Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 15-042 Exhibit B - Dept. of Commerce Checklist Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 1 of 23 Periodic Update Checklist for Cities — Updated June 2013 Covers laws through 2012 This checklist is intended to help cities that are fully planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA)to conduct the "periodic review and update" of comprehensive plans and development regulations required by RCW 36.70A.130(4). Cities can use the checklist to identify components of their comprehensive plan and development regulations that may need to be updated to reflect the latest local conditions or to comply with changes to the GMA since their last update. This checklist includes components of the comprehensive plan and development regulations that are specifically required by the GMA. Statutory requirements adopted since 2003 are emphasized in highlighted text to help identify new components of the GMA that may not have been addressed in annual updates or other amendments outside of the required periodic update process. Cities within the Puget Sound Regional Council boundaries may want to use this checklist in tandem with PSRC checklists. A separate checklist is available for counties. joainded dha::dlkh t (one for Comprehensive Plans, one for Development Regulations) are also available, which include a more comprehensive list of related good ideas and things to consider. I low towill out h cheddist With the most recent version of your comprehensive plan and development regulations in hand, fill out each item in the checklist. Select the check box or type in the fields, answering the following questions: Is this item addressed in your current plan or regulations? If YES, fill in the form with citation(s) to where in the plan or code the item is addressed. We recommend using citations rather than page numbers because they stay the same regardless of how the document is printed. If you have questions about the requirement, follow the hyperlinks to the relevant statutory provision or rules. If you still have questions, visit the Commerce web page or contact a Commerce planner assigned to your region. Is amendment needed to meet current statute? Check YES to indicate a change to your plan or regulations will be needed. Check NO to indicate that the GMA requirement has already been met. Local updates may not be needed if the statute hasn't changed since your previous update, if your city has kept current with required inventories, or if there haven't been many changes in local circumstances. Check"Further Review Needed" if you are unsure whether the requirement has already been met or if the city is considering a review, but hasn't yet decided. Is your city considering optional amendments? Use this field to note areas where your city may elect to work on or amend sections of your plan or development regulations that are not required by the GMA. City of Port Townsend 1 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 2 of 23 Ilt to use the ct uu plet gad cheddist Commerce strongly encourages you to use the completed checklist to develop a detailed work plan (see Appendix B)for your periodic update. The checklist can be used to inform the contents of a city council resolution that defines what actions will be taken as part of the GMA periodic update. 1. Required Comprehensive Plan Elements and Components Key to Abbreviations: LUE=Land Use Element;HE=Housing Element;TE=Transportation Element;CF&UE=Capital Facilities&Utilities Element;and EDE=Economic Development Element. L A Land Ilse Element thAt is consistent with cou tywide planning policies (CWPlps) and'RCW 36.70,x.070(1). Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute. amendments? a. A future land use map showing city limits and urban ❑ No ❑ Yes The number and location of Mixed growth area (UGA) boundaries. X Yes X No Use Centers may be RCW 36.70A.070(1) and RCW 36.70A.110(6) Location(s): LUE ❑ Further reconsidered,as well Goal 1, as policies and WAC 365®196-400(2)(d), WAC 365®196-405(2)(i)(ii) Map ure4.1inm.7" review development Map Figure 4.1 in map pocket at back of Plan needed standards applicable within these areas. b. Consideration of urban planning approaches that ❑ No ❑ Yes Development within the City's Mixed Use increase physical activity. X Yes X No Centers has not RCW 36.70A.070(1), Amended in 2005 Location(s): ❑ Further occurred as Narrative incorporated envisioned in 1996; throughout the Plan;see WAC365-196-405 (2)(j) review accordingly,the City LUE Goal 3,Policies 3.1- needed may revisit these 3.8;LUE Goal 4,Policies designations and 4.1&4.6;LUE Goal 9, their accompanying Policy 9.9,LUE Goal 10, development Policies 10.2-10.3,and standards to identify 10.5-10.7;LUE Goal 12, and remove barriers Policies 12.1-12.12. to successful development. c. A consistent population projection throughout the ❑ No X Yes [Note: The County and City are plan which should be consistent with the Office of X Yes ❑ No finalizing an updated Financial Management forecast for the county or the Location(s): see Further population on projection and ext county's sub-county allocation of that forecast. theheadagell-4,under review allocations for the the heading RCW 43.62.035, WAC 365-196-405(f) 'Accommodating Port needed new planning Townsend's Share of horizon,based upon Countywide Growth;this OFM's Mid-Range population number is Forecast for 2036. used consistently Once the Countywide throughout the current forecast and Plan;also see text on allocations are page IV-6,under the agreed upon and heading"Population adopted,an updated Projection." projection will be incorporated throughout the Plan.] City of Port Townsend 2 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 3 of 23 Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute. amendments? d. Estimates of population densities and building ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional intensities based on future land uses. X Yes X No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(1); WAC 365®196-405(2)(i) Location(s): LUE ❑ Further refer to the Assessment pp.IV-6—IV-16 details review Memorandum the anticipated densities and land use intensities needed prepared by throughout the City's CASCADIA land use designations. Community Planning Services,attached. e. Provisions for protection of the quality and quantity ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional of groundwater used for public water supplies. X Yes X No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(1) Location(s): ❑ Further refer to the Assessment CF&UE,Goal 13,Policy review Memorandum 13.3;and Goal 15,Policy 15.4. needed prepared by CASCADIA Community Planning Services,attached. f. Identification of lands useful for public purposes ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional such as utility corridors, transportation corridors, X Yes X No amendments,please landfills, sewage treatment facilities, stormwater Location(s): In ❑ Further refer to the concert w/the Land Use Assessment management facilities, recreation, schools, and other review Memorandum Map,refer to the prepared by public uses. descriptions of the needed A CASCADI CASCADIA RCS/ 36.70A.150 and WAC 365-196-340 Public/Infrastructure and Community Planning Park&Open Space designations detailed on Services,attached. p.IV-11 of the LUE;see also the policy direction set forth under LUE Goal 13,Policies 13.1-13.6, and Goal 14,Policies 14.1-14.7. g. Identification of open space corridors within and ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional between urban growth areas, including lands useful X Yes X No amendments,please for recreation, wildlife habitat, trails, and connection Location(s): In ❑ Further refer to the concert with the Land Assessment of critical areas. review Memorandum Use Map,refer to the RCS/ 36.70A.160 and WAC 365-196-335 P/OS(A)designation on p. needed prepared by CASCADIA IV-11 of the LUE,as well as Goal 3,Policies 3.1- Community Planning 3.15,particularly Policy Services,attached. 3.6. City of Port Townsend 3 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 4 of 23 Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute. amendments? h. If there is an airport within or adjacent to the city: X No ❑ Yes For potential optional policies, land use designations (and zoning) to ❑Yes X No amendments,please discourage the siting of incompatible uses adjacent Location(s): The ❑ Further refer to the to general aviation airports. [RCW 36.70A.510, RCW statutory provision iAssessment s review Memorandum inapplicable to Port prepared by 36.70.547, New in 1996)] Townsend;the nearest needed Note:The plan (and associated regulations) must be general aviation airport is CASCADIA Community Planning Jefferson County filed with the Aviation Division of WSDOT. WAC 365- International Airport, Services,attached. 196-455 approximately 5 miles south of the Port Townsend city limits. i. If there is a Military Base within or adjacent to the X No ❑ Yes For potential optional jurisdiction employing 100 or more personnel: ❑Yes X No amendments,please policies, land use designations, (and consistent Location(s): The ❑ Further refer to the zoning)to discourage the siting of incompatible uses statutory provision iAssessment s review Memorandum inapplicable to Port adjacent to military bases. Townsend;the nearest needed prepared by CASCADIA RCW 36.70A.530(3), New in 2004. See WAC 365-196- military densase e Indian Community Planning 475 Island Undersea Warfare Naval Weapons Center Services,attached. (US Navy),located 4 nautical miles south of the City,across Port Townsend Bay. j. Where applicable, a review of drainage, flooding, ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional and stormwater run-off in the area and nearby X Yes X No amendments,please jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective Location(s): LUE ❑ Further refer to the Assessment actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that Goal 7,Policies 7.1-7.10; review Memorandum TE Goal 9,Policy 9.2; pollute waters of the state. CF&UE Goal 22,Policies needed prepared by CASCADIA RCW 36.70A.70(1) and WAC 365®196-405(2)(c) 22.1-22.4,Goal 23, Community Planning Policies 23.1-23.4,Goal Services,attached. Note: RCW 90.56.010(26) defines waters of the state. 24,Policies 24.1-3. City of Port Townsend 4 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 5 of 23 Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute. amendments? k. Policies to designate and protect critical areas ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional including wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat X Yes X No amendments,please protection areas, frequently flooded areas, critical Location(s): Refer ❑ Further refer to the Assessment aquifer recharge areas, and geologically hazardous to the Plan Introduction review Memorandum (Chapter 11)at p.11-7;and prepared by areas. In developing these policies, the city must LLIE Goal 2,and Policies needed CASCADIA have included the best available science (BAS) to 2.1-2.8. Community Planning protect the functions and values of critical areas, and Services,attached. give "special consideration" to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fisheries. RCS/ 36.70A.030(5), RCS/ 36.70A.172, BAS added in 1995. See WAC 365-195-900 through -925, WAC 365-190- 080 Note: A voluntary stewardship program was created in 2011 as an alternative for protecting critical areas in areas used for agricultural activities. Counties had the opportunity to opt into this voluntary program before January 22, 2012. See requirements of the voluntary stewardship program. RCS/ 36.70A.700 through .904. I. If forest or agricultural lands of long-term commercial X No ❑ Yes For potential optional significance are designated inside city: a program ❑Yes X No amendments,please authorizing Transfer (or Purchase) of Development Location(s): ❑ Further refer to the Inapplicable—the City Assessment Rights. review Memorandum has not designed RCW 36.70A.060(4), Amended in 2005 agricultural lands of long- needed prepared by CASCADIA term commercial significance within its Community Planning Services,attached. corporate limits; accordingly,a TDR program is unnecessary. 2. A Housing Element to ensure the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods and is consistent with relevant CWPPs and RCW 36'.70A..070(2). a. Goals, policies, and objectives for the preservation, ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional improvement, and development of housing. X Yes X No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(2)(b) and WAC 365-196-410(2)(x) Location(s): HEGoals ❑ Further refer to the 1-8 and associated Policies Assessment review Memorandum 1.1—8.5 set forth the City's framework for preserving, needed prepared by improving,and developing CASCADIA its housing stock. Community Planning Services,attached. City of Port Townsend 5 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 6 of 23 Addressed in Current Plan Are changes Is the City or Regulations? If yes, needed to meet considering optional where? current statute. amendments? b. An inventory and analysis of existing and projected ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional housing needs over the planning period. X Yes ❑ No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(2)(a) and WAC 365®196-410(2)(b) Location(s): The X Further refer to the Inventory&Analysis that Assessment and (c) review Memorandum provided the foundation for the HE was contained in the needed prepared by Draft Plan/EIS circulated in CASCADIA 1996. This is referenced on Community Planning p.V-1 of the HE. Services,attached. c. Identification of sufficient land for housing, ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional including but not limited to, government-assisted X Yes X No amendments,please housing, housing for low-income families, Location(s): In ❑ Further refer to the Assessment manufactured housing, multifamily housing, group conjunction refeth r to HE Land review Memorandum Use Map,refer to HE Goal 1, homes, and foster care facilities. Policies 1.1-1.3,Goal 2, needed prepared by RCS/ 36.70A.070(2)(c) item 1,2.onp.V-8 ofStr CASCADIA item#1,on p.V-8 of the Community Planning Plan Services,attached. d. Adequate provisions for existing and projected ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional housing needs for all economic segments of the X Yes X No amendments,please community. Location(s): HEGoal ❑ Further refer to the Assessment RCS/ 36.70A.070(2)(d) and WAC 365-196-410 2,Policies 2.1-2.7,Goal 4, review Memorandum Policies 4.1-4.5,Goal 5, Policies 5.1-5.5. needed prepared by CASCADIA Community Planning Services,attached. e. If enacting or expanding an affordable housing ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional program under RCW 36.70A.540: identification of X Yes ❑ No amendments,please land use designations within a geographic area Location(s): HE,Goal X Further refer to the where increased residential development will assist 2,Policy 2.2. Note—both Assessment review Memorandum the Plan policies and in achieving local growth management and housing development regulations needed prepared by p011C12S. should be reviewed,and if CASCADIA Community Planning necessary,amended,to Services,attached. RCW 36.70A.540, New in 2006. WAC 365-196-870 conform to RCW 36.70A.540. f. Policies so that manufactured housing is not ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional regulated differently than site built housing. X Yes X No amendments,please RCW 35.21.684, 35.63.160, 35A.21.312, and Location(s): LUEGoal ❑ Further refer to the 9,Policy 9.3;HE Goa14, Assessment 36.01.225, Amended in 2004 review Memorandum Policy 4.1.2. needed prepared by CASCADIA Community Planning Services,attached. City of Port Townsend 6 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 7 of 23 Addressed in Current Plan Are changes Is the City or Regulations? If yes, needed to meet considering optional where? current statute. amendments? g. If the city has a population of over 20,000: ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional provisions for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) to X Yes X No amendments,please be allowed in single-family residential areas. Location(s): rhecity ❑ Further refer to the Assessment RCS/ 36.70A.400, RCS/ 43.63A.215(3) is not subject to this review Memorandum mandate;nevertheless,it has enacted policy and needed prepared by CASCADIA regulatory provisions permitting ADUs in single- Community Planning Services,attached. family residential districts. See LUE Policy 9.7,and HE Policies 2.2 and 4.1.3. 3. A Capital Facilities Plan(CFP) Element to serve as a'check on the practicality of achieving other elements of the plan, covering all,capital facilities planned, provided,and paid for by public entities including local government and special districts, etc.,including water systems;sanitary sewer systems,storm'Water facilities, schools,parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection facilities. Capital expenditures from Park and Recreation elements,if separate, should be included in the CFP dement. The CFP Elemerit must be consistent with 0NPPs, and RCW 36.70A.07b(3), and include; a. Policies or procedures to ensure capital budget ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional decisions are in conformity with the X Yes X No amendments,please comprehensive plan. Location(s): ❑ Further refer to the Assessment RCS/ 36.70A.120 CF&UE Goal 2,Policies 2.5- review Memorandum 2.6,Goal 5,Policies 5.1-5.5, and Goal 6,Policies 6.1-6.2. needed prepared by CASCADIA Community Planning Services,attached. b. An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by ❑ No X Yes For potential optional public entities. X Yes ❑ No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(3)(a) and WAC 365®196-415(2)(a) Location(s): The ❑ Further refer to the integrated Draft Plan/EIS Assessment review Memorandum from 1996 included this inventory;the adopted needed prepared by CASCADIA Policy Plan does not incorporate most of this Community Planning Services,attached. information;preparation of a revised inventory has been identified as a necessary component of the 2016 Update. City of Port Townsend 7 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 8 of 23 Addressed in Current Plan Are changes Is the City or Regulations? If yes, needed to meet considering optional where? current statute. amendments? c. A forecast of needed capital facilities. ❑ No X Yes For potential optional RCS/ 36.70A.070(3)(b) and WAC 365-196-415 (b) X Yes ❑ No amendments,please Note:The forecast of future need should be based Location(s): A ❑ Further refer to the Assessment on projected population and adopted levels of Capital Facilities Plan review Memorandum Support Document was service (LOS) over the planning period. included as an appendix to needed prepared by CASCADIA the Integrated Draft Plan/EIS from 1996. This Community Planning Services,attached. document requires revision as part of the 2016 Update process. Adopted LOS: see Table VII-4 in the CF&UE, p.VII-28. Future needs: see pp.VII-22 through VII-72 of the CF&UE. d. Proposed locations and capacities of expanded or ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional new capital facilities. X Yes ❑ No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(3)(c) and WAC 365-196-415 (3)(C) Location(s): seepp. X Further refer to the VII-22 through VII-72 of the Assessment CF&UE. review Memorandum needed prepared by CASCADIA Community Planning Services,attached. e. A six-year plan (at least) identifying sources of ❑ No X Yes For potential optional public money to finance planned capital facilities. X Yes ❑ No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(3)(d) and RCS/ 36.70A.120 Location(s): seepp. ❑ Further refer to the VII-22 through VII-72 of the Assessment WAC 365-196-415 review Memorandum CF&UE. needed prepared by CASCADIA Community Planning Services,attached. f. A policy or procedure to reassess the Land Use ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional Element if probable funding falls short of meeting X Yes X No amendments,please existing needs. Location(s): CF&UE ❑ Further refer to the Assessment RCS/ 36.70A.070(3)(e) Goal 5,Policy 5.2,and Goal review Memorandum WAC 365®196-415(2)(d) 6,Policy 6.2. needed prepared by CASCADIA Community Planning Services,attached. City of Port Townsend 8 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 9 of 23 Addressed in Current Plan Are changes Is the City or Regulations? If yes, needed to meet considering optional where? current statute. amendments? g. If impact fees are collected: identification of public X No ❑ Yes For potential optional facilities on which money is to be spent. ❑Yes X No amendments,please RCS/ 32.02.050(4) Location(s): The city ❑ Further refer to the does not presently collect Assessment WAC 365-196-350 review Memorandum impact fees under the authority of RCw 82.02. needed prepared by CASCADIA However,the City does collect system development Community Planning Services,attached. charges(SDCs),which are specifically excepted under 82.02.020(3). 4., A Utilities Element which is consistent with relevant CWI?k and RCW 36.70A,070(1)and'includes: a. The general location, proposed location and ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional capacity of all existing and proposed utilities. X Yes X No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(4) Location(s): The ❑ Further refer to the general location of existing Assessment WAC 365-196-420 review Memorandum and proposed utilities, including capacities of needed prepared by CASCADIA existing utilities,was included within the Community Planning Integrated 1996 Draft Services,attached. Plan/EIS which is incorporated by reference within the final adopted policy plan(refer to the Utilities subsections within the Existing Conditions Chapter of that document). S. A Transportation Element which is consistent with relevant CWPPs and RC\ 36.70A'.070(6) and includes: a. An inventory of air, water, and ground ❑ No X Yes For potential optional transportation facilities and services, including X Yes ❑ No amendments,please transit alignments, state-owned transportation Location(s): A ❑ Further refer to the Assessment facilities, and general aviation airports. RCS/ complete inventory of review Memorandum ( )( )( )( ) transportation facilities and prepared by 36.70A.070 6 a III A and WAC 365-196-430(2)(C). services was included within needed CASCADIA the Integrated 1996 Draft Plan/EIS which is Community Planning Services,attached. incorporated by reference within the final adopted policy plan(refer to the Utilities subsections within the Existing Conditions Chapter of that document). This inventory requires revision in order to be up to date. City of Port Townsend 9 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit B to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 10 of 23 Addressed in Current Plan Are changes Is the City or Regulations? If yes, needed to meet considering optional where? current statute. amendments? b. Adopted levels of service (LOS) standards for all ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional arterials, transit routes and highways. X Yes X No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(6)(a)(iii)(B), New in 1997. Location(s): TEPorcy Further refer to the 8.1;CF&UEGoa13,Policy Assessment WAC 365-196-430 review Memorandum 3.1 and Table VII-1. needed prepared by CASCADIA Community Planning Services,attached. c. Identification of specific actions to bring locally- ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional owned transportation facilities and services to X Yes ❑ No amendments,please established LOS. RCW 36.70A.070(6)(a)(iii)(D), Location(s): "Levelof X Further refer to the Assessment Amended in 2005. Service(LOS)Standards& review Memorandum Concurrency Management" prepared by WAC 365-196-430 narrative on pp.VI-6-VI-7 of needed the TE,and TE Goal 8 and CASCADIA Policies 8.1-8.8;and CF&UE Community Planning Goal 4,Policies 4.1-4.4. Services,attached. d. A forecast of traffic for at least 10 years, including ❑ No X Yes For potential optional land use assumptions used in estimating travel. X Yes ❑ No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(6)(a)(i), RCS/ Location(s): Atraffic ❑ Further refer to the forecast was completed and Assessment 36.70A.070(6)(a)(iii)(E) review Memorandum q q included within the prepared by WAC 365-196-430(2)(f). Integrated 1996 Draft needed CASCADIA Plan/EIS(see the Arterial CASCADIA Street Plan Appendix to that Community Planning Services,attached. document). In turn,the draft plan/EIS is incorporated by reference within the final adopted policy plan. However,this traffic forecast should be updated as part of the 2016 Plan review process. e. A projection of state and local system needs to ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional meet current and future demand. X Yes ❑ No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(6)(a)(iii)(F) Location(s): TE X Further refer to the sectAssessment WAC 365-196-430(2)(f) Directionfon o Fu"Policy review Memorandum Direction for Future Transportation Needs,"pp. needed prepared by VI-3 through VI-5. CASCADIA Community Planning Services,attached. f. A pedestrian and bicycle component. ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional RCW 36.70A.070(6)(a)(vii), Amended 2005 X Yes X No amendments,please WAC 365-196-430(2)(j) Location(s): TE ❑ Further refer to the subsection entitled"Policy Assessment review Memorandum Direction On Non-motorized System Needs(Pedestrians, needed prepared by CASCADIA Bicycles&Trails),"pp.VI-5; and TE Goal 5 and 5.1-5.24. Community Planning Services,attached. City of Port Townsend 10 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 11 of 23 Addressed in Current Plan Are changes Is the City or Regulations? If yes, needed to meet considering optional where? current statute. amendments? g. A description of any existing and planned ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional transportation demand management (TDM) X Yes X No amendments,please strategies, such as HOV lanes or subsidy programs, Location(s): TEGoal ❑ Further refer to the 11,Policies 11.1-11.6. Assessment parking policies, etc. review Memorandum RCS/ 36.70A.070(6)(a)(vi) needed prepared by CASCADIA WAC 365-196-430(2)(1) Community Planning Services,attached. h. An analysis of future funding capability to judge ❑ No X Yes For potential optional needs against probable funding resources. X Yes ❑ No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.070(6)(a)(iv)(A) Location(s): TEGoal ❑ Further refer to the 10,Policies 10.1-10.7; Assessment WAC 365.196-430(2)(k)(iv) CF&UEpp.50-52. Identified review Memorandum needs should be reevaluated needed prepared by against probable funding CASCADIA resources as part of the Community Planning 2016 Plan Update. Services,attached. i. A multiyear financing plan based on needs ❑ No X Yes For potential optional identified in the comprehensive plan, the X Yes ❑ No amendments,please appropriate parts of which serve as the basis for the Location(s): CF&UE ❑ Further refer to the Assessment 6-year street, road or transit program. pp.50-52 sets forth the review Memorandum initial six(6)year financing prepared by RCS/ 36.70A.070(6)(a)(iv)(B) and RCS/ 35.77.010 plan for transportation needed CASCADIA WAC 365-196-430(2)(k)(ii) improvements;a new Community Planning financing plan should be prepared as part of the 2016Services,attached. Plan. j. If probable funding falls short of meeting identified ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional needs: a discussion of how additional funds will be X Yes X No amendments,please raised, or how land use assumptions will be Location(s): TE ❑ Further refer to the Assessment subsection entitled"Growth reassessed to ensure that LOS standards will be review Memorandum Management Act met. Requirements,"pp.VI-1-VI- needed prepared by CASCADIA RCS/ 36.70A.070(6)(a)(iv)(C); WAC 365-196- 2;TE Goal 10,Policies 10.1- Community Planning 43 0(2)(1)(11) 10.7. Services,attached. k. A description of intergovernmental coordination ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional efforts, including an assessment of the impacts of X Yes ❑ No amendments,please the transportation plan and land use assumptions Location(s): TEGoal X Further refer to the Assessment on the transportation systems of adjacent 2,Policiesfhis sec. Further review Memorandum review of this section of the jurisdictions and how it is consistent with the TE is necessary to confirm its needed prepared by CASCADIA regional transportation plan. consistency withRCw Community Planning 36.70A.070(6)(a)(v). Services,attached. RCS/ 36.70A.070(6)(a)(v); WAC 365®196® 430(2)(a)(iv) City of Port Townsend 11 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 12 of 23 6. Provisions far siting essential public facilities(EPFs),consistent with CWPPs and RCW 36.70 ,too. This section cavi be included in the Capital Facilities Element, land Use Element, or in its own elerrmerit. Sometimes the identification And siting process for EPFs'is part of the CWPPs. Addressed in Current Plan Are changes Is the City or Regulations? If yes, needed to meet considering optional where? current statute. amendments? a. A process or criteria for identifying and siting ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional essential public facilities (EPFs). X Yes X No amendments,please [RCW 36.70A.200, Amended in 1997 and 20011 Location(s): CF&uE ❑ Further refer to the Assessment subsection entitled Notes: EPFs are defined in RCW 71.09.020(14). review Memorandum "Essential Public Facilities," prepared by Cities should consider OFM's list of EPFs that are pp.VI-3;CF&UE Goal 7, needed CASCADIA required or likely to be built within the next six Policies 7.1-7.2. Community Planning years. Regional Transit Authority facilities are Services,attached. included in the list of essential public facilities RCW 36.70A.200, amended 2010. WAC 365-196-550(d) b. Policies or procedures that ensure the ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional comprehensive plan does not preclude the siting X Yes X No amendments,please of EPFs. RCW 36.70A.200(5) Location(s): CF&uE ❑ Further refer to the Assessment subsection entitled Note: If the EPF siting process is in the CWPPs, this review Memorandum "Essential Public Facilities," policy may be contained in the comprehensive plan pp.VI-3;CF&UE Goal 7, needed prepared by Policies 7.1-7. . CASCADIA 2 as well. Community Planning WAC 365®196®550(3) Services,attached. 7., Consistency is required by the GMA. a. All plan elements must be consistent with relevant ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional county-wide planning policies (CWPPs) and, where X Yes X No amendments,please applicable, Multicounty Planning Policies (MPPs), Location(s): See Plan ❑ Further refer to the Chapter IX,entitled Assessment and the GMA. review Memorandum "Consistency with the GMA prepared by RCW 36.70A.100 and 210 &County-wide Planning needed CASCADIA WAC 365-196-400(2)(c), 305 and 520 Policy." This chapter Community Planning provides a detailed description of how the Plan Services,attached. achieves consistency with both the GMA,as well as the 10 County-wide Planning Policies for Jefferson County. In particular,see Table IX-1 on pp.IX-9-IX-10. City of Port Townsend 12 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 13 of 23 Addressed in Current Plan Are changes Is the City or Regulations? If yes, needed to meet considering optional where? current statute. amendments? b. All plan elements must be consistent with each ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional other. X Yes X No amendments,please RCS/ 36.7OA.O7O (preamble). Location(s): LEPorcy ❑ Further refer to the Assessment WAC 365®197-4OO(2)(f) 1.4;LE Implementation Step review Memorandum 6,p.IV-36;TE Policy 9.4(c); TE Policy 11.1;CF&UE,Goal needed prepared by CASCADIA 6,Policies 6.1-6.2;CF&UE Implementation Step 6,pp. Community Planning Services,attached. VII-73;EDE Policy 1.3;Plan Chapter IX in its entirety. c. The plan must be coordinated with the plans of ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional adjacent jurisdictions. X Yes X No amendments,please RCS/ 36.7OA.1O0 Location(s): Plan ❑ Further refer to the Introduction(Chapter//), review Assessment WAC 365-196-520 Memorandum under the heading"The needed prepared by County-Wide Planning CASCADIA Policy for Jefferson County," p.11-8;LUE Policy 15.5; Community Planning Services,attached. CF&UE Goal 7,Policies 7.1- 7.2. 1, Shorelline Provisions Comprehensive plan acknowledges that for ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional shorelines of the state, the goals and policies of the X Yes X No amendments,please shoreline management act as set forth in RCS/ Location(s): LUEGoal ❑ Further refer to the Assessment 90.58.020 are added as one of the goals of this 19,Policies 19.1-19.6. review Memorandum chapter as set forth in RCS/ 36.7OA.O2O without needed prepared by CASCADIA creating an order of priority among the fourteen Community Planning goals. The goals and policies of the shoreline Services,attached. master program approved under RCS/ 90.58 shall be considered an element of the comprehensive plan. RCS/ 36.7OA.48O, WAC 365-196-580 City of Port Townsend 13 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 14 of 23 �2., Public participaticon,plan amendments and monitoring. Note: House Bill 2834, passed in 2012, eliminates the requirement for cities planning under the GMA to report every 5 years on its progress in implementing its comprehensive plans. Addressed in Current Plan Are changes Is the City or Regulations? If yes, needed to meet considering optional where? current statute. amendments? a. A process to ensure public participation in the ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional comprehensive planning process. X Yes ❑ No amendments,please RCS/ 36.70A.020(11), .035, and .140; WAC 365®196® Location(s): LUEGoaI X Further refer to the 600(3) 15,Policies 15.1-15.5. iew Assessment rev These policies may require Memorandum The process should address annual amendments (if re vision to better align with needed prepared by CASCADIA the jurisdiction allows for them) [RCW the differentiating etweeents, Community Planning differentiating between 36.70A.130(2), Amended in 2006], emergency annual,periodic and Services,attached. amendments [RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b)], and may emergency Plan amendments. include a specialized periodic update process. Plan amendment processes may be coordinated among cities within a county [RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)] and should be well publicized. b. A process to assure that proposed regulatory or ❑ No ❑ Yes For potential optional administrative actions do not result in an X Yes ❑ No amendments,please unconstitutional taking of private property. See Location(s): LUE X Further refer to the Policies 2.8 and 16.7 direct Assessment Attorney Generals Advisory Memorandum: review Memorandum the City to respect private Avoiding Unconstitutional Takings of Private property rights and to needed prepared by develop implementing CASCADIA Property for guidance. Community Planning regulations that conform to RCS/ 36.70A.370 36.70A.370. The City may Services,attached. wish to include specific policy guidance outlining how it intends to avoid both 'facial'(prospective)and "as applied"(retrospective) takings. City of Port Townsend 14 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 15 of 23 II. Required Components of Development Regulations WAC 365-196-810 3; Regulations designating and protecting critical areas are required by RCW 36.10A.170, RCW 3 .7A. 02 acid RCN 30A'.172(1): Note: A voluntary stewardship program was created in ESHB 1886 (2011) as an alternative for protecting critical areas in areas used for agricultural activities. Counties may choose to opt into this voluntary program before January 22, 2012. Click here for the requirements of the voluntary, stewardship program; Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute? amendments? a. Classification and designation of each of the five ❑ No ❑ Yes types of critical areas (wetlands, critical aquifer X Yes X No recharge areas,fish and wildlife habitat conservation Location(s): ❑ Further areas,frequently flooded areas, and geologically PTMCSections review 19.05.070(8),Aquifer hazardous areas), if they are found within your city. Recharge Areas needed RCS/ 36.70A.170; WAC 365®196®830(2) 19.05.080(8),Fish& Wildlife Habitat Note: Senate Bill 5292 adopted in 2012 clarified that Conservation Areas; certain water-based artificial features or constructs 19.05.090(8),Frequent) Flooded Areas&Critical are excluded from being considered part of a fish and Drainage Corridors; wildlife habitat conservation areas. 19.05.100(8), Geologically Hazardous Areas;and 19.05.110(8), Wetlands. b. Findings that demonstrate Best Available Science ❑ No ❑ Yes (BAS)was included in developing policies and X Yes ❑ No development regulations to protect the function and Location(s): LUE X Further values of critical areas. In addition, findings should Policy 2.2;critical Areas review Amendatory Ordinance document special consideration given to conservation 2899(2005);Sections needed or protection measures necessary to preserve or 19.05.020 and 19.05.080(F). The City enhance anadromous fisheries. is undertaking peer RCS/ 36.70A.172(1); WAC 365-195, WAC 365-195 review of Chapter 19.05 PTMC to determine whether this code chapter(last updated in 2005 as part of the City's SMP Update) continues to satisfy the BAS requirements of RCW 36.70A.172. c. Regulations that protect the functions and values of ❑ No ❑ Yes (Note: The City is undertaking peer wetlands. X Yes ❑ No review of Chapter RCS/ 36.70A.060(2) and RCS/ 36.70A.172(1) Location(s): X Further 19.05PTMCto PTMCSectiondetermine whether WAC 365-190-090 19.05.110(C)through(1). review this code chapter needed (lost updated in 2005 as part of the City's SMP Update) continues to satisfy the BAS requirements of RCW 36.70A.172.] City of Port Townsend 15 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 16 of 23 Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute? amendments? d. A definition of wetlands consistent with RCW ❑ No ❑ Yes 36.70A.030(21) X Yes X No WAC 365-190-090, WAC 173-22-035 Location(s): ❑ Further PTMCSection review 19.05.020. needed e. Delineation of wetlands using the approved federal ❑ No ❑ Yes wetlands delineation manual and applicable regional X Yes ❑ No supplements [RCW 36.70A.175, RCW 90.58.380 Location(s): X Further (1995) (2011)] PTMCSubsections review WAC 173-22-035 19.05.110(C),(E)(1)and (1)(1). It may be needed necessary to update the citation to reflect the applicable delineation manuals referenced in WAC 173-22-035. f. Regulations that protect the functions and values of ❑ No ❑ Yes (Note: The City is undertaking peer critical aquifer recharge areas ("areas with a critical X Yes ❑ No review of Chapter recharging effect on aquifers used for potable Location(s): X Further 19.05PTMCto �� PTMCSubsections determine whether water RCW 36.70A.030(5)(b)). review this code chapter RCW 36.70A.060(2) and RCW 36.70A.172(1) (F).05.070(C)through needed (last updated in 2005 as part of the City's WAC 365-190-100 SMP Update) continues to satisfy the BAS requirements cf RCWs 36.70A.060(2)and 172(1).] g. Regulations to protect the quality and quantity of ❑ No ❑ Yes (Note: The City is undertaking peer ground water used for public water supplies. X Yes ❑ No review of Chapter RCW 36.70A.070(1) Location(s): PTMc X Further 19.05PTMCto determine whether 19.05.070(E)through (F). review this code chapter needed (lost updated in 2005 as part of the City's SMP Update) continues to satisfy the BAS requirements of RCW 36.70A.070(1).] h. Regulations that protect the functions and values of ❑ No ❑ Yes (Note: The City is undertaking peer fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. X Yes ❑ No review of Chapter RCW 36.70A.060(2) and RCW 36.70A.172(1) Location(s): X Further 19.05PTMCto PTMC 19.05.080(C) determine whether WAC 365-195-925(3), 365-190-130 through(1). review this code chapter needed (lost updated in 2005 as part of the City's SMP Update) continues to satisfy the BAS requirements of RCW 36.70A.172.] City of Port Townsend 16 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 17 of 23 Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute? amendments? i. Regulations that protect the functions and values of ❑ No ❑ Yes (Note: The City is undertaking peer frequently flooded areas. X Yes ❑ No review of Chapter RCS/ 36.70A.060(2) and RCS/ 36.70A.172(1) Location(s): PTmc X Further 19.05PTMCto Subsections determine whether WAC 365®190®110, WAC 173®158®040 19.05.090(C)through review this code chapter (G). needed (last updated in 2005 as part of the City's SMP Update) continues to satisfy the BAS requirements of RCW 36.70A.172]. j. Definition of"fish and wildlife habitat conservation X No X Yes areas" does not include such artificial features or ❑Yes ❑ No constructs as irrigation delivery systems, irrigation Location(s): Fish ❑ Further infrastructure, irrigation canals, or drainage ditches and Wildlife Habitat review Conservation Areas are that lie within the boundaries of and are maintained defined inPTMC needed by a port district or an irrigation district or company. 19.05.020 and classified and designated in New in 2012. 19.05.080(B). These RCS/ 36.70A.030(5) sections require revision to conform to this 2012 statutory definition. k. Provisions to ensure water quality and stormwater ❑ No ❑ Yes drainage regulations are consistent with applicable X Yes X No Land Use Element policies. RCS/ 36.70A.070(1) Location(s): see ❑ Further L UE Policies 7.3&7.4; review CF&UE Policies 23.1- 23.4;PTMC Chapter needed 13.32;and 19.05.090. I. Regulation of geologically hazardous areas consistent ❑ No ❑ Yes (Note: The City is undertaking peer with public health and safety concerns. X Yes ❑ No review of Chapter RCS/ 36.70A.030(9), RCS/ 36.70A.060(2) and RCS/ Location(s):PTMc X Further 19.05PTMCto Section 19.05.100(C) determine whether 36.70A.172(1) review this code chapter WAC 365®190®120 through(q. needed (last updated in 2005 as part of the City's SMP Update) continues to satisfy the BAS requirements of RCW 36.70A.172]. m. Provisions that allow "reasonable use" of properties ❑ No ❑ Yes constrained by presence of critical areas. X Yes X No RCS/ 36.70A.370. See Attorney General's Advisory Location(s): ❑ Further Memorandum: Avoiding Unconstitution a/Takings of PTMc19.05.050(D). review Private Property for guidance needed City of Port Townsend 17 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 18 of 23 Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute? amendments? n. If your city is assuming regulation of forest practices X No ❑ Yes as provided in RCW 76.09.240: forest practices ❑Yes X No regulations that protect public resources, require Location(s): The ❑ Further appropriate approvals for all phases of conversion of provision is inapplicable review to the City of Port forest lands, are guided by GMA planning goals, and Townsend;however,see needed are consistent with adopted critical areas regulations. PTMCsection 19.06.030. RCW 36.70A.570, Amended in 2007, 2010 and RCW 76.09.240 Amended in 2007, 2010 Note: Applies only to counties fully planning under the GMA with a population greater than 100,000 and the cities and towns within those counties where a certain number of Class IV applications have been filed within a certain timeframe. 11. Shoreline,Master Program See Washington State Department of`Ecology's SMR Submittal Checklist, a. Zoning is consistent with Shoreline Master Program ❑ No ❑ Yes (SMP) environmental designations. X Yes X No RCW 36.70A.070; RCW 36.70A.480 Location(s): see ❑ Further WAC 365-196-580 the narrative under the review heading'Shoreline Master Program'on needed page IV-213 of the LUE. The relevant provisions of the City's Urban Waterfront Plan(a subarea plan)and the relevant provisions of the draft Point Hudson Master Plan were integrated to be consistent with the land use designations of the Plan,and the zoning code. For example,see PTMC 17.22.030(B)(3)&(4). b. If SMP regulations have been updated to meet ❑ No ❑ Yes Ecology's shoreline regulations: protection for critical X Yes X No areas in shorelines is accomplished solely through Location(s): ❑ Further the SMP. PTMC19.0s.030(E). review RCW 36.70A.480(4), Amended in 2003 and 2010 and needed RCW 90.58.090(4). WAC 365-196-580 City of Port Townsend 18 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 19 of 23 Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute? amendments? 12. Tho'Zoning Cade should contain the followirtg,prouisions: a. Family daycare providers are allowed in areas zoned ❑ No ❑ Yes for residential or commercial uses. Zoning conditions X Yes X No should be no more restrictive than those imposed on Location(s): ❑ Further other residential dwellings in the same zone, but may PTMC Chapter 17.52. review address drop-off and pickup areas and hours of needed operation. RCW 36.70A.450, WAC 365-196-365 b. Manufactured housing is regulated the same as site- ❑ No ❑ Yes built housing. RCW 35.21.634, 35.63.160, 35A.21.312 X Yes X No and 36.01.225, All Amended in 2004 Location(s): ❑ Further PTMC Table 17.16.020. review needed c. If the city has a population over 20,000 accessory ❑ No ❑ Yes dwelling units (ADUs) are allowed in single-family X Yes X No residential areas. Location(s): ❑ Further RCW 43.63A.215(3) Although not required review to do so,the City permits ADUs in single- needed family residential zones under PTMC 17.16.020. m. If there is an airport within or adjacent to the city: X No ❑ Yes zoning that discourages the siting of incompatible ❑Yes X No uses adjacent to general aviation airports. Location(s): This ❑ Further RCW 36.70A.510, RCW 36.70.547, New in 1996) provision is inapplicable review to Port Townsend. The Note:The zoning regulations must be filed with the nearest general aviation needed Aviation Division of WSDOT. WAC 365-196-455 airport is the Jefferson County International Airport located approximately 5 miles south of the City limits in unincorporated Jefferson County. n. If there is a Military Base within or adjacent to the X No ❑ Yes jurisdiction employing 100 or more personnel: zoning ❑Yes X No that discourages the siting of incompatible uses Location(s): Not ❑ Further adjacent to military bases. applicable. The nearest review military installation is RCW 36.70A.530(3), New in 2004. WAC 365-196-475 Indian Island Undersea needed Warfare Naval Weapons Center(USN), located approximately 5 miles across Port Townsend Bay from the City. City of Port Townsend 19 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 20 of 23 Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute? amendments? o. Residential structures that are occupied by persons ❑ No ❑ Yes with handicaps must be regulated the same as a X Yes X No similar residential structure occupied by a family or Location(s): see ❑ Further other unrelated individuals. definition of"adult review family home"in PTMC RCS/ 36.70A.410, WAC 365-196-860 Section 17.08.020;and needed Chapter 17.52 PTMC. p. Cities adjacent to 1-5, 1-90, 1-405, or SR 520 and X No ❑ Yes counties --for lands within 1 mile of these highways- ❑Yes X No - must adopt regulations that allow electric vehicle Location(s): This ❑ Further infrastructure (EVI) as a use in all areas except those statutory provision is review inapplicable to Port zoned for residential or resource use, or critical areas Townsend. needed by July 1, 2011. RCW 36.70A.695, New in 2009 q. Development regulations of all jurisdictions must X No X Yes allow electric vehicle battery charging stations in all ❑Yes ❑ No areas except those zoned for residential or resource Location(s): ❑ Further use, or critical areas by July 1, 2011. CF&UE 31.5 encourages review these stations;however, RCW 36.70A.695, New in 2009 the zoning code requires needed amendment to specifically permit such stations within the area specified by RCW 36.70A.695. 13. Subdivision Code regulations a. Subdivision code is consistent with and implements ❑ No ❑ Yes comprehensive plan policies. X Yes X No RCS/ 36.70A.030(7)and 36.70A.040(4)(d), WAC 365- Location(s): ❑ Further 196-820 PTMCSection review 18.04.030(G). needed b. Code requires written findings documenting that ❑ No ❑ Yes proposed subdivisions provide appropriate provision X Yes X No under RCS/ 58.17.110(2)(a) for: Streets or roads, Location(s): PTmc ❑ Further sidewalks, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, Sections review 18.12.060(A)(2), and other features that assure safe walking 18.16.060(A)(2);and needed conditions for students; potable water supplies 18.20.050(A)(2). [RCS/ 19.27.0971, sanitary wastes, and drainage ways (stormwater retention and detention); open spaces, parks and recreation, and playgrounds; and schools and school grounds. WAC 365-196-820(1) City of Port Townsend 20 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 21 of 23 Addressed in Current Are changes Is the City Plan or Regulations? If needed to meet considering optional yes,where? current statute? amendments? c. Subdivision regulations may implement traffic ❑ No ❑ Yes demand management (TDM) policies. X Yes X No RCW 36.70A.070(6)(a)(vi) Location(s): ❑ Further Chapter 12.06PTMC review sets forth the City's Transportation needed Concurrency Management standards. These provisions would be triggered by any subdivision that would create 20 or more peak hour trips on any city- owned road segment. See PTMC Sections 12.06.040_070 and .080. d. Preliminary subdivision approvals under RCW ❑ No ❑ Yes 58.17.140 are valid for a period of five, seven, or X Yes ❑ No nine years. [RCW 58.17.140 and RCW 58.17.170. Location(s): PTmc X Further Amended 2010 by SB 6544. Expires 2014. sections 18.12.140 and review Amended 2012 b HB 2152 18.16..ons These y provisions require needed Note: House Bill 2152, adopted by the Legislature in further review to ensure conformance with the 2012, modified timelines. The preliminary plat statute as revised. approval is valid for: seven years if the date of preliminary plat approval is on or before December 31, 2014; five years if the preliminary plat approval is issued on or after January 1, 2015; and nine years if the project is located within city limits, not subject to the shoreline management act, and the preliminary plat is approved on or before December 31, 2007. 14. Cbricurhancy, Impact Fees,,and T©IW a. The transportation concurrency ordinance includes ❑ No ❑Yes specific language that prohibits development when X Yes X No level of service standards for transportation facilities Location(s): PTMc ❑ Further cannot be met. Section 12.06.070(J). review RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b) needed b. If adopted: impact fee methods are consistent with X No ❑Yes RCW 82.02.050 through 100 ❑Yes X No Note:The timeframe for expending or encumbering Location(s): The city ❑ Further impact fees has been extended to ten years. RCW has not adopted an impact review fee ordinance under the 82.02.070 and RCW 82.02.080, Amended in 2011. authority ofRCW 82.02.050 needed WAC 365®196®850 et seq.,and does not presently collect such fees. City of Port Townsend 21 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 22 of 23 Addressed in Current Plan Are changes needed Is the City or Regulations? If yes, to meet current considering where? statute? optional amendments? If required by RCW 70.94.527: a commute trip X No ❑Yes reduction ordinance to reduce the proportion of ❑Yes X No single-occupant vehicle commute trips. Location(s): Port ❑ Further RCW 70.94.521-551, Amended in 2006. WAC 463-63 Townsend is not subject to review Note:WSDOT maintains a list of affected the commute trip reduction needed requirements of RCW jurisdictions 70.94.527. 15. Siting Essential Public Facilities(EPFs) Regulations are consistent with Essential Public Facility ❑ No ❑ Yes siting process in countywide planning policies or city X Yes X No comprehensive plan, and do not preclude the siting of Location(s): see ❑ Further EPFs. Chapter 17.50PTMC. review RCW 36.70A.200(5) needed WAC 365-196-550 16. Project Review Procedures Project review processes integrate permit and ❑ No ❑ Yes environmental review for: notice of application; notice X Yes X No of complete application; one open-record public Location(s): see ❑ Further hearing; allowing applicants to combine public hearings Chapter 20.01PTMC, review and decisions for multiple permits; notice of decision; Administration of Land needed one closed-record appeal. Development Regulations. RCW 36.70A.470, RCW 36.7013 and RCW 43.210 WAC 365-196-345 17., General Provisions:The G A requires that developmerit regulations be consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. kcw 3`6304.0300')and .040( )(d). Regulations should also'' -include. a. A process for early and continuous public ❑ No ❑ Yes participation in the development regulation X Yes X No development and amendment process. Location(s): see ❑ Further RCW 36.70A.020(11),.035, .130 and .140 Chapter 20.04 PTMC,Port review Townsend Comprehensive Plan and Development needed Regulations Amendment Process. City of Port Townsend 22 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014 Exhibit 8 to Resolution 15-042 DOC Periodic Update Checklist Page 23 of 23 Addressed in Current Plan or Are changes Is the City Regulations? If yes,where? needed to meet considering current statute? optional amendments? b. A process to assure that proposed regulatory or ❑ No ❑ Yes administrative actions do not result in an X Yes ❑ No unconstitutional taking of private property. Location(s): PTMc X Further RCS/ 36.70A.370, WAC 365-196-855 19.05.050(D). The City may review Note:See Attorney General's Advisory Memorandum: consider including specific needed Policy guidance within its Avoiding Unconstitutional Takings of Private Property. Plan outlining how it intends to avoid both'facial" (prospective)and"as applied"(retrospective) takings. There is a potential that these policy amendments may lead to municipal code revisions to ensure that administrative decisions do not result in unconstitutional takings. This checklist covers the requirements of the Growth Management Act through the laws of 2012. It does not address related issues, or things that are not required but that are commonly found in comprehensive plans and the implementing regulations. It may be useful to look at the expanded checklists (one for comprehensive plans, one for development regulations) and the Growth Management Act Amendment Changes 1995- 2012 (amended annually). For more information, please visit: http://www.commerce.wo.gov/Services/localgovernment/Growth onogement/Growth -Monagement-Plarming®Tapics/Poges/GMA-Perladlc-Update.ospx City of Port Townsend 23 Periodic Update Checklist December 23,2014