Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAppendix A - Reference Materials Sims Way Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion Project March 6, 2022 Though final decisions on possible tree removal or construction have not been made, the City, Port, and PUD have made progress on forming a stakeholder group and seeking professional input on planning for the Sims Way Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion Project. The City of Port Townsend has formally approved a stakeholder process in which local residents with expertise and interest will review various aspects of the project. The residents have experience in various areas, including engineering, landscaping, multimodal mobility and marine trades. Members of this group include Jennifer Rotermund of the city’s Parks, Recreation, Tree, and Trail Advisory Board; Ron Sikes of the Admiralty Audubon Society; Arlene Alen of the Chamber of Jefferson County; and local residents Forest Shomer, Kate Dwyer, Dan Burden, Russell Hill, Joni Blanchard, and Steve Mader. “We have a great group for this committee and are very grateful their interest and willingness to volunteer their time on behalf of the community,” said City Public Works Director Steve King. “Staff is excited to start the process and is hoping the public will be engaged in supporting the process and the committee by providing constructive comments and feedback on the work ahead.” The Port of Port Townsend has engaged a professional arborist to study the Lombardy poplars lining Sims Way. Katy Bigelow, an ISA Certified Consulting Arborist, previously worked for the Port to assess the health of a few of the poplars near Port Townsend Brewing. She will assess the poplars on the south side of Sims Way and is expected to have a report done in March. Also, Port Capital Projects Director Matt Klontz, in coordination with City Public Works Director King, has started a selection process for an engineering firm which also has public engagement process and arborist expertise. The stakeholder group will work with the consultant to work through technical analysis of the project. “With the stakeholder process started and the selection of a consultant started, the public engagement continues,” said Port Executive Director Eron Berg. “The project partners are looking forward to working with the community, stakeholders and interested parties as the project moves into the design phase to achieve primary objectives of safe and reliable power, expanded boat yard to serve the marine trades, and implementation of the Gateway Plan.” The Jefferson County Public Utility District has stated its desire to work with the project partners and the community to find the best solution to problems presented by the Lombardy poplars. PUD commissioners and staff have discussed the issues in multiple public meetings and are open to a variety of mitigation options. “The PUD has spent a lot of time the last month looking at alternatives,” said PUD General Manager Kevin Streett, “different ways we can build, different ways other entities have built near trees, and we’ve thrown out quite a few options to the City and Port. We do think the project approved by the PIF grant is a good project, and that we can work together to find a way to come up with a solution that works for the community.” PUD District 1 Commissioner Jeff Randall concurred with Streett and added that he would like to see more development by both the City and the Port before the PUD settles on a final plan for mitigating the contact between power lines and trees. “Our plan is pretty simple, underground the power lines, their plans are a little more complicated.” = = = For more information  Port of Port Townsend Executive Director Eron Berg (360) 316-6013 Port of Port Townsend Capital Projects Director Matt Klontz (360) 385-0656 City of Port Townsend City Manager John Mauro (360) 531-2916 City of Port Townsend Public Works Director Steve King (360) 379-5090 Jefferson County Public Utility District General Manager Kevin Streett (360) 385-8360 Jefferson County Public Utility District Operations Director (360) 385-8340 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 1/12 (/) Friday, June 16, 2023 (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/delivery/cl.php? bannerid=354&zoneid=13&sig=0cdf97a7e59642cf62edbe7c380c727d5f7b8c67884534032bfb94af8698a175&oadest=https% 3A%2F%2Fwww.ptleader.com%2Fmarketplace%2F) MAIN MENU  You have 2 free items remaining before a subscription is required. Subscribe now! (/subscribe/?town_id=0&lcid=78626) | Log in (/login.html) A brief histor y and future of KahTai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint  Log in (/login.html)Subscribe (/subscribe/) 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 2/12 Posted Friday, December 3, 2021 11:04 am Deborah B. Jahnke n 1963, the Army Corps of Engineers dredged 231,000 cubic yards of nearshore sand to expand the Port Townsend Boat Haven and dumped it into what had been a beautiful, tidally ushed estuary called Kah Tai qatáy) Lagoon. Dumping the sand offshore was deemed too expensive, and the 1960s logic was that estuaries weren’t important anyway. As a part of making the dumping more palatable, rows of Lombardy poplars were planted along the highway. The species was selected more for availability, low cost, and speed of growth than for any benet to the area. The Port of Port Townsend had acquired most parcels in the lagoon prior to dumping, and the intent was to build a strip mall on the sand after letting both the sand and the public outrage settle for a few years. Downtown businesses raised a 1,000-plus signature petition against the strip mall idea, arguing that such a development could bankrupt them. A series of lawsuits by citizens delayed the strip mall effort, while a parallel effort by volunteers led to the submission of a grant proposal in 1980 to the National Park Service to make the area a Land and Water Conservation-funded nature park. The city had no money for matching, so the grant match consisted of generous donations of a few privately owned parcels of land that the port had not managed to purchase. The county and port both agreed to give their land in the area to the city if the grant was funded. (/uploads/original/20211203-110337- aerial_65_hires.jpg) An aerial high-resolution image of Kah Tai in 1965 after the USACE dredging operation began in 1963 to expand the Boat Haven at the bottom of the photo. PHOTO COURTESY STEVE HAYDEN OF FILES 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 3/12 The LWCF grant was funded in 1981 and the park boundary established. A second grant proposal to the state provided for the start of development and a 1986 landscape plan was generated by well respected landscape architects and reviewed favorably by a rather famous ornithologist. That plan included a layout of the park into zones with appropriate plant species. The plan for the zone along Sims Way included: Year 1, remove all poplar seedlings and some mature poplars and plant natives; Year 3, remove more poplars, plant more natives; Year 10, remove more poplars to establish view corridors. The port didn’t sign over its Kah Tai holdings to the city in a timely way, so a 30-year lease was signed n 1982 to allow sufcient time to complete the transfer. Unfortunately, the full plan was ignored and no land transfer occurred in the 1980s or 1990s or 2000s. Instead, all ofcial effort to follow the landscape plan was halted, but time, volunteers and birds continued to plant. f you lived here in the 1980s, you may well have been one of the volunteers who planted natives along Sims, behind the poplars. The beautiful natives lled in the corridor but the poplars remained, a wall of trunks blocking the view and limiting the growth of the native species. A nal lawsuit in 2011 led to completion of the land transfer in 2014. You cannot see the Western Larch turning gold in the Kah Tai woodland because the poplars block the view. You cannot see the beautiful Monterey Cypress (regionally appropriate but not native) or the Douglas rs, Shore Pines, Western Red Cedar, Madrone, the young junipers, Western White Pine, serviceberry, and numerous understory species along Sims because of the poplars. Our native poplars (cottonwoods) are long-lived, but Lombardy poplars are short-lived, brittle, too vertical for most bird species to use, with shallow, spreading, nvasive roots. On the port side of Sims, the poplars do more than block the view. They wander around the property line so that some are on city right of way and some are on port property. Their proximity to high voltage lines and boat masts make them dangerous. The PUD needs to underground those power lines on the city right of way, but the shallow, invasive roots make that impossible. The port owns nearly an acre of land that is currently unavailable for economic development because of the poplars. The port has every right to utilize its property and we have a wealth of local professional arborists willing to follow our municipal code on trees and collaborate to advise about selecting appropriate replacement species. f you want to know some species that will grow on the south side of Sims, look across the highway. Diverse native species are already here again, and thriving. Let’s do it right this time, on both sides of the Sims Way corridor. Note: The opinions expressed here belong to the author. An article about Kah Tai written for The Leader in 1984 by then-parks superintendent Kevin Burke provides much more detail about the history, and can be read at http://kahtai.blogspot.com/p/park-emerges.html. (Deborah B. Jahnke is chair of the Port Townsend Parks, Recreation, Trees and Trails Advisory Board.) Comments 5 COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM PLEASE LOG IN TO COMMENT BY CLICKING HERE (/LOGIN.HTML?REFERER=%2FSTORIES%2FA-BRIEF-HISTORY-AND- FUTURE-OF-KAH-TAI-SIMS-WAY-CORRIDOR-GUEST-VIEWPOINT%2C78626)  ptleader Thank you for this thoughtful and informative article. 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 4/12 WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2021 REPORT THIS (/REPORT_ITEM.HTML?SUB_ID=78626&COMMENT_ID=5115&REFERRING_URL=%2FSTORIES%2FA- BRIEF-HISTORY-AND-FUTURE-OF-KAH-TAI-SIMS-WAY-CORRIDOR-GUEST-VIEWPOINT%2C78626)  cedarrose61 I always enjoy reading an article that has been well researched and presented so intelligently. I know I could never put out a piece like that. Having been born and raised in this town and growing up on the “swamp road” I’ve always been interested in how the town continues to evolve. Some parts make me sad but that’s life in every town every where and nothing stays the same. I’ve always loved driving through the tree-- laned road coming into our town but it’s probably time for better trees to be planted. I’m way more irked with those nuisance roundabouts put on Washington Street. Makes me mad every time I see them. Am not particularly fond of the roundabouts up on the hill coming into town either. And while I’m thinking about it, people can quit trying to get rid of the golf course and when is the post ofce going to get with the program and have an easier access available? Climbing those back steps and dodging trafc and standing in the cold is not user friendly! Ahhhh…I’d forgotten how much fun writing on the Leader website can be. --Joyce Blankenship WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2021 REPORT THIS (/REPORT_ITEM.HTML?SUB_ID=78626&COMMENT_ID=5116&REFERRING_URL=%2FSTORIES%2FA- BRIEF-HISTORY-AND-FUTURE-OF-KAH-TAI-SIMS-WAY-CORRIDOR-GUEST-VIEWPOINT%2C78626)  pamstin This helped me left turn my opinion! Thanks for sharing the science. Perhaps this will help settle the matter. FRIDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2021 REPORT THIS (/REPORT_ITEM.HTML?SUB_ID=78626&COMMENT_ID=5120&REFERRING_URL=%2FSTORIES%2FA-BRIEF- HISTORY-AND-FUTURE-OF-KAH-TAI-SIMS-WAY-CORRIDOR-GUEST-VIEWPOINT%2C78626)  ptwise great article - thanks for history TUESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2021 REPORT THIS (/REPORT_ITEM.HTML?SUB_ID=78626&COMMENT_ID=5129&REFERRING_URL=%2FSTORIES%2FA-BRIEF- HISTORY-AND-FUTURE-OF-KAH-TAI-SIMS-WAY-CORRIDOR-GUEST-VIEWPOINT%2C78626)  jonijobone Except, the '86 Kah Tai plan called for 'SELECTIVELY thinning' the Poplars to maintain a view into the Park and Historic District along with planting native ground cover beneath them. Nowhere in the whole plan does it recommend obliterating them.. The 'selectively thinning the Poplars' plan was supported again in the ofcial 1993 landscape design of the Gateway Plan, which also had many local and out of town professional arborists and landscape architects involved. If all those native evergreens planted on their roots grew to full size, the view into the park would be obliterated and all anyone would see driving into town would be a WALL of green only. Also, there aren't many native trees that can be planted along the boatyard side, as most native Cedars, Firs, and Pines, along with the non- 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 5/12 natives recommended by the Parks Board - Ash, Oaks, Cypress are extremely pollen producing trees that would be incompatible with the boatwork. The Poplars have provided great benet to the environment and our town. They've soaked up toxic water and air from road runoff and boatyard activities (Poplars are particularly known and purposly planted for being good at removing toxins), withstood high winds and blocked high winds, fumes, dust, and noise. They've thrived on the brackish sal****er beneath their roots. Wildlife does in fact live within them, in spite of it not being an accommodating wildlife zone with all the industrial and trafc activity (arborist's words). They provide a diversity along with the other non-native trees promoted for planting in Kah Tai Park and around our town, besides just our lovely Evergreen Conifers that are quite abundant. Also, as with any tree, how ong it lives depends more on where it's planted than the species. Our Poplars along there average about 50 years old. Most of the Poplars elsewhere around our town are holding strong (for the most part) at ages over 70 (Disco Bay golf course trees). Our recent arborist report (3/22) declared our South side Sims Poplars at 'low risk' according to the ISA Risk Rating and Action Thresholds chart - meaning - nsignicant - minor issues of concern for years to come. I'm sure an assessment on the North side trees would be similar - especially with so many young strong Poplars with many decades of life left in them along that side!! TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 2022 REPORT THIS (/REPORT_ITEM.HTML?SUB_ID=78626&COMMENT_ID=5612&REFERRING_URL=%2FSTORIES%2FA-BRIEF- HISTORY-AND-FUTURE-OF-KAH-TAI-SIMS-WAY-CORRIDOR-GUEST-VIEWPOINT%2C78626) 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 6/12 OTHER ITEMS THAT MAY INTEREST YOU riends in the garden: Benecial nematodes (/stories/friends-in-the-garden-benecial-nematodes,122507) A story about Liberty on Flag Day | Life in Ludlow (/stories/a-story-about-liberty-on-ag-day-ife-in-ludlow,122505) A special treat: A week not in the North Bay | Life in Ludlow (/stories/a-special-treat-a-week-not-in-the-north-bay-life-in-ludlow,121498) ike ne wine, PT is aging | Mann Overboard (/stories/like-ne-wine-pt-is-aging-mann- verboard,121497) 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 7/12 (/stories/pt-leader-2023-0614,122349) PT Leader-2023-0614 (/stories/pt-leader-2023-0614,122349) View this issue (/stories/pt-leader-2023-0614,122349) Browse other issues (/eeditions/) 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 8/12 /stories/new-member-joins-port- townsend-school-board,122514) /stories/quilcene-to-hire-interim- district-superintendent,122513) /stories/county-commissioners- approve-new-park-fees,122512) More  (/news/ (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=701&zoneid=1&sig=25343ccb994bf4c8533443 4f6ab4db0a0754cf4fb987ac2e125b7e8dce8db765&oades t=https%3A%2F%2Fkristinmanwaring.com%2Findividua l-family%2Fhealth-insurance-plans%2F) LATEST NEWS New member joins Port Townsend School Board (/stories/new-member-joins-port-townsend-school- board,122514) The Port Townsend School Board appointed Simon Little to a vacant position on the board at its last meeting. The decision came after the board interviewed three applicants for the post, … Quilcene to hire interim district superintendent (/stories/quilcene-to-hire-interim-district- superintendent,122513) The Quilcene School Board has voted to extend to a job offer to Ron Moag to take over as the school district’s interim superintendent. Moag has accepted the position, current … County commissioners approve new park fees (/stories/county-commissioners-approve-new-park- fees,122512) Jefferson County commissioners approved an updated fee schedule for use of parks and recreation facilities at their meeting Monday. The new fees will go into place immediately, ofcials said. … 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 9/12 (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=481&zoneid=1&sig=96531745a25d4b1667fcab 3e9885eef3c495b6ae39ce721af5f6dfc8f8d09fa4&oadest= https%3A%2F%2Fptleader.creativecirclemedia.com%2Fs ubscribe%2F) 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 10/12 (/stories/pt-leader_getaway_2023_web,120332) PT Leader_Getaway_2023_WEB (/stories/pt-leader_getaway_2023_web,120332) View this issue (/stories/pt-leader_getaway_2023_web,120332) Browse other issues (/specialsections/) 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 11/12 (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=704&zoneid=1&sig=1adfd0d6ede369eb82f8c4 9875f74573737bedf0a96a900ec3461914bb2a725c&oades t=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chimacumcorner.com) (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=545&zoneid=1&sig=b0c5261aea5f0b8a3d372d 550d376d27c97f36b94ab8378e0f7e52de82253c6a&oades t=https%3A%2F%2Fptleader.creativecirclemedia.com%2 Fsubscribe%2F) (/) 226 Adams Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 1-360-385-2900 (tel:1-360-385-2900) SECTIONS NEWS (/NEWS/INDEX.HTML) ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT (/ARTS-ENTERTAINMENT/) SPORTS (/SPORTS/) CALENDAR (/CALENDAR/) OPINION (/OPINION/) OBITUARIES (/OBITUARIES/) CLASSIFIEDS (/CLASSIFIEDS/) 6/16/23, 6:50 AM A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/a-brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626 12/12 SUBMIT NEWS (/FORMS/SUBMIT-NEWS/) SPECIAL SECTIONS (/SPECIALSECTIONS/) WEB EXTRAS SERVICES About Us (/about/) Contact Us (/contact/) Report News (/forms/submit-news/) Subscribe (/subscribe/) Where to nd the Leader (/racks-and-dealers/) CONNECT WITH US  (https://www.facebook.com/ptleader)  (https://twitter.com/ptleader)  (https://www.youtube.com/user/PortTownsendLeader) © C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 P O RT T O W N S E N D L E A D E R | T E R M S O F U S E (/T E R M S -O F -U S E /) / P R I VAC Y P O L I C Y (/P R I VAC Y-P O L I C Y /) | P O W E R E D B Y C R E AT I V E C I R C L E M E D I A S O L U T I O N S (H T T P ://C R E AT I V E C I R C L E M E D I A .C O M ) Advisory board supports removal of Port Townsend poplars Design concept now goes to city, port, PUD for final vote By Paula Hunt Peninsula Daily News Thursday, August 25, 2022 1:30am ❙NEWS J EFF ERS O N COUNTY PORT TOWNSEND — An advisory board has unanimously recommended a design concept urged by a stakeholder committee that would remove all of the poplar trees on the south side of Sims Way and selectively remove the trees on the north side as part of the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion. Now the concept goes to the Port Townsend City Council and the commissioners of the Port of Port Townsend and Jeerson County Public Utility District for nal consideration. Tuesday’s action by the Port Townsend Parks, Recreation, Trees and Trails Advisory Board was the last step before the design concept goes before the three boards, which are collaborating on the project, at 6:30 p.m. Sept. 12 at the Point Hudson Pavilion, 355 Hudson St., Port Townsend. The project had become identied with public debate surrounding the fate of the 150 or so poplar trees that line the Sims Way corridor leading into downtown Port Townsend rather than its intended purposes related to safety and expansion of Boat Haven boat yard. Concerns about safety were initially raised by the PUD and Boat Haven in 2021 when a boat in a lift touched an overhead high-voltage power line. That, along with reports to the PUD of arcing between the poplars and the powerlines, an expressed need by Boat Haven to expand and the city’s desire to implement its Gateway Development Plan prompted the three agencies to develop a project and apply for Jeerson County Public Infrastructure Funding (PIF). The $1 million grant approved in November is expressly tied to the boat yard expansion’s potential for job creation in the local maritime industry. “The PUD won’t underground the lines if the port doesn’t expand because they’re tied together,” said Jeerson County PUD Commissioner Je Randall, who attended Tuesday’s meeting. “If we don’t get that money, then we’ll just have to keep hacking at those trees.” The PUD shut o the power lines last summer due to the risks associated with their proximity to the poplars and the boat yard. Included in the plans is the construction of a pedestrian and/or bike path on the south (boat yard) side of Sims Way. The nine-member Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion citizen stakeholders committee that began meeting since April was tasked with considering a wide range of elements, site constraints and opportunities when formulating its recommendation for the Sims gateway corridor. Among these were existing city policies, codes and plans (including the 1993 Gateway Development Plan, the city’s 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the 1986 Kah Tai Development Plan); existing tree health and replacement ideas; soils and stormwater challenges; and aesthetics. City Public Works Director Steve King, who facilitated the stakeholder meetings, said the group took into account public comments and the input of arborists and mobility experts, among others, as well as a plan for a partial expansion of the boat yard proposed by the Gateway Poplar Alliance, a local group opposed to any removal of the poplars. The appearance of Sims Way will be less columnar without the two rows of poplars lining each side, but more visually interesting with foliage of varying heights and textures, King said. “The preferred alternative is a parkway setting,” he said. “It will look linear if you look straight ahead, but there will be gaps between the trees if you look to the side.” Pam Adams, a member of the Parks Advisory Board, said she supported the stakeholders group’s preferred alternative, but still had some concerns. “I’d like to know if maintenance can be shared with the port and PUD so it isn’t on the back of our (city) sta,” Adams said. “I’m also concerned about pedestrian safety and ADA and whether, in order to cover both of those, it wouldn’t be better to have a sidewalk on the south side rather than a path and because they’re hard to maintain.” Seven members of the public attended the meeting, among them Rhonda Hall of Port Townsend. “I originally didn’t favor removing the poplars, but when I found out about the danger they posed, that decided it for me,” Hall said. “I hate to see them go, but change can be a good thing.” ________ Reporter Paula Hunt can be reached at paula.hunt@soundpublishing.com. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Matt Klontz Director of Capital Projects and Port Engineer Port of Port Townsend matt@portofpt.com 360-316-1201 SIMS GATEWAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION PROJECT OPEN HOUSE AUG 6 The City of Port Townsend, Port of Port Townsend, and Jefferson County PUD will hold an open house for the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project at the Port Townsend Community Center on August 6th. Members of the public are encouraged to drop-in between 10 AM and 1 PM to view results from work performed over the last 4 months and to speak with members of the project’s Citizen Stakeholder Committee, design consultants, and representatives from the three sponsoring agencies. The open house will be hel d alongside the Saturday Port Townsend Farmers Market. The information presented in the open house will include a range of alternatives considered and the preferred design concepts developed during the Stakeholder process. The design concept will illustrate tree removal locations and replanting concepts, pedestrian walkway development, edge and buffer development and maintenance, fencing and setbacks. Information at the open house will depict the project from multiple angles and will be printed in large format for ease of viewing. Design concepts for alternatives not preferred by the Citizen Stakeholder Committee, including no expansion of the boatyard and no undergrounding of the powerlines, or partial expansion with undergrounding, will also be on display. To facilitate the most participation as possible, there will be no formal presentation of the project or process, but representatives will be on hand throughout the open house to answer questions and engage in discussion. Comment boards will also be available for members of the public to provide feedback. The nine-member Citizen Stakeholder Committee was created to provide a formal review of the project and give in-depth feedback on project design and development. Members of the committee were selected for their varied expertise and interest. The committee has met with agency representatives and project consultants bimonthly since April. The committee and project team will incorporate feedback gained from the open house into their final recommendation to the City Parks Board on August 23, 2022. The City Council, Port Commission and PUD Commission will review the recommendations at a joint special meeting in September to make a final decision on design concept. With funding from the Jefferson County Public Infrastructure Fund, the Port of Port Townsend contracted SCJ Alliance to provide design services and Stakeholder Committee support for the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion. SCJ Alliance, a multi-disciplinary planning and engineering firm, has delivered several projects for the Port Townsend community over the past 10 years. SCJ is joined by MacLeod Reckord, an urban design and landscape architecture firm and a SCJ partner on past projects along the Port Townsend historic waterfront. SCJ is also joined by Urban Forestry Services|Bartlett Consulting for arborist services. The goal of the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project is to improve public safety, increase economic opportunity for the maritime trades community, and restore and enhance native ecosystems along Sims Way as it passes between the Boat Haven and Kah Tai Lagoon. The project partners recognize the tree lined section of Sims Way is an iconic feature and the possibility of changes to the corridor has raised much community dialogue. The intent of the Citizen Stakeholder Committee and the project open house is to have an open and transparent design process with abundant opportunity for community engagement and input. For more information about the process or the open house please visit the project page on the City’s website: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard- expansion-project. - N 1" = 140' Existing Transmission Lines Proposed Boat Yard Expansion Separation Zone - Equipment from Transmission Lines Existing Travelift Drive Aisle Existing Port Fence 27' 35' ~63' 24'-30' 25' 45' 45' 20' CONCEPTUAL DRAWING BOAT HAVEN SIMS WAY Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park Gateway Development Plan Prepared for CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND and the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Prepared by STASTNY ARCHITECTS pc: Urban Design MAYER/REED: Landscape Architecture KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES: Traffic & Transportation Planners ARNOLD, ARNOLD AND ASSOCIATES: Civil Engineers Preliminary Draft: December 5,1990 Drafts: February 18, 1991 August 1, 1991 July 1993 Final Plan: August 1, 1991 STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Peter Badame, Tom Beavers, Joan Deering, Norm R. Dehnhoff, Larry Dennison, Andrea Fontenot, Bob Grace, JeffHamm, Ann Landis, Julie McCulloch, John McNutt, Don Nutter, Ron Olsen, Bart Phillips, Rick Shaneyfelt, Lois Sherwood, Bob Sokol, F. Byron Swigart, Craig Ward, Bob Wheeler, Joe Wheeler CITY STAFF Michael Hildt, Director, Planning and Building Dave Robison, Project Manager Kit Perkins, Staff Planner Darlene Bloomfield, Administrative Assistant Jan Zimmer, Planning and Building Assistant Katherine Johnson, Planning and Building Assistant FUNDING AND IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS Jefferson County Economic Development Council; Port Townsend Chamber of Commerce; Puget Sound Power and Light Company; Port Townsend-Jefferson County Board of Realtors; Jefferson Title Company; Taas Survey Associates (Now David Evans and Assoc.); University of Washington School of Urban Design; Stastny Architects pc; Gateway Steering Committee; Gateway Charrette Core Group; Jefferson County Planning and Building Department; Edmonds Planning Department; Washington State Department of Transportation; Washington State Department of Community Development; Tonkin/Koch/Architects; Prefect Productions (Video Team); Port Townsend School District No. 50; Port Townsend Public Library; Port Townsend Police Department; Port Townsend Main Street Program; Printery Communications; Jefferson Transit; Centrum Foundation; Fort Worden State Park; Inn Deering; Sally's of Port Townsend (catering); Port Townsend Leader, Video Mart 1. PLANNING FOR THE NEXT CENTURY Port Townsend, Washington, has been a gateway to the future of the Pacific Northwest for more than one hundred years. Before statehood, when the Oregon Territory was still a wildly diverse land of mining, fur trapping, logging, fishing and exploration. Port Townsend was the major seaport for commerce and settlers coming in and out of this vast edge of the country. When travel shifted from the sea to the land, with the development of roadways and trucks to carry cargo and private automobiles to transport people, the highway in and out of Port Townsend became the gateway leading away to the urban centers beyond, and the gateway leading into one of the loveliest Victorian seaport towns remaining anywhere in the world. By 1987, with the development pressures from the greater Puget Sound area reaching out to touch the edges of Port Townsend's city limits-from the highway entering from unincorporated Jefferson County to the bluffs overlooking the town and harbor below-Mayor Brent Shirley and the members of the City Council recognized the need to focus the town's attention on this important entrance to its historic downtown. These city leaders made plans for a city-wide participatory planning process, a design charrette, to discuss and decide what kind of gateway the citizens wanted for their town, and to consider how to implement those decisions. The Port Townsend Gateway Project had begun. Mayor Shirley, recognizing the importance of including the broadest possible participation in the planning process, brought together a nine-member steering committee, including citizens and elected officials, to plan the design charrette focusing on the gateway to Port Townsend. The Steering Committee began regular discussion and planning sessions, meeting with City staff and a professional design workshop facilitator, to refine the goals for the design charrette and gather and organize information to be used at the planning session. A series of informational reports was prepared and assembled into packets for the participants. The Jefferson County-Port Townsend Leader published a series of stories, outlining the issues and encouraging citizens to begin the discussion process leading up to the design charrette. Students from Port Townsend High School organized a video project to document the gateway corridor, to interview citizens, and to record all public planning events up to the commencement of the design charrette. After several weeks of discussion, the Steering Committee established goals for the charrette and recommended a core group of thirty-three citizens, representing every facet of Port Townsend life, including: owners of businesses and property along the gateway corridor, realtors; developers; educators; Planning Commission and City Council members; design and arts professionals; other professions; contractors; recreation leaders; religious leaders; design and planning consultants; public officials; students; and citizens-at-large. The Steering Committee developed a goal statement to focus and guide the process: Through an intensive community workshop, develop a plan that graphically defines a consensus vision for the Sims Way Corridor area. This plan will form the basis for business development through regulatory improvement. The plan should identify the aspirations of the citizens of Port Townsend, indicate actions that are realistic and implementable, communicate ideas and solutions to be included in future plan documents, and provide a "sales tool" for the city in encouraging economic development. Enthusiasm and interest grew steadily within the community as planning for the design charrette neared completion. On April 20, 1988, all citizens of Port Townsend were invited to a Town Hall Meeting, held at historic Fort Worden, to meet their representatives on the Core Group, to preview the video presentation which the high school students had prepared, to review the goals for the design charrette, and to provide public comment for consideration at the charrette sessions. The stage was set for the design charrette to commence. The following two days and nights, April 21 and April 22, 1988, were marathon sessions of intensive, focused, highly-participatory design discussions, leading to a practical, concrete list of design priorities for the gateway corridor. Design charrettes are a rare opportunity to bring together the widest possible range of ideas, expertise, energy, and creativity, in a cooperative and constructive effort to find practical solutions to very real design challenges. Several design and planning professionals from other towns in the region offered their time to participate with Port Townsend's citizens. The result was a high-energy, very productive process which gave the City of Port Townsend a concept plan for future development of the gateway area, which would result in a welcoming, safe and attractive introduction to the town lying beyond. The seeds for a new future had been planted. The planning area addressed-in the charrette stretches along the Sims Way/SR20 corridor from the Port Townsend city limits to the Washington State Ferry Terminal. The gateway participants developed the plan on a twenty-foot-long map of the study area, with accompanying graphics. Also adopted was a far-reaching list of specific suggestions and an implementation plan for developing the gateway. At the charrette conclusion, on the late afternoon of the second day, April 22, 1988, the charrette Core Group presented its ideas for the future of the gateway corridor to its fellow citizens. The City Council meeting in the evening of May 11, 1988, was one of the most satisfying moments in recent Port Townsend history. The Core Group participants, along with other citizens observers, students. City staff members, and elected officials, came together in the City Council Chambers, overlooking the harbor where ships had brought in the hopes and dreams of the town's forefathers more than a hundred years before, to present the plan to the City Council. The room was filled with a sense of purpose, quiet excitement and resolve, and energy as the charrette participants presented their consensus plan. After listening to support from a remarkably wide range of citizens during the hearing, the Port Townsend City Council passed Resolution 88-43, formally adopting the PORT TOWNSEND GATEWAY CONCEPT PLAN, a carefully-detailed set of priorities, with practical increments, for shaping the gateway corridor into the kind of place which would reflect the spirit and history and vision of the town to which it leads. During the remaining months of 1988, and on into 1989, the Port Townsend City Council, Mayor, Planning Commission, and City staff members, working together with citizens, the Mainstreet Project, the Jeff Co. Economic Development Council, the Chamber of Commerce, the Board of Realtors, developers, contractors, and individual business owners, moved forward on the implementation of the Gateway Concept Plan. Three major new commercial projects in the Gateway Corridor sought out city officials to voluntarily comply with design guidelines for their projects. The first critical safety improvement--a crosswalk with a blind-person crossing sign--was established at a hazardous pedestrian crossing. After months of meetings with state officials, the speed limits along the Gateway Corridor were reduced to thirty miles per hour. The entrance sign at Port Townsend's city limits was restored and repainted. And the City purchased a high-priority parcel of greenbelt property adjacent to the entrance sign-a step toward preserving the rural nature of the transition area between the county and the city. Dimensional drawings were prepared to delineate use of the Sims Way/SR 20 right-of-way and to set the stage for a detailed streetscape design. During 1990, City staff and the Planning Commission conducted a complete review and draft revision of the City's sign code. The Planning Commission and City Council conducted extensive public hearings on the draft revisions, after which a new sign code, reflecting the specific recommendations included in the Gateway Project Concept Plan, is expected to be adopted by the City Council in early 1991. In early 1990, City staff explored the potential of employing a professional design team to take the Gateway concept Plan to another level of specificity. Realizing that the Concept had not been "tested" technically, that specific project recommendations for capital development were not in place, and that the Design Guidelines needed in the Concept Plan were not yet in place. City staff was able to obtain a grant from the State of Washington Department of Community Development, with the use of matching local funds. In addition, the City obtained Washington State Department of Transportation funds for the technical (engineering) analysis of SR 20/Sims Way to bring together a multi-disciplined design team to address the technical aspects of the project. In May, a team of architects, urban designers, landscape architects, traffic and transportation planners and civil engineers was employed to create a Route Development Plan, a Streetscape Development Plan and Design and Development Guidelines for the Gateway based on the foundation laid by the Concept Plan. The results of this work are enclosed in this report. 2. REVISITNG THE GATEWAY CONCEPT The Port Townsend Gateway Concept Plan, adopted in 1988, set the stage for the creation of the Gateway Development Plan. The basic foundation is the Statement of Purpose created, and adopted, in the Gateway Design Charrette: TO IMPROVE AND PRESERVE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE AND FACILITATE THE CREATION OF A GRACEFUL COMMUNITY FOR BOTH RESIDENTS AND VISITORS. A. To create a gateway that provides continuity of positive visual quality and enhances the overall beauty of the community of Port Townsend. B. To enhance the economic vitality of the corridor, its businesses and the community as a whole. C. To provide a safe corridor to and through the community for motor vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles. D. To maintain continuing dialogue and involvement of the community in development of the corridor. E. To ensure that the corridor concept is implemented in a timely, cost-effective and efficient way. In the Gateway Concept Plan, districts and areas were identified with specific treatments suggested for some locations and various infrastructure improvements throughout. The Concept Plan has continued to evolve and the work of the Consultant Team has built upon the community decisions to date. "Strip" Commercial Development Inherent in a primary roadway is the tendency to treat everything surrounding it in a similar linear fashion. This approach leads to "strip" commercial development that fails to differentiate the special character of districts, intersections and nodes of activity. In the Charrette, the Core Group struggled with ways to make special "places" along Sims Way. Identifying districts and areas of special environmental character were direct responses to the natural desire to differentiate the current linear quality of Sims Way. The Consultant Team, with the assistance of the Gateway Steering Committee, has further evolved the idea of special places so that Sims Way is no longer just a roadway leading from the City limits to the downtown Historic District, but is a continuous sequence of districts separated and defined by corridors of special environmental character. This approach to the planning of Sims Way integrates the downtown as one district along a sequence of districts, each one of which has the opportunity to develop over time as a unique and identifiable "commercial neighborhood" for the City of Port Townsend. Corridors and Districts Port Townsend, "a city carved out of the wilderness," has evolved an urban form where primary building development occurs on available level ground and steep geography is traversed only by roadways. This form is typical of the configuration along SR 20 (Sims Way) and has allowed areas of strong "natural" environmental features to remain along Sims Way. These have been characterized as "corridors" in that they lead from district to district, are linear in form, and are usually difficult development areas. The corridors identified along the extent of Sims Way are: (1) the "Forest Corridor" defined by extensive trees on both sides of the roadway from the city limits to the Hilltop Tavern; (2) the "S Curves Corridor": defined by the drop in topography (and resultant view) along the north face of the bluff overlooking the bay from the Sheraton/Sims Way intersection to the 10th Street/Sims Way intersection; and (3) the "Bluff Corridor" defined by the bluffs from the Washington Street/Sims Way intersection to the ferry landing on Water Street. Established and developing, the districts are delineated by these corridors. The districts are entered and exited through the corridor configuration and could be developed as "commercial neighborhoods", each with its own special identity as a "place". The districts, over time, could have the same locational significance as "uptown" and "downtown". Between the Forest and "S" Curves Corridors is the Upper Commercial District as identified in the Gateway Charrette. This area has traditionally provided service commercial facilities for the residents of Port Townsend. Its use by tourists has been limited and has been more of a "drive-through" area than a destination. The district defined by the "S" Curves and Bluff Corridors is the "Flats" Commercial District. Until recently, this district was dominated by Port activities and the Kah-Tai Lagoon Park area. Recent commercial development at the Safeway/McDonald's area and new motel development on Washington Street near Kearney has begun to change the character of the district from industry/commercial to a more tourist/commercial orientation. While the industrial/commercial elements will continue, they will become less dominant in this district. The last district in the chain is the downtown defined by the Bluff Corridor and the Admiralty Inlet at the north end of Water Street. The rhythm of Corridor-District-Corridor-District-Corridor-District illustrates the existing urban form where future emphasis can be given an area either as a "place" or a transition between "places" along the length of Sims Way/SR 20. The linearity of the roadway no longer controls development form, but services neighborhoods of activity. Rooms in the Districts In further attempts to break the linearity of the roadway, the Development Plan proposes breaking each district into a series of "rooms". Again, rooms are defined by natural features. In the Upper Commercial District, the rooms are defined and separated by major planting areas located perpendicular to Sims Way. These planting areas are located in the natural drainage ravines north and south of the roadway. Within the Upper Commercial District, the potential of three rooms exist by building upon natural features. Integrated into each room is a "centering" intersection that is keyed to the functional development of the traffic artery. The building of the intersection, access points, and resultant structures potentially give these points along Sims Way unique character and quality-and the ability to develop a sequence of activities within each district that break the linearity of the corridor. The "Flats" Commercial District continues the concept of "rooms", but in a different way. Commercial "rooms" exist at both ends of the District: on the west is the Safeway/Port Entrance room; and on the east is the evolving commercial area around the Kearney/Sims Way intersection (the Crossroads). Two larger rooms, the Boat Haven/Marina area and the Kah-Tai Lagoon area, each have a unique identity. Strong natural forms like poplars, other landscape plantings and the bay provide definition to the rooms. Using the same definition for the downtown, each of the sub-districts listed in the Urban Waterfront Plan are "rooms" in the downtown district: the Ferry Retail area, the Historic Commercial area, the Civic area, and the Point Hudson Marina District. The Creation of a Linear Urban Form The Design and Development Guidelines are created around four major themes, each of which addresses key elements of development and scale that contributed to the linear urban form that was initially envisioned in the Gateway Concept Plan. Gateway Concept, Gateway Circulation, Gateway Character, and Buildings and Site Development are critical areas for consideration in future development and redevelopment. The intent of the Gateway Development Plan, as well as the Design and Development Guidelines, is to create a framework for future evolution of the City that will create a chain of neighborhoods from the City limits to Point Hudson--neighborhoods defined as "places" within the City by building upon, and rebuilding, the natural vegetation and topography of the land. This was the underlying goal of the Gateway Concept Plan-to create a Gateway area that is as unique as its historic counterparts-a city carved out of the wilderness. 2a. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GATEWAY PLAN This chapter sets the framework on how the plan will be used by the city and the state, who the plan may affect, who and how will the recommended improvements be funded, and how it will affect future development along the SR 20/Gateway Corridor. Which Properties are Included in the Gateway Planning Area? The Gateway planning area is from the city limits along SimsWay/SR20 to the state ferry terminal on Water Street, a distance of about three miles. For planning purposes only, the Gateway consultant team examined adjacent land uses within 200 feet on either side of the state right-of-way. This was done to determine the potential number of vehicle trips which may be generated by future land uses adjacent to SR 20, and to plan for adequate access for businesses and other adjacent uses. The recommendations in the plan, however, pertain only to those uses directly abutting SR 20 or those uses which would have a significant impact on the future capacity or traffic safety of SR 20. The Plan as a Guide for Development The Gateway Development Plan recommendations are a comprehensive blueprint for action. Implementation of the plan will improve traffic safety along the corridor, make the City's entrance more visually inviting, and promote the economic vitality of district businesses. Most importantly, the Gateway Plan sets out a community-wide vision that the City and Washington State Department of Transportation will use in the design, permitting and funding of new roadside improvements along SR 20. The Plan will be used as a tool to guide development in three basic ways. First, the Plan will be used as the primary vehicle to obtain state and federal funding. Statewide competitive funding programs, administered by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), encourage cities and counties to prepare a comprehensive route development plan in order to receive discretionary state funding for roadside improvements. Adoption of the Plan by the City increases our chances in obtaining funding for transportation-related projects along SR 20. Second, the Plan will be used by both the City and WSDOT when reviewing and permitting new development projects immediately adjacent to SR 20. WSDOT has jurisdiction over any new roadside improvements which may be required between curb-to-curb (or the actual roadway surface). For example, a bank proposed for development along SR 20 would likely be found to generate X number of new vehicle trips to and from its facility. This additional traffic would likely cause significant traffic turning movements and/or delays, as well as potential traffic safety hazards. As a condition of development, WSDOT could require the installation of a two-way left hand turn lane to facilitate better travel (reduced delays) and safer left-hand turns into and out of the new bank. Under this example, the city would have jurisdiction over any streetscape improvements outside of the actual roadway surface (e.g. between the curb and the adjacent private property) but within the 100-wide right-of-way of SR 20. These improvements would typically include monument signs, pedestrian paths, landscaping and lighting along the highway. Third, adoption of the Plan by the City and WSDOT assures citizens of Port Townsend that future improvements along SR 20 will be consistent with the intent and recommendations contained in the Plan. That is, future roadway improvements by WSDOT will be consistent with the plan and emerging traffic safety problems will be addressed in an efficient, orderly, planned program of improvements. Similarly, the plan provides developers and business owners assurance that the City and WSDOT will be reviewing future projects in an orderly, consistent manner which sets out policies and standards which they can rely on in preparing their development plans. And finally, it will streamline the permit process by allowing the City to permit streetscape improvements (such as monument signage, pedestrian walkways, landscaping, etc.) within the right-of-way rather than property and business owners having to obtain WSDOT approval and entering into a lease agreement. Who Pays for Implementation of the Plan? One of the critical issues related to the Gateway Development Plan is who will pay for the estimated $10 million of proposed improvements. Future funding of the improvements recommended in the Gateway Development Plan will likely come from a variety of sources. It is the City's intent to finance most of the planned improvements through 80% state or federal matching funds. This may be accomplished through various grant programs such as the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), Statewide Transportation Program (STP), WSDOT Category C funds, or similar funding programs (see Gateway Implementation and Financing Strategy, March 1991). City contributions will be necessary to match WSDOT funding programs, and to foster public/private partnerships. This could be accomplished by the City reserving a certain percentage of new growth-related tax revenues to fund Gateway related improvments. Private property/business owners, in a partnership with the city may elect to solicit funding for specific Gateway improvements which directly benefit their properties. City funds reserved for Gateway, and supplemented with private/business contributios could be used for the local 20% match, if state or federal funding were obtained. Private development project proponents will also contribute to Gateway improvements as new development occurs, as illustrated byt he bank example above. This will be achieved on a fair share, or proportionate cost basis, dependent on the amount of traffic, or other impacts caused by proposed new development. Existing business and property owners will not be asked to contribute to the costs of these improvements unless they are part of a larger improvement district among several owners. Existing property owners will not be assessed for improvements unless a Local Improvement District (LID) is formed to help bring about necessary improvements sooner than is possible through sate and federal grant programs and developer improvements. Formation of an LID can be initiated by property owners along SR 20, or by the city. State law prescribes the process for formation of an LID. Property owners can be assessed only up to the amount of the special benefit (the increase in the fair market value of the property after the improvement) that the LED-funded improvements would confer to a specific property. If the owners of properties representing 60% or more of the assessment estimate protest the proposed LID, it cannot be formed. Existing residential development along SR 20 will not be included in a future LID. Phasing of Implementation Implementation of Gateway improvements will occur incrementally as funding opportunities and new development projects arise. It is likely that plan implementation will be phased over the next ten to twenty years. Therefore, it is important to prioritize an implementation schedule that is realistic of costs and addresses critical problem areas first. There are five major realignment and/or signalization projects recommended in the plan. Each one of these projects ill involve substantial state or federal funding to be accomplished. Successful funding will require a high degree of cooperation between the City, WSDOT and the property owners in each of these areas. A Gateway Implementation Committee should be established to assist the City and WSDOT in priorrizing projects for funding, work with other property and business owners in determinig their needs, and to help in the grant preparation and implementation schedule. The Committee should be charged with implementing the vision of the Gateway plan, while understanding that we must proceed in smaller increments, over time, sized to meet the capacity and needs of the community as a whole in each year. GATWAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PHASING PRIORITIES Priority Intersection Year Needed #1 Sheridan Street Signalization or Castle Hill Realignment (1991-1995) #2 Haines Street Realignment (potential demonstration project) (1991-1995) #3 Mill Road Signalization (1991-1995) #4 McPherson Street Realignment (1995-2000) #5 Washington/Gaines Street Signal (2000-) City Council Resolution In addition to the preceding discussion, on implementation of the plan, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 9367 to provide property and business owners with specific assurances as to how the City will implement the plan over the long term. This resolution was designed with the help of the Planning Commission and representatives form the Port Townsend Chamber of,. Commerce and other interested citizens in an attempt to resolve some of the concerns expressed during the Gateway workshop meetings. The resolution provides a set of guiding principles the City has committed to in its implementation of the Gateway Development Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 9367 A RESOLUTION adopting guiding principles for the City of Port Townsend to use in the Gateway Development Plan adoption process and future implementation of the Gateway Project. WHEREAS, the Port Townsend City Council requested and authorized preparation of the Port Townsend Gateway Development Plan to guide improvements to the SR 20/Sims Way Corridor area; and WHEREAS, the Gateway Development Plan was developed "to improve and preserve the overall quality of life and facilitate the creation of a graceful community for both residents and visitors;" and WHEREAS, the Gateway Development Plan recommendations are made to further the community goals of traffic safety, economic vitality and streetscape appearance to assure the interests for the community as a whole are served; and WHEREAS, implementation of the Gateway Development Plan must include a continuing dialogue and involvement of the community in the development of the corridor and must ensure that the Gateway concept is implemented, in a timely, cost effective and efficient way; Now, Therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Townsend that the following set of principles will guide adoption and implementation of the Gateway Development Plan: 1. It is the intent of the Gateway Development Plan to enhance economic development, support business strength and expand available shopping and services-primarily for residents. At all stages of consideration of the plan and at each step in plan implementation, private property rights shall be respected. 2. The City of Port Townsend will make all reasonable efforts to help property and business owners examine workable alternatives and plan for future roadway improvements along SR20 consistent with the Gateway Development Plan. 3. The Gateway Development Plan is a blueprint for action. It is a tool to be used to obtain funding from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to provide comprehensive roadway improvements. The plan will also be used to provide more predictability for developers and to assure that the City and WSDOT use a consistent method to evaluate new development proposals in the Gateway corridor. 4. The Plan's recommendations pertain to those properties directly abutting SR 20 and/or adjacent properties which, when developed, may have a significant impact on the operation, vehicle capacity and traffic safety of Sims Way/SR20. all references within the Plan to properties within 200 feet of the SR20 right-of-way are for planning purposes only and have no relevance or bearing on any future district which may be created for assessment purposes. 5. Implementation of improvements recommended within the Gateway plan are anticipated to occur incrementally as opportunities occur within the next twenty years or more. While the plan s intended to provide consistent guidance, it is recognized that conditions along SR20 will change over time, as will the need for refining certain recommendations in the plan, depending on site-specific characteristics and conditions at a particular time and location. 6. Similarly, the major recommendations of the plan will be phased over the long-term, and are dependent on the amount of federal and state funding that can be obtained. Implementation of major roadway improvements will require successful cooperation and coordination between property and business owners, the City, and the Washington State Department of Transportation. 7. Federal and/or state funding will be sought to finance the maximum available portion of the major roadway improvements recommended in the Gateway Development Plan. As any roadway improvement along SR20 is public in nature, the City will contribute its fair share to meet the local match. 8. In order to foster implementation of the Gateway Project, the City should provide "seed money," within City budget limitation, to promote public- private partnerships in those areas where business and property owners would like to construct Gateway "demonstration projects." As appropriate, the City will help to coordinate private investment to the extent that private property owners desire such assistance. 9. Existing, developed single-family residential lots which remain in single-family residential zoning may be made exempt from any special district assessments for Gateway roadway improvements, except for any general obligations as may be required of any other taxpayer throughout the City. 10. The City shall establish a Gateway Implementation Committee to work with the City and WSDOT to assist in implementation of specific roadway improvements (e.g. demonstration projects) once the plan is approved. The Committee will recommend funding priorities, grant priority, and develop public involvement strategies to keep interested and affected parties involved in the implementation process. 11. Prior to construction of future SR20 roadway improvements, the City shall coordinate meetings with WSDOT to assure that business and property owners will have the opportunity to be involved in the design and engineering phase of roadway improvements which may affect their properties. 12. Upon adoption of the plan, the City shall prepare a developer's guidebook for property owners which gives recommendations and design standards for those improvements (landscaping, drainage, pedestrian walkways, etc.) which can be located in the "flexzone" and estimated costs of installation. Adopted by the City Council and signed by the Mayor this 7th day of June, 1993. John Clise, Mayor Attest: David Grove, Clerk-Treasurer Approved as to form: Dennis McLerran, City Attorney 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE CORRIDORS AND DISTRICTS The Gateway Development Plan is an incremental treatment of the Corridors and Districts that comprise the three-mile length of SR 20 (Sims Way) from the city limits to the historic downtown core. The result of the Development Plan, when implemented, is the delineation of a number of "neighborhoods" that the traveller passes through upon entering the town. The distinction between different neighborhoods, and highlighting and building upon the unique characteristics of each, provides new economic opportunities for the land owners and business operators-and by adherence to the Design and Development Guidelines outlined herein, enables public and private entities to enhance and redevelop properties as a pan of a larger community order. Each Corridor and District is described separately: first, discussing the current status and condition; second, synopsizing the traffic recommendations made for that particular Corridor or District; third, discussing detailed streetscape recommendations; and fourth, detailing unique pieces of the Corridor or District. Where practical, graphic aids (drawings and computer photo simulations) have been utilized to illustrate the recommendations and expected outcome of the Development Plan. And what will it look like when completed? The Development Plan aims toward creating a linear urban structure that is a direct reflection of the goals and values of the citizens of Port Townsend. It is a Plan that requires a number of incremental actions by both public and private entities. Each small improvement (sidewalk, curb, light, sign, awning) will contribute to the whole and compliance to a guiding concept for the whole will make each increment that much more important in the overall effort. The success of the Plan, and the final "look", is dependant upon a commitment through public and private action to its realization. Therefore, the Plan should be interpreted as an "agenda for action" that will build a number of neighborhoods (districts with rooms) linked by natural features (Corridors) that are unique to Port Townsend; that will give a diversified flavor to the approach to the historic downtown; that will create commercial areas to serve both citizen and visitor; that will build back the image of a "city carved out of the wilderness." 3.1 FOREST CORRIDOR Status/Condition The Forest Corridor begins at the Mill Road intersection with a small group of commercial buildings and the City of Port Townsend" welcome sign. The remainder of this corridor is an area which is undeveloped, for the most part undifferentiated from the area outside of the City limits. The character for a "green corridor" or "Forest Corridor" within the City limits, is a strong introduction for a town "carved out of the wilderness." Land use adjacent to the corridor is critical in terms' of preserving the corridor. Sims Way is built as basically a two-lane rural highway. Lanes are 12" wide, with a third 12' left turn lane at the Mill Road intersection; there are shoulders along both sides. Traffic safety is compromised at the Mill Road intersection by poor sight distance, and the lack of signalized control. Because of these problems, tractor trailers prefer to use the Thomas Street intersection to by-pass the Mill Road/Sims Way intersection. Traffic Recommendations Several improvements on Sims Way are recommended: ■ The short link with Discovery Bay Road at this intersection should be widened to three lanes to accommodate more vehicles waiting to turn left or right onto Discovery Bay Road. ■ Left turns to private properties within 300 feet of this intersection should be banned when signalization occurs, with westbound left turns made at the Mill Road intersection during the left-turn signal phase. Signs and enforcement should be consistent with a 30 mph speed limit approaching the Mill Road intersection. ■ "Discovery Road" and "Mill Road" signs should be added on the eastbound lane of Sims Way, before this intersection. ■ Continuous bicycle lanes are recommended along both sides of Sims Way in the Forest Corridor. Informational signs describing alternate bike routes and potential hazards on SR 20 should be installed at the entrance to the Forest corridor. Streetscape Recommendations The character of the town "carved out of the wilderness" should be preserved by protecting the existing trees within 150'-200' of Sims Way. Infill planting of conifers along the Sims Way right-of-way, where not in conflict with businesses, will enhance the character of a "green corridor". The planting of coniferous trees directly behind the City Gateway sign will help reinforce the forest image along this section of Sims, and differentiate this section of SR 20 as part of Port Townsend. Further, the City should obtain an easement along the corridor in order to preserve existing tress. As private properties develop, care should be taken to protect existing trees, as well as to provide new native conifers and associated understory plants. Private commercial signs near the Mill Road Intersection should be consolidated. Parking and service elements adjacent to buildings should be screened with architectural or landscape elements. All utilities should be underground. The proposed continuous shoulder lanes along both sides of Sims will provide a bike lane throughout the Forest Corridor. A pedestrian path is to be developed adjacent to Sims, separated from the road by trees (see Figure 1). A small parking lot for a tourist shuttle may be developed at the west end of this corridor perhaps off of Mill Road. The exact location is subject to availability of land, and coordination with Jefferson County Transit. Details/Intersection Recommendations The Transportation Analysis (see Appendix 6.2) shows signalization is necessary within the next few years at the Mill Road intersection. This will prevent conflicts between side street movements and through traffic, and allow safer turning movements in and out of Discovery Bay Road and Mill Road without excessive delays in summer months, and foster truck/trailer left turns out of Mill Road, rather than Thomas Street. This would reduce congestion on a long stretch of Sims Way, encouraging trucks to use the shorter route away from the Port Townsend Paper mill and away from nearby commercial and residential developments. Such signalization would also help break the flow of traffic, enabling side street vehicular and pedestrian movement across Sims Way at unsignalized intersections. need photos from page 13 need graphic page 14 3.2 UPPER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Status/Conditions This section of Sims Way is comprised of three "rooms": various commercial buildings creating the "emerging commercial" room at the west end, the "established commercial" room midway and the "Castle Hill" room at the east end. The "emerging commercial" room is a continuation of a town in the wilderness image setting, created by the stretch of conifers as a backdrop. Lack of curbing creates poor traffic and parking control, and a poor pedestrian environment. Existing parking and building service elements (propane tanks, ventilation equipment, garbage collection, etc.) are exposed to view. There have been minimal landscape improvements along commercial properties. Some of the parking along this section of Sims is diagonal at edge of the roadway, creating a safety hazard as cars back onto Sims. In the "established commercial" room, the conifers begin to thin out, and the image of the town in the wilderness erodes. As in the "upper commercial" room, lack of curbing creates poor traffic control and a dangerous pedestrian environment, and there is no service or parking screening. The "Castle Hill" room also has no curbing or screening of parking or service elements. Limited landscaping at businesses has been developed due to the scale of Castle Hill Shopping Center, and the near disappearance of the conifer backdrop, creates a more urban character. There are two ravines which are in poor condition due to earth and debris fill. Development has altered much of the native vegetation. Conifers along the roadway close off the view corridor to these ravines. Traffic Recommendations This section of Sims Way requires curbing and clearly defined access points with the construction of an additional median lane for left turns. Properties and curbs should be set back from the road to permit construction of the median lane. Existing access and egress points to several properties on this section of road could be consolidated to reduce the number of driveway locations. Curbing is necessary to limit access to specific, well-delineated entry/exits along this portion of Sims Way. .Suggestions on consolidation of existing access points which could operate with shared driveways include: ■ Consolidate access at existing Jackpot driveway with Port Townsend Honda; ■ Consolidate access with Napa Auto Pans to that of the emerging commercial group west of the ravine. ■ Consolidate access at one point on Sims for Port Townsend Cafe and State Farm Insurance, granting an easement to the vacant property to the south. Relocate parking for the Cafe to the west side and rear. Consolidate access of Port Townsend Car Wash, Port Townsend Laundromat, and White Rose Antiques at one point on Sims and one point on McPherson. ■ Relocate the existing parking for Dis'n'dat Store, John's Auto Supply and Bluebird Antiques to the rear and west side of these buildings via a single driveway off Sims Way and "back door" access from McPherson Street. ■ Consolidate access for Hilltop Tavern at one clear driveway. Measures should be taken to minimize any future access points along this segment of Sims. Signalization, to handle traffic volumes and left turns, is recommended at the realigned Sheridan Street/Castle Hill and McPherson/Thomas Street intersections. Street realignments and signalization are discussed in detail as follows in "Details/Intersections Recommendations". Left turn lanes are recommended along Sims between the proposed Industrial Park and Thomas Streets, and between Hancock and Sherman Streets (see Figure 2). A left turn lane with altered one-way movement is recommended between Hendricks and Sheridan Streets. Additional widening of Sims is required for 2010 conditions between Hancock and Sheridan Streets (see Figure 3). need graphic page 16 Streetscape Recommendations It is recommended that the uniform visual backdrop of conifers be maintained and strengthened throughout all of the "rooms" of this District. This can be accomplished by encouraging a rear property line planting of conifers. The pedestrian environment can be improved by planting deciduous street trees along Sims at 50' intervals. Low shrubs or ground cover can be used to create an understory around the street trees. Sidewalks should be developed along the south side of Sims Way between Hancock and McPherson and along the north side of Sims Way between Cleveland and Hancock streets. Crosswalks should be located across Sims at Hancock and Grant Streets, and at the new Thomas/McPherson intersection. Lighting should also mark the crosswalks. The two existing ravines; near Lasalle and McClellan Streets, should be protected to provide adequate drainage and preserve a greenbelt. These drainageways should be protected and restored by recontouring along both sides of Sims to remove existing fills. A roadway configuration of 48' should be established utilizing fill, retaining walls and pedestrian bridges designed to reinforce the natural features of the ravine. Conifers are recommended along the Sims right-of-way. Commercial building should share driveway access wherever possible. Architectural and landscape screening should be created around service elements and parking, and parking should be located beside or behind buildings wherever possible. All utilities should be underground. Details/Intersection Recommendations Recommendations, McPherson and Thomas Streets Signalization is recommended on a fully actuated basis for 1995-2000 at the proposed realigned Thomas/McPherson Street intersection. Signalization would permit side street vehicular and pedestrian movement across Sims Way and help break the flow of traffic to enable similar side street vehicular and pedestrian movement across Sims Way at nearby unsignalized intersections. Along with this, realignment of McPherson and Thomas Streets is recommended (see Figure 4). This proposal connecting McPherson Street to Thomas Street forms a continuous route between Discovery Road and the Port Townsend Paper Mill. It would foster "back door" access to properties along 4th Avenue (the restaurant, car wash, laundromat, antique shop, veterinary center), help consolidate access points, and reduce traffic on Sims Way. This realignment would accommodate the construction of a median left-turn lane on Sims Way allowing north and south movement from Sims Way to both McPherson and Thomas Streets. The recommended intersection will have better sight distance and geometries than the existing Thomas Street intersection. It could be constructed on mostly existing paved public right-of-way. The only acquisition of vacant land would be from the Silver Palace Restaurant (currently used for parking) and to move the Calvary Chapel 75 feet to the north to allow for the realignment of Thomas. Since these options are expensive and will require outside funding and a couple of years to develop, short term measures are needed. This would include clearing trees and brush to the north of McPherson Street, relocating parking on the south of McPherson Street at the Dis'n'dat store, and relocating the planter in front of the Port Townsend Car Wash. UPPER COMMERCIAL "After" shows the planting of a conifer backdrop, a planter strip and pedestrian sidewalk, left turn lane and a bike lane along the shoulder. More uniform signage is developed and utilities (except major transmission lines) are installed underground. "After" provides tree planters on both sides of Sims Way, and pedestrian walkways. A continuous left turn lane, a right turn only lane, and more uniform "monument" type signage are also developed. A new signal beacon creates a new pedestrian crosswalk. Utilities are underground. Recommendations, Upper Commercial District, Thomas to Hendricks Streets This section of Sims Way, like that west of McPherson Street, requires curbing and clearly defined limited access, with the construction of a median lane for left turns. Improvements at the Hancock Street intersection include extending the left-turn lane on this section of Sims Way from Sherman Street and installing a signal beacon and a pedestrian crosswalk, with semi-actuated (Sims signal always green unless triggered red by side street pedestrian or car) traffic signal in the future. Also recommended is the excavation of the northwest corner of this intersection to provide better sight distance. Recommendations, Castle Hill/Sheridan Street Signalization at this intersection is necessary and is already warranted for summer peak conditions, but signalization at this intersection with its current configuration would impose delay to the westbound traffic moving on the uphill slope. It is also likely that right-turning traffic from Sheridan Street would avoid such a signal by cutting through the Castle Hill Center parking lot. An improvement to this situation would be a major realignment of this intersection (see Figure 5), shifting Sheridan Street's intersection at Sims Way to the west, linking at Grant Street. This would require realigning the Sheridan Street roadway south of 7th Street to curve slightly southwest, along the line of the existing Photo Hut booth toward First Federal Savings and Grant Street. Replacement parking for the Castle Hill Center and Century 21 is available on the eastern strip of grass land 80' wide between the existing paved parking lot and Sheridan Street east of the building occupied by the State Department of Social and Health Services, and on the northwest comer of the property along 7th Street (between Grant and Sheridan Streets), and on the segment of Sheridan Street to be vacated. There are several advantages to the Castle Hill/Sheridan Street realignment as recommended: access points would be consolidated; the intersection would be on more level ground; the sight distance would be considerably improved. Motorists seeking a left turn to Manresa Castle would see this building before turning, and left turn movement would become easier. Access to, and visibility of, the Castle Hill Center would be improved and the remaining triangle of land, combined with the vacated south end of Sheridan Street, would create a parcel of developable land of great value, maximizing views of Port Townsend Bay. The new intersection would have high capacity left-turn lanes over 300 feet long both eastbound and westbound. Operation of the realigned Sheridan/Grant Street intersection would further be enhanced by closing the direct access into Sims Way from the Family Dental Center and the Port Townsend Vision Clinic, and redirecting access onto Grant Street. Signs can also be improved approaching this intersection. 3.3 "S" CURVE CORRIDOR Status/Condition As Sims Way curves through this corridor, steep grades provide several panoramic views of the bay, the valley floor, and Kah-Tai Lagoon. The viewshed is enclosed to the north with a deciduous landscape, and partly open to the south for bay views. The changes in road gradient and alignment create a distinctive character in this section of the Gateway Corridor. Groups of small residences provide a sense of community. Larger Victorian homes and the Manresa Castle surround the corridor. Here, Sims Way is two lanes wide with shoulders on both sides. The west shoulder serves as a westbound climbing lane throughout most of the "S" Curve Corridor. Midway in this corridor is a small memorial overlook. The parking is insufficient, and the bay view is limited by tall dense vegetation. Traffic Recommendations Widening at this section of Sims Way is recommended for a second westbound climbing lane for heavier vehicles (see Figure 6). This could be accomplished by widening Sims along both the north and south edges. This may require modification and regrading of the slope, and perhaps structural support of the new pavement. Additional widening is recommended at shoulders for bicycle lanes and pedestrian movement. Appropriate cautionary signage is recommended. Curbing and access consolidation is recommended at the former Maestro Burger property, with access limited to 10th Street and a right turn only at the Hill Street access to SR 20. Hill Street should be vacated. A left-hand turn will be allowed at SR 20 unless, at some future date, a left-hand turn here presents future safety hazards. Signage changes should include a "VIEWPOINT" sign approaching the viewpoint eastbound, a "PORT FACILITIES" sign approaching Haines Street eastbound, and a "HOSPITAL/10TH STREET" sign approaching 10th Street westbound. Streetscape Recommendations The views of the bay along this section of the corridor create a significant and lasting impression for visitors travelling eastbound into Port Townsend. These views could be enhanced by selective removal of vegetation which obscures distant views. Building heights should be limited to protect views. A pedestrian path should then be created along the bayside of Sims Way to allow enjoyment of the views, and link to the existing memorial overlook. No street trees should be planted; however low shrubs could be planted along the west edge of Sims. All utilities Should be underground. The Memorial Overlook, at present, is an underdeveloped resource. This resource could be greatly improved by providing better access with a more developed vehicular turnout and signage. Benches, special lighting, and new landscaping would provide expanded usage of this site. Selective tree and shrub removal would enhance the view north to the valley as well as to the bay and the distant downtown. "After shows this section of Sims widened for a westbound climbing lane, and further widening for shoulders for use as bike lanes and pedestrian paths, and underground utilities. 3.4 THE "FLATS" COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Status/Condition Located on the valley floor of the corridor, this section of Sims Way levels out to a relatively flat roadway. "The expansive viewshed of the "S" Curve closes down to a straight, and more focused roadway corridor. Views are defined by a row of existing mature poplar trees. Glimpses of the Port of Port Townsend shipyards reinforce the sense of the City's special setting on the bay. Across from the shipyards, is the Safeway/McDonald's commercial development including an expanse of parking and the Kah-Tai Lagoon. The commercial developments at the east and west ends of this District are distinctively separate from the Kah-Tai Lagoon area located about midway in the District. The Lagoon provides an important open space resource within the City. However, there is little recognition of the Lagoon presence from the roadway due to the linear emphasis created by the poplar trees along the north edge of Sims Way. There are two triangle shaped sites, formed by the diagonal cut of Sims Way near Kearney, which have been purchased by the City for small parks. The site to the south of Sims Way has a large willow tree and the beginnings of a sidewalk. The triangle to the north of Sims Way has modest landscaping. A group of businesses to the east comprise a commercial cluster, including two motels. These are some of the first services the visitor comes across, but are only accessible by car. There are also views to the east of the Bluff, Jefferson County Courthouse, and a unique residence fashioned after the Mukelito lighthouse. Traffic Recommendations In this District, the western segment of Sims Way requires widening up to the shopping center entry at Haines. The existing left turn median lane approaching Kearney should be extended west to Benedict for westbound turns. The median lane approaching Kearney Streets should be extended west to Benedict Street for westbound left turns from Decatur Street. This would foster access to properties adjacent, south of Sims Way (see Figure 7). A paved bicycle and pedestrian path is recommended through the District. It would connect SR 20 and link to the proposed Waterwalk, Kah-Tai Lagoon and the Olympic Discovery trail (which uses the abandoned railroad row). The proposed signal at Haines St. establishes a safe crossing of Sims Way into the park. A visitor's parking lot is being proposed in the area north of the Safeway store, with a shuttle bus to the downtown area. The exact location would be verified with land availability, and the shuttle coordinated with Jefferson County transit. The existing Visitor Center could potentially be relocated at this proposed shuttle stop. Streetscape Recommendations The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims. adjacent to Kah-Tai Park, can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay. A pedestrian link can be created by the development of a hillclimb in the Jefferson Street right-of-way to link the Kearney/Sims intersection and the County Courthouse, Bluff and Uptown Residential District. This hillclimb could feature works of art by local residents as well as information about Port Townsend's history and provide access to a shuttle/parking lot at the base of the hillclimb. Throughout the District, landscape or architectural screening of parking and service elements should be required. Parking should be located to the side or rear of buildings where possible. Shared vehicular access into business should be encouraged. All utilities should be underground. The east part of the Flats District could be strengthened as an interchange for pedestrians and vehicles, with opportunities for tourists to stop and orientate themselves, leave their cars behind while they walk to services, the Historic District, or up the proposed hillclimb. This area is oriented around the "Crossroads" intersection developed as part of the Waterfront Plan. Additional parking could be provided along the Jefferson Street right- of-way. Tourist support services are encouraged to locate adjacent to existing commercial development. Visitor parking, a seasonal visitor shuttle, and enhanced pedestrian walkways would make this area a staging point for visitors. The pedestrian environment could be enhanced by using special paving on walks and providing benches, planters, bus shelter, drinking fountains, public art, and special lighting. Each of the "triangle" blocks adjacent to Kearney could be developed as parks and could be designed to help define the character of the flats district and entrance to Historic District. The large existing willow tree on the south triangle should be an integral part of the design. Special feature plantings and annuals, along with trees and ground cover unique to this area would also strengthen the pedestrian environment both on these Triangles and the blocks adjacent. Trees should be low enough to preserve the views of historic uptown buildings and the Bluff. A sidewalk is recommended along the south side of Sims Way between Decater and Water, with a natural path among the trees along the north side between Kearney and Haines, and around both of the "triangles" adjacent to Kearney. Details/Intersection Recommendations Signalization is recommended at the Safeway/Haines Street intersection. Traffic volumes indicate this will be warranted within the next few years. This is the main intersection between Sheridan and Kearney Streets. Concurrent with this improvement would be the extension of Haines Street through the Safeway parking lot. There is an unsafe situation as some vehicles currently cut through the parking lot between 12th Street and Sims Way. The creation of a public road would remedy this. Thirty-six parking spaces owned by Safeway, but relatively unused, would be eliminated. This would be curbed, preferably aligned with the segment of Haines Street south of Sims and situated between Safeway and McDonald's, with openings for parking lot access to both Safeway and McDonald's (see Figure 8). Recommendations, Kearny/Sims Way/Washington Street The three-lane configuration of Sims Way intersects with the two-lane Kearney and Washington Streets. The existing signal at Kearney and Sims will remain, and a second signal at Sims and Washington is recommended when warranted by additional traffic counts. Until- the second signal is installed, the traffic movements at Sims and Washington need to be limited to reduce the number of conflicting movements. Four basic modifications are recommended regardless of the one-signal or two-signal configuration. First, the Kearney/Sims Way intersection is recommended to be reconfigured by vacating Jefferson Street from Kearney to Sims Way, removing the "small triangle" north to adjoin the bank property. The new right-turn configuration from Kearney to Sims would be controlled through the existing traffic signal. Second, if traffic congestion and ferry queuing problems warrant, Gaines Street should be examined to be one-way from Gaines to Sims Way intersection with an additional lane for ferry queuing. All curb-side parking along Gaines and Water Streets would need to be realigned to respond to the southbound and east-bound traffic flow resulting from the one-way configuration. Third, the intersection where Water Street joins Sims Way is recommended to be configured to allow left turns from east-bound Water Street to west-bound Sims Way. This can be accomplished by reducing the triangle in the right-of-way (at the east end of Port Townsend Mall) to a rounded curve and creating a left-turn lane, and ferry queuing lane on Water Street (west of this intersection). Fourth, east- bound traffic on Washington would not be allowed to enter Sims Way, but would be required to turn right into the one-way Games/Water circulation path. When the second signal is warranted, turning and through traffic patterns at the Washington Street intersection with Sims Way could be facilitated through signalization, with the only change to the basic modifications listed above being the east-bound and west-bound movement on Washington Street. All through traffic, right- and left-turn movements in both directions would be allowed and controlled through the new signal. "After" shows Sims widened for a continuous left-turn lane, and for bike lanes. The existing poplars have been trimmed, and also thinned to clear dead trees with additional ones planted as infill. Utilities have been placed underground. 3.5 THE BLUFF CORRIDOR Conditions/Status The Bluff Corridor of Sims Way connects to Water Street, and provides a link to the downtown Historic District. The "Crossroads" intersection at Kearney St. marks the entry into the Bluff corridor. This section of the Corridor consists of a two-lane highway with a shoulder to the south, and a narrow shoulder wedged between the bluff to the north. This bluff, 50 to 80 feet high, partially covered with grass and wildflowers, is a predominant feature all along the corridor. The narrowness of the corridor and the views to the water give a sense of Port Townsend's location along the bay. Motels, condos, and small commercial buildings are spaced along the south edge of this section of Sims Way/Water St. These commercial amenities, along with the unique character of the Bluff and views of the bay, provide opportunities to reinforce and improve the tourist and pedestrian environment. Streetscape Recommendations As noted above, bay views, the unique Bluff form, proximity to the ferry and distant views of the historic district make this segment of the Gateway ideal for lodging and other visitor activities. A pedestrian sidewalk, separated from the traffic by landscaping, should be developed along the bay side of Water Street. The bluff along Water Street should remain unobstructed from view, and underground relocation of powerlines should be a priority in this segment of Gateway. Parking and service areas should be screened with architectural or landscape elements. All utilities should be underground. Traffic Recommendations Traffic analysis shows that widening is not necessary along Water to add capacity. Some widening is necessary, however, to extend the queuing lane for ferry traffic along the south edge of Water. The most cost-efficient plan for a bicycle lane would be to incorporate it into the existing shoulder on the bluff side of Sims (see Figure 10). The proposed queuing lane on the south can also accommodate bicyclists. A sidewalk can be accommodated along the south edge of Sims. It is also recommended that an electronic signage system be considered to indicate ferry waiting time. Ferry Queuing and Parking Recommendations: A draft Parking and Management Plan for Port Townsend and Keystone Terminals (August 1992) has been prepared by the Washington State Ferry Division (WSF). The WSF Plan provides an in-depth look into short-term and long-term issues relating to parking needs to service the ferry. The WSF Plan, however, does not address queuing issues associated with the operation of the ferry terminal on SR 20. This section of the Gateway Plan lists alternatives the City would like WSF to consider in its planning for future state ferry service. From the City's perspective, the issue of short-or long-term parking management as well as vehicle queuing needs should not be separated. Due to the location of the ferry terminal, lack of suitable nearby parking areas for both short and long-term ferry parking, and existing problems with ferry queuing, these issues need to be addressed comprehensively, examining the connecting highway/marine transportation system and their relationships. The WSF Plan indicates that commuter walk-on ridership on the Port Townsend-Keystone run is presently minimal. It should be noted that WSF currently does not provide any parking areas for walk-on ferry patrons. The WSF plan indicates that the potential for significant increases for future walk-on/commuter patrons is likely to be relatively low due to existing (or potential) employment markets within close proximity to the Keystone terminal. However, it is recognized that Port Townsend is increasingly used as a demarcation point for bicycle touring. This and the potential for a coordinated transit link to the Keystone Terminal may result in unanticipated future increases. Recent WSF studies also forecast a 25% increase in ridership (primarily drive-on patrons) between now and the year 2000. A 25% increase in drive-on ridership would cause significant impacts on the queuing lanes (along Water and Gaines Streets) to the ferry and likely result in the need for longer queuing lines and much more spillover congestion and safety impacts on SR 20. To mitigate these potential impacts, the City, WSF, and WSDOT, District 3, should work cooperatively to explode both short and long-term alternatives to the parking and queuing issues discussed above. Alternatives to be studied (in no particular order) should include, but not be limited to, the following: Queuing Alternatives: ■ Expansion of ferry terminal to alleviate future on-street queuing impacts. ■ Utilization of Indian Point by WSF to provide an off-street holding area for queuing of ferry traffic. The shoreline area of the property could also provide a linear park for public enjoyment. ■ Creation of alternative ferry queuing lines with additional capacity and possible electronic signage system to facilitate ferry queuing. Parking Alternatives: ■ Utilization of the Chevron property (parcel directly across form ferry terminal) for use as walk-on patron's parking area. ■ Establish remote park and ride shuttle lot (possibly north of Safeway) for short and long-term ferry parking in conjunction with other governmental agencies such as the City, Jefferson Transit, Port of Port Townsend, Washington State parks, to be used for special events and employee parking. ■ Explore possibility of Indian Point property to accommodate both short/long-term parking as well as off-street ferry queuing. 4. DETAILED ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN The Purpose of the Detailed Access Management Plan The Gateway Development Plan seeks to balance the need for highway expansion with the community's vision of maintaining the Gateway Corridor as an auto-oriented commercial district. This vision-is dependent on a three-lane highway, where traffic speeds do not exceed 30 mph, and provides adequate bike lanes, pedestrian walkways and streetscape amenities, thereby creating smaller neighborhood commercial districts and avoiding "strip" development as found in other towns fronting along a state highway. Throughout the Gateway Corridor, the Sims Way/SR 20 roadway encompasses a 100-foot state right-of-way. However, numerous existing buildings have inadequate setbacks and front on the state right-of-way line. Many of these businesses have traditionally used the state right-of-way for private purposes such as parking or loading areas. To carry out the Gateway vision, some existing businesses will lose the use of the state right-of-way for private purposes such as parking. If traffic growth along the Corridor increased dramatically in the next five to ten years, it is possible that the highway (on numbers alone) may need to be expanded to more than three lanes. It is the City's belief that expansion beyond three lanes, with attendant bike lanes, would have even more serious impacts on community character and business operations along the Gateway Corridor. Therefore, to achieve the vision set forth in the Gateway Development Plan and avoid unnecessary widening of the roadway (more than 3 lanes), the highway must operate at its highest level of efficiency and safety. A Detailed Access Management Plan will help the city and state achieve the necessary roadway capacity for the future traffic growth into Port Townsend, including better traffic mobility and efficiency, and better, safer egress and ingress to businesses along the Gateway corridor. The Detailed Access Management Plan also illustrates graphically the result of the improvements recommended in the previous section of this report (Description of the Corridors and Districts). Roadway Configuration To carry out this balancing act and to achieve the Gateway vision, a 48-foot roadway configuration is recommended (see Figure 11). The roadway includes two 12-foot directional moving lanes and a 12-foot two-way left turn lane. A two-way left turn lane is located near the center of the roadway for use by vehicles making left turns in either direction. A continuous left turn lane would improve the operation and safety of the highway, and provide safer left hand turns at mid-block and minor street intersections. The left turn lane shall be developed along the entire corridor with the exception of the Forest Corridor (no businesses projected in this area), or in areas where the topography necessitates narrowing of the roadway. In the three-block area from Hancock to Sheridan, the roadway takes on a four-lane configuration to handle higher traffic counts currently in the area and allow for transition of the climbing lane coming up the "S" curves. The roadway configuration would also include a designated 6-foot bike lane on each side of the highway. As more and more visitors come to Port Townsend on bicycles, and as bicycles increase as an alternate mode of travel, bike lanes will likely play an important role in Port Townsend's future. Flex Zone The recommended roadway configuration also includes 26 feet on each side of the paved highway for uses designated within the "flex zone." The flex zone would establish a combination of uses within its 26 feet, depending on specific site conditions. Generally, the flex zone is defined as a landscaped area of the state right-of-way which could provide pedestrian facilities, walkways, monument signage, bus pull-outs or other streetscape amenities. The design of the flex zone is based on the roadside environment, adjacent land uses, pedestrian volumes, user-age group, economic analysis, and continuity of adjacent pedestrian walkways. Modifications to the flex zone when a four-lane configuration is necessary are shown in Figure 12. Pedestrian Facilities and Walkways Along the Gateway Corridor, walkways may be sidewalks, pedestrian grade separations, or walking trails. Walkways would be designed during project development, along with other flex zone design components. Walkways should be connected to adjacent properties-when (re)development occurs. In the interim, some sidewalks will end at a developed property. In areas of high pedestrian traffic such as commercial retail businesses, school bus or transit stops, and industrial areas, pathways should incorporate raised paved sidewalks. In other areas, such as near Kai Tai Lagoon, or adjacent to Bishop Park or other natural features, walkways would use natural surfaces and connect to other existing trails. Signage Placement of all sign locations will be checked to ensure that a sign's visibility is not obstructed from the roadway, and that the sign does not interfere with the visibility of other signs or with a driver's sight distance. All signage shall be consistent with the City's Sign Code Ordinance. Transit Pull-Outs and Shelters The SR 20 right-of-way will be used wherever possible for transit facilities. Public input should be sought in the location process along the Gateway corridor. Design features must be in compliance with applicable state and local regulations. Design components should include geometric design of access points, pull-outs which allow continuous bicycle movement, landscaping, illumination, and other streetscape ame nines. Streetscape Improvements Streetscape furniture, streetlights, trash receptacles, landscaping, markers, etc. are encouraged to be located within the flex zone. Each commercial district will, with the assistance of City Staff, select and establish specific streetscape standards for their section of the Gateway. Detailed Access Management Plan The Detailed Access Management Plan is the mechanism for the policy application of the Gateway Development Plan. The Access Plan describes how the Gateway Corridor will function and look once it is redeveloped. It also gives guidelines for the location of access points and driveway geometries. Controlling access points serves to improve highway capacity and mobility, and reduces traffic congestion and hazards from uncontrolled access fronting a high-volume highway. With control of access, driveway's entrances and exits are designed to enable vehicles to enter and leave safely with a minimum of interference with through-traffic. In areas along the Gateway corridor today, backing into the right-of-way or uncontrolled access has become a major factor in reducing its capacity, increasing the accident potential, and eroding the mobility function a highway is designed to provide. Provision of a two way left-hand turn lane and control of driveways are the major components of improving access control along Sims Way. Access control also tends to discourage strip development along a highway. It is likely that undeveloped property along the Gateway will experience commercial development within the next 5-10 years. And there is a reasonable expectation that adjoining property will be redeveloped to a more intensive land use, resulting in greater traffic congestion. The detailed access maps (Figures 13, 14, 15, 17, 18) anticipate such changes and provide a framework for future development. The detailed access map illustrates these potential access points for the Gateway corridor. It serves as a guide and is not intended to be absolute; access points and driveways will be determined on a case-by-case basis as (re)development occurs. However, new development must be consistent with the following access design guidelines. Access Design Guidelines The following guidelines are used to determine the number and location of access points: Backing Into ROW. Access points shall not be approved for parking or loading areas that require backing maneuvers into the right-of-way. Sight Distance. A minimum sight distance should be provided at all access points as specified in Washington State Department of Transportation standards. Approaches located in areas where sight limitations create undue hazard should be relocated or closed. Joint access or access to another street should be sought in such cases. Right Turns. Where necessary for safe and efficient traffic movement, driveways should be for right turns only. Left Turns. Left turns should be prohibited to and/or from driveways under the following conditions: ■ Inadequate corner clearances. Inadequate sight distances. ■ Inadequate driveway spacing. ■ Median opening would be too close to another median opening. Parking. Curb parking should be prohibited along SR 20. Limited Access Points. The number of access points to a property will be held to a minimum. One access point per property shall be permitted, with the exception of extensive frontage where one approach is unreasonable or for properties which feature separate ingress and egress points (e.g. gas stations). Access points may be denied along SR 20 if there is inadequate site visibility or could have the potential of creating a dangerous traffic situation. Joint Access. Where possible, joint access points fore two contiguous properties will be required. Joint access points should be located at the property lines. Alternate Access Points. Parcels which have access to another public road or street are not normally permitted direct access to the highway. Additional Driveways. More than one access point per property ownership could be permitted if a traffic study prepared by a registered traffic engineer approved by the City is able to demonstrate that additional access points are required to handle driveway volumes adequately and would not be detrimental to traffic flow. Grades. Maximum grade and grade break criteria shall meet WSDOT driveway design standards. Exceptions. Where modified access control is to be established, developed commercial areas may be excepted from control when all or most of the abutting property has been developed to the extent that few, if any, additional commercial approaches would be required with full development of the area. Design Criteria. The following table shows the recommended minimum design features (driveways and auxiliary facilities). In certain instances, a traffic engineering plan may include variations from these minimums. Design Criteria Standards Minimum spacing between two driveways 100 feet Minimum comer clearance 50 feet Prohibit backing on SR 20 All properties Prohibit parking along highway All locations Provide access from collector street in lieu of access from SR 20 Corner parcels Provide adequate internal circulation and parking space Per City code Consolidation of access points between adjacent properties Frontages too short to permit minimum spacing Provide adequate driveway entrance width Provide minimum 15 mph turning speed Install medians to permit selected movements Where left turns across highway are prohibited Ensure adequate sight distance As per WSDOT standards Option Areas In certain areas along the Gateway Corridor, more than one option is presented to give decision makers, the community and business owners choices as to how best to address problem situations or longer term community needs. The following section highlights issues and clarifies choices for particular problem areas. Thomas/McPherson Street Realignment The Gateway Development Plan recommends to realignment of Thomas/McPherson Street (see p. 14). Concern has been raised by the existing business along this section of the Corridor. As illustrated in the detailed access map, access would be consolidated along SR 20, but back door access would be enhanced by improving 4th Street to serve these businesses on the southern side of SR 20. The City would need to swap existing ROW with private parcels to make this access system work. In addition, the City would need to acquire some private property for realignment purposes. On the northern side, parking and loading would also be provided at the rear or side of the buildings (i.e. John's Auto, Port Townsend Cafe and Balderas Insurance). Of special concern is the loss of parking in front of John's Auto. John's building fronts on the right-of-way line. Any expansion of the highway at this point will necessitate the removal of parking in front of John's building. A new entrance with provision for loading and parking will create at the rear of John's building (see Figure 14). Recent studies have shown that parking and back-door access for a main entrance has little effect on the economic vitality of commercial businesses if the business is visible from the street. Castle Hill/Sheridan Street Options Three different options are presented for improving traffic flow and safety at the Castle Hill-Sheridan Street intersection. The first option, which is the preferred alternative described in the Development Plan, has two variations. Option la (see Figure 15) would establish a signal at the entrance to the Castle Hill Shopping Center and reconfigure Sheridan Street through the southeast comer of the Center. This configuration would resolve the major traffic safety problems of access to and from the Sheridan Street/SR 20 intersection as well as provide safer access to Grant Street, which has a high number of vehicle trips. This option still allows for the commercial expansion of two vacant parcels within the Castle Hill Center. This preferred option would also create better visual and physical access to the shopping center with no net loss of parking spaces. However, it would divide the existing center in two, which would create difficulties in maintaining the existing Century 21 building as an integral part of the Center. On the other hand, it would enhance this parcel for redevelopment by the vacation of Sheridan Street. This parcel could then take advantage of better access, visibility from the,, highway and realigned street, larger redevelopment potential, and capitalize on magnificent views of Port Townsend Bay and the Cascades. Option 1b (see Figure 15) includes the same features as la with the exception that it would promote the rezoning of the residential parcel directly to the east of Sheridan Street to commercial use. This would create a much larger commercial redevelopment parcel of about 18,000 gross square feet, and create additional parking opportunities. This parcel would be ideal for redevelopment of a hotel/restaurant facility or professional medical offices located nearby the hospital. Option 2 (see Figure 16) is the status quo option. It would not require any modification to the Castle Hill shopping center. It would require acquisition and structural improvements of the residential parcel to the northeast of the Sheridan/Sims Way intersection, and structural improvements to the northwest corner of the Sheridan/Sims Way/Century 21 property, to improve sight distance and allow for widening of the roadway. This alternative would reduce fewer of the safety problems than the realigned intersection would. Option 3 (see Figure 16) would signalize Hendricks and SR 20. Hendricks would require reconstruction north of SR 20 and would have a significant impact on the Sea Breeze trailer park to the west. New access would be improved to the south of SR 20 to the existing residential area. No left turns onto or from Sheridan would be allowed. Hendricks would become the major arterial, connecting with 7th Street to Sheridan, and would serve the hospital and residential areas north of SR 20. This option would improve the traffic safety and operational characteristics of SR 20 but would have significant impacts on the economic vitality of the Castle Hill Center and the Sea Breeze trailer park. Visitor Center Three options are presented for the long-term growth of providing for visitor services and information. Option 1 is the enhancement of the existing Visitor Center near Jefferson and Sims Way. Figure 18 illustrates how to maximize parking opportunities, provide designated RV parking and easier access, and includes suggestions for landscaping to improve its appearance. Due to the limited capacity to increase parking supply at this location, this option is a short-term fix and may not meet the long-term needs of visitors coming to Port Townsend. It should be acknowledged that substantial public investment in this option may make it difficult to pursue Option 2 or 3 at a later date. Option 2 would relocate the visitors center to the north of Safeway (see Figure 17). Direct access would be facilitated by signage and a traffic signal at Haines Place, which would cut through the existing Safeway parking lot. The Visitor Center would be located in conjunction with a Jefferson Transit shuttle stop and remote parking lot for visitor and long-term ferry parking. The advantage of locating the visitor center here is the greater parking capacity, providing shuttle service for visitors to the downtown, Fort Worden, or to state and private ferries, reducing traffic congestion, and the easy access to the nearby Kai Tai Lagoon. Option 3 is a long-range option for relocation of the visitor center or a possible satellite visitor information center. It would be located at the entrance of city limits, near Mill Road, on the south side of SR 20 (see Figure 13). If offered for sale, the City would acquire the budget car lot for use as a remote parking area. The advantages of this option are similar to Option 2, whereby traffic congestion could be lessened through the City. In addition, a parking area at this location could serve bicyclists who would take the Olympic Discovery Trail into downtown. Location of the central visitor center here may necessitate a smaller satellite visitor center in the downtown to serve ferry visitors, or vice versa. 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES The Design and Development Guidelines address various elements of urban form that shall be addressed in the ongoing development of the Port Townsend Gateway. These Guidelines serve three purposes: 1. Provide prospective developers and designers with a checklist of issues that must be addressed in their development proposals; 2. Provide existing businesses with an overall conceptual approach that will enable the actions of independent businesses to be in concert with, and add to the Gateway in Port Townsend concept; and 3. Provide the City of Port Townsend with a method of evaluating public and private development or redevelopment proposals on a consistent basis. These Guidelines are performance oriented and not prescriptive. They address issues regarding the look, feel, and function of the Gateway Corridor. They create an environment for design excellence to occur, for small actions to have a major accumulative effect, and for ongoing "reality" checks to see if the vision portrayed in the Gateway Concept Plan, and detailed in the Gateway Development Plan, is being accomplished. If the Guidelines are properly followed, each and every development increment will contribute to a better defined and coordinated Gateway in Port Townsend. As part of an implementation strategy, the City needs to adopt the Guidelines and determine whether voluntary or mandatory compliance is required by development proposals. The Design and Development Guidelines address the following major themes and issues: CORRIDOR CONCEPT 1.1 Character and Theme Issue: Incremental development has spread out uses and made the Gateway Corridor a loose collection of individual buildings rather than a complex of buildings or districts that have a symbiotic relationship. The concept of the Gateway Corridor will develop from a concentration of a number of uses, including retail, office, residential, open space, and recreational opportunities. Establishing an identity for the Gateway Corridor does not require adopting an artificial "theme" to impose on new and existing buildings. It does require careful Grafting of buildings, circulation and open space to ensure both variety and continuity in the Corridor. Guideline: Proposed development should be consistent with the following Statement of Purpose of the Port Townsend Gateway Concept Plan. The Gateway Concept Plan was adopted by the Port Townsend City Council through Resolution 88-43 on May 11,1988. TO IMPROVE AND PRESERVE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE AND FACILITATE THE CREATION OF A GRACEFUL COMMUNITY FOR BOTH RESIDENTS AND VISITORS. A. To create a community that provides continuity of positive visual quality and enhances the overall beauty of the community of Port Townsend. B. To enhance the economic vitality of the corridor, its business and the community as a whole. C. To provide a safe corridor to and through the community for motor vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles. D. To maintain continuing dialogue and involvement of the community in the development of the corridor. E. To ensure that the corridor concept is implemented in a timely, cost-effective and efficient way. 1.2 A Corridor of Multiple Activities Issue: The Gateway Corridor currently has little identity as a "place" or as an introduction to the Historic District of Port Townsend. New development should add to the intensity of activity, integrating uses horizontally on the land and vertically within buildings. The "mix" of uses should foster activity throughout the day with the cycles of intensity governed by the uses introduced. The integration of uses within a building makes the building richer, both architecturally and functionally. Richer buildings make the ensemble of structures and interrelationships between buildings exponentially more exciting. Guideline: New development and redevelopment should foster diverse uses and activities that are active, vibrant, people-oriented and family- focused. New development should encourage a mix of activities on the ground level which enhance the commercial opportunities and diversity of the Corridor, and provide needed community services. 1.3 Corridors and Districts Issue: Sims Way (SR 20), from the entrance at the city limit to its end at Water Street, is a series of corridors and districts. The corridors are defined by strong natural features of landscape and topography. The corridors are identified as the forest corridor (city limits to Hilltop Tavern), the "S" curves (Sheraton to 10th) and the bluff narrows (Water Street from Walker to the Ferry Terminal). The districts consist of built developments-that have a unique identity due to use and age. The Upper Commercial District is a strong service commercial and retail "strip" geared to serve locals. The Flats District is more mixed-use, with retail uses interspersed with parkland and port activities, and provides services for both visitors and residents. The last or northern district "corridors and districts" is the Historic Downtown. Recognition of the rhythm and theme of corridors and districts allows for individual pieces of the Gateway to take on separate and unique identities. Guideline: New development and redevelopment along Sims Way should acknowledge the existing corridor/district concept in which natural features are the dominant elements of the corridors, and built features are the dominant elements of the districts. Districts should seek to develop a distinct character and identity through compliance with the design guidelines set forth for the districts in Section 1.4 below. 1.4 Districts Issue: Within the Gateway Corridor several "districts" can be identified. These are defined by building groupings, land uses, topography, landscape elements and major intersecting streets. The development of these districts along the Gateway Corridor promotes richness and diversity, helps to give an identity of "place" within the larger context of the corridor, and helps to define circulation. Clear distinctions of these districts and their uses will provide richer opportunities for both motorists and pedestrians to enjoy the unique characteristics of each district. Guideline: The design of buildings, landscaping, parking and pedestrian amenities such as walkways, arcades, or awnings should be based upon their identity within designated districts. Each new development or redevelopment should promote appropriate architecture, scale, views and landscape through the use of specific building materials, construction methods, building proportions, site planning, and landscape elements that are compatible with the surrounding district character. 1.5 Rooms in the District Issue: City "rooms" are a basic building block of the Gateway Corridor districts - places for active and passive use by the citizenry. City rooms are defined by structures, types of land uses, geographic features, and vegetation delineating the space - buildings, fences, trees, views, walls. The character of the city room is determined by those uses and artifacts that are in and adjacent to the space. City rooms require surrounding uses to give them flavor. As in a building, city rooms should be a part of a larger sequence of spaces and places - a circulation system that links rooms to rooms, rooms to districts, districts to corridors. City rooms can be made more dynamic by the careful integration of vehicular movement with pedestrians, and relationships of uses from room to room. Guideline: Development in both the public and private sectors should contribute to the formation of "city rooms." Within these rooms, specific commercial uses, circulation patterns, and architectural character will be encouraged to reinforce the room and its linkage to the district and the entire Gateway Corridor. 1.6 Intersections Issue: Intersections in the vehicular network are usually designed according to function, combining traffic flow, utility needs, drainage requirements and pedestrian interface. The richness of the Gateway Corridor will require examination of all intersections to develop a series of hierarchies: movement, identity and definition. The Gateway in Port Townsend will be a rich overlapping of a number of functional elements that combine in a physical and sensory manner, of which intersections are one such element. Buildings abutting intersections, landscaping, and lighting will help define and articulate the function of the intersection in the overall conceptual organization of community traffic flow. Guideline: All intersections should contribute to the development of intersection identities within a district or corridor. This can be accomplished through the placement of parking areas, the location of building entries, the relationship of new development to abutting uses, appropriate signage and buildings details such as the orientation of roof forms, and specific lighting and landscape standards. CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 2.1 Vehicular Circulation Issue: Public streets serve as vehicular and pedestrian ways between origins and destinations. Each street has a functional (traffic movement) requirement that effects both the development pattern and the character of that development In the Gateway Corridor, Sims Way and the abutting streets take on a larger significance and should be thought of as-a linear corridors with floors, walls and roofs. The "character" of the street is defined by building enclosure, vegetation, street landscaping and furniture, surface textures, lighting and signage. The "functional" requirements of the street are set by the way vehicular movement interacts with activities served by the movement of vehicles. Guideline: Streets, parking access and parking areas should be designed as an integral part of development along the Gateway Corridor. Vehicular and pedestrian uses should contribute to the urban setting through careful design relationships between buildings and circulation elements. Design considerations should emphasize basic functional requirements without compromising public safety. This emphasis on design acknowledges the important effect the streetscape has on the evolving character of the Gateway Corridor. All street development or redevelopment should incorporate landscaping, lighting, signage and surface textures that are consistent with the character of each Gateway District, Corridor, or room as outlined in these design guidelines. 2.2 Parking Issue: Port Townsend is predominantly a single-family residential community with retail and commercial office centers located to be easily accessible by car. The reliance on the automobile as the primary mode of transportation will continue, but the way the car interacts with businesses can be modified from "the bumper in the window" syndrome. New and existing development must be served by convenient and attractive parking opportunities. Consolidated parking, serving more than one use or building, should be innovatively integrated with development to provide easy and safe access and security within an attractive setting. Guideline: Vehicular parking should be considered as a significant design element of all new developments. New development should seek shared parking opportunities m existing parking lots and vacated streets where applicable. Parking lots should provide access to the "front doors" of buildings, but should not visually block nor dominate the face of buildings exposed to Sims Way. Appropriately scaled landscaping that is consistent with Section 17.30 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code should be provided to screen parking areas. 2.3 Pedestrian Circulation Issue: Pedestrian circulation in the Gateway Corridor is unstructured, with intermittent sidewalks along streets and undeveloped pathways. The Gateway Corridor must foster a fully developed pedestrian system. The construction of the walking surface is only the initial step. Sidewalks and pathways need to be enhanced with street furniture, landscape and art objects, activity in abutting buildings, to provide a variety of experiences throughout the Gateway Corridor. The pedestrian system needs to include places to pause, rest, and watch the activities of the Corridor with provisions for both indoor and outdoor circulation. Pedestrian ways should connect buildings and activity areas of the Gateway in Port Townsend, but should also provide information, orient the pedestrian, ensure safe and secure "defensible" space and allow for handicapped access. Guideline: The City should combine existing pedestrian sidewalks and trails with those provided by new development to create a continuous public walkway connecting public rights-of-way and spaces. Gateway Corridor activities and uses, buildings and parking. Pedestrian circulation should be accessible to the handicapped. The pedestrian experience should be reinforced through the use of street furniture and landscaping as specified in Section 3.1 and 3.7 below. 2.4 Bicycle Circulation Issue: Bicycle riding is a popular and growing form of transportation and recreation in Port Townsend. Many bicyclists ride long distances to a destination of the Historic District and/or the Ferry. Integration of a bicycle route into the Gateway Corridor would add to the richness and diversity of the corridor, and enhance the recreation of cyclists. Guideline: The City should develop a safe and well-defined bike route along the Gateway Corridor. In support of this, new development is encouraged to provide places for cyclists to stop along the corridor, as well as bike parking near parks, shops and viewpoints. The bike route should connect through to other residential and park destinations, as well as trail systems proposed in and around Port Townsend. CORRIDOR CHARACTER 3.1 Topography and Vegatation Issue: Natural amenities are the cornerstone of good design. Urban areas, while intrusive to natural systems, can be built in harmony with the surroundings. The Gateway Corridor includes many of the natural elements that give Port Townsend its character. Because the alteration of the natural environment will continue as more development occurs, it is important to restore a landscape that is in concert with the natural environment Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design. Good planning also recognizes that certain features are required that make the Gateway Corridor work better functionally and economically-and may require modification of natural features to make it work. Guideline: New development should recognize the subtle topological features and native vegetation in the Gateway Corridor and develop new landscape, pathways, activities, and civic places that protect and enhance these features. All new development should provide vegetation along streets and pathways to reinforce the form and function of the vehicle and pedestrian network. All development should maintain and enhance existing plantings and trees located parallel to, and set back from, Sims Way and provide a backdrop for the buildings along the Gateway Corridor. 3.2 Parks/Open Space Issue: Capitalizing on the opportunities for parks and open space is an integral part of the Gateway Corridor. Recognition and improvement of these resources contributes to the pedestrian environment. Parks and open space lend yet another layer of richness to the multiple activities of the corridor as well as improve the quality of the environment-Opportunities include protection and enhancement of tree-lined roads, ravines, viewpoints and development of interesting intersections. Guideline: The design of new buildings, walkways, and landscape elements should enhance and develop existing parks, viewpoints, ravines and other open space elements, and foster access to these natural areas. Designs should provide lighting, furniture, and landscaping in a way that natural areas and open spaces can be used in a safe and secure manner. 3.3 Viewpoints and View Corridors Issue: Many towns and cities are the result of a simple plat of public rights-of-way and property between rights-of-way. More successful towns and cities have historically been "designed". The Gateway Concept creates linear relationships, street hierarchies, and activities that protect or enhance existing viewpoints and view corridors. Incorporating natural and built features with the vehicular circulation system, and reinforcing those relationships through view corridors, pedestrian links, viewpoints and other features, adds to the design quality of the Corridor and helps to define and protect the character of the districts and rooms. View corridors identified below should be protected as new development occurs. Guideline: Recognize existing potential linear relationships of places and buildings. Using buildings or monuments strengthen and extend, or complete and terminate, existing and potential linear relationships. 3.4 Visual Linkages Issue: Visual experiences are a distinguishing feature of Port Townsend. Key to the comfort of using the Gateway Corridor is the feeling of knowing where you are, and the relationship of the place you are occupying to landmarks or orienting features. The visual connection of the user to his/her surroundings can be as important as a physical connection in developing a welcome and comfortable ambience within the Gateway Corridor. Guideline: Designs should include and blend visual and physical connections between pedestrian spaces, geographic and landscape features, and other landmarks, which encourage easy and inviting movement between adjoining spaces. Designs should protect views and orient the user within the Gateway Corridor and Port Townsend. 3.5 Markers Issue: The Gateway Corridor should have indicators to the visitor and resident that orient and give definition. Markers that introduce people to the Corridor, or tell them where they are in the Corridor, are significant signposts that add to the character and ambience. Markers can be a combination of geographic features, landscape, monuments, signs or buildings. Further development of markers can add to the ongoing development of character and place of the individual districts along the corridor. Guideline: Design markers along the roadway should have a character and scale appropriate to the Gateway Concept. Markers such as significant buildings should be designed to reinforce the beginning or end of a District by utilizing architectural elements, i.e., towers or roof features. Landscaping should also reflect the "marker" characteristic by transitions from individual street trees to groupings of conifers and other natural vegetation. 3.6 Signage and Lighting Issue: Cities and towns are built over time. In the case of Port Townsend, a turn of the century port has become a major visitor destination. As the Corridor begins to develop and mature, both "feature" buildings and "background" buildings will give character to the ensemble of buildings in the landscape. While buildings will vary, repeating similar and recognizable elements gives a sense of cohesiveness to otherwise disparate building designs. Signage and lighting are key elements that can help to build identity and a cohesiveness into the Gateway Corridor. The Port Townsend Sign Code, enacted in 1986, should be updated to implement the signage guidelines of the Gateway Concept Plan. The Planning Commission recommended a specific updating ordinance in November, 1990. The City Council is expected to consider the updated sign code in March, 1991. Lighting should be functional, low maintenance, and oriented to the use. Streets should be classified as to use and type of movement, and lighting designed to enable that use and movement; arterials should be lit for safe and secure movement of vehicles; and streets and ways internal to the Gateway Corridor should be lit for pedestrian comfort and safety. Guideline: Signage should be in accordance with overall Gateway Corridor standards and adopted sign regulation of the Port Townsend Municipal Code, which specifies size, location and type. Design lighting for safe and secure operation of vehicles, with special care given to creating lighting that enhances pedestrian safety at intersections, road crossings, and along pathways. 3.7 Street Furniture Issue: The Gateway Corridor needs to have a separate identity as a sequence of "places" within Port Townsend. The construction of buildings and open space improvements will gradually evolve an identity, but the incorporation of accessories of common and unique design in public and private development will give immediate identity to the Corridor. Common design of benches, trash containers, newspaper stands, tree grates, sign stanchions, street lights, bicycle racks, and other elements of the streetscape will give a sense of unity and purpose to the Corridor. Guideline: Street furniture, lighting and signage should be designed in accordance with the character and predominant theme of the district in which it is located. All streetscape improvements should be assessed for their long-term operation and maintenance costs. BUILDINGS AND SITE DEVELOPMENT 4.1 Site/Building Organization Issue: The mass and bulk of new buildings to be constructed in the Gateway in Port Townsend will vary according to the demands of the private marketplace. The character of the Corridor, however, could be greatly affected by the size, height and setback of new structures. The Corridor concept assumes that the majority of new construction would be one to-two stories in height, whereby the placement of the building and the overall site organization become critical. The site should be organized in a hierarchical relationship of customer use to service function. New development should begin at the front yard setback line and incorporate parking to the side of the building. The location of the building and a front, low landscape buffer and deciduous street trees should be used to define the public right-of-way. Vehicle service areas should be to the rear of buildings, with service elements (garbage, power) shielded by fences or landscaping. The rear of the property should have a tall conifer trees 15 ft. buffer as a backdrop to the development. Guideline: Maintain a maximum building height of three stories throughout the Gateway Corridor. Require appropriate building setbacks, and use building and landscape to define public rights-of-way. Organize the site in a hierarchical arrangement from building to backdrop, as illustrated below. Provide screening for service elements and mechanical equipment on rooftops to block view from street and neighboring properties. 4.2 Building Form Issue: Individual buildings are basic elements of the Gateway in Port Townsend. To date, buildings have been designed as "stand-alone" structures. New construction in the Corridor should be a combination of "stand-alone" structures and "background" buildings that weave together to form the streets and public spaces, defining boundaries, volume, and character. "Stand-alone" buildings should be used for special places or functions in the Gateway Corridor structure. "Background" buildings should be used for supportive mixed uses for the Corridor, supporting retail, commercial, and office. Guideline: Single-purpose buildings should be treated as "stand-alone" structures with style and size appropriate to the use. "Mixed-use" buildings should be treated as "background buildings," which contribute to the context of the Corridor, and the streets and public spaces they define. All new development should be a "good neighbor" to adjacent existing buildings. 4.3 Building Character Issue: The Historic District and "uptown" buildings have a unique architectural quality based on traditional design principals. The existing Gateway area is a conglomeration of styles and types of structures that have been built over a span of years, unimpeded or influenced by the historic context of the early city development. As such, the building design quality varies greatly, with some buildings being quite successful while others do not contribute to Port Townsend's sense of place (or historic architecture). It would be wrong to superimpose a "style" or "period" requirement on Gateway development or redevelopment, but the basic design principles inherent in historic architecture should be followed. Key issues to be considered: 1. Modularity: repetitive facade elements; 2. Form: rectangular facades; 3. Proportion: vertical window breakup; 4. Detail: developed form the "craft" of construction; 5. Roof or Cornice: separate element terminating the wall, not dominating the structure; 6. Wall: importance of the facade wall as the dominant element of the building; 7. Materials: wood, brick masonry, "natural" textures. Guideline: New development and remodeling should recognize the city's historic architectural heritage through the use of building materials, building proportions, forms, and details, and other architectural devices compatible with those design principles inherent in historic architecture, without replicating historical buildings. 4.4 Transitions Issue: Building and open space designs are frequently oriented to a specific site, without a great deal of thought or analysis of the effect of the design on neighboring properties. Design attention should focus on transitions between different buildings. The edges of the Gateway Corridor are undefined. Buildings along the Gateway Corridor should define the street and promote a pedestrian/friendly shopping activity, and also serve as a transition to adjacent residential and park areas. Guideline: Design buildings that create appropriate transitions to neighboring properties, both within and adjacent to the Gateway Corridor. Appropriate transitions are defined as those which do not have an abrupt change in architectural style, building massing, volume and height 4.5 Inside and Outside Issue: In retail areas, there is a zone of sensory interaction between the outside pedestrian system and the inside retail activity. This zone of activity requires shop windows, showcases, displays, entries and other devices that are designed not only for the functional need of the retailer, but also to enrich the experience of the person passing by. Design attention relative to the interaction of pedestrian and retail activities will enhance the pedestrian experience and increase the economic viability of retail operations. Guideline: Encourage retail development that presents an interesting and enticing storefront to the adjacent sidewalk and street. Blank walls (walls without windows, showcases, displays and pedestrian entries) should not be allowed in any first-story building wall abutting public pathways, except as required for the structural integrity of the building. Service elements for buildings and storage yards should be placed away from pedestrian ways, preferably to the rear of properties and screened with physical barriers or landscape. 4.6 Building Entrances Issue: Buildings containing more than one use require separate entrances for each use. Where offices and housing are located above retail space, care should be taken to place entrances to uses, other than retail, in locations that do not disrupt the flow of retail space as perceived by the pedestrian. In buildings containing only one use, entrances should be open and well-lighted to indicate points of access to the pedestrian. All building entrances should be accessible to parking, but be oriented to pedestrian areas. Guideline: Entrances should be created in groupings, visually accessible from each other. Buildings which have more than one entrance should create a grouping of entrances, with design focus on the main entry. Where applicable, locate entrances to upper floor uses so as not to conflict with street level retail continuity. APPENDIX 6.1 APPENDIX: CONSULTANT SCOPE OF WORK The planning process for the Gateway Development Plan was designed to provide the City of Port Townsend with tools to help in the development of the SR 20 corridor, with the continued involvement and review of the Gateway Steering Committee. The work was organized into three separate but interrelated planning elements. First: Route Development Plan; Second: Streetscape; and Third: Design and Development Guidelines; so that the operational characteristics of SR 20 are defined for the entire three-mile length, the abutting conditions (streetscape) are defined along SR 20, and then Design and Development Guidelines were created to evaluate public and private actions for compliance to the Gateway Concept and Development Plan. Route Development Plan Purpose: The purpose of this task was to prepare a joint City-State Route Development Plan for SR-20 within the Port Townsend City Limits. This plan defines recommended physical, operational, and safety-related improvements that will enhance the effectiveness and capacity of this section of SR-20. Special emphasis was given to the development of an access management plan element to assure an appropriate level of access to abutting properties, appropriate with the intended functional and operational characteristics of the roadway. Activities: 1. This task began with a comprehensive assessment of existing transportation-related conditions on SR-20 within the study area. A data base was developed describing the physical, operational, land use, traffic safety, and travel characteristics within the study area. The types of data included within this data base include the following: ■ Physical characteristics data, including pavement width, right-of-way width, cross-section design, and minimum roadway design standards. ■ Operational characteristics data, including the current and planned functional classification, the location and type of signalized intersections, the location and type of all stop-controlled intersections, the average daily traffic volumes on all major street segments, vehicle classification characteristics, morning and evening peak hour turning movement volumes, weekday and weekend traffic profile characteristics, and ferry-related travel behavior. ■ Land use characteristics data, including the existing type and intensity of land use, the proposed type and intensity of land use, the location and size of open space areas, wetlands, floodplains, residential areas, and otherwise undevelopable or environmentally sensitive areas. ■ Traffic safety characteristics represented by accident data for the most recent available three-year period and categorized according to the date, type, and severity of the accident. ■ Pedestrian and bicycle characteristics data, including both the volume and pattern of movements. ■ School bus activities, including the routes used, the frequency of movements, and the times at which the movements occur. ■ Parking characteristics, including an inventory of available on-street and off-street parking spaces by location and duration, average turn-over rates, and parking accumulation profiles. ■ System-wide travel characteristics, including travel time and delay data for important point-to-point travel routes, and current origin-destination patterns for traffic traveling within the study area. 2. Concurrent with developing the above data base, representatives of the Consultant Team met with City, County, and WSDOT officials to identify all committed or planned roadway improvement projects within the project vicinity which might affect traffic flow patterns or operating conditions, assuring that the Route Development Plan meshes appropriately with planned improvements. 3. Evaluation criteria were defined to establish existing system deficiencies and identify appropriate mitigation measures and system alternatives. These criteria were established through discussions among Consultant Team and City staff, and included the following: ■ Traffic conditions, including capacity, level of service, circulation characteristics, and separation of local traffic from through traffic. ■ Street pattern definition, including its clarity and its usability. ■ Support for other transportation modes, including transit, pedestrian, and bicycle movements. ■ Preservation of valuable resources, including open space, wetlands, historic-buildings, and residential areas. ■ Visual characteristics, including the road as viewed from the outside, the road as viewed from the inside, and the views outside the road. ■ Cost, including both operational and construction costs. 4. Future travel demand estimates were prepared, focusing upon the evening peak hour conditions since this is typically the time period when the greatest total one-hour travel demands of the day occur. A variety of trip characteristics were estimated, including the vehicle trip generation potential of various land use categories, vehicle trip distribution characteristics, and vehicle trip assignment characteristics. For the purposes of this study, total buildout conditions were assumed for the study area. This assumption helps to assure that the resulting street improvements are sufficient to accommodate the anticipated maximum development level. 5. Alternative roadway improvement scenarios for the vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, ferry, and parking systems within the study area were defined that met the project goals and objectives. An initial identification of traffic considerations was developed through a workshop session involving Consultant Team members, the Gateway Steering Committee, business representatives along SR 20, City of Port Townsend staff, and WSDOT officials. The workshop reviewed existing conditions, projected travel and parking demands, and identified deficiencies. A series of factors that warranted further investigation was identified. These alternatives, at a conceptual level, appeared capable of being practical and effective techniques for mitigating existing and projected system deficiencies. 6. Each alternative was evaluated based upon project objectives, evaluation criteria, and engineering standards. During the course of the analysis, design elements were identified which do not satisfactorily address one or more of the evaluation criteria. In such instances, attempts were made to refine the alternative in a way that resolved these outstanding concerns. The analysis included, but was not limited to, the following issues: operational adequacy of key intersections and road segments; the adequacy and proximity of parking; potential for pedestrian/vehicle/bicycle conflicts; sense of place and character considerations that could be developed; and potential for impacts on adjacent residential neighborhoods. 7. Based on the results of the above activities, a Route Development Plan was prepared which is intended to meet the project goals, objectives, and minimum standards. The Plan defines recommended physical, operational, and safety-related improvements that will enhance the effectiveness and capacity of this section of SR-20. The Plan also includes an access management element to assure an appropriate level of access to abutting properties, given the intended functional and operational characteristics of the roadway. Product: The product of this work is the Transportation Analysis appended to this report. This analysis has been submitted to Washington DOT. It is intended to lay the foundation for future traffic-related improvements by DOT. Specific recommendations regarding right-of-way improvements are summarized and included in the Gateway Development Plan as described in Sections 3 and 4 of this report. Streetscape Development Plan Purpose: The Streetscape Development Plan includes design recommendations along the SR 20 corridor that, with the technical aspects produced in the Route Development Plan, provide operational characteristics as well as the look and feel of the Gateway Corridor. Streetscape elements include, but are not limited to, curbs, driveways, intersections, sidewalks, landscaping, streetlighting, transit shelters, furniture and receptacles, signage and orientation systems. Activities: 1. The initial task was a visual inventory and analysis of the three mile length of the SR 20 Corridor. The visual inventory includes the following: ■ The overall visual environment composed of urban, topographic, vegetative, open space and water elements, extending beyond the project boundaries. ■ The specific scale and character of the districts which are made up of many complex details, forms, patterns and textures of both the natural and constructed urban elements. ■ Data regarding critical views to natural features or significant architectural landmarks, locating objectionable visual areas which may require screening or finding opportunities to use landscape plantings to enframe or focus a distant view. ■ Location of significant viewpoints, such as the first glimpse of the Port Townsend Bay at the stop of the "S" curves. ■ The visual analysis builds from the inventory information by describing the opportunities as to how landscape plantings or building masses of the urban fabric can influence the views to be opened up, screened or enhanced. The visual analysis is a key step for treating criteria and setting the stage for decision making relative to the Streetscape Development Plan and creation of a "sense of place" through the design guidelines for each district. 2. In tandem with the visual inventory and analysis, base maps were developed for the three mile SR 20 corridor that were used to record information regarding land use, development characteristics, environmental sequences and the current state of improvements. 3. Based on the physical and visual inventories, and the Route Development Plan, the Consultant Team worked with the Gateway Steering Committee in a workshop session to refine and redefine the districts identified during the Charette process. At the conclusion of this step, the Consultant Team established a list of characteristics (existing and desired) for each district with specific district development recommendations addressing the character of new and ongoing development in the district 4. From the district development guidelines, the Consultant Team developed prototype Streetscape sections appropriate to each district, identified sub-districts, and transitions between districts. These prototypes were expanded into visual simulation models that illustrate "how it would look" for sections of SR 20 and abutting properties. 5. The prototype sections are the basis for cost estimates appropriately broken down for use by the City. Cost estimates are developed by incremental length of improvement along the corridor. Products: The product of this work is a visual inventory and analysis with resulting Streetscape recommendations summarized in the Gateway Development Plan described in Sections 3 and 4 of this report. Both the Visual Analysis and Streetscape Plan are appended to this report. Design and Development Guidelines Purpose: The Design and Development Guidelines provide the necessary tools for the creation of public and private partnerships required to realize the vision of the Gateway Project as it was envisioned at the Gateway Charrette. The Guidelines are the roadmap for future development and will help to implement the Gateway Development Plan. The Guidelines are performance oriented, rather than prescriptive, to illustrate intent while maintaining flexibility to respond to specific economic, market and functional conditions. Activities: 1. Elements that are considered in the creation of Design and Development Guidelines include the following: ■ Gateway Charrette Statement of Purpose ■ Material, concepts and ideas recorded in the Gateway Concept Plan Report (Charrette Report) ■ District boundaries, sub-district identities ■ Mixes of uses (retail, mixed commercial, auto-oriented, office, residential, open-space, cultural facilities) ■ Expected development densities ■ Pedestrian circulation system and designation of pedestrian-oriented areas ■ Vehicular circulation and access system (through and local traffic, key intersections, transit, bicycles) ■ Visual environment and view corridors ■ Open space plan ■ Urban form (maximum and minimum building heights, massing, bulk, setbacks) ■ Parking (short term and long term, visual impact mitigation, orientation, flow, relationships to streets and buildings) ■ Detail design 2. In concert with the Gateway Development Plan, the Consultant Team created a set of Design and Development Guidelines to guide new development or assist existing properties in incremental upgrading efforts. These design guidelines are both general and exact, building upon the Gateway Charrette and further refined based on the work of this study. Products: The Design and Development Guidelines, when adopted, form the basis for public and private development decisions for the Gateway Corridor. A specific Design Review Process should be instituted as part of the ongoing administration of permits by the City of Port Townsend. 6.2 APPENDIX: ROUTE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ROUTE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for the PORT TOWNSEND GATEWAY STUDY PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON Prepared for Stastny Architects pc 813 Alder Street, Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97205 Prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 512 SW Broadway, Suite 220 Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 228-5230 December 1990 Project No.: 416.00 INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose of this analysis is to assess existing and future traffic conditions and develop recommendations along the SR20 Corridor within the City of PC Townsend to constitute a Route Development Plan for the Port Townsend Gateway Project. State Route 20, known as Sims Way for most of its length within PC Townsend, acts as the main gateway to the city; it is the only highway leading in Port Townsend and the only vehicular route into town other than two local roads across the Quimper Peninsula and the ferry from Keystone on Whidby Island. The City of Port Townsend inaugurated this project to develop a plan for the Gateway Corridor, recognizing the need to manage growth there, make road improvements to foster traffic flow and safety, improve access to the upper commercial district, protect bicycle and pedestrian movement, and improve the visual image of the city. Sims Way has experienced considerable traffic growth recent years such that it has become increasingly difficult for vehicles or pedestrians to cross this road or for vehicles to make left turns at many locations. In addition, was recognized that the lack of curbing or other limitations to driveway access w becoming a safety problem as well as conveyed a confusing image to visitors. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS FINDINGS Major conclusions this analysis reached were: 1) Traffic levels along SR20 in Port Townsend have grown substantial during the 1980's to the point where existing traffic control devices and even roadway geometrics are becoming insufficient to handle traffic safely and efficiently. 2) Future traffic levels, even under the most conservative assumptions, will beyond that point, requiring an estimated $3.4 million of improvements including a series of traffic signals and roadway widening to add median left-turn lane. 3) Should traffic grow at the rate it has over the past decade, widening to a five-lane roadway would be required west of Sheridan Street, if not west of Kearney Street, if acceptable peak hour conditions in the summer. 4) The improvements recommended in this plan would grant every major intersection a level of service of "C" or better in summer peak hours with the assumed level of traffic growth. Without these recommended improvements several major intersections would fall to a level of service of "E" or "F". Had a traffic growth factor reflective of recent history been used, the recommended improvements would be necessary simply to maintain a minimal "D" level of service at intersections which otherwise would certainly be at "F". 5) The existing conditions for bicycle and pedestrian movement are poor, it is problematic to cross the roadway for much of the day and marginally safe to move along the side of it given the lack of a continuous shoulder, bike lanes, or sidewalks. 6) Visitors experience confusion and drive unnecessarily longer distances due to the poor placement of signage along Sims Way. 7) Traffic safety is compromised at several intersections due to poor sight distance, the uninterrupted stream of cars, excessive speed of Sims Way traffic, and the lack of signalized control. These problems at the Mill Road intersection cause tractor trailers to use the Thomas Street intersection instead, adding to their mileage and traffic congestion on Sims Way. 8) Access to businesses in the upper commercial district is largely undefined and unrestricted, which, combined with the uninterrupted through traffic, leads to inferior access in this district and will have economic impacts. 9) Residents are making increasing use of local streets to avoid Sims Way however, there is a shortage of alternative, parallel routes such traffic can take. MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS The major recommendations identified in this report are as follows: 1. Signalization is recommended to be installed prior to 1995 at the realigned Sims Way intersections at Haines Street/Safeway, Sheridan Street/Castle Hill, and Mill Road. Signalization is also recommended for possible 1995-2000 installation at the realigned Sims Way intersections at McPherson/Thomas Streets, Hancock Street, and Washington Street. 2. Left Turn Lanes are recommended to be constructed along Sims Way between the proposed Industrial Park and Thomas Street, between Hancock and Sherman Streets, and between Benedict and Kearney Streets. 3. Continuous Shoulder Lanes are recommended for all of Sims Way, with a westbound climbing lane, separated from a bicycle and pedestrian shoulder path, to be constructed in the "S" curve section. 4. Realignment of Major Intersections is recommended at Haines Street/Safeway, Sheridan Street/Castle Hill, McPherson/Thomas Street, and Mill Road. 5. Access Consolidation and Control is recommended for all of Sims Way, with municipal codes for building setbacks, transit easements, and an access control ordinance recommended. The report also includes recommendations on signage, pedestrian and bicycle safety, access limitations at specific properties, raised medians, and public transportation. EXISTING CONDITIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Port Townsend, with a population of about 6,800, lies at the mouth of Puget Sound, 46 road miles east of Port Angeles, 20 road and ferry miles southwest of Oak Harbor, and 50 road and ferry miles northwest of Seattle. Figure 1 shows Port Townsend's location within the Puget Sound region of Washington State. Port Townsend is the county seat of Jefferson County, which has a population of roughly 18,600. The City of Port Townsend has a street system laid out on a nineteenth century rectangular grid. Only some of the platted streets have actually been constructed and few have been built to form continuous roads. Hence, the few roads which are long or cut across this grid pattern are of great importance to local circulation. Figure 2 shows the layout of major roads within the study area. All have only two through lanes with marginal shoulders. Of prime importance in the study area is Sims Way itself, originally constructed in the 1920's. The other road not platted as part of the rectangular grid. Discovery Bay Road, forms an important secondary route. Discovery Bay Road, along with SR20 and Hastings Street north of the study area, are the only roads connecting Port Townsend with the rest of the country. Other important secondary routes are McPherson, Thomas, Sheridan, Cherry, Washington, Lawrence, 12th, 19th, and Kearney Streets as well as San Juan Avenue. Sims Way has been largely built as a rural highway. It has two through lanes, each 12' wide; in places it has a third 12' lane for left-turn storage. The highway shoulder varies in width from one to eight feet, in places becoming a right-turn acceleration or deceleration lane, serving as a westbound climbing lane for most of the "S" curve section, and in other places almost disappearing. There are no sidewalks along Sims way west of the Kearney Street intersection and in places the highway shoulder squeezes to being less than a foot wide, constituting meager pedestrian or bicycle right-of-way. The lack of defined and limited access to properties results in wide gravel and asphalt strips along the highway through which vehicles meander to get on and off SR20. This wide open strips crossed by vehicles at different angles present similarly unsafe environments for pedestrian or bicycle traffic. They also are potentially unsafe for vehicular traffic. There is only one traffic signal on the entire stretch of Sims Way, at the Kearney Street intersection and no flashing beacons. There are two more traffic signals on Water Street, which Sims Way runs into. Other than these signals, traffic control is entirely maintained by stop or yield signs. There is no curbside parking along SR20. An inventory of existing parking along the corridor is included as Appendix "A". Ferry service is important to Port Townsend. There are three ferry companies now operating service to Port Townsend. By far the largest is the long-established vehicular ferry of by Washington State Ferries between Port Townsend and Keystone on Whidby Island. This ferry constitutes a maritime continuum of SR20. The other ferry is the Puget Sound Express, a private 45-passenger-only ferry which goes to Friday Harbor on San Juan Island. Recently, PS Express has begun operating passenger-only service to Kingston and Seattle. Clipper Navigation, another company, has operated a larger vessel between Victoria and Seattle since 1986, and has now begun round trip excursions to Port Townsend from Seattle. Other public transportation in Port Townsend consists of taxi and local bus services. There is one major taxi company, Key City Transport There is one local bus system, Jefferson Transit, which operates two local routes within Port Townsend and a few more connecting Port Townsend with other points in Jefferson County and to Greyhound service at Port Ludlow. Figure 3 shows the public transportation system within the study area. It consists of a few County bus routes along SR20 itself (including the route linking to Greyhound) plus two City routes, both of them one-way loops within Port Townsend. Just south of the city is the Jefferson County International Airport, which has private and charter air service and has recently been expanded. Port Townsend no longer has any railroad service connecting it to the rest of the Olympic Peninsula. However, the Port of Port Townsend operates a rail barge slip connected by the old Seattle and North Coast Railway to the Port Townsend Paper mill. Boating activity is an important feature of Port Townsend. The Port of Port Townsend operates a marina with 400 slips and a Boat Repair Yard within the study area (between the Haines and Washington Street intersections). The Port of Point Hudson operates a marina with 100 slips east of the study area near the eastern end of Water Street. A considerable volume of boats dock at Port Townsend, mostly recreational, but also fishing and freight craft. Parking is adequate along virtually the entire corridor with underutilization of parking at the two major shopping center parking lots and several other points. An inventory of existing parking spaces is presented in Appendix A. SPECIFIC INTERSECTION CONDITIONS Along SR20 in Port Townsend are several key intersections. Specific observations on each are given below. Mill Road -- The sight distance from the eastbound SR20 approach to Mill Road is about 450', obscured somewhat by trees and brush plus a "40 MPH" sign and the horizontal curvature. Other signs on this approach are "TRUCK ROUTE TO PAPER MILL" and "TRUCK XING". The sight distance from the westbound SR20 approach is greater. The distance to Jacob Miller Road is about 1,200-1,300'. The key problems at this intersection are the high speed of SR20 traffic, the entering turns by trucks from Mill Road which block the entire SR20 roadway, and die short connection to Discovery Bay Road. Hancock Street -- The sight distance from the southbound (Hancock) approach obscured by a high, sandstone embankment with trees and brush on northwest comer by the Kosec Funeral Home. The sight distance westbound on Sims Way is over 500' and over 400' eastbound. The key problems at this intersection are the high speed of SR20 traffic, the difficulty in making left turns or crossing SR20, and the sight distance problem posed by the southwest comer embankment McPherson Street -- There is adequate sight distance both ways to along Sims Way. However, the view from McPherson Street is obscured to the east by trees and brush and intermittently to west by vehicles parked at Dis n' dat, either parking parallel to head-on parking or backing out from head- on parking. The key problems at this intersection are the high speed of SR20 traffic and the difficulty in making left turns or crossing SR20. McPherson Street is recognized by die City Circulation Plan as a key collector street. Thomas Street -- The sight distance is adequate in both directions on Sims Way, about 700" to east and about 400' to the west (from the White Rose Antiques). The view is obscured intermittently to the east by vehicles parked at the Village Mechanic and at all times to west by the flower stand in front of car wash and by the paved embankment fronting the Silver Palace restaurant The key problems at this intersection are the high speed of SR20 traffic, the entering turns by trucks from Thomas Street which block the entire SR20 roadway, and the difficulty in making left turns or crossing SR20. Thomas Street is recognized by the City Circulation Plan as a key collector street. Castle Hill Center access -- The sight distance is adequate in both directions on Sims Way, about 300' to the east (about from Sheridan Street is) and about 700' to west. The view to this intersection from the east is somewhat obscured by Century 21 sign. As this is a right turn only "T" intersection, it operates without significant problems. Sheridan Street -- The sight distance is marginal both ways along Sims Way, about 250' to the east and about 320' to the west (from about 30' west of Castle Hill Center access). The westbound view is obscured by high brush as well as by horizontal and vertical curvature. The eastbound view is obscured by the high, brushy embankment at the northwest comer (Century 21 building) and, to lesser extent, by horizontal and vertical curvature and signage. The key problems at this intersection are the difficulty in making left turns or crossing SR20, the poor sight distance, and the uphill grade southbound. There are a high volume of left turns made here during peak hours in spite of the difficulty in doing so. This demonstrates how important this intersection is. However, as through volumes grow on SR20, these left turns will have to queue longer or would become virtually impossible unless a traffic signal is installed. Sheridan Street provides access to the Jefferson General Hospital, Manresa Castle, and the County Fairgrounds and is recognized by the City Circulation Plan as a key collector street. Kearney Street -- There is adequate sight distance both ways to along Sims Way. This is only one of two intersections along SR20 in Port Townsend which is signalized. The signal timing permits pedestrians and motor traffic to safely cross Sims Way as well as make left turns. This intersection basically functions well. Kearney Street is recognized by the City Circulation Plan as an arterial street and this intersection may be regarded as the prime one in Port Townsend. Washington Street -- There is adequate sight distance both ways to along Sims Way. This intersection, while not signalized, benefits indirectly from the nearby signals upstream and downstream at Kearney and the Ferry Terminal. Therefore, substantial left turn movements are able to be made here from Sims Way during peak hours. However, the growth in traffic adds to the delay these left turns must face and is gradually making the eastbound left turn lane insufficient to store the waiting vehicles on it. That lane has the capacity to store only five vehicles. Yet queues of up to seven eastbound left turn vehicles were observed at this intersection in 1990. As more vehicles have to wait in the queue to mm left, they will tend to block the through lane. While intersection presently functions well this is only because through volumes are still light enough to allow left turns without signalization. Washington Street is not recognized by the City Circulation Plan as a collector or arterial street. However, it does play an important function as a bypass route to Water Street. The importance of maintaining this eastbound left turn movement at Washington Street is underscored by the fact that if eastbound traffic cannot turn left there it must travel on Water Street into the historic downtown district before finding another left turn possibility. Ferry Terminal -- There is adequate sight distance both ways to along Water Street. This is only one of two intersections along SR20 in Port Townsend which is signalized. The signal timing permits pedestrians and motor traffic to safely cross Sims Way as well as make left turns. This intersection basically functions well because it has only three approaches, is signalized, and handles the lowest through volume of any intersection in the study area. Exiting volumes leaving the Ferry Terminal are limited by the vehicular capacity of the Steel Electric Class vessels used on the route. These boats can accommodate a maximum of only 75 autos per trip and usually carry less. For this reason, the ferry has little impact on westbound peak hour flows. Volumes entering the Ferry Terminal have a storage capacity in the terminal dock itself equivalent to two full boatloads, about 130 vehicle spaces, including the toll booth lanes off Water Street. These ferry queues do back out onto Water Street at times, largely because they are not processed fast enough by the terminal's ticket selling system. TRAFFIC SAFETY The Washington Department of Transportation provided accident data for SR20 in Port Townsend for the years 1985 through 1989. Figure 4 shows the number of accidents at key intersections along Sims Way for these years. The intersections with the most accidents were Sheridan, Haines, and Kearney Streets. Only one fatal accident occurred during these years; that was at the Sheridan Street intersection. No pedestrian accidents were recorded and only one bicycle accident. Nearly 64% of all accidents recorded on SR20 in Port Townsend were due to vehicles entering or leaving the roadway (36% of all accidents), sideswiping (5%), or rearending other vehicles (23%) -- all maneuvers or reactions to maneuvers usually relating to poor access control. The unlimited access granted by the wide gravel and asphalt strips along SR20 allow vehicles to enter and exit almost anywhere, creating a haphazard pattern for vehicular traffic. This is aggravated by the lack of a median left-turn lane so that left-turning vehicles frequently block the single through lane and through traffic pass them on the uneven shoulder. A couple of "STOP" signs on poles at intersection approaches amid these wide open strips are frequently driven over by vehicles and have to be propped up again. The Washington Department of Transportation also conducted a speed survey of traffic on SR20 in Port Townsend in June 1988. This consisted of recording the passing speed of hundreds of vehicles during mornings in June 1988 at six different locations. The average speeds tended to decrease the closer traffic got to downtown, going from 50 mph east of Mill Road to 40 mph near Sherman Street to 32 mph at the junction of Water Street. All these averages exceed the existing posted speed limit, which was lowered since this survey was taken. At Sherman Street, 45% of the eastbound traffic was traveling above 40 mph. At Haines Street, 58% was. At Water Street, 72% of the eastbound traffic was traveling above 30 mph. Based on the traffic safety data available plus local comments and observation, the major traffic problem areas were identified. Figure 5 shows these key problem areas identified along the corridor. It identifies the key intersections which are problematic as well as the two-lane Upper Commercial District strip where a left-turn lane is needed. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic volumes were determined for July 1990 weekday peak hour conditions at key intersections along SR20. These volumes were based on a number manual counts taken for this and prior studies. These included peak hour traffic counts conducted in July 1990 by Kittelson and Associates, Inc. at the Mill, McPherson, Thomas, Hancock, Castle Hill, Sheridan, Haines, San Juan/12th, Washington, and Ferry Terminal intersections and by the Transpo Group in April and May 1989 at the Mill and Thomas intersections (Reference 1). They also included 6AM-6PM traffic counts obtained in June 1988 by the Washington Department of Transportation at the McPherson, Hancock, Sheridan, Haines, Kearney, and Washington intersections. These counts showed the late afternoon as the period of heaviest traffic activity, especially 4-5 PM, but with traffic volumes heavy in all hours 1-6 PM. In contrast, morning volumes were quite lower; even the eastbound (inbound) flow was no higher in the morning peak hour than it was in the afternoon peak hour. Figure 6 shows the July 1990 PM peak hour traffic volumes along SR20 July 1990, which were based on this data. As the figure shows, traffic volumes on SR20 tend to increase west from the downtown area. Westbound traffic, typically about 450 vehicles per hour near the Ferry Terminal, increases to about 630 approaching Haines Street and to about 830 as it leaves the upper commercial district. Eastbound traffic, typically about 570 vehicles per hour as it enters the upper commercial district, decreases to about 490 approaching Haines Street, and to about 490 near the Ferry Terminal. Figure 7 shows the specific intersection turning movements for July 1990. Of particular note here are the key left turn movements made despite opposing traffic. These are heaviest at Mill Road, Sheridan, Haines, Kearney, and Washington Streets. There are substantial cross street volumes entering at Castle Hill, Sheridan, Haines, Kearney, and Washington Streets. Traffic exiting the Ferry Terminal was light and constituted only 5% of all westbound traffic on Water Street Traffic entering the Ferry Terminal was heavier but constituted only 15% of all eastbound traffic on Water Street. Ferry traffic accounts for less than 3% of all traffic exiting and 10% entering the city on SR20. An estimate was also made of future traffic volumes in the year 2010. This estimate assumed a conservative rate of traffic growth, 2% per annum, applied to ever major intersection in the study area, with some allowance for areas where heavier development is likely. The conservatism behind this assumed level of traffic growth can be demonstrated by comparing it to the historical trends recorded in the area. The Washington Department of Transportation traffic counts made at the Washington Street intersection over the three-year 1985-1987 period recorded are average 18% per annum- growth rate. The Washington Department of Transportation traffic counts made by their permanent recorder at the Route 101 junction with SR20 over the 1980-1988 period recorded an average 6.9% per annum growth rate. Vehicular ferry traffic on the Port Townsend-Keystone route grew an average 5.5% per annum between 1979 and 1989; between 1985 and 1989, the ridership for the month of July only grew an average of 7.5% per annum, The 2% growth rate is assumed for the peak hour traffic because of the tendency for traffic to avoid congested peak hours on congested routes and for traffic growth in these hours to lag behind daily and annual traffic increases. Peak hour traffic is likely to increase more on Discovery Bay Road and other underused routes within Port Townsend. The estimate of future traffic volumes was not based on a standard trip generation analysis for the maximum development of land within Port Townsend. This is because the traffic growth in peak periods has been fueled more by tourism than by local development. Traffic peaks occur in summer. The average daily traffic (ADT) on Sims Way was given by the Washington Department of Transportation for 1988 as 11,000 in each direction at Hancock Street. Given the historical growth cited, ADT might be expected to grow at 4% per annum over the next twenty years, or to over 25,000 daily by 2010. A higher growth rate is assumed for daily traffic than peak hour traffic because of the tendency for traffic to avoid congested peak hours on congested routes. Figure 8 shows intersection turning movements for July 2010. This estimate, which assumes 2% per annum growth, results in a general increase of about 50% in traffic volumes throughout the corridor. Note that if even a 4% growth rate had been used instead, this same level of growth would be reached by 2000, ten years earlier. Turning movement and cross street therefore would intensify at Mill Road, Sheridan, Haines, Kearney, and Washington Streets. They also begin to be a much more serious problem at McPherson, Thomas, and Hancock Streets. Figure 9 shows intersection turning movements for July 2010 with recommended realignment and turn bans implemented at key intersections. This estimate assumes the same 2% per annum growth throughout the corridor but reallocates certain turning movements at the McPherson/Thomas intersection (the two are joined), the Castle Hill/Sheridan intersection (these two are also joined), as well as Kearney and Washington Streets. Signalization is assumed at all these intersections. This analysis dealt with summer weekday traffic conditions because this is generally when the highest traffic levels occur and because traffic control devices and roadway design must be oriented to accommodate this peak level. Weekend summer traffic volumes in Port Townsend are also substantial. Seasonal traffic counts recorded by the Washington Department of Transportation along Route 101 at its junction with SR20 and along Route 104 at the Hood Canal Bridge suggest that non-summer traffic in the area is generally about 70% of the summer levels and only 50-60% of the summer levels in January and February. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS EXISTING TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Level of service is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort (including such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, an impediments caused by other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through a intersection or roadway segment Recent research has determined that average stopped delay per vehicle is the best available measure of the LOS at a signalize intersection. As defined within the 7955 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 2 six grades are used to denote the various LOS; these six grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table 1. Additionally, Table 2 identifies the relationship between level of service and average stopped delay per vehicle Using this definition, a "D" LOS is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design. For signalized intersections, LOS defines the quality of the traffic flow, but doe; not necessarily describe the overall design adequacy of the intersection to accommodate the traffic volumes being analyzed. As an example, a good LOS can be achieved even when the volume/capacity ratio for the intersection exceeds 1.0 Similarly, there are conditions under which a poor LOS is achieved even though the volume/capacity ratio for the intersection is well below 1.0. Therefore, al signalized intersection summary tables contained in this report provide both the calculated LOS and the calculated volume/capacity ratio for each intersection. In this way, the reader is provided with a complete description of the expected operation conditions for each signalized intersection that is analyzed. The City of Portland's requirement for Level of Service at signalized intersections outside the Central Business District (CBD) is that the major intersection approaches operate al a Level of Service "D" or better. For unsignalized intersections, LOS is defined differently than for signalized intersections in that it is based upon the concept of "Reserve Capacity" (i.e., that portion of available hourly capacity that is not used). A qualitative description of the various service levels associated with an unsignalized intersection is presented in Table 3. A quantitative definition of LOS for an unsignalized intersection is presented in Table 4. The reserve capacity concept applies only to an individual traffic movement or to shared lane movements. Once the capacity of all the individual movements has been calculated and their LOS and expected delays determined, an overall evaluation of the intersection can be made. Normally, the movement having the worst LOS defines the overall evaluation, but this may be tempered by engineering judgement. Past experience with the unsignalized analysis procedure indicates that this methodology is very conservative in that it tends to overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems that might exist. Therefore, the results of any unsignalized intersection analysis should be reviewed with this thought in mind. Generally, LOS "E" is considered to be acceptable for an unsignalized intersection, although it also indicates that the need for signalized should be investigated. All LOS analyses described in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures described above. Table 5 summarizes the results of the intersection LOS calculations for each of the key intersections during the typical 1990 summer evening peak hour. Signalized LOS only is shown; the need for signalized is explained in the Traffic Signal Warrants section. Signalized would result in a LOS of "B" or "C" for every intersection analyzed. This table also shows the intersection LOS results for the typical 1990 summer evening peak hour without signalization (i.e. the existing summer situation). All intersections were found to be at a LOS of "D" or "E". While Sims Way through traffic flows at a much better LOS, many movements across Sims Way, including some major left turns, are subject to considerable delay. The "D" or "E" ratings reflect those delays to minor street and left turn movements. FUTURE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Table 6 summarizes the results of the intersection LOS calculations for each of the key intersections during the typical 2010 summer evening peak hour. Signalization would result in a LOS of "B" or "C" for every intersection analyzed. Between 1990 and 2010 several intersections drop from a "B" to a "C" in signalized LOS and all increase in the average amount of delay per vehicle. The table also shows the results of the intersection LOS calculations for the typical 2010 summer evening Table 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS) Level of Service Traffic Flow Characteristics A Very low average stopped delay, less than five seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicle arrive daring the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Avenge stop delay is in die imp of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles slop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of avenge delay. C Average stopped delay is a the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping a significant at this level, although many sill pass through the intersection without stopping. D Average slopped delays are in the range of 25.1 10 40.0 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high volume/capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not sopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Average stopped delays are in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume/capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Average slop delay is in excess of 60 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such high delay levels. TABLE 2 LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Stopped Delay Per Vehicle (Sec) A �5.0 B 5.1 to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.0 to 60.0 F >60.0 TABLE 3 GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LOS General Description A - Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation - Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in the queue B - Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience - Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in the queue C - Many times there is more than one vehicle in the queue - Most drivers feel restricted, but not objectionably so D - Often there is more than one vehicle in the queue - Drivers feel quite restricted E - Represents a condition in which the demand is near or equal to the probable maximum number of vehicles that can be accommodated by the movement. - There is almost always more than one vehicle in the queue - Drivers find the delays to be approaching intolerable levels F - Forced flow - Represents an intersection failure condition that is caused by geometric and/or operational constraints external to the intersection. TABLE 4 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA for UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Reserve Capacity (pcph) Level of Service Expected Delay to Minor Street Traffic >400 A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 D Long traffic delays 0-99 E Very long traffic delays *F * * When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the line, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. Table 5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE, SUMMER 1990 TRAFFIC, STATE ROUTE 20, PORT TOWNSEND (PM PEAK HOUR) Intersection LOS Delay Mill Road C 17.3 McPherson NA NA Thomas NA NA McPherson/ Thomas* B 10.9 Hancock B 9.1 Sheridan NA NA Sheridan/ Castle Hill* B 12.0 Haines B 13.2 Kearney C 15.1 Washington C 15.6 Ferry Term B 7.9 Delay=Average delay(seconds) for vehicles. * Proposed Realigned Intersection Table 6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE, SUMMER 2010 TRAFFIC, STATE ROUTE 20, PORT TOWNSEND (PM PEAK HOUR) Intersection LOS Delay Mill Road C 31.0 McPherson NA NA Thomas NA NA McPherson/ Thomas* C 24.8 Hancock C 19.2 Sheridan NA NA Sheridan/ Castle Hill* C 18.8 Haines C 19.3 Kearney C 20.7 Washington C 21.8 Ferry Term B 11.8 Delay=Average delay(seconds) for vehicles. * Proposed Realigned Intersection Table 7 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SR20 CORRIDOR, PORT TOWNSEND 1990 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Traffic Signal Warrants Applied Intersection 1 2 7 9 Warranted? Mill Road NA Yes Yes Yes Yes McPherson NA NA Yes No No Thomas NA NA Yes No No McPherson/ Thomas* NA NA Yes No Marg Hancock NA NA Yes No Marg CastleHill NA Yes Yes Yes Marg Sheridan Marg Yes Yes Yes Yes Sheridan Grant* Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Haines Marg Yes Yes Yes Yes Washington Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Kearney Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes * Proposed Realigned Intersection Table 8 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SR20 CORRIDOR, PORT TOWNSEND 2010 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Traffic Signal Warrants Applied Intersection 1 2 7 9 Warranted? Mill Road Marg Yes Yes Yes Yes McPherson NA NA Yes No Marg Thomas NA NA Yes No Marg McPherson/ Thomas* NA NA Yes Yes Yes Hancock NA NA Yes Yes Yes Castle Hill Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Sheridan Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Sheridan Grant* Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Haines Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Washington Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Kearney Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes * Proposed Realigned Intersection peak hour without recommended signalization. All intersections except Thomas would be at a LOS of "E" or "F". While Sims Way through traffic may still be able to flow well, any movement across Sims Way, by vehicles or pedestrians, would be prohibitive. Intersections with a "F" LOS would include those providing access to the hospital (Sheridan) and major shopping center (Haines). It must be emphasized that this analysis is based on a conservative 2% yearly traffic growth rate. Daily and annual growth rates actually recorded in the area have beer much higher. If peak hour traffic grows at a 4% rate, intersection levels of service without recommended improvements would drop to "E" and "F" levels of service in about half the time. By 2000, both the Sheridan and Haines intersections would be at "F". Such traffic conditions on SR20, would lead to a much greater diversion of traffic to Discovery Bay Road and other alternative routes. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS The traffic signal warrants analysis for 1990 and 2010 traffic conditions applied the guidelines set forth in the 1988 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Reference 3). Five different warrant guidelines were applied. These were as follows. The Minimum Vehicular Volume Warrant (Warrant 1 as described in Reference 3) sets forth minimum volumes for major streets of 350 vehicles per hour and for minor streets of 105 vehicles per hour if major street speeds exceed 40 mph. The Interruption of Continuous Flow Warrant (Warrant 2) applies where major street volume (over 40 mph) exceeds 500 vehicles per hour while minor street volume exceeds 55 vehicles per hour. Both Warrants 1 and 2 are based on the eighth highest hour conditions, assumed here to be 70 percent of the peak hour traffic volumes. The use of 70 percent of the evening peak hour as the eighth highest hour of the average day is supported by numerous observations on arterial streets within the Portland metropolitan area. The Systems Warrant (Warrant 7) standard is for total entering volumes on all approaches exceeding 1,000 vehicles in the peak hour and where Warrants 1, 2, 8, 9, or 11 are met. The Four-Hour Volume Warrant (Warrant 9) sets forth minimum requirements for the fourth highest weekday hour. This is a check for volumes heavy enough to indicate substantial minor street delay and possible turning movement conflicts. The fourth highest hour is assumed here to be 80 percent of the peak hour traffic volumes. This use of 80 percent of the evening peak hour as the fourth highest hour of the average day is based on the 6AM-6PM traffic counts recorded by the Washington Department of Transportation at key Sims Way intersections. The Peak Hour Volume Warrant (Warrant 11) sets forth minimum requirements for peak hour conditions where major street volumes are so heavy as to hinder minor street turns. The results of this analysis for summer 1990 conditions are summarized on Table These results for 1990 indicate that signalization is already warranted at the Mill Road, Sheridan, Haines, Kearney, and Washington Street intersections and is approaching marginal warrant conditions at Hancock Street and the Castle Hill access and would at a realigned McPherson/Thomas intersection. Of these intersections, Kearney Street already is signalized while Washington Street, being so close to Kearney, is to some extent influenced by this signal. As the Castle Hill access involves no left turns, this warrant analysis is largely inapplicable there. However, Mill Road, Sheridan Street, and Haines Street stand out as intersections where signalization is not now provided, even indirectly, and where it is clearly warranted for existing summer conditions. Signalization would also be warranted at the recommended, realigned Castle Hill/Sheridan intersection. The results of this analysis for summer 2010 conditions are summarized on Table 8. These results for 2010 indicate that signalization will be warranted at the Mill Road, Hancock Street, the Castle Hill access, as well as the Sheridan, Haines, Kearney, and Washington Street intersections and would be approaching marginal warrant conditions at the McPherson and Thomas Streets. Signalization would also be warranted were these last two streets conjoined by the recommended, realigned McPherson/Thomas intersection as it would at the recommended, realigned Castle Hill/Sheridan intersection. Therefore, for summer 2010 conditions signalization would be warranted at all these intersections with the recommended configuration It should be noted that this warrants analysis assumes the conservative 2% yearly traffic growth rate cited earlier. At an even slightly higher growth case, the case for signalizadon would be considerably stronger. While the Washington Street intersection would continue to be somewhat influenced by the traffic signal at Kearney Street, the volume increase by 2010 would seriously weaken the ability of motorists to make left turns off of Sims Way onto Washington Street or to continue through on Washington Street, as motorist can presently in the peak hour. As the Castle Hill access involves no left turns, the warrant analysis would still be largely inappropriate, however, the higher 2010 volumes would impose much greater delay to right turns exiting Castle Hill. This could be solved were either Sheridan signalized or the access combined into a signalized Sheridan/Grant intersection. Therefore, signalization would appear unavoidable at all these intersections except perhaps McPherson and Thomas Streets. However, the overall requirements for signalization can be minimized by combining some intersections or by letting an upstream signal act to influence another nearby intersection. The latter strategy could be applied to McPherson and Thomas Streets and to Sheridan Street and the Castle Hill access. TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS Creating improved long haul transit access to Port Townsend should be encouraged so as to reduce the volume of vehicles entering the Quimper Peninsula. The Greyhound bus link should be maintained and enhanced with direct service to Port Townsend restored, if possible. Any ferry operation linking Port Townsend with Seattle, Victoria, and other cities could be encouraged as long as appropriate support facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, or parking demands are met by the ferry service. To handle the vast majority of visitors arriving in the area by auto, park-and-ride possibilities may be explored whereby they park their cars away from the downtown district and travel by foot, bicycle, or local bus within Port Townsend. This might well be sited either near the lagoon or near the Bus Depot on Hancock Street. Either site would be served by Jefferson Transit's existing bus routes. Tourists tend to travel in family groups with the average vehicle surveyed entering Fort Wordon containing 3.5 persons (the national average for intercity auto trips). The existing Jefferson Transit fare structure of individual fares per head would be less attractive to these groups than a family day pass, especially if offered free as pan of a book of tourist coupons. Another park-and-ride possibility is to increase the size of the Keystone Ferry Terminal parking lot, enabling people to leave their cars there and not bring them to Port Townsend at all. Visitors must come by auto to Keystone as there is no connecting bus service to any point on the mainland. There is only infrequent Island Transit service between Oak Harbor and Clinton without a connection via the Clinton-Mukiltwo ferry to Seattle or Everett. Another strategy to relieve traffic on SR20 is to foster alternative local routes. This is already happening as some locals have switched to 9th Street or Discovery Bay Road from SR20. While there will be more demand to do this, few local streets are now connected to allow such movement. One future possibility is to connect and extend 3rd and 4th Streets south of SR20 to form a continuous local route from Cleveland to Howard Streets. Such a route could then provide the direct access for new development in this portion of the corridor. Ninth Street could be extended from Sheridan to Discovery Bay Road while Discovery Bay Road itself will require adequate shoulders and other safety improvements as its traffic grows. Several basic measures are recommended for the SR20 Corridor to increase the traffic capacity and improve safety. A target traffic level of service for 2010 of "D" was identified; the recommended improvements would grant every major intersection a level of service of "C" or better with the assumed level of traffic growth. Without these recommended improvements several major intersections would fall to a level of service of "E" or "F". While much of the recommended plan consists of signalization, this signalization plus widening would add only about two minutes to the overall peak hour travel time on SR20 in Port Townsend. The recommended improvements include the following generic measures: Signalization of key intersections to break the constant flow of traffic while allowing left turns and cross street movements by vehicles and pedestrians; Left Turn Lanes along most of Sims Way, allowing left turns to be made without blocking through traffic; Longer One-Way Left Turn Lanes where feasible, allowing safer left turn movement and greater capacity for future movement; Continuous Shoulder Lanes, allowing a zone for vehicles entering and exiting Sims Way as well as a safer bicycle and pedestrian path; Grass Medians in places where the left turn lanes trail off, allowing safer pedestrian crossing points in between signalized intersections; Sidewalks on much of Sims Way, where safer pedestrian movement requires such treatment; Realignment of Major Intersections where it would improve safety, capacity, and local circulation; Signage Changes to clarify where turns are made and what traffic regulations apply; and Access Consolidation and Control, limiting the number of driveways on Sims Way and creating greater distance between driveways by means of curbing, shared driveways, and the use of side street access (described in detail in the Access management Plan). APPLICATION OF GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS Signalization is recommended to be installed prior to 1995 at the Sims Way intersections at Haines Street/Safeway and Mill Road (and at Sheridan Street if the existing alignment is to be retained). Signalization is recommended for 1995-2000 installation at the realigned Sims Way intersections at Sheridan Street/Castle Hill and the proposed Industrial Park. Signalization is recommended for 2000-2010 installation at the realigned McPherson/Thomas Streets intersection as well as at Hancock Street and Washington Street. Signalization not only would create gaps in the continuous flow of traffic, allowing cross street and left turn movements, but would operate to moderate speeds and caution motorists to urban conditions. Signals operate best in a series, with coordinated timings. Left Turn Lanes are recommended along Sims Way between me proposed Industrial Park and Thomas Street and between Hancock and Sherman Streets. Longer One-Way Left Turn Lanes are recommended between Benedict and Washington Streets. Continuous Shoulder Lanes are recommended for all of Sims Way, with a westbound climbing lane, separated from a bicycle and pedestrian shoulder path, to be constructed in the "S" curve section. Grass Medians are recommended near the Water Street junction, at Benedict Street, and at any future sites where left turns are to be banned. Sidewalks are recommended along the south side of Water Street (SR 20), along the south side of Sims Way between Water and Decatur Streets and between Hancock and McPherson Streets, and along the north side of Sims Way between Washington and Kearney Streets and between Cleveland and Hancock Streets. Realignment of Major Intersections is recommended at Haines Street/Safeway, Sheridan Street/Castle Hill, McPherson/Thomas Street, and Mill Road. Signage Changes are recommended for all of Sims Way, as specified on accompanying figures. Access Consolidation and Control is recommended for all of Sims Way, with an access control ordinance recommended for the entire City. Recommendations for the consolidation of driveways and related measures are specified in the Access Management Plan. Figure 10 shows the basic requirements these recommendations address for Year 2000 conditions. This figure shows that widening for a median left-turn lane and access control is required between Kearney and Benedict Streets and between Sherman and LaSalle Streets (or wherever the Industrial Park is to be located). This figure shows that widening for a westbound climbing lane is required between Haines and Sheridan Streets while traffic signals are required at Mill Road, the Industrial Park, a realigned McPherson\Thomas intersection, Hancock Street, a realigned Sheridan Street, Haines Street, and Washington Street. Also shown are possible local road extensions for alternative access by connecting 3rd and 4th Streets, forming a local route from Cleveland to Howard Streets and extending Ninth Street from Sheridan to Discovery Bay Road. Roadway improvements for Discovery Bay Road are also identified. The measures identified with the highest priority are the signalization of Haines, Mill, and Sheridan Streets. The signalization of Sheridan Street is recommended to be concurrent with a proposed realignment, which may require it to be implemented later than these other two signals. However, planning and preliminary engineering for die proposed new roadway realignments at born die Sheridan and Haines Street intersections as well as die recommended roadway widening should begin soon. Other priority measures for which implementation could begin soon are the access consolidation plan, faster ticket sales at the ferry terminal, as well as the recommended appropriate signage changes appropriate at this stage. Figure 11 shows the proposed intersection conceptual realignments at four key intersections. These are explained later in the recommendations for each segment of SR20. Figure 12 shows the basic requirements these recommendations address for Year 2010 conditions. In addition to the improvements recommended for 2000 in 10, this figure identifies two additional improvements. The first improvement is a four-lane section (with two westbound lanes) between Sheridan and Hancock Streets. If traffic grows at a higher rate than the 2% per annum assumed, a 4- or 5-lane section would be required for all of Sims Way west of Sheridan as well as some sections east of Sheridan. The second improvement is a possible rotary or other major realignment at the Mill Road intersection where SR20 almost meets Discovery Bay Road. The capital costs for all recommended traffic improvements is estimated to exceed $3.4 million. These are shown in Appendix B. These cost estimates are both preliminary and conservative. They are preliminary as precise engineering surveys are required to determine the precise construction costs and related acquisition cost may also vary. They are conservative as they assume a modest 2% a year growth rate in peak hour traffic and a consequent minimal degree of roadway widening. If traffic grows more, additional widening would be necessary. These capital costs estimates do not include any assigned costs for off-road access consolidation, sidewalks, ferry terminal changes, or for improvements to Discovery Bay Road or other streets which do not actually intersect SR20. Potential funding sources for these improvements are Federal Aid Urban Systems (FAUS) funds and other grants available through the Washington Department of Transportation,, federal and state economic development and community development grants, developer Transportation Improvement Fees (TIFs), as well as county or city accommodation or other sales taxes. Short term measures (signalization of Haines and Mill Streets plus installation of a flasher at Sheridan) are estimated to cost over $250,000. These measures are of the highest priority. The signalization of Sheridan Street would be on this list of short term measures were it not for its proposed realignment, which requires a longer time frame for implementation. Intermediate term measures for 1995 (those of the highest priority next to short term measures) are estimated to cost over $820,000. These 1995 intermediate term measures include signalization of Sheridan Street (the highest priority intermediate term measure) and the Industrial Park intersection plus installation of a flasher at Hancock as well as new roadway construction to realign both the Sheridan and Haines Street intersections and roadway widening between Sheridan Street and the Industrial Park. Therefore, measures recommended for implementation in this decade exceed one million dollars and are devoted largely to the Upper Commercial District The capital costs for intermediate term measures for 2000 are estimated to cost an additional $1,165,000. These 2000 intermediate term measures include signalization of Washington Street (the highest priority 2000 intermediate tem measure), Hancock Street, and a realigned McPherson\Thomas intersection plus installation of a flasher at Discovery Bay Road\Mill Street. Also included for 2000 is new roadway construction to realign the McPherson Street intersection connecting it to Thomas Street and roadway widening on Water Street, between Decatur and Benedict Streets, between Haines and Sheridan Streets (the "S curve section), and at Discovery Bay Road\Mill Street connector. These measure; recommended for implementation by 2010 are spread over several portions of the SR20 Corridor. The capital costs for long term measures for 2010 are estimated to cost about $200,000. These measures include widening to create a four-lane section (with two westbound lanes) between Sheridan and Hancock Streets and a variable message sign system for ferry queues. This is a conservative estimate as it is based on a 2% per annum peak hour growth rate. Should peak hour traffic grow at a higher rate than assumed for this analysis, a 4- or 5-lane section would be required for all of Sims Way west of Sheridan plus sections east of Sheridan. This could easily add over a million dollars to the cost of roadway improvements. The cost of a possible rotary or other major realignment at the Mill Road intersection where SR20 almost meets Discovery Bay Road is not included as it is not recommended at this time. Additional study will be necessary in the future to check the growth assumptions used in this report and to get more specific about improvements required after the year 2000. The major topics for such future study may well include: 1) Traffic growth along SR20 necessitating further widening to four or five lanes. 2) Traffic improvement measures for Discovery Bay Road and north/south connecting roads. 3) Traffic improvement measures for the SR20 connections to Discovery Bay and Jacob Miller Roads. 4) Improvements to the ferry system. 5) Parking requirements along the corridor. MILL ROAD INTERSECTION Signalization is recommended on a semi-actuated basis within the next few years. This will prevent conflicts between side street movements and through traffic, most of it traveling at 50 mph. This would be especially beneficial as there are intermittent tractor trailer left turns out of Mill Road, blocking all through lanes when they occur. Additionally, signalization would divert similar truck left turns from Thomas Street to Mill Road. This would reduce congestion on a long stretch of Sims Way, improve safety, and encourage trucks to use the shorter route away from the Port Townsend Paper mill favored by the City and County. Such signalization would also help break the flow of traffic, enabling side street vehicular and pedestrian movement across Sims Way at unsignalized intersections downstream from Mill Road. Signalization would ensure a "C" level of service at this intersection in summer peak hours under the assumed 2010 forecast. Without signalization, the level of service would be "E". Signalization will also be necessary in the future to allow turning movements in and out of Discovery Bay Road and Mill Road without excessive summer delays. Left turns within 300 feet of this intersection should be banned when signalized. Sight distance can be improved from the west by clearing trees and brush and resiting the "40 MPH" sign at the southwest corner. The short link with Discovery Bay Road should be widened to four lanes to accommodate more vehicles waiting there in the future. A flasher may be required there in the future, emphasizing the need for motorists to stop when approaching. It is further recommended that the eastbound signage be modified to deliver a consistent message on the speed limit. The "40 MPH" sign approaching the intersection from the west should be changed to "30 MPH". The "ENTERING PORT TOWNSEND" sign just east of the intersection should have deleted from it "SPEED LIMTT 25 MPH UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED" (it is followed soon after by an existing "30 MPH" sign). The net effect of these changes is to deliver one message ("30 MPH"). not three different ones, to motorists. A another sign recommended on the eastbound approach prior to the intersection would indicate in large letters: "DISCOVERY ROAD" and "MILL ROAD" with appropriate arrows. UPPER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WEST OF MCPHERSON This section of Sims Way requires curbing and clearly defined, limited access with the construction of a median lane for left turns. Properties and curbs should be held back from the road to permit construction of the median lane. The recommended cross section for this section is shown on Figure 13. Signage would be required to inform motorists of the following: "BEGIN TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE" (just west of LaSalle) and "END TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE" (just west of McPherson). Recommendations for the consolidation of driveways and related measures in this roadway section are specified in the Access Management Plan. This roadway section would also benefit were existing parallel routes extended to siphon off some of the local traffic now on SR20. It would be useful if 4th Street were extended in both directions, linking to 3rd Street and to sites to the west A parallel route on the north side of Sims Way would have to be developed to serve the proposed industrial park. This could be accomplished by extending 9th Street. That street could eventually be extended to Discovery Bay Road when improvements there are made to form a continuous local route. This would provide access to the industrial park for locals without having to use SR20. MC PHERSON AND THOMAS STREETS INTERSECTIONS Signalization is recommended on a semi-actuated basis for 1995-2000 at a realigned McPherson Street intersection. Signalization would permit protected side street vehicular and pedestrian movement across Sims Way and help break the flow of traffic to enable similar side street vehicular and pedestrian movement across Sims Way at nearby unsignalized intersections. Signalization would ensure a "C" level of service at this realigned intersection in summer peak hours under the assumed 2010 forecast. Without Signalization, the level of service would be "E". The realigned intersection would connect McPherson Street to Thomas Street, forming a continuous connector between Discovery Road and the Port Townsend Paper mill. It would foster "back door" access to properties along 4th Avenue (the restaurant, car wash, laundromat, antique shop, veterinary center), allowing easier access to that avenue, and enhancing its possible future role as a expanded parallel route. It would help consolidate access points, replacing two intersections with one and reduce traffic on Sims Way. It would improve access to both the paper mill and the proposed industrial park, providing needed linkage between these two major work sites. The recommended realignment would require both the construction of a median left-turn lane on Sims Way and a linkage south of Sims Way between McPherson and Thomas Streets. This could follow an "S" curve alignment. The link would first cross Sims Way at McPherson, continuing along the gravel continuum of McPherson by the car wash, then curve east to head up 4th Avenue. It would then curve east to Thomas Street past the Calvary Church. The recommended intersection would have superior sight distance and geometrics than the existing Thomas Street intersection. It also could largely be constructed on existing public right-of-way, much of it already paved. No demolition of any structure is required for this linkage. The acquisition of some unpaved parking space from both the Silver Palace Restaurant and the Calvary Church would be required. Compensating space for both could be created nearby. Short term measures at these two intersections would include clearing trees and brush to the north of McPherson Street, relocating parking on the south of McPherson Street at the Dis n'dat store, and relocating the flower stand in front of the Port Townsend Car Wash (now obscuring the eastbound view to Thomas Street). All these measures would improve sight distance. The recommended signalization at Mill Road, combined with new signage at the Port Townsend Paper mill, should eliminate the disruptive turning movements by tractor trailers at Thomas Street. Sidewalks are recommended for the south side of Sims Way between McPherson and Hancock Streets. A pedestrian crosswalk already exists on the west side of the McPherson Street intersection. UPPER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, THOMAS TO HENDRICKS STREETS This section of Sims Way, like that west of McPherson Street, requires curbing and clearly defined, limited access with the construction of a median lane for left turns. Properties and curbs should be held back from the road to permit construction of the median lane. The recommended cross section for this section is shown on Figure 13. For future conditions, a second westbound lane may be needed between Sheridan and Hancock Streets. Signage would be required to inform motorists of the following: "BEGIN TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE" and "END TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE" just west of Hancock Street and just east of Hendricks Street. The existing "BEGIN TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE" and "END TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE" signs should be removed. The existing "BLIND PERSON CROSSING" signs should also be removed upon installation of either a flashing signal beacon or traffic signal at Sheridan Street; this would be a much safer crossing. "NO LEFT TURN" signs would be required westbound at the eastbound left-turn approach and at the Sheridan/Grant approach if westbound left turns are banned there. A pedestrian crosswalk is recommended for the west side of the Hancock Street intersection. Sidewalks are recommended for the south side of Sims Way between McPherson and Hancock Streets and the north side of Sims Way between Hancock and Cleveland Streets The median lane for left turns that presently terminates at Sherman Street should be continued to Hancock Street. Until a median lane is constructed on this section of Sims Way, right turn only access to and from Sims Way is recommended with a low, mountable concrete divider. Recommendations for the consolidation of driveways and related measures in this roadway section are specified in the Access Management Plan. Improvements will be needed at the Hancock Street intersection. The recommended cross section for this intersection is shown on 13. It is recommended to extend the left-turn lane on this section of Sims Way from Sherman Street and install a signal beacon and a pedestrian crosswalk now, with a semi-actuated traffic signal in the future. The beacon would flash yellow to Sims Way traffic and red to Hancock traffic. Both would aid safe pedestrian crossing and the movement of Jefferson Transit buses in and out of their base. Signalization would ensure a "C" level of service at this intersection in summer peak hours under the assumed 2010 forecast. Without signalization, the level of service would be "E". Also recommended is the excavation of the northwest corner of this intersection to provide better sight distance. If these measures are implemented, the pedestrian crosswalk by the Texaco station should be relocated to the east side of this intersection. CASTLE HILL CENTER/SHERIDAN STREET Signalization is absolutely necessary at this intersection to ensure safe and efficient traffic operations in the near future. It will be untenable to operate as an intersection without a traffic signal. Eastbound access to the Castle Hill Shopping Center requires a left turn and would be also untenable without signalization. This would have economic consequences for this shopping center. Signalization is already warranted for summer peak conditions. Signalization would ensure a "B" or "C" level of service at this intersection in summer peak hours under the assumed 2010 forecast depending on which of two alignments is used. Without signalization, the level of service would be "F". Short term measures can be taken to improve both existing intersections. For Sheridan Street, sight distance could be improved by excavating the embankment and clearing brush on both corners and by installing convex mirrors to reflect oncoming Sims Way traffic to Sheridan motorists. For the Castle Hill Center access, sight distance could be improved by relocating the Century 21 sign. However, these short term measures would not solve all of this intersection's existing problems and would certainly be inadequate in solving future problems, For instance, signalization at this intersection as it is now constituted would impose some delay to the westbound flow; that flow would have to begin moving on an uphill slope. It is also likely that right-turning traffic from Sheridan Street (80% of the peak hour southbound flow) would avoid this signal by moving through the Castle Hill Center parking lot. What is recommended instead is a major realignment of this intersection, shifting Sheridan Street's intersection with Sims Way west to Grant Street. This would require realigning the Sheridan Street roadway south of 7th Street to curve slightly southwest, along the line of the existing Photo Hut booth toward First Federal Savings and Grant Street. This realignment would permit closure of both the existing Sheridan Street intersection (as was done with Cleveland Street) and the Castle Hill Center access on Sims Way. Access to both Sheridan Street and Castle Hill would be combined at one well-designed, signalized intersection. No buildings would need to be taken to create this new intersection. Some parking space would be lost to the Castle Hill Shopping Center and the Century 21 building would be isolated from the Castle Hill. Both impacts, could be mitigated. Replacement parking for the Castle Hill Center is available on the eastern strip of grass land 80' wide between the existing paved parking lot and Sheridan Street east of the building occupied by the State Social and Health Services. It is also available on the northwest corner of the property and on the block north along 7th Street (between Grant and Sheridan Streets). Parking space for the Century 21 building could also be provided in the eastern strip or on die vacated portion of the old Sheridan Street near the present intersection. A detailed engineering plan for the proposed realignment and a revised parking lot would be necessary to determine the exact impact on parking. However, the total number of parking spaces available at Castle Hill under this plan is likely to be about the same as it is presently. There would be many advantages to relocating this intersection to the site recommended. It would consolidate two access points into one. It would be on more level ground, making future signalization less onerous to the uphill, westbound flow. It would have considerably better sight distance than the existing Sheridan intersection so it would be safer. It would allow motorists seeking a left mm to Manresa Castle to actually see this building before turning, which they cannot do at Sheridan presently. The new intersection would be better aligned for the turning movements that are actually made in the peak hour. Summer 1990 traffic counts found that 80% of the exiting Sheridan flow (and 88% of the combined Sheridan/Castle Hill egress flow) consisted of right-turns on a southwesterly axis. Also, 85% of the Sims Way turns into Sheridan (and 62% of the turns into Sheridan and Castle Hill combined) are left-turns along this same axis. This high left-turn percentage is significant given how difficult left turns are presently. Were a realigned Sheridan/Grant Street intersection signalized, the left-turn movement would certainly increase, as it will when the Castle Hill Center becomes fully leased. The new intersection would have high capacity left-turn lanes over 300 feet long both eastbound and westbound. For future conditions, it may be necessary to ban westbound left turns (a small volume) here and to extend the recommended westbound climbing lane on the "S" curve section into a second westbound lane through this intersection to Hancock Street. Signage can also be improved approaching this intersection. At present, eastbound motorists on Sims Way see a left-turn sign for "FAIRGROUNDS" as they approach the Castle Hill Center, causing some to enter that parking lot instead of Sheridan Street. As they approach Sheridan Street, there are no signs except directly at Sheridan, where there is an "H" (for "HOSPITAL") sign. As eastbound motorists enter the upper commercial strip of Sims Way, they are confronted with a huge billboard (the largest road sign on Sims Way) announcing "MANRESA CASTLE LEFT 1/2 MILE". Yet as they approach the turn for the castle at Sheridan, there are no Manresa Castle signs. Westbound motorists on Sims Way see a large "MANRESA CASTLE" sign with a right-turn arrow at the northwest comer of Sheridan Street. If the existing Sheridan Street alignment is retained, it would be better to have signage before Sheridan stating:"SHERIDANSTREET/COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS" and "COUNTY HOSPITAL" with another private sign for "MANRESA CASTLE", all with turn arrows and appropriate symbols. With the realigned Sheridan/Grant Street intersection, have two large signs before the intersection stating: "SHERIDAN STREET/COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS/GRANT STREET" and "CASTLE HELL SHOPPING CENTER/HOSPITAL" with turn arrows and appropriate symbols. Other signage changes should also be made concurrent with the recommended widening and realignment. A "30 MPH" sign is recommended between Sheridan and Cleveland Streets as well as a "BEGIN TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE" at Sherman Street The existing "BLIND PERSON CROSSING", "BEGIN TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE" and "END TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE" signs should be removed. A pedestrian crosswalk is recommended for the east side of the realigned Sheridan/Grant Street intersection. Sidewalks arc recommended for the north side of Sims Way between Hancock and Cleveland Streets. THE 'S' CURVE SECTION Recommended for this section is widening to allow a second westbound lane to act as a climbing lane for heavier vehicles. Further widening is recommended to allow full shoulders for bicycle and pedestrian movement, separated from the traffic lanes. The recommended cross section for this section is shown on 13. A grass median might be constructed in the "S" curve section to prevent any left turn or through movements across Sims Way. The westbound right-turn curvature should be improved at the turn into 10th Street. Recommendations for access consolidation are specified in the Access Management Plan. Signage changes should also be made concurrent with the recommended widening. A "30 MPH" sign is recommended between Sheridan and Cleveland Streets and near 10th Street to moderate speeds on this downhill section of Sims Way. A large "VIEWPOINT" sign with right-turn arrow should be located approaching the viewpoint eastbound as well as a "PORT FACILITIES" sign with right-turn arrow approaching Haines Street eastbound. A large "HOSPITAL/10TH STREET" sign with right-turn arrow should be located approaching 10th Street westbound. The existing "END SHOULDER DRIVING" and "BEGIN SHOULDER DRIVING" signs should be removed and replaced with "SLOW VEHICLES USE CLIMBING LANE" signs. THE FLATLANDS SECTION The major recommendation for this section of Sims Way is the signalization of the Safeway/Haines Street intersection. The traffic volumes recorded at this intersection show it will be warranted within the next few years. It is clearly the major point for turning movements between Sheridan and Kearney Streets. Signalization would ensure a "C" level of service at this intersection in summer peak hours under the assumed 2010 forecast. Without signalization, the level of service would be "F'. A needed concurrent improvement would be the creation of a defined public street (Haines Street) through the Safeway parking lot. Presently the northern leg of this intersection is this parking lot. Some vehicles cut through the parking lot between 12th Street and Sims Way to use this intersection. This is potentially unsafe. The creation of a public road through the parking lot would involve the loss of 36 parking spaces to Safeway, perhaps less if the road went along the Safeway/McDonald's property line. It would be a curbed, two-lane street with openings for parking lot access and would preferably be aligned with Haines Street south of Sims Way. Consideration was also given to having San Juan (12th Street's entrance to Sims Way) as the major signalized intersection on this section of Sims Way. This was rejected for the following reasons: 1) Turning movements recorded at this intersection were only a fraction of those recorded as Haines, 2) Creation of a southern leg to this intersection would require construction of a new street and displacement of much of the Port of Port Townsend's Boat Repair Yard, 3) This intersection has no left-turn bays, 4) Paved street approaches and left-turn bays already exist at the Haines intersection, and 5) It would leave unprotected turns in and out of the major Safeway and Port of Port Townsend entrances. It is further recommended that any future development in this section be limited t right turns only access on Sims Way, as has been done with the recent approval c the Coast-to-Coast site at 12th Street east of McDonald's. Pedestrian crosswalk should be created on the east side of the Haines and Benedict Street intersection! The left-turn median lane approaching Kearney Street should be extended west t Benedict Street for westbound left turns from Decatur to Benedict Streets. The recommended cross section for this section is shown on 13. This would foster access to properties on the south side of Sims Way in that section, including the Visitor Information Center. Large signs indicating "VISITOR INFORMATION and "BOAT HAVEN/COAST GUARD" are recommended here. Another major recommendation for this section is the construction of a paved bicycle and pedestrian trail to bypass most of SR20 but link the proposed waterfront path to the old railway right-of-way and the Kah Tai Lagoon park. This trail would leave the railway right-of-way at Haines Street, extend north on Haines to Sims Way, run on the southern shoulder of Sims Way to Decatur Street, then run south on Decatur to Washington Street, then along Washington until it curved off to become the waterfront path. This trail would tend to divert bicycle traffic off of the upper commercial portion of Sims Way while fostering bicycle and pedestrian access to the lagoon and marina. The proposed traffic signal at Haines Street ties into this plan by establishing a safe crossing of Sims Way to the Kah Tai Lagoon park. KEARNEY AND WASHINGTON STREET INTERSECTIONS No changes are recommended to the geometries of either intersection so no widening on this section is required. The intersection level of service analysis for future conditions suggests that no more lanes are needed. However, what is needed are the following measures to increase capacity and improve access: 1) Extend the eastbound left-turn lane approaching Kearney Street to Decatur Street, banning westbound left turns to Decatur Street. 2) Extend the eastbound left-turn lane approaching Washington Street to Kearney Street, banning westbound left turns to Kearney Street. 3) Extend the westbound left-turn lane approaching Washington Street by making the entire left-turn lane east of Washington Street one-way. 4) Make right turn only access/egress for the Port Townsend Motel. 5) Construct sidewalks along the south side of Sims Way between Water and Decatur Streets and along the north side between Washington Street and Kearney Streets with sidewalks on the east side of Kearney Street between Washington and Jefferson Streets. 6) Make Gaines Street one-way southbound to Water Street to prevent any traffic entering Sims Way from this minor street. 7) Construct a low, mountable pedestrian median island in the wedge-shaped tail of the westbound left-turn lane approaching Washington Street to allow a safe pedestrian crossing point here. 8) For future conditions, signalize the Washington Street intersection, with left turns from Washington Street banned. Signalization would ensure a "C" level of service at this intersection in summer peak hours under the assumed 2010 forecast. Without signalization, the level of service would be less. Vehicles seeking to turn left off Sims Way would be delayed and queue up, blocking the through lane, while vehicles seeking to turn into Sims Way would also be delayed. A number of signs are recommended to be added to this section concurrent with implementing the above recommendations. These include "LEFT TURN FOR WASHINGTON STREET" signs approaching the eastbound left-turn bay (Kearney Street) and westbound bay (100 feet west of Water Street) and "NO LEFT TURN" signs approaching Kearney and Decatur Streets westbound and at the Port Townsend Motel exit. In addition, large eastbound signs near Decatur Street are recommended, stating: "FAIRGROUNDS/FORT WORDON STATE PARK/GOLF COURSE" and "HISTORIC DISTRICT/FERRY" with appropriate arrows and symbols. When Washington Street is signalized, remove the existing "RIGHT TURN ONLY" signs on Washington Street approaching Sims Way, replacing them with "NO LEFT TURN" signs. WATER STREET SECTION The intersection level of service analysis for future conditions suggests that no more lanes are needed to add capacity. Extensive widening should be avoided as it would encroach on either the bluffs or the properties east of the roadway. However, some widening is needed to provide adequate shoulders for bicycles and pedestrians and to extend the queuing lane for ferry traffic. This would require moving the telephone poles on the east side. Figure 13 shows the recommended new cross section. Widening for bicycle and pedestrian access can be limited by constructing a waterfront bicycle and pedestrian path between the existing sidewalk by the Ferry Terminal and Washington Street east of Sims Way. There would still have to be some shoulder for bicycle and pedestrian access on Water Street, however. The City's recommendations to Washington State Ferries to speed the ticket selling process at the Ferry Terminal are the first measures that should be undertaken to solve the ferry queuing problem here. These measures include having a second (or third) ticket seller, selling out of a second booth, and a faster ticket selling process. These require no capital construction or enforcement problems. The Ferry Terminal already has the capacity to store about 130 autos (or equivalent mix of vehicles) on the dock itself. This is equivalent to two full boatloads. Increasing the size of either the Ferry Terminal or the vessels serving it may be out of the question for at least a decade. This is because of the large capital costs involved in doing either. Washington State Ferries uses Steel Electric Class vessels on this route. These boats can accommodate a maximum of only 75 autos (or equivalent mix of vehicles) per trip. Most larger vessels would not fit into the existing docks and have a higher draft, rendering them unable to navigate the shallow waters approaching the Keystone terminal. Washington State Ferries has only three vessels in its entire fleet with a shallower draft than the Steel Electric boats (12-foot draft); all three have less vehicular carrying capacity. While it would be operationally feasible for Washington State Ferries to operate a third vessel on this route (it operates two during peak demand periods and one most of the time), that would be economically prohibitive. A third vessel and crew would be idle the vast majority of the time. Indeed, other than during summer peaks, one vessel is sufficient to handle the demand on this route which, in winter, is about one sixth the demand experienced in summer. Given the limit to the ferry system's capacity, plus the substantial growth in ferry traffic, it is recommended that more vehicle queuing space be created along Water Street. Widening of Water Street to create a ferry queuing lane is recommended for future conditions as the most cost-efficient solution for this. Extending the queuing lane for ferry traffic would add about thirteen spaces to a right hand lane that already holds about six (assuming 30 feet per vehicle in queue). Signage indicating "RIGHT LANE FOR KEYSTONE FERRY" and "KEYSTONE FERRY/ RIGHT LANE AHEAD" (prior to Water Street) should be incorporated concurrently with the ferry lane. There has been concern that vehicle use of such a ferry queuing lane would effectively cut off access during peak ferry periods to the properties along Water Street. Recommendations for the handling access to these driveways are specified in the Access Management Plan. Another measure is recommended to be considered to aid in this problem. That is to have an electronic signage system for ferry users along SR20. This system would indicate how long the expected wait for the ferry would be. This system would involve electronic signs on Sims Way at Kearney Street, along Water Street and at Ferry Terminal itself. ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT GENERAL ACCESS RECOMMENDATIONS For all of SR20 east of LaSalle street, curbing is recommended to limit access to specific, well delineated entries and exits to properties. These should preferably spaced well apart, for existing properties by consolidating access points. Coincident with curbing and access consolidation, signage to these properties should be combined to reduce confusion and clarify entrance locations. Building setbacks and transit easements (to allow common driveways) should be mandated by City code. In addition to the possibilities for existing properties, plans should be developed to limit access for future properties. This can be accomplished by easement agreements, a municipal ordinance on access that specifies minimum spacing requirements and curbing, and by extending 3rd, 4th, 9th, or other parallel streets to create indirect access to Sims Way. A sample municipal ordinance on minimum spacing requirements for access is shown as Appendix C. The following are suggestions to consolidate some existing access points that are in close proximity and could operate with shared driveways. Hilltop Tavern - Consolidate access at one marked driveway; if feasible, combine with access to the proposed Industrial Park, with Industrial Park access at one point on Sims Way and on McPherson Street. Port Townsend Honda & Marine and Jackpot - Consolidate access at the existing Jackpot driveway; the Honda access is right next to it. Napa Auto Parts - Consolidate access with that of the commercial building directly south of it (containing Angeles Medical Supply, Peninsula Floor Covering. Bergstrom Sewing Center). Veterinary Center and Olympic Real Estate- Consolidate access on Sims Way through Olympic Real Estate and on 4th Street through the Veterinary Center. Port Townsend Cafe and State Farm Insurance - Consolidate access at one point on Sims Way, granting an easement to the vacant property to the south. Relocate parking for the Cafe to the south side and rear. Port Townsend Car Wash, Port Townsend Laundromat, and White Rose Antiques - Consolidate access of all three at one point on Sims Way and one on McPherson. Dis n' dat Store, John's Auto Supply, and Bluebird Antiques - Relocate the existing parking (too close to Sims Way) to the rear and west side of these buildings via a single driveway off Sims Way and "back door" access from McPherson Street. Maestro Burger/10th Street - Consolidate access at 10th Street, with right turn only egress at Hill Street. MILL ROAD AREA AND FOREST CORRIDOR This area is now largely undeveloped and has few access points. The general measures already recommended - access spacing controls and the extension of parallel local streets to provide access off of SR20 - would effectively limit access in this section. City review of site plans should also be used to influence future access. At the Mill Road intersection, left turns within 300 feet of it should be banned when it is signalized. Westbound left turns (into Peninsula Motors, Smiley's Auto Repair, and Red Rooster Antiques) can be made at the Mill Road intersection during the left-turn signal phase. UPPER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WEST OF THOMAS STREET Existing access and egress points to several properties on this section of road could be consolidated to reduce the number of driveway locations. It is suggested to consolidate the access to the Port Townsend Car Wash, the Port Townsend Laundromat, and White Rose Antiques with one access point on Sims Way and one on McPherson. It is similarly suggested to consolidate access to the Veterinary Center and Olympic Real Estate with access to the Veterinary Center through Olympic Real Estate or 4th Street only. The Napa Auto Parts access could be combined with that of the commercial building directly south of it (presently containing Angeles Medical Supply, Peninsula Floor Covering, and the Bergstrom Sewing Center). This should done at a point slightly west of the Jackpot Food Mart access to avoid opposing left-turn conflicts. Measures should be taken to prevent any more access points on this section of Sims Way. These measures include transit easements for undeveloped properties enforcement of a proposed municipal access ordinance, site plan review powers and the increased use of the parallel local route, 4th Street. The realigned McPherson\Thomas intersection would provide "back door" access to the existing properties along 4th Street (the Port Townsend Car Wash, Port Townsend Laundromat, and White Rose Antiques, and the Veterinary Center, as well as to Olympic Real Estate if linked, as recommended, to 4th Street. It would help consolidate access points, replacing two intersections with one while improving access to both the paper mill and the proposed industrial park. Future properties could gain access to 4th Street or an extension of 4th, obviating direct access onto Sims Way. Access limits could also be imposed on the west side of Sims Way in this section Immediately north of McPherson is a low commercial building close to the Sims Way roadway that houses three properties: the Dis n' dat Grocery Store, John's Auto Supply, and Bluebird Antiques. These stores depend on diagonal parking close to Sims Way for customer access though a few unmarked spaces are also available next to Dis n' dat on McPherson. This diagonal parking is too close to Sims Way to allow roadway widening here or to allow a consolidation of these properties' access with curbing. It is also a poor situation to have parkers backing up next to, and potentially into, a major roadway. These parking and backing maneuvers also block visibility to and from McPherson Street. The recommended solution here is to either relocate parking to the north and west of this building or to physically move this building westward to allow curbed, off-street parking with access points off of McPherson and at one point on Sims Way. A single access point with curbing to section off-street parking off of Sims Way is recommended for the Port Townsend Cafe and State Farm Insurance buildings with an easements granted for the vacant property to the south. Parking for the Port Townsend Cafe could be reoriented to the south side and rear of the building, where there is ample space while parallel parking only would be permitted in front. A single access point is also recommended for the Port Townsend Honda & Marine and the Jackpot Food Mart. The access and parking system for the Jackpot is good; as the Honda access is virtually next to it might well be made off of the Jackpot parking lot, with the Honda frontage all curbed. Access to the Hilltop Tavern should be at one clear driveway with curbing on remainder of frontage and possibly combined with that of the proposed Industrial Park. UPPER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, THOMAS STREET TO SHERIDAN STREETS This section of Sims Way, like that west of McPherson Street, requires curbing and clearly defined, limited access with the construction of a median lane for left turns. Properties and curbs should be held back from the road to permit construction of the median lane. Curb the Sea Breeze Center properties, combining access for the Sea Breeze grocery, service station, and mobile home park on Sims Way at Sherman Street, with a secondary access on Hendricks Street If feasible, limit the mobile home park to an access on Hendricks Street only. There is a median lane in both directions approaching Hendricks Street while there is only the taper of one approaching Sherman northbound. The two remaining properties on the west side of Sims Way between Hendricks and Hancock (Ruddell Auto lot and Port Townsend Realty)also should have curbing and a single access, preferably off of Hancock Street only. Similar curbing and access limitation access should be applied to the Texaco service station, with access points at northern and southern ends on Sims Way plus one on Hancock. The General Insurance Service and Community Thrift Store properties could share common access and egress points. Operation of the realigned Sheridan/Grant Street intersection would further be enhanced by closing the direct access into Sims Way from the Family Dental Center, the Port Townsend Vision Clinic, and First Federal Savings. All three should have their access redirected into Grant Street. Also, the pedestrian crosswalk on Sims Way now west of Hendricks should be relocated to the east side of the new intersection when signalized. THE 'S' CURVE SECTION This section presently has few cross street or turning movements on it due to d lack of commercial development. One effective measure to ensure these do not occur in the future is to construct a raised median strip on this section, concurrent with the other recommended widening. This would prevent left rums and cross movement by vehicles yet would make any pedestrian crossing easier. Curbing an access control is recommended at the Maestro Burger property, with access limited to 10th Street and a right turn only exit at the present Hill Street access. Hill Street should be vacated to reduce future access while a grass median might be constructed in the "S" curve section to prevent any left turn or through movement across Sims Way. The westbound right-turn curvature should be improved at the turn into 10th Street. THE FLATLANDS SECTION The access spacing controls and effective City review of site plans should also b used to influence future access in this section. The recent right- turn only access granted to Coast-to-Coast is a good example of what can be achieved. The recommended signalization and roadway widening will improve left-turn access in the Flatlands to Safeway, the Visitor Center, McDonalds, the Port property, and the commercial area just east of the marina. The other effect of the recommended traffic improvements would be to foster "backdoor" use of 12th and Washington Streets t reach properties along SR20. KEARNEY AND WASHINGTON STREET INTERSECTIONS The access controls recommended for this section include establishing right turn only access for the Port Townsend Motel and making Gaines Street one-way eastbound to Water Street. The latter measure would prevent any traffic Sims Way from this minor street and would effect the commercial building bounded by Gaines, Water, and Sims Way as well as the Interwest Savings Bank and the Edgewater Condominiums. The traffic recommendations include banning westbound left turns to Kearney Street in order to extend the eastbound left-turn lane approaching Washington Street. The loss of this left turn would be more than made up for by the provision of a signalized left turn at Washington Street at a better angle so no properties would be negatively impacted by that measure. WATER STREET The access spacing controls and effective City review of site plans should be applied here to limit access. The major traffic recommendation in this section is to create a continuous ferry queue lane by slightly widening this section of Water Street. There has been concern that vehicle use of such a ferry queuing lane would effectively cut off access during peak ferry periods to the properties along Water Street. These include the Bayview Restaurant, Bill's (Les Schwab) Tire, Signs By Seaman, the new condominium complex, and the Tides Inn. While delineated gaps in this lane could be maintained to allow such access, manual enforcement of these may be necessary. Even so, this may prove easy to enforce, would be required only an occasional basis, and would only be needed in summer. It could be performed by persons other than the City Police such as summer youth guides hired by the City who could perform a host of other functions as well. Faster ticket processing at the Ferry Terminal itself, another traffic-related recommendation, may also alleviate any potential problem. REFERENCES 1) The Transpo Group, Glen Cove Transportation Study, for Jefferson County Department of Public Works, January 1990. 2) Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report No. 209 (1985). 3) Federal Highway Administration, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 1978 (plus revisions 1-4, 1986), Section 4-C. 4) Washington Department of Transportation, Port Townsend Ferry Terminal Study, Report on Survey of Passengers, August 1976. 5) Washington Department of Transportation, Non-User Economic Considerations, Port Towns end Ferry Terminal, October 1976. 6) Washington Department of Transportation, Port Townsend Ferry Terminal, Design Report and Project Background, April 1981. 7) Northwestern Territories, Inc., Port Townsend Binding Site Plan, Final Report, for Port of Port Townsend, December 1989. 8) Transportation Solutions, Inc., Port Townsend McDonald's Restaurant Traffic Analysis, for McDonald's Corporation, September 1987. APPENDIX A PORT TOWNSEND GATEWAY PARKING INVENTORY NOTE: Given from East to West along Sims Way Corridor, identifying off-street parking spaces on properties adjacent to Sims Way and on Washington Street south of Sims Way. There are no on-street parking spaces on Sims Way. Conservative estimates are given, most properties having unlined, unorganized parking lots, many with marginal cleared ground occasionally used for parking. Ferry Terminal -- about 10, plus queue space (112 beyond Toll Booth on 10 lanes and 20 before, all paved) Bayview Restaurant -- about 20, paved Bill's (Les Schwab) Tire -- about 30, paved Condominiums (under construction) -- unknown (15+ ?) Tides Inn -- 28, paved Signs By Seaman -- 15+, gravel Commercial Building (Gaines-Water-Sims Way) -- 35, paved off-street plus diagonal on-street on Gaines Street - 10, and Water Street - 16, plus Water Street head-on-street - 10, plus large gravel lot and second eastbound lane for ferry queues Interwest Savings Bank (south side, Gaines-Washington) -- 32, paved Edgewater Condominiums (south side of Washington Street, Sims Way-Kearney) -- 10, paved Port Townsend Motel, north side, north of Washington -- 34, paved Pennysaver (General Store) NE comer, Sims & Kearney -- 58, paved Kearney Street south of Sims Way -- 9 head-on-street, paved Commercial Building (SW comer, Kearney & Sims Way) -- 4, paved Great Northwest Federal Savings Bank (west of Jefferson Street, Kearney to Sims Way) -- about 30, paved Lumber Yard south of Sims Way, west of Kearney -- 20+, unpaved Caldwell Banker south of Sims Way, west of Kearney -- 13, paved Visitor Center south side, west of Decatur -- about 15, unpaved Jefferson Street commercial properties south of Sims Way, west of Decatur Street -- 20+, unpaved plus on-street Garden Center, south of Sims Way at Benedict -- 8 unpaved Texaco service station, south of Sims Way at Benedict -- 5+ Pacific Oil Products, south side, west of Texaco -- 30+, gravel Port of Port Townsend -- undefined, largely gravel or dirt. Port Plan calls for 40 off-street by marina, 21 in fish processing area, 117 diagonal directly on Washington Street, 46 head-on on Washington Street, 96 in Public Administration area, 23 in Boat Repair/Building Yard, 34 in Manufacturing/Warehouse area, 80 in Long Term Storage area, and 17 by Boat Trailer parking for 474 TOTAL. McDonalds north of Sims Way, east of Haines -- 53, paved Safeway supermarket, north of Sims Way, west of McDonalds -- 301, paved (36 in ROW of potential 30' Haines Street extension) Maestro Burger north of Sims Way and Hill Street, north of 10th -- 25+, unpaved Family Dental Center, west of Sheridan, south of Sims Way -- , 8 paved Port Townsend Vision Clinic south of Sims Way, west of Family Dental Center --7 paved Castle Hill Shopping Center, between Hendricks and Sheridan Streets, north side of Sims Way -- 360, paved (including 18 at NE corner Law office/State building First Federal Savings, south of Sims Way, opposite Castle Hill Center -- 8 in front, 7 in back, paved Community Thrift Store, south of Sims Way, near Hendricks -- 8 unpaved General Insurance Service, west of Community Thrift Store, south of Sims Way -- 10 unpaved Sea Breeze Grocery, north of Sims Way, west of Hendricks -- about 10 unpaved Sea Breeze service station west of Grocery -- about 10 unpaved Texaco service station, south of Sims Way north of Hancock -- 10+ Ruddell Auto lot, north of Sims Way, west of Sea Breeze -- NA Port Townsend Realty north of Sims Way north of Hancock -- 23, paved Kosec Funeral Home north of Sims Way west of Hancock -- 30+, paved Jefferson Transit, south of Sims Way west of Hancock -- 30+, paved/unpaved (exclusive of bus parking) Port Townsend Appliances south of Sims Way north of Thomas -- about 10, paved (front) and 10, unpaved (back) Village Mechanic south of Sims Way north of Thomas -- 10+ unpaved Silver Palace (Chinese Restaurant) south of Sims Way west of Thomas -- about 20, paved (front) and 15, gravel (back) S & E Auto & Yacht Brokers north of Sims Way north of Thomas -- 40+, gravel Port Townsend Car Wash, SW of Sims/McPherson --10+, unpaved Port Townsend Laundromat west of Car Wash -- 6, paved Dis n' dat (Grocery Store) north of Sims Way and west of McPherson -- 4, diagonal to Sims Way, paved John's Auto Supply north of Sims Way west of McPherson -- 7, diagonal to Sims Way, paved (south of Dis n'dat) White Rose Antiques south of Sims Way west of McPherson -- 15+ gravel (south of Port Townsend Laundromat) Bluebird Antiques north of Sims Way west of McPherson -- 3, diagonal to Sims Way, paved (south of Johns) Port Townsend Cafe north of Sims Way west of Bluebird Antiques -- about 40, unpaved State Farm Insurance, north of Sims Way, west of Port Townsend Cafe -- about 10,unpaved Veterinary Center, south side opposite State Farm Insurance -- 7, paved Olympic Real Estate south of Sims Way west of Veterinary Center -- about 10, paved Port Townsend Honda & Marine, north of Sims Way, west of State Farm Insurance -- about 10, unpaved Jackpot (Grocery Store & service station) north of Sims Way, west of P Honda --20+ paved Napa Auto Parts south of Sims Way, west of Olympic Real Estate -- 25+, paved Commercial Building south of Sims Way west of Napa Auto Parts, opposite Jackpot -- about 40, paved Hilltop Tavern north of Sims Way, west of Jackpot -- 15+ gravel Piccolo Italian Restaurant north of Sims Way west of Mill Road -- about 25, paved Peninsula Motors south of Sims Way north of Smiley's Auto Repair -- about 20, paved Smiley's Auto Repair/Red Rooster Antiques south of Sims Way north of Mill Road -- about 10, unpaved Table 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS) Level of Service Traffic Row Characteristics A Very low average stopped delay, less than five seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Average stop delay is in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. C Average stopped delay is in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Average stopped delays are in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high volume/capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Average stopped delays are in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume/capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Average stop delay is in excess of 60 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such high delay levels. TABLE 2 LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Stopped Delay Per Level of Service Vehicle (Sec) A �5.0 B 5.1 to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.0 to 60.0 F >60.0 TABLE 3 GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LOS General Description A - -Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation -Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in the queue B -Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience -Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience C -Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience -Most drivers feel restricted, but not objectionably so D -Often there is more than one vehicle in the queue -Drivers feel quite restricted E Represents a condition in which the demand is near or equal to the probable maximum number of vehicles that can be accommodated by the movement -There is almost always more than one vehicle in the queue -Drivers find the delays to be approaching intolerable levels F -Forced flow -Represents an intersection failure condition that is caused by geometric and/or operational constraints external to the intersection TABLE 4 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA for UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Reserve Capacity (pcph) Level of Service Expected Delay to Minor Street Traffic >400 A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 D Long traffic delays 0-99 E Very long traffic delays *F * * When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. Table 5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE, SUMMER 1990 TRAFFIC, STATE ROUTE 20, PORT TOWNSEND (PM PEAK HOUR) Intersection LOS Delay Mill Road C 17.3 McPherson NA NA Thomas NA NA McPherson/ Thomas* B 10.9 Hancock B 9.1 Sheridan NA NA Sheridan/ Castle Hill* B 12.0 Haines B 13.2 Kearney C 15.1 Washington C 15.6 Ferry Term B 7.9 Delay = Average delay (seconds) for vehicles. * Proposed Realigned Intersection TABLE 6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE, SUMMER 2010 TRAFFIC, STATE ROUTE 20, PORT TOWNSEND (PM PEAK HOUR) Intersection LOS Delay Mill Road C 31.0 McPherson NA NA Thomas NA NA McPherson/ Thomas* C 24.8 Hancock C 19.2 Sheridan NA NA Sheridan/ Castle Hill* C 18.8 Haines C 19.3 Kearney C 20.7 Washington C 21.8 Ferry Term B 11.8 Delay = Average delay (seconds) for vehicles. * Proposed Realigned Intersection Table 7 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SR20 CORRIDOR, PORT TOWNSEND 1990 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Traffic Signal Warrants Applied Intersection 1 2 7 9 Warranted ? Mill Road NA Yes Yes Yes Yes McPherson NA NA Yes No No Thomas NA NA Yes No No McPherson/ Thomas* NA NA Yes No Marg Hancock NA NA Yes No Marg Castle Hill NA Yes Yes Yes Marg Sheridan Marg Yes Yes Yes Yes Sheridan Grant* Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Haines Marg Yes Yes Yes Yes Washington Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Kearney Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes * Proposed Realigned Intersection Table 8 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SR20 CORRIDOR, PORT TOWNSEND 2010 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Traffic Signal Warrants Applied Intersection 1 2 7 9 Warranted ? Mill Road Marg Yes Yes Yes Yes McPherson NA NA Yes No Marg Thomas NA NA Yes No Marg McPherson/ Thomas* NA NA Yes Yes Yes Hancock NA NA Yes Yes Yes Castle Hill Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Sheridan Marg Yes Yes Yes Yes Sheridan Grant* Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Haines Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Washington Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Kearney Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes * Proposed Realigned Intersection APPENDIX B CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE, PORT TOWNSEND GATEWAY ROUTE DEVELOPMENT PLAN add and fix tabs(COSTS shown in thousands) SHORT TERM MEASURES Traffic Signal, Fully Actuated (Haines) ..............125 Traffic Signal, Semi-Actuated (Mill) ...................115 Flasher* (Sheridan) ...............................15 SUBTOTAL ......................................$255 INTERMEDIATE MEASURES FOR 1995 Traffic Signal, Fully Actuated (Sheridan) .................125 Traffic Signal. Semi-Actuated (Ind Park) .................115 Flasher* (Hancock) ................................2 New Roadway Construction (Sheridan) ..................68 270 linear feet @ $250/ft New Roadway Acquisition (Sheridan) ...................41 13,800 square feet @ S3/sf New Roadway Construction (Haines) ....................88 350 linear feet @ $250/ft New Roadway Acquisition (Haines) .....................54 18,000 square feet @ S3/sf Roadway Widening (Sheridan-bid Park) ..................330 Adding third lane (@ 32,000 sf) on 2,200 linear feet SUBTOTAL......................................$823 INTERMEDIATE MEASURES FOR 2000 Traffic Signal, Fully Actuated (Washington) ..................125 Traffic Signal, Semi-Actuated (Hancock) ............................ 115 Traffic Signal, Semi-Actuated (McPherson) .......................... 115 Flasher* (Discovery Road) ................................... 2 New Roadway Construction (McPherson-Thomas) ...................... 243 970 linear feet @ $250/ft New Roadway Acquisition (McPherson-Thomas) ...................... 55 22,000 square feet @ $2.5/sf Roadway Widening (Water Street) ............................... 60 Adding third lane (@ 4,400 sf) on 400 linear feet Roadway Widening (Decatur-Benedict) ............................ 38 Adding third lane (@ 3,000 sf) on 250 linear feet Roadway Widening ("S" Curve) .................................. 390 Adding third lane (@ 13,400 sf) on 2,600 linear feet Roadway Widening (Discovery Road connector) ....................... 15 Adding third lane (@ 1,800 sf) on 100 linear feet New Signage & Removal of Old Signs** ............................ 7 SUBTOTAL ............................................ $1,165 LONG TERM MEASURES FOR 2010 Roadway Widening (Sheridan-Hancock) ............................. 115 Adding fourth lane (@ 13,800 sf) on 1,150 linear feet Ferry Queue Variable Message Sign System .......................... 80 SUBTOTAL .............................................. $195 TOTAL, ALL PHASES .................................... $2,438 X 1.4 Contingency, ROW, and Engineering Factor GRAND TOTAL, CAPITAL COST ......................... $3,413*** * Purchase of Single Rasher, to be repositioned first to Hancock, then to Discovery Road with installation cost only shown for secondary and tertiary locations. ** Signage Costs For All Phases allocated here. *** Grand Total Costs include only those for specific recommendations to SR20 and abutting properties within planning horizon given. They exclude the cost of improvements to 6.3 APPENDIX: VISUAL ANALYSIS VISUAL ANALYSIS This map provides a record of findings from the visual Analysis of the natural and built landscape, architectural, and Civic design features throughout the Gateway Corridor. It forms the basis for the Appendix 6.4 map which indicates Streetscape Development Recommendations. 6.4 APPENDIX: STREETSCAPE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS STREETSCAPE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS This map provides a record of landscape and streetscape recommendations along the Gateway Corridor. The recommendations are consolidated by rooms within districts, and by Corridor segments. These recommendations are summarized in Section 3, Description of Corridors/Districts of the Gateway Development Plan. 6.5 APPENDIX: COST MEMORANDUM Prepared by STASTNY ARCHITECTS pc: Urban Design MAYER/REED: Landscape Architecture KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES: Traffic & Transportation Planners ARNOLD, ARNOLD AND ASSOCIATES: Civil Engineers December 5, 1990 Revised December 12,1990 Revised February 11, 1991 The following costs have been assembled to establish an order of magnitude for the improvements proposed in the Gateway Development Plan. Additionally, they are listed in an incremental basis so that pieces of the Sims Way Corridor improvements can be budgeted as implementation programs are developed. The costs are in January 1991 dollars and should be inflated in accordance with the projected Capital Improvement Program of the City of Port Townsend. SUMMARY TOTAL COSTS PER CORRIDOR/DISTRICT (Costs shown in thousands) x 1.4 Contingency* Cost Forest Corridor $592.24 $829.14 Upper Commercial District $2,881.84 $4,034.58 S-Curves Corridor $1,174.92 $1,644.88 Flats District $1,618.61 $2,266.05 Bluffs Corridor $880.57 $1.232.80 GRAND TOTAL - GATEWAY CORRIDOR (Costs shown in thousands) $7.148.18 $10,007.46 * Estimated Contingency, Surveys, Testing, Design, and Engineering Costs. TOTAL LINEAL FEET PER CORRIDOR/DISTRICT Forest Corridor 2,010 lin. feet Upper Commercial District 4,430 lin. feet S-Curves Corridor 2,600 lin. feet Flats District 4,650 lin. feet Bluffs Corridor 2,150 lin. feet GRAND TOTAL - GATEWAY CORRIDOR 15,840 lin. feet FOREST CORRIDOR SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS Improvements throughout Forest Corridor 1. Streetlights - provide at 50' o.c. at each side of Sims 2. Landscaping - infill conifers at gaps - assume conifers at 25' o.c.; in a 30' deep zone 3. Pathway - develop gravel or bark path in trees, off of Sims Way, 4' wide 4. Underground Utilities Improvements at Specific Locations in Forest Corridor 5. Roadway Improvements - Widen Discovery Road connector adding third lane on 100 linear feet, for 2000 condition; provide continuous shoulder along Sims Way 6. Traffic Signalization a. Semi-actuated signal at Mill, for 1990 condition b. Rasher at Discovery Road, for 2000 condition 7. New signage and removal of old signs 8. Business signage consolidation COSTS PER 100 LINEAL FEET (Costs shown in thousands) 1. Streetlights-$10 2. Landscaping - $.75 3. Pathway-$.60 4. Underground Utilities - $ 11 TOTAL COST PER 100 LINEAL FEET = $22.35 SUBTOTAL COST PER CORRIDOR = $449.24 (Corridor = 2.010 lineal feet) COSTS PER ITEM FOR FOREST CORRIDOR (Costs shown in thousands) 5. Discovery Road - widening and shoulders - $15 6. a-Signal at Mill-$115 b - Rasher at Discovery Road - $2 7. Signage-$1 8. Signage-$10 TOTAL ITEM COSTS PER CORRIDOR = $ 143 TOTAL COST - FOREST CORRIDOR = $592.24 UPPER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS Improvements Throughout District 1. Curbs at planter strip, both sides of Sims; including gutters 2. Landscaping a. Deciduous street trees on both sides of Sims at 35' o.c. b. Irrigated ground cover at trees c. Irrigated grass in planter strips 3. Sidewalks along both sides of Sims 4. Streetlights along both sides of Sims, at 50' o.c. 5. Underground utilities 6. Driveway access - one every 100', both sides of Sims 7. Drainage with catch basin on one side, inlet on the other Improvements at Specific Locations in District 8. Contingency for curb, walk, driveway access, and drainage (20% of $6,880) 9. Roadway Improvements a. Widen Sims with a third lane, between the proposed Industrial Park and Sheridan Street, (total of 2,200 lineal feet), for 1995 conditions. b. Widen Sims with a fourth lane, between Sheridan and Hancock Streets, (total of 1.150 lineal feet), for 2010 conditions. 10. Traffic Signalization a. Flasher at Sheridan Street, for 1990 conditions b. Signal, fully activated, at Sheridan Street, for 1995 conditions c. Signal, semi-actuated, at proposed Industrial Park, for 1995 conditions d. Flasher, at Hancock, for 1995 conditions e. Signal, semi-activated, at Hancock, for 2000 conditions f. Signal, semi-activated, at McPherson, for 2000 conditions 11. Intersection realignments a. Roadway acquisition at Sheridan Street, (13.800 sq ft total), for 1995 condition b. Roadway construction at Sheridan, (270 lineal feet total), for 1995 condition c. Roadway acquisition at McPherson, (22,000 sq ft total), Thomas, for 2000 condition d. Roadway construction at McPherson, (970 lineal feet total), Thomas, for 2000 condition e. Land acquisition - (property for church relocation) f. Move building (church) g. New parking lot construction and landscaping 12. Special paving at McPherson Street intersection 13. New signage and removal of old signage. 14. Building removal a. Demolition and clearing of building b. Land acquisition (Dis'n Dat) for parking lot c. New parking lot construction and landscaping 15. Business signage consolidation COSTS PER 100 LINEAL FEET (Costs shown in thousands) 1. Curbs at Planters - $2 2. a - Street trees - $.78 b - Irrigated ground cover - $1.50 c - Irrigated grass - $.32 3. Sidewalks - $1.98 4. Streetlights-$10 5. Underground utilities - $ 11 6. Driveways - $.27 7. Drainage - $2.63 TOTAL COST PER 100 LINEAL FEET = $30.48 TOTAL COST PER DISTRICT = $1,350.26 (District = 4,430 lineal feet) COSTS PER ITEM FOR DISTRICT (Costs shown in thousands) 8. Contingency-$1.38 9. a - Roadway widen - $330 b - Roadway widen - $115 10. a - Flasher at Sheridan - $ 15 b - Signal at Sheridan - $125 c - Signal at Industrial park - $115 d - Flasher at Hancock - $2 e - Signal at Hancock - $115 f - Signal at McPherson - $115 11. a - Roadway acquisition - $41 b - Roadway construction - $68 c - Roadway acquisition - $55 d - Roadway construction - $243 e - Land - $50 f - Move building - $5 g - Lot/landscaping - $20 12. Special paving - $ 1.70 5. 13. Signage - $2 14. a - Demo and clearing - $2.5 b - Land-$15 c - Lot and landscaping - $20 15. Signage - $75 SUBTOTAL ITEM COST PER DISTRICT = $1,531.58 TOTAL COST - UPPER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT = $2.881.84 S-CURVES CORRIDOR SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS Improvement Throughout S-Curves Corridor 1. Streetlights - provide at 50' o.c. at each side of Sims 2. Sidewalk along south side of Sims 3. Curbs at planter strip along south edge of Sims Way, including gutters 4. Landscaping - a. Low shrubs and hydro-seeding along north edge of Sims, 10' depth b. Irrigated grass in planter strip 5. Driveway access - one every 100' along one side of Sims 6. Drainage - catch basins both sides 7. Underground utilities Improvements at Specific Locations in Corridor 8. Roadway widening for a third lane for 2000 conditions, (total of 2,600 lineal feet), widen shoulders, curb at 10th Ave. 9. Develop overlook point with special paving, lighting and benches 10. Contingency, (20% of $7,610), for curbs, gutters, walkways, driveways, and drainage. 11. New signage and removal of old signs. 12. Business signage consolidation. COSTS PER 100 LINEAL FEET (Costs shown in thousands) 1. Streetlights-$10 2. Sidewalks - $.99 3. Curbs at planter - $2 4. Landscaping a - Shrubs - $.75 b - Irrigated grass - $.24 5. Driveways-$.15 6. Drainage - $4.47 7. Underground Utilities - $ 11 TOTAL COST PER 100 LINEAL FEET = $29.60 SUBTOTAL COST PER CORRIDOR = $769.60 (Corridor = 2,600 lineal feet) COSTS PER ITEM IN S-CURVE CORRIDOR (Costs shown in thousands) 8. Roadway Widening, shoulders, curbs - $390 9. Overlook Point - $2.80 10. Contingency - $1.52 11. Signage - $1 12. Signage - $10 TOTAL ITEM COST PER CORRIDOR = $405.32 TOTAL COST - S-CURVE CORRIDOR = $1.174.92 FLATS DISTRICT SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT Improvements Throughout District 1. Curbs at planter strip along south edge of Sims, including gutter 2. Landscaping - Irrigated shrubs in planter strip 3. Sidewalks along south side of Sims 4. Streetlights along both sides of Sims, at 50' o.c. 5. Underground utilities 6. Pathway - develop gravel or bark path off of Sims Way, 5' wide 7. Driveway access - one every 100' along one side of Sims 8. Drainage with catch basin along one side Improvements at Specific Locations in District 9. Roadway widening, from Decatur to Benedict Streets, (total of 250 lineal feet) for 2000 condition 10. Traffic signal, fully actuated, at Haines Street, for 1990 conditions 11. Roadway realignment of intersections a. Acquisition of Haines Street, for 1995 condition (total of 18,000 sf) b. Roadway construction at Haines Street, for 1995 condition (total of 350 lineal feet) 12. Special paving and benches at Crossroads 13. Infill existing poplars with new poplars; total of 30 new poplars 14. Plant willows and other marsh plants along the north side of Sims, adjacent to Kah Tai Park, 20' depth 15. Contingency, (20% of $4,375) for curbs, gutters, walkway, and drainage 16. New signage and removal of old signage 17. Business signage consolidation. COSTS PER 100 LINEAL FEET (Costs shown in thousands) 1. Curbs at Planter - $1 2. Landscaping - Shrubs at planter - $.22 3. Sidewalk - $.99 4. Streetlights - $10 5. Underground utilities - $ 11 6. Pathway - $.60 7. Driveways - $.15 8. Drainage - $2.23 TOTAL COST PER 100 LINEAL FEET - $26.19 SUBTOTAL COST PER DISTRICT = $1,217.84 (Flats = 4,650 lineal feet) COSTS PER ITEM IN DISTRICT (Costs shown in thousands) 9. Roadway widening - $38 10. Traffic Signal - $125 11. Realignments a - Acquisition at Haines Street, (18,000 SF) - $54 b - Construction at Haines Street - $88 12. Special paving, benches-$18 13. Poplar infilling - $.90 14. Willows near Kah Tai - $24 15. Contingency - $.87 16. Signage = $2 17. Signage - $50 TOTAL ITEM COST = $400.77 TOTAL COST - FLATS DISTRICT =$1.618.61 BLUFFS CORRIDOR SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS Improvements Throughout Bluffs Corridor 1. Curbs at planter strip along south side of Sims, including gutter 2. Landscaping a. small deciduous street trees at 35' o.c. b. irrigated ground cover around trees 3. Sidewalks along south side of Water Street 4. Streetlights along both sides of Water Street at 50' o.c. 5. Underground utilities 6. Driveway access - one every 100" along one side of Sims 7. Drainage with catch basin along one side Improvements at Specific Locations in Bluffs Corridor 8. Roadway widening along Water Street, (for a total of 400 lineal feet) 2000 conditions 9. Signalization, fully actuated, at Washington Street, for 2000 conditions 10. Ferry queue message sign along Sims and Water Streets, for 2010 conditions 11. Contingency, (20% of $5,250) for curbs, gutters, sidewalks 12. New signage and removal of old signage 13. Business signage consolidation COSTS PER 100 LINEAL FEET (Costs shown in thousands) 1. Curb at planters - $1 2.a Landscaping - $.39 2.b Ground cover - $.45 3. Sidewalks - $.99 4. Streetlight-$10 5. Underground utilities - $ 11 6. Driveways - $.15 7. Drainage - $2.23 TOTAL COST PER 100 LINEAL FEET = $26.21 SUBTOTAL COST PER CORRIDOR = $563.52 (Corridor = 2,150 lineal feet) COSTS PER ITEM FOR BLUFFS CORRIDOR (Costs shown in thousands) 8. Roadway widening - $60 9. Signalization - $125 10. Ferry Queue - $80 11. Contingency - $ 1.05 12. Signage - $1 13. Signage - $50 TOTAL ITEM COST PER CORRIDOR = $317.05 TOTAL COST - BLUFFS CORRIDOR = $880.57 Current through Ordinance 3119, passed December 8, 2014. Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the Port Townsend Plans Documents. Users should contact the City Clerk's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. City Website: http://www.cityofpt.us/ (http://www.cityofpt.us/) City Telephone: (360) 379-5083 Code Publishing Company (http://www.codepublishing.com/) (https://cdn.kptz.org/2021/02/ATTENTION-PLEASE- bell.jpg) Interview by Emillia Nunn and George Marie (Airdate: March 14, 2022) This week’s program features two stories by new contributors to Attention Please! Emillia Nunn, a 2021 graduate of PT High School, took on the controversial issue of the developing plan for the Poplar trees that line Sims Way as you enter Port Townsend. George Marie talks with the new managers of Fort Worden Hospitality, Aislinn Diamanti and Natalie Maitland, about their plans for welcoming the public to the enjoyment of the Fort and its varied services and activities. The producer for this week’s program is Larry Stein. 0:000:00 / 28:38/ 28:38 (https://kptz.org/)  Donate Now (https://kptz.org/donate/) Radio Connects Us All! Listen Live! (https://kptz.org/kptz2020/) KPTZ Local News (/kptz-local-news/) Program Archive (/archive) KPTZ Podcasts (/kptz-podcasts/) Daily Programs (/programs/) Online Public File (https://publicles.fcc.gov/fm- prole/kptz) KPTZ Underwriting (/become-an- underwriter/) KPTZ Virus Watch (/kptz-virus-watch/) COVID-19 Local Info (https://kptz.org/covid- Donate Now (https://kptz.org/donate/) Radio Connects Us All! Listen Live! (p //p g/ 19-local-information/) »Say Yes Covid Tests (https://kptz.org/covid-19-local- information/#yes) »Free At Home Covid Tests (https://kptz.org/covid-19-local- information/#free) Currently Spinning on KPTZ (https://spinitron.com/KPTZ/) 6:30 AM Gregg McVicar, host ‘UnderCurrents Encore - Hour 4 (UC_011823_4)’ from UnderCurrents (Native Voice One) 5:30 AM Gregg McVicar, host ‘UnderCurrents Encore - Hour 3 (UC_032223_3)’ from UnderCurrents (Native Voice One) 4:30 AM Gregg McVicar, host ‘UnderCurrents Encore - Hour 2 (UC_040423_2)’ from UnderCurrents (Native Voice One) Contact Us: contactus@kptz.org (mailto:contactus@kptz.org) 360-379-6886 Location: 1925 Blaine Street Donate Now (https://kptz.org/donate/) Radio Connects Us All! Listen Live! Port Townsend, WA 98368 (https://cdn.kptz.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/11/24105441/Map.png) Mailing Address: PO Box 2091 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Listen Live! ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2011-2023 KPTZ COMMUNITY RADIO (/) HOME (HTTPS://KPTZ.ORG/)/ ORGANIZATION FILES (HTTPS://KPTZ.ORG/KPTZ-ORGANIZATION-FILES/)/ CONTACT US (HTTPS://KPTZ.ORG/CONTACT/)  (HTTPS://WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/KPTZRADIOPORTTOWNSEND) Donate Now (https://kptz.org/donate/) Radio Connects Us All! Listen Live! FA.ll- UqT (4/ r*t tA6/et/ l/,47/r€e< WWNtcfrU f.VAil,{g vNeq\4,t!i{ NA}.lg q?Jw t u^L TLLa@{ o#fr ?r**n cr+Ep. @,AI [AfrfiCNIA Nif.lVF izfct&tp€a{ WGffiFN frir<#, wAX tti€W FiNf.\taPlNNlP a(L(ffii-3€h Fa/+tafsl11i*e?e\tNw?$-11w€ wwleI ?44€ wt+ ?% tww?e wwzl FlrzgTttaGN' TAot-gYz- Wtt kxlJ ft/AZEr-.|rlUl- tee,lt(WW\ @)WeF-n 6i!+r,bN f.4FftrNloA nqlPL.lUM raA€c+r*(uM a.J/wM l4/fraN^ NaaVEA ?+1oO. /\,trY,t?qfi TLr-UH Fltoe. e(W)\nrc VYErrA 4u?o?1!(q iq'6'r^n1T6s uvt'uz6l c+r*zlA aAw\ reJT1rs UNEDO w1S D,%r/rNl{ qqN< ForS;*t WsW\ W NUTlSAd..{n 7,*\P&Nu9 ffilctN. f'fEAcAt\fit#\ 4€3{lo1ttu 5'Jtu..rA pnaf,sr TfiJFst FtD€+ €AllZr.JrNEu M v/aqNtuM Pg}lrF L{ #lvlWaJS tW"b* ?{A?,9,J5 QE(U\A F{JEl-Ps €pp15 %HP/sg ?nrz:ttft4A:s ?ffi f,nq\tztltN6Utr-r |Ptzvtvtts Dtsu.aj\Dg qr6Wtn<ry| coEN\t rs q'a-oNt, fr#^, r&q#h earust44ts a a a a a a o wtLD UW2 wafiYxwfr 7aP gLfrr?W,PeY ?JEffi+I 7ilAdw(ry ' It+ttPwwq gfiP 4119rq3ttff1 CWAN 6?rAY ftP{teffi ?WINO Wet^WP @ws/1 qNopw 1r)$'Vq?44 Ntttawv+ CN r^JtUrt,l.J qFffi"'Aciffps A-AE tnNLcEK a,u6 mYefc +?tffirs €4qX W?+dA €/Ad,lx e:u@'1voly4 caeY$ corNu1-r\ An^c\o-'-aln-ir,f A ur.i [o \. a a o a a o a a a o a a a lz7+EG1gl o a aa a a o a e a a a c o a a a a o a a a a o a a a a a o a a -._ 4.- t., aaJ Ctt a o a a a t a o a i.r I L:, l; i., t-- :j 1,: vtJ ;tJ :-. \ ,v UqT F ia,Nll4Al- Nr$dEAtu$,cl.t NAI/F zl7 l+15 1611 ls l1 I rol il | I wv& r(3 c*$s1et riR alTffi 47Fgt- *rp= plNl= tt v\ r,/ i lt\U fr;wfsve* f\€NaFslt Mg€ 6/111915 ?tcea qffq+€t€ls PlNtJ9 A\nffih TfirUA fuffih l=t{*+, ffiIe?ffi1\tt/t NATTW MAIA?E\\ A!i\st,t+ H,PA FElxtNUt uq1turi F.lNuS Ei.4n€aNlailA Pvfrus Ffi*' AreFL/{.lcfftqz AJ{UA)A Fri+il.4 1u9 RrFf,f+1r'NA <#E7cu9 WWtl OME€G(J.TJ LA(4,* qAil?, |l a a a a a a O F ia a a a a a a a ; '.4- l'= a t a a a- a a \AffiR{ iA4LOcF I4APFCNA WnPR crcN F6h ATaT clieFp'f qMfrE ; #itffiFFY c#^p6 | i-i7{urfticr+l @'l [4'(418 d(tsrt A wra'\/ al.j' l-' i 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 1/12 (/) Friday, June 16, 2023 (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/delivery/cl.php? bannerid=354&zoneid=13&sig=0cdf97a7e59642cf62edbe7c380c727d5f7b8c67884534032bfb94af8698a175&oadest=https% 3A%2F%2Fwww.ptleader.com%2Fmarketplace%2F) MAIN MENU  You have 1 free item remaining before a subscription is required. Subscribe now! (/subscribe/?town_id=0&lcid=70162) | Log in (/login.html) Native oaks to stretch sky wardonce more  Log in (/login.html)Subscribe (/subscribe/) 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 2/12 Local couple hopes to see trees thrive again at Kah Tai Posted Monday, July 20, 2020 8:00 am Brennan LaBrie blabrie@ptleader.com (mailto:blabrie@ptleader.com ) Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park may be characterized by its tall, swaying Lombardy Poplar trees, but in the future, a tree indigenous to Port Townsend will be joining them in the park’s skyline. A group of local environmentalists hopes that the return of the Garry oak tree will also mean the return of native plants and animals who have lost their local habitats over time. n 2018, a team of volunteers led by Rick and Debbie Jahnke planted more than 40 tree saplings on a 1-acre property on the north shore of Kah Tai Lagoon, most of them Garry oaks. The land, which they acquired in 2015, was previously a horse and dairy farm, but had become overgrown over the years with blackberry bushes and other invasive plants. The property was one of the few privately owned parcels surrounding the lagoon that was not sold or donated to the city of Port Townsend and other government bodies when the park was created in 1981. When the property owners were (/uploads/original/20200720-082148-Oaks.jpg) Debbie Jahnke stands by one of the fourty-plus trees planted by her and her husband Rick, along with a team of volunteers, on their property on the north shore of Kah Tai Lagoon in 2018. This small maple was planted to complement the many indigenous Garry oaks planted by the Jahnkes in order to benefit the local ecosystem. LEADER PHOTO BY BRENNAN LABRIE 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 3/12 nally willing to sell decades later, the Jahnkes pounced on the opportunity to help preserve the lagoon’s north shore, the park’s most protected shoreline due to its status as the best nesting habitat in the park. “We’re latecomers,” Debbie Jahnke said. “We didn’t get to participate in the creation of the park, but we did get to add something in in the end.” The couple intends to hold the parcel until the city submits a grant proposal to park improvements, at which point they will donate it for use as a match toward that grant. The choice of saplings was very purposeful, Rick Jahnke said. Garry oaks are a keystone species, meaning that they serve as an “anchor” for hundreds of indigenous plant, animal and insect species. Most importantly, Garry oaks, also known as the Oregon oak or the Oregon white oak, are the only truly ndigenous oak to the area. He reckons that if a non-native oak could support 10 species of birds, a Garry oak could support about 500. Before European settlement in the Puget Sound, oak savannas characterized by distanced oaks and native grasses and owers were plentiful. Oak Harbor and Oak Bay, for example, were named by European explorers for their oak groves. The area where Kah Tai now sits may have also been an oak savanna at one point in time, Debbie Jahnke said. Under white settlement, these oaks began to disappear. The trees do not fare well in competitive environments, and are easily dominated by fast-growing Douglas rs in the struggle for space and sunlight. Local indigenous peoples would conduct periodic burnings to clear such competitors to the oaks, whose great canopies would provide shade for plants such as camas, which served many essential purposes in their communities. The res could not damage the oak’s re-resistant bark, and instead would allow them the room to thrive. These burns created many prairies and meadows in the region that still exist today, according to Rob Harbour, a volunteer caretaker of the grove. “We have many plant and animal species that are now endangered because of the loss of the Garry oak savannas that we used to have,” Jahnke said. The park’s plentiful poplar population may be nice to look at, but they are, as she put it, “short-lived, brittle, and have a branching structure that isn’t all that conducive to perching and nesting.” Some native species, such as Oregon grape and the purple-owering Brodiaea coronaria, have returned to the property after years of being smothered by Himalayan blackberry bushes. The Jahnkes, as well as their fellow volunteers, are always ghting back the invasive blackberries, Scotch broom, and poison hemlock that continuously spread across the meadow and seeks to smother the small trees. Deer are also a threat, and the team has moved from chicken wire to goat wire to protect the saplings. The Jahnkes complemented the oaks with maples, pines, and other smaller trees that will not out-shade the slow- growing oaks in their maturity. However, for the time being the 40-plus trees are planted in rather close proximity to each other. Why? “We didn’t expect them all to survive,” Jahnke said, adding that despite their current success, some of these saplings are sure to die at some point while others thrive. This is not the rst experience the couple has with preserving Kah Tai. Over the past decade, they have been nstrumental in the effort to preserve the park against efforts to develop it. In 2010, just two years after the couple moved full-time to Port Townsend from Savannah, Georgia, the company Make Waves announced plans to build a large aquatic center on a section of the park owned by the Port of Port Townsend. 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 4/12 When the park was created in 1981, the Port, city, PUD, county and individual landowners all got partial ownership, and in 2010 the Port’s lease on a large portion of the park was up. According to Rick Jahnke, the grant that created the park, from the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund via the National Park Service, protected the park in perpetuity as a wildlife habitat with compatible passive recreation. In addition, the Port may have the lease on their section of the park, but they had signed over the land use to the city. Ofcial records of this information, however, could not be found in the city or Port’s ofces, and only partially in those of the NPS due to a re, Rick Jahnke said. So, he and Debbie got to work nding those documents. They were both career oceanographers at the University of Georgia Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, and so this deep digging was nothing new to them. “It was just another research project,” Debbie Jahnke said. “You leave what you do for a living and you still want to do it. We did academic research for 30 years so when we retired, looking at documents was nothing new and following trails was nothing new.” They were successful in their mission. In 2017 — the aquatic center project long since abandoned — the nal title was recorded at the Jefferson County Courthouse. The Washington State Recreation and Conservation Ofce and the city of Port Townsend afrmed the park’s designation as a wildlife habitat, clearing the path for projects such as the oak grove. Rick Jahnke noted that, since the park sits at or below sea level, it’s not a wise place for the city to develop. It could, however, serve the city as a catchment basin for the oods stemming from rising sea levels. “Not developing this was a really smart idea, because this could be a really important, fundamental, natural facility for the city to combat at least part of the sea level rise issues that they’re gonna be confronting in the next decade or two,” Jahnke said. Kah Tai’s original 1981 design involved cutting down some of the poplars and adding groves of native trees such as oaks, a plan that never came to light due to disagreements in vision for the park’s future. Many people advocated for the development of large strip malls in the park and clashed with supporters of planting ndigenous trees, he said. “A lot of what was planted was by cover of night, or by birds,” Debbie Jahnke added. However, renewed efforts to bring back the native oak savannas are taking place across the Puget Sound, from Oak Harbor to Sequim. Local efforts include those at Froggy Bottoms and Discovery Bay Brewing. All of these projects have a similar goal: re-establish the native oak populations and in doing so bring back species of plants and animals that thrive in their shade. This shade might not become a reality for decades to come, however. “They’re amazingly slow-growing trees,” Harbour said. “It’s incredible. It takes a crazy person or someone special to plant these little babies. We’re all gonna be dead before these things are masterpieces.” Whether the Jahnkes are special or crazy in their endeavor, they knew what they got themselves into when they bought the property ve years ago. “You never plant a tree for yourself,” Debbie Jahnke said. “You plant it for the next generation, or, in the case of Garry oaks, two generations.” Comments 2 COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM PLEASE LOG IN TO COMMENT BY CLICKING HERE (/LOGIN.HTML?REFERER=%2FSTORIES%2FNATIVE-OAKS-TO- STRETCH-SKYWARD-ONCE-MORE%2C70162) 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 5/12  HarveyW Hats off to Rick and Debbie Jahnke. They are a usually under the radar asset to this community. They show how individuals can make a difference, different than what our local City Government power core envisions. Cases in point. The Jahnke's also donated money for a fence at a local dog park that City government could not come up with. Case in point. The 1.2 million dollar carbon heavy, monument to ego, visitor center "park". Far over priced and the opposite of Port Townsend's ofcial carbon reduction policy. It had no public input. It was the scene of the unveiling of John Mauro, when he became the new City Manager. He came from Aukland where he was Sustainability Ofcer. Whatever that entailed. I wish for just a moment I could hear what he was really thinking that day as he smiled at everyone and spouted Mauroismx. And what is he really thinking now. As the new tool in the City Shed. The multi purpose gravel area that was concreted over had a history of multi use. Planting some trees around it would have honored so much. No public input. Your appointed mayor and No Term Limit Council leave another legacy. The Jahnke's and others leave theirs. WEDNESDAY, JULY 22, 2020 REPORT THIS (/REPORT_ITEM.HTML?SUB_ID=70162&COMMENT_ID=2343&REFERRING_URL=%2FSTORIES%2FNATIVE- OAKS-TO-STRETCH-SKYWARD-ONCE-MORE%2C70162)  HarveyW Quick correction typo. Mauroismx is of course Mauroisms. Quick plug. Term Limits on Council. Elected not appointed Mayor. I nominate the Jahnkes as Co Mayors. Wake the hell up reader. WEDNESDAY, JULY 22, 2020 REPORT THIS (/REPORT_ITEM.HTML?SUB_ID=70162&COMMENT_ID=2344&REFERRING_URL=%2FSTORIES%2FNATIVE- OAKS-TO-STRETCH-SKYWARD-ONCE-MORE%2C70162) 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 6/12 OTHER ITEMS THAT MAY INTEREST YOU New member joins Port Townsend School Board (/stories/new-member-joins-port-townsend-chool-board,122514) Quilcene to hire interim district superintendent (/stories/quilcene-to-hire-interim-district-uperintendent,122513) County commissioners approve new park fees (/stories/county-commissioners-approve-new- park-fees,122512) ond farewells (/stories/fond-farewells,122498) 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 7/12 (/stories/pt-leader-2023-0614,122349) PT Leader-2023-0614 (/stories/pt-leader-2023-0614,122349) View this issue (/stories/pt-leader-2023-0614,122349) Browse other issues (/eeditions/) 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 8/12 /stories/new-member-joins-port- townsend-school-board,122514) /stories/quilcene-to-hire-interim- district-superintendent,122513) /stories/county-commissioners- approve-new-park-fees,122512) More  (/news/ (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=481&zoneid=1&sig=96531745a25d4b1667fcab 3e9885eef3c495b6ae39ce721af5f6dfc8f8d09fa4&oadest= https%3A%2F%2Fptleader.creativecirclemedia.com%2Fs ubscribe%2F) LATEST NEWS New member joins Port Townsend School Board (/stories/new-member-joins-port-townsend-school- board,122514) The Port Townsend School Board appointed Simon Little to a vacant position on the board at its last meeting. The decision came after the board interviewed three applicants for the post, … Quilcene to hire interim district superintendent (/stories/quilcene-to-hire-interim-district- superintendent,122513) The Quilcene School Board has voted to extend to a job offer to Ron Moag to take over as the school district’s interim superintendent. Moag has accepted the position, current … County commissioners approve new park fees (/stories/county-commissioners-approve-new-park- fees,122512) Jefferson County commissioners approved an updated fee schedule for use of parks and recreation facilities at their meeting Monday. The new fees will go into place immediately, ofcials said. … 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 9/12 (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=545&zoneid=1&sig=b0c5261aea5f0b8a3d372d 550d376d27c97f36b94ab8378e0f7e52de82253c6a&oades t=https%3A%2F%2Fptleader.creativecirclemedia.com%2 Fsubscribe%2F) 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 10/12 (/stories/pt-leader_getaway_2023_web,120332) PT Leader_Getaway_2023_WEB (/stories/pt-leader_getaway_2023_web,120332) View this issue (/stories/pt-leader_getaway_2023_web,120332) Browse other issues (/specialsections/) 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 11/12 (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=701&zoneid=1&sig=25343ccb994bf4c8533443 4f6ab4db0a0754cf4fb987ac2e125b7e8dce8db765&oades t=https%3A%2F%2Fkristinmanwaring.com%2Findividua l-family%2Fhealth-insurance-plans%2F) (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=704&zoneid=1&sig=1adfd0d6ede369eb82f8c4 9875f74573737bedf0a96a900ec3461914bb2a725c&oades t=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chimacumcorner.com) (/) 226 Adams Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 1-360-385-2900 (tel:1-360-385-2900) SECTIONS NEWS (/NEWS/INDEX.HTML) ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT (/ARTS-ENTERTAINMENT/) SPORTS (/SPORTS/) CALENDAR (/CALENDAR/) OPINION (/OPINION/) OBITUARIES (/OBITUARIES/) CLASSIFIEDS (/CLASSIFIEDS/) 6/16/23, 6:52 AM Native oaks to stretch skyward once more | Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/stories/native-oaks-to-stretch-skyward-once-more,70162 12/12 SUBMIT NEWS (/FORMS/SUBMIT-NEWS/) SPECIAL SECTIONS (/SPECIALSECTIONS/) WEB EXTRAS SERVICES About Us (/about/) Contact Us (/contact/) Report News (/forms/submit-news/) Subscribe (/subscribe/) Where to nd the Leader (/racks-and-dealers/) CONNECT WITH US  (https://www.facebook.com/ptleader)  (https://twitter.com/ptleader)  (https://www.youtube.com/user/PortTownsendLeader) © C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 P O RT T O W N S E N D L E A D E R | T E R M S O F U S E (/T E R M S -O F -U S E /) / P R I VAC Y P O L I C Y (/P R I VAC Y-P O L I C Y /) | P O W E R E D B Y C R E AT I V E C I R C L E M E D I A S O L U T I O N S (H T T P ://C R E AT I V E C I R C L E M E D I A .C O M ) Katy Bigelow 206.351.1375 arboristkaty@gmail.com March 9, 2022 Port of Port Townsend ATTN: Eron Berg Executive Director 2710 Jefferson St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: Poplar Trees - Sims Way, Port of Port Townsend Dear Mr. Berg and the Port of Port Townsend: I was asked by Mr. Berg on behalf of the Port of Port Townsend to provide my professional opinion of a row of poplar trees growing south of Sims Way, north of Port property. The Scope of Work for this project included the following tasks: ●Site visit - tree and site data collection for approximately 65 Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra ‘Italica’) trees lining the north property line of the Port of Port Townsend property. ●Reporting - provide a written report including but not limited to the general health of the trees, comments on the tree retention potential of the trees during undergrounding of transmission wires and a discussion of how expanding the port property (including grading and fill practices) could impact the trees. Methods To evaluate the trees addressed in this report I combined my field experience and education with current accepted practices as defined by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). The tools I used to make this assessment were limited to binoculars, compass, mallet, diameter tape and laser pointer unless otherwise noted. A visual tree assessment and other methods are only conclusive for the day of inspection and do not guarantee that conditions will remain the same in the future. Background, Observations and Discussion I previously inspected five of these trees in 2013 when roots were discovered to be causing extensive damage to the foundation and siding of the Port Townsend Brewery building at the corner of 10th St. and Sims Way. This report detailed my determinations that the five trees posed a low risk of large or total trunk failure, a moderate risk of branches or upper trunks Tree Assessment – Port of PT Sims Way, Port Townsend, WA 3-7-2022 failing and discussed the more major issue and harder to control issue of root intrusion causing infrastructure damage as had already occurred. In this report I also provided recommendations for those trees management. I also suggested that a longer term management plan be decided for the rest of the row of trees of which these were a part of as it was overall an aging population causing problems for other buildings as well as continued maintenance for PUD. Management decisions were to be based on the potential for property damage (both to Port property, PUD transmission lines and to pedestrians and vehicles traveling on Sims Way). Map 1 In February 2022 I was asked by Mr. Berg and the Port to return for an assessment of the entire stand of trees bordering their north property line. On March 8, 2022 I met with Mr. Berg, Executive DIrector at the Port, Kevin Streett, General Manager from PUD, Matt Klontz, Chief Engineer with the Port and Steve King, Port Townsend Public Works Director. Together they are coordinating to potentially redevelop the area close to and in which the row of approximately 65 trees stand, mainly within the Port property and PUD transmission line Right-of-Way. During this meeting we discussed the desire by PUD to underground transmission lines that currently stand south of the row of trees, and the desire of the Port to expand their boatyard property north to incorporate currently undeveloped land south of the trees. These areas and the trees are shown in Map 1. Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 2 of 7 Tree Assessment – Port of PT Sims Way, Port Townsend, WA 3-7-2022 During our meeting I was asked to assess: 1.current tree health including comments on the trees age and architectures, 2.if there were any alternatives to PUD undergrounding the transmission lines without cutting the trees down and; 3.root issues relative to property expansion closer to the trees- specifically if adding fill to expand and grade the port property to the north towards the trees would negatively affect the trees. 1 - Current Tree Observations/Discussion During my site visit I conducted Level 1 tree assessments and some Level 2 assessments of specific trees growing in the row of trees. All levels of assessment are explained in an attachment to this report. All of the poplars I assessed are similar in age and structures. As observed in 2013, during my most recent assessment I did not observe any remarkable defects in the upper canopies of any of the trees. The trunks grow with typical architecture for the species and sounding indicated that most of the lower trunk areas of most of the trees have internal basal trunk rot. A few of the trees have had pieces fall or cut off and a majority have been pruned (sheared) on their south sides in an attempt to keep foliage from touching the lines. Mr. Streett informed me that over the years foliage has burned when touching lines which has caused a need for repeat and frequent pruning maintenance. As has been well documented by Port Townsend historians, the trees are growing in a mix of sand, till and dredging fill. Most of the roots from these trees are likely growing in the top two feet of soil. Many surface roots have mower damage and clumps of new shoots have grown from roots in many areas along the stretch of grass within the Port property as well as extending well into the developed portions of the boatyard. I only observed three trees that had dead trunks in which bird nesting holes had been formed. I did not see any birds entering the nest trunks or perching in the trees during my site visit. Overall due to their location between a busy work area, transmission lines and a busy road I would consider this row of trees to provide poor placement for wildlife habitat using this tree species. As a mono-species vegetation buffer, its function as wildlife habitat is low. At the time of my assessment, branches or small trunks breaking out from the upper and mid canopies were still the most likely pieces to fail. I did not observe any large trunks or bases of trunks with a high potential to fail onto a target. However, failing pieces have many targets that are frequently and less frequently occupied – vehicle and pedestrian traffic, transmission lines, privately owned boats and often occupied buildings. While there is a moderate risk of these parts breaking out in normal conditions, this area of Port Townsend is known to have higher than average wind speeds during storms and gusty conditions and can slightly increase risk in increased weather conditions. Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 3 of 7 Tree Assessment – Port of PT Sims Way, Port Townsend, WA 3-7-2022 While the trees overall pose a moderate risk to targets, it is my professional opinion that the more likely scenario of continued damage will occur from root spread to aging asphalt, concrete and buildings that are close to the north developed area. Italian poplar trees are commonly known as relatively short safe useful life expectancy before starting to fall apart structurally with aggressive roots. Suckers quickly and abundantly grow along and from roots paths or near the base of trees that have been cut down close to grade level. In fact three low in height stumps remaining from recently cut down poplars on the north end of this row near a power box have started to vigorously regrow. In this respect they provide a high priority maintenance need of mowing new sprouts to keep new trees from emerging and repairing infrastructure where roots are damaging port and building property. 2- PUD Observations/Discussion Mr. Streett mentioned the desire of PUD to underground the transmission lines. Normally this process involves daylighting a trench that is approximately six feet deep and a few feet wide with heavy machinery. While other techniques are available for installing underground utilities they are potentially extremely costly to implement along such a long area of lines. Although exploring the other undergrounding options have not been totally taken off the table, the fact remains that the area needed to be disturbed (dug up) for these lines would likely have to be in a location that would be close enough to the trees to require the disturbance and removal of a significant amount of most of each individual trees critical root zone on the windward side of the trees. Because the trees are already mainly ending their safe useful life, this kind of disturbance would likely cause many of the trees to rapidly decline and/or also become unstable. Topping the trees to reduce their heights should not be considered an option strategy to reduce maintenance needs or in conjunction with any other redevelopment activities. Topping is a practice that for this species would significantly increase maintenance needs as each tree topped would regrow vigorously from the topped area of the tree. This practice also could cause some unspecified dieback of critical roots and large cuts in trunks which could stress the trees, cause large wounded areas and potentially cause instability. 3 - Root issues relative to property expansion The Port desires to expand the boatyard property to incorporate a long length of unused property to their property line from the existing fence line. The assumed property line is extremely close to or incorporating the trunks of all of the trees in the row I assessed. Adding fill soil or grading activities would have to occur to match the current boatyard grade. ●Adding fill between the area of the existing fence to any tree trunk would likely and quickly cause the demise of these trees. ●Adding fill to within ten feet of the tree could cause a large percentage of roots on the windward side of each tree to be smothered and new roots would be encouraged to Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 4 of 7 Tree Assessment – Port of PT Sims Way, Port Townsend, WA 3-7-2022 grow up into the newly developed property unless a long and deep retaining wall buffered by root barrier was built. This action could hasten the death of these trees and potentially cause instability. ●Only extending the shipyard a few feet north would not reasonably add space for new boats in the shipyard but would protect the trees. ●Even if the trees were retained, regrowing roots would likely continue to impact infrastructure, paving and buildings over the long term. Summary If no work occurs to underground transmission lines or to expand the boatyard, the poplar trees will likely stand with low but increasing risk to many targets. Ongoing and frequent maintenance would need to continue to prune canopies away from transmission lines, mow emerging root suckers and fix infrastructure damaged from root intrusion. ●It is important to understand that whether or not the boatyard is expanded or not, the trees remain within range of many targets and are at an age where they will start posing greater risk to these targets. It should be expected that falling tree parts and extending roots would increasingly pose risk and continue to cause infrastructure damage. If transmission lines are undergrounded but no redevelopment of the boatyard occurs, no matter where the placement of the underground lines occurred, damage to the critical root structures of the trees will likely cause decline and in some cases instability of entire trees. If the boatyard is expanded to the property line (even if the lines are not undergrounded) fill up to within ten feet of the trees could cause the trees to decline quicker than normal from root smothering. Existing power poles would have to be incorporated into the new boatyard design. If the trees are removed, a wider range of trees, shrubs and groundcovers can be replanted in their stead offering in the long term a better functioning area for wildlife of more types than are attracted to the poplar stand. Portions of trunks from tree removal may also be able to be used to enhance the area offering an even more diverse area for the future. Thank you very much for calling me for your arboricultural concerns. Katy Bigelow Board Master Certified Arborist PNW ISA member # PN-6039B Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Registered Consulting Arborist® # 490 Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 5 of 7 Tree Assessment – Port of PT Sims Way, Port Townsend, WA 3-7-2022 Levels of Tree Assessment LEVEL 1:The Level 1 assessment is a visual assessment from a specified perspective of an individual tree or a population of trees near specified targets to identify obvious defects or specified conditions. A limited visual assessment typically focuses on identifying trees with an imminent and/or probable likelihood of failure. Limited visual assessments are the fastest but least thorough means of assessment and are intended primarily for large populations of trees. LEVEL 2:This is a basic assessment completing a detailed visual inspection of a tree and surrounding site, and a synthesis of the information collected. This assessment requires that a tree risk assessor walk completely around the tree—looking at the site, buttress roots, trunk, and branches. A basic assessment may include the use of simple tools to gain additional information about the tree or defects. Basic is the standard assessment that is performed by arborists in response to a client’s request for tree risk assessment. Simple tools may be used for measuring the tree and acquiring more information about the tree or defects. However, the use of these tools is not mandatory unless specified in the Scope of Work. LEVEL 3: Advanced assessments are performed to provide detailed information about specific tree parts, defects, targets, or site conditions. They are usually conducted in conjunction with or after a basic assessment if the tree risk assessor needs additional information and the client approves the additional service. Specialized equipment, data collection and analysis, and/or expertise are usually required for advanced assessments. These assessments are therefore generally more time intensive and more expensive. Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 6 of 7 Tree Assessment – Port of PT Sims Way, Port Townsend, WA 3-7-2022 Assumptions, Limiting Conditions and General Waiver I, Katy Bigelow, certify that: I have personally inspected the tree(s) and or the property referred to in this report; I have no current or prospective financial or other interest in the vegetation or the property which is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias in favor of or against any of the involved parties or their respective position(s), if any; The analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are the product of my independent professional judgment and based on current scientific procedures and facts, and the foregoing report was prepared according to commercially reasonable and generally accepted arboricultural standards and practices for the Pacific Northwest and Puget Sound areas; The information included in this report covers only those trees that were examined and reflects the condition of the trees as of the time and date of inspection; This report and the opinions expressed herein are not intended, nor should they be construed, as any type of warranty or guarantee regarding the condition of the subject trees in the future; Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (“CC&Rs”) may restrict the number, type and height of vegetation on the subject property, and I have made no investigation regarding whether the property is subject to such CC&Rs; and To the best of my knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this report are true and correct and information provided by others is assumed to be true and correct. I am not an attorney or engineer. This report does not cover these areas of expertise and represents advice only of arboricultural nature. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, it is specifically understood that nothing contained in this report is intended as legal advice, or advice or opinions regarding soil stability or zoning laws, and this report should not be relied upon to take the place of such advice. Katy Bigelow Board Master Certified Arborist PNW ISA member # PN-6039B Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Registered Consulting Arborist® # 490 Prepared by Katy Bigelow Page 7 of 7 6/16/23, 6:49 AM Port Townsend community fights for iconic trees facing removal | king5.com https://www.king5.com/video/news/local/port-townsend-community-fights-for-iconic-trees-facing-removal/281-ed6fee3f-568d-46e7-a9d2-9fec6bf59f8a 1/1 See Nissan's New EV Crossover Nissan's New EV Crossover SUV as Arrived. Search The New Ariya & See What It Has To Oer favoritesearches.com Open 130 towering poplars have greeted people as they entered the city for generations. Author: king5.com Published: 4:15 PM PDT June 20, 2022 Updated: 4:15 PM PDT June 20, 2022 Port Townsend community fights for iconic trees facing removal  6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2C…1/14 (/) Friday, June 16, 2023 (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/www/delivery/cl.php? bannerid=354&zoneid=13&sig=0cdf97a7e59642cf62edbe7c380c727d5f7b8c67884534032bfb94af8698a175&oadest=https% 3A%2F%2Fww w.ptleader.com%2Fmarketplace%2F) MAIN MENU Search Results for 'poplars' 38 results total, viewing 21 - 38 (/stories/lets- avoid- appearance-of- strip-mall- entry way-to-pt- letter-to-the- editor,78774?) Let’s avoid appearance of strip mall entry way to PT | Letter to the editor (/stories/lets- avoid-appearance-of-strip-mall-entry way-to- pt-letter-to-the-editor,78774?) Port Townsend City Manager John Mauro will seek counsel from the Parks Board, again, and selected stakeholders concerning the Sims Way project right-of-way design - after the poplars are cut … more (/stories/lets-avoid-appearance-of- strip-mall-entryway-to-pt-letter-to-the-editor,78774?) 12/15/21  Log in (/login.html)Subscribe (/subscribe/) 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2C…2/14 Entering the gateway together | Guest Viewpoint (/stories/entering-the-gateway-together-guest- viewpoint,78772?) Occasionally we’re forced to walk hastily through a doorway when we’re not ready or willing. Staring down complex issues of inequity, climate change or COVID, it’s hard … more (/stories/entering-the-gateway-together-guest-viewpoint,78772?) Eron Berg, Kevin Streett, Mark McCauley and John Mauro | 12/15/21 (/stories/removin g-trees-is- another-bad- decision-letter- to-the- editor,78723?) Removing trees is another bad decision | Letter to the editor (/stories/removing-trees- is-another-bad-decision-letter-to-the- editor,78723?) Why are beautiful, healthy trees being pulled out? Because the boatyard wants a little more room! At public expense, of course! Do you recall the huge Columbus Day storm many years ago? Blew … more (/stories/removing-trees-is-another- bad-decision-letter-to-the-editor,78723?) 12/10/21 (/stories/please- listen-to-the- citizens-its-our- town-letter-to- the- editor,78721?) Please listen to the citizens - it’s our town | Letter to the editor (/stories/please-listen-to- the-citizens-its-our-town-letter-to-the- editor,78721?) It is very wrong for many reasons to remove the poplar trees on Sims Way. Climate change is a most pressing issue. We should not be cutting down trees. We need them for carbon sequestration, … more (/stories/please-listen-to-the- citizens-its-our-town-letter-to-the-editor,78721?) 12/10/21 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2C…3/14 (/stories/a-brief- history-and- future-of-kah-tai- sims-way- corridor-guest- viewpoint,78626?) A brief history and future of Kah Tai, Sims Way corridor | Guest Viewpoint (/stories/a- brief-history-and-future-of-kah-tai-sims- way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626?) In 1963, the Army Corps of Engineers dredged 231,000 cubic yards of nearshore sand to expand the Port Townsend Boat Haven and dumped it into what had been a beautiful, tidally ushed estuary called … more (/stories/a-brief-history-and- future-of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626?) Deborah B. Jahnke | 12/3/21 | 5 comments (/stories/a-brief-history-and-future- of-kah-tai-sims-way-corridor-guest-viewpoint,78626?#comments) (/stories/a-rhody- way-welcome-to- port-townsend- letter-to-the- editor,78625?) A Rhody Way welcome to Port Townsend | Letter to the editor (/stories/a-rhody-way- welcome-to-port-townsend-letter-to-the- editor,78625?) It would be nice to see a more graceful ending to the signature lines of Lombardy Poplars that have enhanced a crucial span of the welcome to Port Townsend. If they go, something grand should replace … more (/stories/a-rhody-way- welcome-to-port-townsend-letter-to-the-editor,78625?) 12/3/21 (/stories/ofcials- should-stop- putting-us- through-hell- letter-to-the- editor,78375?) Ofcials should stop putting us through hell | Letter to the editor (/stories/ofcials-should- stop-putting-us-through-hell-letter-to-the- editor,78375?) To our dear representatives, congratulations. You have proposed to destroy one of the things that makes Port Townsend unique. The wide boulevard graced by the tall poplars cannot be replaced with … more (/stories/ofcials-should-stop- putting-us-through-hell-letter-to-the-editor,78375?) 11/24/21 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2C…4/14 (/stories/county- oks-funding-for- pt-gateway- project-that- includes-removal- of-iconic-poplar- trees-on-sims- way,78249?) County OKs funding for PT gateway project that includes removal of iconic poplar trees on Sims Way (/stories/county-oks-funding- for-pt-gateway-project-that-includes- removal-of-iconic-poplar-trees-on-sims- way,78249?) Jefferson County commissioners approved a $1 million grant Monday that will help pay for an expansion of Boat Haven — as well as the logging of the iconic gauntlet of poplar … more (/stories/county-oks-funding-for-pt-gateway-project- that-includes-removal-of-iconic-poplar-trees-on-sims-way,78249?) Brian Kelly bkelly@ptleader.com (mailto:bkelly@ptleader.com) | 11/10/21 (/stories/controve rsy-continues- over-cutting- down-sims-way- poplar- trees,78104?) Controversy continues over cutting down Sims Way poplar trees (/stories/controversy- continues-over-cutting-down-sims-way- poplar-trees,78104?) Opposition continues to swirl around a controversial plan to cut down the scenic gauntlet of poplar trees that line the gateway to downtown Port Townsend. Port Townsend City … more (/stories/controversy-continues-over-cutting-down- sims-way-poplar-trees,78104?) Brian Kelly bkelly@ptleader.com (mailto:bkelly@ptleader.com) | 11/5/21 | 1 comment (/stories/controversy-continues-over-cutting-down-sims-way-poplar- trees,78104?#comments) 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2C…5/14 (/stories/just- spend-money-on- housing-people- letter-to-the- editor,77917?) Just spend money on housing people | Letter to the editor (/stories/just-spend-money-on- housing-people-letter-to-the-editor,77917?) I’m more confounded and confused with every issue of The Leader I read. Somewhere in the mix we buy 30 acres at more than $600,000 for a homeless encampment that has no running water or real … more (/stories/just-spend- money-on-housing-people-letter-to-the-editor,77917?) 10/26/21 (/stories/turn-to- local-experts-to- tackle-tree- project-letter-to- the- editor,77766?) Turn to local experts to tackle tree project | Letter to the editor (/stories/turn-to-local- experts-to-tackle-tree-project-letter-to-the- editor,77766?) As a tree lover and professional landscaper, I sadly support the decision to remove the Sims Way poplars due to their age and condition. Whoever chose that species was clearly not … more (/stories/turn-to-local-experts-to-tackle- tree-project-letter-to-the-editor,77766?) 10/13/21 (/stories/poplar- trees-are-a- hazard-and-need- to-go-letter-to- the- editor,77762?) Poplar trees are a hazard and need to go | Letter to the editor (/stories/poplar-trees- are-a-hazard-and-need-to-go-letter-to-the- editor,77762?) Poplar trees are a hazard and need to go I am all for removing the poplars. They are a safety hazard to the community. The shore pines suggested by Forest Shomer, however, are not the … more (/stories/poplar-trees-are-a-hazard-and- need-to-go-letter-to-the-editor,77762?) 10/13/21 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2C…6/14 (/stories/city- council-should- be-focused-on- housing-letter-to- the- editor,77659?) City council should be focused on housing | Letter to the editor (/stories/city-council- should-be-focused-on-housing-letter-to-the- editor,77659?) First things rst? This idea of taking down the poplars along Sims Way is frustrating. The almost million dollar project, when we are so in need of affordable housing that supports our local … more (/stories/city-council-should- be-focused-on-housing-letter-to-the-editor,77659?) 10/6/21 (/stories/dont- cut-down-port- townsends- poplars-letter-to- the- editor,77656?) Don’t cut down Port Townsend’s poplars | Letter to the editor (/stories/dont-cut-down- port-townsends-poplars-letter-to-the- editor,77656?) This is the best season to admire and appreciate the beauty of changing colors. When I lived in Vermont people would pull over and just stare at the trees. We called them leaf peepers but … more (/stories/dont-cut-down-port-townsends- poplars-letter-to-the-editor,77656?) 10/6/21 (/stories/controve rsial-sims-way- tree-removal- plan- continues,77571?) Controversial Sims Way tree removal plan continues (/stories/controversial-sims-way- tree-removal-plan-continues,77571?) The iconic Lombardy poplar trees lining both sides of Sims Way near the entryway to downtown Port Townsend are likely to be removed in the near future, after city, port, and Jefferson County Public … more (/stories/controversial-sims- way-tree-removal-plan-continues,77571?) James Sloan jsloan@ptleader.com (mailto:jsloan@ptleader.com) | 9/29/21 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2C…7/14 (/stories/tree- removal-is-great- idea-long- overdue-letter-to- the- editor,77578?) Tree removal is great idea long overdue | Letter to the editor (/stories/tree-removal-is- great-idea-long-overdue-letter-to-the- editor,77578?) I applaud the city, county, and port for planning to remove the poplar trees along Sims Way. The poplars on Sims Way are the same age as those on the golf course. The golf course has already … more (/stories/tree-removal-is-great-idea-long- overdue-letter-to-the-editor,77578?) 9/29/21 (/stories/leave- the-poplar-trees- in-place-along- sims-way-letter- to-the- editor,77490?) Leave the poplar trees in place along Sims Way | Letter to the editor (/stories/leave-the- poplar-trees-in-place-along-sims-way-letter- to-the-editor,77490?) The Sims Way poplars are far more than an emotional experience. These trees rst and foremost create a spectacular corridor in all seasons with their structure and colors. Their fall show is … more (/stories/leave-the-poplar-trees-in-place- along-sims-way-letter-to-the-editor,77490?) 9/24/21 | 1 comment (/stories/leave-the-poplar-trees-in-place-along-sims- way-letter-to-the-editor,77490?#comments) 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2C…8/14 (/stories/ofcials- look-at- removing-poplar- tree-corridor- along-sims- way,77315?) Ofcials look at removing poplar tree corridor along Sims Way (/stories/ofcials- look-at-removing-poplar-tree-corridor- along-sims-way,77315?) Chainsaws may be coming to Port Townsend’s signature tunnel of trees entry way to town. Ofcials with the Jefferson County Public Utility District, city of Port Townsend, and Port of Port … more (/stories/ofcials-look-at-removing-poplar- tree-corridor-along-sims-way,77315?) Brian Kelly bkelly@ptleader.com (mailto:bkelly@ptleader.com) | 9/16/21 | 15 comments (/stories/ofcials-look-at-removing-poplar-tree-corridor-along-sims- way,77315?#comments) « Prev (? search_lter=poplars&page_size=20&search_lter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cph otos%2Cvideos%2Ceeditions%2Cspecialsections&page=1) | 1 (? search_lter=poplars&page_size=20&search_lter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cph otos%2Cvideos%2Ceeditions%2Cspecialsections&page=1) | 2 (? search_lter=poplars&page_size=20&search_lter_mode=and&sub_type=stories% 2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2Ceeditions%2Cspecialsections&page=2) Currently viewing stories posted within the past 2 years. For all older stories, please use our advanced search (/search.html?content_source=archive). 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2C…9/14 (/stories/pt-leader-2023-0614,122349) PT Leader-2023-0614 (/stories/pt-leader-2023-0614,122349) View this issue (/stories/pt-leader-2023-0614,122349) Browse other issues (/eeditions/) 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2…10/14 /stories/new-member-joins-port- townsend-school-board,122514) /stories/quilcene-to-hire-interim- district-superintendent,122513) /stories/county-commissioners- approve-new-park-fees,122512) More  (/news/ (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/ww w/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=543&zoneid=1&sig=e477e3e31f1d9550bfd325 8d7924c813cd0debdfc2736c2d5bb37b82f0e58895&oade st=https%3A%2F%2Fptleader.creativecirclemedia.com% 2Fsubscribe%2F) LATEST NEWS New member joins Port Townsend School Board (/stories/new-member-joins-port-townsend-school- board,122514) The Port Townsend School Board appointed Simon Little to a vacant position on the board at its last meeting. The decision came after the board interviewed three applicants for the post, … Quilcene to hire interim district superintendent (/stories/quilcene-to-hire-interim-district- superintendent,122513) The Quilcene School Board has voted to extend to a job offer to Ron Moag to take over as the school district’s interim superintendent. Moag has accepted the position, current … County commissioners approve new park fees (/stories/county-commissioners-approve-new-park- fees,122512) Jefferson County commissioners approved an updated fee schedule for use of parks and recreation facilities at their meeting Monday. The new fees will go into place immediately, ofcials said. … 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2…11/14 (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/ww w/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=481&zoneid=1&sig=96531745a25d4b1667fcab 3e9885eef3c495b6ae39ce721af5f6dfc8f8d09fa4&oadest= https%3A%2F%2Fptleader.creativecirclemedia.com%2Fs ubscribe%2F) 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2…12/14 (/stories/pt-leader_getaway_2023_web,120332) PT Leader_Getaway_2023_WEB (/stories/pt-leader_getaway_2023_web,120332) View this issue (/stories/pt-leader_getaway_2023_web,120332) Browse other issues (/specialsections/) 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2…13/14 (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/ww w/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=701&zoneid=1&sig=25343ccb994bf4c8533443 4f6ab4db0a0754cf4fb987ac2e125b7e8dce8db765&oades t=https%3A%2F%2Fkristinmanwaring.com%2Findividua l-family%2Fhealth-insurance-plans%2F) (https://ptleaderbanners.creativecirclemedia.com/ww w/ delivery/cl.php? bannerid=704&zoneid=1&sig=1adfd0d6ede369eb82f8c4 9875f74573737bedf0a96a900ec3461914bb2a725c&oades t=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chimacumcorner.com) (/) 226 Adams Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 1-360-385-2900 (tel:1-360-385-2900) SECTIONS NEWS (/NEWS/INDEX.HTML) ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT (/ARTS-ENTERTAINMENT/) SPORTS (/SPORTS/) CALENDAR (/CALENDAR/) OPINION (/OPINION/) OBITUARIES (/OBITUARIES/) CLASSIFIEDS (/CLASSIFIEDS/) 6/16/23, 6:53 AM Port Townsend Leader https://www.ptleader.com/browse.html?search_filter=poplars&page_size=12&search_filter_mode=and&sub_type=stories%2Cphotos%2Cvideos%2…14/14 SUBMIT NEWS (/FORMS/SUBMIT-NEWS/) SPECIAL SECTIONS (/SPECIALSECTIONS/) WEB EXTRAS SERVICES About Us (/about/) Contact Us (/contact/) Report News (/forms/submit-news/) Subscribe (/subscribe/) Where to nd the Leader (/racks-and-dealers/) CONNECT WITH US  (https://ww w.facebook.com/ptleader)  (https://twitter.com/ptleader)  (https://ww w.youtube.com/user/PortTownsendLeader) © C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 P O R T T O W N S E N D L E A D E R | T E R M S O F U S E (/T E R M S -O F -U S E /) / P R I VAC Y P O L I C Y (/P R I VA C Y- P O L I C Y /) | P O W E R E D B Y C R E AT I V E C I R C L E M E D I A S O L U T I O N S (H T T P ://C R E AT I V E C I R C L E M E D I A .C O M ) PARKS, RECREATION & TREE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING AGENDA August 24, 2021 | 4:30 p.m. | Virtual Meeting ****The State of Emergency declared by Governor Inslee temporarily prohibits in-person contacts with the public required by the Open Public Meetings Act and the Public Records Act. The May 29, 2020 Public Health Order by Jefferson County Health Officer Thomas Locke also states no in-person meetings are allowed. Participation will be by teleconference**** • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 489-143-707 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: (360) 390-5064 Ext. 3 access code: 177-060-048# • Submit public comment emails to be read aloud (up to three minutes per person) to: publiccomment@cityofpt.us I. Call to Order/Roll Call II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of April 27, 2021 Minutes IV. Public Comment (3 minutes per person) V. Old Business A. Mountain View Pickleball Court Proposal Revisions: (Steve and Pickleball Club) – 15 min. VI. New Business A. Poplar Trees Along Sims Way (Steve, PUD, and Port) – 30 min i. Presentation to be provided B. Gateway Park Landmark Tree (Steve) – 10 min C. Autumn Arbor Day Plan and Schedule (Chair Jahnke) – 5 min D. Trails - Standing agenda Item per new advisory board structure (No topic this meeting) VII. Staff update – Steve (15 minutes) A. Department update i. Banked Capacity – Passed by City Council ii. Pool – Transfer of Operations to YMCA iii. Parks – Haller Handrails, Skate Park, RCO visit iv. Trails – Adams Buggy v. City Work Plan – October 26th – City Attorney will attend vi. Board Comment Agenda Item B. Parks staffing update VIII. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: October 26, 2021 IX. Public Comment (3 minutes per person) and Board Comment (may include proposed agenda items for future meetings) X. Adjourn Parking Lot/Future Meetings Invasive pests (Chair Jahnke) PARKS, RECREATION & TREE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES Date: June 22, 2021 Time: 4:30 p.m. Location: City Hall (virtual) Members Present: Debbie Jahnke, Brenda McMillan, Jennifer Rotermund, Jim Todd , Sean Koomen (dropped off mtg due to technical problems), John Nowak Members Excused: None Members Absent: Staff Present: Public Works Director Steve King, Parks Lead Operator Bre Ganne, and Deputy City Clerk Haylie Clement Topic Motions/Recommendation/Action Approval of Agenda: The agenda was unanimously approved. Approval of Minutes: The minutes of April 24, 2021 were unanimously approved. Public Comment: There was none. Old Business: Banked Capacity Steve King provided an overview of the presentation provided to the City Council on 6/14/21. Steve emphasized that the project screening is challenging an d can be debated, and that consensus on project selection is not likely. Recognizing this, the action request is for support of using banked capacity to support the PROS Plan. Comments from the board illustrate concern over project selection and some disagreement with the recommended projects. Steve shared that these are great examples of how it is nearly impossible to get consensus over project selection as there are so many great projects. Steve also shared that providing water at the MTV Dog park is in our work plan in response to the comments about MTV Dog Park. Motion: Move to support levying banked capacity to support implementation of the PROS plan. The motion passed with 4 in favor and Jim Todd abstaining. Old Business: Smoking Ordinance. Public Works Director Steve King briefed the Board that the City Council took action to pass a no smoking ordinance in public parks to be consistent with Jeff. Co. Board of Health ordinance. No Action Old Business: Park Naming. Chair Jahnke provided an overview of the history of park naming. Staff will be forwarding park name approval to the City Council for “Speaker’s Corner”. Staff is sending a letter to the Master Gardeners concerning naming of Dahlia Park given the last names provided were not consistent with City policy and ordinances. No Action New Business: Letter of condolences and appreciation. Chair Jahnke described the history of Landmark trees and Beth Lorber submitting the first landmark tree at the corner of Pierce and Lawrence. Chair Jahnke asked for support to send a letter of condolences and appreciation to the family of Beth Lorber Board provided unanimous support. New Business: Landmark Tree proposed: Chair Jahnke asked the board for support for approaching the property owner concerning designation of a proposed conifer landmark tree in Uptown. No Action. The Board did provide consensus to move forward. New Business: Mountain View Pickleball and Dog Park Modifications. Steve King provided a presentation of proposed pickleball court development and expansion of the concrete slab at Mountain View as provided by the local Pickleball club. The proposal also includes some potential modifications to the fencing at the dog park. Public comment was provided by Michael Napolitano concerning impacts to the Dog Park and asked if there could be another configuration. Staff member Bre Ganne provided information on turf management indicating it is challenging to maintain without establishment of new turf and an irrigation system. James Dow, Mary Critchlow, Lynn Pierle, and Eric Seder of the pickleball club presented the benefits of pickleball and the proposed plan. Concern over impacts to the dog park and existing basketball court were raised by board members Jennifer Rotermund, Jim Todd, and John Nowak. Support by the board members was also provided. Staff will meet with the pickleball club and Michael Napolitano to gather additional information and return to the board for a follow-up with a plan that works for all. No Action. Trails: New standing agenda item given dissolution of ATAB. Trails were discussed at this meeting under banked capacity agenda item. No Action Staff Update: Steve King provided a brief update on pool operations and staffing. Public Comment and Board Comment: There was none. Next Meeting: The next regular meeting is August 24, 2021. The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. Port Townsend Pickleball Club Mountain View Court Revised Renovation Proposal 8/22/2021 Lynn Pierle - President Eric Seder - Facilities Jim Dow - Operations Contact at ptpickleball@gmail.com Mountain View Commons Site The current 97x60 concrete slab provides a very valuable court infrastructure. Mountain View Court Renovation: Resurface Existing 60ft x 97ft Concrete Slab, Add Lines for 2 Pickleball Courts and one Multi-use area for Basketball and Pickleball, Add Perimeter Fencing to Pickleball Area Major Scope Elements ●Project Design and Engineering (Minimal) ●Project Contracting ●Remove Basketball Standards ●Resurface/Paint Existing Slab 97ft by 60ft for 2 PB Courts and Basketball/Pickleball Area ●Install 2 sets of Permanent PB Posts and Nets ●Install Perimeter Fencing (Approx. 250ft of 8 foot highChainlink Fence) and 4 Gates ●?? 20x44 Court 20x44 Court 20x44 Court Existing Mountain View Concrete Pad 97ft x 60ft 12 feet Between Courts 12 feet Between Courts 6.5 ft Fence To Court 6.5 ft Fence To Court Full Perimeter Fence with 4 Gates (30 x 60 Extension to be added to The end of Pad for additional PB Court or PB/Basketball Court) Pickleball area 60x64 feet with perimeter fencing with 4 gates 20x44 ft court area 20x44 ft court area No fencing on 3 sides of Basketball area. 12 feet Between Courts 6 feet Court to Fence 6 feet Court to Fence Basketball/PB area 60x33 feet Basketball Court with PB Lines Risks and Issues ●Project not authorized by City. ●Adequate financing not available. ●Lack of vapor barrier under concrete could yield poor resurfacing result. ●Qualified contractor not available for resurfacing as soon as desired. ●In what way can the Port Townsend Pickleball Club assist in the project. ●?? Sims Way Gateway and Tree Management Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board Meeting August 24, 2021 Problem Statement & Opportunity Presentation Objective Present information to the PRTAB concerning removal of Poplar Trees along Sims Way. Ask for feedback on replanting Ask for support with public outreach Setting and Background Gateway Setting and Background Burned leaves from power lines Transmission Powerlines Setting and Background Setting and Background Approx. 70 mature Poplars with many more volunteer trees Approx. 60 mature Poplars Setting and Background Trees are on Port Property with some straddling right of way Setting and Background Sims Way right of way line References: Gateway Development Plan -1993 The Flats Commercial District proposes thinning of Poplars to enhance views... replanting of Poplars on the south side and other native trees on the north side... feature plantings along with trees and ground cover unique to this area... Strengthen pedestrian environment... Trees should be low enough to preserve views of uptown and the bluff... Sidewalk along the south side with a nature path on the north side. Take away: Distinct difference between the north and south sides of Sims Way. Kah Tai Lagoon Park Landscape and Furniture Site Development -1986. Recommended planting zones along Kah Tai to support the natural environment. Recommends thinning and removal of Poplars with replanting of prescribed shrubs and trees according to the zone planting plan. City Code •Right Tree Right Location. •Manage Trees in right of way •Discourages planting of inappropriate trees such as Lombardi Poplars. Kah Tai Side of Sims Kah Tai Side of Sims Existing Tree Profile Proposed Work Phases 1.Mitigate the hazard –Tree trimming and removal 2.Power undergrounding 3.Path installation and tree replanting 4.Boatyard expansion 5.Kah Tai side of Sims Way tree removal and planting Permitting Requirements Street Development Permit for all work within the right of way. (City, Port, and PUD) Flood Development Permit (Port of Port Townsend) Clearing and Grading Permit (Port of Port Townsend) Compliance with National Electric Code (PUD) Concepts –Sims and Boat Haven Cost and Grants PUD –Tree removal, undergrounding, and path installation. $700,000 Port –Boatyard expansion. $900,000 City –Replanting on Boat Haven side of Sims. $170,000 City –Tree removal and planting on Kah Tai side of Sims. $200,000 TOTAL = $1,970,000 Grants are necessary! Tree Restoration Feedback Key Questions Right Tree, Right Location? Aesthetics –screening? View corridors? Public Outreach Asking for the PRTAB support Public Process Recommendations Visualizations? PRTAB Discussion and Questions PARKS, RECREATION & TREE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING AGENDA October 26, 2021 | 4:30 p.m. | Virtual Meeting ****The State of Emergency declared by Governor Inslee temporarily prohibits in-person contacts with the public required by the Open Public Meetings Act and the Public Records Act. The May 29, 2020 Public Health Order by Jefferson County Health Officer Thomas Locke also states no in-person meetings are allowed. Participation will be by teleconference**** • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 489-143-707 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: (360) 390-5064 Ext. 3 access code: 177-060-048# • Submit public comment emails to be read aloud (up to three minutes per person) to: publiccomment@cityofpt.us I. Call to Order/Roll Call II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of August 24, 2021 Minutes IV. Public Comment (3 minutes per person) V. Old Business A. Gateway Park Replacement Tree (Staff recommendation and board discussion) - 5 min B. Arbor Day Report (Jennifer/Debbie – no action) -5 min C. Sims Way Poplar Replacement – community outreach (Staff update and board discussion) – 10 min D. Retroactive Review of Workplan Summary for Council Retreat (Debbie and board discussion input) – 10 min VI. New Business A. ARPA Funding Parks Strategic Plan (City Manager Mauro – no action) – 10 min B. Safe Space for Youth (John Nowak and board discussion) – 10 min C. DNR TreeLink, Tree of Heaven and Spotted Lantern Fly (Debbie) – 10 min D. Trails and volunteering - (Steve – no action) – 5 min VII. Staff update – Steve (5-10 minutes) A. Pool – Transfer of Operations to YMCA B. Skate Park Fence C. Pickleball D. Right of Way – Intro for another meeting. E. Parks staffing update VIII. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: December ____, 2021 IX. Public Comment (3 minutes per person) and Board Comment (may include proposed agenda items for future meetings) X. Adjourn Parking Lot/Future Meetings Right of Way in Port Townsend Boards and Commissions work Planning Training – Heidi Greenwood PARKS, RECREATION & TREE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES Date: August 24, 2021 Time: 4:30 p.m. Location: City Hall (virtual) Members Present: Debbie Jahnke, Jennifer Rotermund, Jim Todd, John Nowak Members Excused: Sean Koomen, Brenda McMillan Members Absent: Staff Present: Public Works Director Steve King and Deputy City Clerk Haylie Clement Topic Motions/Recommendation/Action Approval of Agenda: The agenda was unanimously approved. Approval of Minutes: The minutes of April 24, 2021 were unanimously approved. Public Comment: There was none. Old Business: Pickleball Courts at Mountain View Steve King provided an overview of discussions since the last PRTAB meeting with the Dog Park representatives and the YMCA concerning court configuration. Jim Dow, Eric Seder, and Lynn Pierle from the pickleball club were present and provided a presentation illustrating a three court configuration leaving one of the three open for basketball and other activities. This configuration does not impact the dog park and facilitates multiple uses of primary interest to the YMCA. Concerns were raised by Mr. Todd regarding long term maintenance obligations. Steve provided an overview of the upcoming anticipated master planning process for Mountain View and the Golf Course and the need to secure more funding for parks to address the back log of maintenance as well as future park development. Motion: Move to support the club installing pickleball courts at Mountain View . The motion passed with 3 in favor and Jim Todd abstaining. New Business: Poplar Tree Removal and Replacement along Sims Way. Public Works Director Steve King briefed the Board with a presentation providing the concept of removal of Poplar trees on the Boat Haven side of Sims Way as a result of interference with the transmission power lines. The presentation also provide background for removal of Poplars on the Kah Tai side of Sims Way consistent with past studies and recommendations. Eron Berg, Exec. Director from the Port of Port Townsend was also present and shared the Port perspective on the project. The Presentation acknowledged the need to find grant funding to support a partnership project with the PUD, Port, and City. No Action Taken. The PRTAB provided support for moving forward with key recommendations concerning tree species, considerations for height, and the need for a plan. The board agreed that Poplars are not the right tree for the location and issues such as sprouting and sucker growth are a problem. Recommendations were also provided concerning emotional attachment and justifications for a significant change in the light of issues such as climate change. New Business: Gateway Park Landmark Tree. Steve King provided an update concerning the collapse of a significant section of the tree. The tree has been stabilized. Three options were presented for the tree. 1. Remove the damaged ½ of the tree; 2. Cable and perform weight reduction to preserve the tree for as much as 10-15 years while planting a replacement tree; or 3. Remove the tree and replant. Based on the arborist consultation, staff recommended option 2. No Action was taken. Consensus by the board supported moving forward with Option 2. Staff will bring back a recommendation for the replacement tree. Board member Rotermund suggested that we evaluate a California Ash as one of the possible options for replacement as the tree should be a stately park grade type of tree. New Business: Autumnal Arbor Day. Chair Jahnke presented that October is Urban and Community Forestry Month and our Tree City status requires an annual Arbor Day Proclamation and event. Chair Jahnke recommended that the City Council present an Arbor Day proclamation on Oct. 4th and recommended Oct. 16, 17,23 , 30 or 31 as the day to hold our Adopt A Native Tree Day to provide native trees and shrubs to the community. Board provided unanimous support. Staff Update: Steve King provided a brief update on a number of park, trails, and tree related topics including pool operations and staffing. An update on RCO grant funding was also provided. Steve shared that we are close to refilling the parks maintenance position. No Action. Public Comment and Board Comment: No public comment. Board member Nowak asked for time on the next agenda to discuss safe outdoor places for youth to gather with a focus on our parks. Chair Jahnke mentioned that RCO does not have a place in their programs for Port Townsend style trails, but rather support formalized trails such as the Olympic Discovery Trail. Next Meeting: The next regular meeting is October 26, 2021. The meeting adjourned at 6:02 p.m. PRTAB response page 1 PRTAB (Chair) Response to Mayor's 24 June 2021 Invitation Regarding Workplan Priorities 4 July 2021 • What 2-3 priorities do you believe are most important to consider as part of the overall City workplan – and how do they align with our 3-year Strategic Plan, Comprehensive Plan and/or functional plans? 1. Stabilize funding for both park capital needs and to support a parks staff size that our parks acreage and population require. The Trust for Public Lands recommends a minimum of five staff per 10,000 residents - we currently have two full-time field staff and have never had more than three since the 2008 recession (PROS Plan, Comprehensive Plan, Community Quality of Life Focus - Strategic Plan). 2. Actively promote a more equitable distribution of park services and amenities to include the west side of town. See for example 2020 PROS Plan Exhibits 2 and 81 and 'gaps' on the west side, referred to throughout the PROS Plan as well as the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element. The 2014 Parks Plan specifically listed a 'Chetzemoka-sized park' needed on the west side. The northwest part of town has no neighborhood parks or a single piece of play equipment and the southwest side has a forested ravine and a small play park with one piece of equipment donated by Rotary. The centrally located 35th Street Park is undeveloped but for trails, and the 13th and Hancock P/OS property is completely undeveloped. There are no park restrooms on the west side and almost no benches for pedestrians to relax and rest on. • What Advisory Board work from this or previous years is incomplete and needs to be considered in 2022? 1. Street tree list update. In 2017, PRTAB submitted to staff an update to the existing 2009 Street Trees list and recommended it to update the Engineering and Design Standards' section on street trees. The update has never been implemented by staff, nor has Council seen it. PRTAB would like to continue updating the 2009 list to include larger species appropriate for parks as well as species which should not be planted here, but PRTAB needs some acknowledgement from staff/Council that this is not a waste of time. 2. 'Significant Trees' brochure and walking tours. PRTAB tried to develop a brochure for Arbor Day walking tours of our most interesting and important trees in 2013 but never got past the draft stage although Council has given permission to proceed. The only input we received from staff was that we couldn't use the word 'significant'. Now that we are finally starting to have Landmark Trees nominated and approved, we hope to develop a 'Landmark Trees' brochure when we have a sufficient number of approved trees. 3. Leash law/dog park brochure - Leash Law Communication Plan: Council tasked PRTAB to develop a communication plan to educate and inform the public about the leash law update in 2019. Effort was intended to develop outreach to the school district and with public notices in the newspapers and water bill newsletter. Brochure would be developed for distribution at trailheads, parks (including the new dog park), the Visitors Center and the ferry terminal. Documents were proposed to be made available on the City website in order to minimize costs and resource consumption as well as to accomodate QR technology, with some paper copies for conventional distribution. Unfortunately, most of 2019 board effort was consumed with the PROS Plan update, followed abruptly by the pandemic shutdown. PRTAB response page 2 • Are there things we should stop doing or do differently, both at the strategic and the operational levels? 1. The Tree Conservation Ordinance should be rewritten so that the City is required to comply with all the requirements for tree planting that other developers must follow (19.06.130.B). Right now the City exempts itself from Municipal Code that it requires others to follow (19.06.100.D), even though the City does more tree planting than any developer. In particular, the City should not plant monocultures or have plantings excessively dominated by single species or genera or non-native species for the reasons listed in the code. PRTAB has tried to convince staff not to plant monocultures but our concerns were discounted. 2. Parks and trails are visitor attractants and should qualify for some LTAC funding including funding for the dog park since many visitors bring their dogs with them. REET can also be used for parks funding. These funding sources could be partially redirected to support parks and trails. 3. Continue to evaluate parks funding and effort for equitable distribution of services and amenities. Parks on the east side are beloved because of their amenities. When a well-funded park has multiple kinds of children's play equipment, comfortable seating, WiFi, flower gardens, shade trees, and real restrooms, of course it is used more frequently, but fairness requires that other areas of our community have access to similar amenities in their own neighborhoods. • What else should we be considering? 1. Consider formation of a Friends and/or a Foundation group to support our parks, recreation, trees and trails or at least some subset of the list. We are the only advisory board that has four assigned areas of responsibility and zero budget. The City Library has both a Friends and a Foundation group. County Parks and Recreation has a Friends group. Fort Worden has a Friends group. All of these groups provide fundraising and community outreach to help with the mission they support. 2. New parks or features - community-built playgrounds and ROWs for parcours - During the PROS Systems workshop in 2019, we identified areas that need parks or at least some recreational infrastructure, in particular in the Rainier/Howard Street corridor to Hastings and Hastings to Discovery. One economical way suggested would be to use ROWs on the west side for small linear parks using community-built efforts with recycled and natural projects as much as possible. The limiting width of ROWs would still allow simple structures/linear activities for kids as well as to build parcours routes for youth and adults. In addition, community-built playgrounds are increasingly common (see the recent effort in Port Angeles) and we likely have the leadership, interest and skills in our community to tackle this idea. 3. More multiuse paths/trails on the west side of town for pedestrian and bicycle safety - A multiuse path on 12th or 14th Streets between Landes and Sheridan and on Hastings Avenue between Sheridan and Howard would add an important safety feature to encourage more walking and bicycling and less car traffic on these well-used routes. 4. Make the street ends listed in the PROS Plan (Appendix C) accessible to the public as view points and prevent future encroachment by adjacent neighbors on all street ends, noting that such use was eliminated for the listed Garfield ROW by a Comprehensive Plan amendment via Ordinance 3119. Spotted Lanternfly Spotted lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula) is a new and emerging pest in the United States. Its preferred host is tree-of-heaven; however, it can be a serious pest on a wide variety of important agricultural crops, including grapes, fruit trees, hops, and ornamentals. Spotted Lanternfly Identification Adults can be found in July and begin laying eggs in September-October. They are 1 inch long and 1/2 inch wide. Forewings are grey with dark spots and venation at the wing tips. Hindwings are red at the base with black and white above. The abdomen is yellow and black. The hindwings and abdomen are hidden when adults are at rest. Nymphs hatch in April-May and develop through four stages. Early nymphal stages are small (less than 1/2 inch) and black with white spots. The fourth nymphal stage develops red markings and are over 1/2 inch long. Nymphs tend to cluster together and cannot fly. Eggs are grey-brown and laid in clusters on tree bark or a wide variety of outdoor surfaces and are easily overlooked. Egg masses can be found from September- April. Contact Us If you have questions about tree-of-heaven identification and control, please contact us: WA State Noxious Weed Control Board 360-725-5764 http://www.nwcb.wa.gov Email: noxiousweeds@agr.wa.gov Or contact your local county noxious weed control board, WSU Extension office, or Conservation District. Spotted Lanternfly Distribution Spotted lanternfly is currently established in several northeastern states, and the potential for rapid spread across North America is high. Egg clusters and adults can be easily transported by car, rail, or air. Careful inspections of materials before transport will help prevent further spread. Spotted Lanternfly Impacts Nymphs and adults damage plants by sucking sap from stems, trunks, and leaves. They also secrete large amounts of honeydew which hosts pathogens such as sooty mold. In Washington, grapes, fruit trees, and hops are most likely to be impacted. Get Involved! Spotted lanternfly is not currently in Washington State but is likely to first infest tree-of-heaven populations if it arrives. Mapping known tree- of-heaven populations allows for strategizing control efforts. Report any sightings of tree-of- heaven and spotted lanternfly by: • Downloading the EDDMapS application or reporting online at: https://www.eddmaps. org/ • Downloading the WISC application or reporting online at: http://invasivespecies. wa.gov/ • Reporting directly to the Washington State Department of Agriculture: pestprogram@agr.wa.gov Cover: Spotted lanternfly (left image - Lawrence Barringer, Pennsylvania Dept. of Agriculture, Bugwood.org; middle, right images - Tim Haye, CABI). First printing 2020. Tree-of-heaven is a Class C noxious weed in Washington State and is proposed for the WSDA quarantine list, which will prohibit its sale and distribution in WA. For more information about tree-of- heaven and spotted lanternfly please scan the QR code Tree-of-Heaven and Spotted Lanternfly Er i c a S m y e r s Pe n n s y l v a n i a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Ti m H a y e , C A B I A widespread noxious weed hosts a new invasive insect La w r e n c e B a r r i n g e r , P e n n s y l v a n i a De p t . o f A g r i c u l t u r e , B u g w o o d . o r g Em e l i e S w a c k h a m e r , P e n n S t a t e Un i v e r s i t y , B u g w o o d . o r g Ri c h a r d G a r d n e r , B u g w o o d . o r g Ti m H a y e , C A B I Ti m H a y e , C A B I La w r e n c e B a r r i n g e r , P e n n s y l v a n i a De p t . o f A g r i c u l t u r e , B u g w o o d . o r g © 2 0 0 6 B e n L e g l e r Identification Tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) is a fast- growing, deciduous tree native to China and Taiwan. Growing to 65 feet or taller, trees develop a taproot and lateral roots, which sprout stems and forms thickets. • Tree bark is smooth and gray, developing shallow, diamond- shaped fissures as it ages. It’s often compared to cantaloupe skin. • Leaves are alternate and pinnately compound - commonly with 10 to 27 leaflets. • Stems have large heart to shield-shaped leaf scars. • Leaflets typically 1.5 to 6 inches long. Margins are smooth except on each side near the base, where there are 1 to 3 rounded teeth, each with a gland bump on the lower surface. • The leaves and stems have a rancid peanut- butter or popcorn-like smell when crushed. Look-A-Likes Quick tips to differentiate from tree-of-heaven• Male and female flowers occur in clusters on separate trees. Flowers are small and yellowish green. • Female flowers develop a samara - a single seed in the middle of an oblong, papery wing that can be slightly twisted. Their color ranges from yellowish green, to pinkish tan and brown, and are ~ 1 to 2 inches long. • Female trees may be identified during the winter by clusters of remaining seeds on the branch tips. Smooth sumac (Rhus glabra) and staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina) • Large shrubs with many stems. Smooth sumac is native to eastern Washington and grows to ~10 feet. Staghorn sumac is not native to Washington and grows to ~15 to 20 feet. • Both have pinnately compound leaves, with leaflets having toothed margins and no glands at the base. • Upright, dense flower clusters that form dense clusters of hairy reddish fruits (drupes). Black walnut (Juglans nigra) • Bark is brown to gray-black and has narrow, deep furrows. • Pinnately compound leaves with leaflets having toothed margins and no glands at the base. • Fruit is a walnut, round in shape, and enclosed in a greenish husk. Control Whenever possible, control plants as seedlings or young plants, prior to the development of their extensive roots. Do not leave cut stems and stumps on moist soils as they may resprout. Check with your county noxious weed board about disposal options. Contact with plant parts may cause skin irritation and rashes to sensitive individuals, so be sure to wear gloves and protective clothing. Manual: Seedlings and small plants can be hand-pulled, dug up, or pulled with a weed levering tool. This is best done when the soil is moist. Make sure to remove the roots as remaining fragments can resprout. Cutting or mowing plants alone will not provide control as stumps and roots will readily resprout. Herbicide: Timing of treatment is important for success. Apply foliar spray to small plants when leaves are fully emerged, from mid to later growing season. For larger plants, treatments such as basal bark, frill cuts, or stem injection should occur from mid-summer to early fall. Check with your county noxious weed control board and the Pacific Northwest Weed Management Handbook (https://pnwhandbooks. org) for specific herbicide treatment information. Frequently monitor the area for multiple years, controlling any new seedlings and resprouts. Plant the area with native and/or non-invasive plants to create shade and provide competition to discourage tree-of-heaven seedlings and prevent other weeds from establishing. glands Left and center images by Rod Gilbert; right image by Robert Vidéki, Doronicum Kft., Bugwood.org (c) 2002 Steven J. Baskauf, http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu, CC by 4.0; Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org, 0008277; Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org, 5125019; Robert Vidéki, Doronicum Kft., Bugwood.org, 5396123. leaflet Ja n S a m a n e k , P h y t o s a n i t a r y A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , B u g w o o d . o r g leaf scar Jo h n M . R a n d a l l , T N C , B u g w o o d . o r g Identification Spread, Habitat, and Impacts Tree-of-heaven reproduces by seed and vegetatively spreads by root and stump sprouts. Mature female trees can produce 325,000+ seeds annually. Tree-of-heaven grows in primarily open habitats, including forest edges, roadsides, riverbanks, and urban areas. Found throughout the state, tree-of-heaven has a higher known distribution in eastern Washington. Besides being a preferred host for spotted lanternfly, tree-of-heaven can crowd out native vegetation, leach allelochemicals that may inhibit growth of neighboring plants, damage infrastructure, produce pollen that can be an allergen, and cause rashes for certain sensitive individuals. When necessary, prioritize the control of fem ale trees to prevent further seed production. Seedling image by Richard Gardner, Bugwood.org PARKS, RECREATION TREES, & TRAILS ADVISORY BOARD SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA December 14, 2021 | 4:30 p.m. | Virtual Meeting ****The State of Emergency declared by Governor Inslee temporarily prohibits in-person contacts with the public required by the Open Public Meetings Act and the Public Records Act. The May 29, 2020 Public Health Order by Jefferson County Health Officer Thomas Locke also states no in-person meetings are allowed. Participation will be by teleconference**** • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 489-143-707 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: (360) 390-5064 Ext. 3 access code: 177-060-048# • Submit public comment emails to be read aloud (up to three minutes per person) to: publiccomment@cityofpt.us I. Call to Order/Roll Call II. Public Comment (3 minutes per person/agenda items only) III. Old Business A. Boatyard Expansion and Sims Way Poplar Replacement – See attached recommended process for public engagement and tree replacement (Staff recommendation and board discussion) - 20 min B. Tree list discussion – See attached lists (Chair Jahnke and board discussion) – 20 min IV. New Business A. 2022 Work Planning Process and Training (Heidi Greenwood, no action) – 15 min B. Discovery Road Project Landscaping Introduction (Steve King and Laura Parsons, no action) – 20 min V. Staff update – Steve (5-10 minutes) A. Pool Brief B. Kearney Street intersection – WSDOT project options C. Park Maintenance Accomplishment – See attached VI. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: February 22, 2022 VII. Adjourn Parking Lot/Future Meetings Right of Way Principles PARKS, RECREATION & TREE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES Date: October 26, 2021 Time: 4:30 p.m. Location: City Hall (virtual) Members Present: Debbie Jahnke, Jennifer Rotermund, Jim Todd, John Nowak, Sean Koomen, Brenda McMillan Members Excused: Members Absent: Staff Present: City Manager Mauro, Public Works Director Steve King, Parks Lead Operator Bre Ganne, and Deputy City Clerk Haylie Clement Topic Motions/Recommendation/Action Approval of Agenda: The agenda was unanimously approved. Approval of Minutes: The minutes of August 24, 2021 were unanimously approved. Public Comment: There was none. Old Business: Gateway Park Tree Replacement. Public Works Director Steve King provided a list of tree replacement options and encouraged discussion amongst the board regarding the priority of tree variety. The following options were considered: California Ash (not readily available), Monterey Cypress, Palm, Corkscrew Willow, Scarlet Oak, Sweet Gum, Shore Pine, Linden, and Himalayan Cedar. Through consensus, the Board recommended three possibilities. From the August meeting, California Ash. Alternatively, Monterey Cypress or an Interior Live Oak (landmark tree at Pierce and Lawrence). A Monterey Cypress is doing well nearby in similar conditions at Kah Tai. Old Business: Arbor Day Report: Board member Jennifer Rotermund shared an overview of her acceptance of the proclamation on Oct. 4th. Jennifer also provided a summary of the Adopt a Native Tree event on Oct. 17th as a great success. Chair Jahnke also reflected positively on both. No action. The Board issued thanks to Jennifer and recognition of her acceptance speech and how it related to the Poplar Replacement project. Old Business: Poplar Tree Removal and Replacement along Sims Way. Public Works Director Steve King briefed the Board on development since the last meeting as well as announced a virtual town hall meeting planned for November 9th at 5:00 p.m. Steve solicited advice and comments concerning the project and public response. No Action Taken. The Board offered the following comments: 1. Ensure that there is adequate funding to complete the replacement project. There is concern based on past experience that the funds run out and the replacement of trees suffer. 2. Recommend doing more proactive outreach to the media to get the facts out. 3. Recognize local expertise and comments such as the letters to the editor and comments to Council. 4. Stay away from monoculture; focus on natives 5. Clarify the funding sources 6. Highlight the values desired to be addressed. Old Business: Retroactive Review of Work Plan Summary for Council Retreat . Chair Jahnke provided an overview of the information provided to the City Manager and City Council dated July 4, 2021. Chair Jahnke asked if the Board concurred with the priorities given they had not had the chance to review. No Action was taken. The Board reviewed the work plan summary retroactively. By consensus, the board supported and agreed with Chair Jahnke’s recommendations to the City Council. The next meeting will include an overview of the work planning process by City Attorney Heidi Greenwood. New Business: Safe Space for Youth. John Nowak provided a summary of his work with youth and their desire to identify locations where youth can gather in a safe outdoor or large building environment. No Action was taken. The Board, City Manager Mauro, and Steve King brainstormed options. The group acknowledged that the City does not have a space that meets the goal. The group suggested contacting the PDA regarding Fort Worden, the County regarding the Community Center, and the YMCA regarding space at Mountain View. New Business: ARPA Funding. City Manager Mauro provided the board with an overview of how ARPA funding will be utilized to bring on a 2-year contract position to facilitate strategic planning for the Golf Course, Mountain View Campus, and sustainable parks and recreation funding. No Action: The Board provided unanimous support and suggested very proactive community outreach. New Business: DNR TreeLink, Tree of Heaven and Spotted Lantern Fly. Chair Jahnke provided an overview of concerns raised by DNR regarding the spread of the invasive species, Ailanthus (Tree of Heaven) and that it is the natural host for the invasive pest, the Spotted Lantern Fly. Chair Jahnke suggested a volunteer approach to mapping Ailanthus as a way to engage the community and raise awareness around the issue or potential problem that would result from an infestation of the Spotted Lantern Fly. No Action: The Board discussed and suggested involving the School (Middle School/High School). The Board was supportive of this effort. New Business: Trails and Volunteering. Steve King presented acknowledgement of the desire of volunteers to work on trails and expressed thanks. Steve expressed that this is a goal to empower volunteers given the great needs around 31 miles of the City trail system. No Action. The Board expressed support for growing volunteer involvement. Staff Update: Steve King provided a brief update on a number of park, trails, and tree related topics including pool operations being officially transferred to the YMCA, the skatepark fence project being completed, Pickleball discussion clarification that the City Council has not approved the project, and staffing including introducing our new employee, Shawn Wiles. Kurt Hardesty with the Street Dept. was also recognized as our new arborist. A future meeting will include right of way principles. No Action. The Board was supportive of the next meeting including right of way principles discussion and overview. Public Comment and Board Comment: No public comment. Next Meeting: The next regular meeting is scheduled early for December 14, 2021 at 4:30 The meeting adjourned at approximately 5:45 p.m. Boat Yard Expansion and Sims Way Poplar Replacement Project Recommended Public Process Introduction: Public engagement and local stakeholder involvement in this Boat Yard Expansion and Sims Way Poplar Replacement project is critical for successful outcomes. The focus of this recommended public process is its focus on the tree replacement and Sims Way gateway enhancement elements of the project. Based on public feedback to date, the following process is recommended to provide for stepwise stakeholder process that affords the opportunity to bring well thought out information to the public in several steps prior to the City Council making decisions on elements of the final plan. Stepwise Stakeholder Process 1. After the December 15th Public Meeting, the partners (City, Port, and PUD) will solicit for professional services to include engineering for the boatyard expansion, general electrical design associate with the expansion and location of the underground transmission, and Sims way improvements including the path, Poplar replacement, and landscaping. For the Poplar replacement and Sims Way work we will be soliciting for expertise in Landscape Architecture and Arboriculture with knowledge of our Municipal Code's guidance on the importance of native species, species diversity and conifer/deciduous ratios. 2. Once a team of professionals is hired, the City will convene a 10 member stakeholder committee made up of 2-3 local experts in arboriculture, a Parks Recreation Trail and Tree Advisory Board (PRTTAB) liaison, and representatives for tourism, Port/boatyard/marine trades, PUD/safety, Admiralty Audubon/Kah Tai. City, Port, and PUD staff will also participate. 3. A series of stakeholder meetings will help the team establish the appropriate replacement plan. The intent being that developing the poplar replacement plan will be a participatory process, inclusive of community members and agency stakeholders. However, there will be guardrails in place such as project budget and having PRTTAB and City Council approval. 4. Once the plan has been established, the plan will be presented to the PRTTAB for recommendation of approval or not to the City Council. 5. Once the PRTTAB has provided a recommendation, City staff will provide the final decision making to the City Council. 6. City Council’s final decision will be on the replacement plan for the poplars. The boat yard expansion and overhead undergrounding work are independent of the decision making for the poplar replacement, yet the City, Port, and PUD agree that a single well-coordinated project with the final vision for the poplar replacement known early in the design development process is a key element to the overall project success. Public Engagement Public engagement and transparency of the process are critical. The use of town hall events in this era of COVID safety is a forum for providing transparency and soliciting public feedback. Periodic townhall events are anticipated. In addition, presentations to the PRTTAB and the City Council are opportunities for public engagement. The PRTTAB is the forum for the public to engage in the decisions making process. draft recommendations for street tree list PRTAB discussion only 23 May 2017 Draft Recommendations to Accompany Street Tree List Update Introduction The City of Port Townsend has been a TreeCity USA for approximately 15 years. A Tree Committee, Commission, Board or Department is required to maintain TreeCity status. The responsibilities of a Tree Committee are listed in Resolution 09-029, which added Tree Committee duties to those of the existing Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Port Townsend's current Street Tree List is dated 2009. Street tree guidance in the City's Engineering and Design Standards dates back to 1997. Guiding documents for best practices require regular updates to incorporate new information. In keeping with Resolution 09-029 Section 2.A.2.g., the Parks, Recreation and Tree Advisory Board (PRTAB) has examined the City's current Street Tree List and the relevant sections on street trees in the Port Townsend Engineering and Design Standards with the goal of recommending updates. Street tree and urban forestry guidance was collected from Washington Department of Natural Resources Urban Forestry and other regional jurisdictions in Washington and Oregon as well as government and research websites and published documents. The PRTAB considered the following guidelines stated by Eugene OR Street Tree List Update Evaluation Criteria (2014) in updating the list: 'Goals for the updated list include: • Remove species that are invasive, overplanted, susceptible to insects or diseases, frequently fail or cause damage or require high levels of maintenance; and • Add species that are native, species that require low maintenance, are durable, provide habitat and environmental benefits and that will be climate resilient' (1) In addition, Port Townsend's current street tree documents are silent on the important concern of species diversity in street tree planning. In the past, street tree plantings have favored monocultures in the pursuit of visual uniformity but PRTAB has more commonly found support in the literature for guidelines such as a 10:20:30 rule with no single species representing more than 10%, no genus representing more than 20% and no family representing more than 30% of trees planted (cf. 1-3). Recent guidance suggests that visual similarity and species diversity can be accomplished with careful planning (2). The proposed update has been reformatted to be more concise and inclusive of information. It includes updates of Sections A, C, E, and F in the current list. It omits updates of Lists B and D, as those are both for large and large columnar trees. Given Port Townsend's street scale, available planting strip widths, and expected life span of street trees, large trees are generally inappropriate for street trees. A separate list could be developed for parks and open spaces that can accomodate large trees. Recommendations PRTAB recommends: • that staff adopt the proposed 2017 update of the street tree list; • that Council append by ordinance the proposed 2017 update to the Engineering and Design Standards to update the 20-year old street tree list in the Standards; • that the City not exempt itself from its own Municipal Code Tree Conservation Ordinance with regard to species diversity in street tree planting plans, specifically Title 19.06.130.B.5; • that future street tree planting plans be shared with PRTAB for discussion prior to City approval so that any concerns observed or changes recommended by the advisory board can be contributed in a timely manner. References 1. City of Eugene Approved Street Tree Species List: Selection Process, Definitions, and Evaluation Criteria (2014) Eugene Public Works Department, Eugene OR. draft recommendations for street tree list PRTAB discussion only 23 May 2017 2. Bassuk, N., P. Trowbridge, and C. Grohs. [n.d.] Visual Similarity and Biological Diversity: Street Tree Selection and Design. Cornell University Urban Horticulture Institute. (accessed March 2017). http://www.hort.cornell.edu/uhi/outreach/pdfs/ visually_compatible_trees.pdf. 3. Pittsburgh Urban Forest Master Plan: A Road Map for the Effective Management of our Urban Forest, Appendix D. Tree Diversity Goals and Recommendations (2012) (accessed April 2017). Other resources consulted for tree list update City of Dupont Citizen's Tree Care Manual (2012) Dupont WA. City of Eugene Approved Street Tree Species List (2014) Eugene Public Works Department, Eugene OR. City of Kent Street Trees: Development Assistance Brochure #14 (2012) Kent WA. Cornell University, Urban Horticulture Institute. http://www.hort.cornell.edu/uhi/ (accessed April 2017). Global Invasive Species Database. http://www.invasivespecies.net/ (accessed April 2017). Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States. https://www.invasiveplantatlas.org/ (accessed April 2017). Kirkland Street Tree Selection List and Planting and Pruning Procedures (2010) Kirkland WA. Oregon State University, College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Horticulture, Landscape Plant List. http://landscapeplants.oregonstate.edu/ (accessed April 2017). Portland Plant List Update (2016) Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Portland OR. Seattle Department of Transportation – Approved Street Tree List (2011) Seattle WA. Spokane Urban Forestry Approved Street Tree List (2014) City of Spokane Parks and Recreation Urban Forestry. United States Forest Service Invasive Species, Pests and Diseases. https://www.fs.fed.us/science- technology/invasive-species-pests-disease (accessed April 2017). University of Washington Herbarium: Plants of Washington http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/imagecollection.php. (accessed April 2017). Vancouver Street Tree Selection (2012) Vancouver WA. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Urban and Community Forestry. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/urbanforestry (accessed April 2017). Port Townsend Street Tree List Update page 1 August 2017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 A B C D E F G H I J K L Bo t a n i c a l na m e Co m m o n na m e Ty p e Na t i v e Dr o u g h t tol e r a n t Dis e a s e res i s t a n t De e r r e s i s t a n t Sid e w a l k s o k pla n t i n g s t r i p , mi n ( f t ) Ov e r h e a d wir e s o k siz e h x w ( f t ) Co m m e n t s (se e k e y t o co m m e n t s a t bo t t o m ) Acer buergianum Trident Maple D Dry DiR SW 4 25x20 round, shrublike; firm hand; red fall color Acer campestre Hedge Maple 'Queen Elizabeth'D Dry DiR SW 5 35x30 vigorous; upright, reliable city tree Acer glabrum Douglas (Rocky Mountain) Maple D N SW 5 30x30 sun to part shade; yellow fall color Acer grandidentatum 'Schmidt'Rocky Mountain Glow maple D DiR SW 5 25x15 exfoliate copper-red bark; adaptable Acer henryi Henry maple D Dry DiR 6 30x30 trifoliate leaves, sun, interesting bark Acer pennsylvanicum Moosewood D 6 W 20x20 part shade, shallow roots, attractive striped bark Acer pseudosieboldianum Korean maple D 4 W 22x20 new; sun/shade, upright, good fall color Acer tataricum 'Patdell'Pattern Perfect Tatarian maple D 4 W 25x20 oval shape, entire-leafed (no lobes), sturdy, fall color Amelanchier x grandiflora Rainbow Pillar 'Glenn's Upright'D 4 W 20X15 white flowers; edible fruit; red fall color Amelanchier x grandiflora Serviceberry 'Robin Hill'D SW 4 W 25x15 upright oval; sun; colorful, low maintenance Amelanchier laevis ‘JFS-ARB'Serviceberry 'Spring Flurry' D 4 28x20 upright oval; sun; reliable street tree Amelanchier laevis Serviceberry 'Snowcloud'D 4 W 25x15 upright oval; sun/part shade; reliable street tree Amelanchier laevis Serviceberry 'Cumulus'D 4 25x10 upright; early bloom; reliable street tree Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree BE Dry DiR 5 30x30 shaggy bark; full sun; tree form difficult to maintain Carpinus caroliniana JFS-KW6 American hornbean 'Native Flame'D 5 30x20 upright oval; bright red fall color Cercocarpis montanus v. glaber Birchleaf mountain mahogany BE Dry De SW 4 W 12x8 long-lived; salt-tolerant; showy seed plumes Chamaecyparis obtusa Hinoki cypress 'Gracilis'C Dry DiR De 4 W 25x15 slow growth; sun to light shade; columnar; low-branching Chionanthus retusus Chinese fringe tree D DiR 5 W 20x25 sun; white fringed flower clusters Chionanthus retusus 'Tokyo Tower'Tokyo Tower fringe tree D 5 W 20x10 new; tightly upright; May bloom, low maintenance Cornus nuttallii x florida Dogwood Eddie's White Wonder D 5 30x20 white flowers; red fall color Cornus kousa 'Chinensis'Kousa dogwood D DiR SW 5 W 20x20 pink flowers; deep red fall color Cornus x 'Rutban'Aurora dogwood D DiR 5 20x20 upright to spreading; pink flowers; red fall color Cornus x Rutcan Constellation dogwood D DiR 5 25x20 upright; white flowers; sterile hybrid Cornus kousa x nuttalli 'KN 30-8'Venus dogwood D DiR 5 25x20 upright oval; giant white blossoms; tolerant Cornus mas Cornelian cherry D DiR 5 W 25x20 early small yellow flowers; wildlife value; edible fruit Cotinus coggygria Purple smoketree D Dry 4 W 10x15 sun; tough; adaptable; tree form hard to maintain Cotinus obovatus American smoketree D Dry DiR De 5 25x25 sun; adaptable; colorful fall foliage Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthorn D N De 4 25x15 shade-tolerant; wildlife value Crataegus x lavallei Lavalle hawthorn D 4 28x20 irregular vase; persistent orange fruit Crataegus phaenopyrum Washington hawthorn D 4 20x20 upright oval; can multitrunk; tolerant; persistent fruit Cryptomeria japonica ‘Elegans’Japanese plume cedar C DiR 4 30x10 bronze/brown in winter; several varieties; low branching Fagus sylvatica 'Fastigiata'Copper beech 'Red Obelisk'D DiR 6 30x10 columnar; sun; tolerant; burgundy leaves Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash D N Dry 6 60x35 only native ash; needs consistent root moisture; big Ginkgo biloba Princeton Sentry (males only)D Dry Dir 6 65x20 upright; gold fall color; males only; firm hand; big Juniper scopulorum Rocky Mountain juniper C N Dry De SW 5 40x12 sun; withstands drought; many cultivars; low branching Maackia amurensis Amur maackia D Dry DiR SW 6 W 25x20 sun; vase shape; clusters of white flowers Magnolia liliiflora x M. sprengeri Galaxy magnolia D DiR 6 W 30x15 sun; late spring fragrant bloom; low maintenance Magnolia kobus x M. salicifolia Magnolia 'Wada's Memory'D 6 30x35 sun; pyramidal; white flowers; fall color Magnolia x loebneri Merrill magnolia BE DiR De 6 25x25 acid soil; early fragrant white flowers Port Townsend Street Tree List Update page 2 August 2017 1 A B C D E F G H I J K L Bo t a n i c a l na m e Co m m o n na m e Ty p e Na t i v e Dr o u g h t tol e r a n t Dis e a s e res i s t a n t De e r r e s i s t a n t Sid e w a l k s o k pla n t i n g s t r i p , mi n ( f t ) Ov e r h e a d wir e s o k siz e h x w ( f t ) Co m m e n t s (se e k e y t o co m m e n t s a t bo t t o m ) 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 Magnolia kobus N. Japanese magnolia D 6 35x25 large late spring white flowers; sun/part shade; tolerant Malus floribunda ‘Adirondack’Adirondack crabapple D DiR 4 W 20x10 columnar; white flowers; orange fruit Malus 'Jarmin'Marilee crabapple D SW 4 W 24x10 upright; nearly fruitless; large mid-spring white flowers Malus ‘Royal Raindrops’Malus x JFS-KW5 D 4 15x15 purplish leaves; late spring pink flowers; maroon fruit Malus 'Sugar Tyme'Malus Sutyzam D 4 18x15 upright spreading; early spring white flowers; red fruit Myrica (Morella) californica Pacific wax myrtle BE N Dry DiR De 4 18x15 tolerant; wildlife value; tree form hard to maintain Oxydendron arboreum Sourwood tree D DiR 6 35x20 needs summer water/acid soil; fall color Parrotia persica Ironwood D Dry DiR 5 35x20 early red apetalous flower; mix of fall color Parrotia persica ‘Ruby Vase’Ruby Vase ironwood D Dry DiR SW 4 W 28x16 upright; new foliage red; bright fall color Parrotia persica 'JLColumnar'Persian Spire parrotia D DiR 4 W 25x10 new; columnar; bronze leaf edges Parrotia persica 'Vanessa'Vanessa parrotia D 4 28x14 upright, red fall foliage & winter flowers; tolerant Pinus contorta Shore Pine C N Dry DiR De 8 40x20 twisted shape; salt-tolerant; low branching Pinus densiflora ‘Imbraculifera'Umbrella pine C Dry DiR De 8 30x25 slow-growing; sun; well-drained soil; low branching Pistacia chinensis Chinese pistache D DiR 8 25x20 sun; pinnate leaves; early pruning needed; tolerant Prunus serrulata ‘Amanogawa’Amanogawa cherry D 6 W 20x8 columnar; pink double flowers; fall color Prunus serrulata ‘Mt Fuji'Mt Fuji cherry D 6 15x20 spreading; white flowers; fall color Prunus ‘Snow Goose'Snow Goose cherry D 6 W 20x20 white early flowers; full sun; good drainage Prunus x yedoensis ‘Akebono’Akebono cherry D 6 W 25x25 soft pink flowers; WA DC 'cherry trees' Pyrus betulifolia Birch-leaf pear 'Dancer'D Dry DiR 5 30x20 oval; tolerant; white flowers; burgundy purple in fall Quercus garryana Oregon white oak/Garry oak D N 8 65x50 only native oak; slow-growing; sun; big at maturity Quercus ilex Holly Oak BE De 6 40x30 salt-tolerant; sun to light shade; adaptable Quercus robur 'Fastigiata'English oak, columnar D DiR 6 40x15 upright; columnar; low-maintenance, big at maturity Quercus robur x Q. alba Crimson Spire Oak 'Crimschmidt'D Dry DiR 6 45x15 tightly upright; red fall color; tolerant of urban setting Rhamnus purshiana Cascara D N 4 W 30x25 moist soil; sun or shade; wildlife value Rhus typhina Staghorn sumac D Dry DiR De 4 20x20 fragrant flowers; wildlife value Stewartia pseudocameillia Japanese stewartia D DiR SW 5 W 25x20 oval shape; summer 'camellia' flowers; peeling bark Styrax japonicus Snowbell (JFS-D)D Dry 5 W 25x25 bell-shaped flowers; yellow fall color Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk'Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac D DiR 4 20x15 rounded; sun; fragrant flowers; low maintenance; tolerant Zelkova serrata City Sprite Zelkova JFS-KW1 D Dry DiR SW 4 W 25x20 bright green foliage; low maintenance Zelkova serrata Wireless; Schmidtlow D Dry DiR 8 W 25x35 spreading vase shape; elm-like; firm hand when young key to type key to comments D=deciduous low branching=conifers may branch to the ground and be difficult to maintain sightlines and tree integrity C=conifer tree form hard to maintain=occur as large multi-trunk shrub; require pruning to maintain tree form BE=broadleaf evergreen big=mature form may be too big for most streets and overwhelm root space, may be better in parks new=relatively new cultivar in 2017 firm hand=species requires early pruning to train leader tolerant=tolerant of urban pollution and other stressors City Tree List Type Scientific Common Name Mature Height Spread Under Wires? Min Strip Width Flower Color Fall Color PRTAB on list Comments Large Columnar Trees Acer nigrum ‘Green Column’ Green Column Green Column Black Sugar Maple 50 10 No 6 N/A Good close to buildings. Fraxinus americana 'Empire' Empire Ash 50 25 No 6 N/A Use for areas adjacent to taller buildings when ash tree is desired species. Ginko biloba ‘Princeton Sentry’ Princeton Sentry Ginkgo 40 15 No 6 N/A Very narrow growth. Nyssa sylvatica Tupelo 60 20 No 6 N/A Handsome chunky bark. Quercus ‘Crimschmidt’ Crimson Spire Oak 45 15 No 6 N/A Yes Hard to find in the nursery trade. Tightly upright, red fall color, tolerant of urban setting. Quercus frainetto Italian Oak 50 30 No 6 N/A Drought resistant – beautiful green, glossy leaves in summer. Quercus robur ‘fastigiata’ Skyrocket Oak 40 15 No 6 N/A Columnar variety of oak. Taxodium distichum 'Mickelson' Shawnee Brave Bald Cypress 55 20 No 6 N/A Deciduous conifer - tolerates city conditions. Quercus robur x alba Skinny Genes Skinny Genes 45 10 N/A Large Trees Acer saccharum ‘Bonfire’ Bonfire Sugar Maple 50 40 No 6 N/A Fastest growing sugar maple. Acer saccharum 'Commemoration' Commemoration Sugar Maple 50 35 No 6 N/A Resistant to leaf tatter. Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' Green Mountain Sugar Map 45 35 No 6 N/A Reliable fall color. Acer saccharum 'Legacy' Legacy Sugar Maple 50 35 No 5 N/A Limited use - where sugar maple is desired in limited planting strip area. Aesculus flava Yellow Buckeye 60 40 No 6 Least susceptible to leaf blotch – large fruit – fall color is varied, but quite beautiful. Cercidiphyllum japonicum Katsura Tree 40 40 No 6 N/A Needs lots of water when young – can produce large surface roots. Fagus sylvatica G reen Beech 50 40 No 6 N/A Silvery-grey bark. Fagus sylvatica 'Asplenifolia' Fernleaf Beech 60 50 No 6 N/A Beautiful cut leaf. Fraxinus latifolia Oregon Ash 60 35 No 6 N/A Yes Only native ash in Pacific Northwest. Fraxinus pennsylvanica ‘Patmore’ Patmore Ash 45 35 No 6 N/A Extremely hardy, may be seedless. Fraxinus pennsylvanica ‘Urbanite’ Urbanite Ash 50 40 No 6 N/A Tolerant of city conditions. Ginkgo biloba 'Magyar' Magyar Ginkgo 50 25 No 6 N/A Yes more upright and narrow than 'Autumn Gold’. Gymnocladus dioicus 'Espresso' Espresso Kentucky Coffee 50 35 No 6 N/A Very coarse branches - extremely large bi-pinnately compound leaves. Liquidambar styraciflua ‘Rotundiloba’ Rotundiloba Sweetgum 45 25 No 8 N/A Only sweetgum that is entirely fruitless. Smooth rounded leaf lobes. Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree 60 30 No 8 N/A Fast-growing tree – can get very large in open conditions. Metasequoia glyptostroboides Dawn Redwood 50 25 No 6 N/A Fast growing deciduous conifer. Platanus x acerifolia 'Bloodgood' Bloodgood London Planetre 50 40 No 8 N/A More anthracnose resistant than other varieties – large tree that needs space. Platanus x acerifolia 'Yarwood' Yarwood London Planetree 50 40 No 8 N/A High resistance to powdery mildew. Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 60 45 No 8 N/A Interesting shaggy peeling bark. Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak 60 40 No 6 N/A Best oak for fall color. Quercus garryana Oregon Oak 50 40 No 8 N/A Yes Native to Pacific Northwest. Quercus imbricaria Shingle Oak 60 50 No 6 N/A Nice summer foliage - leaves can persist throughout the winter. Quercus muhlenbergii Chestnut Oak 60 50 No 6 N/A Coarsely toothed leaf Quercus robur English Oak 60 40 No 8 N/A Yes Large, sturdy tree. Acorns do not need dormant cold period to germinate, so can be invasive. Quercus rubra Red Oak 60 45 No 8 N/A Fast growing oak – large tree that needs space. Quercus velutina Black Oak 60 50 No 8 N/A More drought tolerant than red oak. Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress 55 35 No 8 N/A A deciduous conifer, broadly spreading when mature – columnar when young. Ulmus ‘Homestead’ Homestead Elm 60 35 No 6 N/A Complex hybrid - close in form to American elm - Resistant to Dutch elm disease. Ulmus ‘Frontier’ Frontier Elm 50 35 No 6 N/A Resistant to Dutch elm disease. Zelkova serrata ‘Greenvase’ Green Vase Zelkova 45 40 No 6 N/A Attractive exfoliating bark provides Winter appeal. Dark green leaves turn orange-red and purple in Fall. Zelkova serrata ‘Village Green’ Village Green Zelkova 40 40 No 6 N/A Green Vase, Mussichino and Halka are improved forms. City Tree List Type Scientific Common Name Mature Height Spread Under Wires? Min Strip Width Flower Color Fall Color PRTAB on list Comments Medium / Large Trees Acer campestre Hedge Maple 50 30 No 5 N/A Contrary to its name, this is not a small tree – nice overall shape and structure. Acer campestre ‘Evelyn’ Queen Elizabeth Hedge Maple 40 30 No 5 N/A Yes More upright branching than the species. Acer freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Autumn Blaze Maple 50 40 No 6 N/A Cross between red and silver maple – fast growing with good fall color. Acer miyabei 'Morton' State Street Maple 40 30 No 6 N/A Similar to, but faster growing and larger than Hedge maple. Acer pseudoplatanus ‘Atropurpureum’ Spaethii Maple 40 30 No 5 N/A Leaves green on top purple underneath. Acer Rubrum Autumn Spire 50 30 No N/A Full sun, partial shade narrow upright Acer rubrum ‘Scarsen’ Scarlet Sentinel Maple 40 25 No 6 N/A Leaves are darker green and larger than those of other Red Maples, and they hold up well in summer heat. Aesculus x carnea ‘Briottii’ Red Horsechestnut 30 35 No 6 Resists heat and drought better than other horsechestnuts. Betula jacquemontii Jacquemontii Birch 40 30 No 5 N/A White bark makes for good winter interest – best for aphid resistance, but does have issues with Bronze Birch Borer. Corylus colurna Turkish Filbert 40 25 No 5 N/A Tight, formal, dense crown - not for areas with high pedestrian traffic as tree can have significant debris from nut production. Fraxinus americana 'Autumn Applause' Autumn Applause Ash 45 25 No 6 N/A Purple fall foliage - Compact tree - reportedly seedless. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Cimmzam' Cimmaron Ash 50 30 No 6 N/A More upright than 'Patmore' with more bronze/cinnamon fall color. Ginko biloba ‘Autumn Gold’ Autumn Gold Ginkgo 45 35 No 6 N/A Narrow when young. Medium / Large Trees, Continued Liquidambar styraciflua ‘Moraine’ Moraine Sweetgum 40 25 No 8 N/A Light green foliage. More compact than other varieties of sweet gum. Brittle branches. Nothofagus antarctica Antarctic Beech 50 35 No 5 N/A Rugged twisted branching and petite foliage – difficult to find in the nursery trade. Tilia americana ‘Redmond’ Redmond Linden 50 30 No 8 N/A Pyramidal, needs extra water when young. Tilia cordata ‘Greenspire’ Greenspire Linden 40 30 No 6 N/A Symmetrical, pyramidal form – sometimes has structural issues due to tight branch attachements. Ulmus parvifolia ‘Emer II’ Allee Elm 45 35 No 5 N/A Exfoliating bark and nice fall color – Resistant to Dutch Elm Disease. Medium Columnar Trees Acer rubrum ‘Bowhall’ Bowhall Maple 40 20 No 6 N/A An upright, pyramidal form that is significantly wider than 'Armstrong' or 'Columnare'. Carpinus betulus ‘Fastigiata’P yramidal European Hornbeam 40 15 No 5 N/A Broadens when older. Cornus nuttallii x florida Dogwood Eddie's Whiter Wonder 30 20 No 5 Yes White flowers, red fall color Fagus sylvatica ‘Dawyck Purple’ Dawyck Purple Beech 40 12 No 6 N/A Purple foliage. Fagus sylvatica 'Fastigiata'Copper beed 'Red Obelisk' 30 10 No 6 N/A N/A Yes Column, sun, tolerant, burgundy leaves. Liriodendron tulipifera 'Fastigiatum' Columnar Tulip Tree 40 10 No 6 Good next to buildings – can have problems with tight branch angles. Malus ‘Tschonoskii’ Tschonoskii Crabapple 30 15 Yes 5 Sparse green fruit, pyramidal. Oxydendron arboreum Sourwood 35 12 No 5 Yes Consistent and brilliant fall color. Prunus sargentii 'Columnaris' Columnar Sargent Cherry 35 15 No 8 Upright form. The cherry with the best fall color. Can suffer from brown rot in spring. Prunus x hillieri ‘Spire’ Spire Cherry 30 10 Yes 6 One of the few ‘wire friendly’ columnar cherries. Can suffer from brown rot in spring. Pyrus calleryana ‘Cambridge' Cambridge Pear 40 15 No 5 Narrow tree with better branch angles and form than the species – brittle limbs may still be a problem with breakage due to ice or wet snow. City Tree List Type Scientific Common Name Mature Height Spread Under Wires? Min Strip Width Flower Color Fall Color PRTAB on list Comments Medium Trees Acer grandidentatum ‘Schmidt’ Rocky Mt. Glow Maple 25 20 Yes 5 N/A Yes Intense red fall color - Limited availability in nursery trade. Acer henryi Henry's maple 30 30 No 6 Yes Acer rubrum ‘Karpick’ Karpick Maple 40 20 No 6 N/A Finer texture than other narrow forms of columnar maple. Acer truncatum x A. platanoides 'Warrensred‘ Pacific Sunset Maple 30 25 Yes 5 N/A Limited use under higher wires. Betula albosinenesis var septentrionalis Chinese Red Birch 40 35 No 5 N/A White and pink peeling bark. Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbean 'Native Flame' 25 20 Yes 5 N/A Yes Outstanding fall color (variable – yellow, orange, red) – nice little tree. Cladrastis kentukea Yellowwood 40 40 No 5 White flowers in spring, resembling wisteria flower – blooms profusely only every 2 to 4 years – yellow/gold fall color. Cornus controversa 'June Snow' Giant Dogwood 40 30 No 5 Frothy, 6-inch clusters of white flowers in June. Cornus 'Eddie's White Wonder' Eddie's White Wonder Dogwood 30 20 Yes 5 A hybrid of C. florida and C. nuttalii. Crataegus crus-galli ‘Inermis’ Thornless Cockspur Hawthorne 25 30 Yes 5 Red persistent fruit. Crataegus phaenopyrum Washington Hawthorne 25 20 Yes 5 Yes Thorny – do not plant in high use areas. Crataegus x lavalii Lavalle Hawthorne 25 20 Yes 5 Yes Thorns on younger trees. Davidia involucrata Dove Tree 40 30 No 5 N/A Large, unique flowers in May. Eucommia ulmoides Hardy Rubber Tree 50 40 No 6 N/A N/A Dark green, very shiny leaves – insignificant fall color. gfagus Purple Oak Leaf Beech 50 30 No 6 N/A N/A Attractive purple leaves with wavy margins. Halesia monticola Mountain Silverbell 45 25 No 5 Attractive small white flower. Halesia tetraptera Carolina Silverbell 35 30 No 5 Attractive bark for seasonal interest. Koelreuteria paniculata Goldenrain Tree 30 30 Yes 5 Midsummer blooming – slow growing. Magnolia denudata Yulan Magnolia 40 40 No 5 N/A 6” inch fragrant white flowers in spring. Magnolia grandiflora ‘Victoria’ Victoria Evergreen Magnolia 25 20 Yes 5 N/A Evergreen magnolia – can be damaged in years with wet, heavy snow. Magnolia kobus ‘Wada's Memory’ Wada's Memory Magnolia’ 30 20 Yes 5 Yes Does not flower well when young. Ostrya virginiana Ironwood 40 25 No 5 N/A Yes Hop like fruit – slow growing. Phellodendron amurense 'Macho' Macho Cork Tree 40 40 No 5 N/A This variety is fruitless – fall color can be varied. High drought tolerance. Prunus cerasifera ‘Krauter Vesuvius’ V esuvius Flowering Plum 30 20 Yes 5 N/A Burgundy colored leaves – tree best used as an accent rather than in mass plantings. Pterostyrax hispida Fragrant Epaulette Tree 40 30 No 5 Pendulous creamy white flowers – fragrant – difficult to find in the nursery trade. Pyrus betulifolia Birch-leaf pear 'Dancer'30 20 No 5 N/A Yes Oval, tolerant, white flowers, burgundy purple in fall. Pyrus calleryana ‘Aristocrat’ Aristocrat Pear 40 30 No 5 One of the tallest flowering pears – good branch angles, but wood is brittle. Reported as invasive in other areas. Pyrus calleryana ‘Glen's Form’ Chanticleer or Cleveland Select Pear 40 20 No 5 Selected variety of callery pear – good spring flowering. Reported as invasive in other areas. Pyrus calleryana ‘Redspire’ Redspire Pear 35 25 No 5 Selected variety of callery pear – good spring flowering. Reported as invasive in other areas. Quercus ilex Holly Oak 40 30 No 5 N/A N/A Yes Evergreen oak - Underside of leaf is silvery-white. Often has a prominent umbrella form. Rhamnus purshiana Cascara 30 20 Yes 5 N/A Yes Native tree – fall color depends on exposure – purplish fruit feeds many native birds. Robinia x ambigua Pink Idaho Locust 35 25 No 5 Fragrant flowers. Sterile variety. Drought tolerant. Some varieties will sucker profusely. Sophora japonica 'Regent' Japanese Pagodatree 45 40 No 6 Has a rapid growth rate and tolerates city conditions, heat, and drought. Sorbus aucuparia ‘Mitchred’ Cardinal Royal Mt. Ash 35 20 No 5 A vigorous tree with upright branches and a very symmetrical habit, invasive. Sorbus x hybridia Oakleaf Royal Mt. Ash 30 20 Yes 5 It has leaves which are similar to English oak, and interesting bark for seasonal features. Styrax japonica Japanese Snowbell 25 25 Yes 5 Yes Reliable and easy to grow, it has plentiful, green ½” inch seeds. Flowers similar to lily in the valley. Tilia cordata ‘De Groot’ De Groot Littleleaf Linden 30 20 Yes 5 N/A One of the smaller stature littleleaf lindens. Tilia cordata ‘Chancole’ Chancelor Linden 35 20 No 6 N/A Pyramidal when young. Fragrant flowers that attract bees. Ulmus parvifolia 'Emer I' Athena Classic Elm 30 35 No 5 N/A High resistance to Dutch Elm Disease. Drought resistant. Cinnamon colored exfoliating bark for seasonal interest. City Tree List Type Scientific Common Name Mature Height Spread Under Wires? Min Strip Width Flower Color Fall Color PRTAB on list Comments Small Columnar Trees Maackia amurensis Amur Maackia 30 20 Yes 5 N/A Yes Interesting exfoliating bark – flowering in June or July - varies in intensity from year to year. Malus floribunda ‘Adirondack’ Adirondack Crabapple 20 10 Yes 5 Yes Very resistant to apple scab – one of the narrowest crabapples – persistant reddish ¼” fruit. Malus ‘Red Barron’ Red Barron Crabapple 20 10 Yes 5 Deep pink blossom and persistent red berries for seasonal interest. Parrotia persica 'JLColumnar'Persian Spire parrotia 25 10 Yes 4 N/A Yes New, columnar, bronze leaf edges. Prunus serrulata ‘Amanogawa’ Amanogawa Flowering Cherry 20 8 Yes 6 Yes Pinkish flower bud, changing to white flower. Sorbus americana ‘Dwarfcrown’ Red Cascade Mountain Ash 20 10 Yes 5 Nice winter form - Red berries in clusters. Small Trees Acer buergerianum Trident Maple 30 30 Yes 5 N/A Yes Somewhat shrublike – must train to a single stem – interesting bark. Acer circinatum Vine Maple 25 25 Yes 5 N/A Avoid using on harsh sites – native tree. Acer ginnala ‘Flame’Flame Amur Maple 25 20 Yes 5 Clusters of small cream colored flowers in spring – very fragrant. Nice fall color. Informal branch structure. Acer glabrum Douglas (Rocky Mountain) Maple 30 30 No 5 N/A Yes Sun to part shade, yellow fall color. Acer griseum Paperbark Maple 30 20 Yes 5 N/A Peeling cinnamon colored bark for seasonal interest. Acer palmatum Japanese Maple 20 25 Yes 5 N/A Many varieties available – select larger varieties for street planting. Acer pseudosieboldianum Korean maple 22 20 Yes 4 N/A Yes Sun, shade, upright, good fall color. Acer tataricum 'Patdell'Pattern Perfect Tatarian maple 25 20 Yes 4 Yes Oval shape, entire-leafed (no lobes), strudy, fall color Acer triflorum Three-Flower Maple 25 20 Yes 5 N/A Multi seasonal interest with tan, exfoliating bark and red, orange/red fall color. Amelanchier grandiflora ‘Princess Diana’ Princess Diana Serviceberry 20 15 Yes 4 Good for narrower planting strips. Amelanchier grandiflora Rainbow Pillar 'Glenn's Upright' 20 15 Yes 4 Yes White flowers; edible fruit; red fall color. Amelanchier grandiflora Serviceberry 'Robin Hill'25 15 Yes 4 Yes Upright oval;sun; colorful, low maintenance Amelanchier laevis 'JFS-ARB'Serviceberry 'Spring Flurry' 28 20 No 4 Yes Upright oval, sun, reliable street tree Amelanchier laevis Serviceberry 'Snowcloud' 25 15 Yes 4 Yes Upright oval, sun/part shade, reliable street tree. Amelanchier laevis Serviceberry 'Cumulus'25 10 No 4 Yes Upright, early bloom, reliable street tree. Amelanchier x grandiflora ‘Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 20 15 Yes 4 Good for narrower planting strips – reliable bloom and fall color. Arbutus ‘Marina’Strawberry Tree 25 20 Yes 5 N/A Yes Substitute for Pacific madrone – Shaggy bark, evergreen, full sun tree form difficult to maintain. Asimina triloba Paw Paw 30 20 Yes 5 N/A Burgundy flower in spring before leaves. Shaggy bark, full sun, tree form difficult to maintain. Carpinus japonica Japanese Hornbeam 20 25 Yes 5 N/A Wide spreading, slow growing – fall color is not outstanding. Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 25 30 Yes 5 Deep pink flowers on bare twigs in spring. Cercis siliquastrum Judas Tree 25 30 Yes 5 Deep pink flowers on bare twigs in spring – drought resistant. Cornus alternifolia Pagoda Dogwood 25 25 Yes 5 Small white flowers in flat clusters – fall color is varied. Cornus kousa ‘Chinensis’Kousa Dogwood 20 20 Yes 4 Yes Does not do well on harsh, dry sites. Cornus x 'Rutban'Aurora dogwood 20 20 No 5 Yes Upright to spreading, pink flowers, red fall color. Cornus mas Cornelian cherry 25 20 Yes 5 N/A Yes Early small yellow flowers, wildlife value, edible fruit. Cotinus obovatus American Smoke Tree 25 25 Yes 4 Yes Showy pinkish panicles of flowers in the spring – reddish purple leaves on some varieties. Lagerstroemia 'tuscarora'Tuscarora Hybrid Crape Myrtle 20 20 Yes 4 Light cinnamon brown bark lends year round interest – drought resistant – likes a warm site. Magnolia 'Elizabeth'Elizabeth Magnolia 30 20 Yes 5 N/A Yellowish to cream colored flower in spring. Magnolia 'Galaxy'Galaxy Magnolia 25 25 Yes 5 Yes Showy pink flowers. Magnolia x loebneri Loebner Magnolia 20 20 Yes 5 Yes Flower is ‘star’ shaped rather than tulip like – white to pinkish white in March or April. Malus ‘Golden Raindrops’Golden Raindrops Crabapple 20 20 Yes 5 Disease resistant – persistent yellow fruit in fall and winter. Malus 'Donald Wyman'Donald Wyman Crabapple 25 25 Yes 5 Large white blossom – nice green foliage in summer. City Tree List Type Scientific Common Name Mature Height Spread Under Wires? Min Strip Width Flower Color Fall Color PRTAB on list Comments Small Trees Malus 'Jarmin'Marilee crabapple 24 10 Yes 4 N/A Yes Upright, nearly fruitless, large mid-spring white flowers. Malus 'Lancelot' ('Lanzam')Lancelot Crabapple 15 15 Yes 4 Red flower buds, blooming white – red persistent fruit. Malus 'Royal Raindrops'Malus x JFS-KWS 15 15 No 4 N/A Yes Purplish leaves, late spring pink flowers, maroon fruit. Malus 'Sugar Tyme'Malus Sutyzam 18 15 No 4 N/A Yes Upright spreading, early spring white flowers, red fruit. Parrotia persica Persian Parrotia 30 20 No 5 Yes Blooms before it leafs out – drought tolerant - Varied fall color - reds, oranges and yellows. Parrotia persica 'Ruby Vase'Ruby Vase ironwood 28 16 Yes 4 Yes Upright, new foliage red, bright fall color. Parrotia persica 'Vanessa'Vanessa parrotia 28 14 No 4 Yes Upright, red fall foliage & winter flowers, tolerant. Prunus ‘Frankthrees’Mt. St. Helens Plum 20 20 Yes 5 N/A Burgundy colored leaves – tree best used as an accent rather than in mass plantings. Prunus ‘Newport’Newport Plum 20 20 Yes 5 N/A Burgundy colored leaves – tree best used as an accent rather than in mass plantings. Prunus ‘Snowgoose’S now Goose Cherry 20 20 Yes 5 Yes This selection sports abundant white flowers and healthy green, disease-resistant foliage. Prunus cerasifera ‘Thundercloud’Thundercloud Plum 30 20 No 5 N/A Burgundy colored leaves – tree best used as an accent rather than in mass plantings – can produce significant fruit Prunus x yedoensis ‘Akebono’Akebono Flowering Cherry 25 25 Yes 6 Yes Has masses of large, semi-double, pink flowers, most widely planted cherry in Pacific Northwest. Sorbus alnifolia Korean Mountain Ash 35 30 No 5 Simple leaves and beautiful pink/red fruit. Stewartia monodelpha Orange Bark Stewartia 30 20 Yes 5 Extraordinary cinnamon colored bark – avoid hot, dry sites. Stewartia psuedocamellia Japanese Stewartia 25 15 Yes 5 Yes Patchwork bark, white flower in spring. Styrax obassia Fragrant Styrax 25 20 Yes 5 Smooth gray bark and fragrant white flowers. Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk'Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 20 15 No 4 N/A Yes Rounded, sun, fragrant flowers, low maintenance, tolerant. Zelkova serrata City Sprite Zelkova JFS- KWI 25 20 Yes 4 N/A Yes Bright green foliage, low maintenance. Zelkova serrata Wireless; Schmidtlow 25 35 Yes 8 N/A Yes Spreading vase shape, elm-like, firm hand when young. Discovery Road Project Landscaping Introduction The Discovery Road project will be providing sidewalk, a bike path, and rebuild the existing street between the Rainier Roundabout and Salish School. As part of the design of this project, there will be strategic landscaping placed along the road. City staff and our project design team landscape architect will be working through landscape design details between now and the next PRTTAB meeting. The objective of this agenda item is to introduce the design elements we are seeking to address, obtain preliminary thoughts and suggestions as well as prepare for the review of a final design at the February PRTTAB meeting. Project Limits and Landscaping Areas The following illustrates show the extend of the project and the typical cross section which shows a landscaping strip on the north and south sides of the street. Project Limits are circled in the above illustration. Typical Cross Section. Note the landscape strip on the left is 5-7 feet wide and will contain a drainage swale. The landscape strip on the right is 4 feet wide. Oblique Illustration of the Roadway showing stormwater swale and planter strips. Landscaping Design Objectives The following objectives are key consideration for the landscaping design. In no particular order, these objectives must be balanced. • Environmental sustainability and resiliency to climate change • Low water use • Low maintenance (mowing, trimming, weeding, and irrigation). Staff cannot keep up with what they have. • Irrigation to be used only for 3 years for plant establishment • Landscaping budget is limited by grant funds • Traffic calming is a key function of landscaping for the street operations • Plants must be compatible with stormwater treatment goals • A mix of trees and bushes may be desirable. The following illustrations demonstrate some of the design goals. Shows general vertical clearance goals for mature vegetation Vegetation creates a confined appearance to the street versus an open highway inducing lower traffic speeds Landscaping that works exists through out the City of Port Townsend. Could a combination of bushes and trees accomplish the objective. We do not anticipate a plan like Rainier or Downtown, but rather like other streets that have more diverse landscaping and less intensity. Parks Maintenance Staff 2021 Accomplishments This year we would like to take a minute to celebrate accomplishments in 2021. The parks staff spent a large part of the year with only two staff members until Shawn Wiles joined the team late this summer. Thankfully, we had one seasonal position. The projects completed are in addition to the normal day to day work the staff performs including janitorial, mowing and trimming, park checks, playground equipment inspection, responding to the public, fixing vandalism and so much more. The following list is in no particular order. • Obtained Tree Assessment Reports on Large trees at Chetzemoka, Gateway and Bell Tower • Completed ACAC Grant ADA Trail and Kiosk at Chetzemoka • Obtained a Garden Club grant - $500 for plants for volunteers at Chetzemoka gardens • Installed 3 memorial benches at Pope Marine Park and Haller Stairs • Painted Chetzemoka benches and tables painted, gazebo floor sanded and repainted • Rebuilt Rose arbor rebuilt, roses and other climbers rejuvenated and returning • Rebuilt the lower bridge at Chetzemoka tropical garden • Installed the Storywalk Trail at Kah Tai and added gravel to main trail • Removed the failing basketball hoops at Mountain View • Installed gravel trail in front of Library • Replaced and treated/repainted Skate park fence (Risk management grant = $23,000) • Removed ivy off the back fence at Chetz, on Roosevelt St. • Planted trees at Rotary (shore pines), Kah Tai prairie (Garry oaks), Haller (palm), and Pope Marine park (Vine Maple), Golf course along San Juan (Sequoias) • Installed ADA accessible trail at 9th and McPherson • Repaired/replaced plumbing and irrigation manifold at Haller • Engaged more volunteer gardeners at Chetzemoka, Gateway, City Hall and on trail work • Removed failing raingardens at Bishop Play park and installed underdrain system playground to road • Removed buildup of large graffiti at Skatepark from when we were understaffed in 2020 • Repaired Haller Fountain statue as designed • Helped PT Main Street with the Adams street pocket park, installed hose bib, added trail between • Installed Creative District trail signs (60+) • Installed Adopt a Park signs • Adjusted grade of Adams street trail from Jefferson to Washington, used PUD poles • Addressed failing landmark tree at Gateway Park • Addressed shoreline erosion at Adams street end • Repaired Erosion on Howard Street Trail • Added ADA railing extensions to the Haller Stairs. • Prepared information for Banked Capacity process. Parks appreciates the help from other City Departments. Considerable help was provided by the Streets crew for addressing the Gateway Trees, Adams Street erosion, and the Adams Street Buggy Trail. Additionally, the Fleets crew performed most of the welding and steel replacement at the Skate Park and at the Haller Stairs. The Water Department helped with leaks at the Golf Course and Haller Fountain. Open RFQs (Request for Qualifications) NOTICE TO CONSULTANTS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR SIMS WAY GATEWAY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION & BOAT YARD EXPANSION Port of Port Townsend, Jefferson County, Washington STATEMENT DUE: March 31, 2022 This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeks a qualified consultant to provide professional services public engagement, concept plan development and plans, specifications and estimate for the Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation & Boat Yard Expansion (project). The project lead will be the Port of Port Townsend (Port) but includes close coordination with the City of Port Townsend (City) and Jefferson County Public Utility District No. 1 (PUD) as partner agencies. The Port of Port Townsend reserves the right to amend the terms of this RFQ, to circulate various addenda, or to withdraw the RFQ at any time, regardless of how much time and effort consultants have spent on their respo nses. Scope The project is intended to address safety and reliability issues with PUD’s power transmission lines feeding Port Townsend, implement the City’s Gateway Development Plan and expand the Boat Haven boat yard to the Port’s property line including electrical distribution, constructing a pedestrian walkway on the south side of Sims Way, replanting trees and landscaping on the Sims Way corridor, and fencing the boat yard with an aesthetically pleasing design. The project is envisioned to be developed in several phases. The first phase will center on public outreach. Working with a group of citizen stakeholders who represent a cross - section of the community and working with the City Park, Recreation, Trees & Trails Advisory Board, the consultant will facilitate the development of a vision for the future corridor centered on ecological benefit, environmental stewardship, and sustainable transportation. The second phase of the project entails surveying, permitting, and the development of contract plans, specifications, and estimate for construction. For more information, please see the project web pate at https://cityofpt.us/publicworks/project/sims-gateway-and-boat-yard-expansion-project Submittal of Statement of Qualifications Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) submitted in response to this RFQ must include the following information: • Consultant or firm name, phone numbers, postal, and email addresses • Identification of project team including prime and key subconsultants (max. 2 single-sided 8.5×11 pages). • Résumés of key personnel (max. 5 single-sided 8.5×11 pages) • List of past projects with a brief description and reference contact information for each (max. 5 single-sided 8.5×11 pages) • A one-page cover letter (optional) Please submit an electronic copy of your SOQ in Adobe.pdf format no later than 2:00 PM on March 31, 2022 to: Karen Erickson, Port Executive Assistant karen@portofpt.com Please also submit five (5) printed copies of your SOQ post marked no later than March 31, 2022, mailed to or hand-delivered to: Matt Klontz, Director of Capital Projects/Port Engineer c/o Karen Erickson PO Box 1180, 2701 Jefferson Street Port Townsend, WA, 98368. Hand delivered SOQs must be received by 4:00 PM, March 31, 2022. Submittals will not be accepted after the identified times and dates. If there are any questions with respect to this Request for Qualifications, please contact Matt Klontz, Director of Capital Projects at 360-685-0656 ext 112, or matt@portofpt.com. Evaluation Criteria Submittals will be evaluated and ranked based on the following criteria: • Qualifications (Expertise/Capacity of Firm(s), including any subconsultants); • Key personnel, including point of contact for task orders and any sub- consultants; • Relevant project professional engineering experience, specifically contract experience with municipalities or other government entities; • Relevant project outreach experience, specifically ecological and environmental centered experience; • Relevant project landscaping architecture experience including arboriculture, and specifically signature transportation corridor experience. Americans with Disabilities Act Information The Port of Port Townsend in accordance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act commits to nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in all of its programs and activities. This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing Karen Erickson at karen@portofpt.com or by calling (360) 385-0656. Title VI Statement The Port of Port Townsend in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC §2000d to 2000d-4, and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 26 will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex in consideration for an award. Limitations The provisions of this solicitation may be altered in any of its terms by the Port of Port Townsend. No part of this solicitation is to be considered as part of a consultant contract, nor is any provision contained herein to be binding on the Port of Port Townsend unless expressly included by reference or adoption in a subsequent written agreement executed by both the Port of Port Townsend and the consulting firm. If there are any changes in the Request for Qualifications, or should it be determined that additional information exists which is substantively beyond the scope of the information provided herein, and that this information will be of value in preparation of a response to this Request, the changes or additional information will be posted and made available on the Port of Port Townsends website. Firms are responsible for checking for Request of Qualification updates. Publication dates (March 4, March 7, March 14, 2022)