HomeMy WebLinkAbout041290 Min Ag Packet i Y6' 0
CIO_' '__ToPort Townse
ty
Planning Commission
540 Water St., Port Townsend, WA 98368 206/385,3000
r
Meeting of April 12, 1990
I . Roll C 11
Mr, Kosec called the meeting to order at 7: 30. Other members
present were Karen Erickson, Sally Mc ole and Alan Carman. Also
present was Kevin � eill, planner.
lI. Reading and Approval of Minutes from Previous Meetings
Ms. Erickson moved to approve the minutes from the workshop
meeting of March 21 , 1990 and the regular meeting of March 29,
1990. Ms. I cDole seconded and all were in favor.
III. Communications
The commission received a listing of recent city Council Actions
on land-use related business.
The commission received a memo from Mr. O'Neill outlining SEPA x
procedures.
the ommission received a handout regarding a Earthquakes and
Historic Buildings r rk hop to be held May 5. 1990 by the Office
of Archaeology and Historic Preservation.
IV, old Business
Aa Street vacation 8911-0'41 Arae Wi l lenha (Continued from
January 11 , 1990)
Ms. Mcle left the room for appearance of fairness.
1. Staff Review
Mr. O'Neill reviewed the application. Draft A recommends denial,
Draft B recommends approval, The application was not amended
since the Commission's last review. The applicant proposes t
vacate the portion of 33rd Street from Haines Street east to
McNeill Street.
Mr. Willenhag, applicant, stated that he would like the street
vacation to be granted.
Bjorae Lunde stated that he is in favor of the street vacation.
He stated that he owns land in the neighborhood and hopes to
develop, He stated that the application supports the project
that he will be proposing.
r
0
Planning commission Meeting -- April 12, 1990
Page 2 of
Tinker Cavailaro, a neighboring property owner, stated that she
was in favor of the vacation.
Joshua sage stated that having the brand taken care of by the City
may not accomplish the long run affect desired. He stated that
the applicant's idea is to have the strut -remain as open space
and possibly a pedestrian way* He stated his fear that if the
City owned the land it could possibly be developed as a street at
some later date.
Mr. O'Neill stated that many of the department heads recommended
against the vacation basing their evaluation on the possible
future use of the roads,
Mr. Lunde stated that by adopting Draft ,` recommending approval
of the street vacation, and requiring a 15-foot easement the
department heads' needs would be met.
Mr. Carman stated that placing a condition on the street vacation
requiring a 15-foot easement and the department head's review may
address the concerns of the department heads.
Ms. Erickson stated that it was her understanding that the street
10
vacation had previously been continued so the ,applicants would
have time to consult with the Park's Department and develop
plan.
Some discussion followed over the possibility of granting the
vacation.
Ms. Erickson stated that she could not agree with the vacation
with the department heads recommending against it. Ms. Erickson
stated that the Commission relies heavily on the expertise of the
department heads.
. Erickson moved to ipprove Draft A recommending denial of the
street vacation. Mr. Carman seconded.
Discussion:
Mr, Carman stated that the department heads may have based thein
recommendations on the future use of the road, He stated that
their needs for future use of the read may be net by requiring
1 -foot easement.
Ms. Erickson referred to Mr. Lunde's proposed project. she
stated that it is diff icult to base a decision on the future use
of the road on a proposed project that may be developed in the
area in the future.
r
4W
Planning commission Meeting April 12, 199
t
Page 3 of
Mr. carman stated that it is possible to send the application
back to the department heads to review the suggested revisions.
He suggested that the department heads reriew ..Draft B with the
revision of requiring a 15-foot easement to provide for use by
pedestrians, equestrians and utilities and emergency services.
The motion and the second were withdrawn.
Mr. Carman moved to refer the application back to the department
heads with the amended conditions. The department heads will
review and the hearing will be continued to a .,date specific. The
hearing was continued to May 31 1990. Ms. Erickson seconded.
All were in favor.
Ms. McDole returned to the room.
B. variance 9001-071 Dennis and Paulette O'Rourke
1 . staff Review
Mr. O'Neill distributed a letter from neighboring property
owners, Richard and Lucile shel, dated April 6, 1990. The
letter stated their support for the variance and the conditional
application. Mr. O'Neill also distributed some photographs of
the subject site.
Mr. O'Neill reviewed the variance application. The applicants
propose an expansion to an existing single-family dwelling
located at 411 Fillmore Street. The proposal is to extend a non-
conforming setback.
2. Public Testimony
Dennis O'Rourke, applicant, stated that addition would be used a
part of the applicant's residents. Mr , O'Rourke described the
proposal in detail.
3 . Committee Report
Ms. McDole asked some questions of clarification. Some
discussion followed over the requirement for fire separation
between buildings.
Ms. Erickson stated that she could see no problems with the
application.
Ms. McDole moved to recommend approval of the variance and adopt
Findings of Fact and Conclusions as drafted. Ms, Erickson
seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
C. conditional Use 9002-0 , Dennis and Paulette O'Rourke
NI
-0
Planning Commission Meeti
Manning Commission Meeting -- April 12, 1390
Page 5 of
application. Mr. Carman stated that the matter of the trade-off
in
rade-
in cost for the appraised land would have to be addressed by the
City Attorney.
Mr. Carman moved to recommend approval of the street vacation.
Ms. Erickson seconded and all were in favor.
V. New Business
a, Conditional Use 9004-01, Paul. and Gail Greenhalgh was
scheduled for May 1 , 1990 (Erickson/Sherwood)
Variance 9004-02 , Bertram Levy was scheduled far May 31,
1990 Tavernakis/Carman)
C* Conditional Use, 9004-03 , Bjorn and Gunda' Lunde was
scheduled for May 31, 1990 (Erickson/Grimm) .
1, Announcements
Mr. O'Neill distributed a letter relating to the Sperry/Little
application. With the Planning Commission's approval the letter
will be sent to the applicants. The Planning Commission felt the
letter was appropriate. The letter will be sent,
Mr, O'Neill distributed packets for the next two Planning
Commission meetings.
Ms, McDole stated that if department heads have a problem with an
application that they should come to the meeting to present their
position. some discussion followed. The Commission requested
that department heads include a complete explanation of their
recommendations on future applications* .
oril 2 , 1990
. Short Plat 8912-04 , Glen Woad Erickson/Grimm)
, Conditional Use 9002-02 , Doug and Meg Mason
(Grimm/Tavernakis)
ce Conditional Use 9002-03 , Jefferson General Hospital
(McDole/Sherwood)
My 1
a. Street vacation 9002- , Lisa Enarson and Randy Iraxberger
(Carman/Erickson)
b. variance 3003-01, Marcella Younce (Grimm/Tavernakis)
C, Amended Conditional Use 8908-01, Sperry/Little
(Cannan/Sherwood)
d, Conditional Use 9004-01, Paul and Gail Greenhalgh
(Erickson/Sherwood)
•
Planning Commission Meeting -- April 12, 1990
Page 6 of 6
s
May 310 1290
a. Street Vacation 8911-04, Arae Willenhag
be Conditional Use 8912-08, Douglass and Nancy Lamy
(McDole/Carman)
, variance 9004-02, Bertram Levy Tavernali /Carman)
d. Conditional Use 9004-03, Bjorn and Lunda Lunde
(Erickson/Grimm)
Ms. Mc ole will not attend the May 10, 1990 meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 9: 15,
Darlene Bloomfield
Planning Commission secretary
C/P)4AT7CW
1 S
F �
Enaron
1541 29th S .
Port Townsend , WA
98368
Mr. Kevin O ' Neill
City Planning Department
City Hal l
540 Water St .
Port Townsend , WA 98368
April 11 , 1990
Dear Nix'. OINOill ,
This letter is to confirm our conversation on Tuesday, April 9 .
I asked you to withdraw our street vacation request for Hancock
Street between Hastings and 2.9th streets .
I am doing so reluctantly but it does seem a waste of the planning
commission ' s time to proceed given the fact that the city street
department head Mr . Strickland and the fi
s
Washffigton I*e
ice of Archaeologyand
--Istori'c Preservation
Department of Community Development
i
Amual Conference
I- -d
May1990
Port Townsend Washington
Sha ng LL rt.
in Our Boots. '•
Earthquakes
"How Historic Buildings Behave During Quakes and Seismic Reinforcement Technologies"
Barry onouye and Andy vanags, staff, Dept. of Architecture, university of Washington, Seattle.
"Revising the Building Code"
Todd Perabix Building Code Council Architects Putti, Parr , & Clark; Seattle.
11 ities o Retrofitting"
any Desner and Scott Baker, Developers,. DESKOBA Inc., Olympia.
"Planning for the Big one: Lessons Learned from the California Quake"
John Merritt, Director, California Preservation Foundation, Oakland, California.
Location: Jefferson County Courthouse, Jefferson and Cass Streets, Port Townsend, WA.
Time: 9 am. to 4 p.m. May 5, 1990
A di* n e: Local government preservation program staff and commission members, preservation
consultants, and interested public.
Registration: Pre-registration by phone requl*red. space limited. Staff and commission mer bers have
priority however every effort will be made to accommodate.those desiring to attend.
Fee: $10.00 (payable at the door)--consultants, walk-ins, and interested public. No change to pre-
registered local government preservation staff and commission members.
Contact: For information and pre-registration, Kay Austin, 20 53-9109.
r+ 1
a
City of Port
Thownsend
Planning d BuBding Depa ent Z.
540 Mater Street, Port Tow=nd,STA 98368 20&38.5-3000
To: Planning Commission
ion
From: Kevin O'Neill, Planner
Re: City Council Update .
r
Date: April 12, 1990
At the City Council meeting on April 3 , 1990, the Council took
the following actions regarding land use cases:
Street Vacation Apple 89122-0 , Rickard--Approved
Rezone Appl , 8912-0 , Nassrick--Denied
Conditional. Use Appl. 9001-02, Nie inin--Approved
Final Plat, HaroldGruver--Approved
Next Council Meeting: April 1 , 1990
Final Plat, Carlos Quintana
Ko
1
1
City
Townsend
Planning d Buildmg
540 Water Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 206!385-3000
To: City Council, Planning Commission, Staff
From: Kevin C"Ieill , Planner
Re: SEPA Procedures r
Date: April 1 , 1990
As you are aware, I have been the staff person most responsible
for helping to coordinate the Cityfs review of projects pursuant
to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act SEA . As
such, 1 have spent much time over the past couple of years
reviewing the SEPA rules (Washington Administrative Code 197-11
and speaking with staff from the Washington State Department of
Ecology, Therefore, I feel that it would be appropriate for me
to outline and clarify SPA procedures which should be undertaken
when making a threshold determination on a proposed project.
Io ACTIONS
The environmental review process u'nder SEPA generally begins when
someone. submits a permit application to the City, or when the
City or some other agency initiates some activity, plan,
ordinance, or regulation. These activities are considered
"actions" under SEPA see WAC 197-11-704) . Actions fall within
one of two categories: "project" and "nonpro ect" .
ErgiectAct i project action involves an agency decision on
a specific construction project which will modify the
environment, or the lease or transfer of natural resources. An
agency decision in the City's case would include a building
permit, a land use application, a grading permit--any project on
which the City is issuing some kind of permit or approval . A
project action requires SEPA review Mnlgaa the scope of the
proposal falls within the categorical exemption levels listed in
WAC 19 -w-11-800. To be exempt, the proposed project action must
be smaller than or equal to the following
. the construction or location of any residential
}.
structures of four dwelling units;
b. the construction of a barn or similar agricultural
structure dovering 10,000 square feet, to be used only by
the property owner
c. the construction+ of an school, commercial, service, or
wok w '
Fb
y
{
} " 1
a
SPA Procedures
April 10 , 1990
Page 2 f
storage building with 4,000 square feet of gross floor area,
and with parking facilities designed for 20 automobiles;
d. the construction of a parking lot designed for 20
automobiles; or
e• any landfill or excavation of 100 cubic„ yards.
The S PA rules also list a number of actions classified as "minor
new construction" which are exempt from SEPA review., These are
listed in Attachment A. The City has the authority to raise
these exemption levels if it chooses to do s (WAC 19' -11-
0lc -
Project actions are not exempt when the proposed project is
located in an environmentally sensitive area. Environientally
sensitive areas in Pont Townsend are designated in the
Comprehensive Plan and Section 19.04 . 160 of the Port Townsend
Municipal Code see Attachment Any action thich takes place
in a designated environmentally sensitive area must be reviewed
under SPA.
H ,p oie goip: Ionproject actions involve agency decisions
on policies, plans, and programs. Ionproect actions subject t
SPA review include:
a. the adoption or amendment bf ordinnces: that contain
standards controlling the use or modification of the
environment;
. the adoption or amendment of comprehensive land usep lans
or zoning ordinances;
c. the adoption of any policy or program that will govern
the development of a series of connected actions see WAC
197-11-060) ;
d. the creation of a district or annexations to the City;
el capital. budgets; and
f: road, street, and highway plans.
These nonproject actions require the preparation of ars r
environmental checkl-ist and review under S PA. Furthermore,
nonpro ect actions also require that supplemental checklist form
be completed and attached to the checklist (see Attachment C .
EPA Procedures
April 10 , 1990
Page 3 ,
II. THRESHOLD DETERMINATIONS
If 'a proposed project is not categori
EPA Procedures
April 10, 1990
Page
A, When is the fifteen-day comment period necessary?
WAC 197-o ].-3 o(2) (a) states that an agency shall not act
upon a proposal for fifteen days after the date of issuance
f a DAIS if the proposal involves any of the following:
(i) Another agency with jurisdiction, defined as an
agency with authority to approve, veto, or finance all
or part of a nonexempt proposal . For example, the
Department of Ecology would be an agency with
. juri
SEPA Procedures
April 10 , 1990
Page
(5) Placing notices in appropriate regional or trade
journals; and/or
(6) Publishing notice in agency newsletters.
There is no process for undertaking public notice when
required currently outlined in Title 19 . Currently, all
DDSs which require notice are sent to the Port Townsend
LEADER, The City may wish to consider expanding its process
for notice of SEPA determinations, or clarifying the process
formally in Title 19.
C. Response to Comments
Any person or affected tribe or agency can submit comments
to the City within fifteen days of the date of issuance of a
DNS, SEPA rules are somewhat vague, however, on how the
i responsible official should act upon these comments, The
Council should consider the comments and decide whether the
DNS should be modified or withdrawn based on the comments o
new informati
S PA Procedures
April lo , 1990
Page
handbook Provides a good deal of helpful information and is also
available at City Hall, However, the handbook4should be used for
information purposes only. if a technical or procedural question
arises, the SPA rules should be referenced, not the handbook.
Finally, there are two staff people at the Department of Ecology,
Barbara Ritchie and Don Bales, who can provide -information and
clarification on S PA procedures. l have called both of them
frequently over the past two years and have found them to be
extremely helpful. Their phone number is 206 459-60256
Ko
� F
ATTACHMENT A
EXEMPTIONS FROM SEA REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
FILING OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The following minor construction activities, except for construction wholly or
partly on lands covered by water:
- The construction or location of any residential structure of less than four
dwelling units.
The construction of an agricultural structure less than 10,000 square fe t
in size.
The constructi
ATTACHMENT B
ARTICLE V. ENVIRONM.ENiLTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS ESQ
l9 o 04 .160 Defined. "Environmentally sensitive areasel
(ESA) are those areas that are designated and ma
city that rr�a � c_ ped b� the
e severe limitations to development or where
development could severely impact the area. The
i
rclude
areas that exhibitondin highly compressible s� Ie soils,
un-
stable and steep slopes, former and/or active landslides,
flood hazard zones,
critical wildlife habitats, and signifi-
cant marshes, wetlands, and historical areas . These are
designated on maps filed in the Port Townsend City Hall.
These raps include sub-area characteristic maps , the
{ ton State a. p � Washing-
ton Atlas and the Flood Insurance Rate
Maps FIRM and are adopted by reference,
ESA's are identified where the following conditions
exist:
Site Condition Map Source
Slopes 15 greater City p
comprehensive lan
Within 100 feet of an' Coastal "one atlas
unstable percent or old
slide area
Highly compressible sods Sub-area. ma
p
Ponding area Sub-area, ma
ps
100-year-flood hazard area Flood Insurance Rate
Neap (FIRM)
Marsh or wetland area Sub-area maps . FIRM ria
Critical wildlife and
Sud area maps and coastal
marine habitat zone atlas •
i rational historic district National ,Trust for
Historical Districts
Preservation.,
Ord, 2005 S6 ,100 1984) .
147-112 Port Townsend 3/85)
19 , 4 .170
19 -04 .170 Environmental sensitive area goals and
Policies, The following goals and policies shall, apply to
all nonexempt proposals located within ESA areas, Project
approval shall evaluated against these goals and policies ,
a well i
those listed n Section 19 .04 . 240 .
A. Goals ,
1 . To protect life and property from flooding,
uneven settlement, landslides, erosion, and other disrup-
tions that may be associated with environmentally sensitive
areas;
To recognize the unique natural constraints and
characteristics of sensitive areas and to maintain or en-
hance the quality of such areas; .
. To avoid needless public and private costs from
actions within environmentally sensitive areas resulting
in negative impacts such as damage to life and property;
welfare.f are.4 . To promote pubs,is health, safety, and genera.
•
B. Policies. In addition to the cltl policies identl'
fief, in Section 19 - 04 . 240 , all nonexempt projects cts located
within an shat. �
l be reviewed for compliance with the
following policies :
1 . Proposed actions within environmentally ensl-
tive areas should be managed according to the severity of
natural characteristics
and constraints;
Property owners, prospective property owners,
and the general public should be informed about thepoten-
tial hazards in environmentally sensitive areas;
. The existing vegetative cover should be main-
tained on all project sites to the greatest extent feasible.
Where removal of vegetation is necessary, a reasonable effort
should be rade to replant vegetative cover, stabilize the
soil, and prevent erosion;
4 . Site restoration should be provided if land sur-
face modifications violate these adaptedpolicies or if con-
struction does not ensue within a reasonable period of time;
5 . All possible efforts should be made to ensure
that land surface modifications would not induce excessive
erosion, destabilize adjacent lands, or scar the landscape;
6. The use of cluster design, proper 'Surface water
drainage, and other mitigative techniques should be used in
an effort to avoid unsuitable lands and minimize hazards to
life and property:
7 . The watershed boundaries of publicly owned water
supply systems and significant marsh and wetland areas should
not be . subjected to potential pollution sources;
8 . The modification of marsh and wetland areas should
be avoided;
. Significant wildlife habitats designated as en-
vironmentally sensitive areas should be protected from de-
leterious effects of proposed actions ;
147-11 (Port Townsend 3/85)
146 4 .180--19 .04 .200
10 . Special consideration for project design shout
be given in areas of ponding, highly compressible sible soils or
steep slopes;
11 . In areas of former or active landslides and along
slopes determined to be unstable no
land modification or
related activities should occur without a , favorable geologic
investigation demonstrating that hazardous conditions do
not exist or that mitigative techniques can be used to en-
sure safety to life and property. The geologic investigation
should be prepared by a qualified soils engineer or engineer-
ing geologist. (Ord, 2005 §6 ,20 ,. 1984) e
19 .04 .180 Environmental) sensitive area determination.
A. The responsible official shall determine whether a pro `
poral is located in an ESA using the maps cited in Section
19.04 .l o
Site-specific information concerning soils , geology,
hydrology, and other relevant data may be required of the
applicant in making the determination. The applicant shall
e responsible for the accuracy and vali
ATTACHMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
This column
reserved far
agency
evaluation:
Proposal :
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase
discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances;
or production of no i e
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such
increases are:
" r
How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,
animals, fish, or marine life
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,
animals, fish, or marine life are
How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy
or natural resources
Proposed measures to
protect or conserve energy
and natural resources are:
How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible under study for governmental protection; such
as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, loodplains, prime
farmlands
Proposed measures to protect such resources of to
avoid or reduce impacts are:
51 How would the proposal be likely to affect lana
and shoreline use,' including whether it would allow or
encourage lana or shoreline uses which are incompatible
with existing plans .
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and
land impacts are
t
Supplemental Sheet, page
How would the proposal be likely to increase
demands on transportation or public services and
utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such
demand are
7 . Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may
conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
5
i
■
F
• SEPA PROCESS
FROM SEPA RULES-P CHAPTER 197-11; NUMBERS LISTED REFER TO WAC'-SECTIONS
PERMIT APPLICATION RECEIVED;
PLAN OR REGULATION DEVELOPED
055 M4
INFORMATION INCOMPLETE; RETURN REVIEW FOR COMPLETENESS
TO APPLICANT FOR COMPLETION AND EXEMPTION TO S P PROSECT EXEMPT; SEPA SATISFIED
060 305 80
NOT LEAD AGENCY; 5END COPY OF
APPLICATION TO LEAD AGENCY DETERMINE LEAD AGENCY
WITH OOVEI LETTER 050 060 1 924
LEAD AGENCY; APPLICANT COMPLETES ENVIRONMENTAL
CHECKLIST WITH/WITHOUT AGENCY ASSISTANCE
315
EVALUATE CHECKLIST
IF RESPONSE T "REQUEST FOR EARLY 100 330 335
NOTICE" INDICATES SIGNIFICANT
DETERMINATION POSSIBLE, APPLICANT
MAY ALTER PROPOSAL TO ADD
.MITIGATING MEASURES IF REQUESTED, RESPOND TO
TO REi1EST FDP, EARLY NOTICE
150
MAKE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
460 080 310 O
IF THERE ARE PROBABLE SIGNIFICANT IF THERE ARE NO PROBABLE SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE IMPACTS ADVERSE IMPACTS, I S5UE DETERMINATION
360 OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
ISSUE DETERMINATION of
SIGNIFICANCE/SCOPING NOTICE
PROPOSAL DOES NOT I NVOLVE� PROPOSAL DOES INVOLVE
ANOTHER AGENCY WITH ANOTHER AGENCY WITH
.JURISDICTION$ "MITIGATED". JURISDICTION$ '11ITIGATED"
DNS OR A DNS ISSUED AFTER DNS, OR A DMS ISSUED
CIRCULATE D !SCOPING NOTICE; DS WITHDRAWN AFTER DS WITHDRAWN
GIVE "PUBLIC NOTICE" (ALLOW 340 It I
PREPARE DRAFT EIS I 1 DAYS FOR WRITTEN
COMMENT; FOR EXPANDED
SCOPING ALLOYS UP TO 30 DAYS)
4i- _AZ7�4ZO-44 360 4Ud 410 UIV 340 AGENCY DEC 191 I Ohl CIRCULATE D115 FOR 15 DAY
COMMENT PERIOD
( ) SEND COPY OF DIES TO
DISTRIBUTE DE1S FOR 30 DAY COMMENT ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL
PERIOD; "PUBLIC NOTICE" REQUIRED REVIEW
GIVE "PUBLIC NOTICE" A
1 340
SPECIFIED IN PROCEDURES `
REVIEW, EVALUATE, RESPOND TO RECEIVE, EVALUATE COMMENTS -
DE I S COMMENTS; PREPARE FINAL E I S
560
DISTRIBUTE FEIS
WITHDRAW MODIFY RETAIN
DNS DNS DNS
WAIT 7 DAYS .
O START AGENCY AGENCY
PROCESS DECISION DECISION
AGENCY DECISION OVER
390
AGAIN 0 O
Ulu _390__ 660
• Guest L ist • .
Oa you wish to If yes, indicate
NAME (please printl ADDRL'SS pr8sent,testlmcny? topic•
YES NO
E
v�t�.tFr��t-�, � o• �o�c ss
�Jo LuNqe � T. v/-}-cA-77 �
�'C COVJOAuX-n � D.
�rtcc�.t�d rt./
P. 0 I/e,
Er 0
'bC-'Nj&j Is O'r4 Umt F( 0
'm 0
7jZ
D O
� a a
o n
a a
a 1:1
0 D
D 1:1
0 D
El D .
D 0
{
ity of Port Townsen
Planning Commission
r'
540 Water St,, Port Townsend, WA 98368 2061385,3000
2SI,c3r, IST n A
(Revised)
Business Meeting i April 12, 1990
1, ROLL CALL i� __iii. ________�.��__�_ .�___ _�.__�____�__ '. 0 P, M,
2. READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING
3 . COMMUNICATIONS:
# , current mail
t
, OLD BUSINESS.
. PUBLIC HEARING: Street vacation Appl. 8911-04 Arne
LTi l lena►g Continued from January 11, 19 90
1. Staff Review PC, 311 jqq&
2 . Public Testimony corzr. NA �
Committee Report - (Kosec/Sherwood)
4 . Findings and Conclusions
b. PUBLIC HEARING: Variance Application 9001#07, Dennis and
Paulette O'Rourke
1 . Staff Review
2* Public Testimony
1# 3 • Committee Report - (McDole/Erickson)
4 . Findings and Conclusions i
C, Conditional Use App1 , 9002-01, Dennis, and Paulette O'Rourke
11 Staff Review
2 . Public Testimony
, Committee Report - McDole/Erickson)
4 . Findings and Conclusions
d. Street vacation Appl. 9001-08, H, Donald Blass
11 Staff Review
2, Public Testimony
3 , Committee Report - (Carman/Erickson)
4 . Findings and Conclusions
1
t Qf
r t
.
NEW BUSINESS:
a Conditional Use Appl , 9004-01, Paul and Ga*11 Greenhalgh
Schedule Hearing: - � May 10-,.,..-1.990
Committee:
=:K22njn� \Sherwood,
, variance Appl. 9004-02, Bertram Levy
ScheduleHearing:.,�,. !iay�.... .1 ,, 192Q . ._ .
Committee. averna is arman
C, Conditional Use Appl. 9004-03 , BjornGunGunda Lunde
Schedule Hearing: May
Committee: gric
. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Ne.xt Sc_ e u led Meetings
* a S
April 2 , 1990 }
a. Short Plat Appl. 8912-04, Glen good
Committee: Erickson/Grimm
. Rezone Appl . 8912-06, Conditional Use Appl . 9001-03, . City
+of Port Townsend 0.
po�-r PoAtE
Committee: Erickson/Carman
CIO Conditional Use Appl. 9002-02 , Doug and Meg Mason
Committee: Grimm/ aver na s
Conditional Use Appl. 9002-03 , Jefferson. General Hospital
Committee: Mc ole/Sherwood
}
ah eivo
alb, r
may lo, 1990
a. Street Vacation Appl, 9002-04, Lisa Enarson and Randy
Krerger A*\i A)i7746gi4emaAl
Committee: Carman/ Erickson
Variance Apel . 9003-01, Marcella Younce
Comml.ttee: Grimm/Ta erns is
c• Amended Conditional Use Appl. 8908-01, Sperry/Little
Committee: Carman/Sherwood .
May .1 ,, 1930
a. Conditional Use App l. 8912-08, Douglass and Nancy Lary
Committee: McDol.e/Carman
.' ADoUI