The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About081423 City Council Workshop Meeting PacketPORT TOWNSEND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 540 WATER STREET Workshop Meeting 6:00 p.m. August 14, 2023 • Attend in person or virtually via computer or tablet at ..c.i,t;);webJ,t)aic.c.11; enter the 9 digit Webinar ID 242-937-955 • Phone only (muted - listen -only mode) United States: Local Dial In — (360) 390-5064 access code: 706-376-5054 Live stream (listen only): https:Hcityofpt.us/citycouncil/page/agendasminutesvideos. Submit public comment emails to be included in the meeting record to: pqbjjccc�rnrnent;. - cuts ig If you are experiencing technical difficulties, please attempt all methods listed above before reporting any issues to: ctel;ks� :g�..p.c r;;t:.( L Call to Order/ Roll Call IL General Public Comment (regarding items not on the agenda) III. Discussion Items A. General Sewer Plan Briefing a. Staff Presentation b. Public Comment c. Council Discussion IV. Adjourn Americans with Disabilities Act In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodation for this meeting should notes the City Clerk's Office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting at (360) 379-5083. From: Brent Shirley To: nu b1iccommentC6citvofot.us Subject: Forwarding Sheila Westerman remarks from last nights meeting Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 12:45:07 PM Remarks by Sheila Westerman at Council Meeting last night Aug.7, 2023 I don't know David Faber, or most of the new council members. Up to this point, I had hoped that they and the City Manager would listen carefully to our community (all of us), explore future options (including doing nothing) and not come to decisions based on pre -conceived notions of what they think (especially the Mayor and City Manager) is most appropriate for the future of our community. Here's what I do know: I came here in 1971 after graduation from the University of Washington. I have been involved in the fishing community, boat building community, the small business community, and the nonprofit community. I was a City Councilmember for two terms and served 25 years on the Jefferson County Board of Health. The point of this dissertation: I have interacted with lots of diverse people in this community. Public processes are messy and need to be built on trust and transparency. I have been actively involved in many complicated and contentious public planning processes to chart a path for the future of our community: Gateway Development Plan, Urban Waterfront Plan, Downtown Parking Plans, the City Comprehensive Plan, Northwest Maritime Center, public health plans, etc. I have never seen such a sham public process and arrogance from our Mayor, City Manager and Council as I am witnessing with the golf course public process. How does the Mayor and Council know what the so-called "silent majority" really thinks? It seems to me that the stakeholder group was not very representative of our community, and especially golf course stakeholders. This public process lacks valid surveys, concrete data and relies mostly on what the Mayor and Council wants to hear from their "silent majority." This clearly ignores the fundamental basics of running a fair and transparent public planning process that respects our citizens and the most affected stakeholders. It is time to rethink this whole process. The golf course is an important part of our historic legacy, charm, quality of life and what makes PT such a special place. Sheila Westerman From: Jan 6outilier To: nu bliccommentmcitvofot.us Subject: golf course Date: Monday, August 7, 2023 5:55:08 PM Just some thoughts I have had about all of this. I was born in Port Townsend and grew up believing that the golf course was a gift to the town and would be ours forever. It is our gem, our treasure. I have always loved the green space in the middle of town and still consider myself fortunate to have been able to return to my hometown as an adult to raise my family. We love going to the restaurant at the course and any events hosted there. It is such a beautiful space and well-maintained by Gabe and his volunteers. It is a beauty that not many towns have and I would hate to see it change. Once it's gone, it's gone. I know of some recents PTHS grads who play at the golf course several days a week. I am doubtful that these young folks would make the trip to Chevy Chase or the Port Ludlow course. Not all of them even drive. I had not been to the Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park in several years, as I was concerned for my safety in that area. I decided to give it another try last month on a hot day. I thought it would be cooler there for my pups' afternoon exercise. After walking along the trail by the lagoon for several minutes, I heard some noises but didn't notice anyone, then I saw a man making noises while lying on his back, a few feet from the trail, trying to open a bottle of booze. I turned around and left. Can't some progress be made to get the trails we already have back in working order so we can feel safe using them?? I am appalled at how ugly our town looks now that the city does not do any mowing. I am not sure what the backup plan is, or is there one? My walking route is unsafe for my dogs in parts because of the overgrown weeds (many foxtails) on the sidewalks. Who is supposed to tell the people who are not cutting their weeds, that they have to. Or else ... or else what? It has been months now and my road is getting narrower, as the weeds have taken over and the bushes have grown out into the road. Visibility is poor in many spots because of the tall weeds. It is really hard now to see animals that are near the edge of the road. It's depressing to see our town have an uncared-for look - and I am also embarrassed for what PT's visitors think. A great worry of mine is that if there is no golf course, who will maintain those grounds, if the right-of-ways can't even be cared for, for safety's sake? There has to be a way to keep the golf course and also please some of the folks who want some other things on that property. Yes, and Robert Horner did a wonderful job of creating such a plan. We really need to have that up for consideration. Thanks for reading. I took the attached photo while we were at the golf course enjoying a meal and the gorgeous scenery. From: OlvmpusNet To: nubliccommentC6citvofot.us Subject: Golf Course Date: Monday, August 7, 2023 5:04:17 PM CAUTION: External Email The golf course property in the middle of our beautiful city needs to be preserved as a golf course and additionally many other public uses that could be on this gem of a site, not to include housing at this location. I am not a golfer but I look forward to being involved as a volunteer to having this land be used by many age groups, organizations and interests. There are many new volunteers willing to step tip and be involved. I want this golf course preserved and am joining many others who feel the same way. Thank you, Liz Berman Sent from my Whone From: Julia Cochrane To: publiccommentC6citvofot.us Cc: Julia Cochrane Subject: Kah Tai Date: Monday, August 7, 2023 6:49:08 PM CAUTION: External Email Dear Mayor Faber, Deputy Mayor Howard and the rest of City Council, I was alerted to the consent agenda item about a on-site host for Kah Tai Park and was prepared to do an oral comment, until I heard the comments that happened. I am disturbed by the tone of some of the comments. I know your roots in this community and how you deal with your dirties with a love for this community, a commitment for being thorough, and representative of the diversity of your citizens. The Public Comment that I intended to make is this: I urge the City Council to include in their vision for Kah Tai Park a hosted overnight Safe Park for individuals living in their vehicles. With a host present it would be possible to monitor the area, limit the number of vehicles, and make sure they leave in the morning. I am not suggesting that this become another version of "an open air shelter" like Caswell Brown, but rather somewhere people who are living in their vehicles can park overnight with access to a bathroom, which is better for the people and the community, than having people sleeping in their vehicles at random places around our community without access to sanitation. Thank you for listening, Julia Cochrane Julia Cochrane willowtree@olypen.com PO Box 1654 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 821-1926 cell https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=16439&d iD R51kvRx9hG61J0 veYJpP5- SMR f)xXoAuOBTD &g ti=https%3a%2t"'/o2fwww%2eieffersoninterfaithaction%2eorg%2fwwc Territories of the noxws�:aybm' (Klallam), & tf omgom (Chemakum) peoples "What are we saving our resources for during this rise of fascism?" Rev. Sofia Betancourt, UUA President From: Jan 6outilier To: nu bliccommentmcitvofot.us Subject: golf course and other thoughts Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 7:39:07 AM Hello, I realize I didn't leave my name at the bottom of my email (although it is in the email address) and thought I should do that, so I am resending. Just some thoughts I have had about all of this. I was born in Port Townsend and grew up believing that the golf course was a gift to the town and would be ours forever. It is our gem, our treasure. I have always loved the green space in the middle of town and still consider myself fortunate to have been able to return to my hometown as an adult to raise my family. We love going to the restaurant at the course and any events hosted there. It is such a beautiful space and well-maintained by Gabe and his volunteers. It is a beauty that not many towns have and I would hate to see it change. Once it's gone, it's gone. I know of some recents PTHS grads who play at the golf course several days a week. I am doubtful that these young folks would make the trip to Chevy Chase or the Port Ludlow course. Not all of them even drive. I had not been to the Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park in several years, as I was concerned for my safety in that area. I decided to give it another try last month on a hot day. I thought it would be cooler there for my pups' afternoon exercise. After walking along the trail by the lagoon for several minutes, I heard some noises but didn't notice anyone, then I saw a man making those noises while lying on his back, a few feet from the trail, trying to open a bottle of booze. I turned around and left. Can't some progress be made to get the trails we already have back in working order so we can feel safe using them?? I am appalled at how ugly our town looks now that the city does not do any mowing. I am not sure what the backup plan is, or is there one? My walking route is unsafe for my dogs in parts because of the overgrown weeds (many foxtails) on the sidewalks. Who is supposed to tell the people who are not cutting their weeds, that they have to. Or else ... or else what? It has been months now and my road is getting narrower, as the weeds have taken over and the bushes have grown out into the road. Visibility is poor in many spots because of the tall weeds. It is really hard now to see animals that are near the edge of the road. It's depressing to see our town have an uncared-for look - and I am also embarrassed for what PT's visitors think. A great worry of mine is that if there is no golf course, who will maintain those grounds, if the right-of-ways can't even be cared for, for safety's sake? There has to be a way to keep the golf course and also please some of the folks who want some other things on that property. Yes, and Robert Horner did a wonderful job of creating such a plan. We really need to have that up for consideration. Thanks for reading. I took the attached photo while we were at the golf course enjoying a meal and the gorgeous scenery. With gratitude for the tough job you all are doing, Jan Klockers Boutilier 726 25th Street Port Townsend On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 5:54 PM Jan Boutilier <ianboutilier t c�gmail.com> wrote: Just some thoughts I have had about all of this. I was born in Port Townsend and grew up believing that the golf course was a gift to the town and would be ours forever. It is our gem, our treasure. I have always loved the green space in the middle of town and still consider myself fortunate to have been able to return to my hometown as an adult to raise my family. We love going to the restaurant at the course and any events hosted there. It is such a beautiful space and well-maintained by Gabe and his volunteers. It is a beauty that not many towns have and I would hate to see it change. Once it's gone, it's gone. I know of some recents PTHS grads who play at the golf course several days a week. I am doubtful that these young folks would make the trip to Chevy Chase or the Port Ludlow course. Not all of them even drive. I had not been to the Kah Tai Lagoon Nature Park in several years, as I was concerned for my safety in that area. I decided to give it another try last month on a hot day. I thought it would be cooler there for my pups' afternoon exercise. After walking along the trail by the lagoon for several minutes, I heard some noises but didn't notice anyone, then I saw a man making noises while lying on his back, a few feet from the trail, trying to open a bottle of booze. I turned around and left. Can't some progress be made to get the trails we already have back in working order so we can feel safe using them?? I am appalled at how ugly our town looks now that the city does not do any mowing. I am not sure what the backup plan is, or is there one? My walking route is unsafe for my dogs in parts because of the overgrown weeds (many foxtails) on the sidewalks. Who is supposed to tell the people who are not cutting their weeds, that they have to. Or else ... or else what? It has been months now and my road is getting narrower, as the weeds have taken over and the bushes have grown out into the road. Visibility is poor in many spots because of the tall weeds. It is really hard now to see animals that are near the edge of the road. It's depressing to see our town have an uncared-for look - and I am also embarrassed for what PT's visitors think. A great worry of mine is that if there is no golf course, who will maintain those grounds, if the right-of-ways can't even be cared for, for safety's sake? There has to be a way to keep the golf course and also please some of the folks who want some other things on that property. Yes, and Robert Horner did a wonderful job of creating such a plan. We really need to have that up for consideration. Thanks for reading. I took the attached photo while we were at the golf course enjoying a meal and the gorgeous scenery. From: Barbara Morey. To: nubliccommentCcitvofnt.us Subject: Kah Tai Nature Park Caretaker RV Site Date: Monday, August 7, 2023 5:13:22 PM Attachments: Safe Parking Application.docx Safe nark Pierceco forms and agreements.docx Safe Parking FAQ Final 202209271603086524.2df Agenda Bill AB23-206 Meeting Date: August 7, 2023 Consent Agenda Item. VII.G Kah Tai Nature Park Caretaker RV Site: As a Housing Advocate, I applaud the efforts of the City to address issues at the Kah Tai Nature Park by planning to create a Park Caretaker Host RV site in the park. "Kah Tai Nature Park had previously been subject to ongoing vandalism, staff constraints, and in turn became a space for the unhoused community. The restrooms were closed due to these issues over 10 years ago and little has been done as far as capital improvements. " I urge the City Council, Public Works officials Michael Todd, Facilities and Parks Manager, and Steve King, PW Kah Tai Director to expand the vision of their efforts for developing a Host RV site at Kah Tai to include creating a Temporary Hosted Overnight Safe Park in the parking lot of the KahTai grounds near the public restrooms once this Caretaker Host RV site project is completed. What is a Safe Park? A Safe Park is a supervised parking lot that is temporarily utilized by a social service provider, municipality or religious organization to provide a legal, safe and managed location for people experiencing homelessness to park their vehicle and sleep at night. The Safe Parking sites provide a greater level of safety and stability to vehicle residents through providing access to services. They also help protect the health, welfare and safety of the general public through regulations including requiring sanitation facilities, a code of conduct for people living in vehicles, and a site safety and security plan. In most areas, these sites are not permitted to charge rent to vehicle residents. The Safe Parking program is open overnight, (I.E. from 7 p.m. until 9 a.m.) to those who are living in their cars, vans, or RVs/campers; have an operable vehicle and a valid driver's license; agree to the site rules and requirements; and sign a "Resident Application." (Copies of sample documents are attached) Vehicular homelessness—referring to individuals and households living in cars, vans, recreational vehicles (RVs), and other vehicles—is one of the fastest growing segments of the unhoused population (Ho, 2019; Lyons -Warren & Lowery, 2020). Estimates are that 50% of the unhoused population in Seattle lives in a vehicle. (All Home, 2020; Applied Survey Research, 2019c) A notable proportion of homeless individuals identified in the Jefferson County Point in Time Count live in vehicles. Although people living in vehicles are comparatively "better off" than their unsheltered peers, this temporary form of shelter is still precarious. Vehicular residents have reported a life of con scant mobility in finding safe places to park, a lack of ability to cook for or clean themselves, and a fear of ticketing, towing, and potentially the loss of their vehicle (Pruss et al., 2022; Wakin, 2014). Who are these People who live in their vehicles? Homelessness continues to grow and to affect the lives of an increas ingly diverse group of individuals. An overlooked popu lation is the growing number of the unhoused living in vehicles. It is important to understand the characteristics of peo ple living in vehicles and the extent to which they differ from the non vehicular unhoused population. Compared to those living in tents, in makeshift shelters, and in public spaces, people living in vehicles are more likely to be women and to live in larger households with children, and are less likely to be "chronically unhoused"" (NOTE: We had 3 families living in RV's who were forced to leave their local parking lot sites in PT during Covid) Safe parking programs can pro vide temporary relief to those living in vehicles and, if done well, the interventions necessary to transition into permanent housing *(Chronic homelessness is used to describe people who have experienced homelessness for at least a year — or repeatedly — while struggling with a disabling condition such as a serious mental illness, substance use disorder, or physical disability.) WHAT SERVICES DO SAFE PARKING PROGRAMS PROVIDE? . • Temporarily safely park and sleep in their vehicle in a parking lot with an on-site host and a set schedule (ex: 7 pm until 9 am) • Access and use a restroom and handwashing station on-site • Obtain referrals to community resources such as housing, medical, benefits, education, employment. Why the Kah Tai Nature Park Location? "The plan is to create a caretaker host RV site to bring needed visibility and site lines back to the park. I believe this opportunity will spark new life in the park and in addition will add the much needed support from an onsite caretaker that will assist with the ongoing weekly and daily maintenance. In addition, with a caretaker present we can look at reopening the restrooms to the public." --- and hopefully providing a temporary Safe Park shelter site in the parking lot for women and families who live in their vehicles andfrom which they can access community-based housing support and related services. It takes the whole village... Barbara Morey Housing Advocate Port Townsend, WA bemorey@yahoo.com Nevertheless, she persisted... Primary reason you are experiencing homelessness? o Emergency Contact: last night? ........... employer here: Medical Issues? Ell would like assistance in seeking employment. Job Skills: What city did you sleep in Employment status: ❑ Employed. List ❑ Not currently employed. Page 1 of 2 SAFE PARKING NETWORK— Resident Application (Continued) V Ian I cII II irn fo irim io irn Is vehicle licensed? ❑ YES ❑ NO Are you the registered owner of this vehicle? ❑ YES ❑ NO Vehicle Make Model License Plate# Driver's License # Please list any mechanical issues with your vehicle: MYsignature below, acknowledges that 1 have read and understand the attached Safe Parking Network Agreement and that all occupants of this vehicle will abide by the SPN agreement. 1 also certify 1 have answered the above questions correctly and honestly. Resident Signature: Date: Staff Signature:.... Date: WE ARE EXCITED TO SEE YOU SUCCEED!!! SAFE PARKING NETWORK Site Rules Agreement While staying at the SAFE PARKING NETWORK sites, you are agreeing to the site rules and requirements listed below. You are also agreeing to be a "GOOD NEIGHBOR" while at the site. This Site Rules Agreement is entered into between you, the SAFE PARKING NETWORK (site hosts). This agreement is dated WHILE STAYING AT THE SITE, YOU AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING: Site Rules: • You will agree to fill out all paperwork including: o Vehicle registration o Site Rules Agreement o Child verification o Criminal Background Check a site participant, and ,20—. • As our Safe Parking programs are not 24 hours, participants must arrive at the lot and leave the lot by specified times, such as 7pm- 9 am. • You will follow all laws when you are at or around the site; you understand that laws will be enforced onsite; • You will not engage in any predatory behavior at or around the site (drug dealing, stealing, sex trafficking, assaultive or abusive behavior); • You are not allowed to possess, use or consume drugs or alcohol on the site; • You will only store your stuff (your families personal belongings) within your vehicle; • You must keep your vehicle in your assigned space; • No VISITORS are allowed at the SPN site or on the property; • You will not bring any illegal weapons onto the site; you will not brandish or threaten anyone with guns, knives, or other weapons in or near the site; • You will stay out of other residents' areas and belongings; • You will dispose of all trash in the trash containers; • You will keep your site, bathrooms, showers and other spaces clean; • You are eligible to stay at the site for (30/60? Days). If you need more time to stay at the site extensions may be granted depending on your level of engagement in services; • Children will not be left alone at the site or "watched" by other shelter participants; • You may smoke only in identified outdoor areas; • Parents are responsible for their children and children should not be left alone at any time; • You will be a "Good Neighbor" and follow all direction from site staff. Safe Parking Network — 8.2020 SAFE PARKING NETWORK Site Rules Agreement Good Neighbor Policy • You will follow the "Good Neighbor Policy" which requires you to respect your neighbors at the site and at and neighbors in the surrounding community. The policy is simple, treat others like you would like to be treated. It also includes: o Clean up all outdoor areas around the site o Not gossip about other site participants o Respect all site and surrounding property IF THESE RULES ARE NOT FOLLOWED, IT MAY LEAD TO BEING ASKED TO LEAVE THE SITE. My signature below, acknowledge that I/we have read and understand the above agreement and agree to be bound by them. I acknowledge that a copy of this document was provided to me. Guest Signature: Staff Signature: WE ARE EXCITED TO SEE YOU SUCCEED!!! Date: Date: Safe Parking Network — 8.2020 �u6CL `' a7lVtIQV SafeIIIIIIII IIIIIIII ��FAQ What is "Safe Parking"? Safe Parking is when a parking lot is utilized by a social service provider or religious organization to provide a safe and managed location for people experiencing homelessness to park their vehicle and sleep at night. The sites provide a greater level of safety and stability to vehicle residents through providing access to services. They also help protect the health, welfare and safety of the general public through regulations including requiring sanitation facilities, a code of conduct for residents living in vehicles, and a site safety and security plan. In Pierce County, these sites also are not permitted to charge rent to vehicle residents. Is Safe Parking new to Pierce County? Safe Parking on properties owned or controlled by religious organizations has been permitted under Washington State law since 2020. Safe Parking sites were established in Pierce County during the pandemic, as an alternative to congregate shelters in order to limit exposure to the COVID virus. In the last few years, these sites have proven to be useful in getting people experiencing homelessness away from unsanctioned camps and to a location that can not only provide stability but also give them access to services. Why is the County adopting this ordinance now? An interim ordinance took effect on July 1, 2022, that created a pilot program for Safe Parking on civic and commercial sites in the urban growth area. In that ordinance, Council directed Planning and Public Works (PPW) to draft permanent Safe Parking regulations by the end of the year. The permanent regulations clarify the roles and responsibilities of County Departments, allow Safe Parking on civic and commercial sites outside of the urban growth area, and define more requirements that hosts must meet to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public as well as residents living in vehicles. Where will these be allowed? It is important to note that State law mandates that these be allowed on all properties owned or controlled by a religious organization, including in rural and residential areas. The County cannot prohibit these Safe Parking sites when there is an existing, permitted parking lot, only implement certain regulations regarding what is required of those properties. Under the County's proposed regulations, Safe Parking sites will be allowed on properties with a legally established parking lot where homeless shelters are already a permitted use in the �0irflir)....... ,c.:b,. These regulations apply to unincorporated Pierce County only. If located in a city or town, please contact the respective jurisdiction for their process. Can property owners be required to allow Safe Parking on their property? No. The party that owns or controls the property must consent to Safe Parking being allowed. Will these sites be safe? Won't this create a lot of problems in the surrounding neighborhood? The proposed regulations include numerous requirements of the organizations hosting them as well as general requirements of those staying there. No Safe Parking site will be established until they enter a memorandum of understanding with the County that outlines the requirements specific to the proposal of that site. Some of the requirements include: • A code of conduct that requires all residents living in vehicles at Safe Parking to be a good neighbor and participate in keeping the site clean. The host organization must also identify how they plan to enforce this code of conduct. • A site safety and security plan. • Sanitation facilities and trash receptacles. • Background checks for residents. • Any vehicles are to remain in working condition. Part of the agreement with the County is that these conditions will be followed. If the conditions are not being met, the memorandum of understanding allowing the Safe Parking site can be canceled. How big will these sites be? The size of any Safe Parking site will be dependent on the size of the parking lot. The site must still provide adequate parking for any existing uses and no more than 20% of the existing parking spaces can be used for Safe Parking purposes. For properties not owned or controlled by a religious organization, the absolute maximum is 20 parking spaces to be used for Safe Parking purposes. Who will operate these sites? As permitted under State Law, religious organizations can operate these sites on their property. On non- religious properties, Safe Parking sites must be operated by a social service organization with experience managing Safe Parking sites and/or relevant credentials the County believes demonstrates they are likely to be successful in operating a Safe Parking site. How will I know if a Safe Parking site opens near me? All Safe Parking site hosts must conduct a public meeting 7 calendar days prior to finalizing a Memorandum of Understanding to discuss any neighborhood concerns. Depending on how close you are to a proposed Safe Parking site, you may receive a notice of a public meeting prior to the County entering a memorandum of understanding with an organization. A notice of this meeting will also be posted at the proposed Safe Parking site and at the meeting site. If you have questions about whether a property is permitted to host overnight parking, you may contact the County to verify. Who do I call if there's a problem with a permitted Safe Parking site? All permitted Safe Parking sites will be required to post contact information for a site liaison tasked with addressing neighbor concerns. Depending on the size of the Safe Parking site there may also be an onsite coordinator who assists with ensuring residents living in vehicles follow the code of conduct. What other resources are available to the homeless? There are around 1,300 shelter beds across Pierce County, however none of these are in unincorporated Pierce County. Shelter beds utilization is always above 96% in use. In a typical week, around 120 new individuals enter shelter. Shelter bed availability and a map with shelter sites are available at: b.111p-s14P �:.bs�,ir.rr..:'.II.�'..`.`.,s.)ir�„�.F-a ii.11.iitii.�:b.s S.Ih��;b;llteirs. Pierce County Human Services Homeless Programs supports a coordinated entry system for families and individuals experiencing homelessness. Coordinated Entry is a key step in accessing housing programs and is accessed in a varietyof ways detailed at Ih�tt ago �Ih �.irrr :bll :baja o�)ir "L a�6116t6� s/Op bir�6ir� ::a . Residents in Y....................L�.�...........................L��.................................................................................................g....................................................................................�....................................'A....... need of housing services can contact 2-1-1 weekdays from 8AM-4PM for on -demand support or to schedule an appointment. 24-hour voicemail is available nights and weekends. From: Kris DeWeese To: publiccommentC6cityofot.us Subject: golf course Date: Thursday, August 10, 2023 6:30:15 PM Attachments: golf course schematic housing trails that go nowhere.png I'm a non -golfer, and I walk several miles a day in P.T., but I've never felt deprived or excluded because I can't walk on the golf course. Why would I7 Port Townsend is full of trails, parks, sidewalks, and beaches; it's extremely and infinitely walkable. I also don't feel excluded because I can't walk across Memorial Field during a football game, or through a pickle ball court or a basketball court when people are playing. My kids grew tip here, and even though they couldn't play frisbee, croquet, tennis, basketball, soccer, horseshoes, baseball or anything other than golf on the golf course, they weren't deprived or excluded; there were a million other places where they could, and did, enjoy all these activities and more. And all those places for sports other than golf are still here and are still being used. Only 5% of the population of Port Townsend used the swimming pool in 2022, but even those of us who never use the pool aren't complaining that we can't play other sports or have picnics in it, and aren't asking to eliminate it, even though it costs P.T. hundreds of thousands of dollars annually. ($276,000 according to the YMCA 2022 annual report on the Mt. View pool, or $387,190 according to the City of P.T.'s 2022 budget, tinder "Community Services Fund, Budget Summary." The $387,190 figure is more than half of the Parks Maintenance budget. The golf course, on the other hand, cost P.T. a total of $31,568 in 2022. ($29,843 for city water, plus $11,725 for "Repairs/Maintenance/Professional Services", minus $10,000 in revenue from the course. 0 il. �l� iil . .il.,,��;;.L.�;.i;�� .i,� �.� ��.- ��,.�r I � li �,�t iii;, i;.i, I „i;, 1 J,. `JII We're all trying to understand where the impetus to target the golf course came from, because though it makes no apparent sense, the City Council has spent huge amounts of money on trying to create the illusion of public demand to eliminate the golf course. My own guess is that the real issue with the golf course is that it's open, public land that could provide lots of profit to investors in so-called "public/private partnerships" to build housing, as imagined in depressing schematics like the one I've attached. Maybe you have to have lived in Port Townsend as an adult for at least a few decades to appreciate how deeply damaging and destructive the City Council's actions with regard to the golf course have been so far, and to understand how very long the anger and distrust, as well as the schisms in the community, generated by these actions will probably last. I hope you will decide to take several steps backwards and leave our much -loved, historic golf course alone. Sincerely, Kris DeWeese 1919 Lawrence St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)385-3246 VVVVV� �i m�.. "W100,40 ,iAy Il'�4 / n lV�(nf a v ,µG,uvh u4 �,n Y d� Nll o All -i rP o v,!�,,,. lmU y�,rVloi IYm+�7mu w»M�aev�G ell ,yrA"' � , oJ� g uiAn rairaY I r�uw r of, /i r Z ivuflaao-,ri vlr».?? �w l wMY, rW/1"Y"Y",Pxg wlf"'fluw rrr Z> �r BIRD, BUUD l/�,/(glfyr, s�lr TRADESCO,MIMUNITY 00NNECTIONS PICNIC / �yi�w GI/,�y r ; ,r j % r j j f JwVI li ✓I /UTTJKG,(C:HtPPiNG GREEN TO i'16REMAIN" lmmw i ,'N'''NNn F �J �/l��y��l�� ,RENOVATED,CLUBHOUSE RESTAURANT' COMM'. SPACE" OWN 1*1 N D, 1 ,! IKI I0 � I +VN Vim'' yr � ,y� 'A�NtRJE TO At-MAINPA �jPN ! ol,Nh IM r SCULPTURE Post, a I�� G r r ✓ �� dr r / �Iw Gy µuimA^"" II d m Jr r �, ' 9 rJr�j m/V'Gbil ur 4y ✓� lU%�f Al, ,,,�/,,��//„i ,;✓r`aliU / /�/Iplrry f» N r,�i�J 41, J % �r / N / / P ', ✓ D' ^ N �/ , � "'yJvJj�/danrr, V� msyi�j ' w, amatmd r r From: Joanne Paulev To: publiccommentC6citvofot.us Subject: PT golf Course Keep the Course Date: Sunday, August 13, 2023 4:27:38 PM CAUTION: External Email As a frequent visitor to PT our family plays often at this course. It is a unique course and reasonable for 5 people. would be a DISGRACE to develop this property. Keep Open space OPEN. If it is developed it can never be reclaimed. Joanne Pauley Sent from my Whone August 9, 2023 City of Port Townsend +. City Manager: John Mauro Mayor: David Faber Deputy Mayor: Amy Howard Council Members: Aislinn Palmer, Ben Thomas, Libby Urner Wennstrom, Monica MickHager, Owen Rowe RE: Golf Course Dear Representatives for the Citizens of Port Townsend. Thank you for stepping up to advocate for the history, land and people of this community. Your thoughtful lack of bias is so crucial as we invigorate a legacy through the next hundred years. For 23 years, my father, Dale Judy, was a council member. He said doing his homework was essential to serving on the council. Many dedicated people with high ideals and fiscal knowledge have represented the individuals in our constituency. I know making a decision to be in the public sector and hold office is a big deal. Please consider my thoughts as an elder and third generation resident. Utilize the wisdom, enthusiasm and experience in our community gained as a result of the survey. Assess pervading sentiments; renew tireless efforts that allow local citizens to implement a viable and solution. - Resist divisive comments and actions. - Restore the gem that is our unique golf course. - Regroup to allow investigation of maintenance and equipment. - Recognize the potential for developing this golf course to high standard of excellence. - Revitalize this process to create steps for a shared vision. You all know too well the problems that abound. Move forward by choosing the golf course, continue to ask for and listen to the ideas of local people willing to initiate solutions. People and volunteers are the backbone of this community, not a silent majority. The term silent majority is a pejorative and political term developed by Richard Nixon. In fall 2022, people paid for a full page in the Leader to support keeping the golf course. Check out the next full page ad in the Leader to save the golf course. Those signing and paying for this printed page love our town, appreciate hard work and are a valuable resource. Caro:' w w IQ uthdrearnsftlympus,P 360 531-1555 111y (f port Townsen Agenda Bill AB23-210, Item III.A Meeting Date: August 14, 2023 Agenda Item: ® Regular Business Meeting ❑ Workshop/Study Session ❑ Special Business Meeting Submitted By: Steve King, PW Director & Bliss Morris, Wastewater Operations Manager Date Submitted: August 10, 2023 Department: Public Works Contact Phone: 360-379-5090 SUBJECT: Briefing of General Sewer Plan Findings CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Resolution Staff Report ❑ Ordinance Contract Approval ❑ Other: BUDGET IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Amount: Included in Budget? Yes ❑ No ❑ Public Hearing (Legislative, unless otherwise noted) 3 -Year Strategic Plan: 4 - Ensure sustainable future for public services and facilities Cost Allocation Fund: 411 Water Sewer Fund - General SUMMARY STATEMENT: Background: The last time the sewer plan was updated was in 2000. The City Council authorized a contract with RH2 Engineering on February 16, 2021, to update and prepare a new General Sewer Plan. Subsequently the contract was expanded to include analysis of the Wastewater Treatment Plant associated with Puget Sound Nutrient General Permit on January 3, 2022. At the City Council workshop in May of 2022 for the General Sewer Plan Update, staff introduced the scope of the project. An additional supplement was issued to the contract with RH2 Engineering to add an analysis of the septic receiving and treatment system at the compost facility. Council approved an interlocal agreement with Jefferson County on September 19, 2022, to provide for the County's contribution to evaluating options for expanding capacity of the septage receiving facility. Over the past couple of years with all of the developments in the world of the sewer utility, staff and RH2 Engineering have been working through development of the key elements of the General Sewer Plan. Objective of Workshop The objective of this workshop is to present the City Council with General Sewer Plan findings in preparation for finalizing the General Sewer Plan and performing a rate analysis. The sewer rate ordinance expires at the end of this year. Rate increases are expected and this overview provides information behind the sewer system infrastructure and operational needs in an attempt to strike a balance between critical needs and impact to ratepayers. Many details of system operations and capital improvement costs are to be entered into a rate model developed by Financial Consulting Solutions Group. In addition to setting rates, the General Sewer Plan outlines key items of work for the sewer utility over the next 20 years with a focus on the next 5 years. Overview: Typically, a General Sewer Plan is updated every 5-10 years. Given the City's plan has not been updated in over 20 years, an extensive look at the wastewater treatment plant, collection system, and compost facility was warranted. This is important because the sewer is an enterprise fund and it must be self-supporting. As indicated in a Council workshop presentation by staff on December 14, 2020, the sewer system has performed very well over the years with a first-class wastewater treatment plant and compost facility. However, both of these facilities are approaching the end of their design life and are in need of work. RH2 Engineering and City staff also provided an overview of the wastewater treatment plant capacity and collection system information City Council workshop on May 9, 2022. This initial analysis showed key issues of what will drive an upgrade to the wastewater treatment plant as well as base data about the collection system. With the Nutrient Permit in place, RH2 Engineering took a deeper dive into outlining the next 20 years of wastewater plant upgrades. Furthermore, the collection system was modeled for growth in the various basins to determine where pipeline upsizing is needed. This presentation provides the findings of the in-depth analysis of the wastewater plant, the collection system, and the compost facility. The costs of the improvements needed are substantial. Staff along with RH2 Engineering's help is providing the base needs of the system. Catching up with investments is necessary. The improvements needs have been reviewed in detail and sequenced in future years recognizing the large impact to rates that are anticipated resulting from this plan update. Financial Analysis While staff hesitates to project rate impacts ahead of the rate modeling effort, some basic data is useful in considering the upcoming impacts of much needed work on the sewer system. It is noted that rates are not necessarily the sole driver of sewer operations. Other value sets such as the compost facility, successful NPDES permit compliance, staff sustainability, and quality maintenance practices have a financial impact. For example, the first-class compost facility costs more to operate than if the City were to ship solids remotely like most sewer utilities. This has a cost impact, yet meets community values of lower environmental impact and recycling nutrients in the community. In general, the City runs a very lean sewer utility with only 3 operators at the wastewater treatment plant and 2 operators at compost. The sewer utility also funds 2.56 FTEs for collection system support as part of the Streets, Stormwater, and Wastewater Collections crew. Another key element to this year's effort associated with setting rates is to account for water and sewer separately so both utilities can stand on their own. Ultimately, staff will recommend separating the utilities functionally into different funds. This effort will be quite an administrative effort and for now, staff is focusing on more refined accounting of costs in the combined utility for water and sewer. This modification was made already with the water utility with rate adoptions in 2021. The following general metrics are useful to consider as the City looks ahead to the results of rate modeling. • Annual sewer utility revenue (2023 budget) _ $3.5 million • Annual sewer operating expenses (2023 budget) _ $3.6 million — Thus currently running in a deficit of $100k per year. This deficit requires a rate increase of 3.5% before accounting for any other operational and capital costs. • The sewer utility has approximately 4,800 equivalent residential units (ERUs). A more refined accounting and calculation of ERUs is part of the rate study. Staff is hopeful that the ERU count is higher than 4,800. • Using rough math, a rate increase of $1.28 per month purchases $1 million of capital improvements using utility revenue bonds. • The total estimated operating expense increase will need to account for the following: o Operating ■ Inflation in supplies and operating costs such as wages. ■ Recommending hiring an apprentice for succession planning and plant operational coverage with retirements near. o Capital for 0-5 years: ■ Wastewater Treatment Plant Repairs and Upgrades = $11 million ■ Collection System Repairs and Improvements = $12 million ■ Compost Facility Repairs and Upgrades = $3 million ■ Septage Receiving System Improvements: Note, that any increase in septage receiving facility would need to be covered through a partnership with Jefferson County given the majority of septage comes from outside of the city limits. o The total estimated capital for the sewer utility for years 6-10 include a major wastewater plant upgrade and a pipe rehabilitation program and are roughly estimated at $16 million. While this estimate will not directly have an impact on immediate rates, it will have an impact on future rates. o Finally, for years 11-20 there are much more significant expenses ahead of the City estimated at $98 million. This reflects the cost of upgrading the wastewater treatment plant and rehabilitating all of the concrete and clay pipes. As we have learned with the Water Street failure, these costs can increase significantly if the pipes are not caught in time and rehabilitated. These upcoming costs reinforce the concept of added connections and density (see the recent Whitepaper. Exploration of Strategies for Supporting Infill and Affordable Housing Related to Infrastructure Development, available here: hi :// li of it nli a oin�/ Vli w ir. h li vv lid:::::::4 v nt 1d::::::: 3666 Mi to li ................. d:::::::21 5533). These costs are not avoidable and thus the more people paying for the work, will lessen the burden on existing rate payers. The above figures are overwhelming and staff has already moved many of the improvements to a longer time frame. Additionally, the cost estimates are conservative to represent planning level estimates. However, staff does not recommend reducing them at this time as contingency is especially important in wastewater projects where construction costs are higher than many other types of projects. For example, the Gaines Street lift station was originally estimated at $750,000 and total actual costs was approximately $1.5 million. Additionally, most communities are in this same financially challenging situation necessitating significant grant resources. The City along with others needs to participate in requesting additional grant resources become available through the State and Federal Government. In general, while overall utility costs are high to residents, the cost of providing this complex utility service is lower than many other communities. Below is a list of communities and their wastewater rates for reference. Many of these current rates will be going up in the near future as these cities are also making adjustments to their systems. • Port Townsend: $56.10 • Bremerton: $69.77 • Bainbridge Island: $97.02 • Lake Stevens (Sewer District): $99.00 • Oak Harbor: $118.41 • Port Angeles: $87.58 • Poulsbo: $79.37 In summary, it does not come as a surprise that the costs of sewer infrastructure will be hitting Port Townsend hard. The facilities that were built over the last 50 years as a result of the Clean Water Act are coming of age and needing rebuilding. In addition, the new permitting requirements increase the need for additional treatment such as the nutrient grant. Finally, in the collections systems, the City of Port Townsend like many other are seeing pipe failures such as the Water Street pipe replacement project. Next Steps Staff will refine the capital program and review rate impacts with Financial Solutions Consulting Group. Staff will prepare a draft rate impact and present to City Council in October/November. Once rates have been set and the final sewer plan text and capital programs have been established, the General Sewer Plan will be sent to Department of Ecology for review. The review process is expected to take approximately 6 months before the plan can receive final adoption by the City Council. Staff will take into account sewer impacts into comprehensive planning associated with the periodic comprehensive plan update. Conclusion As required, the sewer utility is intended to be a self-supporting enterprise. Policy decisions regarding investment in the utility infrastructure will be made with adoption of the rates. The upcoming effort of adopting rates and a final General Sewer Plan will have lasting influence of the City of Port Townsend as it is melded into other infrastructure programs such as repairing streets, waterline improvements, and developing housing policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Power point presentation from RH2 Engineering CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION: No Action - Briefing ALTERNATIVES: ❑x Take No Action ❑x Refer to Committee ❑x Refer to Staff ❑ Postpone Action ❑ Remove from Consent Agenda ❑ Waive Council Rules and approve Ordinance ❑x Other: General Sewer Planning Update ID a in IM a II, --i I u imu IP IE J o II"„i in I1,,,,,,l e ire it ire, I I , F im Coleman, IPI, Overview o General Sewer IPlan Update • Overak U�Ddates • CoHection System 0 WWT:::) - SqDtage and Coni,Dost .ifty .:'ingiiineeriiing Sewer System Overview ,, -80 M i s of Pi 1pe - 14 Sewer Drainage Basins - 7 Lift Stations 2 Permitted ww II,,,,F.)s I Selptage Receiving and Compost F::"adihity .:'ingiiineeriiing 1. , , J " , n,, If �%/ , l ( o r-, V, �� I I 11"I""I 'J� " "") , o n s Sewer Illrulurn a Consistent M:IIh 2 11-6 u'TuIh r6IIhen ive II::)Van a I!Xhpu nsii n area iindu..uded sqparatOy Chart 3-1 Population Projections tee. n�m.,a,,: xext 1111 14,444 a ow�iM4 ,o� ',. s � rea 444 zmnsta mzl, � �.^° cu. co,m.rom.. �u s� wwwwwwww��wwwwwwww 6,444 ' /I f° 1 ria veao. xmaa q Cr4r4 4 24]5 241] 2019 2021 2013 2025 2027 2929 2431. 2433 2435 243] 243*] 2041 241 Year Table 3-3 Population Projections mmm 2430 Il 34G .,.,.,.,.,.,., .._]1,4]9 .. L➢ 248 .,.,.,.,.,. 9B. .,. ..1,..,.,. Se- service Sewer system 2111,m city sewer Population served eapan:loo Equivalent Population, with Year city Population System Population by Septi'systems Papulation' rapanslon 2013 9,579 9,18.8 391 - -- 2016 9,845 9,4114 391 � 12,827 2017 9,871 9,41204 3gi 1„11b 20ll89,950 ............. ...................... .. 9,439 3^9i ll,19G .................. 13,3GY. .......... 20➢ ,1111 Io,9G4] 9,669 391 .... .... .... 2024 10,148 9,757 391 1.374 13,8',3 2021 10,220 9,929 391 - -- 2022 10,339 9,981 359 2023 10,460 10,,134 326' 20x4 10 8A ➢0289 2%4 p 14289 702 ......... 10,706 ................................................. .........110 ......... 14 3 .................. 202E 10;23, ll0,G03 228 21G 10,81D 2027 10:938 1111.. 1!762 199 324 11.086 mmm 2430 Il 34G .,.,.,.,.,.,., .._]1,4]9 .. L➢ 248 .,.,.,.,.,. 9B. .,. ..1,..,.,. 54B .,.,.,648 .,.,.,.,., .,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,. 88E 11 .,.,.,.,.,.,.. 2111,m 1D,413mmm 11,896 1032 1i 613 ll1 X84 33 863 ,2444 2433(+10yearsl 11,948 11,748 b 971 12,720 2034 I1;B8G 11,BBb 0 1„041 12,827 2035 12,425 92,425 0 1„11b 13,140 .1111.. 2035 111 .......... ...223 ............. ...................... .. ➢2.1G5 .................. ... ... ... 4 ................... ll,19G .................. 13,3GY. .......... 12, 321. .... ➢2.,3 z21 .... 21111 .... .... .... .... 2038.. 12,479 12,479 0 1.374 13,8',3 2039 12 IN .....12130 1111. b 1111. .1.472 1111. 141 D 1..... 1111. 2443 r+24 a 13 344 13 344 4 1943 15 242 uuu ars muuuuluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, uuufuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJuuuuuuum,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, flulldoutl ��23,435 23,435 uuuu,�� 2,771 25,993 v�vali,.vo zxhuw,"a 1 I. vrol,... JPd atlas �v cs. lttIpav^alaciwn.. f::angiiineeriiing Historical Flow (Last 6 Years) Historical Monthly Aversge Influent Flaw o u f .. 3 I/ AAF per Percent of NPDES Sewer System AAF Capita MMF MDF PHF Permit Max. Month Peaking Factors Year Population (MGD) (gpcd) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) Limit' MMF/AAF MDF/AAF PHF/AAF 2016 9,403 0.85 91 1.07 1.99 -- 52% 1.26 2.33 -- 2017 9,469 0.84 88 0.92 1.39 2.79 45% 1.10 1.66 3.33 2018 9,548 0.87 91 1.16 1.82 3.06 57% 1.33 2.09 3.52 2019 9,658 0.78 81 0.87 1.12 2.35 43% 1.11 1.43 2.99 2020 9,746 0.80 82 1.15 2.37 3.34 56% 1.43 2.96 4.17 2021 9,818 0.84 85 1.02 2.18 --- 50% 1.22 2.60 --- 2016 to 2019 3.28 0.87 ��9�1�� Z633 to 2019 MaxAverage 1.16 1.99 3.06 1F3 3 3.52 1 =The City's WWTF is permitted for a maximum month average influent flow of 2.05 MGD. 2 = 2020 and 2021 values are not included in the historical averages and maximums due to the COVID pandemic. Historical Monthly Aversge Influent Flaw o u f .. 3 I/ J ril " " I Uty Ir roj, [ow - � Table 4-8 Projected WWTF Influent Flow for Sewer System Population Within City Limits 2025 Equivalent Sewer Pnojctod AAF Prj,dd MM,P-ent of NPIDES .J.dd MDF Prj,.Itd PHF Rjettd PHF wittl 10.GM 5"tt., iIMGIDI,l 1,GDV P.k M... 11MGDJ, JMCD Inflo. Rt&t61- year P",.I.Ii" 611 IN, 2..78 M..th, Urnit' 2028 2029 10.921 11,U85 (MGD) 20D 9,559 .... .....................................................................................E.................................. 9,669 0.87 0079 2116 O S7% ................................... UK 1.82 ...............................' E.7;� 3.06 ........................................ Fis . . ....................... 2020 9,7517 ago I is 561X, 2 37 334 bsXl 2021 9,929 0.84 1.02 50% 2..10 f191X 70% 2..99 3.03 2022 ........................... 5.E� ........................................... 22i 1.6� .................................. e.2 T.67 .................................. .................... ZU 3.91 .......................... 2023 ............. 10.134 .................................. 0.92 1.23 .................. .........................57 60% 2..61 ....................................... 3.69 .. . ...................... 2025 10.4115 0.91 1.27 62X, 1..69 3.80 - 2'.026 10.GM 0.97 1.29 631N, 2..73 3.86 - 2027 10.752 0.98 1.31 611 IN, 2..78 3.92 - 2028 2029 10.921 11,U85 0.99 1.01 1.33 1.35 651N, b6N, 2..82 2..86 3.98 - 4.04 - 2.030 11,248 1.02 1.37 b 7% 2..59 4.10 2.031 11,413 1.04 1.39 bsXl 2.94 4.16 2032 7033 1. 10 V-) 11,580 11,748 1.05 1.07 1.111 1.43 f191X 70% 2..99 3.03 4.22 4.28 3,Rfi ........................... 5.E� ........................................... illi6 ................................ 1.6� .................................. T�4 ................................... i6,.� ................................... T.67 .................................. .................... ZU 3.91 2034 12.14S 1.11 1.48 72X, 3..14 4.43 4.02 2037 12,321 1.12 1.50 73'N, 3..18 4.49 4.07 2038 12,479 1.14 1.52 TVA 3 22 4.54 4.13 2039 12,639 1.11 1.53 75'N, 326 4.60 4.19 2041D 12,901 1.17 1.55 76% 331? 4.66 4.25 2.041 12,945 1.19 1.57 77'X, 334 4.72 4.31 2042 13.132 1.20 1.59 78M 3..39 4.78 4.37 7043 J* 20 v,-) 13,31]6 1.21 1.91 79% 3.43 4.94 4.43 ww ni MMII::: IRated Capadty::::::: 2.05 MG) .:'ingiiineeriiing l/� J />(/ J r oj e r m. .m F, I . iow - Expansion Area Table 4-9 Projected WWTF Influent Flow for Sewer System Popullation Expansion 2033 J. 10 Y.."4 Equivalent Sewer Projected AAF Projected MMIP Projected MW Projected PHF 2036 System (MGD)' (MGD)' (MGD)' (MGD)' Year Population 0.16 0.22 0.46 0.82 2039 2039 1,374 1,472 0,17 0.19 0,23 0.25 0.,19 033 0.89 0.94 2019 - 0.21 011 0,28 0--756 0.60 "Ou T07 2020 - 013 030 0.65 1.14 2021 - 0.24 0.33 0.69 1.22 2022 - 0.29 0.39 0.83 1.41 2021- - .......................... 6 .................... E'66 .................. EG6� .................. Ej6 ................... 6.'66 ......... 202'5_.---------- 108---------- 9-.01 --------- --------- 0W9� ---------- 07 2026 216 0,03 0,04 0.9H O 14 2027 224 0.04 0.05 0.12 0.21 2029._._._._._._._._._._._._540._._._._._._._._._. 02q540 0,07 0,()9 0.19 �.�5 2010 649 0,08 0,11 0.21 0�.42 .............................. 16H ................................................. i�.� ...................................... ..................................... 0.10 EYi ...................................... ..................................... 0.27 6�.�6 ................... 2032 863 0.11 0.15 0.31 0.56 2033 J. 10 Y.."4 971 0.12 0.16 ................... 0.35 0.63 0.68 ......... 2036 1,196 0.15 0.20 0.40 O�.72 2037 1,282 0.16 0.22 0.46 0.82 2039 2039 1,374 1,472 0,17 0.19 0,23 0.25 0.,19 033 0.89 0.94 2040 2041 AIES0.20 1,691 0.21 011 0,28 0--756 0.60 "Ou T07 2042 1,912 013 030 0.65 1.14 2043(+20 ye -4 1,943 0.24 0.33 0.69 1.22 guildout 2,771 0.29 0.39 0.83 1.41 RH2 .:'ingiineeriing ril I Tota r o e a.,,, o w Table 4-10 Total Projected WV4TF Flow 2039 14.111 1.34 1.78 87% 3..79 5.54 5.13 2040 14.379 1.36 1.82 89% 3S6 1.66 5.25 ww ni MMII::: IRated Capadty::::::: 2.05 MG) .:'ingiiineeriiing Eq.i..I..t S. -,Percent 1p'.pedd AAF' R -j -td MMF' d NIPIDIES IMIDIF' . Projcte6 PHF' IR jetted PHF with 5"tm, pbJWI.Ii" (IMGD) JMGD) Permit Ma"Pojctd Month, Umie )MGD) JMGDd I,fl- Redi (IMIGID) 2018 (BaSellin.) 9,559 0.87 1.16 57H 1.82 3.06 2019 9,469 0.78 0.87 43% 1.12 2.35 2020 9,757 OM 1.15 56% 2.37 3.34 .929 0.94 2022 9,9191 0.91 1.21 59% 2.57 3.63 2023 10.134 0.92 1.23 60% 2.61 3.69 94 245 75 2025 ..................... 10.553 0.96 ............... 1.29 63% ........................... 2.73 ............... 3.87 .......... - - - - - - YOH - - - - - - - - - i'079 - - - - - -- E9? - - - - - - - 7.32. - - - - - -- E7% - - - - - - - - YTF - - - - - - 7.5'CT - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2027 11.086 1.02 1.36 66% 2.89 4.13 202B 11.354 1.01 1.40 68% 2.97 4.26 2029 11.624 1.08 1.411 70% 3..05 4.39 2m 1 1 -A�n 111 1.47 M� 313 J � � � � � � � � � � 2031 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 12.159 � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1.13 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1.51 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 7,1% � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 321 � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4.65 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2032 12.444 1.16 1.55 76% 329 4.78 20331. ID W-) 12,720 1.19 1.59 78H 3,39 4.91 454) 2034 12.927 1.21 1.62 79% 3..44 1.01 4.19 2,.035 13.140 1.24 1.65 80% 35D 1.1 .......... 2037 13.603 1.28 1.71 83% 3..44 1.31 4.90 2038 13.853 1.31 1.75 85% 3..71 5.42 SM 2039 14.111 1.34 1.78 87% 3..79 5.54 5.13 2040 14.379 1.36 1.82 89% 3S6 1.66 5.25 ww ni MMII::: IRated Capadty::::::: 2.05 MG) .:'ingiiineeriiing ef,:J-,, 2 Loa,,///,,, J Table 4-16 Total Projected WWTF BOD, Loading WY Y( rip mm �3u') Perrri�ttedEquivalent Projected Max. Sewer Projected Average Month Average Percent of NPIDES Capacty:::::: 3,154 pp d System Annual BOD, BOD, Permit Max. Population (ppdl' ' Month Limit' Year (ppdl 11 lowever, Mth current 2018 9,559 2,509 2,968 79% 2019 fBaseline) 9,669 2,591 2,718 72% operadons to rernove 2020 9,757 2,147 2,422 65% nItrogen, BOID treatment 2021 9,829 2,.221 2,500 67% 2022 9,9812,654 2,939 78% capac�ty �s reduced.. 2023 10,134 2,584 2,973 791/. 2024 10,289 2,715 3,007 80% 2025 10,553 2,768 3,066 82% 819 2„821 �125 83% ..................... Ezi ................................ H . ................................................................ ,086, 2,875 3,Tg� .............................. ............. 2028 11,354 2,928 3,243 86% 2029 11,624 2,982 3,303 88% 2030 11,896 3,037 3,363 90% 2031 12,169 3,091 3,424 '91% ------------- 2033 (* 10 years) 12,720 3,202 3,546 9 ilii �� ilii ilii �� ilii �,�� ilii i �� ilii iii�� iiiiiiiii 2035 13,140 3,286 3,639 97% 2036 13,361 3,130 3,688 98% 2037 13,603 3,378 3,741 100% 20313 13,853 3,428 3,797 101% 2039 14,111 3,480 3,854 103% 2040 14,379 3,533 3,913 104% 2041 14,656 3,589 3,975 106% 2042 UE! 122 1222 !08% .................... 3Ma ........... ...................................................................... ,........................................................................ .......................................................................�� Buildout 25,806 5,819 6,445 172% IRIH2 .:'ingiineeriing ou// I ti o n S y s t e m A n a I y si s ,9 lPipes Analyzed on Hydraulic Capacity and lPipe Condition - Hydraukca�,Dacity • Aina�ys�s perfoinirned us�ing coii'Tu�,)uteii, iirnodO for ex�stiing flows and 5:IIO and 20 year forecasted girowtlh • Girowt]h akcated D hAM Site and iinfM girowt]h tJhiroug[mut Uy .:'ingiiineeriiing r1l"ll lj/,v, .1h Allocation .:'ingiiineeriiing n 'k-11,", cdo n Syste m I U ra- f E? n, 1.; //fir a a dty p I S 1- p nag s 5 Year Ilmpaaveanants {CIP) 5 -Year I rnprovennents 2a R 1 & 29 1 ' R 11 , M 230 Wit 22.d St Rh I st mm All, we Inatr I All lbth 51 5th S, 0 0 Una m a ll 1 1 41 Tt0 a �g,� i65 TAR S Pl,k A', Pmt Tv -.d My IRI U [Dn&neeHing c don S s �t e m U r a d e s f o r C a a dJ ; y p g p y Jst 951: Legend301'Yn 10 Y Improven—ts b S2 zr HSP of d4 5c �CIP� D—thv L. W PY 5- and 10 -Year syeert I-Q199 -9th St 10 ye— fi4l" qS' 1I rn p rove rn e n is St 20 V St e- 23rd 23rd d 9t 2211d 51 Rq St A Sl dimfiWi'�5 2 21,t st 21,1 st 201h Ifth SL 'low- p.j,rc A,, 'ww, w 1btl, St 11 1 111,1411, Mtll �t �i �r, 'SO, St 9- In Ift, st 0�1 —IT 12th st It" D Om 5 % h st 41 Ah st (All SL fch .5t P.rt T.—nd RUy 51 Dngiiineeriiing c don S s t e m U r a d e s f o r C a a dJ ; y p g p y 1,11 )st $147 IF, L�gd Sm A" St 20 YY -r 1mp ....a -t (CIP c W 5 10 and 20 -Year IMINIO M, Al� rn p rove rn e n ts 2MI St . .......... - 20,.,, el - 5ro�„S 4k f 23ld A 14, st 22"dSl . % ?/ H'k,"s, PI 201hw^l4d SR lZ 5t 201h Sl Re me P, W6 up K IM st �0 dll Tr PojrrL Av2 M, 51 1w, &t mth s Ole 13u, St , qm'NM 2th Sl 4r , "Wh V I I th sk kO vo t S, P 9U, SL 575 BO 91, Rh 5t 4i P.,t T. --id B:.y D 41h R SM3 SM6 V xrvli se. Kst Nsr 'tsµ414 "Il-1-4 D�, flfld st e� Lawm nc. St ..bi..d I sewer separation, (SM9) 41 1k 4 WWI Existing Monroe Lift Station 9- improvements (WWI) Washington St suitcase (squashed) pipe replacement (SMID) ou// I ti o n S y s t e m A n a I y si s ,9 lPipes Analyzed on Hydraulic Capacity and lPipe Condition - Hydrauk caI,Dacity • Aina. 1perfoinirned usiiing coii'Tul,)uteii, iirnodO for exiistiing, 5... IIS and 20 year forecasted girowt]h • Girowt]h akcated a hAM Siite and iinfM girowt]h tJhiroug[mut Uy ,9 lPipe Condition • .oiii niend ini,D r IIDiI,DeHne data coHection conditions are un,Known • Assunied $350,000/yr in iieqp�acenients may want to increase .:'ingiiineeriiing W, 1"'I.J.'Jew Pipeline Inspection Van ma "0 IR .:'ingiiineeriiing 111 1111 ,/,1 f/ dr f ,,,1 / 1111 r it f/ / „1 o , , r "I dl IHVI NAIPa:Y City of Port Townsend "I dl II I'M I'dAIPa:Y Proposed Sewer System Improvements Implementation Schedule CIP Na. Project Description T (LF) Cast .23 5) Sewer Main Imp, SM1 Sims Way Crossing& Wilson Street Realignment 786 $1,2127 SM2 Howard Street&South Park Ave 1,079 $1,578,02 SM3 Sims Way, Third Street&Gise Street — Holcomb Sheet 796 531 $1,186,02 "19 no( SM7 Fl— l nte,ceptor Up, ,,g SMS Sealer System Defect Investigation SM9 Lawrence Street Combined Sealer *50% Cost sh— m the CIP table. It Is assumed an additional 50% will be paid by the road and storm drainage departments. *'This cost Is sh— spread out over a period of 20 years. Hoeveve,, it Is recommended that this cost be spread out over a longer period of time and grants be acquired for fund'mg these refurbishments. f::angiiineeriiing Long Range Sewer Main Refurbishments The $56,000,000 cost estimate -to line all concrete, asbestos cement (AC) and vitrified clay pipe (V/ IP) is conservative. • Assuni�,Dtions were imade for II ii I, imaterW if un�,Known, • Not ak conc, AC and VO°' wiH inHning II sed on condition • To mitt gatethis cost, rigorous video inspection must be performed -to rehabilitate pipe near failure. • Possibly could defer $40,000,000 in sewer lining -to beyond 20 years • City should have success obtaining grants for -this infrastructure replacement work II Il � iiWudks rd,C�ean Water, .:'ingiineeriing Wastewater Treatment Plant e Main considerations • Age of fackity (-30 years in service) • Ca��,Dacity to serve D�anned growd'i u get So u ��i d N utri e ��it �Red u cti o ��i eoj ect requiiii eiii eiii ts • Plant is well maintained, but no major upgrades in 30 years • Existing WWTIF site is built out e Capital projects are needed -to address -these issues in -the near term and longer term 20 year planning period .:'ingiineeriing WWTP Layout ayout .:'ingiiineeriiing Ca�piiital hirqprovernein-t City of Port Townsend Proposed Sewer System Improvements Implementation Schedule t1mate CUP Cost No. Project Description (2023 $) years years o Main drivers aeration II sins for c a If a c i ty a iii IP S e S 1 11R Additiona� darifier caIfDa.ii ty for growd'i and .:'ingiineeriing e p a g e a n d C o m p o st * Constructed in 1993 Cubic yards of compost per year: 4,31 8 Capital projects •�RqDair of site and fackities • UII' ,Dgii,adesfoit,additioiii a�caIfDacity ,9 Jefferson County septage receiving study - II iiIfDiieogiieess,ilii eetiiii gwitIl,iCouiii tysooiii .:'ingiineeriing N e Jg a e a d Compost Facility i ear -ler, Capital �p g L.:NRI::1 11AINAIRY City of Port Tomsend :NRI::1 11011MIRY Proposed Sevier System Improvements Implementation Schedule M .:'ingiineeriing /% r