HomeMy WebLinkAboutA99e V6 - FEMA Review 4_Response to Spec_Dist_July_2017Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-1
SECTION VIII
FEMA CROSSWALK
(Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool)
(FEMA Response to Revision 2
Received 7/19/2017)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-2
Plan Review Tools
The following Plan Review Tools are based on the Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide,
published by FEMA, dated October 1, 2011. This Plan Review Tool is consistent with the
Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-390), enacted October 30, 2000 and 44 CFR Part 201 – Mitigation Planning, Interim Final Rule (the Rule), published February 26, 2002.
The crosswalks are placed here to assist the reviewer in determining that the plan meets the requirements of the above legislation, and to provide a tool for the planners to use in continuously evaluating and improving the plan and, more importantly, using the plan to
effect changes in policy and property to minimize the impacts of both natural and man-made disasters.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-3
NOTES TO REVIEWER
(Updated with Phase 2 Change Comments.)
The following pages have been changed to meet the requirements noted below in the FEMA review tool. Per our telephone meeting on 4/20/2017, what we are calling “Phase 1” changes are targeted at
getting Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend an approved Hazard Mitigation Plan. We will address the requirements of the Special Districts, once the Plan has been approved. PHASE 1 CHANGES – Jefferson County & City of Port Townsend
1. This has been completed and the Plan has been approved for Jefferson County and for the City of Port Townsend.
2. Changes made for the Special Purpose Districts have changed the total page count and required some repagination. The page numbers contained herein have been changed to point to the appropriate locations. PHASE 2 CHANGES – Special Purpose Districts
1. 2016 Plan Revisions Summary. Changes to this section are in Bold PURPLE to make it easy for the reviewer to find and identify as a Phase 2 Change. All colors will be changed
back to “black” prior to formal publishing.
2. The following notation for CFR’s and published FEMA policies is used to simplify references in the feedback:
CFR Ref #1 - 44 CFR § 201.6 (a)(4) Multi-jurisdiction plans (e.g. watershed plans) may be accepted as
appropriate, as long as each jurisdiction has participated in the process and has officially adopted the plan. CFR Ref#2 - 44 CFR § 201.6 (c)(2)(iii) For multi-jurisdiction plans, the risk assessment section must
assess each jurisdiction’s risks where they vary from the risks facing the entire planning area.
CFR Ref#3 - 44 CFR § 201.6 (c)(3)(iv) For multi-jurisdiction plans, there must be identifiable action items
specific to the jurisdiction requesting FEMA approval or credit of the plan.
FEMA Policy #1: “Guiding Principle 2. Review for Intent, as well as Compliance. Plan reviews will
emphasize actions and implementation of the hazard mitigation strategy. ... A comprehensive review of
the plan assists FEMA to validate that the plan meets the overall intent of mitigation planning, whereas
only a strict interpretation of individual requirements may cause unnecessary revisions. Source:
The Local Mitigation Planning Review Guide, October 1, 2011, p. 5.
FEMA Policy #2: “Guiding Principle 3. This is the Community’s Plan. Plan reviews will recognize the
effort and interest of each community that develops a mitigation plan. Source: The Local Mitigation
Planning Review Guide, October 1, 2011, p. 6.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-4
FEMA Policy #3: “Guiding Principle 4. Process is as important as the Plan itself. FEMA will accept
the planning process as defined by the community. “FEMA will not penalize communities that have less
capability or demonstrate little progress in hazard mitigation efforts over time. In addition, FEMA will
not require specific formats (for example, stand-alone plan, chapter in emergency operations plan, or
integrated into comprehensive plan), and FEMA will not require information above or beyond the
requirements to be removed (for example, non-natural, climate change). In fact, FEMA
acknowledges that some plans will simply “pass” the minimum plan requirements to receive FEMA
approval.” Source: The Local Mitigation Planning Review Guide, October 1, 2011, p. 6.
The Handbook is a companion to the Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide released by FEMA in
2011. Source: Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, Introduction, March 2013, p. I-1
To see all of 44 CFR § 201, which pertains to “Mitigation Planning”:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/44/part-201
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-5
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW TOOL
The Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool demonstrates how the Local Mitigation Plan meets the
regulation in 44 CFR §201.6 and offers States and FEMA Mitigation Planners an opportunity to
provide feedback to the community.
• The Regulation Checklist provides a summary of FEMA’s evaluation of whether the
Plan has addressed all requirements.
• The Plan Assessment identifies the plan’s strengths as well as documents areas for
future improvement.
• The Multi-jurisdiction Summary Sheet is an optional worksheet that can be used to
document how each jurisdiction met the requirements of the each Element of the
Plan (Planning Process; Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment; Mitigation
Strategy; Plan Review, Evaluation, and Implementation; and Plan Adoption).
The FEMA Mitigation Planner must reference this Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide when
completing the Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool.
Jurisdiction: Jefferson County,
the City of Port Townsend, and
17 Special Purpose Districts
Title of Plan: Jefferson County –
City of Port Townsend Multi-
Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation
Plan
Date of Plan:
Local Point of Contact:
Ken Horvath
Address:
Jefferson County Dept of Emergency Management
Emergency Operations Center
81 Elkins Road Port Hadlock, WA 98368
Title:
Hazard Mitigation Plan Project Coordinator
Agency: Jefferson County Department of
Emergency Management
Phone Number:
(360) 385-9368 (Jefferson County EOC)
E-Mail:
khorvath@co.jefferson.wa.us
State Reviewer:
Sarah Tomt
Sarah.Tomt@mil.wa.gov
Title:
Tsunami Program
Coordinator
Date:
3/9/17
FEMA Reviewer:
Amanda Siok
Amanda.Siok@fema.dhs.gov
425-487-4626
Brett Holt
Title:
Mitigation Planner
Mitigation Planner
Date:
03/30/2017
4/10/17
Date Received in FEMA Region (insert #) 03/14/2017
Plan Not Approved 04/11/2017
Plan Approvable Pending Adoption
Plan Approved
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-6
SECTION 1:
REGULATION CHECKLIST
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan
(section and/or page number) Met
Not
Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans)
ELEMENT A. PLANNING PROCESS
A1. Does the Plan document the planning process, including how it
was prepared and who was involved in the process for each
jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(1))
Section I – p.53-74
Appendix B – p.769-
797; Appendix H – p.939-959; Appendix
H – pp. 960-967.
Page 976, 979
X
A2. Does the Plan document an opportunity for neighboring
communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard
mitigation activities, agencies that have the authority to regulate
development as well as other interests to be involved in the
planning process? (Requirement §201.6(b)(2))
Section I – p.61-65;
X
A3. Does the Plan document how the public was involved in the
planning process during the drafting stage? (Requirement
§201.6(b)(1))
Section I – p. 62-67
X
A4. Does the Plan describe the review and incorporation of existing
plans, studies, reports, and technical information? (Requirement
§201.6(b)(3))
Section I – p.65 & 69
Section IV – p.416 &
p.467
X
A5. Is there discussion of how the community (ies) will continue
public participation in the plan maintenance process? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(4)(iii))
Executive Summary –
p. 51-52
Section I – p.69-74
(PDF Page 95-69, Plan
71-72)
X
A6. Is there a description of the method and schedule for keeping
the plan current (monitoring, evaluating and updating the
mitigation plan within a 5-year cycle)? (Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(i))
Section I – p.69-74
(PDF Page 93, plan page 69) X
ELEMENT A: REQUIRED REVISIONS
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning
process. This includes how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan contains
a narrative in section in Section I describing the Steering Committee and Advisory Group’s responsibilities for
the update and Appendix B lists these members. However, the plan is lacking documentation of how
specifically the members participated in the planning process and how they engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that an Appendix H is created with Steering Committee
and Advisory Group Meeting minutes that document attendance at these meetings.
Element A1- Not Met.
Appendix H and Table H-2 document four JPREP meetings and attendees. Mitigation Planning Sessions 2 and 3 request the jurisdiction to take information back to their jurisdictions to develop mitigation projects and/or plan
edits. Where is the documentation from the special districts of the process they took to accomplish this? Where is
the documentation of who/what was provided from the individual special districts and how it was incorporated?
To meet Element A1, Individual District Profiles should describe the district’s process for contributing information,
data, vulnerabilities, etc., compiling that information, and supporting development of the plan.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-7
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met
Not
Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans)
ELEMENT B. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT
B1. Does the Plan include a description of the type, location, and
extent of all natural hazards that can affect each jurisdiction(s)?
(Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i))
Section II –
pp.75-290
X
B2. Does the Plan include information on previous occurrences of
hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events for
each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i
Section II – p.93-282;
each hazard has
representative
previous
occurrences.
pp. 82-86 and 461-
476 List all major
disaster declarations
for Jefferson County
X
B3. Is there a description of each identified hazard’s impact on the
community as well as an overall summary of the community’s
vulnerability for each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii))
Section II p.99-382;
each hazard profile
contains a HIVA
pertinent to the area
and a conclusion.
X
B4. Does the Plan address NFIP insured structures within the
jurisdiction that have been repetitively damaged by floods?
(Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii))
Section II – Floods –
pp.170-173;
Section IV – pp.417-
418 & pp.468-469.
X
ELEMENT B: REQUIRED REVISIONS
Element B3: Not Met. For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must describe the potential impacts and vulnerabilities of
each of the identified hazards on the community.
Impact means the consequences of the hazard on the community and its assets. Assets are determined by the
community and include people, structures, facilities, systems, capabilities, etc. Hazus data can be analyzed to
describe impacts.
The overall summary of each jurisdiction’s vulnerability should identify structures, systems, populations, or other
community assets that are susceptible to damage and loss from hazard events. An example of an overall summary
is a list of key issues or problem statements that clearly describes the community’s greatest vulnerabilities. A
county map may be referenced for this section, but each community seeking approval must describe their own
vulnerabilities. These problem statements should then be used to develop the mitigation actions for element C4.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-8
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met
Not
Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans)
ELEMENT C. MITIGATION STRATEGY
C1. Does the plan document each jurisdiction’s existing authorities,
policies, programs and resources and its ability to expand on and
improve these existing policies and programs? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(3))
Section IV - City –
pp.415-464; County –
pp.465-534; Special
Purpose Districts –
pp. 535-690.
X
C2. Does the Plan address each jurisdiction’s participation in the
NFIP and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as
appropriate? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii))
Executive Summary
p. 51; Section IV –
City pp.417-418;
County pp.468-469.
X
C3. Does the Plan include goals to reduce/avoid long-term
vulnerabilities to the identified hazards? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(i))
Section V –
Mitigation Actions –
pp.691-726
X
C4. Does the Plan identify and analyze a comprehensive range of
specific mitigation actions and projects for each jurisdiction being
considered to reduce the effects of hazards, with emphasis on new
and existing buildings and infrastructure? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(ii))
Section V –
Mitigation Actions –
pp.691-726
X *
C5. Does the Plan contain an action plan that describes how the actions identified will be prioritized (including cost benefit review),
implemented, and administered by each jurisdiction? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(iv)); (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(iii))
Section III – Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard
Mitigation p.395-397
PDF 41 and district
annexes
X
C6. Does the Plan describe a process by which local governments
will integrate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other
planning mechanisms, such as comprehensive or capital
improvement plans, when appropriate? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(4)(ii))
Executive Summary –
p. 51;
Section I – pp.56-65
Special Purpose
Districts – pp.535-
690.
X
ELEMENT C: REQUIRED REVISIONS
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based
on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Reference the table in Section 3 for detailed
information on what needs to be added in order to meet requirements. Element C4- Not Met*
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified
in the risk assessment. Each profile lists at least three priority hazards. There should be a minimum of one
mitigation-specific action for each of the identified priority hazards (not response or preparedness) actions.
Additional comments are made below in section 3 for each of the special districts.
*Jefferson Healthcare Medical Center has met the requirements for element C4. See recommendations for improvement for C5 and C6 in Section 2: Plan Assessment.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-9
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met
Not
Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans)
ELEMENT D. PLAN REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION (applicable to plan updates only)
D1. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in development?
(Requirement §201.6(d)(3))
Revisions Summary –
p.1-10
X
D2. Was the plan revised to reflect progress in local mitigation
efforts? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3))
Section V –
Mitigation Actions
pp.694-726
X
D3. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in priorities?
(Requirement §201.6(d)(3))
Section IV –
Jurisdictions p.409-
690
X
ELEMENT D: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT E. PLAN ADOPTION
E1. Does the Plan include documentation that the plan has been
formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction
requesting approval? (Requirement §201.6(c)(5))
Preface – p.xvii;
Section I – p.68;
Appendix F –pp.
815-840.
X
E2. For multi-jurisdictional plans, has each jurisdiction requesting
approval of the plan documented formal plan adoption?
(Requirement §201.6(c)(5))
Appendix F –
Adoption Resolutions
pp. 815-840.
X
ELEMENT E: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT F. ADDITIONAL STATE REQUIREMENTS (OPTIONAL FOR STATE REVIEWERS ONLY; NOT
TO BE COMPLETED BY FEMA)
F1.
F2.
ELEMENT F: REQUIRED REVISIONS
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-10
SECTION 2:
PLAN ASSESSMENT
A. Plan Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement
This section provides a discussion of the strengths of the plan document and identifies areas where
these could be improved beyond minimum requirements.
Element A: Planning Process
Plan Strengths
-The plan describes a thorough process for maintenance and continued public engagement. An
annual public engagement meeting coinciding with the planning committee’s annual review is an
excellent way to keep focus on the goals and strategies of the plan.
-Page 418 of the plan lists sources used to inform the Plan as well as the owner of that source. This
is an excellent way to track used information while setting up a process that can be followed for
collecting information for the next plan update without having to recreate the wheel.
Opportunities for Improvement
-Consider organizing the Summary of Adoption Resolutions (page 19/884) to more clearly identify
participating jurisdictions in the hazard mitigation plan.
-Text of the plan refers to Appendix C as containing Contributors and Contact Points however, this is
actually Appendix B of the Plan. The text should be changed to reflect the Table of Contents.
Element B: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Plan Strengths
-The plan identifies risks associated with hazards in neighboring counties.
-The plan addresses climate change for each appropriate hazard.
-The plan documents the current status of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs)
-The plan references Sharknado, an invaluable resource to assist with understanding impacts
associated with tornado hazards and reducing the risk of oversight when reviewing 600+ pages.
-Port Townsend did an excellent job of identifying codes and comprehensive plans that support
hazard mitigation planning and risk reduction efforts.
Opportunities for Improvement
-Many of the maps in the risk assessment section (such as those for Brinnon in unincorporated
Jefferson County) are illegible. These maps appear to be copy/pasted from another plan. Consider
obtaining the source GIS data and reproducing the maps in the next updated.
-Use the Risk MAP database created by FEMA and WA DNR to develop GIS-based maps of vulnerable
infrastructure and to enhance understanding of impacts.
-B2 Jefferson Health Care, Port Townsend School District #50: The intent with B2 is to understand
potential impacts based on events that have occurred in the past. Because Special District
boundaries are not the same as county boundaries, it is unclear to the reader that declarations
from Table J-1 (PDF 106) are applicable to all jurisdictions. Future updates should consider power
outages, impacts of impassable roadways for both patient transport and the ability of healthcare
providers to travel to work. Table J-2 PDF Page 10 is excellent for Port Townsend, it would be
useful to see this for all jurisdictions.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-11
Element C: Mitigation Strategy
Plan Strengths
- Port Townsend does an exceptional job meeting requirements for element C6. Not only is there a
thorough description of the code/ordinance that can be linked with goals of the hazard mitigation
planning process, but a column describes the review schedule of each code/ordinance. This process
paves the road for successful implementation of the plan leading to reduced risk in the community.
Opportunities for Improvement
- The strategies can be improved by identifying specific projects for mitigation based on risk
assessment data from the Risk MAP.
- In addition to describing existing programs and policies related to hazard mitigation, include an
assessment of resources that are available to implement mitigation such as existing regulatory
authorities, staff, or funding through taxing authority and annual budgets.
- Make additional linkages between the vulnerability, hazard risk, and mitigation strategy. For
example, target mitigation actions at specific locations/areas that have been identified as vulnerable
to a hazard.
-Element C5: There is significant room for improvement for this element. Future updates of the
plan will need to include a measureable timeframe for completion (this could be met by defining
the timeframe for “short-term” and “long term continuous, and “ongoing” on PDF page 41, Plan
page 17) in order to measure progress on mitigation actions. Additionally, the funding sources will
need to be better defined (Grants, DHS Grants, FEMA Grants are not typically acceptable sources
of funding, they should be more specific, such as FEMA HMA grant, etc.).
-Element C6- There is significant room for improvement for this element. Future updates of the
plan should include district-specific information on how they support Page 69 of the plan “Local
plans, such as Emergency Response Plans, that have sections related to hazard mitigation will be
coordinated with the Plan so that requirements of the Plan are incorporated into local guiding
documents and ordinances” as applicable to their listed existing policies. This could be done
through the annual update process or through further development of mitigation actions.
Element D: Plan Update, Evaluation, and Implementation (Plan Updates Only)
Plan Strengths
- The plan reviews the status of the 2009 mitigation action items and all of the existing actions that
are not ongoing or were not completed have been deferred. An explanation of the
accomplishments, deferment, or any changes made is provided.
Opportunities for Improvement
-Although the plan confirmed the plan goals and reprioritized the mitigation actions, consider
including a narrative description of if and how any priorities have changed since the plan was
previously approved in order to reflect current financial, legal, political, and post-disaster conditions.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-12
B. Resources for Implementing Your Approved Plan
The Region 10 Integrating Natural Hazard Mitigation into Comprehensive Planning is a resource
specific to Region 10 states and provides examples of how communities are integrating natural
hazard mitigation strategies into comprehensive planning. You can find it in the FEMA Library at
http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/89725.
The Integrating Hazard Mitigation Into Local Planning: Case Studies and Tools for Community
Officials resource provides practical guidance on how to incorporate risk reduction strategies into
existing local plans, policies, codes, and programs that guide community development or
redevelopment patterns. It includes recommended steps and tools to assist with local integration
efforts, along with ideas for overcoming possible impediments, and presents a series of case studies
to demonstrate successful integration in practice. You can find it in the FEMA Library at
http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=7130.
The Mitigation Ideas: A Resource for Reducing Risk from Natural Hazards resource presents ideas
for how to mitigate the impacts of different natural hazards, from drought and sea level rise, to
severe winter weather and wildfire. The document also includes ideas for actions that communities
can take to reduce risk to multiple hazards, such as incorporating a hazard risk assessment into the
local development review process. You can find it in the FEMA Library at
http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=6938.
The Local Mitigation Planning Handbook provides guidance to local governments on developing or
updating hazard mitigation plans to meet and go above the requirements. You can find it in the
FEMA Library at http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=7209.
The Integration Hazard Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Planning: Case Studies and Lessons
Learned resource is a 2014 ICLEI publication for San Diego with a clear methodology that could
assist in next steps for integration impacts of climate change throughout mitigation actions.
http://icleiusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Integrating-Hazard-Mitigation-and-Climate-
Adaptation-Planning.pdf
The Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide and Tool resource is available through FEMA’s Library and
should be referred to for the next plan update.
http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=4859
The Tribal Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance: This resource is specific to tribal
governments developing or updating tribal mitigation plans. It covers all aspects of tribal planning
requirements and the steps to developing tribal mitigation plans. You can find the document in the
FEMA Library at http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/18355
Washington Fire Adapted Communities Learning Network
Volcanic Eruption Mitigation Measures: For information on Mitigation Actions for Volcanic
Eruptions that would satisfy the C4 requirement, please visit:
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-13
http://earthzine.org/2011/03/21/volcanic-crisis-management-and-mitigation-strategies-a-multi-
risk-framework-case-study/ and http://www.gvess.org/publ.html.
The FEMA Region 10 Risk Mapping, Analysis, and Planning program (Risk MAP) releases a monthly
newsletter that includes information about upcoming events and training opportunities, as well as
hazard and risk related news from around the Region. Past newsletters can be viewed at
http://www.starr-team.com/starr/RegionalWorkspaces/RegionX/Pages/default.aspx. If you would
like to receive future newsletters, email rxnewsletter@starr-team.com and ask to be included.
The mitigation strategy may include eligible projects to be funded through FEMA’s hazard mitigation
grant programs (Pre-Disaster Mitigation, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Flood Mitigation
Assistance). Contact your State Hazard Mitigation Officer, Tim Cook at tim.cook@mil.wa.gov, for
more information.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-14
SECTION 3:
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET (OPTIONAL)
INSTRUCTIONS: For multi-jurisdictional plans, a Multi-jurisdiction Summary Spreadsheet may be completed by listing each participating
jurisdiction, which required Elements for each jurisdiction were ‘Met’ or ‘Not Met,’ and when the adoption resolutions were received. This
Summary Sheet does not imply that a mini-plan be developed for each jurisdiction; it should be used as an optional worksheet to ensure that
each jurisdiction participating in the Plan has been documented and has met the requirements for those Elements (A through E).
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
1
Jefferson
County,
WA
County Lynn Sterbenz,
Director
Jefferson
County Dept
of Emergency
Management
81 Elkins
Road Port
Hadlock, WA
98338
lsterbenz@co.jefferson.wa
.us
(360) 385-
9368 1. Y
2. Y 3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y
4. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y
2
City of Port
Townsend
City Michael Evans,
Chief of Police
Port
Townsend
Police Dept
1925 Blaine
St Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
mevans@cityofpt.us
(360) 382-
2322 1.Y
2. Y 3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y
4. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-15
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
3
East
Jefferson
Fire &
Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD1)
Ted Krysinski
Deputy Fire
Chief
24 Seton
Road Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
tkrysinski@ejfr.org (360) 385-
2626 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. N/A
3. Y
4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-16
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
4
Quilcene
Fire -
Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD2)
Larry Karp Chief 70 Herbert St
Quilcene, WA
98376
chief@qvfd.org (360) 765-
3333 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. N/A
3. Y
4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment considers earthquake, flooding, and severe storm as priorities so there should be a mitigation action for each of these hazards. Once the vulnerabilities are identified as part of element B3, they can inform hazard-specific mitigation actions.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-17
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
5
Port
Ludlow Fire
- Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD3)
Brad Martin
Chief
7650 Oak Bay
Road Port
Ludlow, WA
98365
brad.martin@plfr.org
(360) 437-
2236 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. N/A
3. Y
4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment considers earthquake, windstorm, and flood as priorities so there should be a mitigation action for each of these hazards. Once the vulnerabilities are identified as part of element B3, they can inform hazard-specific mitigation actions.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-18
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
6
Brinnon
Fire -
Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD4)
Tim Manly Chief 272
Schoolhouse
RD P.O. Box
42 Brinnon,
WA 98320
tmanly@brinnonfire.org (360) 796-
4450 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment considers earthquake, flooding, and landslides as priorities so there should be a mitigation action for each of these hazards. Once the vulnerabilities are identified as part of element B3, they can inform hazard-specific mitigation actions.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-19
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
7
Discovery
Bay Fire &
Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD5)
Willie Knoepfle
Chief
12 Bentley Pl
Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
wkoepfle@dbvfr.org (360) 379-
6839
1. N
2. Y 3. Y 4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N 3. Y 4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y 4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A 3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment considers windstorm, earthquake, and wildfire as priorities so there should be a mitigation action for each of these hazards. Once the
vulnerabilities are identified as part of element B3, they can inform hazard-specific mitigation actions.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-20
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
8
JeffCom 9-
1-1
Special Purpose
District
Karl Hatton
Director
81 Elkins
Road Port
Hadlock, WA
98339
khatton@jcpsn.us (360) 344-
9779
1. N
2. Y 3. Y 4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. N 4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y 4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A 3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment considers earthquake, severe storm, and flood as priorities so there should be a mitigation action for each of these hazards. Once the
vulnerabilities are identified as part of element B3, they can inform hazard-specific mitigation actions.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-21
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
9
Jefferson
HealthCare
Medical
Center
Public Hospital
District No. 2
Bill Hunt 824 Sheridan
St Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
bhunt@jgh.org (360) 385-
2200 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-22
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
10
Jefferson
County
Library
Public Library
District
Meredith
Wagner Director
620 Cedar
Ave Port
Hadlock, WA
98339
mwagner@jclibrary.info
(360) 385-
6544
1. N
2. Y 3. Y 4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. N 4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y 4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A 3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment considers severe storm, earthquake, and volcanic action/ash fall as priorities so there should be a mitigation action for each of these
hazards.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-23
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
11
Port of Port
Townsend
Port District Sam Gibboney
Exec Directo
2701 Jefferson
St Port Townsend, WA
98368
samg@portofpt.com (360) 385-
0656 1. N
2. Y 3. Y 4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. N 4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y 4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A 3. N/A
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-24
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Element C4- Not Met:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment.
• The risk assessment for the airport considers earthquake, severe local storm, wildland fire, and tsunami, priorities so there should be a
mitigation action for each of these hazards.
• The risk assessment for the boat haven includes severe local storm, earthquake, and tsunami. There should be a mitigation action for each of
these hazards.
• The risk assessment for the Herb Beck Marina and & Quilcene Boat Haven include severe storm, earthquake, and tsunami. There should be a
mitigation action listed for each hazard (missing for severe storm).
• The risk assessment for the Point Hudson Marina ranks severe storm, earthquake, and tsunami as a priority. There should be a mitigation
action listed for each hazard (missing for severe storm). Once the vulnerabilities are identified as part of element B3, they can inform hazard-specific mitigation actions.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-25
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
12
Port
Townsend School District No.
50
Public School
District
John Polm
Superintendent Of Schools
450 Fir St
Port Townsend, WA 98368
jpolm@ptschools.org (360) 379-
4501 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment prioritizes earthquake, volcano, and severe storms. There should be a specific mitigation action for each of these hazards.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-26
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
13
Brinnon
School
District No.
46
Public School
District
Patricia
Beathard
Superintendent
Of Schools
46
Schoolhouse
Rd Brinnon,
WA 98320
pbeathard@bsd46.org (360) 796-
4646 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment prioritizes flood, earthquake, and severe storms. There should be a specific mitigation action for each of these hazards.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-27
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
14
Chimacum
School
District No.
49
Public School
District
Rick Thompson
Superintendent
Of Schools
P.O. Box 287
Chimacum,
WA 98325
rick_thompson@csd49.org (360) 302-
5896
1. N
2. Y 3. Y 4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. N 4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y 4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A 3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment prioritizes earthquake, fire, and severe storms. There should be a specific mitigation action for each of these hazards.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-28
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
15
Queets /
Clearwater
School
District No.
20
Public School
District
Scott M. Carter
Superintendent
Of Schools
146000 Hwy
101 Forks,
WA 98331
scarter@qcsd.wednet.edu (360) 962-
2395 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment prioritizes earthquake, severe storms, and fire. There should be a specific mitigation action for each of these hazards.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-29
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
16
Quilcene
School
District No.
48
Public School
District
Wally F. Lis
Superintendent
Of Schools
P.O. Box 40
Quilcene, WA
98376
wlis@qsd48.org (360) 765-
3363
1. N
2. Y 3. Y 4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. N 4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y 4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A 3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment prioritizes fire, earthquake, and severe storms. There should be a specific mitigation action for each of these hazards.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-30
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
17
Quillayute
Valley
School
District No.
402
Public School
District
Diana Reaume
Superintendent
Of Schools
P.O. Box 60
Forks, WA
98331
diana.reaume@qvschools.
org
(360) 742-
6262
1. N
2. Y 3. Y 4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y 3. N 4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y 3. Y 4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A 3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment prioritizes fire but does not have any action items related to fire. There should be a specific mitigation action for each of these hazards.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-31
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
18
Public
Utility
District No.
1 of
Jefferson
County
Public Utility
District
James Parker
General
Manager
310 Four
Corners Rd
Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
Jparker@jeffpud.org (360) 385-
5800 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment prioritizes severe storm, earthquake, and landslides. There should be a specific mitigation action for each of these hazards.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-32
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Require-
ments
19
Jefferson
Transit
Authority
Public
Transportation
District
Tammi Rubert
General
Manager
63 Four
Corners Rd
Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
trubert@jeffersontransit.c
om
(360) 385-
4777 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. Y
6. Y
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content
after attending planning meetings. Element A1- Not Met. See Section 1, Required Revisions for more details
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence
or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and
list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Element B3: Not Met. See Section 1, Risk Assessment for more details.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C4- Not Met
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions to reduce the impacts of hazards identified in the risk assessment. The risk
assessment prioritizes earthquake, severe storms, and wildland fire. There should be a specific mitigation action for each of these hazards.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-33
End of Document