HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 15-042 Exhibit C - Herrera Executive Summary Exhibit omResolution /n-04
Herrera Executive Summary
Page /or4
������ ������
J, ��0������� �
The City ofPort Townsend is mandated by the Growth Management Act ofWashington (GMA)
to review and update its comprehensive plan and development regulations according to
RCVV 36.70A.130(5). This update must include a review and update ofcritical area regulations
per R[VV 36.70A.130(1)(c). If the review shows that the pian or regulations do not comply
with theG/0A, then revisions must be made. The review mfcritical area regulations under
RCW 36.70A.172(l) must be based on best available science (BAS) and give consideration to
conservation and protection ofmnadromousfisheries.
This documen1'yervesesan addendum tmthe ZO05 8A5 review (GeoEngineern2UO5) produced
for the City's ZOO5 Shoreline Master Program update and provided in Appendix A.
Critical areas recognized bythe City, and therefore addressed 1n this addendum, include
wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (which include streams), critical aquifer
recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, and geologically hazardous areas. In addition,
discussions of climate change, sea level rise and tsunami hazards are included.
In general, the City's critical areas regulations are compliant with BAS recommendations for
protection mfcritical areas and public health and safety; however, some changes are required
and updates are recommended. Table ES'1 provides esummary mfrequired changes (shown in
bold) and recommended updates for specific critical area regulatory elements covered in this
report. These code changes and recommended updates are discussed in more detail within
the main body ofthe report.
Table ES-1. Recommendations for Certain Critical Area Regulatory Elements
for the City of Port Townsend.
Compliant with
Best Available
Critical Area R,e,qulat1orY,Element Science' 1111,11,11, Notes
Wetlands Rating System No RCW 36.70A.030(21)requires that all wetlands
that meet the biological definition be
regulated and any impacts be compensated
for;therefore,all wetlands must be regulated
regardless of size.All wetlands:5 1,000 sq.ft.
must be treated as regulated wetlands.
As of January 1,2016,the City is required to
use the"u-p1dated,20114 wethand rating system.
Buffers Yes Update to the revised 2014 point-scaling
Consider updating buffer width regulations to use
the simpler table provided in Ecology's guidance
for small cities(Ecology 2012).
E���0��
V ���
� �
n`
Exhibit C to Resolution 15-042
Herrera Executive Summary
Page 2 of 4
Table - (continued). Recommendations for Certain Critical Area
y
Regulatory Elements for the Cit of Port Townsend.
Compliant with
t Best Available
�( _........ a Recommendations InnNotes
Critical Area Re ulato Element Science
Wetlands Delineation Method No Update PTMC 19.05.110.8.3 to require use of
(continued) the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual and all applicable
guidance that is not superseded by the
Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast
Regional Supplement.See Section 4.2.1 for
details.
Update to indicate the wetland delineations are
applicable for the standard 5 years, instead of 3.
. ....
Mitigation Yes Follows standard procedures and recommended
Requirements mitigation ratios.
Ecology(2012)provides a more specific list of
mitigation report requirements than is provided in
PTMC and the City may want to update
accordingly.
The City may want to allow use of the credit/debit
method as an alternative to mitigation ratios as
described in Calculating Credits and Debits for
Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western
Washington.:Final Report(Hruby 2012)
._ . , _ ,
Stream Fish and Rating System No State law requires the use of the WDNR
Wildlife Habitat stream typing system identified in
Conservation WA 222-16-031.
Area(FWHCA) Update PTMC 19.05.080.8.7 to include all
Waters of the State not just those associated
with certain species as per
WAC 365-190-130(2)(f).
Clarify that not all streams are critical
drainage corridors as defined under 19.05.020
Definitions.
Request WDNR re-evaluate those mapped
streams that are ephemeral and lack outlets to
marine water bodies to determine whether they
are, in fact, streams and potentially fish bearing.
Buffers Yes City uses WDFW recommended stream buffers
from Knutson and Naef(1997).
Mitigation Yes Recommend that stream mitigation should
Requirements identify a stream for stream as a first mitigation
preference.
HER EUSA
vo
pli 1A069s, 0 ix,;l,ld;llll lel tlnrtr oil J ,a
Exhibit C to Resolution 15-042
Herrera Executive Summary
Page 3 of 4
............- ........... ..........
Table ES-1 (continued). Recommendations for Certain Critical Area
Regulatory Elements for the City of Port Townsend.
...........................
Compliant with
Best Available
Critical Area Regulatory e Science' Recommendations/Notes
................
Stream Fish and Protection Measures Yes Consider and clarify whether dunegrass
Wildlife Habitat communities are a habitat of local importance in
Conservation accordance with WAC 365-190-130(2)(b)
Area(FWHCA) Consider and clarify whether dunegrass
(continued) communities constitute"associated vegetated
marine riparian areas" regulated by
PTMC 19.05.080(8)(10).
Define"associated vegetated marine riparian
areas"to clarify whether the protected areas are
limited to within the marine nearshore habitat
area(between extreme low tide and the ordinary
high water mark), or could occur in riparian areas
adjacent to the delineated nearshore area.
Critical Aquifer Protection Measures Yes Update 19.05.070. D.5 and all other PTMC
Recharge Areas references to the Low Impact Development
(CARA) Technical Guidance Manual for the Puget Sound
(2004)to 2012 LID Technical Guidance Manual
for Puget Sound(WSU and PSP 2012), and Rain
Garden Handbook(Ecology et al. 2013).
I Remove requirement for a hydrogeologic
assessment for a domestic underground propane
tank in 19.05.070.C.
Frequently Protection Measures Yes Remap critical drainage corridors using recently
Flooded Areas collected lidar information.
References to the 2001 Stormwater Management
Manual for Western Washington in the critical
areas code should be updated to the 2012
manual or to the current manual used by the City. I
Geologic Hazards Engineering Design Yes Expand"qualified consultant"definition to specify
Standards that all shoreline projects on the Strait(those I
within 200 linear feet of the marine OHWM west
of Point Wilson)be reviewed by a licensed
engineer with coastal experience specifically
related to open ocean swell.
Require all engineering plans within a mapped
tsunami and/or high liquefaction zone to carry a
stamp indicating the plans are being made in a
tsunami and/or high liquefaction zone.
Encourage local relevant scientific agencies
(WDNR, USGS)to evaluate tsunami risk from a
slip of the South Whidbey Island Fault Zone.
Encourage the use of setbacks rather than new
armoring or other shoreline stabilization to protect
property and infrastructure from sea level rise
...................... ........... ........ ——.... .........
vii R R 1'R A
-— ----------------- . .....
Exhibit C to Resolution 15-042
Herrera Executive Summary
Page 4 of 4
Table -1 (continued). Recommendations for Certain Critical Area
l
tory Elements for the City of Port Townsend.
� .. ........ sosososo ��.-�
Compliant with
Best Available
Critical Area Reulato Element Sciencea Recommendations I Notes
and wave energy increases, Encourage removal
of existing armoring.
Require projects located less than 15 feet
NAVD88 in elevation to use USACE guidance
with respect to sea level rise(USACE 2013)for
adequately designed stormwater facilities
a If only an update is required it is given a yes for compliance
Bold items are required for compliance with the GMA.
H RREIRA
� Wilk
N4i N WNAN°.Faro Nv h",Wuborridwnv ImI4 N411irr ?WhJrrq:.a.