Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09221 City of Port Townsend Development Services Department 1"otiC@ PERMIT NUMBER OWNER JOB LOCATION Inspection of this structure has found the following 4iakatiztts. � C You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwis When corrections have been made,.call fo;inspection. Date Z /' -d Inspector DSD Main Office (360) 379-5095 INSPECTION REQUEST (360) 385-2294 THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SITE City of Port Townsend Development Services Department PERMIT NUMBER 71:;a OWNER , ) JOB LOCATION Inspection of this structure has found the following-dens: You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwise. When corrections have been made call for inspection. Date ' Inspector PitkL �©1�1 DSD M in Office (360) 379-5095 INSPECTION REQUEST (360) 385-2' THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SITF City of Port Townsend Development Services Department JXISCl �OI�fation Notice PERMIT NUMBER "'2 OWNER JOB LOCATION 2D ZO Ci �� l.�L)7 (, Inspection of this structure has found the following-vietatieie: jF7Aj I 'So AJ Q / � ATMOV-FEL iv You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwise. When corrections have been made, call for inspection.Date 2 12010 Inspector Lz LM DSD Main Office (360) 379 5095 INSPECTION REQUEST (360) 385 THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SI' City of Port Townsend Development Services Department Correction Notice PERMIT NUMBER ��L22- OWNER JOB LOCATION 2-0 Zo L VO' r62 T Inspection of this structure has found the following violations: 7`00t 41JL� You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwise. When corrections have been made, call for inspection. Date 9 Z l ) Inspector (C �G DSD Main Office (360) 379-5095 INSPECTION REQUEST (360) 385-2294 THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SITE . .CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 181 Quincy Street, Suite 301A,Port Townsend WA 98368 PLUMBING CERTIFICATION PRESSURE TEST BUILDING OWNER PERMIT if ADDRESS 2.0 2.O I a[N i"t S• DATE OF TEST- 30 ri ►✓'�t1 20 I o PLUMBING CONTRACTOR �j WAl< pLM13 LTA LICENSE#) C)/ 4:t14NT 5 � 33�h1 GROUND WORK ROUGHAN PLUMBING "FINAL DWV WATER SERVICE Air PSI Air PSI Water Ye-5 f Head Water PS �GoNS � Working Pressure Time 15vr,,tits- Minutes Time -- DN _5tr�e jSMYW&rF Minutes NOTE_ TESTING REQUIREMENTS(SECTION 318 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE)MINIMUMS: Water Test— 10'Head— 15 Minutes Test.at Working Presure Air Test—.5i1 PSI— 15 Minutes 5011 PSI— 15 Minutes I hereby certify the information provided above is the resuh of the Plumbing System pressure test conducted by the undersigned at the indicated address and date_ Misrepresentation of this certification is a .gross misdemeanor under RCW.9A_72.040 subject to a two-year statute of limitation_ VISUAL SYSTEM INSPECTION IS REQUIRED BEFORE COVER_ Signature ���'�'�` Date d mi ir`C+ 2-o I0 City of Port Townsend Development Services Department Correction Notice PERMIT NUMBER '— OWNER �,r� JOB LOCATION ZO Inspection of this structure has found the following violations: U You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwise. When corrections have been made, call f inspection. r�-. Dater 010 Inspector C IL DSD Maln Office (360) 379-5095 INSPECTION REQUEST (360) 385-2294 THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SITE �OFVoR7 ropy BUILDING PERMIT sv City of Port Townsend Development Services Department �WA 250 Madison Street,Suite 3,Port Townsend,WA 98368 (360)379-5095 Project Information Permit# BLD09-221 Permit Type Residential -Addition/Remodel Project Name ADDITION Site Address 2020 WALNUT ST Parcel# 985210102 Project Description Porch and room addition Names Associated with this Project License Type Name Contact Phone# Type License# Exp Date Applicant Me Bride Kenneth R (360) 385-2343 Owner Me Bride Kenneth R (360)385-2343 Contractor Owner Builder O- STATE exempt 12/31/2009 Pee Information Project Details Project Valuation $30,757.27 Decks—Residential (Covered) 108 SQFT Plan Review Fee 293.70 Dwellings- Remodel @ 90% 195 SQFT PLAN REVIEW DEPOSIT 50 50.00 Dwellings—Type V Wood Frame 136 SQFT PLAN REVIEW REFUND 50 -50.00 Units: Heat Type: Building Permit Fee 451.85 Bedrooms: Construction Type: V -B State Building Code Council Fee 4.50 Bathrooms: Occupancy Type: R-3 Technology Fee for Building Permit 9.04 Record Retention Fee for Building 10.00 Permit Total Fees $ 769.09 Conditions 10. Property corner survey pins must be located at time of footing inspection to verify setbacks. ***SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS *** Call 385-2294 by 3:00pm for next day inspection. Permits expire 180 days from issuance if work is not commenced, or if work is suspended for a period of 180 days. Work is verified by obtaining a valid inspection. The granting of this permit shall not be construed as approval to violate any provisions of the PTMC or other laws or regulations. I certify that the information provided as a part of the application for this pennit is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further certify that I am the owner of the property or authorized agent of the owner. Print Name e"� � .r'��/� Date Issued: 12/18/2009 _ Issued By: MWAY Signature �_— Date '—A/ zJ 7 Date Expires: 06/16/2010 QORTT CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS RECORD CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND wA Development Services Department 250 Madison Street, Suite 3, Port Townsend, WA 98368 POST THIS CARD IN A SAFE,CONSPICUOUS LOCATION.PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE UNTIL ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS ARE MADE AND SIGNED OFF BY THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY AND THE BUILDING IS APPROVED FOR OCCUPANCY.STAMPED APPROVED PLANS MUST BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOBSITE. PARCEL NO. 985210102 PERMIT NO. BLD09-221 ISSUED DATE 12/18/2009 EXPIRATION DATE 06/16/2010 ADDRESS 2020 WALNUT ST CONSTRUCTION TYPE V- B OCCUPANT LOAD OWNER MC BRIDE KENNETH R PROJECT DESCRIPTION Porch and room addition CONTRACTOR OWNER BUILDER LENDER INSPECTION INSP DATE COMMENT INSPECTION INSP )ATE COMMENT SETBACKS SURVEY PIN," 1V FOOTING ~ Q FOUNDATION WALL j�,� N 1.0/Q iv Sc7.(JC'� `TUA3rc FOUNDATION DRAIN FLOOR FRAMING 1 z0 10 FRAMING !O PLUMBING Pl � E'-'+ MECHANICAL SHEAR WALL INSULATION Y GWB ROOF NAILING MISCELLANEOUS FINAL BUILDING �- ;� C' � TO REQUEST AN INSPECTION CALL(360) 385-2294. INSPECTION REQUESTS MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO 3:00 PM FOR NEXT DAY INSPECTION. CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND PERMIT ACTIVITY LOG PERMIT# L Q 9 — Z Z 1 DATE RECEIVED SCOPE OF WORK: D DATE ACTION INITIALS 11� — ENTERED INTO CHET CHECKED FOR COMPLETENESS �E7~ �C r � � r sX i' A, ( f � , n 0 I'1 � a Zoning: c.. GS > Setbacks OK? Lot Size: Building Size: Lot Coverage: FAR OK? Height OK? Parkin OK? Critical Area? Demo? Historic Rev? Notice to Title? Lots of Record? STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS LATERAL ANALYSIS BEAMS McBRIDE ADDITION 2020 Walnut Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Q' of WA Syi Q 27 ' ST \��� EXP. DATE: 05 / 05 / 10 Michael J.AndersonQ PE&PLS No. 27665 --l330 Cleveland StreetlPort Townsend, WA 908368 i FLE COPY 7/DZO Gf/rL�T 5 T P, l; 17 /ZG zo, � /A � /�S/� �K Ta Td=�oF X 27 ----------------- f-2/z O< =20e2l/qr e� Z A.¢s � � fr l� ��-�n-�'L-- i�'n/AYSt s �GoN�-� I (J��i2 �ojz� - - l J it/A�>�z�S � ��'��J G oW� �� r. ram) - �„ _ ; -- �_ ��z���aL�2_ ����� . �� i �� I , ��- _ � � m a� C� s� � 2�x Z V 1,7"4 B G�� : 7.5XiZ�� . . 25 Deli '® meat Services Ae floe0A nsend WA 98368 e360- 79�095 66 344-4f � www:ctfjiofpt.us WM Residential Building Permit Application Project Address- �+ Legal Description(or Tax#] ce�lse Only -O 7 Addition:Pe443ECgoyGS -x Petmrt Zoning: Block: Le•Z � !+�`f BCD �. . Parcel# 9g S Z!a ! �� Lot(s): ,7p 9 p '� �� � r> oa�atecl Permits Project Description: a Z C q /o cl � Applications by mail must include a check for initial plan review fee of$150 for projects valued over$15,000. See Page 2 for details on plan submittal requirements. LenderInformation: Lender information must be provided for projects Property OwnedApplicant: over$5,000 in valuation per RCW 119.27.095. Name: X Crate& C. Name: Jet),/ Address: 2a 20 Wi¢LN u S-i- �a2�r0��✓.t�i l4/A c183f Project Valuation: City/Stop: Phone: Building Information(square feet): Email: C S y"r')25�)d c WT 011 s ly,C-oof 1st floor s Garage: f4 floor o c> Deck(s): S 44 0 ContactfRepresentative: ,� Name: SA/D'! e 3 floor Porch(es): 1�_U Basement Is it finished?Q No Address: City/Stop: Carport Oa Other SHED 180 Phone: Manufactured Home❑ ADU 0 Email: New Addition$ RemodeURepair❑ Contractor. Same as Owner Total Lot Coverage(Building Footprint):* Name: Square feet ,-7!2n % Address: —_ Impervious Surface:" City/St/Zip: � ` /Sq66arr:fi et Y-75 *Total eidsting&proposed Phone: Email: U ul Nnii _ L. LWhaltyear was the structure built?State License# : I -includes demolition,see Page 2.Ci Business License#: I Ci1�cR' I wetlands on the property? Y�Nty iGiri`� 'p slopes(>IS%)?© N I hereby certify that the information provided is correct,that I am either the owner or authorized to act on behalf of the owner and that all activities associated with this permit will be in accordance with State Laws and the Port Townsend Municipal Code. Print Name: Sigma Date: / 2z: z 2 9 Page 1 0 7/31/2008 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST This checklist is for new dwellings,.additions, remodels, and garages. ®'hiResidential permit application. tW.hington State Energy&Ventilation Code forms (2) sets of plans with North arrow and scaled, no smaller than '/" = 1 foot: ❑A site plan showing: 1. Legal description and parcel number(or tax number), 2. Property lines and dimensions 3. Setbacks from all sides of the proposed structure to the property lines in accordance with a pinned boundary line survey 4. On-site parking and driveway with dimensions 5. If creating new impervious surfaces, indicate measures utilized to retain stormwater on-site 6. Street names and any easements or vacations 7. Location and diameter of existing trees 8. Utility lines 9. If applicable, existing or proposed septic system location 10. Delineated critical areas boundaries and buffers 0 Foundation plan: 1. Footings and foundation walls 2. Post and beam sizes and spans 3. Floor joist size and layout 4. Holdowns 5. Foundation venting ❑ Floor plan: 1. Room use and dimensions 2. Braced wall panel locations 3. Smoke detector locations 4. Attic access 5. Plumbing and mechanical fixtures 6. Occupancy separation between dwelling and garage (if applicable) 7. Window, skylight, and door locations, including escape windows and safety glazing ❑Wall section: 1. Footing size, reinforcement, depth below grade 2. Foundation wall, height, width, reinforcement, anchor bolts, and washers 3. Floor joist size and spacing 4. Wall stud size and spacing 5. Header size and spans 6. Wall sheathing, weather resistant barrier, and siding material 7. Sheet rock and insulation 8. Rafters, ceiling joists, trusses, with.blocking and positive connections 9. Ceiling height 10. Roof sheathing, roofing material, roof pitch, attic ventilation Exterior elevations (all four)with existing slope of the land in relation to all proposed structures illf f architecturally designed, one set of plans must have an original signature engineered, one set of plans must have one original signature ❑ For new dwelling construction, Street& Utility or Minor Improvement application If you are proposing partial or full demolition of a structure that is at least 50 years old, per Ordinance 2969 Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) review is required. If within the National Historic Landmark district: $58.00 for full committee review. If outside the National Historic Landmark district and not on the Historic Register: no fee for HPC Administrative review. Complete HPC Form. Partial demolition includes exterior demolition for additions and remodels. Page 2 of 2 - 10/7/2009 -OVER- c)� G, u4 )2'1 v c w07 �oe;e.: C. oo 5 Li C-1 e-1 I LL" 25 CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND DSD CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND RESIDENTIAL: NEW CONSTRUCTION,REMODELS & ADDITIONS BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Name(Legal Owner(s)) .. <rrre •+�!�//J�i /� /� Mailing Address Z c7 Z,-> L,-t,-ir L n�v/ - /-��-' '�"`�-r�•-� ,��3i' Phone .-5i�a Property Street Address 2-C ?- c u q L. - Zoning District Parcel# Descri on. Addition Block aZE!O L0t(s)Sb7� 3 Contractor's Name O w e Mailing Address Phone State Licence Number City Business License Number Estimated Value of Construction S j'a c-c> Financed By b 3"�7L. Date Work is to Be -in � Pi 201 Daze Work is to be Co leted ���- ✓c: Z� a Please check all that applies for the a of buildin ermit You-are requestinLr. New House Addition New Garage or Carport RqaWRemodel Garage R Accessory epair/Remodel House Other(please describe): City Sewer 3/4"Water Meter I ' Ili ( Septic 1"Water Meter I I I I , CITY OF PORT TOWNSENn I L,ZSi:d:ee Sewer Contractor. Floor Area The proposed structure is to be used for Living Space SgFt: 2,�-t-a Porches Sq-Ft: Garage Sq�Ft: BasemendStorage Sq.Ft: Carport Sq Ft: Decks Sq.Ft Other(please describe : Property Site Area/Coverage Inform. in The total area of the property in square feet: Percentage of lot coverage: The total area covered by structures in square feet(existing and proposed;total ground coverage from the outside of walls or supporting members per 17.04 PTMQ : .7 S Impervious Surfaces. Please provide the square footage of the roof area of the proposed and existing structures,and the square footage of the total area covered by porches,walkways.patios and drivewa s. Proposed House Roofprint Sq. Ft: Z 4JD Existing House Roofprint Sq.Ft: Qp t Zo Proposed Garage Roofprint Sq.Ft: Existing Garage Roofprint Sq.Ft: SO Proposed Porcb/Walkway Sq. Ft: Existing Porch/Walkway Sq.Ft: 2 Proposed Driveways Sq. Ft: Existing Driveways Sq.Ft: 8 j� Other(describe): Other(describe): S,�O f 2 Total Proposed Impervious Sq. Ft: Z, Total Existing Impervious Sq.Ft: D S Total Proposed+Existing: Percentage Impervious: Please check the plans that you are submitting with this application: Site Plan Wall Bracing(panels shown on floor plan) Drainage Plan Typical Wall Framing Details Foundation Elevations Floor Plan 1994 WSEC Compliance:Electric Von-electric Special Conditions YES NO Please check YES or NO as applicable 1. Is the property within 200 feet of a fresh or salt water shoreline? 2. Is the property within the Port Townsend Historical District? 1/ 3. Is the property located within or adjacent to an environmentally sensitive area? 4. Will this proposal involve any sewer,water or other utility extensions which will or could serve vacant properties other than the project site? If yes,please identify the utility extensions and sites(attach list). 5. Have any special conditions been placed on this property,or has the property been subject to any conditions on any prior action of the City:e.g. subdivision,short plat,variance,conditional use permit, / street vacation,planned unit development,restrictive covenant,etc? (If yes,attach copies of appropriate l/ documents.) 6. Are any properties within 800 feet of the site owned or controlled by the applicant,any relative or business associate,or any partnership,corporation,or other entity affiliated with the applicant? (If yes, attach list) 7. Have any of the properties listed in item#6 been developed within the last two years? (If yes, attach list) 8. Will you be storing on-site or removing any overburden material from construction site? 9. Have you previously discussed this project with a City staff member? If yes,who and when? V ✓ r c/G �� L�iL Applicant Certification The applicant hereby certifies to have knowledge of those sections of the Uniform Building Code and the Port Townsend Municipal Code pertinent to the above project and that the applicant is responsible for constructing in conformance with these codes: the applicant understands that the permit,if issued,expires in six months unless work is started;that the permit,after construction has started,will expire after one year if an inspection is not made to show significant progress on the structure; the applicant agrees to abide by the ordinances,codes,regulations,restrictive covenants,deed or plat restrictions, and water and sewer plans attached hereto; the applicant certifies that all information given above and on accompanying plans is complete and accurate to the best of their knowledge; and the applicant understands that this information will be relied upon in granting permits and that is such information is later found to be inaccurate any permits may be withdrawn. The undersigned hereby saves and holds the City of Port Townsend harmless from any and all causes of action; judgements,claims,or demands,or from any liability of any nature arising from any non-compliance with any restrictive covenants,plat restrictions,deed restrictions,or other restrictions which may have been established by parties other than the City of Port Townsend. Complete Application Port Townsend Municipal Code,Section 16.04.140,Vested Rights -Substantially Complete Building Permit Application: Applications for all land use and development permits required under ordinances of the city shall be considered under the zoning and other land use control ordinances in effect on the date a fully complete building permit application,meeting the requirements identified in this section,is filed with the Building and Community Development Until a complete building permit application is filed, all applications for land use and development permits shall be reviewed subject to any zoning or other land use control ordinances which become effective prior to the date of issuance of a final decision by the city on the application. An application of a building permit shall be considered complete when an application meeting all of the requirements of Section 106.3 of the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition, is submitted which is consistent with all then applicable ordinances and laws. In addition,to be considered complete,such an application must be accompanied by complete applications for a subsidiary land use or development permits needed,such as a complete shoreline management permit application and/or complete applications for other discretionary permits required under the ordinances of Port Townsend. An application for a partial permit under Section 106.4.1 of the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition,shall not be considered complete unless it meets all requirements stated above and contains the complete structural frame of the building and the architectural plans for the stnicture. Signature o pplicant or Authorized Repres tatrve Date For Office Use Only Permit No. Building Official Approval Date Issued Plan Review Fee S Date Receipt No Water/Sewer SDCS Date Receipt No. Balance Due S Date Receipt jjo ApplieantfRepresentative.Si&sit4re - D*6 Removed i ,, ..� ' r f _ tti � kw v IL ; z �.. to ' N Q Od .......... /0 c - 1 rn r y , .S • '= v O h STRATUM GROUP P.O. Box 2546, Bellingham, WA 98227 Phone(360)114-9409 March 30, 2009 (� !NO Ken McBride2020 Walnut Street V - 6 2009 Port Townsend, WA 98368 CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND Re: Geology Hazard Assessment DSD 2020 Walnut Street Port Townsend, Washington Dear Mr. McBride: I visited the property in February 2009 to evaluate the slope stability of subject property. It is my understanding that you are planning a small addition at west and south side of the existing home on the site. The purpose of the site visit was to assess the geologic stability of the site including the criteria set forth in.City of Port Townsend's Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) Ordinance, PTMC 19.05. Based on my inspection of the property and vicinity, the addition will not be at risk from slope failures for the expected life of the structure (100 years) nor will the addition increase the risk of slope failures on or off of the property. The property is located in a geologically hazardous area as per the Port Townsend's ESA and per my own view of slope stability and processes controlling,the stability of the site. Portions of the steep slope are considered geologically hazardous as per PTMC 19.05(B). However, the proposed additions on the south side and west side of the existing home are outside of geologically hazardous area for the expected life of the structure (100 years) and will not create instability or harm to other properties or public resources as long as the recommendations made in this report are followed. GENERAL GEOLOGY Northwestern Washington has been occupied by continental glaciers at least four times during the Pleistocene Epoch (1.6 million to 12,000 years ago). Glacial and alluvial related deposits underlie the subject property and vicinity. The Geologic Map of the Port Townsend South and Part of the Port Townsend North 7.5 minute Quadrangles Jefferson County Washington (Schasse and Slaughter, 2005) indicate that the subject property and vicinity is underlain by recessional outwash, glacial till and undifferentiated glacial and non glacial sediments from prior to the last glacial period. Site observations on the subject property, shoreline bluff face, and in the vicinity are consistent with the above-described mapping. Recessional outwash and ice wasting sand and gravel deposits underlie the upland area of the property and the uppermost portion of the shoreline bluff. Below the recessional deposits the shoreline bluff slope is underlain by compact sand with a few March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street,Port Townsend,WA Geology Hazard Assessment layers of compact silt. I interpret the sand and silt layers to be advance outwash sand deposited, from streams and rivers flowing from the melting advancing glacial ice prior to the area being covered by glacial ice and preglacial fluvial deposits. Deposition of the sand appears to have been rapid as a few silt dikes cut through the sand from dewatering of saturated silt compacted by the rapid sand deposition.The sand deposited is massive with large cross-beds and occasional rip up clasts of silt. The waterways of Puget Sound are primarily the result of glacial erosion and under ice glacial melt water having carved deep channels into the land surface. Since the end of the last glaciation approximately 14,000 years ago the land has completed its rebound from the weight of the glacial ice. Wave action has eroded the shoreline back to what is now the base of the bluff below the house. The steep bluff formed by waves eroding the base of the bluff. Over time the bluff is undermined and oversteepened and the upper parts of the bluff collapse down onto the beach below. Wave action removes the failed soils and the process repeats itself. This process is still taking place at the site. SPECIFIC SITE OBSERVATIONS The upland portion of the subject property consists of a gently sloping area underlain by sandy to gravely recessional outwash soils. The slope of the upland area is generally towards the north to northwest away fro or parallel to the shoreline bluff slope ion the east side of the property. The existing home on the property is located approximately 34 feet from the top edge of the shoreline bluff slope. The upper portion of the slope slopes down towards the shore at an angle of approximately 36 degrees. This slope is underlain by sand and gravel and is covered by brush, grass and trees. An old stump was observed on this slope. This Douglas fir stump was from a tree that was at least 45 years old prior to the tree being cut down. This stump along with other large trees on the slope indicates that no slope movement has taken place on the upper portion of the slope for at least 50 years and probably, based on the size of some of the trees as much as 100 years. A silt layer is located on the mid portion of the bluff and this layer stands nearly vertical and caps low cohesion by compact sand forming a near vertical face that is between 5 and 15 feet high. The silt layer acts as a protective cap above the sand and in a few places along the shoreline bluff overhangs the sand unit. Stratum Group File:2.6.09 2 March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street,Port Townsend, WA Geology Hazard Assessment s � t r. fit } it View of bluff slope on subject property. View of stump on the upper portion of slope. The number of rings was approximately 45, indicating the tree was at least 45 years old when it was.cut. Other older trees are present on the upper slope. The lower half of the slope slopes at a fairly uniform angle of approximately 30 degrees. This slope is underlain by loose sand and a few areas of broken apart silt derived from the soils on slopes above and from the underlying outwash sand. The slope is mostly grass-covered with areas of exposed sand and a few small trees and other brush. No areas of water seeps or vegetation indicating seasonal water seeps were observed anywhere on the slope immediately below the residence. .The beach at the base of the slope is a sand gravel beach. During times of high water combined with storm waves the sandy soils at the base of the bluff of the bluff will be eroded. Based on the lack of well-established trees growing on the lower slope of the bluff, the lower slope,of the property is actively being eroded. However, other portions of the bluff have less . active erosion because the base of the slope is protected by partially buried logs from past slope failures that have effectively armored sections of the bluff from wave action. These sections of Stratum Group File:2.6.09 3 March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street,Port Townsend, WA Geology Hazard Assessment the shoreline bluff have more trees established on the lower slopes. It appears that removal of large woody debris within landslide debris from wave action at the base of the bluff is a relatively rare event. This is consistent with the lack of open fetch for wind generated waves to form on this portion of the coastline. The fetch over the water to the east is approximately 6 miles. This distance is not large enough to generate large waves and high winds from that direction are not common. No landslide debris, other than sand has accumulated at the base of the bluff at the subject property; hence this portion of the bluff has been recently eroded. Winter storms periodically cause toe erosion as the base of the bluff is underlain by sand with low cohesion. Winter storms in 2006-2007 eroded the toe of the bluff and a shallow slab failure of the lower portion of the slope took place at the base of the bluff on the subject property during the winter of 2006-2007. In addition the lower portion of the bluff as well as the steep mid section of the bluff area eroded by people playing on the sand slope and carving words into the steep portion of the slope. No recent failures have taken place recently along the top portion of the bluff. However, as the lower portion of the bluff erodes and additional failures take place from this continued erosion, the top portion of the bluff will eventually become undermined and shallow slab failures of the upper bluff should be expected. Port Townsend Geologically Hazardous Areas Evaluation As per Port Townsend's Code 19.05.100 B 1 through 6 the following classification criteria were evaluated to determine if the subject property is located in a geologically hazardous area. Based on this evaluation and the conditions described in the above sections, the shoreline bluff slope and areas near the top of the shoreline bluff slope on the subject property are located in a geologically hazardous area. 19.05.100B1:Any area containing soil or soil complexes described or mapped within the United States Department of Agriculture/Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey for Jefferson County as having a severe to very severe erosion hazard potential. Soils underlying the upland area are mapped as consisting of Clalam gravelly sandy loam. Test pits on the upper shoreline slope indicate the soil underlying the upland area and the upper shoreline bluff is underlain by deep sandy gravel soils. The sandy gravel soils on the slope are very permeable and not subject to surface water flow. The risk of erosion of these soils is from wave action at the base of the steep slope or the loss of cohesion if vegetation cover on the slope is removed. Discharge of storm water onto the slope could cause erosion. Stratum Group File:2.6.09 4 March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street,Port Townsend, WA Geology Hazard Assessment 19.05.100B2:Any area with slopes greater than 15 percent with impermeable soils (typically silt and clay)frequently interbedded with granular soils (predominantly sand and gravel); and springs or ground water seepage from perched water tables or potentially unstable slopes. Slopes on the upland area of the property are well under 15 percent. However, the shoreline bluff slope to the east side of the subject property down to the shoreline is greater than 100%. However, there is no evidence of perched water, springs or seeps seasonal or otherwise on the steep shoreline slope. 19.05.10OB3:Any area potentially subject to mass movement due to a combination of geologic, topographic, hydrologic factors, but not limited to those areas mapped or described by the Soil Conservation Service, Washington State Department of Ecology, Department of Natural Resources or U.S. Geologic Service. The classification may be based on performance standards rather than mapping. Indications of shallow rapid mass wasting are apparent on the steep shoreline bluff slope on the east side of the subject property. The mass wasting is the result of wave action undermining the base of the slope and causing the slope to become over steep. The slope at the subject property is not currently significantly undermined as the beach at the base of the slope is.well built up and a prism of past soil raveled off of the bluff face is present at the toe of the slope. However, the mid section of the slope is nearly vertical and shallow rapid failures potentially could take place on the mid slope area. Eventually these slope failures will move up the slope and the upland failures will take place. 19.05.1OOB4:Any area potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision; stream bank erosion or undercutting by wave action. The shoreline bluff slope is steep enough from past wave action that the slope itself and the area immediately adjacent to the slope is potentially unstable due to past wave action and future wave action will increase instability on the bluff slope. Portions of the subject property near the steep shoreline bluff are at risk of becoming unstable due to wave erosion at the base of the bluff. 19.05.1OOB5:Any slope of 40 percent or steeper. Slopes on the shoreline bluff are greater than 40 percent. The shoreline slope has an overall slope of approximately 40 degrees (83%) with areas that are vertical or nearly vertical. Essentially all slopes on the bluff are greater than 40%. 19.05.10OB6:Areas subject to severe risk of damage as a result of earthquakes, slope failure, Stratum Group File:2.6.09 5 March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street, Port Townsend, WA Geology Hazard Assessment settlement, soil liquefaction or faulting. These areas are identified by the presence of poorly drained soils (greater than 50 percent silt and less than 35 percent coarse material) loose sand or gravel,peat, artif cial fill and landslide materials or soils with a high organic content. Soils on the site are well drained and except for the uppermost soil are very compact and are not susceptible to earthquake induced mass movement. An earthquake may generate sufficient force to trigger shallow soil failures on portions of the slope that have been oversteepened by wave action. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on my assessment of the site, it is my opinion that the proposed additions on the site can take place on the site as long as the recommendations of this report are followed. This section presents conclusions about the stability of the site and erosion of the shoreline and provides recommendations per Port Townsend code as to the setback from the steep shoreline bluff. Based on an erosion rate of 3 inches per year, a safe setback for a structure on this property is 30 feet. This distance is equal to 100 years of erosion at 3 inches per year plus an additional 5 feet as an additional margin of safety factor for a larger upper slope failure. The existing home as well as . the proposed additions to the home is set back from the top of the steep shoreline slope greater than 30 feet. The rationale for the 30-foot setback is presented below. Other setback considerations based on Port Townsend regulations are presented in the recommendations section of the report. Observations along the shore and the top of the bluff indicate that the primary cause of slope instability is the undermining of the base of the bluff by wave action. Sandy deposits at the lower portion of the bluff will be susceptible to wave action erosion when exposed to waves. Over time as these soils are eroded, the upper very compact soils on the steep slope will become undermined and will ultimately fail as well. Portions of the shoreline bluff to the north of the subject property are very steep and exposed soil is present on these steep sections. Shallow slab failures as well as minor raveling off of the bluff face where bare soil is exposed should be anticipated. Based on my observations of the scale of failures along the upper bluff and along bluffs with similar geologic conditions, it is my opinion that shallow slab failures at the property will involve soil in an area above the failure that will be on the order of at most five feet. A very old slab like failure appears to have taken lace on the upper half of the shoreline bluff slope sometime in the past. This slab had a depth of approximately 5 feet. Based on stump from a tree cut on this slope sometime in the past the failure took place at least 45`years ago and likely, based on the age of the stump as many as 60 Stratum Group File:2.6.09 6 March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street,Port Townsend, WA Geology Hazard Assessment years ago. The lower half of the slope is susceptible to erosion and slope failures. Over time this erosion will cause the further steepening of the upper sections of the bluff as the loose sand will be eroded away. For this shoreline bluff, the frequency of slope failures is highly dependent upon the erosion rate along the shoreline. Given the slope conditions observed below the subject property and the presence of trees on areas of the slope elsewhere along the shoreline, it appears that the recurrence interval between upper bluff failures that impact the top of the bluff is on the order of at least several decades or more,and involves only shallow soil failures. I have spoken with Jim Johannessen, a geologist with extensive coastal geology experience in the Puget Sound region. Jim Johannessen was the subcontract geologist for the consulting firm that assisted Port Townsend in the update of the city's SMP. Mr. Johannessen indicated that he was unaware of a quantified established shoreline erosion rate for this reach of shoreline. For purposes of this evaluation I selected an erosion rate of 3 inches per year for the bluff at this site. This is likely a conservatively high erosion rate and is based on the size of trees growing on portions of the bluff slope in the vicinity indicative that the recurrence interval of slope failures driven by toe erosion removing all soil on the slope is on the order of at least thirty to forty years. As noted above, the recurrence interval based on tree observations appears.to be longer. The top of the bluff will not systematically retreat 3 inches per year, but the bluff will progressively get steeper and mid slope failures will take place similar to the mid bluff failures that took place in the past and eventually another failure will take place at the top of the bluff. As noted above the size of top of bluff failures should be expected to be on the order of 5 feet. The recurrence interval of top of bluff failures that send material to the base of the bluff appears to be on the order of 60 years based on the age of tree stands along the upper shoreline slopes. This estimate is complicated by a several factors: 1) the bluff height along this reach of shoreline varies, 2) clearing of mature large trees from the top of the bluff may have altered the frequency of slope failures and increased erosion rates because of the loss of large woody material in the landslide debris, 3) drainage and slope management on the developed properties and undeveloped properties likely has varied, and 4) there is some variability in the geology along this section of the shoreline (the bluff to the south is capped by till and till underlies the base of the bluff even further south). Additional consideration could also include removal of landslide material along the base of the bluff in the past to allow public access along the beach, human activity on the sandy slope just above the beach may be limiting vegetation growth and future sea level rise may increase the erosion rate. Stratum Group File:2.6.09 7 March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street,Port Townsend, WA Geology Hazard Assessment RECOMMENDATIONS Setback from Top of Steep Shoreline Bluff The existing home is located 34 feet back from the top of the steep "shoreline slope. This is 4 feet more than the setback of 30 from the top of the bluff was determined by a combination of the geology of the site and an assumed erosion rate of 3 inches per year over a 100 year period plus an additional safety factor of 5 feet. The 30-foot setback is consistent with the specific requirements in the Port Townsend Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) and Shoreline Management Program(SMP). Port Townsend CAO 19.05.100 E sets buffers and setbacks for geologically hazardous areas. Port Townsend CAO 19.05.100 E 1 states Within the management zones established for marine bluffs and inland banks under subsections (D)(2)(fi(ii) and(iii) of this section, the buffer width shall be established by an approved geotechnical report prepared by an engineering geologist with a Washington specialty license in engineering geology as specified in Chapter 18.220 RCW. The report shall be based upon the best available science, existing and proposed uses, risks of slope failure, and coastal erosion rates, if applicable. I am a licensed engineering geologist in the State of Washington and this report is based on my use of the best available science,my interpretation of bluff and shoreline conditions and the expected impacts of the proposed use. The rationale and conclusions regarding conditions at the site and at the shoreline are described within the conclusion section of this report. Port Townsend Critical Areas Ordinance 19.05.100 D 2 f ii states All proposed development occurring within 50 feet of the crest of a marine bluff that exceeds a vertical height of 10 feet, or a distance equal to the height of the slope up to a distance of 100 feet from the crest (measured from the top), whichever is greater, shall require preparation of a geotechnical report. This area shall hereinafter be referred to as the "marine bluff management zone. " This report has been prepared to satisfy this requirement. Recommendations for the development of the site consistent with best management of the shoreline bluff slope are presented below. Port Townsend CAO 19.05.100 E 3 states For existing platted lots, a steep slope buffer less than that required for new subdivisions under subsection (E)(2) of this section may be permitted when necessary to allow development of a single-family residence; provided, that the geotechnical report concludes that doing so would not result in an increased risk to people or property or Stratum Group File:2.6.09 8 March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street, Port Townsend, WA Geology Hazard Assessment impacts to environmental processes. Additionally, proposals within the shoreline jurisdiction shall adhere to the SMP regulations applicable to the residential designation. Port Townsend CAO 19.05.100 E 2 states For new short plats, subdivisions, binding site plans, and PUDs, a minimum buffer of 50 feet shall be provided from the edge of all marine bluffs, and 25 feet from inland banks;provided, that a reduction in the required buffer width to a distance equal to the height of the slope may be permitted when the geotechnical report concludes that doing so would not result in an increased risk to people or property or impacts to environmental processes. Erosion rates measured over:the long-term (i.e., using at least a 75 year period)shall be evaluated in any geotechnical report recommending a buffer width less than the applicable minimum. Under no circumstance may the buffer width for a marine bluff be less than a distance equal to the sum of the bluff erosion rate over at least 75 years plus 20 feet. And Port Townsend SMP Chapter presents policies and development regulations for shoreline development. Specific development regulations for geologically hazardous areas are DR-6.8.1 and DR-6.8.2. DR-6.8.1 states Section 19.05.100E(3) of the PTMC allows for reduced buffers for existing platted lots when necessary to allow development of a single-family residence. In no case shall the reduced buffer width be less than a distance equal to the sum of the bluff erosion rate over at least 75 years plus 20 feet from the crest; ten feet from the sides and toe of a marine bluff. DR-6.8.2 states Pursuant to the critical areas ordinance, surface drainage shall be directed away from marine bluffs. When no other solution is feasible, surface drainage piping maybe located on the face of a steep slope when contained in a tight line (closed, non-leaking pipe) and in such a way that erosion will not be exacerbated and that physical access along the shoreline is not degraded. Furthermore, conditions may be applied to mitigate for aesthetic impacts of drainage systems as viewed from pubic areas. Under 19.05.100 E 2 the buffer width can either use 50 feet as a default buffer or can be reduced to no less than 38.75 feet. The 38.75-foot width is derived from an erosion rate of 3 inches per year over 75 years equaling 18.75 feet plus the additional 20 feet required in the code to equal a total minimum buffer width of 38.75 feet. This same buffer width would apply under DR-6.8.1 of the SMP. It is my opinion that the 38.75-foot setback buffer Will not result in an increased risk to people or property or impacts to environmental processes. The proposed addition to the home will be well back behind the 38.75-foot buffer. Another factor under the SMP is that the proposed addition is well behind the setback line average between the homes north and south of the subject property. In regards to the surface drainage requirements in DR-6.8.2, drainage should be directed Stratum Group File:2.6.09 March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street,Port Townsend, WA Geology Hazard Assessment away from the top of the bluff and directed into level dispersion/infiltration trenches or splash blocks towards the west side of the property. Due to the topography of the site this is readily accomplished. Other Site Development Recommendations The following recommendations are meant to meet the requirements of PTMC 19.05.060 and 19.05.100 D in regards to development of a single-family residence near steep slopes as described in this report. Impervious Surface Area: PMTC 19.05.06 DA.a. restricts the impervious area to no more than 20% for slopes greater than 30%. However, approximately half of the lot has slopes less than 30%. Regardless,the total parcel is approximately 47,200 square feet and therefore the amount of impervious surface is limited to 9,440 square feet if it assumed that only 20% impervious surface area. The proposed addition of 250 square feet plus the existing home of 1,839 square feet, existing shed of 180 square feet, carport of 500 square feet, and driveway/aggregate of 1,815 square feet equals an impervious surface area of 4,584 square feet. Storm water: Storm water and site drainage should be directed towards the west towards either splash blocks, dispersion areas or an approved storm water system. This is readily accomplished as the upland area of the property where the proposed addition will take place slopes to the west away from the top of the steep shoreline bluff. Soils are well drained on the site and should readily infiltrate stormwater. Clearing: The proposed addition will be located well outside any native plant buffer area on the site and are located immediately adjacent to the existing home such that clearing will be minimal and will located in areas previously cleared. Vegetation: Vegetation on the upland portion of the property around the home consists of a mix of native brush and landscape plants along with mature native trees. Some trimming and thinning of trees has taken place on the upland portion of the property for view purposes. The steep shoreline slope consists of native Douglas fir, madrone and other brush and grasses. Vegetation on the bluff slope should be left in tact to reduce the rate of slope failures and provide large woody debris in the event of a slope failure. At present there are no notable invasive species of note on the site. Planting of brush or placement of woody debris on the lower slopes to minimize damaging trespass on the sensitive lower slope is acceptable and may allow more erosion resistant larger brush and trees to become better established by prevent trail building and carving of the steep portion of the bluff. According to SMP DR 5.9.14 15% of the site should be retain or be planted with native Stratum Group File:2.6.09 10 March 30,2009 2020 Walnut Street,Port Townsend, WA Geology Hazard Assessment shoreline bluff slope is in native vegetation. Yard Waste and Debris: No debris or yard waste should be placed on the steep slopes of the property. Yard waste eventually builds up and can form a wet unstable mass that will slide down the slope damaging the slope and increasing the rate of slope failures. However, it would be acceptable to place woody brush on the lower sandy slope, if there is a desire to reduce damaging trespass on the sandy slope. Water Lines: No water lines should be buried on the steep shoreline slope and shutoff valves should be located at least 30 feet from the top of the steep slope. Stratum Group appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions regarding this geology hazard assessment or recommendations please contact our office at(360) 714-9409. - Sincerely yours, Stratum Group Dan McShane, L.E.G.,(M.Sc. Licensed Engineering Geologist Daniel I'VkOha Stratum Group File:2.6.09 11 / s a. x , od / r�U4 \ F } t ����/�/� SIT. , _ KS � 1 , _ , 1 _ yam• ,. �� \ ` �\\'�i\ t � � . \ \ ' • i TX . .... .... .. Lij K .......... 148 y , l vJ. 13� j � 6 , 2 m, tv 1 . C w ... , CO r-�F- A � r `...,-.. \. \=._.•....\,,a.., 7 �. �, .ire \ � \.. . f., ,"/ \w.v � 1 t � Q132 4 , ,` ,vim TI � 2 �a ; � ... \ ! •ice �i ��! \� \ � Fy. Of Ty �Ll 125 T ST L._ (VAC 8 ... s �Q : TL 8' 5 / EN $ rjC12 ��, iti 1 3 B Q 138 TX a JJ CO \\ \\ rA v� v C �� r 76 i Ulu O Q PORT TOE Z - O y Receipt Number: 09 0961 ; Al MMIX yA ,. a - = Receipt Date12M8/2009 � Cashier MV1fAY _ ; PayerlPayee�Name MC BRIDE KENNETH R: 3 �F M E$ OngmalFee v Amount Fee Permt#i Parcel Fee Description Amount Raid Balance ..,.ol, BLD09-221 985210102 Plan Review Fee $293.70 $293.70 $0.00 BLD09-221 985210102 PLAN REVIEW REFUND 50 -$50.00 -$50.00 $0.00 BLD09-221 985210102 Building Permit Fee $451.85 $451.85 $0.00 BLD09-221 985210102 State Building Code Council Fee $4.50 $4.50 $0.00 BLD09-221 985210102 Technology Fee for Building Permit $9.04 $9.04 $0.00 BLD09-221 985210102 Record Retention Fee for Building Per $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 Total: $719.09 �11 ipj F Previous PaymentH►story � 'W Receipt# Receipt DateFeexDescr�ptiorY Amount'Pa�d Permit# 09-0893 11/06/2009 PLAN REVIEW DEPOSIT 50 $50.00 BLD09-221 Payment Check Payment Method �9,zNumber� , A om un CHECK 5243 $719.09 Total: $719.09 genpmtrreceipts Page 1 of 1 OF?OA7 TOE ti v Receipt Number: 09-0893 Receipt Date: 11/06/2009 Cashier: SFOSTER Payer/Payee Name: MC BRIDE KENNETH R Original Fee Amount Fee Permit# Parcel Fee Description Amount Paid Balance BLD09-221 985210102 PLAN REVIEW DEPOSIT 50 $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 Total: $50.00 Previous Payment History Receipt# Receipt Date Fee Description Amount Paid Permit# Payment Check Payment Method Number" Amount CHECK 5215 $50.00 Total: $50.00 genpmtrreceipts Page 1 of 1 2006 Washington State Energy Code - Prescriptive TABLE 6-1 PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS"' FOR GROUP R OCCUPANCY CLIMATE ZONE 1 Glazirog Glazin U Factor 9 Wall 12 Wall- Wall Slabs Option Area = Door Ceiling Vaulted Above int ext Floors on %of Floor Vertical Overhead" U-Factor Ceiling Grade Below Below Grade Grade Grade 1. 10% 032 0.58 0.20 R-38 R-30 R15 R-15 R-10 R-30 R-10 [I.* 15% 035 0.58 0.20 R-38 R-30 R-21 R-21 R-10 R-30 R-10 fit. 25% 0.40 0.58 0.20 R-38/ R-30/ R-21 / R-15 R-10 R-30/ R-10 Group R-1 U=0.031 U=0.034 U=0.057 U=0.029 and R-2 Occupancies 'Only IV. Unlimited 0.35 0.58 0.20 R-38 R-30 R-21 R-21 R-10 R-30 R-10 Group R-3 and R-4 Occupancies O " � �'- Unlimited 0.35 0.58 0.20 R-38/ R-30/ R-21 / R-I5 R-10 R-30/ R-10 Group R-I U=0.031 U=0.034 U=0.057 U=0.029 and R-2 Occupancies Onh # Reference Case 0- Nominal R-values are for wood frame assemblies only or assemblies built in accordance with Section 601.1. I. Minimum requirements for each option listed- For example,if a proposed design has a glazing ratio to the conditioned floor area of 13%,it shall comply with all of the requirements of the 15%glazing option(or higher). Proposed designs which cannot meet the specific requirements of a listed option above may calculate compliance by Chapters 4 or 5 of this Code. 2. Requirement applies to all ceilings except single rafter or joist vaulted ceilings complying with note 3. 'Adv'denotes Advanced Framed Ceiling. 3- Requirement applicable only to single rafter or joist vaulted ceilings where both(a)the distance between the top of the ceiling and the underside of the roof sheathing is less than 12 inches and(b)there is a minimum I-inch vented airspace above the insulation.Other single rafter or joist vaulted ceilings shall comply with the"ceiling"requirements.This option is limited to 500 square feet of ceiling area for any one dwelling unit_ 4. Below grade walls shall be insulated either on the exterior to a minimum level of R-10,or on the interior to the same level as walls above grade. Exterior insulation installed on below grade walls shall be a water resistant material,manufactured for its intended use,and installed according to the manufacturers specifications. See Section 602.2. 5. Floors over crawl spaces or exposed to ambient air conditions_ 6. Required slab perimeter insulation shall be a water resistant material,manufactured for its intended use,and installed according to manufacturers specifications. See Section 602.4- 7. Int.denotes standard framing 16 inches on center with headers insulated with a minimum of R-10 insulation. 8. This wall insulation requirement denotes R-19 wall cavity insulation plus R-5 foam sheathing. 9. Doors,including all fire doors,shall be assigned default 1-1-factors from Table 10-6C. 10. Where a maximum glazing area is listed,the total glazing area(combined vertical plus overhead)as a percent of gross conditioned floor area shall be less than or equal to that value. Overhead glazing with U-factor of U=0.40 or less is not included in glazing area limitations. 4 I L Overhead glazing shall have U-factors determined in accordance with NFRC 100 or as specified in Section 502.1.5. 12. Log and solid timber walls with a minimum average thickness of 3-5"are exempt from this insulation requirement. Effective July 1, 2007 2006 Edition -[. t E r ; —71 J 7 12' O T!4 '3-,C{..1 t r}�x #} --j r r ## 1 - — Z NOOK .�._. � _____._ — 3 � ;:t.l'"T�( � r-�rt �2'�f��,,.# � '��,��.,., ' --E —`� J ` -.r+-It ,t a } t r k 1 �{ mot_ ` 1 j t r VFW �ASEM ,E ( t �� � i~ Y �1>r�i a►-; ,+= f A�t� t ' — ':� �Lo 1 ry ` r� t J r r � .. -- - - --1...�.. t.y,.....r-,+- �r `.�} � �j�fj t� ��.�.� '�' � ,.�r f � � �� � `mac', H fy/.'�.�'y w G..1 l"i'~ F e' ...e. ( ! i \i1 i "'.mot'- .+.......t...w•-..+.u. .+w� 3 .__ \ f �....� 4,.J R t '� � t •-` t � � ._ Cr��C�'t t~�`�l� -.- � t� �L rP _��j� ' j' `7 i V 4J C4 .._ 3n �`R ij i _i r s DR 4 t tl � 'T t E � L } t �.[ f� y ma ...�- V ..i�.� " r S T . i \.C� f Y'l� `�"T) t `-r"` (/,•� (,�1y. ` .•i+.z'+k'o.�'" F++����{��''^'��'� �_� tt_ r. y [.�.+J� ,,y...M(�■ t ({ �t A �� 1t 2 � �� �}� '�� �J`+"i�Fr Mom•/-S•tY•(�; r+w ' � �J �� � t'�S ...-...`� - �«� 'r.Tf.. ia-tr..�•-- •w��^' �� `� Tu'' 1 ���Y .�l '.• 't R C `k' ^ ��,rti�� 4/7 #� v` — +�io...+_. 1 f ` t t ,�/✓4 t C 411 r f Z S -- ,-- , x Y j'� J� 4>� �* �^ �^y� } i " `' S n�i' C t D . +t i ,� t J� r d { t'.", �l ('� ,�,F > �+^ "�.f t 7" �,'{r� .,, {�' * may t - - A�^� `" 7ti tF J ( � t--1 f•^� # t ` ) f- ^- y t t I < � ~L`� ,# ,�,. r - �l..iL�/G. �'' - - —.�.� �_�.a -u s- `� �"T `�' G_ _Y � `J i 11-j � F -'Sfa r`.� �$�� � ;.E� , � Y 4 Y _ r r 1 a...�� �.�.1 I1#�;,.,..Lr! ���t\ � j 1 J'+�,�" i•� It�' '„/``� *"l� � t� � ��'1 � � ��y,# #�^ � t ; i t `^,,,f _J`1�.ti {� "� *� T f r f ,i 't-'� 1 -...,_+..... ».. �...+ ✓ --•.a. I' .�..-f -�'/''- t S 'r `!, `t' - ..+. L , r 1 k�r ✓ J ^- T^ FT(.f Vl- STUDY c�"•t Y r✓ ! T r �-� V S r "�3i r 'a f W J hw ; ri # �� _ fjL-� 3 t� _ � � + .. BEY_ < _ _� jCONN DECK � f �`�•'� �,t - � ---,r� �} _ `t"'`'� {` � � t � ,.�,,, flr�P.t'F-1 �t�.�� ��.�..�.� � � � � KITC# � LJ � {'�-~ m � f_. k � T�"'+� � P'r-�s• �...'K ,t.r ._..-.+--->�,--r. -�.. �''�-' �.y.J,�r`�+!-,` { �• � � V V� � � � � �J r/� 1� !v �, w r� c M - ;1+ Y�..,�, � ht.,.. _.w.� � � `t�.�, y 7,t CIF ' k - t ' �� )~ � x t c �� 1 - r, ` f �y 1f � � twr '••__. �.- -`- `� # - f t i ..5 ---� _ _ (t.. �O� �t.h r �"x t h t ��.-.+ ..-......�.....,...W-..�. ....._.-....F� � o � �` ---•`-tee k--��,+ �� � J t - _ f -fJ�Y� _ _ .^'�..tS.-�... ..r ,k +c ------`�--•�.u�..•s`.h�s� ... .-.�.�....-..-• ti...�.._..... 'it i f� < -irf 14 ti kA �N- ( � �� � �f i�• � "h�``_`.,�.. � .. � � r F .�-�" f � / f ri —'�;C7 t',�S�:D �1�#71 T 101`/ >` r I (�# ��`► � DA Y �• / �-c 0 i � 1'�l'.�"" ^_.X^ ._.-« � ..-.+..-,r._._,,._ . ��- .^�-- -.-.c.-...-�+..-+,-"----- �{-...�-_--...,. __-� �r .. ,� 4 �fh � r._�_,_,_...� .� . - �,.__.._.._ -_ _ .. _ ._ . .. - --- •--r-,l.-.,�.a�a.- - a�..-.t_ w..-.-..-,+.1s_�s,ta ll !' � � - J 41 r' .,�`C" - I Y _ f� � BASEMENT � o � N 1 /oil _ ni y_ STORAGE \N{\LLc-::) LIFE 3t�1 (/��•��r� �y -- _ v '� y 15A v 1 N�c1 L. 1 N��` �J L t-I Ct-1 C �.' _, - -r Tf # L`}` 3 C W L �l i `r�,i rNiWfi '' 'PL`� C� �� ` V�1f -r�,1�t � ` " �1C * r r } r S r e) 1 r �T--- s . _ t r- ——._ ----- --1 -- M114 t rr b - 'a ' 7 _f w { 5L\410 '�... A�,l L.t Vi� , `�I e f ^`C L' " �t�l�i.1 sIt- ft k V it # 1 � � � � 4iG., W�LL �.G` >, �f r y�y /_st f /�`J�j -t,.4 x ,.e j S '+ v f Lam` ..K 1`�L� `S �f.r f'S tr K. i`.'�„� i ` `°" k r f 4 a r t 2� �ry�ty� }_ r+ -1, ..., t # -et'1F�T""t-= x W l� k✓�.- i\ '1` '�r`T 4�.!'��,,� - - - vw..._... �...__ ...-.1,t..,.-✓.�.� e- �^-'--- .. r r Y # x y rs v r , ( .. i} T J �Vc�u r 1t (( 0� fr �L+.�tikt t L _ ���� � � - �� _ _ f �� � ``'�� � NOTICE:Plans are approved excepting Y } C x 4r k.r 1.�sr +:+' `�`.� t'� T— f ' \{i" y �,r ST -'T rr"} # f r t a any errors or omissions. All work must i CITY pass Inspection in conformance with r „ �, `Y TOWPiS all applicable codes and regulations. 3t 4 t WOO 1� �-rw P L i �' ,L . t,, ' ` -`' C, �,1 ', tax �'"1�3 o�PORT Eh'o pp ' 5` " I PL'�' It�IN RCN ..". : REMEWED FOR CODE } Y i '°",-=u.-�i.. .-s., y-� .q.. F+ rn+- ...c z-.,._ a ,.,. .r-• s�....�, r +v w ,+ ..r r a. 5.-N ..,�d. R ,a. - `tC 'III V M UAN i�IE 1 D 3 s1 ES srrr S t F Hq, r t^ 3 au tt > >< a1 n ( , /�11 - f - t -7_1�I v ---- 0-� { C�'��....- I 1 1 ��, ;••: d �F -...f...�"r 8 ,�h ....- X ti -t,..-- ._... Z.-J � ���--77 ,r, i " -'" .._...-. �� Y ��_ f t f I. { 3I r n ,' t r.. r ; r r e 4 � # (2) - ' 1 � NOOKOff i At tA- I i Y F t t p . �C4'}'S.t...L... �)• ..C-. 1 S f I f> �.. .. !-..1./. �(..!'`•{ S {'� �/� V p y 1 • 1 ` i if YYrr ` [`+ �B A 1 i� t ' ) r Y F � ` ` ^; .-- r.-. •----.....+r..-� „y,.;y,.w �,� �L- "� 'c."_ �v.+' tk� �BEDRMt s � t j IL � y ii�� Y J � � ,,,,f-.......-�•r:-a. �� ,p 1,4 wC,�l 1 i k " y 1t tI ,}may �+ �.-y. { t o 4 3 !�'�1 +-w »-.- '-'`'tr+ �..I. � � +. �Q� � � � �` �I r x. �'- 'C.�-� �•�, ��_'�w.l'� �'�y� ¢ } �EEr--�---'-u�••..---}'�1� r �-- ,-. ... -�-�•--�, �} t.,�.� t j�,a t h' �G.� � 1 � r 1 � ( yy 1 ! f 41 t K.+ I fJlf µ } i e. ,, �! t 4�I t' �f 9 L�. ` Y I 4 { 'y` C P a}-.4, ( ' r ,s \ f 2 1 (�`• I E r-.w.....-. ,....._.. _ _ R"`�• I f 1 ..+.. ri ,� t K t '{E a-•e y�, `( '- 5."' 1 _ - �, f" - .�-..--.�,�--�-,n,L ....-i.- - 2 "'' '.,... y3�`T `,}"t��T h i:. \•i.��' f^ ` '7`3. ✓ M 31:.y+"' 1 •F,..{! ,c .r, a t _ R•. -Q..,- �`.+' '1 ( j r- i S 7T C .Yd .N.,W-- '. '`' ..^'t,-.+....,.,-r..r4.. ^• --- wi..... ._ t ,✓ L-/ ICY t 6 Alt � -.y.c.1..C,�A.�.L..-,_ Y A ._ +.s} ....,... � . � , h! � 4-2 '-y1 f I x j V-i tJ J`4!� w� +� �-«- � j •«-r.r.� .,-.,. t 0 �7 'Y }.y 1 t � t « 4 1 _ 1 SIT- 4 J. s > 1 r } r-�r '- x"`� t--� � '.,, r f i (t� ( ( if I t. t p A -,.T � � � f � } y .""-`'. t ,k �----� �+ _-..._..,..__..._,..1. � a , tf �' E '3 � [` --•�---.».-.... � ,f � �t _.._- .._. i E b�r'�f t x t- --- _ r •- C J� r� t� xca Q r f i } _ S I t L ��3+ .... x sa . f1. '3' 1 Y rr� f er "•. ►j -Yti �/ '[ r� Oe4.� '' 7 L 2 ► r ! f �� i m Yr fr i d \-1� { tj' t L 1 V `4 1 ! 1 F+ r 1 " r ¢ ' �Y 'V r � —++.� t '�ZP " r,.c. X �T _ I _4X E. 0�41- ��5 � � r "' =• � ; � � W - � ��- _� A () 0^t P ► " ' r r 7 t �` r t t��d.f =e+ i �1 I vC�J l V } f'' I it t _.. i # �' �1(Ro r •- � y � �i i 2 4 �'����1�1 �t� r'"' -y r � I ...3 ....__._.___ `� - ----------•---� �� � �T- , ` --^-. •- _ i .� � s OC [11 - 1 �� F f - }�`� 3 t r (12�'2� x&.st�7-�t a� y� Ji J _ � -~ 4-r" s "�T V Y ir' +r -f 2 F » :'`'i-`� ( .. -� 7 t•�," ,.. to .. L k� ^�y-J�� ~V t...i '! �1*� 1 � 6 � F.-•- - +r4�' ! I t � `' � r 1 �' �-TY 1 +'r ' } +� 9 } 4 _ % IO 1 ti vt sx ! f n 1 I s `t' 1�rG a h'Fcc tTs STUDY . 1 �� � �} OG fvl/,rf / ! :�"- .�! v �.+....Ji'tt�1 1 i �.1 L3„ / #•-i-^---'--+-' - L�.....''� �t,� ,i ,r•.�.f, ,R �_. ,• ¢ { I �`tcd� 'f l r�� ��� j~v If' t! } 9i1 " C k - C ` cis r i { Cl�T. r<—uJ 1 !G� r_ _ y I `' _9 CONN I i / 2 '` .y ,� ,� - -tim-" t� �^ i ,�++'ry� _. .-T- ' I } �-hY A,' �N1 j�" ��5{[{ � � -DoaP w�}y I i - � - �j �`I"� �-- --.{s� ^w. a� K� — � _ ._ _ �� DECK d { y 4. 4 Iri.� - [ I!_ w, t-.s.. j _ � �. (=1� _IL�I-�9� _ _ �a 4 i Y El } A r i r__ --I `< . 1� _,, x IT j I j�os ro 2�ra,�J1+� 1 g r r �t C_1,4 - 1-Jt.t_ 1-r-'jz i�FIN�"E'� ` ' �. I S •L---r----"-�`r•• .}---4 •' �.,^''�t. \+-�^" r.. f`^- .�--.. r -r^' Yam+.*. ,,, i .. r�, �� I \ �" _--� �1J j R502.2.1 -Positive Attachment E °F�� � nJ�" "'r Decks shall be positively anchored to _- I IS , } �Q ` tl t! tzd Yx } y the primary structure.The attachment �, � shall not be accomplished by the use of '� toe nails or nails sub ect to withdrawal. 1�I�� O a.{ �I 4 r �. � S 't T�� ��� � kr &� a1 .,._...ww ......... -,....+.... ....�..-....ar-..w-... .` �,...... .....� _ i /. t CAI•!D .I I `` x F/.t. -y it I - 2 .r+' F2312.1 Guards required. ` � � - `" ----,- +-- --� Y-- -- - '"•' Porches, balconies or raised floor surfaces 4 — ° s _ _=_ ),,y: L> 2Z4 t` r" located more than 30"above the floor or grade Q � / _. f -M_ .Y x r 1 k a h shall have guards not less than 36"in height. Provide intermediate rails which do not allow 1 i- ^- 1 passage of a 4"sphere,(4-3/8"permitted on open v -X side of stair only). I Y? r f -let ,rt 3 k 5 � 1 I J � t� . 1 } t , � �� 1 r E _ (00 GCM kilt ` �l� �7,• 7 5 r ,art .._ � ...-~ ""' •..r � 11 t t f '� -r=-" ��'r-��.r� � f' ,, � , � ✓ ��f��1� � �► �"(1 -._._ �` � t�,f'�� t 12�� 7 fZ 4 R D � 1 c �js � ����� � I �r "\1 �r t � `'--�,-. �� '-�."- 1 ,. _�,- _.-V.. I ,.-..- r,t --'._ --- - -_ - .._ _... .._ -.,._.. -..-r_..,--tea..,-..� _`-_.._ -..,-..._...: ., ...._ _..,_.. _.� �,,t l^{r'7ntt7 �C, iY i /S / K -- ... ._._. � 1 ----- ---,•--- err-^-- -_— �'"" '-T'"�'-'-T`��-,li _.--t-•" � TM J j �'K-�.�,�r l"` 1` t y` r 3�l193r7oi. nlcls'r �� /� ! � M �� �j_ _ j .. .- -,. / � � , Sec.602.10.6-2006 IRC, Alternate Braced W �` r Panels One Story Building. � I i 1 HOL00.4)t4 2'8"min.width, 10'max.Height.Sheathed on one _ "" f/ l r r �. - f t .' , ,may •4 taws q - - i.j P�\� VPtXface with 3/8"min.wood structural panel,nailed "r I 4'` G``t �I with 8d common nails,6"OC all edges and 12"in 1 C ( ��,tp,l(, the field.Provide two tie-down devices capable of f L✓y-s-� T � , TA t`� z ! > providing uplift capacity of 1800 lbs. f _ BASEMENT \� \ IRQ 1�1EZ tLFLL�i Y I T 4 B A� S E M E I V T } T - - -- - � - _ t�t���.s P.Cr!av„C n � ��� jWlA1N FLOOR N V ' w ( '--a J l STORAGE a \ { C E R-1 N G Y`l k U e) f>V�� r H OT E:J 1 f 't j -•- 'f � � r• -i. ! i 3•r ) �Y Y �Ti 'f�15..+ - - -. yy r } L U L I N (J L N�N� ' ��=' —7 1 0C�fv� c� � �T'S�I L V�1S 0 D ( E L. \,/ �, FL - f L 1 - _...w.... 5--, .+.�.._- -.,-..-.._� .� ..i. -,.-._ I .Y----.-,. IN t S .-- '��-.h.J ( �-i l 4 , Y Y +�-Y� w.w..�....• Y y.,. �..4}... ..,.... ti._.._ k. w-....._...... ...r,........ -,,�+. ....#� ... ..._..._.�y>-1w ...�.-.w. Ll.. -`.,5 S t) .``� {. i �� 1 �� `W rr+e U r. �csli+ i x Lam.i� �✓ L�.. S * ( N f i I �CD'`.{ r 2 f > � ax - E >4 : t; t'�►' f� P�`i' ? ' fff��. l ..�. "". ' �``�Ir y ,f 9a��...t.n.. T ,_..,. .,.,-.C...,....-�..,....-.-...,��.-.�....w-.«..a--- - ..._,...._ ..,.,..,x,._,-•w w-..�-. .._.. �..�...... -�.•, .,..,«.�..�.w j..._.k.... a �-.�,.,.. ... ,.. ..s�-a,... ... ,..., .., ti.s._...,- ..}}..... 4 t. ....,. 1 ~1 1 .c "re- -S,.+I' t / -..ti3y rS "` l 1�. 1 I{�L:.•% 1 `t V 1 T( 1 '�y� �} y ,'�"'�- 1. t S i F r iC`` 11 - r t E t A t .� ,. �. f 3 ,_.........-._. ... nr_s .-.r w.i-. .--ay. ...y � ...,w• ...,y.. ..++.t--•- o � a. ..v s, ,.�.r +�r. .� .,..F� .y,i.,. u. u. �v .,. 1. 1e � .� i h ,.. . �._ z. J( } 1� I a FT ,w,s„>_,e..,.., t.-........-.,->.x�h, a.,:�.�� f, c,'"e�,/'�.7��A 1A'_!✓6J✓,S' J < JT-IELI- IFE f k a f ¢ 5bEb - ! �tsttiK cow W x s M(r , s"+�? Ill v 45 - - , s= a A,(/A1fir` f 41 t.vicf�'Fad c.✓ �'� ` _.�'fr -- � � ����� J'�f f'af 1„�'e� �f�0� T� �-:-,?C,rE+�"°� l_��-�'f�" •�' nr 1, ___�.��.__._--- :.__. ...,.__ -___::,:x.�.�_:�,_.�_:�._.�.—.�.�.�.,.�..�,� f: �. � ,�`.�__�� NAB •�".�".a. " GEAR . " C' ' � _.__.__ � \ W'IL r"��t� .� t� `rn r?•r. !.�,,nlC'AP A��i"x:; _ � �:� + � �'G --- c� 24 .. _ TIL _ r= ,f i''S FILM -------------- • Y .