The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006.12.16 - Wetland Critical Area StudyWETLAND CRITICAL AREA STUDY PREPARED FOR PROPERTIES OWNED BY William and Mary Roberts Located in a portion of Section 09, T.30N.; R.01-W.; W.A Proposed Project: PROPERTY SALE Project Name: ROBERTS 987001401 Reference: Port Townsend Building and Community Development Prepared for: William. and Mary Roberts' P. 0. Box 2434 Homer, AK 99603 -2434 Prepared By: Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting W. David Loggy, CPSS P.O. Box 2347 Port Angeles, WA 98362 -0303 360) 457 -3920 December 16, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CONSULTING COMPANY 1 TYPE OF CRITICAL INVESTIGATION 1 LAND OWNER I APPLICANT 1 PROPOSED PROTECT I PARCEL NUMBER I SITE LOCATION 1 LAND USE CODE 1 ZONING I L WETLAND CRITICAL AAREA DELINEATIONA AND CLASSIFICATION 2 WETLAND SIZE ON PROPERTY 2 WETLAND CLASSMCATIONS 3 CRITICAL AREA BUFFER RE UIREMENTS 3 H. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 -10 Landscape Position 4 Slope gradient 4 Geologic Materials 4 Water types present 42 5. WETLAND SITES 4-8 A. PLOT No.: Wet i - Lot 8 and Wet 1- Plot 1- 2005 (WP -05) 4-6 B. PLOT No.: Wet 1-- Lot 6 (W1- 6), Wet 2 Lot 6 and Wet3 Lot 6 - 2005 6-8 6. NON - WETLAND SITES 4 -10 A. PLOTS No. Non -wet 1- Lot S and Non- Wet 1- Lot 6 4 -10 TABLES TABLE ONE -FLAG NUMBERING OF WETLAND HABITAT AREAS 2 TABLE TWO WETLAND HABITAT, FUNCTIONS AND CATEGORY 3 TABLE THREE = WETLAND CLASSIFIECATION 3 TABLE FOUR - BUFFER REQUIREMENTS 4 TABLE FIVE - VEGETATION ON PLOTS $ AND vp24S -95 5 TABLE SIX - VEGETATION ON PLOTS wplA WP2-6 and WPl -6-05 7 TABLE SEVEN - VEGETATION ON PLOTS N -WP1- s and N -WP1 - 6 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A - APPROACH AND METHODS APPENDIX B -HELD DATA SHEETS AND WETLAND CLASSIFICATION RATING APPENDIX C - MAPS, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND CRITICAL AREA DRAWINGS APPENDIX D - PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE CRITICAL AREA REPORT CONSULTING COMPANY: Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting TYPE OF CRITICAL AREA INVESTIGATION: Soils Wetlands Fish & Wildlife Habitat Areas LAND OWNER: APPLICANT: PROPOSED PROJECT: TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): SITE LOCATION: LEGAL LOCATION: STREET ADDRESS: ROAD ROUTE INSTRUCTIONS: LAND USE CODE: ZONING CODE: Roberts 987001401 1 William. and Mary Roberts PA. Box 2434 Homer, AK 99603 -2434 907 - 235 -0529 William and Mary Roberts Property Sale 987'001401 Section 9, Township 30 North, Range I West, W.M., Port Townsend, Jefferson County, Washington. Discovery Road_ Located between Howard Street and Eddy Street north and south of Discovery Road (See Figure 3 Appendix Q. 9100 — Vacant Laud R -II (SF) hli3 ao C"+ I. WETLAND CRITICAL AREA DELINEATION AND CLASSIFICATION: The approach and methods used in the wetland and non wetland delineation and determination are detailed in Appendix A. The bearings and distances for the compassed transect is provided in the Transeet Bearing and Distance Table in Appendix C. The wetland boundary is marked with 3" x 5" orange plastic wire whips. The wetland whips not always consecutively numbered. The whips have the station numbers for compass traverse, the date the boundary was established and the lettering LSWC indicating Loggy Soil and Wetland consulting as the delineator. Each wetland whip has an orange wetland boundary ribbon attached to it. In heavy shrub areas additional wetland boundary ribbon has been placed at near eye level for easy location ofthe wetland boundary stations. The critical area associated with the tax parcel is shown in the Critical Area Drawing in Appendix C_ The bearings and distances of the wetland stations for the wetland boundary in the drawing ofthis report were established using a staff or hand held compass and hip chain. The drawing in this report is not a legal survey. The location of the property lines are either estimated from fence lines or monuments or from property survey plats. TABLE ONE FLAG NUMBERING OF WETLAND HABITAT AREAS WETLAND DELINEATION BASED ON: STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual Ecology Publication No. 96 - -94, adopted under WAC 173- 22 -08, March 1997 (Port Townsend Municipal Code 19.05. 110 Critical are 5 — Wetlands B3) Data sheet for the wetland identification can be viewed in Appendix B. WETLAND SIZE ON PROPERTY: On Lot 1 through 10 — 28,677 square feet (0.66 acres) On Lot 6 — 1,275 square feet (0.03 acres) On all Lots — 29,953 square feet (0.69 acres) Roberts 987001401 2 LSWC 12/16/06 WETLAND CRITICAL AREA DELINEATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONTHWED WETLAND CLASSIFICATION TABLE TWO WETLAND HABITAT, FUNCTIONS AND CATEGORYI ITERIA FUNCTION ASPECT e See Table Six lity Function* 22 Function* rHydrologic 8 ction* 11 ions* 41 tegory III See Wetland Rating Forms - Western Washington in Appena" DJ TABLE THREE WETLAND CLASSMCAT ION2 abitat S stem Class Subclass Water Re 'mes Soi[ Special Modifiers 40 feet Scrub -shrub Broadleaved SaWrated mineral None FWetland 7 -14 Palustrine 7 Palustrine Scrub -shrub & emergent Broad - leaved persistent Saturated mineral None CRITICAL AREA BUFFER REQUIREMENTS TABLE FOUR BUFFER REQUIREMENTS e o Habitat Function Score Land Use Im acts & Intensi Levells Buffers WidtFrWetland 20 Low 40 feet Moderate 60 feet gib 80 feet EFFECT OF BUFFERS Due to the configuration ofthe wetland on Lots 1 through 10, buffers from the wetland boundary will completely cover the remaining upland (non - wetland) areas on the lots even ifthe lots bare managed for low land use impacts and intensity levels. Buffers for moderate and high land use impacts and intensity levels are well beyond the boundaries for block ld. 1 Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State wetland rating system for western Washington - Revised. Washington State Department ofEcology Publication # 04 -06 -025 2 Lewis M Cowardin, Virginia Carter, Francis. C. Golet and Edward T. LaRue, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service FSW /OBS- 79/31, December 1979 Roberts 987001401 3 LSWC 12/16/06 II. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: 1. LANDSCAPE POSITION: HILLSLOPES FLOODPLAINS LEVEL TERRACES MARINE TERRACES ALLUVIAL FAN VALLEYS LANDSLIDE OTHER (EXPLAIN) 2. SLOPE GRADIENT: 3. GEOLOGIC MATERIALS STREAM & RIVER BASINS TERRACCE DEPRESSION GLACIAL OUTWASH COASTAL DUNES MARINEBLUFF SWALES LAKES & PONDS 0 -3 Percent ALLUVIAL ASH COLL UVIAL GLACIAL DRIFT GLACIAL OUTWASH COMPACT TILL LACUSTRINE ORGANICS EOLIAN RESIDUUM 4. WATER TYPES PRESENT (Table 6, C.C.C. 2712.315): IRRIGATION DITCH STREAM, RIVER OR LAKE IRRIGATION DITCH ASSOCIATED WITH STREAM OR RIVER NIA STREAM, RIVER POND OR LAKE NAME: N/A TYPE I WATER TYPE 2 WATER TYPE 3 WATER TYPE 4 WATER TYPE 5 WATER NIA 5. WETLAND SITES A. PLOT No.: Wet Plot 1— Lot 8 WPI-8) and Wet Plot 2 — Lot 8 - 2005 2 -8 -05 i. VEGETATION TYPE: Herbaceous ® Estuarine Forested Scrub -Shrub Native Non -native Roberts 987001401 4 LSWC 12/16/06 EXISTING ME CONDITIONS CONTINUED TABLE FIVE VEGETATION ON PLOTS Wet 1 Lot 8 AND Wetland 1Plot 1 - 2005 (W1P1 -05) PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER Wet 1 -Lot 8 Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC 20 Slough sedge Carex obim to FACW 35 alder A1nus rubra FAC 25 dhack S iraea dou lash FACW 20 lackbe Rubus ursinus FACU T Wetland l Plot 12005 a rose Rosa autkana FAC 25 sedgea Carer obnn to FACW 25 r (shrub) Alnus rubra FAC 20 er (trees) Ahms rubra FAC 20 H blackbe Rubus roeerus FACU 20 asses A stir sp. FAC T en fern Pteridium a eulinum FACU T ii. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION PRESENT Yes ® No iii. SOILS NRCS Soil Map Unit and Series: Clallam gravelly sandy I0a12 Field Identified Map Unit & Series: Clallam poorly drained sandy loam variant SOIL DEPTH: Shallow Moderately deep Deep ® Very Deep SOIL DRAINAGE: Excessively Somewhat Excessively I Well Mod. Well Somewhat Poorly Poorly Very Poorly WPI-8 and WP2 8 05 SOILS (See Individual Data Sheets in Appendix B for soil descriptions at plot sites). SOIL SURFACE: 4 to 6 inches thick - Al - Very dark grayish brown (10YR 312) silt loam f moderate medium granular structure I clear or abrupt wavy boundary. SUBSURFACE: 0 to 6 inches thick — A2 - Very dark grayish brown (10YR 312) silt loam I few moderate distinct dark yellowish brown (10YR 414) mottle I few medium granular I clear wavy boundary Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington, 1975. Fred R. McCreary, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil conservation Service, in cooperation with the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. Roberts 987001401 5 LSWC 12/16/06 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTEVUED SUBSOIL: SUBSTRATUM: 3 to 6 inches thick — Abwig— Very dark grayish brown (10YR 312) and dark gray (10YR 411) sandy loam to silt loam / common fine to medium: distinct dark _yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) & (10YR 5/4) mottles and or redox concentrations / weak medium subangular blocky structure / clear or gradual wavy boundary. 2 to 4 inches thick — Bw2g — Brown (10YR 5/3) and dark gray (10YR 4/1) sandy loam to gravelly ashy sandy loam / many coarse distinct dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4), red (5YR 4/6) and reddish brown 5YR 4/4) mottles and or redox concentrations/ sand to gravelly ashy loamy sand / massive or subangutar blocky structure / abrupt wavy boundary. 9 +inches thick — Cig— Gary (IOYR 511) gravelly ashy loamy sand / many coarse prominent reddish brown (5YR 416) mottles and or redox concentrations / massive. HYDRIC SOILS: YES ® NO If yes, identify hydric soil indicators: - A11. Depleted Below Dark Surface 43f (2) (a) Matrix chroma of 2 or less in mottled soils$ iv. WATER SOURCE FOR l Precipitation Unconfined Aquifer Lake v. AQUIC CONDITIONS: Endosaturation IYDROLOGY: Unconfined Aquifer, Tidally Influenced Marine, Tidally influenced E] Stream Discharge Episaturation ® Anthric Saturation B. PLOT No.: Wet Plot 1— Lot 6 P1— 6h Wet Plot 2 — Lot 6 2 — 6 and Wet Plot 1 — Lot 6 -2005 1 -6 -OS VEGETATION TYPE: Herbaceous Forested Native Non - native Estuarine Scrub -Shrub 4 USDA, MRCS. 2002 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.1 _ G.W_ Hurt, P.M Whited, and RF. Pringle (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the national Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth; TX. 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96 -94, March 1997. Roberts 987001401 6 LSWC 12/16/06 VYCTJ —iNE V -VV. VV CE 1. IAIL - u Nootka rose Rosa nutkana b Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC- 10 Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FACW ` F EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED Agrostis s FAC 70 dayan blackbe Rubus rocerus Vj 10 TABLE SIX Alnus rubra FAC i0 VEGETATION ON PLOTS 10 Wet 1— Lot 6, Wet 2 Lot 6 and Wet Plot 3 -Lot 6- 2005(WP3 -6 -05) FACW T PLANT INDIC OR PERCENT COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUSI COVER Wet 1-- Lot 6 Bent saes A ostis s FAC 80 Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FACW T Cree in buttercu Ranunculus re us FACW T Tall fescue Festuca anmdinacea FAG T Perennial ryegrass Lolium perenne FACU T VYCTJ —iNE V -VV. VV CE 1. IAIL - u Nootka rose Rosa nutkana Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC- 10 Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FACW ` F bent rasses Agrostis s FAC 70 dayan blackbe Rubus rocerus FACU 10 Red alder Alnus rubra FAC i0 VYCTJ —iNE V -VV. Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FACW 30 Hardhack S iraea douglasii FACW 10 Hin[ala an blaclrberry Rubus roeerus FACU 20 bent rasses Agmstis sp FAC 30 Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC- 10 Soft rush Juneus of -usus FACW T SPECL NOTE: The northern edge ofthis wetland has dominant vegetative cover of Rosa nutkana with some Rubus procerus and Rubus ursinus. The soil in this portion ofthe wetland is the same as found described in the 3 recorded on the wetland on Lot 6. on the rest of the wetland plots ii. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION PRESENT Yes No iii. SOILS NRCS Soil Map Unit and Series: Claliam gravelly sandy loarn6 Field Identified Map Unit & Series: Clallarn poorly drained sandy loam variant SOIL DEPTH: Shallow Moderately deep Deep ® Very Deep SOIL DRAINAGE: Excessively Somewhat Excessively 1 Well Mod. Well Somewhat Poorly Poorly Very Poorly 6Soi1 Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington, 1975. Fred R McCreary, United States Department ofAgriculture, Soil conservation Service, in cooperation with the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. Roberts 987001401 7 LSWC 12116106 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED WP1 - 6. WP2 - 6 and WPI — 6 — 2005 SOILS (See Individual Data Sheets in Appendix B for soil descriptions at plot sites). SOIL SURFACE: 3 to 9 inches thick — A horizons — very dark grayish brown IOYR 312 ) or very dark brown (10YR 212) loam or silt loam / moderate fine to medium granular structure / common to many very fine, fine and medium roots / clear or abrupt wavy boundary. SOIL SUBSURFACE: 0 to 4 inches thick — AB horizons - very dark grayish brown 10YR 312) and brown (10YR 513) sandy loam / weak fine subanguiar blocky structure / clear wavy boundary. SUBSOIL: 6 to 10 inches thick — Bwg horizons — can be a mixture of two or more of the these colors: brown (10YR 5/3), grayish brown (10YR 5 /2), gray (10YR 511) and dark gray (10YR 411) sandy loams to silt loams / dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4 & 4/6) and reddish brown (5YR 4/4) mottles and or redox concentrations, weak fine and coarse, to strong fine subangular blocky structure. HYDRIC SOILS: YES ® NO If yes, identify hydric soil indicators:. A11. Depleted Below Dark Surface 43f (2) (a) Matrix chroma of 2 or less in mottled soils$ iii. WATER SOURCE FOR 7 Precipitation Unconfined Aquifer Lake iv. AQUIC CONDITIONS: Endosaturation 6. NON - WETLAND SITES IYDROLOGY: Unconfined Aquifer, Tidally Influenced Marine, Tidally influenced Stream Discharge Episaturation ® Anthric Saturation A. PLOT No.: Non -Wet 1— Lot 8 (N -WPI 8) i. VEGETATION TYPE: Herbaceous Estuarine Forested ® Scrub -Shrub Native Non -Native 7 USDA, MRCS. 2002 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.1.. G.W. Hurt, P.M. Whited, and R.F. Pringle (eds.). USDA, MRCS in cooperation with the national Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX. s STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96 -94, March 1997. Roberts 987001401 8 LSWC 12/16/06 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED TABLESEVEN VEGETATION ON PLOTS Non -Wet 1 Lot S (NWI -8) and Non -Wet 1 Lot 6 (N -W1fi) PLANT INDICATOR PERCENT COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS COVER N -WPl -8 Salal Gaultheria shallop FACU 50 Scouler willow Salix scouieriana FAC 20 Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC, 1s Oceanspray Holodiscus discolor FACU T Douglas fir Pseudotsu a menziesii FACU 40 Red alder Alpus rubs FAC 10 N -WP1 -6 Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FACU 75 Canada thistle Cirsium arvense FACU T Nootka rose Rosa nutkana Himalayan blackberry Rubus procerus FA T bent asses Agrostis s . FAC 20 SPECIAL NOTE: Lot 7 on the south side of Discovery Road has a vegetative ofapproximately 40 percent each of Rosa nutkana and Symphoricarpos albus while the 10 percent is made up of Rubus procerus and Rubus ursinus_ Lot 6 west of the wetland has a dominant vegetative cover of Rosa nutkana and Rubus ursinus with some Rubus procerus. These two sites have the same soils as the soils recorded for Plat N— WP1 -6. ii, HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION PRESENT Yes No M iii. SOILS NRCS SOIL MAP UNIT AND SERIES: Clallam gravelly sandy loamy FIELD IDENTIFIED MAP UNIT & SERIES: N — WPi — 8, Lynnwood series N — WP1— 6, Clallam loamy variant SOIL DEPTH: Shallow SOIL DRAINAGE: Excessively Mod. Well Very Poorly Moderately deep Deep Somewhat Excessively Somewhat Poorly Very Deep Well Poorly 9 Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington, 1975. Fred R McCreary, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil conservation Service, in cooperation with the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. Roberts 987001401 9 LSWC 12/16/06 SOILATN —WPI -S SOIL SURFACE: 2 to 0 inches — Oi horizon — Forest duff 0 to 4 inches — A horizon — very dark grayish brown (10YR 312) loamy sand / moderate fine granular structure / common fine and medium roots / clear broken boundary. SOIL SUBSURFACE: 4 to 6 inches — E horizon— brown. (10YR 5 /3) loamy sand / weak fine granular structure / few fine roots / abrupt broken boundary. SUBSOIL: 6 to 12 inches — Bsl horizon — Brown (75YR 414) loamy sand / weak very fine subangular blocky structure parting to moderate medium granular structure / few coarse and medium roots / clear wavy boundary. 12 to 20 inches -- Bs2 — brown (10YR 4/3) loamy fine sand / moderate medium subangular blocky structure f few fine coarse and medium roots. SUBSTRATUM: Not Sampled SOILATN— WPl- -6 SOIL SURFACE: 0 to 4 inches — All horizon — very dark grayish brown 14YR 312) loamy sand 1 moderate fine granular structure I many very fine, fine and few coarse roots / clear wavy boundary SOIL SUBSURFACE: 4 to13 inches — Al2 horizon — very [lark grayjsh brown 10YR 3/2) gravelly loamy sand / weal[ coarse subangular blocky structure parting to moderate medium granular structure I few very fine roots I clear wavy boundary. 13 to 22 inches A13 horizon — very dark grayish brown 10YR 312) silt loam / moderate medium granular structure ! few fine and medium roots / clear wavy boundary. SUBSOIL: 22 to 26 inches — Bw horizon — brown (IOYR 513) silt loam / common medium prominent reddish brown (5YR 414) mottles weak fine subangular blocky structure / few very fine roots. HYDRIC SOILS: YES NO iv. WATER SOURCE FOR l Precipitation Unconfined Aquifer Lake v. AQUIC CONDITIONS: Endosaturation NIA IYDROLOGY: Unconfined Aquifer, Tidally Influenced Marine, Tidally influenced Stream Discharge Episaturation Anthric Saturation Roberts 987001401 10 LSWC 12/16/06 APPENDIX A APPROACH AND METHODS APPROACH AND METHODS Wetland Determination Two levels of information were gathered for this analysis. These included: a) Review ofpreliminary site data and, b) On -site investigation to determine the presence ofwetlands. A) A review of existing information was conducted to develop background knowledge ofphysical features, and to identify the potential for wetland occurrence on the subject property. The resource documents available for preliminary review of the site conditions included: USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS), "Soil Survey of 3efferson County Area Washington ", City of Port Townsend aerial photography, and the City ofPort Townsend and Jefferson County Planning Departments Data b) Dining the on -site investigation, wetland areas were determined and verified on the basis of three parameters: Hydrophytic Vegetation, Hydric Soils, and Wetland Hydrology, as recommended in the Washington State Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington State Department of Ecology, Ecology Publication #96 -944, March 1997). Wetlands categories and wetland vegetation classes were identified and classified using the following cited reference: Hruby, T. 2004, Washington State wetlands rating system ofwestern Washington — Revised.-Washington State Department of Ecology Publication 904 -06-025. A ospitivewetlanddeterminationismadewhenallthreeparametersarepresent, or in certain situations determined following the guidelines recommended in wetland determination procedures, or for atypical situations or problem areas. Hvdronhvtic Veaetation Areas where more than 50% ofthe dominant species present from all strata are hydrophytes (plants adapted to growth and reproduction in saturated soil conditions) are considered to be inside the wetland boundary, unless clear evidence of hydric soils or wetland hydrology cannot be established. A species is considered dominant if it is equal to or greater than 20% areal cover, or exerts a controlling influence on, or defines the character ofa community. Hydrophytic vegetation is determined to be present, when under normal circumstances: More than 50% of the dominant plant species in a plant community have an indicator category of Obligate Wetiard (OBL), Facultative Wetland (FACW), and/or Facultative (FAC) as listed in "National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) " (Reed, Porter B., Jr., 1988), and the "1993 Supplement to National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9)" dated December 1993 that became effective on March 31, 1994. Indicator categories ofFACW +, FACW -, FAC +, are included as FACW status. FAC+ species are considered to be wetter (i.e., have a greater estimated probability of occurring in wetlands) than FAC species, while FAC- species are considered to be drier (i.e., have a lesser estimated probability of occurring in wetlands) than FAC species.' Plant indicator status definitions are presented in TABLE 1 below. This Plant Indicator Status Categories system was developed for the iJUSFWS National Wetlands Inventory by Cowardin et al. (1979). The National Plant List Panel, Reed, Porter B., and Jr. modified it in 1988 and 1993. The Wetland Indicator Category (WIC) used in this report refers to the plants Indicator Symbol as referred to in the table below. National indicators reflect the range of estimated probabilities (expressed as a frequency of occurrence) of a species occurring in a wetland versus a non - wetland across the entire distribution of the species. ( "National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) ", Reed, Porter B., Jr., 1988), and the 1993 Supplement to List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) dated December 1993 that became effective Purpose and Approach Continued on March 31, 1994. Percentages expressed as estimated probability. TABLET Indicator Category Indicator Symbol Definition OBLIGATE WETLAND OBL Occur almost always, >99% (estimated PLANTS probability) in wetlands under natural conditions. <1% in non wetlands. FACULTATIVE WETLAND FACW Usually occur in wetlands, 67 -99% and PLANTS 1 -33% in non- wetlands. FACULTATIVE PLANTS FAC Equally likely to occur in wetlands and noa wetlands 34 -66 %. FACULTATIVE UPLAND FACU Usually occur in non wetlands 67 -99% PLANTS but occasionally found in wetlands 1-33 %. OBLIGATE UPLAND UPL Almost always occur in non - wetlands of Plants Northwest Region 9, >99 %- <1% in wetlands. Hydric Soils There have been tremendous scientific changes since 1991 in several of the indicators such as the introduction of aquic conditions to cover the requirements for saturation, reduction, and morphological indicators used to define the modified aquic moisture regime, and mottles and low chroma colors being replaced by redoximorphic features. Because of these changes, we consult the US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service. 1998. "Field Indicators ofHydric Soils in the United States, Reversion 5.1 ". G. W. Hurt, Whited, P. M., and Pringle, R. F. (eds.), USDA, MRCS, Ft. Worth, TX for guidance and decision in making final hydric soils determinations. Additionally, compliance to changes in Hydric Soils of the United States published in Federal RegisterNol. 59, No. 133/July 13, 1994 and Vol. 60, No. 37IFebnzaty 24, 1995 addressing Criterion 2 of the Criteria for Hydric Soils definition is being observed. The main purpose for the criteria is to create Hydric Soil Lists. Criteria 1, 3, and 4 can serve as both database criteria and as indicators for identification of hydric soils. When Criteria 1, 3, and 4 are used to document the presence of a hydric soil, proof that anaerobiosis exists must also be obtained. Criterion 2 serves only to retrieve hydric soils from the database. Also, the wording for Criteria I and 2 were changed in 1999 to incorporate recent changes in Soil Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff, 1999). Field indicators ofhydric soil conditions in this document, (Land Resource Region (LRR) A that includes Western Washington), are presented here in an abbreviated form and include: Purpose and Approach Continued Field indicators of hydric soil conditions in this document, (Land Resource Region (LRR) A that includes Western Washington), are presented here: 1) ALL SOILS: Al. Histosols; A2. Histic Epipedons; A4. Hydrogen sulfide; A6. Organic Bodies; A7. Mucky mineral; A8. Muck Presence; A10. 2 cm Muck; All. Depleted Below Dark Surface; and Al2. Thick Dark Surface 2) SANDY SOILS: Sl. Sandy Mucky Mineral; S4. Sandy Gleyed Matrix; S5.Sandy Redox; and S6. Stripped Matrix 3) LOAMY AND CLAYEY SOILS: F1. Loamy Mucky Mineral; F2. Loamy Gleyed Matrix; F3. Depleted Matrix; F6. Redox Dark Surface; F7.Depleted Dark Surface; and F8. Redox Depressions; Wetland Hvdrolo Water is the driving force for wetlands. Indications of wetland hydrology are those where the presence of water has an overriding influence on characteristics of vegetation and soils due to anaerobic and reducing conditions, respectively. Areas that are seasonally saturated anchor inundated to the surface for a consecutive number of days for more than 12.5% of the growing season are wetlands provided the soil and vegetation parameters are met. Areas wet between 5% and 12% of the growing season in most years may or may not be wetlands. Areas saturated to the surface for less than 51/o of the growing season are non- wetlands. Wetland hydrology exists iffield indicators are present. Field indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not limited to visual observations of inundation, ponding, soil saturation, oxidized root channels (rhizospheres) associated with living roots and rhizomes, watermarks, drift lines, water -borne sediment deposition, orwetland drainage patterns. The growing season starting and ending dates are required to evaluate hydrologiic data. For wetland determinations, the growing season is determined using the local SCS county soils surveys. Generally, the growing season is calculated based on the "28 degrees F or lower" temperature threshold at a frequency of "5 years in 10 ". For much of western Washington at low elevations, the mesic growing season (March 1 to October 31) has been considered a good rule. However, in some areas of the Puget Sound Lowlands and coastal areas the growing season occurs all year round because the soil temperature at 19.7 inches below the soil surface is higher than 41 degrees F. Purpose and Approach Continued Plant Identification and Classification Primary references used for scientific plant names and the endemic and non - native or exotic status of plants to the North Olympic Peninsula were determined as found in Flora ofthe Pacific Northwest by Hitchcock and Cronquist, Univ. of Washington Press, 1972. Other references referred to included: (1) A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington & Northwestern Ore on by Sarah Spear Cooke, editor, Washington Native Plant Society, May 1997; Wetland plants of Oregon & Washington by Jennifer Guard, Lone Pine Publishing, 1995; (2) Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast- Was on, Ore on. British Columbia & Alaska edited by Pojar and Mackinnon, D.C. Forest Service, Research Program, Lone Pine Publishing, 1994 and, D.C_ Forest Service, Research Program, Lone Pine Publishing, 1994; and (3) Northwest Weeds by Ronald I Taylor, Mountain Press Publishing Company, 1990 APPENDIX B WETLAND FIELD DATA SHEETS WETLAND CLASSIFICATION SHEETS DATA FORM 1 WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation ]Manual) RrojectlSite: Howard Street LID - Parcels 987001401 &. 9870014.10 Stratum Date:. March 21, 2005 Applicant/owner. DonFinant Plant SLwcies County/Jefferson City: fort 'Townsend Invistigaltor(s): W. David Loggy, Doggy Soil & Wetland Consulting indicator State : .Washington Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes o No Community ID:: Scrub -Shrub Wetland Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes No M Transect ID: North ofDiscovery Rd. Is the area a poteotiai problem area Yes No ® Plot ID: Wetland 1 Plot l VF.C.FTATTON Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Cover indicator DonFinant Plant SLwcies Stratum ta Cover indicator Slough sedge (Caob) Herb. 25 FACW Red Alder (Alru) TrM 20 FAC Nootka rose (Rona) Shrub 25 FAC 1 I Bentgrssses (Agrostis sp) Herb T FAC Himalayan Black S (hasp) Shrub 20 FACU Eraeken£ ern Herb T FAGS Red Alder saplings (Alru) Shrub 21) FAC HYDROPHYTIC YEGETA.TIONLNDICATORS: QF_ Dominants (}BL FACW and FAC; 415 =:80% Check all indicators that apply * explain below. Regional knowledge ofplaint.eommunities Wetland plant list (Nat'l or regional) Other. Physiological ,or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 inches Dil; @r Technical Literature Wetland plant data base Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage patterns in Wetlands1Rlleld.Ubservatiolas:. Hydropbytic vegetation present? Yes No ® Rationale for deeis onslRemarks: ftvnR(iT,CH:V Is it the growing season? Yes- - ho Based on; Shrubs leafing out and soil temp. above 47.54 F. at 20 inches. Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators: Stream, lake, ortidal gauge Aerial photographs Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 inches Dil; @r Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage patterns in Wetlands1Rlleld.Ubservatiolas:. Depth. to free water in it: ;> 20 Incites Secondary Indicators (2 or more retluimM OYidcce. Rot Channels in Upper t2: inches Local Shine. yDat Local Soil Survey Data 0 FaC- NEUTRAL Test Depth. to.saturated soil x.20 Inches Wetland h drol resent Yes No El Comments. Wetland. hydrology is not apparent due to dry conditions. Shrubs, trees and slough sedge have water staining d Other(Explain in Remarks). above the ground surface REMARKS. Common snowberry is well leafed out and scouter willows starting to leaf out and has mature catkins. SOILS . Map Unit Name: Clallam gravelly sandy loam 0 -15 °fo. Series and Phase):Clallam Draiaage.Class: Moderately well Taxonomy (Subgroup): Oxyaquic Vitrandic Haplexerepts Field observation confirm mapped unit Yes No ED Corrected Map Unit Name or Taxonom Subgroup) Loamy-skeletal, isotic, mesic A uandic Epiaguepts Prole i]escrt t1On5: Depth Matrix Color Mottle or Redox. Mottle or Redox Texture, Concretions, Incises) Horizon Munsell Moist Colors Abundance/Size( Structure, etc. 1Viuusell Moist Contrast 0-4 A] 16YR 3/2 silt loam; moderate medium granular; common v. fine,. fine & medium roots; abrupt y ` (aw). 4.7 ABwlg IOYR 3f? & 411 5YR416 common fine prominent silt loans; many v_ fine, fine; lox concentrations medium & common Coarse roots; adual Wavy 7 -11 Bw2g IOYR 411 5YR 416 many medium prominent gravelly ashy sandy loam; strong redox Concentrations meditu?2 subangnlar blocky; few very fine ,& fine roots; aw_ 11 -20 C1g lOYR 511 5'YR 416 many coarse prominent gravelly ashy loamy sang massive; redox concentrations feSv very fine roots. .............. . y&jc Soil Indicators: Histesol Concretions Histic Rpipedon High Organic Content in. SurfaccLayer of Sand Soils Sulfidie Oder 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic ]Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Sails List Reducing Conditions Listed au National Hydric Soils List Gle yeti or Low- -Chroma Colors. Other (Explain in Remarks REMARKS: Vi'ETLAND IiI+ TERMIINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes jo Nn Is the sample point within a wetland Yes N No El Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes N No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No WA State Wedand Delineation N- tauual 1999.aud 141, i rnrne 111.. tlaonrl nelinv2tinn Mannal.i: fProject/Site: a - , V c f Date: - ApPltiter. i i A C ' t175 j :Location. Cli}r: - 3 4 ri •, P' ", p -." I 1Ve- 8ta¢Rtor - {S }'State' t : PA4 %1D LSr [ Do normal circumstances exist on the site: Yes ,1 No El Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes No Community Transeet M Is the area a potential problem area Yes C 'N'o lot 113:. I _ DominantPlantS pies I Stratum cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Strawm i Caver Lndicator 0 Aerial photo? ra hS I1 Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 inches j ck all indiea #ors that ,apple - explain beldw. Water Marks Q gift Litter tl , - ,. 1z d%'"Lj 7- -JfG '' Depth to free water it} it: Inches Other, e. _J.._ Morphological adaptations Y-j- i i ;1 T FfC:C. i Technical Literature i HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION -DICATORS: aRecorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetiand H dr+alazv Indicators PtY%rtlSirS" Tr3tlitatrrs Streans, )alse, or tidal gauge 0 Aerial photo? ra hS I1 Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 inches j ck all indiea #ors that ,apple - explain beldw. Water Marks Q gift Litter Sediment tlepa,%Rs Drainage Patterns in NVetlands Regional knowledge of plant conimtsrsities 1z I Wetland plant fist {Nat`l or re Depth to free water it} it: Inches Other, Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Y-j- i Technical Literature Wetland plant data base Dydroph }tic vegetation present? Yes No Q 1. Rationale for decisio sfRemarRs: atvr3 znr:r r is.it the rorrinQ season` Yes L' t'+lo used tin: c; ice; « f I aRecorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetiand H dr+alazv Indicators PtY%rtlSirS" Tr3tlitatrrs Streans, )alse, or tidal gauge 0 Aerial photo? ra hS I1 Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 inches j Other Water Marks Q gift Litter Sediment tlepa,%Rs Drainage Patterns in NVetlandsFieldObServaObservations; Depth of inundation: Inches Secondary Indicators f2 or more _retluire it E3 QxidizM Hut Channels in Upper 12 inches wstirSt3ined Leaves i 1.0cal safl3nrwy oata 4C' NFVTR -k Test ! Depth to free water it} it: Inches Depth to saturated sod lnches.. Wetland hydrolot iirmnt jies . , No LJ p i . Other 'Explain in Semarksl REMARKS— f ( }.-. /`'f y . t K- t'Jd6`.'+/ , d3 yrFf ,,'Y' • 4.'"J s"'. . l r" "i. `- -il I' '"'i Y-j- c2n] I Q wet I Lot a MapUnkName: 4JeYSeriesandPhase): drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): 1 Field observation conf rmntapped unit Ycs F1 No ff! jji Corrected Mip Unit NAme or jaxonGmy (Subgroup). 4A- I-i ---j if f a- Profile DewriL)tions: Depth Matrix Mottle or Mottle or Redox Texture, 'Concretions, Inches) HDrizon Color Redox Colors Abundance/Siz& Structure, etc. Munse (Munsell Contrast 1.110it) Moist) 5 fr Hvdiie Soil Indicators- 0 Histosol Concretions IlffisticPpipedon Soffidic Odor AquicAlaisture Regime Rigb Or%4-ak Content in Surfam LAYCT of Sand Soils Organic Streaking in Sand} Soils Listed on Local Hydric. Soils List E) Reducing Conditions Listed an National IlYdric Soils List Gleved Or Low-Chroma CrAors Other (Eaptain.ju Remarks) REMARKS* WETLAND DETER-MINATION Yes z -- flydropkytic Vegetation Present? --TIS —the ample point within a wetland YesA to LiN,3 0 Wetland Hydrology Prewnf? Ves No F—I Hvdvic Soils Present? -Yes No REMARKS: DATA FORM I WA State Wetland Delineation Manual 1989 and i.nQ4 !'........ i1CJ sta,,, ilol:..a.t :nn T1rlhsti i[91Z ProjecdSite. Stratum Date: T Applicantiow r• ,) strAnm County/ Terq' ,,,C -- j Investe + ator(Es1 r f {/ f11T%C -i,l Other Tecbaical Li#erature Do - normal circumstances exist on the Site? Yes No Community ID: Depth. of inundation: A Inches Is .the site significantly disturbed. (Atypical Situation) Yes Nes Transect ID: Depth to saturated soil Inches Is the area a potential problem area Yes El No Plot ID:. 7Vdr_P'r A Tif%NT Dominant Plant Species Stratum r° Cover Indicatory Dominant Plant SPecies strAnm quo Cover Xndieater j Sautrxted in Upper 12 inches Other Tecbaical Li#erature Wetland plant data base Depth. of inundation: A Inches Hydrop. hytic vegetation present? Yes N7 Rationale for dccisions/arks: Depth to saturated soil Inches Wetland hydrology present Yes No REMARKS: l YDRUFRYTIU Vhtih'1A11U1N INVIl- 10* 1lrrtea_ nnr r A r' vu --A. V' A rq. ! r Check all.indicaturs that apply * explain be: lk v . Regional knowledge ofplant communities Wetland plant list (Nat'l or regional) Primary Indicators: Other: Physiological or reproductive adaptations Inundated Morpbo)ogieal adaptations Sautrxted in Upper 12 inches Other Tecbaical Li#erature Wetland plant data base Depth. of inundation: A Inches Hydrop. hytic vegetation present? Yes N7 Rationale for dccisions/arks: Is it the growing season? Yes No Based on<. b .f`.. .rr...o' 4 .- . LLRecorded Data (Describe in Remarks ) I Wedand flydrWaff Indicators Primary Indicators: 0 Stream, lake, or tidal gauge Inundated Aerial photographs Sautrxted in Upper 12 inches Other Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits DraiaagePatterns. in Wetlandsr. f z r Field Observa#ioxes. : _ _ c sar.,a , „- , Depth. of inundation: A Inches Secondary Indicators (2 or more reguired) o>Qai Rot chamads to upper12inehes vpaterMaMed.Leaves l ocsl soli survey Data 0 FAC NEr;-RAL Ted Other (Axplain any Remarks Pe th to free water in it: Troches Depth to saturated soil Inches Wetland hydrology present Yes No REMARKS: Map Uj it Naime '_ . t. f t x e f _cam ., -mow Series.aod: Phase): fr`y Drainage Claw. Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field observation confirm mapped unit Yes No Corrected Map Unit Name or Taxonomy (Sub u ): Profile Deserif Lions: Depth Inches) Horizon Matrix Color Moftie or Redox Colors mottle ar Redox Ahundance/SizO Texture, Concretions,. Structure, ew- Manse_ ll Munsell Contrast moist) Moist ) p Af d W a l'ax t 3 Hvdrie Soil indicators: 0 Iffistosol Concretions HiWc Fpipedon Sulfidic Odor High Organic Contest in Surface Layer of Sand Souls Organic Strealdng in Sandy Mis Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gle ed or Low -Caroms Colors Listed on Local Hydric Soils Lust Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other lain in Remarks) REMARKS: TLAND DETERWNATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the sample point within a wetland Yes No . wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No frAHydricSoilsPresent? Yes No El REMARKS- DATA FORM I WA State Wetland Delineation Manual 1989 and ne'r jo '117661.1..x1 ilot:..or.Finn Vfa"nall ProjectlSite: ` Stratum Date: Applicantfowner: Dominant Plant CoontyfT city- fC: ! f 4'1F V.f( Location- . / a 1,' f indicator Investigators) alt r State: f0 3 Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Ves'W NoEl Community ID: is the site significantly. disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes No . Transect ID: i Is the area a potential problem area 'Yes No Plot IU:. Zrva -v r A 4'ir1wY Dominant Plant Species Stratum aio Cover Iudicater Dominant Plant Stratum Qia Cover indicator Morphological adaptations Saturated in Upper 12 inches Other Technical Literature Wetlaad plant data base Field Observations: Hydraphyiic vegetation.preserlf? Yea No Rationale fordecisionsMem €ants: SecongM Indicators (2 or more r+e .red Oxidized Rot Channels in Upper 22 inches V titer Stained Leaves Local sm survey Data 0 FAC-NEUrRALTe Other lain in R.emactCs 13e to free rater in pit:' Inches D h to saturated soil loch Wetland .>tydrology present Yes /DV No U R7i'1tfARKS; HYDROPHYTIC VEGETAL 'iUl41N01UATE)K5: Check 01 indicators that apply * explain below. Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland Hydrology Indicators Wetland plant list (Nat'l or regional) Primary Indicators: Other-- - Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Saturated in Upper 12 inches Other Technical Literature Wetlaad plant data base Field Observations: Hydraphyiic vegetation.preserlf? Yea No Rationale fordecisionsMem €ants: Isit'the growing season? Yes 0 NQ' Basel LI—Recorded Data (Describe~ in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators: Stream, lake, or. tidal gauge inundated. Aerial photographs Saturated in Upper 12 inches Other WaterMarks DtifltUnes Sediment DepositsFieldObservations: DrainagePatterms in Weoands Depth of inundation: 1171— Inches SecongM Indicators (2 or more r+e .red Oxidized Rot Channels in Upper 22 inches V titer Stained Leaves Local sm survey Data 0 FAC-NEUrRALTe Other lain in R.emactCs 13e to free rater in pit:' Inches D h to saturated soil loch Wetland .>tydrology present Yes /DV No U R7i'1tfARKS; cnrr e . b ..m -, f.. -, -/ Map U'sii Name: Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field observation confirm mapped unit Yes No / s Corrected. Map iT€}it Name or: Taxonnm. (Subgroup) Profile Descri -pt s: Depth Matrix Mottle or Mottle or Redox Texture, Concretions, inches) Horizon Color Redox Colors Abundance/Sbd Structure, etc. Mansell Munsell Contrast Moist ) Moist C e i Ilydrk Soil Indicators: El Histosol Histic. Epipedon Sulf dic Odor Concrelions High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sand Sails Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisbm Regime Redncine Conditions Gle o or Low- Chrouna Colors Usted on Local Hydric Soils Ust Lisicd on National flydric Soils Ust Other (Explain in Remarks REMARKS: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic .vegetation Pmpent? Yes NO Is the sample point within a wetland Yes EX No El Wetland HydroloL Present Yes No Hydrie Sails present? Yes No REMARKS: I DATA FORM I WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1997 Carne Wetland Delineation ]Manual) Project/Site: Howard Street LID - Parcel 987041401 Stratum Date: March 21, 2445 A.pplicantlowner: Dominant Plant Species County /.Jefferson City: Port Townsend Invistigator(s)s W. David L.oggy, Loggy Soil & Wetland Consulting Indicator State:- Washington Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID. Shrub Wetand Is the si #e significan #ly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes No JZ Transect Ay: South of Discovery Rd. Plot ID: Wet -,• - JI I Is the area a potential problem area Yes El No ® VEGETATION Wfuinant Plant Species. Stratum Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum 9/6 Cover Indicator Nootka rose (Rona) Shrub 30 FAC Bentgrasses (Agrostis sp) herb. 30 FAC llardhaek (Slido) Shrub 10 FACW Tall fescue (Fear) Herb 10 FAC. Himalayan Black & (Rusp) Shrub 20 FACU Soft rush (Juef) Herb T FACNV The black berry occtipies hydric soils and wetland hydrology. Area is an overflow from the wetland to the north on theother side of Discovery Rd. flits drainage crosses this parcel and crosses Eddy St via a culvert south of Eddy St. and Discovery Rd. intersection. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: a ©F Dominants ORL; FA.CW and FAC: 213 = 6b %o Check all indicators that apply * explain below. Regianai knowledge of plant communities Wetland Hydrology Indicators Wetland plant list (Nat'l or regional) ndic2lPrimary . tors: Other: Physiological or reproductive adaptations n Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 inches: 14orphological adaptations II Technical Literature Drift Lines Wetland plant data base a Field Observations: Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes ff No Rationale for deeisions/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it fife rt win season? Yes JZ No Based on: Shrubs leafing out and soil temp. above 47.5° F. at 20 inches. 0_Reeorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators ndic2lPrimary . tors: Stream, lake, or tidal gauge El Aerial. photographs n Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 inches: 0 Other Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in WetlandsFieldObservations: Depth to ft"e6water in it: > 19 Incites Secondary Indicators f2 or more reauired) 0 afted Rot Channels in Upper 12 inches water Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-NEUTRAL Test De th to.saturated Soil > IS Incites Wetland h drol resent Yes No =j Comments. Wetland is not apparent due to dry conditions. other (Explain in Remarks REMARKS: Common snowberry is well leafed out and scouler willows starting to leaf out and has mature catkins. Map Unit Name: C allarn gavelly sandy loam 0- 15 %. Series and Phase):Claltarn Drainage Class: Moderately well Taxonomy (Subgroup); Oxyaquic Vitrandic Haploxerepts Field observation confirm mapped unit Yes No 2 Corrected :Ma Unit Name or Taxonomy Subgroup) Loamy - skeletal, isotic, mesic A uandic Epiaguepts Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Mottle or Redox Texture, Concretions, Inches) Horizon Munsell Moist Colors . AhundaneeiSizel Structure, etc. unsel[Moiat Contrast 0 -9 Al 10YR 3l2 Silt loam; moderate medium granular; many v. fine, fine & medium roots; abrupt wavy (aw). 9-18 Bwl b i OYR 416 many medium prominent silt loam & areas of silty clay loam redox concentrations strong, free subangular blocky. Hydric Sail Indicators: Histosoi Histic Epipedon Sulfcdie Odor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions GIe ed or Low- Chroma Colors Concretions High organic Content in Surrace Layer of Sand Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Sails List Other (Explain in Remarks REMARKS. WETLAND DE ER iNATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No Is the sample point within a wetland Yes ® No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Hydric Solis Present? Yes ® No REMARKS: ProjectlSite• 1 DDate. VEGE'iA'i TON Dominaxtt Plant S ties () Stratum Cover indicator Dominant Plant 5pecies Stratton Cover Indicator a L' Yri+7• 4£,F-'Cl i - f -3 J 'Q' /t&pW 5 i`- l d f f i,-' •°". HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS:f OF Dttminnnt% nR1._ FACW sand FAC- 7: ' Cheek all indicators that apply & explain below. Regional: knowledge of plant communities 0 Wetland plant list (Nat'l or regional) Other: Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland plant data base Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes (l No Rationale for deeisionslRemarks: Is it the growinz season? des RoO Based on.- T7 rj, f r O—Recorded Data (Describe in Itema7rlcs) Wetland Hydrology Indicators PrimM Indicators: II Stream,. lake, or tidal gauge F_Llaundated Aerial.photographs © Saturated in Upper 12 inches Oth @r Water Mary Drift Lines. Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of inundation; /0" Inches Secondary Indicators f2 or more quicetl l . Depth to free water in it: 7 ?Inches 0 O,ddtzed RotChm meb in i;p t2 inchm Ej Water Stained Depth to saturated soi Inches Sad Survey Wetland hydrolM pint "ices Ll Na FAG%EUTRAL Test Other is Remarks REMARKS: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS:f OF Dttminnnt% nR1._ FACW sand FAC- 7: ' Cheek all indicators that apply & explain below. Regional: knowledge of plant communities 0 Wetland plant list (Nat'l or regional) Other: Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland plant data base Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes (l No Rationale for deeisionslRemarks: Is it the growinz season? des RoO Based on.- T7 rj, f r O—Recorded Data (Describe in Itema7rlcs) Wetland Hydrology Indicators PrimM Indicators: II Stream,. lake, or tidal gauge F_Llaundated Aerial.photographs © Saturated in Upper 12 inches Oth @r Water Mary Drift Lines. Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of inundation; /0" Inches Secondary Indicators f2 or more quicetll . Depth to free water in it: 7 ?Inches 0 O,ddtzed RotChm meb in i;p t2 inchm Ej Water Stained Depth to saturated soi Inches Sad Survey Wetland hydrolM pint "ices Ll Na FAG%EUTRAL Test Other is Remarks REMARKS: Is it the growinz season? des RoO Based on.- T7 rj, f r O—Recorded Data (Describe in Itema7rlcs) Wetland Hydrology Indicators PrimM Indicators: II Stream,. lake, or tidal gauge F_Llaundated Aerial.photographs © Saturated in Upper 12 inches Oth @r Water Mary Drift Lines. Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of inundation; /0" Inches Secondary Indicators f2 or more quicetll . Depth to free water in it: 7 ?Inches 0 O,ddtzed RotChm meb in i;p t2 inchm Ej Water Stained Depth to saturated soi Inches Sad Survey Wetland hydrolM pint "ices Ll Na FAG%EUTRAL Test Other is Remarks REMARKS: sons map Unit Name- WCL- Series and Phase). BrafiL 4= Taxonomy (Subgroup): FkM observmfion confirm Mal, Corrected Man Unit Name or unit Yes 0 No 5 ?%F-4GWI — Depth inches) Horizon matrk Color Mansell Moist) I Mottle o$ Redoes Colors Munseff moist) 31offleorRedox Abundance(SW Contrast TcEhweCiwwrefion4 Structure, dr- Vz- Z-6 X 07 ff AE Ift(fric SOB hafk%ftrs: Ifis& Epipedon 0 Suffidic Odor A4Wc Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions WETLAND DETEPJWMNATION- El camomfiffift El Rio Organk Content in Swfaec Layer ofSand Soils f7 Or9M& Strealdng in SmIdy SWIS 0 Usted on Local flydrk Soilslot El Listed on Naflonal Hydrk Soils List flydraphyfic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the sample point within a wedand Yes [3 No Welland Hydreloa Present" Yes No Hydrk Soils Present" Yes 0 No REMARKS: DATA FORM I WA State Welland Delineation Manual 1989 and 1(197 rarnc Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site:f. 1 if & Stratum Plate: h Applicantfowner: , f., Stratum C4nntyf al ty t . Location: Investigator(s): s cam^. .' V . [ _3 1! fa! t J . n L. Do normal circumstances Est on flire ite? Ws No Community III: 6'Y u,Y N'J -P, -t s Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical.Situati.en) Yes Nta Transect ID-- Depth to free water in pit. ,7-t Inches Is the area a potential problem area Yes El No Plot l:D:ri Other (Explain in Remarks Vr+.('- .TATTAN IDominant Plant species Stratum Cover Indicator Dominant Ple t S . Stratum Corer I Indicator Morphological adaptations tidier Technical Literature Wetland: plant data base Sediment deposits tlrainagePatterns in Wetlands 6'Y u,Y N'J -P, -t s Rationale for decisions/Remarks: Secondary Iedieators Z or more aired Oxidized Rot Ch U in Upperi2 ml ches water Stared Leave* Loed Sri! Sure Daft FACNEUTRALTest Depth to free water in pit. ,7-t Inches Depth to saturated Soil ; :.Z Inches Wetland hydrology. present Yes D NO)4 Other (Explain in Remarks REMARKS: 4G HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION .INDICATO ,S': p t3F Ilrsm.NS.ste fiRi =_ FAVW end lWA - //!,- Check all indicators that apply * explain below. 1 Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland Hydrolog} Indicators Wetland plant last (Nat'l or regionat) Primary Ixidit:aforR- Other: i Physiological or reproductive adaptations 1 inundated Morphological adaptations tidier Technical Literature Wetland: plant data base Sediment deposits tlrainagePatterns in Wetlands Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes NoA Rationale for decisions/Remarks: MAN r a a , Is itthe growing: season?. Yes El N Based on: °rte Dr'/ eAV } rr G' . rr LLRecorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrolog} Indicators Primary Ixidit:aforR- El Stream, lake, or tidal gauge 1 inundatedAerialphotographsSaturated in Upper 12 inches tidier El Water Mariys Drift Lines Sediment deposits tlrainagePatterns in WetlandsFieldObservations: Depth of inundation: (27/ .inches Secondary Iedieators Z or more aired Oxidized Rot Ch U in Upperi2 ml ches water Stared Leave* Loed Sri! Sure Daft FACNEUTRALTest Depth to free water in pit. ,7-t Inches Depth to saturated Soil ; :.Z Inches Wetland hydrology. present Yes D NO)4 Other (Explain in Remarks REMARKS: Map: Unit Name Serr es and Phase): -rn Taxenoiny .(Subgroup): 11 rahkage Class• Vield observation confirm mapped unit 'Yes No, Corrected. Ma Unit Naive ar:Talonom - (Sidigroarp Profilebescriiations:. Deptlx Matrix Mottle or Mottle or Hedox Texture, Concretions, Inetaes) Horizon Color Redox Colors Ahundance/Sizel Structure, etc. Munsell Mansell Contrast Moist) moist). f pi F.1 Ala•: -: r ttl s i Hydric Soil indicators: HIStGS01 0 HIWW Epipedon Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sand Soils Suiiidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on Local flydric Solis I,lst Reducing Conditions Lasted. on National Hydric Soils List Cl ell or Low- Chroma Colors Utlxer (Ex lain in Remarks) REMARKS. i WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Ej No K the sample point witliin a wetland Yes LJ No Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland name or number v WETLAND RATING FORM —WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 - Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Name ofwetland (if known): Date of site vi6 21S/0/ Rated by2, I(> ke-4ay ( 50C.,_ Trained by Ecology? Yes—Nox Date of traintng SEC: '? L TWNSHP: I:, RNGE: / W Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes No P 0A_kee0j,S ?h 00144611 /q/0 A-4,eic-141207S /—/0 map of wetlaA unit: Figure / Estimated size A //5 eV--e6!_S SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland 1 11 111 V / IV Category I = Score >=70 Category 11 = Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-50 Cateaory IV = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions Score for Hydrologic Functions Score for Habitat Functions TOTAL score for Functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I— H Does not Apply —e Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above) Summary of basic information about the wetland unit Pn Wetland Rating Form – western Washington 1 August 2004 version 2 itRGX Mass Estuarine Depressional Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above Check if unit has multiple HGM classes present Pn Wetland Rating Form – western Washington 1 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or m=bex Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? Ifyou answer YES to any ofthe questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland rr,.. r N'F i YYJ c"+ 51].G SPl. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animai orplant species (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as C o I Natural 1! a Wetlands (see p. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals ofPriority species listed by the WDFW for the state? V SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to itsfunctions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To con fete the next art ofthe data sheet ym will need to determine the H dro eomo hic Class QLfhe wetland bgLng rated The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland hating Form -- western Washington 2 August 2004 version 2 Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington Wetland Name: /o k j , / '/. r Gv15 /- /UDate: 1. , e water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO go to 2 YES — the wetland class is Tidal Fringe Ifyes, is the salinity ofthe water during periods ofannual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES — Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO — Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. Ifit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and 11 estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ). 2. IsAtopography within the wetland flat and precipitation is only source ( >90 %) of water to it. O go to 3 YES — The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water (without any vegetation on the surface) where at least 20 acres (8 ha) are permanently inundatedpondedorflooded); 1--- At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.611 (2 m)? NO go to 4 YES — The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usuallycomesfromseeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a Swale without distinctbanks. The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type ofwetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks( depressions are usually3ftdiameterandlessthan ]foot deep). NO go to 5 YES — The wetland class is Slope 5. Is the wetland in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding fromthatstreamorriver? The flooding should occur at least once every two years, on the average, toanswer `eyes. " The wetland can contain depressions that arefilled with water when the river is ooding. go to 6 YES — The wetland class is Riverine Wetland Rating Form — western Washington DRAFT 3 April 2004 6. Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, atoutlet, ifpresent, is higher than the interior ofthesometimeoftheyear. This means that any wetland. ' NO — go to 7 S The wetland class is Depressional 7. is the wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no stream or riverrunningthroughitandprovidingwater. The wetland seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO —go to 8 YES = The wetland class is Depressional baseg. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify. For example seeps at wetand has a zone ofy grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a dep na flooding along its sides. Sometimes we find characteristics of several different hd min hioUsethefollowingtabletoidentifytheappropriateclasseswithinonewetlandboundary* our wetland. NOTE: use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your iQ% or more Use this table only if the ciassf the f the second c represents than la% classify of the total area of the wetland g area the wetland using the first class. T1V C.IQ.YSe ra; .css.ars cs L.....• — - - Riverine Slo + Riverine D ressional Slo e + Depressional Lake Frin e Slone + Lake Frin a Depressional Depressional + RivCnne along stream within boundary De ressional ressional + Lake Fringe Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Tlt aST underTreat Pe wetland characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or you havemorethan2HGMclasseswithinawetland. boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. 4 April 2004 Wetland Rating Form -- western Washington DRAFT . ii Ul1t ik ajDepiession and FIa WOO n w s WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS - Indicators that _wetland functions to improve water quality D D 1. Does the wetland have the otpential to improve water quality? (seep. 37) D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Wetland is a depression with no surface water outlet points = 3 D Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet points = 1 Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet, or outlet is a ditch points = 1 D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, organic, or smells anoxic hydrogen sulfide or rotten eggs). YES points = 4 NO points -- 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest class): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 95% of area points = 5 D Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 1/2 of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation > =1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, uti ed ve eta#on <1 /10 of area points = 0 D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. This is the area ofthe wetland that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries outDsometimeduringtheyear. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is > %2 total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > `/4 total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < `/e total area of wetland points = 0 TNOTE: See text or indicators a seasonal and eEiManent inundation.. D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above D D 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 43) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water corning into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources ofpollutants. Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear -cut logging multiplier Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland 2Other S multiply score in D 1. by 2 NO multiply score in D 1. by 1 D TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D1 by D2 Add score to table on P. I Wetland Rating l:orm— western Washington DRAFT 5 April 2004 HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS - Indicators that wetland functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 3. Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland Wetland has no surface water outlet points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet points = 0 Wetland is flat and drains by surface flow or a ditch points = 0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height ofponding above the bottom ofthe outlet (see textfor description ofmeasuring height). Marks of ponding are at least 3 ft above the surface points = 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points = 5 Marks are at least 2 ft from surface points = 5 Marks are at least 6 in. ft from surface points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 No marks of ponding above 6 in., or wetland has only saturated soils points = 0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio ofthe area ofupstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area ofthe wetland itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of wetland points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the wetland points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the wetland points = 0 Wetland is in the FLATS class asin = the wetland, by definition points = 5 D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? seep. 48) Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Note which of the following conditions apply. Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems Other Answer NO ifthe water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such asflood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland i om groundwater) YES multiply score in D 3 by 2 i multiply score in D 3 by 1 D I TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Wetland Rating Form — western Washington DRAFT 6 Add score to table on p. I April 2004 multiplier f V/ Wetland name or member t 4 a H I. Does the wetland unit have the aoteredal to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Figure Check the types ofvegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)- Size thresholdfor each class is '/. acre or more than 10'16 ofthe area ifunit is smaller than 2.5 acres. Aquatic bed1Q/ Emergent plants C p Forub / shrub (areas where shrubs have >300/a cover) rested (areas where trees have >30a /o cover) If the unit has aforested class check if I ZMe forested class has ,3 out of 5 strata ( canopy, sub - canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, eoss/ground-cover) that each cover 20` /a within the forested polygon Add the number ofvegetation structures that qualify. Ifyou have: 4 structures or more points = 4 Map of Cowardin vegetation lasses 3 structures points = 2 2 structures points = I 1 structure points = 0 H 1.2. Hvdroperiods (seep. 73) Figure / Check the types ofwater regimes (hydropenods) present within the wetland The water regime has to cover more than 10.0 ofthe wetland or' /s acre to count. (see textfor e e. 4' k descriptions ofhydroperiods) . G' o ?tPermanentlyfloodedorinundated4ormoretypespresentpoints = 3 Oasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points = 2 OccasionalIy flooded or inundated 2 types present point = 1 Saturated only I type present points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake fringe wetland = 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland = 2 points Map,of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the Number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 fl . (different patches ofthe same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife. Canadian Thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 List species below ifyou want to_ 5 - 19 species points = I 5 species points = 0 I Total for page Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 7 Wetland name or number H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) Figure _ - Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1. 1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. k None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points a riparian braided channels] High = 3 points NOTE: Ifyou have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the rating is always "hiGE. Use map ofCowardin v etation classes H 1.5. &qgial Habitat Features: (seeA 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland The number ofchecks is the number ofpoints youput into the next column. s arge, downed, woody debris within the wetland ( >4m. diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3,3 i t (1m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft 10m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning 30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that ave notyet Turned grey/brown) A least %, acre of thin- stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (structures far egg - laying by amphibians) I/ Invasive plants cover less than 25% ofthe wetland area in each stratum ofplants NOTE: The 20 % stated in early printings ofthe manual on page 78 is an error. H 1. TOTAL Score - potential for providing habitat Add the scores om HI.1, HI.2, 1-11.3, HI.4, HI.S Comments Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 Gf 7 Wetland name or member H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure3 Choose the description that best represents condition ofbuffer ofwelland unit. The highest scoring p" criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See textfor definition of le o wz sturbed Vj 112 100 in (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% A( of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively aej--- 41a undisturbed also means no- grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 100 in (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50016 circumference_ Points = 4 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 100 in (33 Oft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference,. Points = 3 50 in (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50° /v circurnferepce. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 in (80ft) of wetland > 50%1, circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 Heavy grazing in buffer. Points =1 Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e-g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0. Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points =1 Aerial photo shovAng buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively, undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at le"isst 306/o cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects toestuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor) YES = 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and ken vegetated corridor either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake- fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) IO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (Skm) ofa brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture C>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? YES =1 point NO 0 points fl Total for page Wetland Rating Form – western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (seep. 82) Which ofthe following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland unit? NOTE. the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed These are DFW definitions Check with your local DFWbiologist ifthere are any questions. Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutuatly influence each other. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands ofaspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres). Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 in (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. Old -growth forests: (Old - growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 1001/6; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old - growth; 80 - 200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 - 2.0 in (0.5 - 6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages Oregon white Oak. Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage ofthe oak component of the stand is 251/6. Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space finictions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development. Estuary/EMiary- -like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually semi - enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by fieshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that ofthe open ocean by evaporation. Along some low - energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean - derived salts measure less than 0.5ppt during the period of average annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons. MarinelEstuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control). If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat =1 point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this / list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in qtwskon H 2.4 Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or uwnber H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description ofthe landscape arotod the wetland that bestfats) (see p. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within %2 mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points = 5 The wetland is Lake -fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake -fringe wetlands within %2 mile points = 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within %2 mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points t) The wetland is Lake -fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are_ 3 other lake- fringe wetland within %2 mile points = 3 There is at least i wetland within V2 mile. points = 2 There are no wetlands within %2 mile. points = 0 13 H 2. TOTAL Score - opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2 1,H2,2, H2.3, H24 lv TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions — add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on P. 1 Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 17 Wetland name or number CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the amibutes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wedand Type Category Check offany criteria that apply to the wetlmtd Circle the Category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep: 86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? The dominant water regime is tidal, Vegetated, and With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. fYES = Go to SC 1.1 NO !/ SC I.I Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Paris, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park.or Educational, Cat_ I Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332- 30 -15I? YES = Category I NO o to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least I acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II Cat. I The wetland is relatively undisturbed {has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. H cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover ofnon -native plant species. If the non - native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than I0% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (UM. The area of Spartina would be rated a Category H while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in IIII determining the size threshold of 1 acre. At least 3/ of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or tin-grazed or un -mowed grassland. The wetland has at least 2 ofthe following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 Wedand name or number SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/ TownshipJRange that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDN) Sfr/R infonnation from Appendix D _ or accessed finm WNHPA)NR web site YES - contact WNHP/DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NO !/ SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category I NO not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bugs (seepu 87} Does the wetland unit (oar any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify ifthe wetland is a bog. Ifyou answer yesyou will still need to rate the wetland based ore Usfunctions. 2. 3. I 2. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - go to Q. 3 P go to Q. 2 Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, orthat are floating on a 1 or pond? Yes - go to Q. 3 T9- Is not a bog for purpose of rating Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the `bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes - Is a bog for purpose ofrating - Fo go to Q. 4 NOTE: Ifyou are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the bog„ plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any ofthe species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover (> 30.0 coverage of71." otal shrub/herbaceous cover)? YES = Category I No not a bog for purpose ofrating Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 19 August 2004version2 Cat. I Cat. I Wetland name or number SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands ( seepL 90) Does the wetland unit have at least I acre of forest that meet one ofthese criteria for the Department ofFish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? Ifyouyou answer yes You will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. Oldvvwth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years ofage OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old - growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. Mature forests: (west ofthe Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 – 200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches 53cm); crown cover may be less that 1001%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that foundinold-growth- YES = Category I NO /not a forested wetland with special characteristics Cat. I SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured ne the bottom) YES = Go W SC 5.1 NO not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). At least 3/ of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un- grazed or un -mowed grassland. Cat. I The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES = Category I NO = Category If Cat. II Wetland Rating Fonn — western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number SC 6.0 Interdunal Wedands (seep: 93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 fine (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES to SC 6.1go NO _Vnot an interdunal wetland for rating Ifyou anger yes you will still need to rate the ywW"d based on its funedORs In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: Long Beach Peninsula lands west of SR 103 Grayland- Westport- lands west of SR 105 Ocean Shores- Copalis- lands west ofSR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II NO — go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is Cat. H between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Cat M K .a y , " g r" rr } x- ..``y x`ra -. a 1',` l, SF ---- -- Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 21 August 2004 Version 2 n ii W 2 H N OW Ix Z C7 O J W Z C/7 W LL LL m cv c iv 9 w U d l 0 r a a o . a 0U t APPENDIX C DRAWINGS AND MAPS OF SITE 1.-J Co 0 r- 0 4 J 3= c> P: r— 0 m X 0 m ID 10 r1rI 0 0 urn E zm 3 co 40 ca 0 0 0 a- f) 1 0 (DOm W m 1.-J Co 00 N 0 r- 0 4 J z 0 0 z m o oz D Q 0 0 m 0 m 0 m X cm Q mm Co Zi m ID 10 r1rI 0 0 urn E zm 3 co 40 ca 0 0 0 a- f) 1 0 (DOm W m 00 N 0 r- 0 4 J z 0 0 z m o oz D Q 0 0 m 0 m 0 m X cm Q mm Co Zi m ID 10 C-> 0 0 urn E zm 3 co 40 9) CL w 0- 0 :3 0 0 0 a- f) 1 0 (DOm W m D ciTo11) (1) a3 m 0 U Z 0 (D CU 0CD a n) C" R (f) CD 0 m C29 T m o :3 -0 r a 0 (D 3 CA C) 71 0 S;L 00 N W1r0•L9t?-09C (-A) 0Z6C-L9t•09C (0) 29£86 VM 'sI OBUV 1-10d LVCZ X09 '0 'd 0N111nSN00 (INVI13M GNV 1109AD001 0 o 0 C/) m z 0 0 r- 0 4 J z 0 0 z m o oz D Q 0 0 m 0 m 0 m X cm Q mm Co Zi m ID 10 C-> 0 0 urn E zm 3 co 40 9) CL w 0- 0 :3 0 0 0 a- f) 1 0 (DOm W m D ciTo11) (1) a3 m 0 U Z 0 (D 0CD a n) W1r0•L9t?-09C (-A) 0Z6C-L9t•09C (0) 29£86 VM 'sI OBUV 1-10d LVCZ X09 '0 'd 0N111nSN00 (INVI13M GNV 1109AD001 0 o 0 C/) m z 0 0 r- 0 4 J z 0 0 z m o oz D Q 0 0 m 0 m 0 m X cm Q mm Co Zi m ID 10 ro- mo z o a Fn 0 0 urn E zm r- M 0 m z co 40 9) CL w 0- 0 :30— P 0 0 0 a- f) 1 0 (DOm W mciTo11) (1) a3 m 0 U Z 0 (D 0CD a n) A 0 Z CL R (f) CD 0 m 0 C: c n T m o :3 -0 r a 0 (D 3 CA C) R (D :3 rL000 7 s') i i I LD C) 0 Aw z m 0 CO j 0 ZZ 5D Gn, N 0' 20'26" W 250.0' J 0 onl 0 m o 0 4Vi W P, Q) o,' roDo w CYI CX) I FA& u m 0 w r- 0 C) — CL ZIT z ID 10 a) Co co 40 9) CL w 0- 0 :30— P 0 0 0 a- f) 1 0 (DOm W mciTo11) (1) a3 0 U Z 0 (D 0CD a n) A 0 Z CL R (f) CD 0 ca 0 C: c n CQ m o :3 -0 r a 0 (D 3 CA C) R (D :3 rL000 I FA& u m0 8 I r- 0 f) 1o m I0 m m Howard Street ROW s') C) Aw m 0 CO j ZZ 5D Gn, N 0' 20'26" W 250.0' J 0 onl 0 m o 4Vi W P, Q) o,' roDo w CYI CX) C31n1'.. n CD w 0 90 W 4 So w 0 1 4 1 i r- 0zr VI 0 n La z OD ALLEY rn D I uo Z z co D r Cn co I 0 O b I I z C czmK) 0 cr), C:) C> co I co rn 0 C I 9 :r- 0) CD 2. ZI 1 C: Ip N 06 20'26" W 70' N 0' 20'26" W 105.02' m 9: m w G) m Eddy Street ROW Eddy Street ROW w z 0 i-11 Cn W cf) NU 0) LL 0 CL 4 45 CL ca 73; P. ca 14 LO0 F Lu Ln LL Qq V2 W in CO 0 U4 ca 14 LO0 F Lu Ln LL Qq V2 W in IS cv cn Zvi 03 as QO V2 C- CO 0 IS cv cn Zvi 03 as QO V2 C- 0 Ch IS cv cn Zvi 03 as QO V2 C- PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE W_ David Loggy, CPSS and Wetland Specialist P. 0. Box 2347, Port Angeles, WA 98362-0303 Phone:360-4573920 -- Fax: 360457 -0131 Toll Free Phone 86648054497 AIrR.GIw Ar—S Email: wdplog&Oolypen.com Specializing in_ Soil Mapping and Classification Certified Soil Investigations and Soil Site Analysis Wetland Mapping. Delineation and Restoration Soil Redox Potential Monitoringfor Hydric Soil Determination Professional Qualification and Experience W. David Loggy Title: Consulting Soil Scientist Total Years Experiences: 41 Education: BS, Range Conservation, Colorado State University, 1966 (Major areas of study, included Biology, Ecology and Soils) Associate of Arts, (Pre- Forestry), Casper College, 1961 Certification/Affiliations: Certified Professional Soil Scientist (CPSS) No. 576, (ARCPACS), 27 years Member: Washington Society ofProfessional Soil Scientists Society of Wetland Scientists National Society of Consulting Soil Scientist, Inc Better Business Bureau Positions Held: Newsletter Editor & Board Member for Washington Society of Professional Soil Scientist Awards: Five Certificates of Merit Awards For Sustained Superior Performance Leggy Soil & Wetland Consulting PROFESSIONAL SPECIALTIES: Soils Surveys and Inventories Soil Classification, Genesis, Morphology - USDA,UNIFIED, and ASSHO Identification of Hazards & Limitations Hydric Soils of Problem & Atypical Wetland Situations Field Fertility Testing Erosion Potential, Control and Plans Correlation of Agri. Soil Class - ification to UNIFIED & ASHO Attributes Affecting Septic Design — Depth to Seasonal Water Tables Wetlands Inventories, Type Determinations, Delineations, Function & Value Analysis, & Reports Mitigation PIans and Monitoring Enhancement and Restoration Soil Redox Potential Monitoring Environmental Soils, Wetland & CAS Data for ECs. DEIS & FEIS Summary of Experiences Project and Program Manager, or Interdisplinary Team Member on 25 major projects in Colorado and Alaska. Thirty an one half years experience in soil survey, and wa- ter planning and budgeting for forest planning, mining and ski area projects, long term and independent timber sales, and road layout and construction. Twenty years of ex- perience in wetland mapping and management, and riparian buffer management and establishment. Since 1979 have done wetland and slope stability deter- mination and analysis, and soil erosion plan work in Snohomish, Island, Skagit, Jefferson and Clallam Counties, and the cities of Port Angeles, Port Town- send, Lake Forest Park and Marysville. Fifteen technical reports and papers authored or co- authored. Training in U.S. Army Crops of Engineers Wetland Delineation Method and State of Washington's Pro- posed Wetland Functional Assessment Method. USDA, NRCS. Training in Advanced H dric Soils in accor- dance to standards of the National Technical Commit- tee for II dric Soils. Training in shoreline boundary determination. Selected Project Experience Private Soil and Wetland Cons ultin 1997 to Present. I have conducted soil slope stability analysis on identi- fied critical areas for timber harvest sites and housing development sites in Skagit and Clallam Counties. I have also developed an erosion control plan for a hous- ing development plat in Clallam County and conducted wetland inventories, delineation and rehabilitation pro- jects for reality companies, developers and private landowners in Clallam, Skagit, Snohomish, Jefferson and Island Counties, and within the city boundaries of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Lake Forest Park and Marysville.. Have conducted and been subcontractor on wetland projects in the above areas since 1997. National Cooperative Soil Survey, U.S. Forest Service. I have thirty years experience in soil identification, classi- fication, soil sampling, standard testing methods, and map- ping soils to the National Cooperative Soil Survey. I sur- veyed and mapped and/or supervised the surveying and mapping of 3 million acres between the states of Nebraska, Colorado and Alaska that included more than 85 organic and mineral soil series. Thirty of the soils were organic and mineral hydric soils associated with estuary, and bog and fen wetlands (both forested and non- forested). Water Management, U.S. Forest Service. Developed modeling protocol for erosion and sediment transfer haz- ards, and co- developed geomorphic risk assessment of potential fish habitat impacts for forest management alter- native practices. Co- developed a classification system for field identifying Class III Streams (equivalent to the State of Washington's Type 4 Waters) based on sedimentation potential. Co- authored a protocol for identifying, classifying and mapping 34 wetland habitat types using GIS soil and plant communities databases for S.E. Alaska. As Watershed Program Manager for 5 years, I supervised three soil scientists, and two hydrolo- gists. I coordinated, managed, directed and budgeted the Ketchikan Area's watershed program and projects, involv- ing watershed analysis, soil and hydrology management consulting, and coordinated the watershed program of work with other resource units. As soil survey supervisor in Alaska, I supervised from 6 to 12 people in 2 person crews per year for 11 years. Technical Soil Management Services U.S. Forest Ser- vice. I conducted soil and wildland watershed support services for slope stability analysis, landslide stabilization, application of soil quality standards, erosion analysis and site surveys. I also identified wetlands, and interpreted wetland and hydric soils data for timber sale planning, layout, administration, fertility and regeneration re- search studies. I provided soil analysis for rock pit devel- opment, road location, and construction, and administra- tion, recreation sites, administrative sites, ski areas, mine development, hydroelectric sites and a pulp mill air pollu- tion study. Forest and Project Planning, U.S. Forest Service. I was the Soil and Water Consultant or IDT member for environ- mental analyses for two Ketchikan Pulp Co.'s Long Term Sale - five year periods, many smaller timber sales, the U.S. Borax Molybdenum, Bulk Sampling Mine Access Road, Swan Lake Hydro - electric Darn, and Tongass Land Management Plan Revision (1987 -90). I wrote soil and water standards and guidelines, management prescriptions, and the soil, water, air and wetland section for environ- mental analysis. I co- authored and edited a white paper on riparian concepts for S.E. Alaska. 1 mac C-0 aAt 1 bl-b, si-k Yc_ss.b vsc r1 W' CLd gUWL lns s i- C:: p2 -c 3$ a)ffeU btu- er Pe 5O i 5 t,-- lq r G 1 _as. © L b ell Cl A.0 17 I c7 di , ? CO <A l - '.- Cann, -acs y _ - w??_ ec _ e s#c -- - — cP- u rv- Nos.d Q h Ci,u,Cc_,I Pmvm , 4 „- Cry -1662 r-,,,, Id - c it L . Div r Y t c fia 2`t - 5 1 a*-" r? WIN to Tu v -- Qkzc ula- -9*, iNS 4 I993 m Qcv Kove kaj lqo)o yy S IS Yi C)...tiJ G. C-Ca I (,+ q 1) ii U f f qz r e --Vir% Y r Ctcoo a6u-, TGa l Oea- k- UJ Arp . XA N2L&O kA C-41u S Ci -tO Jal7dd f\cA Caoi (rAOO/Wlioct Ovel,)K\ rc 4e- nae- Qr-, hak- v-c-LjZQe- 4 10 AIrm 9 004 n-x- j S3 U e Or us. 111 III! 1111 Ir 1111 1111 !l1 r !III! rrl! 1 A! 1111 1 ! rll Ilr! 1 11 1111 IAlr lily nrl 1111 1 1 11111 11f1 11 In ill 1161111 iirillll 1111 71113111 11.1 1 ` liillll 111 11 U 1111 x'11 '. 1111 fill 11m, Ion loll 1111111 1111 111 MAN fill fi`ai 1111111 A 0