Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA99d V6 - FEMA Review 3_Spec_Dist Revision_June_2017Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-1 SECTION VIII FEMA CROSSWALK (Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool) (Revision 2 – Resubmitted to EMD on 6/2/2017 Forwarded to FEMA on 6/16/2017) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-2 Plan Review Tools The following Plan Review Tools are based on the Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide, published by FEMA, dated October 1, 2011. This Plan Review Tool is consistent with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-390), enacted October 30, 2000 and 44 CFR Part 201 – Mitigation Planning, Interim Final Rule (the Rule), published February 26, 2002. The crosswalks are placed here to assist the reviewer in determining that the plan meets the requirements of the above legislation, and to provide a tool for the planners to use in continuously evaluating and improving the plan and, more importantly, using the plan to effect changes in policy and property to minimize the impacts of both natural and man-made disasters. Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-3 NOTES TO REVIEWER (Updated with Phase 2 Change Comments.) The following pages have been changed to meet the requirements noted below in the FEMA review tool. Per our telephone meeting on 4/20/2017, what we are calling “Phase 1” changes are targeted at getting Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend an approved Hazard Mitigation Plan. We will address the requirements of the Special Districts, once the Plan has been approved. PHASE 1 CHANGES – Jefferson County & City of Port Townsend 1. This has been completed and the Plan has been approved for Jefferson County and for the City of Port Townsend. 2. Changes made for the Special Purpose Districts have changed the total page count and required some repagination. The page numbers contained herein have been changed to point to the appropriate locations. PHASE 2 CHANGES – Special Purpose Districts 1. 2016 Plan Revisions Summary. Changes to this section are in Bold PURPLE to make it easy for the reviewer to find and identify as a Phase 2 Change. All colors will be changed back to “black” prior to formal publishing. 2. The following notation for CFR’s and published FEMA policies is used to simplify references in the feedback: CFR Ref #1 - 44 CFR § 201.6 (a)(4) Multi-jurisdiction plans (e.g. watershed plans) may be accepted as appropriate, as long as each jurisdiction has participated in the process and has officially adopted the plan. CFR Ref#2 - 44 CFR § 201.6 (c)(2)(iii) For multi-jurisdiction plans, the risk assessment section must assess each jurisdiction’s risks where they vary from the risks facing the entire planning area. CFR Ref#3 - 44 CFR § 201.6 (c)(3)(iv) For multi-jurisdiction plans, there must be identifiable action items specific to the jurisdiction requesting FEMA approval or credit of the plan. FEMA Policy #1: “Guiding Principle 2. Review for Intent, as well as Compliance. Plan reviews will emphasize actions and implementation of the hazard mitigation strategy. ... A comprehensive review of the plan assists FEMA to validate that the plan meets the overall intent of mitigation planning, whereas only a strict interpretation of individual requirements may cause unnecessary revisions. Source: The Local Mitigation Planning Review Guide, October 1, 2011, p. 5. FEMA Policy #2: “Guiding Principle 3. This is the Community’s Plan. Plan reviews will recognize the effort and interest of each community that develops a mitigation plan. Source: The Local Mitigation Planning Review Guide, October 1, 2011, p. 6. Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-4 FEMA Policy #3: “Guiding Principle 4. Process is as important as the Plan itself. FEMA will accept the planning process as defined by the community. “FEMA will not penalize communities that have less capability or demonstrate little progress in hazard mitigation efforts over time. In addition, FEMA will not require specific formats (for example, stand-alone plan, chapter in emergency operations plan, or integrated into comprehensive plan), and FEMA will not require information above or beyond the requirements to be removed (for example, non-natural, climate change). In fact, FEMA acknowledges that some plans will simply “pass” the minimum plan requirements to receive FEMA approval.” Source: The Local Mitigation Planning Review Guide, October 1, 2011, p. 6. The Handbook is a companion to the Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide released by FEMA in 2011. Source: Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, Introduction, March 2013, p. I-1 To see all of 44 CFR § 201, which pertains to “Mitigation Planning”: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/44/part-201 Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-5 LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW TOOL The Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool demonstrates how the Local Mitigation Plan meets the regulation in 44 CFR §201.6 and offers States and FEMA Mitigation Planners an opportunity to provide feedback to the community. • The Regulation Checklist provides a summary of FEMA’s evaluation of whether the Plan has addressed all requirements. • The Plan Assessment identifies the plan’s strengths as well as documents areas for future improvement. • The Multi-jurisdiction Summary Sheet is an optional worksheet that can be used to document how each jurisdiction met the requirements of the each Element of the Plan (Planning Process; Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment; Mitigation Strategy; Plan Review, Evaluation, and Implementation; and Plan Adoption). The FEMA Mitigation Planner must reference this Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide when completing the Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool. Jurisdiction: Jefferson County, the City of Port Townsend, and 17 Special Purpose Districts Title of Plan: Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Multi- Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan Date of Plan: Local Point of Contact: Ken Horvath Address: Jefferson County Dept of Emergency Management Emergency Operations Center 81 Elkins Road Port Hadlock, WA 98368 Title: Hazard Mitigation Plan Project Coordinator Agency: Jefferson County Department of Emergency Management Phone Number: (360) 385-9368 (Jefferson County EOC) E-Mail: khorvath@co.jefferson.wa.us State Reviewer: Sarah Tomt Sarah.Tomt@mil.wa.gov Title: Tsunami Program Coordinator Date: 3/9/17 FEMA Reviewer: Amanda Siok Amanda.Siok@fema.dhs.gov 425-487-4626 Brett Holt Title: Mitigation Planner Mitigation Planner Date: 03/30/2017 4/10/17 Date Received in FEMA Region (insert #) 03/14/2017 Plan Not Approved 04/11/2017 Plan Approvable Pending Adoption Plan Approved Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-6 SECTION 1: REGULATION CHECKLIST 1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met Not Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) ELEMENT A. PLANNING PROCESS A1. Does the Plan document the planning process, including how it was prepared and who was involved in the process for each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(1)) Section I – p.53-74 Appendix B – p.769- 797; Appendix H – p.939-959; Appendix H – pp. 960-967. X A2. Does the Plan document an opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, agencies that have the authority to regulate development as well as other interests to be involved in the planning process? (Requirement §201.6(b)(2)) Section I – p.61-65; X A3. Does the Plan document how the public was involved in the planning process during the drafting stage? (Requirement §201.6(b)(1)) Section I – p. 62-67 X A4. Does the Plan describe the review and incorporation of existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information? (Requirement §201.6(b)(3)) Section I – p.65 & 69 Section IV – p.416 & p.467 X A5. Is there discussion of how the community(ies) will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process? (Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(iii)) See Response to question below. Executive Summary – p. 51-52 Section I – p.69-74 X A6. Is there a description of the method and schedule for keeping the plan current (monitoring, evaluating and updating the mitigation plan within a 5-year cycle)? (Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(i)) See Response to question below. Section I – p.69-74 X Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-7 ELEMENT A: REQUIRED REVISIONS Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan contains a narrative in section in Section I describing the Steering Committee and Advisory Group’s responsibilities for the update and Appendix B lists these members. However, the plan is lacking documentation of how specifically the members participated in the planning process and how they engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that an Appendix H is created with Steering Committee and Advisory Group Meeting minutes that document attendance at these meetings. Phase1: Element A1: The table of stakeholders on page 59 has been replaced with a table that lists the Plan Point- of-Contact for each participating jurisdiction. A data flow diagram and text have been added to explain how all jurisdictions participate in the planning, including how they integrate with local governance documents. An Appendix “H” has been added to show steering committee meetings and Jefferson County – Port Townsend Regional Emergency Preparedness (JPREP) Network meetings relating to the Plan. Phase2: A1: In addition to the Phase 1 changes, Table H-2 has been to Appendix “H” to show that all participating jurisdictions had input into the Plan through attending meetings and/or providing data. Small districts that could not attend distant meetings should not be penalized per FEMA Policy #3. Please mark Element A1 as “Met” for all jurisdictions. Element A5: The plan must describe how the jurisdictions will continue the public participation process after the plan has been approved and during the plan’s implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Pages 66-68 do not describe this process for all jurisdictions participating in the plan. Please revise the plan to describe how the public will be engaged over the duration of the plan for each jurisdiction. Phase 1: Pages 68 – 74 have been added to and edited to clarify the public participation, including Figure PP-3 that shows the annual maintenance schedule, including designated public participation opportunities. Phase 2: Changes incorporated for Phase 1 should meet the requirement for the Special Districts, too. Please mark Element A5 as “Met” for all jurisdictions. Element A6: The Plan must identify how, when, and by whom the plan will be updated, maintained, and evaluated, for each jurisdiction. The current plan does not demonstrate this process for each jurisdiction. Page 58 delegates the maintenance task to the County however, this task must be undertaken by each jurisdiction participating in the plan. Please revise the plan to show each jurisdiction’s process for updating, maintaining, and evaluating the plan over the five year cycle. Phase 1: The responses to both Element A1 and A5, together, answer this. Phase 2: Changes incorporated for Phase 1 should meet the requirement for the Special Districts, too. See FEMA Policy #1. Please mark Element A6 as “Met” for all jurisdictions. Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-8 1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met Not Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) ELEMENT B. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT B1. Does the Plan include a description of the type, location, and extent of all natural hazards that can affect each jurisdiction(s)? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i)) Section II – pp.75-290 X B2. Does the Plan include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events for each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i)) Phase 1: The City and County are shown as having met this requirement. Phase 2: CFR Ref#2 – the previous occurrences, etc. are clearly documented for Jefferson County as a whole, and only need to be addressed in an “annex” if there is divergence. Our technique has been to call out a jurisdiction in the body of the hazard profile rather than in an “annex” if there is variance from the over-all risk. Do to extremely high turn-over at senior positions, most of the small jurisdictions do not have the institutional memory for damage caused prior to the update project, e.g. from the Nisqually Earthquake. Risk probabilities have been cited if they came from reports, otherwise, an inhouse methodology provided a “high – med – low” estimate based on previous experience of the participants. FEMA Policies 1, 2, and 3 all seem appropriate here. Specific enhancements to the Hazard Profiles to improve on this will be noted in the specific Annex analysis in Part 3. Please mark Element B2 as “Met” for all jurisdictions. Section II – p.93-282; each hazard has representative previous occurrences. pp. 82-86 and 461- 476 List all major disaster declarations for Jefferson County. X B3. Is there a description of each identified hazard’s impact on the community as well as an overall summary of the community’s vulnerability for each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)) Phase 1: The City and County are shown as having met this requirement. Phase 2: Again, CFR Ref #2 applies. There is no difference between the community’s vulnerability for the City and for JCFD1, for example. FEMA Policy #1 pertains. If specific jurisdictions are called out because of unique vulnerabilities, it will be noted in the specific Annex analysis in Part 3. Please mark Element B3 as “Met” for all jurisdictions. Section II p.99-382; each hazard profile contains a HIVA pertinent to the area and a conclusion. X Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-9 1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met Not Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) B4. Does the Plan address NFIP insured structures within the jurisdiction that have been repetitively damaged by floods? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)) Phase 1: The City and County are shown as having met this requirement. There are no repetitive damage properties that belong to the City or the County. There is currently one such structure in the County, but we were told it would be a liability issue to mention it because it would be easily identified since it is the only one. Phase 2: There are no repetitive loss properties in any Special District that are not in the City or the County. CFR Ref#2. FEMA Policy #1. Please mark Element B4 as “Met” for all jurisdictions. Section II – Floods – pp.170-173; Section IV – pp.417- 418 & pp.468-469. X ELEMENT B: REQUIRED REVISIONS See Section three below for jurisdiction specific required revisions. ELEMENT C. MITIGATION STRATEGY C1. Does the plan document each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, programs and resources and its ability to expand on and improve these existing policies and programs? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)) Phase1: City and County have met this requirement. Phase 2: Added to each Jurisdiction as appropriate. Please mark this requirement as “Met” for all jurisdictions. Section IV - City – pp.415-464; County – pp.465-534; Special Purpose Districts – pp. 535-690. X C2. Does the Plan address each jurisdiction’s participation in the NFIP and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii)) Executive Summary p. 51; Section IV – City pp.417-418; County pp.468-469. X C3. Does the Plan include goals to reduce/avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(i)) Section V – Mitigation Actions – pp.691-726 X Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-10 1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met Not Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) C4. Does the Plan identify and analyze a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects for each jurisdiction being considered to reduce the effects of hazards, with emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii)) Phase 1: City and County have met this requirement. Phase 2: Each jurisdiction has one or more mitigation actions that address the issues that they have with the resources they have. Each line item contains a code for the action, the action description, the lead agency or department, and the funding source. The mitigation actions from each jurisdiction have been consolidated and sorted by hazard type in Section V – Mitigation Actions. Section V covers mitigation actions for all natural hazards. Please mark this requirement as “Met.” The requirement that each jurisdiction have mitigation activities for all hazards encourages districts to only list hazards they have solutions for. We have tried to identify a comprehensive set of hazards, including man-made, and document them so that when and if they become front-burner, the local mitigation strategists will have a basis to work from. This does not mean that all identified hazards are being worked on now, because money is tight. See FEMA Policies #1 and #3. Section V – Mitigation Actions – pp.691-726 X C5. Does the Plan contain an action plan that describes how the actions identified will be prioritized (including cost benefit review), implemented, and administered by each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(iv)); (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(iii)) Phase 1: City and County have met this requirement. Phase 2: Text has been added to each jurisdiction to meet this requirement. See Section 3 for specific changes. Please mark C5 as having been “Met.” Section III – Multi- Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation p.395-397 X C6. Does the Plan describe a process by which local governments will integrate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms, such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans, when appropriate? (Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Phase 1: City and County have met this requirement. Phase 2: Text has been added to each jurisdiction to meet this requirement by referring back to Figure PP-1 on Page 65. See Section 3 for specific changes. Please mark C6 as having been “Met.” Executive Summary – p. 51; Section I – pp.56-65 Special Purpose Districts – pp.535- 690. X Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-11 1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met Not Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) ELEMENT C: REQUIRED REVISIONS Element C1: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, program and resources available to accomplish hazard mitigation. Reference the table in Section 3 for detailed information on what needs to be added in order to meet requirements. Phase1: City and County have met this requirement. Phase 2: Added to each Jurisdiction as appropriate. See Section 3 for specific changes. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Reference the table in Section 3 for detailed information on what needs to be added in order to meet requirements. Phase 1: City and County have met this requirement. Phase 2: See Section 3 for comments and/or changes. See FEMA Policies #1 and #3. Each jurisdiction has at least one mitigation action. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Reference the table in Section 3 for detailed information on what needs to be added in order to meet requirements. Phase 1: City and County have met this requirement. Phase 2: See Section 3 for comments and/or changes. See FEMA Policies #1 and #3. Element C6: The plan must document each jurisdiction and Special District’s individual process to integrate the mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. Reference the table in Section 3 for detailed information on what needs to be added in order to meet requirements. Phase 1: City and County have met this requirement. Phase 2: See Section 3 for comments and/or changes. See FEMA Policies #1 and #3. ELEMENT D. PLAN REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION (applicable to plan updates only) D1. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in development? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) Revisions Summary – p.1-10 X D2. Was the plan revised to reflect progress in local mitigation efforts? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) Section V – Mitigation Actions pp.694-726 X D3. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in priorities? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) Section IV – Jurisdictions p.409- 690 X ELEMENT D: REQUIRED REVISIONS ELEMENT E. PLAN ADOPTION E1. Does the Plan include documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction requesting approval? (Requirement §201.6(c)(5)) Preface – p.xvii; Section I – p.68; Appendix F –pp. 815-840. X Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-12 1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met Not Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) E2. For multi-jurisdictional plans, has each jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan documented formal plan adoption? (Requirement §201.6(c)(5)) Appendix F – Adoption Resolutions pp. 815-840. X ELEMENT E: REQUIRED REVISIONS ELEMENT F. ADDITIONAL STATE REQUIREMENTS (OPTIONAL FOR STATE REVIEWERS ONLY; NOT TO BE COMPLETED BY FEMA) F1. F2. ELEMENT F: REQUIRED REVISIONS Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-13 SECTION 2: PLAN ASSESSMENT A. Plan Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement This section provides a discussion of the strengths of the plan document and identifies areas where these could be improved beyond minimum requirements. Element A: Planning Process Plan Strengths -The plan describes a thorough process for maintenance and continued public engagement. An annual public engagement meeting coinciding with the planning committee’s annual review is an excellent way to keep focus on the goals and strategies of the plan. -Page 418 of the plan lists sources used to inform the Plan as well as the owner of that source. This is an excellent way to track used information while setting up a process that can be followed for collecting information for the next plan update without having to recreate the wheel. Opportunities for Improvement -Consider organizing the Summary of Adoption Resolutions (page 19/884) to more clearly identify participating jurisdictions in the hazard mitigation plan. -Text of the plan refers to Appendix C as containing Contributors and Contact Points however, this is actually Appendix B of the Plan. The text should be changed to reflect the Table of Contents. Element B: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Plan Strengths -The plan identifies risks associated with hazards in neighboring counties. -The plan addresses climate change for each appropriate hazard. -The plan documents the current status of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) -The plan references Sharknado, an invaluable resource to assist with understanding impacts associated with tornado hazards and reducing the risk of oversight when reviewing 600+ pages. -Port Townsend did an excellent job of identifying codes and comprehensive plans that support hazard mitigation planning and risk reduction efforts. Opportunities for Improvement -Many of the maps in the risk assessment section (such as those for Brinnon in unincorporated Jefferson County) are illegible. These maps appear to be copy/pasted from another plan. Consider obtaining the source GIS data and reproducing the maps in the next updated. -Use the Risk MAP database created by FEMA and WA DNR to develop GIS-based maps of vulnerable infrastructure and to enhance understanding of impacts. Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-14 Element C: Mitigation Strategy Plan Strengths - Port Townsend does an exceptional job meeting requirements for element C6. Not only is there a thorough description of the code/ordinance that can be linked with goals of the hazard mitigation planning process, but a column describes the review schedule of each code/ordinance. This process paves the road for successful implementation of the plan leading to reduced risk in the community. Opportunities for Improvement - The strategies can be improved by identifying specific projects for mitigation based on risk assessment data from the Risk MAP. - In addition to describing existing programs and policies related to hazard mitigation, include an assessment of resources that are available to implement mitigation such as existing regulatory authorities, staff, or funding through taxing authority and annual budgets. - Make additional linkages between the vulnerability, hazard risk, and mitigation strategy. For example, target mitigation actions at specific locations/areas that have been identified as vulnerable to a hazard. Element D: Plan Update, Evaluation, and Implementation (Plan Updates Only) Plan Strengths - The plan reviews the status of the 2009 mitigation action items and all of the existing actions that are not ongoing or were not completed have been deferred. An explanation of the accomplishments, deferment, or any changes made is provided. Opportunities for Improvement -Although the plan confirmed the plan goals and reprioritized the mitigation actions, consider including a narrative description of if and how any priorities have changed since the plan was previously approved in order to reflect current financial, legal, political, and post-disaster conditions. Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-15 B. Resources for Implementing Your Approved Plan The Region 10 Integrating Natural Hazard Mitigation into Comprehensive Planning is a resource specific to Region 10 states and provides examples of how communities are integrating natural hazard mitigation strategies into comprehensive planning. You can find it in the FEMA Library at http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/89725. The Integrating Hazard Mitigation Into Local Planning: Case Studies and Tools for Community Officials resource provides practical guidance on how to incorporate risk reduction strategies into existing local plans, policies, codes, and programs that guide community development or redevelopment patterns. It includes recommended steps and tools to assist with local integration efforts, along with ideas for overcoming possible impediments, and presents a series of case studies to demonstrate successful integration in practice. You can find it in the FEMA Library at http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=7130. The Mitigation Ideas: A Resource for Reducing Risk from Natural Hazards resource presents ideas for how to mitigate the impacts of different natural hazards, from drought and sea level rise, to severe winter weather and wildfire. The document also includes ideas for actions that communities can take to reduce risk to multiple hazards, such as incorporating a hazard risk assessment into the local development review process. You can find it in the FEMA Library at http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=6938. The Local Mitigation Planning Handbook provides guidance to local governments on developing or updating hazard mitigation plans to meet and go above the requirements. You can find it in the FEMA Library at http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=7209. The Integration Hazard Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Planning: Case Studies and Lessons Learned resource is a 2014 ICLEI publication for San Diego with a clear methodology that could assist in next steps for integration impacts of climate change throughout mitigation actions. http://icleiusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Integrating-Hazard-Mitigation-and-Climate- Adaptation-Planning.pdf The Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide and Tool resource is available through FEMA’s Library and should be referred to for the next plan update. http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=4859 The Tribal Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance: This resource is specific to tribal governments developing or updating tribal mitigation plans. It covers all aspects of tribal planning requirements and the steps to developing tribal mitigation plans. You can find the document in the FEMA Library at http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/18355 Washington Fire Adapted Communities Learning Network Volcanic Eruption Mitigation Measures: For information on Mitigation Actions for Volcanic Eruptions that would satisfy the C4 requirement, please visit: Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-16 http://earthzine.org/2011/03/21/volcanic-crisis-management-and-mitigation-strategies-a-multi- risk-framework-case-study/ and http://www.gvess.org/publ.html. The FEMA Region 10 Risk Mapping, Analysis, and Planning program (Risk MAP) releases a monthly newsletter that includes information about upcoming events and training opportunities, as well as hazard and risk related news from around the Region. Past newsletters can be viewed at http://www.starr-team.com/starr/RegionalWorkspaces/RegionX/Pages/default.aspx. If you would like to receive future newsletters, email rxnewsletter@starr-team.com and ask to be included. The mitigation strategy may include eligible projects to be funded through FEMA’s hazard mitigation grant programs (Pre-Disaster Mitigation, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Flood Mitigation Assistance). Contact your State Hazard Mitigation Officer, Tim Cook at tim.cook@mil.wa.gov, for more information. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-17 SECTION 3: MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET (OPTIONAL) INSTRUCTIONS: For multi-jurisdictional plans, a Multi-jurisdiction Summary Spreadsheet may be completed by listing each participating jurisdiction, which required Elements for each jurisdiction were ‘Met’ or ‘Not Met,’ and when the adoption resolutions were received. This Summary Sheet does not imply that a mini-plan be developed for each jurisdiction; it should be used as an optional worksheet to ensure that each jurisdiction participating in the Plan has been documented and has met the requirements for those Elements (A through E). MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments 1 Jefferson County, WA County Lynn Sterbenz, Director Jefferson County Dept of Emergency Management 81 Elkins Road Port Hadlock, WA 98338 lsterbenz@co.jefferson.wa .us (360) 385- 9368 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. Y 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. Y 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-18 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Consider reconciling the below NFIP repetitive loss data prior to finalizing the plan. The Risk MAP Assessment on Page 165 states there is 1 repetitive loss property in the County and none in the City of Port Townsend. PDF 452 (Plan 430) states the City of Port Townsend has 1 repetitive loss property. These numbers should be reconciled. We will reconcile as soon as we are into the maintenance phase. This was undoubtedly caused because the Risk Map Assessment and the data on the property in the City were collected at significantly different times. PDF Page 490 (Document page 468) documents 1 repetitive loss property in the Unincorporated County but doesn’t identify the value of the property. (Fixed) There should be a Mitigation Strategy for this property. We will look into it during the 1st year maintenance phase. PDF Page 514 (Document page 492) documents 1 repetitive loss property in the County. Noted. 2 City of Port Townsend City Michael Evans, Chief of Police Port Townsend Police Dept 1925 Blaine St Port Townsend, WA 98368 mevans@cityofpt.us (360) 382- 2322 1.Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. Y 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. Y 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-19 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Consider reconciling the below NFIP repetitive loss data prior to finalizing the plan. The Risk MAP Assessment on Page 165 states there is 1 repetitive loss property in the County and none in the City of Port Townsend. PDF 452 (Plan 430) states the City of Port Townsend has 1 repetitive loss property. These numbers should be reconciled. We will reconcile as soon as we are into the maintenance phase. This was undoubtedly caused because the Risk Map Assessment and the data on the property in the City were collected at significantly different times. PDF Page 490 (Document page 468) documents 1 repetitive loss property in the Unincorporated County but doesn’t identify the value of the property. (Fixed) There should be a Mitigation Strategy for this property. We will look into it during the 1st year maintenance phase. PDF Page 514 (Document page 492) documents 1 repetitive loss property in the County. Noted. 3 East Jefferson Fire & Rescue Fire District (JCFD1) Ted Krysinski Deputy Fire Chief 24 Seton Road Port Townsend, WA 98368 tkrysinski@ejfr.org (360) 385- 2626 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. Y 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. N/A 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: pp. 529 - Added Headers to “annex” to clearly identify Planning Section, Hazards, and Mitigation. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-20 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Required Revisions: Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after attending planning meetings. Reference Section 1 for Responses – Phase 2 changes that meet this requirement for Special Districts are the same as Phase 1 for the County. See Plan “Section I – The Planning Process”, pages 59 – 74. Added Tables PP-1 and Figures PP-1 through PP-3 with appropriate transition text. Phase 2: Added Appendix “H” (pp. 939-968 ) to document participation. Added Table H-2 to document participation for Special Districts. Required information to “document” can be provided in the plan through a variety of formats, such as narrative, tables, lists, maps, etc. Guide, p. 13. See FEMA Policy #1 and #3. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. 44 CFR §201.6(c)(2)(iii)) – For multi-jurisdictional plans, the risk assessment section must assess each jurisdiction’s risks where they vary from the risks facing the entire planning area. Vulnerabilities to structures, etc. were developed by Risk Map and modeled using Hazus. These results are used in the Hazard Profiles, if available. If not available, the basic High-Med-Low assessment was made using input from the Planning team and summarized in the Natural Hazard Rating by Jurisdiction Table on page 413. For natural hazards, the risk for any given jurisdiction is the same as for the entire county with a few singular exceptions that are identified in the hazard topic. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-21 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments The Plan review guide says that each jurisdiction must have a comprehensive range of alternatives that address the vulnerabilities to the hazard that the jurisdiction determines are most important. This is not the same as having one action for each hazard identified. – That policy suggests we should just take out all hazards except earthquakes from the Plan in order to get it passed. We have made a good-faith effort to get even the smallest jurisdictions to play in order to qualify to compete for grants that might actually help them, but it is Section V – Mitigation Strategies (pp. 691-720) that has the comprehensive range of strategies that affect the County. See ‘FEMA Guiding Principle #2. Review for Intent... ‘ and “FEMA Guiding Principle #4, “FEMA will not penalize communities that have less capability or demonstrate little progress in hazard mitigation efforts over time. Added activity to replace Marrowstone Fire Station, p. 545. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Each activity line item consists of an activity ID (unless new and not yet assigned), the description of the mitigation activity, who the lead agency is, what the probable funding source is and the projected time to completions. Each line item is contained both at the jurisdiction level, in the Executive Summary (pp. 17-50), and in Section V – Mitigation Strategies (pp.691-720). JCFD1 (EJFR) activities are on pages 544-545. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. FCD1 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 540 of the JCFD1 Annex. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-22 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments 4 Quilcene Fire - Rescue Fire District (JCFD2) Larry Karp Chief 70 Herbert St Quilcene, WA 98376 chief@qvfd.org (360) 765- 3333 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. Y 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. N/A 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD2. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on JCFD2 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. Added New Activity to Upgrade Fire Station 2-1, per the strategic plan (p.552) JCFD2 mitigation activities are on pages 552. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JCFD2 mitigation activities are on pages 552. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-23 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. JCFD2 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 550 of the JCFD2, Quilcene Fire & Rescue, Annex. 5 Port Ludlow Fire - Rescue Fire District (JCFD3) Brad Martin Chief 7650 Oak Bay Road Port Ludlow, WA 98365 brad.martin@plfr.org (360) 437- 2236 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. Y 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. N/A 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD3. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on JCFD3 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JCFD3 mitigation activities are on pages 558. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-24 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JCFD3 mitigation activities are on page 558. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. JCFD3 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 556 of the JCFD3, Port Ludlow Fire & Rescue, Annex. 6 Brinnon Fire - Rescue Fire District (JCFD4) Tim Manly Chief 272 Schoolhouse RD P.O. Box 42 Brinnon, WA 98320 tmanly@brinnonfire.org (360) 796- 4450 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. Y 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD4. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on JCFD4 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-25 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JCFD4 mitigation activities are on pages 564. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JCFD4 mitigation activities are on page 564 Activity LT-FL-4 has been updated to show negotiations are going on with the Salmon Coalition for an exchange of property on which to move Fire Station 4-2. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. JCFD2 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 562 of the JCFD4, Brinnon Fire Department, Annex. 7 Discovery Bay Fire & Rescue Fire District (JCFD5) Willie Knoepfle Chief 12 Bentley Pl Port Townsend, WA 98368 wkoepfle@dbvfr.org (360) 379- 6839 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. N 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-26 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD5. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on JCFD5 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JCFD5 mitigation activities are on pages 569-570. A new activity has been added to Replace Station 5-1 with one that is seismically sound. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JCFD5 mitigation activities are on pages 569-570. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. JCFD5 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 566 of the JCFD5, Discovery Bay Fire & Rescue, Annex. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-27 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments 8 JeffCom 9- 1-1 Special Purpose District Karl Hatton Director 81 Elkins Road Port Hadlock, WA 98339 khatton@jcpsn.us (360) 344- 9779 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. Y 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JeffCom. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on JeffCom and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JeffCom mitigation activities are on page 576. New activities have been added for the replacement of the Uninterruptable Power Supply and for the regionalization of 9-1-1 services. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JeffCom mitigation activities are on pages 569-570. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-28 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. JCFD5 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 573 of the JeffCom Annex. 9 Jefferson HealthCare Medical Center Public Hospital District No. 2 Bill Hunt 824 Sheridan St Port Townsend, WA 98368 bhunt@jgh.org (360) 385- 2200 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. N 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. Hospital Dist 2 did not list any past natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none. What they are saying is that there have not been any natural disaster events that damaged them. Even so, we added the Nisqually earthquake, which everyone knows, even if it didn’t do much damage in Jefferson County. How do you document that there were no hazard events? Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the hospital and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the hospital and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-29 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. Added New Activities to do the Phase 4 Build-out of the Emergency Services Building and to replace the Port Ludlow Clinic with a new building (p.584). JCHD2 mitigation activities are on pages 583-584. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JCHD2 mitigation activities are on pages 583-584. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The Hospital District 2 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 581 of the JCHD2, Jefferson Healthcare Medical Center Annex. 10 Jefferson County Library Public Library District Meredith Wagner Director 620 Cedar Ave Port Hadlock, WA 98339 mwagner@jclibrary.info (360) 385- 6544 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. N 3. N 4. N/A 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-30 Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The Library District did not list any past natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none. Jefferson County Library showed periodic Severe Local Storms and the Nisqually earthquake. In addition, all the Federal Disaster Declarations documented in Table J-1 (pp. 80-85) apply to all jurisdictions within Jefferson County. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the Library and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the library and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C1: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, programs and resources available to accomplish hazard mitigation. The Emergency Planning Manual is not applicable to pre-disaster risk reduction (mitigation) nor is listing the adoption of this plan. Please revise with existing mitigation practices ex. non-structural retrofits, etc. or document that there are none in place. Existing authorities, policies, fiscal capabilities, and community outreach programs have been added to this and to all of the annexes as appropriate. Modeled off of a Hazard Mitigation Plan approved in 2015. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. The Library District mitigation activities are on pages 589. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. The Library District mitigation activities are on pages 589. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The Library District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 587 of the Jefferson County Public Library Annex. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-31 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments 11 Port of Port Townsend Port District Sam Gibboney Exec Director 2701 Jefferson St Port Townsend, WA 98368 samg@portofpt.com (360) 385- 0656 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. N* 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-32 Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The Port did not list any past natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none. The Port broke out its Hazards and Activities by Facility: Airport, Boat Haven, Quilcene, and Point Hudson Marina. The Nisqually earthquake was added on pages 599, and 614. Severe storms were already listed on pages 604 and 608. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the Port and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the Port and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. Port mitigation activities are on pages 600, 605, 609-610, and 615 for the Airport, Boat Haven, Quilcene Marina, and Point Hudson Marina, respectively. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. Port mitigation activities are on pages 600, 605, 609-610, and 615 for the Airport, Boat Haven, Quilcene Marina, and Point Hudson Marina, respectively. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The Port needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on pages 593, 598, 602-603, 607-608 and 613 for the Port Administration, Airport, Boat Haven, Quilcene Marina, and Point Hudson Marina, respectively. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-33 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments 12 Port Townsend School District No. 50 Public School District John Polm Superintendent Of Schools 450 Fir St Port Townsend, WA 98368 jpolm@ptschools.org (360) 379- 4501 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. N 3. N 4. N/A 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District (50) did not list any past natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none. Nisqually earthquake added. In addition, all the Federal Disaster Declarations documented in Table J-1 (pp. 80-85) apply to all jurisdictions within Jefferson County. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on School District 50 and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C1: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, programs and resources available to accomplish hazard mitigation. Please revise with existing mitigation practices ex. non-structural retrofits, etc. or document that there are none in place. Added pages 620-621. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. Mitigation activities are on pages 622-623. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-34 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JCSD50 mitigation activities are on pages 622-623. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. School District 50 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 619 of the PTSD50 Annex. 13 Brinnon School District No. 46 Public School District Patricia Beathard Superintendent Of Schools 46 Schoolhouse Rd Brinnon, WA 98320 pbeathard@bsd46.org (360) 796- 4646 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. N 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District did not list any past natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none. Nisqually earthquake added. In addition, all the Federal Disaster Declarations documented in Table J-1 (pp. 80-85) apply to all jurisdictions within Jefferson County. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-35 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. BSD46 mitigation activities are on pages 630. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 627 of the BSD46, Brinnon School District, Annex. 14 Chimacum School District No. 49 Public School District Rick Thompson Superintendent Of Schools P.O. Box 287 Chimacum, WA 98325 rick_thompson@csd49.org (360) 302- 5896 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. N 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-36 Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District did not list any past natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none. Nisqually earthquake added. In addition, all the Federal Disaster Declarations documented in Table J-1 (pp. 80-85) apply to all jurisdictions within Jefferson County. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. CSD49 mitigation activities are on pages 637. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. CSD49 mitigation activities are on pages 637. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 634 of the CSD49, Chimacum School District, Annex. 15 Queets / Clearwater School District No. 20 Public School District Scott M. Carter Superintendent Of Schools 146000 Hwy 101 Forks, WA 98331 scarter@qcsd.wednet.edu (360) 962- 2395 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. N 3. N 4. N/A 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-37 Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District did not list any past natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none. Distant Tsunami added on p. 642. In addition, all the Federal Disaster Declarations documented in Table J-1 (pp. 80-85) apply to all jurisdictions within Jefferson County. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C1: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, programs and resources available to accomplish hazard mitigation. Please revise with existing mitigation practices ex. non-structural retrofits, etc. or document that there are none in place. Added on pages 641-642. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. QCSD20 mitigation activities are on pages 643-644. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. QCSD20 mitigation activities are on pages 643-644. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex. emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 641 of theQCSD20, Queets – Clearwater School District, Annex. 16 Quilcene School District No. 48 Public School District Wally F. Lis Superintendent Of Schools P.O. Box 40 Quilcene, WA 98376 wlis@qsd48.org (360) 765- 3363 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. N 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-38 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District did not list any past natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none. Nisqually earthquake added. In addition, all the Federal Disaster Declarations documented in Table J-1 (pp. 80-85) apply to all jurisdictions within Jefferson County. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. Added New Activity to remodel or replace old buildings. (p.650) In addition, all the Federal Disaster Declarations documented in Table J-1 (pp. 80-85) apply to all jurisdictions within Jefferson County. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. QSD48 mitigation activities are on pages 650-651. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on pages 647-648 of the QSD48, Quilcene School District, Annex. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-39 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments 17 Quillayute Valley School District No. 402 Public School District Diana Reaume Superintendent Of Schools P.O. Box 60 Forks, WA 98331 diana.reaume@qvschools. org (360) 742- 6262 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. Y 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-40 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. QVSD mitigation activities are on pages 659-662. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. QVSD mitigation activities are on pages 659-662. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 655 of the QVSD annex. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-41 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments 18 Public Utility District No. 1 of Jefferson County Public Utility District James Parker General Manager 310 Four Corners Rd Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jparker@jeffpud.org (360) 385- 5800 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. Y 3. N 4. N/A 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the Public Utility District and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the Utility District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. PUD Mitigation activities are on pages 680-681 and 688-689. Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p.A21 applies here. PUD mitigation activities are on pages 680-681 and 688-689. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The Utility District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-42 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on pages 678 and 686 of the PUD Annex. 19 Jefferson Transit Authority Public Transportation District Tammi Rubert General Manager 63 Four Corners Rd Port Townsend, WA 98368 trubert@jeffersontransit.c om (360) 385- 4777 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. N 6. N 1. Y 2. Y 3. N 4. N/A 1. N 2. Y 3. Y 4. N 5. N 6. N 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. N/A Required Revisions: Element A1, A5, A6: Reference Section 1 for Element A requirements. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the Transit Authority and its service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the Transit Authority and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A20 applies here. Element C1: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, programs and resources available to accomplish hazard mitigation. Please revise with existing mitigation practices ex. non-structural retrofits, etc. or document that there are none in place. Added to page 672. Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action for each hazard identified. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JTA mitigation activities are on page 674. New activity to procure and install back-up generators for critical facilities has been added. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-43 MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET # Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type (city/borough/ township/ village, etc.) Plan POC Mailing Address Email Phone Requirements Met (Y/N) A. Planning Process B. Hazard Identific ation & Risk Assessm ent C. Mitigation Strategy D. Plan Review, Evaluation & Implement ation E. Plan Adopt ion F. State Require- ments Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction. Discussion contained on JCFD1 Required Revisions, p. A21 applies here. JTA mitigation activities are on page 674. Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other planning mechanisms. The Transit Authority needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.). This is covered by changes made to “Section I – The Planning Process” (pp. 53-74) and on page 672 of the Jefferson Transit Authority annex. Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016) Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-44 End of Document