HomeMy WebLinkAbout031124 City Council Workshop Meeting- Added After MeetingU
L—
N
0
N
r -I
r -I
U
i
Ca
R.
A
c
U
.—
O
m
4)
L.-•
M
W
U
L—
N
0
N
r -I
r -I
U
i
Ca
R.
A
ol
o
c�
to
c
•>
c
J
.0
f�
=
�
N
E
N
4A
�
MO
U
C:
U
W
�...
ol
g� N +-+
�iuum�uw � • —
�� +J Q)
��lUmuuusi� L Q)bu Q)
����IIIIVIIIp
L., f6 4-J +�-'
uip u m � +-+
it
ll
�E —
a� IIIIII C�
�IllommllllppQ
CUO N 4 �n
tw +�-1
AlipIw r�
"' w S ro E
Ln
�.w 4-j
C: L N
U i
MS
U v� v)
lVlum��
Wommiml�l� rl N M
IU�UUJ I����II
imy� �Iwm
a
/ r r
41/1RPM
///�/
lUIUIUIDI➢lYIYINI / � r
r
�i
�' rrrrrrrrrrr� ��G�
r rrl
�;
r / /%/ %%�'�/ �ffffffffffffffffffffffff rrri�
. ��
1. 3 minutes to reflect
independently on stories.
2. What were the ingredients
when we were successful (3
minutes
3. Share out (5 minutes)
•
• Open house format
• Dialogue vs presentation
• High quality information
• Strong vision
• Inclusive
• Easy to share
• Didn't need to love the whole thing, but passion for a part
• Visual aids
• Conversations
• Working side by side with staff & public - collaborative
• Accessible to the whole community
• Prioritize the content we are sharing
• Creativity
• Exchange of'views, relaxed atmosphere
• Regular and predictable
• Published dates and times
• Could measure learning
• Project launch that is highly visible
• WI"
• Receptive to many ideas
• People feel heard
• Neighborhood involvement
• Shift in perspective
• Active listening
LO.
O
a)
W
LE
i
a)
a)
i--+
Ln
Ln
a--aJ
+ -0
az
o �
N �
DC
Ln
.E
m
a-•+
a)
E
tw
m
bn
U
Q
a-•+
tlA
bn
�O
w
L
fa
aJ
a)
Ln
a)
a)
U
L
�U
1 ate1
a)
Qm
O
cn
N
O
N
N
U
U
Ln
O
Ul
S
O
Q
(ti•
N
ate-+
V)
0-
0L Q
O
w
Ln
cu
4-1
.E
Ln
E
0
O
N
L
O
a-+
LA
v
Lack of follow up — not shown in next version
Presentations to big groups w/o breakouts
Only blast annoucements
Open house w small groups & set of Qs
Farmers market model
Direct outreach to people historically not included
Telling people what to think Vetting the questions with people with multiple
unconcious bias in survey questions perspectives
Social media engagement that implies the right answers Encourage critical thinking
Further alienation of people who haven't been engaged
Purpose isn't clear
Private lingo, using undefined acronyms
No boundaries in civil discourse
Unintentional condescension
Not considering new folks in the community
Invite people
Insular perspective
Answering basic questions, who what why how, provide
focus and clear where we need feedback
Provide background and easy to find in multiple formats
Engage people intentionally
Thinking about the greater good
Discounting people's opinions (if they haven't lived here Inclusive of everyone
long enough)
Too little too late Early and often
Not including conversation of equity
Running out of time, taking on too much
Forgetting to bring barbie
Belabored public process and bullying, single group
dominates process
Not accounting for future populations
Putting too much weight on anecdotal or individual
experiences
The crushing enormity of the task/document
Engaging and not circling back
Consideration for power dynamics
Planning smart and prioritizing, sharing the load
Seek levity, reduce tension
Ensuring we are hearing equally and being mindful of
people that have had historical power
Engage youth and think about who may need/want to
live work and visit the future PT
Concise clear story that is digestible
Sections that are easily accessible
Text to survey — quick view of what the room thinks,
instant participation
Show results of how we listen and demostrate the input
�•
N
�
�
cn
�
U
U
Q1
4-+
oc
U
U
0
O
2
O
2
�
rl-
Ln
Cti-
N
�
�
cn
�
U
U
.O
N
>
>
a--+
O
U
U
O
O
2
O
2
�
L
O O
= m
i
_U
O
�
v
o
�
a
R•
:
o
v
a
�1
Q)
O
�'
a
v
N
v
•v_
vi
v
�
�
4-j
i
O
>
0
a
>
E
Pick 1— 2 elements at most
Training for people interested in hosting small groups for
inclusivity
See what your neighbors are thinking — posted online?
What is your vision of PT 204S?
Keep options open for what public engagement looks
like, remain adaptable
Ambassador program
Strong headline message
Engage multiple learning styles
Multiple mediums and locations
Take care of the basics and do that well
Include a fun surprising element that speaks to local
flavor
Drawings from youth that we share throughout the year
Generational ambassadors to keep language relevant
and make the process feel safe
People learn in small bites (pre and post survey?)
Participation from 10% of every age bracket
Pivoting future events based on who hasn't participated
yet... responsive meeting schedule
Gateway to comprehensive doing after this process — we
see people continuing to show up and stay engaged in
later work
Instant relevance to why it matters
Ask kids if they had fun
Sets people up for success for later engagement
I
•
U
^'
.�
^�
hW�
Vii/
O
�..�
V
�
�
�
Q
�
a--�
OD
m
OD
Ln
ig