Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09171
CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND PERMIT ACTIVITY LOG PERMIT # L// 9 i f DATE RECEIVED w-Q C5 Z SCOPE OF WORK: DATE ACTION INITIALS ENTERED INTO CHET 7S - CHECKED FOR COMPLETENESS I - - D ( v, Arcln - c. emquwrA s Zoning: Kul Setbacks OK? tie, Lot Size: V L Building Size: Lot Coverage: FAR OK? Height OK? Parking OK? Critical Area? L/ _ �S Demo? Historic Rev? �[p Notice to Title? Lots of Record? kz, City of Port Townsend Development Services Department iXIScr�dtuen Notice PERMIT NUMBER UL�c I OWNER JOB LOCATION Inspection of this structure has found the following Deus-. You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwise. When corrections have been made, call for inspection. Date Inspector DSD Main Office (360) 379-5095 INSPECTION REQUEST (360) 385-2294 THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SITE City of Port Townsend Development Services Department otice PERMIT NUMBER ►J og ( 7/ OWNER JOB LOCATION 2-) /D �omxS � z 7 Inspection of this structure has found the following: 0 You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwise. When corrections have been made, call for inspection. / /,�(►� Date Z �� b Inspector DSD Main Office (360) 379-5095 INSPECTION REQUEST (360) 385-2294 THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SITE ,o�QORT1,C, CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS RECORD �z CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND o WAS Development Services Department 9 - - 250 Madison Street, Suite 3, Port Townsend, WA 98368 POST THIS CARD IN A SAFE,CONSPICUOUS LOCATION.PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE UNTIL ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS ARE MADE AND SIGNED OFF BY THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY AND THE BUILDING IS APPROVED FOR OCCUPANCY.STAMPED APPROVED PLANS MUST BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOBSITE. PARCEL NO. 001033003 PERMIT NO. BLD09-171 ISSUED DATE 09/02/2009 EXPIRATION DATE 03/01/2010 ADDRESS 2710 THOMAS ST CONSTRUCTION TYPE OCCUPANT LOAD OWNER MOLOTSKY DANIEL R PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADD 2 BEDROOMS CONTRACTOR OWNER BUILDER LENDER INSPECTION INSP DATE COMMENT INSPECTION INSP DATE COMMENT TESC FINAL BUILDING SETBACKS SURVEY PIN C;� � P�tSly� c�lSpe✓TtJn -f XC^L FOOTING 1Ci� 4 01DA10 vJ1� 1+ns"' cci t e-A per desk' � Z-2-1/tD FOUNDATION WALL FOUNDATION DRAIN g>,*QE %p 10-1-IAI tI46&&Vd1l l0 bEOP AMh N,&;)(T-W FLOOR FRAMING 1 // n n ,;�-� n _ FRAMING (� 05f5 /� l'Q Q-- �D� C�G�IIG)IWf l'g-y'&u, lnA/ PLUMBING 12(6 C9 K a� 12.2<(-'l MECHANICAL PLUMBING WTR PIPIN SHEAR WALL fix% 2- 1 p INSULATION ` I( ( ,j Q G W B ae- ROOF NAILING MISCELLANEOUS TO REQUEST AN INSPECTION CALL(360) 385-2294. INSPECTION REQUESTS MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO 3:00 PM FOR NEXT DAY INSPECTION. e City of Port Townsend Development Services Department NS9ff717-/0/j - Qom-Notice PERMIT NUMBER o ( —" 1-71 OWNER .. � JOB LOCATION Inspection of this structure has found the following,�r— • r 110 You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwise. When corrections have been made, call for inspection. Date Z Q Inspector 1 LV DSD Main Office (360) 379-5095 INSPECTION REQUEST (360) 385-2294 THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SITE o�P°RT CITE' OF PORT TOWNSEND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT INSPECTION REPORT WA CALL THE INSPECTION LINE AT 360-385-2294 BY 3:00pm THE DAY BEFORE YOU WANT THE I PQECTION. FOR MONDAY INSPECTION,CALL BY 3C:}OOPM FR/IDAY. DATE OF INSPECTION: Cf / PERMIT NUMBER: — '7/ SITE ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON: PHONE: TYPE OF INSPECTION:)© t�2b9 vet 106 C�Q 2 c�looJ CV 70- 161 �JQb4lKJ YZS't5 Ik t , g Cr NO uAlF2f- To laq tx) u6)97 /o �e)OZ-4A/!)S ❑ APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH ❑ NOT APPROVED CORRECTIONS Ok to proceed. Corrections will be Call for re-inspection before checked at next inspection proc eding. Inspector Date /t Acknowledgement Date Approved plans and permit card must be on-site and available at time of inspection. A re-inspection fee may be assessed if work is not ready for inspection. QORT l0 CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT INSPECTION REPORT �W^ CALL THE INSPECTION LINE AT 360-385-2294 BY 3:00pm THE DAY BEFORE YOU WANT THE INSPECTION. FOR MONDAY INSPECTION,CALL BYC3:OOPM FRIDAY. DATE OF INSPECTION: 101,mgloPERMIT NUMBER: /SL—h© I j SITE ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON: PHONE: TYPE,40F IN PEC .ION: ��� v�� qdool,�7w,&�u/fz� IL & /S ❑ APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH ❑ NOT APPROVED . CORRECTIONS Ok to proceed. Corrections will be Call for re-inspection before checked at next inspection proceeding. Inspector ►C�< 72WYLO/2— Date C l o q k Acknowledgement Date Approved plans and permit card mast be on-site and available at time of inspection. A re-inspection fee may be assessed if work is not ready for inspection. PORT TOE City of Port Townsend Development Services Department 250 Madison Street, Suite 3,Port Townsend,WA 98368 v Z. (360)379-5095 FAX(360)344-4619 Re: Critical Areas Permit ) File No. LUP 09-052 Application of- ) FINDINGS, DANIEL MOLOTSKY ) CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION SUMMARY OF APPLICATION AND DECISION Date: August 25, 2009 Application: Daniel Molotsky has submitted a building permit application (BLD09-171) and a Street Development Permit application (SDP 09-009) to construct a 352 square- foot addition to a single-family residence, replace an existing patio, disconnect a failed septic system and connect to city sewer. The request involves work within close proximity to a Category III wetland and a critical drainage corridor, thus, a critical areas pen-nit is required. A wetland delineation has been prepared by Michael B. Dawson documenting a Category III wetland requiring a 60-foot buffer (Revised August 2009). According to the wetland report the proposed addition will encroach into the wetland buffer. A mitigation plan has been proposed. Staff Contact: Judy Surber, Senior Planner Development Services Department 250 Madison Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-5084 jsurber@cityofpt.us Decision: The application is CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. After respectful consideration of the above referenced application, the Port Townsend Director of Development Services hereby adopts the following Findings, Conclusions and Decision. Findinp,s of Fact Project Description. 1. On July 1, 2009, the property owner, Daniel Molotsky, submitted application for a Critical Area Permit to construct a 352 square-foot addition to a single-family residence, replace a 153 square foot patio with a 177 square-foot patio for a net increase of 24-feet, disconnect the failed septic system and connect to city sewer(Figure A, Vicinity Map and Figure 7 of Exhibit B, Site Plan). The proposed improvements are to be conducted _f v ,� '��\ T ���J S qJ � -� � � � Director's Decision Critical Area Permit LUP09-033 Page 2 on an eight-acre parcel partially encumbered by wetlands and a critical drainage corridor. Mr. Molotsky has also submitted application for a building permit (BLD09-171) and street development permit (SDP09-007). 2. The subject property is located at 2710 Thomas Street, Tax Parcel No. 44, Township 30, Range 1 West in the City of Port Townsend (Assessor Parcel Number 001033003). The site is bordered by developed Hastings Avenue on the north, Thomas Street on the west and 25"' Street to the south (Exhibit A. Vicinity Map). 3. The Molotsky property is relatively flat with slopes less than 15-percent grade. Higher ground to the east and southwest slopes gradually to the center of the property and to the southeast. A small plateau at the crest of Hastings Avenue contains a number of poorly drained areas. Drainage ditches, circa 1970s or earlier have been constructed to help drain this area to the southeast, northeast and west. Fill from past road construction may have also impounded waters in some areas, such as upslope of Hastings Avenue. The residence is located at the western property boundary. A barn is located to the south. Pasture dominates the site with shrubs colonizing the fence lines at the property margins. In the 1980s, previous to ownership by the Molotskys, the site was in operation as a dairy farm. 4. Previous wetland study on the property including a level 1 review in June 1998 by Dixie Llewellin, of Olympic Wetland Resources and a delineation in November 1998 by Matt Bennett of the Coot Company, identified wetlands and a critical drainage corridor on-site (Exhibit B. Wetland Boundary Map). During the preapplication, city staff noted that the proposed addition may encroach into the buffer of the northwesterly wetland, Wetland A. 5. Consistent with the requirements of Section 19.05.030 PTMC, a critical area permit is required. Each request for Critical Areas permit is considered a Type II application, Administrative with notice, under Port Townsend Municipal Code (PTMC, Chapter 20.01). 6. Special Study: Michael B. Dawson, wetland biologist, prepared a wetland report (Revised August 26, 2009). The report includes a delineation of the westerly edge of Wetland A, a current wetland rating, assessment of impacts to the wetland/wetland buffer, buffer-averaging, and an enhancement/mitigation plan in accordance with Section 19.05.110 of the Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO). Wetland A was found to be approximately .87 acres in size and was categorizes as a Category III wetland with a habitat function score of 10. 7. Mr. Molotsky's parcel is over 8 acres in size. Residential development at this density within a wetland and/or it buffer is considered a moderate intensity land use requiring a 60-foot buffer from a Category III wetland (Section 19.05.110 Port Townsend Municipal Code (PTMC). Director's Decision Critical Area Permit LUP09-033 Page 3 S. The proposed addition is small, 352 square feet. Measures recommended by the wetland consultant would reduce construction related risk to the wetland to acceptable levels. Post-construction risk is negligible. Taking these facts into consideration, the Director hereby waives the requirement to post a bond for the revegetation. 9. NOA & Comment Letters: Notice of application was issued on July 21, 2009 pursuant to Chapter 20.01 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code. No comments were received. 10. Applicable Critical Areas Policies and Standards: The Performance Standards for Development and other applicable standards from the Critical Areas Ordinance are listed below in bold text. The plain text that follows is the explanation of how the proposed project is consistent with those standards. Section 19.05.060 Performance Standards for Development: (These standards are general development practices to minimize problems related to water quality, stormwater and erosion control, and the placement and construction of development in the city's critical areas). Al. Avoiding Impacts to Critical Areas. The applicant proposes to abandon the failed septic system and connect to city sewer. The proposed sewer line connecting the home to the city's line in 251" Street was routed to avoid impacts to the critical drainage corridor. The 60-foot buffer currently extends to the middle of the existing residence and continues southeast through yard and pasture. The patio is proposed outside of the wetland buffer. However, construction of the 352 square foot (16 x 22) addition and associated infiltration trench will impact the buffer of Wetland A. Construction alternatives have been considered for project, including the building of a second residence on the property instead of adding an addition; adding a larger addition; adding an addition onto another part of the house; not taking any action. The desired alternative— adding a 352 square- foot addition to the east end of the house - combines a modest-sized addition with the most practical part of the existing structure to modify due to roof lines, interior structure and proximity of the house to Thomas Street. D1. Minimum Lot Area 9,900 square feet—Mr. Molotsky's parcel is over 8 acres in size. and thus, exceeds the minimum lot area requirement. D2. Construction-Preferred Practices —The trench for the sewer line will be routed to exit the south side of the addition and avoid the buffer throughout its route south to 25"' Street. Silt fencing will be used during construction. D4. Site Coverage—Impervious Surface Limits for Lots—The proposed addition and patio would add approximately 375 square feet of impervious surface bringing the total to approximately 5,475 square feet or less than 2% of the total property area where the standard allows a maximum of 30%. Director's Decision Critical Area Permit LUP09-033 Page 4 D5. Stormwater and Erosion Control. A drainage plan is provided in the wetland report (Exhibit B). The plan has been approved by the city's stormwater engineer. The stormwater management plan complies with the city engineering design standards manual and the 2005 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMM-WW (2005)). As conditioned, the proposal will incorporate best management practices to control surface runoff during construction. D6. Alterations and Disturbance—The proposed 352 square feet addition and associated infiltration trench impacts the wetland buffer. A site mitigation plan has been included the wetland report, detailing measures to restore and enhance vegetation on site. Section 19.05.110 D. Performance Standards for Development D1, D3. Activities within Wetlands/Wetland Buffers - D1. Activities and uses shall be prohibited in wetlands and wetland buffers, except as provided for in subsection D3. D3 - Where nonwater-dependent activities are proposed, it is presumed that an alternative development location exists; activities and uses shall be prohibited unless the applicant can demonstrate that: i. The basic project purpose cannot reasonably be accomplished on another site or sites in the general region while still successfully avoiding or resulting in less adverse impact on a wetland; and ii. All on-site alternative designs that would avoid or result in less adverse impact on a wetland or its buffer, such as a reduction in the size, scope, configuration or density of the project, are not feasible. Full compensation for the loss of acreage and functions of wetland and buffers shall be provided under the terms established under subsection F of this section The Molotsky's are raising a family and wish to add a 352 square foot addition (two bedrooms) to their 1,064 square foot home. As the 60-foot buffer currently extends to the middle of the existing residence and continues southeast through yard and pasture, opportunities to add to the home are limited (See Al, above). As described in the wetland report by Dawson (Exhibit B), compensation for the loss of 1,372 square feet (352 addition + 1020 setback) and functions of the wetland buffer are provided pursuant to subsection F. Section 19.05.110 E. Buffers and Setbacks. For residential development at less than 1 dwelling unit per acre, the standard buffer for a Category III wetland is 60-feet. A 15-foot building setback from the edge of the buffer is also required. The applicant has requested a reduced buffer width and a reduced setback Director's Decision Critical Area Permit LUP09-033 Page 5 and has proposed buffer enhancement to mitigate the impacts. The director may reduce the standard buffer width on a case-by-case basis Section E(6)) Reduced Buffer Widths a. The director may reduce the standard buffer width on a case-by-case basis where it can be shown that: i. No direct, indirect, short-term, or long-term adverse impacts to regulated wetlands will result from the proposed development activity; or ii. The site is extensively vegetated and has less than 15 percent slopes; or iii. The project contains provisions to enhance buffers using native vegetation which will provide additional protection for the wetland's functions and values. In any case, buffers shall not be reduced to a width of fewer than 25 feet, unless this requirement would deny all reasonable use of the affected property as determined by the director pursuant to PTMC 19.05.050(D). The northeast corner of the addition will protrude farthest into the wetland buffer, reducing the buffer in this location to a minimum of 25 feet at one point near wetland flag 3 and increasing to 60 feet to the north and southeast of the existing house. Pursuant to section 19.05.110(E)(6) the director waives compliance with the standard buffer width and setback for the following reasons: 1) The Molotsky property is relatively flat with slopes less than 15percent grade. 2) A wetland report (Exhibits B and C) has been prepared by a qualified wetland, assess the impacts to the wetland and wetland buffer including impacts to water quality, hydrology and habitat. According to the report, disconnecting the septic system that is a source of water pollution in Wetland A will be a primary reduction in impact. Wetland A has low habitat value based on its low species diversity, degraded buffers and disrupted corridors. The addition will not add a large amount of impervious surface but will add it close to Wetland A. 3) Compensation in the form of buffer enhancement using native vegetation is proposed and detailed in the report. The goal of the enhancement plan is to establish conditions that will allow a native plant community of shrubs and trees to dominate the enhancement area. The long term goal is to ensure no net loss of wetland functions onsite. A minimum 25-foot buffer will be retained. According to the Department of Ecology's Guidance on Wetland Mitigation in Washington State (April 2004 Ecology Publication 04-06-013a) "Generally, improving the vegetation on buffers without an appropriate native community will be more effective than widening the buffer." Director's Decision Critical Area Permit LUP09-033 Page 6 4) Although the site plan shows a reduced setback of 5-feet at the northeast corner, the owner has agreed to build no doors or exits (except required emergency window exits) on the north or east sides of the addition. 15-foot setbacks will be maintained at the west and south sides of the addition. E8. Except as otherwise specified, buffer zones shall be retained in their natural condition. Where buffer disturbance has occurred during construction or in violation of this chapter, revegetation with native vegetation will be required unless the director approves substitute vegetation with the same or better mitigation characteristics. The approved enhancement plan proposes to replant an area of 1,400 square feet with native species (Exhibit B). F. Mitigation and Compensation. Mitigation/Compensation measures presented in the Enhancement Plan (Exhibit B) are consistent with this subsection. Specifically, within the 1,400 square foot enhancement area, native plant species will be planted, noxious weeds controlled, mowing shall cease. The project has been conditioned to include best management practices during construction. The proposed stormwater plan provides for pretreatment of stormwater prior to entering the wetland. A qualified wetlands professional was consulted early in site planning (Michael Dawson). With the Conditions set forth herein, the proposed project and associated mitigation plan (Exhibit B) meet the Performance Standards for Development within wetland buffers. Conclusions 1. The project requires a critical area permit pursuant to Section 19.05.030 PTMC. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Critical Areas performance standards contained in Chapter 19.05 PTMC; specifically, sections 19.05.060 Performance Standards for Development and section 19.05.110, Wetlands. A qualified wetland consultant has demonstrated that the proposal meets the criteria for reduced buffers set forth in Section 19.05.110E. Given the unique circumstances of the site and in consideration of the conditions below, a reduced setback of 5-feet at the northeasterly corner of the addition is reasonable to accommodate a modest addition to an existing home. 3. Conditions have been applied to ensure consistency with all laws and ordinances of the city of Port Townsend, including but not limited to the policies and performance standards for Critical Areas contained in Chapter 19.05 PTMC and Chapter 5, Clearing, Grading and Erosion Control of the Engineering Design Standards Manual which requires implementation of BMPs to control erosion and sedimentation. 4. The proposed project would not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety or welfare. Director's Decision Critical Area Permit LUP09-033 Page 7 Decision Based on the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, LUP09-052, the Director hereby APPROVES the requested critical areas permit maintaining a minimum 25-foot buffer at the northeast corner of the addition and increasing to 60 feet to the north and southeast of the existing house and a minimum 5-foot setback from the buffer edge subject to compliance with the following CONDITIONS: GENERAL 1. Construction shall be completed in strict conformance to the site plan included in the wetland report (Exhibits B and C), conditions of this permit and of any other city approvals obtained for the project (e.g., building permit, street development permit). 2. The DSD Director may approve minor modifications to the approved plans provided they conform to the analysis and conclusions provided herein. If the plan is significantly modified and/or contingency plans are required, the revised plans shall require an Addendum to the Critical Areas permit which shall be distributed to parties of record. 3. To minimize the impact to the buffers habitat functions, exterior lighting shall be of low wattage, shielded and directed to prevent illumination of the wetland buffer. Metal halide lights shall be prohibited. If motion sensors are used, they shall be set so as not to activate due to movement within the wetland buffer. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 4. The following legal documents prepared in a form approved by the city attorney and approved by the director shall be recorded by the applicant with the Jefferson County auditor(Section 19.05.050(H-I) of the PTMC): .t' Hold Harmless Agreement - This agreement shall hold harmless and indemnify the city and its employees from and against any liability for damages to persons or property as the result of construction or other action undertaken by the applicant on the subject property. The Hold Harmless agreement shall cross-reference the Notice to Title, which documents the presence of a critical area. �. Notice to Title - Pursuant to Section 19.05.050(I) of the Critical Areas Ordinance, presence of a critical area shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor as a condition of this permit. This document shall include language, which notifies all future property owners that future development proposals affecting the critical drainage corridor, wetland or associated buffers are subject to the Critical Areas Ordinance. Thirty-percent maximum Director's Decision Critical Area Permit LUP09-033 Page 8 impervious areas/site coverage limits shall be specified per the ordinance. The notice shall apprise future homeowners of the sensitivity of the neighboring wetland and wetland buffer and encourage stewardship by: i. Maintenance of the required permanent fencing and signage along the approved southeasterly buffer edge of Wetland A. ii. Restricting the use of lighting, motion detectors, fencing, lighting, pesticides and fertilizers; promoting plantings which are compatible with the surrounding native vegetation; prohibiting invasive plantings; and iii. The Notice shall state that the homeowner is responsible for maintaining stormwater facilities. Pursuant to Section 19.05.130 B, the applicant shall post a maintenance bond or other security in an amount and with surety and conditions satisfactory to the city. The director shall release the maintenance bond upon determining that performance standards (i.e., 80% coverage in five years or less) have been satisfactorily met for the required period. PRIOR TO COMMENCING DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 6. Pursuant to Subsection 19.05.040(E)(1)(h), the applicant shall: i. Install silt fencing along the approved wetland buffer edge. Flag the following on the site to reflect the proposed site construction plan: the location of the building footprint and the 5- to l 5-foot setback from the wetland buffer. ii. Install eerosion control measures in accordance with approved building permit/street development plans. iii. Schedule a preconstruction meeting at the development site. The meeting is to be attended by the applicant (or applicant's agent) and city staff, to review specific project details and methods of construction. Field markings and erosion control measures shall be verified by staff. DURING CONSTRUCTION 7. All contractors shall prominently post on-site the site-work specifications and conditions of this permit. 8. The applicant or his/her designee shall be responsible for maintenance of the site, including maintenance of field markings, silt/construction fencing and temporary erosion control devices as indicated on approved plans. Additional best management practices shall be implemented as necessary to control runoff/sedimentation from the site. 9. The approved 25-60 foot buffer shall not be disturbed. No construction activity may take place in the buffer. All construction debris shall be properly disposed of in such a manner that it cannot enter into the wetland/approved wetland buffer or cause water Director's Decision Critical Area Permit LUP09-033 Page 9 quality degradation. 10. Pursuant to the Engineering Design Standards, the applicant shall stabilize soils upon completion of construction activities. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT/FINAL INSPECTION 11. The applicant shall install permanent signage along the reduced buffer edge of Wetland A. Given the orientation of the home and existing open wood fencing on the northerly side of the home, no additional fencing is required. Signs shall be provided by the city and installed by the applicant. 12. An occupancy permit/final inspection shall only be granted upon a finding by the DSD Director that the buffer has not been disturbed; temporary fencing and erosion control devices have been removed and permanent fencing and signage has been erected. 13. An occupancy permit shall only be granted upon a finding by the Director of DSD that plantings have been installed in conformance with the approved enhancement plan (Exhibit B). FIVE YEAR MONITORING PERIOD 14. Applicant shall retain a qualified wetlands specialist or biologist to implement the Enhancement Plan (Exhibit B) including overseeing planting, establishing photo stations to evaluate progress; conducting annual monitoring and maintenance, and preparation of annual reports to be submitted to the DSD. The annual monitoring report shall include photos from established photo stations; document plant health, vigor, replacement needs, weed encroachment, erosion potential, adequacy of storm water treatment and contingency actions. Monitoring shall occur in the early fall. 15. The wetland mitigation will be considered successful when 80% native plant coverage in the buffer is achieved and the plants are found to be healthy and vigorous; further that less than 20% invasive species are present. The mitigation monitoring period shall be for a period of five years from the date of the initial planting unless an extended period is found necessary to achieve success. 16. Contingency Plans - Greater than 20 percent mortality of native species in the restoration area or greater than 10 percent cover of invasive species shall be reason to implement a contingency plan. If the consultant determines within the five year period that the density and success of the plantings is not, or will not be, sufficient to serve their functional values in the wetland/wetland buffer the consultant shall, at the applicant's expense, submit a contingency plan for review and approval by the DSD Director. Upon approval, the additional plantings shall be installed and the mitigation monitoring period may be extended. Director's Decision Critical Area Permit LUP09-033 Page 10 ONGOING MAINTENANCE 17. As recommended by the wetland consultant, mowing shall cease within the 1,400 square foot enhancement area and within the reduced buffer area on the westerly side of the wetland with the exception of allowing trimming of 3' circles around trees and shrubs in the enhancement area and trimming of canada thistle throughout (Figure 7 of Exhibit B). 18. The applicant/successor(s) in title shall remove and control non-indigenous plant species within the remaining buffer of Wetland A. Work shall be done by hand/with hand tools (e.g., weedwacker) and without the use of herbicides. 19. Maintenance of the existing culvert in Ditch A will be allowed including periodic cleaning using hand tools and the clearing of vegetation around the intake and outlet to prevent clogging. Suspension—Revocation. In addition to enforcement procedures and penalties provided for in Chapter 1.20 PTMC, the director may suspend or revoke a permit if(s)he finds that the applicant or permittee has not complied with any or all of the conditions or limitations set forth in accordance with this chapter, has exceeded the scope of work set forth in the permit, or has failed to undertake the project in the manner set forth in the approved application. Expiration. Pursuant to Section 19.05.050139 (2-3) this permit shall be valid until May 5, 2012 (i. three years from the date the wetland delineation was conducted by M. Dawson) and shall ex ire at th d of that time if not acted upon. An extension may be requested by the original pe it hold r or the successor in title. &/a-7 05 Richard 10 - Sepler, AICP DateDirectorPlanning & Development Services Exhibits Exhibit A: Vicinity Map Exhibit B: Molotsky Wetland Delineation & Enhancement Plan (Michael B. Dawson: August 26, 2009) Appeals The final decision of a Type II permit application is made by the DSD director. Per PTMC Section 20.01.210, Administrative Type II approvals subject to notice may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner in accordance with PTMC Chapter 1.14. Appeals shall.be filed with the director within 14 calendar days after the date of the notice of the decision of the matter being appealed. The appeal fee of$200.00 is paid at the time of submittal,and an open record public hearing is then scheduled before the Hearing Examiner. If the Hearing Examiner's decision is appealed,Judicial Appeal to the Jefferson County superior court must be made within 21 calendar days of the date the decision becomes final per PTMC 20.01.320. Kirk Boiks'ARCHITECT ♦4601 Mason St♦ PortTownsend WA 98368 O 360 385 6140 " 'L architect@suffbest.net THE DRAWINGS AND PLANS SET FORTH ON THIS SHEET AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE,AND SHALL REMAIN, THE PROPERTY OF KIRK BOIKE, ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ON THIS DRAWING SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS,CONDITIONS,ETC,PERTAINING TO THE WORK BEFORE PROCEEDING. THE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED OF ANY VARIATIONS FROM THE DIMENSIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY SUCH VARIATION SHALL BE RESOLVED BY THIS OFFICE PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST TO RECTIFY SAME. &Noy QE . GE MOL07SKY 4-01.;i-rioN 20 Ja►-�U��Y 20�0 FIE) - $Wc-4E �--- w= MP 5oPz M= golo a, V.LI 6623 REGISTERED I I KIRK E. BOXE- r n r DE V B 4Rl,C L 0 W, r012CE ebHE44Z g/LF rjW H0 FEB 8 2010 I I (Z�x MKT f3) 13[( 120 CITY OF PORT TOWNStNO 2 (Z4-X7X 7,5) (3i) 325-impDSD A 5 (z,'4?)(7,2'•) I21g .144 ® v B �i (24)(7,'l'7,25� 12►a 2�4 ® v ;HEAR-WA L i SCHEDUL i 5.'32'C-C:C D SHEATHI K;w/Sae C 8'O.C. (26)) e t S'32"C-C;C D SHEATHI IG w/We(g;4'O.C. (3E)) e !5,'32"C-C;C D SHEATHI 4G w/Sae 0 3'O.C. (00) � IOlaO �s�3r�c;c o SHEATHI rw sae� 2•o.c. (sao) Double plate i(;7 paid ecg s.) O i01-0-DOW1,_CHEDULI WAPSON CAST 14116(E 19014585) > 311APSON H 1 T i 2.OR Pt 05-SDS3,GR -fDUS-SD':2.5(5250,4,'85,5430) e> ;IIAPSON Hi 84,OR PH)6-SDS3(8455,5880) eq> iIIAPSON Hi iC8-SDS3,1:R HDQ11-StJS2.5(7175 1'445) Kirk Boike ARCHITECT ®4601 Mason St 6 PortTownsend WA 98368 ♦ 360 385 6140 architect@surfbest.net THE DRAWINGS AND PLANS SET FORTH ON THIS SHEET AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE,AND SHALL REMAIN,THE PROPERTY OF KIRK BOIKE, ARCHITECT, WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ON THIS DRAWING SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED D&IIENSIONSCONTRACTOR StFRL1 VERIFY All DIMENSIONS,CONDITIONS,ETC,PERTAINING TO THE WORK BEFORE PROCEEDING. THE ARC}iITE T MLtST BE NOTIFIED N ANY CONTRACTOR tS FROM THE DIMENSIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS SHOWN AL THESE DRAWINGS. ANY SUCH VARIATION SHALL BE RESOLVED BY THIS OFFtcE mok TO 0AocEEDLNG WITH THE WORK OR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST TO RECTIFY SAME. _ h N DY ►2 ==�E M0L0TS ICY 6- lc,I ?' :JN 'Lp ,J d►,1 tSh�Y 2o1c7 K < VJ ar :P 1 I 6623 REGISTERED i_ 41 • fl r c Yz'f D � FEB�' 2010' , 1 it '• , 32;a CITY OF PODRT SO OWNSEND ;HEAR-WAL!_3CHEDUL t ® I 5.'32'C-C:C D SIiEATH1 dG w/8ds(G,8'O.C. (260) ® I S32'C-ClC D ShlFJ1TH1 dC:w/8de,Z.4'O.C. (3E0) i ��O1 ® !5,`32'C-C;C D SHEATHI'Ki vd 8ds 3'O.C. (490) -&m—C-C;C D SHEATHI 7G wl 865 2'O.C. (640) i O I�t----��- 'Double plate i(�g Pew e•g-s•) ! � O :�<"OR5/8' .'N.B.w/ec's 6'0.0 L'�I 1, 1ULD-DOW:i SCHEDULI._ ZZ z ' N ChIS-T 14116(E 19014585) t _ - 7 , J ' ` '`�,\gyp\_\) ♦ yy\\ �)kj C o,�QoaTTo�y BUILDING PERMIT City of Port Townsend Development Services Department 250 Madison Street,Suite 3,Port Townsend,WA 98368 (360)379-5095 Project Information Permit# BLD09-171 Permit Type Residential- Addition/Remodel Project Name ADDITION Site Address 2710 THOMAS ST Parcel# 001033003 Project Description ADD 2 BEDROOMS Names Associated with this Project License Type Name Contact Phone# Type License# Exp Date Applicant Molotsky Daniel R Owner Molotsky Daniel R Contractor Owner Builder (360) 379-6471 STATE exempt 12/31/2009 Fee Information Project Details Project Valuation $33,499.84 Dwellings—Type V Wood Frame 352 SQFT Plan Review Fee 313.40 Units: Heat Type: PLAN REVIEW DEPOSIT 50 50.00 Bedrooms: Construction Type: PLAN REVIEW REFUND 50 -50.00 Bathrooms: Occupancy Type: Building Permit Fee 482.15 State Building Code Council Fee 4.50 Technology Fee for Building Permit 9.64 Record Retention Fee for Building 10.00 Permit Total Fees $ 819.69 Conditions 10. Property corner survey pins must be located at time of footing inspection to verify setbacks. ***SEE A TTACHED CONDI TIONS ** Ca11385-2294 by 3:00pm for next day inspection. Permits expire 180 days from issuance if work is not commenced, or if work is suspended for a period of 180 days. Work is verified by obtaining a valid inspection. The granting of this permit shall not be construed as approval to violate any provisions of the PTMC or other laws or regulations. I certify that the information provided as a part of the application for this permit is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further certify that I am the owner of the property or authorized agent of the owner. Print Name �G^t' 5 Date Issued: 09/02/2009 4 Issued By: SFOSTER Signature III Date 1 Date Expires: 03/01/2010 / 1 pORT l0 . City of Port Townsend �o D EC 1 8 2009 evelopment Services Department ,g 's' = • 250 Madison Street, Suite 3 �wass CITY OF PORT iOWNSEND Port Townsend WA 98368 DSO 36 -379-5095 Fax 360-344-4619 REVISION TO BUILDING PERMIT # Revision # OWNER: Uri o SITE ADDRESS• a' ( �o►f Total Value of Revision: $ do Impervious Surface Change? ❑ Yes Revisions require 2 sets of plans and a written scope of workthat fully describes the proposed change plus any additional information that will be of assistance in issuing your revision. If your plans were stamped by a design professional,all revision submittals require a stamp with a wet signature. Be aware that changes to the existing approved plans may also require y2u to revise your original building permit application(lot coverage, impervious surface,structure square footage, etc.)and energy code documents(changing windows, heat source,etc.)to conform to your proposed changes. Scope of work: G . f-ftt- 6 r Q . `S C C :, 1, 4,- s i J n la igt nci Applicant 3 ignatur5 Date OFFICE USE ONLY: Submittal date: — /0 - 09 Two sets of plans for revision: y4�& Approval of engineer of record(if original plans engineered): ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA PADS13113epartment Forms\Building FomuMpplication-Revision.doc ?OAT Devoopment Services OF TO$ 250..Madison.Street:'Suite 3' �o Port Townsend WA.98368 _- - Fh one: 360 379=5095 Fax .3'60 344-4619, awn ' www.cityofpt.us Residential Building Permit Application Pro ect Address: Legal Description (or Tax #): Office Use OnIV oM , Addition: Tnf- Perm►t#BLD09'�" 1=_ Zoning: Ra Block: Associ Permits: Parcel # Lot(s): (�l'!1 C� S2 )dOl� � � 1} Project Description: i 4 CcM-eT,yt' Pa+,% > Applications by mail must include a check for initial plan review fee of$150 for projects valued over$15,000. See Page 2 for details on plan submittal requirements. Lender Information: Property Owner/Applicant: / Lender information must be provided for projects Name: D C, 1\1 !�6 t� over $5,000 in valuation per RCW 19.27.095. Address: Name:- City/St/zip: Ov..�` Project Valuation: $ SD mooPhone:_ 360 �D koS Email: K S �� Building Information (square feet): 151 floor ? Garage: Contact/Representative: 2"d floor Deck(s): Name: S M 3`d floor Porch (es): Basement: is it finished? Yes No Address: Carport: Other: City/SUZip: Manufactured Home ❑ ADU ❑ Phone: New Addition Pr"', Rey moodeVRepair W- 1 Email: Heat Type: Electric ,*' Heat Pump Other Contractor: ASame as Owner Total Lot Coverage (Building Footprint):' Name: Square feet: "S t /5v� % 1,i(o �--- Address: Impervious Surface:' City/St/Zip: Square feet: 'Total existing&proposed Phone: `- ---— \i' 'What year was the structure built? Email: �— f Wyork includes demolition, see Page 2. State License #: I I Exp! I I )II l Ariy`kraown wetlands on the property? Y N City Business License#: I I I I AUG 1 ( 200 1•-'W I _I An steep slopes (>15%)? Y N C 'thOr PORT TOWN,END I hereby certify that the information provide is correct, that I am either_tt�owe or authorized to act on behalf of-the and that all activities associated with this perrxait-wi"e-in accor'd nce with State Laws and the Port Townsend Municipal Code. Print Name: Signature: Date: Page 1 of 2 - 5/14/2009 RESIDLi.4TIAL BUILDING PERMIT AFr- LICATION CHECKLIST Thi checklist is for new dwellings, additions, remodels, and garages. Residential permit application. Cal ❑Washington State Energy &Ventilation Code forms ❑Two (2) sets of plans with North arrow and scaled, no smaller than Y." = 1 foot: �A site plan showing: 1. Legal description and parcel number(or tax number), 2. Property lines and dimensions 3. Setbacks from all sides of the proposed structure to the property lines in accordance with a pinned boundary line survey 4. On-site parking and driveway with dimensions 5. If creating new impervious surfaces, indicate measures utilized to retain stormwater on-site 6. Street names and any easements or vacations 7. Location and diameter of existing trees 8. Utility lines If applicable, existing or proposed septic system location 10. Delineated critical areas boundaries and buffers Foundation plan: 1. Footings and foundation walls 2. Post and beam sizes and spans Floor joist size and layout Holdowns 5. Foundation venting Floor plan: 1. Room use and dimensions 2. Braced wall paned locations 3. Smoke detector locations 4. Attic access 5. Plumbing and mechanical fixtures Occupancy separation between dwelling and garage (if applicable) 7. Window, skylight, and door locations, including escape windows and safety glazing all section: 1. Footing size, reinforcement, depth below grade 2. Foundation wall, height, width, reinforcement, anchor bolts, and washers 3. Floor joist size and spacing 4. Wall stud size and spacing 5. Header size and spans 6. Wall sheathing, weather resistant barrier, and siding material 7. Sheet rock and insulation 8. Rafters, ceiling joists, trusses, with blocking and positive connections 9. Ceiling height 10. Roof sheathing, roofing material, roof pitch, attic ventilation xterior elevations (all four)with existing slope of the land in relation to all proposed structures --�❑ If architecturally designed, one set of plans must have an original signature ❑ If engineered, one set of plans must have one original signature ❑ For new dwelling construction, Street& Utility or Minor Improvement application If you are proposing partial or full demolition of a structure that is at least 50 years old, per Ordinance 2969 Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) review is required. If within the National Historic Landmark district: $58.00 for full committee review. If outside the National Historic Landmark district and not on the Historic Register: no fee for HPC Administrative review. Complete HPC Form. Partial demolition includes exterior demolition for additions and remodels. Page 2 of 2 - 5/14/2009 0 S Kirk Boike ARCHITECT ♦4601 Mason Street ♦ PortTownsend WA 98368 ♦ 360 385 6140 architect@surfbest.net 2009 The calculations herein comply with the requireme:is of the 2006 IBC (international Building Code), IRC (International Residential Code), WFCM(Wood Frame Construction Manual), AISI(American Iron and Steel Institute), COFS/PM(cold-Formed Steel Framing-Prescriptive Method for one and two family dwellings). Prescriptive nailing, construction methods and techniques shall apply unless otherwise noted and detailed. Seismic zone: D1; (see design for additional parameters) Snow load: 30psf Floor load: 50psf(1 OLL+40DL) Roof load: 40psf(1 OLL+30DL) Exterior deck load: 65psf(DL+LL) DL(hay storage, if applic.): 125psf Wind speed: IOOmph, exposure"B" Wind loading: 24psf Weathering probability: Moderate Frost line depth: 18' Termite infestation prob.: Slight to Moderate Decay probability: Slight to Moderate Winter design Temp.: 20 degrees F Concrete strentgh: 2400psi U.O.N. Wood: P.T. Hem-Fir Sole plate. D. Fir# 2 all structural members(except studs) U.O.N. Air density: 1.0 Soil bearing: 1500psf vertically; 100psf/ft(bearing), 130psf(sliding) laterally Calculator: Hewlett Packard 12c with RPN data entry Sincerely, Kirk Boike,Architect #6528 expires: 30 April 2010 CITY 0F PORT TO, 'l iuD DSD FLE CA U Kirk Boike ARCHITEr'T ♦4601 Mason St♦ PortTownsend WA"168 ♦ 360 385 6140 architect@suftest.net THE DRAWINGS AND PLANS SET FORTH ON THIS SHEET AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE,AND SHALL REMAIN, "I NE PROPERTY 0. KIRK BOIKE, ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ON THIS DRAWING SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS,CONDITIONS,ETC,PERTAINING TO THE WORK BEFORE PROCEEDING. THE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED OF ANY VARIATIONS FROM THE DIMENSIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY SUCH VARIATION SHALL BE RESOLVED BY THIS OFFICE PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST TO RECTIFY SAME. -orL A�IoY rIEECE t-ioLDTSk,( ric,+-4 0wt) &luct 09 PACAI- t 2 A 9 s5zs REGISTERED i 4 ARM CT t' 7 R KI .K E. BOIKE 4- STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 / / t=X 1-JT1NCt i _G�112 1,..v w __ '�G2_IZG_.� _ 5�-t�_�►Z.__.______6f_LF_-----gam_._---t-�_--. _.. . _ 2 !0' Cz�)(�X12) -1 e) O Q lb Lo 5 39� l �` (2�)(�►)(12) 31 (AS 3 52 MAWWALL ®lI5Wc.Cro8WATHMwreca6V0a peo) 40'wrcc*08wATmmw►wl6raa tq ®iNr C-ao 811 AMM W We O r O.C.(40% i5wc-Q0a *Armwsowseraa pq loaa.0"0 PWW 60PL) O ilrOR&VO.W.B.%WOdtiOVOt NOLDDONM BCFEOIAE -1 BeiPBON Cd18T 1Y10(04eaMW FLE COPY SOM411 11 W=OR M054 81,OR heriOMMA(6260,41ft UM •1 88P80111K OR FH -011113 0*k ft" P Vi 4 � � s a C 0 0 TR - g N tJ O ob N OO � N VENTILATION City of Port Townsend r� Development Services Department S, �� Waterman& Katz Building 181 Quincy Street, Suite 301 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-3208 Fax: (360)385-7675 2006 Washington S at te Ventilatign & Indoor Air Quality Code ����rOF F � SOURCE SPECIFIC VENTILATIO ).(�302'.,'. Required in each kitchen, bathroom, wa r closet, laundry room, indoor swimming pool, space, and other rooms where excess water vapor or-cooking odor is produced. See Table 3.1 for capacity requirements. SOURCE SPECIFIC VENTILATION DUCTS (302.2.3) Shall terminate outside the building. Exhaust ducts in systems designed to operate intermittently shall be equipped with back-draft dampers. All exhaust ducts in unconditioned spaces shall be insulated to a minimum of R-4. Terminal elements shall have at least the equivalent free area of the duct work. Terminal elements for exhaust fan systems shall be screened or otherwise protected from entry by leaves or other material. WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS (302.3) Each dwelling unit shall be equipped with a whole house ventilation system capable of providing the volume of air specified in Table 3-2 under normal operating conditions. Controls (302.3.2) shall be readily accessible and capable of operating the system without energizing other energy-consuming appliances. Intermittently operated systems shall have the capability for continuous operation, and have a manual and automatic control such as an automatic control timer. At the final inspection the timer shall be set to operate the whole house fan for at least 8 hours per day. Fan Noise (302.3.3) for whole house fans located 4 feet or less from the interior grille shall have a sone rating of 1.5 or less measured at 0.10 inches water gauge. Remotely mounted fns shall be isolated from the structural elements of the building and attached duct work using insulated flexible duct or other approved material. Exception: systems integrated with forced-air heating systems or heat-recovery ventilation systems are exempt from sone ratings. Ducts (302.3.4) shall terminate outside the building. Exhaust ducts in intermittently operating systems shall be equipped with back-draft dampers. All exhaust ducts in unconditioned spaces and supply ducts in conditioned space shall be insulated to a minimum of R-4. OUTDOOR AIR (302.3.5) Outdoor Air Inlets (302.3.5.2) shall be screened or otherwise protected from entry by leaves or other material. They shall be located so as not to take air from the following areas: a. Closer than 10 feet from an appliance vent outlet, unless such vent outlet is 3 feet above the outdoor air inlet. b. Where it will pick up objectionable odors, fumes, or flammable vapors. c. A hazardous or unsanitary location. d. A room or space having any fuel-burning appliances therein. e. Closer than 10 feet from a vent opening of a plumbing drainage system unless the vent opening is at least 3 feet above the air inlet. f. Attic, crawl spaces, or garages. P:\DSD\Forms\Building Forms\Information-Ventilation.doc 04/16/2009 Page 1 of l 2006 Was rton State Energy Cot..; - Prescriptive I�l I TABLE 6-1 PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS" FOR GROUP R OCCUPANCY AUG 1 0 2009 CLIMATE ZONE 1 j EITY v p(Glaiin.glSE Glazin U-Factor Wall12 Wall- Wall. s Option Area' . Door e z Vaulted in ems' Slab Ceiling 3 Above Floors on ---- -9ro of-Floor--Ve trf•cal- Overhead" U-Factor Ceiling Grade Below Below Grade Grade Grade I. 10% 032 0.58 0.20 R-38 R-30 R15 R-15 R-10 R-30 R-10 ❑.* 15% 035 0.58 0.20 R-38 R-30 R-21 R-21 R-10 R-30 R-10 III. 25% 0.40 0.58 0.20 R-38/ R-30/ R-21/ R-15 R-10 R-30/ R-10 Group R-1 U=0.031 U=0.034 U=0.057 U=0.029 and R-2 Occupancies Only Unlimited 0.35 0.58 0.20 R-38 R-30 R-21 R-21 R-10 R-30 R-10 Group R-3 and R-4 Occupancies Only �'. Unlimited 0.35 0.58 0.20 R-38/ R-30/ R-21 / R-15 R-10 R-30/ R-10 Group R-I U=0.031 U=0.034 U=0.057 U=0.029 and R-2 Occupancies Onl% * Reference Case 0. Nominal R-values are for wood frame assemblies only or assemblies built in accordance with Section 601.1. 1. Minimum requirements for each option listed. For example, if a proposed design has a glazing ratio to the conditioned floor area of 13%,it shall comply with all of the requirements of the 15%glazing option(or higher). Proposed designs which cannot meet the specific requirements of a listed option above may calculate compliance by Chapters 4 or 5 of this Code. 2. Requirement applies to all ceilings except single rafter orjoist vaulted ceilings complying with note 3. 'Adv'denotes Advanced Framed CeiIinEi. 3. Requirement applicable only to single rafter or joist vaulted ceilings where both(a)the distance between the top of the ceiling and the underside of the roof sheathing is less than 12 inches and(b)there is a minimum 1-inch vented airspace above the insulation.Other single rafter or joist vaulted ceilings shall comply with the"ceiling"requirements.This option is limited to 500 square feet of ceiling area for any one dwelling unit. 4. Below grade walls shall be insulated either on the exterior to a minimum level of R-10,or on the interior to the same level as walls above grade. Exterior insulation installed on below grade walls shall be a water resistant material, manufactured for its intended use,and installed according to the manufacturer's specifications. See Section 602.2. 5. Floors over crawl spaces or exposed to ambient air conditions. 6. Required slab perimeter insulation shall be a water resistant material,manufactured for its intended use,and installed according to manufacturer's specifications. See Section 602.4. 7. Int.denotes standard framing 16 inches on center with headers insulated with a minimum of R-10 insulation. 8. This wall insulation requirement denotes R-19 wall cavity insulation plus R-5 foam sheathing. 9. Doors,including all fire doors,shall be assigned default U-factors from Table 10-6C_ 10. Where a maximum glazing area is listed,the total glazing area(combined vertical plus overhead)as a percent of gross conditioned floor area shall be less than or equal to that value. Overhead glazing with U-factor of U=0.40 or less is not included in glazing area limitations. 11. Overhead glazing shall have U-factors determined in accordance with NFRC 100 or as specified in Section 502.1.5. 12. Log and solid timber walls with a minimum average thickness of 3.5"are exempt from this insulation requirement. Effective July 1,2007 2006 Edition Appl# J Date Issued 041 Q120Q9' Applicant MOLOTSKYDAN1EL Type SDP PMT Expiration Date 01109J2010`: Parcel# 0,01033,003 Parent# L JP09-052 Re-issue Date Site Address I _HOMA 5.&25TI4 Date Submitted 02l25l2009 Date Closed F " -_ r Project Name SIDE SEWER CONNECTION FR( Teclunically Complete Last Action 0811012009 i Zoning R-H Date Approved 03130/2009 Status Date U412� Or2G09 Status JIS.5UED Override Expire?F' Government?r Notes?r 55 day(s)to process e�vApphcatnonTI bueryT:I fit....: Fotm fetters `(opX 9 �itejAddress � Quety App#7 c� 3 r "d:N s44 "" 5 a:::c«" .�,,. � ,.�., .� 13tLsPaels uniac C inctois Fe SubmittaLs� Amval 3 C ho TnspB�ods 4licationsr Notes Project Description ISIDE SEWER CONNECTION FROM SEPTIC r Estimated Project Cost 1 15000 r Water Meter Size 51$"Meter r : Service Area City Type of Account SFR (— " Connect to Sewer? Yes f , , F I R a 4 �v r �. _. r y yr2F I3j 3 3 a 33 t- 7_ 13_ ol 5�',I � �`�1 '� U-yl �e � .-� fan Ak ' f SSvo� � 1 OF V.OHT r0h- '� yN o o Receipt Number Y 'n3 �'� 'F``s 3,", aS Receipt Date 0910212009 Cashier FSLOTA Payer/Payee NameMOLOTSKY DANIEL9-R„ � � 1,1 wz, 1'F�ee AmouWN OVER nt k Fee a Permit# Parcel Mill, ee Descnption�� ount Paid Balance ... - ..,� � - ,.� ..., .. Fps .� - cry BLD09-171 001033003 Plan Review Fee $313.40 $313.40 $0.00 BLD09-171 001033003 PLAN REVIEW REFUND 50 -$50.00 -$50.00 $0.00 BLD09-171 001033003 Building Permit Fee $482.15 $482.15 $0.00 BLD09-171 001033003 State Building Code Council Fee $4.50 $4.50 $0.00 BLD09-171 001033003 Technology Fee for Building Permit $9.64 $9.64 $0.00 BLD09-171 001033003 Record Retention Fee for Building Per $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 Total: $769.69 MAE— F Previous Payment History PSI a`eceipt Date s Fee Descnptton , gmountPatd Permit# .:. ...... .. ,. 09-0646 08/10/2009 PLAN REVIEW DEPOSIT 50 $50.00 BLD09-171 PaymentCheck Payment Method be umr Am...................... on t ..„a..: CHECK 1135 $769.69 Total: $769.69 genpmtrreceipts Page 1 of 1 O�,OHT Tp�y Receipt Number: 09-0646 Receipt Date: 08/10/2009 _ MCashier: FFRANKLIN�� PayerlPayee Name: _MOLOTSKY DANIEL R Original Fee Amount Fee Permit# Parcel Fee Description Amount Paid Balance BLD09-171 001033003 PLAN REVIEW DEPOSIT 50 $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 Total: $50.00 Previous Payment History Receipt# Receipt Date Fee Description Amount Paid Permit# Payment Check Payment Method Number Amount CHECK 3630 $50.00 Total: $50.00 genpmtrreceipts Page 1 of 1 NCl1J�<�1ld ��� a.S AdO 3 33'U H A ;j j : ` �: `LSit D ' r Z CJ t QN3SNMOI IVOd 30 Alt3 LL i 6 r V )4Te`hY t . n L. _ :ON "woad rn :e;ep � V 03A0Wdd L © 1t7 ��►/ _ 0 0 \ r� rn _ 0 °suol;sjna, pus sapoo elgeol/dds /IaL n 0 y1lnn aauawloIuoo ul uol; fsul seed `t1' —+ r Isnw yJoM IIV °suorsslwo jo sioafa Aug �I 5u►Idaoxa pandldd> we susId-30IlON Vi o 7 p i, z D O ' im `00 ® 0 i 00 t7 00 00 i , I I 1 1t o4 ' C� lit, 77 9 ;34n - _ R ' t F u i i 110 i aJ aso —T T a ` t i QN33NMQ1 MOd 3Q dllO _.. a sty t�� j VL Lo O — 1-0 co --- _ °o ci 00 �. t 00 > - I -W _ _ 1 0 LLJ - - O z - _ z >om aL LLJ - U a = r- U w LU - _ - - w ,.. a < N TT E IAA I _ Y,4 't _ _' lo € j iff a ANOREW H.R STATEOFWASHINIMM r FILE F , \ X _ -- - , _ j Lq1� � N _ - 0 ' i _j k - O 00CD co z 1.0 ,o co `-) D, Q - «} UJ u.. V CO Q O . � z PHz OL _ V) -. { R � • 0 1 � - CV w U w w r) Z E STATE OE MAS1 INUITOU FILECOPY 1 704 IRS ° su Qa Pf r r F _ ._... r f. ,y &71V1T.�7�°'Se�t�Tit3d�.ri�4Fa t•� I i L L �! o 0 � o (Y) fF r 3 00 ui 00 r _ �O rr _ - REVIEWED FOR CODE O CQMPLIANCE ry W r y. { r - PERW >M CL r ®' = ui ems.. { ,-•.., � _. , r.. r '. , s�V��� lV � , �' ~' ti' A t(i *TV OF PORT TOWNSUO o = y {y 1�._. ' DSO ui uj W o Ale) �. -n - - "r . - Rom!H.n orn, i� Mr gas .SEE y4Tr�GN�b cftuc-OLA ORS .F® r 1 '. r R :F At _ _ r __47 _ t � - - l WIN 1 W " 44 77 '�_5�_ ttf LO M, , - - - -..- --- —rCD — .LJ { Fco OD C) 0 (y 'o co Q Cn ch j3 0 3:00 - c _ W O z C o o�.. ` ) 0 �_. s ' N Q ui g¢ 1F CL ui s t _- Z Q RFE Is 3' R I H.M E STATEOFWAS3 INGM t. � 11 c I - — -- —— ----- -- a y All rATON OFWASHII f v I! co ";r 4 00 LO No 00 cY) "' C) M 0 aA i w No V) 00 ON --- --- - - -- t� z - i � Q -- c LU _ . >00 n .......... 0 - o OL _ . ---- - _ - -- --- >. O LU- - -- ry LU - - � w W t _ o REGISTERED - A CT ST�6iE0�'�IA S�tt�4a?{3fit 1 Y Q - .;. ELT g F T&A I" Mlt�lllAdi`r�l A1� P Ci1i1 -t t {I'M LAM N -N Kb i tt l x _ or 015 -41 r '$-%H tFl W— -H� Rat �� i ;` Lo _2- Via I { � °° o�p o -- --------- - ------- --- — co 00 ui 0.1 Il g Q -- - —sue-- toe :- 0 ' S t L - ' o - - ti t -AV A n w Q � W Cq ry U ,_,_, uw r� STATE OF �,Es ls;ll X El - x � 1�\ REGISIgRaD LO ----- 00 -------- 00 '- 2- _ 00 . - - Ott co _ �y C0 7r 00 y C Q 1 �F d • l ,, ` �C- -7 (� l. S _. V 12- ._.... s �l Ln o = v N < w 1 w cl TWAL, 64 z MT— Yam .. . . . . _ . ..... . Yl � Me _ 771" :. . ool I --- t I I - �S { -,.- _-......._—....�-_,......__.._.. ._._.....-.... ....,.,,.....__v...____.__..,......-......,......._._,..._a...,__...._.�.. .,�._m.._..........-.. ,.,... RVT tr ow A' f) , ! ANDREWH. - TA3 QFWASl ita A5 453 EC E ! D EC 1 8 2009 �( CITY OF PORT TOWNSENO DS0 �! 511 � � _ ! ��M1 Q►i � is �, ..�_ _u _ - � r r ........... „arse ' iy i f� I : �. � 1 -- - �, - _ � u 1 i - t 5� �- Q _ r E �00 «0` NJ ('7 N f e ; - .` _'_ Qom,, -- 1 `y° x f� Ave z �.°. CIO V, z 00 LQ O _ � w I O z rJor IL o NOTICE:Plans are ap proved excepting O � any errors or omissions. All work',must Ui pass inspection in conformance'with = U Tppr/ - all applicable codes and regulations. i-- t F 0 ' r- U S APPROVED77) tom. i LL �. Permit id : t" �w i Building Official -BY: i x I CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND 0 _ Q EGi;0000- F REW H.REECE FIELD Cori FTfE}FYASlilNfiT�JFi I LO LO _ - . t , . . - -- _ et.3 00 _._. . ' *- \ . ..__, i '� ■sue � �\ 0 c \> t .> w O � ry OL 0 ►- _ U 0 ENO ED LLJ U Nui Q 02!-4�' U ui AP - Oil ui - . _wc- y&4 i ` �" ,Ile Ty" T�&W_4 A TIT AN D R�+Y H.R z STA OFWASHW 2 I V4� 21 FIE' COPY -f1 �/ l _ NEW j�� -"'P6, € � IIL NR l.JI -- W� _ !'t•' i li � � CD . j i 1 i r t C c CO CO CD Zco 0 00 110 tia« «x co o„ LU l� _ -- CL f i i — _ _ o W i W W r o a n, �ED Q AN nEVV H* STATE OF WASHINul,ropj