No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix B - Stakeholder - Agency materials - file size reducedAgenda Bill AB21-099 Meeting Date: September 20, 2021 Agenda Item: IX. A. ☒ Regular Business Meeting ☐ Workshop/Study Session ☐ Special Business Meeting Submitted By: Steve King, PW Director Date Submitted: September 15, 2021 Department: Public Works Contact Phone: 360-379-5090 SUBJECT: Resolution 21-057 Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for a Public Infrastructure Fund Grant for the Port Townsend Sims Gateway and Tree Management Project, to Commit $100,000 in City Matching Funds, and to Execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Jefferson County Public Utility District and the Port of Port Townsend to Complete the Project. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: N/A for 2021 ☐ Consent ☒ Resolution Expenditure Amount: $ ☐ Staff Report ☐ Ordinance Included in Budget? Yes ☐ No ☒ ☐ Contract Approval ☐ Other: ☐ Public Hearing (Legislative, unless otherwise noted) ☐ 3-Year Strategic Plan: 4 - Ensure sustainable future for public services and facilities Cost Allocation Fund: 305 CIP Street SUMMARY STATEMENT: Jefferson County PUD and the Port of Port Townsend approached the City concerning a safety issue with the transmission lines and the Poplar Trees along Sims Way. Upon review of the situation, a joint effort has been developed to improve this situation while furthering the City’s Gateway Plan. The attached presentation will be provided at the Council meeting in which a description of the project elements will be detailed. In general, the project would entail removal of the trees, undergrounding of the power, installation of a pedestrian path, expansion of the Boat Haven boat yard and replacement of the Poplars with an appropriate tree that carries on the look at feel of the corridor while providing environmental and safety benefits. Staff has presented this topic to the Parks, Recreation, and Tree Advisory Board as well as the Council Infrastructure and Development Committee. Minutes from those meetings are attached. The presentation includes an approximate budget for the project at approximately $2 million. Passage of this resolution will enable staff to apply for grant funding in partnership with Jefferson County PUD and the Port of Port Townsend. Public Infrastructure Financing grants are available through Jefferson County. Staff proposes applying for this funding as a supporting partner to the Port of Port Townsend. Each of the three partners would bring resources to the table with the majority of funding coming from Jefferson PUD, the Port of Port Townsend, and the afore mentioned potential grant. It is anticipated that the City would need to provide $100,000 in resources. Potential sources for this match includes: General fund reserves, possibility of 2023 banked capacity, in-kind staff time, other grant resources, and community fund raising for environmental benefit. The schedule for this project would involve Public Outreach and design in 2022 with Construction in 2023 and 2024. Schedules are contingent on permitting and availability of funding. Given the high level of public interest for the Poplars, the City anticipates a thorough public process to help obtain the best result possible for this work. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 21-057 2. Presentation 3. Parks Recreation Trees and Trails Advisory Board Minutes – August 24, 2021 4. Council Infrastructure and Development Committee Minutes – September 1, 2021 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Council Infrastructure and Dev. Committee recommended moving forward to find funding and perform public outreach on 9/1/21 consistent with recommendations from the PRTAB. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to approve Resolution 21-057 Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for a Public Infrastructure Fund Grant for the Port Townsend Sims Gateway and Tree Management Project, to Commit $100,000 in City Matching Funds, and to Execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Jefferson County Public Utility District and the Port of Port Townsend to Complete the Project. ALTERNATIVES: ☒ Take No Action ☐ Refer to Committee ☒ Refer to Staff ☒ Postpone Action ☐ Remove from Consent Agenda ☐ Waive Council Rules and approve Ordinance ____ ☒ Other: The PIF Grant deadline is October 6th leaving one business meeting between now and the deadline. Resolution 21-57 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 21-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPLY FOR A PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE FUND GRANT FOR THE PORT TOWNSEND SIMS GATEWAY AND TREE MANAGEMENT PROJECT, TO COMMIT $100,000 OF CITY MATCHING FUNDS, AND TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT AND THE PORT OF PORT TOWNSEND TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT WHEREAS the Jefferson County Public Utility District (PUD) and the Port of Port Townsend (Port) recognize the poplar trees on Sims Way are incompatible with the overhead power lines and cause safety concerns; and WHEREAS, the PUD and the Port agreed to a joint project to rectify the safety concerns and increase the Boat Haven capacity; and WHEREAS, the City’s participation in the project will enhance the City’s Sims Way gateway; and WHEREAS, the project involves the removal of the poplar trees, undergrounding the power, installing a pedestrian path, expanding the Boat Haven, and replacing the trees with more appropriate trees; and WHEREAS, the City’s Parks, Recreation, Trees, and Trails Advisory Board and the Council’s Infrastructure and Development Committee support the project; and WHEREAS, the City’s share of the project is $100,000 in funds or resources; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Townsend, Washington, the City Manager is authorized to apply for a Public Infrastructure Fund Grant for the Sims Gateway and Tree Management Project, to commit $100,000 of City matching funds, and to execute and interlocal agreement with the Jefferson County Public Utility District and the Port of Port Townsend to complete the project. Resolution 21-57 Page 2 of 2 ADOPTED by the City Council of Port Townsend, Washington, at a regular meeting thereof, held this 20th day of September 2021. ___________________________________ Michelle Sandoval Mayor Attest: Approved as to form: ___________________________________ ____________________________________ Joanna Sanders, MMC Heidi Greenwood City Clerk City Attorney Sims Way Gateway and Tree Management City Council Business Meeting –Sept. 20, 2021 Council Infrastructure and Dev.Committee –Sept. 1, 2021 Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board Meeting -August 24, 2021 Attachment 2 - Page 1 of 21 Presentation Objective Share information about this topic as well as feedback from the PRTAB and Council I&D Committee. Ask for feedback. Ask for support to apply for a Public Infrastructure Financing Grant. Attachment 2 - Page 2 of 21 Problem Statement & Opportunity Attachment 2 - Page 3 of 21 Setting and Background Gateway Attachment 2 - Page 4 of 21 Setting and Background Burned leaves from power lines Transmission Powerlines Attachment 2 - Page 5 of 21 Setting and Background Attachment 2 - Page 6 of 21 Setting and Background Approx. 70 mature Poplars with many more volunteer trees Approx. 60 mature Poplars Attachment 2 - Page 7 of 21 Setting and Background Trees are on Port Property with some straddling right of way Attachment 2 - Page 8 of 21 Setting and Background Sims Way right of way line Attachment 2 - Page 9 of 21 References: Gateway Development Plan -1993 The Flats Commercial District proposes thinning of Poplars to enhance views... replanting of Poplars on the south side and other native trees on the north side... feature plantings along with trees and ground cover unique to this area... Strengthen pedestrian environment... Trees should be low enough to preserve views of uptown and the bluff... Sidewalk along the south side with a nature path on the north side. Take away: Distinct difference between the north and south sides of Sims Way. Attachment 2 - Page 10 of 21 Kah Tai Lagoon Park Landscape and Furniture Site Development -1986. Recommended planting zones along Kah Tai to support the natural environment. Recommends thinning and removal of Poplars with replanting of prescribed shrubs and trees according to the zone planting plan. Attachment 2 - Page 11 of 21 City Code •Right Tree Right Location. •Manage Trees in right of way •Discourages planting of inappropriate trees such as Lombardi Poplars. Attachment 2 - Page 12 of 21 Kah Tai Side of Sims Attachment 2 - Page 13 of 21 Kah Tai Side of Sims Existing Tree Profile Attachment 2 - Page 14 of 21 Proposed Work Phases 1.Mitigate the hazard –Tree trimming and removal 2.Power undergrounding 3.Path installation and tree replanting 4.Boatyard expansion 5.Kah Tai side of Sims Way tree removal and planting Attachment 2 - Page 15 of 21 Permitting Requirements Street Development Permit for all work within the right of way. (City, Port, and PUD) Flood Development Permit (Port of Port Townsend) Clearing and Grading Permit (Port of Port Townsend) Compliance with National Electric Code (PUD) Attachment 2 - Page 16 of 21 Concepts –Sims and Boat Haven Attachment 2 - Page 17 of 21 Cost and Grants PUD –Tree removal, undergrounding, and path installation. $700,000 Port –Boatyard expansion. $900,000 City –Replanting on Boat Haven side of Sims. $170,000 City –Tree removal and planting on Kah Tai side of Sims. $200,000 TOTAL = $1,970,000 Grants are necessary! Attachment 2 - Page 18 of 21 Tree Restoration Feedback PRTAB Right Tree, Right Location. Poplars are not the right tree Restoration should consider native trees, diversity, height, CO2 Sequestration, Water update, and aesthetics Concern over the Kah Tai side. Poplars need to be removed per prior recommendations for environmental health Recognize community interest and potential push back I&D Council Committee Support PRTAB Support Partnership Support Public Outreach Attachment 2 - Page 19 of 21 Public Outreach Necessary Work with PRTAB Public Process Recommendations Work with partners Develop visualizations Work through process of selecting the appropriate trees and landscaping Further the Gateway Plan vision with adjustments to today’s environment. Attachment 2 - Page 20 of 21 Discussion and Questions Attachment 2 - Page 21 of 21 PARKS, RECREATION & TREE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES Date: August 24, 2021 Time: 4:30 p.m. Location: City Hall (virtual) Members Present: Debbie Jahnke, Jennifer Rotermund, Jim Todd, John Nowak Members Excused: Sean Koomen, Brenda McMillan Members Absent: Staff Present: Public Works Director Steve King and Deputy City Clerk Haylie Clement Topic Motions/Recommendation/Action Approval of Agenda: The agenda was unanimously approved. Approval of Minutes: The minutes of April 24, 2021 were unanimously approved. Public Comment: There was none. Old Business: Pickleball Courts at Mountain View Steve King provided an overview of discussions since the last PRTAB meeting with the Dog Park representatives and the YMCA concerning court configuration. Jim Dow, Eric Seder, and Lynn Pierle from the pickleball club were present and provided a presentation illustrating a three court configuration leaving one of the three open for basketball and other activities. This configuration does not impact the dog park and facilitates multiple uses of primary interest to the YMCA. Concerns were raised by Mr. Todd regarding long term maintenance obligations. Steve provided an overview of the upcoming anticipated master planning process for Mountain View and the Golf Course and the need to secure more funding for parks to address the back log of maintenance as well as future park development. Motion: Move to support the club installing pickleball courts at Mountain View . The motion passed with 3 in favor and Jim Todd abstaining. New Business: Poplar Tree Removal and Replacement along Sims Way. Public Works Director Steve King briefed the Board with a presentation providing the concept of removal of Poplar trees on the Boat Haven side of Sims Way as a result of interference with the transmission power lines. The presentation also provide background for removal of Poplars on the Kah Tai side of Sims Way consistent with past studies and recommendations. Eron Berg, Exec. Director from the Port of Port Townsend was also present and shared the Port perspective on the project. The Presentation acknowledged the need to find grant funding to support a partnership project with the PUD, Port, and City. No Action Taken. The PRTAB provided support for moving forward with key recommendations concerning tree species, considerations for height, and the need for a plan. The board agreed that Poplars are not the right tree for the location and issues such as sprouting and sucker growth are a problem. Recommendations were also provided concerning emotional attachment and justifications for a significant change in the light of issues such as climate change. Attachment 3 Page 1 of 2 New Business: Gateway Park Landmark Tree. Steve King provided an update concerning the collapse of a significant section of the tree. The tree has been stabilized. Three options were presented for the tree. 1. Remove the damaged ½ of the tree; 2. Cable and perform weight reduction to preserve the tree for as much as 10-15 years while planting a replacement tree; or 3. Remove the tree and replant. Based on the arborist consultation, staff recommended option 2. No Action was taken. Consensus by the board supported moving forward with Option 2. Staff will bring back a recommendation for the replacement tree. Board member Rotermund suggested that we evaluate a California Ash as one of the possible options for replacement as the tree should be a stately park grade type of tree. New Business: Autumnal Arbor Day. Chair Jahnke presented that October is Urban and Community Forestry Month and our Tree City status requires an annual Arbor Day Proclamation and event. Chair Jahnke recommended that the City Council present an Arbor Day proclamation on Oct. 4th and recommended Oct. 16, 17,23 , 30 or 31 as the day to hold our Adopt A Native Tree Day to provide native trees and shrubs to the community. Board provided unanimous support. Staff Update: Steve King provided a brief update on a number of park, trails, and tree related topics including pool operations and staffing. An update on RCO grant funding was also provided. Steve shared that we are close to refilling the parks maintenance position. No Action. Public Comment and Board Comment: No public comment. Board member Nowak asked for time on the next agenda to discuss safe outdoor places for youth to gather with a focus on our parks. Chair Jahnke mentioned that RCO does not have a place in their programs for Port Townsend style trails, but rather support formalized trails such as the Olympic Discovery Trail. Next Meeting: The next regular meeting is October 26, 2021. The meeting adjourned at 6:02 p.m. Attachment 3 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 CALL TO ORDER The Council Infrastructure and Development Committee net on Wednesday, September 1, 2021, in City Hall Council Chambers at 540 Water Street. The meeting was called to order at 3:01 p.m. by City Clerk Joanna Sanders. Members present were David Faber, Amy Howard with Michelle Sandoval excused. ELECTION OF CHAIR There was approval of the nomination for David Faber as Chair. PUBLIC COMMENT There were none. AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT BRIEFING Public Works Director Steve King gave a presentation on a proposed City development of 14 acres at Evans Vista Street utilizing grant funding available for infrastructure. He noted that there are contingencies to the purchase agreement, including bringing the matter before Council for approval. The purchase is in feasibility until December 17. He recognized there is a need to include a timeline for future discussion. He noted to build the lift station is a three-year process. City Manager John Mauro responded to questions about discussions with housing providers and their needs for using this funding. COMPREHENSIVE STREETS PROGRAM BRIEFING – NEXT STEPS Overview Mr. King noted that staff would pause on a presentation on this topic until more work could be done. Next Steps: Funding, Transportation Impact Fees, Right of way maintenance responsibility SIMS WAY AND POPLAR REMOVAL AND TREE REPLANTING Mr. King gave a briefing on a proposal to remove poplar trees along Sims Way. He requested input on whether this should be pursued as well as what a replanting tree planting program might look like recognizing there are regulations about tree replacement in the right of way. Noting this presentation was given previously to the Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board, their recommendation is for evergreens, bushes, and shrubs. Funding needed of $2 million would be a partnership effort DRAFT Attachment 4 Page 1 of 2 Council Infrastructure and Development Committee Meeting September 1, 2021 between City, Port and PUD would be supported through requests for grant funding, possibly through PIF funding. Mr. Mauro noted the ICG has worked collaboratively to consider the benefits of this project. The Committee recognized the difficulty with public perception on such a project. There was further discussion of the practical and emergency needs that exist on the south and north side. PLANNING COMMISSION AND PARKS RECREATION TREES AND TRAILS ADVISORY BOARD REPORT PRTAB: Gateway Park Landmark, Pool, Park Naming, Pickleball Courts at Mountain View Mr. King gave a brief update on what occurred at the last Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board. There was mention that the Planning Commission should not be reporting to this committee whereas there are advisory board activities that might be appropriate to stay on top of related to the Work plan. Planning Commission Ms. Surber noted one item the Planning Commission would be reviewing are the Shoreline Master Program and Critical Areas update. STAFF AND DEPARTMENT UPDATES: DISC. RD, REGIONAL STORMWATER, GAINES LIFT STATION, OUTFALL, OGWS, ADAMS PLAZA, JEFFERSON ST ADA, MADRONA RIDGE DEV. PROPOSAL, STAFFING UPDATE Mr. King provided brief project updates from Public Works as did Planning Manager Judy Surber from the Development Services Department. PUBLIC COMMENT (AGENDA ITEMS ONLY) There were none. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6TH AT 3 PM Comprehensive Streets as well as possibly a Discussion of the Mill Agreement, and affordable housing property update. ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:26 p.m. Attest: Joanna Sanders, MMC City Clerk DRAFT Attachment 4 Page 2 of 2 Council Infrastructure and Development Committee Meeting September 1, 2021 Boat Yard Expansion and Sims Way Poplar Replacement Project Recommended Public Process Introduction: Public engagement and local stakeholder involvement in this Boat Yard Expansion and Sims Way Poplar Replacement project is critical for successful outcomes. The focus of this recommended public process is its focus on the tree replacement and Sims Way gateway enhancement elements of the project. Based on public feedback to date, the following process is recommended to provide for stepwise stakeholder process that affords the opportunity to bring well thought out information to the public in several steps prior to the City Council making decisions on elements of the final plan. Stepwise Stakeholder Process 1. After the December 15th Public Meeting, the partners (City, Port, and PUD) will solicit for professional services to include engineering for the boatyard expansion, general electrical design associate with the expansion and location of the underground transmission, and Sims way improvements including the path, Poplar replacement, and landscaping. For the Poplar replacement and Sims Way work we will be soliciting for expertise in Landscape Architecture and Arboriculture with knowledge of our Municipal Code's guidance on the importance of native species, species diversity and conifer/deciduous ratios. 2. Once a team of professionals is hired, the City will convene a 10 member stakeholder committee made up of 2-3 local experts in arboriculture, a Parks Recreation Trail and Tree Advisory Board (PRTTAB) liaison, and representatives for tourism, Port/boatyard/marine trades, PUD/safety, Admiralty Audubon/Kah Tai. City, Port, and PUD staff will also participate. 3. A series of stakeholder meetings will help the team establish the appropriate replacement plan. The intent being that developing the poplar replacement plan will be a participatory process, inclusive of community members and agency stakeholders. However, there will be guardrails in place such as project budget and having PRTTAB and City Council approval. 4. Once the plan has been established, the plan will be presented to the PRTTAB for recommendation of approval or not to the City Council. 5. Once the PRTTAB has provided a recommendation, City staff will provide the final decision making to the City Council. 6. City Council’s final decision will be on the replacement plan for the poplars. The boat yard expansion and overhead undergrounding work are independent of the decision making for the poplar replacement, yet the City, Port, and PUD agree that a single well-coordinated project with the final vision for the poplar replacement known early in the design development process is a key element to the overall project success. Public Engagement Public engagement and transparency of the process are critical. The use of town hall events in this era of COVID safety is a forum for providing transparency and soliciting public feedback. Periodic townhall events are anticipated. In addition, presentations to the PRTTAB and the City Council are opportunities for public engagement. The PRTTAB is the forum for the public to engage in the decisions making process. 1 SIMS WAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 12, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Welcome and Meeting Logistics: This stakeholder committee workshop is open to the public virtually. The principal purpose of the workshop is to allow the stakeholder committee, agency staff, and the design consultant to communicate with each other, answer questions, and get the stakeholder's opinions and input regarding the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project. It is not the opportunity to give public comment. Public comment can be provided at the Parks Recreation Tree Trail Advisory Board (PRTTAB) meetings during project updates. Written comments can be submitted to HYPERLINK "mailto:engagept@cityofpt.us" engagept@cityofpt.us . All written comment will be provided to the stakeholder committee, PRTTAB, and the City, Port, and PUD elected officials. The public is welcome to join the webinar and view the proceedings of the meeting. The meet ing will also be recorded and posted for later viewing on the project website at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project To join the webinar, follow these instructions. • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 226-425- 723 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: +1 (562) 247 -8422 Ext. 3 access code: 806-679-504 # I. Introductions and Ice Breaker II. Introduction to the project and charge for the Stakeholder Committee from Eron Berg, John Mauro, and Kevin Streett III. Process Review A. Video recording/Transparency B. Meeting Decorum C. Internal communications – Appearance of fairness and public trust D. Public comments E. Parks board meetings F. City council, port commission, and pud commission meetings 2 IV. Public records – City Clerk, Joanna Sanders V. Next Steps A. Information review – See City Website – Is there any existing information that is missing? B. Consultant – Next meeting, we plan to introduce our consultant C. PRTTAB Meeting on April 26, 2022 VI. Round table and Wrap - up A. What is the most interesting part of this project to you? B. How can you and we help the project for our community? VII. Set next meeting date and time: May ___, 2022 Parking Lot/Future Meetings The parking lot is for topics that come up that are not on the agenda and may be addressed in a future meeting. PARKS, RECREATION TREES, & TRAILS ADVISORY BOARD MEETING AGENDA April 26, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. | Virtual Meeting ****The State of Emergency declared by Governor Inslee temporarily requires participation by teleconference. There is no in person component to this meeting**** •Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 489-143-707 •Join by phone in listen-only mode: (360) 390-5064 Ext. 3 access code: 177-060-048# •Submit public comment emails to be read aloud (up to three minutes per person) to: publiccomment@cityofpt.us I.Welcome, Introduction & Call to Order - Chair Debbie Jahnke Good afternoon and welcome to this meeting of the Port Townsend Parks, Recreation, Trees & Trails Advisory Board. The role of this Board is to assist City staff and to advise the City Council on legislative matters concerning parks, recreation, trees and trails. This meeting is open to the public via this web format and is also being video recorded for those who could not attend the meeting today and for future reference. Given that this meeting is in virtual format, we ask that the board members raise their hands to be called on by the Chair. The public can do the same to comment during the public comment periods. We take public comment at the beginning and end of the meeting. II.Roll Call III.Introduction of New Members IV.Approval of Agenda V.Approval of February 22, 2022 Minutes VI.Public Comment (3 minutes per person/agenda items only) – Comments on Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project will be taken after the Staff Briefing. If joining by phone, please press *6 to raise your hand and *9 to unmute yourself. VII.Old Business A.Sims Way Stakeholder Briefing – 20 min •Reference last Stakeholder meeting video at https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project •Public Comments VIII.New Business A.City Staff Introductions, Roles, and Responsibilities (Steve King, Carrie Hite, Michael Todd) – 20 minutes B.RCO Grants (Presentation by Carrie Hite and Michael Todd) – 15 min C.Volunteer Recognition including John Nowak – (All) – 10 min Page 1 of 20 IX. Staff update – (Steve King, Carrie Hite, & Michael Todd) 15 minutes A. Interpretive signs – Kiosks Under Way – Signs are a future work item B. Maintenance Update C. Pool Update D. Bike and Ped Grants E. Open Space and Development F. Parks Tours G. Bench Donations X. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: May 24, 2022 XI. Public Comment XII. Adjourn Parking Lot/Future Meetings Trail signing Sims Way Project Donation Policy Update Page 2 of 20 MINUTES A link to a recorded video is available at: https://cityofpt.us/bc/page/parks-recreation-trees-and-trails-advisory-board-0 PARKS, RECREATION TREES, & TRAILS ADVISORY BOARD February 22, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. | Virtual Meeting I.Welcome, Introduction & Call to Order - Chair Debbie Jahnke Good afternoon and welcome to this meeting of the Port Townsend Parks, Recreation, Trees & Trails Advisory Board. The role of this Board is to assist City staff and to advise the City Council on legislative matters concerning parks, recreation, trees and trails. This meeting is open to the public via this web format and is also being video recorded for those who could not attend the meeting today and for future reference. Given that this meeting is in virtual format, we ask that the board members raise their hands to be called on by the Chair. The public can do the same to comment during the public comment periods. We take public comment at the beginning and end of the meeting. II.Roll Call: All board members present. Staff Present: Steve King.; Laura Parsons; Bre Ganne; Haylie Clement; Heidi Greenwood III.Approval of Agenda: Approved IV.Approval of October 26, 2021 Minutes: Approved V.Approval of December 14, 2021 Minutes: Approved VI.Public Comment (3 minutes per person/agenda items only): None VII.Old Business A.Sims Way Stakeholder Process (Steve King, no action) – 5 min No action taken. Steve K provided a brief overview of an update and next steps. B.Work Planning Process Overview – (Heidi Greenwood, no action) - 15 min No action taken. Heidi G provide an overview of the work planning process. Steve K. agreed to send a copy of the City work plan to the board in a follow up email for information. C.Discovery Road Final landscaping plan review – (Steve King, Laura Parsons, Bre Ganne, no action) - 15 min No action taken. Board provided consensus agreement with the plan and included recommendation to use a seedless Sweet Gum variety or alternative. Board commented on the appropriateness of the planting plan. Staff thanked board for Page 3 of 20 support and advice. VIII. New Business A. Donation policy “Memorial bench policy update” - (Presentation by Steve King and Group Discussion) - 10 min Steve K provided a brief overview of where policy is inconsistent with practice and City code. Board supported revision of policy and suggested that a map of eligible locations for donation be provided for board pre-approval as a way to expedite process as opposed to bringing each item to the board. Board also recommended advertising program as well as ensuring that there is recognition provided to the donors. The newsletter is a good option for example. B. Right of way Principles – (Presentation by Steve King and Group Discussion) - 20 min Steve K. provided presentation and overview. Board discussed nuances and made suggestions concerning the City’s mowing program. Suggestions were made to look at highway 3 as an example in Kitsap Co. Comments were made about the PUD trimming and harm to trees. Board suggested looking for ways the members can help. C. Parks Foundation – (Intro. of topic from Debbie Jahnke and Steve King) - 10 min This item was deferred to a future meeting. IX. Staff update – (Steve King) 5-10 minutes A. Interpretive signs – Kiosks Under Way – Signs are a future work item B. Gateway Tree – Pruning Complete and Monterey Cypress on order C. Utility Vehicle – Ordered D. New Facilities and Parks Manager – Michael Todd E. New Director of Parks and Recreation Strategy – Carrie Hite F. Volunteer Program & Recognition next meeting X. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: April 26, 2022 XI. Public Comment: Russell Hill: Concern over trees hanging on the Powerline between Mill and Hwy 20. Steve will reach out to other agencies to see if there any work planned. Other Discussion: Council Member Howard shared the role of the Liaison. Board Member Nowak asked about recreation side of PRTTAB. Steve responded with future work to be done when Carrie Hite comes on board. Page 4 of 20 XII. Adjourn Parking Lot/Future Meetings Trail signing Introductions of new staff Sims Way Project Donation Policy Update Page 5 of 20 1 Joanna Sanders From:brendainpt@gmail.com Sent:Sunday, April 24, 2022 9:12 AM To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Lombardy Poplars I understand the  removal of the poplars next to the Port.  But removing the poplars in Kah Tai  opens the nature park  to the strong southern winds of winter. These trees  are an excellent wind break. Although there has been much  planting in the Park not many trees are big enough to act as a wind break..  Page 6 of 20 From:Katherine Darrow To:publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject:Kah Tai Prairie Preserve Date:Monday, April 25, 2022 10:00:41 AM This comment is addressed to the Parks, Recreation, Trees, & Trails Advisory Board for public comment/question at the April 24th meeting: Today and for the next couple of months is peak season for wildflowers at our beloved Kah Tai Prairie Preserve. The Washington Native Plant Society and Chetzemoka Trail Project have each had beautiful professionally made interpretive signs posted at the Prairie for years to help educate visitors about the cultural and ecological significance of the rare prairie remnant in this region. Would it be possible for the people in charge of the adjacent construction project to move their materials and equipment to another location in the parking lot so that people can enjoy unobstructed views of the prairie and also have easy access to the interpretive signs? The current arrangement seems disrespectful and an unnecessary intrusion on the educational efforts and enjoyment of the Prairie. Thank you, Katherine Darrow 3403 Sherman Street Port Townsend 623-533-0171 (cell) Page 7 of 20 Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 001 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email The popular trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas and no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine 002 9/28/2021 Craig Voice Mail Expressed passionate discontent with tree removal 003 9/28/2021 Karen Rudd karenlenerudd@gmail.com email Please put trees between car lane and bike/sidewalk lanes. 004 9/16/2021 Nancy Erreca nerreca@aol.com website The project is not needed, housing is needed. 9/28/2021 Keith Emry Facebook Fix the roads first 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Fixing Lawrence street should have priority. How about something for the people that live here not the ones coming to visit 9/28/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook please please please do soil tests before planting; make sure the new trees have room to grow and are the right plant for the right place. Please do not leave this in the hands of out-of-town landscape architects who, though I have great respect for many, are not always very knowledgeable about trees (beyond their aesthetic properties). 9/28/2021 Fredrich Bonbast Facebook Lawrence is fine. the roads in my neighborhood look like iraq, except when it rains. then they look like iraq in a flood. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Friedrich Bombast I picked Lawrence because it’s a major street that many use. 9/28/2021 Robert Jaye Facebook Wow, looks like the city has abandoned reasonable setbacks and their importance for maintaining the city's character. The concept picture shows maybe 15 feet from the road. Nice way to say welcome to PT. 9/28/2021 Sarah Smith Facebook What exactly is wrong with the poplars? Why are they Not environmentally friendly? 9/28/2021 Russell Hansen Facebook Walter McQuillen thank you ! 9/28/2021 Sarah Ludlum-Wisehart Facebook Friedrich Bombast YES!!! All the roads in Uptown need to be fixed!!! This project is ridiculous! 9/28/2021 David Crozier Facebook Cant really believe anyone thinks moving the boat yard boundary closer to the street is more eye appealing than the current situation. This has to be the most unpopular city council project yet. 9/28/2021 Gus Sebastian Facebook I think Boat Haven adds good character to PT. Its pretty cool seeing it when you come down the S curves. Its a major part of the history of this town. "A Victorian Seaport" Many local folks utilize the boatyard not only as a means of employment but recreationally. I support this idea. If you have ever looked up at those tress in big wind you might be concerned. Yes fix the roads, yes fix everything, but please don't complain about an idea that could grow a industry in PT. 9/29/2021 Fredrich Bombast Facebook Walter McQuillen i get that. but i walk a lot of neighborhoods, and many of the out-of-the way streets aren't even streets anymore. at least Lawrence doesn't have massive potholes and washouts. i once asked a city guy about the street in front of our house, which is broken asphalt and gravel undercoat, and he said the cost to repair it would be about the annual street repair budget for the whole city. "improvement projects," though, are sexier. 9/29/2021 Timothy Stone Facebook More gentrification, plz? 9/29/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook Sarah Smith they are wonderful trees but at this stage of their lifespan they are falling apart in high winds. It's a busy road with power lines so there is a reasonable likelihood that a tree failure (usually large sections of these trees break out like ice- bergs off a glacier) can cause damage and even injury. They have a few other issues as well. They send up suckers, new trees from the roots, a great distance from the original tree. They are beloved by aphids. They also produce a lot of pollen which a number of people are allergic to. While I have always admired this allee, it is time to plan for the future; replace these with something new and (hopefully) native trees and shrubs, something to take us the next 100 years. 9/29/2021 James Schultz Facebook Plant pot on the roadway! Pot Townsend rides again. Page 8 of 20 9/29/2021 Stephen Hall Facebook Very low on the priority list for the city. Putting utilities underground is a nice goal. Roads repairs and replacement is much higher on the list. Just not as sexy on the council resume. 005 9/29/2021 Rachel Ganapoler rachelganapoler@gmail.com email The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines..and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? 006 9/29/2021 Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com email In support of removing of removing trees, shrubs and grass that might cause raging wildfires 007 10/13/2021 Dori Bailey BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM email The money should be spent for the homeless. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. 008 10/17/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Replanting the Poplars makes sense but stick to the 1993 study. There are benefits to the poplars. 09 10/19/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached the 1993 Gateway Development Plan recommend read page 14 010 10/11/2021 O'Neill Louchard oneill@olympus.net email Thoughtful planted in needed, mixed species array. 011 10/7/2021 Joni Blanchard email A professional tree person should be consulted about trees and their impacts. Save the yellow lupine. 012 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 and happy to join the planning committee. 013 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Has there been a soil analysis, makes all the difference in the world for tree survival 014 10/27/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email take into consideration all the functions that the poplars provide, including the impressive beauty. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. 015 11/4/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars. 016 11/8/2021 Larry Eifert larryeifert@gmail.com email But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. 017 11/7/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I'm not advocating what-so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! 018 11/7/2021 Karen Anderson karenlanderson736@gmail.com email What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail?  How would it translate into jobs, specifically? There is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. The proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims. I support the planting of native species. 019 11/9/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually. acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. Page 9 of 20 020 11/9/2021 Joan Fabian fabianily@gmail.com email 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existent trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the Netherlands. 021 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. 022 11/2/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. 023 11/17/2021 Fred Weinmann fweinmann@cablespeed.com email A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees. 024 11/19/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. Do not cut trees in December. 025 12/1/2021 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website 026 12/9/2021 Tom Myers tommyers393@gmail.com email Go for it! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ 027 12/10/2021 Linda Tilley artbytilley.com lindatilley44@gmail.com email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. 028 12/13/2021 anonymous butterfly@olypen.com engagept Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? 029 12/12/2021 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref Page 10 of 20 030 12/10/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re-vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). 031 12/9/2021 Andrea Hegland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? When are you proposing to do this? What permits will you be securing? When will you be securing permits? Will you be conducting environmental review. 032 12/6/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan.  At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to  attributes i.e.  functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. 033 12/7/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money.  034 11/22/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. 035 12/14/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the multi-agency plan. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. 036 12/15/2021 Karta John Miller susanmiller@olypus.net engagept Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. 037 12/15/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. 038 12/30/2021 Val Johnstone valjohnstone@aol.com engagept Recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare " Red Maple 039 12/21/2021 Kathy Knoblock toddk@msn.com email I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? 040 1/13/2022 Debbie Jahnke dbjahnke@att.net email Comments on information provided to public 041 2/12/2022 Cliff Moore meamoore@comcast.net email consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. Page 11 of 20 042 2/14/2022 Patti Hoyecki phoyecki@yahoo.com email supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio.  I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future.  The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. 043 2/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com engagept Where is the Long Term Tree Management Plan? What are the plans for the cut trees? Who does one become a stakeholder? Reconsiderwiping out the Kah Tai Populars. 044 2/15/2022 Gail Workman marksyounglady@gmail.com engagept Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. 045 2/18/2022 Richard and MaryAnn Moore ptmoores1@q.com email We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week. 046 2/22/2022 Johnny Ms Johnson's eighth grade class mail The hearts on the poplars comment 047 2/22/2022 Robin Jahnke public comment Stormwater drainage needs to be developed 048 3/6/2022 George Randels gr321@olypen.com email Remove poplars on port side but leave trees on lagoon side. 049 3/8/2022 Mary Elayne Dunphy medunphy@comcast.ne email I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. 050 3/20/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Clarification of accessment report: populars would not likely be killed if trenching done by Port fence line, safe option if heavy equipment stayed off of the main roots closer to tree on the Port side. 051 3/21/2022 Linda Lebrane lebranemusic@yahoo.com engagept Save the poplars 052 3/14/2022 Kelly Drake kellydrake22@gmail.com engagept I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? 053 12/13/2021 anonymous krdmps@hotmail.com engagept How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? 054 4/6/2022 Brent Vadopalas brent@vadopalas.org engagept It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines.illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. Page 12 of 20 1 SIMS WAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 12, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Welcome and Meeting Logistics: This stakeholder committee workshop is open to the public virtually. The principal purpose of the workshop is to allow the stakeholder committee, agency staff, and the design consultant to communicate with each other, answer questions, and get the stakeholder's opinions and input regarding the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project. It is not the opportunity to give public comment. Public comment can be provided at the Parks Recreation Tree Trail Advisory Board (PRTTAB) meetings during project updates. Written comments can be submitted to HYPERLINK "mailto:engagept@cityofpt.us" engagept@cityofpt.us . All written comment will be provided to the stakeholder committee, PRTTAB, and the City, Port, and PUD elected officials. The public is welcome to join the webinar and view the proceedings of the meeting. The meet ing will also be recorded and posted for later viewing on the project website at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project To join the webinar, follow these instructions. •Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 226-425- 723 •Join by phone in listen-only mode: +1 (562) 247 -8422 Ext. 3 access code: 806-679-504 # I.Introductions and Ice Breaker II.Introduction to the project and charge for the Stakeholder Committee from Eron Berg, John Mauro, and Kevin Streett III.Process Review A.Video recording/Transparency B.Meeting Decorum C.Internal communications – Appearance of fairness and public trust D.Public comments E.Parks board meetings F.City council, port commission, and pud commission meetings Page 13 of 20 2 IV. Public records – City Clerk, Joanna Sanders V. Next Steps A. Information review – See City Website – Is there any existing information that is missing? B. Consultant – Next meeting, we plan to introduce our consultant C. PRTTAB Meeting on April 26, 2022 VI. Round table and Wrap - up A. What is the most interesting part of this project to you? B. How can you and we help the project for our community? VII. Set next meeting date and time: May ___, 2022 Parking Lot/Future Meetings The parking lot is for topics that come up that are not on the agenda and may be addressed in a future meeting. Page 14 of 20 Stakeholder committee emails up to 4/12/22 Mr. King: Thank you for updating our Committee on the Sims Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Project, and soliciting questions about the process and work to be performed. As I indicated previously, I will perform in any capacity the agency partners deem appropriate. I am full of questions, as I assume others are, and would be remiss if I did not respond to your request. Here are my current questions: 1.From what viewpoint shall the Stakeholder Committee contribute? That is, shall participants dispassionately help the partners meet their strategic objectives by contributing experience, perspectives, materials, and resources; or shall they more narrowly represent the positions, interests, or concerns of a subset of individuals or organizations? Will participants propose concepts and solutions, or simply serve as a sounding board for the partners and consultant? 2.How will Project decisions be made? For example, shall we strive for consensus, or vote on project elements, or apply objective decision making by ranking design alternatives based on selected criteria? 3.I am aware of the Project’s broad vision and goals; however, the specific objectives escape me. Can we pin down the current Project work scope? Can we define the Project area? Will the Project include designs for boat yard expansion and Boat Haven stormwater system modifications (in the Project area)? (Can Boat Haven stormwater facilities be in the Sims Way ROW?) 4.Is it possible to prepare and distribute a base map (roll plot) to participants showing ownerships, easements, edges of pavement, utilities, structures, and Project area (and tree survey)? Stationing would help with location references (e.g., WSDOT highway stationing for Sims Way). 5.Since the City conducted the Report on the Hydrology of Kah Tai Lagoon in November 1984, has additional information on lagoon hydrology and groundwater become available? Was an additional outlet pipe constructed, as recommended in the Report? 6.Are preliminary roadway/landscape designs available for the WSDOT-proposed roundabout at the intersection of Sims Way and Kearney Street? Thanks for the opportunity to serve. I patiently await my assignments! Steve Mader 612 Lawrence Street Page 15 of 20 Hi Steve~ It all sounds good! I have one question. In your email to us, you wrote 'Public comments' are encouraged and are to be sent to PRTTAB, and then you wrote in the agenda that their 'written comments' are to be sent to engage@cityofpt.us. Are they one and the same? That's a little confusing. Will the Steering Committee have access to all public comments throughout the process so that we can consider their opinions/suggestions as we're throwing out ideas together, or will we only have access to their comments bi-monthly during or after the PRTTAB meetings when the written minutes get posted online? I understand there may be a bombardment of opinions sent that can be overwhelming, but, they may just help guide the steering committee to hear of the community's wishes if we knew of them more often than every two months. It may help with the 'transparency' issue. Personally, I would like access to public comments on the issue as they come in - not every two months. Thanks you for clarifying! Joni From: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:26 PM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Cc: Matthew Klontz <matt@portofpt.com>; Will O'Donnell <wodonnell@jeffpud.org>; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; Eron Berg <Eron@portofpt.com>; Kevin Streett <kstreett@jeffpud.org>; Joanna Sanders <jsanders@cityofpt.us> Subject: First Sims Way Stakeholder meeting Good Morning All! Attached you will find the agenda to the first stakeholder meeting. We will be meeting at City Hall and will allow the public to tune into to watch the meeting virtually. The public will not be able to participate with comments in the meeting to allow us to focus on our work. However, the public will be encouraged to submit comments through the Parks Recreation Tree and Trail Advisory Board. We will also be recording the meeting for transparency of the process. This first meeting is intended to help us all get to know each other and as well as discuss the process and work ahead of us. One of the critical items that we will spend time on is how we work as a group and some protocols to ensure that our work is transparent. For example, this email is sent to you all under blind cc. This helps us avoid email discussions which become a public records challenge. Matt, Will, and I will be your primary contacts for this effort. The three of us will be stewarding this process on behalf of the community and the three agency partners. Arlene and Forest are not available and thus I’ll reach out to you independently to ask for introductory information as well as discuss the meeting points. There is also a possibility that Arlene and Forest may be able to join a portion of the meeting virtually. Page 16 of 20 We are very much looking forward to the work ahead and getting to know everyone. Thank you again for volunteering to partake in serving our community on such an important topic. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Steve Page 17 of 20 Thank you, City, for your new webpage! It's very informative. I just read Katy BIgelow's Poplar tree assessment report. I needed clarification on her remark in her summary that stated to the effect that 'no matter where PUD undergrounding occurs, critical root damage would occur and likely cause the trees' demise'. So, I wrote to her and asked for clarification. Here are my questions and her responses in blue: If the PUD trenches along the existing Port fenceline (one of their options), which is 25' away from the Poplars and beyond the 3' stormwater ditch, that has already been dug between the Poplars and the fenceline, would it still likely kill the Poplars? No. If the heavy machinery worked from the Port side to dig the trench and stayed off the main roots closer to the tree, wouldn't that be a safe option for the PUD trenching? Sure I just thought that was an important correction that needed to be known as all options are still being considered for this whole project. It is also good for us all to know that her assessment summary stated that 'the Poplar trees will likely stand with low but increasing risk', and 'I did not observe any large trunks or bases of trunks with a high potential to fall onto a target'. (By the ISA hazard rating chart, which she used, low risk means: Insignificant minor issues with no concerns for years to come, and the eventual moderate risk to come would be: no concerns for 10 years or more). That ISA hazard chart was listed at the end of her 2013 Assessment report. Although she suspected basal rot in the 2013 trees, also, they were still classified as 'low risk' of trunk failure. Her suggestions for maintaining the health of the Poplars and mitigating their offenses (root invasions, sucker sprouts) were also quite helpful. Can be found at the end of her 2012 Assessment report, also. Perhaps if any trees are left standing, these suggestions could be heeded. I agree with her in that it's an unlikely location for any kind of a substantial wildlife habitat being a busy work area with lots of noise, along with all the busy traffic. I also read the Kah Tai '86 Landscape Plan where it is recommended to selectively thin the Poplars to keep an open view into the Park, and to do pruning and sucker mowing to keep the Poplars healthy and contained. This recommendation is keeping with the following Gateway Plan approved after in 1993 that the Kah Tai group were a part of creating. The Plan that Page 18 of 20 recommended replanting any aging or compromising Poplars with the younger ones that were purposely planted. Thank you for providing such a comprehensive list of references for everyone's overall understanding. This information will provide a good basis for working out a compromising plan for the better good of our whole community. Joni Blanchard Page 19 of 20 Thanks Steve, As the City’s one-time arborist (1990) I endorse the assessment by professional arborist Katy Bigelow. Since as noted a few days ago, I will be in-flight at the time of the April 12 meeting, I wonder how I may best stay abreast of the committee’s work and offer my expertise at that time? I will be away from April 5-12. Last week I did some data-gathering at and near the Sims Way corridor to learn more about the ‘user- group’ in the corridor, and about the composition of the urban forest in proximity to the corridor. Can you help me anticipate how and when I can best share that information? I have no other travel planned in the next two or three months so will likely be present for subsequent meetings of the committee. Sincerely, Forest Page 20 of 20 Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 001 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email The popular trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas and no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine 002 9/28/2021 Craig Voice Mail Expressed passionate discontent with tree removal 003 9/28/2021 Karen Rudd karenlenerudd@gmail.com email Please put trees between car lane and bike/sidewalk lanes. 004 9/16/2021 Nancy Erreca nerreca@aol.com website The project is not needed, housing is needed. 9/28/2021 Keith Emry Facebook Fix the roads first 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Fixing Lawrence street should have priority. How about something for the people that live here not the ones coming to visit 9/28/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook please please please do soil tests before planting; make sure the new trees have room to grow and are the right plant for the right place. Please do not leave this in the hands of out-of-town landscape architects who, though I have great respect for many, are not always very knowledgeable about trees (beyond their aesthetic properties). 9/28/2021 Fredrich Bonbast Facebook Lawrence is fine. the roads in my neighborhood look like iraq, except when it rains. then they look like iraq in a flood. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Friedrich Bombast I picked Lawrence because it’s a major street that many use. 9/28/2021 Robert Jaye Facebook Wow, looks like the city has abandoned reasonable setbacks and their importance for maintaining the city's character. The concept picture shows maybe 15 feet from the road. Nice way to say welcome to PT. 9/28/2021 Sarah Smith Facebook What exactly is wrong with the poplars? Why are they Not environmentally friendly? 9/28/2021 Russell Hansen Facebook Walter McQuillen thank you ! 9/28/2021 Sarah Ludlum-Wisehart Facebook Friedrich Bombast YES!!! All the roads in Uptown need to be fixed!!! This project is ridiculous! 9/28/2021 David Crozier Facebook Cant really believe anyone thinks moving the boat yard boundary closer to the street is more eye appealing than the current situation. This has to be the most unpopular city council project yet. 9/28/2021 Gus Sebastian Facebook I think Boat Haven adds good character to PT. Its pretty cool seeing it when you come down the S curves. Its a major part of the history of this town. "A Victorian Seaport" Many local folks utilize the boatyard not only as a means of employment but recreationally. I support this idea. If you have ever looked up at those tress in big wind you might be concerned. Yes fix the roads, yes fix everything, but please don't complain about an idea that could grow a industry in PT. 9/29/2021 Fredrich Bombast Facebook Walter McQuillen i get that. but i walk a lot of neighborhoods, and many of the out-of-the way streets aren't even streets anymore. at least Lawrence doesn't have massive potholes and washouts. i once asked a city guy about the street in front of our house, which is broken asphalt and gravel undercoat, and he said the cost to repair it would be about the annual street repair budget for the whole city. "improvement projects," though, are sexier. 9/29/2021 Timothy Stone Facebook More gentrification, plz? 9/29/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook Sarah Smith they are wonderful trees but at this stage of their lifespan they are falling apart in high winds. It's a busy road with power lines so there is a reasonable likelihood that a tree failure (usually large sections of these trees break out like ice- bergs off a glacier) can cause damage and even injury. They have a few other issues as well. They send up suckers, new trees from the roots, a great distance from the original tree. They are beloved by aphids. They also produce a lot of pollen which a number of people are allergic to. While I have always admired this allee, it is time to plan for the future; replace these with something new and (hopefully) native trees and shrubs, something to take us the next 100 years. 9/29/2021 James Schultz Facebook Plant pot on the roadway! Pot Townsend rides again. 9/29/2021 Stephen Hall Facebook Very low on the priority list for the city. Putting utilities underground is a nice goal. Roads repairs and replacement is much higher on the list. Just not as sexy on the council resume. 005 9/29/2021 Rachel Ganapoler rachelganapoler@gmail.com email The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines..and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? 006 9/29/2021 Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com email In support of removing of removing trees, shrubs and grass that might cause raging wildfires 007 10/13/2021 Dori Bailey BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM email The money should be spent for the homeless. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. 008 10/17/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Replanting the Poplars makes sense but stick to the 1993 study. There are benefits to the poplars. 09 10/19/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached the 1993 Gateway Development Plan recommend read page 14 010 10/11/2021 O'Neill Louchard oneill@olympus.net email Thoughtful planted in needed, mixed species array. 011 10/7/2021 Joni Blanchard email A professional tree person should be consulted about trees and their impacts. Save the yellow lupine. 012 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 and happy to join the planning committee. 013 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Has there been a soil analysis, makes all the difference in the world for tree survival 014 10/27/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email take into consideration all the functions that the poplars provide, including the impressive beauty. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. 015 11/4/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars. 016 11/8/2021 Larry Eifert larryeifert@gmail.com email But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. 017 11/7/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I'm not advocating what-so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! 018 11/7/2021 Karen Anderson karenlanderson736@gmail.com email What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail?  How would it translate into jobs, specifically? There is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. The proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims. I support the planting of native species. 019 11/9/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually. acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. 020 11/9/2021 Joan Fabian fabianily@gmail.com email 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existent trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the Netherlands. 021 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. 022 11/2/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. 023 11/17/2021 Fred Weinmann fweinmann@cablespeed.com email A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees. 024 11/19/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. Do not cut trees in December. 025 12/1/2021 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website 026 12/9/2021 Tom Myers tommyers393@gmail.com email Go for it! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ 027 12/10/2021 Linda Tilley artbytilley.com lindatilley44@gmail.com email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. 028 12/13/2021 anonymous butterfly@olypen.com engagept Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? 029 12/12/2021 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref 030 12/10/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re-vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). 031 12/9/2021 Andrea Hegland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? When are you proposing to do this? What permits will you be securing? When will you be securing permits? Will you be conducting environmental review. 032 12/6/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan.  At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to  attributes i.e.  functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. 033 12/7/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money.  034 11/22/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. 035 12/14/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the multi-agency plan. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. 036 12/15/2021 Karta John Miller susanmiller@olypus.net engagept Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. 037 12/15/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. 038 12/30/2021 Val Johnstone valjohnstone@aol.com engagept Recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare " Red Maple 039 12/21/2021 Kathy Knoblock toddk@msn.com email I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? 040 1/13/2022 Debbie Jahnke dbjahnke@att.net email Comments on information provided to public 041 2/12/2022 Cliff Moore meamoore@comcast.net email consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. 042 2/14/2022 Patti Hoyecki phoyecki@yahoo.com email supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio.  I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future.  The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. 043 2/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com engagept Where is the Long Term Tree Management Plan? What are the plans for the cut trees? Who does one become a stakeholder? Reconsiderwiping out the Kah Tai Populars. 044 2/15/2022 Gail Workman marksyounglady@gmail.com engagept Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. 045 2/18/2022 Richard and MaryAnn Moore ptmoores1@q.com email We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week. 046 2/22/2022 Johnny Ms Johnson's eighth grade class mail The hearts on the poplars comment 047 2/22/2022 Robin Jahnke public comment Stormwater drainage needs to be developed 048 3/6/2022 George Randels gr321@olypen.com email Remove poplars on port side but leave trees on lagoon side. 049 3/8/2022 Mary Elayne Dunphy medunphy@comcast.ne email I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. 050 3/20/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Clarification of accessment report: populars would not likely be killed if trenching done by Port fence line, safe option if heavy equipment stayed off of the main roots closer to tree on the Port side. 051 3/21/2022 Linda Lebrane lebranemusic@yahoo.com engagept Save the poplars 052 3/14/2022 Kelly Drake kellydrake22@gmail.com engagept I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? 053 12/13/2021 anonymous krdmps@hotmail.com engagept How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? 054 4/6/2022 Brent Vadopalas brent@vadopalas.org engagept It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines.illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. 1 SIMS WAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE AGENDA May 10, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Welcome and Meeting Logistics: The principal purpose of this meeting is to allow the stakeholder committee, agency staff, and the design consultant to communicate with each other, answer questions, and get the stakeholder's opinions, and share information regarding the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project. Meetings are held in hybrid format, in-person and over Goto Meeting. All meetings are recorded and available on the City’s website. While the meeting can be viewed live online, public comment will not be taken during the meeting. Opportunities for general public comment is are provided at the Parks Recreation Tree Trail Advisory Board (PRTTAB) meetings. Those wishing to provide public comment on the stakeholder meeting process can do so via email to engagept@cityofpt.us . All written comment will be provided to the stakeholder committee, PRTTAB, and the City, Port, and PUD elected officials. To join the webinar, follow these instructions. • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 226-425- 723 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: +1 (562) 247 -8422 Ext. 3 access code: 806-679-504 # Recorded Meetings can be viewed anytime online at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project I. Introductions and Ice Breaker (15 min) A. What is most important to you and how can you/we help the project for our community B. Consultant Introduction II. Stakeholder Meetings Purpose: (5 min Recap – Steve King) A. The purpose of the stakeholder committee is to work with City, Port, and PUD staff along with the project consultant to review and prepare technical information with the objective of developing thoughtful options to obtain the best possible outcome for the community. III. Agency Principles: (15 min) A. Port (Matt Klontz) 2 B. PUD (Will O’Donnel) C. City (Steve King) D. Project Limits and Schedule IV. Brainstorming (30 min): Rapid fire – everything goes on the board. A. What ideas have you heard from others community or that is in the public comment? B. What ideas do you have? V. Data Collection (20 min) A. Discuss existing data? B. What data is missing? C. What have we learned to date? VI. Next Steps (5 min) A. PRTTAB Meeting on May 24, 2022 B. Concepts review – Consultant VII. Confirm next meeting date and time: May 31, 2022 Parking Lot/Future Meetings The parking lot is for topics that come up that are not on the agenda and may be addressed in a future meeting. Gateway Poplar Alliance Community Workshop April 23, 2022 Welcome Who are we? Why are we here? From this:To this: likely the only type of job that will create. From this: To this, but maybe not this: This concept photos was used to secure a $1,000,000 economic development grant These 3 agencies were granted a $1,000,000 Economic Development grant our sales tax dollars to cut down all of The Sims Way Street trees our poplars. In their grant application for our sales taxes that go into a fund for ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, administered by the County Commissioners, this is what they said: and is a key project component intended to maintain the societal value and welcoming aesthetic that is critical to the visitor experience of our community. Parks Board The Boatyard Existing Conditions PUD back-up Transmission line was built on Port property. The line to the left of the poplars is a phone line. Their Proposal: Underground the powerline Cut the poplars down by boatyard even though the powerline is undergrounded 7/21/21)in this Put in a sidewalk (PUD $55,000) Cut the poplar street trees on north side Powerlines are THE conflict. NOT THE POPLARS. WIN-WIN SOLUTION Century of Support Undone in a matter of days A Century of Support Beautification Project 1940s-50s Kah Tai lagoon provided unparalleled scenic entrance 1964 Port & Corps fill lagoon. Within a week, the poplars die. 1967 Community begins to replant poplars trees planted in Kah Tai including poplars 1982 Port grants easement to Puget Power, but NO harm to poplars 1987 City approves McDonalds; condition? NO harm to poplars 1988 Intensive Gateway Charrette; model community involvement 1990-1993 Residents overwhelmingly said keep the poplars as the street tree along the Sims Way transportation corridor area known as the Flats District; City adopts Gateway Development Plan. 2005 WSDOT ferries proposes cutting down poplars for ferry queing area. City tells them to shove off . 2013 Port cuts down and does not replace poplars by brew pub; community holds vigil. 2018 PUD trenches extensively by these same poplars. Leaves drop off a few poplars; says City yelled at them. Poplars bounce back. Aug 2021, 3 agencies decide to cut poplars down Sept 2021, they announce it in the newspapers 2 Month Destruction, No Outreach Entering the gateway together|Guest Viewpoint December 2021 Eron Berg, Kevin Streett, Mark McCauley and John Mauro: Because we have pledged to work in deep partnership with each other. work together. The project will proceed in some way, . But what should it look like? What species of tree(s), what size, how far apart, what kind of clustering? How should the work on the two sides of Sims Way be phased? What kind of visibility should or walking path look like and how does it connect into the regional system? These questions are all doorways wide open Evolving Narrative #1 Official vs Actual Sequence of Events The Official Narrative 6/2021 A FEW poplar branches blow into back-up powerline when energized. 7/2021 Port Commission votes to cut south side poplars. No public attending. No public comment. 9/2021 They announce this via Port Townsend Leader. 9/20/21 City authorizes PIF application submittal. No public comment. 10/4/21 PUD authorizes PIF application submittal. 10/13/21 Port authorizes PIF application submittal. Background The discovery of a safety concern in the summer of 2021 in which the transmission powerlines were found to be arcing with the row of Lombardy Poplar trees along Sims Way and Boat Haven, led to a joint project with Jefferson County PUD, the Port of Port Townsend, and the City of Port Townsend to address the issue. The project partners have set out with the goal of turning lemons in to lemonade recognizing the impact to the iconic row of Lombardy Poplar trees that line Sims Way. The Actual Sequence of Events 2018 PUD trenches . 2020 Marine Trades worker tells us that it is common to feel conductivity near lines when ground is wet. 20?? Boat with aluminum rigging in this row conducts electricity, is moved away from lines. (email) 4/2020 Port approaches PUD to remove poplars 6/2021 A FEW poplar branches blow into back-up powerline when energized. has a significant liability issue with the current clearance of its 115 kV transmission line paralleling the Port Townsend Boat Yard August 2021 PUD email to Consultant: if we may be able to show the Port, City and citizens of PT what this area could look like without the existing poplar trees in place there may not be so much public discourse for the tree removal. Background: The Port of PT came to the PUD about 16 months ago to discuss the idea of removing the poplar trees along Sims Way on Port property. The Port and the PUD feel it is in the best interest of each entity to remove the poplar trees along Sims Way on Port property. The last Port meeting there was a 3-0 vote approving the removal of the poplar trees, now we are getting ready to communicate to the public what we intend to do. PUD would like Studio STL to put together a rendering of what driving down Sims Way may look like without the poplar trees in place Back to the Official Narrative 2021 Marine Trades worker tells us that it is common to feel conductivity near lines when ground is wet. 20?? Boat with aluminum rigging in this row conducts electricity, is moved away from lines. (email) 2018 PUD trenches 4/2020 Port approaches PUD to remove poplars 6/2021 A FEW poplar branches blow into back-up powerline when energized. has a significant liability issue with the current clearance of its 115 kV transmission line paralleling the Port Townsend Boat Yard August 2021 PUD email to Consultant: existing poplar trees in place there may not be so much public discourse for the tree removal. Background: The Port of PT came to the PUD about 16 months ago to discuss the idea of removing the poplar trees along Sims Way on Port property. The Port and the PUD feel it is in the best interest of each entity to remove the poplar trees along Sims Way on Port property. The last Port meeting there was a 3-0 vote approving the removal of the poplar trees, now we are getting ready to communicate to the public what we intend to do. PUD would like Studio STL to put together a rendering of what driving down Sims Way may look like without the poplar trees in place. The Official Narrative 6/2021 A FEW poplar branches blow into back-up powerline when energized. Background The discovery of a safety concern in the summer of 2021 in which the transmission powerlines were found to be arcing with the row of Lombardy Poplar trees along Sims Way and Boat Haven, led to a joint project with Jefferson County PUD, the Port of Port Townsend, and the City of Port Townsend to address the issue. The project partners have set out with the goal of turning lemons in to lemonade recognizing the impact to the iconic row of Lombardy Poplar trees that line Sims Way. After initial consultation with the Parks, Recreation, Trees and Trails Advisory board in August of 2021 , the project was expanded to consider both sides of Sims way in recognition of the impacts of the Lombardy Poplars to the Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park and a 1986 study recommending replacement of the Lombardy Evolving Narrative #2 Fall 2018 PUD trenches from base of poplars by gas cut the roots 4 feet from the base of the trees; did not kill them. Kevin Streett told us he worked on-site on that job and remembers it well. Undergrounding the port line would be much further away, about where July 21, 2021 Eron Berg told the Port Commission that the trees had to be cut before the powerline could be undergrounding the powerline would eliminate existing conflicts they had between mast stays and the high-voltage transmission lines. (He also said they could , Dec 21 Jan 22 could not trench without killing the poplars, and therefore the poplars had to be cut down even though there would no longer be a chance for the poplar limbs to hit the line. What Streett said in November 2021 at PIF I don't know if you all remember, but through one stretch five of the trees lost most of their leaves when we dug through and did that power line project. The city came to us and said, hey you guys are in a ton of trouble if those trees die. So you know, they came back. But it was, it shows you that if we try to dig through that area with the trees, even if we're off the tree root systems, it will probably kill them. Also the PUD has recognized our responsibility to have to at least take the trees below the transmission line. That will kill them. We met on site with Berg & Commissioner elect. We pointed out this existing deep trench. 12/21/21 Eron Berg told us that trenching near the poplars would kill them, causing a liability for the port. 12/21/21 on site mtg. We pointed out these two large storm water swales, Commissioner-elect in December 2021. Yet they continued to claim that trenching anywhere near the poplars would kill them, and create a huge liability for the Port. Using the ominous fear of liability, the Port, PUD and City continued to sharpen Each time we asked for clarification for what that meant, we were stonewalled. Emails on file. Note the cut poplar roots sprouting? if we're off the tree root systems, it will probably kill PUD, Port, City said that undergrounding the powerline Streett it was, it shows you that if we try to dig through that area with the trees, even if we're off the tree root systems, it will probably kill them These pictures were shared with the community and now the PUD says they can trench without killing the trees. What Streett said in What Streett I don't know if you all remember, but through one stretch five of the trees lost most of their leaves when we dug through and did that power line project. The city came to us and said, hey you guys are in a ton of trouble if those trees die. So you know, they came back. But it was, it shows you that if we try to dig through that area with the trees, even if we're off the tree root systems, it will probably kill them. Also the PUD has recognized our responsibility to have to at least take the trees below the transmission line. That will kill them. If we underground our costs will probably triple without taking the trees down. And if you leave the trees instead of falling over on the power lines are going to fall over on a boat or a car. We have talked to the city, the Port, the county and the PUD does have options. The options we have: we can take this power line that's overhead now and put it underground right next to Sims road. That would allow us to trench and we could get all that built. And it would save the trees. There's a couple drawbacks to the original plan that we had with the Port. Powerlines are THE conflict. NOT THE POPLARS. The Problem Just Went Away Boatyard Expansion can be done without cutting down the poplars. Summary: Their stated reason for this project was because the poplars hit the powerline. The PUD now admits that the powerlines can be undergrounded without cutting down the polars; AND All of their stated objectives can now be achieved. Contest #1 Picture? #2 Non-native replacement tree (they say the poplars have to go cuz they are non- #4 Functionally sidewalk is not needed on both utility district, the PUD #5 ?? This is the official concept used to secure $1,000,000 in grant funding from Jefferson County. North Side of Sims Way How did we get to the North Side of Sims Way? Who is making the decisions? initial consultation with the Parks, Recreation, Trees and Trails Advisory board in August of 2021, the project was expanded to consider both sides of Sims way in recognition of the impacts of the Lombardy Poplars to the Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park and a 1986 study recommending replacement of the Lombardy Poplars This proposal also included replacement of the trees along the Kah Tai side as well based on previous studies and the work of volunteers who have been stewarding Kah Tai improvements over the years. (February 2022 City Council staff reports) October 26, 2021 Parks Board Meeting Hand-out from Steve King, City Public Works Director addition, presentations to the PRTTAB and the City Council are opportunities for public engagement. The PRTTAB is the forum for the public to engage in the decisions making process The Parks Board represents the public involvement for the proposed removal of the Gateway Poplar Trees . Dec. 22 PT Leader Committee forming for poplar project In the second town hall meeting trees buffering Sims Way from the Boat Haven, Port Townsend officials [Steve King] said a stakeholder committee would be formed to help negotiate a long-term plan for the future. stakeholder committee of around 10 members of the community to help field ideas and develop proposals to pitch to the city parks board, whose meetings are open to the public. Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park. Community Involvement? & Admiralty Audubon? Parks, Recreation, Trees and Trails Advisory Board (Parks Board) Members: Deborah Jahnke (Chair, & Admiralty Audubon leadership team member) Matt Miner Jim Todd Jennifer Rotermund John Nowak Brenda McMillan Admiralty Audubon Newsletter Admiralty Audubon November 2021 Newsletter Lombardy Poplars Stay tuned as the Port, PUD and City work through this process and we begin to see our beautiful and important native species where they belong - along our view corridors Admiralty Audubon March 2022 Newsletter now have an opportunity for the City, Port and PUD to work together on both sides of Sims Way and the right tree(s) in the right place After nearly forty years of delay time to recognize and complete the grant-funded landscape design for Kah Tai Parks Board position on poplars The Parks Board recommended proceeding with the project and reinforced the need to replace the poplars for a number of reasons. The Parks Board also suggested an open transparent process, recognizing there could likely be public concerns or push back regarding the proposal Stakeholder Committee Its members February 15, 2022 City of Port Townsend Business Meeting Staff Report, Steve King. Motion to Recognize the Stakeholder Committee Membership and Support Their Efforts in the Sims Way Gateway Project Technical Analysis The Parks Board recommended proceeding with the project and reinforced the need to replace the poplars for a number of reasons. The Parks Board also suggested an open transparent process, recognizing there could likely be public concerns or push back regarding the proposal. The Parks Board provided a recommendation of three individuals with background with Kah Tai and arboriculture in Port Townsend as possible members to the stakeholder advisory group; they also recommended Jennifer Rotermund as the Parks Board liaison. Name Represents Position on Poplars Jennifer Rotermund Parks Board & Liaison Cut them down Ron Sikes Admiralty Audubon Cut them down Forest Shomer Resident Cut them down Steve Mader Resident Cut them down Russell Hill Resident Cut them down Dan Burden Resident Kate Dwyer Resident Joni Blanchard Port Arlene Alen Chamber - Toursim Sims Way Stakeholder Committee to report to Parks Board --Parks Board picked 4. 5 of the 9 members are ALREADY on record to clear cut the Poplars #1 Jennifer Rotermund, Parks Board (Chosen by Parks Board) December 14, 2021 Old Business: Arbor Day Report: Board member Jennifer Rotermund shared an overview of her acceptance of the proclamation on Oct. 4th. Jennifer also provided a summary of the Adopt a Native Tree event on Oct. 17th as a great success. The Board issued thanks to Jennifer and recognition of her acceptance speech and how it related to the Poplar Replacement project #2 Ron Sikes, Admiralty Audubon Secretary (Chosen by Parks Board) Admiralty Audubon March 2022 Newsletter (Debbie Jahnke AA Newsletter lead) now have an opportunity for the City, Port and PUD to work together on both sides of Sims Way and the right tree(s) in the right place After nearly forty years of delay time to recognize and complete the grant-funded landscape design for Kah Admiralty Audubon November 2021 Newsletter (Debbie Jahnke, AA Newsletter lead) Lombardy Poplars Stay tuned as the Port, PUD and City work through this process and we begin to see our beautiful and important native species where they belong - along our view corridors Kah Tai Poplars 40 years Admiralty Audubon has wanted the Poplars Gone? What about these? Kah Tai Poplars nearly forty years of delay -funded landscape design for Kah Tai Kah Tai Poplars nearly forty years of delay -funded landscape design for Kah Tai Kah Tai Poplars tuned as the Port, PUD and City work through this process and we begin to see our beautiful and important native species where they belong - along our view corridors Kah Tai Poplars native species where they belong - along our view corridors ? #3 Forest Shomer (chosen by Parks Board) City of Port Townsend Sims Way Project Comment Log 9/27/21 Forest Shomer, ziratt@olympus.net The popular (sp) trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas with no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine. #4 Steve Mader City of Port Townsend Sims Way Project Comment Log 12/1/21 Steve Mader, stevefmader77@gmail.com I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website. #5 Russell Hill City of Port Townsend Sims Way Project Comment Log 12/12/21 Russell Hill, rhill3795@gmail.com If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner . Gateway Development Plan The only City plan that governs these poplars These 3 agencies say that cutting the poplars down is consistent with the Gateway Development Plan, which plan says: corridor quality of the poplar trees can be retained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and the boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20-25' apart, can be Existing poplars along Kah Tai were to be thinned only to allow views into Kah Tai Park. Gateway Development Plan 1988-1993 Current and only plan governing Sims Way Gateway Development Plan 4 Year Process - Adopted 1993 August & September 2021 Hundreds of Residents Participated 8 Members of the Public Participated in Decision to cut down the poplars 1987-88 33 residents representing businesses and property along the gateway corridor, realtors, developers, educators, Planning Commission and City Council members, design and arts professionals, other professions, contractors, recreation leaders, religious leaders, design and planning consultants, public officials, students and Residents-at-large. All residents of Port Townsend were invited to a Town Hall Meeting to meet their representatives on the Core Group. 8-24-21 Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board Meeting - 4 public members present, 1 City staff, 1 Port Ex Dir 9-1-21 Council Infrastructure and Dev. Committee- 2 city councilors, City Manager, City Pub Works Dir 9-20-21 City Council Bus. Mtg- 6 city councilors, 7 City Manager/Staff. Motion: Moved to approve Resolution 21-057 Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for a Public Infrastructure Fund Grant for the Port Townsend Sims Gateway and Tree There were marathon sessions of intensive, focused, highly- participatory design discussions. 1988 The PT City Council adopted the Port Townsend Gateway Concept plan 1990-91 A Consultant Team, with the assistance of a 21 member Gateway Steering Committee presented the city with a final draft of the 73 page Gateway Development Plan. 8-2-93 The City adopted the Gateway Development Plan which recommended retaining and caring for the poplars. Management Project, Motion carried unanimously, 6-0 by voice vote. 10-26-21 Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board Meeting - 4 These public agencies claim that a hand-written plan, prepared in 1986 with no documented public outreach or formal adoption, calls for the removal of the poplars: As illustrated above this furniture and site detail plan calls for selective thinning along Kah Tai, not wholesale removal. Clear & Present Danger According to whom? The statements cited have never been vetted by or supported by any qualified arborists or other experts in any forum or presentation to any public committee, board, council or commission. Entering the gateway together | Guest Viewpoint Eron Berg, Kevin Streett, Mark McCauley and John Mauro willing. Few people actually want to remove the stately Lombardy poplars. That includes us. They have history, are a majestic statement about who we are to anyone coming into Port Townsend, and are loved by many, us included. For years decades in fact those who knew about this fast-growing species embedded the need to find an eventual replacement into planning documents. Without a clear and present danger or Native Trees down Poplars, Still Standing. Native Trees down Poplars..Still Standing damage . damage One much older, larger poplar fell during November storm by Pet Townsend on San Juan. The internal rot is quite obvious and was likely evident before the tree fell. The City warns that this is what will happen to the Sims Way poplars as they age. What is the only thing the Sims Way poplars have in common with the San Juan poplars? Neglect. Agency staff presented the Clear and Dangerous Concept with regard to the poplars at all of these forums with no formal and comprehensive arborist report: Staff presentations to their elected and advisory Boards (July/August onwards); Agency resolutions authorizing application to the PIF Board on this basis (October); The PIF Grant Application claims (October); The PIF Grant Application presentation (November); Streett/McCauley (December); Neglect Tree City USA? FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Arbor Day Foundation Names Port Townsend Tree City USA @ Lincoln, Neb. (February 27 2021) Port Townsend, Washington, was named a 2020 Tree City USA by the Arbor Day Foundation in honor of its commitment to effective urban forest management. Tree City USA communities see the impact an urban forest has in a community first hand," said Dan Lambe, president of the Arbor Day Foundation. "The trees being planted and cared for by Port Townsend are ensuring that generations to come will enjoy a-better quality of life. Additionally, participation in this program brings residents together and creates a sense of civic pride, whether it's through volunteer engagement or public education If ever there was a time for trees, now is that time. Communities worldwide are facing issues with air quality, water resources, personal health and well-being, energy use, and protection from extreme heat and flooding. Trees provide a Multitude of Benefits Trees and other vegetation throughout the City collectively provide an Urban Forest which greatly benefits the entire City of Port Townsend. A few key benefits are: Increased appeal, enjoyment & property value Effective Wind and Sound Barriers Stormwater Management & Filtration Wildlife Habitat & Food source Multifaceted Environmental Benefits: fight climate change by sequestering carbon, filter air and water, mitigate heat waves, convert CO2 to oxygen, and more! The City manages the Urban Forest in the right of way with the goals of tree preservation and forest health. Care and pruning under supervision of a certified arborist can help save trees that would otherwise be removed. The City manages the Urban Forest in the right of way with the goals of tree preservation and forest health. Care and pruning under supervision of a certified arborist can help save trees that would otherwise be removed. Much older, bigger San Juan Tree neglected too Imagine What is Possible Healthy Poplar-lined streets in Europe, a sense of longevity and history we all long for, yet here, we plan to destroy: Poplaralliance.org Please donate to support our work Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 001 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email The popular trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas and no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine 002 9/28/2021 Craig Voice Mail Expressed passionate discontent with tree removal 003 9/28/2021 Karen Rudd karenlenerudd@gmail.com email Please put trees between car lane and bike/sidewalk lanes. 004 9/16/2021 Nancy Erreca nerreca@aol.com website The project is not needed, housing is needed. 9/28/2021 Keith Emry Facebook Fix the roads first 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Fixing Lawrence street should have priority. How about something for the people that live here not the ones coming to visit 9/28/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook please please please do soil tests before planting; make sure the new trees have room to grow and are the right plant for the right place. Please do not leave this in the hands of out-of-town landscape architects who, though I have great respect for many, are not always very knowledgeable about trees (beyond their aesthetic properties). 9/28/2021 Fredrich Bonbast Facebook Lawrence is fine. the roads in my neighborhood look like iraq, except when it rains. then they look like iraq in a flood. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Friedrich Bombast I picked Lawrence because it’s a major street that many use. 9/28/2021 Robert Jaye Facebook Wow, looks like the city has abandoned reasonable setbacks and their importance for maintaining the city's character. The concept picture shows maybe 15 feet from the road. Nice way to say welcome to PT. 9/28/2021 Sarah Smith Facebook What exactly is wrong with the poplars? Why are they Not environmentally friendly? 9/28/2021 Russell Hansen Facebook Walter McQuillen thank you ! 9/28/2021 Sarah Ludlum-Wisehart Facebook Friedrich Bombast YES!!! All the roads in Uptown need to be fixed!!! This project is ridiculous! 9/28/2021 David Crozier Facebook Cant really believe anyone thinks moving the boat yard boundary closer to the street is more eye appealing than the current situation. This has to be the most unpopular city council project yet. 9/28/2021 Gus Sebastian Facebook I think Boat Haven adds good character to PT. Its pretty cool seeing it when you come down the S curves. Its a major part of the history of this town. "A Victorian Seaport" Many local folks utilize the boatyard not only as a means of employment but recreationally. I support this idea. If you have ever looked up at those tress in big wind you might be concerned. Yes fix the roads, yes fix everything, but please don't complain about an idea that could grow a industry in PT. 9/29/2021 Fredrich Bombast Facebook Walter McQuillen i get that. but i walk a lot of neighborhoods, and many of the out-of-the way streets aren't even streets anymore. at least Lawrence doesn't have massive potholes and washouts. i once asked a city guy about the street in front of our house, which is broken asphalt and gravel undercoat, and he said the cost to repair it would be about the annual street repair budget for the whole city. "improvement projects," though, are sexier. 9/29/2021 Timothy Stone Facebook More gentrification, plz? 9/29/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook Sarah Smith they are wonderful trees but at this stage of their lifespan they are falling apart in high winds. It's a busy road with power lines so there is a reasonable likelihood that a tree failure (usually large sections of these trees break out like ice- bergs off a glacier) can cause damage and even injury. They have a few other issues as well. They send up suckers, new trees from the roots, a great distance from the original tree. They are beloved by aphids. They also produce a lot of pollen which a number of people are allergic to. While I have always admired this allee, it is time to plan for the future; replace these with something new and (hopefully) native trees and shrubs, something to take us the next 100 years. 9/29/2021 James Schultz Facebook Plant pot on the roadway! Pot Townsend rides again. 9/29/2021 Stephen Hall Facebook Very low on the priority list for the city. Putting utilities underground is a nice goal. Roads repairs and replacement is much higher on the list. Just not as sexy on the council resume. 005 9/29/2021 Rachel Ganapoler rachelganapoler@gmail.com email The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines..and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? 006 9/29/2021 Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com email In support of removing of removing trees, shrubs and grass that might cause raging wildfires 007 10/13/2021 Dori Bailey BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM email The money should be spent for the homeless. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. 008 10/17/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Replanting the Poplars makes sense but stick to the 1993 study. There are benefits to the poplars. 09 10/19/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached the 1993 Gateway Development Plan recommend read page 14 010 10/11/2021 O'Neill Louchard oneill@olympus.net email Thoughtful planted in needed, mixed species array. 011 10/7/2021 Joni Blanchard email A professional tree person should be consulted about trees and their impacts. Save the yellow lupine. 012 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 and happy to join the planning committee. 013 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Has there been a soil analysis, makes all the difference in the world for tree survival 014 10/27/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email provide, including the impressive beauty. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. 015 11/4/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars. 016 11/8/2021 Larry Eifert larryeifert@gmail.com email But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. 017 11/7/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I'm not advocating what-so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! 018 11/7/2021 Karen Anderson karenlanderson736@gmail.com email What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail?  How would it translate into jobs, specifically? There is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. The proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims. I support the planting of 019 11/9/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually. acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. 020 11/9/2021 Joan Fabian fabianily@gmail.com email 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existent trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the Netherlands. 021 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. 022 11/2/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. 023 11/17/2021 Fred Weinmann fweinmann@cablespeed.com email A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees. 024 11/19/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. Do not cut trees in December. 025 12/1/2021 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website 026 12/9/2021 Tom Myers tommyers393@gmail.com email Go for it! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ 027 12/10/2021 Linda Tilley artbytilley.com lindatilley44@gmail.com email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. 028 12/13/2021 anonymous butterfly@olypen.com engagept Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? 029 12/12/2021 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref 030 12/10/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re-vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). 031 12/9/2021 Andrea Hegland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? When are you proposing to do this? What permits will you be securing? When will you be securing permits? Will you be conducting environmental review. 032 12/6/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan.  At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to  attributes i.e.  functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. 033 12/7/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money.  034 11/22/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. 035 12/14/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the multi-agency plan. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. 036 12/15/2021 Karta John Miller susanmiller@olypus.net engagept Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. 037 12/15/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. 038 12/30/2021 Val Johnstone valjohnstone@aol.com engagept Recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare " Red Maple 039 12/21/2021 Kathy Knoblock toddk@msn.com email I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? 040 1/13/2022 Debbie Jahnke dbjahnke@att.net email Comments on information provided to public 041 2/12/2022 Cliff Moore meamoore@comcast.net email consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. 042 2/14/2022 Patti Hoyecki phoyecki@yahoo.com email supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio.  I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future.  The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. 043 2/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com engagept Where is the Long Term Tree Management Plan? What are the plans for the cut trees? Who does one become a stakeholder? Reconsiderwiping out the Kah Tai Populars. 044 2/15/2022 Gail Workman marksyounglady@gmail.com engagept Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. 045 2/18/2022 Richard and MaryAnn Moore ptmoores1@q.com email We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week. 046 2/22/2022 Johnny Ms Johnson's eighth grade class mail The hearts on the poplars comment 047 2/22/2022 Robin Jahnke public comment Stormwater drainage needs to be developed 048 3/6/2022 George Randels gr321@olypen.com email Remove poplars on port side but leave trees on lagoon side. 049 3/8/2022 Mary Elayne Dunphy medunphy@comcast.ne email I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. 050 3/20/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Clarification of accessment report: populars would not likely be killed if trenching done by Port fence line, safe option if heavy equipment stayed off of the main roots closer to tree on the Port side. 051 3/21/2022 Linda Lebrane lebranemusic@yahoo.com engagept Save the poplars 052 3/14/2022 Kelly Drake kellydrake22@gmail.com engagept I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? 053 12/13/2021 anonymous krdmps@hotmail.com engagept How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? 054 4/6/2022 Brent Vadopalas brent@vadopalas.org engagept It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines.illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. 055 5/2/2022 Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept Provided a copy of the April 23, 2022 Gateway Alliance Slideshow along with comments that the project can be done wihtout cutting down the poplars, the ity has no economic analysis for cutting the trees, the parks board is the public forum, the city has arranged the parks board to be in favor of removal of the poplars, the stakeholder committee is in favor or removal of the poplars, the city has always intended to remove the poplars and the public process is not transparrent. 056 5/5/2022 ? Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept Can you clarify the purpose for the stakeholder committee and defined scope of work. SIMS GATEWAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION PROJECT STAKEHOLDER GRAPHICS Prepared for the May 10, 2022 Stakeholder Meeting and the May 24, 2022 PRTTAB Meeting Stakeholder Ideas One of the agenda items for the May 10, 2022 stakeholder meeting is to brainstorm ideas. The following slides is an accumulation of information provided by the stakeholders. Arlene Alen Notes: See meeting recording Joni Blanchard See following pictures: Notes: See meeting recording Joni Blanchard Notes: Joni Blanchard Notes: Joni Blanchard Notes: Joni Blanchard Notes: Dan Burden See Short Presentation Attached. Notes: See meeting recording. Also See Slideshow. Russell Hill •Pictures from University Place •Pictures from Federal Way •Diagram of Larry Scott Trail 0ption •See meeting recording Pictures from Federal Way Pictures at Lakota Middle School -Student Safety First project creating a pedestrian way. Larry Scott Trail Diagrams Boat Yard Parking and Operations Steve Mader Notes: See meeting recording Jennifer Rotermund Notes: See meeting recording Ron Sikes Existing sucker growth on Kah Tai side of the street. Shows overcrowding of other tree species. See meeting recording Forest Shomer Notes: See meeting recording Public Suggestions •Poplars could be replaced with Shore Pines •Preserve the Poplar Trees •Put trees between cars and bike lanes/sidewalks •Perform soil tests and install right tree for the right place. •Consider setbacks from the street. Do not make corridor too narrow. •Do not move boat yard closer to street. •Concern over poplars failing in the wind •Poplars produce a lot of pollen •Replace with Native Trees •Plant mixed species •Consider ornamental varieties in addition to natives for aesthetics •Shore Pines, Evergrees and Madronas would not work due to pollen. Plant female trees that won’t pollinate. Replace with Poplars. Public Suggestions •Prefer a natural edge to Sims Way instead of block wall •Consider Co2 impacts of removal and variety selection •Trim Poplars on Kah Tai side and remove on the boatyard side. •Re-use wood. Ied wooden shoes in Netherlands use Poplar •Allergens are a concern with poplars and birches. Consider allergens in selection of trees. •Diversify the plantings is recommended •Consider flowering cherry trees. •Strategically replant for the entrance. Consider links to Larry Scott trail visually. •Continue to further native species along Kah Tai •Consider impacts of climate change (heat and floods, winds, etc.) on tree selection. •Remove trees in stages to allow replanted trees to fill in. •Include a long term tree maintenance plan. •Consider environmental impacts of the entire project. SIMS GATEWAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION PROJECT PORT, PUD, AND CITY PRINCIPLES Prepared for the May 10, 2022 Stakeholder Meeting and the May 24, 2022 PRTTAB Meeting Basis for Successful Partnerships Four Key Partnership Points: 1.Recognition that Port, PUD, and the City serve the same people, but with specifically different purposes as set forth in the authorizing laws of Washington State. 2.Successful partnerships rely on recognizing and respecting each agency’s specific purpose and goals for the partnership project. 3.Successful partnerships seek to find overlapping benefit for each agency’s purpose in the project. 4.The result of successful partnerships are coordinated and cost effective outcomes. These partnership principles will be reflected upon often during the process of developing options for this project. Partnership: Recognizing Differences Special Purpose of Port Districts (Title 53 RCW): Ports are specifically created to operate, build, and water ports, airports, and properties owned by the Port. Ports also support economic development through the development of infrastructure to support job creation. Port Districts receive very little taxes and thus are expected to create a return on investments in order to be sustainable. This means a primary requirement of Port Districts to receive revenue from their assets to cover costs of operations while promoting and facilitating commerce. Partnership: Recognizing Differences Special Purpose of Public Utility Districts (Title 54 RCW): PUDs are specifically created to operate, build, and manage utility infrastructure including electric, water, sewer, and broadband. PUDs operate almost exclusively on fees for services or rates collected from customers. The only time PUDs receive tax dollars is associated with grants and loans for infrastructure. Partnership: Recognizing Differences General Purpose of City Government (Title 35 RCW): Cities purposes are broad in that they provide for the operation, maintenance, and construction of public infrastructure, promote commerce, and provide utilities services similar to Ports and PUDs. However, cities also provide general public services such as, parks, police, streets/transportation, planning/building services, and for the general health and public safety of densely populated areas. Cities are different from Ports and PUD is that most of the city’s revenue is from general taxation from sales, property, B&O, and utility taxes. This means the city has less limitations about use of funds so long as there is a public benefit. Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion Project Recognizing each agency’s specific purposes and limitations, the three agencies came together in partnership to find win-wins: This is the purpose of the stakeholder committee…. to find the best possible options for the project for our community. Key Project Principles Seeks to improve the financial and operational sustainability of Boat Haven and improve the interface between Sims Way and the boatyard thru: 1.Making full use of the existing property ownership increases the boatyard work area and flexibility for placing boats. Property line is along row of poplars. 2.Increasing the length of boat stalls from 40 ft to 65 ft provides for serving larger vessels too. 3.Providing a safe environment for boatworks by avoiding overhead wires. 4.Providing reliable power service for boat repair operations by providing new secondary service and pedestals. 5.Preserving flexibility of property by minimizing the impact of the PUD easement encumbrance above and below ground. 6.Creating a visually appealing and functional boatyard interface with Sims Way by providing fencing along property line. 7.Increasing community resiliency by sustaining the economic vitality and health of the marine trades. Key Project Principles Key Project Principles Key Project Principles Seeks to address safety issue with the transmission lines and adjoining trees while improving reliability of power service to the city service area through: 1.Underground the transmission lines along Sims Way. 2.Comply with National Electric Code and Washington State Laws governing distribution of electric service. 3.Minimize long term operations and maintenance costs. 4.Maintain accessibility to infrastructure for repairs. 5.Support partner agencies by locating the infrastructure in a location meeting their goals to the greatest extent feasible Key Project Principles Approximate limits of transmission to be routed underground Key Project Principles Service power for boatyard needs upgrading. If possible, utilize the same trench as the transmission lines to minimize trenching impacts and costs. Key Project Principles Seeks to support the Port and PUD by facilitating the use of the City’s public right of way consistent with adopted plans, policies, and codes while balancing public input through: 1.Fostering a public engagement process in which all voices can fairly be heard and carried through the decision making process of selecting an alternative for the project. 2.Follow the intent of the adopted 1993 Gateway Development Plan. 3.Follow city codes, and other adopted plans such as the Comprehensive Plan, Non-motorized Plan, PROS plan, and Transportation Functional Plan. 4.Apply best available science for the Kah Tai Nature Park consistent with the original intent for the park. 5.Minimize long term maintenance costs and requirements. 6.Support partner agencies in their project objectives. Key Project Principles Public Engagement: The City’s EngagePT website includes access to all meeting recordings and data. https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion- project The stakeholder committee will research options for the project and make recommendations to the PRTTAB. A meeting with the PRTTAB will be held each month to provide informational updates and collect public feedback on the work being done. At the August 23, 2022 PRTTAB, the board will make a recommendation of the preferred alternative to be forwarded to the City Council. The preferred option will also be considered by the Port of Port Townsend and PUD Commissioners. Key Project Principles The City Comprehensive Plan refers to the Gateway Development Plan in multiple locations. Key Project Principles Key Project Principles Gateway Development Plan set goals and intent. Key Project Principles Gateway Development Plan Flats District Key Points: •Linear corridor –created by the existing poplars •Views of shipyard and historic buildings should be enhanced. Views of bluff and courthouse are also recognized. Trees should be low enough to preserve views of the Courthouse and Uptown. •Thin poplars and remove sucker growth. •Plant with riparian plantings along Kah Tai. •Utilities should be placed underground. •Trees should be infilled with new ones when others are removed. •Grasses and wildflowers can be used as ground cover Key Project Principles Gateway Development Plan Flats District Key Points (cont.) •Create a pedestrian link to the Courthouse area. •Pedestrian environment should be enhanced with amenities such as public art. •A sidewalk is shown on the south side of Sims with a nature path on the north side. •Create connection to waterwalk and Discovery Trail •Plantings should strengthen pedestrian environment Key Project Principles Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan adopted in 2020 Key Project Principles Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan adopted in 2020. Key principles include: •Enhancing Gateways with art and aesthetic improvements •References Gateway Development Plan and importance of open space. •Improve Kah Tai lagoon for passive recreational use and conduct habitat restoration. •The 1986 furniture and landscaping plans were done as a result of the Land Water Conservation Funding to purchase the park and the 1983 IAC grants to partially develop the park. •Volunteers have been working since the early 1980s to restore native vegetation and remove invasive species. •Remove vegetation to open views from Sims Way. Key Project Principles City Code, Chapter 12.04 -Tree Removal Requirements inside of Right of Way WSDOT requirements: The city is responsible for maintenance outside of the traveled way. All improvements will need to be reviewed by WSDOT for impacts to the roadway system. Key Project Principles Minimizing maintenance: Long term maintenance requirements put considerable strain on city parks crews and budgets. For example, projects should be designed to: •Minimize mowing and weeding, and brush/tree maintenance. •Irrigation requirements should be minimal and preferably only for plant establishment. •Plantings should be selected reduce impacts to traveled way due to roots and overgrown limbs/brush. •The use of the right of way should be optimized for aesthetics, transportation, and utilities. •Plants and trees need to be non-invasive and hardy for the environment Project Budget The project budget is as follows: Project Limits & Schedule Project Limits: The project limits are along Sims Way between 10th Street and Kearney Street. Schedule: 1.Power safety and reliability needs to be addressed prior to the next storm season. This means that a project alternative needs to be selected by the decision makers no later than September of this year. Thus the stakeholder work needs to be completed by the Parks Recreation Tree Trail Advisory Board meeting on August 23, 2022. 2.Design of the boatyard expansion needs to be completed by February of 2023 in order to facilitate construction in 2023 and 2024 consistent with the Public Infrastructure Funding Grant. | CONFIDENTIAL | 2019 | PAGE Urban Street Trees and Gateways by Dan Burden Street Parts The functions of a street are spelled out in its various parts. This street has two high quality walkways -one on each side. Note the attached and detached sidewalks. Which is more comfortable for pedestrians? The travel lanes shown here are 10 feet wide, the bike lanes are six feet wide. Sidewalk Bike Lanes Triple canopy of trees Turn Lanes Raised Medians 10’ Travel Lanes Sequim, Washington | CONFIDENTIAL | 2019 | PAGE Grasscrete Multi Use Trail Triple canopy of trees Raised Median 10’ Travel Lanes Brattleboro, Vermont 5 Bridgeport Way, University Place, Washington Target Speed Target Speed 12 Chico, CA Nord Avenue Chico, CA Nord Avenue Chico, CA Nord Avenue Chico, CA Nord Avenue Chico, CA Nord Avenue 1 SIMS WAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE AGENDA May 31, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Welcome and Meeting Logistics: The principal purpose of this meeting is to allow the stakeholder committee, agency staff, and the design consultant to communicate with each other, answer questions, and get the stakeholder's opinions, and share information regarding the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project. Meetings are held in hybrid format, in-person and over Goto Meeting. All meetings are recorded and available on the City’s website. While the meeting can be viewed live online, public comment will not be taken during the meeting. Opportunities for general public comment is are provided at the Parks Recreation Tree Trail Advisory Board (PRTTAB) meetings. Those wishing to provide public comment on the stakeholder meeting process can do so via email to engagept@cityofpt.us . All written comment will be provided to the stakeholder committee, PRTTAB, and the City, Port, and PUD elected officials. To join the webinar, follow these instructions. • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 348-835-859 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: +1 (562) 247-8422 Access code: 972-173-160# Recorded Meetings can be viewed anytime online at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project I. Introductions (15 min) A. Roll Call B. Reintroduction of the SCJ Alliance Team. C. Stakeholder meeting purpose: The purpose of the stakeholder committee is to work with City, Port, and PUD staff along with the project consultant to review and prepare technical information with the objective of developing thoughtful options to obtain the best possible outcome for the community. D. Share roadmap for the process (timeline and meeting schedule) II. Last meeting followup: Homework review (50 Minutes) A. Thank you for the last meeting discussion. B. Reflections on last meeting information: Review and confirmation of the “Values” that we heard. C. Reflections on public comments received to date. Review of key points that provide 2 constructive ideas for the project. Do our “Values” reflect the goals that the construction solutions aim to achieve? III. Lighting-Round - Project Canvas and Limits Review (20 min) (Just to get started in advance of our next meeting) A. North side/South side B. Right of way width IV. Next Steps (5 min) A. PRTTAB Meeting on June 28, 2022 B. Homework: TBD V. Confirm next meeting date and time: June 14, 2022 Parking Lot/Future Meetings The parking lot is for topics that come up that are not on the agenda and may be addressed in a future meeting. Sims Way Commet Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 001 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email The popular trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas and no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine 002 9/28/2021 Craig Voice Mail Expressed passionate discontent with tree removal 003 9/28/2021 Karen Rudd karenlenerudd@gmail.com email Please put trees between car lane and bike/sidewalk lanes. 004 9/16/2021 Nancy Erreca nerreca@aol.com website The project is not needed, housing is needed. 9/28/2021 Keith Emry Facebook Fix the roads first 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Fixing Lawrence street should have priority. How about something for the people that live here not the ones coming to visit 9/28/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook please please please do soil tests before planting; make sure the new trees have room to grow and are the right plant for the right place. Please do not leave this in the hands of out-of-town landscape architects who, though I have great respect for many, are not always very knowledgeable about trees (beyond their aesthetic properties). 9/28/2021 Fredrich Bonbast Facebook Lawrence is fine. the roads in my neighborhood look like iraq, except when it rains. then they look like iraq in a flood. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Friedrich Bombast I picked Lawrence because it’s a major street that many use. 9/28/2021 Robert Jaye Facebook Wow, looks like the city has abandoned reasonable setbacks and their importance for maintaining the city's character. The concept picture shows maybe 15 feet from the road. Nice way to say welcome to PT. 9/28/2021 Sarah Smith Facebook What exactly is wrong with the poplars? Why are they Not environmentally friendly? 9/28/2021 Russell Hansen Facebook Walter McQuillen thank you ! 9/28/2021 Sarah Ludlum-Wisehart Facebook Friedrich Bombast YES!!! All the roads in Uptown need to be fixed!!! This project is ridiculous! 9/28/2021 David Crozier Facebook Cant really believe anyone thinks moving the boat yard boundary closer to the street is more eye appealing than the current situation. This has to be the most unpopular city council project yet. 9/28/2021 Gus Sebastian Facebook I think Boat Haven adds good character to PT. Its pretty cool seeing it when you come down the S curves. Its a major part of the history of this town. "A Victorian Seaport" Many local folks utilize the boatyard not only as a means of employment but recreationally. I support this idea. If you have ever looked up at those tress in big wind you might be concerned. Yes fix the roads, yes fix everything, but please don't complain about an idea that could grow a industry in PT. 9/29/2021 Fredrich Bombast Facebook Walter McQuillen i get that. but i walk a lot of neighborhoods, and many of the out-of-the way streets aren't even streets anymore. at least Lawrence doesn't have massive potholes and washouts. i once asked a city guy about the street in front of our house, which is broken asphalt and gravel undercoat, and he said the cost to repair it would be about the annual street repair budget for the whole city. "improvement projects," though, are sexier. 9/29/2021 Timothy Stone Facebook More gentrification, plz? 9/29/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook Sarah Smith they are wonderful trees but at this stage of their lifespan they are falling apart in high winds. It's a busy road with power lines so there is a reasonable likelihood that a tree failure (usually large sections of these trees break out like ice- bergs off a glacier) can cause damage and even injury. They have a few other issues as well. They send up suckers, new trees from the roots, a great distance from the original tree. They are beloved by aphids. They also produce a lot of pollen which a number of people are allergic to. While I have always admired this allee, it is time to plan for the future; replace these with something new and (hopefully) native trees and shrubs, something to take us the next 100 years. 9/29/2021 James Schultz Facebook Plant pot on the roadway! Pot Townsend rides again. 9/29/2021 Stephen Hall Facebook Very low on the priority list for the city. Putting utilities underground is a nice goal. Roads repairs and replacement is much higher on the list. Just not as sexy on the council resume. 005 9/29/2021 Rachel Ganapoler rachelganapoler@gmail.com email The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines..and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? 5/24/2022 4 Sims Way Commet Log 006 9/29/2021 Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com email In support of removing of removing trees, shrubs and grass that might cause raging wildfires 007 10/13/2021 Dori Bailey BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM email The money should be spent for the homeless. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. 008 10/17/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Replanting the Poplars makes sense but stick to the 1993 study. There are benefits to the poplars. 09 10/19/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached the 1993 Gateway Development Plan recommend read page 14 010 10/11/2021 O'Neill Louchard oneill@olympus.net email Thoughtful planted in needed, mixed species array. 011 10/7/2021 Joni Blanchard email A professional tree person should be consulted about trees and their impacts. Save the yellow lupine. 012 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 and happy to join the planning committee. 013 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Has there been a soil analysis, makes all the difference in the world for tree survival 014 10/27/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email provide, including the impressive beauty. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. 015 11/4/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars. 016 11/8/2021 Larry Eifert larryeifert@gmail.com email But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. 017 11/7/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I'm not advocating what-so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! 018 11/7/2021 Karen Anderson karenlanderson736@gmail.com email What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail?  How would it translate into jobs, specifically? There is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. The proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims. I support the planting of 019 11/9/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually. acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. 020 11/9/2021 Joan Fabian fabianily@gmail.com email 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existent trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the Netherlands. 5/24/2022 4 Sims Way Commet Log 021 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. 022 11/2/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. 023 11/17/2021 Fred Weinmann fweinmann@cablespeed.com email A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees. 024 11/19/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. Do not cut trees in December. 025 12/1/2021 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website 026 12/9/2021 Tom Myers tommyers393@gmail.com email Go for it! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ 027 12/10/2021 Linda Tilley artbytilley.com lindatilley44@gmail.com email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. 028 12/13/2021 anonymous butterfly@olypen.com engagept Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? 029 12/12/2021 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref 030 12/10/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re-vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). 031 12/9/2021 Andrea Hegland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? When are you proposing to do this? What permits will you be securing? When will you be securing permits? Will you be conducting environmental review. 032 12/6/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan.  At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to  attributes i.e.  functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. 033 12/7/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money.  5/24/2022 4 Sims Way Commet Log 034 11/22/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. 035 12/14/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the multi-agency plan. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. 036 12/15/2021 Karta John Miller susanmiller@olypus.net engagept Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. 037 12/15/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. 038 12/30/2021 Val Johnstone valjohnstone@aol.com engagept Recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare " Red Maple 039 12/21/2021 Kathy Knoblock toddk@msn.com email I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? 040 1/13/2022 Debbie Jahnke dbjahnke@att.net email Comments on information provided to public 041 2/12/2022 Cliff Moore meamoore@comcast.net email consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. 042 2/14/2022 Patti Hoyecki phoyecki@yahoo.com email supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio.  I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future.  The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. 043 2/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com engagept Where is the Long Term Tree Management Plan? What are the plans for the cut trees? Who does one become a stakeholder? Reconsiderwiping out the Kah Tai Populars. 044 2/15/2022 Gail Workman marksyounglady@gmail.com engagept Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. 045 2/18/2022 Richard and MaryAnn Moore ptmoores1@q.com email We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week. 046 2/22/2022 Johnny Ms Johnson's eighth grade class mail The hearts on the poplars comment 047 2/22/2022 Robin Jahnke public comment Stormwater drainage needs to be developed 048 3/6/2022 George Randels gr321@olypen.com email Remove poplars on port side but leave trees on lagoon side. 049 3/8/2022 Mary Elayne Dunphy medunphy@comcast.ne email I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. 050 3/20/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Clarification of accessment report: populars would not likely be killed if trenching done by Port fence line, safe option if heavy equipment stayed off of the main roots closer to tree on the Port side. 051 3/21/2022 Linda Lebrane lebranemusic@yahoo.com engagept Save the poplars 052 3/14/2022 Kelly Drake kellydrake22@gmail.com engagept I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? 053 12/13/2021 anonymous krdmps@hotmail.com engagept How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? 054 4/6/2022 Brent Vadopalas brent@vadopalas.org engagept It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines.illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. 5/24/2022 4 EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 001 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email The popular trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas and no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine 002 9/28/2021 Craig Voice Mail Expressed passionate discontent with tree removal 003 9/28/2021 Karen Rudd karenlenerudd@gmail.com email Please put trees between car lane and bike/sidewalk lanes. 004 9/16/2021 Nancy Erreca nerreca@aol.com website The project is not needed, housing is needed. 9/28/2021 Keith Emry Facebook Fix the roads first 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Fixing Lawrence street should have priority. How about something for the people that live here not the ones coming to visit 9/28/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook please please please do soil tests before planting; make sure the new trees have room to grow and are the right plant for the right place. Please do not leave this in the hands of out-of-town landscape architects who, though I have great respect for many, are not always very knowledgeable about trees (beyond their aesthetic properties). 9/28/2021 Fredrich Bonbast Facebook Lawrence is fine. the roads in my neighborhood look like iraq, except when it rains. then they look like iraq in a flood. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Friedrich Bombast I picked Lawrence because it’s a major street that many use. 9/28/2021 Robert Jaye Facebook Wow, looks like the city has abandoned reasonable setbacks and their importance for maintaining the city's character. The concept picture shows maybe 15 feet from the road. Nice way to say welcome to PT. 9/28/2021 Sarah Smith Facebook What exactly is wrong with the poplars? Why are they Not environmentally friendly? 9/28/2021 Russell Hansen Facebook Walter McQuillen thank you ! 9/28/2021 Sarah Ludlum-Wisehart Facebook Friedrich Bombast YES!!! All the roads in Uptown need to be fixed!!! This project is ridiculous! 9/28/2021 David Crozier Facebook Cant really believe anyone thinks moving the boat yard boundary closer to the street is more eye appealing than the current situation. This has to be the most unpopular city council project yet. 9/28/2021 Gus Sebastian Facebook I think Boat Haven adds good character to PT. Its pretty cool seeing it when you come down the S curves. Its a major part of the history of this town. "A Victorian Seaport" Many local folks utilize the boatyard not only as a means of employment but recreationally. I support this idea. If you have ever looked up at those tress in big wind you might be concerned. Yes fix the roads, yes fix everything, but please don't complain about an idea that could grow a industry in PT. 9/29/2021 Fredrich Bombast Facebook Walter McQuillen i get that. but i walk a lot of neighborhoods, and many of the out-of-the way streets aren't even streets anymore. at least Lawrence doesn't have massive potholes and washouts. i once asked a city guy about the street in front of our house, which is broken asphalt and gravel undercoat, and he said the cost to repair it would be about the annual street repair budget for the whole city. "improvement projects," though, are sexier. 9/29/2021 Timothy Stone Facebook More gentrification, plz? 9/29/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook Sarah Smith they are wonderful trees but at this stage of their lifespan they are falling apart in high winds. It's a busy road with power lines so there is a reasonable likelihood that a tree failure (usually large sections of these trees break out like ice- bergs off a glacier) can cause damage and even injury. They have a few other issues as well. They send up suckers, new trees from the roots, a great distance from the original tree. They are beloved by aphids. They also produce a lot of pollen which a number of people are allergic to. While I have always admired this allee, it is time to plan for the future; replace these with something new and (hopefully) native trees and shrubs, something to take us the next 100 years. 9/29/2021 James Schultz Facebook Plant pot on the roadway! Pot Townsend rides again. 9/29/2021 Stephen Hall Facebook Very low on the priority list for the city. Putting utilities underground is a nice goal. Roads repairs and replacement is much higher on the list. Just not as sexy on the council resume. 005 9/29/2021 Rachel Ganapoler rachelganapoler@gmail.com email The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines..and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? 6/10/2022 6 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 006 9/29/2021 Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com email In support of removing of removing trees, shrubs and grass that might cause raging wildfires 007 10/13/2021 Dori Bailey BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM email The money should be spent for the homeless. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. 008 10/17/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Replanting the Poplars makes sense but stick to the 1993 study. There are benefits to the poplars. 09 10/19/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached the 1993 Gateway Development Plan recommend read page 14 010 10/11/2021 O'Neill Louchard oneill@olympus.net email Thoughtful planted in needed, mixed species array. 011 10/7/2021 Joni Blanchard email A professional tree person should be consulted about trees and their impacts. Save the yellow lupine. 012 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 and happy to join the planning committee. 013 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Has there been a soil analysis, makes all the difference in the world for tree survival 014 10/27/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email provide, including the impressive beauty. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. 015 11/4/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars. 016 11/8/2021 Larry Eifert larryeifert@gmail.com email But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. 017 11/7/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I'm not advocating what-so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! 018 11/7/2021 Karen Anderson karenlanderson736@gmail.com email What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail?  How would it translate into jobs, specifically? There is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. The proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims. I support the planting of 019 11/9/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually. acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. 020 11/9/2021 Joan Fabian fabianily@gmail.com email 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existent trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the Netherlands. 6/10/2022 6 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 021 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. 022 11/2/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. 023 11/17/2021 Fred Weinmann fweinmann@cablespeed.com email A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees. 024 11/19/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. Do not cut trees in December. 025 12/1/2021 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website 026 12/9/2021 Tom Myers tommyers393@gmail.com email Go for it! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ 027 12/10/2021 Linda Tilley artbytilley.com lindatilley44@gmail.com email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. 028 12/13/2021 anonymous butterfly@olypen.com engagept Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? 029 12/12/2021 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref 030 12/10/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re-vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). 031 12/9/2021 Andrea Hegland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? When are you proposing to do this? What permits will you be securing? When will you be securing permits? Will you be conducting environmental review. 032 12/6/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan.  At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to  attributes i.e.  functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. 6/10/2022 6 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 033 12/7/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money.  034 11/22/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. 035 12/14/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the multi-agency plan. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. 036 12/15/2021 Karta John Miller susanmiller@olypus.net engagept Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. 037 12/15/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. 038 12/30/2021 Val Johnstone valjohnstone@aol.com engagept Recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare " Red Maple 039 12/21/2021 Kathy Knoblock toddk@msn.com email I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? 040 1/13/2022 Debbie Jahnke dbjahnke@att.net email Comments on information provided to public 041 2/12/2022 Cliff Moore meamoore@comcast.net email consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. 042 2/14/2022 Patti Hoyecki phoyecki@yahoo.com email supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio.  I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future.  The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. 043 2/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com engagept Where is the Long Term Tree Management Plan? What are the plans for the cut trees? Who does one become a stakeholder? Reconsiderwiping out the Kah Tai Populars. 044 2/15/2022 Gail Workman marksyounglady@gmail.com engagept Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. 045 2/18/2022 Richard and MaryAnn Moore ptmoores1@q.com email We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week. 046 2/22/2022 Johnny Ms Johnson's eighth grade class mail The hearts on the poplars comment 047 2/22/2022 Robin Jahnke public comment Stormwater drainage needs to be developed 048 3/6/2022 George Randels gr321@olypen.com email Remove poplars on port side but leave trees on lagoon side. 049 3/8/2022 Mary Elayne Dunphy medunphy@comcast.ne email I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. 050 3/20/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Clarification of accessment report: populars would not likely be killed if trenching done by Port fence line, safe option if heavy equipment stayed off of the main roots closer to tree on the Port side. 051 3/21/2022 Linda Lebrane lebranemusic@yahoo.com engagept Save the poplars 052 3/14/2022 Kelly Drake kellydrake22@gmail.com engagept I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? 053 12/13/2021 anonymous krdmps@hotmail.com engagept How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? 054 4/6/2022 Brent Vadopalas brent@vadopalas.org engagept It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines.illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. 6/10/2022 6 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 055 5/2/2022 Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept Provided a copy of the April 23, 2022 Gateway Alliance Slideshow along with comments that the project can be done wihtout cutting down the poplars, the ity has no economic analysis for cutting the trees, the parks board is the public forum, the city has arranged the parks board to be in favor of removal of the poplars, the stakeholder committee is in favor or removal of the poplars, the city has always intended to remove the poplars and the public process is not transparrent. 056 5/5/2022 ? Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept Can you clarify the purpose for the stakeholder committee and defined scope of work. 057 5/7/2022 Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept It appears that the 9 member Stakeholder Committee that is supposed to have an open mind about our Gateway Poplars already has a predetermined bias against the Poplars.  A majority are already on record to cut our community trees down. The City's website still says that one of the project goals is to cut the trees down. ·  Replacement of Lombardy poplars, an emerging and eventual need for the City The Port informed us that the selection process for the Stakeholder Committee was an open one, available to the general public.  We were also told that all options were on the table.   We subsequently requested copies and/or documentation of that notificiation to the general public for this committee formation...and the City was unable to provide us with any announcement for openings that was made available to the general public.  The Stakeholder Committee members appear to have been hand picked and with an existing bias against our poplars. The Parks Board was able to choose 4 of the 9 members, and the City indicated from the outset that the Admiralty Audubon would be invited.  The Port was guaranteed a spot as well.  The general public was not allowed to serve on this hand-picked committee, which has been stacked with anti-poplar votes. We expect our elected officials to engage in truly democratic processes backed by democratic principles.  Clearly that is not what has occured.058 5/16/2022 Vicki Legman vickilegman@gmail.com email Thank you. Been doing some reading and poplars are short lived trees. They’re beautiful, but removal seems to, sadly,  make sense. 059 2/19/2022 Robin Ornelas public comment Please preserve the poplars. They are one of the reasons that I wanted to move to Port Townsend. 060 2/19/2022 Darlene Schanfalc darlenes@olympus.net public comment I am disappointed that the City staff proposes to remove the Poplars on Sims Way. Those older and still healthy trees add character and a beauty to the area, which otherwise looks totally industrial. If the height is a problem, a trim is sufficient. Why would you even spend City funds on an unnecessary project when they can be put elsewhere? Please leave the trees alone. 061 2/20/2022 Larry Eifert larryeifert.com public comment How is the city, county and port going to take care of what they have been entrusted with? Will they take the easy way out and cut the trees, cutting a riff through the town that will maybe not be repairable? Will you help make it look like a strip mall by planting more Mall-Ready trees that look like every other place in America? Will people like Nancy and I drift away from here to be replaced by Mall-Ready home buyers? 062 2/20/2022 Melinda Bryden public comment I just wanted the City of Port Townsend to know that my husband, Ron Hayes, and I support cutting down the Poplar trees along Sims Way. It makes economic sense. As relatively long term residents (1999), we would like the City to know that it has our support. 063 2/20/2022 Rachel Ganapoler public comment I’m opposed to your plans for cutting the beautiful trees lining the gateway to our town.. they should be maintained, not destroyed! This plan is short sighted and that money could be spent elsewhere.. I’m sure you can come up with another worthless round about.. or you could fill pot holes or try to beautify the town by maintaining the existing trees.. ya know.. like the ones that were removed on main street . Yes, I’m pissed at your decision.. we want the trees to stay.. those trees!! 6/10/2022 6 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 064 2/20/2022 Lois Venarchick public comment The poplar trees along Sims Way literally transformed my life with their beauty, color and most importantly, the calming, I can breathe, peaceful way into town. Although you might dismiss this comment thinking it just too out there; I have driven into PT most of my adult life on a near daily basis. Nothing removed the stress I feel, and the beauty I see, than these two rows of stately poplar trees. I can only imagine the feelings they evoke in visitors and newcomers alike. In addition Port Townsend, “ use it up, wear it out, fix it up or do without. “ Stop spending money on things not needing to be done, directly contributing to the unaffordable town we are becoming. Save the trees! 065 2/21/2022 Sheri Suryan smithsuryan@gmail.com public comment Please don’t cut these beautiful trees down! They are such a welcoming sight as people drive into Port Townsend. They block wind from the sea and provide shade to Khai Tai Lagoon for fish and other wildlife. Sadly no other trees will grow to that extent in my lifetime. It would be such a shame to cut them down. What a void there will be and will be permanently! It’s not worth high speed internet to kill these trees! Please rethink other possibilities and let them survive!! 066 5/22/2022 Laura Snodgrass laurafound@yahoo.com engagept I just want my opinion to be heard. I know you have heard all of the arguments for and against. Please do not cut down the poplars.  067 5/20/2022 Mark McCauley mmccauley@co.jefferson.wa.us email Looking out off my deck just now - from the hill between the hospital and Safeway - removing the poplars is going to substantially alter my view and not for the better. My view is world class and one reason the house is valued so highly. I won’t oppose the plan but thought you might want to hear an unvarnished opinion from an interested resident who will adversely impacted by the current plan. I love the poplars as does my wife. 068 5/25/2022 Kaci Cronkhite kacicronkhite@gmail.com engagept I support the Port’s boatyard expansion and PUD under grounding of power lines. However, I also support saving the poplar trees. Those poplar trees have proven time and again how resilient they are… through negligence, drought, floods, boatyard toxins, highway toxins, brackish mingling with Kai Tai lagoon, and when PUD has chopped them down to stumps on the boatyard side of the road across from Safeway. They’re tough as well as iconic. How much water are the trees currently drinking? When they’re gone, where will the water go? Will the new trees and surfaces manage water and mitigate toxins as well? Will new trees be so hardy? At what comparable budget? IF you must remove poplars from the Port side of the road, at least keep the ones on the Kai Tai side and use the money for improved maintenance: thinning, pruning, root barriers. Lastly, please ensure that all new surfaces and landscaping maintains or improves the environmental impacts of poplar removal: No concrete, no plastic, just green space and plantings that would parallel the work of those trees. 069 5/26/2022 Lisa Flores laflores99@yahoo.com engagept I am among the many who have lived here in Port Townsend for more than 40 years. I love the entry to our town. There is no valid reason to cut down these beautiful specimens. I have read all of the opinions. Perhaps there is a danger ... as in anything else of any validity in the world. I am also a climate refugee from the California Wildfires, where we lost ALL of our trees to the deadly devastation,,,, we had no choice in the matter. Here you have a choice. Use it wisely. 6/10/2022 6 June 10, 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetings Meetings Previously Held • Meeting 1 (April 23) • Meeting 2 (May 10) o Add the Consultant Team o Agency Principles o Brainstorming • Meeting 3 (~May 31) – Criteria o Brainstorm criteria – “What’s important to each of us?” o Screen criteria o Establish final criteria Meetings Currently Scheduled • Meeting 4 (June 14) – Alternatives o Brainstorm alternatives o Screen alternatives o Establish final alternatives Future M eetings • Meeting 5 (~June 28) – Landscaping/Species o Discuss pros and cons of specific tree species and landscaping species • Meeting 6 (~July 12) – Ranking Results o Share results ▪ Scoring of each alternative by criteria ▪ Alternatives Ranking – sum of score x weight by criteria o Sensitivity and What-ifs o Establish final preferred alternative • Open House (~August 6) – Public open house to share the process and preferred alternative • Parks Board Meeting (August 23) – Recommend alternative to elected bodies EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-01 Sheet 1 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Project Limits and Constraints KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Project Assumptions & Constraints - Expand Boat Yard to the property line (Sims Way right of way line) - Keep project work within City right-of-way and Boat Yard property - Maintain the current roadway alignment (vehicle lanes) - Underground power lines and Boat Yard service connections - Honor the guidance provided by the Sims Way Gateway Development Plan - Sim Way right-of-way is owned by the City - WSDOT has jurisdiction for Sims Way pavement - City has jurisdiction for Sims Way outside of pavement (and medians) - Project Budget = $1.97 million - Construct improvements in 2023-2024 D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Boat Yard Expansion Limit of Power Undergrounding Limit of Sims Gateway Plan Implementation Features to Consider in Developing Alternatives Pedestrian Facilities - One side or both sides? - Location relative to the roadway? - Width? - Materials? - Crossings? Boat Yard/Sims Way Right-of-Way Interface - Fence, wall, or other? - Access points to the Boat Yard? Trees - Poplar thinning or removal? One side or both sides? - Replacement Planting - Native, ornamental, or other? - Conider or decidious? - Diversity or consistency? - Formal symmetry, informal asymmetry, or a mix? Utility Undergrounding (support project decisions, not drive project decisions) - Location relative to the roadway Framework Preferences - Focus on establishing big picture preferences for the 8/23 Parks Board meeting - Defer details until conceptual/preliminary design Preference 1: Poplars - Poplars on the north side - Keep - Replace over time (some now) with what? - Replace all now with what? - Poplars on the south side - replace with what? Preference 2: Ped/Bike Circulation - Ped/bike crossings/circulation - Both sides or one side - Path(s) or sidewalk(s) - Connection to Larry Scott Trail Focus Meeting 5 on tree species type selection EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-03 Sheet 3 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 1 Je ffer so n C ounty, W A., Pro-West & A ssoci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M a xar, Ear ths tar Geogr a phics , and th e e da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 1 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W 1 0 0 f t 5 0 f t 5 0 f t 5 0 f t 3 0 f t 4 0 f t 2 3 f t 3 0 f t Approximate location of Poplars EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-04 Sheet 4 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 2 Jeffer son C ou nty, W A., Pro-W e st & A ssoci ates, Inc., Source: Esr i, M axa r, Ea r ths tar Ge og r aph ics , an d the³ h ese da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 2 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W 1 0 0 f t 5 0 f t 5 0 f t 2 4 f t 2 6 f t 2 1 f t 3 0 f t Approximate location of Poplars EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-05 Sheet 5 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 3 Jeffer so n C ounty, WA., Pro -West & A sso ci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M a xar, Ear ths ta r Geogr a phics , and th e³ h ese da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 3b 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W 1 0 0 f t 5 0 f t 5 0 f t 2 5 f t 3 3 f t 2 9 f t 1 0 0 f t 5 0 f t 5 0 f t 2 5 f t 3 6 f t 2 3 f t Approximate location of Poplars EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-06 Sheet 6 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 4 Jeffe r son C ounty, W A., Pro-W est & A ssoci ate s, Inc., So ur ce : Esr i, M axa r, Earths tar Geog r aphics , and the³ Sim s Way 4 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W 1 0 0 f t 5 0 f t 5 0 f t 2 4 f t 3 2 f t 3 0 f t Approximate location of Poplars EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-07 Sheet 7 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 5 Je ffer so n C ounty, W A., Pro-West & A ssoci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M axar, Ear ths tar Geogr a phics , an d the³ Th ese da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 5 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W Approximate location of Poplars EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-08 Sheet 8 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 6 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 Je ffer son C ou nty, W A., Pro-We st & A ssoci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M axar, Ea r ths tar Ge ogr a ph ics , an d the³ Sim s Way 6 R/W R/W R/W Approximate location of Poplars EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: Je ffer so n C ounty, W A., Pro-West & A ssoci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M a xar, Ear ths tar Geogr a phics , and th e³ Th ese da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 7 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-09 Sheet 9 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 7 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W Approximate location of Poplars EXHIBIT No: JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t SHEET No: EX-01 Sheet 1 commercial/retail boatyard park LEGEND DRAFT Stakeholder Meeting #4 6/14/2022 VISITORS CENTER EXISTING LAND USE FRONTAGE ZONES EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t EXISTING TREE ZONES DRAFT Stakeholder Meeting #4 6/14/2022 large poplars medium poplars alternate canopy trees no canopy LEGEND VISITORS CENTER EXHIBIT No: JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t NON-MOTORIZED CONNECTIONS: SIDEWALKS SHEET No: EX-03 Sheet 3 POTENTIAL CONCEPTUAL NON-MOTORIZED CONNECTIONS SIDEWALK VISITORS CENTER existing bike lane shared use path / trail (existing and extended) sidewalk (existing and extended) possible crossing improvements LEGEND DRAFT Stakeholder Meeting #4 6/14/2022 Larry Scott Trail Connection Options LARRY SCOTT TRAIL EXHIBIT No: JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t NON-MOTORIZED CONNECTIONS: SHARED USE PATH SHEET No: EX-04 Sheet 4 10-12' Shared Use Path Replacing Sidewalk DRAFT Stakeholder Meeting #4 6/14/2022 POTENTIAL CONCEPTUAL NON-MOTORIZED CONNECTIONS SHARED USE PATH LEGEND VISITORS CENTER existing bike lane shared use path / trail (existing and extended) sidewalk (existing and extended) crossing improvements Larry Scott Trail Connection Options LARRY SCOTT TRAIL 1 SIMS WAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE AGENDA June 14, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Welcome and Meeting Logistics: The principal purpose of this meeting is to allow the stakeholder committee, agency staff, and the design consultant to communicate with each other, answer questions, and get the stakeholder's opinions, and share information regarding the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project. Meetings are held in hybrid format, in-person and over Goto Meeting. All meetings are recorded and available on the City’s website. While the meeting can be viewed live online, public comment will not be taken during the meeting. Opportunities for general public comment is are provided at the Parks Recreation Tree Trail Advisory Board (PRTTAB) meetings. Those wishing to provide public comment on the stakeholder meeting process can do so via email to engagept@cityofpt.us . All written comment will be provided to the stakeholder committee, PRTTAB, and the City, Port, and PUD elected officials. To join the webinar, follow these instructions. • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 528-774- 379 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: +1 (415) 930-5321 Ext. 3 access code: 416-366-314# Recorded Meetings can be viewed anytime online at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project I. Introductions (10 min) A. Thank you for the last meeting discussion. B. Stakeholder Group Purpose The purpose of the stakeholder committee is to work with City, Port, and PUD staff along with the project consultant to review and prepare technical information with the objective of developing thoughtful options to obtain the best possible outcome for the community. C. Review of planned Stakeholder Group Meetings – Scott Sawyer i. Stakeholder Meetings 5 & 6 (June 28th & July 12th) ii. August 6th Open House iii. August 23rd Parks Board Meeting 2 II. Criteria (15 mins) A. Framework Preferences i. Trees – south side of Sims and north side of Sims ii. Pedestrian Circulation B. Review Final Criteria III. Alternative Development (60 mins) A. Context Graphics i. Zoning/Land Use Frontage ii. Existing Tree Zones iii. Non-motorized Circulation B. Alternatives Brainstorm i. Non-motorized Circulation ii. Landscaping – Boat Yard Side iii. Landscaping – Kah Tai Side C. Final Alternatives IV. Next Meeting (5 min) A. Stakeholder Meeting 5 (Trees Species): June 28th Meeting at 2:00p (tentative) B. PRTTAB Meeting: June 28th at 4:30p Parking Lot/Future Meetings (The parking lot is for topics that come up that may be addressed in a future meeting.) June 10, 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Criteria Criteria – Bike/Pe des trian Circulation Preference • Welcoming gateway, aka “warm hug” (aesthetic, placemaking, Port Townsend “feel”) o Measurement ▪ Qualitative • Connectivity/accessibility o Measurement ▪ Connections to existing facilities • Safety o Measurement ▪ Increase lateral offset from Sims Way traveled lanes ▪ Promote slower vehicle speeds ▪ Reduce required crossings of Sims Way ▪ Increase lateral offset from Port property line • Cost o Measurement ▪ Minimize long-term maintenance costs • Planning document consistency o Measurement ▪ Qualitative C riteria – Tree Preference • Welcoming gateway, aka “warm hug” (aesthetic, placemaking, Port Townsend “feel”) o Measurement ▪ Qualitative • Tree Species o Measurement ▪ Maximize use of native/climate resilient species ▪ Maximize diversity of size, color, spacing, and shape ▪ Maximize habitat value ▪ Minimize risk of root damage to sidewalks and utilities • Cost o Measurement ▪ Minimize long-term maintenance costs • Planning document consistency o Measurement ▪ Qualitative Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion | Criteria Page 2 of 2 Design Considerations • Port property line wall/fencing • CPTED (crime prevention through environmental design) • Boat yard pedestrian access points • Median trees (future compatibility) • Haines Street intersection (possible roundabout) • Kearney Street intersection (possible roundabout) • Use of root barriers • Pollen • Lateral offset to power undergrounding • Maintaining gateway feel during construction • Consider bird nesting when scheduling tree work • Obtain topographic survey – trees, pavement, sidewalks, property lines, etc. • Electrical service connections to the Port • Inflation impacts on project budget • Stormwater design • Connect pedestrian facilities to the Visitors Center and Willene sculpture • Soil amendments Redundant Cri teria • Larry Scott trail (future compatibility) – redundant to Connectivity/Accessibility Criteria that ar e Solutions • Keep Poplars on the north side • Transplant Poplars EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-01 Sheet 1 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Project Limits and Constraints KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Project Assumptions & Constraints - Expand Boat Yard to the property line (Sims Way right of way line) - Keep project work within City right-of-way and Boat Yard property - Maintain the current roadway alignment (vehicle lanes) - Underground power lines and Boat Yard service connections - Consider the Sims Way Gateway Development Plan - Sim Way right-of-way is owned by the City - WSDOT has jurisdiction for Sims Way pavement - City has jurisdiction for Sims Way outside of pavement (and medians) - Project Budget = $1.97 million - Construct improvements in 2023-2024 D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Boat Yard Expansion Limit of Power Undergrounding Limit of Sims Gateway Plan Implementation Features to Consider in Developing Alternatives Pedestrian Facilities - One side or both sides? - Location relative to the roadway? - Width? - Materials? Boat Yard/Sims Way Right-of-Way Interface - Fence, wall, or other? - Access points to the Boat Yard? Trees - Poplar thinning or removal? One side or both sides? - Replacement Planting - Native, ornamental, or other? - Conider or decidious? - Diversity or consistency? - Formal symmetry, informal asymmetry, or a mix? Utility Undergrounding (adjust to project decisions, not drive project decisions) - Location relative to the roadway EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-03 Sheet 3 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 1 Je ffer so n C ounty, W A., Pro-West & A ssoci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M a xar, Ear ths tar Geogr a phics , and th e e da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 1 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-04 Sheet 4 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 2 Jeffer son C ou nty, W A., Pro-W e st & A ssoci ates, Inc., Source: Esr i, M axa r, Ea r ths tar Ge og r aph ics , an d the³ h ese da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 2 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-05 Sheet 5 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 3 Jeffer so n C ounty, WA., Pro -West & A sso ci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M a xar, Ear ths ta r Geogr a phics , and th e³ h ese da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 3b 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-06 Sheet 6 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 4 Jeffe r son C ounty, W A., Pro-W est & A ssoci ate s, Inc., So ur ce : Esr i, M axa r, Earths tar Geog r aphics , and the³ Sim s Way 4 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-07 Sheet 7 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 5 Je ffer so n C ounty, W A., Pro-West & A ssoci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M axar, Ear ths tar Geogr a phics , an d the³ Th ese da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 5 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-08 Sheet 8 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 6 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 Je ffer son C ou nty, W A., Pro-We st & A ssoci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M axar, Ea r ths tar Ge ogr a ph ics , an d the³ Sim s Way 6 R/W R/W R/W EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: Je ffer so n C ounty, W A., Pro-West & A ssoci ates, Inc., Sou r ce: Esr i, M a xar, Ear ths tar Geogr a phics , and th e³ Th ese da ta are prov ided o n Sim s Way 7 1"= 30' May 2022 EX-09 Sheet 9 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Site Map 7 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W May 24, 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetings Meetings Previously Held • Meeting 1 (April 23) • Meeting 2 (May 10) o Add the Consultant Team o Agency Principles o Brainstorming Meetings Currently Scheduled • Meeting 3 (~May 31) – Criteria o Brainstorm criteria – “What’s important to each of us?” o Screen criteria ▪ What helps us decide? ▪ Do we have duplicates? ▪ What can we realistically measure (quantitative or qualitative)? o Establish final criteria ▪ How will we measure it? Future M eetings • Meeting 4 (~June 14) – Alternatives o Brainstorm alternatives o Screen alternatives o Establish final alternatives • Meeting 5 (~June 28) – Landscaping/Species o Discuss pros and cons of specific tree species and landscaping species • Meeting 6 (~July 12) – Ranking Results o Share results ▪ Scoring of each alternative by criteria ▪ Alternatives Ranking – sum of score x weight by criteria o Sensitivity and What-ifs o Establish final recommended alternative • Open House (~August 2) – Public open house to share the process and recommended alternative • Parks Board Meeting (August 23) – Recommend alternative to elected bodies May 26, 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Criteria (aka Values) Welcoming Gateway (warm hug) • Aesthetic • Port Townsend “age-less” beauty Pedestrian M obility Safety and S ecurity • CPTED • Boat yard security • Pedestrian safety (proximity to vehicles) Future Compatibility • Larry Scott Trail • Medians (trees) Landscaping • Native • Diverse – species, size, color, etc. • Habitat value • Climate change considerations • Maintenance Cost – P ractical Considerations • Capitol • Maintenance 1 SIMS WAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE AGENDA May 31, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Welcome and Meeting Logistics: The principal purpose of this meeting is to allow the stakeholder committee, agency staff, and the design consultant to communicate with each other, answer questions, and get the stakeholder's opinions, and share information regarding the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project. Meetings are held in hybrid format, in-person and over Goto Meeting. All meetings are recorded and available on the City’s website. While the meeting can be viewed live online, public comment will not be taken during the meeting. Opportunities for general public comment is are provided at the Parks Recreation Tree Trail Advisory Board (PRTTAB) meetings. Those wishing to provide public comment on the stakeholder meeting process can do so via email to engagept@cityofpt.us . All written comment will be provided to the stakeholder committee, PRTTAB, and the City, Port, and PUD elected officials. To join the webinar, follow these instructions. • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 348-835-859 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: +1 (562) 247-8422 Access code: 972-173-160# Recorded Meetings can be viewed anytime online at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project I. Introductions (15 min) A. Roll Call B. Reintroduction of the SCJ Alliance Team. C. Stakeholder meeting purpose: The purpose of the stakeholder committee is to work with City, Port, and PUD staff along with the project consultant to review and prepare technical information with the objective of developing thoughtful options to obtain the best possible outcome for the community. D. Share roadmap for the process (timeline and meeting schedule) II. Last meeting followup: Homework review (50 Minutes) A. Thank you for the last meeting discussion. B. Reflections on last meeting information: Review and confirmation of the “Values” that we heard. C. Reflections on public comments received to date. Review of key points that provide 2 constructive ideas for the project. Do our “Values” reflect the goals that the construction solutions aim to achieve? III. Lighting-Round - Project Canvas and Limits Review (20 min) (Just to get started in advance of our next meeting) A. North side/South side B. Right of way width IV. Next Steps (5 min) A. PRTTAB Meeting on June 28, 2022 B. Homework: TBD V. Confirm next meeting date and time: June 14, 2022 Parking Lot/Future Meetings The parking lot is for topics that come up that are not on the agenda and may be addressed in a future meeting. Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 001 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email The popular trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas and no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine 002 9/28/2021 Craig Voice Mail Expressed passionate discontent with tree removal 003 9/28/2021 Karen Rudd karenlenerudd@gmail.com email Please put trees between car lane and bike/sidewalk lanes. 004 9/16/2021 Nancy Erreca nerreca@aol.com website The project is not needed, housing is needed. 9/28/2021 Keith Emry Facebook Fix the roads first 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Fixing Lawrence street should have priority. How about something for the people that live here not the ones coming to visit 9/28/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook please please please do soil tests before planting; make sure the new trees have room to grow and are the right plant for the right place. Please do not leave this in the hands of out-of-town landscape architects who, though I have great respect for many, are not always very knowledgeable about trees (beyond their aesthetic properties). 9/28/2021 Fredrich Bonbast Facebook Lawrence is fine. the roads in my neighborhood look like iraq, except when it rains. then they look like iraq in a flood. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Friedrich Bombast I picked Lawrence because it’s a major street that many use. 9/28/2021 Robert Jaye Facebook Wow, looks like the city has abandoned reasonable setbacks and their importance for maintaining the city's character. The concept picture shows maybe 15 feet from the road. Nice way to say welcome to PT. 9/28/2021 Sarah Smith Facebook What exactly is wrong with the poplars? Why are they Not environmentally friendly? 9/28/2021 Russell Hansen Facebook Walter McQuillen thank you ! 9/28/2021 Sarah Ludlum-Wisehart Facebook Friedrich Bombast YES!!! All the roads in Uptown need to be fixed!!! This project is ridiculous! 9/28/2021 David Crozier Facebook Cant really believe anyone thinks moving the boat yard boundary closer to the street is more eye appealing than the current situation. This has to be the most unpopular city council project yet. 9/28/2021 Gus Sebastian Facebook I think Boat Haven adds good character to PT. Its pretty cool seeing it when you come down the S curves. Its a major part of the history of this town. "A Victorian Seaport" Many local folks utilize the boatyard not only as a means of employment but recreationally. I support this idea. If you have ever looked up at those tress in big wind you might be concerned. Yes fix the roads, yes fix everything, but please don't complain about an idea that could grow a industry in PT. 9/29/2021 Fredrich Bombast Facebook Walter McQuillen i get that. but i walk a lot of neighborhoods, and many of the out-of-the way streets aren't even streets anymore. at least Lawrence doesn't have massive potholes and washouts. i once asked a city guy about the street in front of our house, which is broken asphalt and gravel undercoat, and he said the cost to repair it would be about the annual street repair budget for the whole city. "improvement projects," though, are sexier. 9/29/2021 Timothy Stone Facebook More gentrification, plz? 9/29/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook Sarah Smith they are wonderful trees but at this stage of their lifespan they are falling apart in high winds. It's a busy road with power lines so there is a reasonable likelihood that a tree failure (usually large sections of these trees break out like ice-bergs off a glacier) can cause damage and even injury. They have a few other issues as well. They send up suckers, new trees from the roots, a great distance from the original tree. They are beloved by aphids. They also produce a lot of pollen which a number of people are allergic to. While I have always admired this allee, it is time to plan for the future; replace these with something new and (hopefully) native trees and shrubs, something to take us the next 100 years. 9/29/2021 James Schultz Facebook Plant pot on the roadway! Pot Townsend rides again. 9/29/2021 Stephen Hall Facebook Very low on the priority list for the city. Putting utilities underground is a nice goal. Roads repairs and replacement is much higher on the list. Just not as sexy on the council resume. 005 9/29/2021 Rachel Ganapoler rachelganapoler@gmail.com email The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines..and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? 006 9/29/2021 Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com email In support of removing of removing trees, shrubs and grass that might cause raging wildfires 007 10/13/2021 Dori Bailey BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM email The money should be spent for the homeless. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. 008 10/17/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Replanting the Poplars makes sense but stick to the 1993 study. There are benefits to the poplars. 09 10/19/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached the 1993 Gateway Development Plan recommend read page 14 010 10/11/2021 O'Neill Louchard oneill@olympus.net email Thoughtful planted in needed, mixed species array. 011 10/7/2021 Joni Blanchard email A professional tree person should be consulted about trees and their impacts. Save the yellow lupine. 012 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 and happy to join the planning committee. 013 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Has there been a soil analysis, makes all the difference in the world for tree survival 014 10/27/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email take into consideration all the functions that the poplars provide, including the impressive beauty. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. 6/23/2022 8 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 015 11/4/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars. 016 11/8/2021 Larry Eifert larryeifert@gmail.com email But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. 017 11/7/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I'm not advocating what- so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! 018 11/7/2021 Karen Anderson karenlanderson736@gmail.com email What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail?  How would it translate into jobs, specifically? There is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. The proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims. I support the planting of native species. 019 11/9/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually. acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. 020 11/9/2021 Joan Fabian fabianily@gmail.com email 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existent trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the Netherlands. 021 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. 022 11/2/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. 023 11/17/2021 Fred Weinmann fweinmann@cablespeed.com email A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees. 024 11/19/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. Do not cut trees in December. 025 12/1/2021 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website 026 12/9/2021 Tom Myers tommyers393@gmail.com email Go for it! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ 027 12/10/2021 Linda Tilley artbytilley.com lindatilley44@gmail.com email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. 028 12/13/2021 anonymous butterfly@olypen.com engagept Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? 029 12/12/2021 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref 6/23/2022 8 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 030 12/10/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re- vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). 031 12/9/2021 Andrea Hegland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? When are you proposing to do this? What permits will you be securing? When will you be securing permits? Will you be conducting environmental review. 032 12/6/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan.  At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to  attributes i.e.  functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. 033 12/7/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money.  034 11/22/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. 035 12/14/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the multi-agency plan. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. 036 12/15/2021 Karta John Miller susanmiller@olypus.net engagept Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. 037 12/15/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. 038 12/30/2021 Val Johnstone valjohnstone@aol.com engagept Recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare " Red Maple 039 12/21/2021 Kathy Knoblock toddk@msn.com email I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? 040 1/13/2022 Debbie Jahnke dbjahnke@att.net email Comments on information provided to public 041 2/12/2022 Cliff Moore meamoore@comcast.net email consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. 042 2/14/2022 Patti Hoyecki phoyecki@yahoo.com email supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio.  I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future.  The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. 043 2/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com engagept Where is the Long Term Tree Management Plan? What are the plans for the cut trees? Who does one become a stakeholder? Reconsiderwiping out the Kah Tai Populars. 044 2/15/2022 Gail Workman marksyounglady@gmail.com engagept Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. 045 2/18/2022 Richard and MaryAnn Moore ptmoores1@q.com email We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week. 046 2/22/2022 Johnny Ms Johnson's eighth grade class mail The hearts on the poplars comment 047 2/22/2022 Robin Jahnke public comment Stormwater drainage needs to be developed 048 3/6/2022 George Randels gr321@olypen.com email Remove poplars on port side but leave trees on lagoon side. 049 3/8/2022 Mary Elayne Dunphy medunphy@comcast.ne email I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. 050 3/20/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Clarification of accessment report: populars would not likely be killed if trenching done by Port fence line, safe option if heavy equipment stayed off of the main roots closer to tree on the Port side. 051 3/21/2022 Linda Lebrane lebranemusic@yahoo.com engagept Save the poplars 052 3/14/2022 Kelly Drake kellydrake22@gmail.com engagept I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? 053 12/13/2021 anonymous krdmps@hotmail.com engagept How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? 6/23/2022 8 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 054 4/6/2022 Brent Vadopalas brent@vadopalas.org engagept It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines.illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. 055 5/2/2022 Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept Provided a copy of the April 23, 2022 Gateway Alliance Slideshow along with comments that the project can be done wihtout cutting down the poplars, the ity has no economic analysis for cutting the trees, the parks board is the public forum, the city has arranged the parks board to be in favor of removal of the poplars, the stakeholder committee is in favor or removal of the poplars, the city has always intended to remove the poplars and the public process is not transparrent. 056 5/5/2022 ? Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept Can you clarify the purpose for the stakeholder committee and defined scope of work. 057 5/7/2022 Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept It appears that the 9 member Stakeholder Committee that is supposed to have an open mind about our Gateway Poplars already has a predetermined bias against the Poplars.  A majority are already on record to cut our community trees down. The City's website still says that one of the project goals is to cut the trees down. ·  Replacement of Lombardy poplars, an emerging and eventual need for the City The Port informed us that the selection process for the Stakeholder Committee was an open one, available to the general public.  We were also told that all options were on the table.   We subsequently requested copies and/or documentation of that notificiation to the general public for this committee formation...and the City was unable to provide us with any announcement for openings that was made available to the general public.  The Stakeholder Committee members appear to have been hand picked and with an existing bias against our poplars. The Parks Board was able to choose 4 of the 9 members, and the City indicated from the outset that the Admiralty Audubon would be invited.  The Port was guaranteed a spot as well.  The general public was not allowed to serve on this hand-picked committee, which has been stacked with anti-poplar votes. We expect our elected officials to engage in truly democratic processes backed by democratic principles.  Clearly that is not what has occured. 058 5/16/2022 Vicki Legman vickilegman@gmail.com email Thank you. Been doing some reading and poplars are short lived trees. They’re beautiful, but removal seems to, sadly,  make sense. 059 2/19/2022 Robin Ornelas public comment Please preserve the poplars. They are one of the reasons that I wanted to move to Port Townsend. 060 2/19/2022 Darlene Schanfalc darlenes@olympus.net public comment I am disappointed that the City staff proposes to remove the Poplars on Sims Way. Those older and still healthy trees add character and a beauty to the area, which otherwise looks totally industrial. If the height is a problem, a trim is sufficient. Why would you even spend City funds on an unnecessary project when they can be put elsewhere? Please leave the trees alone. 061 2/20/2022 Larry Eifert larryeifert.com public comment How is the city, county and port going to take care of what they have been entrusted with? Will they take the easy way out and cut the trees, cutting a riff through the town that will maybe not be repairable? Will you help make it look like a strip mall by planting more Mall-Ready trees that look like every other place in America? Will people like Nancy and I drift away from here to be replaced by Mall-Ready home buyers? 062 2/20/2022 Melinda Bryden public comment I just wanted the City of Port Townsend to know that my husband, Ron Hayes, and I support cutting down the Poplar trees along Sims Way. It makes economic sense. As relatively long term residents (1999), we would like the City to know that it has our support. 063 2/20/2022 Rachel Ganapoler public comment I’m opposed to your plans for cutting the beautiful trees lining the gateway to our town.. they should be maintained, not destroyed! This plan is short sighted and that money could be spent elsewhere.. I’m sure you can come up with another worthless round about.. or you could fill pot holes or try to beautify the town by maintaining the existing trees.. ya know.. like the ones that were removed on main street . Yes, I’m pissed at your decision.. we want the trees to stay.. those trees!! 064 2/20/2022 Lois Venarchick public comment The poplar trees along Sims Way literally transformed my life with their beauty, color and most importantly, the calming, I can breathe, peaceful way into town. Although you might dismiss this comment thinking it just too out there; I have driven into PT most of my adult life on a near daily basis. Nothing removed the stress I feel, and the beauty I see, than these two rows of stately poplar trees. I can only imagine the feelings they evoke in visitors and newcomers alike. In addition Port Townsend, “ use it up, wear it out, fix it up or do without. “ Stop spending money on things not needing to be done, directly contributing to the unaffordable town we are becoming. Save the trees! 065 2/21/2022 Sheri Suryan smithsuryan@gmail.com public comment Please don’t cut these beautiful trees down! They are such a welcoming sight as people drive into Port Townsend. They block wind from the sea and provide shade to Khai Tai Lagoon for fish and other wildlife. Sadly no other trees will grow to that extent in my lifetime. It would be such a shame to cut them down. What a void there will be and will be permanently! It’s not worth high speed internet to kill these trees! Please rethink other possibilities and let them survive!! 066 5/22/2022 Laura Snodgrass laurafound@yahoo.com engagept I just want my opinion to be heard. I know you have heard all of the arguments for and against. Please do not cut down the poplars.  6/23/2022 8 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 067 5/20/2022 Mark McCauley mmccauley@co.jefferson.wa.us email Looking out off my deck just now - from the hill between the hospital and Safeway - removing the poplars is going to substantially alter my view and not for the better. My view is world class and one reason the house is valued so highly. I won’t oppose the plan but thought you might want to hear an unvarnished opinion from an interested resident who will adversely impacted by the current plan. I love the poplars as does my wife. 068 5/25/2022 Kaci Cronkhite kacicronkhite@gmail.com engagept I support the Port’s boatyard expansion and PUD under grounding of power lines. However, I also support saving the poplar trees. Those poplar trees have proven time and again how resilient they are… through negligence, drought, floods, boatyard toxins, highway toxins, brackish mingling with Kai Tai lagoon, and when PUD has chopped them down to stumps on the boatyard side of the road across from Safeway. They’re tough as well as iconic. How much water are the trees currently drinking? When they’re gone, where will the water go? Will the new trees and surfaces manage water and mitigate toxins as well? Will new trees be so hardy? At what comparable budget? IF you must remove poplars from the Port side of the road, at least keep the ones on the Kai Tai side and use the money for improved maintenance: thinning, pruning, root barriers. Lastly, please ensure that all new surfaces and landscaping maintains or improves the environmental impacts of poplar removal: No concrete, no plastic, just green space and plantings that would parallel the work of those trees. 069 5/26/2022 Lisa Flores laflores99@yahoo.com engagept I am among the many who have lived here in Port Townsend for more than 40 years. I love the entry to our town. There is no valid reason to cut down these beautiful specimens. I have read all of the opinions. Perhaps there is a danger ... as in anything else of any validity in the world. I am also a climate refugee from the California Wildfires, where we lost ALL of our trees to the deadly devastation,,,, we had no choice in the matter. Here you have a choice. Use it wisely. 070 5/29/2022 David Goldman Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Alliance engagept The 11-15-22 Jefferson County Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Grant addresses a legitimate economic development project that involves the Port of Port Townsend and the Jefferson County PUD. This development does not require the removal of the lower Sims Way poplar streetscape. What is it about present conditions of the Port Townsend Sims Way gateway transportation corridor that requires removal of the poplars ? Nothing Does the lower Sims Way “Flats” part of the gateway need critical aesthetic, restoration or maintenance work? No One member of the Stakeholder committee expressed the business community’s appreciation for the current beauty of the gateway. Another committee member is on record with his professional analysis of the lifetime value of the poplars to the community. The solution to the legitimate concern about the condition of the Kah Tai Lagoon Park is to promote an independent project to address that. Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park is a worthy project suitable for grant funding and the improvement of which would contribute to what makes Port Townsend a special community. The Nature Park project would not require poplar removal from the Sims Way ROW. 071 6/3/2022 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com engagept I am entirely in favor of completely removing the poplars and improving the appearance, habitat function, and diversity of Sims way for future generation and visitors.  As a resident of town for 42 years I have been impressed with the beauty of abundance of flowering trees and shrub planted in historic uptown (over 60 different trees species recorded during a recent survey). I have noticed the dominance of poplars planted in Port Townsend: they are breaking up (beyond their lifespan) and very unattractive in the winter. In fall I noticed all the wonders of color of other trees and in spring the stunning floral possibilities. I am involved professionally with revegetation and restoration projects (since 1995) in the City and Washington State with my business Olympic Wetland Resources, LLC. Currently I am involved with several ongoing City and State (Fort Worden, Kah Tai Prairie Preserve) revegetation projects. I have been past president of the Washington Native Plant Society, Olympic Chapter Although I work exclusively with native species there are many non-native trees and shrubs that have much higher habitat value and seasonal beauty than the ragged monotonous poplar meant to windbreak farmlands in Kansas.. 6/23/2022 8 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 072 6/3/2022 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com engagept I am unclear of the current status of the proposed poplar tree replacement plan. This has been a divisive topic but I hope decision makers proceed and remove the poplar trees, for both safety reasons, regarding power line issues, and because they are relatively short-lived non-native trees. As much as possible, new development in this and all cases should enhance the environment. So I strongly support replacing the poplars with native vegetation. Others have pointed out that our native Pacific Northwest trees from Douglas fir and western red cedar to Pacific alders and Pacific madrones are beautiful visually and symbolically, appropriate, and would enhance the environment. That might also benefit Kah Tai Lagoon park by somewhat extending that quasi- natural area. I would further remind all of us that the entire area from Townsend Bay through the lagoon, including the Boat Haven boatyard, Sims Way, nearby commerce like boat shops, Henry's, Safeway, etc., the transit center, and Kah Tai Lagoon park and lagoon themselves, are themselves products of fill and development that converted a historical natural active estuary and adjacent terrestrial ecosystem, and their use by indigenous populations. In that context, I urge you to consider how removal and replacement of the poplars, development of bike and pedestrian paths, and Boat Haven expansion can be more connected to that natural and human history. For example, native vegetation appropriate to estuary shorelines should be considered, and not just native upland trees. Interpretive signage is important. Even more visionary and substantial would be incorporating ways to restore some measure of functionality to these past tidal aquatic, wetland and adjacent terrestrial systems, their connection to Townsend Bay and lowlands towards North Beach, and historical uses by Native occupants. I get that is very big picture, that significant restoration of that area's pre-settlement condition is likely not practical or affordable. But I encourage you to do what you can. 073 6/6/2022 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email There is a gorilla in the stakeholders’ process - the poplars are to remain. This, according to the 1993 adopted ‘Gateway Development Plan’; intended to provide continuity for future projects. This plan, a years long community effort, describes  “special environmental character” and streetscape recommendations: “The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims. adjacent to Kah-Tai Park (note: land later incorporated into the Park) can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay. The ‘Sims Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project’ is a collaboration of three agencies, sharing a County $1M PIF grant. The grant language refers multiple times to “implementing” the ‘Gateway Development Plan’, the community’s vision for future development. Newly hired staff managers promote a mantra, “the poplars must go”, an idea inserted into the project narrative: “The Poplars have been identified as an inappropriate tree by both the Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board, as well as a supporting landscape study for Kah Tai Lagoon”. However, no City policy, goal, vision or priority has been adopted to incorporate such incongruent and contradictory ideas into the ‘Gateway Development Plan’. The grant money is to implement not amputate the community’s vision. What of the future town landscape, prioritizing “ the poplars must go” - cutting hundreds of trees - projected at $3000 per tree. One might be concerned; poplar cutting before residential streets potted with water features and arterials without shoulders for bicycles and walkers. A few 074 6/7/2022 Glen Bellerud Front Desk “What about the roads – cutting down the poplar trees, which have been here & have not had any storm damage as the shore pines have? Having managed Fort Worden for the first 20 yrs & a back ground in parks, I find this discerning (disturbing?). There are poplar trees at the Fort & they are doing great. I have been here for 60 yrs & find your thinking very short sighted. Who wants to look at stunted shore pine – not really native either. Let’s do something for everybody – not the few leading us & those choosing to make us look like all the same As in Calif(?).” 075 6/13/2022 Beverly Michaelsen engagept I love the poplars after the s curve and entering into beautiful Port Townsend. Please save the north side ones!! It is unfortunate that the port must take down the ones that border their side for expansion, they make such a perfect border. I wish they could all stay and they are perfect for water absorption and ecology. Thank you for considering and I hope that we can do the right thing in regards to our town, it’s citizens and our beautiful natural world. 076 6/15/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email At the June 14th Gateway Stakeholders Meeting, we began a discussion about planting setbacks from features in the Project area. Attached is a landscape detail sheet prescribing planting setbacks that WSDOT has used, sometimes with modification, for many roadside vegetation projects. WSDOT offers these distances as guidelines, not strict requirements. See attached. 6/23/2022 8 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 077 6/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached is an EPA Review titled 'Biological Aspcects of Hybrid Poplar Cultivation on Floodplains in Western North America'.  In it, they lament the widespread elimination of Hybrid Poplars and herald the re-introduction and cultivation of them for environmental benefits. One line in it says 'Given current trends in climate warming, hybrid Poplar could potentially compensate for the adaptive limitations of some native species'. It was written, since, there was a need in the divided scientific community, for all parties to have a better understanding of the basic biology and ecological role of both native and hybrid Poplars. I've consulted with two of our renown local naturalists, both with Doctorates in Biology, both experts and authors of books about birds. To quote one of them, when asked about wildlife value of OUR Poplars along Sims, he says 'removing the Lombardies from along that main path would be a short term loss for the migrating yellowrumps, nomadic waxwings, et al, that periodically make HEAVY use of them for foraging, but, IMMEDIATELY replanting with black cottonwood, willow, etc could fill that gap pretty quickly.' i've been working beside the Poplars (on a boat) for the past 2 months everyday. Songbirds have been singing all day long every day in them for these past 2 months as I work. The internet may say there's no wildlife value in Poplars, but, apparently, OUR Poplars are special and DO have wildlife value! 078 6/10/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email At the last meeting, Scott said we should email our thoughts of the concepts just sent to us. Here're mine~ 1. Sidewalk completed along north side ONLY. Upgrade crosswalks. 2. Any walking path along boatyard fenceline, if one MUST be put in, should be as narrow as possible and maybe only crushed pea gravel as is already across the road along the front of Henery's for low visibility. NO 6' slabs of anything - especially concrete!! 4. It's best to keep bicycle traffic as far to the west side of marina to connect as directly as possible to Larry Scott. As in the new path that will eventually connect the west side of boatyard entry to the shoreline. Straight in past Blue Moose is best until the new path is put in. 6. Bicycle traffic coming in past Admiral Ship Supply or along the marina waterfront shouldn't be encouraged. Too much traffic coming and going, cars parking, backing up, boats on lifts going by. Groups of bicycles mosying through the marina get in the way of busy comings and goings of workers and marina patrons. Bicyclers will start taking up all our precious parking spaces if they get a trail all along there, also!! They are already increasingly using our parking down closer to the trail. 8. Boatyard fence would be nice with a retaining wall of 2-man basalt rocks 3' or 4' high with wood posts and simple square wire between them to maintain view in and out of the yard for us workers and for those looking in to see the cool boats as they pass. 4. Absolutely NO opening along the yard fenceline. Those wanting to come in can access by coming into the marina and figuring their way in. Openings just encourage the (illegal) 'death dash' across the road to Henery's. Not necessary for workers to have easy access to Henery's. And, us workers definitely don't want easy ready access of the public right into where we're working! I've asked many regulars who work along there and WE DON'T WANT IT. 6. And, since the City owns the Right of Ways, they should honor their '93 Gateway Plan and tree policies in place to try to keep as many Poplars as possible (Tree City USA!!). On the Northside, in front of Safeway, McDonalds, Henery's and along the one acre or so ROW along the near 80 acre Kah Tai Park - with thinning, pruning, and root barriers where needed. Ripping all 200 trees out along the North side for the sake of the Audobon Society or because the Parks Board 'recommends' it, isn't what the City's Planning Director or City Council has to actually do (Consider the majority of the community's public comments in favor of keeping them!) There are many justifications for keeping those Hybrid Poplars. EPA recommends them to be planted along floodplanes along with native trees. (Climate change!!) Poplars are low maintenance and easily prevented from spreading. They've just been severly neglected for 40 years. 7. On the Southside, keep the trees in the commercial zones and replant behind Port buildings with young Poplars with root barriers. 8. Plant whatever in front of where boats will be. Just NOT monecious conifers that create pollen!!!! 9. $$ may come up tight. Not touching the Northside trees at all until the priorities of this project are finished might be a good idea (boatyard expansion/power undergrounding/fencing/replanting). 079 6/20/2022 Charles Nelson chasnelson101@icloud.com email Why not install new power lines underground, & save the trees? 080 6/20/2022 Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org email We were blind copied on an email in which you wrote: In addition, we also desire to make another seat available and seek a representative of the Poplar Alliance group to be part of the process directly. Assuming this was your formal invitation, here is our response. The current process to achieve the stated objectives of the multiagency "Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Grant” agreement and to qualify forJeff County PIF grant funds requires the removal of all the poplars from the lower Sims Flats commercial corridor of the GDP as an “ implemen[ation] [of] the City's Gateway Development Plan” [GDP] . The GDP specifically calls for a streetscape of linear poplars: Streetscape Recommendations The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims. adjacent to Kah-Tai Park, can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay. The GDP can’t be implemented by removing all the poplars. The Gateway Poplar Alliance (GPA) was organized to oppose that poplar removal. The GPA won’t participate in what is intended to be a public advisory/decision making process to redesign the Sims Flats commercial corridor of the GDP if the decision to remove the poplars has already been made before any substantive public involvement with the Potemkin village public process that has been undertaken to date. Therefore, the GPA will only agree to participate in the “technical advisory group,” the “Sims Way Technical Advisory Group,” aka the “stakeholder committee,” if the 081 6/19/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Kah Tai Volunteers, the Audubon Society, and our Parks Board members through the years have created a lovely park over the years and I appreciate and support all the prairie restoration and wildlife habitat efforts.  We have near 80 acres of this lovely park.  I’m hoping to keep Poplars just along the 1 -acre strip on the very edge of the park in the ROW.  Many in our community are wanting to keep many of those Poplars.  Let’s compromise to thin, prune, and save a good stand of healthy Poplars that stand along that stretch.   6/23/2022 8 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 082 6/120/22 Kathy Lundquist woodland.antiques@gmail.com engagept I know there's a backlash in response to the removal of the poplars along the Gateway, between the lagoon & the port. It is a noisy group but I hope folks like me let you know we agree with the effort to plant native trees along that strip. I vote to remove them. They are messy & dangerous, to my mind. My neighbor recently removed 7 poplars along our property line. I couldn't have been more grateful. He worried (as did I) during every windstorm that they'd come down on his house (or mine). Plant some native trees that are easier to maintain& less messy & ignore the noisy folks. 083 6/14/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Nonnative plants reduce population growth of an insectivorous bird Desirée L. Narango Nonnative plants lack an evolutionary history with native fauna and support insect communities that are less abundant and diverse, and this may change food availability for vertebrate consumers. Most insectivorous birds are absent or declining in urban areas, yet no study has tested whether nonnative plants impact bird populations via food limitation. We monitored reproduction and survival of Carolina chickadees within residential yards and found that when nonnative plants increased, both insect availability and chickadee population growth declined. We also found that populations could only be sustained if nonnative plants constituted <30% of plant biomass. Our results demonstrate that nonnative plants reduce habitat quality for insectivorous birds and restoration of human-dominated areas should prioritize native plants to support local food webs. Human-dominated landscapes represent one of the most rapidly expanding and least-understood ecosystems on earth. Yet, we know little about which features in these landscapes promote sustainable wildlife populations. Historically, in urban areas, landowners have converted native plant communities into habitats dominated by nonnative species that are not susceptible to pest damage and require little maintenance. However, nonnative plants are also poor at supporting insects that are critical food resources for higher order consumers. Despite the logical connection, no study has examined the impact of nonnative plants on subsequent population responses of vertebrate consumers. Here, we demonstrate that residential yards dominated by nonnative plants have lower arthropod abundance, forcing resident Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) to switch diets to less preferred prey and produce fewer young, or forgo reproduction in nonnative sites altogether. This leads to lower reproductive success and unsustainable population growth in these yards compared with those with >70% native plant biomass. Our results reveal that properties landscaped with nonnative plants function as population sinks for insectivorous birds. To promote sustainable food webs, urban planners and private landowners should prioritize native 6/23/2022 8 June 27, 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetings Meetings Previously Held • Meeting 1 (April 23) • Meeting 2 (May 10) o Add the Consultant Team o Agency Principles o Brainstorming • Meeting 3 (May 31) – Criteria o Brainstorm criteria – “What’s important to each of us?” o Screen criteria o Establish final criteria • Meeting 4 (June 14) – Alternatives o Brainstorm alternatives o Screen alternatives o Establish final alternatives Meetings Currently Scheduled • Meeting 5 (June 28) – Draft Alternatives Ranking Results o Review draft scoring and ranking of alternatives o Discuss character (aka form) of vegetation o Discuss options for property line treatments (i.e., fence, wall, etc.) Future M eetings • Meeting 6 (~July 12) – Final Alternatives Ranking Results & Discussion of Design Details o Share final alternatives ranking results o Finalize preference(s) for vegetation species o Finalize preference for property line treatments (i.e., fence, wall, etc.) • Open House (~August 6) – Public open house to share the process and preferred alternative • Parks Board Meeting (August 23) – Recommend alternative to elected bodies 1 SIMS WAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE AGENDA June 28, 2022 | 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Welcome and Meeting Logistics: The principal purpose of this meeting is to allow the stakeholder committee, agency staff, and the design consultant to communicate with each other, answer questions, and get the stakeholder's opinions, and share information regarding the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project. Meetings are held in hybrid format, in-person and over Goto Meeting. All meetings are recorded and available on the City’s website. While the meeting can be viewed live online, public comment will not be taken during the meeting. Opportunities for general public comment is are provided at the Parks Recreation Tree Trail Advisory Board (PRTTAB) meetings. Those wishing to provide public comment on the stakeholder meeting process can do so via email to engagept@cityofpt.us . All written comment will be provided to the stakeholder committee, PRTTAB, and the City, Port, and PUD elected officials. To join the webinar, follow these instructions. • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 348-835- 859 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: +1 (562) 247-8422 Access code: 704-353-576# Recorded Meetings can be viewed anytime online at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project I. Introductions (10 min) A. Thank you for the last meeting discussion. B. Stakeholder Group Purpose The purpose of the stakeholder committee is to work with City, Port, and PUD staff along with the project consultant to review and prepare technical information with the objective of developing thoughtful options to obtain the best possible outcome for the community. C. Review of where we left off in the last meeting. II. Alternatives (15 mins) A. Review of draft alternative scoring 2 III. Tree Species and Vegetation (60 mins) A. Review of conditions (i.e., soils, volume, etc.) B. Form C. Trees D. How does this information fit into alternatives IV. Next Meeting (5 min) A. Stakeholder Meeting 6 Concept Drawings Review: July 12th Meeting at 4:30 pm B. PRTTAB Meeting: June 28th at 4:30p Parking Lot/Future Meetings (The parking lot is for topics that come up that may be addressed in a future meeting.) EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t VISITORS CENTER LARRY SCOTT TRAIL Stakeholder Meeting #5 - 6/28/2022 NON-MOTORIZED CONNECTIONS ALTERNATIVE SIDEWALK NORTH SIDE ONLY LEGEND Existing Bike Lane (no modifications) Shared Use Path / Trail Sidewalk (existing and infill) Crossing Improvements Remove short segment of existing sidewalk on west side of bus stop and driveway Add sidewalk in front of garden center Improve crossing across Sims Way at Benedict Larry Scott Trail Connection Options Alternate P1 EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Reconstruct Shared Use Path for 10'-12' width LEGEND VISITORS CENTER Existing Bike Lane (no modifications) Shared Use Path / Trail Sidewalk (existing and infill) Crossing Improvements Stakeholder Meeting #5 - 6/28/2022 NON-MOTORIZED CONNECTIONS ALTERNATIVE SHARED USE PATH Remove short segment of existing sidewalk on west side of bus stop and driveway Add sidewalk in front of garden center Improve crossing across Sims Way at Benedict Larry Scott Trail Connection Options Alternate P2 EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t VISITORS CENTER LARRY SCOTT TRAIL Stakeholder Meeting #5 - 6/28/2022 NON-MOTORIZED CONNECTIONS ALTERNATIVE SIDEWALK BOTH SIDES LEGEND Existing Bike Lane (no modifications) Shared Use Path / Trail Sidewalk (existing and infill) Crossing Improvements Larry Scott Trail Connection Options Add sidewalk in front of garden center Improve crossing across Sims Way at Benedict Alternate P3 EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #5 - 6/28/2022 Replace Now LEGEND VISITORS CENTER PLANTING ALTERNATIVE REPLACE OVER TIME Replace Over Time Replacement over time will include strategic thinning but replacement tree species has not yet been determined. Alternate V1 EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #5 - 6/28/2022 Replace Now LEGEND VISITORS CENTER PLANTING ALTERNATIVE REPLACE NOW Alternate V2 EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #5 - 6/28/2022 PLANTING ALTERNATIVE REPLACE OVER TIME Remove select poplars where immediately adjacent to established tree stands in Kah Tai Park. REPLACE OVER TIME EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #5 - 6/28/2022 PLANTING ALTERNATIVE REPLACE OVER TIME Retain poplars where no established tree stands in Kah Tai Park are adjacent. Plant tree species consistent with long range planning documents. Remove poplars when other tree plantings are mature. REPLACE OVER TIME P 1 - N o r t h S i d e ( e x i s t i n g f a c i l i t i e s ) P 2 - N o r t h S i d e ( n e w s h a r e d u s e p a t h ) P 3 - B o t h S i d e s ( n e w s i d e w a l k s ) V 1 - R e p l a c e S o u t h S i d e N o w / R e p l a c e N o r t h S i d e O v er T i m e V 2 - R e p l a c e S o u t h S i d e N o w / R e p l a c e N o r t h S i d e N o w Criteria P1 P2 P3 V1 V2 Welcoming Gateway ("warm hug") Connectivity/accessibility Safety Greater Offset from Sims Way Slower Vehicle Speeds Reduced Required Crossing of Sims Way Greater Offset from Port Property Line Maintenance Costs Consistency with Planning Documents Welcoming Gateway ("warm hug") Vegetation Species Maximize Native/Climate Resilient Species Maximize Diversity (size, color, spacing, and shape) Maximize Habitat Value Minimize Risk Root Damage to Sidewalks and Utilities Compatible with existing soils and available soil volume Maintenance Costs Consistency with Planning Documents Alternatives Peds Vegetation Pedestrians Vegetation June 27, 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Scoring Summary 1 2 3 4 5 No distinction/detail No distinction/detail No distinction/detail 15 16 23 20 20 Alternative P1 - North Side (existing facilities) Scoring By Criteria Score Welcoming Gateway ("warm hug")Pedestrian facilities on one side only in an urban setting is less inviting than ped facilities on boths sides. 3 Connectivity/accessibility Connectivity is limited with ped facilities on one side.3 Safety Greater Offset from Sims Way No distinction/no detail at this point. Slower Vehicle Speeds Vehicle speeds are slowed less with ped facilities on one side only. Vehicles generally feel they have more space to speed.3 Reduced Required Crossing of Sims Way More crossings of Sims Way are required with facilities on one side only.2 Greater Offset from Port Property Line No distinction/no detail at this point. Maintenance Costs Maintenance costs are lower with only one side, but the existing facilities are older and more prone to future root damage.2 Consistency with Planning Documents Planning documents (i.e., City Non-motorized Plan) calls for facilities on both sides.2 15 Pedestrians Alternative P2 - North Side (new shared use path) Scoring By Criteria Score Welcoming Gateway ("warm hug")Pedestrian facilities on one side only in an urban setting is less inviting than ped facilities on boths sides. 3 Connectivity/accessibility Connectivity is limited with ped facilities on one side.3 Safety Greater Offset from Sims Way No distinction/no detail at this point. Slower Vehicle Speeds Vehicle speeds are slowed less with ped facilities on one side only. Vehicles generally feel they have more space to speed.3 Reduced Required Crossing of Sims Way More crossings of Sims Way are required with facilities on one side only.2 Greater Offset from Port Property Line No distinction/no detail at this point. Maintenance Costs Maintenance costs are lower with only one side. A new shared use path could have less maintenance and be designed to mitigate root damage.3 Consistency with Planning Documents Planning documents (i.e., City Non-motorized Plan) calls for facilities on both sides.2 16 Pedestrians Alternative P3 - Both Sides (new sidewalks) Scoring By Criteria Score Welcoming Gateway ("warm hug")Pedestrian facilities on both sides is a more inviting urban setting. 4 Connectivity/accessibility Connectivity is better with facilities on both sides.4 Safety Greater Offset from Sims Way No distinction/no detail at this point. Slower Vehicle Speeds Vehicle speeds are slower with ped facilities on both sides. Vehicles generally feel more constrained by space.4 Reduced Required Crossing of Sims Way Less crossings of Sims Way are required with facilities on both sides.4 Greater Offset from Port Property Line No distinction/no detail at this point. Maintenance Costs Maintenance costs could be higher with facilities on both sides, but the facilities would be new and concrete requires less maintenance than asphalt.3 Consistency with Planning Documents Planning documents (i.e., City Non-motorized Plan) calls for facilities on both sides.4 23 Pedestrians Alternative V1 - South Side Replace Now/North Side Replace Over Time Scoring By Criteria Score Welcoming Gateway ("warm hug")Phase replacement of Poplars creates a feel of more overall trees and gives time for new trees to mature.4 Vegetation Species Maximize Native/Climate Resilient Species Poplars are not native and the current Poplars lack resilience due to their age reaching their full life-span. Monocultures have a high risk of mass failure from disease.2 Maximize Diversity (size, color, spacing, and shape)Replacing Poplars increases diversity more slowly; however, replacing over time does increase diversity in size.3 Maximize Habitat Value The habitat value of Poplars moderate by comparison to a more diverse planting. Habitat is not impacted as greatly in the short term with slow replacement of trees. Habitat value is greater in the long term with greater diversity of planting. 3 Minimize Risk Root Damage to Sidewalks and Utilities Existing Poplars create more risk of root damage.2 Compatible with existing soils and available soil volume No distinction/no detail at this point. Maintenance Costs Maintenance costs are expected to be higher for Poplars due to their age and relative weak-wooded brittleness. 2 Consistency with Planning Documents Replacing Poplars over time is consistent with the Gateway Plan. The Gateway Plan recommends maintaining poplars but removing sucker growth, selective removal of small seedlings, open up views to lagoon and boatyard, and filling in gaps at a 20' to 25' spacing. Kah Tai Lagoon Plans (undated Master Plan and 1986 Plan) recommends replacement of poplars along north side, fronting park, with native species beneficial to wildlife, with some exotic/ornamental species at entrances; and creation of water vistas with large openings in planting. 4 20 Vegetation Alternative V2 - South Side Replace Now/North Side Replace Now Scoring By Criteria Score Welcoming Gateway ("warm hug")Replacing all Poplars now would reduce the visual impact of trees until replacement trees are more mature.1 Vegetation Species Maximize Native/Climate Resilient Species New species can be selected to favor native and climate resilient vegetation.4 Maximize Diversity (size, color, spacing, and shape)New species can be designed to create diversity; however, replanting all at once may limit diversity in size that would occur with phased replanting.3 Maximize Habitat Value New species can be selected to enhance habitate value; however, replacing all trees now will impact habit value until new trees mature.3 Minimize Risk Root Damage to Sidewalks and Utilities New species can be designed and planted to mimimize root damage (i.e., root barriers)4 Compatible with existing soils and available soil volume No distinction/no detail at this point. Maintenance Costs New species may have lower maintenance costs than aging Poplars; however, new trees will require maintenance to establish new plantings.2 Consistency with Planning Documents Replace all Poplars now is less consistent with the Gateway Plan. The Gateway Plan recommends maintaining poplars but removing sucker growth, selective removal of small seedlings, open up views to lagoon and boatyard, and filling in gaps at a 20' to 25' spacing. Kah Tai Lagoon Plans (undated Master Plan and 1986 Plan) recommends replacement of poplars along north side, fronting park, with native species beneficial to wildlife, with some exotic/ornamental species at entrances; and creation of water vistas with large openings in planting. 3 20 Vegetation 6/16/23, 7:09 AM cityofpt.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view_id=4&clip_id=2437 https://cityofpt.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view_id=4&clip_id=2437 1/3 PORT TOWNSEND AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 540 WATER STREET Business Meeting 01:47 p.m.June 28, 2022 I.Welcome, Introduction & Call to Order - Chair Debbie Jahnke Good afternoon and welcome to this meeting of the Port Townsend Parks, Recreation, Trees & Trails Advisory Board. The role of this Board is to assist City staff and to advise the City Council on legislative matters concerning parks, recreation, trees and trails. This meeting is open to the public at the City Council Chambers, virtually via this web format, and is also being video recorded for those who could not attend the meeting today and for future reference. Given that this meeting is in virtual format, we ask that the board members raise their hands to be called on by the Chair. The public can do the same to comment during the public comment periods. We take public comment at the beginning and end of the meeting. II.Roll Call III.Approval of Agenda IV.Approval of May 24, 2022 Minutes 52422 Minutes V.Public Comment (3 minutes per person/agenda items only) – Comments on Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project will be taken after the Staff Briefing. If joining by phone, please press *6 to raise your hand and *9 to unmute yourself. A.Public comments received via prtab@cityofpt.us are attached. Sims Way Comment Log 6-23-22 Comment_Joni Blanchard Comment_ Jefferson County Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Grant_GPA VI.Election of the Chair (5 min) VII.Old Business A.Sims Way Stakeholder Briefing – 20 min * Reference last Stakeholder meeting video and reference material at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and- 6/16/23, 7:09 AM cityofpt.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view_id=4&clip_id=2437 https://cityofpt.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view_id=4&clip_id=2437 2/3 boatyard-expansion-project * See Public Comments Log. Staff will provide worksheets as well from the 6/28/22 meeting. VIII.New Business (40 min) A.Golf Course and Mountain View Public Engagement Plan - (Carrie Hite) – 15 min * See attached Public Engagement Plan 2022 PT Envisioning golf course comms plan revised 6.9.22 B.2023 Work Planning Action Item – (Debbie Jahnke and Staff) – 20 min * See attached draft work plan recommendations * Motion to forward recommended 2023 work plan items to the City Manager and City Council for consideration PRTTAB_workplan_response_2022 Public comment Bob Gray IX.Staff update – (Steve King, Carrie Hite, & Michael Todd) 15 minutes A.Pool B.Maintenance C.2023 Banked Capacity D.Kah Tai RCO Grant Application E.Park Donation F.Pickleball Courts X.Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: July 26, 2022 XI.Public Comment XII.Adjourn Parking Lot/Future Meetings Trail signing PUD tree presentation? 6/16/23, 7:09 AM cityofpt.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view_id=4&clip_id=2437 https://cityofpt.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view_id=4&clip_id=2437 3/3 Americans with Disabilities Act In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodation for this meeting should notify the City Clerks Office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting at (360) 379-5083. Hearing Assistance Available July 8, 2022 Sims Way Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetings Meetings Previously Held • Meeting 1 (April 23) • Meeting 2 (May 10) o Add the Consultant Team o Agency Principles o Brainstorming • Meeting 3 (May 31) – Criteria o Brainstorm criteria – “What’s important to each of us?” o Screen criteria o Establish final criteria • Meeting 4 (June 14) – Alternatives o Brainstorm alternatives o Screen alternatives o Establish final alternatives • Meeting 5 (June 28) – Draft Alternatives Ranking Results o Review draft scoring and ranking of alternatives o Discuss character (aka form) of vegetation o Discuss options for property line treatments (i.e., fence, wall, etc.) Meetings Currently Scheduled • Meeting 6 (July 12) – Vegetation Species, Design Details, and Additional Alternatives o Discuss vegetation species for replacement of poplars (south side now, north side over time) o Discuss design details (i.e., property line security, pedestrian facility, utility undergrounding, etc.) o Introduce additional alternatives – (1) no boat yard expansion, and (2) partial boat yard expansion Future M eetings • Meeting 7 (~July 26) – Discussion of Design Details and pros/cons Discussion of Additional Alternatives o Review final design details for public open house o Discuss pros/cons of no boat yard expansion and partial boat yard expansion • Open House (~August 6) – Public open house to share the process and preferred alternative • Parks Board Meeting (August 23) – Recommend alternative to elected bodies Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 001 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email The popular trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas and no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine 002 9/28/2021 Craig Voice Mail Expressed passionate discontent with tree removal 003 9/28/2021 Karen Rudd karenlenerudd@gmail.com email Please put trees between car lane and bike/sidewalk lanes. 004 9/16/2021 Nancy Erreca nerreca@aol.com website The project is not needed, housing is needed. 9/28/2021 Keith Emry Facebook Fix the roads first 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Fixing Lawrence street should have priority. How about something for the people that live here not the ones coming to visit 9/28/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook please please please do soil tests before planting; make sure the new trees have room to grow and are the right plant for the right place. Please do not leave this in the hands of out-of-town landscape architects who, though I have great respect for many, are not always very knowledgeable about trees (beyond their aesthetic properties). 9/28/2021 Fredrich Bonbast Facebook Lawrence is fine. the roads in my neighborhood look like iraq, except when it rains. then they look like iraq in a flood. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Friedrich Bombast I picked Lawrence because it’s a major street that many use. 9/28/2021 Robert Jaye Facebook Wow, looks like the city has abandoned reasonable setbacks and their importance for maintaining the city's character. The concept picture shows maybe 15 feet from the road. Nice way to say welcome to PT. 9/28/2021 Sarah Smith Facebook What exactly is wrong with the poplars? Why are they Not environmentally friendly? 9/28/2021 Russell Hansen Facebook Walter McQuillen thank you ! 9/28/2021 Sarah Ludlum-Wisehart Facebook Friedrich Bombast YES!!! All the roads in Uptown need to be fixed!!! This project is ridiculous! 9/28/2021 David Crozier Facebook Cant really believe anyone thinks moving the boat yard boundary closer to the street is more eye appealing than the current situation. This has to be the most unpopular city council project yet. 9/28/2021 Gus Sebastian Facebook I think Boat Haven adds good character to PT. Its pretty cool seeing it when you come down the S curves. Its a major part of the history of this town. "A Victorian Seaport" Many local folks utilize the boatyard not only as a means of employment but recreationally. I support this idea. If you have ever looked up at those tress in big wind you might be concerned. Yes fix the roads, yes fix everything, but please don't complain about an idea that could grow a industry in PT. 9/29/2021 Fredrich Bombast Facebook Walter McQuillen i get that. but i walk a lot of neighborhoods, and many of the out-of-the way streets aren't even streets anymore. at least Lawrence doesn't have massive potholes and washouts. i once asked a city guy about the street in front of our house, which is broken asphalt and gravel undercoat, and he said the cost to repair it would be about the annual street repair budget for the whole city. "improvement projects," though, are sexier. 9/29/2021 Timothy Stone Facebook More gentrification, plz? 9/29/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook Sarah Smith they are wonderful trees but at this stage of their lifespan they are falling apart in high winds. It's a busy road with power lines so there is a reasonable likelihood that a tree failure (usually large sections of these trees break out like ice-bergs off a glacier) can cause damage and even injury. They have a few other issues as well. They send up suckers, new trees from the roots, a great distance from the original tree. They are beloved by aphids. They also produce a lot of pollen which a number of people are allergic to. While I have always admired this allee, it is time to plan for the future; replace these with something new and (hopefully) native trees and shrubs, something to take us the next 100 years. 9/29/2021 James Schultz Facebook Plant pot on the roadway! Pot Townsend rides again. 9/29/2021 Stephen Hall Facebook Very low on the priority list for the city. Putting utilities underground is a nice goal. Roads repairs and replacement is much higher on the list. Just not as sexy on the council resume. 005 9/29/2021 Rachel Ganapoler rachelganapoler@gmail.com email The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines..and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? 006 9/29/2021 Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com email In support of removing of removing trees, shrubs and grass that might cause raging wildfires 007 10/13/2021 Dori Bailey BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM email The money should be spent for the homeless. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. 008 10/17/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Replanting the Poplars makes sense but stick to the 1993 study. There are benefits to the poplars. 09 10/19/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached the 1993 Gateway Development Plan recommend read page 14 010 10/11/2021 O'Neill Louchard oneill@olympus.net email Thoughtful planted in needed, mixed species array. 011 10/7/2021 Joni Blanchard email A professional tree person should be consulted about trees and their impacts. Save the yellow lupine. 012 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 and happy to join the planning committee. 013 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Has there been a soil analysis, makes all the difference in the world for tree survival 7/9/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 014 10/27/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email take into consideration all the functions that the poplars provide, including the impressive beauty. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. 015 11/4/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars. 016 11/8/2021 Larry Eifert larryeifert@gmail.com email But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. 017 11/7/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I'm not advocating what- so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! 018 11/7/2021 Karen Anderson karenlanderson736@gmail.com email What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail?  How would it translate into jobs, specifically? There is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. The proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims. I support the planting of native species. 019 11/9/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually. acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. 020 11/9/2021 Joan Fabian fabianily@gmail.com email 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existent trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the Netherlands. 021 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. 022 11/2/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. 023 11/17/2021 Fred Weinmann fweinmann@cablespeed.com email A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees. 024 11/19/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. Do not cut trees in December. 025 12/1/2021 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website 026 12/9/2021 Tom Myers tommyers393@gmail.com email Go for it! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ 027 12/10/2021 Linda Tilley artbytilley.com lindatilley44@gmail.com email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. 028 12/13/2021 anonymous butterfly@olypen.com engagept Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? 7/9/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 029 12/12/2021 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref 030 12/10/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re- vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). 031 12/9/2021 Andrea Hegland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? When are you proposing to do this? What permits will you be securing? When will you be securing permits? Will you be conducting environmental review. 032 12/6/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan.  At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to  attributes i.e.  functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. 033 12/7/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money.  034 11/22/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. 035 12/14/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the multi-agency plan. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. 036 12/15/2021 Karta John Miller susanmiller@olypus.net engagept Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. 037 12/15/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. 038 12/30/2021 Val Johnstone valjohnstone@aol.com engagept Recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare " Red Maple 039 12/21/2021 Kathy Knoblock toddk@msn.com email I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? 040 1/13/2022 Debbie Jahnke dbjahnke@att.net email Comments on information provided to public 041 2/12/2022 Cliff Moore meamoore@comcast.net email consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. 042 2/14/2022 Patti Hoyecki phoyecki@yahoo.com email supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio.  I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future.  The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. 043 2/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com engagept Where is the Long Term Tree Management Plan? What are the plans for the cut trees? Who does one become a stakeholder? Reconsiderwiping out the Kah Tai Populars. 044 2/15/2022 Gail Workman marksyounglady@gmail.com engagept Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. 045 2/18/2022 Richard and MaryAnn Moore ptmoores1@q.com email We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week. 046 2/22/2022 Johnny Ms Johnson's eighth grade class mail The hearts on the poplars comment 7/9/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 047 2/22/2022 Robin Jahnke public comment Stormwater drainage needs to be developed 048 3/6/2022 George Randels gr321@olypen.com email Remove poplars on port side but leave trees on lagoon side. 049 3/8/2022 Mary Elayne Dunphy medunphy@comcast.ne email I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. 050 3/20/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Clarification of accessment report: populars would not likely be killed if trenching done by Port fence line, safe option if heavy equipment stayed off of the main roots closer to tree on the Port side. 051 3/21/2022 Linda Lebrane lebranemusic@yahoo.com engagept Save the poplars 052 3/14/2022 Kelly Drake kellydrake22@gmail.com engagept I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? 053 12/13/2021 anonymous krdmps@hotmail.com engagept How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? 054 4/6/2022 Brent Vadopalas brent@vadopalas.org engagept It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines.illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. 055 5/2/2022 Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept Provided a copy of the April 23, 2022 Gateway Alliance Slideshow along with comments that the project can be done wihtout cutting down the poplars, the ity has no economic analysis for cutting the trees, the parks board is the public forum, the city has arranged the parks board to be in favor of removal of the poplars, the stakeholder committee is in favor or removal of the poplars, the city has always intended to remove the poplars and the public process is not transparrent. 056 5/5/2022 ? Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept Can you clarify the purpose for the stakeholder committee and defined scope of work. 057 5/7/2022 Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org engagept It appears that the 9 member Stakeholder Committee that is supposed to have an open mind about our Gateway Poplars already has a predetermined bias against the Poplars.  A majority are already on record to cut our community trees down. The City's website still says that one of the project goals is to cut the trees down. ·  Replacement of Lombardy poplars, an emerging and eventual need for the City The Port informed us that the selection process for the Stakeholder Committee was an open one, available to the general public.  We were also told that all options were on the table.   We subsequently requested copies and/or documentation of that notificiation to the general public for this committee formation...and the City was unable to provide us with any announcement for openings that was made available to the general public.  The Stakeholder Committee members appear to have been hand picked and with an existing bias against our poplars. The Parks Board was able to choose 4 of the 9 members, and the City indicated from the outset that the Admiralty Audubon would be invited.  The Port was guaranteed a spot as well.  The general public was not allowed to serve on this hand-picked committee, which has been stacked with anti-poplar votes. We expect our elected officials to engage in truly democratic processes backed by democratic principles.  Clearly that is not what has occured. 058 5/16/2022 Vicki Legman vickilegman@gmail.com email Thank you. Been doing some reading and poplars are short lived trees. They’re beautiful, but removal seems to, sadly,  make sense. 059 2/19/2022 Robin Ornelas public comment Please preserve the poplars. They are one of the reasons that I wanted to move to Port Townsend. 060 2/19/2022 Darlene Schanfalc darlenes@olympus.net public comment I am disappointed that the City staff proposes to remove the Poplars on Sims Way. Those older and still healthy trees add character and a beauty to the area, which otherwise looks totally industrial. If the height is a problem, a trim is sufficient. Why would you even spend City funds on an unnecessary project when they can be put elsewhere? Please leave the trees alone. 061 2/20/2022 Larry Eifert larryeifert.com public comment How is the city, county and port going to take care of what they have been entrusted with? Will they take the easy way out and cut the trees, cutting a riff through the town that will maybe not be repairable? Will you help make it look like a strip mall by planting more Mall-Ready trees that look like every other place in America? Will people like Nancy and I drift away from here to be replaced by Mall-Ready home buyers? 062 2/20/2022 Melinda Bryden public comment I just wanted the City of Port Townsend to know that my husband, Ron Hayes, and I support cutting down the Poplar trees along Sims Way. It makes economic sense. As relatively long term residents (1999), we would like the City to know that it has our support. 063 2/20/2022 Rachel Ganapoler public comment I’m opposed to your plans for cutting the beautiful trees lining the gateway to our town.. they should be maintained, not destroyed! This plan is short sighted and that money could be spent elsewhere.. I’m sure you can come up with another worthless round about.. or you could fill pot holes or try to beautify the town by maintaining the existing trees.. ya know.. like the ones that were removed on main street . Yes, I’m pissed at your decision.. we want the trees to stay.. those trees!! 7/9/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 064 2/20/2022 Lois Venarchick public comment The poplar trees along Sims Way literally transformed my life with their beauty, color and most importantly, the calming, I can breathe, peaceful way into town. Although you might dismiss this comment thinking it just too out there; I have driven into PT most of my adult life on a near daily basis. Nothing removed the stress I feel, and the beauty I see, than these two rows of stately poplar trees. I can only imagine the feelings they evoke in visitors and newcomers alike. In addition Port Townsend, “ use it up, wear it out, fix it up or do without. “ Stop spending money on things not needing to be done, directly contributing to the unaffordable town we are becoming. Save the trees! 065 2/21/2022 Sheri Suryan smithsuryan@gmail.com public comment Please don’t cut these beautiful trees down! They are such a welcoming sight as people drive into Port Townsend. They block wind from the sea and provide shade to Khai Tai Lagoon for fish and other wildlife. Sadly no other trees will grow to that extent in my lifetime. It would be such a shame to cut them down. What a void there will be and will be permanently! It’s not worth high speed internet to kill these trees! Please rethink other possibilities and let them survive!! 066 5/22/2022 Laura Snodgrass laurafound@yahoo.com engagept I just want my opinion to be heard. I know you have heard all of the arguments for and against. Please do not cut down the poplars.  067 5/20/2022 Mark McCauley mmccauley@co.jefferson.wa.us email Looking out off my deck just now - from the hill between the hospital and Safeway - removing the poplars is going to substantially alter my view and not for the better. My view is world class and one reason the house is valued so highly. I won’t oppose the plan but thought you might want to hear an unvarnished opinion from an interested resident who will adversely impacted by the current plan. I love the poplars as does my wife. 068 5/25/2022 Kaci Cronkhite kacicronkhite@gmail.com engagept I support the Port’s boatyard expansion and PUD under grounding of power lines. However, I also support saving the poplar trees. Those poplar trees have proven time and again how resilient they are… through negligence, drought, floods, boatyard toxins, highway toxins, brackish mingling with Kai Tai lagoon, and when PUD has chopped them down to stumps on the boatyard side of the road across from Safeway. They’re tough as well as iconic. How much water are the trees currently drinking? When they’re gone, where will the water go? Will the new trees and surfaces manage water and mitigate toxins as well? Will new trees be so hardy? At what comparable budget? IF you must remove poplars from the Port side of the road, at least keep the ones on the Kai Tai side and use the money for improved maintenance: thinning, pruning, root barriers. Lastly, please ensure that all new surfaces and landscaping maintains or improves the environmental impacts of poplar removal: No concrete, no plastic, just green space and plantings that would parallel the work of those trees. 069 5/26/2022 Lisa Flores laflores99@yahoo.com engagept I am among the many who have lived here in Port Townsend for more than 40 years. I love the entry to our town. There is no valid reason to cut down these beautiful specimens. I have read all of the opinions. Perhaps there is a danger ... as in anything else of any validity in the world. I am also a climate refugee from the California Wildfires, where we lost ALL of our trees to the deadly devastation,,,, we had no choice in the matter. Here you have a choice. Use it wisely. 070 5/29/2022 David Goldman Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Alliance engagept The 11-15-22 Jefferson County Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Grant addresses a legitimate economic development project that involves the Port of Port Townsend and the Jefferson County PUD. This development does not require the removal of the lower Sims Way poplar streetscape. What is it about present conditions of the Port Townsend Sims Way gateway transportation corridor that requires removal of the poplars ? Nothing Does the lower Sims Way “Flats” part of the gateway need critical aesthetic, restoration or maintenance work? No One member of the Stakeholder committee expressed the business community’s appreciation for the current beauty of the gateway. Another committee member is on record with his professional analysis of the lifetime value of the poplars to the community. The solution to the legitimate concern about the condition of the Kah Tai Lagoon Park is to promote an independent project to address that. Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park is a worthy project suitable for grant funding and the improvement of which would contribute to what makes Port Townsend a special community. The Nature Park project would not require poplar removal from the Sims Way ROW. 7/9/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 071 6/3/2022 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com engagept I am entirely in favor of completely removing the poplars and improving the appearance, habitat function, and diversity of Sims way for future generation and visitors.  As a resident of town for 42 years I have been impressed with the beauty of abundance of flowering trees and shrub planted in historic uptown (over 60 different trees species recorded during a recent survey). I have noticed the dominance of poplars planted in Port Townsend: they are breaking up (beyond their lifespan) and very unattractive in the winter. In fall I noticed all the wonders of color of other trees and in spring the stunning floral possibilities. I am involved professionally with revegetation and restoration projects (since 1995) in the City and Washington State with my business Olympic Wetland Resources, LLC. Currently I am involved with several ongoing City and State (Fort Worden, Kah Tai Prairie Preserve) revegetation projects. I have been past president of the Washington Native Plant Society, Olympic Chapter Although I work exclusively with native species there are many non-native trees and shrubs that have much higher habitat value and seasonal beauty than the ragged monotonous poplar meant to windbreak farmlands in Kansas.. 072 6/3/2022 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com engagept I am unclear of the current status of the proposed poplar tree replacement plan. This has been a divisive topic but I hope decision makers proceed and remove the poplar trees, for both safety reasons, regarding power line issues, and because they are relatively short-lived non-native trees. As much as possible, new development in this and all cases should enhance the environment. So I strongly support replacing the poplars with native vegetation. Others have pointed out that our native Pacific Northwest trees from Douglas fir and western red cedar to Pacific alders and Pacific madrones are beautiful visually and symbolically, appropriate, and would enhance the environment. That might also benefit Kah Tai Lagoon park by somewhat extending that quasi- natural area. I would further remind all of us that the entire area from Townsend Bay through the lagoon, including the Boat Haven boatyard, Sims Way, nearby commerce like boat shops, Henry's, Safeway, etc., the transit center, and Kah Tai Lagoon park and lagoon themselves, are themselves products of fill and development that converted a historical natural active estuary and adjacent terrestrial ecosystem, and their use by indigenous populations. In that context, I urge you to consider how removal and replacement of the poplars, development of bike and pedestrian paths, and Boat Haven expansion can be more connected to that natural and human history. For example, native vegetation appropriate to estuary shorelines should be considered, and not just native upland trees. Interpretive signage is important. Even more visionary and substantial would be incorporating ways to restore some measure of functionality to these past tidal aquatic, wetland and adjacent terrestrial systems, their connection to Townsend Bay and lowlands towards North Beach, and historical uses by Native occupants. I get that is very big picture, that significant restoration of that area's pre-settlement condition is likely not practical or affordable. But I encourage you to do what you can. 073 6/6/2022 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email There is a gorilla in the stakeholders’ process - the poplars are to remain. This, according to the 1993 adopted ‘Gateway Development Plan’; intended to provide continuity for future projects. This plan, a years long community effort, describes  “special environmental character” and streetscape recommendations: “The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims. adjacent to Kah-Tai Park (note: land later incorporated into the Park) can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay. The ‘Sims Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project’ is a collaboration of three agencies, sharing a County $1M PIF grant. The grant language refers multiple times to “implementing” the ‘Gateway Development Plan’, the community’s vision for future development. Newly hired staff managers promote a mantra, “the poplars must go”, an idea inserted into the project narrative: “The Poplars have been identified as an inappropriate tree by both the Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board, as well as a supporting landscape study for Kah Tai Lagoon”. However, no City policy, goal, vision or priority has been adopted to incorporate such incongruent and contradictory ideas into the ‘Gateway Development Plan’. The grant money is to implement not amputate the community’s vision. What of the future town landscape, prioritizing “ the poplars must go” - cutting hundreds of trees - projected at $3000 per tree. One might be concerned; poplar cutting before residential streets potted with water features and arterials without shoulders for bicycles and walkers. A few 7/9/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 074 6/7/2022 Glen Bellerud Front Desk “What about the roads – cutting down the poplar trees, which have been here & have not had any storm damage as the shore pines have? Having managed Fort Worden for the first 20 yrs & a back ground in parks, I find this discerning (disturbing?). There are poplar trees at the Fort & they are doing great. I have been here for 60 yrs & find your thinking very short sighted. Who wants to look at stunted shore pine – not really native either. Let’s do something for everybody – not the few leading us & those choosing to make us look like all the same As in Calif(?).” 075 6/13/2022 Beverly Michaelsen engagept I love the poplars after the s curve and entering into beautiful Port Townsend. Please save the north side ones!! It is unfortunate that the port must take down the ones that border their side for expansion, they make such a perfect border. I wish they could all stay and they are perfect for water absorption and ecology. Thank you for considering and I hope that we can do the right thing in regards to our town, it’s citizens and our beautiful natural world. 076 6/15/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email At the June 14th Gateway Stakeholders Meeting, we began a discussion about planting setbacks from features in the Project area. Attached is a landscape detail sheet prescribing planting setbacks that WSDOT has used, sometimes with modification, for many roadside vegetation projects. WSDOT offers these distances as guidelines, not strict requirements. See attached. 077 6/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached is an EPA Review titled 'Biological Aspcects of Hybrid Poplar Cultivation on Floodplains in Western North America'.  In it, they lament the widespread elimination of Hybrid Poplars and herald the re-introduction and cultivation of them for environmental benefits. One line in it says 'Given current trends in climate warming, hybrid Poplar could potentially compensate for the adaptive limitations of some native species'. It was written, since, there was a need in the divided scientific community, for all parties to have a better understanding of the basic biology and ecological role of both native and hybrid Poplars. I've consulted with two of our renown local naturalists, both with Doctorates in Biology, both experts and authors of books about birds. To quote one of them, when asked about wildlife value of OUR Poplars along Sims, he says 'removing the Lombardies from along that main path would be a short term loss for the migrating yellowrumps, nomadic waxwings, et al, that periodically make HEAVY use of them for foraging, but, IMMEDIATELY replanting with black cottonwood, willow, etc could fill that gap pretty quickly.' i've been working beside the Poplars (on a boat) for the past 2 months everyday. Songbirds have been singing all day long every day in them for these past 2 months as I work. The internet may say there's no wildlife value in Poplars, but, apparently, OUR Poplars are special and DO have wildlife value! 078 6/10/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email At the last meeting, Scott said we should email our thoughts of the concepts just sent to us. Here're mine~ 1. Sidewalk completed along north side ONLY. Upgrade crosswalks. 2. Any walking path along boatyard fenceline, if one MUST be put in, should be as narrow as possible and maybe only crushed pea gravel as is already across the road along the front of Henery's for low visibility. NO 6' slabs of anything - especially concrete!! 4. It's best to keep bicycle traffic as far to the west side of marina to connect as directly as possible to Larry Scott. As in the new path that will eventually connect the west side of boatyard entry to the shoreline. Straight in past Blue Moose is best until the new path is put in. 6. Bicycle traffic coming in past Admiral Ship Supply or along the marina waterfront shouldn't be encouraged. Too much traffic coming and going, cars parking, backing up, boats on lifts going by. Groups of bicycles mosying through the marina get in the way of busy comings and goings of workers and marina patrons. Bicyclers will start taking up all our precious parking spaces if they get a trail all along there, also!! They are already increasingly using our parking down closer to the trail. 8. Boatyard fence would be nice with a retaining wall of 2-man basalt rocks 3' or 4' high with wood posts and simple square wire between them to maintain view in and out of the yard for us workers and for those looking in to see the cool boats as they pass. 4. Absolutely NO opening along the yard fenceline. Those wanting to come in can access by coming into the marina and figuring their way in. Openings just encourage the (illegal) 'death dash' across the road to Henery's. Not necessary for workers to have easy access to Henery's. And, us workers definitely don't want easy ready access of the public right into where we're working! I've asked many regulars who work along there and WE DON'T WANT IT. 6. And, since the City owns the Right of Ways, they should honor their '93 Gateway Plan and tree policies in place to try to keep as many Poplars as possible (Tree City USA!!). On the Northside, in front of Safeway, McDonalds, Henery's and along the one acre or so ROW along the near 80 acre Kah Tai Park - with thinning, pruning, and root barriers where needed. Ripping all 200 trees out along the North side for the sake of the Audobon Society or because the Parks Board 'recommends' it, isn't what the City's Planning Director or City Council has to actually do (Consider the majority of the community's public comments in favor of keeping them!) There are many justifications for keeping those Hybrid Poplars. EPA recommends them to be planted along floodplanes along with native trees. (Climate change!!) Poplars are low maintenance and easily prevented from spreading. They've just been severly neglected for 40 years. 7. On the Southside, keep the trees in the commercial zones and replant behind Port buildings with young Poplars with root barriers. 8. Plant whatever in front of where boats will be. Just NOT monecious conifers that create pollen!!!! 9. $$ may come up tight. Not touching the Northside trees at all until the priorities of this project are finished might be a good idea (boatyard expansion/power undergrounding/fencing/replanting). 079 6/20/2022 Charles Nelson chasnelson101@icloud.com email Why not install new power lines underground, & save the trees? 7/9/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 080 6/20/2022 Gateway Poplar Alliance info@poplaralliance.org email We were blind copied on an email in which you wrote: In addition, we also desire to make another seat available and seek a representative of the Poplar Alliance group to be part of the process directly. Assuming this was your formal invitation, here is our response. The current process to achieve the stated objectives of the multiagency "Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Grant” agreement and to qualify forJeff County PIF grant funds requires the removal of all the poplars from the lower Sims Flats commercial corridor of the GDP as an “ implemen[ation] [of] the City's Gateway Development Plan” [GDP] . The GDP specifically calls for a streetscape of linear poplars: Streetscape Recommendations The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims. adjacent to Kah-Tai Park, can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay. The GDP can’t be implemented by removing all the poplars. The Gateway Poplar Alliance (GPA) was organized to oppose that poplar removal. The GPA won’t participate in what is intended to be a public advisory/decision making process to redesign the Sims Flats commercial corridor of the GDP if the decision to remove the poplars has already been made before any substantive public involvement with the Potemkin village public process that has been undertaken to date. Therefore, the GPA will only agree to participate in the “technical advisory group,” the “Sims Way Technical Advisory Group,” aka the “stakeholder committee,” if the 081 6/19/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Kah Tai Volunteers, the Audubon Society, and our Parks Board members through the years have created a lovely park over the years and I appreciate and support all the prairie restoration and wildlife habitat efforts.  We have near 80 acres of this lovely park.  I’m hoping to keep Poplars just along the 1 -acre strip on the very edge of the park in the ROW.  Many in our community are wanting to keep many of those Poplars.  Let’s compromise to thin, prune, and save a good stand of healthy Poplars that stand along that stretch.   082 6/120/22 Kathy Lundquist woodland.antiques@gmail.com engagept I know there's a backlash in response to the removal of the poplars along the Gateway, between the lagoon & the port. It is a noisy group but I hope folks like me let you know we agree with the effort to plant native trees along that strip. I vote to remove them. They are messy & dangerous, to my mind. My neighbor recently removed 7 poplars along our property line. I couldn't have been more grateful. He worried (as did I) during every windstorm that they'd come down on his house (or mine). Plant some native trees that are easier to maintain& less messy & ignore the noisy folks. 083 6/14/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Nonnative plants reduce population growth of an insectivorous bird Desirée L. Narango Nonnative plants lack an evolutionary history with native fauna and support insect communities that are less abundant and diverse, and this may change food availability for vertebrate consumers. Most insectivorous birds are absent or declining in urban areas, yet no study has tested whether nonnative plants impact bird populations via food limitation. We monitored reproduction and survival of Carolina chickadees within residential yards and found that when nonnative plants increased, both insect availability and chickadee population growth declined. We also found that populations could only be sustained if nonnative plants constituted <30% of plant biomass. Our results demonstrate that nonnative plants reduce habitat quality for insectivorous birds and restoration of human-dominated areas should prioritize native plants to support local food webs. Human-dominated landscapes represent one of the most rapidly expanding and least-understood ecosystems on earth. Yet, we know little about which features in these landscapes promote sustainable wildlife populations. Historically, in urban areas, landowners have converted native plant communities into habitats dominated by nonnative species that are not susceptible to pest damage and require little maintenance. However, nonnative plants are also poor at supporting insects that are critical food resources for higher order consumers. Despite the logical connection, no study has examined the impact of nonnative plants on subsequent population responses of vertebrate consumers. Here, we demonstrate that residential yards dominated by nonnative plants have lower arthropod abundance, forcing resident Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) to switch diets to less preferred prey and produce fewer young, or forgo reproduction in nonnative sites altogether. This leads to lower reproductive success and unsustainable population growth in these yards compared with those with >70% native plant biomass. Our results reveal that properties landscaped with nonnative plants function as population sinks for insectivorous birds. To promote sustainable food webs, urban planners and private landowners should prioritize native plant species. 7/9/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 084 6/14/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Poplar – The Homemaker - Chelsea Green Publishing https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=16439&d=8Zio4tgMej-HeO3JeIQJoO- hFa3fWfjtcCv1nujoyA&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2echelseagreen%2ecom%2f20 20%2fpoplar-the-homemakerPlantations of hybrid poplar are always made of clones. Some of these large plantations out in the Northwest are thousands of acres and support little wildlife. They are voids for biodiversity. This is not the fault of the tree, but a mistake of management. The difference between clonal blocks of native poplars and hybrid poplars is in the origin of the trees. Native insects have evolved to eat native poplars. There are countless species that will only feed on poplar leaves. These insects are the backbone of a food web that supports birds. Hybrid poplars do not feed insects the way aspens do. In fact, many newer hybrid poplar clones have been genetically engineered to avoid being food for Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). These trees have had Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) added to their DNA. Bt is a bacterium that is regularly used to kill Lepidoptera. The result is a silent forest. Transgenic poplars are not available to the public in the United States at this time. They are widely planted in afforestation projects in China. 085 6/13/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Attached is from Wikipedia regarding problems related to Lombardy Poplars. It is relevant to both sides of Sims Way. The second and third attachments are relative to concerns of habitat for birds in the Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park. The last two are an abstract from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 086 6/12/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I have been thinking about stormwater management in the Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion project area since the recent flooding. I recommend that the agencies include stormwater management in the project alternatives because the approaches will influence structures, vegetation, bike/ped connections, water quality, flooding, and aesthetics. 087 6/1/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email Here are the graphics I presented at the last Stakeholder meeting, which Scott requested that I forward. The thoughts and ideas respond to the “Features to Consider in Developing Alternatives” of the Project Limits and Constraints map distributed by Scott. The graphics present a preliminary high level functional plan (e.g., focal points, view corridors, connectivity) based on the 1993 Gateway Development Plan to the extent that Project constraints allow, and reflecting Project criteria from public comments. The two typical sections show how many of the criteria expressed in the Gateway Development Plan and public comments could be incorporated in the Project alternatives. 088 6/12/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email “Meadow grass and wildflowers” in the planter strip (north side) was a failed experiment from around 25 years ago. I actually obtained hundreds of transplants from the WSDOT nursery stock—species they wished to see growing there. And we installed them—including Port Townsend High School students doing their Senior Project service work. That strip proved simply too high-impact for those plants to endure. I personally spent something like 30 cumulative hours doing periodic weeding and garden maintenance, and it was not sufficient to perpetuate the planting. There were many introduced weed species that migrated in; way too little water available; foot traffic and bicycle wheels nipping at the edges. A nice thought, one that would require a considerable investment beyond the resources I describe above, just to reach a level of ’survival’ after as little as two or three years. I strongly recommend woody shrubs as a primary planting category, set well back from the shoulder(s), and with committed water and weeding resources until established. 089 6/13/2022 Rick Janke rjahnke@att.net email I received this email, cover email and press release (attached) from the state Audubon office.  Deborah and I are working on a statement from Audubon WA and/or National Audubon that we will run past you just in case we want to use it. We’ll also ask your advice about where (or if) we should send it. I just wanted to let you know that I did have a phone call with Andrea Haegland months ago about the poplar issue and I was misrepresented in their email below. I did not say that Admiralty Audubon is out of step with National. In fact, I told her that National Audubon is pro native plants (via our Plants for Birds initiative). We also talked about the Birds and Climate in National Parks report that Audubon did a few years ago that talked about birds and ecosystems moving because of climate change. I think that’s where she got the idea that Audubon is in “flux on its view of non-native plants” which is not true at all. 090 6/21/2022 Don Archer bobblacktym@comcast.net phone call 1:20pm The poplar trees should be saved put power underground 7/9/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary 091 6/21/2022 Rick Janke rjahnke@att.net email Just to keep you in the loop - I received this from the state Audubon office. Thank you for the FYI on your press release. I want to clarify that the statement from the Gateway Poplar Alliance that “Audubon evidently is in flux on its view of non-native plants like the Lombardy poplar” is a misrepresentation of Audubon’s conservation priority of supporting native plants for native birds. “The National Audubon Society and its field office, Audubon Washington, strongly promote the use of native plants through our Plants for Birds conservation initiative because research shows that native plants are critical for supporting our native bird species. Native plants – and the insects they support – evolved with native birds and provide resources that are matched to the birds’ needs, which is especially important during breeding when birds are feeding hungry chicks. Many landscaping plants are exotic species from other countries that require maintenance, more resources, and may become invasive, negatively impact native ecosystems and natural areas. Our native bird species face innumerable threats and replacing non-native and invasive plant species with natives is an important way that individuals and municipalities can support our native birds.” 092 1/17/2504 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email At the last Gateway Project stakeholders meeting, we discussed the vegetation establishment information accumulated by Admiralty Audubon for Kah Tai park. Ron Sikes has kept the records of naturally established and planted vegetation, which has been compiled in the attached spreadsheet (identical files in two formats). Obviously, the objectives for the plantings have changed over the years. The record will be helpful for the Gateway project’s landscape design. 093 6/27/2022 Margaret Lee ptmlee@olypen.com engagept The controversy about the poplar trees along Sims Way and their possible removal has occupied a great deal of time and energy by many, which is understandable considering the changes being contemplated.  However, before such an important decision is made, everyone involved should be able to assure the community that the process is adequate to address objections.  Certainly to clarify what is factual. One objection is that attention has not been given to the original Gateway Project which is yet in effect, a “governing” document written by the City. That document is very explicit about the poplar trees and their care, which includes trimming and pruning to assure healthy growth. I remember that being the case because I participated as a citizen, among many, who helped formulate the Gateway Plan. During that citizen effort, the Sims Way corridor was divided into several section to help with plans for that unique area. I worked with a small group on the section that lay between the boat haven and Kai Tai lagoon, the area now receiving primary attention. We decided that careful tending of the poplars would enhance the beauty of the “Gateway What the final outcome of the present process for Sims Way will be, I don’t know, but I would feel much more secure in the decision if the question of what the original Gateway Plan dictates is addressed. 094 6/30/2022 Dan Burden dan.burden@bluezones.com The information you tracked regarding ADA is correct in the legal sense, but not practical, nor is it appropriate on a road of this importance. Only one person at a time can walk in a 4-foot space, and walking side by side, the way people walk, takes a minimum of 5 feet on a well maintained sidewalk. A road with a volume of Sims makes it challenging to get across the street, so full support for walking and bicycling is needed on each side of Sims.  For the commercial urban form of this area, the recommended minimum sidewalk width is 6 feet, with 8 feet preferred (easier to maintain). Also, only about 7% of people who ride bikes feel comfortable in bike lanes or buffered bike lanes, so they too seek to be separated on a multiuse path. A multiuse trail needs to be 10 feet wide in order to receive state or federal funding. That said, the majority of those bicycling should feel comfortable riding on the lakeside of Sims, so it is not essential to have a multiuse trail on both sides, so A 6-8 feet sidewalk (my recommendation) would be a workable minimum for the boatyard portion, and this should be setback with a buffer from the street edge. 095 6/30/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com A six to 8 foot 'path' on the boatyard side would make it look waaaay too inviting for people traffic.  That is something that creates a 'security risk' for the boatyard - which is something we're trying to minimalize in our design.  This isn't the place for a 'promenade' lane.  With larger slips and commercial vessels going in along that fenceline, there will be even more loud noises and boat construction work going on than there currently is with the smaller recreational boats.  Noise and fumes!  Not the place for promoting hanging out. As I said, this is a small town - with somewhat heavy traffic through there at times. Not an 'urban setting' that needs to look like a small big city slabbed over with hard surfaces. Especially on both sides. It sounds like there's a rootin' for the 10' multiuse hard surface on the Kah Tai side coming up. An 8' hard surface also on the Port side is much too much too much. This is a flood plain. 7/9/2022 10 Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories Soil Nutrient Analysis & Recommendations Soil Organic Matter: 2.0% Deficient Ideal range 3-5% Soil pH: 7.0 Acceptable Ideal pH range for this species: 5.0 to 7.0 Acidic Alkaline Paul Thompson Arborist Representative pthompson@bartlett.com Client: Submitter: Office: Location: Objective: Plant Name:Lombardy Poplar 'Italica' (Populus nigra 'Italica') S2. Maintain Vitality Town of Townsend 98368 Report Date: 22-Jun-22 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting Sample Number: 432316 Very HighOptimalDeficient Current Levels Lbs/1000 ft2Soil Nutrient Levels Phosphorus (P) Potassium (K) Magnesium (Mg) Calcium (Ca) Iron (Fe) Manganese (Mn) Copper (Cu) Zinc (Zn) Boron (B) 0.96 4.87 6.89 27.09 9.41 0.28 0.88 0.46 0.02 Deficient Very HighModerateNeeds treatment Could be treated Within ideal range Above optimalOptimal Additional tests: Nitrogen ENR L 1.4 lbs/1000 ft2, Nutrient Retention 4.7 Low, Sodium (45.00ppm Low), Soluble Salts (0.06dS/m Very Low) Recommendations: To achieve your plant health objective for Maintenance of tree vitality, the Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories recommends soil treatments to address issues associated with Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Manganese, and Calcium. Increase the level of soil organic matter with Root Invigoration, Biochar, and/or mulch. Monitor or treat excesses in: Copper as prescribed by the Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories. Re-sampling: We recommend that you re-sample this site in 2023. © 2022 The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company. All rights reserved. Sample ID 432316 WP 22-180-0954 1 SIMS WAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE AGENDA July 12, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Welcome and Meeting Logistics: The principal purpose of this meeting is to allow the stakeholder committee, agency staff, and the design consultant to communicate with each other, answer questions, and get the stakeholder's opinions, and share information regarding the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project. Meetings are held in hybrid format, in-person and over Goto Meeting. All meetings are recorded and available on the City’s website. While the meeting can be viewed live online, public comment will not be taken during the meeting. Opportunities for general public comment is are provided at the Parks Recreation Tree Trail Advisory Board (PRTTAB) meetings. Those wishing to provide public comment on the stakeholder meeting process can do so via email to engagept@cityofpt.us . All written comment will be provided to the stakeholder committee, PRTTAB, and the City, Port, and PUD elected officials. To join the webinar, follow these instructions. • Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 348-835- 859 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: +1 (562) 247-8422 Access code: 704-353-576# Recorded Meetings can be viewed anytime online at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project I. Introductions (10 min) A. Thank you for the last meeting discussion. B. Stakeholder Group Purpose The purpose of the stakeholder committee is to work with City, Port, and PUD staff along with the project consultant to review and prepare technical information with the objective of developing thoughtful options to obtain the best possible outcome for the community. C. Review of where we left off in the last meeting. D. ADA and path emails - Discussion II. Followup on Arborist Observations (15 mins) A. Soil Data Results B. See attached illustrations and photos 2 III. Vegetation Form Discussion (60 mins) A. Form (linear, columnar, asymmetrical, symmetrical, diversity, uniform, etc.) B. Recall photos. C. Continue discussion on replacement over time options D. Kah Tai Park Landscaping Plan recommendations IV. Next Meeting (5 min) A. Next Meetings topics – Updated Schedule B. Sims Way Stakeholder Meeting July 26th at 2:00. C. PRTTAB Meeting: July 26th at 4:30p Parking Lot/Future Meetings (The parking lot is for topics that come up that may be addressed in a future meeting.) NO Tree Form -Groundcover and mixed shrubs. -Plant height increases w/ pavement distance. -Planting density is variable. -Occasional small accent trees. -5’ minimum safety zone with mowed lawn or stormwater infiltration swale. -Lower level of maintenance due to informal arrangement. -Lowest hazard potential. June 27, 2022 Page 1 of 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion A rboricultural Summary Kai Tai Park Inspection limited to trees in or on the edge of the right-of-way that comprises the linear formal planting. • Trees currently have the following physiological condition: o Small leaf size o Fair to poor leaf color o Low foliage density o Moderate to significant dieback o Fair to poor condition • Trees have failed significant branch parts, including codominant trunks(leaders)/branching. This included: o Branches up to 5 inches diameter; length up to 25 feet (estimates) o Includes the failure of live and dead components o Failed component material is on the ground within the park o It is a reasonable assumption that failed component material has also impacted area within the active right-of-way • Select trees contain significant basal and lower trunk decay • At a minimum, the City should plan to perform risk mitigation work for retained trees on a defined recurring interval • A sample measurement placed the trees about 22 feet from the edge of pavement and about 32 feet to the edge of the traffic lane • Root barrier installation to protect existing surface infrastructure cannot be completed without impacting: o Tree condition o Stability (dependent on form/size of the barrier) • In the current infrastructure configuration, root barrier cannot be installed without significant impact; root barrier is currently not recommended for retained trees • Root growth has impacted asphalt • Smaller Populus species behind the right-of-way row have a similar physiological condition; some exceptions exist • A remove and replace plan that includes some retention must identify trees with structural flaws; irrespective of the alternative selected such trees require removal • A remove and replace plan that includes some retention should budget and complete maintenance on retained trees; this would be on a schedule but may also require additional unscheduled work • A remove and replace plan that includes some retention should budget and complete work to improve the growing conditions of retained trees for duration of their retention • Soil samples should be collected; nutrient and sodium analysis should be completed Arboricultural Summary Page 2 of 2 Boat Haven • Soil sampling has been collected and submitted for analysis • Trees adjacent to the Safeway gas station contain signs of a similar physiological condition as the Kai Tai Park right-of-way/edge trees • Tree retention could be attempted, considering the following: o Significant dieback is noted in the upper crown o Fair to poor physiological condition o Minimum tree protection distance required; trees will not tolerate grade change or trench within the Critical Root Zone o Significant maintenance is required prior, during, and following project completion for retained trees • Area is currently used by pedestrians without formal pedestrian facilities • Existing utilities should be mapped before finalize layout of replanting vegetation July 8, 2022 Sims Way Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetings Meetings Previously Held • Meeting 1 (April 23) • Meeting 2 (May 10) o Add the Consultant Team o Agency Principles o Brainstorming • Meeting 3 (May 31) – Criteria o Brainstorm criteria – “What’s important to each of us?” o Screen criteria o Establish final criteria • Meeting 4 (June 14) – Alternatives o Brainstorm alternatives o Screen alternatives o Establish final alternatives • Meeting 5 (June 28) – Draft Alternatives Ranking Results o Review draft scoring and ranking of alternatives o Discuss character (aka form) of vegetation o Discuss options for property line treatments (i.e., fence, wall, etc.) Meetings Currently Scheduled • Meeting 6 (July 12) – Vegetation Species, Design Details, and Additional Alternatives o Finish tree assessment discussion o Finish the discussion of character (aka form) of vegetation o Introduce additional alternatives – (1) no boat yard expansion, and (2) partial boat yard expansion Future M eetings • Meeting 7 (~July 26) – Discussion of Design Details and pros/cons Discussion of Additional Alternatives o Discuss vegetation species for replacement of poplars (south side now, north side over time) o Review final design details for public open house o Discuss pros/cons of no boat yard expansion and partial boat yard expansion • Open House (~August 6) – Public open house to share the process and preferred alternative • Parks Board Meeting (August 23) – Recommend alternative to elected bodies a. CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) – The CRZ of a tree is established based on trunk diameter measured at 4.5-feet from grade (DBH). The CRZ is a generalized circular area which has a radius of 12-inches to every inch trunk diameter. Root systems will vary both in depth and spread depending on size of tree, soils, water table, species and other factors. However, this CRZ description is generally accepted in the tree industry. Protecting this entire is area optimum and should, in theory, result in no adverse impact to a tree. The CRZ can be further differentiated into the ’Perimeter’ and ‘Interior’ CRZs to help evaluate potential impacts and required post-care. b. PERIMETER CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (PCRZ) – the full PCRZ is generally considered the optimum amount of root protection for a tree. The further one encroaches into the PCRZ (but not into the ICRZ) the greater post-care treatments the tree will require to remain alive and stable. c. INTERIOR CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (ICRZ) – The absolute maximum disturbance allowed for a tree should leave the ‘Interior’ CRZ undisturbed if the tree is to have any chance of long-term survival. The ICRZ is half the radius of the full CRZ/PCRZ. Disturbance into the ICRZ could destabilize or cause the tree to decline. The ICRZ approximately equals the size of a root-ball needed to transplant this tree, which in turn would require extensive post-care treatments and possibly guying or propping to stabilize the tree. Post Care Treatment includes but may not be limited to; regular irrigation, misting, root treatment with special root hormones, mulching, guying and monitoring during construction and for several years following impacts. Tree Trunk a. CRZ – 12-inch Radius for every inch of trunk diameter. Generally considered optimum protection. c. ICRZ – the inner half of the CRZ. Protecting only this area would cause significant impact to the tree, potentially life threatening, and would require maximum Post Care Treatment to retain the tree. See Post Care Treatment below. b. PCRZ – the outer half of the CRZ. The greater the disturbance allowed in this area; the greater post-care treatments are required. CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) EXPLANATION CRZ - 01 Not to scale 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1 (360) 399-1377 © Urban Forestry Services|Bartlett Consulting – A Division of The F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company, January 2022. This document has been prepared specifically for UFS|BC related projects and may not be suitable for use on other projects, or in other applications, and/or without the approval and participation of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company. Leaf Density Observations Leaf Density Comparison Photo taken on 7/2/22 This tree with good leaf density is set back in Park and more space This tree has relatively low leaf density This tree has relatively moderate leave density Leaf Density Photographs Low leaf density in front of Henry’s and McDonalds indicating trees under stress June 27, 2022 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Criteria Criteria – Bike/Pedestrian Circulation Preference • Welcoming gateway, aka “warm hug” (aesthetic, placemaking, Port Townsend “feel”) o Measurement ▪ Qualitative • Connectivity/accessibility o Measurement ▪ Connections to existing facilities • Safety o Measurement ▪ Increase lateral offset from Sims Way traveled lanes ▪ Promote slower vehicle speeds ▪ Reduce required crossings of Sims Way ▪ Increase lateral offset from Port property line • Cost o Measurement ▪ Minimize long-term maintenance costs • Planning document consistency o Measurement ▪ Qualitative Criteria – Vegetation Preference • Welcoming gateway, aka “warm hug” (aesthetic, placemaking, Port Townsend “feel”) o Measurement ▪ Qualitative • Vegetation Species o Measurement ▪ Maximize use of native/climate resilient species ▪ Maximize diversity of size, color, spacing, and shape ▪ Maximize habitat value ▪ Minimize risk of root damage to sidewalks and utilities ▪ Compatible with existing soils and available soil volume • Cost o Measurement ▪ Minimize long-term maintenance costs • Planning document consistency o Measurement ▪ Qualitative Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion | Criteria Page 2 of 2 Design Considerations • Port property line wall/fencing • CPTED (crime prevention through environmental design) • Boat yard pedestrian access points • Median trees (future compatibility) • Haines Street intersection (possible roundabout) • Kearney Street intersection (possible roundabout) • Use of root barriers • Pollen • Lateral offset to power undergrounding • Maintaining gateway feel during construction • Consider bird nesting when scheduling tree work • Obtain topographic survey – trees, pavement, sidewalks, property lines, etc. • Electrical service connections to the Port • Inflation impacts on project budget • Stormwater design • Connect pedestrian facilities to the Visitors Center and Willene sculpture • Soil amendments Redundant Criteria • Larry Scott trail (future compatibility) – redundant to Connectivity/Accessibility Criteria that are Solutions • Keep Poplars on the north side • Transplant Poplars EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #6 - 7/12/2022 CANOPY Tree Form - Medium to large spreading canopy; variable spread and height depending on species. - Typically deciduous; usually more ornamental with spring/fall color than with flowering. - Fast growing species more likely weak-wooded; slow growing species often more durable (speaks to maintenance and safety). - Symmetrical formality conveys 'gateway'. - Monoculture; blended species will diminish sense of symmetrical formality. EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #6 - 7/12/2022 COLUMNAR Tree Form - Medium to large columnar form; variable spread and height but typically ranges from 5' to 10' spread, 15' to 60' height. - Typically deciduous, but may be coniferous or broad leaf evergreen; usually more ornamental with spring/fall color than with flowering. - Typically moderate growth; some coniferous or broad leaf may be slower. - Symmetrical formality and strong vertical form emphatically convey 'gateway'. - Monoculture; blended species does not convey strong symmetrical formality. EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #6 - 7/12/2022 FLOWERING Tree Form - Small to medium spreading canopy or broadly conical form typical; variable spread and height but typically ranges from 10' to 20' spread, 15' to 30' height. - Typically deciduous, but may be coniferous or broad leaf evergreen; usually ornamental in spring, but can be 3 season interest. - Typically moderate growth. - May be monoculture or blended with other vegetation; best with a 'foil' of other vegetation as a backdrop such as deep green conifers or leafed-out deciduous trees. EXHIBIT No: SHEET No:JOB No.: DRAWING FILE No.: DATE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washin g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #6 - 7/12/2022 PARKWAY Tree Form - Blended mix of large to small trees with or without shrub understory; blend of coniferous, deciduous, and broad leaf. - Plantings 'layered' or arranged to highlight flowering or leaf color, texture, form. - Mixed range of growth provides quick cover and long lasting durability (lower level of maintenance due to informal arrangement) - No formal symmetry or 'gateway' effect, particularly if depth of planting is variable on both sides of roadway. - No monoculture. Rationale for Full Expansion of the Boat Haven Boat Yard 1. Full Expansion means full build out of the Boat Haven work yard to the Port of Port Townsend’s northern property line (0.9 acre). Full Expansion of the work yard entails: raising the surface elevation to match adjacent work yard grades, constructing a retaining wall/security fence, constructing structural fill ballasted to support travel lifts and loads, ground surfacing with non- polluting gravel material, installing connections to the property’s stormwater collection and treatment system, rehabilitating the work yard’s electrical service, fiber optic, and cable network, and security lighting. 2. City of Port Townsend designated Boat Haven as zone M-II(A) ((Boat Haven) Marine Related Uses). This district accommodates a variety of uses including marina, recreational boating, manufacturing, assembly, haul out, and repair. The zone designates larger scale and more intensive water-dependent or marine-related uses at the Boat Haven. These uses are consistent with Full Expansion. 3. Chapter 17.22 (MARINE-RELATED AND MANUFACTURING ZONING DISTRICTS) of the City of Port Townsend Municipal Code allows Full Expansion, with associated marine uses. The Code requires neither yard setbacks from the property line nor a vegetated buffer along non- residential land uses (i.e., Sims Way R/W). 4. Full Expansion is consistent with the Port of Port Townsend’s 2020 Comprehensive Scheme of Harbor Improvements (CSHI) plan, which states “future development of the upland areas at the Boat Haven property...anticipates maximizing the efficient use of available land to encourage marine-related commerce and industry” and “the upland areas should be actively managed to efficiently use all available land, encourage intensification of marine related industrial and commercial uses, and improve the Port’s bottom line.” The CSHI anticipates upland capital improvements, such as “Work Yard & Boat Yard Resurfacing (Periodic),” “Stormwater Treatment System Rehabilitation (Periodic),” “Sandblast Containment Facility,” and “Work Yard & Boat Yard Electrical Service Rehabilitation/Lighting,” which are elements of Full Expansion. 5. The 2020 Annual Update of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS Project #24) identifies elements of Full Expansion, which is therefore consistent with and helps to implement locally adopted project priorities. 6. Full Expansion has received a specific and substantial Public Infrastructure Fund grant from Jefferson County under the State Community Economic Revitalization Board Prospective Development Program. This commitment of financial resources verifies the Port’s need for Full Expansion. 7. The project will assist in retaining and creating 20 permanent jobs that sustain and enhance Port Townsend’s “working waterfront,” thereby enhancing an economic sector long identified by policy plans as essential to preserving community character. 8. The Boat Haven work yard is an integrated complex of interdependent operations that rely on efficient use of designated space. The work yards and spaces rely centralized infrastructure; that is, close proximity to utilities, environmental protection measures, equipment staging, and equipment and vehicle access/circulation. Shipbuilding and repair activities generate pollutants, such as abrasive blast media, metals, metal related compounds, petroleum associated hydrocarbons, and antifouling ingredients in paints, which require connections with comprehensive containment and treatment systems already present. Alternative sites for conducting these activities are unavailable. 9. Boat Haven no longer imagines westward expansion of the Boat Yard into the “Balch Property” primarily due to shoreline and environmental constraints (e.g., wetlands). This condition reduces the Port’s buildable area, and forces intensified uses of unencumbered land, as envisioned by Full Expansion. 10. Full Expansion will benefit two Boat Haven Upland Use Designations: (1) BH-A Work Yard, and (2) BH-B Marine Industrial/Boat Yard. The use designations seek to agglomerate specific types of development where activities are conducive; that is, to compatible work yard and marine trade uses adjacent to the boat lifts, distinct from designated administrative, recreational, and parking areas near public and pedestrian facilities. 11. The BH-A Work Yard is east of Haines Place and Boat Street, and extends easterly to the Safeway Gas Station property. It encompasses the area ballasted for the 75-ton mobile travel lift, and has approximately 120 spaces for vessel storage and refit projects. Boat storage and refit projects are the principal use in this area. Per the CSHI, “the area should be managed to maximize its vessel storage potential and, in turn, improve the Port’s bottom line.” Full Expansion will allow work spaces for larger vessels, and servicing with new electrical conduits, wiring, transformers, pedestals, receptacles, and meters. The Travel Lift Drive aisle would be less congested, facilitating equipment and vehicle access and circulation. Also, Full Expansion will allow installation of industrial grade (non-glare) lighting to improve security and safety. 12. The BH-B Marine Industrial/Boat Yard, the majority upland designated use at Boat Haven, is west of Haines Place, and extends westerly to the Balch Property and delineated wetlands. This area is for shipbuilding and repair, ship and yacht building businesses, boat storage, and other marine-related industry. The Port proposed the unballasted former Port Townsend Lumber Company area in BH-B for a needed sandblast facility and containment area to serve the entire work yard. 13. Full Expansion offers economies of scale over Partial Expansion, and significant cost savings opportunities on a unit area basis. It is difficult to project the specific marine-related uses precluded by Partial Expansion. Certainly, space for longer vessels would be limited, and work yard congestion would continue to compromise operational safety under Partial Expansion. 14. If Partial Expansion, with associated infrastructure improvements, such as a retaining wall for fill containment, security fencing and lighting, stormwater collection and treatment, and electrical and other utility improvements, were followed by future Full Expansion, many costs of mobilization and construction would double, significant costs would accrue for demolition and reinstallation of the infrastructure improvements, and work yard practices and operations would be disrupted by construction for a second time. 15. Full Expansion requires removal of Lombardy poplar trees along the Port’s property line. Partial Expansion would not require near-term tree removal for structural fill or retaining wall construction, but would not importantly benefit the Lombardy poplar trees in the long-term because: (1) the trees are progressively degenerating, and many are failing and posing safety hazards, (2) trenching for undergrounding of Jeffco PUD’s electrical lines and for installing lateral electrical hookups and other utilities to boat yard work spaces will accelerate degradation of poplar health, and (3) the poplars do not have any special heritage or other designation that warrants protection. Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 001 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email The popular trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas and no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 002 9/28/2021 Craig Voice Mail Expressed passionate discontent with tree removal Comment noted. 003 9/28/2021 Karen Rudd karenlenerudd@gmail.com email Please put trees between car lane and bike/sidewalk lanes.Thank you. Comment incorporated into stakeholder committee and project development alternatives. 004 9/16/2021 Nancy Erreca nerreca@aol.com website The project is not needed, housing is needed.Comment noted. 9/28/2021 Keith Emry Facebook Fix the roads first Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Fixing Lawrence street should have priority. How about something for the people that live here not the ones coming to visit Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook please please please do soil tests before planting; make sure the new trees have room to grow and are the right plant for the right place. Please do not leave this in the hands of out-of-town landscape architects who, though I have great respect for many, are not always very knowledgeable about trees (beyond their aesthetic properties). Thank you. Soil tests have been taken and will be helpful in species selection. The Stakeholder process is incorporating local professional and consulting professional knoweledge into project development. 9/28/2021 Fredrich Bonbast Facebook Lawrence is fine. the roads in my neighborhood look like iraq, except when it rains. then they look like iraq in a flood. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Friedrich Bombast I picked Lawrence because it’s a major street that many use.Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Robert Jaye Facebook Wow, looks like the city has abandoned reasonable setbacks and their importance for maintaining the city's character. The concept picture shows maybe 15 feet from the road. Nice way to say welcome to PT. Comment noted. Concept drawing was provided without the benefit of survey and was helpful in creating interest in the project. 9/28/2021 Sarah Smith Facebook What exactly is wrong with the poplars? Why are they Not environmentally friendly? Please see stakeholder process for discussion on species. The challenge with Poplars is they are an invasive tree and they are not recommended by city code section 12.04 PTMC. 9/28/2021 Russell Hansen Facebook Walter McQuillen thank you !Comment noted for Comprehenisve Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Sarah Ludlum-Wisehart Facebook Friedrich Bombast YES!!! All the roads in Uptown need to be fixed!!! This project is ridiculous! Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 David Crozier Facebook Cant really believe anyone thinks moving the boat yard boundary closer to the street is more eye appealing than the current situation. This has to be the most unpopular city council project yet. Comment noted. This project is about a safety concern and the Port desire to utilize the property they own for their mission to support the marine trades. Project asethetics are also important to the project. 9/28/2021 Gus Sebastian Facebook I think Boat Haven adds good character to PT. Its pretty cool seeing it when you come down the S curves. Its a major part of the history of this town. "A Victorian Seaport" Many local folks utilize the boatyard not only as a means of employment but recreationally. I support this idea. If you have ever looked up at those tress in big wind you might be concerned. Yes fix the roads, yes fix everything, but please don't complain about an idea that could grow a industry in PT. Thank you. The economic impact of the boat yard is a key tenent behind the project. The City and PUD desire to support the Port in their mission to support marine trades. 9/29/2021 Fredrich Bombast Facebook Walter McQuillen i get that. but i walk a lot of neighborhoods, and many of the out-of-the way streets aren't even streets anymore. at least Lawrence doesn't have massive potholes and washouts. i once asked a city guy about the street in front of our house, which is broken asphalt and gravel undercoat, and he said the cost to repair it would be about the annual street repair budget for the whole city. "improvement projects," though, are sexier. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/29/2021 Timothy Stone Facebook More gentrification, plz?Comment noted. 7/22/2022 1 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 9/29/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook Sarah Smith they are wonderful trees but at this stage of their lifespan they are falling apart in high winds. It's a busy road with power lines so there is a reasonable likelihood that a tree failure (usually large sections of these trees break out like ice-bergs off a glacier) can cause damage and even injury. They have a few other issues as well. They send up suckers, new trees from the roots, a great distance from the original tree. They are beloved by aphids. They also produce a lot of pollen which a number of people are allergic to. While I have always admired this allee, it is time to plan for the future; replace these with something new and (hopefully) native trees and shrubs, something to take us the next 100 years. Thank you. Evalutation of this project over the long term is an important factor. 9/29/2021 James Schultz Facebook Plant pot on the roadway! Pot Townsend rides again.Comment noted. 9/29/2021 Stephen Hall Facebook Very low on the priority list for the city. Putting utilities underground is a nice goal. Roads repairs and replacement is much higher on the list. Just not as sexy on the council resume. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 005 9/29/2021 Rachel Ganapoler rachelganapoler@gmail.com email The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines..and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? Thank you. The history of the look of Port Townsend is a key element under consideration. Several undergrounding options are available depending on boatyard expansion and tree/utility/path placement. 006 9/29/2021 Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com email In support of removing of removing trees, shrubs and grass that might cause raging wildfires Thank you. Various planting approaches are being evaluated as part of the Stakeholder process 007 10/13/2021 Dori Bailey BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM email The money should be spent for the homeless. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. Thank you. The City attempts to balance the public resource of trees in the right of way with safety and other uses of the right of way. City codes promote preservation of trees when not in conflict with street, non- motorized, and utility needs. 008 10/17/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Replanting the Poplars makes sense but stick to the 1993 study. There are benefits to the poplars. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 09 10/19/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached the 1993 Gateway Development Plan recommend read page 14 This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 010 10/11/2021 O'Neill Louchard oneill@olympus.net email Thoughtful planted in needed, mixed species array.Thank you. Species variety diversity is part of the Stakeholder evaluation. 011 10/7/2021 Joni Blanchard email A professional tree person should be consulted about trees and their impacts. Save the yellow lupine. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 012 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 and happy to join the planning committee.Thank you. 013 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Has there been a soil analysis, makes all the difference in the world for tree survival Thank you. Yes, soil analysis has been performed. 014 10/27/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email take into consideration all the functions that the poplars provide, including the impressive beauty. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. Thank you. Please see a record of meeting and meeting schedule on the City's engagePT website. www.cityofpt.us/engagePT 015 11/4/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 016 11/8/2021 Larry Eifert larryeifert@gmail.com email But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. Comment noted. The City, Port, and PUD seek transparent process that allow for all viewpoints to be heard. 017 11/7/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I'm not advocating what- so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 2 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 018 11/7/2021 Karen Anderson karenlanderson736@gmail.com email What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail?  How would it translate into jobs, specifically? There is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. The proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims. I support the planting of native species. Thank you. Boatyard expansion allows for larger boats to be worked on in Boat Haven which engages more of the trades. The edge look of Sims Way is being evaluated by the stakeholder committee 019 11/9/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually. acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. Thank you. Carbon sequestration and effects of climate change are important considerations. 020 11/9/2021 Joan Fabian fabianily@gmail.com email 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existent trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the Netherlands. Thank you. These comments are included for the stakeholder process and evaluation. 021 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 022 11/2/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 023 11/17/2021 Fred Weinmann fweinmann@cablespeed.com email A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees. Thank you for the suggestion. 024 11/19/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. Do not cut trees in December. Comment noted. These factors along with others must be brought into the decision making process. 025 12/1/2021 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 026 12/9/2021 Tom Myers tommyers393@gmail.com email Go for it! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ Thank you. The stakeholder committee is evaluating options that include species as well as optional landscaping forms. 027 12/10/2021 Linda Tilley artbytilley.com lindatilley44@gmail.com email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 7/22/2022 3 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 028 12/13/2021 anonymous butterfly@olypen.com engagept Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? Thank you. The Port seeks to expand the boatyard to their property line to fully utilize their property for their mission and purpose of operating the boat yard. 029 12/12/2021 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 030 12/10/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re- vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). Thank you for the suggested plantings. 031 12/9/2021 Andrea Hegland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? When are you proposing to do this? What permits will you be securing? When will you be securing permits? Will you be conducting environmental review. Thank you for the questions. The Port is proposing to expand the boatyard, the PUD would like to bury the power lines and the City would like to support the Gateway. Thus, the project involves all three agencies. The timing of the project is dependent on the outcomes of the public process and decision making process. Permits are dependent on the outcomes of hte public process and decision making process. The scope of environmental review will depend on the project scope as determined by the process. 032 12/6/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan.  At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to  attributes i.e.  functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. Thank you for the suggestion. An Environmental Impact Statement has not been identified as the appropriate level of environmental review. The adopted City plans are key in supplying the intent for the area in which the project is located. The City does not have a Parks, Recreation, and Tree Functional Plan, but rather Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan. The City code discourages planting of poplars. 033 12/7/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money. Comment noted. 034 11/22/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. Thank you. Climate change considerations is important for this project an all projects as is carbon sequestration. 035 12/14/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the multi-agency plan. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. Thank you for the suggestion and desire to honor our Pacific Nowrthwest natural heritage. 036 12/15/2021 Karta John Miller susanmiller@olypus.net engagept Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. Thank you for the suggestion. 7/22/2022 4 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 037 12/15/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. Comment noted. Thank you. One clarification regarding opening the tidal flats is that the salt would likely kill existing native plants. That said, the elevations of Kah Tai were set with dredge spoils form the 1960s above seal level. 038 12/30/2021 Val Johnstone valjohnstone@aol.com engagept Recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare " Red Maple Thank you for the species suggestion. 039 12/21/2021 Kathy Knoblock toddk@msn.com email I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? Comment noted. Safety around the powerlines is a fundamental requriement and was the initial driver for this project. 040 1/13/2022 Debbie Jahnke dbjahnke@att.net email Comments on information provided to public by Gateway Poplar Alliance Thank you for the helpful information concerning the GPA complaint. 041 2/12/2022 Cliff Moore meamoore@comcast.net email consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. Thank you. A replacement over time option is being considered. 042 2/14/2022 Patti Hoyecki phoyecki@yahoo.com email supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio.  I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future.  The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. Thank youi for the suggestion of species. 043 2/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com engagept Where is the Long Term Tree Management Plan? What are the plans for the cut trees? Who does one become a stakeholder? Reconsiderwiping out the Kah Tai Populars. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 044 2/15/2022 Gail Workman marksyounglady@gmail.com engagept Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. Thank you. Long term costs and safety is a concern that is desired to be mitigated. 045 2/18/2022 Richard and MaryAnn Moore ptmoores1@q.com email We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week.Thank you. 046 2/22/2022 Johnny Ms Johnson's eighth grade class mail The hearts on the poplars comment Thank you. 047 2/22/2022 Richard Jahnke public comment Stormwater drainage needs to be developed Thank you. Stormwater is important to this project. 048 3/6/2022 George Randels gr321@olypen.com email Remove poplars on port side but leave trees on lagoon side.Thank you. This option is under consideration. 049 3/8/2022 Mary Elayne Dunphy medunphy@comcast.ne email I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. Thank you. The evaluation of the trees indicate that more care is needed for the trees as they are stressed. 050 3/20/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Clarification of accessment report: populars would not likely be killed if trenching done by Port fence line, safe option if heavy equipment stayed off of the main roots closer to tree on the Port side. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 051 3/21/2022 Linda Lebrane lebranemusic@yahoo.com engagept Save the poplars Comment noted. 052 3/14/2022 Kelly Drake kellydrake22@gmail.com engagept I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? Thank you. It may be possible to bury the powerlines wihtout removing the trees. The expanded boatyard project would replace the trees in a location closer to the street. 053 12/13/2021 anonymous krdmps@hotmail.com engagept How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? Thank you. The project is very much about the community benefit of supporting the marine trades. 054 4/6/2022 Brent Vadopalas brent@vadopalas.org engagept It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines.illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. Comment noted. 055 5/2/2022 Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Allianceinfo@poplaralliance.org engagept Provided a copy of the April 23, 2022 Gateway Alliance Slideshow along with comments that the project can be done wihtout cutting down the poplars, the ity has no economic analysis for cutting the trees, the parks board is the public forum, the city has arranged the parks board to be in favor of removal of the poplars, the stakeholder committee is in favor or removal of the poplars, the city has always intended to remove the poplars and the public process is not transparrent. Thank you for providing a suggested alternative. Please see the city's engagePT website. All videos of the stakeholder meetings are available on this website for transparency. Final decisions on what the project will entail will be made in public session at the City Council, Port Commissions, and PUD Commission levels. www.cityofpt.us/engagePT 7/22/2022 5 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 056 5/5/2022 ?Gateway Poplar Allianceinfo@poplaralliance.org engagept Can you clarify the purpose for the stakeholder committee and defined scope of work. The purpose of the stakeholder committee is to evaluate and develop thoughful options for the decision makers. 057 5/7/2022 Gateway Poplar Allianceinfo@poplaralliance.org engagept It appears that the 9 member Stakeholder Committee that is supposed to have an open mind about our Gateway Poplars already has a predetermined bias against the Poplars.  A majority are already on record to cut our community trees down. The City's website still says that one of the project goals is to cut the trees down. ·  Replacement of Lombardy poplars, an emerging and eventual need for the City The Port informed us that the selection process for the Stakeholder Committee was an open one, available to the general public.  We were also told that all options were on the table.   We subsequently requested copies and/or documentation of that notificiation to the general public for this committee formation...and the City was unable to provide us with any announcement for openings that was made available to the general public.  The Stakeholder Committee members appear to have been hand picked and with an existing bias against our poplars. The Parks Board was able to choose 4 of the 9 members, and the City indicated from the outset that the Admiralty Audubon would be invited.  The Port was guaranteed a spot as well.  The general public was not allowed to serve on this hand-picked committee, which has been stacked with anti-poplar votes. We expect our elected officials to engage in truly democratic processes backed by democratic principles.  Clearly that is not what has occured. Comment noted. The stakeholder committee volunteered to be a part of the process. The Parks Tree Trail Advisory Board made a recommendation for a couple of people to participate. Staff asked those if they would be willing to participate. The City, Port, and PUD are thankful for the stakeholder volunteers and all they have brought to the table for discussion and consideration. 058 5/16/2022 Vicki Legman vickilegman@gmail.com email Thank you. Been doing some reading and poplars are short lived trees. They’re beautiful, but removal seems to, sadly,  make sense.Comment noted. 059 2/19/2022 Robin Ornelas public comment Please preserve the poplars. They are one of the reasons that I wanted to move to Port Townsend.Comment noted. 060 2/19/2022 Darlene Schanfalc darlenes@olympus.net public comment I am disappointed that the City staff proposes to remove the Poplars on Sims Way. Those older and still healthy trees add character and a beauty to the area, which otherwise looks totally industrial. If the height is a problem, a trim is sufficient. Why would you even spend City funds on an unnecessary project when they can be put elsewhere? Please leave the trees alone. Thank you. The stakeholder process and arborist evaluation has identified that the trees are stressed and need investment. 061 2/20/2022 Larry Eifert larryeifert.com public comment How is the city, county and port going to take care of what they have been entrusted with? Will they take the easy way out and cut the trees, cutting a riff through the town that will maybe not be repairable? Will you help make it look like a strip mall by planting more Mall-Ready trees that look like every other place in America? Will people like Nancy and I drift away from here to be replaced by Mall-Ready home buyers? Comment noted. There are many demands on tax payer resources creating challenges in maintaining public assets. 062 2/20/2022 Melinda Bryden public comment I just wanted the City of Port Townsend to know that my husband, Ron Hayes, and I support cutting down the Poplar trees along Sims Way. It makes economic sense. As relatively long term residents (1999), we would like the City to know that it has our support. Comment noted. 063 2/20/2022 Rachel Ganapoler public comment I’m opposed to your plans for cutting the beautiful trees lining the gateway to our town.. they should be maintained, not destroyed! This plan is short sighted and that money could be spent elsewhere.. I’m sure you can come up with another worthless round about.. or you could fill pot holes or try to beautify the town by maintaining the existing trees.. ya know.. like the ones that were removed on main street . Yes, I’m pissed at your decision.. we want the trees to stay.. those trees!! Comment noted. 7/22/2022 6 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 064 2/20/2022 Lois Venarchick public comment The poplar trees along Sims Way literally transformed my life with their beauty, color and most importantly, the calming, I can breathe, peaceful way into town. Although you might dismiss this comment thinking it just too out there; I have driven into PT most of my adult life on a near daily basis. Nothing removed the stress I feel, and the beauty I see, than these two rows of stately poplar trees. I can only imagine the feelings they evoke in visitors and newcomers alike. In addition Port Townsend, “ use it up, wear it out, fix it up or do without. “ Stop spending money on things not needing to be done, directly contributing to the unaffordable town we are becoming. Save the trees! Comment noted. 065 2/21/2022 Sheri Suryan smithsuryan@gmail.com public comment Please don’t cut these beautiful trees down! They are such a welcoming sight as people drive into Port Townsend. They block wind from the sea and provide shade to Khai Tai Lagoon for fish and other wildlife. Sadly no other trees will grow to that extent in my lifetime. It would be such a shame to cut them down. What a void there will be and will be permanently! It’s not worth high speed internet to kill these trees! Please rethink other possibilities and let them survive!! Comment noted. Clarification, the existing overhead lines are transmission lines supplying power to Port Townsend and not highspeed communication lines. 066 5/22/2022 Laura Snodgrass laurafound@yahoo.com engagept I just want my opinion to be heard. I know you have heard all of the arguments for and against. Please do not cut down the poplars. Comment noted. 067 5/20/2022 Mark McCauley mmccauley@co.jefferson.wa.us email Looking out off my deck just now - from the hill between the hospital and Safeway - removing the poplars is going to substantially alter my view and not for the better. My view is world class and one reason the house is valued so highly. I won’t oppose the plan but thought you might want to hear an unvarnished opinion from an interested resident who will adversely impacted by the current plan. I love the poplars as does my wife. Comment noted. Thank you for the suggestions. These topics have been debated signficantly by the stakeholders. Please see the videos on the engagePT website at www.cityofpt.us/engagePT 068 5/25/2022 Kaci Cronkhite kacicronkhite@gmail.com engagept I support the Port’s boatyard expansion and PUD under grounding of power lines. However, I also support saving the poplar trees. Those poplar trees have proven time and again how resilient they are… through negligence, drought, floods, boatyard toxins, highway toxins, brackish mingling with Kai Tai lagoon, and when PUD has chopped them down to stumps on the boatyard side of the road across from Safeway. They’re tough as well as iconic. How much water are the trees currently drinking? When they’re gone, where will the water go? Will the new trees and surfaces manage water and mitigate toxins as well? Will new trees be so hardy? At what comparable budget? IF you must remove poplars from the Port side of the road, at least keep the ones on the Kai Tai side and use the money for improved maintenance: thinning, pruning, root barriers. Lastly, please ensure that all new surfaces and landscaping maintains or improves the environmental impacts of poplar removal: No concrete, no plastic, just green space and plantings that would parallel the work of those trees. Comment noted. Thank you for the suggestions. These topics have been debated signficantly by the stakeholders. Please see the videos on the engagePT website at www.cityofpt.us/engagePT 069 5/26/2022 Lisa Flores laflores99@yahoo.com engagept I am among the many who have lived here in Port Townsend for more than 40 years. I love the entry to our town. There is no valid reason to cut down these beautiful specimens. I have read all of the opinions. Perhaps there is a danger ... as in anything else of any validity in the world. I am also a climate refugee from the California Wildfires, where we lost ALL of our trees to the deadly devastation,,,, we had no choice in the matter. Here you have a choice. Use it wisely. Comment noted. 7/22/2022 7 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 070 5/29/2022 David Goldman Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Alliance engagept The 11-15-22 Jefferson County Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Grant addresses a legitimate economic development project that involves the Port of Port Townsend and the Jefferson County PUD. This development does not require the removal of the lower Sims Way poplar streetscape. What is it about present conditions of the Port Townsend Sims Way gateway transportation corridor that requires removal of the poplars ? Nothing Does the lower Sims Way “Flats” part of the gateway need critical aesthetic, restoration or maintenance work? No One member of the Stakeholder committee expressed the business community’s appreciation for the current beauty of the gateway. Another committee member is on record with his professional analysis of the lifetime value of the poplars to the community. The solution to the legitimate concern about the condition of the Kah Tai Lagoon Park is to promote an independent project to address that. Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park is a worthy project suitable for grant funding and the improvement of which would contribute to what makes Port Townsend a special community. The Nature Park project would not require poplar removal from the Sims Way ROW. Comment noted. Thank you for the suggestion for securing funding for Kah Tai. The evaluation process through the consultant and stakeholders has revealed that the Poplars are stressed and need investment. The aesthetic is a large topic of discussion. 071 6/3/2022 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com engagept I am entirely in favor of completely removing the poplars and improving the appearance, habitat function, and diversity of Sims way for future generation and visitors.  As a resident of town for 42 years I have been impressed with the beauty of abundance of flowering trees and shrub planted in historic uptown (over 60 different trees species recorded during a recent survey). I have noticed the dominance of poplars planted in Port Townsend: they are breaking up (beyond their lifespan) and very unattractive in the winter. In fall I noticed all the wonders of color of other trees and in spring the stunning floral possibilities. I am involved professionally with revegetation and restoration projects (since 1995) in the City and Washington State with my business Olympic Wetland Resources, LLC. Currently I am involved with several ongoing City and State (Fort Worden, Kah Tai Prairie Preserve) revegetation projects. I have been past president of the Washington Native Plant Society, Olympic Chapter Although I work exclusively with native species there are many non-native trees and shrubs that have much higher habitat value and seasonal beauty than the ragged monotonous poplar meant to windbreak farmlands in Kansas.. Thank you for the background. 7/22/2022 8 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 072 6/3/2022 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com engagept I am unclear of the current status of the proposed poplar tree replacement plan. This has been a divisive topic but I hope decision makers proceed and remove the poplar trees, for both safety reasons, regarding power line issues, and because they are relatively short-lived non-native trees. As much as possible, new development in this and all cases should enhance the environment. So I strongly support replacing the poplars with native vegetation. Others have pointed out that our native Pacific Northwest trees from Douglas fir and western red cedar to Pacific alders and Pacific madrones are beautiful visually and symbolically, appropriate, and would enhance the environment. That might also benefit Kah Tai Lagoon park by somewhat extending that quasi- natural area. I would further remind all of us that the entire area from Townsend Bay through the lagoon, including the Boat Haven boatyard, Sims Way, nearby commerce like boat shops, Henry's, Safeway, etc., the transit center, and Kah Tai Lagoon park and lagoon themselves, are themselves products of fill and development that converted a historical natural active estuary and adjacent terrestrial ecosystem, and their use by indigenous populations. In that context, I urge you to consider how removal and replacement of the poplars, development of bike and pedestrian paths, and Boat Haven expansion can be more connected to that natural and human history. For example, native vegetation appropriate to estuary shorelines should be considered, and not just native upland trees. Interpretive signage is important. Even more visionary and substantial would be incorporating ways to restore some measure of functionality to these past tidal aquatic, wetland and adjacent terrestrial systems, their connection to Townsend Bay and lowlands towards North Beach, and historical uses by Native occupants. I get that is very big picture, that significant restoration of that area's pre-settlement condition is likely not practical or affordable. But I encourage you to do what you can. Thank you for pointing out a number of concerns and the suggestions. The stakeholder disussions and process have been helpful and reflect a majority of this comment. 073 6/6/2022 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com continued There is a gorilla in the stakeholders’ process - the poplars are to remain. This, according to the 1993 adopted ‘Gateway Development Plan’; intended to provide continuity for future projects. This plan, a years long community effort, describes  “special environmental character” and streetscape recommendations: “The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims. adjacent to Kah-Tai Park (note: land later incorporated into the Park) can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay. The ‘Sims Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project’ is a collaboration of three agencies, sharing a County $1M PIF grant. The grant language refers multiple times to “implementing” the ‘Gateway Development Plan’, the community’s vision for future development. Newly hired staff managers promote a mantra, “the poplars must go”, an idea inserted into the project narrative: “The Poplars have been identified as an inappropriate tree by both the Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board, as well as a supporting landscape study for Kah Tai Lagoon”. However, no City policy, goal, vision or priority has been adopted to incorporate such incongruent and contradictory ideas into the ‘Gateway Development Plan’. The grant money is to implement not amputate the community’s vision. What of the future town landscape, prioritizing “ the poplars must go” - cutting hundreds of trees - projected at $3000 per tree. One might be concerned; poplar cutting before residential streets potted with water features and arterials without shoulders for bicycles and walkers. A few Comment noted. Thank you for the suggestion. The PIF grant is for economic development and cannot be used for maintenance of Streets. The Gateway Plan is an important guiding document that identifies intent. It is important to consider all relevant information in the plan and what has been learned since the plan's development for decision making by the elected bodies. This comment regarding streets is helpful to know that there is a priority to investment in streets. 7/22/2022 9 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments continued Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email water features and arterials without shoulders for bicycles and walkers. A few chosen stakeholders are discussing the staff’s ‘Sims Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project’’. It’s unclear if stakeholders know roadside streetscapes are not parks and the poplars are to be maintained not cut down. One can hope they recommend to the Parks Board and City staff to groom and steward the poplars as recommended in the ‘Gateway Development Plan’, clearly the community’s intention. The Port manager has indicated he is open to replanting poplars and the PUD has indicated it does not need to remove the poplars in order to trench for its lines. continuation of the above comment. 074 6/7/2022 Glen Bellerud Front Desk “What about the roads – cutting down the poplar trees, which have been here & have not had any storm damage as the shore pines have? Having managed Fort Worden for the first 20 yrs & a back ground in parks, I find this discerning (disturbing?). There are poplar trees at the Fort & they are doing great. I have been here for 60 yrs & find your thinking very short sighted. Who wants to look at stunted shore pine – not really native either. Let’s do something for everybody – not the few leading us & those choosing to make us look like all the same As in Calif(?).” Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 075 6/13/2022 Beverly Michaelsen engagept I love the poplars after the s curve and entering into beautiful Port Townsend. Please save the north side ones!! It is unfortunate that the port must take down the ones that border their side for expansion, they make such a perfect border. I wish they could all stay and they are perfect for water absorption and ecology. Thank you for considering and I hope that we can do the right thing in regards to our town, it’s citizens and our beautiful natural world. Thank you. The aesthetic into PT is a huge part of this porject. 076 6/15/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email At the June 14th Gateway Stakeholders Meeting, we began a discussion about planting setbacks from features in the Project area. Attached is a landscape detail sheet prescribing planting setbacks that WSDOT has used, sometimes with modification, for many roadside vegetation projects. WSDOT offers these distances as guidelines, not strict requirements. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 077 6/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached is an EPA Review titled 'Biological Aspcects of Hybrid Poplar Cultivation on Floodplains in Western North America'.  In it, they lament the widespread elimination of Hybrid Poplars and herald the re-introduction and cultivation of them for environmental benefits. One line in it says 'Given current trends in climate warming, hybrid Poplar could potentially compensate for the adaptive limitations of some native species'. It was written, since, there was a need in the divided scientific community, for all parties to have a better understanding of the basic biology and ecological role of both native and hybrid Poplars. I've consulted with two of our renown local naturalists, both with Doctorates in Biology, both experts and authors of books about birds. To quote one of them, when asked about wildlife value of OUR Poplars along Sims, he says 'removing the Lombardies from along that main path would be a short term loss for the migrating yellowrumps, nomadic waxwings, et al, that periodically make HEAVY use of them for foraging, but, IMMEDIATELY replanting with black cottonwood, willow, etc could fill that gap pretty quickly.' i've been working beside the Poplars (on a boat) for the past 2 months everyday. Songbirds have been singing all day long every day in them for these This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 078 6/10/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email At the last meeting, Scott said we should email our thoughts of the concepts just sent to us. Here're mine~ 1. Sidewalk completed along north side ONLY. Upgrade crosswalks. 2. Any walking path along boatyard fenceline, if one MUST be put in, should be as narrow as possible and maybe only crushed pea gravel as is already across the road along the front of Henery's for low visibility. NO 6' slabs of anything - especially concrete!! 4. It's best to keep bicycle traffic as far to the west side of marina to connect as directly as possible to Larry Scott. As in the new path that will eventually connect the west side of boatyard entry to the shoreline. Straight in past Blue Moose is best until the new path is put in. 6. Bicycle traffic coming in past Admiral Ship Supply or along the marina waterfront shouldn't be encouraged. Too much traffic coming and going, cars parking, backing up, boats on lifts going by. Groups of bicycles mosying through the marina get in the way of busy comings and goings of workers and marina patrons. Bicyclers will start taking up all our precious parking spaces if they get a trail all along there, also!! They are already increasingly using our parking down closer to the trail. 8. Boatyard fence would be nice with a retaining wall of 2-man basalt rocks 3' or 4' high with wood posts and simple square wire between them to maintain view in and out of the yard for us workers and for those looking in to see the cool boats as they pass. 4. Absolutely NO opening along the yard fenceline. Those wanting to come in can access by coming into the marina and figuring their way in. Openings just encourage the (illegal) 'death dash' across the road to Henery's. Not necessary for workers to have easy access to Henery's. And, us workers definitely don't want easy ready access of the public right into where we're working! I've asked This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 079 6/20/2022 Charles Nelson chasnelson101@icloud.com email Why not install new power lines underground, & save the trees? Thank you. Undergrounding is possible. Evaluations of impact to the trees has been considered by the stakeholder committee and consultant team. 080 6/20/2022 Gateway Poplar Allianceinfo@poplaralliance.org email We were blind copied on an email in which you wrote: In addition, we also desire to make another seat available and seek a representative of the Poplar Alliance group to be part of the process directly. Assuming this was your formal invitation, here is our response. The current process to achieve the stated objectives of the multiagency "Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Grant” agreement and to qualify forJeff County PIF grant funds requires the removal of all the poplars from the lower Sims Flats commercial corridor of the GDP as an “ implemen[ation] [of] the City's Gateway Development Plan” [GDP] . The GDP specifically calls for a streetscape of linear poplars: Streetscape Recommendations The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims. adjacent to Kah-Tai Park, can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay. The GDP can’t be implemented by removing all the poplars. The Gateway Poplar Alliance (GPA) was organized to oppose that poplar removal. The GPA won’t participate in what is intended to be a public advisory/decision making process to redesign the Sims Flats commercial corridor of the GDP if the decision to remove the poplars has already been made before any substantive public involvement with the Potemkin village public process that has been undertaken to date. Therefore, the GPA will only agree to participate in the “technical advisory group,” the “Sims Way Technical Advisory Group,” aka the “stakeholder committee,” if the Comment noted. The additional seat has been filled by a volunteer desiring to participate. 7/22/2022 11 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 080 continued Therefore, the GPA will only agree to participate in the “technical advisory group,” the “Sims Way Technical Advisory Group,” aka the “stakeholder committee,” if the city commits to: a formal review of the 1993 GDP that involves as substantial a public process as was conducted in the drafting of the GDP and memorialized in the Plan and especially with reference to the specification of the poplar streetscape of the Plan "FLATS" COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.” This review shall include the impacts of the GDP revisions on the Kah Tai Lagoon Park and shall be subject to formal ratification by the Port Townsend City Council, and such SEPA review and process specified by PTMC Chap. 19.04 (SEPA) and PTMC 19.04.260D3p (Substantive authority) as required by law to address the environmental impacts (Flats streetscape, poplars, linearity, tree replacement, storm water, wind currents, etc) on that corridor of the GDP and the lands to the north and south of it, and any other similar legal processes and reviews required of any other agency the actions of which are premised on or dependent on the completion of the city’s full review process specified immediately above. Continued 081 6/19/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Kah Tai Volunteers, the Audubon Society, and our Parks Board members through the years have created a lovely park over the years and I appreciate and support all the prairie restoration and wildlife habitat efforts.  We have near 80 acres of this lovely park.  I’m hoping to keep Poplars just along the 1 -acre strip on the very edge of the park in the ROW.  Many in our community are wanting to keep many of those Poplars.  Let’s compromise to thin, prune, and save a good stand of healthy Poplars that stand along that stretch.   This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 082 6/120/22 Kathy Lundquist woodland.antiques@gmail.com engagept I know there's a backlash in response to the removal of the poplars along the Gateway, between the lagoon & the port. It is a noisy group but I hope folks like me let you know we agree with the effort to plant native trees along that strip. I vote to remove them. They are messy & dangerous, to my mind. My neighbor recently removed 7 poplars along our property line. I couldn't have been more grateful. He worried (as did I) during every windstorm that they'd come down on his house (or mine). Plant some native trees that are easier to maintain& less messy & ignore the noisy folks. Thank you. This is helpful information. 7/22/2022 12 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 083 6/14/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Nonnative plants reduce population growth of an insectivorous bird Desirée L. Narango Nonnative plants lack an evolutionary history with native fauna and support insect communities that are less abundant and diverse, and this may change food availability for vertebrate consumers. Most insectivorous birds are absent or declining in urban areas, yet no study has tested whether nonnative plants impact bird populations via food limitation. We monitored reproduction and survival of Carolina chickadees within residential yards and found that when nonnative plants increased, both insect availability and chickadee population growth declined. We also found that populations could only be sustained if nonnative plants constituted <30% of plant biomass. Our results demonstrate that nonnative plants reduce habitat quality for insectivorous birds and restoration of human-dominated areas should prioritize native plants to support local food webs. Human-dominated landscapes represent one of the most rapidly expanding and least-understood ecosystems on earth. Yet, we know little about which features in these landscapes promote sustainable wildlife populations. Historically, in urban areas, landowners have converted native plant communities into habitats dominated by nonnative species that are not susceptible to pest damage and require little maintenance. However, nonnative plants are also poor at supporting insects that are critical food resources for higher order consumers. Despite the logical connection, no study has examined the impact of nonnative plants on subsequent population responses of vertebrate consumers. Here, we demonstrate that residential yards dominated by nonnative plants have lower arthropod abundance, forcing resident Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) to switch diets to less preferred prey and produce fewer young, or forgo reproduction in nonnative sites altogether. This leads to lower reproductive success and unsustainable population growth in these yards This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 083 Despite the logical connection, no study has examined the impact of nonnative plants on subsequent population responses of vertebrate consumers. Here, we demonstrate that residential yards dominated by nonnative plants have lower arthropod abundance, forcing resident Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) to switch diets to less preferred prey and produce fewer young, or forgo reproduction in nonnative sites altogether. This leads to lower reproductive success and unsustainable population growth in these yards compared with those with >70% native plant biomass. Our results reveal that properties landscaped with nonnative plants function as population sinks for insectivorous birds. To promote sustainable food webs, urban planners and private landowners should prioritize native plant species. Continued 084 6/14/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Poplar – The Homemaker - Chelsea Green Publishing https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=16439&d=8Zio4tgMej-HeO3JeIQJoO- hFa3fWfjtcCv1nujoyA&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2echelseagreen%2ecom%2f20 20%2fpoplar-the-homemakerPlantations of hybrid poplar are always made of clones. Some of these large plantations out in the Northwest are thousands of acres and support little wildlife. They are voids for biodiversity. This is not the fault of the tree, but a mistake of management. The difference between clonal blocks of native poplars and hybrid poplars is in the origin of the trees. Native insects have evolved to eat native poplars. There are countless species that will only feed on poplar leaves. These insects are the backbone of a food web that supports birds. Hybrid poplars do not feed insects the way aspens do. In fact, many newer hybrid poplar clones have been genetically engineered to avoid being food for Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). These trees have had Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) added to their DNA. Bt is a bacterium that is regularly used to kill Lepidoptera. The result is a silent forest. Transgenic poplars are not available to the public in the United States at this time. They are widely planted in afforestation projects in China. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 13 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 085 6/13/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Attached is from Wikipedia regarding problems related to Lombardy Poplars. It is relevant to both sides of Sims Way. The second and third attachments are relative to concerns of habitat for birds in the Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park. The last two are an abstract from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 086 6/12/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I have been thinking about stormwater management in the Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion project area since the recent flooding. I recommend that the agencies include stormwater management in the project alternatives because the approaches will influence structures, vegetation, bike/ped connections, water quality, flooding, and aesthetics. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 087 6/1/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email Here are the graphics I presented at the last Stakeholder meeting, which Scott requested that I forward. The thoughts and ideas respond to the “Features to Consider in Developing Alternatives” of the Project Limits and Constraints map distributed by Scott. The graphics present a preliminary high level functional plan (e.g., focal points, view corridors, connectivity) based on the 1993 Gateway Development Plan to the extent that Project constraints allow, and reflecting Project criteria from public comments. The two typical sections show how many of the criteria expressed in the Gateway Development Plan and public comments could be incorporated in the Project alternatives. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 088 6/12/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email “Meadow grass and wildflowers” in the planter strip (north side) was a failed experiment from around 25 years ago. I actually obtained hundreds of transplants from the WSDOT nursery stock—species they wished to see growing there. And we installed them—including Port Townsend High School students doing their Senior Project service work. That strip proved simply too high-impact for those plants to endure. I personally spent something like 30 cumulative hours doing periodic weeding and garden maintenance, and it was not sufficient to perpetuate the planting. There were many introduced weed species that migrated in; way too little water available; foot traffic and bicycle wheels nipping at the edges. A nice thought, one that would require a considerable investment beyond the resources I describe above, just to reach a level of ’survival’ after as little as two or three years. I strongly recommend woody shrubs as a primary planting category, set well back from the shoulder(s), and with committed water and weeding resources until established. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 089 6/13/2022 Rick Janke (Sharing State Audibon informnation) rjahnke@att.net email I received this email, cover email and press release (attached) from the state Audubon office.  From Teresa Anderson at State Audubon "Deborah and I are working on a statement from Audubon WA and/or National Audubon that we will run past you just in case we want to use it. We’ll also ask your advice about where (or if) we should send it. I just wanted to let you know that I did have a phone call with Andrea Haegland months ago about the poplar issue and I was misrepresented in their email below. I did not say that Admiralty Audubon is out of step with National. In fact, I told her that National Audubon is pro native plants (via our Plants for Birds initiative). We also talked about the Birds and Climate in National Parks report that Audubon did a few years ago that talked about birds and ecosystems moving because of climate change. I think that’s where she got the idea that Audubon is in “flux on its view of non-native plants” which is not true at all. Thank you for the clarification from the State Audubon Office 090 6/21/2022 Don Archer bobblacktym@comcast.net phone call 1:20pmThe poplar trees should be saved put power underground Thank you. Power and variety is part of the Stakeholder evaluatibo. 7/22/2022 14 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 091 6/21/2022 Rick Janke (Sharing information from John Rowden, National Audubon) rjahnke@att.net email “The National Audubon Society and its field office, Audubon Washington, strongly promote the use of native plants through our Plants for Birds conservation initiative because research shows that native plants are critical for supporting our native bird species. Native plants – and the insects they support – evolved with native birds and provide resources that are matched to the birds’ needs, which is especially important during breeding when birds are feeding hungry chicks. Many landscaping plants are exotic species from other countries that require maintenance, more resources, and may become invasive, negatively impact native ecosystems and natural areas. Our native bird species face innumerable threats and replacing non-native and invasive plant species with natives is an important way that individuals and municipalities can support our native birds.” - John Rowden, Ph.D., Senior Director Bird-Friendly Communities, National Audubon Society Thank you for the helpful information. 092 1/17/2504 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email At the last Gateway Project stakeholders meeting, we discussed the vegetation establishment information accumulated by Admiralty Audubon for Kah Tai park. Ron Sikes has kept the records of naturally established and planted vegetation, which has been compiled in the attached spreadsheet (identical files in two formats). Obviously, the objectives for the plantings have changed over the years. The record will be helpful for the Gateway project’s landscape design. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 093 6/27/2022 Margaret Lee ptmlee@olypen.com engagept The controversy about the poplar trees along Sims Way and their possible removal has occupied a great deal of time and energy by many, which is understandable considering the changes being contemplated.  However, before such an important decision is made, everyone involved should be able to assure the community that the process is adequate to address objections.  Certainly to clarify what is factual. One objection is that attention has not been given to the original Gateway Project which is yet in effect, a “governing” document written by the City. That document is very explicit about the poplar trees and their care, which includes trimming and pruning to assure healthy growth. I remember that being the case because I participated as a citizen, among many, who helped formulate the Gateway Plan. During that citizen effort, the Sims Way corridor was divided into several section to help with plans for that unique area. I worked with a small group on the section that lay between the boat haven and Kai Tai lagoon, the area now receiving primary attention. We decided that careful tending of the poplars would enhance the beauty of the “Gateway What the final outcome of the present process for Sims Way will be, I don’t know, but I would feel much more secure in the decision if the question of what the original Gateway Plan dictates is addressed. Comment noted. Thank you for sharing about the development of the plan. The value sets provided in the Gateway Development Plan are important to this project as well as other information. It is important that all information is provided to the decision makers. 094 6/30/2022 Dan Burden dan.burden@bluezones.com email The information you tracked regarding ADA is correct in the legal sense, but not practical, nor is it appropriate on a road of this importance. Only one person at a time can walk in a 4-foot space, and walking side by side, the way people walk, takes a minimum of 5 feet on a well maintained sidewalk. A road with a volume of Sims makes it challenging to get across the street, so full support for walking and bicycling is needed on each side of Sims.  For the commercial urban form of this area, the recommended minimum sidewalk width is 6 feet, with 8 feet preferred (easier to maintain). Also, only about 7% of people who ride bikes feel comfortable in bike lanes or buffered bike lanes, so they too seek to be separated on a multiuse path. A multiuse trail needs to be 10 feet wide in order to receive state or federal funding. That said, the majority of those bicycling should feel comfortable riding on the lakeside of Sims, so it is not essential to have a multiuse trail on both sides, so A 6-8 feet sidewalk (my recommendation) would be a workable minimum for the boatyard portion, and this should be setback with a buffer from the street edge. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 15 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 095 6/30/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email A six to 8 foot 'path' on the boatyard side would make it look waaaay too inviting for people traffic.  That is something that creates a 'security risk' for the boatyard - which is something we're trying to minimalize in our design.  This isn't the place for a 'promenade' lane.  With larger slips and commercial vessels going in along that fenceline, there will be even more loud noises and boat construction work going on than there currently is with the smaller recreational boats.  Noise and fumes!  Not the place for promoting hanging out. As I said, this is a small town - with somewhat heavy traffic through there at times. Not an 'urban setting' that needs to look like a small big city slabbed over with hard surfaces. Especially on both sides. It sounds like there's a rootin' for the 10' multiuse hard surface on the Kah Tai side coming up. An 8' hard surface also on the Port side is much too much too much. This is a flood plain. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 096 7/17/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Parkway Form with blended trees is the best option for the south boatyard side, (full pie - excellent), since, it can encompass mixed species with bushes (Hairy Manzanita), Non-fruit bearing flower trees (Dogwood, Washington Hawthorne),  along with some taller/bushier/canopied trees behind the Port buildings (Female Aspen, Female Western Balsam, Lombardy Poplar).  I guess it would be called Parkway Form on the North side even though many young strong columnar Poplars will be kept along the length mixed in with the native trees. It'd be a columnar/parkway mix - as it already is, but, with fewer Poplars. So, North side gets a 1/2 pie for columnar and a 1/2 pie for Parkway. The look it has now shows that blending forms and species works nicely. The height variations look good. Note* With full expansion, according to printed 'Street Cross Section' plates, the bowsprits of the boats end up 15' from 'Small Treetrunks', boathulls would be 25' from tree trunks (limbs/leaves 10' from bowsprit/20'from boathulls). Large Canopied treetrunks would be 18' from bowsprit/28' from boathullss (limbs/leaves 5' from bowsprit/15' from boathulls). Boats being 20' from overhead limbs, leaves, birdpoop, and general tree debris is close enough to cause operational complications for boatwork. Putting utilities beneath the sidewalk near fenceline and planting any taller trees as far towards the road as possible would be best. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 097 7/17/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email No expansion without undergrounding power won't work.  Keeping overhead powerlines would cause the Port to lose the whole row along the fenceline of 35 plus active workspaces due to newly revealed setbacks between power lines and the Port's moving machinery (travellift).  That would be a huge economic loss for the Port and for the Marine Trades. Power lines cannot be undergrounded along the boatyard side of the Poplars, as, it's impossible to relocate all the 35 plus boats for the trench digging/heavy machinery work to stay off of the Critical Root Zone. IF power can go underground along the roadside, beyond the City's 2' 'storm drain', that would put the 6' trench only 13' way from Poplar trunks for much of that stretch (as treetrunkss are only 21' from bike lane for a good stretch along there). It would be quite risky for the trees to cut their roots that close to their trunks. Also, no expansion means all the funding goes away, as it's the Port's creation of (10 jobs?? ) - 'economic development' that justified the grant. A partial expansion (5 feet less than the 25' plan), would put the Poplars waaaaayyy tooo close to the boats and would not work! Ideally, the boatyard could expand elsewhere and not head out towards the road, the power lines could be undergrounded and the Poplars could live out the 20 or more years of life they have in them with thinning of the compromised ones and pruning of the rest. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 16 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 098 7/17/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email We HAVE young healthy Poplars all along just about the whole length of the north corridor blended in nicely with the native trees.  We should keep a good many of them.  It IS what the Environment Protection Agency recommends to mitigate future climate changes coming down upon us - planting Hybrid Poplars along with native species in floods zones. (The Federal Land and Water Conservation grant folks heed EPA's recommendations - so, keeping or planting Poplars in the Park won't hurt the Kah Tai funding they provide).  The North side needs serious thinning of the Poplars and of conifers that are closing in the view corridor.  There are too many trees on top of each other along there competing for soil nutrition and water.  Poplar water usage is comparable to Douglas Firs, so, their water usage isn't justification for wiping them out.  i haven't heard a decent justification for not allowing Poplar trees in the ROW yet.  70 + years is not short-lived.  Of the thousands of Poplars around our town and county, in over 70 years, we've had less incidents of them coming down or causing harm than many native trees have caused.  Most trees have a degree of 'basal rot' and is not justification alone for killing off a tree.  The arborist's recent assessment of the southside trees mentioned cases of basal rot, but, still classified those trees as 'low risk' of trunk failure for years ahead - it's not the death sentence that it sounds like. The Kah Tai Park belongs to all the citizens, and although the volunteers, Audubon Society, and the Parks Board do great work, they should not wield ultimate power over our Gateway ROW plantings. The Poplars and their fate is up to the City Council and City Planner ONLY. And, remember, we're talking a 5' - 10' width of land totaling approximately one acre along the near 80-acre park! Let us keep Poplars all along the corridor on that side with natives as it already is!! New plantings are hardly even necessary. The butterflies and migrating birds who use the Poplars will truly appreciate it. Their tallness adds This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 099 7/18/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email See Steve's email sharing ranking of vegetation forms and suggested visuals for a no tree option. See Stakeholder committee meeting packet for 7/26/22 on engagePT website. Www.cityofpt.us/engagePT This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 100 7/19/2022 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email All, I will not get into as much detail regarding the types of Vegetation to consider, leaving that to the Arboricultural professionals, but will reply to the “tree forms” rankings that are due today, as suggested by the Design Team. Here are my thoughts, in the simplest of descriptions. Reminder, I volunteered for the “constructability” aspect, which I have other opinions on, but not pertinent to today’s assignment. 1)Canopy Tree Form: I absolutely love this form, but in our case, would rank this as ½ pie, fair. It seems to me as if Sims way is too wide to accomplish the beautiful effect I have seen in other places without negatively affecting the Boatyard expansion in return. It just doesn’t appear that there is enough space to create a “canopy” stretching across Sims Way. 2)Columnar Tree Form: This is my favorite choice, as it the closest to what we currently have with the Lombardy Poplars. Very welcoming and very majestic / proud to stand tall as a community. I would rank this form as a ¾ to full pie, and think it would lessen the impact to the community if the removal of the Poplars is truly required. 3)Flowering Tree Form: I think this form would require a lot of Maintenance, clean up and watering, which is not in the current budgeting. This form would only “pop” during spring months, and I don’t think they would represent the “welcoming, warm hug” other than in the spring. While beautiful, I would rank this as ½ pie, fair. 4)Parkway Tree Form: I like this style as well, but the randomness of species patterns, flow & symmetry would not provide much character, as we have now with the Poplars. I would prefer a more DYNAMIC Gateway to downtown….. I do appreciate the low maintenance & lack of direct future costs to the city This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 17 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 100 Continued email 4)Parkway Tree Form: I like this style as well, but the randomness of species patterns, flow & symmetry would not provide much character, as we have now with the Poplars. I would prefer a more DYNAMIC Gateway to downtown….. I do appreciate the low maintenance & lack of direct future costs to the city though. I would Rank this as ½ to ¾ pie. 5)No Tree Form: I would think that if the Poplars indeed are required to be removed, the general public will really want to see something similar in its place. As it stands now, for me, if the Poplars must be removed, here are my overall thoughts: I am hoping to see a mixed use path on the Boatyard side, not concrete sidewalk, with a barrier of columnar trees of blended species, to separate Sims Way with the path. Along with that, an upward bent ornamental iron fence along the Boatyard, with no openings for public access, for security of Boatyard. Maybe a historical maritime art piece or two, mixed with a couple of “interactive” amenities along the path. For the Kah Tai side, I am in favor of a Maintenance / Pruning / Trimming program, with removal & replacement as needed over time. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 101 7/19/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Review Four Tree Forms plus a Shrub Form Below in order of preference with caveats: 1. Flowering Trees with caveats of having tree families mix, staggered planting, and require planting stock large enough to have canopy above deer browse line. Positive attributes are interest of flowers and fall color, and can fit space. Negative - require careful choice on Port side to minimize fruiting. 2. Shrub Form and Fern planting with caveats of ferns and evergreen broadleaf shrubs required to minimize weed growth and deer browsing. NO IVY! Positives are easier maintenance, always evergreen, no drab winter image, allows some views of the boat yard, the true iconic image of a maritime city. Negatives are needs weeding until canopy closure completed, no fall color, and may require some protection from deer. 3. Parkway Tree Form Positives are the blended mix plantings layered, and mixed growth size, lower maintenance of informal arrangement, and image would or could be similar on both sides of Sims Way. Negatives are the larger trees would contribute more windblown debris to boats, possible limbs, wind thrown trees on roadway, and requires more space. 4. Large Canopy Tree Form Positive is lots of summer green enclosing street and some fall color. Negatives are limbs and trees falling on street or boat yard, needs lots of space This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 18 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 101 continued Ron Sikes 4. Large Canopy Tree Form Positive is lots of summer green enclosing street and some fall color. Negatives are limbs and trees falling on street or boat yard, needs lots of space for roots and canopy, less space for pathways, trenching, and would send lots of wind blown debris into boat yard. Also the canopy would block views of dramatic clouds over uptown/down town. 5. Columnar Tree Form Positive is vertical form allows fit into above ground horizontal space for trunk and limbs. Negatives are limbs and entire tree wind throw, interference with any trenching or covering of root zone, suckering into pathways and boat yard, and windblown debris into boat yard. Columnar form does not relate to iconic images of the Pacific Northwest. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 102 7/20/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email 1.Review the four presented tree forms. plus the Þfth form suggested by Steve (No Tree From - groundcover and varying height shrubs) and rank your preference using the criteria we agreed upon from Meeting 4 (attached). DUE Tuesday, July 19th o oCanopy Form oColumnar Form oFlowering Form oParkway Form oNo Tree Form 2.Consider the new alternatives introduced in Meeting 6 to prepare for a pros/cons discussion during Meeting 7 on July 26th at 2p. DUE Tuesday, July 26th oNo Expansion Trim trees (PUD) to create a 10-ft clear radius from the nearest power wire(s) Re-energize the power lines after tree trimming Constrain Port operations to be offset 20 feet from the nearest power wire Leave Poplars on the north side Leave Poplars on the south side with heavy trimming (Þrst bullet) Begin maintenance program for remaining Poplars Keep existing ped facilities - no new facilities oPartial Expansion Expand boat yard by 20 feet (existing curb to new curb and existing fence to new fence) Trim trees to allow for boat yard expansion Keep existing ped facilities - no new facilities Assess tree impacts due to Port expansion - keep Poplars as much as This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 19 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 103 7/20/2022 Arlene Alen arlene.alen@jeffcountychamber.org email Scott- After reading all your materials and the video of the last meeting, I was sorry my overlapping meeting conflicted, and I was unable to for that lively discussion. My vote on this is to stay columnar as from the placemaking perspective it isn’t as jarring a variance as some of the other alternatives and maintains the “gateway” feeling which is important to our businesses and visitors. If greater detail on this is needed, please advise. It is a pleasure watching you facilitate this “interesting” group and I am grateful it is you not I. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 104 7/20/2022 Sarah McQuillen sassymcquillen@gmail.com email I'll respond to the full Port expansion: The Poplars will need to be removed along the boatyard and the power put underground. I do not think the Poplars should be remove adjacent to the buildings unless necessary due to their health or building's foundation damage. I do not think the Poplars should be removed on the N. side of Sims Way. There are many young Poplars that can be incorporated into the street border if some of the mature trees need to be removed. I am not in favor of replanting trees along the S.side - boatyard. It seems that any trees would be too close to the boats and would negatively impact work there. I think a rock wall and metal fence - with no pedestrian access is good. Native shrubs could be planted next to this and either grass and/or a soft permeable surface foot path. Manzanita, Salal, Oregon Grape and native Current are easily maintained possibilities. This would be more of a Parkway entrance to town which also draws the eye into town in a welcoming way with the Poplars on the N. side. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 105 7/21/2022 Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email My email does very strange things to long “copy all” email strings, so I’m hoping this comes through clearly to everyone. It’s taken some careful work on my part to make sense of the string so far on my end, unfortunately. A great discussion last week. Thank you for that. I especially appreciated the background information and understanding about how the funding works for these projects and that they tend to be geared toward initial development and building (which includes infrastructure such as large sidewalks) for overall uniformity and flow, rather than being left to piecemeal it with each developer. That helped me to understand how that occurs with large projects like this. With that conversation came some criticism about the design between the two round abouts along upper Sims/ HWY 20. I maintain and regularly work at one of the business properties along that stretch, and although I agree about the challenges of landscape maintenance along there, I want to add a voice of praise for the wide sidewalks. I’m not a fan of concrete, but as I work along that space, I see people regularly use the sidewalks. Every time I’m there, I feel like there is a comfortable sense of space for pedestrians, including benches and a nice sense of flow that I rarely see provided for foot traffic along busy roads. It always feels safe to be there - which is also a rarity along such a busy road. I think the Parkway option makes the most sense for the overall space and for the long term legacy of the overall space - on both north and south sides. I completely understand that the poplars are problematic on the port side, and I’ve always had a sense of them forming a tough barrier that creates an awkward and abrupt visual to the rest of the Kah Tai Park. If I were to think of the entire park as a landscape, I would never plant the tallest trees on the front edge along a road or path. I would want shorter perennials, shrubs and small This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 20 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 105 7/21/2022 Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email I think the Parkway option makes the most sense for the overall space and for the long term legacy of the overall space - on both north and south sides. I completely understand that the poplars are problematic on the port side, and I’ve always had a sense of them forming a tough barrier that creates an awkward and abrupt visual to the rest of the Kah Tai Park. If I were to think of the entire park as a landscape, I would never plant the tallest trees on the front edge along a road or path. I would want shorter perennials, shrubs and small trees closest to the road and sidewalk, then inviting the eye to wander further back and up into the park. I can imagine a similar experience along the port with a solid but attractive fence keeping people from entering the port in unwelcome places. I personally love the look of the Canopy form, but a monoculture of trees is simply not sustainable enough with climate change any longer. I fear that even those trees grown to be particularly pest and disease resistant may not withstand the test of time, given the unpredictability of climate change, and a mom-culture in this location (the entrance to town) is creating too high of a risk for future failure of an entire stand of trees. I would also like to see as many native plants included as possible (and we have SO many options there - including Pacific Wax Myrtle, which is low pollen, evergreen, and provides well for migrating birds). I feel that we have the opportunity with native plants to expand across the city our theme of honor the original people of this land and the plants they lived off of and incorporated into their lives and culture. Perhaps one day, the city will even have the opportunity to add more native art (like the totem pole on the other end of downtown) or expand upon a theme (like the Chetzemoka Trail) bringing that level of This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 105 Continued Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email I would also like to see as many native plants included as possible (and we have SO many options there - including Pacific Wax Myrtle, which is low pollen, evergreen, and provides well for migrating birds). I feel that we have the opportunity with native plants to expand across the city our theme of honor the original people of this land and the plants they lived off of and incorporated into their lives and culture. Perhaps one day, the city will even have the opportunity to add more native art (like the totem pole on the other end of downtown) or expand upon a theme (like the Chetzemoka Trail) bringing that level of education and interest into the very arrival corridor of our community, honoring the first people who inhabited and stewarded this land. All of the other tree form options rank equally last for me. Circling back to a different topic for a moment, I had a thought/question arise in my consideration of the pathway conversation along the port side. I wonder if one of the experts on paths & sidewalks in our stakeholder group knows if there is any research available on the assumption that a sidewalk automatically invites more people into a space - specifically people with criminal intent. It might, and if it does, I’m in favor of a smaller or no path on that side. However, when thinking about this topic, the research about street lighting (another topic I’ve been involved in before) came to mind. There is often the assumption that street lights automatically make a street safer by providing light - seems like common sense - when in fact street lights often shine in people’s eyes making it harder to see and cast harsh, contrasting shadows that the eye has trouble adjusting to. So, I’m just curious if by chance there is any data about sidewalks that actually is similarly nuanced. Like, I could also imagine that the lack of sidewalks invites people wishing to hide what they’re doing because everyone This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 21 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 105 Continued Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email Like, I could also imagine that the lack of sidewalks invites people wishing to hide what they’re doing because everyone else going about their every day business are on the provided sidewalk across the street. I’m speculating here, but it had me wondering about the data because so often what seems like common sense is not what actually is true. Finally, even though I know we’re not talking about specific tree/plant species yet, I’m just going to begin mentioning it (also because I’ve seen the suggestion pop up a time or two already): please, please, please, please, please…PLEASE…DO NOT plant Quaking Aspen in this space - EVER. PLEASE (yes, this is me actually begging). It’s a gorgeous tree…when it has tens of thousands of acres of space to spread into on a mountain side. Please do not inflict it on us and future generations in this little space here. I’ve had to maintain too many properties where the designer thought it a good idea to include a single Quaking Aspen and very quickly I was left to deal with the immediate and strong spread of a powerful tree that chokes out everything else in the landscape and even ruptures asphalt and cement. Please don’t plant it here. Thank you for hearing all of my thoughts, This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 106 7/21/2022 dan.burden@bluezones.com email Jennifer, great insights. To answer two of your questions, "...if there is any research available on the assumption that a sidewalk automatically invites more people into a space - specifically people with criminal intent. I could also imagine that the lack of sidewalks invites people wishing to hide what they’re doing because everyone else going about their everyday business are on the provided sidewalk across the street ... (do) street lights automatically make a street safer by providing light - seems like common sense - when in fact street lights often shine in people’s eyes making it harder to see and cast harsh, contrasting shadows that the eye has trouble adjusting to. Trails and sidewalks, and people using them, bring added security. There is significant data on this (see my presentation). The more people walking and bicycling the more there is natural surveillance. As to lighting, this also reduces the opportunity for crime. Lighting should not create glare (see my presentation), and lighting helps build a strong sense of welcome and identity. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 107 7/21/2022 dan.burden@bluezones.com email After serving on this working group, I came to realize how essential it is to have everyone involved become aware of the greater mission of Sims Way, to be a signature street that addresses each of the following: •safely move trafÞc within the designated target speed (30 mph), •advance a multi-modal community that supports all people walking and bicycling, •create a true "front porch" gateway and welcome into our community, •provide a mix of green and shade, •reduce the potential for crime, •consider maintenance costs, lighting snd more. This slide deck provides a menu of visual opportunities to visualize and address each topic. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. Dan Burden Dan Burden 7/22/2022 22 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 108 7/21/2022 dan.burden@bluezones.com email Jennifer, great insights. To answer two of your questions, "...if there is any research available on the assumption that a sidewalk automatically invites more people into a space - specifically people with criminal intent. I could also imagine that the lack of sidewalks invites people wishing to hide what they’re doing because everyone else going about their everyday business are on the provided sidewalk across the street ... (do) street lights automatically make a street safer by providing light - seems like common sense - when in fact street lights often shine in people’s eyes making it harder to see and cast harsh, contrasting shadows that the eye has trouble adjusting to. Trails and sidewalks, and people using them, bring added security. There is significant data on this (see my presentation). The more people walking and bicycling the more there is natural surveillance. As to lighting, this also reduces the opportunity for crime. Lighting should not create glare (see my presentation), and lighting helps build a strong sense of welcome and identity. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 109 7/21/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email As I mentioned previously, the Port’s rationale for Full Expansion was not clear to me, which made the Pros/Cons exercise challenging. I attempted to flesh out the Full Expansion rationale for me, and I attach it here for your consideration. I imagine that this rationale could be improved by those with greater insight. Rationale for Full Expansion of the Boat Haven Boat Yard 1. Full Expansion means full build out of the Boat Haven work yard to the Port of Port Townsend’s northern property line (0.9 acre). Full Expansion of the work yard entails: raising the surface elevation to match adjacent work yard grades, constructing a retaining wall/security fence, constructing structural fill ballasted to support travel lifts and loads, ground surfacing with nonpolluting gravel material, installing connections to the property’s stormwater collection and treatment system, rehabilitating the work yard’s electrical service, fiber optic, and cable network, and security lighting. 2. City of Port Townsend designated Boat Haven as zone M-II(A) ((Boat Haven) Marine Related Uses). This district accommodates a variety of uses including marina, recreational boating, manufacturing, assembly, haul out, and repair. The zone designates larger scale and more intensive water-dependent or marine-related uses at the Boat Haven. These uses are consistent This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. Dan Burden 7/22/2022 23 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 109 Continued 3. Chapter 17.22 (MARINE-RELATED AND MANUFACTURING ZONING DISTRICTS) of the City of Port Townsend Municipal Code allows Full Expansion, with associated marine uses. The Code requires neither yard setbacks from the property line nor a vegetated buffer along nonresidential land uses (i.e., Sims Way R/W). 4. Full Expansion is consistent with the Port of Port Townsend’s 2020 Comprehensive Scheme of Harbor Improvements (CSHI) plan, which states “future development of the upland areas at the Boat Haven property...anticipates maximizing the efficient use of available land to encourage marine-related commerce and industry” and “the upland areas should be actively managed to efficiently use all available land, encourage intensification of marine related industrial and commercial uses, and improve the Port’s bottom line.” The CSHI anticipates upland capital improvements, such as “Work Yard & Boat Yard Resurfacing (Periodic),” “Stormwater Treatment System Rehabilitation (Periodic),” “Sandblast Containment Facility,” and “Work Yard & Boat Yard Electrical Service Rehabilitation/Lighting,” which are elements of Full Expansion. 5. The 2020 Annual Update of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Economic Development This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 109 Continued 5. The 2020 Annual Update of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS Project #24) identifies elements of Full Expansion, which is therefore consistent with and helps to implement locally adopted project priorities. 6. Full Expansion has received a specific and substantial Public Infrastructure Fund grant from Jefferson County under the State Community Economic Revitalization Board Prospective Development Program. This commitment of financial resources verifies the Port’s need for Full Expansion. 7. The project will assist in retaining and creating 20 permanent jobs that sustain and enhance Port Townsend’s “working waterfront,” thereby enhancing an economic sector long identified by policy plans as essential to preserving community character. 8. The Boat Haven work yard is an integrated complex of interdependent operations that rely on efficient use of designated space. The work yards and spaces rely centralized infrastructure; that is, close proximity to utilities, environmental protection measures, equipment staging, and equipment and vehicle access/circulation. Shipbuilding and repair activities generate pollutants, such as abrasive blast media, metals, metal related compounds, petroleum associated This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 24 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 109 Continued hydrocarbons, and antifouling ingredients in paints, which require connections with comprehensive containment and treatment systems already present. Alternative sites for conducting these activities are unavailable. 9. Boat Haven no longer imagines westward expansion of the Boat Yard into the “Balch Property” primarily due to shoreline and environmental constraints (e.g., wetlands). This condition reduces the Port’s buildable area, and forces intensified uses of unencumbered land, as envisioned by Full Expansion. 10. Full Expansion will benefit two Boat Haven Upland Use Designations: (1) BH- A Work Yard, and (2) BH-B Marine Industrial/Boat Yard. The use designations seek to agglomerate specific types of development where activities are conducive; that is, to compatible work yard and marine trade uses adjacent to the boat lifts, distinct from designated administrative, recreational, and parking areas near public and pedestrian facilities. 11. The BH-A Work Yard is east of Haines Place and Boat Street, and extends easterly to the Safeway Gas Station property. It encompasses the area ballasted for the 75-ton mobile travel lift, and has approximately 120 spaces for vessel storage and refit projects. Boat storage and refit projects This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 109 Continued are the principal use in this area. Per the CSHI, “the area should be managed to maximize its vessel storage potential and, in turn, improve the Port’s bottom line.” Full Expansion will allow work spaces for larger vessels, and servicing with new electrical conduits, wiring, transformers, pedestals, receptacles, and meters. The Travel Lift Drive aisle would be less congested, facilitating equipment and vehicle access and circulation. Also, Full Expansion will allow installation of industrial grade (non-glare) lighting to improve security and safety. 12. The BH-B Marine Industrial/Boat Yard, the majority upland designated use at Boat Haven, is west of Haines Place, and extends westerly to the Balch Property and delineated wetlands. This area is for shipbuilding and repair, ship and yacht building businesses, boat storage, and other marine-related industry. The Port proposed the unballasted former Port Townsend Lumber Company area in BH-B for a needed sandblast facility and containment area to serve the entire work yard. 13. Full Expansion offers economies of scale over Partial Expansion, and significant cost savings opportunities on a unit area basis. It is difficult to project the specific marine- related uses This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 25 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 109 Continued limited, and work yard congestion would continue to compromise operational safety under Partial Expansion. 14. If Partial Expansion, with associated infrastructure improvements, such as a retaining wall for fill containment, security fencing and lighting, stormwater collection and treatment, and electrical and other utility improvements, were followed by future Full Expansion, many costs of mobilization and construction would double, significant costs would accrue for demolition and reinstallation of the infrastructure improvements, and work yard practices and operations would be disrupted by construction for a second time. 15. Full Expansion requires removal of Lombardy poplar trees along the Port’s property line. Partial Expansion would not require near-term tree removal for structural fill or retaining wall construction, but would not importantly benefit the Lombardy poplar trees in the long-term because: (1) the trees are progressively degenerating, and many are failing and posing safety hazards, (2) trenching for undergrounding of Jeffco PUD’s electrical lines and for installing lateral electrical hookups and other utilities to boat yard work spaces will accelerate degradation of poplar health, and (3) the poplars do not have any special heritage or other This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 109 Continued poplar health, and (3) the poplars do not have any special heritage or other designation that warrants protection. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 110 7/21/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email I would just like to clarify, that my concerns about boatyard security became aroused initially when I saw the PUD Concept drawing of the sidewalk right up against the fenceline - eye level and about 10 feet away from where all us workers have our expensive tools, supplies and equipment in view - (one sander can cost over $500!). That, along with the fence opening the Port and City wanted to reinstall in our new fenceline for 'enhanced access' into that area. The sidewalk just invites more walking traffic along there - where, up to now, the walkers trickle along through there, and are buffered away from the fenceline. Our vehicles full of tools aren't in blatant view as they will be with a sidewalk right along the fence. With the space allowed, that is most likely right where it will go. Just like the PUD Concept drawing. Stragglers mosying through the yard in broad daylight have been known to up and just try to make off with our tools and our bikes. There is a growing sense of vulnerability in the workyard that never use to exist all these years and I was just addressing my concerns about that as a new design is created. I'm not wanting a beefy fortified fence about it, but, at least no opening, and, since a sidewalk WILL go in now, maybe at least some buffer plantings between the sidewalk and fenceline for a bit of a visual 'shield' for both us workers and our goods. The yardworkers and boatowners I've spoken to that work daily along that stretch didn't want more people RIGHT THERE on the other side of the fence as they were trying to work. I've enjoyed the occasional chat with folks through the fenceline who had all the usual questions about the boats, the work, let them take my picture, etc., but, peopling up that space isn't something I'd like This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 26 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 111 7/21/2022 Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email I completely agree with Joni about the opening in the fence along the boat yard. That doesn’t seem like it makes any sense to me, when I think we all had consensus about the main entrance to the boatyard (by the Safeway intersection and sunrise coffee) being the preferred/only entrance. It’s unclear to me whether or not a full sidewalk on that side is a forgone conclusion, and I understand that none of us are the decision-makers. However, I am wondering if the grant providing the funding for this project is calling for sidewalks on both sides, as was potentially suggested at the last meeting, with the explanation of how the funding works. Is our discussion about small, soft, permeable paths moot given the inevitable problems with longterm maintenance? If there are any absolutes, based on grant funding directives, it would be good to know so that we don’t waste time discussing ideas that can’t be. There is also another dilemma I see here. A number of people from the public have reached out to me after they found out that I was on this stakeholder committee simply to tell me that they want the view of the boatyard to be covered up with trees and shrubs completely because they think it’s very unsightly. I personally think the boatyard is awe-inspiring and would love for it to be on display and honored. However, I can completely understand the issue with security and theft (so sad and frustrating that always a few people break the trust of so many others!). I think a sturdy fence can also be a beautiful fence, providing views and (hopefully) keeping people from having direct access to boats and expensive tools. But I can also imagine that shrubs could protect the immediate view of This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 7/22/2022 27 Lower Sims Discussion Primer by Dan Burden Illustration by: Port Townsend Leader A Balanced Transportation System - Allows all people of all ages and abilities full access to all parts of their community. Switching from one mode of travel to another is seamless. To achieve this requires a close partnership with land use and transportation. Quality of life and health increase as policies, programs, and people are considered in each and every decision, and budget, we set in motion. Madison, WI Five keys to the Success of Place Security Convenience Efficiency Comfort Welcome Welcoming Eatery and Defensible Space Los Altos, California 5 LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS Thirty-seven percent of the public self rate their interest to bike at zero. This leaves sixty-three percent who are looking for more active transportation supports than we are providing today. The Strong and Fearless and Enthusiastic and Confident crowds are being served. Infrastructural investments should support the fifty-one percent who are Interested but Concerned. Target Speed Chico, CA Chico, CA Nord Avenue Chico, CA Chico, CA Nord Avenue Chico, CA Chico, CA Nord Avenue Chico, CA Chico, CA Nord Avenue Chico, CA Chico, CA Nord Avenue Chico, CA The Basics of Street Design 14 Sidewalk 5’-10’ feet wide Width Varies 10’ feet 7’ feet 6’ feet Edge THE PARTS OF THE STREET Bike Lane Raised Medians Triple Canopy of Trees Attached Sidewalk Detached Sidewalk The functions of a street are spelled out in its various parts. This street has two high quality walkways (one on each side). Note the “attached” and the more comfortable “detached” sidewalks. Why is the detached sidewalk more comfortable? This Central Avenue, Sequim, Washington, street also has a quality planter strip on each side, bike lanes, travel lanes and a center set of medians and turn lanes. Center Turn Lane Narrow Travel Lanes IMAGE LOCATION: CENTRAL AVENUE, SEQUIM, WASHINGTON Sidewalks and Bike Systems 18 THE PARTS OF A SIDEWALK Tree Canopy Edge with Ground Cover Groundcover 8’ Walk/Talk Zone4-8’ Furniture Zone IMAGE LOCATION: BIRMINGHAM, MICHIGAN Quality Lighting Shoreline Parking Buffer Four Feet We all have choices Four Feet Crime and Security Natural surveillance is achieved through design and maintenance that allow people engaged in their normal activity to easily observe the space around them, as well as eliminating hiding places for people engaged in criminal activity. Natural surveillance is generally achieved by the use of appropriate lighting, low or see through fencing or landscaping, the removal of areas that offer concealment. There are many positive testimonials from law enforcement officers regarding trails. Typically they state that trail users watch out for each other and report crime as that they see it occur, thus helping law enforcement to do its job. There is no supporting evidence that trails have led to increased homeowner crime. Do not use landscaping or fencing to screen the boatyard from the public view. This will breed crime. Dover Kohl & Partners Dover Kohl & Partners Dover Kohl & Partners Dover Kohl & Partners Edges / Fences Bryant Park, New York City Material / Maintence Lighting Trees and Tree Placement Birmingham, MI Neighborhood Collector Neighborhood Collector Anywhere in California Houston, Texas PARKS, RECREATION TREES, & TRAILS ADVISORY BOARD SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA July 26, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. | Virtual or In Person Meeting Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 489-143-707 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: (360)390-5064 Ext. 3 access code: 177-060-048# • Submit public comment emails to be read aloud (up to three minutes per person) to: publiccomment@cityofpt.us I. Welcome, Introduction & Call to Order - Chair Debbie Jahnke Good afternoon and welcome to this meeting of the Port Townsend Parks, Recreation, Trees & Trails Advisory Board. The role of this Board is to assist City staff and to advise the City Council on legislative matters concerning parks, recreation, trees and trails. This meeting is open to the public at the City Council Chambers, virtually via this web format, and is also being video recorded for those who could not attend the meeting today and for future reference. Given that this meeting is in virtual format, we ask that the board members raise their hands to be called on by the Chair. The public can do the same to comment during the public comment periods. We take public comment at the beginning and end of the meeting. II. Roll Call III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of June 28, 2022 Minutes V. Public Comment (3 minutes per person/agenda items only) – Comments on Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project will be taken after the Staff Briefing. If joining by phone, please press *6 to raise your hand and *9 to unmute yourself. A. No public comments received via prtab@cityofpt.us VI. Old Business A. Sims Way Stakeholder Briefing – 60 min • Reference last Stakeholder meeting video and reference material at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project • See Public Comments Log and response to comments. • Public comments: Public comment on this issue will be taken. • Many thanks to the public for submitting comments including constructive suggestions and opinions. PRTTAB Board Members to discuss comments received from the public in preparation for the August 23rd meeting. Board members will not be making suggestions regarding recommendations to the City Council on options but rather will be acknowledging and discussing public comments received to date. • PRTTAB board members will evaluate options developed by the stakeholder committee on August 23, 2022. At this time, the PRTTAB will make a recommendation to the City Council for the preferred option. This recommendation will also be shared with the Port Commission and the PUD Commission as the final decision involves all three elected bodies. VII. New Business (35 min) A. Park Rules – (Carrie Hite and Michael Todd) – 20 minutes • Staff and Board Discussion about park rules. B. Trail signing – (Michael Todd) – 15 min • Staff will provide visual preferencing and ask for suggestions on signing. Key features include: i. Utilizing Street names ii. Logos (ie Quimper Wildlife Corridor, City of PT, Jeff. Co. LT) iii. Size/color/material of sign and posts iv. Plaques (Adopt a trail) VIII. Staff update – (Steve King, Carrie Hite, & Michael Todd) 10 minutes A. Pool B. Maintenance C. Park Donation D. Council Work Planning Retreat IX. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: August 23, 2022 X. Public Comment XI. Adjourn Parking Lot/Future Meetings Trail signing PUD tree presentation? Walking and Biking Map FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Matt Klontz Director of Capital Projects and Port Engineer Port of Port Townsend matt@portofpt.com 360-316-1201 SIMS GATEWAY AND BOAT YARD EXPANSION PROJECT OPEN HOUSE AUG 6 The City of Port Townsend, Port of Port Townsend, and Jefferson County PUD will hold an open house for the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project at the Port Townsend Community Center on August 6th. Members of the public are encouraged to drop-in between 10 AM and 1 PM to view results from work performed over the last 4 months and to speak with members of the project’s Citizen Stakeholder Committee, design consultants, and representatives from the three sponsoring agencies. The open house will be hel d alongside the Saturday Port Townsend Farmers Market. The information presented in the open house will include a range of alternatives considered and the preferred design concepts developed during the Stakeholder process. The design concept will illustrate tree removal locations and replanting concepts, pedestrian walkway development, edge and buffer development and maintenance, fencing and setbacks. Information at the open house will depict the project from multiple angles and will be printed in large format for ease of viewing. Design concepts for alternatives not preferred by the Citizen Stakeholder Committee, including no expansion of the boatyard and no undergrounding of the powerlines, or partial expansion with undergrounding, will also be on display. To facilitate the most participation as possible, there will be no formal presentation of the project or process, but representatives will be on hand throughout the open house to answer questions and engage in discussion. Comment boards will also be available for members of the public to provide feedback. The nine-member Citizen Stakeholder Committee was created to provide a formal review of the project and give in-depth feedback on project design and development. Members of the committee were selected for their varied expertise and interest. The committee has met with agency representatives and project consultants bimonthly since April. The committee and project team will incorporate feedback gained from the open house into their final recommendation to the City Parks Board on August 23, 2022. The City Council, Port Commission and PUD Commission will review the recommendations at a joint special meeting in September to make a final decision on design concept. With funding from the Jefferson County Public Infrastructure Fund, the Port of Port Townsend contracted SCJ Alliance to provide design services and Stakeholder Committee support for the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion. SCJ Alliance, a multi-disciplinary planning and engineering firm, has delivered several projects for the Port Townsend community over the past 10 years. SCJ is joined by MacLeod Reckord, an urban design and landscape architecture firm and a SCJ partner on past projects along the Port Townsend historic waterfront. SCJ is also joined by Urban Forestry Services|Bartlett Consulting for arborist services. The goal of the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion project is to improve public safety, increase economic opportunity for the maritime trades community, and restore and enhance native ecosystems along Sims Way as it passes between the Boat Haven and Kah Tai Lagoon. The project partners recognize the tree lined section of Sims Way is an iconic feature and the possibility of changes to the corridor has raised much community dialogue. The intent of the Citizen Stakeholder Committee and the project open house is to have an open and transparent design process with abundant opportunity for community engagement and input. For more information about the process or the open house please visit the project page on the City’s website: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard- expansion-project. Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Welcome! Welcome to the open house for the Sims Gateway Plan and Boat Yard Expansion Project. Please browse the materials presented today and take an opportunity to discuss your thoughts with members of the Project Team. Remember to visit the comment table to leave any thoughts you’d like to share in writing. Thank you for coming today! Thank You! The Project Team would like to say, “Thank you!” to all of the Stakeholders who generously volunteered considerable time to help shape and develop the materials presented today. Stakeholders Joni Blanchard Forest Shomer Ron Sikes Russell Hill Steve Mader Dan Burden Jennifer Rotermund Arlene Alen Sarah McQuillen The Project Team also wishes to express our appreciation for the collaborative leadership and guidance provided by the elected bodies of the three project partners. Elected Bodies Port of Port Townsend Commissioners City of Port Townsend City Council Members Jefferson County Public Utilities District Board of Commissioners Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h S t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffe r s o n S t Jeffe r s o n S t Jeffe r s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washi n g t o n S t VISITORSCENTER Sims Wa y Sims Wa y LEGEND Limit of Sims Gateway Plan Implementation Limit of Power Undergrounding Boat Yard Expansion Project Purpose and Limits Project Purpose • Expand the Boat Yard to provide space for larger boats (~65-ft) along the north boundary • Underground power lines to avoid potential conflicts between boats and power lines • Provide underground secondary power service to the Boat Yard to improve reliability • Create a visually appealing interface between the Boat Yard and Sims Way • Increase community resilience by sustaining economic vitality and health or marine trades Project Assumptions • Keep project work within City right-of-way and Boat Yard property • Maintain the current roadway alignment (vehicle lanes) • Underground power lines and Boat Yard service connections with Boat Yard expansion • Honor the guidance provided by the Sims Way Gateway Development Plan • Project Budget = $1.97 million • Construct improvements in 2023-2024 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Alternatives Considered - South Side of Sims Way Fence/Wall Fence/Wall ROW Line Existing Fence Pathway with Utility Corridor Below Buffer Planting Edge of Paving Edge of Paving Edge of Paving Utility Corridor Existing Bike Lane Existing Bike Lane Existing Bike Lane Existing Pole Existing Poplar Existing poplars pruned to remove dead and problematic branches ROW Line ROW Line Sims Way Sims Way Sims Way Boat Haven Boat Haven Boat Haven Variable - 11’ to 19’ Variable - 21’ to 29’ Variable - 13’ to 21’6’2’ Variable - 21’ to 29’Variable - 22’ to 30’ 6’ Approx. 20’ 5’ Approx. 6’16’ Full Expansion Partial Expansion No Expansion Description • Expands the Boat Yard to the right-of-way (ROW) line • Power and utility services connections placed underground • Pedestrian facilities added to the south side of Sims Way • Poplars on the south side of Sims Way replaced with “parkway” planting Pros • Maximizes opportunities for employment growth (up to 20 jobs) • Creates space for larger vessels and projects that employ local marine trades • Allows the Port to maximize efficient use of its property • Replaces poplars on the south side of Sims Way with “parkway” plantings Cons • Removes all poplars within the expansion area Description • 20’ Boat Yard expansion provides opportunity for job growth – but less than Option #1 • Power and utility services connections placed underground • No pedestrian facilities added to the south side of Sims Way • Retains poplars on the south side of Sims Way – dependent upon individual tree health Pros • Preserves poplars – and “corridor” entrance into town Cons • Placing utilities underground could adversely affect individual tree health – accelerating tree mortality • Vessels placed closer to poplar trees – creating challenges for refinishing and refit work • Limits opportunities to expand marine trades and economic activity Description • No Boat Yard expansion (fence line remains in current location) • Trees trimmed substantially to provide safety clearance - above-ground power lines reenergized • No pedestrian facilities added to on south side of Sims Way • Retains poplars on the south side of Sims Way (depending on individual tree health) Pros • Preserves poplars – but trimming will stress trees and change aesthetic by reducing canopy size Cons • Safely reenergizing existing overhead power lines requires: ◊ Trimming to ensure a 10’ radius from tree canopy to power lines ◊ Dedicating a 20’ setback from vessels to power lines will substantially reduce Boat Yard space • Initial and recurrent tree trimming will adversely affect tree health Existing poplars to be pruned 10ft minimum from existing power lines 10f t R Boats require a 20ft safety setback (not shown) from energized power line Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Full Expansion Tree Replacement OptionsNOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffe r s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffe r s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washi n g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #5 -6/28/2022 Replace Now LEGEND VISITORS CENTER Replace Over Time Planting Alternative Replace Poplars Over Time Replacement over time will include strategic thinning of Poplars but replacement tree species has not yet been determined. Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Full Expansion Non-Motorized ConnectionsNOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washi n g t o n S t VISITORS CENTER LARRY SCOTT TRAIL Stakeholder Meeting #5 -6/28/2022 LEGEND Existing Bike Lane (no modifications) Shared Use Path / Trail Sidewalk (existing and infill) Crossing Improvements Non-Motorized Connections Alternative Sidewalk Both Sides Possible Future Larry Scott Trail Connection Options Add sidewalk in front of garden center Improve crossing across Sims Way at Benedict Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Parkway Planting Concept - South Side of Sims Way Fence/Wall ROW Line Pathway with Utility Corridor Below Buffer PlantingEdge of Paving Stormwater Swale Existing Bike Lane Sims Way Boat Haven Variable - 11’ to 19’ Variable - 22’ to 30’ 6’5’ Sims Way Fence/Wall at ROW Line Pathway with Utilities Below Shrub, Groundcover and Grass Edge of Paving Small Tree (15’ to 25’) Boat Haven NORTH 0 4 8 16 SCALE View View 11’ to 19’ 22’ to 30’ 6’5’ Concept PlanSection (not to scale) Full Expansion Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Parkway Planting Concept - North Side of Sims Way Sims WaySims Way OPTION: Widen Existing Path to a 10’-12’ Wide Shared Use Path Existing Path Edge of Paving Existing Path OPTION: Widen Existing Path to a 10’-12’ Wide Shared Use Path Edge of Paving Existing Bike Lane View Approx. 8’Variable 5’-16’Variable 5’-8’ Section (not to scale)Concept Plan NORTH 0 4 8 16 SCALE View Selectively Replace Poplars within ROW Selectively Replace Poplars within ROW Path into Kah Tai Park Kah Tai Park ROW Line ROW Line Approx. 8’5’-16’5’-8’ Kah Tai Park Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Replace Poplars Over Time - North Side of Sims Way Remove select poplars where failing or immediately adjacent to established tree stands in Kah Tai Park Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Replace Poplars Over Time - North Side of Sims Way Retain poplars where no established tree stands in Kah Tai Park are adjacent. Plant tree species consistent with long range planning documents. Remove poplars when other plantings mature. Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Perspective 1 Poplars Retained Perspective 2 Poplars Retained Perspective 1 Poplars Reduced Perspective 2 Poplars Reduced Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Condition of Poplars - Preliminary Observations Tree Health • Overall trees have poor foliage density, size, and color. Low vigor and branch die-back shows physiological strain. • Soils conditions - high metals and low organics • Competing for limited nutrients and water • Trees have experienced significant branch and codominant stem failure. A sample of trees found cavity and decay in lower trunks. Soil Testing • There are high levels of metal elements, especially copper. This can be improved through soil treatments. • All sampling returned low sodium (salt) levels in the soil. • Low levels of organic matter is a concern. This can also be improved through soil treatments. Future Tree-by-Tree Assessment • Design treatments to improve the soil. Address nutrient deficiencies and high metals. • Complete an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Level 2 basic assessment of poplars, including soil testing and tree health measurements. • Evaluate risk, assign risk ratings, and identify ways to mitigate the risk of tree and/or component failure. Sparse Leaf DensitySparse Leaf Density Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Frontier Elm Ulmus carpinifolia x parvifolia ‘Frontier’ Lindsey’s Skyward Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum ‘Lindsey’s Skyward’ Suggested Potential Tree Species General Note (All Species): Because concern has been expressed about the potential production of pollen by any of the proposed species, UFS|BC has consulted with persons in research, nursery production, urban forestry, and arboricultural specialists. The consensus is that pollen production from the species selected is minimal. In addition, the pollen production will be less than that produced by the existing trees, and pollen production occurs for a very short period of the year. UFS|BC experience has shown this is a proven tree that can tolerate sandy soils and high wind exposure. In addition, less structural pruning is required than with other streetscape tree species, reducing maintenance cost. This species has also proven to be free of pests and diseases. Height: 30’ to 40’ Spread: 20’ to 30’ Based on nursery production feedback, species availability is limited; plants may have to be sourced from as far away as Idaho. However, this tree is tolerant of high sodium (salt) levels and sandy soils. In addition, its form is compact and is likely to require less maintenance than other species. This species is also deciduous. Height: 30’ to 40’ Spread: 20’ to 30’ This area has been independently identified as suitable for planting this species, which could be an important component of creating a native prairie habitat based on its ecological importance and historical/cultural connection to the area. Concern over form can be addressed through formative and structural pruning. Garry oak is suited to the soils and maritime environment. Height: 40’ to 60’ Spread: 25’ to 35’ UFS|BC experience in planting this species has shown it can tolerate sandy soils, high winds, and the maritime environment. UFS|BC has also seen success in the planting of this species in road right-of-way. Excellent form, with impressive fall color and spring flush. Could be planted as a part of a native species tree mix. Height: 50’ to 70’ Spread: 12’ to 18’ Garry Oak Quercus garryana Ruby Vase Ironwood Parrotia persica ‘Ruby Vase’ Western Larch Larix occidentalis Scarlet Oak Quercus coccinea Proven record of tolerance for sandy soils and harsh growing environments. Height: 25’ to 30’ Spread: 15’ to 19’ Professional feedback is that this species may grow too large, although formative and structural pruning during establishment would allow for manipulating the form. Some concern over the level of maintenance required to maintain structure. Excellent tree for tolerance of sandy soil and adapting to climatic variability. Height: 50’ to 80’ Spread: 45’ Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Cascara Rhamnus purshiana Kindred Spirit Oak Quercus robur x bicolor ‘Nadler’ Suggested Potential Tree Species General Note (All Species): Because concern has been expressed about the potential production of pollen by any of the proposed species, UFS|BC has consulted with persons in research, nursery production, urban forestry, and arboricultural specialists. The consensus is that pollen production from the species selected is minimal. In addition, the pollen production will be less than that produced by the existing trees, and pollen production occurs for a very short period of the year. This species is an important source of food for native fauna. It is also known for flowering. UFS|BC suggests this species could be a minor but important component of a native tree species planting mix i.e., Garry Oak and Western Larch*. Height: 30’ Spread: 15’ *Not a maritime species, but adaptable. Pyramidal form, and hardy physiologically. Excellent choice for narrow planting spaces where form and structure are also an important consideration. Height: 20’ to 40’ Spread: 10’ to 15’ In nursery production, the species Wildfire is male only. This is to avoid berry production. The species is extremely hardy and would be well suited to this right- of-way planting. Height: 40’ Spread: 25’ Professional feedback is that this tree* may not tolerate the soils. In addition, formative and structural pruning would be required However, planted in small quantities, and supplemented with sufficient soil amendment, this would provide a showy flowering accent to any planting design. Height: 18’ Spread: 15’ to 17’ *Possibly a marginal species for this site. Wildfire Sourgum Nyssa sylvatica ‘Wildfire’ Autumn Gold Ginkgo Ginkgo biloba ‘Autumn Gold’ Elizabeth Magnolia Magnolia x ‘Elizabeth’ Sterling Silver Linden Tilia tomentosa ‘Sterling’ Shown to be extremely hardy. One concern is the extremely slow growth of this species. However, it is not affected by insect pests or disease. This tree has strong fall color and spring flush. Height: 40’ to 50’ Spread: 25’ to 30’ A hardy tree species, with low maintenance requirements and foliage interest; silver underside on leaf, and strong fall color. An excellent choice for the soil and maritime growing environment. Height: 50’ to 70’ Spread: 25’ to 30’ PARKS, RECREATION TREES, & TRAILS ADVISORY BOARD MEETING AGENDA August 23, 2022 | 4:30 p.m. | Virtual or In Person Meeting Join via computer or tablet at http://joinwebinar.com enter 9 digit Webinar ID 489-143-707 • Join by phone in listen-only mode: (360)390-5064 Ext. 3 access code: 177-060-048# • Submit public comment emails to be read aloud (up to three minutes per person) to: publiccomment@cityofpt.us I. Welcome, Introduction & Call to Order - Chair Debbie Jahnke Good afternoon and welcome to this meeting of the Port Townsend Parks, Recreation, Trees & Trails Advisory Board. The role of this Board is to assist City staff and to advise the City Council on legislative matters concerning parks, recreation, trees and trails. This meeting is open to the public at the City Council Chambers, virtually via this web format, and is also being video recorded for those who could not attend the meeting today and for future reference. Given that this meeting is in virtual format, we ask that the board members raise their hands to be called on by the Chair. The public can do the same to comment during the public comment periods. We take public comment at the beginning and end of the meeting. II. Roll Call III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of July 26, 2022 Minutes V. Public Comment (3 minutes per person/agenda items only) – Comments on Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project will be taken after the Staff Briefing. If joining by phone, please press *6 to raise your hand and *9 to unmute yourself. A. No public comments received via prtab@cityofpt.us VI. Old Business A. Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Action Item – (Steve King) - 60 min • Reference Staff Presentation • Reference last Stakeholder meeting video and reference material at: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project • See Public Comments Log and response to comments. • Public comments: Public comment on this issue will be taken. • PRTTAB board members will evaluate options developed by the stakeholder committee and will make a recommendation to the City Council. This recommendation will also be shared with the Port Commission and the PUD Commission as the final decision involves all three elected bodies on September 12, 2022. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the PRTTAB forward the preferred option presented by staff to the City Council for approval of the design concept. B. Trail signing mockup review – (Michael Todd) – 25 minutes VII. New Business (35 min) A. Autumn Arbor Day Proclamation and Celebration Dates – (Chair Jahnke) – 5 minutes • Suggested Proclamation Date – October 3rd Regular City Council Business Meeting. • Suggested Adopt a Tree (Shrub) Day – October 15th Weekend VIII. Staff update – (Steve King, Carrie Hite, & Michael Todd) - 10 minutes A. Pool B. Maintenance C. Banked Capacity 2023 Road Restoration List IX. Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting: Septebmer 27, 2022 X. Public Comment XI. Adjourn Parking Lot/Future Meetings Trail signing PUD tree presentation? Walking and Biking Map Wednesday, August 17, 2022 1 August 17, 2022 RE: 8/17/22Public Comment Regarding the Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion. To whom it may concern, I’ve moved to Port Townsend in 1977, with my husband James Roberts (who grew up here). We do NOT support the removal of the poplars on either side of Sims Way. We understand the needs of the Port and JPUD, but the City’s inclusion on the Public Infrastructure Grant with the intent to replace the poplars is not appropriate use of these funds. If there are to be changes to the Gateway Plan of 1991, there should be a substantial public process including a SEPA review. understand the needs of the Port and particularly on the north side of Sims Way. Work on the norths side does not meet the fit the intended use of these Public Infrastructure Grants (PIF) with it’s restricted ‘use for economic development’. The Project Purpose slide presented at the open house on Aug 6th does include any list work items on the north side as ‘purpose’ for this grant work. My specific comments/concerns are listed below to address the Alternatives for the South and North sides of Sims Way. SOUTH SIDE – Partial Expansion is the preferred option. I appreciate having the opportunity to view the various options being considered by the Port, JPUD and the City. I was able to speak to JPUD staff and was reassured to hear their plan is the trim the trees along the south side in 2022 and then proceed with undergrounding the utilities in 2023. Where they underground are the primary consideration in this process. The “Partial Expansion” plan allows for both the removal of the risk from the power lines and provides an increase in the boatyard capacity. This option is an ideal compromise to meet the Project Purpose. Project Purpose • Expand the Boat Yard to provide space for larger boats (~65-ft) along the north boundary • Underground power lines to avoid potential conflicts between boats and power lines • Provide underground secondary power service to the Boat Yard to improve reliability • Create a visually appealing interface between the Boat Yard and Sims Way • Increase community resilience by sustaining economic vitality and health or marine trades Project Assumptions • Keep project work within City right-of-way and Boat Yard property • Maintain the current roadway alignment (vehicle lanes) • Underground power lines and Boat Yard service connections with Boat Yard expansion • Honor the guidance provided by the Sims Way Gateway Development Plan • Project Budget = $1.97 million • Construct improvements in 2023-2024 However, I have some questions about the stated “Cons” of the Partial Expansion plan. Wednesday, August 17, 2022 2 Partial Expansion Pros • Preserves poplars – and “corridor” entrance into town Cons • Placing utilities underground could adversely affect individual tree health – accelerating tree mortality • Vessels placed closer to poplar trees – creating challenges for refinishing and refit work • Limits opportunities to expand marine trades and economic activity Questions: a) Regarding the second bullet: “vessels placed closer to poplar trees – creating challenges for refinishing”. This could be determined if there was a real cost/benefit analysis with some of the proposed potential parkway trees – some of which have huge spreads (e.g., scarlet oak reaching 45’ wide) that negate the ‘con’ against retaining the poplars. b) Regarding the last bullet: the ‘job growth’ differences between Full Expansion and Partial Expansion are not well defined. Please be more specific on how the additional footage with full Expansion would influence these jobs. NORTH SIDE Our concerns regarding the proposed work on the North Side of Sims Way fall into three categories: 1) Proposed Project Goals – justification, 2) Environmental cost/benefit, and 3) City Fiscal Responsibility/Staffing Priorities? 1) Grant Goals The city web page states that: “Project goals include, but are not limited to: • Positive economic impact for the Port (job creation) • Elimination of public safety issue (tree hazards) • Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard • Improved reliability of power infrastructure • Replacement of Lombardy poplars, an emerging and eventual need for the City • Environmental stewardship of Kah Tai Lagoon and support for growth of plantings of native species that has already occurred as recommended in the 1986 Landscape Plan • Reduced water needs and include climate change considerations • Improved bio-diversity and create an aesthetically pleasing gateway I have not yet seen any real justification for why the City’s proposed work on the north side of Sims Way was included in a Public Infrastructure Grant. The first four bullets of the above Project Goals are specific to the south side (boatyard) of Sims Way and directly address the “Project Purpose”. The remaining four bullet points (highlighted) have no justification and do not seem appropriate to be included in this PIF grant. Any work on the Wednesday, August 17, 2022 3 North side other than tree maintenance should be done after a substantial public process to the 1991 Gateway plan, with a complete SEPA evaluation. The last bullet is very subjective and not documented. Many residents, and visitors, think the current legacy poplars provide a very ‘aesthetically pleasing gateway’ - though there certainly could be improvements with more care provided through pruning the current trees properly. Without substantial public process who is to decide what is aesthetically pleasing? The Stakeholders Group? The Parks Board? 2) Environmental - cost/benefit As we are facing regional climate changes and uncertainties, the third bullet in the goal list above seems counter intuitive. A full environmental cost/benefit analysis needs to be done before you cut down fully mature and well-established trees and replace them with trees that will need some sort of irrigation and nursing until they reach maturity. All materials presented at the Open House state the plan is to replace all the legacy poplars over time with different ‘preferred’ species. This does not appear to be up for discussion. Retain poplars where no established tree stands in Kah Tai Park are adjacent. Plant tree species consistent with long range planning documents. Remove poplars when other plantings mature This proclamation/plan for the replacement of the legacy poplars on the north side of Sims Way is not acceptable without due process. Especially with such little justification. A long- term plan of this magnitude requires substantial public participation. The 1991 Gateway Plan that clearly states the community preference to retain these legacy poplars and that the city needs to follow certain protocols before making changes to this plan. 3) City Fiscal Responsibility/Staffing Priorities The justification for including the north side of Sims Way in this PIF Grant is not stated in any of these materials. Many questions remain before committing city resources (funds, staff, equipment) to a poorly justified project. The city’s webpage on this topic states: Fiscal Considerations The funded project budget is $2,000,000 Total Project Cost including in-kind resources. Wednesday, August 17, 2022 4 • Jefferson County PUD: $700,000 for tree removal, undergrounding power lines and installing a walking path • Port of Port Townsend: $900,000 for expansion of the boatyard • City of Port Townsend: $370,000 total for replanting the Boat Haven side of Sims Way (estimated $170,000) and for Lombardy poplar tree removal on the Kah Tai Lagoon side (estimated $200,000) A successful Jefferson County Public Infrastructure Funding grant for $1,000,000, is restricted to use for economic development in Jefferson County and helps to offset half the total project cost. a) How does the proposed work on the north side of Sims Way provide any benefit for economic development in Jefferson County? b) How much of the total $370,000 of the city budget is grant funded and how much is in-kind costs provided by the city? c) What happens to the grant money if the city doesn’t spend it on replanting? By accepting the grant is the city required to spend all the grant money regardless of what the community wants? d) I understand the awarded funds can only be spent on the project described but what if the work isn’t warranted after doing the full cost benefit analysis? The budget on the grant application (below) shows that the city is on the hook to match the grant funds with $185,000 which includes public funds and/or in-kind labor and equipment use (see below taken from the grant application). e) Where is the $185,000 of in-kind contributions coming from? Current city staff time or does the grant provide funding for hiring additional staff? Wednesday, August 17, 2022 5 f) How will the city meet this staffing obligation if using current staff time? (e.g., what won’t get done?) g) Is this really a priority and best use of city staff time and money? We are concerned that current city resources are already stretched thin and that taking on a new project without full consideration of need to justify addition burden on staff time is a bad idea. There have been numerous articles in the Leader about the difficulty employees are having filling current vacant positions and meeting work needs. Current work needs should be prioritized. There are roadside enhancement projects already in place that need city attention – the downtown raingardens and Water Street plantings are a mess and desperately need some love and care after the pandemic shut down. Yes, the legacy poplars need maintenance, but so do many other street side plantings that the city is responsible for. As a retired limnologist I know there are quite a few studies that show raingardens lose their ability to reduce stormwater flows and take up pollutants if not well maintained. In addition to the need to maintain functionality, the lack of maintenance in raingardens and other street plantings are creating a hazard to pedestrians and drivers at some intersections due to reduced visibility. In April 2022 I contacted the city to inquire about the maintenance of the downtown raingardens and sidewalk plantings. I was interested in volunteering to adopt a raingarden or two as they were clearly suffering from neglect. At the time of my call, I was told the city preferred to leave this work to the professionals and they had currently hired a crew to address these issues. It is now August and I’ve seen no evidence of any maintenance. I am assuming this is due to a lack of staffing capacity to finish their current priorities to maintain previous enhancement projects. Please take a step back and carefully reconsider the inclusion of the north side of Sims Way before committing to this work. At the very least, defer initiating the work until completing the appropriate public input protocols and cost benefit evaluations. Respectfully submitted, Debra Bouchard 360-774-1904 James Roberts 419 Lawrence Street Port Townsend, WA. 98368 Comments on 7-26-2022 Draft Tree List Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion Project Steve Mader Scientific Name Common Name South R/W North R/W Notes Large Trees Proposed by Consultant Team Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold'Autumn Gold Ginkgo **Not native to Coastal Washington Larix occidentalis Western larch **Not native to Coastal Washington Magnolia x 'Elizabeth'Elizabeth Magnolia **Not native to Coastal Washington Nyssa sylvatica 'Wildfire'Wildfire Sourgum **Not native to Coastal Washington Parrotia persica 'Ruby Vase'Ruby Vase Ironwood **Not native to Coastal Washington Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak **Not native to Coastal Washington Quercus garryana Garry Oak ********Native Quercus robur x bicolor 'Nadler'Kindred Spirit Oak **Not native to Coastal Washington Rhamnus [Frangula ] purshiana Cascara ********Native Taxodium distichum 'Lindsey's Skyward'Lindsey's Skyward Bald Cypress **Not native to Coastal Washington Tilia tomentosa 'Sterling'Sterling Silver Linden **Not native to Coastal Washington Ulmus carpinifolia x parvifolia 'Frontier'Frontier Elm **Not native to Coastal Washington My Ratings1 I understand public sentiment, of those not outright opposed to replacing Lombardy poplars, to be favorable to natural greenscapes composed of native Coastal plant species that minimize landscape installation costs (planting stock, construction, fertilization) and future maintenance requirements (mowing, debris cleanup, pruning), provide wildlife habitat, are compatible with the Kah Tai landscape, and that are resilient to predicted climate changes (groundwater, temperature, rainfall, salt). Native plants are less expensive and can be sourced locally. Also, they have generally lower nutrient demands, which would minimize unintended discharges of fertilizers to groundwater. I know our public to be artsy, creative, nature-lovers who would not want to see a surburban mall landscape that immitates the commercial strips of other cities. I imagine a corridor something like the Parkway Tree Form shown to the Gateway project team: Acer circinatum Vine Maple ********Native; salt tolerant Acer glabrum Douglas Maple ********Native; salt tolerant Acer macrophyllum Big-Leaf Maple ********Native; salt tolerant Arbutus mensiesii Madrone ********Native; salt tolerant Cornus natallii x Cornus florida Eddies White Wonder ********Hybridized in PNW Corylus cornuta Beaked Hazelnut ********Native; salt tolerant Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray ********Native; salt tolerant Malus fusca Pacific Crabapple ********Native; salt tolerant Oemleria cerasiformis Indian Plum ********Native; dioecious Salix hookeriana Hooker's Willow ********Native; salt tolerant; dioecious Salix scouleriana Scouler’s Willow ********Native; salt tolerant; dioecious Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnickinnick ********Native; salt tolerant Gaultheria shallon Salal ********Native; salt tolerant Lonicera involucrata Black Twinberry ********Native; salt tolerant Mahonia aquifolium Tall Oregon Grape ********Native; salt tolerant Mahonia nervosa Dull Oregon Grape ********Native; salt tolerant Morella californica California Wax Myrtle ********Native; salt tolerant; dioecious Rhododendron macrophyllum Rhododendron ********Native; salt tolerant Ribes sanguineum Red Flowering Currant ********Native; salt tolerant Rosa nutkana Nootka Rose ********Native; salt tolerant Rubus parvifolius Thimbleberry ********Native; salt tolerant Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry ********Native; salt tolerant Vaccinium ovatum Evergreen Huckleberry ********Native; salt tolerant Herbaceous Groundcover to Consider Asarum caudatum Wild Ginger ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous Carex lyngbyei Lyngbye’s Sedge ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous Deschampsia cespitosa Tufted Hairgrass ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous Elymus mollis Dunegrass ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous Fragaria chiloensis Beach Strawberry ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous Lupinus littoralis Coastal Lupine ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous Polystichum munitum Sword Fern ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous Pteridium aquilinum Bracken Fern ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous Tellima grandiflora Fringe Cup ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous Vancouveria spp.Inside-Out Flower ********Native; salt tolerant; herbaceous 1 * = Not so Good; **** = Good Native Small-Medium Trees to Consider Native Shrubs to Consider Port Townsend ● Sims Way Gateway and New Haven Boatyard Expansion Project August 16, 2022 ● Page 1 of 1 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Nyssa Male Fire starter male Wildfire male Green Gables is male Gum drop is male Red Rage is male seedless Zydeco twist is Male Female Afterburner is female Forum is female Tupelo Tower is female Northern Splendor is female Red Splyndor is female SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 1 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Tree List Ulmus carpinifolia x parvifolia 'Frontier' Frontier Elm [Height: 30 to 40 feet, Spread: 20 to 30 feet] Taxodium distichum 'Lindsey's Skyward' Lindsey's Skyward Bald Cypress [Height: 18 to 20 feet, Spread: 6 to 10 feet] General Comment (All Species): Concern has been expressed about the production of pollen from the reproductive structures of the species proposed. In response this UFS|BC has consulted with persons in research, nursery production, urban forestry, and arboricultural specialist. The consensus is that pollen production from the species selected is minimal. In addition, the pollen production will be less than that produced by the existing trees. A reasonable assumption by UFS|BC is that persons or entities currently affected have measures that can be employed to prevent any nuisance. Finally, pollen production occurs for a very short period of the year, and it is UFS|BC opinion that public interest/benefit outweighs this limited nuisance factor when considering measures that can be taken to eliminate the effect of pollen. Lindsey's Skyward Bald Cypress: Since presenting this tree as an option for planting as part of a mix, one concern for this species choice (nursery production feedback) is the species availability. It is limited. Plants may have to be sourced from as far away as Idaho. However, this tree is tolerant of high sodium (salt) levels and sandy soils. In addition, its form is compact and is likely to require less maintenance than other species. This species is also deciduous. Frontier Elm: UFS|BC experience has shown that this is a proven tree that can tolerate sandy soils and high wind exposure. In addition, structural pruning required is less than other streetscape tree species, reducing maintenance cost. This species has also proven to be free of pests and diseases. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 2 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Quercus garryana Garry Oak [Height: 40 to 60 feet, Spread: 25 to 35 feet] Larix occidentalis Western larch [Height: 50 to 70 feet, Spread: 12 to 18 feet] Garry Oak: This area has been independently identified as suitable for planting this species in this location. This species could be an important component of creating a native prairie habitat. Research has demonstrated its ecological importance and historical/cultural connection to the area. Concern over form can be readily addressed through formative and structural pruning. Garry oak is suited to the soils and maritime environment. Western larch: UFS|BC experience in planting this species has shown that it can tolerate sandy soils, high winds, and the maritime environment. UFS|BC has also been involved in the planting of this species on right-of-way. Excellent form, with impressive fall color and spring flush. This tree could be planted as a part of a native species tree mix. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 3 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Parrotia persica 'Ruby Vase' Ruby Vase Ironwood [Height: 25 to 30 feet, Spread: 15 to 19 feet] Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak [Height: 50 to 80 feet, Spread: 45 feet] Ruby Vase Ironwood: Proven record of tolerance for sandy soils and harsh growing environments. Scarlet Oak: Professional comments to the planting of this species are that it may grow too large. Although formative and structural pruning during establishment would allow for manipulating the form. Some concern over the level of maintenance required to maintain structure. Excellent tree for tolerance of sandy soil and currently adapting to climatic variability. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 4 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Rhamnus purshiana Cascara [Height: 30 feet, Spread: 15 feet] Quercus robur x bicolor 'Nadler' Kindred Spirit Oak [Height: 20 to 40 feet, Spread: 10 to 15 feet] Cascara: Concern has been expressed about the nuisance caused by bird excrement following consumption of fruit i.e., staining. This may be a valid concern, although given the maritime environment and the local source of other berries bird excrement is likely an existing issue. This issue can be readily addressed by reducing the number of Cascara planted in the tree groupings. This species is an important source of food for native fauna. It is also known for flowering. UFS|BC suggests this species could be a minor but important component of a native tree species planting mix i.e., Garry oak and western larch+. +Not a maritime species, but adaptable. Kindred Spirit Oak: Pyramidal form, and hardy physiologically. Excellent choice for narrow planting spaces where form and structure are also an important consideration. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 5 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Nyssa sylvatica 'Wildfire' Wildfire Sourgum [Height: 40 feet, Spread: 25 feet] *Magnolia x 'Elizabeth' Elizabeth Magnolia [* Possibly a marginal species for this site] [Height: 18 feet, Spread: 15 to 17 feet] Wildfire Sourgum: One point (nursery production) with this species is that in nurseries the species Wildfire is male only. This is to avoid berry production. The species is extremely hardy and would be well suited to this right-of-way planting. Elizabeth Magnolia: Professional feedback is that this tree may not tolerate the soils. In addition, formative and structural pruning would be required. However, planted in small quantities this would provide a flowering accent (showy) to any planting design. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 6 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' Autumn Gold Ginkgo [Height: 40 to 50 feet, Spread: 25 to 30 feet] Tilia tomentosa 'Sterling' Sterling Silver Linden: [Height 50 to 70 feet; Spread: 25 to 30 feet] Autumn Gold Ginkgo: Shown to be extremely hardy. One concern is the slow growth of this species. However, it is not affected by insect pests or disease. This tree has strong fall color and spring flush. Sterling Silver Linden: A hardy tree species, with low maintenance requirements and foliage interest; silver underside on leaf, and strong fall color. An excellent choice for the soil and maritime growing environment. City of Port Townsend ● Sims Way Gateway and New Haven Boatyard Expansion Project August 16, 2022 ● Page 1 of 1 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Native - Dioecious species +Black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) +High risk tree, crown, and primary branch failure +Aggressive root system +Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia) +Emerald Ash Borer +Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia) +Toxic +Aspen (Populus tremuloides) +Suckering, although one non-native variety has proven suitability +Only cultivars will tolerate dry soils Non-Native – Dioecious species Honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Kentucky Coffeetree (Gymnospermum dioicus) +Ash species (Fraxinus sp.) +Changes sex from male to female with age +Emerald Ash Borer +Katsura (Cercidiphyllum japonicum) +Not tolerant of dry soils +Box Elder (Acer negundo) +Protoxin Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) Native +Douglas maple (Acer glabrum) +Broad form, with limited height growth; consider a component of the shrub layer +Scouler’s Willow (Salix scouleriana) + Short-lived (30 years), not suitable for right-of-way planting or in public places +Pacific dogwood (Cornus nuttallii) +Species highly susceptible to trunk diseases (cankers), and foliar diseases Serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) +Shore pine (Pinus contorta) +Pollen Non-Native +Eddies White Wonder Dogwood (Cornus ‘Eddies White Wonder’) ++Not tolerant of dry soils +Japanese Smoke Tree (Cotinus coggygria) +Short-lived (20 years), broad form, soil tolerance concern, concern for maritime environment tolerance Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) +Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra) +High risk tree, not suitable for public right-of-way, significant branch failure +Aggressive root system 8730 Tallon Lane NE, Suite 200  Lacey, WA 98516  Office 360.352.1465  Fax 360.352.1509  scjalliance.com Technical Memo To Matt Klontz, PE, Port of Port Townsend Steve King, PE, City of Port Townsend Will O’Donnell, Jefferson County Public Utilities District From: Scott Sawyer, PE Date: Draft - August 15, 2022 Project: 22-00257: Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion Project Subject Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 1 Purpose The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the work performed by the Stakeholder Group and the Project Team during Stakeholder Engagement between April and August 2022. More detailed information and video recordings of all the meetings are available publicly on the City’s engagePT website at https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project 2 Background 2.1. Project Partners There are three agencies acting as project partners with the Port of Port Townsend acting as the lead. Each agency brings a different perspective and focus in representing their respective constituencies. Port of Port Townsend: Promote economic activity and sustainable job creation through operation and development of Port-owned properties. The Port is governed by a three-members commission. City of Port Townsend: Operate, maintain, and construct public infrastructure, promote commerce, provide water and sewer utilities, and provide general public services (police, fire, parks, etc.) for the health and public safety of citizens. The City is governed by a seven-member City Council chaired by the City Mayor. Jefferson County Public Utilities District: Operate, maintain, and construct public utilities (electric, water, sewer, and broadband). The PUD is governed by a three-members commission. Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 2022-0818 | 2 2.2. Project Purpose The project purpose is to facilitate the expansion of the Port of Port Townsend Boat Yard (Boat Yard) to accommodate larger boats along the northern boundary of the yard. Furthermore, given the current knowledge regarding restrictions around operating a boat yard next to the adjoining overhead power transmission wires and their impacts on the existing trees, the project seeks to alleviate safety problems and future negative economic impacts to the boat yard. Bigger boats create more jobs and economic activity for the community. Concurrent with the Boat Yard expansion, the project will evaluate existing Lombardi poplars along both sides of Sims Way between 10th Street and Kearney Street to decide if poplar should remain or be replaced. This project will need to honor the intent of the Sims Way Gateway Development Plan while taking into account other City policies and codes given the project impacts public rights of way. Lastly, the project will include the undergrounding of overhead electric power lines along the south side of Sims way between 10th Street and Benedict Street. The undergrounding of power lines will increase the reliability and resilience of electric services. The undergrounding will reduce the risk of outages and reduce the length of outages when they do occur. The project limits (Study Area) are defined as Sims Way from 10th Street to Kearney Street. The purpose of the Stakeholder Engagement process phase of the project is to develop a preferred alternative design concept to address the project scope – Boat Yard expansion, Gateway Development Plan implementation, and power lines undergrounding. This is to be accomplished through development of a range of alternatives with a diverse stakeholder group to ensure that a wide range of perspectives are considered in the development of a preferred alternative. Project Purpose and Project Limits Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 2022-0818 | 3 3 Stakeholder Engagement Process 3.1. Stakeholder Membership The Project Team during Stakeholder Engagement consists of the following members from three groups – the Stakeholder Group, Agency Staff, and Consultant Team staff: Stakeholder Group • Joni Blanchard, Resident – Boat Yard Representative • Forest Shomer, Resident – Arborist • Ron Sikes, Admiralty Audubon – Kah Tai Lagoon Representative • Russell Hill, Resident – Engineer (utilities, mechanical) • Steve Mader, Resident – Landscape Design • Dan Burden, Resident – Multi-modal Transportation • Jennifer Rotermund, PRTTAB Liaison – Landscape Design • Arlene Alen, Chamber of Commerce – Tourism Representative • Sarah McQuillen Agency Staff • Matt Klontz, Port of Port Townsend • Steve King, City of Port Townsend • Will O’Donnell, Jefferson Co PUD Consultant Team Staff • Connie Reckord, Urban & Landscape Design – MacLeod Reckord • Arielle Farina-Williams, Urban & Landscape Design – MacLeod Reckord • Paul Thompson, Arborist – Bartlett Consulting • Scott Sawyer, Civil Engineering – SCJ Alliance 3.2. Stakeholder Engagement Process Stakeholder Engagement included a series of eight meetings held in person and virtually, as well as a public open house held between Meeting 7 and Meeting 8. The stakeholder meetings were documented by video recording and posted on the project page located in the City’s engagePT website at https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project. Meeting 1 – April 23: Introductions This meeting was used to introduce the Stakeholder Group to the Agency staff and establish the purpose of the Stakeholder Engagement process. Meeting 2 – May 10: Agency Principles and Consultant Team Inclusion This meeting introduced the Consultant Team staff to the Stakeholder Group. Agency staff presented an overview of the project and the varying perspectives and principles guiding each of the Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 2022-0818 | 4 three partner agencies. The meeting closed with a brainstorm discussion to gather initial thoughts and ideas from each member of the Stakeholder Group. Meeting 3 – May 31: Criteria This meeting established a consistent definition of the project limits, elements, and constraints. There was a in-depth discussion of what is important to each member of the Stakeholder Group (values). This discussion was used by the Consultant Team to develop a set of criteria to use in evaluating and comparing alternatives considered. The Consultant Team also shared a suggested progression of meetings with planned topics of focus for each meeting (Stakeholder Road Map). Meeting 4 – June 14: Alternatives This meeting established a basic framework for identifying preferred components for use in developing alternatives, (1) disposition of poplars (keep or replace with new vegetation), and (2) non-motorized circulation in the Study Area. The Consultant Team provided exhibits illustrating existing conditions to gain an understanding of the project context. The meeting closed with a brainstorming discussion on possible alternatives to consider. These alternatives were combinations of the two framework components noted above. Disposition of Poplars (Vegetation) Component • Component V1: Replace poplars now on the south side of Sims Way and replace poplars over time on the north side of Sims Way • Component V2: Replace poplars now on the south side of Sims Way and replace poplars now on the north side of Sims Way Non-motorized Circulation (Ped) Component • Component P1: Maintain existing facilities (north side of Sims Way). Maintain buffered bike lanes on Sims Way. • Component P2: Replace the existing path (~7-8 feet wide) on the north side of Sims Way with a full-width shared-use-path (~10-12 feet wide). Maintain buffered bike lanes on Sims Way. • Component P3: Build sidewalks on both sides of Sims Way. Maintain buffered bike lanes on Sims Way. The Consultant Team scored and ranked the components between Meeting 4 and Meeting 5 based on the criteria developed in Meeting 3. Meeting 5 – June 28: Draft Alternatives Ranking Results This meeting reviewed the draft ranking of alternatives prepared by the Consultant Team. There was consensus agreement from the Stakeholder Group with Component V1 as the preferred Vegetation component and Component P3 as the preferred Pedestrian component. Lastly, the Consultant Team presented preliminary findings from a field assessment of the poplars. Meeting 6 – July 12: Poplar Assessment and Introduction of Additional Alternatives Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 2022-0818 | 5 This meeting continued a discussion on the field assessment of existing poplars and added information about soil sampling and testing. The Consultant Team provided an exhibit showing the “critical root zone” for existing poplars (based on trunk diameter) for use in establishing desired offset buffers between improvements (i.e., sidewalk, power undergrounding, and/or Boat Yard expansion). The Consultant Team also facilitated a discussion on various vegetation forms (aka themes) that could be used in locations where poplars are replaced. The meeting closed with the introduction of two other alternatives for evaluation. The consideration of these two alternatives was requested by the elected bodies of the three agency partners. • No Expansion • Partial Expansion Meeting 7 – July 26: Discussion of Additional Alternatives and Vegetation Species This meeting started with an informative presentation by Dan Burden about non-motorized facilities. The Consultant Team facilitated a discussion about the pros and cons of the new alternatives introduced in Meeting 6 – No Expansion and Partial Expansion. There was continued discussion of planting forms (aka themes) started in Meeting 6. The meeting closed with a discussion of draft materials being prepared for the public open house held on August 6th, including a draft list of recommended tree species that could be considered for replacement of poplars. Meeting 8 – August 16: Vegetation Species This meeting continued a discussion about the list of tree species from Meeting 7 and refined the list based on input from the Stakeholder Group from their collective experience and expertise. Pros and cons of various species of trees were discussed at length. While consensus on all the species was not reached, a “basket” of species was developed to be used during design to select trees from while considering the impacts of pollen to the boat yard side and preferably focusing on native species on the Kah Tai side. Many members of the stakeholder member expressed an interest in utilizing native trees to the extent possible. Agency Staff also provided a debrief of the public open house and reviewed next steps as the Stakeholder Engagement process draws to a close. • Parks Recreation, Tree, and Trail Advisory Board Meeting (August 23rd) • Joint Elected Bodies Meeting (September 12th) 3.3. Public Open House The Agency staff and Consultant Team hosted a public open house on Saturday, August 6th, between 10:00 am and 1:00 pm at the Port Townsend Community Center on Tyler Street to coincide with the Farmers’ Market. The open house presented the following materials arranged around Community Center so that attendees could drop in anytime between 10:00 am and 1:00 pm. The Agency Staff and Consultant Team members were spread out amongst the display boards to engage the public attendees and answer questions. Stakeholder Group members were encouraged to attend the open Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 2022-0818 | 6 house to provide their perspectives to the public on the work developed during the Stakeholder Engagement Process. • Welcome Board • Project Purpose and Limits • Alternatives Considered – No Expansion, Partial Expansion, and Full Expansion • Full Expansion (Alternative V1 and P3) – Plan Views • Full Expansion – Section Views • Full Expansion – Guideline for Poplar Replacement North Side • Condition of Poplars • Suggested Tree Species for Replacement Planting These boards are included as Attachment 1. 4 Key Findings and Stakeholder Preferences 4.1. Decision Making This project is a multi-agency partnership and requires approval of their respective elected bodies. During the Stakeholder Engagement process, the Stakeholder Group, the Consultant Team, and Agency staff had the primary task of considering alternatives and developing a preferred alternative to be presented to the Parks Recreation, Tree, and Trail Advisory Board (PRTTAB). The PRTTAB will review the preferred alternative and provide a recommendation to the three elected bodies – the Port Commission, the City Council, and the PUD Commission – for design concept approval. The three elected bodies will hold a joint meeting to make the final decision on how the project moves forward. 4.2. Alternatives Considered During Meetings through Meeting 5, the Project Team (1) identified criteria (aka values) to use in comparing the performance of alternatives, (2) developed a list of alternatives to address framework considerations – poplar disposition/replacement vegetation and non-motorized facilities, and (3) ranked the performance of the alternative to establish a preferred alternative for the full expansion (Full Expansion) of the Boat Yard to the northerly property line (the Sims Way southerly right of way line). During Meetings 6 and Meeting 7, the Project Team defined two additional alternatives – No Expansion and Partial Expansion. The final three alternatives considered are described below. 4.2.1. No Expansion Generally, this alternative is a “no-build” alternative. The existing poplars are retained; however, the PUD still needs to re-energize the overhead power lines, which requires trimming of the poplars to create a 10-ft radius buffer between active power lines and the trees. The re- Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 2022-0818 | 7 energizing of overhead power lines also requires a 20-ft radius offset from power lines to storage of boats and/or operation of boat cranes. This 20-ft offset would reduce the functional footprint of the Boat Yard along its northerly boundary. Existing poplars are retained where their health is not impacted by tree trimming. 4.2.2. Partial Expansion This alternative expands the Boat Yard but limits the expansion to moving the current fence 20 feet toward Sims Way. This alternative leaves about 16 feet of property owned by the Port on the roadway side of the fence. Existing poplars are retained where their health is not impacted by the Boat Yard expansion and/or power undergrounding. Existing pedestrian facilities are maintained but there are no new pedestrian facilities. Power lines are undergrounded for this alternative. 4.2.3. Full Expansion This alternative expands the Boat Yard the full limits available by moving the current fence about 36 feet toward Sims Way to be coincident with the northerly property line/southerly Sims Way right of way line. This alternative uses the preferred components developed between Meeting 3 and Meeting 5 – Component V1 (replace south side poplars now/replace north side poplars over time) and Component P3 (pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of Sims Way). Power lines are undergrounded for this alternative. 4.2.4. Preferred Alternative – Full Expansion The Stakeholder Group preferred the Full Expansion alternative. • The No Expansion alternative significantly impacts the economic activity of the Boat Yard since it contracts the footprint available for the boat storage and working space. • The Partial Expansion alternative limits the economic benefit of Boat Yard expansion by leaving about 16 feet of Port property unused. This alternative also moves boats closer to the poplars, which may create challenges for boat refinishing work. The Boat Yard expansion and the power undergrounding could impact the health of already distressed poplars, accelerating tree mortality. 4.3. Concept Development – Full Expansion During Meeting 7, the Project Team flushed out the details of Full Expansion for presentation at the public open house. 4.3.1. Poplar Replacement Poplars will be replaced during project construction on the south side. Poplars on the north side will be replaced over time. The definition of “over time” was discussed during Stakeholder meeting 8. Agency staff indicated that subject to tree health that replacement over time might be as long as 20 years given the variety of ages of the existing tees on the North side. It is Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 2022-0818 | 8 expected some poplars on the north side will be replaced during project construction using the following guidelines: • Remove unhealthy poplars based on a Level 2 assessment (International Society of Arboriculture) of all existing poplars. • Removal of poplars adjacent to established tree stands (other tree species) on the Kah Tai Park side of the northerly Sims Way right of way line. • Retain poplars where there is a lack of established tree stands (other tree species) on the Kah Tai Park side of the northerly Sims Way right of way line. Preserve the look the poplars provide while other trees continue to grow. • Replace the poplars with a preference native trees species considering the impacts of climate change, soil conditions, maintenance, and species characteristics. 4.3.2. Non-motorized Facilities The existing asphalt path on the north side of Sims Way will be retained. Widening this path to a desired width of a shared-use-path (widen from ~7-8 feet to ~10-12 feet) could be a future project. Consider in-fill of gaps (i.e., McDonalds frontage) to provide a continuous pedestrian path from 10th Street to Kearney Street. Build a 6-foot pedestrian path (surface type to be determined) on the south side from 10th Steet to Benedict Street (connecting to existing sidewalk at Safeway gas station) and in-fill the sidewalk gap from Benedict Steet to the sidewalk fronting the Visitors Center just west of Thayer Street. 4.3.3. Vegetation Species During Meeting 7, the Consultant Team presented a draft list of trees species to choose from for replacement of poplars. This draft list was also presented during the public open house. The Project Team continued a discussion of tree species and refined the list during Meeting 8. 4.4. Engage PT Resources There is a project website on the City’s Engage PT site the includes materials from Stakeholder Engagement process, including Stakeholder Engagement meeting agendas, meeting materials, video recordings of each meeting, and the boards presented during the public open house. The site also includes a log of all public comments received during the Stakeholder Engagement process. The site can be accessed with the following link: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 2022-0818 | 9 5 Next Steps Following approval of a design concept, the project moves to permitting and detailed design and preparation of contract documents for construction of the improvements. Next steps including the following: • Parks Recreation, Tree, and Trail Advisory Board Meeting (August 23rd): Consider the work of the Stakeholder Group and make a recommendation to the three elected bodies of the Port, PUD, and the City on adoption of a preferred alternative. • Joint Elected Bodies Meeting (September 12th): Consider the work of the Stakeholder Group and the Parks Board recommendation(s) to adopt a preferred alternative for project development moving forward. Adoption of the preferred alternative sets for the design concept to be followed through out the rest of the project development. Adoption of the design concept allows staff to move forward with permitting and detailed design as outlined in the following bullet. • Future Design Consideration: During Project Team discussions about criteria (Meetings 2 and 3), several of the values expressed by Stakeholder Group members did not fit well with the purpose of comparing alternatives; however, these items were documented and deferred for future use as “design considerations.” o Port property line wall/fencing material/design – looking for a soft interface and yet a fence that keeps the public directly out of the boat work zones and creates a level of security that is effective but not threatening. o Aesthetics for the gateway need to create the feel of a “warm hug” as the traveling public enters the city. o CPTED (crime prevention through environmental design) o Boat yard pedestrian access points – define access points instead of free access anyway along Sims Way. The boat yard is open to the public, but workers prefer that the public stay in defined corridors rather than walking through the work zone of boat works. o Median trees (future compatibility for a possible future project) – the goal being to slow traffic through visual cues and to add greenery. o Haines Street intersection (possible future roundabout) – WSDOT reviews all signal replacements with a roundabout option as a matter of policy to improve safety and mobility for all users. o Kearney Street intersection (a compact roundabout is under design and is expected to be constructed in 2023) o Use of root barriers with new trees to mitigate damage to pedestrian facilities. o Lateral offset to power undergrounding o Keeping a gateway feel during construction o Considering bird nesting when scheduling tree work o Electrical service connections to the Port – The Port needs better electrical service for the row of boats along Sims Way. There may be efficiencies in undergrounding power in a mutually beneficial location for the Port and the PUD. Stakeholder Engagement Summary Memorandum 2022-0818 | 10 o Inflation impacts on project budget – creates concern over long term costs and delaying some of the work. o Stormwater design – an integral part of any project. The green space along Sims Way must accommodate stormater management. o Soil amendments - Soil amendments are necessary to bolster the soil given the existing dredge spoils and poor soil conditions. o Sims Way Crossings – Alternative exist for creating safe pedestrian crossings which all must be coordinated with the WSDOT. o ADA access needs to be considered – An ADA accessible route a project concern. Multiple ways are possible to achieve accessibility. • Project Schedule Goals: Following approval of a design concept, agency staff are planning for the project to proceed to design development and permitting in the fall of 2022 with construction planned in 2023 or 2024. While the project is being developed, the PUD will need to trim the existing Poplars significantly to restore operations to the existing powerlines. Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Welcome! Welcome to the open house for the Sims Gateway Plan and Boat Yard Expansion Project. Please browse the materials presented today and take an opportunity to discuss your thoughts with members of the Project Team. Remember to visit the comment table to leave any thoughts you’d like to share in writing. Thank you for coming today! Thank You! The Project Team would like to say, “Thank you!” to all of the Stakeholders who generously volunteered considerable time to help shape and develop the materials presented today. Stakeholders Joni Blanchard Forest Shomer Ron Sikes Russell Hill Steve Mader Dan Burden Jennifer Rotermund Arlene Alen Sarah McQuillen The Project Team also wishes to express our appreciation for the collaborative leadership and guidance provided by the elected bodies of the three project partners. Elected Bodies Port of Port Townsend Commissioners City of Port Townsend City Council Members Jefferson County Public Utilities District Board of Commissioners Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h S t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffe r s o n S t Jeffe r s o n S t Jeffe r s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washi n g t o n S t VISITORSCENTER Sims Wa y Sims Wa y LEGEND Limit of Sims Gateway Plan Implementation Limit of Power Undergrounding Boat Yard Expansion Project Purpose and Limits Project Purpose • Expand the Boat Yard to provide space for larger boats (~65-ft) along the north boundary • Underground power lines to avoid potential conflicts between boats and power lines • Provide underground secondary power service to the Boat Yard to improve reliability • Create a visually appealing interface between the Boat Yard and Sims Way • Increase community resilience by sustaining economic vitality and health or marine trades Project Assumptions • Keep project work within City right-of-way and Boat Yard property • Maintain the current roadway alignment (vehicle lanes) • Underground power lines and Boat Yard service connections with Boat Yard expansion • Honor the guidance provided by the Sims Way Gateway Development Plan • Project Budget = $1.97 million • Construct improvements in 2023-2024 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Alternatives Considered - South Side of Sims Way Fence/Wall Fence/Wall ROW Line Existing Fence Pathway with Utility Corridor Below Buffer Planting Edge of Paving Edge of Paving Edge of Paving Utility Corridor Existing Bike Lane Existing Bike Lane Existing Bike Lane Existing Pole Existing Poplar Existing poplars pruned to remove dead and problematic branches ROW Line ROW Line Sims Way Sims Way Sims Way Boat Haven Boat Haven Boat Haven Variable - 11’ to 19’ Variable - 21’ to 29’ Variable - 13’ to 21’6’2’ Variable - 21’ to 29’Variable - 22’ to 30’ 6’ Approx. 20’ 5’ Approx. 6’16’ Full Expansion Partial Expansion No Expansion Description • Expands the Boat Yard to the right-of-way (ROW) line • Power and utility services connections placed underground • Pedestrian facilities added to the south side of Sims Way • Poplars on the south side of Sims Way replaced with “parkway” planting Pros • Maximizes opportunities for employment growth (up to 20 jobs) • Creates space for larger vessels and projects that employ local marine trades • Allows the Port to maximize efficient use of its property • Replaces poplars on the south side of Sims Way with “parkway” plantings Cons • Removes all poplars within the expansion area Description • 20’ Boat Yard expansion provides opportunity for job growth – but less than Option #1 • Power and utility services connections placed underground • No pedestrian facilities added to the south side of Sims Way • Retains poplars on the south side of Sims Way – dependent upon individual tree health Pros • Preserves poplars – and “corridor” entrance into town Cons • Placing utilities underground could adversely affect individual tree health – accelerating tree mortality • Vessels placed closer to poplar trees – creating challenges for refinishing and refit work • Limits opportunities to expand marine trades and economic activity Description • No Boat Yard expansion (fence line remains in current location) • Trees trimmed substantially to provide safety clearance - above-ground power lines reenergized • No pedestrian facilities added to on south side of Sims Way • Retains poplars on the south side of Sims Way (depending on individual tree health) Pros • Preserves poplars – but trimming will stress trees and change aesthetic by reducing canopy size Cons • Safely reenergizing existing overhead power lines requires: ◊ Trimming to ensure a 10’ radius from tree canopy to power lines ◊ Dedicating a 20’ setback from vessels to power lines will substantially reduce Boat Yard space • Initial and recurrent tree trimming will adversely affect tree health Existing poplars to be pruned 10ft minimum from existing power lines 10f t R Boats require a 20ft safety setback (not shown) from energized power line Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Full Expansion Tree Replacement OptionsNOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffe r s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffe r s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washi n g t o n S t Stakeholder Meeting #5 -6/28/2022 Replace Now LEGEND VISITORS CENTER Replace Over Time Planting Alternative Replace Poplars Over Time Replacement over time will include strategic thinning of Poplars but replacement tree species has not yet been determined. Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Full Expansion Non-Motorized ConnectionsNOT TO SCALE MAY 2022 EX-02 Sheet 2 Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Stakeholder Sketch Map KAH TAI LAGOON BOAT HAVEN SAFEWAY HENERY HARDWARE McDONALD'S 10th St Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Sims Wa y Ha i n e s S t Ha i n e s P l 10th St B o a t S t 12th St 1 2 t h s t B e n e d i c t S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t Jeffer s o n S t D e c a t u r S t K e a r n e y S t Washi n g t o n S t VISITORS CENTER LARRY SCOTT TRAIL Stakeholder Meeting #5 -6/28/2022 LEGEND Existing Bike Lane (no modifications) Shared Use Path / Trail Sidewalk (existing and infill) Crossing Improvements Non-Motorized Connections Alternative Sidewalk Both Sides Possible Future Larry Scott Trail Connection Options Add sidewalk in front of garden center Improve crossing across Sims Way at Benedict Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Parkway Planting Concept - South Side of Sims Way Fence/Wall ROW Line Pathway with Utility Corridor Below Buffer PlantingEdge of Paving Stormwater Swale Existing Bike Lane Sims Way Boat Haven Variable - 11’ to 19’ Variable - 22’ to 30’ 6’5’ Sims Way Fence/Wall at ROW Line Pathway with Utilities Below Shrub, Groundcover and Grass Edge of Paving Small Tree (15’ to 25’) Boat Haven NORTH 0 4 8 16 SCALE View View 11’ to 19’ 22’ to 30’ 6’5’ Concept PlanSection (not to scale) Full Expansion Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Parkway Planting Concept - North Side of Sims Way Sims WaySims Way OPTION: Widen Existing Path to a 10’-12’ Wide Shared Use Path Existing Path Edge of Paving Existing Path OPTION: Widen Existing Path to a 10’-12’ Wide Shared Use Path Edge of Paving Existing Bike Lane View Approx. 8’Variable 5’-16’Variable 5’-8’ Section (not to scale)Concept Plan NORTH 0 4 8 16 SCALE View Selectively Replace Poplars within ROW Selectively Replace Poplars within ROW Path into Kah Tai Park Kah Tai Park ROW Line ROW Line Approx. 8’5’-16’5’-8’ Kah Tai Park Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Replace Poplars Over Time - North Side of Sims Way Remove select poplars where failing or immediately adjacent to established tree stands in Kah Tai Park Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Replace Poplars Over Time - North Side of Sims Way Retain poplars where no established tree stands in Kah Tai Park are adjacent. Plant tree species consistent with long range planning documents. Remove poplars when other plantings mature. Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Perspective 1 Poplars Retained Perspective 2 Poplars Retained Perspective 1 Poplars Reduced Perspective 2 Poplars Reduced Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Condition of Poplars - Preliminary Observations Tree Health • Overall trees have poor foliage density, size, and color. Low vigor and branch die-back shows physiological strain. • Soils conditions - high metals and low organics • Competing for limited nutrients and water • Trees have experienced significant branch and codominant stem failure. A sample of trees found cavity and decay in lower trunks. Soil Testing • There are high levels of metal elements, especially copper. This can be improved through soil treatments. • All sampling returned low sodium (salt) levels in the soil. • Low levels of organic matter is a concern. This can also be improved through soil treatments. Future Tree-by-Tree Assessment • Design treatments to improve the soil. Address nutrient deficiencies and high metals. • Complete an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Level 2 basic assessment of poplars, including soil testing and tree health measurements. • Evaluate risk, assign risk ratings, and identify ways to mitigate the risk of tree and/or component failure. Sparse Leaf DensitySparse Leaf Density Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Frontier Elm Ulmus carpinifolia x parvifolia ‘Frontier’ Lindsey’s Skyward Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum ‘Lindsey’s Skyward’ Suggested Potential Tree Species General Note (All Species): Because concern has been expressed about the potential production of pollen by any of the proposed species, UFS|BC has consulted with persons in research, nursery production, urban forestry, and arboricultural specialists. The consensus is that pollen production from the species selected is minimal. In addition, the pollen production will be less than that produced by the existing trees, and pollen production occurs for a very short period of the year. UFS|BC experience has shown this is a proven tree that can tolerate sandy soils and high wind exposure. In addition, less structural pruning is required than with other streetscape tree species, reducing maintenance cost. This species has also proven to be free of pests and diseases. Height: 30’ to 40’ Spread: 20’ to 30’ Based on nursery production feedback, species availability is limited; plants may have to be sourced from as far away as Idaho. However, this tree is tolerant of high sodium (salt) levels and sandy soils. In addition, its form is compact and is likely to require less maintenance than other species. This species is also deciduous. Height: 30’ to 40’ Spread: 20’ to 30’ This area has been independently identified as suitable for planting this species, which could be an important component of creating a native prairie habitat based on its ecological importance and historical/cultural connection to the area. Concern over form can be addressed through formative and structural pruning. Garry oak is suited to the soils and maritime environment. Height: 40’ to 60’ Spread: 25’ to 35’ UFS|BC experience in planting this species has shown it can tolerate sandy soils, high winds, and the maritime environment. UFS|BC has also seen success in the planting of this species in road right-of-way. Excellent form, with impressive fall color and spring flush. Could be planted as a part of a native species tree mix. Height: 50’ to 70’ Spread: 12’ to 18’ Garry Oak Quercus garryana Ruby Vase Ironwood Parrotia persica ‘Ruby Vase’ Western Larch Larix occidentalis Scarlet Oak Quercus coccinea Proven record of tolerance for sandy soils and harsh growing environments. Height: 25’ to 30’ Spread: 15’ to 19’ Professional feedback is that this species may grow too large, although formative and structural pruning during establishment would allow for manipulating the form. Some concern over the level of maintenance required to maintain structure. Excellent tree for tolerance of sandy soil and adapting to climatic variability. Height: 50’ to 80’ Spread: 45’ Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Open House - 8/06/2022 Cascara Rhamnus purshiana Kindred Spirit Oak Quercus robur x bicolor ‘Nadler’ Suggested Potential Tree Species General Note (All Species): Because concern has been expressed about the potential production of pollen by any of the proposed species, UFS|BC has consulted with persons in research, nursery production, urban forestry, and arboricultural specialists. The consensus is that pollen production from the species selected is minimal. In addition, the pollen production will be less than that produced by the existing trees, and pollen production occurs for a very short period of the year. This species is an important source of food for native fauna. It is also known for flowering. UFS|BC suggests this species could be a minor but important component of a native tree species planting mix i.e., Garry Oak and Western Larch*. Height: 30’ Spread: 15’ *Not a maritime species, but adaptable. Pyramidal form, and hardy physiologically. Excellent choice for narrow planting spaces where form and structure are also an important consideration. Height: 20’ to 40’ Spread: 10’ to 15’ In nursery production, the species Wildfire is male only. This is to avoid berry production. The species is extremely hardy and would be well suited to this right- of-way planting. Height: 40’ Spread: 25’ Professional feedback is that this tree* may not tolerate the soils. In addition, formative and structural pruning would be required However, planted in small quantities, and supplemented with sufficient soil amendment, this would provide a showy flowering accent to any planting design. Height: 18’ Spread: 15’ to 17’ *Possibly a marginal species for this site. Wildfire Sourgum Nyssa sylvatica ‘Wildfire’ Autumn Gold Ginkgo Ginkgo biloba ‘Autumn Gold’ Elizabeth Magnolia Magnolia x ‘Elizabeth’ Sterling Silver Linden Tilia tomentosa ‘Sterling’ Shown to be extremely hardy. One concern is the extremely slow growth of this species. However, it is not affected by insect pests or disease. This tree has strong fall color and spring flush. Height: 40’ to 50’ Spread: 25’ to 30’ A hardy tree species, with low maintenance requirements and foliage interest; silver underside on leaf, and strong fall color. An excellent choice for the soil and maritime growing environment. Height: 50’ to 70’ Spread: 25’ to 30’ Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 001 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email The popular trees are brittle, short lived, roots disrupt sidewalks and paved areas and no wildlife value. A good match is the Shore Pine This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 002 9/28/2021 Craig Voice Mail Expressed passionate discontent with tree removal Comment noted. 003 9/28/2021 Karen Rudd karenlenerudd@gmail.com email Please put trees between car lane and bike/sidewalk lanes.Thank you. Comment incorporated into stakeholder committee and project development alternatives. 004 9/16/2021 Nancy Erreca nerreca@aol.com website The project is not needed, housing is needed.Comment noted. 9/28/2021 Keith Emry Facebook Fix the roads first Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Fixing Lawrence street should have priority. How about something for the people that live here not the ones coming to visit Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook please please please do soil tests before planting; make sure the new trees have room to grow and are the right plant for the right place. Please do not leave this in the hands of out-of-town landscape architects who, though I have great respect for many, are not always very knowledgeable about trees (beyond their aesthetic properties). Thank you. Soil tests have been taken and will be helpful in species selection. The Stakeholder process is incorporating local professional and consulting professional knoweledge into project development. 9/28/2021 Fredrich Bonbast Facebook Lawrence is fine. the roads in my neighborhood look like iraq, except when it rains. then they look like iraq in a flood. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Walter McQuillen Facebook Friedrich Bombast I picked Lawrence because it’s a major street that many use.Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Robert Jaye Facebook Wow, looks like the city has abandoned reasonable setbacks and their importance for maintaining the city's character. The concept picture shows maybe 15 feet from the road. Nice way to say welcome to PT. Comment noted. Concept drawing was provided without the benefit of survey and was helpful in creating interest in the project. 9/28/2021 Sarah Smith Facebook What exactly is wrong with the poplars? Why are they Not environmentally friendly? Please see stakeholder process for discussion on species. The challenge with Poplars is they are an invasive tree and they are not recommended by city code section 12.04 PTMC. 9/28/2021 Russell Hansen Facebook Walter McQuillen thank you !Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 Sarah Ludlum-Wisehart Facebook Friedrich Bombast YES!!! All the roads in Uptown need to be fixed!!! This project is ridiculous! Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/28/2021 David Crozier Facebook Cant really believe anyone thinks moving the boat yard boundary closer to the street is more eye appealing than the current situation. This has to be the most unpopular city council project yet. Comment noted. This project is about a safety concern and the Port desire to utilize the property they own for their mission to support the marine trades. Project aesthetics are also important to the project. 9/28/2021 Gus Sebastian Facebook I think Boat Haven adds good character to PT. Its pretty cool seeing it when you come down the S curves. Its a major part of the history of this town. "A Victorian Seaport" Many local folks utilize the boatyard not only as a means of employment but recreationally. I support this idea. If you have ever looked up at those tress in big wind you might be concerned. Yes fix the roads, yes fix everything, but please don't complain about an idea that could grow a industry in PT. Thank you. The economic impact of the boat yard is a key tenent behind the project. The City and PUD desire to support the Port in their mission to support marine trades. 9/29/2021 Fredrich Bombast Facebook Walter McQuillen i get that. but i walk a lot of neighborhoods, and many of the out-of-the way streets aren't even streets anymore. at least Lawrence doesn't have massive potholes and washouts. i once asked a city guy about the street in front of our house, which is broken asphalt and gravel undercoat, and he said the cost to repair it would be about the annual street repair budget for the whole city. "improvement projects," though, are sexier. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 9/29/2021 Timothy Stone Facebook More gentrification, plz?Comment noted. 8/20/2022 1 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 9/29/2021 Richard Hefley Facebook Sarah Smith they are wonderful trees but at this stage of their lifespan they are falling apart in high winds. It's a busy road with power lines so there is a reasonable likelihood that a tree failure (usually large sections of these trees break out like ice-bergs off a glacier) can cause damage and even injury. They have a few other issues as well. They send up suckers, new trees from the roots, a great distance from the original tree. They are beloved by aphids. They also produce a lot of pollen which a number of people are allergic to. While I have always admired this allee, it is time to plan for the future; replace these with something new and (hopefully) native trees and shrubs, something to take us the next 100 years. Thank you. Evaluation of this project over the long term is an important factor. 9/29/2021 James Schultz Facebook Plant pot on the roadway! Pot Townsend rides again.Comment noted. 9/29/2021 Stephen Hall Facebook Very low on the priority list for the city. Putting utilities underground is a nice goal. Roads repairs and replacement is much higher on the list. Just not as sexy on the council resume. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 005 9/29/2021 Rachel Ganapoler rachelganapoler@gmail.com email The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines..and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? Thank you. The history of the look of Port Townsend is a key element under consideration. Several undergrounding options are available depending on boatyard expansion and tree/utility/path placement. 006 9/29/2021 Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com email In support of removing of removing trees, shrubs and grass that might cause raging wildfires Thank you. Various planting approaches are being evaluated as part of the Stakeholder process 007 10/13/2021 Dori Bailey BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM email The money should be spent for the homeless. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. Thank you. The City attempts to balance the public resource of trees in the right of way with safety and other uses of the right of way. City codes promote preservation of trees when not in conflict with street, non- motorized, and utility needs. 008 10/17/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Replanting the Poplars makes sense but stick to the 1993 study. There are benefits to the poplars. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 09 10/19/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached the 1993 Gateway Development Plan recommend read page 14 This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 010 10/11/2021 O'Neill Louchard oneill@olympus.net email Thoughtful planted in needed, mixed species array. Thank you. Species variety diversity is part of the Stakeholder evaluation. 011 10/7/2021 Joni Blanchard email A professional tree person should be consulted about trees and their impacts. Save the yellow lupine. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 012 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 and happy to join the planning committee.Thank you. 013 10/19/2021 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com email Has there been a soil analysis, makes all the difference in the world for tree survival Thank you. Yes, soil analysis has been performed. 014 10/27/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email take into consideration all the functions that the poplars provide, including the impressive beauty. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. Thank you. Please see a record of meeting and meeting schedule on the City's engagePT website. www.cityofpt.us/engagePT 015 11/4/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 016 11/8/2021 Larry Eifert larryeifert@gmail.com email But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. Comment noted. The City, Port, and PUD seek transparent process that allow for all viewpoints to be heard. 8/20/2022 2 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 017 11/7/2021 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I'm not advocating what- so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 018 11/7/2021 Karen Anderson karenlanderson736@gmail.com email What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail?  How would it translate into jobs, specifically? There is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. The proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims. I support the planting of native species. Thank you. Boatyard expansion allows for larger boats to be worked on in Boat Haven which engages more of the trades. The edge look of Sims Way is being evaluated by the stakeholder committee 019 11/9/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually. acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. Thank you. Carbon sequestration and effects of climate change are important considerations. 020 11/9/2021 Joan Fabian fabianily@gmail.com email 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existent trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the Netherlands. Thank you. These comments are included for the stakeholder process and evaluation. 021 9/27/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 022 11/2/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 023 11/17/2021 Fred Weinmann fweinmann@cablespeed.com email A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees. Thank you for the suggestion. 024 11/19/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. Do not cut trees in December. Comment noted. These factors along with others must be brought into the decision making process. 025 12/1/2021 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 3 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 026 12/9/2021 Tom Myers tommyers393@gmail.com email Go for it! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ Thank you. The stakeholder committee is evaluating options that include species as well as optional landscaping forms. 027 12/10/2021 Linda Tilley artbytilley.com lindatilley44@gmail.com email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 028 12/13/2021 anonymous butterfly@olypen.com engagept Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? Thank you. The Port seeks to expand the boatyard to their property line to fully utilize their property for their mission and purpose of operating the boat yard. 029 12/12/2021 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 030 12/10/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re- vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). Thank you for the suggested plantings. 031 12/9/2021 Andrea Hegland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? When are you proposing to do this? What permits will you be securing? When will you be securing permits? Will you be conducting environmental review. Thank you for the questions. The Port is proposing to expand the boatyard, the PUD would like to bury the power lines and the City would like to support the Gateway. Thus, the project involves all three agencies. The timing of the project is dependent on the outcomes of the public process and decision making process. Permits are dependent on the outcomes of the public process and decision making process. The scope of environmental review will depend on the project scope as determined by the process. 032 12/6/2021 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan.  At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to  attributes i.e.  functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. Thank you for the suggestion. An Environmental Impact Statement has not been identified as the appropriate level of environmental review. The adopted City plans are key in supplying the intent for the area in which the project is located. The City does not have a Parks, Recreation, and Tree Functional Plan, but rather Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan. The City code discourages planting of poplars. 033 12/7/2021 Andrea Heland rubymaxlily@gmail.com email At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money. Comment noted. 034 11/22/2021 Charles Law clawthree@gmail.com email We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. Thank you. Climate change considerations is important for this project an all projects as is carbon sequestration. 035 12/14/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I support the multi-agency plan. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. Thank you for the suggestion and desire to honor our Pacific Northwest natural heritage. 8/20/2022 4 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 036 12/15/2021 Karta John Miller susanmiller@olypus.net engagept Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. Thank you for the suggestion. 037 12/15/2021 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com email I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. Comment noted. Thank you. One clarification regarding opening the tidal flats is that the salt would likely kill existing native plants. That said, the elevations of Kah Tai were set with dredge spoils form the 1960s above seal level. 038 12/30/2021 Val Johnstone valjohnstone@aol.com engagept Recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare " Red Maple Thank you for the species suggestion. 039 12/21/2021 Kathy Knoblock toddk@msn.com email I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? Comment noted. Safety around the powerlines is a fundamental requirement and was the initial driver for this project. 040 1/13/2022 Debbie Jahnke dbjahnke@att.net email Comments on information provided to public by Gateway Poplar Alliance Thank you for the helpful information concerning the GPA complaint. 041 2/12/2022 Cliff Moore meamoore@comcast.net email consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. Thank you. A replacement over time option is being considered. 042 2/14/2022 Patti Hoyecki phoyecki@yahoo.com email supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio.  I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future.  The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. Thank you for the suggestion of species. 043 2/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com engagept Where is the Long Term Tree Management Plan? What are the plans for the cut trees? Who does one become a stakeholder? Reconsider wiping out the Kah Tai Populars. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 044 2/15/2022 Gail Workman marksyounglady@gmail.com engagept Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. Thank you. Long term costs and safety is a concern that is desired to be mitigated. 045 2/18/2022 Richard and MaryAnn Moore ptmoores1@q.com email We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week.Thank you. 046 2/22/2022 Johnny Ms Johnson's eighth grade class mail The hearts on the poplars comment Thank you. 047 2/22/2022 Richard Jahnke public comment Stormwater drainage needs to be developed Thank you. Stormwater is important to this project. 048 3/6/2022 George Randels gr321@olypen.com email Remove poplars on port side but leave trees on lagoon side.Thank you. This option is under consideration. 049 3/8/2022 Mary Elayne Dunphy medunphy@comcast.ne email I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. Thank you. The evaluation of the trees indicate that more care is needed for the trees as they are stressed. 050 3/20/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Clarification of assessment report: populars would not likely be killed if trenching done by Port fence line, safe option if heavy equipment stayed off of the main roots closer to tree on the Port side. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 051 3/21/2022 Linda Lebrane lebranemusic@yahoo.com engagept Save the poplars Comment noted. 052 3/14/2022 Kelly Drake kellydrake22@gmail.com engagept I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? Thank you. It may be possible to bury the powerlines without removing the trees. The expanded boatyard project would replace the trees in a location closer to the street. 053 12/13/2021 anonymous krdmps@hotmail.com engagept How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? Thank you. The project is very much about the community benefit of supporting the marine trades. 054 4/6/2022 Brent Vadopalas brent@vadopalas.org engagept It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines.illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. Comment noted. 8/20/2022 5 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 055 5/2/2022 Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Allianceinfo@poplaralliance.org engagept Provided a copy of the April 23, 2022 Gateway Alliance Slideshow along with comments that the project can be done without cutting down the poplars, the ity has no economic analysis for cutting the trees, the parks board is the public forum, the city has arranged the parks board to be in favor of removal of the poplars, the stakeholder committee is in favor or removal of the poplars, the city has always intended to remove the poplars and the public process is not transparent. Thank you for providing a suggested alternative. Please see the city's engagePT website. All videos of the stakeholder meetings are available on this website for transparency. Final decisions on what the project will entail will be made in public session at the City Council, Port Commissions, and PUD Commission levels. www.cityofpt.us/engagePT 056 5/5/2022 ?Gateway Poplar Allianceinfo@poplaralliance.org engagept Can you clarify the purpose for the stakeholder committee and defined scope of work. The purpose of the stakeholder committee is to evaluate and develop thoughtful options for the decision makers. 057 5/7/2022 Gateway Poplar Allianceinfo@poplaralliance.org engagept It appears that the 9 member Stakeholder Committee that is supposed to have an open mind about our Gateway Poplars already has a predetermined bias against the Poplars.  A majority are already on record to cut our community trees down. The City's website still says that one of the project goals is to cut the trees down. ·  Replacement of Lombardy poplars, an emerging and eventual need for the City The Port informed us that the selection process for the Stakeholder Committee was an open one, available to the general public.  We were also told that all options were on the table.   We subsequently requested copies and/or documentation of that notification to the general public for this committee formation...and the City was unable to provide us with any announcement for openings that was made available to the general public.  The Stakeholder Committee members appear to have been hand picked and with an existing bias against our poplars. The Parks Board was able to choose 4 of the 9 members, and the City indicated from the outset that the Admiralty Audubon would be invited.  The Port was guaranteed a spot as well.  The general public was not allowed to serve on this hand-picked committee, which has been stacked with anti-poplar votes. We expect our elected officials to engage in truly democratic processes backed by democratic principles.  Clearly that is not what has occurred. Comment noted. The stakeholder committee volunteered to be a part of the process. The Parks Tree Trail Advisory Board made a recommendation for a couple of people to participate. Staff asked those if they would be willing to participate. The City, Port, and PUD are thankful for the stakeholder volunteers and all they have brought to the table for discussion and consideration. 058 5/16/2022 Vicki Legman vickilegman@gmail.com email Thank you. Been doing some reading and poplars are short lived trees. They’re beautiful, but removal seems to, sadly,  make sense.Comment noted. 059 2/19/2022 Robin Ornelas public comment Please preserve the poplars. They are one of the reasons that I wanted to move to Port Townsend.Comment noted. 060 2/19/2022 Darlene Schanfalc darlenes@olympus.net public comment I am disappointed that the City staff proposes to remove the Poplars on Sims Way. Those older and still healthy trees add character and a beauty to the area, which otherwise looks totally industrial. If the height is a problem, a trim is sufficient. Why would you even spend City funds on an unnecessary project when they can be put elsewhere? Please leave the trees alone. Thank you. The stakeholder process and arborist evaluation has identified that the trees are stressed and need investment. 061 2/20/2022 Larry Eifert larryeifert.com public comment How is the city, county and port going to take care of what they have been entrusted with? Will they take the easy way out and cut the trees, cutting a riff through the town that will maybe not be repairable? Will you help make it look like a strip mall by planting more Mall-Ready trees that look like every other place in America? Will people like Nancy and I drift away from here to be replaced by Mall-Ready home buyers? Comment noted. There are many demands on tax payer resources creating challenges in maintaining public assets. 062 2/20/2022 Melinda Bryden public comment I just wanted the City of Port Townsend to know that my husband, Ron Hayes, and I support cutting down the Poplar trees along Sims Way. It makes economic sense. As relatively long term residents (1999), we would like the City to know that it has our support. Comment noted. 8/20/2022 6 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 063 2/20/2022 Rachel Ganapoler public comment I’m opposed to your plans for cutting the beautiful trees lining the gateway to our town.. they should be maintained, not destroyed! This plan is short sighted and that money could be spent elsewhere.. I’m sure you can come up with another worthless round about.. or you could fill pot holes or try to beautify the town by maintaining the existing trees.. ya know.. like the ones that were removed on main street . Yes, I’m pissed at your decision.. we want the trees to stay.. those trees!! Comment noted. 064 2/20/2022 Lois Venarchick public comment The poplar trees along Sims Way literally transformed my life with their beauty, color and most importantly, the calming, I can breathe, peaceful way into town. Although you might dismiss this comment thinking it just too out there; I have driven into PT most of my adult life on a near daily basis. Nothing removed the stress I feel, and the beauty I see, than these two rows of stately poplar trees. I can only imagine the feelings they evoke in visitors and newcomers alike. In addition Port Townsend, “ use it up, wear it out, fix it up or do without. “ Stop spending money on things not needing to be done, directly contributing to the unaffordable town we are becoming. Save the trees! Comment noted. 065 2/21/2022 Sheri Suryan smithsuryan@gmail.com public comment Please don’t cut these beautiful trees down! They are such a welcoming sight as people drive into Port Townsend. They block wind from the sea and provide shade to Khai Tai Lagoon for fish and other wildlife. Sadly no other trees will grow to that extent in my lifetime. It would be such a shame to cut them down. What a void there will be and will be permanently! It’s not worth high speed internet to kill these trees! Please rethink other possibilities and let them survive!! Comment noted. Clarification, the existing overhead lines are transmission lines supplying power to Port Townsend and not highspeed communication lines. 066 5/22/2022 Laura Snodgrass laurafound@yahoo.com engagept I just want my opinion to be heard. I know you have heard all of the arguments for and against. Please do not cut down the poplars. Comment noted. 067 5/20/2022 Mark McCauley mmccauley@co.jefferson.wa.us email Looking out off my deck just now - from the hill between the hospital and Safeway - removing the poplars is going to substantially alter my view and not for the better. My view is world class and one reason the house is valued so highly. I won’t oppose the plan but thought you might want to hear an unvarnished opinion from an interested resident who will adversely impacted by the current plan. I love the poplars as does my wife. Comment noted. Thank you for the suggestions. These topics have been debated significantly by the stakeholders. Please see the videos on the engagePT website at www.cityofpt.us/engagePT 068 5/25/2022 Kaci Cronkhite kacicronkhite@gmail.com engagept I support the Port’s boatyard expansion and PUD under grounding of power lines. However, I also support saving the poplar trees. Those poplar trees have proven time and again how resilient they are… through negligence, drought, floods, boatyard toxins, highway toxins, brackish mingling with Kai Tai lagoon, and when PUD has chopped them down to stumps on the boatyard side of the road across from Safeway. They’re tough as well as iconic. How much water are the trees currently drinking? When they’re gone, where will the water go? Will the new trees and surfaces manage water and mitigate toxins as well? Will new trees be so hardy? At what comparable budget? IF you must remove poplars from the Port side of the road, at least keep the ones on the Kai Tai side and use the money for improved maintenance: thinning, pruning, root barriers. Lastly, please ensure that all new surfaces and landscaping maintains or improves the environmental impacts of poplar removal: No concrete, no plastic, just green space and plantings that would parallel the work of those trees. Comment noted. Thank you for the suggestions. These topics have been debated significantly by the stakeholders. Please see the videos on the engagePT website at www.cityofpt.us/engagePT 069 5/26/2022 Lisa Flores laflores99@yahoo.com engagept I am among the many who have lived here in Port Townsend for more than 40 years. I love the entry to our town. There is no valid reason to cut down these beautiful specimens. I have read all of the opinions. Perhaps there is a danger ... as in anything else of any validity in the world. I am also a climate refugee from the California Wildfires, where we lost ALL of our trees to the deadly devastation,,,, we had no choice in the matter. Here you have a choice. Use it wisely. Comment noted. 8/20/2022 7 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 070 5/29/2022 David Goldman Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Alliance engagept The 11-15-22 Jefferson County Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Grant addresses a legitimate economic development project that involves the Port of Port Townsend and the Jefferson County PUD. This development does not require the removal of the lower Sims Way poplar streetscape. What is it about present conditions of the Port Townsend Sims Way gateway transportation corridor that requires removal of the poplars ? Nothing Does the lower Sims Way “Flats” part of the gateway need critical aesthetic, restoration or maintenance work? No One member of the Stakeholder committee expressed the business community’s appreciation for the current beauty of the gateway. Another committee member is on record with his professional analysis of the lifetime value of the poplars to the community. The solution to the legitimate concern about the condition of the Kah Tai Lagoon Park is to promote an independent project to address that. Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park is a worthy project suitable for grant funding and the improvement of which would contribute to what makes Port Townsend a special community. The Nature Park project would not require poplar removal from the Sims Way ROW. Comment noted. Thank you for the suggestion for securing funding for Kah Tai. The evaluation process through the consultant and stakeholders has revealed that the Poplars are stressed and need investment. The aesthetic is a large topic of discussion. 071 6/3/2022 Dixie Llewellin dixie@cablespeed.com engagept I am entirely in favor of completely removing the poplars and improving the appearance, habitat function, and diversity of Sims way for future generation and visitors.  As a resident of town for 42 years I have been impressed with the beauty of abundance of flowering trees and shrub planted in historic uptown (over 60 different trees species recorded during a recent survey). I have noticed the dominance of poplars planted in Port Townsend: they are breaking up (beyond their lifespan) and very unattractive in the winter. In fall I noticed all the wonders of color of other trees and in spring the stunning floral possibilities. I am involved professionally with revegetation and restoration projects (since 1995) in the City and Washington State with my business Olympic Wetland Resources, LLC. Currently I am involved with several ongoing City and State (Fort Worden, Kah Tai Prairie Preserve) revegetation projects. I have been past president of the Washington Native Plant Society, Olympic Chapter Although I work exclusively with native species there are many non-native trees and shrubs that have much higher habitat value and seasonal beauty than the ragged monotonous poplar meant to windbreak farmlands in Kansas.. Thank you for the background. 8/20/2022 8 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 072 6/3/2022 Steven Yanoff syanof@yahoo.com engagept I am unclear of the current status of the proposed poplar tree replacement plan. This has been a divisive topic but I hope decision makers proceed and remove the poplar trees, for both safety reasons, regarding power line issues, and because they are relatively short-lived non-native trees. As much as possible, new development in this and all cases should enhance the environment. So I strongly support replacing the poplars with native vegetation. Others have pointed out that our native Pacific Northwest trees from Douglas fir and western red cedar to Pacific alders and Pacific madrones are beautiful visually and symbolically, appropriate, and would enhance the environment. That might also benefit Kah Tai Lagoon park by somewhat extending that quasi- natural area. I would further remind all of us that the entire area from Townsend Bay through the lagoon, including the Boat Haven boatyard, Sims Way, nearby commerce like boat shops, Henry's, Safeway, etc., the transit center, and Kah Tai Lagoon park and lagoon themselves, are themselves products of fill and development that converted a historical natural active estuary and adjacent terrestrial ecosystem, and their use by indigenous populations. In that context, I urge you to consider how removal and replacement of the poplars, development of bike and pedestrian paths, and Boat Haven expansion can be more connected to that natural and human history. For example, native vegetation appropriate to estuary shorelines should be considered, and not just native upland trees. Interpretive signage is important. Even more visionary and substantial would be incorporating ways to restore some measure of functionality to these past tidal aquatic, wetland and adjacent terrestrial systems, their connection to Townsend Bay and lowlands towards North Beach, and historical uses by Native occupants. I get that is very big picture, that significant restoration of that area's pre-settlement condition is likely not practical or affordable. But I encourage you to do what you can. Thank you for pointing out a number of concerns and the suggestions. The stakeholder discussions and process have been helpful and reflect a majority of this comment. 073 6/6/2022 Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com continued There is a gorilla in the stakeholders’ process - the poplars are to remain. This, according to the 1993 adopted ‘Gateway Development Plan’; intended to provide continuity for future projects. This plan, a years long community effort, describes  “special environmental character” and streetscape recommendations: “The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims. adjacent to Kah-Tai Park (note: land later incorporated into the Park) can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay. The ‘Sims Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project’ is a collaboration of three agencies, sharing a County $1M PIF grant. The grant language refers multiple times to “implementing” the ‘Gateway Development Plan’, the community’s vision for future development. Newly hired staff managers promote a mantra, “the poplars must go”, an idea inserted into the project narrative: “The Poplars have been identified as an inappropriate tree by both the Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Board, as well as a supporting landscape study for Kah Tai Lagoon”. However, no City policy, goal, vision or priority has been adopted to incorporate such incongruent and contradictory ideas into the ‘Gateway Development Plan’. The grant money is to implement not amputate the community’s vision. What of the future town landscape, prioritizing “ the poplars must go” - cutting hundreds of trees - projected at $3000 per tree. One might be concerned; poplar cutting before residential streets potted with water features and arterials without shoulders for bicycles and walkers. A few Comment noted. Thank you for the suggestion. The PIF grant is for economic development and cannot be used for maintenance of Streets. The Gateway Plan is an important guiding document that identifies intent. It is important to consider all relevant information in the plan and what has been learned since the plan's development for decision making by the elected bodies. This comment regarding streets is helpful to know that there is a priority to investment in streets. 8/20/2022 9 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments continued Julie Jaman jjamubi@gmail.com email water features and arterials without shoulders for bicycles and walkers. A few chosen stakeholders are discussing the staff’s ‘Sims Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project’’. It’s unclear if stakeholders know roadside streetscapes are not parks and the poplars are to be maintained not cut down. One can hope they recommend to the Parks Board and City staff to groom and steward the poplars as recommended in the ‘Gateway Development Plan’, clearly the community’s intention. The Port manager has indicated he is open to replanting poplars and the PUD has indicated it does not need to remove the poplars in order to trench for its lines. continuation of the above comment. 074 6/7/2022 Glen Bellerud Front Desk “What about the roads – cutting down the poplar trees, which have been here & have not had any storm damage as the shore pines have? Having managed Fort Worden for the first 20 yrs & a back ground in parks, I find this discerning (disturbing?). There are poplar trees at the Fort & they are doing great. I have been here for 60 yrs & find your thinking very short sighted. Who wants to look at stunted shore pine – not really native either. Let’s do something for everybody – not the few leading us & those choosing to make us look like all the same As in Calif(?).” Comment noted for Comprehensive Streets Program intended to address multiple streets needs. 075 6/13/2022 Beverly Michaelsen engagept I love the poplars after the s curve and entering into beautiful Port Townsend. Please save the north side ones!! It is unfortunate that the port must take down the ones that border their side for expansion, they make such a perfect border. I wish they could all stay and they are perfect for water absorption and ecology. Thank you for considering and I hope that we can do the right thing in regards to our town, it’s citizens and our beautiful natural world. Thank you. The aesthetic into PT is a huge part of this project. 076 6/15/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email At the June 14th Gateway Stakeholders Meeting, we began a discussion about planting setbacks from features in the Project area. Attached is a landscape detail sheet prescribing planting setbacks that WSDOT has used, sometimes with modification, for many roadside vegetation projects. WSDOT offers these distances as guidelines, not strict requirements. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 077 6/14/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Attached is an EPA Review titled 'Biological Aspcects of Hybrid Poplar Cultivation on Floodplains in Western North America'.  In it, they lament the widespread elimination of Hybrid Poplars and herald the re-introduction and cultivation of them for environmental benefits. One line in it says 'Given current trends in climate warming, hybrid Poplar could potentially compensate for the adaptive limitations of some native species'. It was written, since, there was a need in the divided scientific community, for all parties to have a better understanding of the basic biology and ecological role of both native and hybrid Poplars. I've consulted with two of our renown local naturalists, both with Doctorates in Biology, both experts and authors of books about birds. To quote one of them, when asked about wildlife value of OUR Poplars along Sims, he says 'removing the Lombardies from along that main path would be a short term loss for the migrating yellowrumps, nomadic waxwings, et al, that periodically make HEAVY use of them for foraging, but, IMMEDIATELY replanting with black cottonwood, willow, etc could fill that gap pretty quickly.' i've been working beside the Poplars (on a boat) for the past 2 months everyday. Songbirds have been singing all day long every day in them for these This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 10 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 078 6/10/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email At the last meeting, Scott said we should email our thoughts of the concepts just sent to us. Here're mine~ 1. Sidewalk completed along north side ONLY. Upgrade crosswalks. 2. Any walking path along boatyard fenceline, if one MUST be put in, should be as narrow as possible and maybe only crushed pea gravel as is already across the road along the front of Henery's for low visibility. NO 6' slabs of anything - especially concrete!! 4. It's best to keep bicycle traffic as far to the west side of marina to connect as directly as possible to Larry Scott. As in the new path that will eventually connect the west side of boatyard entry to the shoreline. Straight in past Blue Moose is best until the new path is put in. 6. Bicycle traffic coming in past Admiral Ship Supply or along the marina waterfront shouldn't be encouraged. Too much traffic coming and going, cars parking, backing up, boats on lifts going by. Groups of bicycles mosying through the marina get in the way of busy comings and goings of workers and marina patrons. Bicyclers will start taking up all our precious parking spaces if they get a trail all along there, also!! They are already increasingly using our parking down closer to the trail. 8. Boatyard fence would be nice with a retaining wall of 2-man basalt rocks 3' or 4' high with wood posts and simple square wire between them to maintain view in and out of the yard for us workers and for those looking in to see the cool boats as they pass. 4. Absolutely NO opening along the yard fenceline. Those wanting to come in can access by coming into the marina and figuring their way in. Openings just encourage the (illegal) 'death dash' across the road to Henery's. Not necessary for workers to have easy access to Henery's. And, us workers definitely don't want easy ready access of the public right into where we're working! I've asked This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 079 6/20/2022 Charles Nelson chasnelson101@icloud.com email Why not install new power lines underground, & save the trees? Thank you. Undergrounding is possible. Evaluations of impact to the trees has been considered by the stakeholder committee and consultant team. 080 6/20/2022 Gateway Poplar Allianceinfo@poplaralliance.org email We were blind copied on an email in which you wrote: In addition, we also desire to make another seat available and seek a representative of the Poplar Alliance group to be part of the process directly. Assuming this was your formal invitation, here is our response. The current process to achieve the stated objectives of the multiagency "Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Grant” agreement and to qualify forJeff County PIF grant funds requires the removal of all the poplars from the lower Sims Flats commercial corridor of the GDP as an “ implemen[ation] [of] the City's Gateway Development Plan” [GDP] . The GDP specifically calls for a streetscape of linear poplars: Streetscape Recommendations The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims. adjacent to Kah-Tai Park, can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay. The GDP can’t be implemented by removing all the poplars. The Gateway Poplar Alliance (GPA) was organized to oppose that poplar removal. The GPA won’t participate in what is intended to be a public advisory/decision making process to redesign the Sims Flats commercial corridor of the GDP if the decision to remove the poplars has already been made before any substantive public involvement with the Potemkin village public process that has been undertaken to date. Therefore, the GPA will only agree to participate in the “technical advisory group,” the “Sims Way Technical Advisory Group,” aka the “stakeholder committee,” if the Comment noted. The additional seat has been filled by a volunteer desiring to participate. 8/20/2022 11 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 080 continued Therefore, the GPA will only agree to participate in the “technical advisory group,” the “Sims Way Technical Advisory Group,” aka the “stakeholder committee,” if the city commits to: a formal review of the 1993 GDP that involves as substantial a public process as was conducted in the drafting of the GDP and memorialized in the Plan and especially with reference to the specification of the poplar streetscape of the Plan "FLATS" COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.” This review shall include the impacts of the GDP revisions on the Kah Tai Lagoon Park and shall be subject to formal ratification by the Port Townsend City Council, and such SEPA review and process specified by PTMC Chap. 19.04 (SEPA) and PTMC 19.04.260D3p (Substantive authority) as required by law to address the environmental impacts (Flats streetscape, poplars, linearity, tree replacement, storm water, wind currents, etc) on that corridor of the GDP and the lands to the north and south of it, and any other similar legal processes and reviews required of any other agency the actions of which are premised on or dependent on the completion of the city’s full review process specified immediately above. Continued 081 6/19/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Kah Tai Volunteers, the Audubon Society, and our Parks Board members through the years have created a lovely park over the years and I appreciate and support all the prairie restoration and wildlife habitat efforts.  We have near 80 acres of this lovely park.  I’m hoping to keep Poplars just along the 1 -acre strip on the very edge of the park in the ROW.  Many in our community are wanting to keep many of those Poplars.  Let’s compromise to thin, prune, and save a good stand of healthy Poplars that stand along that stretch.   This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 082 6/120/22 Kathy Lundquist woodland.antiques@gmail.com engagept I know there's a backlash in response to the removal of the poplars along the Gateway, between the lagoon & the port. It is a noisy group but I hope folks like me let you know we agree with the effort to plant native trees along that strip. I vote to remove them. They are messy & dangerous, to my mind. My neighbor recently removed 7 poplars along our property line. I couldn't have been more grateful. He worried (as did I) during every windstorm that they'd come down on his house (or mine). Plant some native trees that are easier to maintain& less messy & ignore the noisy folks. Thank you. This is helpful information. 8/20/2022 12 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 083 6/14/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Nonnative plants reduce population growth of an insectivorous bird Desirée L. Narango Nonnative plants lack an evolutionary history with native fauna and support insect communities that are less abundant and diverse, and this may change food availability for vertebrate consumers. Most insectivorous birds are absent or declining in urban areas, yet no study has tested whether nonnative plants impact bird populations via food limitation. We monitored reproduction and survival of Carolina chickadees within residential yards and found that when nonnative plants increased, both insect availability and chickadee population growth declined. We also found that populations could only be sustained if nonnative plants constituted <30% of plant biomass. Our results demonstrate that nonnative plants reduce habitat quality for insectivorous birds and restoration of human-dominated areas should prioritize native plants to support local food webs. Human-dominated landscapes represent one of the most rapidly expanding and least-understood ecosystems on earth. Yet, we know little about which features in these landscapes promote sustainable wildlife populations. Historically, in urban areas, landowners have converted native plant communities into habitats dominated by nonnative species that are not susceptible to pest damage and require little maintenance. However, nonnative plants are also poor at supporting insects that are critical food resources for higher order consumers. Despite the logical connection, no study has examined the impact of nonnative plants on subsequent population responses of vertebrate consumers. Here, we demonstrate that residential yards dominated by nonnative plants have lower arthropod abundance, forcing resident Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) to switch diets to less preferred prey and produce fewer young, or forgo reproduction in nonnative sites altogether. This leads to lower reproductive success and unsustainable population growth in these yards This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 083 Despite the logical connection, no study has examined the impact of nonnative plants on subsequent population responses of vertebrate consumers. Here, we demonstrate that residential yards dominated by nonnative plants have lower arthropod abundance, forcing resident Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) to switch diets to less preferred prey and produce fewer young, or forgo reproduction in nonnative sites altogether. This leads to lower reproductive success and unsustainable population growth in these yards compared with those with >70% native plant biomass. Our results reveal that properties landscaped with nonnative plants function as population sinks for insectivorous birds. To promote sustainable food webs, urban planners and private landowners should prioritize native plant species. Continued 8/20/2022 13 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 084 6/14/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Poplar – The Homemaker - Chelsea Green Publishing https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=16439&d=8Zio4tgMej-HeO3JeIQJoO- hFa3fWfjtcCv1nujoyA&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2echelseagreen%2ecom%2f20 20%2fpoplar-the-homemakerPlantations of hybrid poplar are always made of clones. Some of these large plantations out in the Northwest are thousands of acres and support little wildlife. They are voids for biodiversity. This is not the fault of the tree, but a mistake of management. The difference between clonal blocks of native poplars and hybrid poplars is in the origin of the trees. Native insects have evolved to eat native poplars. There are countless species that will only feed on poplar leaves. These insects are the backbone of a food web that supports birds. Hybrid poplars do not feed insects the way aspens do. In fact, many newer hybrid poplar clones have been genetically engineered to avoid being food for Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). These trees have had Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) added to their DNA. Bt is a bacterium that is regularly used to kill Lepidoptera. The result is a silent forest. Transgenic poplars are not available to the public in the United States at this time. They are widely planted in afforestation projects in China. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 085 6/13/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Attached is from Wikipedia regarding problems related to Lombardy Poplars. It is relevant to both sides of Sims Way. The second and third attachments are relative to concerns of habitat for birds in the Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park. The last two are an abstract from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 086 6/12/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email I have been thinking about stormwater management in the Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion project area since the recent flooding. I recommend that the agencies include stormwater management in the project alternatives because the approaches will influence structures, vegetation, bike/ped connections, water quality, flooding, and aesthetics. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 087 6/1/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email Here are the graphics I presented at the last Stakeholder meeting, which Scott requested that I forward. The thoughts and ideas respond to the “Features to Consider in Developing Alternatives” of the Project Limits and Constraints map distributed by Scott. The graphics present a preliminary high level functional plan (e.g., focal points, view corridors, connectivity) based on the 1993 Gateway Development Plan to the extent that Project constraints allow, and reflecting Project criteria from public comments. The two typical sections show how many of the criteria expressed in the Gateway Development Plan and public comments could be incorporated in the Project alternatives. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 14 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 088 6/12/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email “Meadow grass and wildflowers” in the planter strip (north side) was a failed experiment from around 25 years ago. I actually obtained hundreds of transplants from the WSDOT nursery stock—species they wished to see growing there. And we installed them—including Port Townsend High School students doing their Senior Project service work. That strip proved simply too high-impact for those plants to endure. I personally spent something like 30 cumulative hours doing periodic weeding and garden maintenance, and it was not sufficient to perpetuate the planting. There were many introduced weed species that migrated in; way too little water available; foot traffic and bicycle wheels nipping at the edges. A nice thought, one that would require a considerable investment beyond the resources I describe above, just to reach a level of ’survival’ after as little as two or three years. I strongly recommend woody shrubs as a primary planting category, set well back from the shoulder(s), and with committed water and weeding resources until established. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 089 6/13/2022 Rick Janke (Sharing State Audibon information) rjahnke@att.net email I received this email, cover email and press release (attached) from the state Audubon office.  From Teresa Anderson at State Audubon "Deborah and I are working on a statement from Audubon WA and/or National Audubon that we will run past you just in case we want to use it. We’ll also ask your advice about where (or if) we should send it. I just wanted to let you know that I did have a phone call with Andrea Haegland months ago about the poplar issue and I was misrepresented in their email below. I did not say that Admiralty Audubon is out of step with National. In fact, I told her that National Audubon is pro native plants (via our Plants for Birds initiative). We also talked about the Birds and Climate in National Parks report that Audubon did a few years ago that talked about birds and ecosystems moving because of climate change. I think that’s where she got the idea that Audubon is in “flux on its view of non-native plants” which is not true at all. Thank you for the clarification from the State Audubon Office 090 6/21/2022 Don Archer bobblacktym@comcast.net phone call 1:20pmThe poplar trees should be saved put power underground Thank you. Power and variety is part of the Stakeholder evaluation. 091 6/21/2022 Rick Janke (Sharing information from John Rowden, National Audubon) rjahnke@att.net email “The National Audubon Society and its field office, Audubon Washington, strongly promote the use of native plants through our Plants for Birds conservation initiative because research shows that native plants are critical for supporting our native bird species. Native plants – and the insects they support – evolved with native birds and provide resources that are matched to the birds’ needs, which is especially important during breeding when birds are feeding hungry chicks. Many landscaping plants are exotic species from other countries that require maintenance, more resources, and may become invasive, negatively impact native ecosystems and natural areas. Our native bird species face innumerable threats and replacing non-native and invasive plant species with natives is an important way that individuals and municipalities can support our native birds.” - John Rowden, Ph.D., Senior Director Bird-Friendly Communities, National Audubon Society Thank you for the helpful information. 092 1/17/2504 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email At the last Gateway Project stakeholders meeting, we discussed the vegetation establishment information accumulated by Admiralty Audubon for Kah Tai park. Ron Sikes has kept the records of naturally established and planted vegetation, which has been compiled in the attached spreadsheet (identical files in two formats). Obviously, the objectives for the plantings have changed over the years. The record will be helpful for the Gateway project’s landscape design. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 15 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 093 6/27/2022 Margaret Lee ptmlee@olypen.com engagept The controversy about the poplar trees along Sims Way and their possible removal has occupied a great deal of time and energy by many, which is understandable considering the changes being contemplated.  However, before such an important decision is made, everyone involved should be able to assure the community that the process is adequate to address objections.  Certainly to clarify what is factual. One objection is that attention has not been given to the original Gateway Project which is yet in effect, a “governing” document written by the City. That document is very explicit about the poplar trees and their care, which includes trimming and pruning to assure healthy growth. I remember that being the case because I participated as a citizen, among many, who helped formulate the Gateway Plan. During that citizen effort, the Sims Way corridor was divided into several section to help with plans for that unique area. I worked with a small group on the section that lay between the boat haven and Kai Tai lagoon, the area now receiving primary attention. We decided that careful tending of the poplars would enhance the beauty of the “Gateway What the final outcome of the present process for Sims Way will be, I don’t know, but I would feel much more secure in the decision if the question of what the original Gateway Plan dictates is addressed. Comment noted. Thank you for sharing about the development of the plan. The value sets provided in the Gateway Development Plan are important to this project as well as other information. It is important that all information is provided to the decision makers. 094 6/30/2022 Dan Burden dan.burden@bluezones.com email The information you tracked regarding ADA is correct in the legal sense, but not practical, nor is it appropriate on a road of this importance. Only one person at a time can walk in a 4-foot space, and walking side by side, the way people walk, takes a minimum of 5 feet on a well maintained sidewalk. A road with a volume of Sims makes it challenging to get across the street, so full support for walking and bicycling is needed on each side of Sims.  For the commercial urban form of this area, the recommended minimum sidewalk width is 6 feet, with 8 feet preferred (easier to maintain). Also, only about 7% of people who ride bikes feel comfortable in bike lanes or buffered bike lanes, so they too seek to be separated on a multiuse path. A multiuse trail needs to be 10 feet wide in order to receive state or federal funding. That said, the majority of those bicycling should feel comfortable riding on the lakeside of Sims, so it is not essential to have a multiuse trail on both sides, so A 6-8 feet sidewalk (my recommendation) would be a workable minimum for the boatyard portion, and this should be setback with a buffer from the street edge. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 095 6/30/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email A six to 8 foot 'path' on the boatyard side would make it look waaaay too inviting for people traffic.  That is something that creates a 'security risk' for the boatyard - which is something we're trying to minimalize in our design.  This isn't the place for a 'promenade' lane.  With larger slips and commercial vessels going in along that fenceline, there will be even more loud noises and boat construction work going on than there currently is with the smaller recreational boats.  Noise and fumes!  Not the place for promoting hanging out. As I said, this is a small town - with somewhat heavy traffic through there at times. Not an 'urban setting' that needs to look like a small big city slabbed over with hard surfaces. Especially on both sides. It sounds like there's a rootin' for the 10' multiuse hard surface on the Kah Tai side coming up. An 8' hard surface also on the Port side is much too much too much. This is a flood plain. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 16 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 096 7/17/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email Parkway Form with blended trees is the best option for the south boatyard side, (full pie - excellent), since, it can encompass mixed species with bushes (Hairy Manzanita), Non-fruit bearing flower trees (Dogwood, Washington Hawthorne),  along with some taller/bushier/canopied trees behind the Port buildings (Female Aspen, Female Western Balsam, Lombardy Poplar).  I guess it would be called Parkway Form on the North side even though many young strong columnar Poplars will be kept along the length mixed in with the native trees. It'd be a columnar/parkway mix - as it already is, but, with fewer Poplars. So, North side gets a 1/2 pie for columnar and a 1/2 pie for Parkway. The look it has now shows that blending forms and species works nicely. The height variations look good. Note* With full expansion, according to printed 'Street Cross Section' plates, the bowsprits of the boats end up 15' from 'Small Treetrunks', boathulls would be 25' from tree trunks (limbs/leaves 10' from bowsprit/20'from boathulls). Large Canopied treetrunks would be 18' from bowsprit/28' from boathullss (limbs/leaves 5' from bowsprit/15' from boathulls). Boats being 20' from overhead limbs, leaves, birdpoop, and general tree debris is close enough to cause operational complications for boatwork. Putting utilities beneath the sidewalk near fenceline and planting any taller trees as far towards the road as possible would be best. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 097 7/17/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email No expansion without undergrounding power won't work.  Keeping overhead powerlines would cause the Port to lose the whole row along the fenceline of 35 plus active workspaces due to newly revealed setbacks between power lines and the Port's moving machinery (travellift).  That would be a huge economic loss for the Port and for the Marine Trades. Power lines cannot be undergrounded along the boatyard side of the Poplars, as, it's impossible to relocate all the 35 plus boats for the trench digging/heavy machinery work to stay off of the Critical Root Zone. IF power can go underground along the roadside, beyond the City's 2' 'storm drain', that would put the 6' trench only 13' way from Poplar trunks for much of that stretch (as treetrunkss are only 21' from bike lane for a good stretch along there). It would be quite risky for the trees to cut their roots that close to their trunks. Also, no expansion means all the funding goes away, as it's the Port's creation of (10 jobs?? ) - 'economic development' that justified the grant. A partial expansion (5 feet less than the 25' plan), would put the Poplars waaaaayyy tooo close to the boats and would not work! Ideally, the boatyard could expand elsewhere and not head out towards the road, the power lines could be undergrounded and the Poplars could live out the 20 or more years of life they have in them with thinning of the compromised ones and pruning of the rest. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 17 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 098 7/17/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email We HAVE young healthy Poplars all along just about the whole length of the north corridor blended in nicely with the native trees.  We should keep a good many of them.  It IS what the Environment Protection Agency recommends to mitigate future climate changes coming down upon us - planting Hybrid Poplars along with native species in floods zones. (The Federal Land and Water Conservation grant folks heed EPA's recommendations - so, keeping or planting Poplars in the Park won't hurt the Kah Tai funding they provide).  The North side needs serious thinning of the Poplars and of conifers that are closing in the view corridor.  There are too many trees on top of each other along there competing for soil nutrition and water.  Poplar water usage is comparable to Douglas Firs, so, their water usage isn't justification for wiping them out.  i haven't heard a decent justification for not allowing Poplar trees in the ROW yet.  70 + years is not short-lived.  Of the thousands of Poplars around our town and county, in over 70 years, we've had less incidents of them coming down or causing harm than many native trees have caused.  Most trees have a degree of 'basal rot' and is not justification alone for killing off a tree.  The arborist's recent assessment of the southside trees mentioned cases of basal rot, but, still classified those trees as 'low risk' of trunk failure for years ahead - it's not the death sentence that it sounds like. The Kah Tai Park belongs to all the citizens, and although the volunteers, Audubon Society, and the Parks Board do great work, they should not wield ultimate power over our Gateway ROW plantings. The Poplars and their fate is up to the City Council and City Planner ONLY. And, remember, we're talking a 5' - 10' width of land totaling approximately one acre along the near 80-acre park! Let us keep Poplars all along the corridor on that side with natives as it already is!! New plantings are hardly even necessary. The butterflies and migrating birds who use the Poplars will truly appreciate it. Their tallness adds This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 099 7/18/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email See Steve's email sharing ranking of vegetation forms and suggested visuals for a no tree option. See Stakeholder committee meeting packet for 7/26/22 on engagePT website. Www.cityofpt.us/engagePT This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 100 7/19/2022 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com email All, I will not get into as much detail regarding the types of Vegetation to consider, leaving that to the Arboricultural professionals, but will reply to the “tree forms” rankings that are due today, as suggested by the Design Team. Here are my thoughts, in the simplest of descriptions. Reminder, I volunteered for the “constructability” aspect, which I have other opinions on, but not pertinent to today’s assignment. 1)Canopy Tree Form: I absolutely love this form, but in our case, would rank this as ½ pie, fair. It seems to me as if Sims way is too wide to accomplish the beautiful effect I have seen in other places without negatively affecting the Boatyard expansion in return. It just doesn’t appear that there is enough space to create a “canopy” stretching across Sims Way. 2)Columnar Tree Form: This is my favorite choice, as it the closest to what we currently have with the Lombardy Poplars. Very welcoming and very majestic / proud to stand tall as a community. I would rank this form as a ¾ to full pie, and think it would lessen the impact to the community if the removal of the Poplars is truly required. 3)Flowering Tree Form: I think this form would require a lot of Maintenance, clean up and watering, which is not in the current budgeting. This form would only “pop” during spring months, and I don’t think they would represent the “welcoming, warm hug” other than in the spring. While beautiful, I would rank this as ½ pie, fair. 4)Parkway Tree Form: I like this style as well, but the randomness of species patterns, flow & symmetry would not provide much character, as we have now with the Poplars. I would prefer a more DYNAMIC Gateway to downtown….. I do appreciate the low maintenance & lack of direct future costs to the city This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 18 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 100 Continued email 4)Parkway Tree Form: I like this style as well, but the randomness of species patterns, flow & symmetry would not provide much character, as we have now with the Poplars. I would prefer a more DYNAMIC Gateway to downtown….. I do appreciate the low maintenance & lack of direct future costs to the city though. I would Rank this as ½ to ¾ pie. 5)No Tree Form: I would think that if the Poplars indeed are required to be removed, the general public will really want to see something similar in its place. As it stands now, for me, if the Poplars must be removed, here are my overall thoughts: I am hoping to see a mixed use path on the Boatyard side, not concrete sidewalk, with a barrier of columnar trees of blended species, to separate Sims Way with the path. Along with that, an upward bent ornamental iron fence along the Boatyard, with no openings for public access, for security of Boatyard. Maybe a historical maritime art piece or two, mixed with a couple of “interactive” amenities along the path. For the Kah Tai side, I am in favor of a Maintenance / Pruning / Trimming program, with removal & replacement as needed over time. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 101 7/19/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com email Review Four Tree Forms plus a Shrub Form Below in order of preference with caveats: 1. Flowering Trees with caveats of having tree families mix, staggered planting, and require planting stock large enough to have canopy above deer browse line. Positive attributes are interest of flowers and fall color, and can fit space. Negative - require careful choice on Port side to minimize fruiting. 2. Shrub Form and Fern planting with caveats of ferns and evergreen broadleaf shrubs required to minimize weed growth and deer browsing. NO IVY! Positives are easier maintenance, always evergreen, no drab winter image, allows some views of the boat yard, the true iconic image of a maritime city. Negatives are needs weeding until canopy closure completed, no fall color, and may require some protection from deer. 3. Parkway Tree Form Positives are the blended mix plantings layered, and mixed growth size, lower maintenance of informal arrangement, and image would or could be similar on both sides of Sims Way. Negatives are the larger trees would contribute more windblown debris to boats, possible limbs, wind thrown trees on roadway, and requires more space. 4. Large Canopy Tree Form Positive is lots of summer green enclosing street and some fall color. Negatives are limbs and trees falling on street or boat yard, needs lots of space This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 19 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 101 continued Ron Sikes 4. Large Canopy Tree Form Positive is lots of summer green enclosing street and some fall color. Negatives are limbs and trees falling on street or boat yard, needs lots of space for roots and canopy, less space for pathways, trenching, and would send lots of wind blown debris into boat yard. Also the canopy would block views of dramatic clouds over uptown/down town. 5. Columnar Tree Form Positive is vertical form allows fit into above ground horizontal space for trunk and limbs. Negatives are limbs and entire tree wind throw, interference with any trenching or covering of root zone, suckering into pathways and boat yard, and windblown debris into boat yard. Columnar form does not relate to iconic images of the Pacific Northwest. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 102 7/20/2021 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net email 1.Review the four presented tree forms. plus the Þfth form suggested by Steve (No Tree From - groundcover and varying height shrubs) and rank your preference using the criteria we agreed upon from Meeting 4 (attached). DUE Tuesday, July 19th o oCanopy Form oColumnar Form oFlowering Form oParkway Form oNo Tree Form 2.Consider the new alternatives introduced in Meeting 6 to prepare for a pros/cons discussion during Meeting 7 on July 26th at 2p. DUE Tuesday, July 26th oNo Expansion Trim trees (PUD) to create a 10-ft clear radius from the nearest power wire(s) Re-energize the power lines after tree trimming Constrain Port operations to be offset 20 feet from the nearest power wire Leave Poplars on the north side Leave Poplars on the south side with heavy trimming (Þrst bullet) Begin maintenance program for remaining Poplars Keep existing ped facilities - no new facilities oPartial Expansion Expand boat yard by 20 feet (existing curb to new curb and existing fence to new fence) Trim trees to allow for boat yard expansion Keep existing ped facilities - no new facilities Assess tree impacts due to Port expansion - keep Poplars as much as This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 20 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 103 7/20/2022 Arlene Alen arlene.alen@jeffcountychamber.org email Scott- After reading all your materials and the video of the last meeting, I was sorry my overlapping meeting conflicted, and I was unable to for that lively discussion. My vote on this is to stay columnar as from the placemaking perspective it isn’t as jarring a variance as some of the other alternatives and maintains the “gateway” feeling which is important to our businesses and visitors. If greater detail on this is needed, please advise. It is a pleasure watching you facilitate this “interesting” group and I am grateful it is you not I. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 104 7/20/2022 Sarah McQuillen sassymcquillen@gmail.com email I'll respond to the full Port expansion: The Poplars will need to be removed along the boatyard and the power put underground. I do not think the Poplars should be remove adjacent to the buildings unless necessary due to their health or building's foundation damage. I do not think the Poplars should be removed on the N. side of Sims Way. There are many young Poplars that can be incorporated into the street border if some of the mature trees need to be removed. I am not in favor of replanting trees along the S.side - boatyard. It seems that any trees would be too close to the boats and would negatively impact work there. I think a rock wall and metal fence - with no pedestrian access is good. Native shrubs could be planted next to this and either grass and/or a soft permeable surface foot path. Manzanita, Salal, Oregon Grape and native Current are easily maintained possibilities. This would be more of a Parkway entrance to town which also draws the eye into town in a welcoming way with the Poplars on the N. side. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 21 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 105 7/21/2022 Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email My email does very strange things to long “copy all” email strings, so I’m hoping this comes through clearly to everyone. It’s taken some careful work on my part to make sense of the string so far on my end, unfortunately. A great discussion last week. Thank you for that. I especially appreciated the background information and understanding about how the funding works for these projects and that they tend to be geared toward initial development and building (which includes infrastructure such as large sidewalks) for overall uniformity and flow, rather than being left to piecemeal it with each developer. That helped me to understand how that occurs with large projects like this. With that conversation came some criticism about the design between the two round abouts along upper Sims/ HWY 20. I maintain and regularly work at one of the business properties along that stretch, and although I agree about the challenges of landscape maintenance along there, I want to add a voice of praise for the wide sidewalks. I’m not a fan of concrete, but as I work along that space, I see people regularly use the sidewalks. Every time I’m there, I feel like there is a comfortable sense of space for pedestrians, including benches and a nice sense of flow that I rarely see provided for foot traffic along busy roads. It always feels safe to be there - which is also a rarity along such a busy road. I think the Parkway option makes the most sense for the overall space and for the long term legacy of the overall space - on both north and south sides. I completely understand that the poplars are problematic on the port side, and I’ve always had a sense of them forming a tough barrier that creates an awkward and abrupt visual to the rest of the Kah Tai Park. If I were to think of the entire park as a landscape, I would never plant the tallest trees on the front edge along a road or path. I would want shorter perennials, shrubs and small This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 105 7/21/2022 Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email I think the Parkway option makes the most sense for the overall space and for the long term legacy of the overall space - on both north and south sides. I completely understand that the poplars are problematic on the port side, and I’ve always had a sense of them forming a tough barrier that creates an awkward and abrupt visual to the rest of the Kah Tai Park. If I were to think of the entire park as a landscape, I would never plant the tallest trees on the front edge along a road or path. I would want shorter perennials, shrubs and small trees closest to the road and sidewalk, then inviting the eye to wander further back and up into the park. I can imagine a similar experience along the port with a solid but attractive fence keeping people from entering the port in unwelcome places. I personally love the look of the Canopy form, but a monoculture of trees is simply not sustainable enough with climate change any longer. I fear that even those trees grown to be particularly pest and disease resistant may not withstand the test of time, given the unpredictability of climate change, and a mom-culture in this location (the entrance to town) is creating too high of a risk for future failure of an entire stand of trees. I would also like to see as many native plants included as possible (and we have SO many options there - including Pacific Wax Myrtle, which is low pollen, evergreen, and provides well for migrating birds). I feel that we have the opportunity with native plants to expand across the city our theme of honor the original people of this land and the plants they lived off of and incorporated into their lives and culture. Perhaps one day, the city will even have the opportunity to add more native art (like the totem pole on the other end of downtown) or expand upon a theme (like the Chetzemoka Trail) bringing that level of This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 22 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 105 Continued Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email I would also like to see as many native plants included as possible (and we have SO many options there - including Pacific Wax Myrtle, which is low pollen, evergreen, and provides well for migrating birds). I feel that we have the opportunity with native plants to expand across the city our theme of honor the original people of this land and the plants they lived off of and incorporated into their lives and culture. Perhaps one day, the city will even have the opportunity to add more native art (like the totem pole on the other end of downtown) or expand upon a theme (like the Chetzemoka Trail) bringing that level of education and interest into the very arrival corridor of our community, honoring the first people who inhabited and stewarded this land. All of the other tree form options rank equally last for me. Circling back to a different topic for a moment, I had a thought/question arise in my consideration of the pathway conversation along the port side. I wonder if one of the experts on paths & sidewalks in our stakeholder group knows if there is any research available on the assumption that a sidewalk automatically invites more people into a space - specifically people with criminal intent. It might, and if it does, I’m in favor of a smaller or no path on that side. However, when thinking about this topic, the research about street lighting (another topic I’ve been involved in before) came to mind. There is often the assumption that street lights automatically make a street safer by providing light - seems like common sense - when in fact street lights often shine in people’s eyes making it harder to see and cast harsh, contrasting shadows that the eye has trouble adjusting to. So, I’m just curious if by chance there is any data about sidewalks that actually is similarly nuanced. Like, I could also imagine that the lack of sidewalks invites people wishing to hide what they’re doing because everyone This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 105 Continued Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email Like, I could also imagine that the lack of sidewalks invites people wishing to hide what they’re doing because everyone else going about their every day business are on the provided sidewalk across the street. I’m speculating here, but it had me wondering about the data because so often what seems like common sense is not what actually is true. Finally, even though I know we’re not talking about specific tree/plant species yet, I’m just going to begin mentioning it (also because I’ve seen the suggestion pop up a time or two already): please, please, please, please, please…PLEASE…DO NOT plant Quaking Aspen in this space - EVER. PLEASE (yes, this is me actually begging). It’s a gorgeous tree…when it has tens of thousands of acres of space to spread into on a mountain side. Please do not inflict it on us and future generations in this little space here. I’ve had to maintain too many properties where the designer thought it a good idea to include a single Quaking Aspen and very quickly I was left to deal with the immediate and strong spread of a powerful tree that chokes out everything else in the landscape and even ruptures asphalt and cement. Please don’t plant it here. Thank you for hearing all of my thoughts, This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 23 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 106 7/21/2022 dan.burden@bluezones.com email Jennifer, great insights. To answer two of your questions, "...if there is any research available on the assumption that a sidewalk automatically invites more people into a space - specifically people with criminal intent. I could also imagine that the lack of sidewalks invites people wishing to hide what they’re doing because everyone else going about their everyday business are on the provided sidewalk across the street ... (do) street lights automatically make a street safer by providing light - seems like common sense - when in fact street lights often shine in people’s eyes making it harder to see and cast harsh, contrasting shadows that the eye has trouble adjusting to. Trails and sidewalks, and people using them, bring added security. There is significant data on this (see my presentation). The more people walking and bicycling the more there is natural surveillance. As to lighting, this also reduces the opportunity for crime. Lighting should not create glare (see my presentation), and lighting helps build a strong sense of welcome and identity. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 107 7/21/2022 dan.burden@bluezones.com email After serving on this working group, I came to realize how essential it is to have everyone involved become aware of the greater mission of Sims Way, to be a signature street that addresses each of the following: •safely move trafÞc within the designated target speed (30 mph), •advance a multi-modal community that supports all people walking and bicycling, •create a true "front porch" gateway and welcome into our community, •provide a mix of green and shade, •reduce the potential for crime, •consider maintenance costs, lighting snd more. This slide deck provides a menu of visual opportunities to visualize and address each topic. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 108 7/21/2022 dan.burden@bluezones.com email Jennifer, great insights. To answer two of your questions, "...if there is any research available on the assumption that a sidewalk automatically invites more people into a space - specifically people with criminal intent. I could also imagine that the lack of sidewalks invites people wishing to hide what they’re doing because everyone else going about their everyday business are on the provided sidewalk across the street ... (do) street lights automatically make a street safer by providing light - seems like common sense - when in fact street lights often shine in people’s eyes making it harder to see and cast harsh, contrasting shadows that the eye has trouble adjusting to. Trails and sidewalks, and people using them, bring added security. There is significant data on this (see my presentation). The more people walking and bicycling the more there is natural surveillance. As to lighting, this also reduces the opportunity for crime. Lighting should not create glare (see my presentation), and lighting helps build a strong sense of welcome and identity. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. Dan Burden Dan Burden Dan Burden 8/20/2022 24 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 109 7/21/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com email As I mentioned previously, the Port’s rationale for Full Expansion was not clear to me, which made the Pros/Cons exercise challenging. I attempted to flesh out the Full Expansion rationale for me, and I attach it here for your consideration. I imagine that this rationale could be improved by those with greater insight. Rationale for Full Expansion of the Boat Haven Boat Yard 1. Full Expansion means full build out of the Boat Haven work yard to the Port of Port Townsend’s northern property line (0.9 acre). Full Expansion of the work yard entails: raising the surface elevation to match adjacent work yard grades, constructing a retaining wall/security fence, constructing structural fill ballasted to support travel lifts and loads, ground surfacing with nonpolluting gravel material, installing connections to the property’s stormwater collection and treatment system, rehabilitating the work yard’s electrical service, fiber optic, and cable network, and security lighting. 2. City of Port Townsend designated Boat Haven as zone M-II(A) ((Boat Haven) Marine Related Uses). This district accommodates a variety of uses including marina, recreational boating, manufacturing, assembly, haul out, and repair. The zone designates larger scale and more intensive water-dependent or marine-related uses at the Boat Haven. These uses are consistent This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 109 Continued 3. Chapter 17.22 (MARINE-RELATED AND MANUFACTURING ZONING DISTRICTS) of the City of Port Townsend Municipal Code allows Full Expansion, with associated marine uses. The Code requires neither yard setbacks from the property line nor a vegetated buffer along nonresidential land uses (i.e., Sims Way R/W). 4. Full Expansion is consistent with the Port of Port Townsend’s 2020 Comprehensive Scheme of Harbor Improvements (CSHI) plan, which states “future development of the upland areas at the Boat Haven property...anticipates maximizing the efficient use of available land to encourage marine-related commerce and industry” and “the upland areas should be actively managed to efficiently use all available land, encourage intensification of marine related industrial and commercial uses, and improve the Port’s bottom line.” The CSHI anticipates upland capital improvements, such as “Work Yard & Boat Yard Resurfacing (Periodic),” “Stormwater Treatment System Rehabilitation (Periodic),” “Sandblast Containment Facility,” and “Work Yard & Boat Yard Electrical Service Rehabilitation/Lighting,” which are elements of Full Expansion. 5. The 2020 Annual Update of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Economic Development This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 25 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 109 Continued 5. The 2020 Annual Update of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS Project #24) identifies elements of Full Expansion, which is therefore consistent with and helps to implement locally adopted project priorities. 6. Full Expansion has received a specific and substantial Public Infrastructure Fund grant from Jefferson County under the State Community Economic Revitalization Board Prospective Development Program. This commitment of financial resources verifies the Port’s need for Full Expansion. 7. The project will assist in retaining and creating 20 permanent jobs that sustain and enhance Port Townsend’s “working waterfront,” thereby enhancing an economic sector long identified by policy plans as essential to preserving community character. 8. The Boat Haven work yard is an integrated complex of interdependent operations that rely on efficient use of designated space. The work yards and spaces rely centralized infrastructure; that is, close proximity to utilities, environmental protection measures, equipment staging, and equipment and vehicle access/circulation. Shipbuilding and repair activities generate pollutants, such as abrasive blast media, metals, metal related compounds, petroleum associated This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 109 Continued hydrocarbons, and antifouling ingredients in paints, which require connections with comprehensive containment and treatment systems already present. Alternative sites for conducting these activities are unavailable. 9. Boat Haven no longer imagines westward expansion of the Boat Yard into the “Balch Property” primarily due to shoreline and environmental constraints (e.g., wetlands). This condition reduces the Port’s buildable area, and forces intensified uses of unencumbered land, as envisioned by Full Expansion. 10. Full Expansion will benefit two Boat Haven Upland Use Designations: (1) BH- A Work Yard, and (2) BH-B Marine Industrial/Boat Yard. The use designations seek to agglomerate specific types of development where activities are conducive; that is, to compatible work yard and marine trade uses adjacent to the boat lifts, distinct from designated administrative, recreational, and parking areas near public and pedestrian facilities. 11. The BH-A Work Yard is east of Haines Place and Boat Street, and extends easterly to the Safeway Gas Station property. It encompasses the area ballasted for the 75-ton mobile travel lift, and has approximately 120 spaces for vessel storage and refit projects. Boat storage and refit projects This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 26 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 109 Continued are the principal use in this area. Per the CSHI, “the area should be managed to maximize its vessel storage potential and, in turn, improve the Port’s bottom line.” Full Expansion will allow work spaces for larger vessels, and servicing with new electrical conduits, wiring, transformers, pedestals, receptacles, and meters. The Travel Lift Drive aisle would be less congested, facilitating equipment and vehicle access and circulation. Also, Full Expansion will allow installation of industrial grade (non-glare) lighting to improve security and safety. 12. The BH-B Marine Industrial/Boat Yard, the majority upland designated use at Boat Haven, is west of Haines Place, and extends westerly to the Balch Property and delineated wetlands. This area is for shipbuilding and repair, ship and yacht building businesses, boat storage, and other marine-related industry. The Port proposed the unballasted former Port Townsend Lumber Company area in BH-B for a needed sandblast facility and containment area to serve the entire work yard. 13. Full Expansion offers economies of scale over Partial Expansion, and significant cost savings opportunities on a unit area basis. It is difficult to project the specific marine- related uses This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 109 Continued limited, and work yard congestion would continue to compromise operational safety under Partial Expansion. 14. If Partial Expansion, with associated infrastructure improvements, such as a retaining wall for fill containment, security fencing and lighting, stormwater collection and treatment, and electrical and other utility improvements, were followed by future Full Expansion, many costs of mobilization and construction would double, significant costs would accrue for demolition and reinstallation of the infrastructure improvements, and work yard practices and operations would be disrupted by construction for a second time. 15. Full Expansion requires removal of Lombardy poplar trees along the Port’s property line. Partial Expansion would not require near-term tree removal for structural fill or retaining wall construction, but would not importantly benefit the Lombardy poplar trees in the long-term because: (1) the trees are progressively degenerating, and many are failing and posing safety hazards, (2) trenching for undergrounding of Jeffco PUD’s electrical lines and for installing lateral electrical hookups and other utilities to boat yard work spaces will accelerate degradation of poplar health, and (3) the poplars do not have any special heritage or other This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 109 Continued poplar health, and (3) the poplars do not have any special heritage or other designation that warrants protection. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 27 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 110 7/21/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com email I would just like to clarify, that my concerns about boatyard security became aroused initially when I saw the PUD Concept drawing of the sidewalk right up against the fenceline - eye level and about 10 feet away from where all us workers have our expensive tools, supplies and equipment in view - (one sander can cost over $500!). That, along with the fence opening the Port and City wanted to reinstall in our new fenceline for 'enhanced access' into that area. The sidewalk just invites more walking traffic along there - where, up to now, the walkers trickle along through there, and are buffered away from the fenceline. Our vehicles full of tools aren't in blatant view as they will be with a sidewalk right along the fence. With the space allowed, that is most likely right where it will go. Just like the PUD Concept drawing. Stragglers mosying through the yard in broad daylight have been known to up and just try to make off with our tools and our bikes. There is a growing sense of vulnerability in the workyard that never use to exist all these years and I was just addressing my concerns about that as a new design is created. I'm not wanting a beefy fortified fence about it, but, at least no opening, and, since a sidewalk WILL go in now, maybe at least some buffer plantings between the sidewalk and fenceline for a bit of a visual 'shield' for both us workers and our goods. The yardworkers and boatowners I've spoken to that work daily along that stretch didn't want more people RIGHT THERE on the other side of the fence as they were trying to work. I've enjoyed the occasional chat with folks through the fenceline who had all the usual questions about the boats, the work, let them take my picture, etc., but, peopling up that space isn't something I'd like to happen without some planting buffers between us workers, our tools, and the curious questioning public. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 111 7/21/2022 Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com email I completely agree with Joni about the opening in the fence along the boat yard. That doesn’t seem like it makes any sense to me, when I think we all had consensus about the main entrance to the boatyard (by the Safeway intersection and sunrise coffee) being the preferred/only entrance. It’s unclear to me whether or not a full sidewalk on that side is a forgone conclusion, and I understand that none of us are the decision-makers. However, I am wondering if the grant providing the funding for this project is calling for sidewalks on both sides, as was potentially suggested at the last meeting, with the explanation of how the funding works. Is our discussion about small, soft, permeable paths moot given the inevitable problems with longterm maintenance? If there are any absolutes, based on grant funding directives, it would be good to know so that we don’t waste time discussing ideas that can’t be. There is also another dilemma I see here. A number of people from the public have reached out to me after they found out that I was on this stakeholder committee simply to tell me that they want the view of the boatyard to be covered up with trees and shrubs completely because they think it’s very unsightly. I personally think the boatyard is awe-inspiring and would love for it to be on display and honored. However, I can completely understand the issue with security and theft (so sad and frustrating that always a few people break the trust of so many others!). I think a sturdy fence can also be a beautiful fence, providing views and (hopefully) keeping people from having direct access to boats and expensive tools. But I can also imagine that shrubs could protect the immediate view of vulnerable tools being used at the ground level while not obscuring the view of the boats (which I believe are the awe-inspiring part for visitors). I’d welcome any data again on the pros/cons of man-made fencing vs living/green screening for security purposes - if any exists. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 28 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 112 7/26/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com Thank you for the drawing.  It raises some issues.  The Gate Way Planis the SR20 right of Way but the drawing suggest retaining Lombardi Poplars inside the park. This is counter to the 1986 Kah Tai Landscape Plan which called for poplar removal. Also it does not show poplars marked for removal that have grown from suckers of the parent trees lining SR20. Perpetuating L. Poplars in the Kah Tai Park is counter to the PT City Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Element Open Space and Trails Policy. Policy 4.41: "Preserve natural features." Lombardi Poplar is not natural to the Park or the Pacific Northwest. They are not in the Park's proposed planting list. Policy 4.4.2: "Incorporate habitat considerations in design and development of new park and recreation facilities. Regarding Kah Tai Park in particularly, Policy 4.5.1: "Extend maximum environmental protection in perpetuity of wildlife habitat, and passive outdoor recreation functions within Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park." Lombardi Poplars are a non native invasive tree continuing to invade the Kah Tai Park. They repress efforts to establish native species. The Sims Way Project should not violate laws governing Kah Tai Lagoon Park by creating a plan allowing Lombardi Poplar perpetuation inside the park. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 113 7/25/2022 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com See attached. Mr. Mader summed it up pretty well, and a lot of my comments/questions are the the same. Attached Trim trees (PUD) to create a 10-ft clear radius from the nearest power wire(s) Pros: Will preserve Poplar Trees – Appears to be enough room to achieve 10 ft. clear area – Status Quo maintained will make some folks very happy Cons: Gateway Project will not exist with this current funding - Must be continuously maintained or same thing will happen again – No economic improvement for Port – Will continue to have same issues with Poplar deterioration and sucker growth – Does not align with Gateway Plan comments to replace Poplars over time – Constrain Port operations to be offset 20 feet from the nearest power wire Will they still have the current issues with mast safety? Will this direction actually shrink the Port’s boat parking footprint to achieve 20 ft offset? Leave Poplars on the north side – Maintenance Program? Leave Poplars on the south side with heavy trimming (first bullet) – See above Begin maintenance program for remaining Poplars – On North side as well? Keep existing ped facilities - no new facilities -Will the North Sidewalk still need to be upgraded to ADA requirements, with funding from elsewhere? Expand boat yard by 20 feet (existing curb to new curb and existing fence to new fence) Pros: Gives the Port a little more room, but what exactly can they achieve with this partial expansion? - Funding Remains – Poplars remain in place – Overhead power & comm. lines are no longer visible or Safety concern – With less money needed for this particular design, could there be some reserved for a real Poplar Maintenance & replacement as needed program? This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. Continued Keep existing ped facilities - no new facilities – Again, will north sidewalk still need to be upgraded to meet ADA requirements? Assess tree impacts due to Port expansion - keep Poplars as much as practical – Please define practical as fact & not opinion…. Some going & some staying will not be the sightliest version of beautification unless they are replaced with new or different vegetation species. Consider future compatibility with full expansion (including new ped facilities) – If all entities consider for the future, should they consider it more now, when there is funding available? Underground power and communication lines – Yes please! Spot replace Poplars based on tree health/expansion impacts – See comment above on Assess tree impacts. 8/20/2022 29 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 115 7/29/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com Full expansion would mean there would be only 21' left for sidewalk/ undergrounding power and plantings. Full expansion would mean there would be only 21' left for sidewalk/ undergrounding power and plantings. With a 5' buffer between sidewalk and Port fencline, a 6' sidewalk, a 2' storm swale/clearance from bikelane, that would leave 8' for any trees and bush planting. With the pullout lane running a good portion from the entrance, that would mean about 5' for planting along that stretch. Even that doesn't include the 5' root buffer from the power line trench PUD would like. My point is, with full expansion, we are going to end up with a planting section approximately the width of the existing bicycle lane - just as the initial PUD Concept drawing that was made up last fall showed. That's not enough room for any kind 'parkway planting' at all. Small stick trees will fit. That's about it. i haven't heard of anyone who saw that initial concept PUD put out as being happy about it AT ALL!! Partial expansion of only 20' would be great!! 40' would be heartbreaking. A 40' expansion would blow a big hole in our new concept plan! (Sorry, I was told all along that the Poplars were standing on the property line of the Port, which is 32' from the Port's concrete bars in the yard - which are 7' - 10' from the fenceline. This last meeting was the first time I ever heard ithe property line was 40' from the concrete bars - which is 8' beyond the trees!) This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 116 8/5/2022 Jeff Selby Jefferson County Peninsula Trails Coalition selbyjl44@gmail.com The purpose of this email is to express support, on behalf of the Peninsula Trails Coalition (PTC), for Shared Use Paths both bordering and connecting to Sims Way. Due to the significance of the Boatyard LST/ODT trailhead, the PTC recommends that the expansion of the boatyard take into consideration future trail oriented events that may be staged there. Those may include fundraising or promotion events of between 500 & 1000 participants in running, cycling, & walking activities. Listed below are three PTC Shared Use Path (described in the WSDOT Design Manual, M 22-01.20, Chapter 1515) recommendations associated with the Boatyard Expansion and Sims Way Stakeholder Committee project. 1. Sims Way – The PTC supports a separated Shared Use Path along the north (Ka Tai Lagoon) side (or south [boatyard] side) of Sims Way. The PTC envisions that this Path will one day extend to the Ferry Terminal, connecting to the PNNST via the ferry, and the Port Townsend downtown Water Street retail core. 2.Larry Scott Trailhead - The PTC supports a Shared Use Path from the corner of Sims Way and Haines Place around the western perimeter of the Boatyard to the current MP 0 trailhead location of the Larry Scott segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail. This would be the starting point of any large-scale organized events. 3. Jefferson County Transit Center - The PTC supports a Bike Lane or Shared Use Path from the corner of Sims Way and Haines Place to the Jefferson County Transit Center In order to accommodate event parking for larger MP0 based events. The Peninsula Trails Coalition would welcome the opportunity to share specifics regarding design, construction and maintenance for the above referenced Shared Use Path recommendations. Thank you for the supporting information. The project scope has been thought out to supports a future connection to the current Larry Scott Trailhead. 8/20/2022 30 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 117 7/26/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com Thank you for the drawing. It raises some issues. The Gate Way Plan is the SR20 right of Way but the drawing suggest retaining Lombardi Poplars inside the park. This is counter to the 1986 Kah Tai Landscape Plan which called for poplar removal. Also it does not show poplars marked for removal that have grown from suckers of the parent trees lining SR20. Perpetuating L. Poplars in the Kah Tai Park is counter to the PT City Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Element Open Space and Trails Policy. Policy 4.41: "Preserve natural features." Lombardi Poplar is not natural to the Park or the Pacific Northwest. They are not in the Park's proposed planting list. Policy 4.4.2: "Incorporate habitat considerations in design and development of new park and recreation facilities. Regarding Kah Tai Park in particularly, Policy 4.5.1: "Extend maximum environmental protection in perpetuity of wildlife habitat, and passive outdoor recreation functions within Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park." Lombardi Poplars are a non native invasive tree continuing to invade the Kah Tai Park. They repress efforts to establish native species. The Sims Way Project should not violate laws governing Kah Tai Lagoon Park by creating a plan allowing Lombardi Poplar perpetuation inside the park. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 118 7/27/22 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com i'm not sure if my suggestions for trees will work for the space allowed on the boatyard side (if not maybe Kah Tai side?), but, I had: FEMALE ONLY: Oregon Ash - 60' - 80' H/2' - 3' W, Aspen 40' H/ 20' - 30' W, Western Balsam 75' - 70' H/3' - 5' W, Black Cottonwood? Japanese Smoke Tree (Cornelian Cherry American), Redosier Dogwood - 10' H, Pacific Ninebark 6' - 8' H/ 3' - 6' W, Winter Daphne/Hellebore/Honeywort, Wax Myrtle (has berries, but, only in the wintertime) For Rock Wall plants: Trailing Lobelia? Creeping Thyme. For a wire fence vine: Western Honeysuckle (onica Ciliosa) or Star Jasmine. Yellow Lupine/Oregon Grape- Tall/Nootka Rose/Ceanothus/ Rhodedendrums. Of the tree list sent to us: The Elizabeth Magnolia/Gold Ginkgo/Sterling Linden (although that one has invasive roots) The rest of the 9 trees on the list sent to us are not options for the boatyard side. They are ALL MONECIOUS extremely high pollen trees and two are berry trees that birds would love eating from and pooping on boats after. We already have purple poop problems on boats way in the water during berry season! We need DIOECIOUS trees - mainly FEMALE. These are the trees that aren't likely to put off clouds of fine pollen (Although each species needs double checking!!) . No Conifers - they're all monecious. Especially, no Shore Pines!!! Choosing high pollen trees just for the sake of being able to handle the soil is not an option. Might as well replant with Poplars, which we know thrive in that soil, and suffer their short-term inconvenience of catkins on deck that to have every painted/varnished surface non-skidded by fine pollen every springtime. Literally, thousands of dollars are paid for one paintjob on many of these boats. To have it ruined by one gust of pollen blowing into it would be a huge loss for our customers. It'd cost thousands AGAIN to undo the damage and repaint again. That cannot happen! Pollen season (springtime) is our busiest season in the Port. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 119 7/28/2022 Russell Hill rhill3795@gmail.com See attached. I have marked up the drawing with “stars” for what I like most & least. This is only my opinion. As I have previously stated, I am not the Arboricultural specialist that Paul is, and trust that he has fleshed all these specific tree types & sizes for what is best for our climate, soil type, water availability, etc… and is giving us a good list. I do think that Joni’s comments that these new trees will be close to the Boats being worked on & painted are very valid concerns, and should be considered when selecting species. Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' Autumn Gold Ginkgo rate Good. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 31 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 120 7/28/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com I received only two attachments, the first from Scott - a list of 12 trees and one from Paul - images of the 12 trees. If there are other list, the attachments did not come with emails. My preference regarding the Kah Tai Park side and where the trees would have to be planted inside the Park beyond the SR 20 ROW. These are now planted and summer watered by drip irrigation in other locations within the Park. They are Quercus garryanna (Gary Oak)and Rhamnus (now Frangula) purshiana (Cascara). I would add Acer glabrum (Douglas Maple) as it is surviving if not thriving without watering near the ROW. For the Port side I defer to Paul and the landscape designer/architect persons in our group. I expect Cornus species were not considered due the soil conditions. There is an outstanding hybrid between C. natallii and C. florida (Eddies White Wonder), developed in the plant nursery of Mr. Edie of Vancouver BC. It does very well in PT landscapes but probably would need mulching and location on the east side of a more sun tolerant tree. It is reported to have sterile flowers so no pollen or fruit. I believe there is no plan to irrigate plants on the park side. Irrigation on both sides would be necessary to have plantings succeed. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 121 7/29/2022 Steve Mader stevefmader77@gmail.com All, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft tree list for Sims right-of-way plantings. Please see the attached spreadsheet with my ratings for Paul’s proposed species list and for native plant species I think would perform well at the site. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 122 7/29/2022 Dan Burden dan.burden@bluezones.com I will leave the tree species up to the experts, but ideally, new trees will be placed 5-6 feet back from the street edge, and not behind the sidewalk or path. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 123 7/30/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net First among these, is the preference for the PARKWAY form. Again, it offers a way to best integrate the high-traffic corridor and environs, with the now-36 year-old Kah Tai Lagoon Park. The discontinuity between those two has been, for me, glaringly obvious for decades—kind of like stitches that never got removed after a surgery. Speaking personally: I lived until adulthood in Chicago, whose motto is “Urbs in Horto” (City in a Garden). The great, connecting concept in that city is the Parks-Boulevards system shaped by the justly- famous masters, Frederick Law Olmsted, and Daniel Burnham; I grew up knowing all those parks and boulevards and it largely influenced my decision toward a career in city planning. (Earned a B.S. in Urban Studies, plus graduate work in Urban Planning.) They showed how harmony was and is possible in cities between the need for efficient transportation and vehicle movement, and the need for human access to green spaces and for habitat for birds and other species. So the Parkway form offers a path toward reintegration of the Lagoon basin with its surroundings. Replacing the poplar wall with a more right-sized and right-shaped tree margin along Sims Way will overtly and subtly bring connectivity between two ’sides’ of Port Townsend: the Historic District, and Castle Hill in the east-west direction; and between the mostly plant-deprived Port/Boat Haven area and the increasingly green Park/Lagoon area, opposite. Imagine if it were possible to put Sims Way into a tunnel! Then there would be lots of movement between what are now polarized sides of that corridor. The positive suggestions made within our group have tended to be toward humanizing and softening the highway’s influence in that neighborhood. Secondly: during the wrap-up during Tuesday’s meeting, there was frequent use of “native” as a concept for species selection, as referenced in the Kah Tai long-term plan for tree replacement, and elsewhere in our studies. As a native- This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 32 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 124 8/1/2022 Bre Ganne City of Port Townsend bganne@cityofpt.us Thanks for sharing. I have a lot of respect for the consultant arborist team from Urban Forestry Services. Their research into good street trees for this area is unmatched by anyone around, in terms of adapting to current conditions, cultivating new species and away from the old standards of Green Ash, Red Maple and Cleveland Pear. I read their street tree blog regularly when we look for trees. I don’t think it’s realistic to have all native large trees, but I do like the list of the other native shrubs and medium trees to consider, with a few minor modifications in terms of maintenance. Who is going to maintain this area? The larch and bald cypress are great choices. I think we can add a lot of native sm/med trees and shrubs to balance the reality of needing durable, hybridized or disease resistant cultivars as large street trees. Some of these large trees are slower growers, like the Frontier elm, the ironwood and the sourgum, but they are solid choices. I am leary of Elms in landscapes these days, but the Frontier doesn’t sucker. It wont like the wind or being fully exposed either, so used in the right locations, it’s a good choice to add color and diversity. I haven’t seen any Gingko’s that are doing well near the water in PT. The ones in the plaza are rootbound, I think. The ones behind the UPS store on that end of Water St. also don’t look great. I think it’s too windy for them to do well on the water side, as much as everyone always wants to put them there. A smattering in a more protected planted area could work. City staff has much experience with trees in the street and park systems. Thank you. 125 8/2/2022 Paul Thompson Bartlett Consulting pthompson@Bartlett.com These are solid responses with some excellent observations. Please consider that the soils in these areas will require amendment and that this will impact the growth and performance of trees in this location. I anticipate they will outperform the same species or similar in Port Townsend. I agree that the maritime environment may impact the growth of the elm and other trees (slowing and possibly stunting height growth); however, I still anticipate the species being a suitable choice. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 126 8/5/2022 Sarah McQuillen sassymcquillen@gmail.com My thoughts/conclusions: - shrubbery along the wall/fence will need an area larger than 5ft wide - the only tree on the suggested list that might work is Ginko Biloba (male only - no pollen or bad smell). This would be beautiful and would compliment the avenue look on the Kah Tai side. However, this is not a native tree - which has been a concern some people have re: the Poplar trees. I think the graphic sketch of: fence, shrubbery, paved sidewalk and small trees along the street curb, is graphically clean but would not constitute a warm welcoming entrance into town. It would look and feel like "anywhere urban planning", be uninteresting and high maintenance. The current view coming into town - and leaving town - is beautiful, peaceful and inviting. Not fussy or fragmented or high maintenance. If citizen input agrees with this, maybe the City can negotiate with the Port to not expand to their property line along the boatyard. Then the PUD could underground the wires and the Poplars, small permeable path and current crosswalks could stay. Mature trees would Not need to be removed at great expense (visual and monetary). If this money is for economic and facilities development of the Port - how important is it for them to expand between Safeway Gas and Sunrise Coffee? I know they need a heavy haul out area (behind the Brewery) and need to upgrade their toxic waste system. Are mature tree removals and another paved sidewalk essential or cost effective for their needs? If the Port insists on full expansion, I still recommend: native shrubs - 10' wide along the wall/fence property line, a path that is not paved and no trees along the road curb (unless there is a tree species that can grow large and survive along the road, is not monecious, and would be a gracious complement to the mature Poplars on the Kah Tai side). I still question why the City Manager and City Council are willing to go against Port Townsend's designation as a Tree City, and why they are This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 33 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 127 8/6/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net But first: I think there is wisdom in Paul’s assessment of the condition of aging poplars and the idea of gradual replacement—but some discussion is in order regarding the (1) cost of ‘gradual' and (2) committing future players to carry out the blueprint we are providing to Parks & Recreation, and beyond that, to City Council. (1) It seems like the cost to remove some trees now, some later, is certain to escalate. How will that be paid for—will there be a fund set aside now, invested to earn some interest, to try to cover those costs in, perhaps, 2030 or 2040? Speaking practically: I think whichever trees are assessed as liable to fail/fall/die in the next 20 years, should all be replaced NOW, instead of saddling future government with that responsibility. Do it while equipment and staffing are on- site—it can only be more affordable to do that. (2) It doesn’t make sense to me to react, as a tree here or there falls or dies in 2025, 2028, etc. Take Paul’s assessment of individual trees seriously and leave those more likely to be healthy in 20 years, and remove the others. That leaves our future City free of the burden of assessing tree health, and providing perpetual maintenance, for a couple of decades. There are so many other trees in the City’s care that can and need to be tended, on streets and in parks. Regarding the 12 suggested species, a couple of considerations: (1) There ought to be some present-time, living examples in the community of each suggested species; otherwise, it is just an expensive, risky experiment. I have commented previously about Garry oak: how slow it grows, how it must be protected from deer browse for many years, etc.. Notably, although it can be found in Sequim, Oak Harbor, and elsewhere nearby, I have not found evidence it ever grew on the drier end of the Quimper Peninsula. This could well be a high-maintenance planting. Linden: There is a very large, beautiful specimen of some kind of linden 128 8/6/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com Regards planting on the north side/Park side are new plants to be put in the right of way or would they be planted inside the park boundary? This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 129 8/6/2022 Steve King sking@cityofpt.us Thanks for the question.  This project will not be addressing trees in the park, only those that are on the right of way line or inside right of way. 130 8/7/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net  Adding to my email comment on 8/6 regarding Gingko as a suitable tree species: I suggested that if gingko is planted, choose the male form instead of the female that produces smelly fruits. But instead I found in my notes from 2021: https://conifersociety.org/conifers/articles/conifers-allergy-friendly- evergreen-trees/ The Ogren Pollen Allergy List Scale (OPALS)• Ginkgo biloba 7 (male trees); 2 (female trees) My pollen concern then, is about the potential for allergenic reaction. It’s more than a boatyard issue. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 34 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 131 7/31/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com I just read Port Townsend's Non-Motorized 2011 Comprehensive Plan.  I'm impressed with all the work that went into providing alternatives to driving cars everywhere and the many aspects of walking/bicycling routeplanning that went into this plan.  For the most part, I strongly support it.  I read in it, the need for a link between the Larry Scott Trail to the Park and Ride - with a plan for an eventual link directly off the trail through the Port to the Park and Ride. Good idea there to head bikes out directly towards the Park 'n Ride and to the bicycle lanes as suggested. Hopefully the Port's new linking trail to the west will be happen in the years ahead. I also read the plan for an eventual multi-use trail of 10' to link the Park and Ride and ride to Kearny. Since, it was suggested in the plan itself to put any multi-use path through Parks whenever possible - instead of in alignment with or adjacent to streets in as few places as possible, lets put this multi-use path THROUGH Kah Tai Park! There's already a path between the Park and RIde and Kearny in there. Just widen it into a paved multi-use path! Kah Tai already gets funding from the LWCF (Land Water Conservation Fund) which would match a 50/50 funding up to $75,000 for bikeway facilities. As far as allowing bicycles to ride on a new 6' sidewalk along the boatyard fenceline, Washington code RCW's prohibit riding a bicycle upon a sidewalk in a business district. Sims way is a commercial corridor - a business district. Back in 2011, there was support for police enforcement (by the Non-Motorized Transportation Plan Committee) to issue warnings to bicyclers for 'inappropriate behavior' (as I was for riding on a completely uninhabited sidwalk just before downtown back then). Most enforcements are lax anymore, but, they may not always be so. I also noticed in the Plan, the option for 'Neighborhood Connector' paths (Secondary connectors) instead of concrete sidewalks (a primary connector) that are used for shorter connections that aren't heavily used by pedestrians - as is the short This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 132 8/6/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com I'm up for more meetings on species type!  We need to figure out a completely different list of species from most of those provided by Paul for the boatyard side.  If we're unable to find any non-pollen or berry trees suitable for that soil, we may just need to replant with more Poplars - as we KNOW that they thrive in that soil and last a good 70 years (As both our county and city golf course's trees have).  Their springtime catkins falling for a few weeks in spring and storm leaves blowing on boats is a minor conflict compared to getting all surfaces non-skidded by the high quantity pollen of Oak, Elm, Cypress trees,  or, splattered purple by the other chosen bird loving berry trees!  As I've said, finding Poplar replacement trees to stand 16' to 20', with branches and limbs even closer to the boats, will be quite tricky.  I'm glad to see a level 2 assessment of the Poplars along the Kah Tai side will happen. I'm sure we will find many trees with at least 20 or many more years left in them. Those are the one that should stay - for many years ahead, as long as they remain healthy~ The southside level 1 assessment of trees showed a very low risk of trunk or limb failure for all but 3 of those Poplars. The main risk there was simply root invasion. Our Poplars are just under 50 years of age, by the way. They were planted in '75. I'm curious, since, the power can't be undergrounded until one year from now (PUD meeting said 52 weeks out from now for supplies), does that mean this whole project is on hold now? I guess no expansion can happen with power poles right there.   8/20/2022 35 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 133 8/15/2022 Ron Sikes b1rdbrush@gmail.com Since on the North side there is only 5 to 8 feet between the SR20 ROW and the pavement of the pedestrian/bicycle path, large or even medium trees would not fit the space. Instead we should consider shrubs or small trees for the North side. Steve Mader's Park Way list rated several. A short list of shrubs I think would survive in the 5 to 8 foot space are: Amelanchier alnifolia (serviceberry), Phiadelphus lewisii (mock orange), Rubus parviflorus (thimbleberry), Symphoricarpos albus (common snowberry). Also needed would be wood chip mulching as recommended by Paul and circle fencing for the serviceberry and mock orange. These shrubs are now growing without irrigation in area 12 near the ROW. Larger trees would best work inside the park but that is a project outside the gateway project. For native species the http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=16439&d=24D74g0l5FJWiooqEYua9c5JSepT Ouo-UKQZogw8JA&u=http%3a%2f%2fbiology%2eburke%2ewashington%2eedu has many images of the species, distribution maps, and descriptions, and more. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 134 8/15/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com That Oak is truly a beautiful tree! I love most all Oak tree species. It'd be lovely IN the Kah Tai Park, but, all Oak trees are very high pollen trees and it wouldn't work on the boatyard side, or in the narrow bit left of the ROW on the northside. I'm not sure about Live Oak, but, I know that the Garry Oak is a v.e.r.y. slow grower! It takes decades for those to mature! Debbie Janke and her husband planted a whole lot of the Garry Oaks (same trees as along Marrowstone Island road) in the Park over the years. I was hoping maybe Ron, Forest, Jennifer, or Steve, who all know trees really well could help with specie suggestions for non-pollen/berry/fruit trees for the Portside. That's where we're really needing help!! There's no shortage of possibilities for for the Northside! There are already all kinds of native trees recently planted already along there, along with many established natives. That side barely needs replanting with anything! This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 135 8/10/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com Thank you, Forest!  It's nice to hear some feedback on these suggestions. I knew trees species would be very tricky to come up with to replace the Poplars that thrive so well there. We can also look at species with heavier pollens - like the Poplars' and Willows' catkins, that fall close to the tree and only travel in high winds onto nearby horizontal surfaces. That kind of pollen would be a mess for boats still, but, not as bad as the dusty pollen that hits every surface in light gusts of winds. We'll also need to consider the increasing floods predicted to happen along that space along with the droughts. We need to find some perfect trees, like the Poplars, that can handle all those conditions. Speaking of costs, it would be less expensive altogether to keep many healthy younger Poplars the City already has along the Kah Tai side than to remove them at $3,000 apiece. Most likely, there will not be $$ left for buying any new trees to plant. The $$ for this project is for the priority of expanding the boatyard, undergrounding the power, removing and replacing the trees along the boatyard side. That may just use up the bulk of the $2 million grant funds with expected price increases. Putting in the new multi-use path along Kah Tai side will take a big chunk out of the $200,000 meant for the Northside tree removal. With the project scope and expenses growing, taking out ALL the healthy Poplars, just to replant with different species seems ... extremely impractical. Since work can't even begin until about one year from now when the PUD can begin to underground the power (their supplies are 52 weeks out) we can expect costs to be even higher than predicted at this time. Any work on the Kah Tai side should not begin until the initial mission of this grant is completed in a year. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 36 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 136 8/12/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com Whoops!  I almost forgot to include these two tree/bush species!! Royal Purple Smoke Tree 10' - 15'H X 10 - 15'W (This one isn't native) Lombardy Poplar~ Thrives in Soil Conditions onsite Lives 70 up to 70 years (or more!) Recommended for planting by EPA in floodzones/wetlands Recommended by EPA to plant along with Native trees for future climate change concerns (flooding/droughts) Heavily used by migratory Yellowrump Warblers, Nomadic Waxwings, Bushtits for foraging, also by many butterflies Particularly noted for absorbing metal and other toxins from the soil and air (boatyard and road run-off) Water use comparable to Douglas Fir Roots controllable by root barrier Heavy Catkins (Pollen) falls close to trees/interferes with horizontal surfaces on boats only during high winds in springtime (Much less debilitating than clouds of fine pollen of many other tree species non- skidding every surface of the boats They are so lovely to see in the backdrop of our town arriving by boat into our marina!! The greenery against the blue skies over the masts and buildings is a welcoming sight! This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 137 8/15/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net Garry oak is our lone native oak, and occurs naturally at just one location in the county (Oak Bay). To use Jennifer’s expression, it is “deer candy” or more like an entree. I’d love to see full-grown oaks there, but to get to that, it will be necessary to provide ample and very secure cages for a number of years for each oak until they reach about 15 feet in height and develop indigestible (to deer) bark. Anything short of that, results in coppiced trunks; rinse, and repeat. It’s a path toward failure. So the choices besides not using Garry oak are: large secure cage for each tree that not only excludes deer, but resists human vandalism; cages should extend to at least 10 feet in height or deer will find a way; the mesh should be wide enough that a hand can reach inside for weeding while the tree(s) is/are reaching semi-mature height —purchase well-established trees that already have some of the above qualities—if such trees can be found; they won’t be cheap—I suggest a specific fundraising opportunity to attract donors and the trees be dedicated to the donors’ chosen person/thing In its favor, a Gateway with some Garry oak would be a cultural statement and make a nice ‘bookend’ with the Jamestown gift-pole at Monroe Street. It would help people understand where they truly are: it’s the westernmost corner of the Lower 48, not Lombardy. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 37 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 138 8/14/2022 Jennifer Rotermund gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com I recall an earlier comment by Forest inquiring about an established, local stand of Oregon White Oak (Quercus garryana). I’ve never stopped to confirm, but I believe there’s a large, mature stand just before you enter the new bridge to Marrowstone (not the main bridge that takes you to Indian Island, but the road converted to bridge further in at the entrance to M’stone itself), on the south side of the road. I’ve admired them for a few years now, every time I drive past. I don’t know the exact soil composition and structure there, but they’re practically on the waterI also strongly second the use of Pacific Wax Myrtle and Pacific Rhododendron. And, I wanted to share that in my experience around PT, all of the shrub Dogwoods are like deer candy. The small, dwarf varieties of red & yellow twig that sucker a lot still look decent around town even though they’re continuously nibbled on. They’re like cute, little suckered shrub buttons…but I don’t often see our native Red Twig or even the cool MidWinter Fire types look so nice with what our deer do to them. In my experience, all of the Manzanitas are deer candy too. Ive tried a bunch of different varieties around town and they all get eaten to the ground unless protected long term. What I don’t know is how many deer legitimately frequent the Sims corridor in question…or, if when newly planted, will that bring them in - because our deer love the novelty of new plants too. Comments on the other suggested plants: Ulmus carpinifolia x parvifolia 'Frontier' Frontier Elm - I have no problem with this. Taxodium distichum 'Lindsey's Skyward' Lindsey's Skyward Bald Cypres - my fear with this one is that the deer would eat/prune these like all of our Arborvitae around town (a very unfortunate look). Larix occidentalis Western larch - I’ve had a lot of success installing and growing these around the area. I like them! Parrotia persica 'Ruby Vase' Ruby Vase Ironwood - I’m good with this one, a hardy & pretty street tree. Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak - another nice Oak, I like it. Nyssa sylvatica 'Wildfire' Wildfire Sourgum - I don’t have any major This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 139 8/11/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com Quaking Aspen, Western Balsam (Black Cottonwood Oregon Ash Scoulers Willow Hawthorne Tree Hairy Manzanita Pacific Dogwood Pacifc Ninebark Pacific Wax Myrtle Here're some possible trees FEMALE Western Balsam: 70'H X 3' -5' W ) FEMALE Quaking Aspen: 20' - 80'H X 20' - 30' FEMALE Oregon Ash: 60' - 80'H X 2' - 3' W Scouler's Willow: 30'H X 30'W Douglas Hawthorne: 25'H X 15'W Hairy Manzanita: 12' - 15' H X ? Pacific Dogwood: 15' - 40'H X 10' - 25'W Pacific Ninebark: 12' - 18'H X 8' W Wax Myrtle: 15' - 20'H X ? (Mature size) This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 140 8/10/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net Can you offer some comments on contrasting costs of: 8. "Remove select poplars where failing or immediately adjacent to established tree stands in Kah Tai Park. 9. Remove poplars when other plantings mature.” I think there was a projected cost of $200,000 originally? That would be for removing all poplars in one operation in 2022-23, if I understood the original estimate. So what is the contrasting cost of gradual removals? Is there a unit cost per clump? My thought as expressed previously is: —preclude the possibility that US$ inflation saddles future City government with tree maintenance/removal expenses competing with other Public Works expense such as fixing streets —try to keep the Sims Way project costs at or under $2M, the figure that has been pitched to the public We have the recent experience of the ‘Cherry Street’ multi-unit housing imported from Victoria BC, sitting incomplete and not serving the known housing need, and becoming a gradual drain on maintenance budgets (unless it gets demolished). Sims Way is much more prominent, more costly, and needs to be financially clear start to finish. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 38 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 141 8/9/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net Along with their recommendation of the Linden tree, Ginkgo, and Magnolia that seem like possibilities, again, here're the trees and plants I found. after my deep digging months ago,  that seemed compatible if they'd fit in the space and can handle the soil conditions.  Maybe they can be considered and checked into.  FEMALE ONLY: Oregon Ash - 60' - 80' H/2' - 3' W Aspen 40' H/ 20' - 30' W Western Balsam 75' - 70' H/3' - 5' W (Black Cottonwood) Some kind of female native WIllow? Lombardy Poplars behind buildings with root barriers Japanese Smoke Tree (Cornelian Cherry American) Redosier Dogwood - 10' H Hairy Manzanita - 10' H Pacific Ninebark 6' - 8' H/ 3' - 6' WWinter Daphne/Hellebore/Honeywort Wax Myrtle (has berries, but, only in the wintertime) Rhodedendrums Fraxinus latifolius (Oregon ash): typically grows in seasonal marshes in its native range, hence not likely to succeed on a dry roadside. But further: emerald ash borer is working its way northward and will arrive here in due course. I think it is inadvisable to plant a host for this pest, particularly where Fraxinus is already uncommon in the area. See: https://www.oregonlive.com/hsji/2022/08/profoundly-devastating-invasive- beetle-threatens-oregon-ash-trees.html Aspen: it’s present in the county but only in high freshwater marshes; can’t see how it would fit ecologically on Sims Way. Black cottonwood: probably adaptable to the dry conditions; it does tend to shed heavy branches frequently. I see it as a potential safety hazard at such a trafficked site. Willow: Scouler’s willow is a pretty good fit both hydrologically and in stature. Shortcoming is that the species doesn’t live very long—a few decades at most. Shrubs (above): Red-osier dogwood—prefers wet to damp soils; it does grow in the county but may require supplemental water during dry spells in a setting like Sims Way. Hairy manzanita—potentially a great choice; it tends to associate locally with both madrone, and shore pine, both of which are This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 142 8/9/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com The one aspect I've been saying over and over in the last couple of meetings is that we NEED to discuss the timetable meant by 'replace over time'.  It was even on the written agenda as a topic of discussion before our last meeting, but, we never did get around to discussing that timetable or what 'replace over time' meant.  Perhaps you've had discussions with some agency members about their timetable intentions, but, the rest of us haven't heard what is meant. As far as my word 'approve', what I meant was that the majority of us on the Committee were 'in favor' of keeping Poplars where possible. And, the majority of us on the Committee were hoping to keep a smaller permeable path on the boatyard side, not a 6' sidewalk, and the majority of us understood the tree species/boatyard conflict concern. Just as the majority of us were 'in favor' of the Parkway plan. You're right we didn't 'approve' the parkway plan, but, we were 'in favor' of it as we were the other topics I mentioned. What do you mean we're meant to 'facilitate votes'?? We haven't voted. All we've done is offer and discuss options that may or may not be heeded. Our influence obviously is minimal. As we've been told, the comments written in have little influence. Voices speaking directly to the City are who is being heard. As Mayor Faber said, everyone who talks to him wants the Poplars all gone. Most of the people (I'll admit not all) in my many circles of people want the Poplars kept. Most of the public comments sent in on this issue were for keeping the Poplars. As far as 'in keeping with existing planning documents' the documents for the ROW that exist are for keeping Poplars into the century ahead. The '86 Kah Tai document is for the Park, not the ROW. This project is only for ROW trees. We will not be removing any Park Poplars beyond the ROW line. Even so, as Connie said in the last meeting, the '86 Kah Tai document DID NOT say to remove ALL Poplars. The drawing on that document even kept Poplars in the design along Sims! I read in many comments by the public Saturday, that they This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 39 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 143 8/9/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net the Committee hasn't yet approved of any 'preferred' alternative and it shouldn't be said to the public that we have.  Our only overall approval was of the 'Parkway' replanting concept, keeping Poplars along the Kah Tai side, and one ADA sidewalk on the northside. We haven’t “approved” of “keeping the poplars along the Kah Tai side”; see Boards 8 and 9 of the PDF sent out on Friday and seen by the public on Saturday: 8. "Remove select poplars where failing or immediately adjacent to established tree stands in Kah Tai Park. 9. …Plant tree species consistent with long range planning documents. Remove poplars when other plantings mature." We have been discussing the timetable of removing poplars, whether beginning in 2023 together with the other tree removals including those observed as failing by Paul, at that time—or delaying some removals during a multi-year transition period. Cost of removing in 2023 as contrasted with some removals later, has yet to be estimated and is a practical consideration in decision making. Framing our recommendation as “keeping” existing poplars may create an inaccurate impression to part of the public (or a Leader reporter new to the issue). it'd be up to the CIty Council to decide on species, and that a couple of them might know about trees. Final decision is theirs, but that recommendation is ours—if we are to believe that our work means anything—along with the work and vote of Parks, Recreation & Trees. I fail to believe that our esteemed Council members “might know about trees” in some way greater than those of us who put trees at the center of our work and avocation for longer than some Council members have been alive. We exist as a Committee because they want to hear that intel from us. They empowered our Committee’s existence to facilitate votes they will need to take—not to punt on providing clear intel.  This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 144 8/9/2022 Sarah McQuillen sassymcquillen@gmail.com Thank you Joni for this information and for emphasizing the preferences expressed- both at our meetings and in public comments. I agree that if we can't find suitable tree species for the Port's requirements and for the soil type, we should re-plant poplars or go with grass. Also, thank you Forest for educating us re: Ginko.  145 8/7/2022 Forest Shomer ziraat@olympus.net  Adding to my email comment on 8/6 regarding Gingko as a suitable tree species: I suggested that if gingko is planted, choose the male form instead of the female that produces smelly fruits. But instead I found in my notes from 2021: https://conifersociety.org/conifers/articles/conifers-allergy-friendly- evergreen-trees/ The Ogren Pollen Allergy List Scale (OPALS) On a scale of 10: • Ginkgo biloba 7 (male trees); 2 (female trees) My pollen concern then, is about the potential for allergenic reaction. I suggest that the OPALS scale has value for those of us who are allergy sufferers (we are legion). Many do not even know that their allergies—respiratory, sneezing, eyes watering, etc.—are impacted by seasonal tree pollens. It’s more than a boatyard issue. This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 8/20/2022 40 Sims Way Comment Log Comment Date From Organization email Comment via Comment Summary Response to Comments 146 8/9/2022 Joni Blanchard jonijobone@hotmail.com Thank you, Forest for considering the pollen issue. Tree species along the boatyard side certainly needs to be figured out differently from the high pollen/berry trees presented to us. I spent quite a few months researching/investigating possible trees and plants that wouldn't cut the Port's economic development off at the knees as many of the recommended trees presented WOULD. They simply can't go in. Grass alone would be better. I found it'll be dioecious trees - mainly FEMALE that wouldn't create pollen. Although, each species needs to be individually checked into. I spoke with the Parks, Trees Board Chair at our Saturday meeting to see if she had any good recommendations for compatible trees, but, she said she didn't know much about trees and that the Trees Board wouldn't be helping with recommending any tree species for replanting. She said it'd be up to the CIty Council to decide on species, and that a couple of them might know about trees. So, it is up to our consultants and any recommendations we, the committee or public, can give to them. Along with their recommendation of the Linden tree, Ginkgo, and Magnolia that seem like possibilities, again, here're the trees and plants I found. after my deep digging months ago, that seemed compatible if they'd fit in the space and can handle the soil conditions. Maybe they can be considered and checked into. FEMALE ONLY: Oregon Ash - 60' - 80' H/2' - 3' W Aspen 40' H/ 20' - 30' W Western Balsam 75' - 70' H/3' - 5' W (Black Cottonwood) Some kind of female native WIllow? Lombardy Poplars behind buildings with root barriers Japanese Smoke Tree (Cornelian Cherry American) Redosier Dogwood - 10' H Pacific Ninebark 6' - 8' H/ 3' - 6' WWinter Daphne/Hellebore/Honeywort Wax Myrtle (has berries, but, only in the wintertime) Rhodedendrums. I'm not sure if we'll have another meeting or not on this issue. The newspaper implied that we would be meeting again so that the Committee can actually, give an approval (or not) of the final alternative presented to the Parks Board. At this This comment is from one of the stakeholder members. All stakeholder member comments are included in the comment log for the public to see. 147 8/17/2022 Debra Bouchard James Robers debdbouchard419@gmail.com engagePT Concern over scope, financials, and process. See attached.Thank you for the email. A number of points are made that are addressed in the preffered alterantive to be presented to the Parks Board on 8/23/22 8/20/2022 41 1 20 jobs not accurate assessment / estimate 2 Room @ BH for expansion w/o moving toward Sims 3 City has not maintained poplars as was req / promised - what will change? 4 Drastic changes take along time to recover aesthetically! Prefer incremental changes. "Partial" expansion. Both pro economic development and pro attractive UNIQUE entry to town. Do the necessary first. Underground cables. If trees die - then remove & replace expand boatyard with utilitarian but attractive fence. Be cost effective and follow a solid plan. Marine trades are hugely valuable economically to all Jefferson County. Expansion is valid. Undergrounding power is smart. Tree choice is critical. Maintenance plan critical. 5 Full expansion is the best option offered. This is for the future. 6 Ditto above comment. 7 Full expansion is the best option, both for the Port side and the Park side. The Lombardi Poplars are a safety hazard and an aggressive invasive species. 8 full expansion seems best if the boat yard really needs to expand 9 Hopefully the tress will be centered in the best space for future tree growth (probably as far from Sims Way as possible). Is the park side poplar removal a city priority? Maintain what is there do a full community process to deal with park side planning. 10 I think the jobs is a red herring. Are there unemployed boat workers? Option 2 - partial expansion sounds good. I really don't trust the Port and would like an independent evaluation. 11 I agree 12 N. side concept plan looks good with shared use path, at least where Sims Way borders Kah Tai Park. I think S. side is fine with just a footpath. Less asphalt covering earth and blocking rain. 13 Southside plan - attractive & practical Boat yard fence. Perhaps low growing rhodies for color & fill. Runoff water management from road is important. A row of trees - preferably the poplars. Do not do general tree fill. No fruit trees. Minimize use concrete & pavement. not excessively wide pathways please. 14 Shared? (!!), .. Keep all bikes off! People on bikes these days go 100 mph!! 15 When I first drove down the hell to go int PT I thought - wow, I now arrived someplace important. That's because of the drama of the allie of trees. 16 I don't believe the amount of foot-traffic in this area warrants the of cement / pavement being suggested here. It's too much! The trees should be protected at all costs: Thin them & keep the heathiest. Replant as needed, but keep as many as possible 17 Proper maintenance of the trees, groundscape is required and should occur. Copper saturation of grounds is a boat yard, copper bottom paint vestage - now stopped. Clean it up. Do not cut all trees on either side. Immediately bury the power lines! 18 Why pave more? This is a low traffic foot & bike use area. Bikes use the sidewalk. Cars drive in the bike lanes. More pavement I unsightly and not needed. Please, please preserve our trees on both sides of Sims Way!!! I have lived here too long to bear this kind of "modernization" that has no purpose above what we already have in place. 19 Yes, keep the trees, reduce pavement and bury power lines! 20 Please remove as many Lombardi Poplars as possible with the $1.97 million available. They are a safety hazard on the Port side and an aggressive no native tree that is competing with native plantings on the Park side. 21 Larch! Ironwood! Sour Gum! 22 Native species tree mix!!! Yes (x2 more) (Western Larch & kindred spirit oak :) ) 23 2nd native species - attention to habitat. 24 Retain poplars on N. side of Sims Way! No removals! Yes please! Yes 25 Replace w/ tall trees. No spindly saplings! ( I agree) Perhaps replace 1/2 at a time (I agree) Yes 26 No high pollen trees- Do not confuse invasive" with "non-native"-there are differences. 8/20/2022 Open house comments 1 27 The poplars have proven to be as good a choice as alternatives. They have been low pollen, low maintenance, happy in briny soil, smaller foot print growing tall not wide. No fruit trees! Very high maintenance, attract bees & deer to eat fallen fruit. Deer become added vehicle hazard. Who will prune & gleen and clean up seasonally?? They become very ugly when not maintained- (Yes!!) 28 Of the 69 trees species on the City list - why is there only 1 native tree? More than 1! (good question) 29 Why ignore that the poplars are historic, iconic, stable & beautiful. Do these things count? (good question) 30 I like the poplars reduced plan Choose replacement trees with extreme care. Ask several experts. I like the Sterling Silver Linden. 31 Poplars need maintenance and replacement w/ young poplars as necessary. Too much $& time on this new landscape (I agree) 32 I counted 135 trees += foot systems habit, shade, wind block = air, birds, insects for birds - we need this for our health 33 Condition of Poplars: the city has failed to care for and steward the existing poplars as the Gateway Development plan calls for. Adopted 1993 34 Poplar has been here for over 100 years - why not consider native. Concerned about removal of large established trees (climate change, need for health of community) Weak argument is to remove trees because of possible branches dropping 35 Remove the poplars. Could be a danger in a wind storm. 36 No poplars down winter 2021 in PT Natives down on 101 in big numbers 37 Please remove the poplars. They do not fit this area. - Not native no matter how old they are. 38 Please do not remove the poplars. Replace any specific individual trees along Port side as needed to put wires underground. The photos of the street perspectives w/ the new plantings look lovey BUT the maintenance of grass & ferns, etc. will not realistically happen. Poplars are lower maintenance. Also - the visual of the tall poplars help keep speeds in check without them, Sims becomes a visual "freeway." If nothing else, keep the Kah Tai side as is. (2nd this; as needed, partial<3) 39 Support full expansion and gradual replacement on lagoon side  40 Shared use path on lagoon of boatyard side of Sims Way - no sidewalk 41 I support full expansion on south side. Yes to path / sidewalk 42 There's already a walk-way on the lagoon side Who wants to walk along busty Sims anyway. Sidewalks in uptown more needed. (repaired, also) What trees will tolerate that awful soil? Too may things are planted around town & left to die with no maintenance. Except foxtails & weeds. Trees are being planted in other towns for carbon uptake and cooling. We're chopping them down. Huh. 43 Do not recommend native trees of Port side. Attracting birds to cross Sims way will cause more bird deaths. Native trees on Park side recommended north of paved walkway. Shore Pine has done better in the park without irrigation or deer protection than any other tree planted. Garry Oak has done well also (see berm between park & ride & park) However it needs irrigation & deer protection to survive. 44 Do the full expansion and get it all done at once replace poplars on Park side when they die. 45 Replacing poplars over time seems like a choppy. Ill-conceived landscape design. Poplars are short-lived trees (in the ground scheme) and though lovely, are not a good choice for a major thoroughfare. I believe the city should move forward on a complete design, de-do and full expansion of the boatyard and Sims Way improvement. This is the most forward - thinking approach of the options. Port Townsend is growing and cannot be stopped. Lets grow wisely and with the best future in mind. 46 The comment above is exactly what I believe - move forward. Poplars are not a good choice. Yes to above comment. 47 Why not immediately underground the power lines and then allow efforts to proceed over next several years on how to treat the poplars? 48 Great opportunity to transition to native plantings supporting habitat. People want to connect to place. I like the S. pathway further of the road. Could be exemplary: integrating people + place in away both can thrive. 49 Agree w/ top comment! Yes, need full & complete redo - Poplars are non-native & at end of their lifespan. 50 Absolutely do not agree with top comment. May make sense for progress, but in not cognizant of the community here. A faster transition may be less wise in some ways, smart even, but truly dumb when it comes to preserving good will in our growing community (2nd * this) 51 Do not wide the existing path on Kah Tai side - will result / encourage increased bicycle speeding resulting in bike / ped accidents. - Already have had 1 serious accident 8/20/2022 Open house comments 2 52 Use to tree health assessment. Yes to pruning & maintenance, low pollen, low / small footprint (tall & narrow)/ Good in this soil. Yes to extended & improved multi use path on Kah Tai side. 53 Yes to total removal of poplars. Experience tells us that they are weak and short-lived. Like the idea of a line of kindred oaks, would make a good entrance to downtown. 54 I prefer replacing N. side poplars over time. S. side all at once. 55 L. Poplars are to be stewarded and replaced with Lombardy poplars as needed. Gateway Development Plan adopted by city 1993 56 Yes, stay with the Gateway Plan until or unless community process changes it. And get the wires underground for safety - now. No need to remove poplars. And where is the money for it? Streets are potholed. Poplars have proven their value time and time again. Everything needs maintenance - doesn't happen here. 57 If "L. Poplars must go" then what is the plan to remove all the poplars on city land. The cost in this plan looks like about $3,000/tree. 58 A.H. "O": Remove all the fill in the park & hiway to reconnect the lagoon with the bay. 8/20/2022 Open house comments 3 Scientific Name Common Name South R/W North R/W Native? OPALS2 Flower Salt Large Trees Proposed by Consultant Team Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold'Autumn Gold Ginkgo **Non-native 2 or 7 Dioecious Larix occidentalis Western Larch **Non-native 2 Monoecious Magnolia x 'Elizabeth'Elizabeth Magnolia **Non-native Low Monoecious/perfect Nyssa sylvatica 'Wildfire'Wildfire Sourgum **Non-native 1 or 8 Dioecious/perfect Parrotia persica 'Ruby Vase'Ruby Vase Ironwood **Non-native 4 Monoecious Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak **Non-native 8 Monoecious Quercus garryana Garry Oak ***Native 8 Monoecious Quercus robur x bicolor 'Nadler'Kindred Spirit Oak **Non-native 8 Monoecious Rhamnus [Frangula ] purshiana Cascara ********Native 1 to 9 Perfect/monoecious Taxodium distichum 'Lindsey's Skyward'Lindsey's Skyward Bald Cypress **Non-native 5 Monoecious Tolerant Tilia tomentosa 'Sterling'Sterling Silver Linden **Non-native 2 Monoecious Ulmus carpinifolia x parvifolia 'Frontier'Frontier Elm **Non-native Low Rarely flowers Acer rubrum  ‘Festival’ or 'Autumn Glory'Red Maple ******Non-native 1 Dioecious (Female) Acer circinatum Vine Maple ******Native 5+ Perfect/staminate Tolerant Acer glabrum Douglas Maple ** **** Native 5+Dioecious/staminate/ perfect Tolerant Acer macrophyllum Big-Leaf Maple ******Native 5+ Monoecious/staminate Tolerant Arbutus mensiesii Madrone ********Native 3 Monoecious Tolerant Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar ********Native 2 Monoecious Cornus natallii x Cornus florida Eddies White Wonder **** ****Non-native; hybridized in PNW Low Monoecious Corylus cornuta Beaked Hazelnut ******Native 7 Monoecious Tolerant Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray *******Native 6 Monoecious Tolerant Malus fusca Pacific Crabapple ********Native 3 to 4 Perfect/monoecious Tolerant Oemleria cerasiformis Indian Plum ********Native ? Dioecious (monoecious) Picea sitchensis Sitka Spruce ********Native 3 Monoecious Tolerant Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir ********Native 3 Monoecious Salix hookeriana Hooker's Willow ******Native 10 Dioecious Tolerant Salix scouleriana Scouler’s Willow ******Native 10 Dioecious Tolerant Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnickinnick ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Gaultheria shallon Salal ********Native 1 to 5 Monoecious Tolerant Lonicera involucrata Black Twinberry ********Native Mild Monoecious Tolerant Mahonia aquifolium Tall Oregon Grape ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Mahonia nervosa Dull Oregon Grape ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Ratings1 Native Small-Medium Trees to Consider Native Shrubs to Consider Non-Native Medium Tree to Consider Species list provided by Steve Mader 1 Morella californica California Wax Myrtle ********Native Low Dioecious Tolerant Philadelphus lewisii Mock Orange ********Native 3 Monoecious Physocarpus capitatus Pacific Ninebark *******Native 4 Monoecious Rhododendron macrophyllum Rhododendron *******Native 4 Monoecious/perfect Tolerant Ribes sanguineum Red Flowering Currant ********Native Low Monoecious Tolerant Rosa nutkana Nootka Rose ********Native 2 to 6 Dioecious Tolerant Rubus parvifolius Thimbleberry ********Native 3 Dioecious Tolerant Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry ********Native 3 Monoecious Tolerant Vaccinium ovatum Evergreen Huckleberry ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Herbaceous Groundcover to Consider Asarum caudatum Wild Ginger ********Native ? Tolerant Carex lyngbyei Lyngbye’s Sedge ********Native Moderate Tolerant Deschampsia cespitosa Tufted Hairgrass ********Native Mild Tolerant Elymus mollis Dunegrass ********Native ? Tolerant Fragaria chiloensis Beach Strawberry ********Native 1 Tolerant Lupinus littoralis Coastal Lupine ********Native ? Tolerant Polystichum munitum Sword Fern ********Native 4 Tolerant Pteridium aquilinum Bracken Fern ********Native Mild Tolerant Tellima grandiflora Fringe Cup ********Native ? Tolerant Vancouveria spp.Inside-Out Flower ********Native ? Tolerant 1 * = Not so Good; **** = Good Species list provided by Steve Mader 2 Scientific Name Common Name South R/W North R/W Native?OPALS2 Flower Salt Large Trees Proposed by Consultant Team Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold'Autumn Gold Ginkgo **Non-native 2 or 7 Dioecious Larix occidentalis Western Larch **Non-native 2 Monoecious Magnolia x 'Elizabeth'Elizabeth Magnolia **Non-native Low Monoecious/perfect Nyssa sylvatica 'Wildfire'Wildfire Sourgum **Non-native 1 or 8 Dioecious/perfect Parrotia persica 'Ruby Vase'Ruby Vase Ironwood **Non-native 4 Monoecious Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak **Non-native 8 Monoecious Quercus garryana Garry Oak ***Native 8 Monoecious Quercus robur x bicolor 'Nadler'Kindred Spirit Oak **Non-native 8 Monoecious Rhamnus [Frangula ] purshiana Cascara ********Native 1 to 9 Perfect/monoecious Taxodium distichum 'Lindsey's Skyward'Lindsey's Skyward Bald Cypress **Non-native 5 Monoecious Tolerant Tilia tomentosa 'Sterling'Sterling Silver Linden **Non-native 2 Monoecious Ulmus carpinifolia x parvifolia 'Frontier'Frontier Elm **Non-native Low Rarely flowers Acer rubrum ‘Festival’ or 'Autumn Glory'Red Maple ******Non-native 1 Dioecious (Female) Acer circinatum Vine Maple ******Native 5+Perfect/staminate Tolerant Acer glabrum Douglas Maple ******Native 5+Dioecious/staminate/ perfect Tolerant Acer macrophyllum Big-Leaf Maple ******Native 5+Monoecious/staminate Tolerant Arbutus mensiesii Madrone ********Native 3 Monoecious Tolerant Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar ********Native 2 Monoecious Cornus natallii x Cornus florida Eddies White Wonder ********Non-native; hybridized in PNW Low Monoecious Corylus cornuta Beaked Hazelnut ******Native 7 Monoecious Tolerant Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray *******Native 6 Monoecious Tolerant Malus fusca Pacific Crabapple ********Native 3 to 4 Perfect/monoecious Tolerant Oemleria cerasiformis Indian Plum ********Native ?Dioecious (monoecious) Picea sitchensis Sitka Spruce ********Native 3 Monoecious Tolerant Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir ********Native 3 Monoecious Salix hookeriana Hooker's Willow ******Native 10 Dioecious Tolerant Salix scouleriana Scouler’s Willow ******Native 10 Dioecious Tolerant Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnickinnick ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Gaultheria shallon Salal ********Native 1 to 5 Monoecious Tolerant Lonicera involucrata Black Twinberry ********Native Mild Monoecious Tolerant Mahonia aquifolium Tall Oregon Grape ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Mahonia nervosa Dull Oregon Grape ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Ratings1 Native Small-Medium Trees to Consider Native Shrubs to Consider Non-Native Medium Tree to Consider Species list provided by Steve Mader 1 Morella californica California Wax Myrtle ********Native Low Dioecious Tolerant Philadelphus lewisii Mock Orange ********Native 3 Monoecious Physocarpus capitatus Pacific Ninebark *******Native 4 Monoecious Rhododendron macrophyllum Rhododendron *******Native 4 Monoecious/perfect Tolerant Ribes sanguineum Red Flowering Currant ********Native Low Monoecious Tolerant Rosa nutkana Nootka Rose ********Native 2 to 6 Dioecious Tolerant Rubus parvifolius Thimbleberry ********Native 3 Dioecious Tolerant Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry ********Native 3 Monoecious Tolerant Vaccinium ovatum Evergreen Huckleberry ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Herbaceous Groundcover to Consider Asarum caudatum Wild Ginger ********Native ?Tolerant Carex lyngbyei Lyngbye’s Sedge ********Native Moderate Tolerant Deschampsia cespitosa Tufted Hairgrass ********Native Mild Tolerant Elymus mollis Dunegrass ********Native ?Tolerant Fragaria chiloensis Beach Strawberry ********Native 1 Tolerant Lupinus littoralis Coastal Lupine ********Native ?Tolerant Polystichum munitum Sword Fern ********Native 4 Tolerant Pteridium aquilinum Bracken Fern ********Native Mild Tolerant Tellima grandiflora Fringe Cup ********Native ?Tolerant Vancouveria spp.Inside-Out Flower ********Native ?Tolerant 1 * = Not so Good; **** = Good Species list provided by Steve Mader 2 Scientific Name Common Name South R/W North R/W Native? OPALS2 Flower Salt Large Trees Proposed by Consultant Team Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold'Autumn Gold Ginkgo **Non-native 2 or 7 Dioecious Larix occidentalis Western Larch **Non-native 2 Monoecious Magnolia x 'Elizabeth'Elizabeth Magnolia **Non-native Low Monoecious/perfect Nyssa sylvatica 'Wildfire'Wildfire Sourgum **Non-native 1 or 8 Dioecious/perfect Parrotia persica 'Ruby Vase'Ruby Vase Ironwood **Non-native 4 Monoecious Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak **Non-native 8 Monoecious Quercus garryana Garry Oak ***Native 8 Monoecious Quercus robur x bicolor 'Nadler'Kindred Spirit Oak **Non-native 8 Monoecious Rhamnus [Frangula ] purshiana Cascara ********Native 1 to 9 Perfect/monoecious Taxodium distichum 'Lindsey's Skyward'Lindsey's Skyward Bald Cypress **Non-native 5 Monoecious Tolerant Tilia tomentosa 'Sterling'Sterling Silver Linden **Non-native 2 Monoecious Ulmus carpinifolia x parvifolia 'Frontier'Frontier Elm **Non-native Low Rarely flowers Acer rubrum  ‘Festival’ or 'Autumn Glory'Red Maple ******Non-native 1 Dioecious (Female) Acer circinatum Vine Maple ******Native 5+ Perfect/staminate Tolerant Acer glabrum Douglas Maple ** **** Native 5+Dioecious/staminate/ perfect Tolerant Acer macrophyllum Big-Leaf Maple ******Native 5+ Monoecious/staminate Tolerant Arbutus mensiesii Madrone ********Native 3 Monoecious Tolerant Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar ********Native 2 Monoecious Cornus natallii x Cornus florida Eddies White Wonder **** ****Non-native; hybridized in PNW Low Monoecious Corylus cornuta Beaked Hazelnut ******Native 7 Monoecious Tolerant Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray *******Native 6 Monoecious Tolerant Malus fusca Pacific Crabapple ********Native 3 to 4 Perfect/monoecious Tolerant Oemleria cerasiformis Indian Plum ********Native ? Dioecious (monoecious) Picea sitchensis Sitka Spruce ********Native 3 Monoecious Tolerant Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir ********Native 3 Monoecious Salix hookeriana Hooker's Willow ******Native 10 Dioecious Tolerant Salix scouleriana Scouler’s Willow ******Native 10 Dioecious Tolerant Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnickinnick ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Gaultheria shallon Salal ********Native 1 to 5 Monoecious Tolerant Lonicera involucrata Black Twinberry ********Native Mild Monoecious Tolerant Mahonia aquifolium Tall Oregon Grape ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Mahonia nervosa Dull Oregon Grape ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Ratings1 Native Small-Medium Trees to Consider Native Shrubs to Consider Non-Native Medium Tree to Consider Species list provided by Steve Mader 1 Morella californica California Wax Myrtle ********Native Low Dioecious Tolerant Philadelphus lewisii Mock Orange ********Native 3 Monoecious Physocarpus capitatus Pacific Ninebark *******Native 4 Monoecious Rhododendron macrophyllum Rhododendron *******Native 4 Monoecious/perfect Tolerant Ribes sanguineum Red Flowering Currant ********Native Low Monoecious Tolerant Rosa nutkana Nootka Rose ********Native 2 to 6 Dioecious Tolerant Rubus parvifolius Thimbleberry ********Native 3 Dioecious Tolerant Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry ********Native 3 Monoecious Tolerant Vaccinium ovatum Evergreen Huckleberry ********Native 2 Monoecious Tolerant Herbaceous Groundcover to Consider Asarum caudatum Wild Ginger ********Native ? Tolerant Carex lyngbyei Lyngbye’s Sedge ********Native Moderate Tolerant Deschampsia cespitosa Tufted Hairgrass ********Native Mild Tolerant Elymus mollis Dunegrass ********Native ? Tolerant Fragaria chiloensis Beach Strawberry ********Native 1 Tolerant Lupinus littoralis Coastal Lupine ********Native ? Tolerant Polystichum munitum Sword Fern ********Native 4 Tolerant Pteridium aquilinum Bracken Fern ********Native Mild Tolerant Tellima grandiflora Fringe Cup ********Native ? Tolerant Vancouveria spp.Inside-Out Flower ********Native ? Tolerant 1 * = Not so Good; **** = Good Species list provided by Steve Mader 2 SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 1 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Tree List Ulmus carpinifolia x parvifolia 'Frontier' Frontier Elm [Height: 30 to 40 feet, Spread: 20 to 30 feet] Taxodium distichum 'Lindsey's Skyward' Lindsey's Skyward Bald Cypress [Height: 18 to 20 feet, Spread: 6 to 10 feet] General Comment (All Species): Concern has been expressed about the production of pollen from the reproductive structures of the species proposed. In response this UFS|BC has consulted with persons in research, nursery production, urban forestry, and arboricultural specialist. The consensus is that pollen production from the species selected is minimal. In addition, the pollen production will be less than that produced by the existing trees. A reasonable assumption by UFS|BC is that persons or entities currently affected have measures that can be employed to prevent any nuisance. Finally, pollen production occurs for a very short period of the year, and it is UFS|BC opinion that public interest/benefit outweighs this limited nuisance factor when considering measures that can be taken to eliminate the effect of pollen. Lindsey's Skyward Bald Cypress: Since presenting this tree as an option for planting as part of a mix, one concern for this species choice (nursery production feedback) is the species availability. It is limited. Plants may have to be sourced from as far away as Idaho. However, this tree is tolerant of high sodium (salt) levels and sandy soils. In addition, its form is compact and is likely to require less maintenance than other species. This species is also deciduous. Frontier Elm: UFS|BC experience has shown that this is a proven tree that can tolerate sandy soils and high wind exposure. In addition, structural pruning required is less than other streetscape tree species, reducing maintenance cost. This species has also proven to be free of pests and diseases. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 2 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Quercus garryana Garry Oak [Height: 40 to 60 feet, Spread: 25 to 35 feet] Larix occidentalis Western larch [Height: 50 to 70 feet, Spread: 12 to 18 feet] Garry Oak: This area has been independently identified as suitable for planting this species in this location. This species could be an important component of creating a native prairie habitat. Research has demonstrated its ecological importance and historical/cultural connection to the area. Concern over form can be readily addressed through formative and structural pruning. Garry oak is suited to the soils and maritime environment. Western larch: UFS|BC experience in planting this species has shown that it can tolerate sandy soils, high winds, and the maritime environment. UFS|BC has also been involved in the planting of this species on right-of-way. Excellent form, with impressive fall color and spring flush. This tree could be planted as a part of a native species tree mix. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 3 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Parrotia persica 'Ruby Vase' Ruby Vase Ironwood [Height: 25 to 30 feet, Spread: 15 to 19 feet] Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak [Height: 50 to 80 feet, Spread: 45 feet] Ruby Vase Ironwood: Proven record of tolerance for sandy soils and harsh growing environments. Scarlet Oak: Professional comments to the planting of this species are that it may grow too large. Although formative and structural pruning during establishment would allow for manipulating the form. Some concern over the level of maintenance required to maintain structure. Excellent tree for tolerance of sandy soil and currently adapting to climatic variability. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 4 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Rhamnus purshiana Cascara [Height: 30 feet, Spread: 15 feet] Quercus robur x bicolor 'Nadler' Kindred Spirit Oak [Height: 20 to 40 feet, Spread: 10 to 15 feet] Cascara: Concern has been expressed about the nuisance caused by bird excrement following consumption of fruit i.e., staining. This may be a valid concern, although given the maritime environment and the local source of other berries bird excrement is likely an existing issue. This issue can be readily addressed by reducing the number of Cascara planted in the tree groupings. This species is an important source of food for native fauna. It is also known for flowering. UFS|BC suggests this species could be a minor but important component of a native tree species planting mix i.e., Garry oak and western larch+. +Not a maritime species, but adaptable. Kindred Spirit Oak: Pyramidal form, and hardy physiologically. Excellent choice for narrow planting spaces where form and structure are also an important consideration. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 5 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Nyssa sylvatica 'Wildfire' Wildfire Sourgum [Height: 40 feet, Spread: 25 feet] *Magnolia x 'Elizabeth' Elizabeth Magnolia [* Possibly a marginal species for this site] [Height: 18 feet, Spread: 15 to 17 feet] Wildfire Sourgum: One point (nursery production) with this species is that in nurseries the species Wildfire is male only. This is to avoid berry production. The species is extremely hardy and would be well suited to this right-of-way planting. Elizabeth Magnolia: Professional feedback is that this tree may not tolerate the soils. In addition, formative and structural pruning would be required. However, planted in small quantities this would provide a flowering accent (showy) to any planting design. SCJ Alliance ● Sims Way Gateway Improvement and Boat Yard Expansion Project August 4, 2022 ● Page 6 of 6 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' Autumn Gold Ginkgo [Height: 40 to 50 feet, Spread: 25 to 30 feet] Tilia tomentosa 'Sterling' Sterling Silver Linden: [Height 50 to 70 feet; Spread: 25 to 30 feet] Autumn Gold Ginkgo: Shown to be extremely hardy. One concern is the slow growth of this species. However, it is not affected by insect pests or disease. This tree has strong fall color and spring flush. Sterling Silver Linden: A hardy tree species, with low maintenance requirements and foliage interest; silver underside on leaf, and strong fall color. An excellent choice for the soil and maritime growing environment. Over 40 Years of Local Experience Establishing Trees, Shrubs, and Groundcovers at Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park, Port Townsend 28-Jun-22 Contributors: Ron Sikes (2022), Fred Weinmann (2007), Janet Kearsley (ca. 1985), Forest Shomer, and Steve Mader. Plant Species Native? 1985 Kah Tai Plan 1 (Zone) Extant at Kah Tai? (Zone) Within 15' of Sims Poplars? General Performance at Kah Tai Common Name Scientific Name Established Naturally or by Planting2 Planting Success3 Notes Planned and Extant Trees and Shrubs at Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park Grand fir Abies grandis Yes 1,2 1 Planted by AA Surviving Forest Noble fir Abies procera Yes 6 Planted Surviving Forest Vine maple Acer circinatum Yes 5 Planted by AA Surviving Forest Douglas maple Acer glabrum Yes 6,12 Yes Planted by AA Surviving, some dieback Forest Big-leaf maple Acer macrophyllum Yes 5 Planted by AA Surviving Forest Sugar maple Acer saccharum No ???Shoreline Red alder Alnus rubra Yes 1,2,6 1,2,5,6 Planted by AA, et al.Surviving Forest Serviceberry Amelanchier alnifolia Yes 1,2,6 2,5,6,12 Yes Planted by AA Surviving but poorly at SR20 Forest Madrona Arbutus menziesii Yes 1,2,6,12 1,6,12 Yes Natural/planted by AA Surviving Forest, mainly located at 12th St./SR 20 junction Strawberry tree Arbutus unedo No 2,12 No Manzanita Arctostaphylos columbiana Yes 2,12 2,12 Planted by AA, et al.Failed Kinnickinnik Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Yes 1,2,6,12 No Open dry Barberry Berberis darwinii No 2,12 No Paper birch Betula papyrifera Yes 4,6 Planted by AA, et al.Surviving Disturbed Weeping birch Betula pendula No 6 Planted ?Surviving Shoreline Butterfly bush Buddleia davidii No 2 Planted Surviving, one plant Disturbed Incense cedar Calocedrus decurrens Yes 9 Planted Surviving Redstem ceanothus Ceanothus sanguineus Yes 2 Planted by AA Surviving Wild lilac Ceanothus thyrsiflorus 'Julia Phelps'Oregon 2,12 No Planted Failed Rockrose Cistus purpureus No 12 No Pacific dogwood Cornus nutalli Yes 1,6,12 Yes Planted by AA Failed Redosier dogwood Cornus sericea Yes 4,5,6,7 1,3 Planted by AA, et al.Surviving Riparian Common hazel Corylus avellana No 2 Natural?Surviving Disturbed Hazelnut Corylus cornuta Yes 6 2,6 Planted by AA Surviving Open Rock cotoneaster Cotoneaster horizontalis No Riparian Douglas hawthorn Crataegus douglasii Yes 1,2,12 5,12 Yes Natural/planted by AA Surviving Open Common hawthorn Crataegus monogyna No 1,4,5,6,12 Natural?Surviving & widespread Open Monterrey cypress Cupressus macrocarpa No 12 Planted Surviving One tree Spurge laurel Daphne laureola No 4,5,6,9,10,11,12 Natural Surviving & widespread Disturbed Russian olive Eleagnus angustifolia No 2 Planted Surviving, one plant Forest 1 Cascara Frangula purshiana Yes 6 5,6 Planted by AA Surviving Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia Yes 1,2,6 2 Planted by AA Failing Silk tasselbush Garrya elliptica Oregon 6 No Salal Gaultheria shallon Yes 2,6,12 2,5,6,12 Planted by AA, et al.Surviving Forest Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor Yes 4,6 2,12 Natural/planted by AA Surviving Forest English holly Ilex aquifolium No 1,2, 4,5,6,10,11,12 Natural Surviving & widespread Forest English walnut Juglans regia No 2 Planted Surviving Rocky Mountain juniper Juniperus scopulorum Yes 12 Yes Planted by AA Surviving but slow growing Juniper Juniperus sp.No 1,2 Planted Surviving Persisting Western larch Larix occidentalis Yes 6 Planted Surviving Orange honeysuckle Lonicera ciliosa Yes 2,12 6 Planted by AA Surviving Hairy honeysuckle Lonicera hispidula Yes 1,6 Natural Surviving Twinberry honeysuckle Lonicera involucrata Yes 1,5 Planted by AA Surviving Tall Oregon grape Mahonia aquifolium Yes 1,2,6,12 1,2,5,6,7,8,9,12, YesYes Natural/planted by AA Planted grew poorly Open Low Oregon grape Mahonia nervosa Yes 1,2,6 6 Planted by AA Surviving Forest Apple Malus domestica No 5,6 Natural Surviving Persisting Crabapple Malus fusca Yes 1,2,6,12 4,6 Planted by AA Surviving California wax myrtle Morella californica Yes 2,12 1,6,12 Yes Planted by AA Surviving Z. 6, failed in Z. 12 Nursery stock was in poor condition Indian plum Oemleria cerasiformis Yes 4,5,6,7 1,6,12 Natural/planted by AA Surviving Mock orange Philadelphus lewisii Yes 2,6,12 Yes Planted by AA Surviving slow growing Ninebark Physocarpus capitatus Yes 6 1,4,6 Planted by AA Surviving Sitka spruce Picea sitchensis Yes 1,2,6 4,6,11 Planted by AA Surviving Shore pine Pinus contorta Yes 1,2,12 1,2,5,6,12 Yes Planted by AA/F. ShomerSurviving Sand; male deer have damaged some by breaking off mos Western white pine Pinus monticola Yes 12 Planted by AA Surviving Mugo pine Pinus mugo No 2 Planted, one plant Surviving Scotch pine Pinus sylvestris No 2,12 Natural/planted Surviving Black cottonwood Poplus trichocarpa Yes 1,2,5 Planted Surviving Forest Lombardy poplar Populus nigra No 1,2,5,6,10,12 Planted & natural Surviving & widespread Persisting Cherry plum Prunus cerasifera No 1 Natural Surviving Bitter cherry Prunus emarginata Yes 1,2,6 5,6,7,8,9,12 Natural Surviving Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Yes 1,2,6,12 1,2,5,6,12 Yes Natural/planted AA, et al.Surviving Forest; spreading by seed Firethorn Pyracantha coccinea No 2,12 4,6 Planted Surviving Disturbed Pear Pyrus domestica No 4 Planted?Surviving Persisting Garry oak Quercus garryana?No 2,3 Planted by AA, et al.Surviving Open English oak Quercus robur No 5,12 Planted Surviving One tree Western rhododendron Rhododendron macrophyllum Yes 1,2,6 1,12 Planted by AA Surviving Western azalea Rhododendron occidentale Yes 1,2,7 No American sumac Rhus glabra No 2 Planted Surviving Persisting Red flowering currant Ribes sanguineum Yes 4,5,6,12 5,6,8 Planted by AA, et al.Surviving Nootka rose Rosa nutkana Yes 1,12 1,2,3,7,8,12 Natural Widespread Open Beach rose Rosa rugosa No 1,12 1,12 Planted Surviving Disturbed 2 Rosemary Rosmarinus officinalis No 6,12 No Himalayan blackberry Rubus armeniacus No All zones Natural Surviving/widespread DIsturbed Thimbleberry Rubus parviflorus Yes 5,7 6,12 Natural Surviving Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis Yes 5,7 No California blackberry Rubus ursinus Yes 6,7,8 Natural Forest Weeping willow Salix babylonica No 10,11 Planted Surviving Shoreline Hookers willow Salix hookeriana Yes 4,5,6,7 4,5,6,7 Natural/planted Surviving Shoreline Pacific willow Salix lasiandra Yes ?Planted ?Moist/wet Corkscrew willow Salix matsudana 'tortuosa'No 5 Planted Failing Shoreline; persisting Mackenzie willow Salix rigida? or Salix prolixa?Yes 5?,6?Planted Surviving Shoreline Scouler willow Salix scouleriana Yes 4,5,6,7 4,5,6,7 Natural Widespread Forest Sitka willow Salix sitchensis Yes ?Planted ?Wet areas Blue elderberry Sambucus caerulea Yes 6 6 Planted by AA Failed Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa Yes 6 No Coast redwood Sequoia sempervirens No 2 Planted Surviving Giant sequoia Sequoiadendron giganteum No 2 Planted?Surviving Canadian buffaloberry Shepherdia canadensis Yes 6,10 Yes Natural/planted by AA Natural surviving; planted failedOpen; nitrogen fixer European mountain ash Sorbus acuparia No 2,4 Natural/planted Surviving Disturbed Hardhack Spirea douglasii Yes 4,5,7 No Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus Yes 4,6 1,2,5,6,12 Yes Natural/planted by AA Surviving & widespread Open Lilac Syringa vulgaris No 6,12 Planted Surviving Disturbed Western redcedar Thuja plicata Yes 1,2,6,12 1,2,6 Planted by AA, et al.Surviving Forest Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla Yes 1,2 2,4,6 Planted by AA Surviving Forest Oregon myrtle Umbellularia californica Oregon 1,2,12 No Evergreen huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum Yes 2,6 5,6 Planted by AA Surviving Forest Red huckleberry Vaccinium parvifolium Yes 6 No High bush cranberry Vibernum opulus Yes 5 Planted by AA Surviving Extant Groundcovers at Kah Tai Yellow sand verbena Abronia latifolia Yes ?Natural?Sand dunes Yarrow Achillea millefolium Yes 5, 6 Natural Disturbed Colonial bentgrass Agrostis cappilaris No ?Seeded?Disturbed Creeping bentgrass Agrostis stolonifera No ?Seeded?Marshes Little hairgrass Aira praecox No ?Natural?Open disturbed Pearly everlasting Anaphalis margaritacea Yes 6 Natural Open Dog fennel Anthemis cotula No ?Natural?Disturbed Lady fern Anthyrum felix-femina Yes 6 Planted by AA Surviving Forest Sylvian goat's beard Aruncus sylvester Yes 1 Planted by AA Surviving ? Lawn daisy Bellis perennis No ?Natural?Open disturbed Black mustard Brassica nigra No ?Natural?Disturbed 3 Smooth brome Bromus mollis No ?Natural?Disturbed Cheat grass Bromus tectorum No 2,3,4,5 Natural Surviving & widespread Disturbed Giant morning glory Calystegia silvatica No ?Natural Disturbed Hairy bittercress Cardamine hirsuta No ?Natural Disturbed Rough paintbrush Castilleja hispida Yes 8 Planted by AA Failed Forest edges Canada thistle Cirsium arvense No ?Natural Disturbed Bull thistle Cirsium vulgare No ?Natural Disturbed Miner's lettuce Claytonia perfoliata Yes ?Natural Open Candy flower Claytonia sibirica Yes ?Natural Forest Sm. fl. blue-eyed Mary Collinsia parviflora Yes ?Natural Open sand Poison hemlock Conium maculatum No 1,4 Natural Surviving Disturbed Scot's broom Cytisus scoparius No 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,12 Natural Surviving & widespread Open disturbed Orchard grass Dactylus glomerata No ?Natural Disturbed California oatgrass Danthonia californica Yes ?Seeded?Disturbed Queen Anne's lace Daucus carota No 6 Natural Surviving Disturbed Saltgrass Distichlis spicata Yes 6,10 Natural Surviving Marshes Sweet whitlow grass Draba verna No ?Natural Open disturbed Blue wildrye Elymus glaucus Yes ?Seeded?Forest Beach ryegrass Elymus mollis Yes 12 Seeded?Surviving Sand Quack grass Elytrigia repens No ?Natural Disturbed Fireweed Epilobium angustifolium Yes ?Natural Open Watson's willowherb Epilobium ciliatum Yes ?Natural Marshes Field horsetail Equisetum arvense Yes 4,8,9 Natural Surviving & widespread Moist soil Scouring rush Equisetum hyemale Yes 4, 8, 9 Natural Surviving & widespread Open Fileree Erodium cicutorium No ?Natural Disturbed Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea No ?Seeded?Disturbed Red fescue Festuca rubra Yes ?Seeded?Open Woodland bedstraw Galium aparine Yes ?Natural Forest Dovefoot geranium Geranium molle No ?Natural Disturbed Stinky bob Geranium robertianum No ?Natural Disturbed Beach gumweed Grindelia integrifolia Yes 5,6 Natural Surviving Disturbed English ivy Hedera helix No 1,4,5,6,9,10 Natural Surviving & widespread Disturbed Velvet grass Holcus lanatus No ?Natural Disturbed Hare barley Hordeum marinum No ?Natural DIsturbed St. Johns wort Hypericum perforatum No ?Natural Open disturbed Hairy catsear Hypochaeris radicata No ?Natural Open disturbed Spiny rush Juncus acutus Yes ?Natural Shallow water Jointed rush Juncus articulatus Yes ?Natural Marshes Baltic rush Juncus balticus Yes 4,6 Natural Surviving Marshes Wire rush Juncus effusus No 6 Natural Surviving Wet disturbed 4 Common dead nettle Lamium purpureum No ?Natural Open disturbed Nipplewort Lapsana communis No ?Natural Disturbed Everlasting pea Lathrus latifolius No ?Natural Disturbed Perennial ryegrass Lolium perenne No ?Seeded?Disturbed Miniature lotus Lotus micranthus Yes ?Natural?Disturbed Tree lupine Lupinus arboreus No 4,5,6,9,12 Natural Surviving & widespread Open disturbed Tall mallow Malva sylvestris No ?Natural Disturbed Pineapple weed Matricaria matricariodes Yes ?Natural Disturbed Black medic Medicago lupulina No ?Natural Wood/sand Alfalfa Medicago sativa No 6 Natural Disturbed Sweet Clover Melilotus albus No 4,6 Natural Surviving Open; nitrogen fixer California poppy Papaver californica No ?Natural?Open dry English plantain Plantago lanceolata No ?Natural Disturbed Common plantain Plantago major No ?Natural Disturbed Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis No ?Seeded?Disturbed Pacific silverweed Potentilla anserina Yes 6,10 Natural Surviving Marshes Self heal Prunella vulgaris No ?Natural DIsturbed Sour dock Rumex crispus No ?Natural DIsturbed Hardstem bulrush Schoenoplectus acutus Yes 1,5,6,10 Natural Surviving Shallow water Saltmarsh bulrush Scirpus maritimus?Yes ?Natural Marsh Small-fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus Yes ?Natural Shoreline Common groundsel Senesio vulgaris No ?Natural Disturbed Canada goldenrod Solidago canadensis Yes 2 Natural Surviving Disturbed Perennial sow thistle Sonchus arvensis No ?Natural Disturbed Cooley's hedge nettle Stachys cooleyae Yes 1 Planted by AA Surviving Garden chickweed Stellaria media No ?Natural Disturbed Aster Symphiotrichium sp.Yes 6,10 Natural Surviving Dandelion Taraxacum officinalis No ?Natural Disturbed Fringecup Tellima grandiflora Yes 6 Planted by AA Surviving Oyster plant Tragopogon dubium No ?Natural Disturbed Rabbit's foot clover Trifolium arvensis No ?Natural Disturbed Hop clover Trifolium dubium No ?Natural Woods/sand Red clover Trifolium pratense No ?Seeded?Disturbed White clover Trifolium repens No 4,6 Seeded?Surviving Disturbed Western white trillium Trillium ovatum Yes 1 Planted by AA Surviving Red ant-weed Tryphisaria pusilla No ?Natural Disturbed Cat-tail Typha latifolia No NE of lagoon Natural Surviving Marsh Stinging nettle Urtica dioica Yes ?Natural Disturbed Hairy vetch Vicia hirsuta No ?Natural Disturbed Tiny vetch Vicia micrantha No ?Natural Disturbed 5 Common vetch Vicia sativa No ?Natural Disturbed Periwinkle Vinca major No 12 Planted ?Surviving Potential Coastal Groundcovers (not found or planted at Kah Tai) Wild ginger Asarum caudatum; A. hartwegii Yes No Douglas aster Aster subspicatus Yes No Bunchberry Cornus canadensis Yes No Tufted hairgrass Deschampsia cespitosa Yes No Beach strawberry Fragaria chiloensis Yes No Fireweed Epilobium angustifolium Yes No Coastal strawberry Fragaria chiloensis Yes No Coastal lupine Lupinus littoralis Yes No Broad-leaved stonecrop Sedum spathulifolium Yes No Inside-out flower Vancouveria planipetula; V. chrysanthaYes No 1 Bassetti, et al. 1985. Plant List, Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park. Bassetti/Norton/Metler/Rekevics; MacLeod Reckord; Jestina Boughton, Seattle, WA. 2 AA=Plant species planted by Admiralty Audubon volunteers, including near the Lombardy poplars at Sims, approximately within 15 feet north of the Lombardy poplars lining SR 20 from 12th Street to Chase Bank. Plants were purchased from the Jefferson Co. Conservation District, the DNR Plant Materials facility at Bow, WA, and native plant nurseries. They were planted during the fall and winter months over several years. Most deciduous plants received protective deer exclusion. 3 Reasons that plantings showed poor survival or lacked vigor: (1) lack of sufficient rainfall through July-September; (2) sandy soil probably low in nutrients; (3) competition with the Lombardy poplars and their suckers; and (4) vandalism of deer exclusion "cages" allowing deer to consume most buds and leaves. Survival of deciduous plants would increase if summer irrigation is provided. 6 City of Port Townsend ● Sims Way Gateway and New Haven Boatyard Expansion Project August 16, 2022 ● Page 1 of 1 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Native - Dioecious species +Black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) +High risk tree, crown, and primary branch failure +Aggressive root system +Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia) +Emerald Ash Borer +Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia) +Toxic +Aspen (Populus tremuloides) +Suckering, although one non-native variety has proven suitability +Only cultivars will tolerate dry soils Non-Native – Dioecious species Honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Kentucky Coffeetree (Gymnospermum dioicus) +Ash species (Fraxinus sp.) +Changes sex from male to female with age +Emerald Ash Borer +Katsura (Cercidiphyllum japonicum) +Not tolerant of dry soils +Box Elder (Acer negundo) +Protoxin Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) Native +Douglas maple (Acer glabrum) +Broad form, with limited height growth; consider a component of the shrub layer +Scouler’s Willow (Salix scouleriana) + Short-lived (30 years), not suitable for right-of-way planting or in public places +Pacific dogwood (Cornus nuttallii) +Species highly susceptible to trunk diseases (cankers), and foliar diseases Serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) +Shore pine (Pinus contorta) +Pollen Non-Native +Eddies White Wonder Dogwood (Cornus ‘Eddies White Wonder’) ++Not tolerant of dry soils +Japanese Smoke Tree (Cotinus coggygria) +Short-lived (20 years), broad form, soil tolerance concern, concern for maritime environment tolerance Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) +Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra) +High risk tree, not suitable for public right-of-way, significant branch failure +Aggressive root system Port Townsend ● Sims Way Gateway and New Haven Boatyard Expansion Project August 16, 2022 ● Page 1 of 1 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ● 360.399.1377 ● www.bartlett.com Nyssa Male Fire starter male Wildfire male Green Gables is male Gum drop is male Red Rage is male seedless Zydeco twist is Male Female Afterburner is female Forum is female Tupelo Tower is female Northern Splendor is female Red Splyndor is female 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Tuesday, August 16, 2022 11:36 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Tree species meeting Please log. From: joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 8:49 PM To: Russell Hill <rhill3795@gmail.com>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Cc: Steve Mader <stevefmader77@gmail.com>; Forest Shomer <ziraat@olympus.net>; Ron Sikes <b1rdbrush@gmail.com>; arlene.alen@jeffcountychamber.org; Sarah McQuillen <sassymcquillen@gmail.com>; Dan Burden <dan.burden@bluezones.com>; Jennifer Rotermund <gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com>; Matthew Klontz <matt@portofpt.com>; wodonnell@jeffpud.org; connier@macleodreckord.com; Scott Sawyer <scott.sawyer@scjalliance.com>; pthompson@bartlett.com Subject: Re: Tree species meeting CAUTION: External Email Quaking Aspen Western Balsam (Black Cottonwood 2 )Oregon Ash Scoulers WIllow Hawthorne Tree Hairy Manzanita Pacific Dogwood Pacifc Ninebark 3 Pacific Wax Myrtle Here're some possible trees FEMALE Western Balsam: 70'H X 3' -5' W (Mature size) FEMALE Quaking Aspen: 20' - 80'H X 20' - 30' W FEMALE Oregon Ash: 60' - 80'H X 2' - 3' W Joni Scouler's Willow: 30'H X 30'W Douglas Hawthorne: 25'H X 15'W Hairy Manzanita: 12' - 15' H X ? Pacific Dogwood: 15' - 40'H X 10' - 25'W Pacific Ninebark: 12' - 18'H X 8' W Wax Myrtle: 15' - 20'H X ? From: Russell Hill <rhill3795@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 2:44 AM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Cc: Steve Mader <stevefmader77@gmail.com>; Forest Shomer <ziraat@olympus.net>; Ron Sikes <b1rdbrush@gmail.com>; joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com>; arlene.alen@jeffcountychamber.org <arlene.alen@jeffcountychamber.org>; Sarah McQuillen <sassymcquillen@gmail.com>; Dan Burden <dan.burden@bluezones.com>; Jennifer Rotermund <gaiaceousgardens@gmail.com>; Matthew Klontz <matt@portofpt.com>; wodonnell@jeffpud.org <wodonnell@jeffpud.org>; connier@macleodreckord.com <connier@macleodreckord.com>; Scott Sawyer <scott.sawyer@scjalliance.com>; pthompson@bartlett.com <pthompson@bartlett.com> Subject: Re: Tree species meeting All, Would it be possible to have some visual examples of some of the suggestions made by Joni & Forest, as well as those from Paul? Thanks, Russell Hill On Aug 11, 2022, at 7:30 PM, Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> wrote: Hi All, I know this is a bit last minute, but would everyone be willing to attend a meeting next Tuesday August 16th at 4:30 at City Hall to talk through the species topic? 4 Please let me know if this time works. We will have the virtual option as usual. Thanks! Steve CITYOFPT NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC DISCLOSURE: Public documents and records are available to the public as required under the Washington State Public Records Act (RCW 42.56). The information contained in all correspondence with a government entity may be disclosable to third party requesters under the Public Records Act. 1 Steve King From:Forest Shomer <ziraat@olympus.net> Sent:Wednesday, August 10, 2022 1:36 PM To:Steve King Cc:joni blanchard; Steve Mader; Ron Sikes; arlene.alen; Dan Burden; Russell Hill; Jennifer Rotermund; Matthew Klontz; Will O'Donnell; Scott Sawyer; Connie Reckord; Paul Thompson; Sarah McQuillen Subject:Comments on species CAUTION: External Email On Aug 9, 2022, at 5:02 PM, Forest Shomer <ziraat@olympus.net> wrote: Along with their recommendation of the Linden tree, Ginkgo, and Magnolia that seem like possibilities, again, here're the trees and plants I found. after my deep digging months ago, that seemed compatible if they'd fit in the space and can handle the soil conditions. Maybe they can be considered and checked into. FEMALE ONLY: Oregon Ash - 60' - 80' H/2' - 3' W Aspen 40' H/ 20' - 30' W Western Balsam 75' - 70' H/3' - 5' W (Black Cottonwood) Some kind of female native WIllow? Lombardy Poplars behind buildings with root barriers Japanese Smoke Tree (Cornelian Cherry American) Redosier Dogwood - 10' H Hairy Manzanita - 10' H Pacific Ninebark 6' - 8' H/ 3' - 6' WWinter Daphne/Hellebore/Honeywort Wax Myrtle (has berries, but, only in the wintertime) Rhodedendrums Fraxinus latifolius (Oregon ash): typically grows in seasonal marshes in its native range, hence not likely to succeed on a dry roadside. But further: emerald ash borer is working its way northward and will arrive here in due course. I think it is inadvisable to plant a host for this pest, particularly where Fraxinus is already uncommon in the area. See: https://www.oregonlive.com/hsji/2022/08/profoundly-devastating-invasive-beetle-threatens-oregon-ash- trees.html Aspen: it’s present in the county but only in high freshwater marshes; can’t see how it would fit ecologically on Sims Way. Black cottonwood: probably adaptable to the dry conditions; it does tend to shed heavy branches frequently. I see it as a potential safety hazard at such a trafficked site. 2 Willow: Scouler’s willow is a pretty good fit both hydrologically and in stature. Shortcoming is that the species doesn’t live very long—a few decades at most. Shrubs (above): Red-osier dogwood—prefers wet to damp soils; it does grow in the county but may require supplemental water during dry spells in a setting like Sims Way. Hairy manzanita—potentially a great choice; it tends to associate locally with both madrone, and shore pine, both of which are growing at and near the Sims Way—Twelfth Street intersection. Possible drawback is that it grows very slowly. Installed plants may need caging for the first years. Pacific ninebark—another good choice, though I don’t find it growing on very dry sites, much like red-osier. Both of these species may succeed here if there is drip irrigation provided. Wax myrtle—there are some good examples of it succeeding on dry sites nearby, such as behind Safeway at Kitsap Credit Union. Can’t think of any drawbacks, and it is evergreen. Rhododendron—our State flower and a celebrated shrub in the County but in decline due to careless maintenance. It like ninebark probably needs subirrigation because the site is slightly too arid for just rainfall taking care of water requirements. In sum, these suggested species could round out the understory and provide a green screen on the boatyard side especially; we’re still short of tree candidate species that can succeed on their own at this location. -Forest FA.ll- UqT (4/ r*t tA6/et/ l/,47/r€e< WWNtcfrU f.VAil,{g vNeq\4,t!i{ NA}.lg q?Jw t u^L TLLa@{ o#fr ?r**n cr+Ep. @,AI [AfrfiCNIA Nif.lVF izfct&tp€a{ WGffiFN frir<#, wAX tti€W FiNf.\taPlNNlP a(L(ffii-3€h Fa/+tafsl11i*e?e\tNw?$-11w€ wwleI ?44€ wt+ ?% tww?e wwzl FlrzgTttaGN' TAot-gYz- Wtt kxlJ ft/AZEr-.|rlUl- tee,lt(WW\ @)WeF-n 6i!+r,bN f.4FftrNloA nqlPL.lUM raA€c+r*(uM a.J/wM l4/fraN^ NaaVEA ?+1oO. /\,trY,t?qfi TLr-UH Fltoe. e(W)\nrc VYErrA 4u?o?1!(q iq'6'r^n1T6s uvt'uz6l c+r*zlA aAw\ reJT1rs UNEDO w1S D,%r/rNl{ qqN< ForS;*t WsW\ W NUTlSAd..{n 7,*\P&Nu9 ffilctN. f'fEAcAt\fit#\ 4€3{lo1ttu 5'Jtu..rA pnaf,sr TfiJFst FtD€+ €AllZr.JrNEu M v/aqNtuM Pg}lrF L{ #lvlWaJS tW"b* ?{A?,9,J5 QE(U\A F{JEl-Ps €pp15 %HP/sg ?nrz:ttft4A:s ?ffi f,nq\tztltN6Utr-r |Ptzvtvtts Dtsu.aj\Dg qr6Wtn<ry| coEN\t rs q'a-oNt, fr#^, r&q#h earust44ts a a a a a a o wtLD UW2 wafiYxwfr 7aP gLfrr?W,PeY ?JEffi+I 7ilAdw(ry ' It+ttPwwq gfiP 4119rq3ttff1 CWAN 6?rAY ftP{teffi ?WINO Wet^WP @ws/1 qNopw 1r)$'Vq?44 Ntttawv+ CN r^JtUrt,l.J qFffi"'Aciffps A-AE tnNLcEK a,u6 mYefc +?tffirs €4qX W?+dA €/Ad,lx e:u@'1voly4 caeY$ corNu1-r\ An^c\o-'-aln-ir,f A ur.i [o \. a a o a a o a a a o a a a lz7+EG1gl o a aa a a o a e a a a c o a a a a o a a a a o a a a a a o a a -._ 4.- t., aaJ Ctt a o a a a t a o a i.r I L:, l; i., t-- :j 1,: vtJ ;tJ :-. \ ,v UqT F ia,Nll4Al- Nr$dEAtu$,cl.t NAI/F zl7 l+15 1611 ls l1 I rol il | I wv& r(3 c*$s1et riR alTffi 47Fgt- *rp= plNl= tt v\ r,/ i lt\U fr;wfsve* f\€NaFslt Mg€ 6/111915 ?tcea qffq+€t€ls PlNtJ9 A\nffih TfirUA fuffih l=t{*+, ffiIe?ffi1\tt/t NATTW MAIA?E\\ A!i\st,t+ H,PA FElxtNUt uq1turi F.lNuS Ei.4n€aNlailA Pvfrus Ffi*' AreFL/{.lcfftqz AJ{UA)A Fri+il.4 1u9 RrFf,f+1r'NA <#E7cu9 WWtl OME€G(J.TJ LA(4,* qAil?, |l a a a a a a O F ia a a a a a a a ; '.4- l'= a t a a a- a a \AffiR{ iA4LOcF I4APFCNA WnPR crcN F6h ATaT clieFp'f qMfrE ; #itffiFFY c#^p6 | i-i7{urfticr+l @'l [4'(418 d(tsrt A wra'\/ al.j' l-' i Sims Way Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project Parks, Recreation, Tree and Trail Advisory Board Meeting –Aug. 23, 2022 Overview Photographs illustrate conditions in the summer of 2021 when problem between powerlines and wires were first raised in the boatyard. Port Prop. Line A Year of Learning Much has been learned over the course of a year including details about boatyard operations, safety requirements, tree health, soil conditions, aesthetic considerations, constructability, and much more. Appreciation The Project Team would like to say, “Thank you!” to all of the Stakeholders who generously volunteered considerable time and brought diverse perspectives to the table to help shape and develop the materials. Stakeholders include: Joni Blanchard (boatyard works) Forest Shomer (arboriculture and Kah Tail Nature Park experience) Ron Sikes (Audubon and Kah Tai Nature Park experience) Russell Hill (constructability and design) Steve Mader (urban forestry, landscape, and environmental stewardship) Dan Burden (complete Streets/multimodal transportation) Jennifer Rotermund (PRTTAB liaison, arboriculture, and landscape arch.) Arlene Alen (Chamber of Commerce and tourism) Sarah McQuillen (overall design) Meeting Objective & Decision-Making Process 1.Provide a comprehensive overview of the efforts for this project over the last year. 2.Present a preferred design concept alternative for Board consideration. 3.Request action from the Board with a recommendation to the City Council of the preferred design concept. Note: The final decision on the preferred design concept will be made jointly by the City Council, Port of Port Townsend Commission, and the Jefferson Co. PUD Commission. A Multi-Agency Partnership Project Agency Roles Agency Roles: Port Agency Roles: PUD Agency Roles: City Public Participation The public participation plan for development of the preferred alternative design concept was executed with the objective of providing transparent discussions based on diverse perspectives in order to derive the best possible outcomes for the community. The following points are key elements were deployed to accomplish the objective: Convene a stakeholder committee of volunteers with diverse perspectives and video record all stakeholder meetings Solicit and collect comments continuously throughout the process. Create a comments log with responses. Hold a public open house showing preferred design concept. Post reference materials, meeting agendas and videos, and notices on a project website. www.cityofpt.us/engagePT Background/Timeline Concern of powerlines and boatyard safety raised in July of 2021 Boatyard expansion, powerline undergrounding, and Gateway implementation plan project scope of work developed and presented to Parks, Recreation, Tree, and Trail Advisory Board on 8/24/21 Same presentation provided to City Council on 9/20/21and submittal for Jeff. Co. Public Infrastructure Funding (PIF) Grant approved. https://cityofpt.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewe r.php?view_id=4&clip_id=2290 PIF Grant in the amount of $1,000,000 submitted and approved on November 2, 2021 by PIF funding board. Background/Timeline Town Hall meetings held on: 11/10/21 –Video link https://cityofpt.granicus.com/player/clip/2307?view_id=4& redirect=true 12/15/21 –Video link https://cityofpt.granicus.com/player/clip/2318?view_id=4& redirect=true Stakeholder committee of volunteers assembled in February of 2022 8 stakeholder meetings held between April and August of 2022. Meetings video recorded and available on engagePT website. Public Open House to present preferred design concept alternative held at the Uptown Community Center on August 6, 2022. Displays available on engagePT website. Sideboards & Project Limits Sideboards & Project Limits Key Sideboards include: No work within limits of pavement unless a proposed crossing which needs WSDOT concurrence. No work in the Kah Tai Nature park except to address trees straddling right of way line Project must accomplish goals of boatyard expansion and undergrounding of power. Consistency with intent of adopted plans, policies, and codes. Project budget $1.97 Million Range of Alternatives Considered Range of Alternatives Based on what has been learned about safety requirements for operating around high voltage powerlines, doing nothing results in significant impacts to the trees in terms of pruning and to the boatyard in terms of setbacks to the traveling crane. Effectively, row of boats along the fence would be reduced by 10 to 20 feet. Range of Alternatives Partial expansion is an option, however, concerns were raised concerning the proximity of the boats to the existing trees. A partial expansion results in trees directly overhanging the boats. Partial expansion also puts additional stress on the already relatively stressed trees by placing fill over the critical root zone. Range of Alternatives Full expansion best meets the objectives of the project including creating an environment for healthy vegetation. The remainder of the presentation illustrates full expansion because it is the preferred alternative. Project Principles Plans, policies, and codes Facilitate future improvements Multimodal mobility Boatyard considerations Aesthetics –Gateway, Parkway Stormwater Soils Existing tree health Tree replacement Existing tree recycling Plantings and species selection Project Principles: Plans, Policies, and Codes Respecting the intent of the following adopted plans is an important element of the project development of a preferred alternative. These plans serve as guidance documents that are intended to balance various objectives. They differ from City code in that they are not intended to be literal. Following City codes are required elements of the project. Project Principles: Comprehensive Plan (2016) The Comprehensive Plan adopts all other city plans by reference including the relevant Non-motorized, PROS, Gateway Dev. Plan. Project Principles: Non-motorized Plan (1998 & 2011) The Non-motorized plan identifies key walking and biking connections/routes. A neighborhood connector is identified along Sims Way with a multi-use trail on the Kah Tai side. Project Principles: Gateway Develpoment Plan (1993) The Gateway Development Plan provides a balanced set of objectives. Project Principles: Gateway Development Plan (1993) Illustration of intent of Gateway Plan. The Non-motorized plan adds a multiuse trail on the park side. The third lane is only at intersections. Project Principles: Gateway Develpoment Plan (1993) Gateway Development Plan Flats District Key Points: Linear corridor –created by the existing poplars Views of shipyard and historic buildings should be enhanced. Views of bluff and courthouse are also recognized. Trees should be low enough to preserve views of the Courthouse and Uptown. Thin poplars and remove sucker growth. Plant with riparian plantings along Kah Tai. Utilities should be placed underground. Trees should be infilled with new ones when others are removed. Grasses and wildflowers can be used as ground cover Create a pedestrian link to the Courthouse area. Pedestrian environment should be enhanced with amenities such as public art. A sidewalk is shown on the south side of Sims with a nature path on the north side. Create connection to waterwalk and Discovery Trail Plantings should strengthen pedestrian environment Project Principles: PROS and Kah Tai Park Work in the park is limited due to grant restrictions and project scope/funding. However, Sims Way improvements should complement the Nature Park intent. Project Principles: Kah Tai Development Plan In 1986, development plan for Kah Tai park was created. City Council resolutions impacting the development of the park include: Resolutions 82-20, 83-1, 83-2, 83-2, 84- 19, 85-2, 85-9 and a shoreline development permit for the small lagoon in 1985 (SH10-85). Zone 12 of the 12-zone Planting Plan for Kah Tai is impacted by this Sims Way project. See attached Tree Variety List and Planting information. This project is outside of the park, but to the extent feasible the project should honor consider impacts to zone 12 of the Planting Plan. Project Principles: City Codes Applicable sections of City Code include the following: Chapter 12 addresses right of way development including rules for management of the right of way, right of way trees, and adoption of the Gateway Plan as a guidance document. Chapter 17 addresses land use on private property and development regulations Chapter 19 is the State Environmental Policy Act code setting forth environmental permitting requirements. Chapter 20 provides the rules and administrative procedures for processing permit applications. Project Principles: Facilitate Future Improvements The stakeholders brainstormed future work that might occur in the area and set the criteria that the preferred alternative should facilitate future work. A Larry Scott realignment shown here is an example. Other future work includes possible roundabout at Haines. Project Principles: Multimodal Transportation City’s complete streets policy requires projects to address transportation for all users of all abilities Project Principles: Boatyard Considerations Boatyard interface considerations are an important element of preferred alternative development including the following: Security and Public Safety: Public access should not be direct and fenced separation is needed between the right of way and the boatyard. Access to the boatyard needs to be controlled to Haines Street, internal roadways, and near the Safeway Gas pumps. An updated power supply is needed for boat works. Tree and shrub species should be selected to minimize branches, leaves, pollen, and other tree debris falling on the boats under work. Maximize the horizontal separation between trees and the boats by placing trees closer to the roadway. Project Principles: Aesthetics -Gateway Stakeholders asked that the Gateway feel like a “warm hug” welcoming residents and visitors to our community. The following characteristics are key objectives. Preserve as much green space as possible within the right of way. Create view corridors consistent with Gateway Plan into the boatyard and park to add interest. Create view corridors such that those interested in the boatyard, see glimpses of boats, and those not interested see a welcoming vegetated streetscape. Make the corridor welcoming to motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Create a Parkway tree planting form as compared to a columnar row form and still maintain linear look of the Gateway with a degree of symmetry Columnar Tree Form Parkway Tree Form Project Principles: Softscape -examples Project Principles: Soils 1966 aerial photo on left illustrates dredge spoils. 2012 aerial photo on the right shows park vegetation. Project Principles: Stormwater and Soils June 5, 2022 25-yr rainfall event. Water pooled for approx. 3 hours before completely infiltrating. Project Principles: Existing Tree Health Many of the existing trees are stressed due to a combination of factors including but not limited to poor soil conditions, competition for nutrients and water, tree age, 2021 summer heat, lack of maintenance, and impacts to the root zone. Project Principles: Tree Replacement The preferred alternative proposes replacement of the poplars on the boatyard side associated at the time of this project and thinning of trees on the Kah Tai park side with replacement over time. Tree replacement over time on the park side means: Individual analysis of trees will be made by an arborist to assess tree health to focus removal on trees in the poorest condition. Strategic removal and thinning will seek to improve health of nearby trees and open views into the park as part of the project. Replacement over time generally means that trees will need to be evaluated periodically and replaced over a period of approximately 20 years consistent with urban forestry practices. Project Principles: Existing Tree Recycling To the extent feasible, the stakeholder committee and design team recommend recycling the existing trees in the following ways: Make trees available for public to utilize as a wood product to honor our maritime, arts, and natural resource values in the community. Utilize existing removed trees as habitat strategically placed in Kah Tai Park or potentially other locations in the region. Utilize chips as a soil amendment to help new plantings the health of new plantings. Project Principles: Planting Considerations Plantings and landscape architecture design need to include the following considerations: Soils are largely devoid of organics, free draining (sand) with high concentrations of copper and other metals. Soil amendments are necessary to support the health of plantings. Irrigation for plant establishment will be required. (5-10 years) Root volume needs to be sufficient to support tree growth. This means horizontal and longitudinal separation from hard surfaces should be maximized. The boatyard side and park side are distinctly different from an aesthetic and maintenance standpoint. The boatyard side green space serves as a stormwater infiltration swale. Project Principles: Species Selection Considerations Tree species selection is critical given soil conditions and project goals. The following principles should be considered: Trees should not have aggressive root systems causing suckering and upheaval of road/path and other infrastructure The boatyard side along the boats needs to have low pollen producing trees and granular pollen rather than in dust form. The boatyard side could have greater pollen producing species along existing buildings, but not along the boats. Native varieties are preferred on the park side. See attached tree varieties and planting information illustrating 1986 IACC park planting plan. The boatyard side trees need to be sturdy and fit a parkway setting. There is a preference for all trees to be native or cultivars of native species that will be successful in the right-of-way environment. Climate change should be considered in species selection. Shrubs and ground cover need to accompany tree planting for mutual plant health and for architectural aesthetic purposes. Project Principles: Species Selection Considerations A list of tree species and attributes has been developed for the design. Other factors impacting species selection include: Tree species availability in the market place. Whether or not female or male trees are available and their relative pollen/fruit producing characteristics. If possible, tree sex is important to consider. Size of trees (3-inch minimum caliper trees are preferred for initial planting) Deer protection and impacts Tree replacement if a new planting fails to survive Shrub maintenance and control (parks maintenance staff capacity and experience) The basket of tree species evaluated and recommended are included as a reference to this presentation. See attached. Preferred Alternative: Design Concept Key visual features include: Parkway Setting with Poplar replacement on the boatyard side and poplar replacement over time on the Kah Tai park side. Timeline and Next Steps Based on design concept approval in September of 2022, the following steps and approximate timeline are anticipated: Refine design concept and initiate permitting (Fall 2022) Complete design and prepare construction documents for bidding (Spring of 2023) Construction (Fall of 2023/Spring of 2024). Note: Construction timelines may vary and are based on availability of materials Note: While the project is in further development stages, the PUD will need to trim the boatyard side Poplars in order to address powerline safety in the interim. Discussion and Questions Board Recommendation References See the City’s website for the project for a complete record of materials, meetings, and videos at https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and- boatyard-expansion-project Other key reference documents attached include Memo report from SCJ Alliance and August 6th Open House materials and public comment Public Comment log and response to comments Tree varieties –lists of tree and shrub species that have the best chance of thriving in the environment. 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Emily Coler Sent:Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:26 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Kah Tai changes Hi Sarah, please see comment below re: poplars Emily Coler From: Karen Lené Rudd <karenlenerudd@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:24 PM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Kah Tai changes CAUTION: External Email Hi There, I'm in support of moving the poplar trees along Sims Way. I'd prefer to see the native trees. However, please consider putting the island of trees on the east side of the street between the car traffic and the bike lane (instead of between the sidewalk and the bike lane). It is so much safer for bicyclists. This is a wonderful opportunity to really get the bike lanes right and improve safety. I like to ride my e-bike as much as possible in town but Sims Way is scary. Thank you, Karen Rudd -- Karen Lené Rudd she/her karenlenerudd.com 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Wednesday, September 29, 2021 8:40 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Contact Us Form Submission Sarah, Here is another comment about the Sims Way Gateway project. From: Website Form <porttownsend-wa@municodeweb.com> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 4:53 PM To: Webmaster <Webmaster@cityofpt.us> Subject: Contact Us Form Submission CAUTION: External Email Submitted on Thursday, September 16, 2021 - 4:53pm Submitted by anonymous user: 174.21.28.96 Submitted values are: First Name Nancy Last Name Erreca Email nerreca@aol.com Question/Comment Hi - the poplar tree project is ridiculous, embarrassing and cruel. We need housing not dead trees and a sidewalk. The only thing that needs to go underground is this project. The results of this submission may be viewed at: https://cityofpt.us/node/7/submission/29391 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Wednesday, September 29, 2021 9:18 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Reg/ removing poplar trees Kelly Graves -----Original Message----- From: rachel Ganapoler <rachelganapoler@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 9:17 AM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Reg/ removing poplar trees The trees.. while they are not indigenous to the area… have stood 30 years, and have graced the entrance of our town with their beauty. I think it’s a terrible idea to remove them under any circumstances… certainly there are other solutions for underground lines.. and does the port really have to expand a few feet.. ? Rachel Ganapoler Sent from my iPhone 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Wednesday, September 29, 2021 8:40 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: poplars/wildfire experience/support Hi Sarah, Please add to the comment log... Thank you Steve From: meg lodes <meg_lodes@msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 3:37 PM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: poplars/wildfire experience/support Steve, I read the article in the PTLeader about the removal of Poplar trees along Sims Way and the undergrounding of power lines. The article wasn't necessarily about wildfire issues but touched on the problem of electricity from power lines "arcing into the poplar trees" causing some trees to be scorched. My interest was piqued. When I mention to friends here in Port Townsend the possibility of raging wildfires occurring within this community their typical reaction is, "What? Wildfire? Not in a coastal community like Port Townsend." Their assessment might be true, but nature knows no limits and climate change has forced me to recognize the incomprehensible, boundaryless ability of fire to consume and destroy any community either coastal or inland. Colorado was my home for 30+ years. My former husband and I were evacuated during the 2002 Hayman Fire which was eventually stopped only a few miles from our home. We were under pre-evacuation notices during the 2012 Waldo Canyon fire which was stopped, in part, by the Air Force Academy's efforts. I watched in horror as massive plumes of smoke rose high into the sky southeast of our home during the 2013 Black Forest fire as if dramatic thunderheads were ready to drop rain from the sky: Terror drenched the land that day, not moisture laden rain. Port Townsend's lack of measurable precipitation this summer elevated my concern about fire. The community wide notices of high fire danger helped to alleviate my fear; perhaps the community would rally behind the fire department’s warnings. I support any effort by the City's Public Works department and PUD to remove trees, shrubs and grass that could easily ignite and cause unstoppable raging wildfires in this beautiful coastal community. The covid pandemic has been devastating yet a different sort of pandemic is smoldering, undetected, in the entire world due to climate change. What was once incomprehensible has now become 2 comprehensible. Unfortunately, climate change has altered the safe orbit of human life on this planet – perhaps the city should reevaluate its long held tree policy. I'm not a tree hater. In fact, my soul wrenched when I watched chainsaws slit and tear at a Madrone tree near my home. Within a matter of hours its beauty was eviscerated; wiped away from the place where it gracefully stood for many decades. When the tree was finally turned into a pile of logs I wept. This majestic tree that stood in harmony with the land it inhabited for many decades was, within a few hours, turned into a pile of rubble lying on the ground. Therefore the public's desire to keep the "iconic" poplar trees is understandable. Emotional attachments do drive desire. But my experience concerning wildfire danger has tempered my long held desire to be a savior to every tree. I considered sending this to the PTLeader – community support on removing the poplars seems to be lacking. Hmmmm....if published I could become an enemy of the people. Meg Meg Lodes meg_lodes@msn.com 303-249-8695 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply email and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Emily Coler Sent:Wednesday, October 13, 2021 12:34 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Contact Us Form Submission Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Sarah, Please see below re: poplar trees. Emily Coler From: Website Form <porttownsend-wa@municodeweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 12:18 PM To: Webmaster <Webmaster@cityofpt.us> Subject: Contact Us Form Submission CAUTION: External Email Submitted on Wednesday, October 13, 2021 - 12:17pm Submitted by anonymous user: 172.58.45.174 Submitted values are: First Name DORI Last Name BAILEY Email BAILEY_0611@YAHOO.COM Question/Comment I briefly read an article in yesterday's newspaper, The Leader. I do not subscribe to this newspaper nor do I subscribe to it online so I could not read the entire article. I was however, irritated, annoyed, and extremely disappointed that the city wants to cut down all of the poplar trees that border the Kai Thai lagoon. This removal of nature, is going to cost 2 million from what the article said. But yet we have homeless people. We have homeless people with mental issues. We have families that are going to be homeless, we have seniors that are going to be homeless. And yet nothing is done for them. A tiny little village. Which these tiny homes are just going to be a place for a person to sleep with no bath facilities. But the case is that the city of Port Townsend time and time 2 again makes bad decisions on what to do with money. No I do know that when a grant is given to cities and counties and government agencies and whatnot they can only spend it a certain way which doesn't even make sense. But $2 million to a tiny little community like ours would really do a lot of good to help homelessness. Whatever happened to the apartments that were bought from Canada and have sat behind a church for probably 10 years now. They sit there vacant another form of government waste. Roundabouts were they don't even need to be a waste of money. So why does the city keep wasting taxpayers money. The removal of these trees probably houses birds or some other type of wildlife. Trees are important no matter what type of wildlife or birds or whatever how's them why is the city always trying to remove either animals or trees. The results of this submission may be viewed at: https://cityofpt.us/node/7/submission/30851 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Monday, October 18, 2021 6:42 PM To:Sarah Tiffany; Emily Coler Subject:Fw: Poplars Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Another comment to log. thank you From: joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 11:46 AM To: karen@portofporttownsned <karen@portofporttownsned>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; publiccomment@cityofpt.us <publiccomment@cityofpt.us>; jrandall@jeffpud.org <jrandall@jeffpud.org> Subject: Poplars Replanting with Poplars makes the most sense. Low pollen (for boatyard consideration in springtime), shallow root system to not interfere with new buried lines, or from saltwater intrusion (Deep rooted trees may not like saltwater under there!), Poplars are noted for their ability to soak up contaminations/pollutants in soil or water (perfect for running alongside a boatyard!!), They're tall to add to the pretty skyline (creating less of an industrial/tourist strip look), AND, we have plenty of young, strong, and, healthy offsprings right there that we could dig up and replant where we want them (keep the cost down by not buying new trees). They live up to 70 years old (most trees' lifespan is about that). This is what was recommended by the Gateway Plan Steering Committee for the study done that we all paid lots of money for in '93. Let's stick with the plan, already! It is said 'But, they're not native!!'. True, but, they came here from Italy back in the early 1700's. I'm sure they've adapted themselves to being native enough. How pure do we need to be??? Joni Blanchard 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Monday, October 18, 2021 6:42 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Cc:Emily Coler Subject:Fw: Gateway Plan Attachments:1993 Gateway Development Plan.zip; 1993 Gateway Development Plan.zip Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Sarah, Can you log this comment? thanks! Steve From: joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 12:11 AM To: karen@portofpt.com <karen@portofpt.com>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; publiccomment@cityofpt.us <publiccomment@cityofpt.us> Subject: Gateway Plan Attached is the 1993 Gateway Development Plan. I was so impressed reading the first two pages of all that went into creating Resolution 88 - 43. This plan was 5 years in the making! This plan with it's researched and well thought out strategies was created by a whole slew of paid professionals along with in-depth public input by citizens, local authorities, and, businesses. I recommend reading page 14 with it's 'Streetscapes' recommendations for 'The Flats' - (the straight stretch from Safeway through to the Pennysaver intersection). Maybe it'd be best to 'stick to the plan' that has already been well thought out and planned rather than re- inventing it all over again. PUD says it's a liability to keep those trees along that stretch. Then, these Poplars are a liability for them ALL OVER this town along many of our well traveled roads. Why focus just on the gateway trees if they're so very dangerous? An argument I've heard is 'But, it's a State Highway!!' with potential for clogging up traffic if a tree fell and needed cleaning up. Diverting traffic is quite simple around that stretch of Poplars there. Also, the argument that it costs our city and the PUD alot of $$ to clean up limbs that may fall. Well, that's true all around this town. Limbs fall off of all kinds of trees. It's on public record that it was said (sorry, can't remember by whom) that the power line interference with the trees CAN be solved without taking them all down, so, that's not reason enough for taking them. Although, I agree, that problem doesn need addressing. Burying power lines with such a high water table right there doesn't seem to make much sense to me. The ribbon of port property gained isn't enough to create another row for boats to set for haulouts. I don't understand the significant gain there. There's an argument that 'the trees aren't native'. True. They came over from Italy in the early 1700s. I think we can say they've adapted by now enough to be called native. 2 This 1993 Gateway plan had professional landscaping architects suggesting replanting of more poplars! These folks were strategizing for a LONG TERM plan and didn't seem to have a problem with the Poplars. There was absolutely NO mention in the whole plan for getting rid of them. Shallow roots soaking up lots of water are probably a good thing coming out of a boatyard. Poplar trees are noted for their abilities for soaking up/cleaning up toxic contaminants and waters out of soil. They add such aesthetic beautfy to the whole area. Coming into the marina on a boat, they make the prettiest backdrop against the sky looking towards the land. Our Poplars look very healthy. Sure they have a life span, but, it seems quite premature for wiping these trees out. I'd follow the recommendations of this 1993 Plan. There couldn't be a better tree for that corridor. Finding compatible trees that aren't 'lollypop trees' to replace them will be difficult. Listen to the PT 'old-timers' who created this plan with trying to keep our local character in-tact. Sometimes 'economic development' shouldn't be the bottom line in all decision making. I know some of you who are new to this town and pushing this agenda are experts in transportation and economic development, but, so were the original Plan makers here in this 1993 Concept. For all the reasoning I'm hearing for this, something just seems 'extravagant' and 'not right'. Joni 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Sunday, October 10, 2021 9:12 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: sentinels of this historic shipping village Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Sarah, Can you add this to the comment log? Thank you! Steve From: O'Neill Louchard <oneill@olympus.net> Sent: Sunday, October 3, 2021 5:48 PM To: Julie Jaman <jjamubi@gmail.com> Cc: publiccomment@cityofpt.us <publiccomment@cityofpt.us>; jrandall@jeffpud.org <jrandall@jeffpud.org>; kcollins@jeffpud.org <kcollins@jeffpud.org>; dtoepper@jeffpud.org <dtoepper@jeffpud.org>; kstreett@jeffpud.org <kstreett@jeffpud.org>; pam@portofpt.com <pam@portofpt.com>; bill@portofpt.com <bill@portofpt.com>; phanke@portofpt.com <phanke@portofpt.com>; eron@portofpt.com <eron@portofpt.com>; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; editor@ptleader.com <editor@ptleader.com> Subject: Re: sentinels of this historic shipping village Thank you for sharing this beautifully thought out and written letter. I totally agree with you. O'Neill On Oct 3, 2021, at 1:24 PM, Julie Jaman <jjamubi@gmail.com> wrote: October 2, 2021 To: Port Townsend City Council and Public Works Port of Port Townsend Commissioners Public Utility District #1 Commissioners Re: Elimination of the poplar trees along Sims Way on Kah Tai Nature Park and Port of Port Townsend rights of ways. The poplar tree removal project will be a shocking event for many people, tourists and residents. Some careful landscape planning and aesthetics are called for 2 to replace the dramatic Lombardy Poplars with a comparable treescape in this broad lowland. It would be careless to plant little lollipop trees or one-trick pony cherry trees, subject to disease and needing lots of tending, as the finale to this $2M+ plan. . The issues of native species is of little consequence as little about Sims Way is native. But currently the trees along the rights of ways do provide numerous benefits and they thrive in soil made of dredge spoils, infiltrating water from the permeable grassed surrounds. They gather moisture from stormwater on its way to the bay; they slow, infiltrate and filter the polluted roadway runoff and the workyard dust and chemicals.They work as screening, windbreaks and they beautify the landscape with shape and form: hefty trunks, limb structure,and myriad hues emanating from leaves and needles. The broad reach of the once estuary lands comes into view from the top of the curve catching the eye in all seasons, the trees sentinels to this historic shipping village. This is a challenge for a worthy landscape plan: a variety of species varying in height, texture and colors; or a corridor of columnar or large species similar in show to the poplars. Thoughtful landscaping is needed for this plan in order to replace the logged off poplars with a comparable dramatic and functional treescape along the rights of ways. One example would be to plant an impressive mixed species array: some groupings of Quaking Aspen interspersed with Shore Pines, Douglas Firs and Western Red Cedars. These trees are considered native. They all have beautiful bark and longevity. By using the already established trail on the Port side they would provide a pleasurable, not too engineered, walking experience. And along the Kah Tai park side the existing paved walkway is ample for all users. We hope these concerns and suggestions help to embellish just how big and important this project is not only for the infrastructure needs of the Port and the PUD but for all of us who live within this landscape. Friends of Kah Tai Lagoon Nora Regan, Julie Jaman, Paula Mackrow . 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Sunday, October 10, 2021 2:48 PM To:Joanna Sanders; John Mauro Cc:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Re: Sims Way Tree Replacements Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Thanks Joanna, Sarah, can you log this comment? Thanks! Steve From: Joanna Sanders <jsanders@cityofpt.us> Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 8:36 AM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Subject: FW: Sims Way Tree Replacements For your info. Comment for 10/18 From: joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 7:09 PM To: Eron Berg <Eron@portofpt.com>; Eric Toews <eric@portofpt.com>; Pam Petranek <Pam@portofpt.com>; phanke@portofpt.com Cc: publiccomment@cityofpt.us Subject: Sims Way Tree Replacements I'd like to offer some information to be considered about what trees replace the Poplars on Sims Way in time. Consideration needs to be given for the hauled out boats right there that will be next to them in the boatyard for the Port's and Boatowners' sakes. 2 1. No Food trees!! (Michelle's suggestion). Attracting lots of birds and feeding them would be a disaster for the boats nearby! Colored birdpoop is already a problem enough during berry season! 2. Trees planted should be FEMALES ONLY and certainly not MONECIOUS trees. (Monecious trees have both female and male 'parts' on one tree for self-pollination)'. Males trees and Monecious trees create pollens - some worse than others that would blow all over the boats in our springtime evening winds. Male Shore Pines (suggested by Forest Shomer) are one of the worst for pollen clouds and very allergenic. 3. Trees I'd recommend would be: 4. FEMALE Western Balsam Poplar - Lives 70 years, it's 75' to 100' talll by 3' to 5' wide. It's low allergen and only creates a horrible 'cotton fluff' if pollinated by a MALE. It's DIOECOPIS (requires tree of opposite sex to pollinate). 5. FEMALE Red Maples HA WTHORNE Tree - 20' - 30' High. Attracts bees. Low pollen/allergenic FEMALE Shore Pines - They're VERY long lived. About 45' Tall and 30' Wide A professional tree person should be consulted about these trees and their impacts. There could be problems I don't not know about them! Saltwater intrusion should be considered, also. The saltwater table comes up quite close to the surface along there. (Makes me wonder about burying the power lines!!) Also, it occurred to me that if SAFETY of the Lombardy Poplar trees is the main consideration for removing them, then, the other Lombardy Poplars all behind Henery's Hardware store, Safeway, along the Lagoon road over to 19th, and behind Penny Saver should also be considered dangerous and removed sooner rather than later. There are about 70 more trees at least with those! Also, there is one HUGE and beautiful lone yellow lupine bush dead-center along the boatyard fence across from Henery's that should be saved and replanted if possible!! It's so old and makes the boatyard smell heavenly in May/June. Maybe you could plant even more lovely native yellow lupines!! (I'll take it if it's going to get killed!). I'm sorry the Lombardy trees need to go, but, I do understand their lifespan is nearing an end. Just please be sure to take the boatyard into consideration with the flying pollen and flying leaves of whatever they're replaced with. Some tree species have bigger and heavier pollen that falls close to the tree and doesn't blow wild in the wind. Thank you for taking my input! Joni Blanchard Marine Tradeslady who hauls out along the fenceline every spring. 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Tuesday, October 19, 2021 1:21 PM To:Sarah Tiffany; Emily Coler Subject:FW: Poplars along Sims Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Additional comment to log. From: dixie@cablespeed.com <dixie@cablespeed.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:49 PM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: Poplars along Sims CAUTION: External Email Steve, I am not sure where to send my comments on the proposed poplar removal along Sims Way Anyway please forward: To Who It May Concern; I am in total agreement with the plan to removal the poplars along Sims Way. They are at the end of their life cycle and will only require maintenance when breaking apart, not to mention they are often considered an invasive species. I have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 though my business Olympic Wetland Resources, and I am also a member of the Olympic Chapter of the Washington Native Plant Society since 1989. I know planting only native plants/ (trees or shrubs) is not the only solutions but I do believe the area along Sims should incorporate natives as much as possible. A diversity of trees that are both evergreen and deciduous, spring blooming and fall color would be more natural and interesting than just a promenade of one species. I would be happy to join in the planning committee involved with some final decisions. Dixie Llewellin 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Friday, October 29, 2021 11:03 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Poplars along Sims Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Can you log this? Thanks From: dixie@cablespeed.com <dixie@cablespeed.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:26 PM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: RE: Poplars along Sims One last comment…. This is a known area of fill from the boat haven in the 1960’s?. Has there been a soil analysis…it makes all the difference in the world for tree survival. Dixie From: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 1:20 PM To: dixie@cablespeed.com Subject: RE: Poplars along Sims Thank you Dixie! We appreciate you sending in your comments. We are keeping all of the comments in one place in preparation for our replanting design process. This is very helpful. Thanks! Steve From: dixie@cablespeed.com <dixie@cablespeed.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:49 PM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: Poplars along Sims CAUTION: External Email 2 Steve, I am not sure where to send my comments on the proposed poplar removal along Sims Way Anyway please forward: To Who It May Concern; I am in total agreement with the plan to removal the poplars along Sims Way. They are at the end of their life cycle and will only require maintenance when breaking apart, not to mention they are often considered an invasive species. I have been designing jurisdictional mitigation projects since 1995 though my business Olympic Wetland Resources, and I am also a member of the Olympic Chapter of the Washington Native Plant Society since 1989. I know planting only native plants/ (trees or shrubs) is not the only solutions but I do believe the area along Sims should incorporate natives as much as possible. A diversity of trees that are both evergreen and deciduous, spring blooming and fall color would be more natural and interesting than just a promenade of one species. I would be happy to join in the planning committee involved with some final decisions. Dixie Llewellin 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Friday, October 29, 2021 11:15 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: popular poplars Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Sarah, Can you log this one too? Thanks From: Julie Jaman <jjamubi@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 4:09 PM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Cc: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; jrandall@jeffpud.org; kcollins@jeffpud.org; dtoepper@jeffpud.org; kstreett@jeffpud.org; pam@portofpt.com; bill@portofpt.com; phanke@portofpt.com; eron@portofpt.com; CityCouncil <citycouncil@cityofpt.us> Subject: popular poplars Hello again Mr. King, I am sending along further comment concerning the proposed $2M logging of the Sims Way poplars. The most urgent consideration is to make a plan that includes local, knowledgeable landscapers and arborists. This effort should provide more in depth information about the longevity, growth habits, water uptake and filtration of the existing poplars and include an option to continue with poplars as the “gateway” trees along this corridor. I know there are a few folks who hope for only native species in Kah Tai Nature Park but in truth “native” is gone by over 100 years and you, Mr. King, would be long retired before all the poplars could be downed, if even possible. If you review photos of the wetland prior to the dumping of dredge spoils you will spot poplars here and there. The poplars do well in these poor soils,even better, they provide filtration services so needed for the bay waters. In my research I have found no trees that provide such verticality, color and capture through three seasons the caprice of light and wind. It is a corridor that lifts the eyes. The option to husband the mature poplars would be a worthy consideration:, selectively limbing as necessary; allowing suckers to grow; planting seedlings in gaps - a 50, 100 year plan to continue with them. After all, the City will have to tend to this streetscape no matter what. Therefore instead of the shock of shearing the sides to this section of highway that connects the south and the east roadways that are and can only be two lane roads, take into consideration all the functions that the poplars provide, including the impressive beauty. This project plan should not be left to a few employees in the City or at the PUD. Please keep me informed of when the public meeting will be held concerning this issue. Thank you 2 Julie Jaman 360-385-6078 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Thursday, November 4, 2021 7:34 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Town Hall Statement~ Are you still logging Poplar tree comments? Kelly Graves From: joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 7:43 PM To: Eron Berg <Eron@portofpt.com>; karen@portofporttownsned; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; engagePT@cityofpt.us; kstreett@jeffpud.org Subject: Town Hall Statement~ I can't do Zoom, so, here's my public statement for the Nov. 9th Town Hall: (Sorry about redundancy of previous letters - I made some factual corrections). Shore Pines, Evergreens, and, Madronas would not work along the boatyard side of the road (as has been recommended). There will be very little space for any big trees with all the concrete planned to be put in (We don't need a sidewalk there!) Many of the suggested replacement trees would be a disaster for the boatyard, such as Shore Pines or Evergreens. Those trees are MONECIOUS - self-pollinating due to their male and female parts on each tree and would CREAM the boatyard during it's busiest haul -out season, Feb thru July. It would literally incapacitate the boatwork! Fruit and berry trees would be a mess for boats, also. The boatyard MUST BE CONSIDERED when replanting trees and I urge the Port to stay on that and pay attention to what the City does there! No MONECIOUS, MALE, FRUIT OR BERRY TREES! Dioecious (only one sexed trees) female trees only - they don't pollinate. I'm sure we'll end up with small streetscape trees, such as those little maples, which have been used for most new landscaping that has happened between Mill Rd. and Pt. Hudson. It'll be stereotypical streetscape trees (MORE Douglas Maples - the ONLY Native Maple that'll fit there), with lots of concrete, and, a predominant industrial scene of blue tarps and boats in various states of disrepair (as much as I love our boatyard!). I've always liked the Poplars for their shielding of us boatworkers, yet, allowing for a spotted view into the yard at our boats. We should replace (if we must remove all the Poplars) with more young Poplars that already are well underway in Kai Tai. (Save taxpayers' $$!) They're the perfect tree for that area! Without powerlines to interfere, why not?? They're HYBRID Poplars that can live 70 - 100 years, unlike, native Poplars. (Our trees aren't much more than 50 years old with years of life left in them)! They're known to THRIVE here in the Pacific NW more than anywhere else in the US, since coming to our country in the late 1700's. Their shallow roots would be perfect for underground powerlines. AND, Poplars are noted for their particular ability to soak up any toxins and pollutants from the soil. Without that concrete sidewalk (that isn't needed), there would be more options for a prettier and greener space along there - maybe with some native bushes like Rhody's, more Yellow Lupine (already a huge one mid-stretch there!) put in ALONG with the young new Poplars!! 2 I think a Professional Arborist should be consulted to come core each Poplar tree to determine it's health and prospective life span left. Remove or prune any problematic trees and TRY to keep as many as you can. The Port should keep sacrificing it's 15' ribbon of property for to keep that lovely greenspace between their industrial site and the road. They have another 3.7 acres planned elsewhere for expansion to booster their economic impact. Accessibility to the boatyard doesn't need 'enhancing'!! People make their way to use the bike trail just fine as is - with the bike lanes and nice sidewalk across the road already put in! What's a 'multi-use' sidewalk?? A sidewalk is for pedestrians only. Bikes use the bike lane that's right there! PUD could investigate their ability to underground the wires without removal of the trees. The sidewalk across the road was dug out and put in within feet of the Poplars without hurting the roots. A few years ago, Discovery Road was widened with a 4' drainage ditch dug right against the Golf Course Poplars without harming the trees. This way, you'd be honoring our past City Leaders' and Citizens' Public Input for THEIR LONG TERM PLAN and commitment for KEEPING the Poplars along that welcoming stretch as stated in their 1993 Gateway Plan 'Landscaping RECOMMENDATIONS' - page 14. I'm wondering WHO has determined they're dead and dying and ALL need to be wiped out? Getting rid of these trees mainly because 'they are not Native' is simply - anal. Let's try for some continuity with our City's leadership decade to decade!! Let's 'stick with the plan'! Joni Blanchard 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Monday, November 8, 2021 7:34 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Don't cut the Gateway Poplars Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Poplar Tree correspondence. Kelly Graves From: Larry Eifert <larryeifert@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 5:01 PM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Don't cut the Gateway Poplars CAUTION: External Email I'm adding my concerns and shock about your plan to kill the Lombardy poplars along Sim's Way. Your website states: The City recognizes that this tree lined section of Sims Way is an iconic feature to Port Townsend along with Boat Haven and Kah Tai Lagoon. And so, any intelligent person who wrote that would then figure out a way to save the trees, prioritize them as the 'iconis feature' they are, and build your wires and marina around them. It's not rocket science to realize the wires are being undergrounded, so they will be no threat to the poplars. You state they're hazard trees. What tree isn't? A town that destroys what makes it beautiful is missing an understanding of what has made this place beautiful in the first place. These trees have become part of our legacy here. They're helping climate change, not making sidewalks and gravel. You say this will bring a scant few jobs to town, maybe, boats to be repaired in the slim strip of new gravel, but what about the fact you're also destroying what helps makes this Gateway worth coming to town for in the first place. Will fewer people come to town to spend money when this place just looks like any other town, like millions of other towns with tiny disposable trees. Planting the same tiny trees you see anywhere is not how you make this a destination town. Why this is happening is obviously because several new people have been hired by the Port and City, and they need to prove they can change things. But this is a rare town that is hanging by a thread before turning into just another town full of strip stores and industrial parks. There are hundreds of these poplar trees between Port Townsend and Sequim. None of them appear to be falling down in every storm. In fact, in the past three early fall storms, not a one fell along Sims Way - and one 2 storm had 64mph winds. Why are you all worried about this now, when 20 years ago the Gateway Plan celebrated these trees, provided a maintenance and replanting plan. What has changed? And these hybrid poplars last far longer than what your claiming. Has someone actually looked at them? They're not big trees - and in fact the ones next to the nearby motel are far bigger. Are you cutting those, too? They say you cannot teach culture and taste. That may be. But I'm also hoping you'll see that killing 130 poplars for some vague ideas is also going to tear this community apart. It already has if you read social media. And once a government looses their respect from the people they govern, it looses its ability to govern. You'd be heros to just let this plan to be focused to support the trees, not senselessly kill them. Respectfully Larry Eifert Larry Eifert Painting nature for half a century larryeifert.com 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Monday, November 8, 2021 4:58 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: Trees~ Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Sarah, Please include this in the log. Thanks Steve From: joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 3:36 PM To: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: Trees~ Hello~ All this talk about trees falling and killing us got me to looking around. Just yesterday I noticed and took pictures of all the dead trees (Madronas and Alders) within our lovely Madrona tunnel coming into town beyond Mill Road. I was hesitant to write to make the City aware of these dangers because I've been so wordy about the Poplar trees already! But, ironically, one of those trees came down today right across the road. I don't know if anyone was hurt (although I did see a car getting towed away nearby that could've/might've been involved). What a bummer. I'm not advocating what-so-ever those trees get wiped out, but, seriously - maintenance IS so important and has obviously been neglected along that dangerous stretch of trees. The living healthy Madronnas stand firm at their precarious looking angles, so, please don't touch those!! But, the standing dead NEED to get dealt with. Thank you, Joni Blanchard 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Tuesday, November 9, 2021 7:10 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Comments Re: Sims Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project Kelly Graves From: Karen Anderson <karenlanderson736@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 6:03 PM To: engagept@cityofpt.us Subject: Comments Re: Sims Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project Dear City of Port Townsend Representatives, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Sims Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project. I cannot attend the Virtual Town Hall, so I am providing written comments through the Engage PT e-mail address. This is a multi- faceted project and, while I appreciate the effort to take a cooperative approach with the Port of Port Townsend and the PUD to coordinate areas of mutual interest and leverage various funding sources, I think it is important to consider each component separately including separate analyses, prioritization and recommendations. As it is currently proposed all of the issues (safety, environment, economic development, etc.) have been characterized as a package deal, which doesn't allow for the decision makers to take a more incremental approach and address the highest priority items first. I have structured my comments to correspond to the Project Goals that appear on the project website. Project Goals Primary goal: positive economic impact for the Port (job creation) - I do not support this as the primary goal of the project and feel that it is disingenuous to say that the primary reason for removing the poplar trees is to create jobs. Is it a one-to-one ratio - cut a tree/create a job? I know this is a flippant comment, but seriously, if people are being shocked and trees are catching fire, I think the primary goal should be elimination of public safety issues. The exhibits in the presentation did not clearly indicate the various ROW dimensions along with ownership to make it easier to understand which entities have control of the ROW. I am not certain how this narrow strip of property adjacent to the boatyard would actually translate into usable area for the boatyard that would then translate into the aforementioned "jobs." Further, I question what eliminating the existing buffer between the boatyard and the roadway would do for the safety of those working on the boats, and how the pedestrian environment would be improved. This aspect of the project requires a great deal more information and analysis. What would the design of the expanded boatyard entail? How would it translate into jobs, specifically? Elimination of public safety issue (tree hazards) - This is clearly the most important goal and there seems to be significant evidence that the trees conflict with the power lines on the south side of Sims. Indeed, now that the City, the PUD and the Port have all publicly stated that there is a known public safety hazard, they have set the stage for tree removal regardless of any other actions in order to avoid potential future liability claims. That said, there is no relationship between the tree removal on the south side of Sims and the north side of Sims due to public safety. These should be analyzed as two different options. Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard - It is not clear what this means. There is currently a chain link fence adjacent to the ROW and the boatyard. The photo simulation labeled "CONCEPT" in the presentation shows a block wall adjacent to the boatyard. I'm not sure why this is listed as a goal. In general, the proposal to have a narrow sidewalk adjacent to a 2 block wall with a small landscape strip adjacent to the street is unacceptable and does not appear to conform to the 1993 Gateway Development Plan concept for Sims. This is, by far, one of the worst outcomes of the entire proposal. Preserving this ROW to create an enhanced pedestrian/bicycle facility would be the preferred alternative. Improved reliability of power infrastructure - This would require more data to demonstrate that the current conflict between the trees and the power lines results in disruption of the power infrastructure such that it warrants removal of the trees and undergrounding of the utilities. Again, these are two separate issues. The tree removal alone could improve the safety and reliability. The undergrounding appears to be more related to the boatyard expansion. Replacement of poplars, an emerging and eventual need for the City - This item needs to be addressed separately for the north and south sides of Sims. My personal opinion is that, as a pedestrian, the existing poplars on the north side of Sims are a very poor street tree. They are not well maintained and the lower trunks are covered with suckers which, in my view, give them the appearance of large weeds. They may look great to people in their cars driving at 30/40 mph as they enter town, but they do not contribute to the comfort of the pedestrian as they are not aesthetically pleasing at the ground level and they create dense coverage which contributes to an unsafe feeling walking by. I noticed that there are many fir trees planted just behind the poplars, some that are as tall as the poplars, but that are obscured. I would prefer to see a more natural edge to Sims and to open up the area between the road and Kah Tai Lagoon. Environmental stewardship of Kah Tai Lagoon and support for growth of plantings of native species that has already occurred/Reduced water needs/Improved bio-diversity - My comments here are a continuation of my previous comments. I support the planting of native species. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this proposed project. I look forward to seeing a more robust analysis and would request that the various issues not be conflated, as they currently are. Best regards, Karen Anderson 736 S Street Port Townsend, WA 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Wednesday, November 10, 2021 7:54 AM To:Sarah Tiffany; Steve King Subject:FW: Tree Removal Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged FYI Kelly Graves From: Charles Law <clawthree@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 6:08 PM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Tree Removal Hello Mr. King, I'm responding to your call for me to send the information I found. "...full-sized [fruit] trees will sequester between 220 and 260 pounds [of CO2] annually."1 "...acre-sized apple orchard can fix as much as 20 tons of CO2 from the air each season, while it releases 15 tons of oxygen, and provides over 5 billion BTUs of cooling power."2 I can't imagine how much carbon these full-size poplar trees sequester? Personally, I don't like these trees. However, we have these trees and we need to keep them. The idea of discharging CO2 into the atmosphere from destruction of hundreds of trees should be considered. 1. Kat West , el al., editors, 2009. Portland Fruit/Nut Tree Report 2. Alan N. Lakso, 2010. "Estimating the Environmental Footprint of New York Apple Orchards". New York State Horticultural Society 18:26-32. Cheers, 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Wednesday, November 10, 2021 10:21 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Town hall meeting Sarah, Can you log this as well? Thanks! Steve From: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 8:19 AM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: Fw: Town hall meeting Hi Steve - I forget, is Sarah logging? This one in too from last night. i responded to Joan but want to make sure her comments are captured. From: J Fabian <fabianily@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 6:23 PM To: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Subject: Town hall meeting I am disappointed that the phone number to participate via phone was not given nor repeated throughout the broadcast. Some points to note: My perspective regarding the trees on the Sims gateway town hall. 1) native species are likely to suffer or not adapt to climate change. What species will thrive in the Sandy soil on the boatyard side? Special consideration should be made that irrigation or lack of water in our microclimate as well as sea water intrusion need be studied.. 2) Can the trees be removed only on the boat yard side and leave the others on the lagoon side and experiment with heavy trimming of existant trees on the lagoon side. 3) Lombardy poplar do thrive after extreme cutting. Please look into it. 4) poplar wood is the wood used specifically in the making of wooden shoes in the netherlands. Perhaps this use of wood could be considered an opportunity to offset tree replacement budget or establish a viable long range green belt? Or ongoing trash collection as a lot blows over from the boat yard and is rarely cleaned up. Thank you. I plan to continue participation even without at home internet access. Joan Fabian Port Townsend resident since 1984 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Wednesday, November 10, 2021 10:35 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Sims way tree replacement Another one to log. From: Forest Shomer <ziraat@olympus.net> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 8:31 AM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: Re: Sims way tree replacement CAUTION: External Email Thanks, and certainly you can use the information as outreach. The only small caveat is that it is possible that some of the poplars pre-dated 1964. I suspect that the ones along the main path inside the park were planted earlier to help stabilize the dike behind which (i.e, south) the dredge spoils were spread. Within the main ‘flats’ of the park land, all of those trees are less than 60 years old. Most of the conifers date from the mid-1980s and it’s not hard to detect that they have grown pretty slowly, due to the unfavorable soil (dredgings), as they would be much taller in average soil fertility. If more people know about the allergenic downside of poplars and birches (the latter being one of the four most common trees planted here around 40-50 years ago), some may change their minds about wanting to retain the poplars, and also help swing the public toward a more diverse and ‘cleaner’ urban forest. Something like 20% of the general population has strong reactions with allergenic trees—and don’t even realize that. https://www.nysinuscenter.com/2017/06/best-and-worst-trees-for-allergies/ Best, Forest On Sep 27, 2021, at 5:40 AM, Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> wrote: Hi Forest, Thank you so much for your email. I will go to 12th street today to look at the Shore Pines. I'm very interested in this type of replacement approach. I appreciate this information as the 2 community push back is strong. If it is ok with you, I'd like to use the information you have shared here to help with community outreach. Thanks again! Steve From: Forest Shomer <ziraat@olympus.net> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 3:01 AM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: Sims way tree replacement Hello Steve, Having served, and Chaired, both the City Parks Commission and the (former) Tree Committee at various times over the past 40+ years, as well as having conducted the state-funded Port Townsend Tree Survey (1985-87) I am well informed of the history of the poplars, which not only line Sims Way, but also the south and west edges of Kah Tai Lagoon. They were planted as a quick fix after the dredge spoils from the Boat Haven were spread north of Sims Way in 1964. The downside of poplars, which have long fallen out of favor in most American cities, is that they are brittle, short-lived, and their roots disrupt sidewalks and other paved areas.. Now is the right time to plant a new generation of trees for the long term. The quick fix lasted 60 years which coincides with the estimated life span of Lombardy poplar. One of the most compatible near-shore trees that is longer-lived, and a good match for a 170-year-old historic community, is Shore Pine. Lower Sims Way is one of most windy, exposed areas here, and poplars, being narrow columnar trees, do nothing to temper that wind, instead being susceptible to breakage after storms, as some of us can remember from some past peak wind events. Shore pine, conversely, is the ideal tree form to provide shelter from wind at the ground level. There is a row of shore pine on the 12th Street side of Kah Tai, planted there around 1983 by community members; although some have been damaged not by wind but by vandalism, they do provide a good visual glimpse of the possible reforestation of the Sims Way side of the lagoon area. They branch near to the ground and give excellent protection from wind--the name "shore" pine is an obvious clue of their rightness for this location. They won't die off after 60 years like poplars nor have their tops or stems break off after a howling gale. Not to mention, they are native to the Olympic Peninsula unlike the "Lombardy" poplar--a tree that has no wildlife value for food or nesting. Shore pine, being evergreen, could transform that street corridor with year-round foliage instead of the six-month leaf cycle of poplars. Lastly, the poplar is an allergenic tree, for 60 years showering much of the town with irritating pollens that cause many to have allergic reactions and sneezing for weeks every spring. And on that note, I urge the City to take pollen into consideration when choosing trees for the replanting episode. Pine is one of the best solutions. Please: don't be planting "lollipop" street trees as depicted in the artist's conception with this article! That is exactly the tree shape that will suffer the most wind damage at that breezeway location, and probably need expensive irrigation support as well. Shore pine is perfectly adapted to thriving on the limited amount of precip that falls at this location (see: 12th Street non-irrigated pines). Change is inevitable. Let's invest in the long-term this time. Truly, Forest 385-6114 CITYOFPT NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC DISCLOSURE: Public documents and records are available to the public as required under the Washington State Public Records Act (RCW 42.56). The information contained in all correspondence with a government entity may be disclosable to third party requesters under the Public Records Act. 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Friday, November 12, 2021 6:37 PM To:Joanna Sanders Cc:Haylie Clement; Sarah Tiffany Subject:Re: Port Townsend entrance changes - PRTAB Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Thanks for forwarding Joanna, Sarah, Can you log this comment? Thanks! Steve From: Joanna Sanders <jsanders@cityofpt.us> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 10:02 AM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Cc: Haylie Clement <HClement@cityofpt.us> Subject: FW: Port Townsend entrance changes - PRTAB It seems your email was incorrectly typed below, so this is an FYI. Joanna Sanders, MMC | City Clerk City of Port Townsend | www.cityofpt.us | jsanders@cityofpt.us 250 Madison St. Suite 2, Port Townsend, WA 98368 P:(360) 379-5083 | F:(360) 390-5645 From: Andrea Hegland <rubymaxlily@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 9:55 AM To: bill@portofpt.com; dtoepper@jeffpud.org; eron@portofpt.com; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; jrandall@jeffpud.org; kcollins@jeffpud.org; kstreett@jeffpud.org; pam@portofpt.com; phanke@portofpt.com; publiccomment@cityofpt.us; sking@cityofpt.org Subject: Port Townsend entrance changes Dear representatives, Congratulations. You have proposed to destroy one of the things that makes Port Townsend unique. The wide boulevard graced by the tall poplars cannot be replaced with a narrower road way and lollipop trees…or any other tree…without looking and feeling like some street in a relatively recent pop up town on the east side. 2 Poplars ARE the official tree here. Look around. They’ve been here longer than many non-native individuals that call Port Townsend their home and look down their noses at non-native vegetation. Looking back—we’ve all been through hell the past two years. Why would you put our community through this??!! Are you mad? The kids on my street are afraid of the wind because they think it will kill them. Now you are suggesting to further tear our community apart…? The reasons stated simply don’t rise to the occasion. There is no problem to fix here. Have you seen the condition of our roads? Plenty of work there. Looking forward—-every year is hotter than the prior. Drought and heatwaves more frequent. Etc. Can you please just focus on community building activities instead of ones that put us through more hell? I assure you I will vote for anyone other than whomever advances this idea. Maybe I’ll run myself. Andrea Hegland 51st Street Port Townsend -- Andrea 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Wednesday, November 17, 2021 7:20 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: Water Street Lombardy poplars Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Sarah, Please add this comment to our logs. Thank you! Steve From: fweinmann@cablespeed.com <fweinmann@cablespeed.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 3:04 PM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Subject: Water Street Lombardy poplars CAUTION: External Email Lombardy Poplars To: Mr. King and Mr. Mauro: I am not sure where this input should be directed. I hope it can be forwarded to the appropriate office. I have been teaching about and advocating for the native plants of Washington for over fifty years. This includes teaching at the University of Washington and here in Port Townsend. I have also served terms as state Chair of the Washington Native Plant Society, as chair of the Central Puget Sound Chapter and as chair of the Olympic Peninsula Chapter. I say this simply to emphasize that I am dedicated to the advocacy, education and protection of native plants. That said I see no compelling reason for necessarily replanting with species native to Washington following removal of the Lombardy Poplars along Water Street. A city is not a natural area preserve and should not be thought of as such. In fact there is very little that is “natural” within the urban area. Instead the city should be thought of as an arboretum-like setting where the citizens nurture trees, and other plants from around the world. This is exactly what has happened in Port Townsend. In fact, the trees of Port Townsend are mostly non-native species. We have conducted a preliminary survey of uptown Port Townsend where we noted the location of nearly 200 different trees. Of these there are nearly 100 different species. With the exception of some Douglas fir, western redcedar, bigleaf maple and madrona nearly all of the trees are non-native species. Many of these natives are beautiful trees, mostly left in place as uptown was developed; however equally attractive are the many non- native trees which have been planted by the city or by city residents. The tree flora of the city would be boring indeed if only native species were cultured along our city streets. 2 As for replacing the Lombardy poplars. I believe we should be looking for something attractive as an entrance to downtown. One suggestion would be flowering cherry trees as a border along Water Street. Our climate is excellent for many different varieties of cherries. What a beautiful entrance it would be when the cherry trees flower in March. The subsequent leaves would remain on the trees until late fall thus leaving only a few months when the trees would be leafless. A local example is the grove of flowering cherry trees in the parking lot of the San Juan Baptist church (photo attached). These trees are magnificent in flower and retain deep purple leaves into November. Other species which might be considered are red maple. This is a small tree with beautiful fall foliage. Sweetgum are attractive trees with beautiful fall color but may eventually become to large. In any event I hope the city and their partners will take broad-minded approach to the decision on replacement of the Lombardy poplars. If there is any intent to establish a committee for public input I would appreciate learning of it. Thank you very much for taking the time to consider this input. Fred Weinmann, PhD Botanist 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Monday, November 22, 2021 6:45 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: sims way capital project Hi Sarah, Please add this to our log. Thanks! From: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 4:02 PM To: Julie Jaman <jjamubi@gmail.com> Cc: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; eron@portofpt.com; kstreett@jeffpud.org Subject: RE: sims way capital project Thank you again for your thoughts, Ms. Jaman (City Council bcc’d). We will continue to record these comments as we build a record of perspectives and I’ll continue to offer you the opportunity, as described during the town hall event, to be engaged as part of the public process moving forward as part of the project. I expect to be able to share more details including a date for another meeting in a week or two. Please note that the dates and materials you reference in the Leader are inaccurate. Thanks again for your interest and look forward to a productive, positive and civil process where we can actually work together on a solution we can all support. Best john John Mauro | City Manager City of Port Townsend | www.cityofpt.us 250 Madison Street, Suite 2 | Port Townsend, WA 98368 P: 360.379.5043 | M: 360.531.2916 Follow us on Facebook: fb.me/CityofPT Help steer our future together with Engage PT: www.cityofpt.us/engage From: Julie Jaman <jjamubi@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 3:55 PM To: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; eron@portofpt.com; kstreett@jeffpud.org; CityCouncil <citycouncil@cityofpt.us> Subject: sims way capital project Nov 19, 2021 Re: Sims Way Capital Project It seems the cart is before the horse - how apropos. 2 The City administration, the Port and the PUD are proceeding with a capital project that does not reflect the vision, goal statements or policies in the Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan, Tree Conservation Chapter 19.06, the Gateway Development Plan, the Strategic Plan 2019-2022, the Port Townsend Urban Forestry - Trees In The ROW and Brochure, the Parks and Recreation Functional Plan. It is unknown if the PUD or Port have followed planning policy with their part of the project including permitting for commercial expansion that may involve chemical pollution of water and air. There appears to be procedural and substantive issues regarding SEPA including cultural and historical components..Such a project would require amending the existing Gateway plan and SEPA accordingly.The Gateway plan calls for public involvement and transparency; options for how to proceed with the landscaping for the future. The posted “concept” representation for the “Sims Way Project” appears to be a stock representation and is very misleading. Because of the lack of consistency in planning this project, this small town with its sea port history is at risk of becoming anywhere U.S.A. There is public confusion and resistance due to a dearth of public process; lack of invitation to join, discuss, listen, learn and carefully create. After all, the project portends our legacy into the future - that which will be historic. The Gateway Plan describes “The Flats”: “The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings…” Below is the timeline posted (no date) by public works. However the Leader has Indicated in two articles that the City plans to cut down the northside poplars in December (no year indicated). Project Timeline: · Initial Planning 2021 · Public Outreach & Design in 2022 · Construction Late 2022 – 2024 Project Phases: The Project is planned for five (5) phases: · Phase 1: Tree trimming & removal along the Boat Haven boatyard · Phase 2: Undergrounding power lines along Boat Haven · Phase 3: Installing pedestrian path & replanting Boat Haven side · Phase 4: Expanding the boatyard at Boat Haven · Phase 5: Tree removal & replanting along Kah Tai Lagoon* *Phase 5 removal and replanting is endorsed by the City of Port Townsend’s Parks, Recreation, Tree and Trails Advisory Board and is included in the City’s long-term Tree Management Plan This, one of the loveliest historic seaports in the country, has a community that participates, stewards and volunteers their time and creativity, caring for the future legacy of Port Townsend. Out of simple respect as well as policy, there must be a public process to create a plan before such a significant capital project can proceed. Please, no Christmas surprise by chopping any trees in December as reported in the Leader. Thank you for considering these concerns. Julie jaman 3 P.S. I could not find a document: “Port Townsend Long-term Tree Management Plan but there are Tree and landscaping supporting documents for private property; Urban Forestry - Trees in the ROW. 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Wednesday, December 1, 2021 7:24 AM To:Steve King; Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Boat Haven Poplar Trees Comments for Boat Yard Expansion Project. Kelly Graves From: Steve Mader <stevefmader77@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 7:13 AM To: engagept@cityofpt.us Subject: Boat Haven Poplar Trees Steve King I totally and completely support the Sims Way and Boat Yard Expansion Project as described on the City's website. Steve Mader, PhD Certified Forester Certified Senior Ecologist 612 Lawrence Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 503-780-5281 stevefmader77@gmail.com 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Thursday, December 9, 2021 11:37 AM To:Sarah Tiffany; Steve King Subject:FW: Sims Way makeover Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged FYI Kelly Graves From: tom myers <tommyers393@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 11:02 AM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Sims Way makeover CAUTION: External Email Go for it! I can't believe people want to save the trash trees and not improve the roadway and pedestrian link along Sims! Very short sighted. Wrong trees, wrong place!!! Ask any certified arborist! But please!!!! Plant native trees that FIT! Avoid "straight lines" if at all possible. https://www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace/ I can just picture coming home into town and seeing appropriate trees and bushes lining the boulevard leading the way. Be sure any lighting changes are Dark Sky appropriate too. The new LED street lamps installed recently are not, dispite what anyone thinks. And they ALL need shades to keep the light DOWN, not out! www.darksky.org Good luck. Cheers, tom myers 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Friday, December 10, 2021 8:48 AM To:Steve King; Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Sims Way trees Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Kelly Graves From: Linda Tilley <lindatilley44@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 6:22 AM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Sims Way trees CAUTION: External Email It just simply seems like the wrong time to invest the money in this project when so many of Port Townsend’s roads are falling apart as well as other infrastructure issues. Sent from my iPad Linda Tilley artbytilley.com 360-301-2343 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Friday, December 10, 2021 6:00 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: Boatyard/poplars Sarah, Can you log this? Thanks! From: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 5:22 PM To: butterfly@olypen.com <butterfly@olypen.com> Cc: matt@portofpt.com <matt@portofpt.com>; Kelly Graves <KGraves@cityofpt.us> Subject: Re: Boatyard/poplars Good evening, Thank you for your comments and concerns. We didn't get your name in the email, so hoping you will reply with your name so we can add it to our log of comments. I'm including Matt Klontz in this reply. Matt is the new Director of Projects for the Port and might be able to either answer questions or connect you with the right person and the Port who can answer questions about boatyard expansion. Regarding Streets maintenance, I'm glad you have concerns. This is a top priority for the City. We are developing a comprehensive streets program in which we will look at options to generate revenue work on our streets. The grant for the boat yard expansion and Poplar replacement can't be applied to street maintenance given the funds are specifically required to be used for economic development. I hope you will consider that our thinking is not along the lines of your comment, but rather to be the stewards of public resources balancing community needs and priorities while addressing a huge backlog of maintenance. If you would like to discuss more, I'm happy to visit with you on a call or in person. I hope you will participate in the project going forward to make it the best possible project for the long term looking forward. Thanks, Steve Public Works Director, City of PT. 2 -----Original Message----- From: butterfly@olypen.com <butterfly@olypen.com> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 12:48 PM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Boatyard/poplars Why does the Port have to expand toward Sims Way when there's not enough land there to put any boats? Why can't they expand toward the south where they have more property? Why do the many have to pay for something that will only benefit the few? The City doesn't do anything about the gutter along the street in front of my property which fills up almost to street level whenever we get a hard rain, yet my taxes are going to go for something that doesn't need to be done. It's just an expensive vanity project for the Port that is going to cost the taxpayers a lot of money to free up property that isn't going to be large enough to put boats there and raise any money for the Port. Are they planning to use that space for rowboats? I hear a lot of excuses about this project, but no valid reasons except we're bigger than you are and we'll do what we want. And please don't tell me that if I don't like it I can move. My family has been here since the mid-1880s so those of us "old timers" shouldn't be the ones to move. 1 Sarah Tiffany From:John Mauro Sent:Monday, December 13, 2021 10:16 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Sims Boatyard and Gateway Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Sarah – could you add this to poplar/Sims feedback log? Thank you! John Mauro | City Manager City of Port Townsend | www.cityofpt.us 250 Madison Street, Suite 2 | Port Townsend, WA 98368 P: 360.379.5043 | M: 360.531.2916 Follow us on Facebook: fb.me/CityofPT Help steer our future together with Engage PT: www.cityofpt.us/engage From: Kelly Graves <KGraves@cityofpt.us> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 7:51 AM To: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Subject: FW: Sims Boatyard and Gateway This was addressed to you so forwarding on. Can you forward to the others its addressed to as I am not sure I have their contact info. Kelly Graves From: Russell Hill <rhill3795@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 8:17 AM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Sims Boatyard and Gateway CAUTION: External Email Eron, Kevin, Mark (hi Mark!) and John, After reading your co-written Guest Viewpoint in the PT Leader, it is inevitable, for the safety of human life, to move the power lines along the Boatyard and Sims to be underground utilities. Unfortunately, that will result in the removal of the Poplars, and it may take awhile for folks to get over this fact. If care is taken by the design team to strategically re-plant replacement trees, and incorporate other items to enhance the arrival experience in PT, folks will get over it much sooner. 2 While on vacation in Estes Park, Colorado, over the early fall, as we walked our puppy to the dog park, we ran across the outdoor exercise equipment below (and in link), and were inspired. I believe a couple of these pieces of equipment (and maybe a couple more sprinkled along the Larry Scott trail near the Boatyard) would provide a great “personal experience” and would promote more use of the new walk path. I would imagine the maintenance costs of this type of equipment would be minimal, but perhaps worthy of inquiry to justify. Just my 2 cents here, but making the new walkway “for the people and interactive” might smooth the waters, so to speak (pun intended:). Have a great day! https://playworld.com/fitness-wellness/lifetrail#gref 3 4 5 6 7 Thanks, Russell Hill 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Friday, December 10, 2021 5:59 PM To:John Mauro; Sarah Tiffany Subject:Re: I support poplar tree removal/replacement Thanks John, Sarah, Can you log this? Thanks! Steve From: S Y <syanof@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 2:33 PM To: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Subject: I support poplar tree removal/replacement City Manager Mauro, I support the new "gateway" vision including poplar tree removal/replacement. Thanks for getting behind that. I wrote a response to the PT Leader with my view, advocating the benefits of replacing non-native short-lived species (poplars) with Northwest-appropriate vegetation. As an aside, we live near this section of Sims Way and I've never found these "gateway" lines of poplars attractive or inviting, in contrast to some public comments. Although my biggest complaint about Sims Way, coming from the vantage point of a neighbor, is the noise, speed and emissions from the sometimes heavy traffic, making it seem more like a highway. But that is another matter. I wonder if some of the native species of Kah Tai can be seen as a model for re-vegetating this section. With careful landscaping they could be attractive as well as beneficial to our region's wildlife and ecology, such as madrones, maples, bitter cherry, willows, and various shrubs and grasses (unfortunately there are non-native species there as well). That could be something to be proud of. Before Sims and Boat Haven, of course, lagoons extended both directions to Townsend Bay and the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and I suppose were bounded by native wetland and riparian vegetarian. Steven Yanoff Port Townsend 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Friday, December 10, 2021 6:00 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: Answers Attachments:Eron.pdf; PUD Sims Way - 08-05-2021 - Revised 2.jpg Sarah, Can you log this? Thank you! From: Scott Bancroft <Sbancroft@jeffpud.org> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 11:25 AM To: Andrea Hegland <rubymaxlily@gmail.com>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Cc: Josh Garlock <jgarlock@jeffpud.org> Subject: Answers Hi Andrea, I will answer each question below. But, before I do that I would like to explain something to you about the poplar trees. Jefferson County PUD has been in existence for only eight years. The former utility provider was headquartered outside of Jefferson County. Since the former utility provider was not local many things were overlooked that should not have been allowed to happen. The poplar trees along Sims Way is one of them. What I mean by poplar trees are the trees located near transmission lines, those are the poplars PUD is concerned with. Jefferson County PUD has a much different approach to its service area than the former provider, PUD is thinking long- term when it designs, upgrades and tree trims the electrical facilities. The former utility provider conducted minimal tree trimming in this electrical system and you may drive around Jefferson County and observe disfigured trees that have been trimmed flat directly under the power lines. Those trees should have been removed at their early infancy rather than allowed to grow to a larger diameter. As for the poplar trees along Sims Way they should never have been planted there and now that they are grown there is an issue. PUD has had two incidents in 2021 one involving the poplar trees and the transmission lines and one involving a sailboat and the transmission lines. If you could look up OSHA 1926.1408 this is minimum approach distances for equipment. I have lived in Jefferson County my whole life of 55 years I have seen the poplar trees for years this is not an easy decision the PUD has made to do this work. I realize how important trees are to people of our community but I would be delinquent in my duties if something wasn't done and potentially liable if someone is hurt or property is damaged. Public Utility District No. 1 of Jefferson County is subject to the Washington Public Records Act, RCW 42.56. Therefore, 2 this email and its attachments, if any, may be disclosed as a public record. Public Utility District No. 1 of Jefferson County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. -----Original Message----- From: Andrea Hegland <rubymaxlily@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 11:28 AM To: Scott Bancroft <Sbancroft@jeffpud.org>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: Question Dear Scott and Steve, Can either or both of you please clarify for me the following: 1. Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? ANS: Attached is a letter I sent to the Port on May 10, 2021. This started the process this year. 2. When are you proposing to do this? ANS: At this time there is no scheduled date for this work. The goal of the PUD, Port and City is to collaborate with citizens establish an alternative and begin the work. There is a rendering that I have attached, I believe this is the latest drawing. 3. What permits will you be securing? ANS: When it comes to hazard trees around power lines the PUD only needs to discuss with the owner of the property (RCW 64.12.035). 4. When will you be securing permits? ANS: PUD will not apply for something it is legally obligated conduct. 5. Will you be conducting environmental review. ANS: PUD will not conduct an environmental review as per RCW 64.12.035. Please remember this is a difficult decision for everyone. If you would like to discuss or go to the site I would be happy to schedule a time to meet with you. My phone number is 360 385 8363. Thanks I would appreciate a timely response to these basic questions. Kindly, -- Andrea 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Sunday, December 12, 2021 1:46 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: Sims Way Project -The Flats Hi Sarah, Can you log this? Thanks! From: Julie Jaman <jjamubi@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:22 PM To: CityCouncil <citycouncil@cityofpt.us>; jeffbocc@co.jefferson.wa.us <jeffbocc@co.jefferson.wa.us>; jrandall@jeffpud.org <jrandall@jeffpud.org>; kcollins@jeffpud.org <kcollins@jeffpud.org>; dtoepper@jeffpud.org <dtoepper@jeffpud.org>; pam@portofpt.com <pam@portofpt.com>; bill@portofpt.com <bill@portofpt.com>; phanke@portofpt.com <phanke@portofpt.com> Cc: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; kstreett@jeffpud.org <kstreett@jeffpud.org>; Eron Berg <eron@portofpt.com>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; mmccauley@jefferson.wa.us <mmccauley@jefferson.wa.us>; editor@ptleader.com <editor@ptleader.com> Subject: Sims Way Project -The Flats CAUTION: External Email Dec. 4, 2021 Port of Port Townsend Commissioners Jefferson County Public Utility District City of Port Townsend Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners Re: Sims Way Project 2021 The Leader, in early October 2021, printed that the poplars along the Sims Way Flats were to be cut down. The elected commissioners and council people of the Port of Port Townsend, Jefferson County Public Utility District, and the City of Port Townsend approved a joint Sims Way Project proposal - a $2M project , to include a request for County infrastructure grant money. The plan proposes to cut all the poplars (madrones?) along the Flats ROW; to underground utilities; and to expand the boat yard, placing the fence closer to the highway. The most concerning aspect so far of this proposal is the lack of public input and process, including any SEPA review. 2 The proposed project is not a commercial and safety project in isolation. Instead it will alter the entire view scape in the section of the Gateway Development Plan, the Flats. Rather than entering a Victorian Seaport and Arts Community - the golden eggs of prosperity announced at the entrance to town - the PUD concept depicts 21st century streamlined sterility, linear convenience - the same bordering monoscape used for strip malls throughout the United States. This concept view reflects a paucity of understanding the essence of this community; the inspiration and investment for architecture, policies, advertising and volunteering throughout the years; the pride of place; the knowledge of the ecology; the stewarding of the beauty and history of this community. The staff, new to Jefferson County, is planning for fence lines and ditching electricity. But it is the plan to cut the poplars that has caused the most disconcerting public response. The ambiguous descriptions and rationals concerning the trees’ age, safety, and native origins offered over the last four months belies all the years of public process in defense of the historic legacy and habitat and the subsequent adopted plans that reflect this effort. The three agencies seem unaware of the years of community meetings, committees, surveys and adopted documents that provide the vision and guidance for what we value about this place. Our parks and trees are a big deal. The Landscape The poplars mixed with madrones and needled trees are impressive across the viewscape of the Flats. From the adopted Gateway Development Plan: “All development should maintain and enhance existing plantings and trees located parallel to, and set back from, Sims Way and provide a backdrop for the buildings along the Gateway Corridor.” And, “ “Most importantly, the Gateway Development Plan sets out a community-wide vision that the City and Washington State Department of Transportation will use in the design, permitting and funding of new roadside improvements along SR 20.” 3 The Lombardy poplars are a part of our history and have important attributes that must be taken into consideration when designing for the future landscape and the aesthetics of the Flats The View The Gateway Development Plan - the streetscape through the Flats: “The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be maintained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and the Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20'-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims. Meadow grass and wildflowers can be planted as ground cover around the poplars. The area north of Sims adjacent to Kah-Tai Park, can be planted with willows, riparian plantings and other marsh plants to recall the lagoon's former link with the Bay.” The view from the top of the S curve, the poplar tunnel, is eye-catching; verticality, seasonal color, and the caprice of light and wind pandering to the leaves is stunning. These trees are able to thrive in poor soils; no need for expensive soil amendments or irrigation. They break up the prevailing on-shore breeze and do not fall over in big storms. In fact, they provide extensive natural services as well as beauty unlike the tiny urban clones proposed to replace them. 4 There are multiple poplar-lined corridors, layered from the Port, along the lagoon, and threading the golf course all the way to F Street and beyond, throughout the Quimper Peninsula. Does the City plan to log out all of them? “Primarily native to North America, the poplar species has been well categorised under different name heads, namely: Aspen, Cottonwood, and the Balsam Poplar species. The name Populus has its foundation derived back to the Roman Times, where there was a predilection to plant the poplar trees around the public meetings areas.” The Functions The Flats, once a series of tidal wetlands and ponds, in the mid-twentieth century was filled with nutrient- poor dredge spoils. That’s why the firs and pines are struggling. The poplars are one of the few tree species that can tolerate and thrive in such soils. The Gateway Plan states the poplars should be thinned and replanted when they wear out or fall down, a clear path to why we still have them. But regular maintenance hasn't happened in years and they sure need a cleaning up. They, like all trees and public landscapes, need tending; a regular inspection and limb pruning as needed every few years along with encouraging young seedlings to replace any trees that must come down. “Poplars are some of the fastest-growing trees in the world. They can tolerate the worst conditions and are heavily favored by wildlife. In places where land has been degraded or is falling apart, the poplars can rebuild. They produce tremendous amounts of biomass, feed unbelievable numbers of insects, birds, and mammals, and suck tons of carbon out of the sky like gigantic outstretched vacuums. ”https://www.chelseagreen.com/2020/poplar-the-homemaker/ 5 Poplars provide good bird habitat;dense and complicated foliage for gleaning insects and nesting sites. photo courtesy Nancy Cherry Eifert Community Input This very small town brings lots of love and support for both the historic and modern boat culture, but the functions of “...marine-related manufacturing, assembly, haul out and repair activities..” and industrial lighting are also polluting. As well as carbon capture, the poplars function as air and chemical filtrators . The trees provide some separation for pedestrians from the toxic fumes and dust 6 of the boat yard. The trees provide a mix of services including a semi-screened view of the tarps and tents in the work yard. This helps to keep the Port in good stead with the community. Placement of a new fence should take these tree attributes into consideration. About the yard lighting: LED lights on high poles cast glow and glare into the night sky and across large spaces disrupting creatures’ night habitat and lighting the windows of residents on the hillsides -a “high end” view. “Uptown was where the merchants, sea captains, and professionals of Port Townsend built their homes… overlooking the port and the buildings of Downtown.” The poplars help to block artificial light. There should be a thorough review and plan for the lighting: placement, intensity/lumens, color, height, and hooding. Conclusion An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan. At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to attributes i.e. functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. “The Gateway Corridor includes many of the natural elements that give Port Townsend its character. Because the alteration of the natural environment will continue as more development occurs, it is important to restore a landscape that is in concert with the natural environment. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future. These three agencies, managers, council and commissioners, should not ditch years of community involvement in favor of a concept idea that belies the overarching visions and guidelines honed to cradle the legacy worthy of one of the loveliest historic seaports in the country. A course correction is needed before the saws come out. Respectfully Julie Jaman Quimper Peninsula 7 P.T.Tree Brochure file:///D:/Julie%20Jaman/Downloads/pdf%20sims%20way%20plan.pdf Community Input This very small town brings lots of love and support for both the historic and modern boat culture, but the functions of “...marine-related manufacturing, assembly, haul out and repair activities..” and industrial lighting are also polluting. As well as carbon capture, the poplars function as air and chemical filtrators . The trees provide some separation for pedestrians from the toxic fumes and dust of the boat yard. The trees provide a mix of services including a semi- screened view of the tarps and tents in the work yard. This helps to keep the Port in good stead with the community. Placement of a new fence should take these tree attributes into consideration. 8 About the yard lighting: LED lights on high poles cast glow and glare into the night sky and across large spaces disrupting creatures’ night habitat and lighting the windows of residents on the hillsides -a “high end” view. “Uptown was where the merchants, sea captains, and professionals of Port Townsend built their homes… overlooking the port and the buildings of Downtown.” The poplars help to block artificial light. There should be a thorough review and plan for the lighting: placement, intensity/lumens, color, height, and hooding. Conclusion An environmental impact statement would provide the community an opportunity to review the project more in depth allowing provision for information and alternatives not yet considered. The particulars about chemical fumes and dust are needed in order to make a community friendly plan. At a minimum, there should be at least three landscape design options . Sketches/concepts, one with re-planted poplars, should be provided for public input with consideration given to attributes i.e. functions, costs and overall design and aesthetics. “The Gateway Corridor includes many of the natural elements that give Port Townsend its character. Because the alteration of the natural environment will continue as more development occurs, it is important to restore a landscape that is in concert with the natural environment. Recognizing topographical opportunities and retaining existing vegetation are beginning points for good design.” Look in the adopted Gateway Development Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Tree Functional Plan. The community has supplied vision and guidance for our small town aesthetics as we proceed into the future These three agencies, managers, council and commissioners, should not ditch years of community involvement in favor of a concept idea that belies the overarching visions and guidelines honed to cradle the legacy worthy of one of the loveliest historic seaports in the country. A course correction is needed before the saws come out. Respectfully Julie Jaman Quimper Peninsula 9 P.T.Tree Brochure 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Sunday, December 12, 2021 1:48 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: Sims Way Project - piecemealing the project Here is another one to log. Thanks! From: Andrea Hegland <rubymaxlily@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:55 AM To: CityCouncil <citycouncil@cityofpt.us>; jeffbocc@co.jefferson.wa.us <jeffbocc@co.jefferson.wa.us>; jrandall@jeffpud.org <jrandall@jeffpud.org>; kcollins@jeffpud.org <kcollins@jeffpud.org>; dtoepper@jeffpud.org <dtoepper@jeffpud.org>; pam@portofpt.com <pam@portofpt.com>; bill@portofpt.com <bill@portofpt.com>; phanke@portofpt.com <phanke@portofpt.com>; editor@ptleader.com <editor@ptleader.com> Cc: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; kstreett@jeffpud.org <kstreett@jeffpud.org>; Eron Berg <eron@portofpt.com>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; mmccauley@jefferson.wa.us <mmccauley@jefferson.wa.us> Subject: Fwd: Sims Way Project - piecemealing the project CAUTION: External Email Dear elected officials and public agency staff: Dear Letter to the Editor: When staff and/or electeds get alone in a room or Zoom, and ask themselves..."how do we get a controversial project done with the least amount of environmental review and public involvement?"...what do they come up with? They come up with the approach you have chosen: First, divide one project up into smaller projects so that a cumulative environmental impact analysis is avoided. This is against state law. Check. Second, declare the project a dire emergency, all the while having initiated the project at least a year earlier. Check. Third, confuse the public with conflicting information, including the exact scope of work. Check. Fourth, invite only public input that you can control...through hand picked appointed advisory committees and those favorable to your scheme. Check. Fifth, pick a time, it used to be around the Holidays, now it's during lockdown and no in-person meeting or public hearing, so that you can avoid public input. Oh, and it's the Holidays. Double Check. Sixth, any meeting offered is limited to a negligible amount of time, and the moderator has control over the "mute" button. Check. 2 Seventh, anyone who speaks passionately, is deemed to be disrespectful and silenced. Check. And that's what you have done regarding the proposed destruction of the Poplar lined entry into Port Townsend, which sure does look like this is the proverbial smoke-filled, back room deal. I can't find the words to tell you how despicable this feels. At a time when we need to be healing, you are tearing out this community's soul so the Marine Trades and Port can make more money. Andrea Hegland ---------------------------------------------------------- I recevied this email, have edited it, and am including this in my comment: Whether you support the removal of the Poplar trees, or not, we should all be concerned by the tactics being deployed by these 3 public agencies. There are significant substantive and procedural issues with the City, Port and PUD process to cut down the Poplar trees. We were all told that this project arose out of some power lines touching the Poplar Trees by the boatyard, sometime in July. But what they didn't tell us is that the Port contacted the PUD about expanding the boatyard and removing the Poplar trees over a year ago. PUD staff Scott Bancroft in the email below is communicating with an artist for a rendering showing the Poplars gone: On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 12:31 PM Scott Bancroft <Sbancroft@jeffpud.org> wrote: Hi Monica, I hope your day is going well. I have attached a couple pics showing the area that will be covered in the rendering, I realize you will not be able to show the whole section in the rendering but if we may be able to show the Port, City and citizens of PT what this area could look like without the existing poplar trees in place there may not be so much public discourse for the tree removal. Background: The Port of PT came to the PUD about 16 months ago to discuss the idea of removing the poplar trees along Sims Way on Port property. The Port and the PUD feel it is in the best interest of each entity to remove the poplar trees along Sims Way on Port property. The last Port meeting there was a 3-0 vote approving the removal of the poplar trees, now we are getting ready to communicate to the public what we intend to do. PUD would like Studio STL to put together a rendering of what driving down Sims Way may look like without the poplar trees in place. We need to have the following in the rendering, 1. A hog wire and wood fence along Sims Way replacing the existing chain link fence. The new hog wire and wood fence would be installed about 25’ feet towards Sims Way giving the Port a bit more space. 2. 6-8 foot wide gravel path on the outside of the new fence in right of way. There will need to be a 4’ wide space between the new fence and the gravel path. 3. At approximately every 30’ feet have a small hardwood tree planted between the new hog wire fence and the gravel path. Thank you so much! 3 As I hope you can see, this project seems to have originated not as characterized by these people at these public agencies. This is deceptive. Many of you may not know that the day after the November 9 Zoom meeting--the first and only public meeting where this was the exclusive topic to discuss this proposed significant alteration to the entry to Port Townsend...the Port approved its capital budget which included the removal of the Poplars. According to the City, Port and PUD grant application to Jefferson County...(Jefferson County approved the grant also within days of the November 9 Zoom meeting)...the public will only be involved in this project in a few very tightly chosen and controlled ways: 1. The City's project page on its website. 2. The Parks Advisory Board whose position is already known on this matter. 3. And others chosen by the three agencies. In addition, the permits the City plans to issue to itself to cut down the trees all appear to be internal, with little to no opportunity for public involvement - a street development permit and grading, erosion control permit. They are piecemealing the project, against state law, WAC 197-11-060 3b, to avoid addressing cumulative impacts. The city will cut the trees down, and then the Port will apply to expand the boatyard. As you can see in the email excerpt below from the City's Public Works Director, a public hearing was to be avoided: "one of the key things I was looking for was weather (sic) any of the permits required a hearing...which they don't." From: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 10:44 AM To: Eron Berg <Eron@portofpt.com>; Kevin Streett <kstreett@jeffpud.org>; Mike Love <mike@portofpt.com>; Scott Bancroft <Sbancroft@jeffpud.org> Cc: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Subject: Poplar Permitting Hi All, I’m following up with one of my action items by checking in with our permitting folks about what is required. One of the key things I was looking for was weather any of the permits required a hearing... which they don’t. The permit that is likely requires the most work is the Flood Dev. Permit which requires a habitat analysis... this is a FEMA requirement. The following permits apply. 1. Flood Dev. Review Form and ESA Compliance tied to a Clearing and Grading for boat yard expansion and possibly undergrounding. 2. Undergrounding, path, planting of new trees requires a Street Development Permit 3. Public Process is not tied to a permit, but is pretty critical to this given the public interest. Hope this helps, Steve Steve King, P.E. | Public Works Director City of Port Townsend | www.cityofpt.us | sking@cityofpt.us 250 Madison St. Suite 2R, Port Townsend, WA 98368 4 P:(360) 379-5090| C:(360) 531-1631 This appears to be set for a fast track with minimal to no public involvement, and certainly no public hearing where we could each listen to each other and consider all the issues and facts. For example, they say the Poplars are at the end of their life. But they are not all the same size. Some are younger than others, and as most of you witnessed two weeks ago, there was mayhem throughout the county but nary a Poplar fell on Sims Way. One by the golf course; that's it. They say that the are non-native. But the City's own development guidelines for streets are full of non-native trees...Gingko, Japanese Katsura, Beech trees, Ash trees...Linden trees...Locust trees...Hornbeam...Norway Maple...and on and on. They say that these trees have pollen which blows into the boatyard. Do you know of a tree that doesn't have pollen? Or leaves or needles that blow down? Or limbs that blow down like the many conifers that knocked out power two weeks ago? They say that the Poplars are adversely impacting the native trees and shrubs that they planted on the roots of the Poplars on the Kah Tai side. They say one thing and then something else. Their "concept" drawing shows trees cut down on the Port side only but the Poplars remaining on the other side, but then the City says they are cutting them all down. · Removal of poplar trees along Sims Way corridor o Trees must be removed to accommodate both the undergrounding and the expansion plans o Trees are nearing the end of their useful life and are starting to damage the pedestrian walkway and are currently a fire hazard with their proximity to the above-ground power lines · Replacement of trees with an appropriate species to restore linear gateway aesthetic and achieve environmental objectives for Kah Tai side of Sims Way. Many native 5 species of trees have been planted on the Kah Tai side of Sims Way while thinning and removal of poplars has not occurred as recommended. They say that construction won't start till late 2022: Project Timeline: · Initial Planning 2021 · Public Outreach & Design in 2022 · Construction Late 2022 – 2024 Then they say (in the City Newsletter from last week City Manager Mauro) they start coming down early 2022: The poplar trees between the boat yard and Sims Way will start coming down in early 2022. It's very hard to figure out what is actually being proposed, what the process is for public involvement, and whether it would even matter. Port Townsend used to be a place where debate and dialog was valued. Now, any public comment on this matter must conform to the pre-determined (by someone) sideboards. I doubt any amount of public involvement will matter. The outcome is fixed. They even listed the articles in the newspapers as a form of public outreach. I would hope that this is concerning for each of you. Democracy is messy, but it is better than the alternatives. We do appear to be headed down the alternative path. 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Sunday, December 12, 2021 5:14 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: TREES and one more thing Hi Sarah, here is another one to log. From: Charles Law <clawthree@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 7:25 AM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: TREES and one more thing Hello Steve, There were old sayings my parents used to tell me, “What goes around, comes around.” and “Little things add up.” To me it begins when we start by allowing our precious commodities, such as, food scraps going to the dump. There it releases a powerful greenhouse gas, Methene. Now we plan to cut down carbon sequestering trees. Which will release another powerful greenhouse gas, Carbon dioxide. Scientists tell us these GHG cause our summers to get hotter and drier and our winters to get stormier and wetter. Scientists tell us this is mainly caused by human activities, especially from the emissions released by the burning of fossil fuels. If the feeling is the poplar trees have to go. Now we must consider which species we are most likely going to use to replace them. We need to start considering which species are most likely not to die off due to our climatically uncertain future. i.e.: good at adapting to the heat and cold, the floods and powerful winds that are coming. Because these higher frequency extreme weather events are in our future, it would be best to plan ahead to get the best bang for the buck. We need that list. We need trees that perform more than carbon sequestration services, ones that create shade, transpire water, create rain, add beauty, habitat, could add food, fiber, and more. That being said the faster the tree grows the more it gets better at all of the services it can perform. However, the faster trees grow the sooner they die and need to be replaced. The concept of planned fast track secession needs to be implemented so that we can establish adapted trees now and allow the slower climate adapted trees to come into function over time. The issue here is that the temperature and climatic changes are happening too quickly for trees to naturally fill in, or move, to more hospitable ecological niches. (An example might be California’s iconic redwoods. They likely aren’t going to survive down there. Not once it gets really hot and the fires ravage their ranges ... but they might succeed here. They might, in fact, be a replacement for the 2 Western red cedars and Shore pines around here that are currently showing alarming signs of climate change stress and disease. According to studies, the most important trees for carbon sequestration are in large, mature forests, not young urban trees, street trees etc. Carbon capture works best when trees live hundreds of years. The capacity of forests is significant. I think anyone can concede that a mature tree, especially a native species surrounded by a functional ecosystem of other mature trees, is best for carbon mitigation and resiliency. And our first thoughts should be centered around mitigation and resilience rather than the economy and growth. Finally, please note in the photo of the root system of poplar trees. They are rhizomic and they are hard to eradicate completely. -- Cheers, 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Wednesday, December 15, 2021 7:17 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Sims Gateway future Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Kelly Graves From: S Y <syanof@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 8:07 PM To: engagept@cityofpt.us Subject: Sims Gateway future I support the multi-agency plan to bury the power line, remove aging non-native poplar trees, install a walking and bike trail, and optimize boat yard space. I appreciate the effort to move forward! I see the line of poplars from our house and walk, bike and drive that section of Sims frequently. I am ready for a new gateway. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. I believe in the past this was a partly aquatic low lying ecosystem stretching more or less from Townsend Bay to North Beach. So relating to those historic wetlands and tidelands, and the former Native American presence, also makes sense. Native trees, shrubs and forbs that make ecological sense, support the area ecosystem, in a semi-natural attractive configuration with signage that talks up our natural heritage, the lagoon and boat yard. In a way that enhances views of the boats in the boat yard and the lagoon. That would be a fitting re-envisioned gateway. The heavy often fast traffic on Sims is a challenge because visually and in loudness it will vie aesthetically and psychologically with a new gateway. Short of adding another round-about to slow the traffic, I am stumped by that part. Steven Yanoff Port Townsend 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Wednesday, December 15, 2021 2:04 PM To:Sarah Tiffany; Steve King Subject:FW: Poplars on Sim's Way Attachments:There is a better way.docx Kelly Graves From: susan miller <susanmiller@olympus.net> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 1:51 PM To: EngagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Poplars on Sim's Way CAUTION: External Email Hello EngagePT, Please include the above attached proposal to your discussion regarding cutting down the poplars on Sim’s Way. Please acknowledge receipt. Thank you, Karta John Miller 80 Gull Shadow Lane Port Townsend, WA 98368 susanmiller@olympus.net This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com Regarding the poplars on Sim’s Way There is a better Way. To clear cut Sim’s Way catapults Port Townsend into an environmental, emotional deficit Those beautiful mature poplars are the lungs of your children. It’s apparent from all the critical response against tree removal many of the people of Port Townsend remain upset and don’t appreciate having their town made into what they don’t want. There is no need to expand the boatyard into Sim’s Way because 20 or more acres, give or take, of 90% vacant land is waiting to be developed in the port’s own boat yard. Unseen at first glance this acreage is easily viewed at the boat yard’s far west entrance. Beyond the gate is all that viable land. Use it. If we don’t pay attention now, we all pay later. Never rule out possibilities. Right next to the port’s gated 20 acres exist 20 more privately owned acres. Why not, the city of Port Townsend buy that 20 acres and trade it to the port for Sim’s Way frontage and it’s win-win for all. Inflated fear and special interests put aside, these ideas would work for the good for all, but only if all concerned work for that good. For a better world we need to make it better, and that’s just what HJ Carroll did when he planted those poplar trees. They have welcomed people into Port Townsend ever since. Thank you, HJ Carroll for your boldness and insight. A tree with strong roots laughs at storms, but the very strongest of humans can easily fall to the bullet, any tree, likewise falls from the chainsaw. Make a better world for room to move and trees to breathe. Karta John Miller 80 Gull Shadow Lane Port Townsend 360 301 2555 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Thursday, December 16, 2021 7:14 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Sims Gateway future Kelly Graves From: S Y <syanof@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 8:45 PM To: Kelly Graves <KGraves@cityofpt.us> Subject: RE: Sims Gateway future Thank you. Please add this to my comment as a follow-up: I listened to the December 15 discussion about the Sims Gateway live on KPTZ. Thanks to everyone for doing this, it is a good project. Eron Berg recounted a conversation in his breakout group about using this as an opportunity to consider ways to improve the health of the local ecosystem, specifically rejoining Kah Tai with Townsend Bay through an active estuarine connection. That is a great idea! It would truly enrich the project and carry widespread benefits for a re- envisioned gateway, functionally and symbolically. Since part of the project is advancing the port, a related opportunity would be to improve the environmental safeguards of the port. I understand these goals are complicated both in terms of policy and funding, but let's be bold and pursue such worthy outcomes. Steven Yanoff Port Townsend Kelly Graves wrote: Thank you for your comment, I will pass along to be files with this project’s correspondence. Kelly Graves From: S Y <syanof@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 8:07 PM To: engagept@cityofpt.us Subject: Sims Gateway future I support the multi-agency plan to bury the power line, remove aging non-native poplar trees, install a walking and bike trail, and optimize boat yard space. I appreciate the effort to move forward! I see the line of poplars from our house and walk, bike and drive that section of Sims frequently. I am ready for a new gateway. I would like to see it revegetated/landscaped to relate to our Pacific Northwest natural heritage, and proximity to Kah Tai lagoon and the shoreline. I believe in the past this was a partly aquatic low lying ecosystem stretching more or less from Townsend Bay to North Beach. So relating to those historic wetlands and tidelands, and the former Native American presence, also makes sense. Native trees, shrubs and forbs that make ecological sense, support the area ecosystem, in a semi-natural attractive configuration with signage that talks up our natural heritage, the lagoon and boat yard. In a way that 2 enhances views of the boats in the boat yard and the lagoon. That would be a fitting re-envisioned gateway. The heavy often fast traffic on Sims is a challenge because visually and in loudness it will vie aesthetically and psychologically with a new gateway. Short of adding another round-about to slow the traffic, I am stumped by that part. Steven Yanoff Port Townsend CITYOFPT NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC DISCLOSURE: Public documents and records are available to the public as required under the Washington State Public Records Act (RCW 42.56). The information contained in all correspondence with a government entity may be disclosable to third party requesters under the Public Records Act. 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Emily Coler Sent:Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:49 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Cc:Steve King Subject:FW: Poplar replacement Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed For the log. Emily Coler From: Valjohnstone <valjohnstone@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:35 PM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Poplar replacement To: City of Pt Townsend Although I've moved back to Portland (due my rental house being sold and there being no more rentals in PT!) I still subscribe to the Leader and have been following the Sims Way/Poplar issue with interest. As a passionate gardener, I have the following replacement tree to recommend: Acer Rubrum "Columnare", Columnar Red Maple. Good for parking strips and gorgeous color in the fall. Sincerely, Val Johnstone Val Johnstone 863 NE 122nd Ave, Apt 61 Portland, OR 97230 503-477-4157 1 Sarah Tiffany From:John Mauro Sent:Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:42 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Tree removal on Sims Way HI Sarah - Can we log this Sims gateway feedback when you get a chance? Thankyou! John Mauro | City Manager City of Port Townsend | www.cityofpt.us 250 Madison Street, Suite 2 | Port Townsend, WA 98368 P: 360.379.5043 | M: 360.531.2916 Follow us on Facebook: fb.me/CityofPT Help steer our future together with Engage PT: www.cityofpt.us/engage -----Original Message----- From: John Mauro Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:41 PM To: Kathy Knoblock <toddk@msn.com> Cc: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; Eron Berg <Eron@portofpt.com>; Kevin Streett <kstreett@jeffpud.org> Subject: RE: Tree removal on Sims Way Hi Kathy Thank you for taking time to send us your thoughts and to call out your own emotions of anger and being upset. Your message is clearly delivered and clearly received. These are hard emails for us to receive and read, but I'm glad to get them directly. Thank you. You've helped us think through how we provide more details on the process and our next steps. We will be doing so on our webpage in the coming few days, here: https://cityofpt.us/publicworks/project/sims-gateway-and-boat-yard- expansion-project. In essence, we'll need to explain how the project elements (and agencies and their responsibilities and authorities) come together better and how public and stakeholder engagement will be used to developing a vision and plan for the Gateway. Please stay tuned and we'll have that description up. I'd also like to clarify that the City isn't the sole decision-maker here, but has been working in a supportive and collaborative way with our agency partners. I'm hoping that new information can make those intersecting but delineated roles clearer so your critical feedback can be taken on board at the relevant decision point by the relevant agency/elected body. That's why I'm copying in my colleagues at Port and PUD so they're aware of your concerns. We'll also record your input into our project file so it can be carried forward. Finally, it seems as though my use of "plantings" has been offensive. That was not intended. Could you help point me to where that showed up in the PDN as I'm not recalling using that phrasing but would love to see it in context. Thanks again for taking the time to comment. Your frustrations are clear; I'm hoping that by doing our best to work together and communicate more effectively, you can see yourself as helping to be a constructive and civil part of the solution and that these correspondences are more productive and less combative. I moved to this community because I 2 believe in spirited but respectful civic dialogue and was drawn to a community where this seemed practiced and valued, so I'm asking you to try harder to work with us in that direction even if we end up disagreeing all the while. Thank you. Cheers John John Mauro | City Manager City of Port Townsend | www.cityofpt.us 250 Madison Street, Suite 2 | Port Townsend, WA 98368 P: 360.379.5043 | M: 360.531.2916 Follow us on Facebook: fb.me/CityofPT Help steer our future together with Engage PT: www.cityofpt.us/engage -----Original Message----- From: Kathy Knoblock <toddk@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:35 AM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Subject: Tree removal on Sims Way I am angry about the decision to remove the poplar trees from Sims Way. I am angry because of the reasons given, and the lack of communication of a plan to replace the trees. Boat Haven will expand. The trees will come down. There is no room for compromise. I have kept my boat in Boat Haven for twenty years, and used it before that. It is the only boatyard in the region (the state?) that has a dirt surface and no mitigation for the heavy metals that are ground and washed into it. The Port has successfully evaded this responsibility for years. Boat bottoms are covered in paints that contain heavy metals - poisons - that slow the growth of marine life on the hull. Every time someone runs a grinder, scrapes the hull or power washes, those toxins leach into the dirt that is the Boat Haven site. The only response from the Port has been to tell boaters using their bare dirt “buy a bigger blue tarp”. So of course, we are letting them expand. Why aren’t we requiring them to expand safely? And two anecdotes are used as reason to deface the iconic entrance into our town. Because you were going to do it anyway, so anecdotes are sufficient. I have to note that, in the recent major windstorm that knocked out power to the entire town, not one of those poplar trees came down. You’ve heard from experts in environmental issues and arborists. Their information doesn’t seem to matter as much as the anecdotes. But what could make it better for all of us is if you would clearly state your plan for replacing the trees. Everyone understands that things get overgrown, time passes, maintenance is necessary. But there has been no reassurance that our tree lined entry will return someday. Mr. Mauro referred to “plantings” in an earlier PDN article. “Plantings”? Like that weedy stuff that surrounds the rusted ring of metal and pavement at the former visitors’ center? If the city communicated that it was replacing the trees with TREES that would mature quickly and shield the view of chain link and dirt and make our city entrance attractive, people would be mollified. But I hear nothing. So I have zero confidence. 3 I am a member of the Historic Preservation Committee and the Vice President of the Port Townsend Heritage Association. I moved to this town twenty years ago because I loved the boat festival, I loved the Victorian homes and Downtown, and I loved that Port Townsend did NOT look like a cookie cutter strip mall bedroom community. Please do better in your community outreach and communication around this project! People are upset. I am upset! It sounds like a business needs something, so the rest of us don’t matter; and that you are willing to destroy the iconic entryway into our community and town without a plan to mitigate it. And all the while, pollution continues unabated. Please do better. Please. This is awful. Kathleen Knoblock 1 Sarah Tiffany From:sking@cityofpt.us Sent:Thursday, January 13, 2022 5:00 PM To:stiffany@cityofpt.us Subject:FW: comments about complaint Attachments:Gateway Complaint 12-29-2021_comments.pdf Sarah, Can you log this? Thanks! Steve From: DB Jahnke <dbjahnke@att.net> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 4:48 PM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: comments about complaint Dear Steve, Attached is a copy of a recent complaint that the City received about the Sims Corridor project. I have made some comments on it in Acrobat Professional. Just open it and click on each comment to see what they refer to. I would be happy to provide more information if needed. Please note that these comments are my personal opinion only, as an interested member of the public. Regards, Debbie Jahnke PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 1 Complaint against the: Port of Port Townsend Jefferson County Public Utility District City of Port Townsend I. PROBLEM STATEMENT The Port of Port Townsend (Port), Jefferson County Public Utility District (PUD), and City of Port Townsend (City) propose to expand the Port’s boatyard 25’ on the south side of Sims Way, cut down the historic and culturally significant poplars that line both sides of Sims Way, underground existing overhead powerline(s) on the south side, put in a sidewalk, and re-plant a different tree. The project is divided up between the 3 public agencies without a cumulative impacts analysis or meaningful public involvement. Each agency will seek permits separately, and in the case of the PUD, they’ve said they aren’t required to get permits to cut the trees, even though these actions are part of a larger proposal. This project is a fragmented permitting and piecemealed environmental review.i The overall project to cut the trees, trench the powerline, put in a sidewalk, and expand the boatyard are divided up between the 3 agencies.  The PUD will cut and dispose of the trees, trench and underground the power line, and pave the path.  The Port will expand the boatyard.  The City will remove the poplars on the Kah Tai side, replant, and plant replacement trees for the poplars that the PUD cuts down on the boatyard side.  The City will then maintain the new plants; water and replace any trees that die. There is:  No environmental impact statement for the overall project.  No alternatives analysis or weighing of the pros and cons of multiple alternatives.  No environmental analysis of the potential adverse impacts to the community and environment for the loss of these historic and culturally significant trees. There are approximately 130 trees (we are doing our own count) on both sides of the roadway, Sims Way, which is also State Hwy 20. This section of roadway has been lined with popl ars for almost 100 years; planted and replanted over the decades. Poplars are peppered throughout the Port Townsend area, and one could argue are an unofficial city tree. They are a significant part of the landscape and skyscape, and culturally significant as part of the Victorian seaport character. This proposed dramatic alteration to this entryway is evolving rapidly, with community awareness occurring around September 2021, with the City indicating the trees would start coming down in “early 2022.” There is conflicting information on the timing of the tree cutting, and the agencies claim that environmental review to remove these historic trees is not required. Even though this proposal has PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 2 repercussions throughout the community, public involvement is discouraged—it is tightly controlled and the residents have been told their role is limited to selecting a “replacement tree.” This complaint demonstrates that the primary reason stated to remove the poplars—that they are a danger to the existing overhead powerline--isn’t substantiated by the record or the proposed work. Instead, the driving motivation behind this dramatic alteration to this entryway into Port Townsend is the Port of Port Townsend’s desire to expand the boatyard by 25’ into where the poplars reside today…some of which are on Port property and others within the right-of-way. From this: Photo courtesy of Larry Eifert To this: PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 3 NOTE: THIS RENDERING IS INACCURATE. The agencies have provided this one and only concept drawing which shows the poplars remaining on the Kah Tai Lagoon side (the left)—but plan to cut the poplars on BOTH SIDES. This is problematic. II. BACKGROUND Excerpted from the adopted “Port Townsend Gateway Development Plan:” Before statehood, Port Townsend was the major seap ort for commerce and settlers coming in and out of this vast edge of the country. When travel shifted from the sea to the land, with the development of roadways and trucks to carry cargo and private automobiles to transport people, the highway in and out of Port Townsend became the gateway leading away to the urban centers beyond, and the gateway leading into a uniquely lovely Victorian seaport town. By 1987, development pressures from the greater Puget Sound area were reaching the Olympic Peninsula. Port Townsend became a destination for tourists and those who could live away from the metropolis bustle. Mayor Brent Shirley and the members of the City council recognized the need to focus the town’s attention on this important entrance to its historic downtown. These city leaders made plans for a city-wide participatory planning process: a design charrette, to discuss and decide what kind of gateway the residents wanted for their town, and to consider how to implement these decisions. The Port Townsend Gateway Project had begun. A. Port Townsend Gateway Concept Plan – 1987-1988 Mayor Shirley recognized the importance of including the broadest possible participation in the planning process, and brought together a nine-member steering committee, including residents and elected officials, to plan the design charrette focusing on the gateway to Port Townsend. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 4 The Steering Committee began regular discussion and planning sessions, meeting with City staff and a professional design workshop facilitator, to refine the goals for the design charrette and gather and organize information to be used at the planning session. A series of informational reports was prepared and assembled into packets for the participants. The Jefferson County-Port Townsend Leader published a series of stories, outlining the issues and encouraging residents to begin the discussion process leading up to the design charrette. Students from Port Townsend High School organized a video project to document the gateway corridor, to interview residents, and to record all public planning events up to the commencement of the design charrette. After several weeks of discussion, the Steering Committee established goals for the charrette and recommended a core group of thirty-three residents, representing every facet of Port Townsend life, including: owners of businesses and property along the gateway corridor: realtors, developers, educators, Planning Commission and City Council members, design and arts professionals, other professions, contractors, recreation leaders, religious leaders, design and planning consultants, public officials, students and residents-at-large. Enthusiasm and interest grew steadily within the community as planning for the design charrette neared completion. On April 20, 1988, all residents of Port Townsend were invited to a Town Hall Meeting, held at historic Fort Worden, to meet their representatives on the Core Group, to preview the video presentation with the high school students had prepared, to review the goals for the design charrette, and to provide public comment for consideration at the charrette sessions. The stage was set for the design charrette to commence. The following two days and nights, April 12, and April 22, 1988, were marathon sessions of intensive, focused, highly-participatory design discussion, leading to a practical, concrete list of design priorities for the gateway corridor. Design charrettes are a rare opportunity to bring together the widest possible range of ideas, expertise, energy, and creativity, in a cooperative and constructive effort to find practical solutions to very real design challenges. The result was a high-energy, very productive process which gave the City of Port Townsend a concept plan for future development of the gateway area, which would result in a welcoming, safe and attractive introduction to the town lying beyond. The City Council meeting the evening of May 11, 1988, was characterized as “one of the most satisfying moments in recent Port Townsend history.” The Core group participants, along with other residents, observers, students, City staff members, and elected officials, came together in the City Council Chambers, overlooking the harbor where ships had brought in the hopes and dreams of the towns forefathers more than a hundred years before, to present the plan to the City Council. The room was filled with a sense of purpose, quiet excitement and resolve, and energy as the charrette participants presented their consensus plan. After listening to support from a noteworthy wide range of residents during the hearing, the Port Townsend City Council adopted the Port Townsend Gateway Concept plan, for shaping the gateway corridor into the kind of place which would reflect the spirit and history and vision of the town to which it leads. B. Port Townsend Gateway Development Plan, 1990-1993 In early 1990 the City started another multi-year process to develop more specificity to the 1988 plan, and to continue the dialogue and involvement with the community in the development of the corridor, PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 5 and "to improve and preserve the overall quality of life and facilitate the creation of a graceful community for both residents and visitor." This planning effort divided the corridor into Districts, and the subject section of Sims Way--located between Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park (Kah Tai) and the Port Townsend boatyard--became known as the “Flats,” a commercial district whose views are defined by the existing rows of poplar trees. The Streetscape Recommendation for the Flats: “The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be retained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and the boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims Way.” The Port had a representative on the steering committee, and the Port had no objection to the poplars (The author was the representative from 1990-1991). In fact, removal or retention of the poplars were debated as part of this early 1990’s process and the community decided to retain them. The Port Townsend Gateway Development Plan was adopted on August 3, 1993.ii C. The Poplars – Historically and Culturally Significant The purpose of this section is to illustrate the historical and cultural significance of the poplars with contemporary and historical photos, and a painting, and to help others to visualize why these trees are so important to the community as well as visitors. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 6 Photo courtesy of Larry Eifert PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 7 Photo courtesy of Joyce Blankenship As shown in the photos above, the poplars line this entryway into Port Townsend, with Kah Tai on the left and the boatyard on the right. In addition, they are planted throughout Port Townsend. Here is another photo showing more poplars along Kah Tai and on the left of the photo, by the golf course: PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 8 Photo courtesy of Larry Eifert The poplars have been planted, died and replanted over many years. From “City of Dreams: A Guide to Port Townsend:”iii 1930s The Chamber of Commerce planted the poplars. 1939 Wild rice was planted in the lagoon to attract wildlife. 1940-50’s Kah Tai Lagoon provided the town with an unparalleled scenic entrance. 1963 Port Commission approved an Army Corp of Engineers scheme to dispose of 231,000 yards of dredged sand into Kah Tai Lagoon. Within a week the salty fill killed the stately poplars. 1964 Eight acres of sand covered the southern lagoon. 1973 500 trees were planted including poplars 1976 Kah Tai Lagoon began to regenerate with varieties of grasses, trees, and shrubs and the poplars were replanted. 1985 Twenty one years after it was filled, ground-breaking ceremony at Kah Tai Lagoon PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 9 Photo courtesy of Jefferson County Historical Society, 1950s. The trees are already established and tall. Photo courtesy of Jefferson County Historical Society, no date but prior to filling of Kah Tai Lagoon in 1964. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 10 Photo courtesy of Joyce Blankenship, no date but prior to the filling of Kah Tai…by the Port which killed that generation of poplars…in the early 1960’s. Photo courtesy of Jefferson County Historical Society, 1964; the Port filling of Kah Tai. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 11 Photo courtesy of Jefferson County Historical Society, 1964. Photo courtesy of Jefferson County Historical Society, no date. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 12 Painting by Melville Holmes, 1984…across Kah Tai towards Sims Way/Hwy 20 III. CURRENT PROPOSAL: Proposed in August/September 2021; trees to be cut down starting in “early 2022.” In stark contrast to the extensive community involvement in the Gateway planning, 1987-1993, the Port, PUD, and City started planning to cut down all of the poplars – on both sides of Sims Way/Hwy 20 -- in August 2021. City Manager John Mauro said in the December City Newsletter that “the poplar trees between the boat yard and Sims Way will start coming down in early 2022.”iv The general public was not aware of this until late September, 2021. In less than 4 months, these 3 agencies developed a plan and announced to the community what they intend to do, with no community brainstorming; no consideration of alternatives; and no community buy-in to an agreed upon plan. Their clearly stated intention is to only allow the public to help select “replacement” trees but not poplars. This abrupt 3 month timeframe is characterized by top-down messaging from these agencies, conflicting information, lack of consideration of alternatives to keep and/or replace the poplars, some misleading information, no meaningful and open public involvement, no analysis of cumulative impacts, and no clear way to be involved other than to help select…with City chosen sideboards that won’t allow replacing the poplars…replacement trees. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 13 They say the trees will be cut on the boatyard side first, then the undergrounding of the powerlines1, followed by the cutting of the trees on the Kah Tai side, and then the boatyard expansion. No environmental review is planned for the entirety of this proposal. It appears the trees will be cut by the PUD, and then the Port will later submit expansion applications and some agency will conduct SEPA on that project alone. The City will remove the trees on the Kah Tai side and replant on both sides, and maintain the new plantings. Here is an aerial photograph that orients the reader to Sims Way, the poplars, Kah Tai on one side, and the boatyard on the other (this is all fill): From: “Sims Way Gateway and Tree Management,” powerpoint presen tation, no date. These photos show the tree count: 1 The lines are 115kV transmission lines. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 14 From: “Sims Way Gateway and Tree Management,” powerpoint presentation, no date. This photo illustrates how narrow the row of poplar greenspace is relative to the adjacent hardscapes: From: “Sims Way Gateway and Tree Management,” powerpoint presentation, no date. Note the highly urbanized pavement and hard surfaces on both side of the roadway, illuminating how relatively narrow this existing greenway is, and according to the proposal, would be dramatically reduced. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 15 At some point in history a power line was installed on the boatyard side of the poplars. Historical photos show no powerline near the trees. The PUD is the current owner. In June 2021 there was an event where tall poplars touched the powerline, causing an arc. According to the three public agencies, this event was the catalyst that prompted them to: 1. Propose to expand the boatyard 25’ and remove the poplars along the boatyard, some of which are in the 100’ right-of-way and some that are on Port property; 2. Cut all of the poplars down on the Kah Tai side of Sims Way/Hwy 20; although there are no power lines on that side. 3. Replace the trees with a “more appropriate” tree. These three public agencies applied to Jefferson County for a Public Infrastructure Development Grant on October 6, 2021, in which they said “Primary goal: positive economic impact (job creation).v This statement is found in other agency publications.vi Here is the only concept drawing provided to the public, and it is inaccurate: it incorrectly shows only the trees on the boatyard side removed; however, their plan is to cut the poplars on both sides of this remarkable entryway: From: “Sims Way Gateway and Tree Management,” powerpoint presentation, no date. To put greater emphasis on the deception of this rendering, it was included in the same grant application and powerpoint presentation which included a description of the scope of work to remove trees on BOTH SIDES. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 16 We question whether the removal of the poplars on the Kah Tai meets the requirements of RCW 82, sales and use tax for economic development, statement of intent and eligible activities, the Public Infrastructure Development grant that Jefferson County awarded to these entities.vii The removal of this row of poplars is not tied to the boatyard expansion or underground of powerlines, or any road improvements, or any economic development activity. It appears the City solely wants to remove these trees because they are non-native. This photo illustrates the location of the powerlines to the poplars on the boatyard side and the trees that were burned when they touched the energized line: From: “Sims Way Gateway and Tree Management,” powerpoint presentation, no date PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 17 From: “Sims Way Gateway and Tree Management,” powerpoint presentation, no date IV. PROPOSAL ISSUES Issue #1. Tightly controlled and selective public involvement. Even though these public agency staff and elected officials were fully aware that, as the Parks Advisory Board told them, the community would “push back at the cutting of the “popular” poplar trees, they proceeded to craft a process that offered little to no public input. In an email from City Public Works Director Steve King to the other 2 agency staff, he determined no public hearing would be required: Hi All, I’m following up with one of my action items by checking in with our permitting folks about what is required. One of the key things I was looking for was wea ther any of the permits required a hearing... which they don’t. The permit that is likely requires the most work is the Flood Dev. Permit which requires a habitat analysis... this is a FEMA requirement. The following permits apply. (emphasis added) Flood Dev. Review Form and ESA Compliance tied to a Cleari ng and Grading for boat yard expansion and possibly undergrounding. Undergrounding, path, planting of new trees requires a Street Development Permit Public Process is not tied to a permit, but is pretty critical to this given the public interest. Hope this helps, Steveviii PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 18 Yet these agency people were fully aware of the significant public interest, but checked to make sure no public hearing would be required as part of the permitting process: “…This summer, it was brought to our attention that the Poplars along Sims Way are too close and causing hazards with the power lines along the Boat Haven. The PUD and Port would like to take down the Poplars. The trees currently straddle the right of way line with some entirely on the right of way and other on Port property. As you can imagine, this is a controversial topic with the Community.ix (emphasis added) Steve King, City Public Works Manager, email to Andy Larson, WSDOT, September 28, 2021. All of the public agency discussions took place during COVID 19 lock-downs, with almost all Council, Commission and Advisory Committee meetings conducted remotely, with little to no community attendance or comment. There were no community meetings where the public was invited and this proposal was the exclusive topic. Many Port Townsend residents heard about the plan to cut the trees for the first time from a Port Townsend Leader article on September 16, 2021: Officials look at removing poplar tree corridor along Sims Way Proposal expected to generate strong public pushback Chainsaws may be coming to Port Townsend’s signature tunnel of trees entryway to town. Officials with the Jefferson County Public Utility District, city of Port Townsend, and Port of Port Townsend have been talking in recent weeks of removing the long stretches of poplar trees on both sides of Sims Way in a nearly $2 million project that would include putting power lines underground, adding sidewalks along the Boat Haven property line, and replanting both sides of the street with more environmentally appropriate tree choices. City, PUD, and port officials have all acknowledged during recent proposal discussions the potential public blowback the plan will create. The tree-lined entryway into Port Townsend is an iconic feature, City Engineer Steve King acknowledged during a briefing on the proposal earlier this month to the Port Townsend Council Infrastructure and Development Committee. “We know there is a lot of emotional attachment and concern about that,” he said of the tree - lined corridor leading to downtown. The plan calls for the removal of 60 mature trees on the Boat Haven side of the road, and 70 that border Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park. King said the Parks, Recreation, and Tree Advisory Board had reviewed the plan and endorsed it, but they also warned city leaders to “get ready for some strong pushback.” Port Townsend Councilwoman Amy Howard …dryly noted: “I would like to know why we didn’t put parking on this agenda, too, so we could become the most hated committee immediately at the gate.” PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 19 “There is going to be pushback. It’s going to be an unpopular decision one way or the other,” Howard said. There are going to be people who are going to be unhappy with the proposal, she added.x And another article on September 29, 2021: Controversial Sims Way tree removal plan continues, Local officials warn that the poplar trees along Sims Way are a safety hazard, because they are growing into power lines. The iconic Lombardy poplar trees lining both sides of Sims Way near the entryway to downtown Port Townsend are likely to be removed in the near future, after city, port, and Jefferson County Public Utility District officials passed a resolution to start funding a $2 million project that includes the removal and replacement of the trees. The city council passed a resolution last week to enable the city, PUD, and Port of Port Townsend to partner and apply for grant funding to finance the removal and replacement of the trees. The public has generally disapproved of the proposal to remove the Lombardy poplars, seeing the trees as the long-standing leafy “welcoming committee” into Port Townsend’s commercial district. Although the poplar trees are a scenic part of the gateway, officials fear the age, positioning, and potential safety hazards of the trees are too important to ignore and must be chopped down. With the poplar trees on Sims Way nearing the end of their lifespan (which is typically around 60 years), the trees are a potential safety hazard if any were to topple down and potentially hit a car or pedestrian on the road or sidewalk, officials said. “As the trees get older, they’ll tend to rot in the center. Poplars have a trend to lose branches anyway,” said Public Works Director Steve King. “They also have the potential to collapse. That’s another safety hazard.” Additionally, the poplars’ branches have started to touch nearby power lines, making them a potential fire hazard. The Jefferson County PUD has documented problems with tree branches touching the power lines parallel to the poplars, and electricity has been seen arcing between the power lines and trees, burning leaves and branches. “Jefferson County PUD and Port of Port Townsend approached us with complaints about the wires against trees, causing safety hazards,” King said. “You could walk down and see burnt leaves on the wires.” PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 20 The trees have also made it impossible to expand the neighboring Boat Haven boatyard, which badly needs the space to hold more ships. The removal of the trees would benefit Port of Port Townsend and potentially add more jobs for the organization, port officials said earlier. “If we remove these trees, it’s a big deal for the public,” King said. King agrees with the public on the beauty and importance of the poplars, but said safety concerns outweigh the aesthetic beauty and long histo ry of the trees. “We agree they’re iconic to the community and that they are beautiful,” King said. But the potential safety hazards are “not something that we can ignore. Our job is to help engage the community to figure out how, what, where to replant.” Although the tree removal project is a new hot-button topic around town, the removal of the trees isn’t a new problem by any means. A 1986 study recommended taking out the poplar trees and replacing them with vegetation that uses less water and is native to the Puget Sound region. “Those poplars are a detriment to native trees; they suck a lot of the water,” King said. Additionally, the vertical shape of the Lombardy poplars is not a suitable nesting tree for many local bird species. Another study in 1993 recommended the poplar trees be thinned out to leave a better view of Kah Tai Lagoon. King said the improved visibility of Kah Tai would be beneficial “both for safety, and you get to realize the vision for how to enhance Kah Tai.” Although King knows many residents are unhappy about the project, he encouraged locals to give input on the plans, and make recommendations for how the area should be replanted. King and project coordinators are “looking at different options on how replanting will look,” King said. “I want to encourage public feedback, we learn from that.” The planned project to remove and replace the poplars, along with expanding the boatyard, moving the power lines underground, and installing a path along the road, will cost an estimate d $2 million. The project will involve five primary phases of construction and removal. Phase 1 will mitigate potential safety hazards by trimming branches and leaves near power lines, and removing the poplar trees on the Boat Haven side of Sims Way. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 21 The second step will move the power lines on Sims Way underground, and Phase 3 will involve replanting new trees where the Lombardy poplars are currently, and installing a walkway for pedestrians. For Phase 4, the project will expand the boatyard for Boat H aven, adding space for more vessels. The final phase will involve removing the trees on the Kah Tai side of Sims Way, along with planting new trees in their stead. The tree removal, under-grounding of power lines, and installation of a pedestrian walkway would go through Jefferson County PUD, and would cost around $700,000. For Port of Port Townsend, the expansion of the Boat Haven boatyard would cost approximately $900,000. On the city’s side, the tree removal and replanting on the Kah Tai side would cost about $200,000, while replanting trees on the Boat Haven side would take $170,000 to do. Combining the two, it would cost around $370,000. Between the city, Port of Port Townsend, and Jefferson County PUD, the cost comes out to roughly $1.9 million. These newspaper articles prompted an outcry, after which the public agencies felt compelled to offer a 1 hour Zoom meeting, on November 9, 2021, in which over 80 people signed in. The meeting was 1 hour, and the moderator, City Manager John Mauro, talked for about 10% of that time, and the other public agency people talked for another 15%...which made it clear this was a one-way conversation. That left about 45 minutes for 80 people to have input or ask questions. John Mauro decided who would go into which “rooms” or break-out groups, where only a few people were able to talk, and then each moderator went back to the full group reporting in a minute or two their summary after at most 10 minutes of input. In one breakout group, the moderator called on individuals by name who were known to support the removal of the poplars, while others did not get a chance to speak.xi The Leader ran articles on November 5, and November 10, 2021, and printed a guest article by a prominent proponent of cutting the trees down, who also serves as the Chair of the City’s Parks, Recreation & Tree Advisory Board, a City Appointed position, on December 3, 2021. According to the Jefferson County Public Infrastructure Grant application that these 3 public agencies submitted on October 6, 2021, this is the full scope of the planned public involvement: PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 22 From: “Sims Way Gateway and Tree Management,” powerpoint presentation, no date Further, in the body of the grant application, the initial public outreach lists meetings with elected officials and their appointed committees, as well as newspaper articles, as the primary forms of public outreach.xii No other form of public outreach is indicated, and as noted below, the City has distanced themselves from some of the newspaper articles as “inaccurate:” From City Manager John Mauro to Julie Jaman, Nov 19, 2021 Thank you again for your thoughts, Ms. Jaman (City Council bcc’d). We will continue to record these comments as we build a record of perspectives and I’ll continue to offer you the opportunity, as described during the town hall event, to be engaged as part of the public process moving forward as part of the project. I expect to be able to share more details including a date for another meeting in a week or two. Please note that the dates and materials you reference in the Leader are inaccurate. (emphasis added) Thanks again for your interest and look forward to a productive, positive and civil process where we can actually work together on a solution we can all support. Best john John Mauro | City Manager City of Port Townsend | www.cityofpt.us In other documents they have also said that the project website will also serve as public involvement. This is problematic for the excluded residents for obvious reasons. A second 1 hour Zoom meeting was announced for December 15, 2021, at 5 p.m. The residents are at a significant disadvantage for three reasons: 1) due to COVID lockdowns all meetings are virtual, with no opportunity to comment or network with other concerned residents; 2) it’s the holidays. Many people are distracted and/or out-of-town; and 3) the meetings are not set up for meaningful dialogue or input PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 23 and many people realize they have no way to influence the process or the plan. This has caused much frustration and cynicism as can been seen on social media comments. In this meeting, the staff talked until 5:35 p.m.; leaving 25 minutes for input, which was already constrained by the technology, the format, and the unwillingness to discuss ways to save the poplars. There were dramatically fewer call in or log ins, down from over 80 at the November 9 meeting to just over 30. At this second Zoom meeting, the issue of whether the trees would be cut was off the table. John Mauro would not allow any discussion or procedural concerns to be raised before breaking up people into groups that he chose. One person attempted to speak to get out contact info for anyone unsatisfied by this process, but was cut off by Mauro who said “questions only.” One person tried to suggest that all people be heard in the main group, which was televised live on the local radio station, but was muted. So anyone who wanted to network with another member of the community, who they could see on the screen was logged in, was prohibited. In addition, Mauro created surveys, where he controlled the question and all of the options available for people to select. We did not participate as our concerns were not reflected and we had no way to have input. Issue #2. Fragmented permitting and piecemealed environmental review The overall project to cut the trees, trench the powerline(s), put in a sidewalk, and expand the boatyard are divided up between the 3 agencies. The PUD will cut and dispose of the trees, trench and underground the power line, and pave the path on the boatyard side. The Port will expand the boatyard. The City will cut the poplars on the Kah Tai side and plant trees (no poplars allowed) on both sides of the right of way. The City will then provide on-going maintenance of the landscaping. They do not plan to amend the adopted Gateway Development Plan, but instead have adopted it by reference into the grant application, and claim that this project is consistent with the plan. They do not intend to do an environmental impact statement for the overall project, conduct an alternatives analysis or weigh the pros and cons of multiple alternatives including landscape designs with an option to replant poplars as has been done for almost a century. There is only one alternative: cut the trees down, underground the powerline(s) and expand the boatyard. In fact, they do not plan to do any environmental analysis of the potential adverse impacts to the community and environment for the loss of these historic and culturally significant trees, including the functions they provide or the fact that they are established at a time when the climate is expected to dramatically change. Below are emails between the author and the PUD to this effect: From Andrea Hegland to Annette Johnson, PUD Dec 2, 2021 Hi Annette thank you for checking. You have a very early start. I wonder if you could have Scott email me who is cutting the trees in “early 2022” and under what permit and environmental review? From Annette Johnson PUD to Andrea Hegland, Dec 9, 2021 PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 24 Good morning, In response to your request, Scott Bancroft had answered. There is no permit or environmental review. The trees are removed due to them being an electrical hazard that if someone was to get hurt, the PUD would be liable. There is no set plan as to when more trees will be removed. They are removed as needed when a potential hazard is seen From Scott Bancroft PUD to Andrea Hegland, Dec 10, 2021 Scott answered my questions using my original email as follows: 1.Who is proposing to remove the trees on the south side of Sims Way? ANS: Attached is a letter I sent to the Port on May 10, 2021. This started the process this year. 2. When are you proposing to do this? ANS: At this time there is no scheduled date for this work. The goal of the PUD, Port and City is to collaborate with citizens establish an alternative and begin the work. There is a rendering that I have attached, I believe this is the latest drawing. 3. What permits will you be securing? ANS: When it comes to hazard trees around power lines the PUD only needs to discuss with the owner of the property (RCW 64.12.035). 4. When will you be securing permits? ANS: PUD will not apply for something it is legally obligated conduct. 5. Will you be conducting environmental review. ANS: PUD will not conduct an environmental review as per RCW 64.12.035. Please remember this is a difficult decision for everyone. If you would like to discuss or go to the site I would be happy to schedule a time to meet with you. My phone number is 360 385 8363. Thanks This is very concerning to the residents of Port Townsend. Issue #3. What is the real reason for cutting the poplars? Although these agencies say the catalyst for this project was an incident in late Junexiii when limbs touched the powerline, this email was discovered under FOIA which reveals that this project had started approximately in April of 2020: This is from an August 2, 2021 email from Scott Bancroft, PUD, to Monica Mader at STL design, regarding a rendering STL was hired to prepare of the removal of the trees, expansion of the boatyard, and addition of sidewalk: Hi Monica, …Background: The Port of PT came to the PUD about 16 months ago to discuss the idea of removing the poplar trees along Sims Way on Port property. The Port and the PUD feel it is in the best interest of each entity to remove the poplar trees along Sims Way on Port property. The last Port meeting there was a 3-0 vote approving the removal of the poplar trees, now we are getting ready to communicate to the public what we intend to do. PUD would like Studio STL to put together a rendering of what driving down Sims Way may look like without the poplar trees in place….xiv PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 25 In addition, on October 6, 2021, the Port was moving a sailboat at the north end of the yard and the forestay/mast hit a powerline that serves the Port offices, pushing it 2 feet out of its normal position.xv The Port contracted with ESCI, Safety, Training and Consulting Services, to conduct an incident investigation. The ESCI representatives recommended, in part: “…#3. The fastest and most cost effective solution to the clearance issues of the Jefferson County PUD 115 kV transmission line running along the edge of the Port Townsend Boat Yard is to: a. Replace all existing poles with 75’ poles; b. Replace all existing poles with 65’ poles and compact or flattop construction. #4. ESCI understands there are potential plans and possible grant money from the government to underground the 115 kV circuit which would eliminate the problem, but this option is very expensive and may take years to accomplish .” (emphasis added) This investigative report leads one to wonder, is replacing the existing line next to the poplars with taller poles an option? Or, if this were truly an emergency, couldn’t the PUD just cut the trees that are nearest the powerline, and plant new ones closer to the road? Another questionable aspect of this project is its evolution. In May 2021 the PUD sent a letter to the Port proposing to remove the trees,xvi before the tree limbs hit the line in late June 2021. The PUD proposed removing the trees to protect the overhead power lines. After the limbs hit the line the PUD proposed removing the poplars a section at a time, and replacing with a shorter tree.xvii But now, the proposal is to underground the line, which should obviate the need to cut the poplars, but that is now their proposal. Here’s another example of their logic, from the Public Infrastructure Development grant application that was submitted and approved by Jefferson County Commissioners: “Removal of the poplars adjacent to the Boat Haven and growing into PUD powerlines greatly reduces outage and fire risks. Undergrounding power lines ensures that a key transmission path for electric service will be unaffected by storms, small animal intrusion, or traffic accidents.xviii This simply does not make sense, unless the primary reason for the entire project is to expand the boatyard (or address an OSHA/NEC safe equipment operation setback from the powerlines by existing operations, but this is confusing.) This entire project has been handled in a confusing manner; the public is confused, unclear about the facts, unclear about the scope and the time, and most importantly, about the need and is now rightfully questioning the real motives. New information has been provided to this project by a member of the Marine Trades that helps explain the need to underground the powerlines, but does not explain cutting down the poplars: Oh, and I do remember working on a commercial fishing boat blocked up adjacent to those high power lines, and due to the large array of aluminum outriggers and masts on the boat that it was conducting, and concentrating the electromagnetic field that emanates from those lines and we couldn’t get near the boat without feeling the effect. We had to have it moved to work on it.xix PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 26 In addition, we have been told by another long time worker in the boatyard that they could feel electricity just standing by the transmission lines on a wet day. Issue #4. Misleading and inaccurate information The project proponents say the following: A. That trenching to underground the powerline would kill the trees…and therefore the trees have to go even though there would no longer be an overhead line. The problem with this is that it is not supported by the evidence. Upon investigation of the poplars and area, it is clear that deep trenching has already occurred nearby, and directly adjacent to the poplars without killing them. These electrical vaults are deep, next to several healthy trees, with no adverse impacts. See the fire hydrant which is fed by an underground high pressure water line. It appears from these photos that deep trenching has already occurred adjacent, to, and on top of the poplar tree roots, and the trees did not die. Cutting some roots may not kill the tree, but knock it back or shock it. In addition, if a tree did die from trenching, why not replace it with a poplar? The overhead lines would now be gone. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 27 In addition, there are two stormwater catchment swales between the boatyard fence and the row of poplars. These swales are a little over 2’ deep, and almost 100’ long. The top of the swale cut is 11’ from the base of the poplars. As you can see in these photos, the poplars did not die: On the contrary, one can see that the excavation for these swales cut poplar roots…and they sent up new shoots!! In this screenshot from the City’s Utilities map, it is evident that utilities, water, sewer, and stormwater have crossed through the poplars: B. That the poplars are causing pavement buckling in the road. We could find no evidence of pavement buckling on Sims Way caused by the poplars. See photo below. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 28 Jefferson County maintains a steep ditch very close to poplar trees on Discovery Road and Cape George Road, next to the former Chevy Chase golf course. The trees are close to the pavement and there is no evidence of pavement buckling; this also demonstrates a ditch next to trees doesn’t necessarily kill them. C. That the trees are causing buckling on the Kah Tai side sidewalk. There is some damage to the asphalt sidewalk that is close to the poplar trunks on the Kah Tai side; but to put this into perspective, San Juan Avenue is buckling (photos below), and Jackman road is so damaged that cones are permanently placed to ward off vehicles. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 29 Compare the minor damage above to conditions on other city streets: San Juan and Jackman: D. That the trees are at the end of their useful life. Believe it or not, no professional arborist has been consulted regarding the age or health of these trees. Upon actual examination, the trees are of varying sizes and likely not all the same age. Here’s what an older poplar looks like (by the golf course): PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 30 Here are photos of some of the trees along the boatyard: These poplars are young; the one on left has a diameter at breast height of only 10” PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 31 Here’s yet ANOTHER young tree, and ANOTHER, nowhere near the end of their “useful life” These poplars have not been maintained as required by the Gateway Development Plan. Even if they were at the end of their life, an option would be to plant younger trees further away from the powerlines, or not mow down suckers growing further away from the powerlines. The photo below shows a clump of poplars that were allowed to grow further from the power lines (into a phone line). Obviously the trees could be allowed to grow in this direction to obviate this issue but have not been allowed to: PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 32 In addition, according to the PUD November Newsletter, 2012, in September and October more trees and more branches caused more outages than normally occur during the worst months of winter – in fact, they had the worst September and October for outages in more than 5 years, and maybe the worst September of all time. Did a poplar tree fall on Sims Way? Not one. Did limbs cause an outage in September? No. Here are photos of a relatively young conifers that fell on PUD powerlines those storms: E. That the WSDOT requires native trees to be planted along state highways. According to emails between the City and WSDOT, this section of roadway is deemed “managed access.” Under this type of designation, the WSDOT has responsibility from curb to curb, and the City has authority outside the curbs including landscaping. The WSDOT has only a courtesy review role.xx From: Archie, Cameron <ArchieC@wsdot.wa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 11:34 AM To: Larson, Andy <LarsonA@wsdot.wa.gov>; Rae, Connie <RaeC@wsdot.wa.gov>; Bergeman, Nate <BergemN@wsdot.wa.gov> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: SR 20 - Sims Way Andy, As per the Maintenance Manual M 51-01.11, Appendix A-7, item #4: Landscaping and irrigation systems and any decorative items are the cities responsibility. I would like to stay in the loop about the design and what is finally approved by the city. Does WSDOT have any mechanism for reviewing and approving any design prior to installation on something like this? Just wondering if we would be included in the future design sessions moving forward. Thank you again for letting me know about this proposal… From: Larson, Andy <LarsonA@wsdot.wa.gov> PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 33 Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 11:38 AM To: Archie, Cameron <ArchieC@wsdot.wa.gov> Cc: Rae, Connie <RaeC@wsdot.wa.gov>; Bergeman, Nate <BergemN@wsdot.wa.gov> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: SR 20 - Sims Way Hi Cameron, Yes, the authority to do this is theirs and it would be a courtesy review and suggestions that we could make, but the final decision would be up to the city. Andrew Larson, PE Development Services Engineer F.That the trees are non-native and therefore don’t belong there. On the contrary, the City’s policy is for the exclusive use of non-native trees in the right-of-way and specifically under utility lines. Out of 24 recommended street trees in the City’s 1997 Engineering Design Standards Manual, all are non-native.xxi G.That wildlife don’t use the trees because of their upright hab it. According to Trees of Power, by Akiva Silver, “Poplars are some of the fastest-growing trees in the world. They can tolerate the worst conditions and are heavily favored by wildlife. In places where land has been degraded or is falling apart, the poplars can rebuild. They produce tremendous amounts of biomass, feed unbelievable numbers of insects, birds, and mammals, and suck tons of carbon out of the sky like gigantic outstretched vacuums.” While these people claim they love wildlife and birds, cutting these existing trees will immediately remove an entire ecosystem, providing protection to small birds from prey, food and insects for those birds, a very tall vertical habitat that took decades to evolve that will not be replaced. These concerns are hollow and their claims are unfounded and ignorant at best. Issue #5. Even more confusing and inaccurate information PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 34 A. Timing. According to the grant application to the Jefferson County Public Infrastructure Development fund, the trees on the south side of Sims Way will be cut down in June 2022, with the poplar trees on the other side of Sims Way to be removed in December.xxii But in the December City Newsletter, City Manager John Mauro stated that “the poplar trees between the boat yard and Sims Way will start coming down in early 2022.”xxiii In PUD’s Scott Bancroft email to Andrea Hegland on December 10, 2021, Barnard said “At this time there is no scheduled date for this work. The goal of the PUD, Port and City is to collaborate with citizens establish an alternative and begin the work. There is a rendering that I have attached, I believe this is the latest drawing. B. Inaccurate concept rendering. As noted above, the concept rendering inaccurately shows the trees on the Kah Tai remaining. If these trees were removed from the concept drawing, the community would see a dramatically different entryway. In addition, the rendering shows replacement trees of an advanced age; it will take many years to reach this size. C. Extreme weather. On a related note, the PUD said in its November Newsletter that the cause of stress on the trees and falling trees and limbs was due to extreme weather. These agencies assert that they will plant a better tree than the poplars, ones that sequester more carbon…without providing any comparative analysis. The poplar trees are likely to endure weather extremes as they are established and just rode out a severe weather year. A newly planted tree will be at a significant disadvantage, and may never reach maturity to do all of the things these agencies claim they will do. D. Permits and Environmental Review. According to the City’s Steve King, there will be no planning level SEPA, only project level SEPA, and all the permits are not known at this time:  “The full permitting requirements are not fully known at this time as it will depend on how the project moves forward.  We anticipate that a flood development permit will be needed as part of the Boat Yard expansion.  We anticipate that a street development permit will be required for the portion of work inside the right of way.  We have not reviewed the SEPA thresholds yet, so the SEPA process is still to be determined. If applicable, we anticipate a project level SEPA determination will be made once the details of the scope of work are better understood.  Before permitting can be initiated, we generally strive for a good understanding of the scope of work by performing preliminary design. Once we have preliminary design work performed, we can start the permitting process.”xxiv E. Tree removal recommended by adopted plans. They say that the poplar removal is “endorsed by the City of Port Townsend’s Parks, Recreation, Tree and Trails Advisory Board and this recommendation is included in the city’s tree plan. However, the adopted, and widely participatory Gateway Development Plan recommends: “The linear corridor quality of the poplar trees can be retained, while enhancing views of the shipyards and Historic buildings. Removal of "sucker" growth of the large poplars, and selective removal of the small, individual seedlings would open up views to the lagoon and the boatyard. New poplars, spaced 20-25' apart, can be selectively planted to fill in "gaps" along Sims Way.” (emphasis added) This City appointed Advisory Board is not representative of the entire community, and this appears to be a back-door way to circumvent the community’s desires. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 35 V. Is this an Emergency? Initially these agencies claimed that there was an imminent health and safety matter with the powerlines touching tree limbs. Then we discovered, as noted previously, the Port approached the PUD 16 months prior to that event with the limb and electrical arcing. In addition, we have learned that this is a back-up line, and is currently de-energized. There are other factors that cloud the claim that this is an emergency situation. #1. The City, Port, and PUD have not maintained the poplars or trimmed limbs that are “growing into” the powerlines or limbs near the top that could blow into the powerlines. #2. On October 6, 2021, the port was moving a sailboat into a seldom used area by the Port office and hit one of the 115kV powerlines that runs perpendicular to the poplars and Sims Way. The Port commissioned an incident report from a safety consultant, in which the consultant recommended immediate lifting of the line with taller poles, as there are also operational distance issues from the line to equipment that the Port needs to satisfy. In addition, there are light standards that do not meet these separation requirements. The consultant noted the proposed undergrounding, but stated that installing taller poles would be faster, and cheaper. No action has been taken to raise the lines, and no action has been taken to PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 36 underground the lines although the PUD was granted money from Jefferson County to do so. From the report: 1. Jefferson County PUD has a significant liability issue with the current clearance of its 115 kV transmission line paralleling the Port Townsend Boat Yard. ESCI highly recommends this issue be permanently correct as soon as possible. 2. The PUD should enter into a written agreement of the type of work that can be performed near the transmission line until a permanent solution can be obtained. 3. The fastest and most cost-effective solution to the clearance issues of the Jefferson County PUD 115 kV transmission line running along the edge of the Port Townsend Boat Yard is to: a. Replace all existing poles with 75’ poles b. Replace all existing poles with 65’ poles and compact or flattop construction.xxv 4. ESCI understands there are potential plans and possible grant money from the government to underground the 115 kV circuit which would eliminate the problem, but this option is very expensive and may take years to accomplish. #3. The PUD has been awarded a Public Infrastructure Development Grant and in the grant application indicated that they have secured the $350,000 necessary to underground the powerlines. If this were an emergency, wouldn’t they have moved on this? VI. CONCLUSION It appears from the actions and records obtained from these public agencies that the primary reason for cutting down the iconic, historical and culturally significant poplars is for the Port to expand the boatyard 25’ into where the trees reside. Undergrounding of the powerlines will make this expansion possible. If the stated reason to cut the trees is to prevent them from hitting the powerlines, then there would be no need to underground the powerlines. Conversely, if the powerlines are undergrounded, there is no need to cut the trees. In addition, it appears that the City’s sole motivation for cutting the iconic and historical poplars along Kah Tai is simply because they are a non-native tree. But as we have demonstrated, this is a hypocrisy as all city trees are non-native. PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 37 If this were an emergency, the Port and PUD could have trimmed the trees, raised the powerlines per the recommendation of its safety consultant, or immediately undergrounded the powerlines as funding has evidently been secured. They have not. Also evident from their actions is the desire to minimize or avoid any public involvement, public comment, and environmental review; any action or decision that might offer an opportunity for meaningful comment or appeal. On top of this, many of their claims are not supported by the facts on the ground. Most importantly from a state law perspective, this project is a fragmented permitting and piecemealed environmental review.xxvi The overall project to cut the trees, trench the powerline, put in a sidewalk, and expand the boatyard are divided up between the 3 agencies. There is:  No environmental impact statement for the overall project.  No alternatives analysis or weighing of the pros and cons of multiple alternatives.  No environmental analysis of the potential adverse impacts to the community and environment for the loss of these historic and culturally significant trees. Ironically, the Port’s filling of Kah Tai Lagoon in the early 1960s killed the existing poplar trees that were planted in the 1930s. Now the Port and City are evidently attempting to put in the final nail. i https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&ar ticle=1715&context=sulr “On the local level, classic piecemealing typically occurs in "phased" developments. In PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 38 phased developments, project proponents seek approval of plans to construct a project in a patchwork fashion over a period of time. Planning for these projects is often piecemealed as a matter of practicality because financial or planning concerns force the project proponent to proceed in phases. On occasion, deferral of a comprehensive environmental impact study appears logical because later phases of a project may be subject to change. In the absence of a concrete plan, project proponents cannot be expected to predict environmental impacts at the beginning of the planning stages." However, an appropriate circumstance for phased construction does not directly translate into an appropriate circumstance for phased environmental review." From a SEPA perspective, phasing is improper if it results in an avoidance of a cumulative impact study for the entire project or for the combination of the various phases of the project.” [Emphasis added] pp 346-7. ii City of Port Townsend, “Port Townsend Gateway Development Plan,” August 2, 1993. iii “City of Dreams: A Guide to Port Townsend,” edited by Peter Simpson, July 1, 1986, Bay Press. iv City of Port Townsend, “A Note from City Manager John Mauro,” December 1, 2021. v PUD, Port, City, “Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation & Boat Yard Expansion Project,” Jefferson County PIF Application – October 6, 2021; Port Commission Meeting – September 22, 2021; City Council Business Meeting – September 20, 2021; Council Infrastructure and Dev. Committee – Sept 1, 2021; Parks, Recreation & Tree Advisory Board Meeting – August 4, 2021. “Project Goals,” no page number. vi Town Hall virtual meeting announcement for December 15, 2021. vii https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCounty03/JeffersonCounty0328.html https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=82.14.370 viii Steve King, City Public Works Manager, email to Eron Berg, Port, Keven Strett, PUD, Mike Love, Port, Scott Bancroft PUD and John Maura, City. August 12, 2021. ix Steve King, City Public Works Manager, email to WSDOT Andy Larson, Development Services Engineer, September 28, 2021. x Brian Kelly, “Officials look at removing poplar tree corridor along Sims Way, Proposal expected to generate strong public pushback,” The Leader, December 10, 2021. xi Attendee Andrea Fontenot Hegland, interview, December 10, 2021. xii City, Port, and PUD Jefferson County Public Infrastructure Fund Grant Application, “Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion,” October 6, 2021, page 9. xiii Scott Bancroft, PUD, email to David Peterson, Eron Berg (Port), and Kevin Streett (PUD), June 28, 2021. xiv Scott Bancroft, PUD, email to Monica Mader, STL Design, August 2, 2021. xv Hector Silva, ESCI Director of Operations, Edmundo Avila, Safety Manager, “Electrical Contact Incident Port Townsend Boat Yard, October 6, 2021. xvi Scott Bancroft, PUD, letter to Eron Berg, Port, May 10, 2021. xvii Scott Bancroft, PUD, email to David Peterson, Eron Berg, Kevin Stree tt, June 28, 2021. xviii City, Port, and PUD Jefferson County Public Infrastructure Fund Grant Application, “Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion,” October 6, 2021, page 5. xix Mike Gal mukoff, December 28, 2021 communication, PT Free Press. xx Andrew Larson, Development Services Engineer, WSDOT, email to Steve King, City, September 28, 2021. xxi City of Port Townsend, Engineering Design Standards Manual, April 1997, Appendix D. xxii https://www.ptleader.com/stories/county-oks-funding-for-pt-gateway-project-that-includes-removal-of-iconic- poplar-trees-on-sims-way,78249? xxiii City of Port Townsend, “A Note from City Manager John Mauro,” December 1, 2021. xxiv Steve King, City, email to Andrea Hegland, Dec 12, 2021 (a Sunday). xxv Hector Silva, Edmundo Avila, ESCI, November 22, 2021, Incident Report. xxvi https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&ar ticle=1715&context=sulr “On the local level, classic piecemealing typically occurs in "phased" developments. In phased developments, project proponents seek approval of plans to construct a project in a patchwork fashion over a period of time. Planning for these projects is often piecemealed as a matter of practicality because financial or planning concerns force the project proponent to proceed in phases. On occasion, deferral of a comprehensive environmental impact study appears logical because later phases of a project may be subject to change. In the absence of a concrete plan, project proponents cannot be expected to predict environmental impacts at the PT Poplar Removal Complaint 12/28/2021 5:54 PM Page | 39 beginning of the planning stages." However, an appropriate circumstance for phased construction does not directly translate into an appropriate circumstance for phased environmental review." From a SEPA perspective, phasing is improper if it results in an avoidance of a cumulative impact study for the entire project or for the combination of the various phases of the project.” [Emphasis added] pp 346-7. 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Monday, February 14, 2022 7:41 AM To:Steve King; Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Poplar tree project comprise FYI Kelly Graves -----Original Message----- From: Mea Moore <meamoore@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2022 3:06 PM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Cc: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Subject: Poplar tree project comprise City of Port Townsend Department of Public Works, I have been intending to write to the city in regard to the proposed removal of the poplar trees along Sims Way. Seeing the powerful public art work today where the trees are provided with red hearts to demonstrate our community’s love and respect for them prompted me to write. I would like to point out what seems to be obvious, but to my knowledge has not been discussed, which is a comprise. Recognizing the city’s concerns, as well as the concerns of so many Port Townsend residents, please consider this idea: take the trees on the Port side, but on the Kai Tai side, take one third of the trees and replant with native species. In five years, take another one third of the trees and again replant with native species. Five years later, take the final one third. This approach is consistent with best management practices, allows the Port to expand its footprint and meets the PUD’s need to bury power lines. In addition, it honors the historic gift of HJ Carroll and it would be an olive branch from the city to the many residents who have such a high regard and love for the trees that have long welcomed us home and have withstood countless Salish Sea storms. Please bring this suggested compromise forward for Council consideration and public comment. Kind Regards, Cliff Moore 1 Sarah Tiffany From:John Mauro Sent:Monday, February 14, 2022 12:19 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Cc:Steve King Subject:FW: Sims Way trees Attachments:Coniferous Trees.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Sarah- some public feedback re: Sims Way project to log. Thank you! Steve – I can respond and thank Ms. Hoyecki. Joh John Mauro | City Manager City of Port Townsend | www.cityofpt.us 250 Madison Street, Suite 2 | Port Townsend, WA 98368 P: 360.379.5043 | M: 360.531.2916 Follow us on Facebook: fb.me/CityofPT Help steer our future together with Engage PT: www.cityofpt.us/engage From: Patti Hoyecki <phoyecki@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 11:16 AM To: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us> Subject: Sims Way trees CAUTION: External Email I am actually supportive of the poplar tree removal and have participated in the virtual meetings, listened in on the radio. I write to nominate a tree type for planting if that becomes part of city/group efforts now and in the future. The Western Red Cedar is native, long lived, well suited for that soil type and our weather. It’s also iconically representative of cultures in our region. I’ll attach a reference page. P.S. I also think you do a pretty good job as city manager. It’s tough to be a decision maker, facilitator and be caught in between when a decision can influence thousands of individuals. I’ve been there. And when you’re not the decision maker but represent the decision its easy to become the target. Page 14 for information about WesternRed Cedar https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=16439&d=i6qK4iAt_nlolmM6YMCEBlQzQmsG5oovdRIZedk_ZA&u=https%3a%2f%2f www%2ewnps%2eorg%2findex%2ephp%3fpreview%3d1%26option%3dcom%5fdropfiles%26format%3d%26task%3dfro ntfile%2edownload%26catid%3d136%26id%3d502%26Itemid%3d1000000000000 2 CAUTION: External Email Sent from my iPad 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Tuesday, February 15, 2022 10:08 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Poplar Steering Committee~ Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Kelly Graves From: joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 6:47 PM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: Poplar Steering Committee~ CAUTION: External Email Sent from Mail for Windows Hello John, Steve, and Whomever, I have a few quick questions for you (and #4 is a suggestion)! 1. How can I find the City’s Long Term Tree Management Plan that the Park, Trails, etc. Board uses that you mentioned in your project overview page? 2. What are your plans to do with the Lombardys’ wood once they’re cut?? (Quite a few locals I know of would like to see it offered up to local woodworkers/maybe our schools’ shop classes/or offered up to locals for firewood). Offering it to locals first would be a good gesture for those who would want to do the trees justice by making something beautiful out of the wood. Your next option, of course, is to sell them. That wood is worth some $$. It’d be a shame to just throw them all in a chipper. Local should get first dibs, though. 3. Eron Berg and some Port Commissioners think I’d be the perfect person as their Stakeholder. I’m considering it. How do I ‘get on board’ and what’s my timeline for making my decision?? Eron didn’t seem to know. 4. You need to reconsider wiping out the Kah Tai Poplars. Taking the suggestions of the few people on the parks trails, etc. board and running with it, isn’t very diplomatic and considerate of what many long time locals already had made a ‘plan’ for years ago. So what if they aren’t ‘native’!! Neither are other trees and plants in the Lagoon that they cherish and protect (Monteray Cypress, Yellow Lupine, etc.). I’ve heard all the arguments for by that handful of the ‘native ONLY’ folks, and none of them are valid. Thank you! Joni Blanchard 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Tuesday, February 15, 2022 10:09 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Opinion about the Sims Way poplars Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Kelly Graves From: Gail Workman <marksyounglady@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 9:32 AM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Opinion about the Sims Way poplars Hello, I posted the following on Nextdoor in regards to the Sims Way poplars and was told it would be more effective to send it here. Have you seen the gigantic poplar on San Juan that fell apart? It will be much cheaper to cut these poplar trees now than later when they are much bigger, rotting from the inside, and posing a serious hazard. The sooner we get started planting trees that are appropriate for our area, the sooner those trees will mature into their full beauty. Thank you for taking account of one citizen's opinion. Gail Workman 206-604-3370 857 57th Street PT 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Friday, February 18, 2022 12:34 PM To:Sarah Tiffany; John Mauro Subject:FW: NHS-Register for Seattle Trees Webinar 2/24/22 6:30 PM PT Hi Sarah, Can you log this? Thank you! From: Richard and MaryAnn Moore <ptmoores1@q.com> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 8:53 AM To: John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; David Faber <DFaber@cityofpt.us>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: Fwd: NHS-Register for Seattle Trees Webinar 2/24/22 6:30 PM PT CAUTION: External Email Dear John, David, and Steve, We are forwarding this Zoom educational webinar opportunity that we will be attending next week. My wife, MaryAnn, and I have been living and gardening at our home in Port Townsend for 29 years. We applaud the city decision to remove the poplar trees. We hope the Seattle experience in tree planting can be an inspiration for our town. You do not have to be a member of the Northwest Horticultural Society to attend this event. Thanks for listening and for all you do for Port Townsend. Sincerely, Richard and MaryAnn Moore 360 385-2632 Begin forwarded message: From: NHS <info@northwesthort.org> Date: February 18, 2022 at 6:00:11 AM PST To: Richard Moore <ptmoores1@q.com> Subject: NHS-Register for Seattle Trees Webinar 2/24/22 6:30 PM PT Reply-To: NHS <info@northwesthort.org> 2 northwesthort.org View this email in your browser Northwest Horticultural Society REGISTER FOR TREES FOR NEIGHBORHOODS 3 Trees for Neighborhoods Storage Area THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 6:30-8:00 PM PT Trees for Neighborhoods: Community Engagement for Tree Planting in Seattle with Lou Stubecki 4 Since 2009, Trees for Neighborhoods has helped Seattle residents, businesses, and organizations plant over 12,300 trees in their yards and along the street. That's 12,300 more trees working to clean our air and water, make our streets more walkable, and our neighborhoods healthier! Find out about the tree selection process and how this program is so successful at engaging Seattle communities in tree planting. Join Lou Stubecki to learn which trees he particularly likes, explain what makes homeowners successful, and describe what the program looks for in selecting trees. Lou Stubecki is an International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist. Since 1986 he has worked for private tree care companies, the Arboretum, and for the Seattle Department of Transportation Urban Forestry. He is currently managing the Trees for Neighborhoods Program for Trees for Seattle. LOCATION: ZOOM WEBINAR FEE : MEMBERS: $10.00 NON-MEMBERS: $15:00 This recording will be sent within 48 hours and will be available for viewing by the registrant for two weeks. Register for Trees for Neighborhoods Check out the Trees for Neighborhoods website and bring your questions about the program and trees for your garden to the webinar Q&A. https://www.seattle.gov/trees/planting-and-care/trees-for-neighborhoods 5 QUESTIONS: EMAIL info@northwesthort.org or CALL 206-780-8172 Copyright © *2014* *Northwest Horticultural Society*, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you are a member of the Northwest Horticultural Society.. Our mailing address is: Northwest Horticultural Society PO Box 4597 Rollingbay, WA 98061-0597 Add us to your address book unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences FoRTHELovEoFpoptARs fou Hwe GoT T, Bg ,DD,NG t1s0 $ai fidt Hffi htllL -,cfrb ot{€ i ss $x $.'fin i tJ! t7t ili {Ir rt1 I t;'t -..t t'r! f$iil XrurgJ1 \r_qi' 2 *L{:.J = JSnj+ \)rrEE:?:->*-<ggii Ef ,-\'s># En?\ ;: iil;l f, Fr r- H}/N, Tatlst snv' t 8r,* $wvsCuu ;f, .-rlttnp ffifr9 ffia$ f*aF6 &rt,J I {AJT, D trSTRIE"JT'XGN: rt iT.n v7-rnurl^n',.1'r.UnLJJ IuIJLla ! &2. City Council: .Q{nff (Identify u'ho) Conrrnittee Facket fnfo Faek l\o E esponse trlequ ired : I{ame) Q.lx 27 Other: Jrrrn D 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Sunday, March 6, 2022 5:57 PM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: an idea I wish I didn't have to share Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Sarah, Can you log this please? Thanks! Steve From: George Randels <gr321@olypen.com> Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2022 3:00 PM To: Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: an idea I wish I didn't have to share CAUTION: External Email Hi Steve == In light of recent events, it occurs to me that the best Sims Way solution may have to be a compromise, and the only one that would seem to make sense would be to follow through on the plan for the Port side, enabling underbrounding and boatyard expansion, but keeping the Poplars on the lagoon side. This would mean a slow-moving evolution toward consistent treatment that might be completed 10-15 years out. Hardly idea, in my view, but it might make sense. Obviously you can file this in the “for what it’s worth” basked. G 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Thursday, March 10, 2022 5:40 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:Fw: Retaining Sims Way poplars Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Sarah Can you log the comment from Ms. Elayne below? Thank you! Steve From: David Faber <DFaber@cityofpt.us> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 5:00 PM To: Mary Elayne <medunphy@comcast.net>; Amy Howard <AHoward@cityofpt.us>; Aislinn Diamanti <adiamanti@cityofpt.us>; Ben Thomas <bthomas@cityofpt.us>; Monica MickHager <MMickhager@cityofpt.us>; Owen Rowe <orowe@cityofpt.us>; Libby Wennstrom <lwennstrom@cityofpt.us>; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; carol@portofpt.com; pam@portofpt.com; phanke@portofpt.com; eron@portofpt.com; kstreet@jeffpud.org; jrandall@jeffpud.org; kcollins@jeffpud.org; dtoepper@jeffpud.org Subject: Re: Retaining Sims Way poplars Hi Mary Elayne, and my apologies for the delay in responding to you. The Sims Gateway Project/Poplars are a complicated issue with a series of competing interests and a lot of misinformation. The City has not made a final decision or taken final action on any plan regarding the poplars; instead, we (meaning the City, Port, and PUD) recently initiated a stakeholder group (including a certified arborist) to explore the circumstances surrounding the project and the state of the poplars. We have also initiated a public process through the City's Parks, Recreation, Trees, and Trails Advisory Board to receive public input in the stakeholder process. Rest assured that nobody is taking this situation lightly. Thank you! Best, David J. Faber Mayor, City of Port Townsend From: Mary Elayne <medunphy@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 2:02 PM To: David Faber <DFaber@cityofpt.us>; Amy Howard <AHoward@cityofpt.us>; Aislinn Diamanti <adiamanti@cityofpt.us>; Ben Thomas <bthomas@cityofpt.us>; Monica MickHager <MMickhager@cityofpt.us>; Owen Rowe <orowe@cityofpt.us>; Libby Wennstrom <lwennstrom@cityofpt.us>; John Mauro <JMauro@cityofpt.us>; carol@portofpt.com <carol@portofpt.com>; pam@portofpt.com <pam@portofpt.com>; phanke@portofpt.com <phanke@portofpt.com>; eron@portofpt.com <eron@portofpt.com>; kstreet@jeffpud.org <kstreet@jeffpud.org>; jrandall@jeffpud.org <jrandall@jeffpud.org>; kcollins@jeffpud.org <kcollins@jeffpud.org>; dtoepper@jeffpud.org 2 <dtoepper@jeffpud.org> Subject: Retaining Sims Way poplars Dear Port Townsend City Manager Mauro and Members of the City Council: I have been following The Leader’s coverage of the proposal to remove the Lombardy Poplars along Sims Way bordering Kah Tai Lagoon and the boatyard. One of the reasons apparently is their “short” lifespan. It got my attention because around 1967 when some of the present trees were planted, I recall the reason the old trees failed likely wasn’t age but because salty sand dredged from the boat haven was dumped along the lagoon side of Sims Way and damaged the existing trees. Both of my parents, Judge A. Clemens Grady and Irene Joy Grady, were involved in civic affairs. In the ‘60s, my mother led the Port Townsend Beautification Committee (the group that created the “Welcome” sign and plantings at the “H”- shaped intersection about a mile south of the City limits). About 1967 that group helped replant poplars along Kah Tai. I remember being there one day with my husband and our car wheels almost got stuck in the sand at the north end. I’m a native of Port Townsend and long before the expansion of businesses along that stretch of highway, the poplars always were a welcoming symbol of the city. It is not clear to me that the present replacement proposal is giving any weight to the historic presence of these trees - in what is advertised as Historic Port Townsend. From my history, I believe the poplars as a tree variety have endured well over the decades, hurt mostly by the dumping of the salty dredged sand. I urge you to insure more dedicated care for the existing trees and preserve this iconic landscape. Thank you. Mary Elayne (Grady) Dunphy 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Monday, March 21, 2022 7:38 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Recent Tree Assessment~ Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Please file. Kelly Graves From: joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:57 PM To: Kevin Streett <kstreett@jeffpud.org>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us>; Eron Berg <Eron@portofpt.com>; engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Recent Tree Assessment~ Thank you, City, for your new webpage! It's very informative. I just read Katy BIgelow's Poplar tree assessment report. I needed clarification on her remark in her summary that stated to the effect that 'no matter where PUD undergrounding occurs, critical root damage would occur and likely cause the trees' demise'. So, I wrote to her and asked for clarification. Here are my questions and her responses in blue: If the PUD trenches along the existing Port fenceline (one of their options), which is 25' away from the Poplars and beyond the 3' stormwater ditch, that has already been dug between the Poplars and the fenceline, would it still likely kill the Poplars? No. If the heavy machinery worked from the Port side to dig the trench and stayed off the main roots closer to the tree, wouldn't that be a safe option for the PUD trenching? Sure I just thought that was an important correction that needed to be known as all options are still being considered for this whole project. It is also good for us all to know that her assessment summary stated that 'the Poplar trees will likely stand with low but increasing risk', and 'I did not observe any large trunks or bases of trunks with a high potential to fall onto a target'. (By the ISA hazard rating chart, which she used, low risk means: Insignificant minor issues with no concerns for years to come, and the eventual moderate risk to come would be: no concerns for 10 years or more). That ISA hazard chart was listed at the end of her 2013 Assessment report. Although she suspected basal rot in the 2013 trees, also, they were still classified as 'low risk' of trunk failure. 2 Her suggestions for maintaining the health of the Poplars and mitigating their offenses (root invasions, sucker sprouts) were also quite helpful. Can be found at the end of her 2012 Assessment report, also. Perhaps if any trees are left standing, these suggestions could be heeded. I agree with her in that it's an unlikely location for any kind of a substantial wildlife habitat being a busy work area with lots of noise, along with all the busy traffic. I also read the Kah Tai '86 Landscape Plan where it is recommended to selectively thin the Poplars to keep an open view into the Park, and to do pruning and sucker mowing to keep the Poplars healthy and contained. This recommendation is keeping with the following Gateway Plan approved after in 1993 that the Kah Tai group were a part of creating. The Plan that recommended replanting any aging or compromising Poplars with the younger ones that were purposely planted. Thank you for providing such a comprehensive list of references for everyone's overall understanding. This information will provide a good basis for working out a compromising plan for the better good of our whole community. Joni Blanchard 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Monday, March 21, 2022 11:34 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: TREES Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged For the file. Kelly Graves -----Original Message----- From: Linda <lebranemusic@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 11:12 AM To: engagept@cityofpt.us Subject: TREES SAVE THE POPLARS!!! PUT IT TO A VOTE OF THOSE OF US WHO LIVE HERE. NOT SOME JOHNNY-COME-LATELY BUREAUCRAT Sent from my iPhone 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Tuesday, March 15, 2022 7:26 AM To:Sarah Tiffany; Steve King Subject:FW: Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion Project Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed For Sarah to file, and Steve can you answer her questions? Kelly Graves From: Kelly Drake <kellydrake22@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 5:27 PM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Sims Gateway and Boat Yard Expansion Project Hello! I am a Port Townsend resident who loves the popular trees on Sims Way. So, I wonder if it would be possible to bury the power lines without removing the trees? One more question is how does the boatyard expand if you're just replanting new trees? Thank you, Kelly Drake 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Friday, December 10, 2021 8:47 AM To:Steve King; Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Future of the Boatyard Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Categories:Blue Category Kelly Graves From: Privacy Enabled <krdmps@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 9:33 PM To: engagePT@cityofpt.us Subject: Future of the Boatyard Friends, As a worker in the Boat Haven boatyard, I want to state an inconvenient truth that must be put on the table for discussion. The businesses at the boatyard are all hostage to the whims of the Port of Port Townsend. We are equivalent to "owners" of manufactured homes in a leased land park. Real estate is becoming so precious that motivations are skewed and morality is pushed aside. Even practicality, survival and a healthy economy are pushed aside. A that matters to some people is gold. And the love of gold destroys towns. How will the City of Port Townsend protect the vital industry that is the heartbeat of this town? The boatyard is one of the only places young people can work and are paid living wages. But every business is under threat of closing when they can no longer afford the rent. And that will happen, soon. Each lease, as it comes up for renewal, may face harsh increases as the years go by, until the boatyard is extinguished and hotels dark our view of the coastline. The Port of Port Townsend should be cooperatively owned by all of us. Everyone in Port Townsend has a stake in the success and continuity of business here. The businesses at the boatyard should be partial owners of the yard itself, and we, the people of Port Townsend should earn the rents. The business I work for needs to expand and build a state of the art facility that would bring boatyard work into an ecologically and socially minded future. How can we invest in our future if the POPT is holding our future in its greedy hands? There has to be a way to ensure the survival of the workers here in Port Townsend. Without young workers, OUR TOWN WILL DIE. WITHOUT BOATYARDS WE CAN'T HAVE BOATS. Boats provide alternative transportation for emergency supplies and travel during natural disasters, especially in the Puget Sound. 2 Please consider extinguishing the POPT and forcing it to become a Co-Op. They are big, dangerous and full of political and profit motivated agenda. What say you? krdmps@hotmail.com 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Emily Coler Sent:Wednesday, April 6, 2022 9:46 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Sims Gateway Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Emily Coler From: Brent A Vadopalas <brentv@uw.edu> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 9:44 AM To: engagept@cityofpt.us Cc: brent@vadopalas.org Subject: Sims Gateway Good morning, Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in on the proposed gateway project. My main points are these: · Jefferson County PUD: $700,000 for tree removal, undergrounding power lines and installing a walking path. It is not logical to both remove trees and underground the power lines. Removing trees that interfere with overhead lines makes sense. Undergrounding the power does not necessitate tree removal. · Port of Port Townsend: $900,000 for expansion of the boatyard Given that the PT Boat Haven has serious wastewater infiltration issues (pervious surfaces), plus direct and indirect discharge to surface waters, it seems illogical to expand the boatyard before tackling these serious environmental issues. · City of Port Townsend: $370,000 total for replanting the Boat Haven side of Sims Way (estimated $170,000) and for Lombardy poplar tree removal on the Kah Tai Lagoon side (estimated $200,000) It seems to me the City of Port Townsend has far greater issues to deal with, and to spend money on, than healthy tree removal and replacement. The claim that the poplars have exceeded their lifespan is incorrect—they were planted in the 1960s I believe. The claim that poplars are more prone to falling than many other trees is likewise incorrect. 2 The public infrastructure grant could be spent in a more productive way than the proposed gateway project. Please reconsider the logic of what’s being proposed. Sincerely, Brent 1 Steve King From:Kelly Graves Sent:Tuesday, May 3, 2022 10:06 AM To:Sarah Tiffany; Steve King Subject:FW: Save the Poplars Kelly Graves From: Gateway Poplar Alliance <info@poplaralliance.org> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 6:14 PM To: engagept@cityofpt.us Subject: Save the Poplars CAUTION: External Email Dear Engage PT, Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Attached is the Friends of the Poplars workshop presentation, and below is the general outline of the narrative that accompanied the presentation. Please share this with the Stakeholders Committee members. Thank you! Andrea Hegland Gateway Poplar Alliance The April 23, 2022 Gateway Alliance presentation slide show was accompanied by a narrative that wove the story together in support of our conclusions. There were several main points: (The slides may have slightly different numbers depending on the version you view.) The Port and the PUD have a genuine economic development project that can be executed without cutting down the poplars. (Slide 27) The city does not have a genuine economic development project: It has no economic analysis for its tree cutting plan and its rationale for cutting the poplars is a plan written in 1986 (Slide 56) that addresses Kah Tai Park, not the Sims Way right-of-way, a transportation corridor used by 10,000 cars per day. 2 The city has made its Parks Board the "Public forum" for public involvement, along with a "stakeholder" committee which reports to it. (Slides 35 and 36) The city has arranged to have the Parks Board, already on record in favor of the removal of the poplars (Slide 39)--its chair is Admiralty Audubon's newsletter editor--shape the project along with a "stakeholder" committee with Audubon participation (Slide 36). Admiralty Audubon is on record promoting the removal of poplars from Kah Tai Park. (Slide 39) A majority of the members of the "stakeholder" committee (Slide 42) are in favor of the removal of the poplars. This committee will report to the Parks Board which in turn makes recommendations to the city council. The entire process of vetting the city's Sims Way project is anything but genuinely public, transparent and open. In fact, from the very beginning the outcome of the city's "planning" has almost certainly been intended to remove the poplars. Workshop Presentation 4-23 without Animations f... 1 Steve King From:Kelly Graves Sent:Friday, May 6, 2022 8:22 AM To:Steve King; Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Clarification Sara for the file, Steve can you respond? Kelly Graves From: Gateway Poplar Alliance <info@poplaralliance.org> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 9:45 PM To: engagept@cityofpt.us; Sarah Tiffany <stiffany@cityofpt.us>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Cc: joni blanchard <jonijobone@hotmail.com> Subject: Clarification Dear Engage PT, Can you please clarify what the purpose of the Sims Way Stakeholder Committee is, and what the scope of their work is defined as? It appears the decision to cut the poplars down has already been made. The City's project website says that the goal is to cut the poplars down. Can you please clarify? Project goals include, but are not limited to:  Positive economic impact for the Port (job creation)  Elimination of public safety issue (tree hazards)  Enhanced accessibility to the boatyard  Improved reliability of power infrastructure  Replacement of Lombardy poplars, an emerging and eventual need for the City  Environmental stewardship of Kah Tai Lagoon and support for growth of plantings of native species that has already occurred as recommended in the 1986 Landscape Plan  Reduced water needs and include climate change considerations  Improved bio-diversity and create an aesthetically pleasing gateway 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Steve King Sent:Monday, May 9, 2022 7:10 AM To:Sarah Tiffany Subject:FW: Stakeholder Committee - hand-picked and with a documented bias Sarah, Can you log this? Thanks! Steve From: Kelly Graves <KGraves@cityofpt.us> Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 7:02 AM To: Sarah Tiffany <stiffany@cityofpt.us>; Steve King <sking@cityofpt.us> Subject: FW: Stakeholder Committee - hand-picked and with a documented bias Kelly Graves From: Gateway Poplar Alliance <info@poplaralliance.org> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2022 2:02 PM To: engagept@cityofpt.us; publiccomment@cityofpt.us; kcollins@jeffpud.org; dtoepper@jeffpud.org; jrandall@jeffpud.org; chasse@portofpt.com; phanke@portofpt.com; pam@portofpt.com; jsloan@ptleader.com; bkelly@ptleader.com; Gateway Poplar Alliance <info@poplaralliance.org> Subject: Stakeholder Committee - hand-picked and with a documented bias CAUTION: External Email Dear Engage PT and Elected officials, Thank you for the opportunity to comment. It appears that the 9 member Stakeholder Committee that is supposed to have an open mind about our Gateway Poplars already has a predetermined bias against the Poplars. A majority are already on record to cut our community trees down. The City's website still says that one of the project goals is to cut the trees down. · Replacement of Lombardy poplars, an emerging and eventual need for the City 2 The Port informed us that the selection process for the Stakeholder Committee was an open one, available to the general public. We were also told that all options were on the table. We subsequently requested copies and/or documentation of that notificiation to the general public for this committee formation...and the City was unable to provide us with any announcement for openings that was made available to the general public. The Stakeholder Committee members appear to have been hand picked and with an existing bias against our poplars. The Parks Board was able to choose 4 of the 9 members, and the City indicated from the outset that the Admiralty Audubon would be invited. The Port was guaranteed a spot as well. The general public was not allowed to serve on this hand-picked committee, which has been stacked with anti-poplar votes. We expect our elected officials to engage in truly democratic processes backed by democratic principles. Clearly that is not what has occured. Below are the slides from the Gateway Poplar Alliance workshop held on April 23, illustrating just this issue, one of many about this ill-conceived project. The entire presentation is available for download at www.poplaralliance.org 3 4 5 6 1 Sarah Tiffany From:Kelly Graves Sent:Monday, May 16, 2022 9:47 AM To:Sarah Tiffany; Steve King Subject:FW: Contact Us Form Submission For the log – Sims Gateway Kelly Graves From: Vicki <vickilegman@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 9:44 AM To: Kelly Graves <KGraves@cityofpt.us> Subject: Re: Contact Us Form Submission Thank you. Been doing some reading and poplars are short lived trees. They’re beautiful, but removal seems to, sadly, make sense. Vicki On May 16, 2022, at 8:47 AM, Kelly Graves <KGraves@cityofpt.us> wrote: Hello Vicki, You can see information about this project here: https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard- expansion-project Kelly Graves From: Website Form <porttownsend-wa@municodeweb.com> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2022 6:39 PM To: Webmaster <Webmaster@cityofpt.us> Subject: Contact Us Form Submission CAUTION: External Email Submitted on Saturday, May 14, 2022 - 6:38pm Submitted by anonymous user: 24.113.154.113 Submitted values are: First Name Vicki 2 Last Name Legman Email VickiLegman@gmail.com Question/Comment What is the status of the proposed tree removal on Sims way? What is the purpose of the removal? What alternatives to removal are being explored? Thank you,Vicki Legman Port Townsend resident The results of this submission may be viewed at: https://cityofpt.us/node/7/submission/41694 Special Joint Meeting of City of Port Townsend, Port of Port Townsend and Jefferson County Public Utility District AGENDA Monday, September 12, 2022, 6:30 p.m. Point Hudson Pavilion Building, 355 Hudson Street, Port Townsend (seating limited) and also online Via https://zoom.us/ – or call (253) 215-8782, use Webinar ID: 862 6904 3651, Password: 911887 Send comment to publiccomment@portofpt.com, publiccomment@cityofpt.us, customerservice@jeffpud.org I. Call to Order, Roll Call & Pledge of Allegiance a. City Council b. Port Commission c. PUD Commission II. Special Business Item – Memorandum of Understanding for Collaborating on Projects Along the Sims Gateway Corridor a. Staff Report ....................................................................................................................... 2-61 b. Public Comment (limited to 3 minutes per person), in person and Zoom participants c. Joint Elected Official Deliberations d. Possible Action on Draft Memorandum of Understanding by City Council, Public Utility District Commission and Port Commission. III. Adjournment a. City Council b. Port Commission c. PUD Commission PORT OF PORT TOWNSEND  AGENDA MEMO    Port of Port Townsend 2022‐9‐12 Special Commission Meeting Sims Gateway & Boatyard Expansion Project Page 1 of 3  DATE: 9/12/2022  TO: Commission  FROM: Eron Berg, Executive Director, Eric Toews, Deputy Director & Matt Klontz, Director of  Capital Projects  SUBJECT: Sims Gateway & Boatyard Expansion Project      ISSUE    Should the Commission approve the draft memorandum of understanding between the City of Port  Townsend, Port of Port Townsend and Jefferson Public Utility District No. 1 and authorize the  Executive Director to execute all necessary documents to implement the project?    BACKGROUND    The PUD owns and operates an 115kV electrical transmission line that runs parallel to Sims Way at  the outside edge of the boatyard. Along the same alignment and very close to those power lines,  there is a row of Lombardy poplar trees that are near and above the power lines. These trees were  planted between 1964 and 19761 which makes them about 50 years old. On June 25, 2021, Port  staff witnessed arcing between the power lines and the trees and on one occasion experienced an  electrical tingling sensation while standing in the Boat Yard. Burn marks were plainly visible on the  poplar trees at the height of the lines.    As a result of the safety concerns, last summer, the Executive Director authorized the PUD to enter  Port property for any emergency tree trimming that they deemed appropriate and on July 14, 2021,  the Commission authorized the PUD to fully remove those trees on Port property that create a  safety hazard.    The City, PUD and Port continued to work together to develop a project that not only addresses the  safety concerns, but also implements the City’s Gateway Plan (which includes tree replanting and  pedestrian amenities) while also expanding the Boat Yard. This became what we now call the Sims  Gateway & Boatyard Expansion Project and on September 17, 2021, the Commission authorized a  Public Infrastructure Fund (PIF) grant application to Jefferson County. That grant was awarded and  the City, Port and PUD selected a design team to begin design work while also planning more public  process and engagement.    As a result of concerns raised by members of the community, including an organized group, the  Gateway Poplar Alliance, the three entities shifted from designing the imagined project to a full  public process that was intended to address the problems identified, conceptualize various  alternatives, and culminate with a proposed preferred alternative. To aid the engagement process a    1 Simpson, Peter, City of Dreams (Jefferson County Historical Society, 2018) at page 192  Page 2 of 61 Port of Port Townsend 2022‐9‐12 Special Commission Meeting Sims Gateway & Boatyard Expansion Project Page 2 of 3  stakeholder advisory group was created. The stakeholder advisory group worked with the  consultant, Port, PUD, and City staff to develop alternatives during nine stakeholder meetings held  over the course of five months from April to August 2022.The following volunteers composed the  stakeholder advisory group.     Name Organization Diversity in Representation  Jennifer Rotermund PRTTAB Liaison Arboriculture/Landscape Architecture  Ron Sikes Admiralty Audubon Kah Tai Nature Park  Forest Shomer Resident Local Arborist  Dan Burden Resident Transportation and Multimodal  Mobility  Russell Hill Resident Civil Engineer ‐ Design   Joni Blanchard  Resident Boatyard  Arlene Allen Chamber Tourism  Steve Mader Resident WSDOT/NEPA/SEPA landscape, native  plants, forestry  Sarah McQuillen Resident Overall Design    Additionally, on August 6, 2022, a community open house was held to share preliminary findings  and hear from the community. Approximately 100 people attended that public open house. On  August 23, 2022, three project design alternatives were presented to the City’s Parks, Tree, Trail,  Recreation Advisory Committee (PTTRAB). At this meeting, the PTTRAB identified a preferred  alternative: the full expansion alternative presented tonight for your consideration and possible  action.    The three alternatives presented to the PTTRAB included:   A "null" or no expansion option.   A "partial" expansion option of 20 feet measured from the existing concrete curb (12 feet  when measured from the existing chain link fence).   A "full" expansion option, about 35 feet from the curb to the Port's property line along Sims  Way.    In summary, the no expansion option would require the Travelift to observe a 20‐foot setback from  the energized power lines, effectively reducing the boatyard by 20 feet from what is used today.  The partial expansion option would require removing the Lombardy poplar trees without the  benefit of a fully expanded yard, since the trees and boats would be too close to each other. The full  expansion option would provide the most operational flexibility the to the Boat Haven since  commercial fishing vessels up to 60 feet could be staged for work by the maritime trades.     DISCUSSION    The key objectives for the project from the Port’s perspective are to improve financial and  operational sustainability of Boat Haven and improve the interface between Sims Way and the  boatyard thru:  Page 3 of 61 Port of Port Townsend 2022‐9‐12 Special Commission Meeting Sims Gateway & Boatyard Expansion Project Page 3 of 3   Making full use of the existing property ownership increases the boatyard work area and  flexibility for placing boats. Property line is along row of poplars.   Increasing the length of boat stalls from 40 ft to 65 ft provides for serving larger vessels too.   Providing a safe environment for boatworks by avoiding overhead wires.  Providing reliable power service for boat repair operations by providing new secondary  service and pedestals.   Preserving flexibility of property by minimizing the impact of the PUD easement  encumbrance above and below ground.   Creating a visually appealing and functional boatyard interface with Sims Way by providing  fencing along property line.   Increasing community resiliency by sustaining the economic vitality and health of the  marine trades.    Action on the proposed motion tonight will shift staff from supporting the public engagement  process to designing the preferred alternative and seeking permits to construct the project. The  Port’s proposed boatyard expansion will require a number of permits that include their own process  and opportunity for citizen participation. The timeline for moving forward includes refining the  design concept and the initial permitting in the Fall of 2022, completing design, permitting, and  construction documents for bidding in the Spring of 2023, and construction in the Fall of  2023/Spring of 2024.    FISCAL IMPACT  No new impact: this project is included in the 2022 adopted budget. The Public Infrastructure grant  award was $1 million, and was allocated to the Port, PUD and City as $450k, $350k, and $200k,  respectively.  The total project cost for the preferred alternative is estimated to be about $2 million of  which, roughly $1 million is associated with boatyard improvements.    ATTACHMENTS    City of Port Townsend Agenda Bill on the same topic.    RECOMMENDATION    Motion to approve the draft memorandum of understanding between the City of Port Townsend,  Port of Port Townsend and Jefferson Public Utility District No. 1 and authorizing the Executive  Director to execute all necessary documents to implement the project.    Page 4 of 61 Agenda Bill AB22-082 Meeting Date: September 12, 2022 Agenda Item: ☐ Regular Business Meeting ☐ Workshop/Study Session ☒ Special Business Meeting Submitted By: Steve King, PW Director Date Submitted: September 7, 2022 Department: Public Works Contact Phone: 360-379-5090 SUBJECT: Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City, Port of Port Townsend, and the Jefferson County PUD and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to carry out the City’s responsibilities as listed in the MOU, including consultant and construction contracts. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 2023 Budget ☐ Consent ☐ Resolution Expenditure Amount: $170,000 ☐ Staff Report ☐ Ordinance Included in Budget? Yes ☐ No ☒ ☐ Contract Approval ☒ Other: Motion ☐ Public Hearing (Legislative, unless otherwise noted) ☐ 3-Year Strategic Plan: 4 - Ensure sustainable future for public services and facilities Cost Allocation Fund: 305 CIP Street SUMMARY STATEMENT: The City of Port Townsend, Port of Port Townend, and Jefferson County PUD have been working collaboratively to address safety concerns reported by the Port of Port Townsend in summer 2021 regarding poplar trees along Sims Way and power transmission lines alongside the boatyard. Since then, the agencies have worked to coordinate efforts to ameliorate short-term safety concerns as well as provide a greater set of community benefits, including but not limited to positive economic impacts for the community via the Port, enhanced boatyard accessibility, improved power reliability, improved nonmotorized connectivity and environmental stewardship. The agencies were successful in applying for and receiving Public Infrastructure Fund support from Jefferson County. An extensive public engagement process has been underway since the Parks, Recreation, Tree and Trails Advisory Board (PRTTAB) was briefed on August 24, 2021. Over the course of the year since August 2021, the three agencies including the City agreed, coordinated and participated in an approach that included PRTTAB, a volunteer stakeholder group, virtual and in-person open houses and town halls. Those meeting videos, agendas and all related materials can be found at the City’s Engage PT website at https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and-boatyard-expansion-project. Page 5 of 61 The stakeholder group discussed and worked through various alternatives with staff and consultant support, landing on a preferred alternative. The PRTTAB recommended forwarding the preferred alternative as the design concept to follow for the project, now being considered for action as a coordinated Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) at the joint special public meeting on September 12, 2022, at the Port Pavilion Building in Point Hudson at 6:30 p.m. The MOU provides a summary background of the work to date, the project scope, and an outline of each agency’s respective responsibilities for project implementation. A presentation will be provided to the three elected bodies at the meeting that mirrors the presentation provided to the Parks, Recreation, Trees, and Trails Advisory Board on August 23, 2022. Public comments will be received at the meeting after a detailed presentation is provided by staff either in person or virtually. Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached MOU and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents to carry out the City’s responsibilities under the MOU. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Meeting announcement flyer 2. Memorandum of Understanding 3. Presentation (See the August 23rd, Parks Recreation, Trees, and Trails Advisory Board meeting at the engage PT link above.) CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to approve the MOU and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to carry out the City’s responsibilities as listed in the MOU, including consultant and construction contracts. ALTERNATIVES: ☒ Take No Action ☒ Refer to Committee ☒ Refer to Staff ☒ Postpone Action ☐ Remove from Consent Agenda ☐ Waive Council Rules and approve Ordinance ____ ☐ Other: Page 6 of 61 SIMS GATEWAY & BOATYARD EXPANSION  PUBLIC MEETING Monday, September 12, 2022 – 6:30 P.M.  See Agency Websites for Agenda (In‐Person & Zoom)  Point Hudson Pavilion (355 Hudson Street) Joint Special Meeting of the  Port of Port Townsend, City of  Port Townsend, and Jefferson  PUD No. 1 Page 7 of 61 CITY/PORT/PUD - MOU CONCERNING SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 THE SIMS/GATEWAY PROJECT 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU): SIMS GATEWAY & BOATYARD EXPANSION PROJECT Parties to the Agreement (“the Parties”): 1.The City of Port Townsend (City), a non-charter code city and municipal corporation of the State of Washington. The City owns the Kah Tai Nature Park and is responsible for management of the SR20 right-of-way outside of the existing pavement. 2.The Port of Port Townsend (Port), a special purpose district organized in the State of Washington to own and operate maritime, aviation, commercial, and industrial facilities throughout Jefferson County. The Port owns Port Townsend Boat Haven Boatyard and Marina immediately adjacent to Sims Way. 3.The Jefferson County Public Utility District No. 1 (PUD), a special purpose district organized in the State of Washington to own and operate water, sewer, electric, and fiber optic utilities. The PUD owns a 115 KV electrical transmission located in a utility easement that traverses the edge of the Port’s boatyard. Project Background: 1.A safety issue concerning interaction between poplar trees along Sims Way and the power transmission lines along the boatyard was discovered by the Port and confirmed by the PUD in the summer of 2021. 2.The Port, PUD and City each recognized that they have unique and significant interests and responsibilities involving the Sims Gateway Corridor: a.The City owns Kah Tai Nature Park on the north side of Sims Way, is responsible for managing the SR20 right-of-way, and is the general-purpose government under Chapter 36.70A RCW responsible for adopting and administering the comprehensive plan and development regulations that govern the Gateway Corridor, including its Gateway Development Plan (a subarea plan incorporated within the City’s Comprehensive Plan); b.The Port owns the Port Townsend Boatyard immediately abutting Sims Way in which the overhead electrical transmission lines are located; and c.The PUD owns a 115KV electrical transmission line that serves much of downtown Port Townsend which is located along the Sims Way right-of-way. Because a row of Lombardy poplar trees straddles the right-of-way line between SR 20 and the Port of Port Townsend’s Boat Haven Boatyard, the Parties agreed that a collaborative project involving the City, the Port, and the PUD would most be the most efficient means to address the Page 8 of 61 CITY/PORT/PUD - MOU CONCERNING SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 THE SIMS/GATEWAY PROJECT 2 transmission line safety issue along the south side of Sims Way, expand the boatyard, and implement the City’s Gateway Development Plan. 3.In October 2021, the Parties submitted a joint application to the Jefferson County Public Infrastructure Fund (PIF) Board requesting funding to complete a collaborative, multi- jurisdictional, project involving tree removal, expansion of the Port’s boatyard, undergrounding of the PUD’s electrical transmission lines, and associated streetscape improvements. 4.On November 15, 2021, the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners approved the Parties’ PIF grant request for project funding in the amount of $1,000,000. 5.On November 10, 2021, and December 15, 2021, the Parties conducted townhall meetings to apprise citizens of the anticipated scope of the PIF funded project and outline anticipated next steps. Based on initial community feedback, the Parties agreed that a comprehensive public process was needed to engage and inform the public, more fully develop project alternatives for consideration by decisionmakers, and recommend a “preferred” alternative for implementation. 6.The public process agreed upon by the Parties involved the following: a.Retaining a consultant to assist with developing project alternatives and to lead the public engagement effort; and b.Appointing a Citizen Stakeholder Committee to represent a diverse cross-section of community interests, assist in refining the alternatives, and recommend a preferred project alternative; and c.Review and evaluation of the Stakeholder Committee’s preferred alternative by the City’s Parks Recreation Trees and Trails Advisory Board (PRTTAB) together with a formal recommendation by the PRTTAB to the City Council. 7.The Parties agreed that the Port should take the lead in soliciting qualifications from qualified professionals to complete concept plans and specifications for the Sims Way Gateway Plan Implementation and Boat Yard Expansion Project. On March 31, 2022, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was published. Following a formal selection process, the Port selected SCJ Alliance to assist the Parties with the project. 8.The City of Port Townsend took the lead in convening the Citizen Stakeholder Committee. The Stakeholder Committee was comprised of nine members representing key interests and areas of expertise, including Boatyard marine trades, Kah Tai Nature Park, arborists, landscapers, local tourism, transportation, project constructability, environmental stewardship, and citizens at large. The Stakeholder Committee met a total of eight times between April 12, 2022, and August 16, 2022, and held an open house on August 6, 2022, to invite public comment on the project. 9.On August 16, 2022, the Stakeholder Committee, consultant, and staff completed the process of developing a preferred alternative for consideration by the PRTTAB. The preferred alternative featured removal of the poplar trees along the boundary of the Port’s boatyard, expansion of Page 9 of 61 CITY/PORT/PUD - MOU CONCERNING SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 THE SIMS/GATEWAY PROJECT 3 the boatyard to the Port’s northerly ownership boundary and undergrounding of the PUD’s 115 KV electrical transmission line. In arriving at its preferred alternative, the Stakeholder Committee considered alternatives to full expansion, and a wide variety of factors ranging from pedestrian mobility, environmental stewardship, boatyard/right-of-way interface, aesthetics, and replacement tree and shrub species for the streetscape. 10.On August 23, 2022, the City’s PRTTAB considered the work of the Stakeholder Committee along with the public comments from the open house, emails, and in-person comments. The PRTTAB endorsed the preferred alternative developed by the Stakeholder Committee and staff and recommended it to the City Council with the understanding that it would also be reviewed and considered by the Port and PUD Commissions. 11.Throughout the above-described public engagement effort, the Parties have sought to provide the public with timely and complete information concerning the project and decision-making timeline and process. The City’s “Engage PT” website and Sims Gateway Boatyard Expansion Project page has been used throughout the effort to accomplish this, and citizens have been afforded a variety of means to stay informed and participate, including the following: video and in-person attendance of all Stakeholder Committee meetings and the meeting of the PRTTAB; opportunities to submit comments online via the “Engage PT” website; and attendance and participation in a public Open House meeting held on August 6, 2022. 12.Separate and distinct from the project scope described in this MOU, the Parties understand and acknowledge the PUD’s need to undertake near-term steps to ensure safe and reliable electrical power supply to the community that may involve the trimming or removal of selected poplar trees consistent with its statutory and regulatory authority under RCW 64.12.035 and 197-11- 800(23)(c). Project Scope: The preferred alternative developed by the Stakeholder Committee and recommended by the City’s PRTTAB incorporates the following key features: •Expansion of the Port Townsend Boatyard to the Port’s north property line; •Removal of the poplar trees on the south side of Sims Way adjacent to the boatyard; •Placing the 115 KV electrical transmission powerlines underground; •Replacing the existing substandard power supply to the boatyard with upgraded electrical distribution infrastructure and capacity; •Replanting the right-of-way adjacent to the boatyard with appropriate street trees and shrubs; •Installing a pedestrian path between Haines Street and the existing sidewalk near Benedict Street; and •Over time, thinning and replacing the poplars on the north side of Sims Way (i.e., the south side of Kah Tai Nature Park). Page 10 of 61 CITY/PORT/PUD - MOU CONCERNING SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 THE SIMS/GATEWAY PROJECT 4 Project Implementation: The parties will work together to implement the project scope as set forth below. City Responsibilities: 1.Sims Gateway & Boatyard Expansion Project. In its role as property owner and right-of-way manager, the City will move forward with the PRTTAB’s preferred alternative which includes pedestrian improvements and new tree plantings along Sims Way/SR 20 on the boatyard side and a gradual thinning of the Lombardy poplars on the Kah Tai Nature Park side. The City will be the lead entity for work on the Kah Tai side of Sims Way. 2.Planning. The City will initiate a separate process to incorporate the work of the Stakeholder Committee and PRTTAB in amendments to the Gateway Development Plan and Comprehensive Plan. Subsequent plan amendments will be subject to programmatic environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW as required by law. 3.Permitting. The City will process any permits related to the project described in this MOU as required by law. The intent of Section 3 is to distinguish the City’s dual role as project owner and land use regulatory authority. Port Commission Finding and Port Responsibilities: The Port Commission finds that the existing conditions in the Port Townsend Boatyard with the proximity of the powerlines and poplars and vessels in an area of mobile straddle crane operations is untenable and represents a significant threat to the economic viability of the boatyard and marine trades in Jefferson County. Consistent with this finding, the Port affirms the following: 1.Sims Gateway & Boatyard Expansion Project. The Port supports the recommendation of the preferred alternative from the City’s PRTTAB and reaffirms the Executive Director’s authority to advance the design and permitting of the Port Townsend Boatyard Expansion Project. The Port will be the lead entity for project elements concerning the south side of Sims Way, except for electrical utilities and infrastructure which are a PUD responsibility. 2.Collaboration. The Port will coordinate and collaborate with the City on elements of the project in the Sims Way/SR 20 right-of-way and with the PUD on power distribution for the boatyard. Page 11 of 61 CITY/PORT/PUD - MOU CONCERNING SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 THE SIMS/GATEWAY PROJECT 5 PUD Responsibilities: 1.Electrical Service and Safety. The Parties acknowledge that the PUD has independent obligations and duties regarding the development, maintenance, and operation of its electrical utility facilities and infrastructure. Nothing in this MOU limits the duties, obligations, immunities, and actions that the PUD Board of Commissioners may take to maintain and operate its facilities and infrastructure. 2.Sims Gateway & Boatyard Expansion Project. The PUD supports the recommendation of the preferred alternative from the City’s PRTTAB and reaffirms the General Manager’s authority to advance the design in coordination with the Port for work on south side of Sims Way. 3.Collaboration. The PUD will collaborate and coordinate with the Port on the design and construction of an electrical distribution system to serve the Boatyard. APPROVED AND SIGNED THIS 12th day of September 2022 by the City of Port Townsend: ______________________________ David Faber, Mayor City of Port Townsend Attest: Approved as to form: ______________________________ ______________________________ Alyssa Rodrigues, City Clerk Heidi Greenwood, City Attorney Page 12 of 61 APPROVED AND SIGNED THIS 12th day of September 2022 by the Port of Port Townsend: ______________________________ ______________________________ Pamela A. Petranek, President Carol L. Hasse, Vice President Port Commission Port Commission Attest: Approved as to form: ______________________________ ______________________________ Peter W. Hanke, Secretary Port Attorney Port Commission APPROVED AND SIGNED THIS 12th day of September 2022 by PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County: ______________________________ ______________________________ Dan Toepper, President Kenneth Collins, Vice President Board of Commissioners Board of Commissioners Attest: Approved as to form: ______________________________ ______________________________ Jeff Randall, Secretary Joel Paisner, Board of Commissioners Legal Counsel Page 13 of 61 Sims Way Gateway and Boatyard Expansion Project Parks, Recreation, Tree and Trail Advisory Board Meeting –Aug. 23, 2022 Page 14 of 61 Overview Photographs illustrate conditions in the summer of 2021 when problem between powerlines and wires were first raised in the boatyard. Port Prop. Line Page 15 of 61 A Year of Learning Much has been learned over the course of a year including details about boatyard operations, safety requirements, tree health, soil conditions, aesthetic considerations, constructability, and much more. Page 16 of 61 Appreciation The Project Team would like to say, “Thank you!” to all of the Stakeholders who generously volunteered considerable time and brought diverse perspectives to the table to help shape and develop the materials. Stakeholders include: Joni Blanchard (boatyard works) Forest Shomer (arboriculture and Kah Tail Nature Park experience) Ron Sikes (Audubon and Kah Tai Nature Park experience) Russell Hill (constructability and design) Steve Mader (urban forestry, landscape, and environmental stewardship) Dan Burden (complete Streets/multimodal transportation) Jennifer Rotermund (PRTTAB liaison, arboriculture, and landscape arch.) Arlene Alen (Chamber of Commerce and tourism) Sarah McQuillen (overall design) Page 17 of 61 Meeting Objective & Decision-Making Process 1.Provide a comprehensive overview of the efforts for this project over the last year. 2.Present a preferred design concept alternative for Board consideration. 3.Request action from the Board with a recommendation to the City Council of the preferred design concept. Note: The final decision on the preferred design concept will be made jointly by the City Council, Port of Port Townsend Commission, and the Jefferson Co. PUD Commission. Page 18 of 61 A Multi-Agency Partnership Project Page 19 of 61 Agency Roles Page 20 of 61 Agency Roles: Port Page 21 of 61 Agency Roles: PUD Page 22 of 61 Agency Roles: City Page 23 of 61 Public Participation The public participation plan for development of the preferred alternative design concept was executed with the objective of providing transparent discussions based on diverse perspectives in order to derive the best possible outcomes for the community. The following points are key elements were deployed to accomplish the objective: Convene a stakeholder committee of volunteers with diverse perspectives and video record all stakeholder meetings Solicit and collect comments continuously throughout the process. Create a comments log with responses. Hold a public open house showing preferred design concept. Post reference materials, meeting agendas and videos, and notices on a project website. www.cityofpt.us/engagePT Page 24 of 61 Background/Timeline Concern of powerlines and boatyard safety raised in July of 2021 Boatyard expansion, powerline undergrounding, and Gateway implementation plan project scope of work developed and presented to Parks, Recreation, Tree, and Trail Advisory Board on 8/24/21 Same presentation provided to City Council on 9/20/21and submittal for Jeff. Co. Public Infrastructure Funding (PIF) Grant approved. https://cityofpt.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewe r.php?view_id=4&clip_id=2290 PIF Grant in the amount of $1,000,000 submitted and approved on November 2, 2021 by PIF funding board. Page 25 of 61 Background/Timeline Town Hall meetings held on: 11/10/21 –Video link https://cityofpt.granicus.com/player/clip/2307?view_id=4& redirect=true 12/15/21 –Video link https://cityofpt.granicus.com/player/clip/2318?view_id=4& redirect=true Stakeholder committee of volunteers assembled in February of 2022 8 stakeholder meetings held between April and August of 2022. Meetings video recorded and available on engagePT website. Public Open House to present preferred design concept alternative held at the Uptown Community Center on August 6, 2022. Displays available on engagePT website. Page 26 of 61 Sideboards & Project Limits Page 27 of 61 Sideboards & Project Limits Key Sideboards include: No work within limits of pavement unless a proposed crossing which needs WSDOT concurrence. No work in the Kah Tai Nature park except to address trees straddling right of way line Project must accomplish goals of boatyard expansion and undergrounding of power. Consistency with intent of adopted plans, policies, and codes. Project budget $1.97 Million Page 28 of 61 Range of Alternatives Considered Page 29 of 61 Range of Alternatives Based on what has been learned about safety requirements for operating around high voltage powerlines, doing nothing results in significant impacts to the trees in terms of pruning and to the boatyard in terms of setbacks to the traveling crane. Effectively, row of boats along the fence would be reduced by 10 to 20 feet. Page 30 of 61 Range of Alternatives Partial expansion is an option, however, concerns were raised concerning the proximity of the boats to the existing trees. A partial expansion results in trees directly overhanging the boats. Partial expansion also puts additional stress on the already relatively stressed trees by placing fill over the critical root zone. Page 31 of 61 Range of Alternatives Full expansion best meets the objectives of the project including creating an environment for healthy vegetation. The remainder of the presentation illustrates full expansion because it is the preferred alternative. Page 32 of 61 Project Principles Plans, policies, and codes Facilitate future improvements Multimodal mobility Boatyard considerations Aesthetics –Gateway, Parkway Stormwater Soils Existing tree health Tree replacement Existing tree recycling Plantings and species selection Page 33 of 61 Project Principles: Plans, Policies, and Codes Respecting the intent of the following adopted plans is an important element of the project development of a preferred alternative. These plans serve as guidance documents that are intended to balance various objectives. They differ from City code in that they are not intended to be literal. Following City codes are required elements of the project. Page 34 of 61 Project Principles: Comprehensive Plan (2016) The Comprehensive Plan adopts all other city plans by reference including the relevant Non-motorized, PROS, Gateway Dev. Plan. Page 35 of 61 Project Principles: Non-motorized Plan (1998 & 2011) The Non-motorized plan identifies key walking and biking connections/routes. A neighborhood connector is identified along Sims Way with a multi-use trail on the Kah Tai side. Page 36 of 61 Project Principles: Gateway Develpoment Plan (1993) The Gateway Development Plan provides a balanced set of objectives. Page 37 of 61 Project Principles: Gateway Development Plan (1993) Illustration of intent of Gateway Plan. The Non-motorized plan adds a multiuse trail on the park side. The third lane is only at intersections. Page 38 of 61 Project Principles: Gateway Develpoment Plan (1993) Gateway Development Plan Flats District Key Points: Linear corridor –created by the existing poplars Views of shipyard and historic buildings should be enhanced. Views of bluff and courthouse are also recognized. Trees should be low enough to preserve views of the Courthouse and Uptown. Thin poplars and remove sucker growth. Plant with riparian plantings along Kah Tai. Utilities should be placed underground. Trees should be infilled with new ones when others are removed. Grasses and wildflowers can be used as ground cover Create a pedestrian link to the Courthouse area. Pedestrian environment should be enhanced with amenities such as public art. A sidewalk is shown on the south side of Sims with a nature path on the north side. Create connection to waterwalk and Discovery Trail Plantings should strengthen pedestrian environment Page 39 of 61 Project Principles: PROS and Kah Tai Park Work in the park is limited due to grant restrictions and project scope/funding. However, Sims Way improvements should complement the Nature Park intent. Page 40 of 61 Project Principles: Kah Tai Development Plan In 1986, development plan for Kah Tai park was created. City Council resolutions impacting the development of the park include: Resolutions 82-20, 83-1, 83-2, 83-2, 84- 19, 85-2, 85-9 and a shoreline development permit for the small lagoon in 1985 (SH10-85). Zone 12 of the 12-zone Planting Plan for Kah Tai is impacted by this Sims Way project. See attached Tree Variety List and Planting information. This project is outside of the park, but to the extent feasible the project should honor consider impacts to zone 12 of the Planting Plan. Page 41 of 61 Project Principles: City Codes Applicable sections of City Code include the following: Chapter 12 addresses right of way development including rules for management of the right of way, right of way trees, and adoption of the Gateway Plan as a guidance document. Chapter 17 addresses land use on private property and development regulations Chapter 19 is the State Environmental Policy Act code setting forth environmental permitting requirements. Chapter 20 provides the rules and administrative procedures for processing permit applications. Page 42 of 61 Project Principles: Facilitate Future Improvements The stakeholders brainstormed future work that might occur in the area and set the criteria that the preferred alternative should facilitate future work. A Larry Scott realignment shown here is an example. Other future work includes possible roundabout at Haines. Page 43 of 61 Project Principles: Multimodal Transportation City’s complete streets policy requires projects to address transportation for all users of all abilities Page 44 of 61 Project Principles: Boatyard Considerations Boatyard interface considerations are an important element of preferred alternative development including the following: Security and Public Safety: Public access should not be direct and fenced separation is needed between the right of way and the boatyard. Access to the boatyard needs to be controlled to Haines Street, internal roadways, and near the Safeway Gas pumps. An updated power supply is needed for boat works. Tree and shrub species should be selected to minimize branches, leaves, pollen, and other tree debris falling on the boats under work. Maximize the horizontal separation between trees and the boats by placing trees closer to the roadway. Page 45 of 61 Project Principles: Aesthetics -Gateway Stakeholders asked that the Gateway feel like a “warm hug” welcoming residents and visitors to our community. The following characteristics are key objectives. Preserve as much green space as possible within the right of way. Create view corridors consistent with Gateway Plan into the boatyard and park to add interest. Create view corridors such that those interested in the boatyard, see glimpses of boats, and those not interested see a welcoming vegetated streetscape. Make the corridor welcoming to motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Create a Parkway tree planting form as compared to a columnar row form and still maintain linear look of the Gateway with a degree of symmetry Page 46 of 61 Columnar Tree Form Page 47 of 61 Parkway Tree Form Page 48 of 61 Project Principles: Softscape -examples Page 49 of 61 Project Principles: Soils 1966 aerial photo on left illustrates dredge spoils. 2012 aerial photo on the right shows park vegetation. Page 50 of 61 Project Principles: Stormwater and Soils June 5, 2022 25-yr rainfall event. Water pooled for approx. 3 hours before completely infiltrating. Page 51 of 61 Project Principles: Existing Tree Health Many of the existing trees are stressed due to a combination of factors including but not limited to poor soil conditions, competition for nutrients and water, tree age, 2021 summer heat, lack of maintenance, and impacts to the root zone. Page 52 of 61 Project Principles: Tree Replacement The preferred alternative proposes replacement of the poplars on the boatyard side associated at the time of this project and thinning of trees on the Kah Tai park side with replacement over time. Tree replacement over time on the park side means: Individual analysis of trees will be made by an arborist to assess tree health to focus removal on trees in the poorest condition. Strategic removal and thinning will seek to improve health of nearby trees and open views into the park as part of the project. Replacement over time generally means that trees will need to be evaluated periodically and replaced over a period of approximately 20 years consistent with urban forestry practices. Page 53 of 61 Project Principles: Existing Tree Recycling To the extent feasible, the stakeholder committee and design team recommend recycling the existing trees in the following ways: Make trees available for public to utilize as a wood product to honor our maritime, arts, and natural resource values in the community. Utilize existing removed trees as habitat strategically placed in Kah Tai Park or potentially other locations in the region. Utilize chips as a soil amendment to help new plantings the health of new plantings. Page 54 of 61 Project Principles: Planting Considerations Plantings and landscape architecture design need to include the following considerations: Soils are largely devoid of organics, free draining (sand) with high concentrations of copper and other metals. Soil amendments are necessary to support the health of plantings. Irrigation for plant establishment will be required. (5-10 years) Root volume needs to be sufficient to support tree growth. This means horizontal and longitudinal separation from hard surfaces should be maximized. The boatyard side and park side are distinctly different from an aesthetic and maintenance standpoint. The boatyard side green space serves as a stormwater infiltration swale. Page 55 of 61 Project Principles: Species Selection Considerations Tree species selection is critical given soil conditions and project goals. The following principles should be considered: Trees should not have aggressive root systems causing suckering and upheaval of road/path and other infrastructure The boatyard side along the boats needs to have low pollen producing trees and granular pollen rather than in dust form. The boatyard side could have greater pollen producing species along existing buildings, but not along the boats. Native varieties are preferred on the park side. See attached tree varieties and planting information illustrating 1986 IACC park planting plan. The boatyard side trees need to be sturdy and fit a parkway setting. There is a preference for all trees to be native or cultivars of native species that will be successful in the right-of-way environment. Climate change should be considered in species selection. Shrubs and ground cover need to accompany tree planting for mutual plant health and for architectural aesthetic purposes. Page 56 of 61 Project Principles: Species Selection Considerations A list of tree species and attributes has been developed for the design. Other factors impacting species selection include: Tree species availability in the market place. Whether or not female or male trees are available and their relative pollen/fruit producing characteristics. If possible, tree sex is important to consider. Size of trees (3-inch minimum caliper trees are preferred for initial planting) Deer protection and impacts Tree replacement if a new planting fails to survive Shrub maintenance and control (parks maintenance staff capacity and experience) The basket of tree species evaluated and recommended are included as a reference to this presentation. See attached. Page 57 of 61 Preferred Alternative: Design Concept Key visual features include: Parkway Setting with Poplar replacement on the boatyard side and poplar replacement over time on the Kah Tai park side. Page 58 of 61 Timeline and Next Steps Based on design concept approval in September of 2022, the following steps and approximate timeline are anticipated: Refine design concept and initiate permitting (Fall 2022) Complete design and prepare construction documents for bidding (Spring of 2023) Construction (Fall of 2023/Spring of 2024). Note: Construction timelines may vary and are based on availability of materials Note: While the project is in further development stages, the PUD will need to trim the boatyard side Poplars in order to address powerline safety in the interim. Page 59 of 61 Discussion and Questions Board Recommendation Page 60 of 61 References See the City’s website for the project for a complete record of materials, meetings, and videos at https://cityofpt.us/engagept/page/sims-gateway-and- boatyard-expansion-project Other key reference documents attached include Memo report from SCJ Alliance and August 6th Open House materials and public comment Public Comment log and response to comments Tree varieties –lists of tree and shrub species that have the best chance of thriving in the environment. Page 61 of 61