Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout113089 Min Ag Packet y i it a a t - � � ♦ r . PORT T TO N S l r ISIS H 1 O ' 8 3 6 Jor 4P L +r• - + 4 ` ' k �-' i �- � 1 � _ P1. -nA columl, ISS1 P - - 46. �. i 0ift ',{;i a, 4 i.'` 'T` .C3 P 0 RT TOWN E D • Y i ! � F w� t a - ,rt .'� � M t �w � � I.. y a rt, . ,.-. s� j it _x i* -�' • ♦ + a {+ t r f y 4} } w - + r c •Nov - 0, '1989 a + ,.F 11 Call 4i' •}-• T -• 4 �' 1 -# '+ rt ti. I *+ aairma ,-Ta eirnak�is .. alled "ithe. ee i order. a J. :4 t # # • ya �l + - 1i leme "1 1'`e 1 �� Karen. t r i s �n. and Bob Grim. Also,. , eseint{ was sis . Planner Kevin' i * " F• Reading. and . Val � f the minutes, - a + moved to it a r� Te r .n s f r . meeting of . i November. 9.- - 19890.- - r s. S d seconded_ aftd'-x tyle motion .passeda . : y R r iii-O Vm' i# VVI# * ; _=A + t 1 ` ; L a '4 • • { ` x 5 tl �- NL f+. hk 4P The, � � ion to&erred,. a t f 'the + -i�nu es llf om 'I em er�, 15.1 1989 Planning '.C6mmission4 �neet�n ,arid ars �� a yf- future y noun rye 1 s. d.'recent decisions made r r o t ••Z1 ,a � F a, '# I• , i' 1a �* '. land- use,, i �Y+k _.. � � r �.� - _ lr! i y t G ■ 5L r - * + Iva- Old us ness � i - r �� � + i ��,.. Street- Vacation' .- - 969— '1; Skip, cod' L i l ► i{ - � + ♦ �� w � �'�. .Ire .i!' � r� -. Staff r�e a ati �d Review �3� �� . •. yy*y + r k ; -3 - } i ' i # �.a - � R i �5 `} ♦tom# ~ � + �� * O'Neill' �,.�/yy■■ r #r�/Y #* �y�y�*M y�.�+ yF/Y r �ry1� l/y= .1/�]��11�} The- i {yam, l/1r�'�/•-•�� _ + Mr..: a i. r i 7'# 7.�i * nt i ; irf �R n F/ 3rr/X14 it i requests ,the..H a at that-.-po t{1on% :o X31 act ed m but #�.�► ed � - &-,I + + .. •. Rosecrans ans Street extending:i f � �l s str� a 's � N%.,' a city. . limits `where 1 aJ abuts the --Ea l e I rid �i a�. hl a l a Id Ms 0 1 * }lied clarif.i at�F r - thecomment-' made' -.by the ,fine T a � department on the 'ra l i cats on. � � �� - - �•' �.F �' +. + r - * i k � d. Public +Testi'moray, � ,x. �• r-�� ,, i t,�wa every. T + . , r I + i µ d. a• ' # Committee-.--Report.-(Grimm/Sherwood). _ * i • I 4 t + � # " ry a w' • -� - " a _ i � • yI xmm i a d that it,R meets the +review_criteria ' -+ � '` LL + i t, 1� r i t ; * ~ r, �F{* � ' ' F � i, J r F • i , { � { ,F y i i +' .•, r## 1 y Planning Commission-November 30p 1983 Page Ms. Sherwood concurredf Ms. Sherwood moved to recommend approval of street Vacation application 8909-05 to City Cou.ncil Mr. Grimm seconded and the motion passed unanimously. B. Conditional Use 910-01 , Clayton Cook 1. Staff Presentation and Review Mr, O'Neill distributed a copy of a letter received from the Port Townsend Historic Preservation Commission concerning the review of the proposed expansion. Dr, Taernakis read the letter into the record. Mr. O'Neill reviewed the proposed expansion. ,The applicant proposes a 1 , 200 square foot expansion to an existing building located at 627-31 mater Street in the -111 zoning district. The applicants propose to use the addition for off ic-e space medical offices and a one-unit motel * The Commission asked Mr, O'Neill to clarify issues relating to the proposed expansion and zoning requirements and historic building regulations. 2, Public Testimony David McCullo h,, tenant of the building and representative for the applicant, stated that the property is unique in that the access is from the water side of building* He stated that he would rather not have parking in the rear but would like t preserve the area to be compatible with its surroundings. Public Testimony was closed. Committee Report (Carman/Sherwood) . Carman asked the applicant how he plans to respond to the recommendations from the Historic Preservation commission* The ppl icrt said he will keep their interests in mind. Mr. Cannan said he found no faults in the application. M . Sherwood stated that the building is not the same as other buildings in the historic district so making the addition look historic would not be compatible. She agreed , that the application was acceptable. Mr. Carman moved to recommend approval City Council Conditional Use 8910- 1, Clayton Cook. Ms. Sherwood seconded. Discussion, Mr, Tavernaki s asked the applicant for some i Planning Commission-November 3o, 1989 Page clarification on the proposed parking plan. The motion passed -1 in favor of approval with Ms, Erickson dissenting. C. Variance 8910-02, Allan and Rosalind Cunningham 1. staff Presentation and Review Mr. O'Neill reviewed two draft Findings of Fact and Conclusions for the variance request. Draft A recommends denial while Draft recommends approval . The previous owner of the property hal begun construction of a 200 square-foot carport/deck, The addition was built to within 12 feet of the front property line without a building permit. Ir. O'Neill advised the Commission that City Attorney, Keith Harper, recommended the Commission revise Conclusion 2 in Draft if it is decided to adopt that draft. Public 'testimony Al Cunningham, applicant, stated his case for approval of the i application. Public Testimony was closed. 3 . Committee Report (Carman/Erickson) Ms. Erickson stated that she was unable to identify a► hardship that would allow the variance and stated tate approval of the variance would set a bad precedent. Mr. Carman stated that some of the adjacent streets will not be developed because of adverse grades and that the applicant did not cause the action that caused the non-compliance, some discussion followed over whether the construction was 90 complete. Ni . Losec stated that setback variances have not been judged on the amount of traffic on adjacent streets. Ms, Erickson moved to approve Draft A of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions recommending to City Council the denial of the variance application. Mr. Carman seconded. Discussion. fir. Carman stated that Conclusion 2 does not adequately address the hardship of the applicant. He stated that the previous owners caused the nonconformance. Nor. Carman suggested that Conclusion 2 be revised to reflect that the applicants did not cause the non-conformity. After some discussion the Commission decided not to revise the drafted Planning Commission--November 30, 1989 Page 4 of 5 Findings and Conclusions. The motion for denial passed 5-1 as drafted by staff with Alan. Carman dissenting. 4 . Findings and Conclusions D. Final Plat, Bay vista Condominiums Mr. O'Neill reviewed the documents received from the applicants and pointed out some of his concerns. Mr. Carman listed some additional requirements that must be added to the plat. And asked for some clarifications on the survey. Mr. Carman recommended the plat be continued for review at the next Planning Commission hearing and that the -application be properly noticed . Erickson seconded and the motion passed unanimously. New Business A. Conditional Use 8911-05, Discovery View Associates was scheduled for January 11, 1989. McD le/Carman) B. Conditional Use 8911-01 James and Linda Dornan was scheduled for January 11 , 1989 . . Erickson/Grimm Tl, Announcements Bob Grim announced that he will not be available to attend the meeting of December 14. 1990, Megting pf .Decembpr Street Vacation 8909-0 , Sally McDole herwoodKosec Conditional Use 8910-0 , Port of Port Townsend (Erickson/Kosec) Draft Ordinance relating to review process for binding site plans. Meeting December Short Plat 8908-0 , Harold Gruver (Carman/Kosec) Variance 8911 , Judith and Kurt Dobsinsky (Grimm/Erickson) Short Plat 8911-03 , Carlos Quintana (Erickson/Grimm) Met, 3f January0 Planning commission--November J , 1989 Page 5 of 5 Workshop on proposed sign code update eting o _ .Januar 1 r ,_,1990 Street Vacation 8911-04, Arne Willenha ose /Sherwood) Conditional Use 8911-05, Discovery view Associates (McDole/Carman) Conditional Use 8911-06, James and Linda Dornan (Erickson/Grimm) Mr. Of Nei11 asked the- commission if they might like to cancel the meeting January 25, 1989. The Commission concurred and asked that hearings be scheduled accordingly. VII. The meeting was adjourned at 9: 20 Darlene Bloomfield, Planning Commission Secretary POEN TD1EDi WA19MINISN 919360 Port Townsend : . CITY OF PORT TOW S D (Revised) Business Meeting November ber 30, 1989 1. R L LL iiiii#--- ....i. 7: 30 e 41 2 • READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING (November 9. 1989) 3 . COMMUNICATIONS: a. current mail . OLD BUSINESS a. PUBLIC HEARING: street Vacation Appl. 8909-05, Skip Wood 1. Staff Presentation and Review OL 2 , Public Testimony 00�R " 3 . Committee Report - Grimm Sherwood 4 . Findings and Conclusions bo PUBLIC FEARING; Conditional Use Appl. 8910-01 , Clayton Cook 1. Staff Presentation and Review 2. Public Testimony . c 3 . Committee Report - (Carman/Sherwood) 4 . Findings and Conclusions � C, PUBLIC REARING: Variance Appl , 8910-02 , Allan and Rosalind Cunningham 1. Staff Presentation and Review 2, Public Testimony 3 , Committee Report - (Carman/Erickson) 4 , Findings and Conclusions ' d. Final Plat Application, Bay Vista Condominiums i I f i t 5. NEW BUSINESS. fi a, Conditional Use Appl. 8911-05, Discovery View Associates Set Hearing: January 11 1989 ---- Committee: cdole/Carman x: * b, Conditional Usep 1. 8911-061 James and Linda Dornan Set Hearing: January -11 .. 1.989 committee: Erickson&rimm . ANNOUNCEMENTS: Next Scheduled Meetings December 14 , 1989 a. Street Vacation Appl, 8909-03 , Sally McDole Committee: /Kosec h. Conditional Use Appl, 8910-03 , Port of Port Townsend Committee: / oseo C, Draft ordinance relating to review process for binding site pans ' December 28, 1989 a. Short Plat Appl. 8908-03 , Harold Gruver Committee: Carman/Ko eo b. 1 Variance Appl. 891 -02 , Judith and Kurt Do s insk Committee: co Short- Plat Application 8911-03 , Carlos Quintana Committee: Erickson/Grimm January 4 , 1990 ' . Workshop on proposed sign code update 4 or _ w January 11, 1990 . Street Vacation Apel. 8911-04, Arne Willenhag Committee: Kosec/Sherwood � ADJOUR +6N 5 GPM 3 est List, n,,.,j 3v 8✓ Do you wish 10 If yes, indicate NAME Ipleese print) ADDRL'SS present testimony? topic... • YES NO � t PC).G 411 cif TQ CIt i?c D�Str47 � ❑ �v �g., s O—A re � Zit W.t � �"� Llatl� 4 C. O' D ❑ a 0: 0 D D d D D D D -0 D D D D