HomeMy WebLinkAbout062890 Min Ag ho�
city 0wl'os
s
- M
Planning Commission
540 water St., Port Townsend, WA 98368 2061385--3000
x
i
Meeting o ,*Tune 2 , 1990
I . Roll Call
chairman Ron Losec called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m.
Other members present were Sally McDole, Jim Tavernakis, Karen
Erickson, Alan Carman and Bob Grimm. Also present were Planning
and Building Director Michael Hi ldt, Planner Rick Sepl er and
Planner Dave Robison,
II. Reading and Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting
Ms, Mcdole moved to approve the minutes from the meeting of June
141 1990, Ms. Erickson seconded and all were in favor.
III . Communications
Mr. Hildt ,introduced Mr. Sepler and Mr. Robison to the
Commission.
IV, old Business
A. Letter requesting reconsideration of Short Plat Appl . , 8912-
04, Glenn Wood
I. Commission Discussion
Mr, Hildt reviewed Mr. Wood's alternatives. The Planning
Commission had previously denied the request for a short plat.
Mr. Wood has asked the Commission to reconsider. The commission
may decide to hear the application again and renotify the
hearing, or the Commission may decide not to reconsider the
application, in which case Mr, Wood may appeal to the City
council..
t,
Mr. Tavernakis reviewed the issues surrounding his decision to
recommend the short plat application be denied.
Some discussion followed over the SA requirements.
Ms. Erickson moved to reschedule the short plat application and
asked that the applicant come prepared to address the concerns
discussed at the previous hearing.
Mr. Kosec read Article XXII of the Planning Commission's Policy
and Procedures concerning reconsideration. Some discussion
planning Commission - June 28, 1990
Page 2 of
followed over the difference between resubmittal of an
application and postponement.
Some discussion followed over the completeness of the application
submitted by Mr. mood.
a
Mr. Carman stated the City Counci
�+
Pring Commission - June 28, 1990
Page 3 of
Ellen Wood stated that the applicants are willing to do what i
necessary. And commented on past land use activities in the
neighborhood of the proposed short plat.
vote was taken on the Motion on the floor. The motion passed
4-3 to deny the request for reconsideration with Mr. Ternaki ,
Ms, McDo .e and Mr, Carman dissenting.
B. Conditional Use Permit Appl . , 3005 -04, Laraine Dover
1. . Staff Review
The Commission' received two drafts of Findings.. and conclusions a
well as 4 letters commenting on the application. Mr. Sepler
reviewed the draft findings and conclusions. Draft A recommends
the tourist home be approved with conditions while draft
recommends the application be denied. The applicant proposes to
establish a one-room transient accommodation (tourist home) in an
existing single-fa il.y dwelling located at 1726 Franklin Street.
Public Testimony
I
Ms. Laraine Dover, applicant, stated that she would like t
establish a tourist hone in her home. She also stated that she
felt her driveway would accommodate all parking needs.
Charles Hani ord, an adjacent property owner, -.stated that h
would like to find out how many tourist domes ",and bed and
breakfast inns had been issued since the first of the year. He
stated that there is a tremendous parking issue with the proposed
unit because of the proximity of its location to the courthouse.
He questioned ,the meed to change a family neighborhood to a mixed
use zone, He also stated that he shares his sewer service line
with the Dover house and stated there has been problems with
blockage of the sewer line in the past. He stated that if the
Commission recommended approval of the application. that he would
ask that a fence be required for a► buffer between the two
properties. `
Ms. Doegal , of 1740 Franklin, stated that the surer line was a
concern. She also stated that the height of the curb in the
neighborhood makes it difficult to open car doors. She told the
Commission that the upstairs room would invade her privacy. She
feels there is already adequate transient accommodation
facilities in the City.
Mary Mcuillen, 442 Cass Street, stated the applicants have done
a great job in remodeling their home. She stated that she would
like the area to remain residential and feels that it is a short
step to a bed and breakfast inn from a tourist home* She stated
that the business may have an affect on her taxes.
Planning Commission - June 2 , 1990
Page 4 of
Public Testimony was closed.
. Committee Deport McDole/Grimm
Ms. McDole asked the applicant if a fire escape would be
required. - Mr. Hildt responded that the fire department would
have to review the residence prior to occupancy, Ms. McDole
clarified that one of the applicants vehicles is currently parked
across the street on a neighbors property.
Mr. Grimm stated that the bed and breakfast Ordinance which was
adopted was designed to include the neighborhood comments' in the
application process.
Ms, McDole stated that a bed and breakfast in the neighborhood
does have an impact on the neighborhood. Some privacy is lost
when tourists walk around the neighborhood.
Ms, McDole moved to approve draft B of the Findings of Fact rid
Conclusions and recommend denial of conditional use application
9005-04 Laraine Dover. Ms. Erickson seconded.
Discussion.
Mr. Grimm suggested that the Commission take the comments of the
neighboring property owners into account when making a decision
on a transient accommodation applications, He stated that if
neighbors do not want the unit in their neighborhood than there
are grounds to deny the application.
M . Tavrnaks stated that he is in favor of the restoration of
historic buildings. He stated that a tourist home may help t
finance renovation of these structures.
Mr. Grimm stated that a conditional use permit can be reviewed b
the City Council if complaints are received. In this particular
case the neighbors do not want the project.
vete was taken on the motion on the door. The motion carried
5-2 in favor of denial of the tourist home with Mr. Tavernakis }
and Mr. Carman dissenting*
C, Variance Appl, 9005-07, Mary and Gary Kaiser
1, Staff Review
Dare Robison reviewed the materials and the findings of fact and
conclusions e. Draft A recommends denial while draft B recommends
approval with conditions. The applicants propose to build
,000 square foot building on water street on Block 2, ' portions
of Lots l and 3 . They have requested a variance from the parking.
a 4
Panning Commission -- June 28, 1990
Page 5 of
requirements to be allowed to supply no parking spaces*
r. Grimm left the room due to a co f l ict in interest.
2. Public Testimony
Cary Kaiser, applicant, stated that they have an interest in
preserving the characteristic of the historicdistrict and have
voluntarily submitted drawings to the Historic Preservation
Commission. He stated they were unable to acquire an easement
from Seafrrst Bank to access the property, Mr., wiser stated
that the applicants are not responsible for the conditions on the
lot. A past owner of the property received a variance on a
passed application on the same lot. He stated- the only other
option would be to go over the sidewalk on water street. He
stated the parking crisis is over stated, and the parking
requirements are arbitrary. Union wharf was .ranted a variance
for parking. fir. Kaiser stated that the fee in lieu of parking
spaces would be $68,000 which would hurt a project of this size.
Mr. Kaiser asked the Commission to continue the hearing to the
next available date.,
Bob Rickard stated that the project is appropriate and would be
in the character of the downtown. He questions whether buildings
meeting the downtown character should be required to meet
parking, He stated that another business downtown may not
contribute to the overall traffic downtown. 4
Ann Reardon stated that the Kaiser's plan to establish a quality
building and that the parking concerns can be mitigated.
I
Jonathan Dudley stated that he recommends the -variance be denied
and that some other options be pursued in order to comply with
the ordinance.
Committee Report (Sherwood/Tavernakis)
Mr. Tavernakis clarified with the applicant that an easement was
not an option with neighboring SeaFirst Bank. The applicant
stated he would verify that the bank would not be willing to sale
the easement. Mr. Tavernakis asked Mr,Hildt if a curb cut was
possible. fir. Hildt stated responded that it would be a question
for the City Attorney,
Ir. Losec asked the applicant- about the possibility of a joint
use agreement for parking. Anything in the downtown historic
district can be used as joint use. Mr. wiser stated that the
downtown does not have many night time uses to share space with.
Ms, Sherwood stated her mixed feeling for the project* She
stated that a curb cut on Nater street is not desirable. She
r
x
Planning Commission - .Tune 28, 1990
Page 6 of 7
would lake to have other options pursued further as specified in
draft B..
Mr. Tave na is roved to continue the variance application to
August 30, 1990 Ms'. Sherwood seconded.
Di scu�ss ion, Mr, Tavernakis suggested that if an earlier date
becomes available the Kaiser's application will be heard at that
time.
Mr. Carman suggested that the hearing be continued to the night
of the sign code workshop on August 16, 1990. Mr. Hildt
responded that the Commission would need the entire meeting for
the sign code.
D. Conditional. Use Permit Appl . 9006-061 , William and D anna
Wolcott
1 . staff Review
The applicants wish to convert two apartments units to motel
rooms at 936 Water street.
2. Public Testimony
Ball Wolcott stated that the applicants have decided not' to use
the building for a motel unit. Mr. Wolcott stated that there i
ars area of concern near the proposed parting area. They would
life to pursue the application in order to reserve the
applications approval for a later date.
3 ., Committee deport - Carman/Eric son
Ms. Erickson stated she had no concerns with the application.
some discussion followed over the parking problem behind the
building.
Ms. M Dole stated that she dick not like to. see apartments being
transferred to transient accommodations,
Mr. Carman stated that he also has reservation about converting
apartments to overnight accommodations.
Mr. Carman moved to recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit
ppl , 9006-01 , William and Dyanna Wolcott, adopting the Findings
of Fact and Conclusions as drafted by staff. Mr, Grimm
seconded.
Discussion.
Mr. Tavernakis clarified the parking requirement. He also asked
Planning Commission June 28, 1990
Page 7 of 7
if the Council could grant an extension on the Conditional Use.
Ir. Hildt responded that this is an option.
The motion passed unanimously.
V. New Business
none
VI . Announcements - Next scheduled Meetings
July 12: 1990
a. Conditional Use Permit, 8912-08, Douglass and Nancy Lamy
(McDole/Carman)
1 . Variance Appl, , 9005-01, Jean Anderson Carman/Grimm
ucut__ 1 9 9
. Draft Ordinance Sign Code Workshop
The meeting was adjourned at 10:10.
4
-City of Port owes
r
Planning Commission � =
540 Nater St., fort Townsend, WA 98368 206/385..3000
(Proposed)
Regular Meeting Jure 28 , 1990
1 . ROLL CAL __---- ----�__�__�_��.� �k"�.L� ���A�F�li ��i�F�� • 0 .Iii.
404 S
W-A
ALj%%N 6V8
2 . READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS:
a. current mail
OLD BUSINESS:
a{. Letter requesting reconsideration of Short Plat
Applal 8912- 4 , Glenn Wood beA t�h
it Commission Discussion 4 -3 1>1 sin ej C%
2, Planning Commission] Decision (-nweZAAS., McbOl6WMAN)
b, Conditional Use Permit Appl. , 9005-04 , Laraine
Doer be4q Y
11 Staff Review (-TA VCF�S, CAeA&a�)
Public Testimony
Committee Report - cDole Grimm
4 . Findings and Conclusions
c. variance Apel. 9005- , Mary and Gary Kaiser
Cow-mvvE:0 7-0 e130190
1Staff Review
2 .. public Testimony ■■■
Committee Report - (Sherwood/Tavernkis .
4t Findings and Conclusions
d. Conditional Use Permit Appl. , 9006-0I, William and
Dyanna Wolcott )k p>[�G:
1 . Staff Review
2. Public Testimony
Committee Report -- Carman/Erickson
4 . Findings and Conclusions
NEW BUSINESS: F
r
0 0 &1
• 9
a. None
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Next Scheduled Meetings:
July 12 , 1990
a. Conditional Use Permit, 8912-08, Douglass and Nancy
Lamy
Committee: Mc ole/Carman
bo Variance App1 . 9005m-0 1, Jean Anderson Carman/Grimm
August 16 1990 �•
•
• i + # a S + t
y
a. Draft Ordinance Sign Code Workshop
I . ADJOURN
y I +
4
■
w
i
City
Townselfil
Planning Commission
540 Water St., Fort Townsend, WA 98368 Z06/385-3000
To: Planning Commission
From: Darlene Bloomfield
Administrative Assistant
r
Date. June 22, 190 ,.
Subject: Council Update
City Co -Action on-June .19. 1920
City Council adopted an ordinance expanding and strengthening the
City's substantivie authority under SEPA,
Sche& d Co in
Conditional Use Permit, Pacific Oil
Conditional Use Permit, City of Port Townsend
Historic District Design Review Ordinance
LeVVI VARIA%K�or,-
led Council. 1 90
Street Vacation, Ca ` er/Ta er a l
Street Vacation, Hamilton
DB 6/22/90
i
est List •
NAME iplease printl ADDRESS 0o you wish to If yes, indicate
present testimony? topic.
YES NO
U
w 0 c��r se.�� J
-Pw Ip-SAD 74o 61J K Ll t,-)
S-
RA)v icL N U
lQ'i"k-d rt i
0
elp
` a
a"
(7 �(2) "PP
f-Of
Kc
t2..
. D El
1:3
a a
a
0