HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007.08.21 - Email from Carol Wise to Suzanne Wassmer/ S. "*uJ Page I of2
Suzanne Wassmer
From: Suzanne Wassmer
Sent: Wednesday, August 22,2007 10:01 AM
To: Judy surber; Leonard Yarberry; Kenneth clow; John watts; Pat lolavera
Subject: FW: Class 4 wetland
FYl. What are your thoughts?
Thanks,
Suzanne
-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Wise fmailto:cwise@olypen.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 2L,2007 6:21 PM
To: Suzanne Wassmer
Ccr Mike Biggs; Anne Mclaughlin; Carol Wise
Subject: Class 4 wetland
Good Morning!
Ok, new developments occurring as we speak. We now have a major issue about the class 4
wetlands. In talking with Mike Biggs, and with the Loggy report, we are at a 50'buffer on a
class 4 r,vetland. With that acknowledgement, we are able to remove the manhole and have a
direct line for the sewer, a better layout and more efficient system.
I need. to know that we are in agreement that the official report is the Loggy report and the
drawing will reflect the buffer for the wetland at 50'. There is no reason for us to be
categorizecl so harshly just because no one wants to be wrong. We have a binding, licensed
and bonded report and the reputation of Mr. Loggy of over 30 years experience and no guess-
work and fully accountable for his report.
We have come to realize that we cannot just go along here with the idea that maybe-perhaps
someone will decide, to be safe, that this should be a class 3 wetland. The development of that
sewer line is dramatically different and we are not willing to just give up that land use on a
perhaps. Mike went out today, Aug 21., to view the marking and survey of the sewer line and
80'marking for a proposed buffer and realized that the line was an average of 50' away from
that extreme point and that would mean the correct, 50'buffer would eliminate that manhole
and. that is what the report reflects is 50', So, please help us get through this the best you can.
There is no intention of being offensive here, we just have to have the correct call on this
classification based on the proper format and documentation, which we have provided, and a
point of agreement that is binding for us to proceed.
Thank you so much for all the assistance and patience through this. We didn't cause this
problem and it wasn't a problem to start with and never was until outside factors changed it.
Most Sincerely,
812212007
f Page2 of2
Carol Wise
D iS c'u(J le sAry
)y ad* w
s d\<d
bR- U
AJ d/]n1 a
r , work ?
Plaat+I* oc:k*at -l-hi;
@e:s+*st{Q-a- a,F +kL
812212007
w<44