HomeMy WebLinkAboutA99c V6 - FEMA Review 2_PT-JC Revision_May_2017Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-2
Plan Review Tools
The following Plan Review Tools are based on the Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide,
published by FEMA, dated October 1, 2011. This Plan Review Tool is consistent with the
Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-390), enacted October 30, 2000 and 44 CFR Part 201
– Mitigation Planning, Interim Final Rule (the Rule), published February 26, 2002.
The crosswalks are placed here to assist the reviewer in determining that the plan meets the
requirements of the above legislation, and to provide a tool for the planners to use in
continuously evaluating and improving the plan and, more importantly, using the plan to
effect changes in policy and property to minimize the impacts of both natural and man-made
disasters.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-3
NOTES TO REVIEWER
The following pages have been changed to meet the requirements noted below in the FEMA review
tool. Per our telephone meeting on 4/20/2017, what we are calling “Phase 1” changes are targeted at
getting Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend an approved Hazard Mitigation Plan. We will
address the requirements of the Special Districts, once the Plan has been approved.
1. 2016 Plan Revisions Summary, pp. 4 and 9. Changes noted in the “Plan Process” section,
the addition of Appendix H, Plan Development Meetings, and changes to the crosswalk,
itself. Changes to this section are in Bold RED to make it easy for the reviewer to find.
2. Section I – The Planning Process
a. Pp. 59-60 – Added “Multi-jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan Points-of-Contact table
to show who is responsible each jurisdiction’s maintenance of their piece of the Plan.
b. P. 64 – Corrected reference to table containing the names and contact information of
people involved with the development of the Plan. Added text to transition to graphic
depicting the Plan Development Cycle.
c. P. 65 – Created a figure (PP-1 – Hazard Mitigation Plan Development Cycle) to show
how all the relevant entities interact, how the public is continuously involved in the
process, and how ideas flow into the governance documents of the participating
jurisdictions.
d. P.66-67 – Added text and Figure PP-2, Sample Hazard Mitigation Project Webpages
– Home, to show the mechanism by which the public can input suggestions from
anywhere at any time.
e. Repaginated with pages 68a – 68f so that I would not have to repaginate the entire
900-page document, which is normally in multiple files to facilitate pushing to online
or to the menu system on disk.
f. Page 68b – Revised Table PP-6 to reflect the new timing of annual maintenance
based on Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend being approved by June
2017.
g. Page 68c – Added a text block adding the caveat that the schedule on 68b is subject
to change based on resources and competing mandated obligations.
h. Pp. 68c-68d – Created a graphic to show the timing of an annual maintenance cycle
and how the JCDEM, participating jurisdictions, and public interact through regular
JPREP meetings and known community events.
i. P. 68d – Added Table of Figures for the Section.
j. P. 68f – Spacer page to assure that, if printed, all the tabs and major section
headings start on the right-side page.
k. Pp. 875 – 898 – Added Appendix H – “Planning Team Documentation” that contains
agendas, sign-sheets, and rebuilt minutes, where available.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-4
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW TOOL
The Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool demonstrates how the Local Mitigation Plan meets the
regulation in 44 CFR §201.6 and offers States and FEMA Mitigation Planners an opportunity to
provide feedback to the community.
• The Regulation Checklist provides a summary of FEMA’s evaluation of whether the
Plan has addressed all requirements.
• The Plan Assessment identifies the plan’s strengths as well as documents areas for
future improvement.
• The Multi-jurisdiction Summary Sheet is an optional worksheet that can be used to
document how each jurisdiction met the requirements of the each Element of the
Plan (Planning Process; Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment; Mitigation
Strategy; Plan Review, Evaluation, and Implementation; and Plan Adoption).
The FEMA Mitigation Planner must reference this Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide when
completing the Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool.
Jurisdiction: Jefferson County,
the City of Port Townsend, and
21 Special Purpose Districts
Title of Plan: Jefferson County –
City of Port Townsend Multi-
Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation
Plan
Date of Plan:
Local Point of Contact:
Ken Horvath
Address:
Jefferson County Dept of Emergency Management
Emergency Operations Center
81 Elkins Road
Port Hadlock, WA 98368
Title:
Hazard Mitigation Plan Project Coordinator
Agency: Jefferson County Department of
Emergency Management
Phone Number:
(360) 385-9368 (Jefferson County EOC)
E-Mail:
khorvath@co.jefferson.wa.us
State Reviewer:
Sarah Tomt
Sarah.Tomt@mil.wa.gov
Title:
Tsunami Program
Coordinator
Date:
3/9/17
FEMA Reviewer:
Amanda Siok
Amanda.Siok@fema.dhs.gov
425-487-4626
Brett Holt
Title:
Mitigation Planner
Mitigation Planner
Date:
03/30/2017
4/10/17
Date Received in FEMA Region (insert #) 05/15/2017
Plan Not Approved
Plan Approvable Pending Adoption
Plan Approved
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-5
SECTION 1:
REGULATION CHECKLIST
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number) Met
Not
Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans)
ELEMENT A. PLANNING PROCESS
A1. Does the Plan document the planning process, including how it
was prepared and who was involved in the process for each
jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(1))
Section I – PDF 80-87
Appendix B – PDF
736-764; Appendix H
– PDF 906-928
X
A2. Does the Plan document an opportunity for neighboring
communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard
mitigation activities, agencies that have the authority to regulate
development as well as other interests to be involved in the
planning process? (Requirement §201.6(b)(2))
Section I – p.59-64
X
A3. Does the Plan document how the public was involved in the
planning process during the drafting stage? (Requirement
§201.6(b)(1))
Section I – p. 63-64
X
A4. Does the Plan describe the review and incorporation of existing
plans, studies, reports, and technical information? (Requirement
§201.6(b)(3))
Section I – p.61
Section IV – p.406 &
p.457
X
A5. Is there discussion of how the community(ies) will continue
public participation in the plan maintenance process? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(4)(iii)) See Response to question below.
Section I – PDF 93-94
X
A6. Is there a description of the method and schedule for keeping
the plan current (monitoring, evaluating and updating the
mitigation plan within a 5-year cycle)? (Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(i))
See Response to question below.
Section I – PDF 93-94
X
ELEMENT A: REQUIRED REVISIONS
See Section three below for jurisdiction specific required revisions.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-6
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number) Met
Not
Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans)
ELEMENT B. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT
B1. Does the Plan include a description of the type, location, and
extent of all natural hazards that can affect each jurisdiction(s)?
(Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i))
Section II –
pp.69-372
X
B2. Does the Plan include information on previous occurrences of
hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events for
each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i))
Section II – p.93-372;
each hazard has
representative
previous
occurrences.
pp. 76-80 List all
major disaster
declarations for
Jefferson County.
X
B3. Is there a description of each identified hazard’s impact on the
community as well as an overall summary of the community’s
vulnerability for each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii))
Section II p.69-372;
each hazard profile
contains a HIVA
pertinent to the area
and a conclusion.
X
B4. Does the Plan address NFIP insured structures within the
jurisdiction that have been repetitively damaged by floods?
(Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii))
Section II – Floods –
PDF 193-195
Section IV – PDF 437-
451 & PDF 489 & 513
X
ELEMENT B: REQUIRED REVISIONS
See Section three below for jurisdiction specific required revisions.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-7
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number) Met
Not
Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans)
ELEMENT C. MITIGATION STRATEGY
C1. Does the plan document each jurisdiction’s existing authorities,
policies, programs and resources and its ability to expand on and
improve these existing policies and programs? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(3))
Section IV - City –
pp.389-454; County –
pp.455-524; Special
Purpose Districts –
pp.525-626.
X
C2. Does the Plan address each jurisdiction’s participation in the
NFIP and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as
appropriate? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii))
Section IV – City
pp.407-408; County
pp.458-459.
X
C3. Does the Plan include goals to reduce/avoid long-term
vulnerabilities to the identified hazards? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(i))
Section V –
Mitigation Actions –
pp.627-662
X
C4. Does the Plan identify and analyze a comprehensive range of
specific mitigation actions and projects for each jurisdiction being
considered to reduce the effects of hazards, with emphasis on new
and existing buildings and infrastructure? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(ii)) City and County have met this requirement.
Section V –
Mitigation Actions –
pp.627-662
X
C5. Does the Plan contain an action plan that describes how the
actions identified will be prioritized (including cost benefit review),
implemented, and administered by each jurisdiction? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(iv)); (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(iii))
City and County have met this requirement.
Section III – Multi-
Jurisdiction Hazard
Mitigation p.305-387
X
C6. Does the Plan describe a process by which local governments
will integrate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other
planning mechanisms, such as comprehensive or capital
improvement plans, when appropriate? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(4)(ii)) City and County have met this requirement.
Section I – p.66
X
ELEMENT C: REQUIRED REVISIONS
See Section three below for jurisdiction specific required revisions.
ELEMENT D. PLAN REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION (applicable to plan updates only)
D1. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in development?
(Requirement §201.6(d)(3))
Revisions Summary –
p.1-10
X
D2. Was the plan revised to reflect progress in local mitigation
efforts? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3))
Section V –
Mitigation Actions
pp.627-662
X
D3. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in priorities?
(Requirement §201.6(d)(3))
Section IV –
Jurisdictions p.402-
404
X
ELEMENT D: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT E. PLAN ADOPTION
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-8
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number) Met
Not
Met Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans)
E1. Does the Plan include documentation that the plan has been
formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction
requesting approval? (Requirement §201.6(c)(5))
Preface – p.xvii;
Section I – p.65;
Appendix G –p.751.
X
E2. For multi-jurisdictional plans, has each jurisdiction requesting
approval of the plan documented formal plan adoption?
(Requirement §201.6(c)(5))
Appendix F –
Adoption Resolutions
pp. 749-772.
X
ELEMENT E: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT F. ADDITIONAL STATE REQUIREMENTS (OPTIONAL FOR STATE REVIEWERS ONLY; NOT
TO BE COMPLETED BY FEMA)
F1.
F2.
ELEMENT F: REQUIRED REVISIONS
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-9
SECTION 2:
PLAN ASSESSMENT
A. Plan Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement
This section provides a discussion of the strengths of the plan document and identifies areas where
these could be improved beyond minimum requirements.
Element A: Planning Process
Plan Strengths
-The plan describes a thorough process for maintenance and continued public engagement. An
annual public engagement meeting coinciding with the planning committee’s annual review is an
excellent way to keep focus on the goals and strategies of the plan.
-Page 418 of the plan lists sources used to inform the Plan as well as the owner of that source. This
is an excellent way to track used information while setting up a process that can be followed for
collecting information for the next plan update without having to recreate the wheel.
Opportunities for Improvement
-Consider organizing the Summary of Adoption Resolutions (page 19/884) to more clearly identify
participating jurisdictions in the hazard mitigation plan.
-Text of the plan refers to Appendix C as containing Contributors and Contact Points however, this is
actually Appendix B of the Plan. The text should be changed to reflect the Table of Contents.
Element B: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Plan Strengths
-The plan identifies risks associated with hazards in neighboring counties.
-The plan addresses climate change for each appropriate hazard.
-The plan documents the current status of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs)
-The plan references Sharknado, an invaluable resource to assist with understanding impacts
associated with tornado hazards and reducing the risk of oversight when reviewing 600+ pages.
-Port Townsend did an excellent job of identifying codes and comprehensive plans that support
hazard mitigation planning and risk reduction efforts.
Opportunities for Improvement
-Many of the maps in the risk assessment section (such as those for Brinnon in unincorporated
Jefferson County) are illegible. These maps appear to be copy/pasted from another plan. Consider
obtaining the source GIS data and reproducing the maps in the next updated.
-Use the Risk MAP database created by FEMA and WA DNR to develop GIS-based maps of vulnerable
infrastructure and to enhance understanding of impacts.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-10
Element C: Mitigation Strategy
Plan Strengths
- Port Townsend does an exceptional job meeting requirements for element C6. Not only is there a
thorough description of the code/ordinance that can be linked with goals of the hazard mitigation
planning process, but a column describes the review schedule of each code/ordinance. This process
paves the road for successful implementation of the plan leading to reduced risk in the community.
Opportunities for Improvement
- The strategies can be improved by identifying specific projects for mitigation based on risk
assessment data from the Risk MAP.
- In addition to describing existing programs and policies related to hazard mitigation, include an
assessment of resources that are available to implement mitigation such as existing regulatory
authorities, staff, or funding through taxing authority and annual budgets.
- Make additional linkages between the vulnerability, hazard risk, and mitigation strategy. For
example, target mitigation actions at specific locations/areas that have been identified as vulnerable
to a hazard.
Element D: Plan Update, Evaluation, and Implementation (Plan Updates Only)
Plan Strengths
- The plan reviews the status of the 2009 mitigation action items and all of the existing actions that
are not ongoing or were not completed have been deferred. An explanation of the
accomplishments, deferment, or any changes made is provided.
Opportunities for Improvement
-Although the plan confirmed the plan goals and reprioritized the mitigation actions, consider
including a narrative description of if and how any priorities have changed since the plan was
previously approved in order to reflect current financial, legal, political, and post-disaster conditions.
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-11
B. Resources for Implementing Your Approved Plan
The Region 10 Integrating Natural Hazard Mitigation into Comprehensive Planning is a resource
specific to Region 10 states and provides examples of how communities are integrating natural
hazard mitigation strategies into comprehensive planning. You can find it in the FEMA Library at
http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/89725.
The Integrating Hazard Mitigation Into Local Planning: Case Studies and Tools for Community
Officials resource provides practical guidance on how to incorporate risk reduction strategies into
existing local plans, policies, codes, and programs that guide community development or
redevelopment patterns. It includes recommended steps and tools to assist with local integration
efforts, along with ideas for overcoming possible impediments, and presents a series of case studies
to demonstrate successful integration in practice. You can find it in the FEMA Library at
http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=7130.
The Mitigation Ideas: A Resource for Reducing Risk from Natural Hazards resource presents ideas
for how to mitigate the impacts of different natural hazards, from drought and sea level rise, to
severe winter weather and wildfire. The document also includes ideas for actions that communities
can take to reduce risk to multiple hazards, such as incorporating a hazard risk assessment into the
local development review process. You can find it in the FEMA Library at
http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=6938.
The Local Mitigation Planning Handbook provides guidance to local governments on developing or
updating hazard mitigation plans to meet and go above the requirements. You can find it in the
FEMA Library at http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=7209.
The Integration Hazard Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Planning: Case Studies and Lessons
Learned resource is a 2014 ICLEI publication for San Diego with a clear methodology that could
assist in next steps for integration impacts of climate change throughout mitigation actions.
http://icleiusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Integrating-Hazard-Mitigation-and-Climate-
Adaptation-Planning.pdf
The Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide and Tool resource is available through FEMA’s Library and
should be referred to for the next plan update.
http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=4859
The Tribal Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance: This resource is specific to tribal
governments developing or updating tribal mitigation plans. It covers all aspects of tribal planning
requirements and the steps to developing tribal mitigation plans. You can find the document in the
FEMA Library at http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/18355
Washington Fire Adapted Communities Learning Network
Volcanic Eruption Mitigation Measures: For information on Mitigation Actions for Volcanic
Eruptions that would satisfy the C4 requirement, please visit:
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-12
http://earthzine.org/2011/03/21/volcanic-crisis-management-and-mitigation-strategies-a-multi-
risk-framework-case-study/ and http://www.gvess.org/publ.html.
The FEMA Region 10 Risk Mapping, Analysis, and Planning program (Risk MAP) releases a monthly
newsletter that includes information about upcoming events and training opportunities, as well as
hazard and risk related news from around the Region. Past newsletters can be viewed at
http://www.starr-team.com/starr/RegionalWorkspaces/RegionX/Pages/default.aspx. If you would
like to receive future newsletters, email rxnewsletter@starr-team.com and ask to be included.
The mitigation strategy may include eligible projects to be funded through FEMA’s hazard mitigation
grant programs (Pre-Disaster Mitigation, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Flood Mitigation
Assistance). Contact your State Hazard Mitigation Officer, Tim Cook at tim.cook@mil.wa.gov, for
more information.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-13
SECTION 3:
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET (OPTIONAL)
INSTRUCTIONS: For multi-jurisdictional plans, a Multi-jurisdiction Summary Spreadsheet may be completed by listing each participating
jurisdiction, which required Elements for each jurisdiction were ‘Met’ or ‘Not Met,’ and when the adoption resolutions were received. This
Summary Sheet does not imply that a mini-plan be developed for each jurisdiction; it should be used as an optional worksheet to ensure that
each jurisdiction participating in the Plan has been documented and has met the requirements for those Elements (A through E).
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
1
Jefferson
County, WA
County Lynn Sterbenz,
Director
Jefferson
County Dept
of Emergency
Management
81 Elkins
Road Port
Hadlock, WA
98338
lsterbenz@co.jefferson.wa
.us
(360) 385-
9368
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-14
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
Consider reconciling the below NFIP repetitive loss data prior to finalizing the plan.
The Risk MAP Assessment on Page 165 states there is 1 repetitive loss property in the County and none in the City of Port Townsend. PDF
451 (Plan 420) states the City of Port Townsend has 1 repetitive loss property. These numbers should be reconciled.
PDF Page 489 (Document page 458) documents 1 repetitive loss property in the Unincorporated County but doesn’t identify the value of
the property. There should be a Mitigation Strategy for this property.
PDF Page 513 (Document page 482) documents 1 repetitive loss property in the County.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-15
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
2
City of Port
Townsend
City Michael Evans,
Chief of Police
Port
Townsend
Police Dept
1925 Blaine
St Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
mevans@cityofpt.us
(360) 382-
2322
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
Consider reconciling the below NFIP repetitive loss data prior to finalizing the plan.
The Risk MAP Assessment on Page 165 states there is 1 repetitive loss property in the County and none in the City of Port Townsend. PDF
451 (Plan 420) states the City of Port Townsend has 1 repetitive loss property. These numbers should be reconciled.
PDF Page 489 (Document page 458) documents 1 repetitive loss property in the Unincorporated County but doesn’t identify the value of
the property. There should be a Mitigation Strategy for this property.
PDF Page 513 (Document page 482) documents 1 repetitive loss property in the County.
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-16
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
3
East
Jefferson
Fire &
Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD1)
Ted Krysinski
Deputy Fire
Chief
24 Seton
Road Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
tkrysinski@ejfr.org (360) 385-
2626
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. N/A
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each jurisdiction’s
representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning
process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after attending
planning meetings.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD1. Impact means the consequence or
effect of the hazard on FCD1 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of
prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action
for each hazard identified.
Element C5:
The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction. Additionally,
the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other
planning mechanisms. FCD1 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency
response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-17
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
4
Quilcene
Fire -
Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD2)
Larry Karp Chief 70 Herbert St
Quilcene, WA
98376
chief@qvfd.org (360) 765-
3333
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. N/A
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each jurisdiction’s
representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction in the planning
process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after attending
planning meetings.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD2. Impact means the
consequence or effect of the hazard on JCFD2 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of
critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4:
Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one
action for each hazard identified.
Element C5:
The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction.
Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. JCFD2 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms
(ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-18
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
5
Port
Ludlow Fire
- Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD3)
Brad Martin
Chief
7650 Oak Bay
Road Port
Ludlow, WA
98365
brad.martin@plfr.org
(360) 437-
2236
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. N/A
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after
attending planning meetings.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD3. Impact means the consequence or
effect of the hazard on JCFD3 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of
prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action
for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction.
Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other
planning mechanisms. JCFD3 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency
response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-19
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
6
Brinnon
Fire -
Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD4)
Tim Manly Chief 272
Schoolhouse
RD P.O. Box
42 Brinnon,
WA 98320
tmanly@brinnonfire.org (360) 796-
4450
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after
attending planning meetings.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD4. Impact means the
consequence or effect of the hazard on JCFD4 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of
critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. JCFD4 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms
(ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-20
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
7
Discovery
Bay Fire &
Rescue
Fire District
(JCFD5)
Willie Knoepfle
Chief
12 Bentley Pl
Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
wkoepfle@dbvfr.org (360) 379-
6839
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after
attending planning meetings.
Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. JCFD5 did not list any past natural hazard
events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JCFD5. Impact means the consequence or
effect of the hazard on JCFD5 and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of
prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action
for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction.
Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other
planning mechanisms. JCFD5 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex emergency
response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-21
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
8
JeffCom 9-
1-1
Special Purpose
District
Karl Hatton
Director
81 Elkins
Road Port
Hadlock, WA
98339
khatton@jcpsn.us (360) 344-
9779
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes
how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their
jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to
develop plan content after attending planning meetings.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on JeffCOM’s service area. Impact
means the consequence or effect of the hazard on JeffCOM and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The
current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. JeffCOM needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms
(ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-22
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
9
Jefferson
HealthCare
Medical
Center
Public Hospital
District No. 2
Bill Hunt 824 Sheridan
St Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
bhunt@jgh.org (360) 385-
2200
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after
attending planning meetings.
Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. Hospital Dist 2 did not list any past natural
hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the hospital and its service area. Impact
means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the hospital and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The
current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action
for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction.
Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other
planning mechanisms. The Hospital District 2 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms
(ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-23
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
10
Jefferson
County
Library
Public Library
District
Meredith
Wagner Director
620 Cedar
Ave Port
Hadlock, WA
98339
mwagner@jclibrary.info
(360) 385-
6544
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N
3. N
4. N/A
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after
attending planning meetings.
Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The Library District did not list any past natural
hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the Library and its service area. Impact
means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the library and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current
list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C1: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, programs and resources available to accomplish hazard mitigation.
The Emergency Planning Manual is not applicable to pre-disaster risk reduction (mitigation) nor is listing the adoption of this plan. Please revise with
existing mitigation practices ex. non-structural retrofits, etc. or document that there are none in place.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action
for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction.
Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other
planning mechanisms. The Library District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex
emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-24
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
11
Port of Port
Townsend
Port District Sam Gibboney
Exec Director
2701 Jefferson
St Port
Townsend, WA
98368
samg@portofpt.com (360) 385-
0656 1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N*
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after
attending planning meetings.
Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The Port did not list any past natural hazard
events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the Port and its service area. Impact means
the consequence or effect of the hazard on the Port and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems, and populations. The current list of
critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s risk and
vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to include one action
for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each jurisdiction.
Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into other
planning mechanisms. The Port needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning mechanisms (ex
emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-25
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
12
Port
Townsend
School
District No.
50
Public School
District
John Polm
Superintendent
Of Schools
450 Fir St
Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
jpolm@ptschools.org (360) 379-
4501
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N
3. N
4. N/A
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction in the
planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan content after
attending planning meetings.
Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District (50) did not list any
past natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on School District 50 and its service
area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems,
and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C1: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, programs and resources available to accomplish hazard
mitigation. Please revise with existing mitigation practices ex. non-structural retrofits, etc. or document that there are none in place.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. School District 50 needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning
mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-26
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
13
Brinnon
School
District No.
45 (46?)
Public School
District
Patricia
Beathard
Superintendent
Of Schools
46
Schoolhouse
Rd Brinnon,
WA 98320
pbeathard@bsd46.org (360) 796-
4646
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes
how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their
jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to
develop plan content after attending planning meetings.
Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District did not list any past
natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service
area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems,
and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning
mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-27
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
14
Chimacum
School
District No.
49
Public School
District
Rick Thompson
Superintendent
Of Schools
P.O. Box 287
Chimacum,
WA 98325
rick_thompson@csd49.org (360) 302-
5896
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes
how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their
jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to
develop plan content after attending planning meetings.
Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District did not list any past
natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service
area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems,
and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning
mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-28
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
15
Queets /
Clearwater
School
District No.
20
Public School
District
Scott M. Carter
Superintendent
Of Schools
146000 Hwy
101 Forks,
WA 98331
scarter@qcsd.wednet.edu (360) 962-
2395
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N
3. N
4. N/A
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-29
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes
how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their
jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to
develop plan content after attending planning meetings.
Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District did not list any past
natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service
area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems,
and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C1: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, programs and resources available to accomplish hazard
mitigation. Please revise with existing mitigation practices ex. non-structural retrofits, etc. or document that there are none in place.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning
mechanisms (ex. emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-30
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
16
Quilcene
School
District No.
48
Public School
District
Wally F. Lis
Superintendent
Of Schools
P.O. Box 40
Quilcene, WA
98376
wlis@qsd48.org (360) 765-
3363
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. N
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes
how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their
jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to
develop plan content after attending planning meetings.
Element B2: The Plan must include the history of previous hazard events for each of the identified hazards. The School District did not list any past
natural hazard events since 1975. Please revise the plan to include any hazard events or document that there were none.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service
area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems,
and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning
mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-31
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
17
Quillayute
Valley
School
District No.
402
Public School
District
Diana Reaume
Superintendent
Of Schools
P.O. Box 60
Forks, WA
98331
diana.reaume@qvschools.
org
(360) 742-
6262
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes
how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their
jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to
develop plan content after attending planning meetings.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the School District and its service
area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the School District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures, systems,
and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. The School District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning
mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-32
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
18
Public
Utility
District No.
1 of
Jefferson
County
Public Utility
District
James Parker
General
Manager
310 Four
Corners Rd
Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
Jparker@jeffpud.org (360) 385-
5800
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. Y
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Element A1:
For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes how each
jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their jurisdiction
in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to develop plan
content after attending planning meetings.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the Public Utility District and its
service area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the Utility District and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures,
systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. The Utility District needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning
mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-33
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(city/borough/
township/
village, etc.)
Plan POC Mailing
Address Email Phone
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identific
ation &
Risk
Assessm
ent
C.
Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan
Review,
Evaluation
&
Implement
ation
E.
Plan
Adopt
ion
F.
State
Requi
re-
ment
s
19
Jefferson
Transit
Authority
Public
Transportation
District
Tammi Rubert
General
Manager
63 Four
Corners Rd
Port
Townsend,
WA 98368
trubert@jeffersontransit.c
om
(360) 385-
4777
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. Y
5. Y
6. Y
1. Y
2. Y
3. N
4. N/A
1. N
2. Y
3. Y
4. N
5. N
6. N
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. N/A
Required Revisions:
Element A1: For each jurisdiction seeking plan approval, the plan must document how they were involved in the planning process. This includes
how each jurisdiction’s representative engaged its own community. The plan is lacking documentation of how each special district engaged their
jurisdiction in the planning process after team meetings. It is suggested that each special district describe how they engaged their jurisdiction to
develop plan content after attending planning meetings.
Element B3: The plan must describe and summarize the potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the Transit Authority and its service
area. Impact means the consequence or effect of the hazard on the Transit Authority and its assets. Consider vulnerabilities to structures,
systems, and populations. The current list of critical facilities and list of prioritized hazards is not sufficient.
Element C1: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s existing authorities, policies, programs and resources available to accomplish hazard
mitigation. Please revise with existing mitigation practices ex. non-structural retrofits, etc. or document that there are none in place.
Element C4: Each jurisdiction participating in the plan must have mitigation actions specific to that jurisdiction that are based on the jurisdiction’s
risk and vulnerabilities as well as priorities. Each jurisdiction must have at least one action for each hazard identified. Please revise the plan to
include one action for each hazard identified.
Element C5: The plan must identify the position, office, or department responsible for implementing and administering the action for each
jurisdiction. Additionally, the plan must document the potential funding source for each action and jurisdiction.
Element C6: The plan must describe each jurisdiction’s process to integrate the data, information, and hazard mitigation goals and actions into
other planning mechanisms. The Transit Authority needs to document its process for integrating the hazard mitigation actions into other planning
mechanisms (ex emergency response plan, emergency operations plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, etc.).
Jefferson County – City of Port Townsend Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (Rev. 2016)
Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool A-34
End of Document