating a tree as a landmark tree will be maintained by public works. C. Nominations for landmark tree designation shall be reviewed by the city's tree committee. To qualify as a landmark tree, one or more of the following criteria must be met: 1. The tree has significance associated with a historical person, place or event; 2. The tree has attained significant size in height, caliper, or canopy spread for its age and species, 3. The tree has unique or uncommon aesthetic qualities for its species; 4. The tree is prominently visible to the public, along a major road or near a public place; 5. The tree possesses rare horticulture value. D. In addition to the above criteria, to qualify as a landmark tree the tree must not constitute a hazard or obstruction. E. The tree committee shall consider all nominations for landmark tree designation at an open public meeting. The above code does not address other considerations when making the determination of landmark tree designation. City staff recommend that the following criteria also be evaluated. 1. Hazards are reflective of safety concerns to traveling public or people on private property, impacts to private property, impacts to public property public property, and/or impacts to animals, is a significant contributor to wildfire hazard, or other trees and plants. Hazards should be able to be mitigated if designation proceeds. 2. Tree health needs to be considered in terms of hazard evaluation as well as maintenance costs. 3. Impact to City and franchise utilities. 4. Right tree right location versus right tree wrong location, versus wrong tree right location 5. Impacts to pavement and or road surfacing 6. Whether there is an impact to a future road extension or driveway necessary to access property or meet city street plans, fire access, or other public needs. 7. Impacts to trails. 8. Impacts to uses of right of way and/or easements. Some easements may prevent trees from existing within an easement as an example. 9. The PW Director should seek input from utility managers as a matter of decision making process. 10. Whether the landmark tree designation is being used as a tool to create neighborhood division or impact others negatively 11. How the tree fits within the goals for housing, commercial development, and other land uses designated by the comprehensive plan. 12. How the tree impacts utility plans. Are there other criteria that should be evaluated as part of the application and designation process? Thanks, Steve