HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007.08.00 - 32nd & HendricksY] ~ C-~
D
Steve Goodwin
Wetland Delineation and Buffer Reduction Plan
Parcel# 948 002 608
August 2007
r~pared for:
tee ood~n
21 ~ ll~riet~a hoop
fort Townsend, A 9 S 3~ 8
v-'~i;~ :^r+-Sa;+sna{',f~4'7a'S',~gF ;x y;rr-~7,<<sa~7.•.ffa"sJ{ ."k5: r-:Y's~'`;.y,,•-„-,~,xi>w"•<~4iS~N;tiu- -} _ -kus`,"~a:{i°%),~ - h~ - a->:vs - {s,rkr`:~,•ss°r~~~,! r"'S- ~i7``'f~k['Yt ~k~i,.,yryn.tiri4i ~, t~~s ~1 ,2 ~, ~F,. ~14~; air g ~k.~,~~:~. ~' ~! • "~~,~ ~<C, ~•. •.,a4,~v„ ~a1;S,A. ~,srwa •~<...1'. ys...s; s'„ .•~,ts~•ri~s, i.:l,;.h,,, a ,~,, ,r.,ai.,~t,i ,Yr, t ~~ rah' r,4 ~. i~;~: ~ ~~s,,~'G.t .M ,~,-~:a3{s: rL.1 war . { ~a~'+ ,ki p.os-a>.E.4:'k,,:; ;~y,~ l . x:}>: r:;1~v `Ir.'..:'=.~f.','4,<;':, r:. ~,,,::~~:}..,; F:. ;.y„i:~:'t.~;`.y5,:'~,".w {'w_,~ ~..y. '1 ,"~] ~ ,.,a ! ~h' ">'sy<~b.f, S~;g", ~ ~. „4;~;~„>rf <k,i , h^ ,] ,r,i, ,.~) :'b°. 5.. ;a4::' '..-+.i:;,.::yk~n: ,,5„ •:iws ~. ".3~ ,~s, s' ; ~ < ~ .y .
t<";,cy,F~ y.; {,au, ",?,< <`f.. ,.11`,s,: a:.~., ~?",",;~ a,; , .~~,..?;"r~ ..l',';x:k, ,.y::, :x" , i 3~ ,ee ". ~'`t .,. ~a5~~((S. `,i %~` w~.,U~~.~ ,o-}p.1, L,t~a,,. ,.,r,,>~*~ r kl5 S~~l<v,~41 . v.`%Vx :':Yl~:. x:.k^~ ;.}.., .] ~: ~~'~9.r5- s .`L, ,wk^ .k k : ~ .S~ i'.S':'4} „{~.. kr, ,,~:.;;".S `. 'r. tin - ~; •iv > ^~'° :-~. . r. ^~4, °`U' ~ 5.`.'''~~~•'.'.AF.. ~ ..,Ya ,.k~, ,.y.r v.}'-,,.i. " 4. r<S k- S:" ''i"'s''rr, itl`t:~ti ~•r:,'.s`t '., s. .,r.. s.." ~~.. .,5,. i~.l,~r1' ,.
5
1 o~e:,r.,rs ~0 r , ... ~ .r .~.,.,,:: ,...i~~~~~
el~~
n ~'hoo.on~ .
Steve Goodwin
Wetland Delineation and Buffer Reduction Plan
Pazcel # 948 002 608
August 2007
Table of Contents
Introduction
Description of Site
Methodology
Background Information
Wetland Delineation Findings
General Wetland Conditions
Soils
Vegetation
Hydrology
Wetland Categorization and Buffer Requirements
Buffer Reduction Pian
Project Goals and Qbjectives
Summary
Limitations
References
Appendices
Sheet #1 Location Map and Soil Survey o~ Jefferson County, State of Washington
Sheet #2 Wetland Boundary Map
Sheet #3 Buffer Reduction Plan
Applied Methodology
Wetlands Rating Field Data Form
Data Forms, Routine Determination WA State Wetland Delineation Manual
Steve Goodwin
Wetland Delineation and Buffer Reduction Plan
Pazcel # 948 002 608
August 2007
Introduction
Olympic wetland Resaurce, lnc. has been authorized by Steve oodvvin to perfar~n wetland
delineation at 1224 32~~ Street Port Townsend, Washington. A Level I Assessment was
conducted an July ~, and 1 ~, ~aa7. Findings indicated connectivity to a small wetland that
drains across the Goodwin parcel via a small ditch, through a man made pond, and downslope to
matitla Avenue. The wetland, drainage, and pond were completely dry during the Level ~
Assessment. This small wetland is not indicated on the pity of Part Townsend wetland naps but
was previously identif ed wetland by Olympic Wetland Resources, inc. in 2~0~ Parcel #948 as
5}.
Steve Oaodwin plans to divide the 1 ~~' 1 ~~' parcel to create an additia~al building lot with a
separate parcel number. currently there is a single family residence at ~ 224 32~~ Street ~Lat ~ a}.
According to Suzanne Wassmer, Land use Development Specialist ~ema11 carrespandence}thc
following development codes will apply to this site:
Starr r~et today and deterrnxr~ed the ~~, ADO square food rnaxrrnurn density in conrirr~ed cri#ical
areas does not apply to Steve ooa~win's L.o~s 9 arrd ~ ~, Bfock ~ of Dundee Place Adalr'#r'or~. ~~~
house a~ ~ ~~4 3Znd Street was built in ~ g9o, prior to the 9 9g2 SSA cove: and sa the property fatis
under PTI~IC Critical Area Chapter ~9.4~.~O. ~.e which states
e. Ilacarrl platted lots which are held in the ~an~e ownership as a plated lot or lots containing air
existing dwelling ar cornrnaroial structure are excepted rro~r the rnaxi~ur~ density requirements of
this section as long as no parcef is created which does Trot rr~eet the lot area or dimensr'onal
requirements of the zoning ordlnance~
The goal of the wetland delineation was to define the enact wetland edges, analyze wetland
categories, and detern~ne ssac~ated buffers for Lot 9 Bloch 2~ of Dundee Place A-ddltlon. The
delineation was conducted on August ~, 2~~~.
Description of Site
Legal Description: Parcel #948 0~2 ~a8, Section 3 Township ~N Range 1 , Lots 9 and 1 D,
Blac1~ ~~ of Dundee Place Addition
Location; I224 32~~ Street near the intersection of 2nd and Hendricl~s Street ~undevelaped}
Part Townsend, WA
Sails: ~m lallam gravelly sandy loam, Not hydric
SlapesF a to 15 percent
Size: Two Tots, each ~~ feet 125 feet
C~oudwin wetland Delineation and Buffer Reduction Plan Olympic wetland Re~o~'Ges, Ins.
Report Pile #2407-07 ~ G ~ Oate August 2007
This relativel flat arcel is at the top of Basin 8. The subject parcel lies between 32~~ Street top
the south and an undevelaped and densely vegetated parcel to the north. The undeveloped axes
of Hendricks Street is also covered with a dense shrub saver. The s1te is landscaped with
maples, aspen, firs, and pines with a mowed lawn unerstory. In the narthwest corner of the site
there is a small shed, piles of grass clippings, and wood piles. A map that includes the site
location and napped sails is included in the Appendix sheet #I}.
Nl~t~adolo~
A comprehensive description of methodology used to conduct this report is included in the
Appendix.
ckr~un~ Ynfo~n~~tion
The following resources were cansulted prior to f~e1d wank for this prof ect:
Port Townsend and Jefferson Jaunty critical areas Map ~ 1995}
National wetland ~nventary Map
Aerial Photagraphs Soil maps pre-19'75 and 1994, ~a~0 and ~a45 Internet}
Port Townsend Municipal bode, critical Areas {November ~aa}
Soil Survey of Jefferson bounty ~U,, Sail anservataon Service 1975}
Washington Mate wetland Identification and Delinetian Manual
National List ofPlant Species That occur m wetlands Northwest {Region }
Wetland Delineation Findings
General Wetland Conditions
The tna~ority of the small seasonal wetland is offsite slang the northern boundary of the
raodwin parcel. It is located within low lying area of the landscape and is defined by a dense
shrub and tree layer, It clearly drains acrass Lot 9 through a 1 a inch wide by 3 inch deep ditch
towards a man rrrade panel on Lot 1 a. when the pond fills with seasonal stor~nwater it overflows
towards Silver Street. No water was observed within any part of the wetland or test pits.
The wetland's edges were flagged with orange plastic ribbon labeled "wetland Boundary," at
paints ~~ feet intervals. Flagging is labeled with alphanumeric codes {A ~ through A3 }. A
hainman ~Y hi chain was used to rrreaure wetland edges from l~nown property corners at 3~~ap
Street. A wetland Boundary Map, included in the Appendix, indicates approximate locations of
the hausa, wetland edge, n~an made pond, ditch, data point locations, and 8a foot buffers Sheet
o~~s
wetland soils were identified at Data Point # 1 {Mansell 1 aR~ll and 1 ~ ~Il with nottles}.
The soil was dry during this assessment which is typical of seasonal wetlands during the dry
summer months. Although the lalla series soils are not classified a hydric many Port
Townsend wetlands occur within this soil type when there is a depression in the landscape.
C~aodwin wetland Delineation and Buffer l~educti~n Plan Olympic wetland Revurce, Inc.
Report File #~~D~-07~~ ~ Date August ~0~7
Soil pits m the upland t Data Pants # and #~ did nat have hydric soils. These soil test pits
were dug on either side of the rose, snowberry, and spires hedge. Soil colors were fight brown
1Viunsll 1 aYR 313 and X14).
Vegetation
The wetland cans~sts of a dense rase, spires shrub layer with an o~rer story of hawthorns. The
subject parcel consists of a mowed lawn and numerous planted trees and shrubs. There is a
native shrub hedge on Lot 9 that contained wetland species {spirea~ but is not included within the
wetland due to the dominance of non wetland species {snowberry~.
elaw ~s the list of vegetation identified on s1te and the assigned ~nd~cator status of each species.
cie~ntY~c l~an~e o~nnaon name Stains Layer
V~'etlan~. plants
4 os~is c~~a~~ari~ (,~. ~enr~is olonia~ bentgrass FAQ Crass
ra~~a~g~cs d~~g~iasii Douglas' hawthorn FAQ Shrub
Tali fescue FAQ-
Cosa n~~1~a~ta Noatka rase FAQ Shrub
S'a~~x sco~~ri~na Scowler willow FAQ Tree
Y~~ C~O1~~~STI lrea FAw Shrub
U hand Plants
I~b~~s n~~~z~ies~i drona Nl Tree
ac~y~~s ~oer~a rchard~grass FACU Grass
a~~~~eria s~~~~or~Salal FAU Shrub
a~hae~is~ ~ad~c~~a tai cat's-ear NI Kerb
s~~dots~g~ ~nen~~esii Douglas-fir FAU Tree
Rufus ~~s~r~us Trailing blackbe FAU Shrub
r~rcar os ~~~us Snowberry FA~U Shrub
UPL Upland Species, FACE Facultative Upla~ad 5pccieslNan 1~etland, FAC Facultative Species,
FACw Facultative wetland species, OIL Qbligat~ wetland species, N~ No IndFCator Assigned
The qualifier ~f+ or -further defines the status ofthe species.
Plants classified according to the Fish and ~~ldlife ervice;198S,1993 Update
I~dro~o~
The wetland drains towards ~~~ Street pia a ditch and throw h a man made and behind thep
Coodwin pause. This pond holds water to de the of 1 ~ inches. ~verow water is then
channeled to the east, dawn a ditch along 3~ Street, and dawnsl~pe to S~l~er Street.
Although the site was cainpletely dry during this delineation, water returns seasonally.
hydrology can be assumed when positive indication of wetland plants and sells axe present.
According to Steve Coodwin, standing water and saturated soils are present during the winter
months at the Dp#~ location. 'The source ofhydrology is the lateral flow of stormwater along the
shallow layer of hard paced glacial till that is typical o~ the lalln sail series.
Coodwin Wetland Delineation and Buffer Reduction Plan Qlympic Wetland Resources, Inc
Report File #007-071 d Date August X007
wet~n~ ategari~~tia~a cud Buffer ~ea~uireent
During the original assessment in ~~~~ the ~retland was rated as a category 111 wetland with ~
foot buffers. The fort Townsend 1Vlunic1pal bode was revised In ~~~ and now requires
wetlands to be rated using the updated Department of ecology publication 44-~~-05. This
wetland still qualifies as a category ~I~ wetland ~~ points: 22 points for water quality, ~ for
hydrologic function, and 1 ~ for habitat} but the associated buffers are 80 feet for the high
intensity development amore that 1 dwelling unit per acre. All buffers are measured
perpendicular from the delineated edge and are indicated on the wetland Boundary ll~ap. The
rating form is included at the end of this report.
Buffer e~ucti~n Riau
To accommodate a building site on Lot ~ the buffers from the offsite wetland will need to be
reduced to D feet. Fifty foot buffers were originally assigned to this wetland prior to the revised
cede in 200,
Lots 9 and 1 ~, within the subject parcel, conform. to the R-Ii zoning 1n terms of size and width,
1nce there 1s a wetland adjacent to the s1te and Lot ~ ~s w1th~n wetland buffers, PTNf
I .~.06~.~. states the nnximum lot area that can be cavered by imperious surfaces including
paring areas} for lots with a slope less than l °Io is 3D°Io.
11~itigation requirements for this buffer reduction plan have been prepared to meet the standards
outlined in the Department of ecology, Guidance on wetland ll~itigation in the state of
Washington state April 204} and pity of Port Townsend Standards and Recommendations as
autllned 1n the Port Townsend' ~nvlronrnentally ensltive Areas {~~~ ~rdlnance hater
19.5 PT}. A rnp with Buffer Reduction Plan. ~s included to the A,ppend1x clarifying project
goals sheet #}.
Project Goals and Objectives
The goals and objectives for this project are as follows
to reduce the S~ foot buffers to 5~ feet;
to remove the shed, debris, and grass piles from the buffer;
to reveetated the 5o foot wetland buffers that now consist of mowed grass by
allowing the native shrub layer to return;
to remove and control non-indigenous plant species within the n~tigation areas;
to clearly marls the wetland buffer boundary with fencing yr permanent rr~arl~ers
impervious surfaces will not exceed 3 0°I~ cower for the lot
ifthe wetland buffer is enhanced there should be increased protection for the wetland and
functions and values of the overall site conditions wi11 be increased.
uad~+in'~Vetland Delineation and Buffer Reduction Plan Olympic etXand Resources, Inc.
Report Pile #2407-071 G 4 Date August 2007
umm~ry
The southern boundary of ~ small wetland adjacent to Lot 9 was delineated an August 2~, ~a07.
This majority of this wetland is north of the aadwin parcel and seasonally drains across Lots 9
and ~ 4 through a shallow ditch to a rnan made pond. During high water periods the overflow
from the wetland drains downslope to Silver street. All parts of this wetland were dry during
this assessment.
This wetland, identified in ~Oan, was assessed as a category III wetland with 5~ fovt buffers,
using the revised rating as required by the pity ur~icipal bode the wetland still is a category
III wetland but now has associated buffers of 8~ feet.
The goals ofthis pra~ect is to divide Parcel #948 aa~ 6~8 which includes two platted. lots Lots
and I a, Block ~ of Dundee Place Addition}, currently there is a house on Lot 1 a. To
accommodate a building site on Lot 9 the 8~ foot wetland buffer will need to be reduced to Sa
feet.
This buffer reduction plan includes the removal of shed, wood piles, and all deposited plant
material in the northwest corner of Lvt 9. The remaining Sa~foat buffer edge should be fenced ar
permanently marked. The buffer should be allowed to return to a natural state; nearby native
trees and shrubs that now thrive in the hard glacial till sails will naturally return to mewed areas,
shrubs that now donnnate the site, which include rose, snowberry, spirea, and hawthorn all have
lugh habitat value for birds and mammals, During this revegetation pracessnon-native species
should be controlled. fIimalayan blackberries and thistles should be removed, This buffer
reduction plan will enhance the existing buffer and protect future wetland impacts.
ir~~~tion
wetland status depicted in this report has net been confirmed by a government official, final
authority over this wetland deterrninat1on rests with the governmentaX agenc1es~ Jurisdictional
authority aver wetlands rests with the local, state and federal agencies, All information in this
report should be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory agencies prior to approval. Zf there are
fiu~ther questions or planning requirements far this project please do not hesitate t~ call.
Dixie Llewellin
Principal Biologist
Olympic wetland Resources Inc.
certified far wetland I)ellneatlon, l9~'7 ~Vlanual wetland Training Institute, June I995
certified for ~a04 Wetland Rating ysten~ X007
C~vodwin wetland Dellneatlan and Buffer Reduction Flan Olympic wetland Resources, Inc,
Repar~ File #Za07-07 ~ d 5 Date August ~~a7
References
Buckingham, et ai.,199. Flora of the tympi Peninsura. I~arthv~est Interpretive Association
and the Wahing~an Native. Plant Society, Seattle, Wash,
Cooke, ~ Sarah Spear,1997. ~ Field guide to the omrnon Wetland Plants of Western
Washington and Northwest Oregon. Beattie Audubon Society, Seattle, Wash,
av~ardin, L.M., darter, F..Coblet, and E.T, LaRoe, i 979, classification of Wetiand and
Deep Water ~ahitats of the U,.. U, . Fish and Wildlife Service, 'V~ashinton, ~..
I~itchcacl~ and ronquist, ~ 973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest.
Federal Interagency committee far Wetland Delineation, t 957. Federal 1Vlanuai for ~de~tifyxng
and delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. July 199 update. IJ,S. Ararny corps o
Engineers, U.S. Environmental Proteatlon Agency, U,S. Fish and W~ldllfa Service, and
S.D.A. Boll conservation Service. r
Leonard, William P.,1993. Amphibians of Washington and Oregon. Seattle Audubon Series,
MaBeth, Div. of I~olln~~rgen Instruments arp.,199~. ]Vlunsell Soii oior charts,
Mitsch and aselink,193, wetlands.
Pa~ar, Mackinnon,199. Plants of the Pacific Northwest boast.
Port Townsend, pity of, July, ~UaS, critical Area ordinance N. X599, pity o~ Part
Townsend.
Reed, Porter,195S. National List of Pant Species That occur in Wetlands, Region 9.1993
update.
Washington State Wetland Department of Ecology, March ~ 997. Washington State Wetland
Identification and Delineation Manual, 9G-94,
Washington State Wetland' Department of Ecology, April 2aD~. guidance on Wetland
ll~itigatron in 'L~ashington State.
i.J.. Department of Agriculture,1994. keys to Soil Taxonarny. Pocahontas Press.
J.S. Department afA,g~iulture, Sail vnservatian Service,1975. Sufi Survey ofJeffersan
vunty,
References
Buck~nhan~, et x1.,1995. Fiora of the ~ly~plc Peninsula, Northwest Interpretive Association
and the ashintan Native.Plant Society, Seattle, 'dash.
Cooke, Sarah Speax,197, AField guide to the arnmon wetland Plants o~ western
xshing#on and northwest Oregon. eatt~e Audubon Society, Seattle, Wash,
owardin, L,~Vi.'~. darter, F.,Coblet, and E.T. LaRoe,1979. Iassific~tion of Wetland and
Deep mater habitats of the U.. ~. . Fish and Wildllfe~ Service, Washin on, D..
itchcoc~ and ron~uist,1973. Flan of the Pacific ~arthwest.
Federal interagency ~amn~ittee for Wetland Delineatian,19S7, Federal lVlanual for Identifying
and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. July 1994 update. I~.. Army corps of
Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ,~. Fish and Wildlife erce, and
i].S,D,A. doll Conser~ation~Ser~ice,
Leonard, William P., 1993. Amphibians of Washington and Oregon. Seattle ~uduhon series.
McBeth, Div. of I~ollrnorgen Instruments orp,,199~. Niunsell foil dolor charts.
Mitsch and osselir,1993. wetlands.
Pour, Mackinnon,199~. Plants of the Pacific ~Iorth~vest boast.
Part Townsend, pity of, July, ~aa, critical Area Ordinance N~, X899. City of Port
Townsend,
deed, Porter,1988. National List of Plant species That occur in Wetlands, Region 9.1993
update.
Washington State Wetland Department of Ecology, March 1997, Washington Mate wetland
Identification and Delineation Manual, #9-~. ,
Washington Mate Wetland Department of Ecology, April ~aa4. guidance an etiand
Mitigation in 'ashingtan State,
U.S. Department of Agriculture,1994. Ke s to Soil Ta~anam .Pocahontas Press.Y Y
tJ.S. Department of Agriculture, Sail Conservation Service,1975. Sail Surrey of Jefferson
Jaunty.
LL ~ .. ~ , ~
u
4 ~ ~ ~
s
r ~
r ~ ~
RdI~:T 5
4. ~ ~yy~
xY ' •
Y~
n ~ I'
Y I
f.
A4
r
w.
u
u
n ~ ~;t
4~
J J
r
I~4i
n
sheet #1 ~ ~ocati~n~ a and ail curve ~f ~effers~n gun ,State o~ ah~n tin
i
y ~ 4 ~ ~~
i~
4
4 ~ I~
i
4 '~: YSheet # et~and B~undar~ ~Vlap ~
µ
k.~ ~ ~
f
4INNSSheet # ,~ Buffer Redn~t~~n Plan ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
J
4 [~'r ~ .
1~~
2
y
li liedNfet~advlo ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~° . ~ ~ ~ . ~ s
P ~;
f
f ~.et~audat~n F~eld~Data
Form
r
wrDataPer, ~~~txneD~ter~n~natxon ~A Stateetla~d ~ De~~neati~r~ ~Vlanua~
J
4
f
1 .
r ~
I~Its
4~
Y
k
k.1 Z / ~
4
fr y
y ~
A ~~
1
y ~,
F ~,
yy
Y ~ + ,
I
r ~. ~
I ~
I
d
4~
V ~ ~~
I
r 1f / }LL~
4 ` F
S
N
a
L~~a~ion and iii Il~p ~I~: Shea
As Ind~cat~d
1~~4 end tr~et4~~m~I[ W~t~~~~ nG~~~1C~~~r I~~
A ~ Porgy T'OWnS~nd, ~ X58l € ~ D~f~Fi
8~6 ~~t~ tr~~~
P~~ T~w~s~~~r W~ ~8~b8 ~i~~t: ~ev~ oodvv~~
360 ~$~-632 ~ ~ ~ Marie. Loo
i~~~tl~we~ll~a p~h~o,oom Pert To~unand, A ~3 ~~
Par~~~ ~#9~ ~ 342 01 ~
Q
Q
b
a
n
v
1~~~~~'aa+~ 1~~~~~`aa~~ u~ ~~ ~~~~~~~aa~~
a 1~
5 1~ 1S ~~ ~~ km
Frit~#ed from TaP~~ @1~~9'~~d#laure~ Productia~ (wwru,to~po.~om~
Cm~.Clallam gravelly sandy loam
0-15% slopes
Subject
ToPO! a~ ~rir~~e~ o~ aS~~~JO~ fr~~ "I~~~t,tp~" end "Unt~tl~~.tpg"
aa~~ v~ 1 ~~~ ~~~ aa~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ aa~~
n~umncaC~
11 e~
V? ~#~
4
Y~ ~~ ~
g ~~ ~IympECW~~~nd ~sa~s, Inc I X24 3~~ad ~re~~
o ~'awnend, ~ 95384:{ .. ~ ~ ~~b ~ Stetv ;1 i ,~~
Porgy I~w~se~~+ WA 9~3b$ ~~~m~ tee C~~~d~vin
36~ 38~•~42 ~ 1 ~ Marietta Lao A
di~i~Cl~w~lli~y~~a~.co~ fort Townsend, OVA 98~~8
J ~'r
r ~ i s
xr '~1,+'i 1
t, ~ ~ ~y ~
xrs~uRpiRti~pflW~areve~~~tltnbWii~B~it~R~~te{y~ ` ~
Wi til~~ a
Identified on ~ * ~~~,~ ~
I
l,i
Panel #94S U~ X05 ~ `'+~ ~~~ 5~~~ ,
4~,~ ' ; n 1ti~: Y ~ ~~y! tiff ~~
Del~neated~ ~-~~~~~~~ ~ ~r '~` s11~f ~~ ~$
al~: Sh~~
s Incat~d
2
Ll~l1S~ ~~~~
Jib #:
247-~7I6
1~ ~~~
J ~'
Applied Methodology
Jefferson County
hingt~n State ~t~n~ ~dnti~ct~an end ~elineati~n 1VI~nu~1
Fieldwork to determine the actual wetland boundaries was conducted according to the n~ethadalogy
outlined in the Washington State Wetland ~dentificatian and Delineation manual ~Depar~ment of
ecology March I997}. Chapter 173-22 of the Washington Administrative fade rewires that ail
wetlands within the Mate of Washington be delineated using this rr~anual. All wetlands within Jefferson
bounty are regulated according to the Jefferson Jaunty 1evelopment Code, January ~a~ ~ JI~C},
The methodology outlined in tie Washington State Wetland Identifica~an and Delineation Manual
requires examination ofthe three parameters far a positive wetland determination: hydric soils,
hydrophytic vegetation, and hydrology. Far an area to qualify a ajurisdictional wetland it must have a
positive indicator from all three parameters. All wetlands identifled using this methodology nay be
feder~.ly regulated, regardless of size.
The subject parcel was initially examined to identify plant carrYrriunities, potential wetlands,
topographic features, hydrology sources, and drainage patterns. It was determined whether human
lmpacts to the site would slgnlficantly alter the wetland.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion:
Wetland plant species must, under normal circumstances, constitute greater than 5a°Io afthe fatal
vegetation present to meet the qualification as a site dominated by hydrophytic vegetation. ~orrrinance
ofplant species is determined by calculating actual aerial cover within 3a-foot radius for trees, a 1~-
footradius far shrubs, and a -foot radius for the herbaceous layer at each data point. commonly
occurring plant species have been rated by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service {UFW}
National List of Plant Species That occur in wetlands: Northwest legion 9}, as to their frequency
of occurrence in wetlands and non-wetlands. wring the fieldwork, each species was recorded and given
a rating based on indicator status and percent cover.
Hydrophytic Soil Criterion:
A hydric sail is a sail that fortes under conditions of saturation, flooding, ar ponding lasting long
enough during the growing season to result in an anaerobic upper layer ~CJSI]A Sail onservatian
Service, l 9~7~. Hydric soils favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation, The
indicators for this type of sail include law chrama, Mottles, gleying, and high organic content within the
upper 32 inches of the sail prole. Moles mere dug on the site and soil colors including value and
chranaa~ v~ere recorded in the tap 1 ~ inches. Soil colors were analyzed using the 1Vlnnsell ol~r
charts ~ 1 ~.
Wetland Hydrology Criterion:
Wetland hydrology is defined in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual as
areas that are periodically inundated or have soils saturated to the surface at Borne tine during the
growing season," Areas must have seasonally inundated or saturated sail at least 12, 5 °Io of the growing
season ~~~ days out of2S days}. The groing season is described in Jefferson County by the
Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington
Name of 1Netland cif kno~rn~: Steve aadwin Parcel #~48 ~o~ X08
La~ation: Section:3 Tov~nshi~:3~N Range: ~ IN
Name of Rater: Dixie l.le~r~rellin Affiliation: ~lym~ic_INetland_I~e~~urce~,_Inc,
Date of bite Ilisit:.~uly ]} X407
Cate o based on Functions provided by wetland
Category 1=Score >70
Category 11=Score 5 ~ -69
Category III=Stare30-50
Catenorv IV=Score <30
Score forl~ater duality Functions ~~
Score forlNater Hydrologic Functions ~
Sore far Habitat Functions 1 ~
Tot~i core Fir Functions 3~
Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland
Does not aPP Y--X----------------
36 Points
Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above) III
Estuarine
Natural Heritage l~tland
Bog
Mature Forest
old Growth Forest
Coastal Lagaan
Interdunal
None of the Abave
Depressional ~
Riverine
Lake~Fringe
slope
Flat
Freshwater Tidal
re~~n1 ~d ~~~t I~Ile~lnd
Water duality Functions-indicators that wetland functions to improve water quality P~iNTS
D1~ Does the wetiand have the o entiai to improve water quality?
1 Characteristics of surface ~rate~r flows out of the wetland:
Wetland is ~ depression with no surface water outlet
INetiand has an intermittently flowing, or height constricted, outlet ~ ~
Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet ~
Wetland is flat and has no obvious nutlet and~or outlet is a ditch 1
i.~ The Sail Z" below the surface is clay, organic, ar smells anoxic,
YES 4 4
N~ ~
l .3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation ~ernergent, shrub, and Jor forest class:
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetations=95 of area 5
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetations=1 ~~ of area 3
Wetland has persistent, ungra~ed, vegetation~~ J1 ~ of area
1Netland has persistent, un rayed, ve station ~ ~ ~ 0 of area ~
D~ .~ Characteristics of seasonal ponding ar inundation,
This is the area of the wetland that is paraded for at least 2 months, but dries out sornetirne during
the year. ~o not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average
condition five out often years,
Area seasonally ponded is 1 ~~ total area of wetland 4
Area seasonally ponded is 1 J4 total area of wetland ~ ~
Area seasonally ponded is l ~~ total area of ~retland ~
ot~ ~ for ~ ~ ~d d t~ ~ p~ I ~1t I !~ t~'le ~~X ~ ~~ve ~ ~
D~. doe the wetiand have the ppportunity to improve water quality
Answer YES if you know to believe there are pollutants in groundwater of surface water corning
into the wetland that v~ould otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes, or groundwater
downgradient from the wetland. Nate v~rhich of the following conditions provide the sources.
Crazing in the v~retland within 150'
Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland
Tilled fields ororchards within 150' of wetland
A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas,
farmed fields, roads, or dear cuts
Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within ~ 50' of wetland
1Netland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen
W~.~ther
AYES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 ~
To~~~ ~Il~ter ua~~~~ Fun~tior~ Nlu1~i ~y end ore fri ~~ ~y DY ~
Add s~~re to tb~ on ~a~e ~ ~ Z
D Depressional and Flats Wetlands
HYDROLOGIC FUNC:TI~NS Indicators that wetland function to reduce flooding P~iNTs
D~. ~~es the vwretland have the otential to redoes f~ood~ng and erosion?
D3.1 Characteristics of surface water out of the vuetland
Vvetland has na surface v~rater outlet 3
Wetland has an interrnittentiyflowing, or highly constricted, autlet ~
Wetland is flat and has no obvious autlet and~or is a small ditch 1
Wetland has an uncanstricted surface autlet ~
3.~ depth of storage during wet periods ~stimate,height of ponding move the bottom of outlet
Marks of parading are 3 ft or mare above the surface ~ l
The wetland is a headwater wetland 5
Marks of parading between ~ ft to aft from the surface 5
Marks are at IeastD.S to ~ ft from surface 3
1Netiand is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water ~
Marks of andin less than a.5 ft D g
D3. vntribution ofviretland to storage in the watershed
Estimate the ratio of the area of upstrearn basin contributing surface ~vater to the wetland
to the area of the v~retland itself.
The area of the basin is less than 1 ~ times the area of the wetland 5
The area of the basin is i a to 1 ~0 times the area of the wetland ~
The area of the basin is~~ mare than 144 times the area of the wetland 0 a
I~letlar~d in the FLATS class basin=the wetland, by definition} ~ ~
Total for ~ Add the Dints in the boxes bov
D4. Does the wet~ar~d have the opportunity to reduce flooding and ero~vn'?
Answer Yes if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where flood storage, or reduction in
the vuater velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from
flooding or excessive and~or erosive flaws.
Answer NO if the water coming into the uvetland is controlled by a structure such as a flood gate,
tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc, OR you estimate that more than 9D9~ of the ~vater in the
retland is from groundwater.
Note which of the fallowing indicators of opportunity apply.
Wetland fis in ~ headwaterofa river orstream that has flooding problems
Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding probierrrs
1Netland has na outlet and impounds surface water that might otherwise
flow into a river or stream that has flooding probierns
Other
YES multiplier is ~ NO rnultipiier is 1 1
Tot~~ -H~drologi Function f~u~t~~~y end score from ~ by ~4
Add score ~o table on page ~
Habitat Functions-
ndica~ors that the wetland functions to provide important habitat
H1.t Does the wetland have the ote tiai to provide habitat for many species'
Check the types of vegetation classes present has defined by Cawardin~ if the class covers 1 J4 acres or mare
than lgaf the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres.
Aquatic Bed
Emergent plants
scrub shrub areas where shrubs have 3a saver}
Farested areas where trees have 3a coven
Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata ~canapy, shrubs, herbaceous, rnoss~ round cover}
Add the number of vegetation types that qualify. lfyou have P~INTs
4 Types 4
Types ~
Types ~
Type D
H~ .~ Hydroperiods
Check the types of water regimes ~hydraperiods} within the wetland, The water re irne has to
saver mare than ~ 09~ of the wetland ar 1 ~4 acres to count, P~INTs
Permanently flaaded ar inundated ~ or more types present
seasonally flooded ar inundated ~ types present ~
ccasianally flaaded or inundated ~ types present ~
saturated only Fake fringe wetland ~
Freshwater tidal wetland 2
Perrnanentl flawin stream or river in, or ad'acent ta, the wetland
H~ . Richness of Plant pecie ~P~INTs
Count the ~ of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 1 a ft~
Da nat include reed canarygrass, purple laasestrife, Canadian thistle i g 2
5ta19 ~1
5 a
H~ .4 Interspersion of habitats
Interspersion of habitats between vegetation, unvegetated areas is high medium ar law. ~l
Hi h= ~ Dints Moderate=~ paints Low=1 Dint None=O paints
H 1, 5 special Habitat Features
Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland, the of checks is the # of paints
Large, dawned weedy debris vVlth~n the wetland ~.~" diameter and G' lang~
tand~ng snags {diameter at the bDttam 4f} Nn the wetland
Under cut banks are present for at least ~.G ft and~ar overhanging vegetation extends 3.~ ft for 3~ ft
stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver ar r~uskrat
At least 1 ~4 acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches in areas that are
seasonally or perrr~anently inundated structure for egg-laying amphibians.
Invasive plants cover less than ~s9~ of the wetland area in each stratum of plants
To~ai for H1~~ Potentiai for providing Habitat Add tie pointy in the baxe above
H~. saes the wetland have the oaaortunity to provide habitat far many species'?
H~.~ Buffers
hoase the description that best represents condition of buffer afwetland. The highest scaring
critei'+ia that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating.PINTS
1 OOm {~0'~ of relative undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water X9596 of circumference.5
10~m {630r~ of relative undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water 50 of circumference.4
Sam X170"~ of relative undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water 95~ of circumference.4
100m ~~30'~ of relative undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, ar open water ~5~6 of circumference,
50m ~~ 70"y of relative undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water 5096 of circumference.
If buffer daes not meet any of the criteria above
No paved areas {except trails or buildings within ~5 m {Sg'} of wetland X9596 circurr~ference.
No paved areas or buildings within 50 m ~HO'~ of wetland ~D~ circumference.2
Heavy grazing in buffer
Vegetated buffers are ~M wide {6,G ft~ for mare than 9596 of the circumference a
Buffer does not meet any of the above criteria ,
H,~ corridors and ~annections
H.~~1 is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor riparian or uplands that is
at least 15a ft wide, has at least 306 saver of shrubs, forest of native undisturbed prairie, that connects to
estuaries, or other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least X50 acres in size
YES = 4 paints ego to 1~,3~ NO = ga to ~H~.2,~~
H~.2.~ is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor {riparian ar upland} that is
at least 5~ ft vwride, has at least 30 cover of shrubs, forest of native undisturbed ,prairie, that connects to
estuaries, or other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least ~~ acres in sire? OR aLake-fringe
wetland , if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above?
YES = 2 paints ~gata H~.~ N~ = gota ~H2.~.3~
H2.~. Is the wetland
within 5 mil ~8km~ of a brackish ar salt water estuary ~R within 3 mi of a large field ar pasture 1
R within 1 mile of a lake rester that ~0 acres? YE5 =~ point Na~4
H~.3 Near ar adjacent to ether priority habitats limited by w~FIN
which of the following priority habitats are within 3~a ft ~i O~rn} of the wetland P~iNTS
Riparian Talus
Aspen Stands haves or more habitats 4
cliffs Oregon white oak ~ priority habitats 3
old-growth forests Urban natural open space 1 priority habitat ~
Mature forests Estuary Estuary-I i ke
Prairies Marine Estuarine Shorelines
H,4 wetland Landscape
hoase the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits PINT
There are at least other wetland within ~ ~~ mile, and the connections between then are relatively undisturbed
light graying ~K, but should NDT be bisected by paved roads or development 5
The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are ~ other lake-fringe wetlands
rririthin ~ JZ mile 5
There are at least wetland within ~ ~~ mile, BUT the cannecti~ons between then are disturbed 3
The wetland is Lake-fringe an a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands
within 1 ~~ rnlle 3
There is at least ~ v~retlandv~rithin 1~ mile ~
there are na wetland within rt ~~ mile ~ ~
Total for H~. ~pportuniy fir pr~vidin H~bit~t add tie pointy ire tie ~v~es above 7
Tt~l fir H1, Potential to provide important habitats 5
Total more for Habitat Fun~tio~~- ~4dd oi~t~ for H 1 and H~ and record on Pa e 1 2
Routine Wetland Determination
DATA FORM 1 (Revised)
WA State Wetland Detineation Manual or 1.987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manua
ProjectJite: 124 3~nd street, Part Townsend, VvA Date: ~Dg71210?
Applicantlowner: Steve aodwin County: Jefferson
Investigatar~s}: Dixie Llewellin, ~lyt~pic wetland Resources, Inc.
BITIR: 1ON11 Vv
Do normal circumstances exist vn the site? ®Yes ^ No Comaunity lD:
Is the site significantly disturbed atypical situatian~~ ^Yes ~ No Transact ID:
Is the area ~ potential problem area? ^Yes ~I No Plot ID: DP 'I
Ex lanation of a ical or roblern area:
VECETATID~1 ~1=ar strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H ~ herb; V =vine}
Dominant Plant ecies *Btratum °lo cover Indicator Dominant Plant ecies *tratum °l~ cover Indicator
Crataegus douglasii T 45 1=AC
pirea douglasii 3 1=ACVV
Rosa nutkana 5 1=AC
MYDR~PHYTI IIEETATI~N INDICATOR:
lo of dominants BBL, FACVVx &FAC: ~ ~~°l~
Check all indicators that apply and explain below:
Visual observation of plant species growing in ^ Physialvgicallreproductive adaptations
areas of prolonged inundationlsaturatian ®Uvetland plant database
Morphological adaptations ^ Personal knowledge of regional plant communities
Technical Literature ^ Other explain}
Hydrophy~c vegetation present? ~ Yes ^ No
Rationale for decisionlRemarks: Vlletland species dominant.
HYDROLDOY
1s it the growing season? ®Yes ^ No Water Marks: ^Yes ~ No Bediment Deposits: ^Yes ^ Na
af~
Based on: ®Air and~ail temp. and date Drift Lines: ^Yes ®Na Drainage Patterns: ~{ Yes ^ No
Other ex lain season
Depth of inundation: g inches oxidized Rant alive roots}Local Boil purvey: ^Yes ~ ^ hio
Channels ~~ in.. ^ Yes ~ No
Depth to free water in pit: ~ nches FAC Neutral: ^Yes ~ No UVater-stained f~eaves:
Yes ®No
Depth to saturated sail: Wane
Check all that apply ~ explain below:ether explain}:
stream, lake ar gage data
Aerial photographs
Other Nearby wetland an City of PT map
Vvetland hydrology presents ^Yes ~ No
Rationale for decisionlrernarks: Hydrology not present in seasonal wetland in July. Presence of past hydrology with
vegetation and soils.
7
Map knit Name Series and Phase} : m Ciaifarn gravelly Drainage lass: ivw-~
sandy Ioarn, o - ~ percent slopes Field observations con#irm mapped type's ~ Yes ^ ~o
Taxonom sub rou Fntic Durochrepts
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions,Drawing o#soil profile
inches Horizon Mansell moist Mansell moist size and contrast structure, etc.match description}
fi~OYR 211 None Loamy sandy
2"4YR 312 1 DYR 314 Large and abundant dandy loam
below Hardpan
1~~
Wydric fail Indicators: check all that apply}
Histosvl hllatrix chroma 2 with mottles
Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions
Sulfidic odor High Organic Content in surface Layer o€ Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime organic streaking in Sandy soils
Reducing Conditions Listed an National~Local Hydric foils List
Cleyed or Low'Chroma ~=~ y matrix ~other ex train in remarks
Hydric soils present? ®Yes ^ No
atiortale for decisionf Remarks:
Vl~etiand Determination
Hydrophytic vegetation present? ®Yes ^ No
Hydric soils present? ~ Yes ^ No
Vl~etiand hydrology present? ^ Yes ®Na
Is the sam lin Dint uvithin a wetland? ~ Yes ^ No
RatianalelRemarks: This seasonal wetland is ark of a drains a area that eventaa~l em ties downslo a to culverts and ditches.
MOTE:
Revised 419
Routine Wetland Determination
DATA FORM 1 (Revised)
WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 19$7 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual)
Pra~ectlSite: ~ ~~4 end Street, Port Tovnsend, UvA Date: ~~a71~1a7
Applicantlawner: taus oo win ounty: Je arson
lnvestigetcr{s}: Dixie Llev~rellin, Olyrnpic Vvetland Resources, Inc,State: VIA
S1TlR: ~gNf ~ V1~
Da~narmal circumstances exist cn the site? ~ Yes ^ Na Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed atypical situation}? ^ Yes ®No Trar~sect ID:
Is the area ~ potential problem area? ^ Yes ®No Plot ID: DP ~
Bx lanatian of a ical ar rablem area:
VECETATI~f~ For *strata, indicate T = tree; B = shrub; H = herb; V ~ vine}
Dominant Plant ecies *Stratum Flo cover Indicator Dominant Plant ecies *tratum °I° saver Indicator
Psuedatsuga men~esii T D FACU
rasa nutkana 5 FAC
Dactylic glomerate H 25 FACU
ymphoricrpos albs 2D FACD
HYDROPHYT~C V~CETATION INDICATR:
l~ of dominants OBL, FACI~v, ~ 1=AC: ~5°l0
Check all indicators that apply and explain below:
Visual observation of plant species graving in ^ Physialagicallreproductive adaptations
areas of prolonged inundatianlsaturation ^ Vlletland plantda#abae
Marphalagical adaptations ®Personal kna~rledge of regional plant communities
Technical Literature ^ Other explain}
Hydrophytic vegetation present? ^ Yes ~ No
Rationale far decisianlRemarks: Data Point #~ is upslape from the wetland and has less than 5~ °lo wetland species.
HYDR~L~Y
Is it the growing season? Yes ^ ~Ia Vllater Marks: ^ Yes ®No pediment Deposits: ^ Yes ^ Na
an
Based an: ~ Air andBoil temp. and date Drift Lines: ^ Yes ~ Na Drainage Patterns: ^ Yes ^ Na
Other ex lain season
Depth of ir~undativn: g inches Oxidised Root alive raatsy Laval Boil Survey: ^ Yes ^ iVa
Channels ~~in.: ^ Yes ~ Na
Depth to free water in pit: D nches PAC Neutral: ^ Yes ~ Na water-stained Leaves:
Yes ®No
Depth to saturated soil: none
Check all thatapply & explain below:Other explain}:
stream, lake or gage data
Aerial photographs
Other Nearby vretland an City of PT map
I Wetland hydrology present? ^ Yes ~ No
Rationale for decision/remarks: Wetland is not present in the location.
OIL
Map Unit Name series and ~hasey : m~ Olallam gravelly Drainage Class; Ivw-~
sandy loam, ~ - ~ 5 percent slopes Field a~servations oonfrm mapped type? ®Ye ^ Na
Taxonomy subgroup} antic Durochrepts
Profile Descri Lion.... .. ..
Depth Matrix color Mottle colon Mottle abundance Texturet concretions,Drawing of soil profile
inches Horizon Munseil moist Munsell moist size ar~d contrast structure, etc.match descriptior~~
8~1 AYR 314 Nane Loamy sandy
S~-~ 6~1 AYR 313 1 AYR 314 Large and abundant Sandy loam
Hydrrc Soil Indicators: check all that apply}
Histosol Matrix chroma 2 with mottles
Histic Epipedan Mg or Fe concretions
Sulfidic Odor High Organic Oontent in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Reducing Oonditions Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List
Oleyed ar Low-~hroma ~=L}matrix Other ex lain in remarks
Hydric soile presents ^ Yes ~Na
Rationale for decisionlRernarks: Even though mottles were peent and indicated a rising water table the sail rr~atrix did not support the
presence of regular inundation.
1Netland Determination
Hydrophytic vegetation present? ^ Yes ®No
Hydric soils present? ^ Yes ®No
Vvetland hydrology present? ^ Yes ®No
Is tf~e sam lin Dint within a wetland? ^ Yes ^ No
Rationale~Remarlcs: This data Dint is u slo a from the wetland and outside of the wetland as su orted ~ lack of wetland ve etation.
NO~'E:
Revised 4197
Rou#ine Wetland Determination
DATA FORM 1 (Revised)
WA StatE Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual}
Projec#15ite: ~ ~~4 end Street, Part Townsend, vVA Date: ag71~~107
Applicant}awner: Steve Goodwin County: Jefferson
Investigator{}: Dixie Llewellin, Olympic wetland Resources, lnc.Mate; VIIA
fTlR: 1oN11 vv
Do normal circumstances exist an the site? ~ Yes ^ No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed {atypical situation}'~ ^ Yes ®No Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? ^ Yes ~ No Plat ID: DP 3
Ex lanation o~ a ical or roblern area:
11EETATION For *trata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V =vine}
Dominant Plant S ecie *Stratum °lo cover Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies *Stratum °lo cover Indicator
Psuedotsuga menzesii T 0 f~ACU
Rasa nutkana 4 I~AC
Symphoriarpa albs 3g I=ACD
Spirea douglasii S 5 f=Al1
l~ypochaeris radiate l~15 NI
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDIOATDRS:
lo of dominants OBL, I=ACVU, ~ FAC: 2g~lo
Check all indicators thatapply and explain below:
Visual observation of plant species growing in ^ Physialagicallrepraductive adaptations
areas of prolonged inundatianlsaturatian ^ ~Ifetland plant database
Morphological adaptations ®Personaf knowledge a# regional plant cvrnmunities
Technioal Literature ^ Other ~expiain}
Hydrophytic vegetation present? ^ Yes No
Rationale for decision~Remarks: Data Point #2 is sligltly upslope from the ditch with less than ~1 °lo wetland speciea~
HYDROI.~Y
Is it the growing season? ~ Yes ^ Na water Marks; ^ Yes ~ No Sediment Deposits; ^ Yes ^ No
on
Based an: ®Air andS~il temp, and date Drift Lines: ^ Yes ®No Drainage Patterns: ^ Yes ^ No
Other ex fain season
Depth of inundation: g inches Oxidized Roat alive roots}ocaf Sail Survey: ^ Yes ^ IVo
Channelsl~in,; ^Yes ~Na
Depth to free water in pit: 0 nches PAC Neutral; ^ Yes ~ No 111later~stained Leaves:
Yes ®Na
Depth to saturated coif; none
Check all that apply ~ explain below:Other explain};
Stream, lake ar gage data
Aerial photographs
Other Nearby wetland on City of PT map
vlite~and hydrology presents ^ Yes ~ IVo
Rationale for deciion~remarks: Vlletland indicators not present in this location.
SOILS
Map ~Jni~ Name Series and Phase} : CmC Clallarr~ gravel ly Drainage Class: Ivw-~
sandy loam, ~ - 'I 5 percent slopes
Taxonom u r n i ry ~ bg vup} E t c Du ochrepts
Field observations confirm mapped pe? ®Yes ^ No
Pr~`iie Descri tiara
Depth Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions,Drawing of sail profile
inches Horizon Mu~nsell moist Munseil moist size and cvn#rest structure, etc.match description
0 - ~ oA gYR 3J3 hlone Loamy Bendy
I~ardpan
Hydric Soil lr~dicator: check all that apply}
His#osol Matrix chrama 2 with mottles
Histic Epipedan Mg or Fe Concretions
uli'id'rc Odor High Orgar-ic Content in Surface Layer of dandy Sails
Aquic Moisture Regime Organic treak'rng in Sandy Soils
Reducing Conditions Listed an NatianailLacal Hydric fails List
Gleyed or Law-Chror~a {~~ ~ matrix Other ex fain in remarks
Hydric sails present? ^ Yes ®No
Rationale for decisionlRemarks; foils were dry and large rcks were present, na mottles were observed shave hardpan.
1Ntland Determination
Flydrophytic vegetation present? ^ Yes ®lVo
1~ydric soils presen#? ^ Yes ~ Na
1lVetland hydrology presen#? ^ Yes ®No
Is the sam lira Dint within a wetland? ^ Yes ®No
Ratianalel~er~erks:.Data Point #3 is outside of wetland with d soils and no wetland indicators.
NOTE:
Devised 4191