Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit A - SEPA Environmental Checklist SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. The help links in this checklist are intended to assist users in accessing guidance on the checklist questions. Links are provided to the specific sections of the guidance applicable to the questions. However, the links may not work correctly on all devices. If the links do not work on your device, open the guidance at www.ecV.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/apquide/EnvChecklistGuidance.html and navigate to the appropriate section. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: h� gM For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements—that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 1 of 24 A. RMt-L:yr^iJ„N 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2016 GMA Periodic Update - The City of Port Townsend is proposing amendments to the Comprehensive Plan & Development Regulations in conjunction with the periodic update required under the Growth Management Act (RCW36.70A) (File Reference: LUP16-037) 2. Name of applicant: City of Port Townsend 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: City Hall, 250 Madison Street, Suite 3 Port Townsend, WA 98368. Contact: Judy Surber, Planning Manager/Senior Planner 4. Date checklist prepared: May 6, 2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Port Townsend 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Planning Commission Hearing—June 9, 2016 City Council Review—June-July 2016 City Council Public Hearing - July 2016 Ordinance adopting the 2016 GMA Periodic Update—July-August 2016 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Comprehensive Plan is a 20-year planning document that sets the framework for the physical, social and economic development of the City. The periodic update is a non-project action. The City envisions future adoption of a subarea plan for the Howard Street Corridor. The subarea plan will be subject to future environmental review. Future specific development proposals within this project area will be reviewed consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations including the City's Municipal Code. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Port Townsend: Howard Street Corridor Economic Feasibility Study by E.D., Hovee & Company, LLC (January 30, 2015) Port Townsend Housing Element Inventory &Needs Assessment by E.D., Hovee & Company, LLC (December 31, 2015) SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 2 of 24 The following document relates to the initial adoption of the City's 1996 GMA compliant Comprehensive Plan: The Draft Port Townsend Comprehensive Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (an integrated SEPA/GMA (Growth Management Act) document) issued on January 10, 1996 (referred to herein as the Comprehensive Plan DEIS); and 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments by the City of Port Townsend City Council. • State Agency review pursuant to GMA (RCW 36.70). 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) 2016 GMA PERIODIC UPDATE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS - The City of Port Townsend proposes a non-project action to conduct a "periodic update" to its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations in conformance with the Growth Management Act (RCW36.70A). The Comprehensive Plan is a 20-year planning document that sets the framework for the physical, social and economic development of the City. The update is not an overhaul of the existing plan and regulations. Council adopted a docket outlining the amendments under consideration. Items listed on the docket are intended to reflect new public input, changes in state law, and new population and employment growth forecasts (Exhibit A, attached). Although the focus of the 2016 update is to complete mandatory revisions necessary to comply with the GMA, Council has included a limited number of optional amendments on the docket (Exhibit A, attached). Essentially, the Final Docket includes optional amendments which: 1) Begin preparing Port Townsend for transition and resilience. 2) Promote and encourage a wider range of housing types. The community is interested in a number of"new"housing types (e.g., tiny homes, micro-apartments, common wall construction). Corollary amendments to the development regulations would follow in a subsequent phase. 3) Foster economic development—Howard Street Corridor presents the greatest opportunity to promote employment growth with the goal of increasing family-wage jobs. Overarching Comprehensive Plan goals will be processed as part of the 2016 update with a subarea plan to follow. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 3 of 24 A working draft of the proposed amendments to the Comnl'PhPnQ1-,IP Plan anld A-vPlonmPnt rP n)atinnQ hav been prepared with input from the City of Port Townsend Planning Commission(Exhibits B and Q. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations have the potential to affect lands within incorporated limits of the City of Port Townsend, Washington. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site: (circle one): xFlat, x rolling, x hilly, x steep slopes, —mountainous, other This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. Port Townsend's elevation ranges from sea level to nearly 300 feet above sea level. Steep slopes greater than 30%represent a relatively small percentage of the City's total acreage (0.7%, or 33 acres) and, in general, the terrain is suitable for development. A majority of Port Townsend's existing development has taken place in areas with slopes of less than 15%. Steep slopes include near vertical bluffs along the adjacent saltwater bodies. (A detailed description of the City of Port Townsend Planning Area can be found on page IV -1 of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan DEIS.) The planning area includes a variety of terrain and soil types. Soils reflect the region's geologic history. Townsend gravelly loam (Tnc) and Clallam gravelly sandy loam (CmQ are the predominant soil groups within the City. According to the City's Critical Areas maps, seismic hazard areas and unstable soils exist within the planning area. As a non-project action, the proposal does not involve any development activities (e.g., filling, excavation, grading, impervious surfaces). Future specific development proposals within this project area will be reviewed consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations, i.ncludinbg the C.tv 'C X/hin;oitnaa]i rode, and the Engineering LnAesiigrturStandards. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? See 1 a above. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. See 1 a above. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 4 of 24 See 1 a above. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. See 1 a above. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. See 1 a above. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? See 1 a above. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Does not apply. This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. Any development permitted pursuant to the proposed Comprehensive Plan revisions will follow applicable City codes, the City Engineering Design Standards and any applicable State and Federal regulations. Future project level actions which are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11- 800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). Proposals within critical areas or there buffers will be reviewed for compliance with the City's Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) (Chapter 19.05 PTMC). 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Adoption of the proposed amendments would not have direct effects on air quality. The Comprehensive Plan will, however, provide a framework that will guide growth and development in the City during the 20-year planning period. Indirectly, the Comprehensive Plan could affect air quality in three ways: • During construction of infrastructure or private projects, dust from construction could be generated, even if localized and temporary. • Pollutants could be released during residential wood burning at new homes and from any new industrial facilities constructed in areas zoned according to the Comprehensive Plan. • Increased traffic due to population and employment growth will generate vehicle emissions (primarily carbon monoxide, but also particulates and oxides of nitrogen) (which will continue to be the single largest air pollutant source category within the City). b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Port Townsend Paper Company pulp mill, located directly adjacent to the city limits, is a significant contributor of air pollutants and strong odors that impact portions of the city when winds are from the southwest. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: h( elpl SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 5 of 24 Adoption of the proposed Plan amendments 1-oulydl not luxe direct -ffeets oi,air quality. Some of r-� the proposed amendments may serve to reduce overall emissions— Specifically, amendments associated with the following docket items #2 Plan for Transition and community resilience. Incorporate community resiliency concepts throughout the plan, beginning with any new policies adopted during the 2016 update. Consider resiliency recommendations included in public comment letters including but not limited to the recommendations of Local 20/20 Climate Change Preparation Group (Comment 17) #49 Except for residential zoning districts, the tables of permitted, conditional and prohibited uses set forth in Title 17 PTiWC (§§ 17.18.020, 17.20.020, 17.22.020 and 17.24.020) must be amended to specifically permit electric vehicle battery charging stations in all areas outside designated critical areas. See RCW 36.70A.695. See proposed amendments to the Land Use Element Policies 2.2; 2.3.2, Air quality Management, Climate Mitigation and Adaptation,New policy 8.5*, 8.6, 8.6.1, 8.6.2; Strategy 8; Housing 8.5, new 8.6 Future proposals would be subject to further environmental review on a case-by-case basis. Any development permitted pursuant to the proposed Comprehensive Plan revisions will follow applicable City codes, the City Engineering Design Standards and any applicable State and Federal regulations. 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and proxide names. If appropriate, State what Stream or river it flows into. Ilei General: Pont Townsend contains a variety of natural and human modified aquatic resources. These include Port Townsend Bay, Admiralty Inlet, the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and ponds, wetlands, and aquifers. Each of these features has its own hydrological functions as well as other important and sometimes competing functions, such as economic, recreational, wildlife and fisheries habitat, open space and aesthetic functions. For additional information, refer to page IV -16 of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan DEIS.) 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. hl elpl Does not apply. This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. hI elpl Does not apply. This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 6 of 24 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. h( ell The City of Port Townsend's source water is supplied from the Big Quilcene and Little Quilcene Rivers. The river diversions, 28.5 mile transmission pipeline, and Lords Lake (500 million gallons) and City Lake (140 million gallons) storage reservoirs are known as the Olympic Gravity Water System (OGWS). Water rights permit diversions of 19.4 million gallons per day (mgd) from the Big Quilcene River and 6.2 mgd from the Little Quilcene River. The diversions and sections of pipeline transiting the Olympic National Forest are permitted by the US Forest Service. The 2016 GMA Periodic Update is a non-project action and does not directly affect a specific site; however, the plan sets forth the framework for the next 20 years of growth. The draft Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities & Utilities Elements provide and inventory of the existing system. For water service, the City proposes a Level of Service of"A flow volume that meets peak demand and fire flows for at least a 20-year horizon" Given revised population forecasts, demands placed upon the City's infrastructure, natural resources and land supply can be expected to be somewhat less than anticipated in the current Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to the GMA, the City and County developed updated population forecasts and allocation. The revised forecasts reflects a slower growth rate, in fact,the City's population is expected to be less in 2036 than was anticipated for the year 2024. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (existing and draft) and the City's Critical Areas maps, portions of the city lie within the special flood hazard area. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. hf elpl Does not apply. This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. b. Ground Water: 1)Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well,proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. hel This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. The City of Port Townsend's source water is supplied from the Big Quilcene and Little Quilcene Rivers; see Section 3(a)(4) above. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. hf elpl This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. Although a few remnant septic tanks exist in the city limits, the vast majority of development is served by the City's SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 7 of 24 ll'lllt'llr1YlAl �x7µlCte\x1atPl�' CVCtPlyty'ly T1iP /daft Comprel�enSive Plan Capital Faciii ilities Element provides r and inventory of the existing system and sets a Level of Service of "A level that allows collection and treatment of peak wastewater flows and meets Dept . of Ecology criteria" c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. hI elpl As a non-project legislative action, this proposal will not directly result in runoff collection or disposal. Future development would be required to meet the City's adopted Engineering Design Standards to control surface water management. Critical areas/shoreline regulations may also apply. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. hel The proposal involves a non-project legislative action. Future development would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. The proposal involves a non-project legislative action. Future development would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: None, as this is a non-project action. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. City's Critical Areas/Shoreline regulations may apply and project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. Any future project related impacts from stormwater discharges would be mitigated by the implementation of temporary erosion and sediment controls and stormwater quality and quantity standards as required by the Puget Sound Stormwater Management Manual and the Port Townsend Engineering Design Standards. 4. Plants hel a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: hj elpl Deciduous tree: balder maple aspen other: Evergreen tree: fir cedar spine other: Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop/Grain Wet Soil Plants: cattail buttercup bulrush SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 8 of 24 skunk cabbage other: Water Plants: water lily �eelgrass �milfoil Other: Port Townsend supports a diversity of native and non-native plants, including all of the species listed above. Documented native and introduced tree species include: Ornamental Cherry, Ash,Norway Maple, Washington Hawthorne, Small Hornbeam, Lombardy Poplar, Monterey Cypress, Willow, various species of pine, Western Red Cedar, Douglas Fir, Western Hemlock, Alder, Cottonwood, Big Leaf and Vine Maple, and Madrona. Native shrubs, herbs, grasses and wetland plants also exist within the city limits. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?fd.eM No vegetation would be removed as a result of the 2016 Periodic update. Future project level actions which require issuance of any state or local permit or license; and that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC) and the Critical Areas (CAO) Ordinance (Chapter 19.05 PTMC) and the City's Shoreline Master Program as applicable. After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hf g The list of species that may occur includes: golden paintbrush d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: hel None, as this is a non-project action. Preservation of native vegetation and new landscaping associated with future site-specific development will continue to be regulated pursuant to the Port Townsend Municipal Code, Critical Areas Ordinance and Shoreline Master Program as applicable. Landscaping may be required as mitigation if warranted during the development review stage. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. h( e This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. A number of noxious weeds and invasive species are present within the City limits including but not Butterfly bush, Common reed, cordgrass, Himalayan blackberry, scotch thistle, scotch broom. European green crab monitoring is ongoing in Jefferson County. 5. Animals hel a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. hel Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 9 of 24 All of the underline species exist within the City lirnits. b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. f helpl USFW 'listed species that may occur include: marbled mur elet, short-tailed albatross, streaked horned lark, yellow-billed cuckoo, bull trout, dolly varden. Critical habitats include: Chinook salmon, chum salmon, and killer whale. Migratory birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act include: bald eagle, black swift, Caspian tern, fox sparrow, marbled godwit, olive-sided flycatcher, peregrine falcon, pink-footed shearwater, purple finch, rufous hummingbird, short-billed dowitcher, short-eared owl, western grebe, willow flycatcher. Species listed on the Audubon Society's Blue List (rare or threatened) are the osprey and the black oystercatcher. NOAA Fisheries indicate that the following aquatic species may be present within Admiralty Inlet/Puget Sound for portions of their lifecycle: Puget Sound Fall Chinook salmon Evolutionary Significant Unit (ESU) (Oncorhynchustshawytscha) (Federally Threatened, State Concern), Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Coho salmon ESU (O. kisutch)(Federal Species of Concern), the Coastal— Puget Sound populations of Dolly varden (Salveninus malma)/Bulltrout (S. confluentus) (Federally Threatened, State Concern), Sockeye Salmon(O. nerka) (Puget Sound population not listed), and Puget Sound Steelhead ESU (O. mykiss) (Federally Proposed Threatened, State Concern). C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. hl elpl Yes. The City of Port Townsend lies along and within the Pacific Flyway. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: fhelpl None, as this is a non-project action. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. City's Critical Areas/Shoreline regulations may apply and project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. hl elpl Local marine interest groups are considering the need to monitor for Zebra mussel and European green crab. 6. Energy and Natural Resources hel a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. As a non-project action, the 2016 Periodic Update would not directly result in energy needs. Future development is likely to rely on electric, propane, and/or solar energy however, due to slowed population growth; demand is not anticipated to exceed what is anticipated under the current Comprehensive Plan. Population growth has slowed markedly over the last decade. The City's forecast population is expected to be less in 2036 under the County's population projection and allocation than was anticipated in the current Comprehensive Plan for the year 2024. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 10 of 24 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. hI jpJ No, as a non-project action, the 2016 Periodic Update would not directly affect the potential of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: hf e No measures are proposed. As noted in 6a, demand is anticipated to be less in 2036 than previously forecast for 2024. Implementation of Docket Item #2 Plan "Transition and community resilience. Incorporate community resiliency concepts throughout the plan, beginning with any new policies adopted during the 2016 update. Consider resiliency recommendations included in public comment letters including but not limited to the recommendations of Local 20/20 Climate Change Preparation Group" may improve energy conservation. Future project level actions must comply with applicable building and development regulations. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. City's Critical Areas/Shoreline regulations may apply and project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. 7. Environmental Health 1hel a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. h The Periodic update is not anticipated to have any impact regarding Environmental health hazards. The Comprehensive Plan will guide and direct future growth throughout the City. Contaminated soils do exist within the city limits. Clean-up of contaminated sites would be subject to applicable federal/state regulations. Future project level actions that propose use of any hazardous materials would be subject to Federal and State law and the City Building and Fire Codes. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. hf elpl Past uses in the planning area include: auto repair facilities, gasoline dispensing facilities, dry cleaning, historical dump sites, underground storage tanks, industrial boat yard, and bulk oil dispensaries, etc. As of February 17, 2016, six sites are listed on the State Department of Ecology's Hazardous Sites List. See response under 7.a. above. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. hf elpl See response under 7.a. (1) above. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. h SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 11 of 24 UeG 1GJ1JV11Je'lAllUGl /.a. aVV VG. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. hf elpl None needed. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: hf egm None needed. b. Noise hel 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? hel Traffic from nearby streets. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. hel The 2016 Periodic update would not directly create noise. Planned land uses would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and are not expected to be associated with any unusual noise sources and would be generally consistent with the nature of existing uses in the community. Therefore, operational noise levels are not expected to change substantially from current levels. Future development may add traffic, adding to background traffic noise. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: h[ e None are requ ref1 for the 2016 Periodic T Tndate FiifiirA Sifn_cv ifln r�rnic�n4 �n4i�ri� IA 11 ..l Kaivu t./ U.- alV-JtJ I'V...I FII JVVL u�.uvu vv'o uW be subject to further environmental review on a case-by-case basis. Future proposals would be subject to the maximum environmental noise levels established pursuant to the Noise Control Act of 1974, RCW 70.107. See Chapter 173-60 WAC. Construction/development work hours would be subject to the City's Engineering Design Standards. Future uses are subject to the City's noise ordinance codified in Chapter 9.09 PTMC. The State of Washington has adopted Chapter 173-62 WAC Motor Vehicle Noise Performance Standards. This section provides noise emission standards for new motor vehicles and noise emission standards for the operation of motor vehicles on public highways. 8. Land and Shoreline Usehf elpl a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. h� e This proposal is a non-project action and does not affect a specific site. The land uses within the City include residential, commercial, industrial, mixed-use,transportation, utility, institutional and open space. The proposed non-project action will amend the Comprehensive Plan and revised development regulations would apply to future land use proposals. The City envisions future adoption of a subarea plan for the Howard Street Corridor. Policy 10.9 of the Land Use Element proposes: Encourage the development and build out of the Howard Street/Discovery Road Corridor as a mixed employment work district comprised of commercial, light industrial and service uses, with median and higher density residential along the periphery of the work district. Prepare a subarea plan for development of the area. The subarea plan should address.- a. ddress:a. The size and location of proposed land uses; SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 12 of 24 b. Targeted commercial, light industrial and service uses and potential employment numbers; c. Proposed street improvements, including right-of-way acquisition and nonmotorized facilities; d. The location of open space and buffers; e. Identification of public improvements and costs needed to facilitate the planned development; and f. Design guidelines which clearly describe the development characteristics desired. The subarea plan will be subject to future environmental review. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? hJ eM As an urban growth area, the City does not designate mineral, agricultural or forest resource lands. However, the Comp Plan and zoning allow a variety of agricultural uses in R-I and R-II that you would not normally see in cities with 5,000 and 10,000 square foot densities. For example, farm stands such as Collingwood Farms, are allowed in R-Il. The City can encourage and promote these aspects of the vision, but cannot require it. Community gardens and small farms are popular within the city limits. Docket Items#47 and 51 support local agriculture. 1)Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: h( g As a non-project action, not directly. Future development proposals would be assessed at the time of application. c. Describe any structures on the site. hf elpl As an urban growth area,the City contains numerous buildings varying from residential to industrial. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? 1hel No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? hel The City has the following zoning classifications: Residential Designations: Low Density: R-I (SF) up to 4 d.u. per acre (i.e., 10,000 s.f. minimum lot size) Medium R-II (SF) up to 8 d.u. per acre (i.e., 5,000 s.f. minimum lot size) Density: Medium R-III (MF) a minimum of 10 units and a maximum of 16 units per SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 13 of 24 Density: 40,000 s.f. area High Density: R-IV (MF) 24 units per 40,000 s.f. area Mixed Use Designations: Neighborhood-Serving Mixed Use C-I/MU with moderate density multi-family Center residential Community-Serving Mixed Use Center C-II/MU with high density multi-family residential Commercial Designations: Neighborhood Commercial: C-I General Commercial: C-II Hospital Commercial: C-II (H) Historic Commercial: C-III Marine-Related and Manufacturing Designations: Mixed Light Manufacturing and M/C Commercial Light Manufacturing: M-I Marine-Related Uses: M-IIA (Boat Haven) Marine-Related Uses M-IIB (Point Hudson) Heavy Manufacturing: M-III Park& Open Space Designations: • Existing Park& Open Space P/OS • Potential Park & Open Space (overlay) P/OS(A) • Mixed Public/Infrastructure/Open Space P/OS(B) Other Designations: • Public/Infrastructure P-I SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 14 of 24 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Designations: • Residential R-PUD • Mixed Use MU-PUD • Commercial/Manufacturing CM-PUD f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? hf elpl See Response to e. above. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? hI fjo The City Shoreline Master Program classifies the following shoreline designations: Shorelines of Statewide Significance, Aquatic,Natural, Conservancy, Shoreline Residential, Urban, Historic Waterfront, Boat Haven, Point Hudson h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Proposed amendments are non-project actions. The planning area includes environmentally sensitive areas (including geologically hazardous, frequently flooded and wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, and fish and wildlife habitat) as indicated on the City's Critical Areas Map. Environmentally sensitive areas associated with specific projects will be reviewed with project-level design and permitting. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? hf elpl The 2016 Periodic Update includes a consistent population projection throughout the plan which is consistent with the Office of Financial Management forecast. Over the next twenty years, Port Townsend's current population (estimated at 9,454 for 2016) is expected to increase by 2,711 to a total population of 12,165 by 2036. This projection anticipates that the City's population will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 1.27% over the course of the planning period 2016-2036. This updated forecast and allocation anticipates a significantly slower growth rate than was projected under the City's initial GMA Comprehensive Plan in 1996. In fact, the updated allocation anticipates Port Townsend's 2036 population will be 1,711 less than was projected for the year 2016 under the original GMA Plan. Accordingly, the updated forecast and allocation suggests that no expansion to the Port Townsend UGA is currently necessary, and neither is there a need for municipal infrastructure expansions not anticipated under the 1996 Plan. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? hj p None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: hf elpl The following docket items are intended to address housing/shelter needs: 24. Include provisions for temporary encampments for the homeless pursuant to RCW 36.01.290 (WICA) SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 15 of 24 2 Coiisidei" adding "re-exainine parking re ulrentents" to the fist oJ aJjordaoie housin g strategies. 26. Provide more flexibility in housing types while preserving neighborhood character. — Set the framework for future amendments to the zoning code. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: hf elpl Several Docket Items pertain to a proposed Howard Street Subarea Plan (Docket items 15-20, 45, 46, and 50). The subarea plan will be subject to future environmental review. See 8a above. Pursuant to PTMC Section 20.04.080 (3) For all amendments, the planning commission shall develop findings and conclusions and a recommendation based on the following decision criteria: a. Whether the amendment will adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare in any significant way; and b. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the GMA and adopted county-wide planning policies; and c. Whether the proposed amendment reflects current widely held community values or resolves inconsistencies in the city's comprehensive plan; and d. Whether the proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the city; and e. Whether the proposal implements the comprehensive plan; or alternatively f. Since the adoption of the comprehensive plan, there has been a substantial change in circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located which warrants the proposal. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. City's Critical Areas/Shoreline regulations may apply and project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: hel SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 16 of 24 See response to b. and 1. above. 9. Housinghj pM a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. h[ elpl As required by the GMA, Docket Item#22 calls for: An updated inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs over the planning period. The City has prepared the required housing needs assessment. Port Townsend's portion of the forecasted 2036 countywide population is 2,711 residents, translating to a need for an estimated 1,369 additional residential units (based on 2010 Census average household size of 1.98 persons per household). Additional multi-family construction will be of particular importance in the years ahead, to better address needs for affordable and special needs housing. As a non-project action, the 2016 Periodic Update would not directly provide for homes; however, amendments are intended to improve the range of housing types available in Port Townsend. Docket Item#26 calls for: Provide more flexibility in housing types while preserving neighborhood character. —Set the framework for future amendments to the zoning code. See proposed revisions in the Housing Element. Per Docket Item#24, amendments to the PTMC Include provisions for temporary encampments for the homeless pursuant to RCW 36.01.290. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. h[ pM None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: hel See response to 9a above. 10. Aestheticshf pM a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? hel Not applicable. This non-project action will not directly result in construction of any new facilities. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? hf elM Not applicable. This non-project action will not directly result in construction of any new facilities. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: hf e None, as this is a non-project action. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application including design review if applicable (Chapter 17.30 Historic Preservation Code; Chapter 17.34 Cottage Housing Development Design Standards; 17.36 Multifamily Residential Standards; 17.40 Mixed Use Developments; 17.44 Commercial and Mixed Use Architectural and Site Design Standards; 17.46 Commercial, Multifamily, Cottage Housing Developments, and Mixed Use Architectural and Site Design Review Processes). Additional design standards may apply with future adoption of the Howard Street Subarea Plan. Project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 17 of 24 applications for such rnroiact actions fl— r fes Po- Townsend .J_ter '. +L. + 't?t=_ _ r, j., a "..5, L..., �XLY of. i L u may ueLciu I uiaL iM!LlgaL!on measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. i 1i. Light and Glare 'hl e a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? hf elpl As a non-project action, the 2016 Update would not directly produce light or glare. Future project actions may include exterior lights as well as new facilities development the glass from which could increase glare in specific areas. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? [helpl See above. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? h1 PIPJ Existing sources are typical of an urban environment and would not be considered significantly adverse. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: hel None, as this is a non-project action. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application including design revie.zT if applicable (Chapter 17.3v Hiitori_ r-- p- Preservation Code; Chapter 17.34 Cottage Housing Development Design Standards; 17.36 Multifamily Residential Standards; 17.40 Mixed Use Developments; 17.44 Commercial and Mixed Use Architectural and Site Design Standards; 17.46 Commercial, Multifamily, Cottage Housing Developments, and Mixed Use Architectural and Site Design Review Processes). Additional design standards may apply with future adoption of the Howard Street Subarea Plan, City's Critical Areas/Shoreline regulations may apply and project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. 12. Recreationhf PIPJ a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? h� PIPJ Port Townsend contains numerous parks providing both formal and informal recreational opportunities including but not limited to: Kali Tai Lagoon Nature Park, Port Townsend Golf Course, non-motorized trails linking neighborhoods, Port Townsend Bay, Larry Scott Memorial Trail, and the 433.5 acre Fort Worden State Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. [help No. However, in association with Docket Item#24, the Planning Commission is considering amendments Chapter 17.60 PTMC that would allow temporary encampments on public land. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 18 of 24 Proposed amendments specify a term limit and Section 17.60.xx Minimum standards (A) requires that the encampment be located on a previously disturbed site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: fbpjpl In association with Docket Item#24 regarding temporary encampments for the homeless,proposed revisions include the following: Section 17.60.080 Required Conditions The director of the development services department shall establish, as a condition of each temporary use permit, A. A time within which the use and all physical evidence of the use must be removed. B. If the applicant has not removed the use as required by the temporary use permit, the city may abate the use as provided in PTMC 17.60.090. Existing Section 17.60.100 Assurance device. In appropriate circumstances, the director of the development services department may require a reasonable performance of maintenance assurance device, in a form acceptable to the city attorney, to assure compliance with the provisions of this title and the temporary use permit as approved. 13. Historic and cultural preservationhf elM a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. hf elpl Port Townsend contains numerous national and state listed historic structures, with the highest concentrations occurring within the limits of the Port Townsend National Register Historic District. Fort Worden military reservation is a historic district designated as a National Historic Landmark and the Point Wilson Lighthouse is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The Chinese Gardens is also a significant cultural landscape, but has not been designated as a local, state, or national historic site. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. hel See 13a. above c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Future projects will adhere to and comply with all local, State and Federal historical and archaeological preservation laws, should any artifacts or items be discovered during construction. Washington cultural resource laws (RCW 27.53) state that no known archaeological resources or site can knowingly be damaged without obtaining a certified permit from the Washington State Department of Archeology &Historic Preservation. Also under Washington State law, all archaeological sites and resources are protected on private and public lands (RCW 27.53). Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, stipulates early, often, and SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 19 of 24 cpntlnt L S __11_________tatinn �x�ith the 11—i �r Federal/State lead agency and affe%ted Native American Tribe(s) depending on the jurisdiction of the proposed project. If any significant archaeological resources are discovered during project related construction excavation and/or operation/maintenance, all activities must stop in the immediate area. A professional archaeologist should be contacted to inspect and assess the disturbed archaeological deposits. If necessary, the Washington State Department of Archeology & Historic Preservation and the affected Native American Tribe(s) would be contacted to further assess the damaged cultural resources. Future site- specific project actions would be subject to further environmental review on a case-by-case basis. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. h( e See 13c above. In addition, projects, which are not categorically exempt, are subject to environmental review under SEPA and Washington State Parks operates under a cultural resource management policy that adopts the US Department of Interior, Secretary's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. These standards in part provide guidance for treatment of historic structures and landscapes in a manner that retains a site's historical integrity. 14. Transportation hel a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. hel The Transportation Element Table 6-1 provides an inventory of the roadways within the City of Port Townsend by classification and surface type. The principal arterial within the City Limits is State Route 20 (SR20) which extends from the Ferry Ter , nai and continues 2.? �files west to the City Limits. SR 20 provides a regional connection from the Olympic Peninsula and the I-5 Corridor via the Port Townsend—Coupeville ferry. . It is designated by the State as a Highway of Statewide Significance. Highways of Statewide Significance are facilities that have been specially designated by the State of Washington to ensure linkages between major communities within the State and to assist with priority planning and the allocation of funding. As a non-project action, no specific"access"is proposed nor would the action directly increase vehicular trips/day. Pursuant to the GMA and Docket Item#22 "An updated inventory of air, water, and ground transportation facilities and services, including transit routes, state-owned transportation facilities and general aviation airports" has been included in the updated Transportation Element. Given revised population forecasts, demands placed upon the City's infrastructure can be expected to be somewhat less than anticipated in the current Comprehensive Plan. The Transportation Element establishes level-of-service standards, and identifies future transportation improvement needs to meet the defined level of service. Future development projects will be subject to concurrency and may require site-specific traffic analysis when a site-specific project is submitted. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? hel The City of Port Townsend is currently served by Jefferson Transit. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? hel SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 20 of 24 This proposal is non-project action and does not affect a specific site. The 2016 Update does not call for displacement of any existing designated parking uses however, Docket Items 925 - Consider adding "re-examine parking requirements" to the list of affordable housing strategies and 935 Review existing parking policy- consider parking pricing policies in commercial districts and explore the feasibility of paid parking as a means to fund nonmotorized transportation/transit. (See comment letter 922) could result in reduced parking requirements for future development. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to.existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). hf pV Please refer to the response to Question 14.a, above. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Jt@jpJ Please refer to the response to Question 14.a, above. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? hel Please refer to the response to Question 14.a, above. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. hf elpl No. Port Townsend is an Urban Growth Area predominated by urban uses. See 14a above. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: h None, as this is a non-project action. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. City's Critical Areas/Shoreline regulations may apply and project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. 15. Public Serviceshf e a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 1hel The 2016 GMA Periodic Update is a non-project action that sets forth the framework for the next 20 years of growth. The draft Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities &Utilities Elements provide and inventory of the existing system and set level of service standards for water, sewer and transportation. Given revised population forecasts, demands placed upon the City's infrastructure, natural resources and land supply can be expected to be somewhat less than anticipated in the current Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to the GMA, the City and County developed updated population forecasts and SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 21 of 24 allocation. T e revised Fig — ,'- flectn 1 ., +1 � a 1 i_ l i h T ✓.�.,d iviecasw rets.,.,t,J a slower growl rate, Jr,ifact., the l.1LyJ popl,llal.lon is expected to be less in 2036 than was anticipated for the year 2024. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. hl e1p1 Implement Comprehensive Plan policies relating to public services and the Capital Facility Plan (CFP), which addresses concurrent provision of water, sewer, stormwater, and transportation facilities. Future site-specific projects may be subject to further environmental review, impact mitigation or connection charges as applicable to control direct impacts to public services. 16. Utilitiesh[ e a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: hf elpl electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other See the Utilities Element of the Comprehensive.Plan for additional detail. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. hel Utilities would be expanded to serve future development and improved for existing users as needed to maintain adopted levels of service. Project specific construction activities are not expected to impact or disrupt surrounding service, but there may be a need to relocate service lines or create new connections. Ongoing maintenance of utility systems will be necessary, but no conflicts with proposed plans, policies, or regulations are anticipated. C. Signature lkM The above answers are true andgmplete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on1them topake its decision. Signature: /�fyl Name of signee Position and Agency/Organization � _z "l� � �s, Y � c. �� ;�_ '- Date Submitted.. I` D. supplemental sheet for non project actions ILeip (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 22 of 24 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendments would not add any new land uses that are not currently permitted within the city limits and thus would not pose any environmental hazards nor produce any emissions/noise, which were not previously anticipated by the 1996 Comprehensive Plan. Please refer to the following checklist sections: 2. Air, 3. Water, 7. Environmental Health and Noise. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None, as this is a non-project action. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. City's Critical Areas/Shoreline regulations may apply and project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Please refer to Section B, Questions 4 and 5. Assuming that future development complies with applicable codes and environmental review, it is not likely that the proposed amendments would affect protected plants, animals, fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None, as this is a non-project action. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. City's Critical Areas/Shoreline regulations may apply and project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Please refer to Section B, Question 6. As a non-project action,the proposal will not directly deplete energy or natural resources. Projected growth is lower than previously anticipated by the 1996 Comprehensive Plan and thus, demand on energy and natural resources is not anticipated to exceed previously anticipated levels. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Please refer to Section B, Question 6 c above. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The amendments would not directly affect environmentally sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 23 of 24 None, as this is a non-p rojcct action. Future project level actions would be subject to regulations in place at the time of application. City's Critical Areas/Shoreline regulations may apply and project actions that are not categorically exempt under Chapter 197-11-800 WAC will be subject to review under the City's SEPA Implementing Ordinance (Chapter 19.04 PTMC). After reviewing applications for such project actions, the City of Port Townsend may determine that mitigation measures are necessary to avoid probable significant adverse environmental impacts. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None of the proposed amendments on the 2016 docket are likely to have such an affect. No rezones are proposed and code amendments would not allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. Separate environmental analysis will be conducted prior to adoption of subarea plaits and, unless categorically exempt, site—specific proposals. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No specific measures have been proposed. Separate environmental analysis will be conducted prior to adoption of subarea plans and site—specific proposals. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Please refer to Section B, questions 14, 15 and 16. The proposal alone would not be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities. Future development envisioned by the plan will place additional demands on transportation, public services and utilities, however, due to slowed population t 1b. ,a 'likely s 1 1 t .���,�.,,d r,.,ru.a�ior�grov����; ue���and is l��ce�y �o be less t>ian anticipated under the current Comprehensive Plan. Population growth has slowed markedly over the last decade. The City's forecast population is expected to be less in 2036 under the County's population projection and allocation than was anticipated in the current Comprehensive Plan for the year 2024. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Please refer to Section B, questions 14, 15 and 16. Impacts will be mitigated by maintaining service levels by implementing the Capital Facilities Plan and requiring concurrent provision of services. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposed amendments are designed to update the Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations to comply with local, state, and federal laws. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 24 of 24