Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09022
?ORT 1-0. CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND o DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT INSPECTION REPORT WA CALL THE INSPECTION LINE AT 360-385-2294 BY 3:OOpm THE DAY BEFORE YOU WANT THE INSS,PECTION. FOR MONDAY INSPECTION, CALL BY 3:OOPM FRIDAY. DATE OF INSPECTION: ! PERMIT NUMBER: © 9 C� 7-W SITE ADDRESS: I ( 7 5 l Fr' CONTACT PERSON: / TYPE OF INSPECTION: Ma a�y(jj/,j <Z,) J (4 S IJA(Ll/i(q PHONE: EAP.�_04 t -L_ 60 0� rt VV v� / ,) *�cTl-o,v Z o 0 --- AG ❑ APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH ❑ NOT APPROVED CORRECTIONS Ok to proceed. Corrections will be Call for re -inspection before � checked at next inspection proceeding. Inspector l e �C L - Date 9 Acknowledgement Date Approved plans and permit card must be on-site and available at time of inspection. A re -inspection fee may be assessed if work is not ready for inspection. QORT ro CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND o DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT INSPECTION REPORT AWA CALL THE INSPECTION LINE AT 360-385-2294 BY 3:00pm THE DAY BEFORE YOU WANT THE INSPECTION. FOR MONDAY INSPECTION, CALL BY 3:OOPM FRIDAY. DATE OF INSPECTION: Z 3 0 PERMIT NUMBER: SITE ADDRESS: t� 3 G q / %g S (aE I CONTACT PERSON: PHONE: TYPE OF INSPECTION: doLou)AjS 06►'242 co � oj d L C&M NO' -f- i E/II .Y h/LQ12 �Q (_& w N S /M f74 , 1 f N 1 a�' QD CAN OT Jr a-, t C��i1� t L W"_ SAl P' VL i JA LL.. l�c� f i��'►� ❑ APPROVED Inspector 1 Cly A( Acknowledgement ❑ APPROVED WITH ❑ NOT APPROVED CORRECTIONS Ok to proceed. Corrections wi)be Call for re -inspection before checked at next inspection proceeding. Date Date Approved plans and permit card must be on-site and available at time of inspection. A re -inspection fee may be assessed if work is not ready for inspection. a�?0RTrCONSTRUCTION PR( �Z CITY OF PORT I v WA Development Servic 250 Madison Street, Suite 3, Poi POST THIS CARD IN A SAFE, CONSPICUOUS LOCATION. PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE T' BY THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY AND THE BUILDING IS APPROVED FOR OCCUPAI PARCEL NO. 993600501 PERMIT NO. BLD09-022 ISSU ADDRESS 1939 49TH ST OWNER TIMMONS DAVID PROJECT DES, CONTRACTOR CRANSTON CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION INSP DATE COMMENTS ESC r)�t= — viz FINAL SETBACKS SURVEY PINS y FOOTING ?v�� FOUNDATION DRAIN FOUNDATION WALL SLAB MISCELLANEOUS Fes& FRAMING 4 PLUMBING MECHANICAL SHEAR WALL INSULATION 04, INSULATION GWB v7 FINAL PUBLIC WORK TO REQUEST AN INSPECTION CALL (360) 385-2294. INSPECTION REQUESTS MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO 3:00 PM FOR NEXT DAY INSPECTION. EJ I L X I �I J L. D r r)�t= — viz a° y ?v�� E;CD a w �_ o- no �n o y fi CDoo 5<D CCD CD CD con 0 CD a -a I o C \ cr b v) .tJ C Q 2 C17 CD C CD z� �o C �. z c . d aq c b C TO REQUEST AN INSPECTION CALL (360) 385-2294. INSPECTION REQUESTS MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO 3:00 PM FOR NEXT DAY INSPECTION. EJ I L X I �I J L. D r 3/3/09 David — Your building plans (not approved yet) came back today with the following instructions: 1. Approved demolition permit required before starting any work. 2. Approved erosion control plan required before starting any excavation. 3. Both sets of plans have been marked with corrections that must be made. These corrections are also spelled out on the Residential Plan Review List. 4. 4 sets of corrected plans need to be returned to Krazan for review and approval. Sheila o�?ORT ropy > 't,P u �o RESIDENTIAL PLAN REVIEW LIST W PLAN CHECK NO.:09-022 PROJECT: Timmons SFR PROJECT ADDRESS: 1939 491h St. OCCUPANCY: R-3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Addition/Remodel TYPE OF CONSTR.: TBD 1ST REVIEW BY: JMA DATE: 2/27/09 CORRECTIONS 2ND REVIEW BY: DATE: CORRECTIONS APPROVED 3RD REVIEW BY: DATE: CORRECTIONS APPROVED 4TH REVIEW BY: DATE: CORRECTIONS APPROVED CODES This plan review has been made to verify conformance to minimum requirements of codes adopted by the City of Port Townsend. The 2006 International Residential Codes with Washington amendments, 2006 ICC PC, ICC EBC, IMC, IFC; 2006 UPC, 2006 WIAQ & 2006 Washington State Energy Code. See Chapter 16.04 of the Port Townsend Municipal Code for complete adoption and amendment information. INSTRUCTIONS A. The items below require correction or clarification before this plan check can be approved for permit issuance. Return all correction material when resubmitting. B. Note on this correction sheet or on a separate sheet the location of the completed correction. (i.e. Sheet No., detail, etc.). C. Corrections shall be made on the original tracings and new prints submitted. D. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of Application shall expire by limitation. A one-time extension of 180 days may be granted upon written request to the Building Official. ADMINISTRATIVE 1) The following clearances or approvals are required before a building permit can be issued: a) Planning Department. b) Approved Erosion control Plan 2) Valuation in accordance with Resolution 06-037 fA)�5_Ziving space: 1413 + 1615=3028 X 95.17= =$288,175.00 Sunroom= 80 X 25.75= $2060.00 c) Total $290,235 valuation 3) Building Department Fees a) Building Permit -993.75 + 1069,60= $2063.35 b) Plan Review @ 65%=$1341.18 4C)DwDemolition Permit Required GENERAL 4) Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the title sheet. Include the following code information for the building proposed if not already shown on the plans: a) Occupancy: R-3, U b) Type of Construction: V -N c) Sprinklers: Yes or No 5) Provide a legend to indicate new walls, demolished walls, or altered walls. Your plan already has line types to show demo and new. The question is the wall in the existing garage apartment. A simple legend would clarify the extent of new construction. 6) Provide house street number visible and legible from street. t/2" min. width and 4" height on contrasting background. May note on site plan. 7) See drawing for additional corrections or clarification of corrections LIGHT AND VENTILATION 8) Safety glazing is required in hazardous locations. Check required clearance as noted on A2.0. Scales< a) Glazing adjacent to doors within 24" arc of the vertical edge in closed position. MEANS OF EGRESS 9) Provide and show smoke detectors in each hallway leading to sleeping rooms, in each sleeping room of new and existing construction, and in each story. In new construction detectors to be hard wired with battery back up. Detectors shall be interconnected to sound at the same time. 10) Provide door schedule for all doors which are required to meet any fire or energy rating. FOAM= 11) Please see comments under WSEC for foam question. ROOF ASSEMBLIES 12) Provide minimum 2% slope at flat roof and deck. A section or a cut sheet to clarify the balcony will suffice. If balcony is an architectural detail and this is a plant -on type system, a detail for waterproofing would be helpful. IRC 905.11-.15.1. 13) Show location of 22"x30" attic access. Attic access is shown on an interior bearing wall. Please clarify. Mechanical equipment in the attic requires access size sufficient to remove largest unit. (IRC 1305 & 807) GARAGE AND CARPORT 14) The stairs which are being reconfigured for the new living space that abut the garage will require occupancy separation from the existing garage. The wall marked on A2.1 is the wall in question. Additionally, no where on the plans is the boiler location noted. I strongly recommend indicating the location of the boiler in order to address any fire/occupancy separation issues which may arise due to boiler location. It is my assumption that the tankless water heater is intended for domestic use only. The tankless as located on the elevations will present problems with the venting requirements. Please show venting for the tankless and provide manufacturer installation details for c:\documents and settings\jastle\my documents\plancheck\port townsend\09-022\bld09-022.doc Page 1 venting. The following are required for attached garage/carport: a) Specify 1/2" gypsum board for walls, posts and beams of garage adjacent to or supporting residential uses. b) Minimum 5/8" Type X G.B. Com? roof/ceiling when there is habitable space above. (IRC 309.2) c) Self-closing, tight -fitting, solid wood 1-3/8" thick door or a 20 -minute rated door at openings to dwelling. (309.1) CONSTRUCTION 15) Fire blocking, vertical or horizontal, shall conform to Sec. 602.8. Clarify stairway at southwest side of dwelling. 16) In section, specify exterior wall covering over weather - resistive barrier. (IRC 703.2) Section should show following: a) Primary wall construction material(s) i.e. 2X4 studs, ICF, masonry, footings, foundations, subgrade structures, anchor bolts, etc. b) Water resistive barrier c) Insulation- R value and location- structural does not meet the requirements d) Exterior wall finish e) Interior wall finish D Finish grade g) Weep screed or weep holes h) Stone and masonry veneer support (IRC 730.7) 17) Exterior plaster requires two layers of Grade D paper over all wood base sheathing. (IRC 703.6.3) _ .__18) For factory built metal fireplace specify: Manufacturer, model and ES/UL number. 19) Masonry and factory -built fireplaces have outside air intake with a damper and means to prevent burning material from entering the duct. Outside air intake shall not be from basement, garage, or located higher than the firebox. Show intake on plans. 20) Masonry/concrete fireplaces to be certified per Washington State Building Code Standard 31-2. 21) Chimney to terminate no less than 2' above 10' radius. Minimum termination is 3' above roof penetration. Scale on plans. 22) Wall covering shall nonabsorbent to 6' above drain inlet at showers or tub with showers. 23) Flame spread ratings for vapor barriers, fiberboard, loose fill or cellulose insulation and permeable membranes within assemblies cannot exceed 25 with a smoke index not to exceed 450. Provide verification or specifications for all insulative materials shown in typical wall sections. WA STATE ENERGY CODE 24) Submit forms and calculations. a) Incorporate all of the requirements of the energy analysis into the plans. 25) Alterations or repairs to buildings which met the code at the time of construction are subject to all requirements of this code. Envelope changes/repairs must improve energy efficiency of the building. Lighting and mechanical are subject to this code. 26) Envelope Compliance- Please provide insulation values, specs, for wall types, slab and footing in section. Your radiant floor must meet Sections 502.1.4.8b and 502.1.4.9 of the WSEC. Type V does not apply to R-3 occupancy. Please provide specific information in section and provide Option #. See Table 6-1. a) Prescriptive- Climate Zone 1 b) Glazing @ 10%= .32 U value (1) above grade walls=R15 (2) R15- int. below grade c) UnlimiicU glazing=.35 U value (1) above grade walls=R21 (2) R21 for int. below grade d) Doors=.2 U value e) Ceiling insulation =R-38 f) Vaulted ceilings=R-30 g) Ext. walls below grade= R10 h) Floors=R30 i) Slabs=R10 (24" min, see 502.1.4.8) 27) Lighting- Prescriptive/Performance See attached. Provide legend for can lights which will need to meet WSEC specs.t a) Exterior lighting attached to structure to be either high efficacy or photo/motion sensor control. b) All recessed lighting to be IC rated and gasketed or caulked at ceiling. 28) Exterior doors and windows to be designed and built to reduce air infiltration. Such openings shall be sealed, caulked, gasketed or weatherstripped. Note only. 29) Each mech system to have separate thermostat. Show thermostat location on plans. With buildings with multiple zones, identify each thermostat with the system it controls. 30) Heating/cooling by other than air to air, ground to air, or water to air heat pumps, must sized per 503, balanced and listed as complying with NAECA.( National Appliance Energy Conservation Act). 31) Each zone shall have a readily accessible manual or automatic means for reducing heating/cooling temperatures during periods of disuse, and to prevent the flow of conditioned air to unused floor area(s) when building is occupied. Show method on plans. 32) Specify the maximum flow rate for showerheads, tub and sink faucets per WAC 51-56. IAO 33) Provide whole house venting and source specific venting either prescriptively or by performance method. All habitable rooms require minimum of 4 sq. in. inlets. See mark ups on plans. a) The whole house fan shown lacks minimum cfms for square footage. b) The air inlets for chimney effect reduction suffice for master. c) Please clarify ventilation to demonstrate compliance with IAQ 303.4 including controls. 34) All fireplaces and solid fuel burning appliances require tight fitting glass or metal doors. The oven qualifies as a solid fuel burning appliance. Provide details for compliance. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL 35) Provide heating facilities and show location of equipment. Provide specs to verify size and listing. 36) Show source of combustion air to boiler and water heater. Show vents/chimneys to outside. 37) Show how heat -producing appliances in garage will be protected from automobile damage. (If applicable) 38) Elements of appliances which create a glow, spark, or flame shall be located a minimum of 18" above garage floor. 39) Show clothes dryer exhaust as .016" rigid metal duct (min. 4" diameter) to the outside and equip with a back -draft damper. Duct length is limited to 25'. Reduce allowable length by 2.5' for each 45 deg elbow and 5' for each 90 deg. STRUCTURAL by PE on Separate list. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS eMocuments and settings\ astle\my documents\plancheck\port townsend\09-022\bId09-022.doc Page 2 _There is virtually no information regarding your radiant floor system. At the very minimum you need to provide boiler location, sizing, thermostat zoning, etc. to show WSEC compliance and address associated fire/life/safety compliance. The actual system installation details, gas piping, recirc pump, etc.; may be addressed when mechanical permit application is submitted. Odocuments and settings\jastle\my documentsWancheck\port townsend\09-022\bId09-022.doc Page 3 DATE: March 2, 2009 TO: B2 Structural Engineers 7516 NE 153`" Place NE Kenmore, WA 98028 ATTENTION: Basri Basri Correction Notice #1 Dear Mr. Basri, i i-------- Tfa, STRUCTURAL; ENGINEERS _.__------- ----., RE: Timmons Residence Plan Check #: 08-246 PHONE NO: (425) 296-2993 The following are our plan review comments. The comments refer only to the structural portions of the drawings and the structural calculations. 1. Provide ICC number or report for the "Faswall" system shown on the drawings. The ICC report should state the code allowed R value for seismic design. The shear walls for the "Faswall" system should be shown on the drawings as concrete shear wall elevations, not in a table as shown on sheet S9. 2. Sheet S 1 & structural calculations: Revise calculations and drawings as needed for an R value of not more than 5, due to concrete shear walls being used in both directions. The lower R value controls the calculation. 3. Sheet S 1 & structural calculations: Revise calculations and drawings as needed for the minimum roof snow load of 25psf per the city of Port Townsend. 4. Sheet S2: Provide details for the pilasters shown. 5. Sheets S3 & S4: Clarify the joist framing call -outs. Show the extent of the sizes referenced. 6. Structural Calculations: Provide diaphragm calculations and chord force calculations (for the wood walls). If you have any questions regarding our comments above, please feel free to contact us at our office. We will make ourselves available to help you in this review process. Very truly yours, RFA Structural Engineers /nnifer D ohn P.EManag r 2013 4th Avenue, Suite 202 Seattle, Washington 98121 • T: 206.615.9700 F: 206.615.7737 W: www.rfaengineers.com osr rCity of Port Townsend p Kee"lopmetit Services Department (o 250 Madison Street, Suite 3 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-5095 Fax: (360) 344-4619 CU R't *3 % on State Energy Code (WSEC) ®G--c�- 2 01 sidential Construction Checklist Complete this o addition to WSEC forms. Please answer the following questions TYPE OF PROJECT: New construction, or addition over 750 square feet Must meet whole house and spot ventilation requirements, and show full WSEC compliance as a stand-alone project. A detached, habitable structure such as an Accessory Dwelling Unit regardless of size must also meet these requirements. House addition under 750 square feet Possible trade-offs are allowed with the existing buildingfor WSEC complia7Ce, such as increasing ceiling insulation. See WSEC component performance forms. j NOTE. A house addition less than 500 sq. ft. does not require whole house ventilation. Spot ventilation is still required _ TYPE OF HEATING — Please check all that apply: Electric =;.. Wall Heater 'Baseboard 'Forced Air Furnace Radiant `Floor (Boiler) I Other Non -Electric: Propane.%Radiant Floor/Baseboard (Boiler) �L'PGStove LPG Furnace Other LPG Heat Pump JA Oil Furnace I -A Woodstove (can only be. used as secondary heat source) VAPOR RETARDERS: _ Vapor retarders shall be installed toward a warm surface as represented below. Select one option for floors, walls, and approprialings: • Floors: Plywood with exterior glue ViToly plastic (greater than or equal to 4 millimeter thick) Backed batts • Walls: Poly plastic (greater thar. equal to 4 millimeter thick) I Face -stapled, backediatfs r N/Low-perm pair • Ceilings: 1 Not required where�ventilatiori space averages greater than or equal to 12 inches above insulation Face -stapled, backed batts i Poly plastic (greater tharor equal to 4 millimeter thick) N/Low-perm paint SEE BACK http://ptimaging/DSDBuilding_FormsBuddingPerntitPackedApplication-Residential Energy Code Checklist.doc Pagel of 2 WASHINGTON STATE VENTILATION AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY (2000 Code): Type of ventilation used throughout the house: ' HVAC Integrated Option VExhaustOption Whole House Fan for "Exhaust Option": • In what room is your whole house fan loc ? L • What size is the whole house exhaust fan. 150-75 CFM1- bedroom house) 80-1 FM (3 bedroom house) 100-150 CFM (4 bedroom house) 2� 120- 0 CFM (5 bedroom house) Note: the whole house fan shall be readily accessible and controlled by a 24-hour clock timer with the capability of continuous operation, manual and automatic control. At the time of final inspection, the automatic control timer shall be set to operate the whole house fan for at least 8 hours a day, and have a sone rating at 1.5 or less measured at 0.10 inches water gauge. Spot Ventilation: Source specific exhaust ventilation is required in each kitchen, bathroom, water closet, laundry room, indoor swimming pool, spa and other rooms where excess water vapor or cooking odor is produced. Bathrooms, laundries or similar rooms require fans with a minimum 50 cfm rating at 0.25 inches water gauge; kitchens shall have a fan with a minimum 100 cfm rating at 0.25 inches water gauge. Outdoor Air Inlets: Outdoor air shall be distributed to each habitable room by means such as individual inlets, separate duct systems, or a forced -air system. Habitable rooms include all bedrooms, living and dining rooms but not kitchens, bathrooms or utility rooms. Where outdoor air supplies are separated from.exhaust points by doors, undercutting doors a minimum of %2 inch above the surface of the 'f nish floor covering, distribution ducts, installation or grilles, transoms or similar means where permitted by the Uniform Building Code. When the system provides ventilation through a dedicated opening, such as a window or through -wall vent, these openings must: • Have controlled and secure openings • Be sleeved or otherwise designed so as not to compromise the thermal properties of the wall or window in which they are placed. • Provide not less than 4 square inches of net free area of opening for each habitable space. What type of fresh air inlet will be installed? (See figure below) Window Ports V Wall Ports http://ptimaging/DSDBuilding_FormsBuildingPermitPacketlApplication-Residential Energy Code Checklist.doc Page 2 of 2 The following table shows typical insulation requirements for single rafter joist. If the table notes R-38, then R-38 is required. Prescriptive Footnote 3, Table 6-1 or 6-2 Rafter Insulation Based on Fiber lass Batts Nominal Actual Max depth with 1 " ventilation First 500 SF Over 500 SF R -value R -value 2X10 9 1/4" 8 1/4" R-30 HID Note' 2X12 11 1/4" 10 1/4" R-30 R-38 HID 2X14. 131/4" 131/4" R-38 R-38 I -Joist 9 1/2" 8 1/2" R-30 HID Note' I -Joist 11 7/8" 1 10 7/8" R-30 R-38 HID I -Joist 14" 13" R-38 R-38 I -Joist 16" 15" R-38 R-38 Note 1 Upsize joist or provide an alternative method meeting U-.027. HD Refers high density fiberglass batt or equivalent. A take off noting rafter area will be required. Identical rules are included in 5-1. They will be incorporated into the UA trade off spreadsheet. 11 502.4.4 Recessed Lighting Fixtures: • Must now be tested for air leakage using ASTM E283 • A gasket or caulking must seal the fixture to the drywall • Other options for fixture air sealing, including field inspection and a sealed box have been deleted. This has been an option in Washington since 1991. California mandated testing for air tight can lights two years ago. Since then, every major manufacturer has come on board. The fixtures are readily available. Look for the label in the ean. If the can is not labeled, it does not comply. 505.3 Outdoor Lighting: • Requires high efficiency lighting or controls for all porch lighting • High Efficiency Luminaire is defined in Chapter 2. Typically requires a pin based compact fluorescent fixture • As an exception to the High Efficiency Luminaire, a motion sensor + photo daylight control may be used. 505.4 Linear Fluorescent Fixtures: • This rule applies to typical fluorescent tube fixtures • Linear fluorescent fixtures must be fitted with T-8 (1" diameter) or smaller lamps (but not T 10 or T-12 lamps) ol�s ° (/i c7.-�z bVCGNAIN16 20 GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL SURROUND WITH 1/2" CEMENT BOARD FRONT PANEL --% ARCH OF 1 3/4" FLOOR TILE 2" x 2" TUBULAR STEEL FRAME - 4" x 4" x 114" STEEL FEET - 382" ARCH OPENIM (PROJECT 2") STAINLESS S" BOLT -ON SF I OUTSIDE & SHELF WIDTH NrrDIO 110 FORNO AL FRESCO BUILT IN ENCLOSURE >> i O -L NOTES: CLEARANCES STEEL PAN WITH 4 THERMAL SLAB ULAR STEEL STAN[ -1 LEVELING FEET The oven shall be installed a minimum of 2" away from combustible material from back wall to oven and side wall to oven. You may bridge the gap between any wood framing and the oven by using metal framing with concrete board or masonry. WEIGHT 2000# VENTING The oven is direct vented with a 6' chimney pipe listed to the UL 103 HT standard. The chimney starts with an anchor plate and requires a minimum rise of 36' for the oven to properly draft. The Chimney must terminate to a UL listed spark arrestor installed 2' taller than any structure within a 10' radius. UTILITIES No electricity or gas required. LISTINGS Mugnaini Wood -fired Ovens have been tested and comply with the UL -737 safety standard. 1 � y C—crD,S axeS 24 M/ (`�`•,, Progressive changes technology in technology and product development may neccesitate changes to specifications without notice. DRAWINGS NOT TO SCALE MUGNAINI IMPORTS -11 Hangar Way, Watsonville, CA 95076 - www.mugnaini.com - mugnaini@mugnaini.com Toll Free: 888 887-7206 - Phone: 831 761 1767 - Fax 831 728-5570 1 of 12 R� 114,74 ®w • _ • ♦1 P hof wA Sy�ry S.Q ♦ www.b2engineers.com Al a 7516 NE 153rd Place NE �= F Kenmore, WA 98028PLAN CHECK RESPONSE #2 t3 4-09 ,� � (425) 296-2993 ��O\fa'. 43789FCIST TIMMONS RESIDENCE OA-1. STRUCTURAL DESIGN EXPIRES MAY 212010 PROJECT NO. 0901 03124109 Buildino Codes International Building Code (IBC) (2006) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 7 (2005) National Design Specifications (NDS) for Wood Construction (2005) American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Steel Construction Manual Thirteen Edition (2005) American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318-05 (2005) American Concrete Institute (ACI) 530-05 (2005) Calculation Description The Faswall has been re -analyzed as ordinary reinforced concrete wall with R equals of 4. The IBC 2006 states that this system should comply with ACI 2005 chapter 1 to 18. The walls are found to have ample capacity to meet the required seismic demand. RECEIVED APR 3 - 2009 CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND ADMINISTRATION iLC11'1.1 m• Job No: Op Sheet No: www.b2ergineers.com PrOiect TMAIQAJ2 41CLOCAVCC Sheet Title: Checked By: Made By: Pd�i 7516 NE 153rd Place NE Kenmore, WA 98028 (425) 296-2993 Date: Date: 03 2. 'WO FAs wftGL L476-ghl- D€S/fes VAGv55 as" FOP- oes/4k) SSS 0.88 0-(/I/ SDG = D I _ bo (oko1No*Zy "1A)F02C6v C& ICOM&) V z 0.2 faase sap aeiaC6ecL Sfrpadsked fox kiron)1-c.. Y�Ox ce caic c a "s �94L 6A>6n4t- GBia Ppe- IA�6,(- Z -TBG S TA7ES 014!21A.�A0% G�/NFO=C�Q� CDNG� T� S%G�UG%l�u�-f1L Ltr�3'Gfi To ACT CNOV76-w- m, Job No: d O/ Sheet No: www.b2engineers.com Project: 7loN Sheet Title: Checked By: Made By: OAS 7516 NE 153rd Place NE Kenmore, WA 98028 (425) 296-2993 Date: Date: O 3 Z r vV ?U11evE S~ct3rP�C i r 1 rer, 46 N. /o 5 of 4,0 ai #Z/ ®16 va vo Z f� haQ Z 5 1, Pt7 w)o>H 6F t,1,091 = a ( NOW 1--// I Jr4 6�,) VG 5 A 0 84 21"412" z-- 1/0 k- vszAV f� d s Av s a. 2 /N Z 4 I Z j=- 2 0 2 %AJ US G. Z 60 K- /6 In �V" V'- vow 0.754 (//014 /"5- /'96 Uu ?a,6�./.. V/7 0i4/ A)WiL 6th ACI T'll' /s fiur'# W(. -rasp- i#f19v Me .�� 1=0'ece 2 mJob No: Q fp j Sheet No: • www.b2engineers.com 7516 NE 153rd Place NE Pro's TIMA4,019 AF -S Sheet Title: Checked By: Made By: 61S Kenmore, WA 98028 (425)2W2993 Date: Date: 43 , CZ Z1, Z To 7,57 P¢ o. o. fla 25 o, oa a o5/ 51W W4- o hto�i� oN7 k�-iiv r 7`f S�Ifi tc--,S T 13 * SoAc lnnr p 1,6 " ep, D,002'.r #L/ V 12" S#* tc 'er l°e 0.2 z 0.00 33 > d, oo 2S' ©1` 5� IZ SMCINrr of V6FX riot- ,eiNF . s #Ift RV ?o' S��1 GGA T O P- Q��3 a 2 # /Z/3 $ f use sA c/aa- 01p /Z" 2 m® Job No: p C�' p� Sheet No: www.b2engineers.com Project: T f" A/S Oz�S 4VJ -Sheet Title: Checked By: Made By: A%43 7516 NE 153rd Place NE Kerunore, WA 98028 (425) 296.2993 pate: Date: d 3 A O mime, Aeloovr, Ov/ 2 3G � e . • e • s d s ���� 16tA rcoi. /S of 7o )pxoA)ee � )r ewux.r iNTe /off Pim," e SiFe ,7ff-�� (21. z . Z47so 3G � e . • e • s d s ���� 16tA rcoi. /S of 7o )pxoA)ee � )r ewux.r iNTe /off Pim," e SiFe ,7ff-�� IBC2006 (1613), ASCE 7-05 CHAPTER 11, 12,13 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Response Spectral Acc. (0.2 sec) Ss =130.00%g = 1.300g Figure 22-1 through 22-14 Response Spectral Acc.( 1.0 sec) S, = 48.00%g = 0.480g Figure 22-1 through 22-14 Soil Site Class Table 20-3-1, Default = D Site Coefficient Fa=1,000 Table 11.4-1 Site Coefficient F,=1.521 Table 11.4-2 Max Considered Earthquake Acc. SMS= F .S = 1.300 (11.4-1) Max Considered Earthquake Acc. SM, = F,.S, = 0.730 (11.4-2) @ 5% Damped Design SDs=2/3(SMs) = 0.867 (11.4-3) SDI =2/3(SM,) =0.487 (11.4-4) Building Occupancy Categories 11, standard Table 1-1 Design Category Consideration: I Flexible Diaphragm with dist. between seismic resisting system >401`t Seismic Design Category for 0.1 sec D Table 11.6-1 Seismic Design Category for 1.0sec D Table 11.6-2 S1 <.75g NA Section 11.6 Since Ta < .8Ts (see below), SDC = D Control (exception of Section 11.6 does not apply) Comply with Seismic Design Category D IRC, Seismic Design Category = D2 T -R301.2.2.1.1 12.8 Equivalent lateral force procedure A. BEARING WALL SYSTEMS T -12.2 - Seismic Force Resisting Systems 2. ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls C,=0.02 x = 0.75 T-12.8-2 Building ht. H,= 20 ft Limited Building Height (ft) = NP C.=1.400 for Sp, Of0.487g Table 12.8-1 Approx Fundamental period, T. = C,(h,)' = 0,189 12.8-7 T, = 2.000 Sec Calculated T shall not exceed <_ Cu.Ta = 0.000 Use T = .1l18 sec. 0.8Ts = 0.8(So,/Sos) = 0.449 Control (exception of Section 11.6 does not apply) Is structure Regular &:5 5 stories '?F---7 12.8.1.3 Response Spectral Acc.( 0.2 sec) S,=1.300g Max Ss:5 1.5g F, =1.00 @ 5% Damped Design SDs='�3(F,.S) = 0.867g (11.4-3) Response Modification Coef. R = 4 Table -12.2-1 Over Strength Factor 12 = 2 foot note g Importance factor I = 1 Table 11.5-1 Seismic Base Shear V = C,W C.= wl =0.217 (12.8-2) or need not to exceed, C. = SD' --0.643 For T5 T, (12.8-3) (R/1).T or C = SD'T` C. N/A For T > TL (12.8-4) T2(R/1) C, shall not be less than = 0.01 (12.8-5) Min C = 0.5S,1/R N/A For S, s 0.6g (12.8-6) Use C. = 0.217 Design base shear V = 0.217 W Control 1 O t- h F-' N m- - • Job No. Sheet No. • www.b2engineers.tntn Project No. Sheet Title 7516 NE 153rd Place NE Checked By Made By Kenmore, INA 98028 (425) 296-2993 Date Date DEAD LOAD WEIGHTS FOR SEISMIC CALCULATIONS: Unit Roof Weight: 15 psf Unit Floor Weight 50 psf Unit Exterior Wall Weight: 84 psf Unit Interior Corridor Wall Weight: 0 psf Unit Interior Parry Wall Weight: 0 psf Unit Interior Partition Wall Weight: 84 psf LOCATION LENGTH HEIGHT UNIT WT. TOTAL SUB WEIGHT TOTAL ROOF LEVEL: Roof 1300 1.00 15 = 19500 Ext. Wall Below 144 5.0 84 = 60480 psf Corridor Wall Below 0 5.0 0 = 0 62 Party Wall Below (1 5.0 0 = 0 Partition Wall Below 0 50 84 = 0 79980 FOURTH FLOOR LEVEL Floor 0 1 50 = 0 Ext. Wall Above 0 0 84 = 0 Corridor Wall Above 0 0 0 = 0 Party Wall Above 0 0 0 = 0 Partition Wall Above 0 0 84 = 0 Ext. Wall Below 0 0 84 = 0 psf Corridor Wall Below 0 0 0 = 0 #DIV/0! Party Wall Below 0 0 0 = 0 Partition Wall Below 0 0 84 = 0 0 THIRD FLOOR LEVEL Floor 0 1 50 = 0 Ext. Wall Above 0 0 84 = 0 Corridor Wall Above 0 11 0 = 0 Party Wall Above O 11 0 = 0 Partition Wall Above 0 0 84 = 0 Ext. Wall Below 0 0 84 = 0 psf Corridor Wall Below (1 0 0 = 0 #DIV/0! Party Wall Below U 0 0 = 0 Partition Wall Below 0 0 84 = 0 0 SECOND FLOOR LEVEL Floor 650 1 50 = 32500 Ext. Wall Above 144 5.0 84 = 60480 Corridor Wall Above 0 0.0 0 = 0 Party Wall Above 0 0.0 0 = 0 Partition Wall Above 36 5.0 84 = 15120 Ext. Wall Below 144 5.0 84 = 60480 psf Corridor Wall Below 0 5A 0 = 0 283 Party Wall Below 0 5.0 0 = 0 Partition Wall Below 36 5.0 84 = 15120 183700 STRUCTURE WEIGHT FOR SHEAR WALL TOTAL: 263.7 Kips FOUNDATION LEVEL: Ext, Wall Above (1 5.0 84 = 0 Corridor Wall Above 0 5.0 0 = 0 Party Wall Above 0 5.0 0 = 0 Partition Wall Above 0 5.0 84 = 0 STRUCTURE WEIGHT FOR BASE SHEAR TOTAL: 263.7 Kips J 0 M N N P2 Structural engineers www.b2ergineers.com 7516 NE 153rd Place NE Kenmore, WA 98028 (425)296-2993 Vertical Seismic Distribution Cs = 0.22 W W = 263.7 kips V = 57.1 kips Important: It is assumed that the R value is the same Rho = 1 for both directions No. Title By E/W Direction 263.7 3437 57.13 40.81 40.81 598.02 Diaphragm Seismic Distribution Story Total Story Force Story Story Story Story Mot Floor Height Height Weight Wi'Hl Force Shear Force Shear Fpx Fpx/1.4 Hi Ht Wi Hl Fi E/1.4 Fi E/1.4 E/1.4 H it kis k -ft kis kis kis kis (kip -ft) Roof 10.00 20.00 80.0 1600 26.6 19.0 26.6 19.0 379.89 Fourth 0.00 10.00 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 Third 0.00 10.00 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 Second 10.00 10.00 183.7 1837 30.5 21.8 30.5 21.8 218.13 Ground 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0 263.7 3437 57.13 40.81 40.81 598.02 Diaphragm Seismic Distribution 263.7 57.1 tp O Ifi N N Story TotalStory Force Calculated Max Min Governing Transverse Longitudinal Floor Height Height Weight Distribution Fpx Fpx Fpx Fpx Fpx/1.4 Fpx/1.4 Hi Hl Wi Fx H H kis kis kis kis kis kis I I Roof 10.00 20.00 80.0 26.6 26.6 27.7 13.9 26.6 526 526 Fourth 0.00 10.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 #DN/01 #DIV/01 Third 0.00 10.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 #DN/01 #DN/01 Second 10.00 10.00 183.7 30.5 39.8 63.7 31.8 39.8 1575 1575 Ground 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 263.7 57.1 tp O Ifi N N m�(j(•,y Job No. Sheet No. www.b2engineers.com Project No. Sheet Ti9e 7516 NE 153rd Place NE Checked By Made By Kenmore, WA 98028 Fourth 0.00 (425) 296.2993 Date Date Level Wind (Trans.) kis Wind (Long.) kis Seismic Trans.) kis Seismic (Long.) ki s Roof 1.77 4.23 18.99 18.99 Fourth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Third 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Second 1 5.22 4.23 1 21.81 1 21.81 Total 1 6.99 8.47 1 40.81 40.81 Controlling: Transverse - Seismic Longitudinal - Seismic 18.991 0.00 K 0.00 K 21.81 K Transverse Direction Longitudinal Direction 18.99" 0.00 K 000K 21.81 K Al Y 432 x 5 in Code: ACI 318-95 Units: English Run axis: About Y-axis Run option: Investigation Slenderness: Not considered Column type: Structural Bars: ASTM A615 Date: 03/24/09 Time: 21:39:30 P (kip) 1600 -400 10 of 12 PCACOL V3.00 (PCA 1999) - Licensed to: Licensee name not yet specified. File: untitled.col Project: TIMMONS RESIDENCE Column: 5" WALL Engineer: BB fc = 3 ksi fy = 60 ksi Ag = 2160 in^2 Ec = 3122 ksi Es = 29000 ksi As = 7.20 in^2 fc = 2.55 ksi e_rup = Infinity Xo = 0.00 in e_u = 0.003 in/in Yo = 0.00 in Beta1 = 0.85 Clear spacing = 11.50 in .Confinement: Tied-phi(a) = 0.8, phi(b) = 0.9, phi(c) = 0.7 36 #4 bars Rho = 0.33% Ix = 4500 in^4 ly = 3.35923e+007 in A4 Clear cover = N/A 03/24/09 PCACOL V3.00 - PORT CEMENT ASSOCIATION - 21:39:23 Licensed to: Licensee name not yet specified. General Information: File Name: untitled.col Project: TIMMONS RESIDENCE Column: 5" WALL Code: ACI 318-95 Run Option: Investigation Run Axis: Y-axis Material Properties: -------------------- -------------------- f'c = 3 ksi Ec = 3122.02 ksi fc = 2.55 ksi Ultimate strain = 0.003 in/in Betal = 0.85 Engineer: BB Units: English Slenderness: Not considered Column Type: Architectural fy = 60 ksi Es = 29000 ksi Rupture strain = Infinity Page 2 untitled 11 of 12 Section: Exterior Points No. X (in) Y (in) No. X (in) Y (in) No. X (in) Y (in) ------------------------- ------------------------- ----- ---------- ---------- 1 -216.0 -2.5 2 216.0 -2.5 3 216.0 2.5 4 -216.0 2.5 Gross section area, Ag = 2160 in"2 Ix = 4500 inA4 Iy = 3.35923e+007 inA4 Xo = 0 in Yo = 0 in Reinforcement: Rebar Database: ASTM A615 Size Diam (in) Area (in'2) ------------------------ # 3 0.38 0.11 # 6 0.75. 0.44 # 9 1.13 1.00 # 14 1.69 2.25 Size Diam (in) Area (in'2) # 4 0.50 0.20 # 7 0.88 0.60 # 10 1.27 1.27 # 18 2.26 4.00 Size Diam (in) Area (in A2) ------------------------ # 5 0.63 0.31 # 8 1.00 0.79 ## 11 1.41 1.56 Confinement: Tied; #3 ties with #10 bars, #4 with larger bars. phi(a) = 0.8, phi(b) = 0.9, phi(c) = 0.7 Pattern: Irregular Total steel area, As = 7.20 in'2 at 0.330 Area in A2 X (in) Y (in) 0.20 -210.0 0.0 0.20 -174.0 0.0 0.20 -138.0 0.0 0.20 -102.0 0.0 0.20 -66.0 0.0 0.20 -30.0 0.0 0.20 6.0 0.0 0.20 42.0 0.0 0.20 78.0 0.0 0.20 114.0 0.0 0.20 150.0 0.0 0.20 186.0 0.0 Area inA2 X (in) Y (in) 0.20 -198.0 0.0 0.20 -162.0 0.0 0.20 -126.0 0.0 0.20 -90.0 0.0 0.20 -54.0 0.0 0.20 -18.0 0.0 0.20 18.0 0.0 0.20 54.0 0.0 0.20 90.0 0.0 0.20 126.0 0.0 0.20 162.0 0.0 0.20 198.0 0.0 Area in'2 X (in) Y (in) 0.20 -186.0 0.0 0.20 -150.0 0.0 0.20 -114.0 0.0 0.20 -78.0 0.0 0.20 -42.0 0.0 0.20 -6.0 0.0 0.20 30.0 0.0 0.20 66.0 0.0 0.20 102.0 0.0 0.20 138.0 0.0 0.20 174.0 0.0 0.20 210.0 0.0 ,103/24/09 PCACOL V3.00 - PORTL CEMENT ASSOCIATION - 21:39:23 Licensed to: Licensee name not yet specified. Page 3 untitled 12 of 12 Factored Loads and Moments with Corresponding Capacities: (see user's manual for notation) --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Pu Muy fMny No. kip k -ft k -ft fMn/Mu --- ------------ ------------ ------------ -------- 1 149.0 837.0 7136.0 8.526 *** Program completed as requested! *** CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CITY O This certificate is issued as adopted and amendec structure and use was d the City of Port Townser Property Owner: Building Address: Type of Construction: Date Issued: 0 January 27, 20 SEND TMENT ermit Number: national Building Code issuance, the indicated ides and ordinances of of buildings. N/A R-3 R-1 BLD 09-022 Buildink Official Q16 Y) A Iv k�' t� 1u N n 45TRUG Ok V-N�- NO -Dc�. TIWE G�-- j'K'F<2'. o -3 e-(-) ":7A' Tz-ezv-9�>�-'V'- / \ 4 03 -"Y\` , fWt b' ` St.- 6RASS \\ 4' TIOHT�INE ALAN6 �O , 1 � / / / 5 f/EXISTiNr, / FOyNTAIN E9I5TIN5 POND DRPEIRIYY TO \ � k ` NEH 5FR 1,516 5F FOOTPRINT EXI5TIN6--� 6ARA6E AND LIVING SPACE ABOVE TYP. ROOF OY W446 i EXISTING' / TRS TO REMAIN / 0 ?`9� M'=5 S GARDENS 4aTH 5T. IQTH 5T. A i d � KAI-TAI `U w LAGOON -' 12TH 5T. 5R 20 NORTH YIGINIiY N.T.S. v \ v , NEN 6RAVEI- HAI.KWAY �\ �• AND 6U \T PARKINS. / v 4 ' NE 4 250 6A. \ PROPANE TAtf, \ EXISTING \\ PROPANE TAA \\ � REVIEWED ° /11.V ✓1116- 1 16-1 N♦ v 1 Iw.+rv. ..r v., v ...v.. A2.0 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A2.1 UPPER FLOOR PLAN A3.0 5ECTION5 A3.1 5EGTION5 A4.0 HE5T s 50UTH ELEVATIONS A4.1 EA5T $ NORTH ELEVATION5 A5.0 MAIN FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN A5.1 UPPER FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN 5TRUGTURAL 5-1 GENERAL NOTES 5-2 MAIN FLOOR PLAN 5-3 5ECOND FLOOR PLAN 5-4 ROOF PLAN 5-5 5ECTION5I 5-6 DETAIL51 5-1 DETAIL5 2 5-& DETAIL5 3 5-a TYPICAL DETAIL5 AND 50HEOULE NOTE TO OHNERS GONTRAGTOR5 AND BUILDING OFFICIAL5: I. THESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO CONTAIN ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING AND ZONING CODES. IN CASE OF ANY INFORMATION THAT APPEARS TO BE LACKING, PLEASE CONTACT THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 2. THESE PLANS CONTAIN THE MAJORITY OF THE INFORMATION REGURED TO BUILD THE 5TRUCTURE 5HoM ON THE PLANS. HOWEVER, IT 15 NOT POSSIBLE TO ANTICIPATE EVERY PIECE OF INFORMATION NEEDED FOR WN5TF44TIOK THE ARCHITECTS HAVE MADE A 600D FAITH EFFORT TO 5TRIKE A REASONABLE BALANCE BETYEN PRCY15ION OF INFORMATION AND C05T OF THE PLANS. THE PLANS HIL_ INEVITABLY CONTAIN MINOR 015GREPANGIES AND AREAS LACKING IN 5PEGIFIC INFORMATION. DURING THE COIXL OF CONSTRUGTION, AS THESE AREA5 EMERSE, THEY HILL REQUIRE ATTENTION AND RE50LIJTION. THE BEST RESOLUTION OF 15WES OF THIS TYPE 15 MOST OFTEN ACHIEVED THROWH A JOINT DECISION MAKING PROCESS INVOLVING THE OWNERS, ARCHITECT AND 6ONTRACTOR(5). DOMSPOUT CATCH BA51N (YARD DRAIN) DEDR1'WELL PLAN VIER N.T.5. 48 INCH DIAMETEit HOLE FILLED WITH 3' WASHED DRAIN ROCK Mix Design Report COTTON REDIMIX P.O. Box 179 121 PROMWELL RD. PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339 USA 800-732-5683 seeMIX III Mix Report 7 sk 30p- [0] Strength Compressive: 3500 PSI 05/06/2009 Customer : CRANSTON CONSTRUCTION Class: 3500 PSI Aggregate size : 3/8" -- 9.5 mm Air: 6.0 ± 1.0 % Water/Cement ratio : 0.456 Slump : 5.00 ± 0.10 in Constituents : Source of Concrete Construction type : GENERAL Placement: N. A. Unit Weight: 143.34 pcf Design Date : 07/11/2008 Quantity Density Volume 05/06/2009 CEM02 - ABC Type 1/II Cement (ASH GROVE CEMENT) 658 Ib 3.150 3.348 WAT01 - City Water (City Water supply) 300 Ib 1.000 4.808 FA1 - ASTM C-33 Concrete Sand (PLANT 1) 2045 Ib 2.660 12.320 PEA - Pea gravel (PLANT 1) 863 Ib 2.700 5.122 AIR - MB -AE 90 (BASF ADMIXTURES INC) 2.70 floz (US)/yd3 1.200 0.003 WR - POLYHEED 997 (BASF ADMIXTURES INC) 42.00 floz (US)/yd3 1.100 0.044 Air 5.0%. 1.350 Total : 3869 26 994 Remarks Reported by DENNIS MORGAN Approval by Date : 04/20/2009 Date: 05/06/2009 7 sk 30p- [0J 3500 PSI Concrete Mixture Submittal Mix Design Report Mix Analysis Yield Unit Wt: 143.34 Volume: 26.994 Yield: 99.98 Mix Analysis Vol %Total % Mortar : 73.7 Cag/Tag Q : 1.4 Tot. FM : 4.00 1 : 40.0 SS -mod: 36.12 Q/Q+I: 3.3 M.S.F: 39.38 W : 58.6 Wadj : 61.1 26.4 70.oc 65.0c 60.00 55.00 50.00 a Y 45.00 L 0 3 40.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 1 Paste and Mortar Coarseness Factor Chart Iv ou �,u 40 30 20 10 0 Coarseness Factor Q/(Q+I) 05/06/2009 2 Vol %Total %Agg %Mortar %Paste +3/8 0.236 0.9 1.4 3/848 6.876 25.5 39.4 +#8 7.112 26.4 40.8 Mortar 19.883 73.6 -#8 10.331 38.3 59.2 52.1 Paste 9.552 35.3 47.9 Powder 3.348 12.4 16.8 35.1 Air 1.350 5.0 6.8 14.2 Water 4.854 18.0 24=45 TOTAL 27.00 100.0 100.ol 100 n I 100.0 Coarseness Factor Chart Iv ou �,u 40 30 20 10 0 Coarseness Factor Q/(Q+I) 05/06/2009 2 7 sk 30p- 10] 3500 PSI Mix Design Report Concrete Mixture Submittal 05/06/2009 Design summary Water Design % Reduction: 0.0 Manual Entry Method DRUW / FA: 0.00 pcf FA Density: 0.00 pcf Quantity: 300 Ib Cement Design Number of tests: 0 Manual Entry Method Cement Efficiency: 0.00 psi/Ib Standard Deviation: 0 Prob. low test. 1 in: 100 Water/Cement Ratio: 0.460 lbs/Ib Quantity: 658 Ib Mineral Additive Design Material name Replacement Method Ratio Quantity % Coarse Aggregate Design Work Adj. Factor: 61.1 Manual Entry Method Percent Mortar: 73.7 Total Fine Modulus: 3.70 CA Fine Modulus: 0.00 Coarse DRUW: 0.00 Quantity: 0 Ib Total Agg. %: 0.00 M. S. F.: 39.380 Fine Aggregate Design Volume: 27.000 yd' Produce Specific Volume Fineness Modulus: 3.71 Quantity: 2908 Ib Admixture Design Material name Quantity Inc. in W/C ratio Inc. in volume AIR - MB -AE 90 (BASF 2.70 floz No Yes V1%Rx POLYHE,ED�997'(BASFv , X42 OOfloz x ,�' „�f k SNo r „ Yes .. 05/06/2009 Mix Design Report COTTON REDIMIX P.O. Box 179 121 PROMWELL RD. PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339 USA 800-732-5683 seeMIX III Mix Report 7 sk 30p- [0] Strength Compressive: 3500 PSI 05/06/2009 Customer : CRANSTON CONSTRUCTION Class : 3500 PSI Aggregate size : 3/8" -- 9.5 mm Air: 6.0±1.0% Water/Cement ratio : 0.456 Slump : 5.00 ± 0.10 in Constituents : Source of Concrete : Construction type : GENERAL Placement : N. A. Unit Weight : 143.34 pcf Design Date : 07/11/2008 05/06/2009 %,4U01JL1LY ucIIJILY VUIUIIIC CEM02 - ABC Type 1/II Cement (ASH GROVE CEMENT) 658 Ib 3.150 3.348 WAT01 - City Water (City Water supply) 300 Ib 1.000 4.808 FA1 - ASTM C-33 Concrete Sand (PLANT 1) 2045 Ib 2.660 12.320 PEA - Pea gravel (PLANT 1) 863 Ib 2.700 5.122 AIR - MB -AE 90 (BASF ADMIXTURES INC) 2.70 floz (US)/yd3 1.200 0.003 WR - POLYHEED 997 (BASF ADMIXTURES INC) 42.00 floz (US)/yd3 1.100 0.044 Air 5.0%. 1.350 Total: 3869 26.994 Remarks Reported by DENNIS MORGAN Approval by Date : 04/20/2009 Date : 05/06/2009 7 sk 30p- (0) 3500 PSI Concrete Mixture Submittal Mix Design Report Mix Analysis Yield Unit Wt: 143.34 Volume: 26.994 Yield : 99.98 Mix Analysis Vol %Total % Mortar: 73.7 Cag/Tag Q : 1.4 Tot. FM: 4.00 1 : 40.0 SS -mod: 36.12 Q/Q+1: 3.3 M.S.F: 39.38 W : 58.6 +#8 Wadj : 61.1 40.8 70.00 65.00 60.00 55.00 50.00 d Y 45.00 L O 3 40.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 Paste and Mortar Coarseness Factor Chart 1vv au du 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Coarseness Factor Q/(Q+1) 05/06/2009 2 Vol %Total %Agg %Mortar %Paste +3/8 0.236 0.9 1.4 3/848 6.876 25.5 39.4 +#8 7.112 26.4 40.8 Mortar 19.883 73.6 -#8 10.331 38.3 59.2 52.1 Paste 9.552 35.3 47.9 Powder 3.348 12.4 16.8 35.1 Air 1.350 5.0 6.8 14.2 Water 4.854 18.0 24.4 51.01 TOTAL 1 27.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.01 Coarseness Factor Chart 1vv au du 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Coarseness Factor Q/(Q+1) 05/06/2009 2 7 sk 30p- [0] 3500 PSI Mix Design Report Water Design Yo Reduction: DRUVV I FA: FA Density: Quantity: Cement Design I Number of tests: Cement Efficiency: Standard Deviation: Prob. low test. I in: Water/Cement Ratio: Quantity: Design summary 0.0 0.00 pcf 0.00 pcf 300 lb 0 0.00 psi/lb 0 100 0.460 lbs/lb 658 lb Concrete Mixture Submittal • Manual Entry Method Manual Entry Method Mineral Additive Design Material name Replacement Method Ratio Quantity % Coarse Aggregate Design Work Adj. Factor: Percent Mortar: Total Fine Modulus: CA Fine Modulus: Coarse DRUW: Quantity: Total Agg. %: M. S. F.: 61.1 73.7 3.70 0.00 0.00 0 lb 0.00 39.380 Fine Aggregate Design Volume: 27.000 yd' Fineness Modulus: 3.71 Quantity: 2908 lb Manual Entry Method ..Produce Specific Volume Admixture Design Material name Quantity Inc. in',W/C ratio. Inc. in volume AIR - MB -AE 90 (BASF 2.70 floz No Yes R YEN 05/06/2009 3 Mix Design Report COTTON REDIMIX P.O. Box 179 121 PROMWELL RD. PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339 USA 800-732-5683 seeMIX III Mix Report 7 sk 30p- [0] Strength Compressive: 3500 PSI 05/06/2009 Customer : CRANSTON CONSTRUCTION Class: 3500 PSI Aggregate size : 3/8" -- 9.5 mm Air: 6.0±1.0% Water/Cement ratio : 0.456 Slump : 15.00 ± 0.10 in Constituents : Source of Concrete : Construction type : GENERAL Placement: N. A. Unit Weight : 143.34 pcf Design Date : 07/11/2008 Quantity Density Volume 05/06/2009 CEM02 - ABC Type 1/II Cement (ASH GROVE CEMENT) 658 Ib 3.150 3.348 WAT01 - City Water (City Water supply) 300 Ib 1.000 4.808 FA1 - ASTM C-33 Concrete Sand (PLANT 1) 2045 Ib 2.660 12.320 PEA - Pea gravel (PLANT 1) 863 Ib 2.700 5.122 AIR - MB -AE 90 (BASF ADMIXTURES INC) 2.70 floz (US)/yd3 1.200 0.003 WR - POLYHEED 997 (BASF ADMIXTURES INC) 42.00 floz (US)/yd' 1.100 0.044 Air 5.0%. 1.350 I Total: 3869 26.994 Remarks Reported by DENNIS MORGAN Approval by Date : 04/20/2009 Date 05/06/2009 7 sk 30p- [0] 3500 PSI Concrete Mixture Submittal Mix Design Report Mix Analysis Yield Unit Wt: 143.34 Volume: 26.994 Yield : 99.98 Mix Analysis Vol %Total % Mortar: 73.7 Cag/Tag Q : 1.4 Tot. FM : 4.00 I : 40.0 SS -mod: 36.12 Q/Q+I: 3.3 M.S.F: 39.38 W : 58.6 +#8 Wadj : 61.1 40.8 70.00 65.00 60.00 55.00 50.00 Y 45.00 O 3 40.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 Paste and Mortar 1v� au Vol %Total %Agg %Mortar %Paste +3/8 0.236 0.9 1.4 3/848 6.876 25.5 39.4 +#8 7.112 26.4 40.8 Mortar 19.883 73.6 -#8 10.331 38.3 59.21 52.1 Paste 9.552 35.3 47.9 Powder 3.348 12.4 16.8 35.1 Air 1.350 5.0 6.8 14.2 Water 4.854 18.0 24.4 51.0 TOTAL 27.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.6- 1v� au ou /u 60 50 40 Coarseness Factor Q/(Q+I) 30 20 10 0 05/06/2009 2 7 sk 30p= [0j 3500 PSI Mix Design Report Concrete Mixture Submittal Cement Design Number of tests: Cement Efficiency: . Standard Deviation: Prob. low test. 1 in: Water/Cement Ratio: Quantity: let 0.00 psi/Ib 0 100 0.460 lbs/Ib 658 Ib Manual Entry Method Mineral Additive Design Material. name Replacement Method Ratio Quantity Coarse Aggregate Design Design summary Water Design 61.1 Manual Entry Method % Reduction: 0.0 Manual Entry Method DRUW / FA: 0.00 pcf FA Density: 0.00 pcf Quantity: 300 Ib Cement Design Number of tests: Cement Efficiency: . Standard Deviation: Prob. low test. 1 in: Water/Cement Ratio: Quantity: let 0.00 psi/Ib 0 100 0.460 lbs/Ib 658 Ib Manual Entry Method Mineral Additive Design Material. name Replacement Method Ratio Quantity Coarse Aggregate Design Work Adj. Factor: 61.1 Manual Entry Method Percent Mortar: 73.7 Total Fine Modulus: 3.70 CA Fine Modulus: 0.00 Coarse DRUW: 0.00 Quantity: 0 lb Total Agg. %: 0.00 M.S.F.: 39.380 Fine Aggregate Design . " .- Volume: 27.000 yd' :; : ' ."..' ; Produce Specific Volume Fineness Modulus. 3.71 Quantity: 2908 lb Admixture Design Material name Quantity Inc. in W/C ratio Inc. in volume AIR MB AE 90 (BASF 2.70 floz No Yes 05/06/2009 3 PERMIT # SCOPE OF WORK: CITY OF PORT TOWNSEO PERMIT ACTIVITY LOG DATE RECEIVED DATE I ACTION I INITIALS ENTERED INTO CHET CHECKED FOR COMPLETENESS SeP 6t1hOq- 03�✓-,,.r%.nAc�n �.. (A �I(c Setbacks OK? Lot Size: Building Size: Lot Coverage: FAR OK? Height OK? Parking OK? Critical Area? Demo? Historic Rev? Notice to Title? Lots of Record? M h O�pORT Tory BUILDING PERMIT U ��G City of Port Townsend W Development Services Department 250 Madison Street, Suite 3, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-5095 Project Information Permit # BLD09-022 Permit Type Residential - Addition/Remodel Project Name House addition Site Address 1939 49TH ST Parcel # 993600501 Project Description Add onto existing house (includes kitchen). Existing kitchen to become laundry room. Names Associated with this Project License Type Name Contact Phone # Type License # Exp Date Applicant Timmons David Owner Timmons David Contractor Cranston Construction Randy Cranston (360) 379-2730 CITY 2980 12/31/2009 Contractor Cranston Construction Randy Cranston (360) 379-2730 STATE CRANSCC07C 04/24/2010 Fee Information Project Details Project Valuation $244,933.84 Dwellings — Type V Wood Frame 2,552 SQFT Building Permit Fee 1,805.75 Sunrooms and Solariums 80 SQFT Energy Code Fee - New Single 100.00 Units: Heat Type: Family Unit Bedrooms: 1 Construction Type: V - B Mechanical Permit Fee per Dwelling 150.00 Bathrooms: 1.5 Occupancy Type: R-3 Unit - New Residential Plan Review Fee 1,173.74 Plumbing Permit Fee per Dwelling 150.00 Unit - New Residential State Building Code Council Fee 4.50 Technology Fee for Building Permit 36.12 Record Retention Fee for Building 10.00 Permit Total Fees $ 3,430.11 *** SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS *** Call 385-2294 by 3:00pm for next day inspection. Permits expire 180 days from issuance if work is not commenced, or if work is suspended for a period of 180 days. Work is verified by obtaining a valid inspection. The granting of this permit shall not be construed as approval to violate any provisions of the PTMC or other laws or regulations. I certify that the information provided as a part of the application for this permit is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further certify that I am the owner of the property or authorized agent of the owner. Print Name v r'-1 vv\- Date Issued: 04/03/2009 Issued By: FSLOTA Signature Date Date Expires: 09/30/2009 o�QORTro�ti BUILDING PERMIT City of Port Townsend Development Services Department awn 250 Madison Street, Suite 3, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-5095 Project Information Permit # BLD09-022 Permit Type Residential - Addition/Remodel Project Name House addition Site Address 1939 49TH ST Parcel # 993600501 Project Description Add onto existing house (includes kitchen). Existing kitchen to become laundry room. Conditions 10. Property corner survey pins must be located at time of footing inspection to verify setbacks. Call 385-2294 by 3:00pm for next day inspection. Permits expire 180 days from issuance if work is not commenced, or if work is suspended for a period of 180 days. Work is verified by obtaining a valid inspection. The granting of this permit shall not be construed as approval to violate any provisions of the PTMC or other laws or regulations. I certify that the information provided as a part of the application for this permit is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further certify that I am the owner of the property or authorized agent of the owner. Print Name Signature Date Date Issued: 04/03/2009 Issued By: FSLOTA Date Expires: 09/30/2009 BLD09-022 Permit Activity for David & Maria Timmons' SFR addition at 1939 49th Street Date Action Comments 02/13/09 Received bldg. permit application Receipt #09-0087 for $150 plan review deposit 02/13/09 Joy Astle (Krazen) picked up plans Said they would be returned in 10 days. 02/27/09 HPC Design Review Approved HPC09-009 03/03/09 Joy returned plans. Corrections to plans need to be made and 4 copies submitted for review. Approved demo permit required before starting any work. Approved erosion control plan required before starting any excavation. 03/05/09 DT submitted Foundation permit app. 03/06/09 Foundation permit issued 0312/09 Received corrected building plans Mailed to Joy Astle. (2 new, old marked up & the same for the calcs). She will return these in person & stamp the other 2 sets for the contractor at that time. G: (City AdminlSheilalBuildingPermitsl7innnons BLD09-02DLog.BLD09-022.doc Land Use Checklist Parcel Number: �q 36 00501 , --50Z 1505, So -7 Legal Description: 5UC S -, C dT' S I - S , 6 -g, Zo -2-4 , Iq Location: t'" & MRS Zoning: TC-= Recorded Plat Shows Lot Size as: '-,0r X IOC) r Streets: (�b W I pE P-oy� Assessor Shows: NoySE = 5S% �l � 4G�=x%3 1 = I� 730 i4 --) ArcReader Shows: OYElz Zo& FUM OH VJ G nNnl-H (,owa fit PPGE"Y Critical Area? NOT "Pt -D <Drj A-YLC P-1--,tV0Z- Other Permits? 6 -D 00 -158 (NOW P09-( D 5eAvylel'i Part of a Plat, BSP or PUD? (Any Conditions? Tree Plan?) No Site Visit? SO ZAV . Fb72 INI- I'Fr'jl—=Y M1L,L,PbPosA-i (24)(08 Building meets setbacks? NfL� D IND i 0-M IN PSS Building meets lot coverage? UP To Z.Syo AuoWED -- NOW A --F 4'10 Building meets height restrictions? (If close, ask for elevations/contours showing existing and final grade: in some cases need to establish reference datum.) 3 0 MAX Notice to Title needed? No Restrictive Covenant needed? No Lots of Record needed? N 0 Comments: Lb TS �3oX 1001 31 boo X x'19 = 4Z�Ooo �] I X, ZSIs 00 i I !� 4v Goss &6 N eE�P5 P -6S. 55-41. P EYN 11" S Tl2E cc�.r sFi2i i n ► i� orals . City of Port Townsend Building & Community Development Waterman & Katz -Bi- ci.i.g 181 Quincy Street, Suit Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-3208 Fax: (360) 385-7675 1. What are the rules for cutting trees on a residentially zoned lots (R -I, R -II, R -III, or R -IV) that are 40,000 s.f. or less in size and contain a single-family residence (including duplex, triplex, or fourplex)? • Removal of any tree on private property that lies outside of environmentally sensitive areas (including wetlands and oversteepened-slopes.) is exempt. PTMC 19.060(2). -- —_ 2. What are the rules for cutting trees on a residentially zoned lots (R -I, R -I[, R -III) that are under one ownership, greater than 40,000 s.f. in size, and contain a single-family residence (including dulexL'IuT��he triplex, or fourplex)? lowing tree removal activities on private property are exempt: The removal of trees with a diameter at breast height (d.b.h.) of 8" or less. "Diameter at breast height' is defined as the trees diameter measured at V2 feet above the ground; For trees over 8" d.b.h., up to six (6) healthy trees/ 40,000 s.f of lot area may be removed in any twelve month period. The removal of additional trees requires a written exemption and compliance with tree conser_v_ation_standards-of-P_TMC_1.9. 0.61.2Q. I What about "hazard trees"? What are they and when can they be removed? • A "hazard tree" is defined as any tree which, in the opinion of the city of Port Townsend .' Department or an expert approved by the city of Port Townsend (such as but not limited 0-, " professional forester, certified arborist, or landscape architect), poses an unreasonable risk of failure and is a distance of I `/z tree length or less from a permanent structure or high use outdoor area. • The removal of hazardous trees, dead trees, diseased trees, or damaged trees which constitute a hazard to life or property, or adjacent trees is exempt. The removal of 4 or fewer hazardous trees from a single private property in any 12 month period does not require a written exemption. • The removal of more than 4 hazard trees in any 12 month period from a single private property shall require a written exemption from the BCD Director, unless the tree removal is determined to be otherwise exempt from the provisions of this chapter. The applicant may be required to provide documentation by an arborist, forester, or other qualified tree professional that a tree constitutes a hazard to life or property. • Emergency Situations. Hazardous trees determined to pose an imminent threat or danger to public health or safety, or to public or private property, or serious environmental degradation may be removed by the landowner prior to receiving written approval from BCD; provided that within 14 days following such action, the landowner shall submit a written report from a tree professional and a replanting plan if tree conservation is required by the provisions of this chapter. 4. What about tree removals as part of an approved building permit or other project permit approval (such as an approved subdivision, binding site plan, etc.)? • The removal of trees associated with an approved project permit is exempt, including but not limited to building permits, design review permits, binding site plans, preliminary plats, or other project permits which authorize the installation of utilities and construction of buildings; or the establishment of a permitted or conditionally permitted use per PTMC Title 17 -Zoning. However, certain projects must prepare a landscaping and tree retention plan and show compliance with the tree conservation standards of section 19.06.120. S. What are the "tree conservation standards" of PTMC section 19.06.120? • Tree Density Requirements All activities that are not exempt, or must otherwise comply with the tree conservation standards, are subject to the following tree densities expressed in "tree units." Tree densities vary by zoning district. Minimum Tree Density Requirements for Vacant or Redeveloping Lots Table. 19.06.120 1 ': .I' y R-1, R -II, P/OS 40 Tree Units/ 40,000 square feet R-lII, R -IV, C -MU, C-II/MU 30 Tree Units/ 40,000 square feet C-1, C -II, C -II , P-1, M -C 20 Tree Units/ 40,000 square feet C -III, M -11(A), M -11(B), M-1, M -in, P/OS N/A Calculating Tree Units The total number of tree units required shall be calculated by multiplying gross site area, minus any public or private street rights-of-way, by the required tree density (in tree units per 40,000 square feet) set forth in Table 19.06.120(D). The result of the calculation will be the total number of tree units required for the project approval. The tree unit calculation shall include retained or newly planted trees within the site as well as newly planted street trees located in contiguous public rights-of-way or alleys. More tree units are granted for larger trees to encourage the retention of existing trees. Tree Unit Credits - Table 19.06.120 3 .I' y Existing Tree 1" to 6' d.b.h. 1 tree unit per tree retained Existing Tree 7" to 19" d.b_h. 2 tree units per tree retained Existing Tree > 20" d.b.h. 3 tree units per tree retained New or Replacement Tree, Small to Medium Species (At maturity less .50 tree unit per tree planted than 40 feet tall) New or Replacement Tree, Large Species (At maturity more than 40 1 tree unit per tree planted feet tall) 6. What types of projects or development activities must prepare a tree conservation plan? • Residential subdivisions (10 or more lots); Planned Unit Developments (PVDs), Short Plats (2 — 9 lots), cottage housing developments, condominium binding site plans, and commercial and industrial binding site plans; • Construction or additions to buildings subject to design review in the C -II General Commercial, R411 and R -IV Multi -family, and C-l/MU and C-IUMU Mixed Use zoning districts; • Construction of new buildings or the expansion of existing buildings by more than 10% in the C -I Neighborhood Commercial, C -11(H) Hospital Commercial, M -C Mixed Commercial/Light Manufacturing, P/OS(B) Mixed Pub lic/Infrastructure/Open Space, or P-1 Public/Infrastructure zoning districts located outside the Port Townsend Historic District. 7. What about the construction of single-family residences (including duplexes, triplexes, or fourplexes) on lots exceeding 40,000 s.f. where trees will be removed as part of the construction activities? Are these permits subject to tree conservation? • Yes. Because residential sites exceeding 40,000 s.f. may be further developed, they are subject to tree conservation standards. a: Such proposals shall minimize tree removal and shall comply with the tree conservation standards of 19.06.120. b. Proposals that involve tree removal but will not comply with the tree conservation standards of 19.06.120 due to a pre-existing lack of trees, shall plant two new trees for each tree removed per the standards of 19.06.130 and the project shall be exempt from the remainder of this chapter. 8. What about the construction of single-family residences (including duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes) on lots 40,000 or less in size where tree removal is proposed? • These proposals are exempt from all tree conservation standards. However, the building permit must be submitted prior to beginning tree removal activities. Once the single-family residence is built, all future tree removal associated with landscaping activities are also exempt. 9. What about tree removal on vacant land, including logging and tree thinning where no project is proposed (such as a building permit, short plat, subdivision, etc.)? • Tree Thinning. Tree thinning is encouraged, but requires a written exemption to ensure compliance with the standards of the tree conservation ordinance. Generally no more than one-third of the trees shall be removed in any 6 year period. Trees thinned should be primarily those that are crowded, receive the least sunlight, are hazard, or nuisance trees. No more than 10% of trees removed shall be dominant or codominant (healthy trees have at least 1/3 of their tree height covered with leaf canopy). • Logging Activities. Logging activities that exceed thinning standards must first obtain a tree conservation permit (PTMC section 19.06.080). Tree conservation permits are subject to fees and public notice requirements. a. Approval Criteria: 1. Not more than 40% of the tree canopy, or 40% of the pre-existing tree units as calculated per section 19.06.120, throughout the gross area of the site shall be removed during any six-year period; 2. The applicant shall prepare a tree conservation plan; 3. Trees shall be selected for retention based upon the standards contained in PTMC section 19.06.130 standards for Trees to be Retained or Planted. 4. Trees selected for retention shall be protected during tree harvest consistent with the standards established by PTMC section 19.06.150 Protection of Trees During and After Development. 10. What. are the penalties for removing trees in violation of the Tree Conservation Ordinance (PTC Chapter 19.06)? • PTMC Chapter 20.10 —Code Enforcement Violations of the tree conservation ordinance shall be processed pursuant to PTMC Chapter 20.10. The BCD Director may order the violation abated (stop work order to cease tree cutting) and may order corrective work (tree replanting or proper pruning to damaged trees). Where voluntary corrective action is not successful a formal notice and order may be directly assessed by the BCD Director and civil penalties of $100.00 per day may be imposed until the violation is corrected. PTMC Chapter 20.10 contains other enforcement mechanisms that may be applicable depending upon the situation. • 9 Z-771 5EA VIEW i Tp THE CITY OF po �. -10D1T10A 04.-o,.,�.. da boa a"q 6 w 4� as as w ebL�.�.- A I e a ! a... woe 15-1 63.A ?9 z .q J /I u ,y s /6 L /J 7 ..c 1 u 15-1 63.A z .q J /7 s /6 L of 7 ..c 1 /J 15-1 63.A NIF 6 l•"'- 10098 IV 94, „i 9.4._ 90 _ .. �'-- ; ' -� '��� � �/•� �/ - Imo( � ti:\`' �6 ., t. c9 f � 1f i H=268 ,Ml WE ._--�-_ � -J , �, _. /�J,� ;� �, . 51 >� r � l�C�: y I�'� � � �✓ ` EJB: J J f ; �I � .�.�t 98 a' - '"' �'�y' k- � 1• h 4 5` �� �4��?��.. "may � t _ -i S y Ik +�' Y • ` �'� °'S �t�r `y��1 � � 1 'i '�r 1 Watcr N d� �, � �•9W2see Water 1, rti f a ej° ^0 18 tf i �5♦ �'Yt-* r Storm Water Lol 17 3'� i I inch e,I,.L IW tcet 169 /�` %�. ..�V�^"'dti "w,l.,i t i t{ l ,�� `✓ `��� Ih:v my u�v:.lcanvn "�a s: "wrh uli f..ults .. � 5��� v(+ - —- - 'r+: 3 ♦ _. ."'� r ` 1- Ih. r.ryor Pyr: T..—, d.d, cmplr.yc. _ ' fgp\y� ^'i �.r .� ¢�'�\y��� ,1Q / ' r+ ``�' w� + i ::.. n c, a •ncy w.y +h y f rh r c �w�• s'�: '" �j 15. 5 . ` a:n:h r<,t••n hcluvcri u,.... F h rsa r } i~ ' � e � +' x:+~, -=•r ��� i 1 '41; 'F�a ' •4y�y..�� 4`''r" `i'" `� \ a � 1�, r:.i u,n .na „na o- .m,,l,y.�s rr. m any L,J n:ry 6 nh,r City of Port Townsend TABLE 17.16.030 Residential Zoning Districts - Bulk, Dimensional and Density Requirements /-I—\ DISTRICT RA) R -II R -III R -IV MAXIMUM HOUSING 4 dwelli its (Multiple 8 dwelling units (Multiple 16 units per 40,000 sf 24 units per 40,000 sf DENSITY (units per dwelling units on a single lot dwelling units on a single lot of lot area of lot area 40,000 square foot area) must be contained within a must be contained within a single structure, except: a single structure, except: a permitted accessory dwelling permitted accessory dwelling unit (ADU) may be unit (ADU) may be established in a separate established in a separate building if allowed by building if allowed by 17.16.020 PTMC) 17.16.020 PTMC) 10,000 sf of lot area per unit 5,000 sf of lot area per unit MINIMUM AVERAGE 10 units where a parcel 15 units HOUSING DENSITY and/or contiguous parcels (units per 40,000 square under single ownership foot area) are 12,000 square -feet in size or greater MAXIMUM NUMBER 4 (Note:. limited structures 4 (Note: limited structures No limit No limit OF DWELLING UNITS with more than 4 dwellings with more than 4 dwellings IN ANY ONE per structure may be permitted per structure may be STRUCTURE through the PUD process, see permitted through the PUD Chapter 17.32 PTMC.) process, see Chapter 17.32 PTMC. MINIMUM LOT SIZE 10,000 sf = single-family 5,000 sf = single-family 3,000 sq ft = single-family detached detached detached; 5,000 sf = single-family attached (duplex); 7,500 sf = single-family attached (triplex); and 10,000 sf = multi -family' MINIMUM LOT 50' 50' 30' except: 100'= WIDTH multifamily MINIMUM FRONT 20' except: 10' except 20 feet for 20' except: 20' except; YARD SETBACKS 50'= barns and agricultural garages with vehicle access 10' w/side or rear 10' w/side or rear buildings facing a street right-of-way parking/garages; garages parking; no setback for and 50'=barns and with vehicle access facing multifamily structures agricultural buildings a street right-of-way must located within 200 feet be setback 20'; no setback of an abutting mixed use for multifamily structures zoning district located within 200 feet of an abutting mixed use zoning district MINIMUM REAR 20' except: 10' except: 10' except: 15' except: YARD SETBACKS 50' = bams and agricultural 100' = bams and agricultural no setback for multifamily 20' if directly abutting buildings, and 100' if abutting buildings structures located within an R -I or R -l1 district; no a R -II, R -III, or 200 feet of an abutting setback for multifamily R -IV zoning district mixed use zoning district structures located within 200 feet of an abutting mixed use zoning district MINIMUM SIDE 5' except: 5' except: 5' except: 15' except: YARD SETBACKS 10'= abutting a street r -o -w; 10'= abutting a street r -o -w; 10'= along a street r -o -w; 20' if directly abutting 20 feet for garages with 20 feet for garages with 20 feet for garages with an R- l or vehicle access facing a street vehicle access facing a street vehicle access facing a R -II district; no setback right-of-way and 50' barns right-of-way and 100'= street right-of-way and no for multifamily and agricultural buildings and bams and agricultural setback for multifamily structures located within 100' if abutting a R -II, R-111, buildings structures located within 200 feet of an abutting or R -IV zoning district 200 feet of an abutting mixed use zoning district mixed use zonin district ' In order to achieve the minimum density, subdivision of parcels 12,000 square feet or greater shall not allow individual lots larger than 40,000 square -feet unless said lots are reserved for multi -family dwellings. P: DSD Worms lBuildmg Formst[nformation-Table 17.16.030 Res Zoning Districts.doc Page 1 of 2 08/18/08 City of Port Townsend TABLE 17.16.030 Residential Zoning Districts - Bulk, Dimensional and Density Requirements Table continued from Page 1 DISTRICT ,R -I R -1I R -III R -IV MAXIMUM 30' 35' 35' BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM LOT 25% 35% except 40% where an 45% 50% COVERAGE ADU is included on the lot MAXIMUM FENCE Front=4'; Side=8'; Side Front --4'; Side=8'; Side Front --4'; Side=8'; Side Front=4';Side=8'; HEIGHT* abutting a public right-of-way abutting a public right -of- abutting a public right -of- Side abutting a public =4'; rear -8' way = 4'; rear --8' way =4'; rear -8' right-of-way =4'; rear -8' • NOTE: Maximum fence heights apply within any required front, side, or rear setback area or along the edge of any required yard; refer to Chapter 17.68 PTMC, Fences, Walls, Arbors, and Hedges for specific requirements. (Ord. 2967 3 4.2.2008; Ord. 2939 33 1,2, 2007; Ord. 2913 3 2, 2005; Ord. 2925 3 4, 2003; Ord. 2782 3 4, 2001; Ord. 2716.3 4.3, 1999; Ord. 2700:) 11, 1999; Ord. 2571 3 2, 1997). P: IDSDIFornuOuilding FormsVnformation-Table 17.16.030 Res Zoning Disiricts.doc Page 2 of 2 08/18/08 Development Services Project Address: Zoning: Parcel # Project Description: Legal Description (or Tax #): Addition: Block: Lot(s): ➢ Applications by mail must include a check for initial plan review fee of $150 for projects valued over $15,000. See Page 2 for details on plan submittal requirements. Lender Information: Lender information must be provided for projects over $5,000 in valuation per RCW 19.27.095. Name: Project Valuation: $ Building Information (square feet): 1 st floor Garage: 2nd floor Deck(s): 3`d floor Porch(es): Basement: Is it finished? Yes No Carport: Other: Manufactured Home ❑ ADU ❑ New Addition ❑ Remodel/Repair ❑ Total Lot Coverage (Building Footprint):* Square feet: % Impervious Surface:* Square feet: *Total existing & proposed What year was the structure built? If work includes demolition, see Page 2. Any known wetlands on the property? Y N Any steep slopes (>15%)? Y N Property Owner/Applicant: Name: Address: City/St/Zip: Phone: Email: Contact/Representative: Name: Address: City/St/Zip: Phone: Email: Contractor: ❑ Same as Owner Name: Address: City/St/Zip: Phone: Email: State License #: Exp: City Business License #: I hereby certify that the information provided is correct, that I am either the owner or authorized to act on behalf of the owner and that all activities associated with this permit will be in accordance with State Laws and the Port Townsend Municipal Code. Print Name: Signature: Date: Page 1 of 2 7/31/2008 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST This checklist is for new dwellings, additions, remodels, and garages. The purpose is to show what you intend to build, where it will be located on your lot, and how it will be constructed. ❑ Residential permit application. ❑ Washington State Energy & Ventilation Code forms ❑ Two (2) sets of plans with North arrow and scaled, no smaller than '/<" = 1 foot: ❑ A site plan showing: 1. Legal description and parcel number (or tax number), 2. Property lines and dimensions 3. Setbacks from all sides of the proposed structure to the property lines in accordance with a pinned boundary line survey 4. On-site parking and driveway with dimensions 5. If creating new impervious surfaces, indicate measures utilized to retain stormwater on-site 6. Street names and any easements or vacations 7. Location and diameter of existing trees 8. Utility lines 9. If applicable, existing or proposed septic system location 10. Delineated critical areas boundaries and buffers ❑ Foundation plan: 1. Footings and foundation walls 2. Post and beam sizes and spans 3. Floor joist size and layout 4. Holdowns 5. Foundation venting ❑ Floor plan: 1. Room use and dimensions 2. Braced wall panel locations 3. Smoke detector locations 4. Attic access 5. Plumbing and mechanical fixtures 6. Occupancy separation between dwelling and garage (if applicable) 7. Window, skylight, and door locations, including escape windows and safety glazing ❑ Wall section: 1. Footing size, reinforcement, depth below grade 2. Foundation wall, height, width, reinforcement, anchor bolts, and washers 3. Floor joist size and spacing 4. Wall stud size and spacing 5. Header size and spans 6. Wall sheathing, weather resistant barrier, and siding material 7. Sheet rock and insulation 8. Rafters, ceiling joists, trusses, with blocking and positive connections 9. Ceiling height 10. Roof sheathing, roofing material, roof pitch, attic ventilation ❑ Exterior elevations (all four) with existing slope of the land in relation to all proposed structures ❑ If architecturally designed, one set of plans must have an original signature ❑ If engineered, one set of plans must have one original signature ❑ For new dwelling construction, Street & Utility or Minor Improvement application If you are proposing partial or full demolition of a structure that is at least 50 years old, per Ordinance 2969 Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) review is required. If within the National Historic Landmark district: $58.00 for full committee review. If outside the National Historic Landmark district and not on the Historic Register: $30.00 for HPC Administrative review. Complete HPC Form. Partial demolition includes exterior demolition for additions and remodels. Page 2 of 2 7/31/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTIA L ZONING DISTRICTS (16 hits) Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Page 1 of 11 Sections: 17.16.01_0 Purposes. 1.7.16.020 Permitted, conditional and prohibited uses — Accessory dwelling units. 17._16.030 Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. _1.7.16.050 Repealed. 17.16.010 Purposes. A. Residential Districts. The general purposes of the residential districts are as follows: 1. To provide a sustainable residential development pattern for future generations; 2. To encourage development of attractive residential areas that provide a sense of community and contain a variety of housing types to accommodate different lifestyles and household sizes; 3. To maintain or improve the character, appearance, and livability of established neighborhoods by protecting them from incompatible uses, excessive noise, illumination, glare, odor, and similar significant nuisances; 4. To establish a compact growth pattern to efficiently use the remaining developable land; enable cost effective extension and maintenance of utilities, streets, and transit; and enable development of affordable housing; 5. To enable community residents to reside and work within walking or bicycling distance of transit, employment centers, and businesses offering needed goods and services in order to reduce traffic congestion, energy consumption, and air pollution; 6. To provide for development of neighborhoods with attractive, well- connected streets, sidewalks, and trails that enable convenient, direct access to neighborhood centers, parks, and transit stops; 7. To ensure adequate light, air, and readily accessible open space for each dwelling unit in order to maintain public health, safety, and welfare; 8. To ensure the compatibility of dissimilar adjoining land uses; 9. To protect or enhance the character of historic structures and areas; 10. To provide residential areas of sufficient size and density to accommodate the city's projected population growth, consistent with RCW 36.70A.110; 11. To preserve or enhance environmental quality and protect groundwater used as a public water source from contamination; 12. To minimize the potential for significant flooding and allow recharge of groundwater; 13. To allow innovative approaches for providing housing, consistent with the policies of the comprehensive plan. B. The additional purposes of each individual residential district are as follows: http://www. codepublishing. com/dtSearch/dtisapi6. dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175 &Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTI A T, ZONING DISTRICTS Page 2 of 11 1. R -I — Low Density Single -Family. This district accommodates single-family residences (including duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) at a density of up to four dwelling units per 40,000 -square -foot area (i.e., 10,000 -square -foot minimum lot size, or approximately four dwelling units within one block of platted land). It allows four or fewer single-family dwelling units to be contained within one structure upon condition of sufficient tract size: 20,000 square feet for a duplex; 30,000 square feet for a triplex; and 40,000 square feet for a fourplex. Limited multifamily development could occur with approval of a planned unit development. This zoning district has been applied only in the northwestern portion of the city, because of stormwater related development constraints. The district accommodates single-family development at densities that maintain and promote the "small town" character of Port Townsend, while ensuring that the environmental quality (particularly as it relates to stormwater control) of the area is not adversely impacted. Higher densities could be permitted in these areas through approval of a planned unit development (R -PUD) overlay designation pursuant to Chapter 17.32 PTMC. 2. R -II — Medium Density Single -Family. This district accommodates single- family dwellings (including duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) at a density of up to eight units per 40,000 -square -foot area (i.e., 5,000 -square -foot minimum lot size, or approximately eight dwelling units within one block of platted land). It allows four or fewer single- family dwelling units to be contained within one structure upon condition of sufficient tract size: 10,000 square feet for a duplex; 15,000 square feet for a triplex; and 20,000 square feet for a fourplex. Limited multifamily development could occur with approval of a planned unit development. The R -II district corresponds closely to those areas of town that are currently platted to eight lots per block, include few development limitations, and which are in proximity to existing public facilities and services. 3. R -III — Medium Density Multifamily. The R -III district accommodates smaller scale multifamily structures (e.g., five to 12 dwellings per structure) at a minimum density of 10 units and a maximum of up to 16 units per 40,000 square feet of land area. The intent of this district is to provide a broad range of housing opportunities; to provide a variety of housing types and styles; and to provide for development with a density and configuration that facilitates effective and efficient transit service. Although multifamily development is encouraged in these areas, single-family residences continue to be an allowed use provided the minimum density requirement can be achieved. This district includes areas along arterial and major collector streets with existing or planned transit service. 4. R -IV — High Density Multifamily. This district accommodates larger scale multifamily structures (e.g., 10 to 24 dwellings per structure) at a density of not less than 15 units per 40,000 square feet of land area, or more than 24 units per 40,000 square feet of land area. A minimum density has been specified for this district in order to discourage use of this land for subordinate, lower density development; single-family dwellings are not permitted in this district. This district includes areas designed to be compatible with adjoining uses; to provide for development with a density and configuration that facilitates effective and efficient transit service; and to enable provision of affordable housing. C. Accessory Dwelling Units. This chapter provides standards for the establishment of accessory dwelling units within the structure of a single-family residence or an outbuilding which is accessory to such residence. Accessory dwelling units are allowed in order to: 1. Allow more energy efficient use of large, older homes; http:Hwww. codepublishing.corn/dtSearch/dtisapi6.d11?curd=getdoc&Doc1d=175&Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTJ ^ T. ZONING DISTRICTS Page 3 of 11 2. Provide more affordable housing opportunities for Port Townsend residents; 3. Provide additional density with minimal cost and disruption to existing neighborhoods; and 4. Allow individuals and smaller households to retain large houses as residences. (Ord. 2967 § 4.1, 2008; Ord. 2825 § 4, 2003; Ord. 2782 § 4, 2001; Ord. 2716 § 4.2, 1999; Ord. 2571 § 2, 1997). 17.16.020 Permitted, conditional and prohibited uses — Accessory dwelling units. A. Table 17.16.020 identifies land uses in the residential zoning districts that are permitted outright (P), subject to a conditional use permit (C), prohibited (X), or not applicable (N/A). However, notwithstanding the fact that a use may be permitted outright, additional permits may be required for certain projects. For example, multifamily residential development project applicants must procure a Type I permit in accordance with Chapter 17.36 PTMC, Multifamily Residential Development Standards. Uses not specifically identified within Table 17.16.020 are deemed to be contrary to the interests of the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Port Townsend and shall be prohibited. B. Requirements for the uses identified in Table 17.16.020 which are contained within other provisions of this title are referenced under the heading "applicable regulations/notes," although this should not be construed as a comprehensive listing of all provisions of this title which may apply to any given use. Specifically, the provisions of Chapter 17.72 PTMC, Off -Street Parking and Loading, and Chapter 17.76 PTMC, Signs, shall apply to all uses, even if not noted in Table 17.16.020. C. Accessory Dwelling Units — Limitations on Use. One accessory dwelling unit (ADU) may be established only as an accessory use to a single-family, detached residence (and specifically, not including a duplex, triplex or fourplex), provided the following conditions are continuously met: 1. A certificate of occupancy pursuant to the currently adopted city construction codes shall be obtained from the building official and posted within the ADU. The code inspection and compliance required to obtain a certificate of occupancy in an existing building shall be restricted to the portion of the building to be occupied by an ADU and shall apply only to new construction rather than existing components, except that any high hazards (i.e., smoke detectors, fire exits, stairways, LP gas appliances and fire separation) shall be corrected. Where additional fire separation is unduly burdensome, the building official may authorize a fire alarm system in lieu of required fire separation. 2. The owner of the subject property shall reside on the premises, whether in the main or accessory dwelling; provided, that in the event of illness, death or other unforeseeable event which prevents the owner's continued occupancy of the premises, the director may, upon a finding that discontinuance of the ADU would cause a hardship on the owner and/or tenants, grant a temporary suspension of this owner -occupancy requirement for a period of one year. The director may grant an extension of such suspension for one additional year, upon a finding of continued hardship. In the case of an ADU established prior to March 6, 1995, but after August 17, 1971, if the property on which the ADU is located complies with all of the requirements of this section except owner -occupancy, the ADU property may continue without occupancy by the owner until sold, exchanged or otherwise transferred to a different owner. http:Hwww. codepublishing. corn/dtS earch/dtisapi6.d11?curd=getdoc&Doc1d=175&Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTI ^ 1, ZONING DISTRICTS Page 4 of 11 3. Neither the main nor accessory dwelling unit shall be used as a transient accommodation. 4. ADUs established in an outbuilding shall not exceed 800 square feet in floor area, and under no circumstance shall the total lot coverage of the primary residence along with the ADU exceed the standard allowed in the underlying zoning district. 5. In order to preserve the outward appearance of single-family neighborhoods, the front of the house shall have only one exterior entrance. 6. An ADU may be established in a residence or outbuilding that is legal, nonconforming with respect to required setbacks if entrances are no closer than five feet to neighboring property lines, and if each side window that is closer than five feet to a side property line and that is also closer than 20 feet to either the front or rear property line is permanently glazed with translucent material; provided, that the director may permit an entrance as close as three feet to a neighboring property line upon a finding that no feasible alternative exists. 7. Repealed by Ord. 2939. D. Accessory Dwelling Units — Exception for Legal, Nonconforming Accessory Dwelling Units. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection C of this section, in the case of an ADU established prior to August 17, 1971, and continuously occupied thereafter, the ADU may continue without compliance with PTMC _17.16.020(C)(1) and (C)(2), provided a certificate of occupancy is obtained pursuant to PTMC 17,16.020(C)(1). [Note: The fee for inspection and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for an accessory dwelling unit shall be the same as that established in the currently adopted International Building Code for a special inspection. For the purposes of determining system development charges or utility or infrastructure requirements, a single-family residence with an accessory dwelling unit which does not separately connect to city water or sewer service shall have the same charges and the same requirements as a single-family residence without an accessory dwelling unit]. E. Incidental uses which are identified in this title as prohibited or conditional uses within the applicable zoning district shall be considered conditional and processed in accordance with Chapter 20.01 PTMC subject to the approval criteria codified in Chapter 17.84 PTMC. Table 17.16.020 Residential Zoning Districts — Permitted, Conditional and Prohibited Uses Key to table: P = Permitted outright; C = Subject to a conditional use permit; X = Prohibited; N/A = Not applicable DISTRICT R -I I R-11 I R- R- APPLICABLE REGULATIONS/NOTES 111 IV SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES Accessory dwelling units P P P X Ch. 17.48 PTMC, Accessory Dwelling Units; and PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. For ADUs in the R -Ili zone, the ADU shall be counted toward the maximum housing density as provided in PTMC 17.16.030. Adult family homes (for 6 P P P P PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density or fewer adults) requirements. Emergency shelter (6 or P P P P Same as above. fewer adults) http://www.codepublishing.com/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175&Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTJ ^ T . ZONING DISTRICTS Page 5ofII Emergency shelters P P P P This provision recognizes the Red Cross's desired use of established by the various facilities located in the residential zoning districts American Red Cross during a time of public emergency. during a time of public emergency Group homes for the P P P P PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density disabled (6 or fewer requirements. residents) Manufactured homes (on P P P X Manufactured homes, whether used as single-family individual lots) residences or as an ADU, meeting the definition for "manufactured home" and set on a permanent foundation with the space from the bottom of the home to the ground enclosed by either load-bearing concrete or decorative concrete or masonry blocks so that no more than one foot of the perimeter foundation is visible above grade, are permitted on individual lots in R -I, R -II and R - III zoning districts, subject to PTMC 17.16 030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Title to the manufactured home shall be eliminated as a condition of building permit approval, and no certificate of occupancy shall issue until the applicant has completed correctly the title elimination process. The placement of manufactured homes that were constructed more than three years prior is prohibited. Mobile homes and trailer X X X X homes (on individual lots) Modular homes P P P X PTMC 17 16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Modular homes are constructed in accordance with the International Building Code and are considered a type of single-family dwelling. Single-family dwellings P P P X PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density (including duplexes, requirements. triplexes, and fourplexes which meet the base density requirements of the applicable district) Cottage housing C P P X Ch. 17.34 PTMC, Cottage Housing Development Design developments Standards; Ch. 17.46 PTMC, Commercial, Multifamily, Cottage Housing Developments, and Mixed Use Architectural and Site Design Review Processes; Ch. 18.20 PTMC, Binding Site Plans; Ch. 19.06 PTMC, Article III — Standards for Tree Conservation. Transient use of single- X X X X See PTMC 1.7.08.060, "Transient accommodation." family residential uses (including duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes and cottage housing) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES Apartment houses X X P P Ch. 17.36 PTMC, Multifamily Residential Development Standards; and PTMC 17.._16..030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Boardinghouses (six or P P P P Same as above. fewer roomers) Lodging houses (seven or X X P P Same as above. more roomers) Congregate care or X X P P Same as above. assisted living facilities (with seven or more dwelling units/bedrooms) http://www.codepublishing.com/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175&Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTI ^ T, ZONING DISTRICTS Page 6 of 11 Foster homes P IP I P P I Same as above. Fraternities, sororities and X X C C Same as above. student cooperatives Halfway house X X X X See definition PTMC _17.08.030. Multifamily dwellings X X P P Same as above. Nursing, rest, or X X P P Same as above. convalescent homes (seven or more persons) Residential treatment C C P P facilities Residential treatment X X P P "Group homes" are considered an "essential public facilities including group facility" under RCW 36.70A.200; "...their siting cannot be homes for the disabled precluded by development regulations..."; and PTMC (for seven or more 1.7,16_0.30, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. residents) Townhouses or X X P P Ch. 17.36 PTMC, Multifamily Residential Development rowhouses (zero lot lines) Standards; and PTMC 17.1.6.030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Transient use of X X X X See PTMC 17.08.060, "Transient accommodation." multifamily residential uses COMMERCIAL USES Adult entertainment X X X X facilities Bed and breakfast inns C C C C PTMC 1.7.._16.030., Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Child day care centers C' C' C C (') See PTMC 17 52.020(6) for child care as an and stand alone accessory use. Child day care centers may be permitted preschools in any residential zone through the planned unit development (PUD) process, see Ch. 17.32 PTMC. Ch. 17.52 PTMC, Child Care Facilities; and PTMC 17.16.03.0., Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Family home child care P P P P Same as above. and in-home preschools Home occupations P P P P Ch. 17.56 PTMC, Home Occupations; and PTMC 17..16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Tourist homes C C C C PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. ACCESSORY USES Accessory buildings P P P P PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk and dimensional requirements. Detached office/studio P P P X Subject to home occupation regulations, Ch. 17.56 PTMC. Fuel oil and kerosene P P P P Such containers require a permit and inspection containers pursuant to Ch. 16.04 PTMC, Building Code, may only be permitted for domestic heating purposes, must be located aboveground, and may not exceed 750 gallons' capacity. Guesthouse/detached P P X X See definition PTMC 17.08.030. bedroom Garages, private P P P P PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density residential requirements. AGRICULTURAL USES Barns P. IC IX IX PTMC 17._16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density http://www. codepublishing. com/dtSearch/dtisapi6. dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175 &Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTJ AT, ZONING DISTRICTS Page 7 of 11 http://www.codepublishing.com/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175 &Index=... 12/10/2008 requirements. Community agricultural C C X X Ch. 17.84 PTMC, Conditional Uses. Structures including center farmer/apprentice housing are subject to PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Community agricultural centers are limited to locations fronting onto principal arterial, collector, and minor arterial streets. All office and retail uses shall be secondary to the agricultural component of the center. Concession stands, P P" X X PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density agricultural or produce requirements; temporary agricultural or produce stands are subject to Ch. 17.60 PTMC, Temporary Uses. 'In the R -II zone, concession stands are limited to locations fronting onto principal arterial, collector, and minor arterial streets. Crop or tree farming (no P P X X retail sales) Crop or tree farming with P P X X All parking shall be off-street. community supported agriculture sales Stables, private and riding P C X X PTMC 1-7..16.- 7..16 _030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Plant nurseries, C C X X Same as above. landscaping materials, greenhouses (commercial) Small animal husbandry, C X X X Same as above. commercial Small animal husbandry, P P P P Same as above. noncommercial U -pick sales of crops P P X X All parking shall be off-street. OTHER USES Cemeteries C C Ix X Churches C C C C Church buildings must comply with the requirements of PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements; however, towers, spires and steeples exceeding the height requirements of that section may be allowed, provided they comply with International Building Code. Community clubhouses P P P P PTMC 17.16_030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Fraternal organizations C C C X Same as above. Kennels, animal C X X X Same as above. Public facilities P P P P Same as above. Personal wireless service N/A N/A N/A N/A Refer to Chapter 17..78 PTMC, Personal Wireless facilities Service Facilities, for list of permitted, conditional and prohibited uses and other substantive requirements. Radio and television C C C C Such facilities are allowed in all zoning districts subject to towers the conditional use permit requirements of Ch. 17.84 PTMC; however, such facilities are prohibited within the limits of the Port Townsend National Register Historic District; and PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements, except as provided in applicable Federal Communications Commission rules and regulations. Satellite dishes, P P P P I Satellite dishes and antennas shall meet the http://www.codepublishing.com/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175 &Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTI ^ T, ZONING DISTRICTS Page 8 of 11 noncommercial, and requirements of PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and antennas density requirements, except as provided in applicable Federal Communications Commission rules and regulations. Schools, higher education X X C C PTMC _1.._7_16.0.3..0, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Schools (public or private) C C C X PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. Stadiums, arenas, and C C X X PTMC 17.16.030, Bulk, dimensional and density assembly halls requirements. Veterinary hospitals C X X X Same as above. TEMPORARY USES Contractor offices and P P P P PTMC 17.16_030, Bulk, dimensional and density model homes requirements; and Ch. 17.60 PTMC, Temporary Uses. Rummage or other P P P P Ch. 17.60 PTMC, Temporary Uses. outdoor sales Yard or garage sales P P P P Same as above. (Ord. 2982 § 1, 2008; Ord. 2977 § 1, 2008; Ord. 2939 §§ 4, 5, 8, 2007; Ord. 2916 § 4, 2006; Ord. 2898 §§ 2, 3, 2005; Ord. 2893 § 1, 2005; Ord. 2867 § 2, 2004; Ord. 2864 § 5(Exh. D § 2), 2004; Ord. 2837 § 2(Exh. B § 7), 2003; Ord. 2825 § 4, 2003; Ord. 2792 § 2, 2001; Ord. 2782 § 4, 2001; Ord. 2700 §§ 9, 10, 1999; Ord. 2670 § 3.2, 1998; Ord. 2571 § 2, 1997). 17.16.030 Bulk, dimensional and density requirements. A. The standards contained in Table 17.16.030 apply to all residential zoning districts, and shall be determined to be minimum requirements, unless stated as maximum by this title. B. Exceptions. The rear setbacks provided in Table 17.16.030 shall not apply to accessory structures smaller than 120 square feet in building coverage and 10 feet in height; provided, that all such accessory structures shall be a minimum of five feet from rear lot and/or property lines. C. Setbacks and Minimum Yard Requirements. Notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of this title, all setbacks (yard requirements) shall be measured from the lot line to the building line. In addition, there shall be a five-foot setback measured from the closest edge of a public or private easement for ingress or egress. Provided, however, that the roof or eaves of a roof of a building may extend beyond the building line a maximum distance of two feet into the applicable minimum yard area. Lot line for purposes of this section means the lot lines established for the lot by a plat, or subdivision, and does not include any line or boundary encompassing property that may be part of the lot or attached to the lot by reason of a street vacation resulting from the effect of statutory vacation (State of Washington Laws of 1889-1890, Chapter 19, section 32, "statutory vacation statute"). Easements include easements evidenced by conveyance, or recorded plat (unless extinguished by judicial determination and owner provides a copy of title insurance without any exceptions for easements whether or not of record title). D. Fences. An owner, who provides the city satisfactory evidence of title to any right-of-way vacated by statutory vacation, may erect fences in accordance with the Port Townsend Municipal Code in the former right-of-way. Satisfactory evidence of title shall be a policy of title insurance or other documentation satisfactory to the city attorney that the owner owns the property in fee simple with no exceptions or http://www. codepublishing. com/dtS earch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175 &Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTJ ^ T, ZONING DISTRICTS Page 9 of 11 encumbrances for easements, ingress or egress whether or not of record title. E. Construction and Permits. From and after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section, no building permit shall be issued and no building shall be constructed on any tract, lot or site in the city unless the building is situated on such tract, lot or site in conformance with the requirements of this title and any other applicable provision of law. Table 17.16.030 Residential Zoning Districts — Bulk, Dimensional and Density Requirements DISTRICT R -I R -II R -III R -IV MAXIMUM 4 dwelling units 8 dwelling units 16 units per 40,000 sf of 24 units per HOUSING lot area 40,000 sf of lot DENSITY (units (Multiple dwelling (Multiple dwelling area per 40,000 units on a single lot units on a single lot square foot must be contained must be contained area) within a single within a single structure, except: a structure, except: a permitted permitted accessory dwelling accessory dwelling unit (ADU) may be unit (ADU) may be established in a established in a separate building if separate building if allowed by PTMC allowed by PTMC 1.7.16..020) 17.16.020.) (10,000 sf of lot (5,000 sf of lot area area per unit) per unit) MINIMUM _ _ 10 units where a parcel 15 units AVERAGE and/or contiguous parcels HOUSING under single ownership DENSITY (units are 12,000 square feet in per 40,000 size or greater square foot area) MAXIMUM 4 (Note: limited 4 (Note: limited No limit No limit NUMBER OF structures with structures with DWELLING more than 4 more than 4 UNITS IN ANY dwellings per dwellings per ONE structure may be structure may be STRUCTURE permitted through permitted through the PUD process, the PUD process, see Chapter 17.32 see Chapter 17 32 PTMC.) PTMC.) MINIMUM LOT 10,000 sf = single- 5,000 sf = single- 3,000 sf = single-family _ SIZE family detached family detached detached; 5,000 sf = single-family attached (duplex); 7,500 sf = single-family attached (triplex); and 10,000 sf = single-family attached (fourplex) and multifamily (1) MINIMUM LOT 50' 50' 30' except: WIDTH 100' = multifamily MINIMUM 20' except: 10' except: 20' except: 10'w/ side or 20' except: 10' http://www. codepublishing.com/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175&Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTI A T, ZONING DISTRICTS Page 10 of 1 I FRONT YARD 50' = barns and 20' for garages with rear parking/garages; w/ side or rear SETBACKS agricultural vehicle access garages with vehicle parking; no buildings facing a street right- access facing a street setback for of -way and right-of-way must be multifamily setback 20'; no setback structures 50' = barns and for multifamily structures located within agricultural located within 200 feet of 200 feet of an buildings an abutting mixed use abutting mixed zoning district use zoning district MINIMUM 20' except: 10' except: 10' except: 15' except: REAR YARD SETBACKS 50' = barns and 100' = barns and no setback for multifamily 20' if directly agricultural agricultural structures located within abutting an R -I buildings, and 100' buildings 200 feet of an abutting or R -ll district; if abutting an R -II, mixed use zoning district no setback for R -III, or R -IV zoning multifamily district structures located within 200 feet of an abutting mixed use zoning district MINIMUM SIDE 5' except: 5' except: 5' except: 15' except: YARD SETBACKS 10' = abutting a 10' = abutting a 10' = along a street r -o -w; 20' if directly street r -o -w; 20' for street r -o -w; 20' for 20' for garages with abutting an R -I garages with garages with vehicle access facing a or R -II district; vehicle access vehicle access street right-of-way and no no setback for facing a street right- facing a street right- setback for multifamily multifamily of -way and 50'= of -way and 100' = structures located within structures barns and barns and 200 feet of an abutting located within agricultural agricultural mixed use zoning district 200 feet of an buildings and 100' if buildings abutting mixed abutting an R -II, R- use zoning III, or R -IV zoning district district MAXIMUM 30' 30' 35' 35' BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM LOT 25% 35%, except 40% 45% 50% COVERAGE where an ADU is included on the lot MAXIMUM Front = 4'; side = 8'; Front = 4'; side = 8'; Front = 4'; side = 8'; side Front = 4'; side FENCE side abutting a side abutting a abutting a public r -o -w = = 8'; side HEIGHT` public r -o -w = 4'; public r -o -w = 4'; 4'; rear = 8' abutting a public rear = 8' rear = 8' r -o -w = 4'; rear = 8' (1) In order to achieve the minimum density, subdivision of parcels 12,000 square feet or greater shall not allow individual lots larger than 4,000 square feet unless said lots are reserved for multifamily dwellings. 'Note: Maximum fence heights apply within any required front, side, or rear setback area or along the edge of any required yard; refer to Chapter 17.68 PTMC, Fences, Walls, Arbors and Hedges, for specific requirements. (Ord. 2982 § 2, 2008; Ord. 2967 § 4.2, 2008; Ord. 2939 §§ 1, 2, 2007; Ord. 2913 § 2, 2005; Ord. 2825 § 4, 2003; Ord. 2782 § 4, 2001; Ord. 2716 § 4.3, 1999; Ord. 2700 § 11, 1999; Ord. 2571 § 2, 1997). http://www.codepublishing.com/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175&Index=... 12/10/2008 Chapter 17.16 RESIDENTT ^ T. ZONING DISTRICTS Page 11 of 11 17.16.050 Cottage housing. Repealed by Ord. 2864. (Ord. 2837 § 2(Exh. B § 8), 2003; Ord. 2792 § 3, 2001). dtSearch 00 i08 http://www.codepublishing.com/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=175&Index=... 12/10/2008 SQ 01 P/0, Appl # €B 08 245 ? Date Issued O1l05/20U9 Applicant FREMONT PINES LLC'a„ x_ v.;`` Type BLD RES `SFR y� Expiration Date 08!08!2009 Parcel # 948322903 TV Parent # Re -issue Date Site Address 712 MCPHERSON �� Date Submitted 12!0.3/2008: Date Closed Project Name JSFP in 6.mire development (Manzanit Technically Complete -- Last Action F0211�1/2009:'; Zonina VIII Date Approved 1l2l1 0 Status Datej0llOS 00 Status;ISSTTED Override Expire? F G overmnent? r Notes? Nes Applieahon L?uery ;; Print ;, Form Leiters 1 Copy Site Address; l Query App #�� � Mails Par)sSiruetures Caxtacis-Cantracters Yaliwimx Fees SaAmitials Approval Csndihnns Ixstnec�usBanis�° 3 Cu� nYt �Calcnlated Y r Amo k Fee [i ernd' Fee Code AED Basedt�n uazrta uariti Pazd x Amounts `t ?` Q Q Address Ung€. 3PF Valuation 153703 89 153703'89 $1 d96 15 — 296 15 �C $l 3PF-FR ! f Valuah�n 153703 89 15370389 $10 00 $10 00 3PF-TECH Valuation 153703_§,153703 89 $25 92"j . -! Static 100.00 $100.00 ITERGSFR $100 00 € %ECH-DTEW-RES r € � Static "$75000 $150.00 $150.00 �1 0 ?LM -NEW -RES (-t Static € . $150.OU $1 000; $15U'00 r , )FF€T Valuation 153703 89 _ 150.00 $150M �r ee Descnption Site Address Fee Total :,v,:889 ,:889 57 $1,889 I�� 5 ✓L a 561d Qom► �Q 0 T6,5 dl 44 s & )-I0_1- � 60 fail I. ca � i0 h1 big- -Poe 5- 5 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST This checklist is for new dwellings, additions, remodels, and garages. The purpose is to show what you intend to build, where it will be located on your lot, and how it will be constructed. ✓Residential permit application. t✓Washington State Energy & Ventilation Code forms Yfwo (2) sets of plans with North arrow and scaled, no smaller than = 1 foot: ✓A site plan showing: 1. Legal description and parcel number (or tax number), 2. Property lines and dimensions 3. Setbacks from all sides of the proposed structure to the property lines in accordance with a pinned boundary line survey 4. On-site parking and driveway with dimensions 5. If creating new impervious surfaces, indicate measures utilized to retain stormwater on-site 6. Street names and any easements or vacations 7. Location and diameter of existing trees 8. Utility lines 9. If applicable, existing or proposed septic system location 10. Delineated critical areas boundaries and buffers ✓Foundation plan: 1. Footings and foundation walls 2. Post and beam sizes and spans • 3. Floor joist size and layout 4. Holdowns 5. Foundation venting ✓Floor plan: 1. Room use and dimensions 2. Braced wall panel locations 3. Smoke detector locations 4. Attic access 5. Plumbing and mechanical fixtures 6. Occupancy separation between dwelling and garage (if applicable) 7. Window, skylight, and door locations, including escape windows and safety glazing ✓Wall section: 1. Footing size, reinforcement, depth below grade 2. Foundation wall, height, width, reinforcement, anchor bolts, and washers 3. Floor joist size and spacing 4. Wall stud size and spacing 5. Header size and spans 6. Wall sheathing, weather resistant barrier, and siding material 7. Sheet rock and insulation 8. Rafters, ceiling joists, trusses, with blocking and positive connections 9. Ceiling height 10. Roof sheathing, roofing material, roof pitch, attic ventilation ✓Exterior elevations (all four) with existing slope of the land in relation to all proposed structures G✓If architecturally designed, one set of plans must have an original signature C✓If engineered, one set of plans must have one original signature -=for new dwelling construction, Street & Utility or Minor Improvement application If you are proposing partial or full demolition of a structure that is at least 50 years old, per Ordinance 2969 Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) review is required. If within the National Historic Landmark district: $58.00 for full committee review. If outside the National Historic Landmark district and not on the Historic Register: $30.00 for HPC Administrative review. Complete HPC Form. Partial demolition includes exterior demolition for additions and remodels. Page 2 of 2 7/31/2008 .._ Development Services oFQOHTT250 Madison Street, Suite 3 Port Townsend WA 98368 o Phone: 360-379-5095 Fax: 360-344-4619 www.cityofpt.us Residential Building Permit Application Project Address: (a" &"* t Legal Description (or Tax #): Addition: SC -w V l EW Block: 5 Office Use Only Permit Number BLD 0 OZ2 Associated Permits: Zoning: (Z - ( Parcel # ��) 3(�p0501 t502� 505r 507 Lot(s): 4 Project Description: Si=1e jkTTA'(_Xt&T'M eYt1 ,T(^1(2 Applications by mail must include a check for initial plan review fee of $150 for projects valued over $15,000. See Page 2 for details on plan submittal requirements. Property Owner/Applicant: Name:_b iQ ANQ W11 -91A Ti m►vtontS Address: (q 3m 41W City/St/zip: F6V-T -r6WN5ENn,WA 18368 Phone: 106 ' 319. 2654 Email: Contact/Re resentative: Name: �L�M IWC i els AR&W i LC.TS Address: -1161 7L4YU tz ST. City/st/zipfb> VZT T6w3W'a l USF ` 936gj Phone.- Email: hone:Email: Contractor: ❑ Same as Owner Name: n F=AN S-TQlQ C01`IS1RQ&TlQrJ Address: 2757 W-QW3 S17 City/St/zip: ?OYLT TM"J 145 y Wk 418 3616 Phone: -,3loQ ' 319 ' 27 30 Email: State License #:GRA4SC-6o 70J7 Exp: 20l O City Business License #: Lender Information: Lender information must be provided for projects over $5,000 in valuation per RCW 19.27.095. Name: 131FLIff f l !JA-NJ6efl Project Valuation: $ Building Information (square feet): 15` floor Garage: 2nd floor 0 Deck(s): 3rd floor Porch(es):0 Basement: Is it finished? Yes No Carport: Other: Manufactured Home ❑ ADU ❑ New Addition Remodel/Repair ❑ Total Lot Coverage (Building Footprint):* Square feet: 312,1 (D % ?- Impervious Surface:* Square feet: 7, $9 *Total existin4 & proposed What year was the structure built? If work includes demolition, see Page 2. Any known wetlands on the property? Y Any steep slopes (>15%)? Y(5) I hereby certify that the information provided is correct, that I am either the owner or authorized to act on behalf of the owner and that all activities associated with this permit will be in accordance with State Laws and the Port Townsend Municipal Code. Print Name: I M(3/L Signature: Date: Z ��Z / - C7 Page 1 of 7/ 1 /20 Page 1 of 1 Sheila Spears From: Sheila Spears Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:52 AM To: Joy Astle (JoyAstle@krazan.com) Subject: BLD09-022 Joy: I've checked with our Development Services Dept. and was told that the proposed demolition of a portion of the deck does not meet the threshold for requiring a separate demo permit. It can be incorporated into the building permit. Also, the level of impact on this work being done on the property and because the site is level, DSD would not require a stormwater erosion control plan. Close attention will be paid to stormwater during construction. This is how we would treat all like building permits. Sheila Spears, CMC Deputy Clerk City of Port Townsend 250 Madison Street, Suite 2 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-5083 sspears cityofpt. us 3/4/2009 Page 1 of 1 Sheila Spears From: Joy Astle [JoyAstle@Krazan.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 9:01 AM To: Sheila Spears Subject: Timmons Sheila: It is perfectly acceptable to issue a foundation only permit if the foundation is approved. A revised detail for insulation to meet WSEC would suffice based on the submitted structural design as reviewed. There may be some additional retrofitting required for lateral resistance, but it would most likely be minimal. These "foundation only" permit is generally granted by the Building Official on a case by case basis. The 3 big criteria would be: 1. Applicant is responsible and knowledgeable about process. 2. Project is being supervised and designed by professionals. 3. Design is substantially complete I would think that the project in question complies without any favoritism. Once again, you must have approved erosion control plans. That is local, county, state & federal law. Joy M. Astle, CBO Krazan & Associates 360/598-2126 joyastle@krazan.com 3/4/2009 ADN,..,�ISTRATIVE CERTIFICATE OF hr VIEW For possible HISTORIC STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Design Review Application HPC09-009, Timmons The Port Townsend Historic Preservation Committee has completed its design review of the: Partial demolition of an existing single-family residence Representative: Richard Berg For the building located at: 1939 49`h Street The building classification: (highlight one): N/A Pivotal Primary Secondary Altered Historic/Recent Compatible Intrusion Review of the project is: Mandatory per Ordinance 2969 Compliance with review is: Mandatory per Ordinance 2969 The review was conducted pursuant to Chapter 17.30 and of the Port Townsend Municipal Code, and was based on the application submitted on January 8, 2009 HPC Subcommittee: Charlie Paul & DSD staff John McDonagh Applicable Guidelines: Criteria for determining historical significance per Section 2 of Ordinance 2969. After review and analysis of relevant criteria (attached), the Historic Preservation Committee finds that the proposed partial demolition: (circle one) DOES NOT INVOLVE A HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE DOES INVOLVE A HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE within the City of Port T4 v send Issued this day of hair, Historic Preservation Committee proved Disapproved by D Director (or designee) Bcd_Permits:Form Letters2 Page I of 1 — Revised 12198 Review of partial Demolition permit for 1939 of Ordinance 2969 1939 49`x' Street (c. 2000) is a concrete perimeter foundation, 2 story home consisting of an 875 square foot dwelling located over a two car garage. The existing home contains a combination of horizontal wood siding and stucco, with composition shingles on the roof and various sizes and types of fenestration. The request involves partial demolition of an existing deck and staircase, which will facilitate construction of an elevated breezeway that will connect the upper story of the existing home with a new 1,578 square foot addition to be built to the northeast. Portions of the existing home's facade will be altered as part of the breezeway addition. Per Ordinance No. 2969, the demolition of certain structures is regulated as specified by Section 2. Staff analysis of the request for applicability of the Ordinance the follows in italics. The analysis is followed by a staff conclusion on Ordinance applicability. Ordinance 2969, Section 2. Defined Structures. The following structures are subject to this Ordinance: 1. Structures shown as pivotal, primary or secondary on a map prepared in connection with the Port Townsend National Historic Landmark District (NHLD) application. The map is attached as Exhibit A. The building lies outside the NHLD, therefore it is not labeled Pivotal, Primary or Secondary. 2. Structures, whether inside the NHLD or outside the NHLD, that have "historical significance." Structures have historical significance if the structure is at least 50 years old, and meets three or more of the following criteria or is less than 50 years old and meets at least five of the following criteria: Built in 2000 (according to the applicant), the building is less than SO years old. Therefore at least S of the following criteria must be met for the building to be subject to Ordinance 2969. a. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state, or local history; To staff's knowledge, the building does not meet this criteria. The building is not listed on the NPS, State or local database of historic structures. b. Embodies distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style, or method of design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; Not to staff's knowledge. The building is not listed on the NPS, State or local database of historic structures. c. Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder, or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art; Not to staff s knowledge. The building is not listed on the NPS, State or local database of historic structures. d. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; Not to staff's knowledge. The building is not listed on the NPS, State or local database of historic structures. e. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state or local history; Not to staffs knowledge; f. It is the only remaining, or one of the few remaining, structures of a particular style, building type, design, material, or method of construction; Not to staffs knowledge. The building is not listed on the NPS, State or local database of historic structures. g. It is a conspicuous visual landmark in the community or neighborhood; While the existing structure fits well within the neighborhood context, it is not considered a conspicuous visual landmark. h. It is an important or critical element in establishing or contributing to the continuity or character of the street, neighborhood or area. To staffs knowledge, the building is not an important or critical element in street or neighborhood character. Conclusions: Ordinance 2969 does not apply to the proposed partial demolitions at 1939 49th Street for two (2) reasons. First, the building is not within the National Historic Landmark District. Second, none of the eight (8) qualifying criteria are met by the building. Given the age of the building (less than 50 years old), 5 of the 8 criteria cited above must be met in order for Ordinance 2969 to apply. A search of the National, State and local register databases did not reveal any listing of the building. Therefore, the proposed partial demolition does not involve a historically significant structure. Page 1 of 2 Sheila Spears From: Joy Astle [JoyAstle@Krazan.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:32 AM To: Sheila Spears Subject: RE: BLD09-022 Thanks. That is everything that I need to add for "other departmental approvals". Joy M. Astle, CBO Krazan & Associates 360/598-2126 ioyastle@krazan.com From: Sheila Spears [mailto:sspears@cityofpt.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:14 AM To: Joy Astle Subject: RE: BLD09-022 1. City Manager (David Timmons) told me to make approved erosion control plan a condition of the building permit. It will be reviewed in-house. It is a flat site and the existing driveway will be used for construction. 2. City sewer. 3. 1 checked with our plans reviewer and he said we haven't been doing this, so this probably isn't the time to start. We have a new building official coming on -board next week and this will be added to his list of things to work on. 4. Development Services Department will work on this. Thanks for the heads -up. From: Joy Astle [mailto:JoyAstle@Krazan.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:22 AM To: Sheila Spears Subject: RE: BLD09-022 thanks Joy M. Astle, CBO Krazan & Associates 360/598-2126 joyastIe@krazan.com From: Sheila Spears [mailto:sspears@cityofpt.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:21 AM To: Joy Astle 2/25/2009 Page 2 of 2 Subject: RE: BLD09-022 Joy, I know one of the answers. No. 2 — the house is connected to the city's sewer system, not a septic system. I'll talk to a planner this morning and get back to you with the rest. Sheila From: Joy Astle [mailto:JoyAstle@Krazan.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:11 AM To: Sheila Spears Subject: BLD09-022 Shelia: I am pretty much done with the review on the Timmons property and have a couple of questions regarding the section of additional department approvals. 1. There is no erosion control plan with the plans nor is there any indication that one has been submitted. Who reviews erosion control and in what department is he/she located? 2. They are adding a bedroom and altering the waste plumbing system. Is the current septic system sized accurately? This is about 2,000 sq. ft. addition with 1 additional bedroom. There is a significant addition of plumbing fixtures. Health Department approval for increased fixture load needs to be verified. You may also be able to check this via your web. 3. PT adopted the International Performance Code, (16.04.020- 1). One and two family residences are subject to the provisions of the code under 103.1.8.3 R-3. Who reviews the "concept" documents? Could you find out if there is an existing checklist for this? Although I understand the point of the adoption, this is pretty touchy-feely. You might want to speak with a Planner. 4. Additionally, one of the forms supplied is the City of Port Townsend 2001 Residential Construction Checklist. It is the same form that is posted on the City website. IT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is out of date. The code currently in effect in PT is the 2006. It is going to be awkward to tell the applicant that the City supplied form is non-compliant. 5. Due to President's Day, we had a one day delay getting the plans to the structural engineer. I will probably not get them back until the 2nd. I will call him tomorrow for a progress report. Anyway, it is a pretty good set of plans. There will be some revision and additional information required, but nothing major. Let me know about the above as soon as it is convenient, and I will incorporate the additional permit requirements into the permit review list. Joy M. Astle, CBO Krazan & Associates 360/598-2126 joyastle@krazan.com 2/25/2009 Page 1 of 2 Sheila Spears From: Sheila Spears Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:14 AM To: 'Joy Astle' Subject: RE: BLD09-022 1. City Manager (David Timmons) told me to make approved erosion control plan a condition of the building permit. It will be reviewed in-house. It is a flat site and the existing driveway will be used for construction. 2. City sewer. 3. 1 checked with our plans reviewer and he said we haven't been doing this, so this probably isn't the time to start. We have a new building official coming on -board next week and this will be added to his list of things to work on. 4. Development Services Department will work on this. Thanks for the heads -up. From: Joy Astle [mailto:JoyAstle@Krazan.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:22 AM To: Sheila Spears Subject: RE: BLD09-022 thanks Joy M. Astle, CBO Krazan & Associates 360/598-2126 joyastle a krazan.com From: Sheila Spears [mailto:sspears@cityofpt.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:21 AM To: Joy Astle Subject: RE: BLD09-022 Joy, I know one of the answers. No. 2 — the house is connected to the city's sewer system, not a septic system. I'll talk to a planner this morning and get back to you with the rest. Sheila From: Joy Astle [mailto:JoyAstle@Krazan.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:11 AM To: Sheila Spears Subject: BLD09-022 Shelia: I am pretty much done with the review on the Timmons property and have a couple of questions regarding the section of additional department approvals. 1. There is no erosion control plan with the plans nor is there any indication that one has been submitted. 2/25/2009 Page 2 of 2 Who reviews erosion control and in what department is he/she located? 2. They are adding a bedroom and altering the waste plumbing system. Is the current septic system sized accurately? This is about 2,000 sq. ft. addition with 1 additional bedroom. There is a significant addition of plumbing fixtures. Health Department approval for increased fixture load needs to be verified. You may also be able to check this via your web. 3. PT adopted the International Performance Code, (16.04.020- 1). One and two family residences are subject to the provisions of the code under 103.1.8.3 R-3. Who reviews the "concept" documents? Could you find out if there is an existing checklist for this? Although I understand the point of the adoption, this is pretty touchy-feely. You might want to speak with a Planner. 4. Additionally, one of the forms supplied is the City of Port Townsend 2001 Residential Construction Checklist. It is the same form that is posted on the City website. IT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is out of date. The code currently in effect in PT is the 2006. It is going to be awkward to tell the applicant that the City supplied form is non-compliant. 5. Due to President's Day, we had a one day delay getting the plans to the structural engineer. I will probably not get them back until the 2nd. I will call him tomorrow for a progress report. Anyway, it is a pretty good set of plans. There will be some revision and additional information required, but nothing major. Let me know about the above as soon as it is convenient, and I will incorporate the additional permit requirements into the permit review list. Joy M. Astle, CBO Krazan & Associates 360/598-2126 joyastle@krazan.com Page 1 of 1 Sheila Spears From: Sheila Spears Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:28 AM To: Rick Sepler Subject: FW: BLD09-022 Rick, Could you please forward me the answers to these questions and then I will send them on to Joy. I already told her the house is connected to the city's sewer system. I assume that addresses #2. Does the water tap need to be upsized for the increase in plumbing fixtures? Thanks, Sheila From: Joy Astle [mailto:JoyAstle@Krazan.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:11 AM To: Sheila Spears Subject: BLD09-022 Shelia: I am pretty much done with the review on the Timmons property and have a couple of questions regarding the section of additional department approvals. 1. There is no erosion control plan with the plans nor is there any indication that one has been submitted. Who reviews erosion control and in what department is he/she located? 2. They are adding a bedroom and altering the waste plumbing system. Is the current septic system sized accurately? This is about 2,000 sq. ft. addition with 1 additional bedroom. There is a significant addition of plumbing fixtures. Health Department approval for increased fixture load needs to be verified. You may also be able to check this via your web. 3. PT adopted the International Performance Code, (16.04.020- 1). One and two family residences are subject to the provisions of the code under 103.1.8.3 R-3. Who reviews the "concept" documents? Could you find out if there is an existing checklist for this? Although I understand the point of the adoption, this is pretty touchy-feely. You might want to speak with a Planner. 4. Additionally, one of the forms supplied is the City of Port Townsend 2001 Residential Construction Checklist. It is the same form that is posted on the City website. IT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is out of date. The code currently in effect in PT is the 2006. It is going to be awkward to tell the applicant that the City supplied form is non-compliant. 5. Due to President's Day, we had a one day delay getting the plans to the structural engineer. I will probably not get them back until the 2nd. I will call him tomorrow for a progress report. Anyway, it is a pretty good set of plans. There will be some revision and additional information required, but nothing major. Let me know about the above as soon as it is convenient, and I will incorporate the additional permit requirements into the permit review list. Joy M. Astle, CBO Krazan & Associates 360/598-2126 joyastle@krazan.com 2/25/2009 Joy, I know one of the answers. No. 2 — the house is connected to the city's sewer system, not a septic system. I'll talk to a planner this morning and get back to you with the rest. Sheila From: Joy Astle [mailto:JoyAstle@Krazan.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:11 AM To: Sheila Spears Subject: BLD09-022 Shelia: I am pretty much done with the review on the Timmons property and have a couple of questions regarding the section of additional department approvals. 1. There is no erosion control plan with the plans nor is there any indication that one has been submitted. Who reviews erosion control and in what department is he/she located? 2. They are adding a bedroom and altering the waste plumbing system. Is the current septic system sized accurately? This is about 2,000 sq. ft. addition with 1 additional bedroom. There is a significant addition of plumbing fixtures. Health Department approval for increased fixture load needs to be verified. You may also be able to check this via your web. 3. PT adopted the International Performance Code, (16.04.020- 1). One and two family residences are subject to the provisions of the code under 103.1.8.3 R-3. Who reviews the "concept" documents? Could you find out if there is an existing checklist for this? Although I understand the point of the adoption, this is pretty touchy-feely. You might want to speak with a Planner. 4. Additionally, one of the forms supplied is the City of Port Townsend 2001 Residential Construction Checklist. It is the same form that is posted on the City website. IT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is out of date. The code currently in effect in PT is the 2006. It is going to be awkward to tell the applicant that the City supplied form is non-compliant. 5. Due to President's Day, we had a one day delay getting the plans to the structural engineer. I will probably not get them back until the 2"d. I will call him tomorrow for a progress report. Anyway, it is a pretty good set of plans. There will be some revision and additional information required, but nothing major. Let me know about the above as soon as it is convenient, and I will incorporate the additional permit requirements into the permit review list. Joy M. Astle, CBO Krazan & Associates 360/598-2126 j oyastle@krazan. coin Pagel of 3 Sheila Spears From: Suzanne Wassmer Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:51 AM To: Sheila Spears Subject: FW: Interim Demolition Ordinance - Administrative Procedures for Determination of Whether Interim Ordinance Applies to Structure Proposed for Demolition. Sheila, FYI — Demolition Ordinance. Suzanne From: John McDonagh Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:44 AM To: Suzanne Wassmer Subject: FW: Interim Demolition Ordinance - Administrative Procedures for Determination of Whether Interim Ordinance Applies to Structure Proposed for Demolition. fyi John McDonagh, Planner Development Services Dept. City of Port Townsend Pt. Townsend, WA 98368 360-344-3070 office 360-344-4619 fax From: John Watts Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 10:15 AM To: John McDonagh Cc: David Timmons; Leonard Yarberry; Pat Iolavera; Rick Sepler; Brent Butler (City) (bbutler@cityofpt.us); Catharine Robinson (CITY) (crobinson@cityofpt.us); David King (City) (dking@cityofpt.us); George Randels (City) (grandels@cityofpt.us); Laurie Medlicott (City) (Imedlicott@cityofpt.us); Mark Welch (City) (mwelch@cityofpt.us); Michelle Sandoval (CITY) (msandoval@cityofpt.us) Subject: Interim Demolition Ordinance - Administrative Procedures for Determination of Whether Interim Ordinance Applies to Structure Proposed for Demolition. John — this is a follow up on our recent discussions, and discussions with Pat and Leonard. I am copying Council for their information on how City staff will be implementing the interim demolition ordinance. I also provide Council with a summary of the scope of design review: Design review for alteration of an historic structure follows the Secretary Standards. There is no design review for new construction (except in the downtown commercial district). On Feb. 19, the City Council passed Ordinance 2969, an interim regulation applying demolition standards (currently in place for downtown historic commercial buildings) to all structures in the City. If the structure is historically significant (determined by applying criteria in the ordinance), then exterior alteration, partial demolition, or complete demotion is reviewed under the provisions of the ordinance (allowing denial unless demolition criteria are met, and for alterations and partial demolition, requiring historic preservation design review). The procedures require HPC review and recommendation before 2/23/2009 Page 2 of 3 any structure can be altered or demolished. Interim Ordinance Administrative Procedures for Determination of Whether Interim Ordinance Applies to Structure Proposed for Demolition. Because the interim ordinance requires that every application for exterior alteration, partial demolition, or complete demotion of any structure in the City must be reviewed to see if the interim ordinance applies (i.e., is the structure historically significant), we discussed administrative procedure as follows: . If the structure is in the National Historic Landmark District, the application would be reviewed by the entire HPC. If the structure is outside the National Historic Landmark District and listed on either the local, state or national register as historic), then the application would be reviewed by the entire HPC. If the structure is outside the National Historic Landmark District (but not listed on either the local, state or national register as historic), then DSD staff and one member of the HPC would review the application to see if the interim ordinance likely applied (namely, whether or not the structure was historically significant as defined by the ordinance). If DSD staff and the one HPC member concluded the structure was not historic (for example, a 1960s rambler), then the application would proceed without further HPC review. If DSD staff and the one HPC member concluded the structure was historic, then the entire HPC would review the application. I support the above procedures as substantially meeting the intent and requirement of the interim ordinance. We also discussed design review and SEPA. 1. Design Review under Interim Ordinance for Exterior Alteration/Demolition — Secretary Standards, SEPA. If a structure is historically significant and the owner proposes exterior alteration, or partial or complete demolition, review occurs under both the provisions of the interim ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Under the interim ordinance, design review for alteration and partial demolition follows the standards of the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing historic Buildings. 2. No Residential Design Review for New Construction; SEPA. There is no design review under the interim ordinance or other city regulation for new single-family residential construction anywhere in town, including in the National Historic Landmark District. If new single family residential construction occurs on a vacant lot, or an existing non -historic home is demolished and the owner rebuilds, or an existing historic home is demolished after applying the demolition standards in the interim ordinance, there is no design review on the new residential structure. Generally, SEPA does not apply to construction or alteration of a single family residence. Under SEPA, demolition of a residence "with recognized historical significance" is subject to SEPA review. 3. Downtown Commercial Design Review; demolition. Dating back to the 1970s, design review for new construction or exterior alteration occurs in the downtown commercial district. In 2003, the City adopted specific regulations providing that anyone seeking to demolish an historic commercial building in the downtown had to prove that it wasn't economical to rehabilitate the building. Let me know any questions. Thanks. John Watts City Attorney - City of Port Townsend 2/23/2009 City Clerk City of Port Townsend Waterman & Katz Building 181 Quincy Street, Suite 201 Port Townsend, WA 98368 III ILII III�I III ISI ill III IIII NI �Jefferson County. WA CITY OF PORT TOWNSEN NOTICE TO TITLE Grantor(s): David and Maria Timmons Grantee: City of Port Townsend, a Washington municipal corporation. Reference: No Protest Real Property Covenant Agreement, AFN 441864 Legal description: Grantor(s)/Owner(s) own the following described real property: Addition: Seaview, Block: 5 Lot(s): 1-8 and 19-24 to the City of Port Townsend, found in Volume 4 of Plats, page 26, records of Jefferson County, Washington. 462231 Pape: 1 of 2 11/15/2002 10:128 NTIT 20.00 Assessor's Property Tax parcel No: 993-600-501; 993-601-502; 993-600-507; 993-600-505 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the Grantor(s)/Owner(s) of the above -referenced real property, to potential purchasers and future owners, to agents or representatives, and to any other concerned person or entity: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF THE SIDE SEWER PUMP AND LINE RUNNING FROM MASON STREET, THROUGH THOMAS STREET TO THE MAIN LINE IN TEA STREET IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT BENEFIT FROM THE SIDE SEWER LINE. 462231 111115/2002 10:12A J�ff�raon County, WA CITY OF PORT TOWNSEN NTIT 20.00 Grantor(s) Grantee City: Notice to Title Page 2 DATED this / day of September, 2002. s , By: By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that David Timmons and Maria Timmons are the persons who appeared before me, and who acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Given under my hand and official seal this ���'P'SPEq S��gS10N � 110TAlly —ems .G oF /WABN�����` [Notary stamp inside V margin] day of September, 2002. [Print Name] NOTARY PUBLIC in and forState of Washington, Residing at: jL- 1� rSoh My appo*ntent expires: ©S I�d��B1�EIN�IN�NNI:';8emJefferson County, WA CITY OF PM TOWNSEN W 13.90 AFTER RECORDING. RETURN TO: City of Port Townsend Attn: City Clerk Department of Public Works Waterman & Katz Building 181 Quincy, Suite 201 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-5045 NO PRO!- :: . L PROPE-RTY°:.C6VENANT AGREEMENT Reference dgc#meta$. GRANTOd"::and Maria Ti►tulwn `' GRANTEE: City of Pon Townsend, a Washington municipal corporation THIS NO PROTEST REAL PROPERTY COVENANT AGREEMENT is made and executed as of this j_ day of XUP- N , 200L, by the City of Port Townsend, a Washington municipal corporation, 181 Quincy Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, under the laws of Washington State, (City or Grantee), and David and Maria Timmons, (Grantors), 615 W Street, Port Townsend, Washington 98368, and shall be effective as set forth in paragraph 14. "Grantors" own the following described real property located in Port Townsend, Jefferson County, Washington, more commonly known as: 1939 Cook Avenue Port Townsend, WA 98368 Legal description: Seaview Addition, Block 5, Lots 1-8 and 19-24 to the City of Port Townsend, found in Volume 4 of Plats, page 26, records of Jefferson County, Washington. Jefferson County Assessor Tax No. 993-600-501; 993-601-502; 993-600-507, 993-600- 505 (hereinafter the "property" or "properties"). NO PROTEST REAL PROPERTY COVENANT AGREEMENT - Page 1 441864 00 9/2901 02:35P Jeffgrton County, wA CITY OF PORT TOMNSIN AOR 18.00 RECITA:S:._ 1. Pursuant to Port Townsend Municipal QQ6' A•", ):— ties 12 and 13, the Grantors have applied for a Street and Utility.Peye2fbpMe`q Permit in order to connect to the existing street and utilities within t6,�.:dty:rJgh :sof--way in association with the development of a single famitymq,i,% 2. The Public Works Director'cib*: ig* (Director) has approved development of the eet that was constructed #o less than the current minimum property on an existing str street standards in ttii .64.1 tU&eering Desiglt:Wpdards (Local Access Street, Design Detail T-9)..Aod&:ihe authority ofPT:W-K x.-ific Director may grant a waiver from constru.C.ti Wof:frcii 61f improvem nA3, %fire tiiitii' of development if they can better be col *::� ' # d -i: Ae future thrd i� � aaea-wide improvement district. 3. The ii: lneering Desi&KStand9r-ds: fOr new residential streets require concrete cut b&a:gw8v.s, paved asphalt oad ' ifd catchbasins and enclosed piping for The City's Non -Motorized Transportation Plan (NMTP) includes a policy (NMTP Policy 1.15) that requires development to provide sidewalks or pathways along local street frontage. In addition, local stormwater detention and treatment facilities do not exist or may be inadequate for this area and the Grantors are creating new impervious surfaces. 4. In consideration of the City agreeing to waive the requirement to bring the existing infrastructure up to full standards as part of the Street and Utility Development permit, the Grantors desire to voluntarily enter into this Agreement with the City not to protest the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) or Utilities Local Improvement District (ULID) to construct the street, sidewalk and stormwater improvements, and non -motorized transportation improvements per city standards as described in this Agreement, and further agree to join in any proposed petition for such LID or ULID for the purposes specifically set forth below. Grantors agree that the public improvements to be made in connection with such LID or ULID will specifically benefit the Grantors' property. 5. Section 35.43.180 RCW, describes Grantors' rights to protest formation of an LID or ULID; and Section 35.43.182 RCW, provides for waiver of protest and limits on NO PROTEST REAL PROPTItTy COVENANT AGREEMENT - Page 2 441864 Pass: 8 01 8 08/10/2001 08:80P Jefferson County, MA CITY OF PORT TOMNSEN AGR 18.00 enforceability of such waivers. The Grantors adhowledge and warrant that Grantors have had the opportunity to review those 1&*s:.n :XttWAgreement with independent legal counsel of Grantors' choice. NOW, THEREFORE, in con td p4gn 6f.. mutual covenants and benefits set forth in this Agreement, the City ;ntl.64tors agree as follow: R`°EEME°T 1. Area. The ares i uiliili``fe Grantors' p#oeatyis luted and for which an LID or ULID may : ojpo ss�d:br formed (t erei�a£ter;"improved area") is described as follows; SV.I(M, including Gook A4ye l te:5treet between 53"d and Thomas Streets, and Thoiru :%4reet between 53' air's C -66k Streets, Port Townsend Drainage Basin 1 and 4, and/or:`other boundaries as may :lte-r &::ermined by the City to best implement the area - wide improvements. 2. Improvements to be financed. The improvements to be financed by the LID or ULID (hereinafter "public improvements") include the following: Street, Sewer, Drainage and Frontage Improvements, including, but not limited to: concrete curb and gutter and asphalt paving; sidewalks, pathways or other pedestrian facilities; catch basins and drainage pipe; regional systems for stormwater detention and treatment all installed to adopted City standards at the time the improvements are made. 3. Obligation to join petition. In accordance with PTMC Titles 12 and 13 as now or later amended, and RCW 35.43.180 and 35.43.182, the Grantors hereby obligate themselves, Grantors" heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns to join in any valid petition for the formation of an LID or ULID for the public improvements which may be proposed to be established within or for the area. 4. Waiver of right to protest. In accordance with PTMC Titles 12 and 13 and RCW 35.43.180 and 35.43.182, the Grantors for themselves, Grantors' heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns agree not to protest the establishment of such NO PROTEST REAL PROPERTY COVENANT nGREEMerr - Page 3 441864 Pass; 40 f e IM11 11 05/1912001 02:36P Jefferean County, M CITY OF PORT TOWNSEN AN 1S.00 LID or ULID for the public improvements for th6:Area and serving the Grantors' property, whether proposed by petition or ky:res dutiori df the City Council of Port Townsend, or by both such petition and :resaliltoit,. Pursuant to RCW 35.43.182, this yvaiver°slialj .dirt constitute a waiver of any right of the Grantors, Grantors' heirs, pprsoiial fomsehtatives, successors or assigns, to object to the Grantors' individual asses'9m' (including the determination of special benefits allocable to the property),::0.r::tQ .appeal `td the Superior Court the decision of the City Council affirming the role. 5. Power of Attor�pey:t :oxiKcute` petition. Itars :hgree that if Grantors, Grantors' heirs, personal rePrMiM. *s, successors•wf;• Signi;:t fuse to join in a proposed petition for•�ui�:)M.:ar. ULID after eveJ-5j`calendar days written notice from the City, the Diredbi-Aail�bave the right, powet'•arid',�:ut).ority to sign the petition for and on beha4X` :the'�E'ssat?tors, Gr antors'•:hdir&-, . rs tlal representatives, successors and assigns as:it=Pelw,.tls:to the property, WlGraru,grs::tiereby designate and appoint the Director as their, ahq-in-fact for such �tiipwseg and with such powers and authority. The power°shall be deemed to be cotiplod4ith an interest and therefore irrevocable throughout the term of this Agreement. 6. Binding effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Grantors, Grantors' heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 7. Covenant to run with the land. The obligations and agreement contained in this Agreement are acknowledged and declared to be covenants running with the above- described land and shall be binding upon the Grantors, Grantors' heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 8. Attorney fees. In the event of any action brought to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees, costs and disbursements awarded by the court. 9. Recordation. Upon execution by all signatories of this Agreement, the City shall record this Agreement with the Jefferson County Auditor's Office. A completed stamped, recorded copy shall be forwarded to the Grantors. 10. Entire Agreement. This written Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties, and there is no other written or oral representation or agreement between the NO PROTEST REAL PROPERTY COVENANT AGRED4ENr - Page 4 441864 Pass: 5 of & 031191209I 93:36P Jeffermon CamtY. WA CITY OF PORT TWANUN POR 13-00 parties, except as contained in this Agreement... A,ny modification of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by the Direoiw-,a o.`6y:Q Grantors, Grantors' heirs, personal representatives, successors, 11. Effective date and term. This both parties. The term of the.Agkekme;i UT."t #z 7 -; R ftomes effective upon the signatures of f:Jhafl be ten (10) years from its effective date. DATED this day of M4►C bi 2000. TIMMONS :By: o A -S [Printnampf/ By: C, C- —ilvVVnL-� [Print name] NO PROTEST REAL PROPERTY COVENANT AGREMENT - Page 5 441864 Paw: ! of 6 03/1012001 0340 j*flaraon CamtY, MA CITY OF PORT TOMNM AGN 13.00 STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) On this day personally appead.b#;orir•:ifie, DA V f ?i m m oN s n'1 A 2 r� Ti m,oN s known to be the individuals dwfiiiti aril who executed the foregoing No Protest Real Property Covenant Agreg po;'::°�ti6.acknowledged sigMg the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for.te`ises a'n purposes theeiiti'Irientioned. ':.. ::•...::,• ••:: ;, •: too Given undF.:.tiiy `ltaiid ipd: official seal it is`° day of /YI dnc A , 2000. lune€n$met r+ ��� c�.y •�--- �-.•, lO I'A>Ii'•Y PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at & e •r 7Q u�,y s£p 1jzA My appointment expires. 41-'0.3 -OY NO PROTEST REAL PROPERTY COVENANT AGREEMENT - Page 6 O�VORT r04 a y� u i 0 BLD09-022 CHECK Receipt Number: 993600501 Plan Review Fee $150.00 $150.00 Total: $150.00 4941 $ 150.00 Total: $150.00 a Loj 9- 6Zz $0.00 genpmtrreceipts Page 1 of 1 M 1<,raZ;an& ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND INSPECTIONS August 12, 2008 KA Proposal No.P08-950P Page 1 of 5 Mr. Leonard Yarberry Development Services Director Phone: 360-344-3071 City of Port Townsend 250 Madison St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: 2008-2009 PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT FOR PLAN REVIEW SERVICES (VALID THROUGH JUNE 31ST, 2009) Dear Mr. Yarberry: We greatly appreciate and thank you for the opportunity to submit this Proposal for Building Plan Review Service during the 2008-2009 fiscal year at specific rates as stated below. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at the number listed below. The fee charges for projects under this Agreement are: Building Plan Review Service Fee= 80% of current plan review fees per current City of Port Townsend Fee Schedule as adopted under Resolution 06-037 or most current fee schedule. Conditions: • These rates are valid and will be used on all 2008/2009 projects from today's date through June 31, 2009 unless otherwise noted. Prices are subject to change if Agreement is not executed within thirty (30) calendar days. • Services will be performed on a percentage basis as stated above. • Plans requiring engineering review shall be reviewed by Washington licensed structural engineer. • Plan Review to be performed per current ICC/Uniform/Washington Codes (s) as adopted and amended by Port Townsend Municipal Code; Title 16, Section 16.04, "The Building Construction Code" exclusively. • Plans requiring structural engineer's review shall have a maximum turn around time of 10 working days from time of receipt by Krazan & Associates, Inc. Plans may be messengered daily to Krazan & Associates, Inc. at cost to the City of Port Townsend. • Plans will be picked up and delivered to the City of Port Townsend one day per week by Krazan & Associates, Inc. at no additional cost to the City. Day to be determined by the City of Port Townsend and Krazan Project Manager. • Planreviewer is to be available to meet at the City of Port Townsend one day per week as necessary or by appointment. Plan reviewer to be available by phone during normal working hours. • Plans to have a maximum turn around time of 10 working days from time of receipt by Krazan & Associates, Inc. ,—With Twelve Offices Serving the Western United States 14 State Hwy. 305NE, Suite 3C Poulsbo, WA 98370 • (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127 nt ice' n� Page.#-- KA Proposal No: POS -950P City of Port Townsend Plan Review Services August 13, 2008 Page No. 2 • Plan review service to include initial review and two subsequent reviews inclusive in the original fee. Additional review beyond three submittals is subject to an hourly rate of $95.00/hour for non-structural review and $135.00 for licensed structural engineer review. • Our prices do NOT include "Inspector of Record" responsibilities, project oversight, and or construction management. • Plan - review does not include Land Use, Zoning, grading, NPDES, LID, Flood Zone administration or other portions of the City of Port Townsend Municipal Code not included in Section 16.04 as referenced above. Included as an Attachment: ® Attachment A — Agreement for Professional Services and General Terms and Conditions Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Anita Otterson Business Development Coordinator Pacific Northwest Division / 111' lz Page �of� . Joy Astle Project Manager Pacific Northwest Division Krazan & Associates, Inc. With Offices Serving The Western United States ,pORT r, OF Receipt Number: 0916217, genpmtrreceipts Page 1 of 1 4TR Receipt �a TIMM N ayer/ S'DAVI 'at 9 -s rmit F BLD09-022 993600501 Building Permit Fee $1,805.75 $1,805.75 $0.00 BLD09-022 993600501 Energy Code Fee - New Single Family $100.00 $100.00 $0.00 BLD09-022 993600501 Mechanical Permit Fee per Dwelling U $150.00 $150.00 $0.00 BLD09-022 993600501 Plan Review Fee $1,173.74 $1,023.74 $0.00 BLD09-022 993600501 Plumbing Permit Fee per Dwelling Uni $150.00 $150.00 $0.00 BLD09-022 993600501 State Building Code Council Fee $4.50 $4.50 $0.00 BLD09-022 993600501 Technology Fee for Building Permit $36.12 $36.12 $0.00 BLD09-022 993600501 Record Retention Fee for Building Per $10.00 $10.00 $0.00 Total: $3,280.11 Receipt-# Descriptionr" Receipt Date Fee -Pe 09-0087 02/13/2009 Plan Review Fee $150.00 BLD09-022 zPa,ymen V., -fi4dk "R, MethodA� NOmbdr,"' CHECK 4982 $3,280.11 Total: $3,280.11 genpmtrreceipts Page 1 of 1